Universiv Micr^Ilms International Aoon.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting througli an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. UniversiV Micr^ilms International aOON.Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8508369 Souag, Mostefa THE THEORY OF LITERARY GENRES IN GEORGE LUKACS The American University Ph.D. 1984 University Microfilms I nternstionsiSOO N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml48106 Copyright 1984 by Souag, Mostefa All Rights Reserved THE THEORY OF LITERARY GENRES IN GEORGE LUKACS by Mostefa Souag Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Literary Studies Signatures of^Comyf)tee: Chairman : 1 / Y Dean of the Coll eg .-1 /. / f P ^ Date 1984 The American University Washington, D.C. 20016 TES AIŒRICAÎÎ UiîIYEACITY LIBRARY ©COPYRIGHT BY MOSTEFA SOUAG 1984 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE THEORY OF LITERARY GENRES IN GEORGE LUKACS by Mostefa Souag ABSTRACT In spite of his high reputation among the contemporary Intellectual audience, Lukâcs* work is still perceived and treated reductively in parts, especially with respect to his literary theory and criticism . Believing that Lukâcs’ views particularly in this sphere of aesthetic form an evolving whole, this study seeks to construct the most fundamental principles on which he bases his genre theory. This perspective was chosen because, like many critics, I regard genre theory as the formative principle of literary theory as a whole. Mostly through descriptive method, this study exposes and explains the differences that Lukâcs directly or indirectly makes between modes (the historically universal categories of the genre system), and genres (the variables that represent the more concrete changes in the historical process as aesthetically reflected in literary forms). Throughout his career, Lukâcs established his genre theory on one central category, that of totality. The modes represent the most ii fundamental types of totality: totality of objects for epic, totality of movement for drama, and to ta lity of the lyrical moment or the subjective for ly r ic . The genres, on the other hand, are the more concrete forms in which the modes, and thus the totalities, aesthetically objectify themselves. They are, in other words, the aesthetic forms of particular historical moments, such as the epic genre for early Greek society or the novel for the bourgeois society. Although it contains some weaknesses, Lukâcs' genre theory does form a whole that is deep, rich, insightful, and very useful in understanding the problems of genre, especially from an historical perspective. iii Dedication : To Peggy, my wife: Without her direct and indirect help, this work would have never been completed. To Lameen and Raji; For putting up with me. CONTENTS Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 II. LUKÂCS AND GENRE THEORY ................................................................ 7 Constants and Variables ............................................................... 7 The Aristotelian Marxist............................................................... 9 The M o d e s ................................................................................................... 10 Lukâcs' Concept of T otality................................................................13 Totality and Literature ............................................................... 17 Totality and Literary Modes............................................................... 21 The Modes and the Aesthetic Dista n ce............................................31 Complementary R em arks........................................ 34 III. LUKÂCS' THEORY OF LITERARY GENRES .............................................. 38 Lukâcs' Definition of Genre ........................................................ 38 The Relationship Between Literature, Genre, and Works ....................................................................40 The Genres-Modes Relationship .................................................. 44 IV. CONCLUSION........................................................................................................ 49 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................... 53 iv I. INTRODUCTION Writing in 1964, Alfred Kazin judged that George Lukâcs "is probably the only Communist philosopher and literary c r itic in East Europe who s t i l l has the power to interest and to teach many readers in the West."l Much has changed in the la st twenty years, and certainly other Eastern European intellectuals now receive respectful hearings by their Western colleagues. Nonetheless, Lukâcs continues to be the most prominent. In fact. Western in tellectu als with different ideological and philosophical beliefs now widely recognize Lukâcs’ contribution to modern thought. Although his reputation reached the literary circles of the United States much later than it did Western Europe, Lukâcs' influence has become increasingly evident in this country since the sixties. Many of his works are translated into English and seem to be well-circulated among a wide range of readers; books, articles, dissertations, and reviews in English are being published with notable frequency. This growing in terest, however, has until now failed to construct an understanding of his works as a whole, as a philosophical-aesthetic system unified by a clear deep world-view that can be called Lukacsian. ^Alfred Kazin, in his "Introduction," George Lukâcs, Studies in European Realism, trans. not mentioned (New York; The Universal Library, Grosset and Dunlap, 1964), p. v. Ubrich Weisstein, in "Modes of Criticism: Studies in Hamlet." Comparative Literature: Method and Perspective, ed. Newton P. Stallknecht and Horst Frenz (Carbondale: Southern I llin o is University Press, 1961), p. 279, ca lls Lukâcs "the dean of Marxist critics and a writer of a great perspicacity." 2 This may be a result of what Paul de Man describes as "the oversimplified division that has been established"^ concerning Lukâcs's intellectual and political career. During his long eighty-six year l i f e , Lukâcs did sh ift his philosophical and ideological positions, as well as his political loyalty, several times — moves that have created for him an image problem: that of an intellectual drifter or even "disaster."3 His career is usually divided into pre- and post-Marxist stages and each of these is in turn subdivided into smaller blurred stages of intellectual and p o litica l positions. These stages may be glimpsed through the following highlights of his career. At the outset of his lifework. he founded the Thalia Theatre in Budapest (1904) with his friends. In 1910, he published Soul and Form as one of the young neo-Kantians and then The History of the Development of Modern Drama (1911); when writing The Theory of the Novel (1914-15), he had become a new-Hegelian, a phase which ended vAen he joined the Hungarian Communist Party in 1918. In 1923, while he was considered a Leninist, he published his famous History and Class Consciousness, which led to repeated attacks on him by orthodox 2paul de Man, "Georg Lukâcs's Theory of the Novel," in Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 52. 3see in particular the controversial George Lictheim, "An Intellectual Disaster," in Encounter, vol. xx, no. 5 (May 1963), especially p. 74 and his conclusion on p. 80, in which he judges that At the age of 78, and after almost sixty years of intensive and far-ranging activity, George Lukâcs has