<<

FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 175 Friday, September 12,1969 • Washington, D.C. Pages 14311-14360

Agencies in thk issue— Agriculture Department Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Customs Bureau Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Foreign Assets Control Office Foreign-Trade Zones Board Interior Department International Commerce Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Notv Available

LIST OF CFR SECTIONS AFFECTED

1949-1963

This volume contains a compilation of the “List of Sections Af­ fected” for all titles of the Code of Federal Regulations for the years 1949 through 1963. All sections of the CFR which have been ex­ pressly affected by documents published in the daily Federal Reg­ ister are enumerated. Reference to this list will enable the user to find the precise text of CFR provisions which were in force and effect on any given date during the period covered.

Price: $6.75

Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

^ONAl.4^

Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Natiooaj FEDERALffiREGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 204®i , Area Code 202 'OXlTEO’’»s«_ J ¿y Phone 962-8626 pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1»,, (49 Stat. 600, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, ap­ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Offic > Washington, D.C. 20402. -n The F ederal R egister will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, payable advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Rem it chec money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. t The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursua to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code op Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintenae of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code op Federal Regulations. Contents

AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT FEDERAL AVIATION FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION See also Consumer and Marketing ADMINISTRATION Notices Service; Federal Crop Insur­ Rules and Regulations Oregon; partial vacation of with­ ance Corporation. Airworthiness directive; Boeing drawal of lands______14357 Notices airplanes______14315 Hearings, etc.: Iowa; designation of areas for Alterations: Amerada Petroleum Corp_____ 14352 emergency loans------14337 Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co___ 14353 Control zone______14315 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (2 Control zones and transition documents)______14353, 14354 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION areas (3 documents)— 14315, 14316 Iowa Power and Light Co. and Proposed Rule Making Standard instrument approach Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric p r o c e d u r e s ; miscellaneous Source material reports------14333 Co — ____ 14354 amendments______14317 Pacific Gas Transmission Co__ 14355 BUSINESS AND DEFENSE Transition area; designation------, 14316 Sea Robin Pipeline Co______14355 SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Proposed Rule Making Texas Gas Transmission Corp_ 14356 Airworthiness directive; Vickers United Gas Pipe Line Co______14356 Notices Viscount airplanes______14331 United Natural Gas Co______14357 Decisions on applications for Alterations: duty-free entry of scientific Control zone and transition FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION articles: area ______14332 Rules and Regulations Harvard University (2 docu- Jet route segments______14332 Prohibited trade practices: ments) ______14338 Use of foreign pilot, flight engi­ Hilco Homes Corp______14326 University of Miami______14338 neer, and flight navigator cer­ Market Fur Dressing Corp. and tificates and medical qualifi­ Milton Mainwold______14327 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD cation evidence______14331 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Notices FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Rules and Regulations Hearings, etc.: COMMISSION International Air Transport Brigantine National Wildlife Ref­ Association______14344 Rules and Regulations uge, N.J.; hunting—______14330 Scott Air Freight, Inc______14344 O r g a n iz a t io n ; miscellaneous Necedah National Wildlife Refuge, Service mail rates for military amendments______- 14330 Wis.; public access, use, and ordinary mail______14344 Notices recreation ______14330 COAST GUARD Common carrier services inf orma­ tion; domestic publie radio serv­ FOOD AND DRUG Notices ices applications accepted for ADMINISTRATION Equipment, construction, and ma­ filin g______14346 Rul es and Regulations terials; approval notice______14343 FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Pesticide chemical tolerances: Definitions and interpretations. 14328 COMMERCE DEPARTMENT CORPORATION Succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhy- See Business and Defense Services Rules and Regulations drazide______14329 Administration ; International Notices Commerce Bureau. Federal crop insurance; designa­ tion of counties; corrections: Canned sweet potatoes deviating Combined crops______14325 from identity standard; tempo­ CONSUMER AND MARKETING C o m ______;______14325 rary permit for market test­ SERVICE ing ------— ______14339 FEDERAL MARITIME Chatham Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Rules and Regulations COMMISSION opportunity for hearing regard­ Inspection and certification of ing certain combination drugs_ 14339 certain agricultural commodi­ Notices Drugs for human use; efficacy ties and products; miscellane­ Agreements filed: study implementation: ous amendments______14325 Italy, South France, South Cetylpyridinium chloride with Oranges: Spain, Portugal/U.S. Gulf benzyl alcohol throat lozenges importation ______14326 and Puerto Rico Conference._ 14348 and certain other drugs___ 14339 Standards for grades; oranges Novo Corp. and Barnett Inter- Disulfiram______14340 grown in Texas and certain national Forwarders, Inc___ 14348 Triacetyloleandomycin, tetracy­ other States; correction____ 14325 Novo Corp. and Freeslate Inter­ cline, or penicillin in com­ Proposed Rule Making national Corp______14348 bination with Novo Corp. and Trans-World and/or analgesics and/or de­ frozen corn-on-the-cob; stand­ Forwarding & Air Expediting congestants for oral u se..__ 14342 ards for grades______14334 Co ------14348 South African Marine Corp., FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CUSTOMS BUREAU Ltd., and Unicom Shipping OFFICE Rules and Regulations Lines (Pty), Ltd______14349 Independent ocean freight for­ Notices Pecial classes of merchandise; warder licenses: importation of viruses, serums, Chinese-type carpets and rugs; Matson Navigation Co.; applica­ importation directly from Sing­ toxins, antitoxins, and analo­ tion ______14349 gous products for use in treat­ Railway Express Agency, Inc.; apore; available certifications_ 14337 ment of man______14328 revocation „ ______14349 (Continued on next page) 14313 14314 CONTENTS FOREIGN-TRADE ZONES BOARD Notices TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT National Wild and Scenic Rivers See Coast Guard; Federal Avia­ Notices System and National Trails Sys­ tion Administration. New Orleans, La.; adjustment of tem; responsibility for plan­ boundaries and contiguous ex­ ning and operation of programs TREASURY DEPARTMENT pansion of foreign-trade sub­ and projects------14337 zone ______14349 See Customs Bureau; Foreign As­ INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE sets Control Office, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND BUREAU WELFARE DEPARTMENT WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations See Food and Drug Administra­ Export control; short supply li­ tion. Wage orders; certain Puerto Rican censing controls over nickel industries: INTERIOR DEPARTMENT products ------t------14326 Rubber products------14329 See also Fish and Wildlife Service. INTERSTATE COMMERCE Shoe and related products------14329 COMMISSION Notices Fourth section applications for re­ lief ______14350 Household Goods Carriers’ Bu­ reau; supplemental applica­ tion for changes in by-laws----- 14350 Motor carriers; Temporary authority applica­ tions ______14350 Transfer proceedings (2 docu­ ments) ______14352 LABOR DEPARTMENT See Wage and Hour Division.

List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. . , u A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1969, and specifies Jiow they are affected.

P roposed R ules: 7 CFR 19 CFR 39______. ______14331 1 2 ...... 14328 6 1 ______+— ______14331 68______- 14325 14331 401 (2 docum ents)------. 14325 71 ______14332 21 CFR 944 ____— ------_ _ - 14326 „14332 120 (2 docum ents)------14328,14329 P roposed R ules: 52 ______14334 15 CFR 29 CFR OQft ______14326 601 ____ 14329 10 CFR 720 _ 14329 P roposed R ules: 16 CFR 40 ____ _ 14333 13 (2 documents) 14326, 14327 4 7 CFR 15ft ______. ______14333 A t 14330

14 CFR 5 0 CFR 39______14315 „ 14330 71 (5 docum ents)------14315, 14316 - 14330 97______14317 14315 Rules and Regulations

eral R egister (34 F.R. 12225) stating In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557) the descrip­ Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND that the Federal Aviation Administra­ tion of the Grand Junction, Colo., con­ tion was considering an amendment to trol zone is amended by deleting the SPACE Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Reg­ numeral “* * * 10 * * *” and substi­ ulations that would alter the description Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ tuting “* * * g * * *” therefor. of the Palm Springs, Calif., control zone. In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637) in the de­ tration, Department of Transportation Interested persons were given 30 days scription of the Grand Junction, Colo., SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT in which to submit written comments, transition area a 700-foot portion of [AirwortMness Docket No. 69-WE-l 6-AD; suggestions, or objections. No objections transition area is added and amended to Arndt. 39-838] have been received and the proposed read in part as follows: amendment is hereby adopted with the Grand J unction, Colo. PART 39— AIRWORTHINESS following change: Delete the F ederal DIRECTIVES R egister citation “* * * (34 F.R. 4557 That airspace extending upward from 700 * * *” and substitute “* * * (34 F.R. feet above the surface within 8 miles north­ Boeing 727 Series Airplanes west and 5 miles southeast of the Grand 12085 * * *” therefor. Junction VORTAC 247° and 067'' radiais ex­ Amendment 39-810, 34 F.R. 12563, AD Effective date. This amendment shall tending from 13 miles southwest to 14 miles 69-16-1, requires revision of the Airplane be effective 0901 G.m.t., November 13, northeast of the VORTAC and within 2 miles Plight Manual, Emergency Procedure 1969. south and 10 miles north of the Grand Junc­ Section, Loss of All Generators para­ tion VORTAC 110° radial extending from the graph, to include procedures which would Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on VORTAC to 22 miles southeast; that airspace August 28, 1969. extending upward from 1,200 feet above the direct the flight crew to switch the stand­ surface * * * by power system, insure that the battery Lee E. Warren, switch is “On,” and reduce loads on Acting Director, Western Region. [F.R. Doc. 69-10894; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Boeing 727 airplanes. After issuing 8:47 a.m.] In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 12085) the descrip­ Amendment 39-810, the agency deter­ tion of the Palm Springs, Calif., control mined that a delay in the effective date [Airspace Docket No. 69-SO-79] of the AD to August 15, 1969, was re­ zone is amended by deleting the last quired to effect changes in the Flight sentence and substituting therefor “This PART 7T— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Manuals which material was being sup­ control zone shall be effective during the AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, plied by the manufacturer. Therefore, the specific dates and times established in AND REPORTING POINTS AD is being amended to provide for a new advance by a Notice to Airmen. This eifectivity date, as indicated. control zone shall be effective during the Alteration of Control Zone and Since this amendment imposes no specific dates and times established in Transition Area additional burden on any person, notice advance by a Notice to Airmen. The and public procedure hereon are un­ effective date and time will thereafter On July 25, 1969, a notice of proposed necessary and the amendment may be be continuously published in the Air­ rule making was published in the F ed­ made effective in less than 30 days. man’s Information Manual. eral R egister (34 F.R. 12289), stating In consideration of the foregoing, and [F.R. Doc. 69-10893; FUed, Sept. 11, 1969; that the Federal Aviation Administration pursuant to the authority delegated to 8:47 a.m.] was considering an amendment to Part me by the Administrator (31 F.R. 13697), 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations that would alter the Brunswick, Ga. § 39.13 of Part 39 of the Federal Avia­ [Airspace Docket No. 69-WE-51] tion Regulations, Amendment 39-810, 34 (Malcolm-McKinnon Airport and NAS P.R. 12563, AD 69-16-1, is amended as p a r t 71— designation o f f e d e r a l Glynco), control zones and the Bruns­ follows: AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, wick, Ga., transition area. Amend the eifectivity date (now Aug. AND REPORTING POINTS Interested persons were afforded an 1. 1969) to read: “* * * August 15, opportunity to participate in the rule 1969.” Alteration of Control Zone and making through the submission of com­ This amendment becomes effective Transition Area ments. All comments received were fav­ September 12,1969. orable. On July 24, 1969, a notice of proposed (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603, Federal Aviation Act rule making was published in the Subsequent to the publication of the *958, 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423; sec. F ederal R egister (34 F.R. 12225) stating notice, the geographic coordinate (lati­ 6(c), Department of Transportation Act, 49 tude 31°04'25" N., longitude 81°25'40" U.S.C. 1655(c)) that the Federal Aviation Administra­ tion was considering amendments to W.) for Jekyll Island Airport was ob­ Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on Sep­ Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ tained from Coast and Geodetic Survey. tember 2,1969. tions which would alter the descriptions Additionally, it was determined that the of the Grand Junction, Colo., control criteria contained in U.S. Standards Arvin O. B asnight, for Terminal Instrument Procedures Director, Western Region. zone and transition area. Interested persons were given 30 days (TERPs) as applied to AL/JAL TACAN |F.R. Doc. 69-10878; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; RWY 7 and AL/JAL TACAN RWY 25 in­ 8:46 a.m.] in which to submit written comments, suggestions, or objections. No objections strument approach procedures was in er­ have been received and the proposed ror. Correct application of this criteria requires the following alterations: SUBCHAFTER E— AIRSPACE amendments are hereby adopted without [Airspace Docket No. 69-WE-54] Control zone (NAS Glynco). 1. In­ change. crease the width of the extension predi­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Effective date. These amendments cated on Glynco TACAN 055° radial from AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, shall be effective 0901 G.m.t., Novem­ 1.5 to 2 miles (increase in controlled air­ a n d r e p o r t in g p o in t s ber 13, 1969. space of 2 square miles). 2. Increase the width of the extension Alteration of Control Zone Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on August 28, 1969. predicated on Glynco TACAN 250° radial On July 24, 1969, a notice of proposed Lee E. Warren, from 2 to 3 miles (increase in controlled making was published i n th e F e d ­ Acting Director, Western Region. airspace of 2.5 square miles).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14316 RULES AND REGULATIONS Transition area. 1. Add an extension W.); within a 5-mile radius of Jekyll Island 43°20'30" N„ longitude 112°45'30'' W., thence “within 4.5 miles each side of Glynco Airport (latitude 31°04'25" N., longitude 81° to point of beginning. 25'40" W ); within 3 miles each side of TACAN 055° radial, extending from the Brunswick VOR 203° radial, extending from [F.R. Doc. 69-10896; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8.5-mile radius area to 7 miles Northeast the Malcolm-McKinnon Airport 8.5-mile and 8:47 a.m.] of the TACAN” (increase in controlled, Jekyll Island Airport 5-mile radius areas to airspace of 0.3 square mile). 8.5 miles south of the VOR, excluding the [Airspace Docket No. 69-SO-77] 2. Add an extension “within 4.5 miles portion outside the continental limits of the each side of Glynco TACAN 250° radial, United States. FART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL extending from the 8.5-mile radius to 8.5 (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, miles West of the TACAN’’ '(increase in 49 U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6(c), Department of AND REPORTING POINTS controlled airspace of 0.94 square mile) ; Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ) These alterations require a total in­ Issued in East Point, Ga., on Septem­ Designation of Transition Area crease in controlled airspace of 3.74 ber 4, 1969. square miles. It is necessary to alter the On July 23, 1969, a notice of proposed Brunswick (NAS Glynco) control zone Gordon A. W illiams, Jr., rule making was published in the Fed­ and the Brunswick transition area to Acting Director, Southern Region. eral R egister (34 F.R. 12186) and sup­ plemented on August 9, 1969 (34 F.R. reflect these alterations. [F.R. Doc. 69-10895; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Since these amendments are editorial 8:47 am.] 12951), stating that the Federal Aviation and minor in nature, notice and public Administration was considering an procedure hereon are unnecessary and amendment to Part 71 of the Federal action is taken herein to amend the de­ [Airspace Docket No. 69-WE-37] Aviation Regulations that would desig­ scriptions accordingly. nate the Hilton Head Island, S.C., transi­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL tion area. In consideration of the foregoing, Part AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is Interested persons were afforded an amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Novem­ AND REPORTING POINTS opportunity to participate in the rule ber 13, 1969, as hereinafter set forth. making through the submission of com­ Alteration of Control Zone and ments. All comments received were fa­ In § 71.171 (34 F.R. 4557), the Bruns­ Transition Area wick, Ga. (Malcolm-McKinnon Airport vorable except those submitted by the and NAS Glynco), control zones are On August 14, 1969, F.R. Doc. 69-9588 Navy Regional Airspace Officer, FAA amended to read : was published in the F ederal R egister Southern Region. The comments sub­ amending the Pocatello, Idaho, control mitted by the Navy Regional Airspace Brunsw ick, Ga. ( Malcolm - Officer pertain to air traffic control pro­ McKin no n AirDort) •' zone and transition area. Subsequent to the action initiating this document, it cedures in the Savannah/Beaufort tèr­ Within a 5-mile radius of Malcolm-McKin- was discovered that certain changes were minal areas and have no bearing on es­ non Airport (latitude 31°09'05" N„ longitude tablishing the 700-foot transition area at 81°23'20" W.); within 1.5 miles each side df necessary to clarify the description of the Brunswick VOR 023° radial, extending the transition area. Action is taken Hilton Head Airport and will be consid­ from the 5-mile radius zone to the VOR, herein to affect these changes. ered under separate action. excluding the portion within a 1.5-mile In consideration of the foregoing, F.R. Subsequent to the publication of the radius of Brunswick Municipal Airport (lati­ Doc. 69-9588 is amended in part as fol­ notice, the geographic coordinate (lati­ tude 31°11'10" N.„ longitude 81°28'50". W.) lows: In the description of the transition tude 32°13'20" N., longitude 80°41'55" and the portion within the Brunswick (NAS area delete all after “* * * centered on W.) for Hilton Head Airport was ob­ Glynco) -control zone. the Pocatello VORTAC * * *” and sub­ tained from Coast and Geodetic' Survey. Brunsw ick, Ga. (NAS Glynco) . , ; stitute “* * * to latitude 43°05'20" N., It is necessary to alter the description by Within a 5-mile radius of NAS Glynco longitude 113°00'00" W., thence to lati­ adding the geographic coordinate for the (latitude 31°15'30'' N„ longitude 81°28'00" tude 43°20'30" N., longitude 112°45'30" airport. W.); within 2 miles each side of the Glynco W., thence to point of beginning.” Since this amendment is editorial in TAOAN 055° radial, extending from the 5- therefor. nature, notice and public procedure mile radius zone to 5 miles northeast of hereoh are unnecessary and action is the TACAN; within 3 miles each side of the Effective date. The effective date as taken herein to alter the description Glynco TACAN 250° radial, extending from originally adopted may be retained. accordingly. the 5-mile radius zone to 6.5 miles west of the TACAN, excluding the portion that is • • Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on Sep­ In consideration of the foregoing, Part within a 1.5-mile radius of Brunswick tember 3,1969. 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is Municipal Airport (latitude 31°11'10" N„ Lee E. Warren, amended, effective 0901 G.m.t., Novem­ longitude 81°28'50'' W.) south of a line 3.5 Acting Director, Western Region. ber 13, 1969, as hereinafter set forth, • miles south of and parallel to NAS Glynco > In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), the follow­ Runway 7 centerline extended. , : In.§ 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637) the Pocatello, Idaho, transition area is amended to read ing transition area is added : In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), the Bruns­ Hilton Head I sland, S.C. wick, Ga., transition area is amended as follows: P ocatello, Idaho That airspace extending upward from 700 to read : 8.5-mile ■ Brunswick,G a. ;:,.i feet above the surface within an 1 That airspace extending upward from 700 radius of Hilton Head Airport (latitude That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within 4.5 miles south­ 32°13'20" N., longitude 80°41'55" W.), ex­ feet above the surface within an 8.5-mile east and 11 miles northwest of the Pocatello cluding the portion outside the continental radius of NAS Glynco (latitude 31°15'30'' VORTAC 048° radial, extending from the limits of the United States. N., longitude 81°28'50'' W.); within 4.5 miles VORTAC to 28 miles northeast of the VOR each side of Glynco TACAN 055° radial, ex­ TAC; within 9.5 miles north and 4.5 miles (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, 49 tending from the 8.5-mile radius area to 7 south of the 252° radial extending from 18.5 U.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6(c), Department of miles northeast of the TACAN; within 4.5 miles west to 1.5 miles east of the VORTAC; Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c) ) miles each side of Glynco TAOAN 250° radial, that airspace extending upward from 1,200 extending from the 8.5-mile radius area to feet above the surface bounded by a line Issued in East Point, Ga., on Septem­ 8.5 miles west of the TACAN; within 3 miles beginning at latitude 43°11'30" N„ longitude ber 3,1969. each side of the 268° bearing from Glynco 112°10'00" W., thence to latitude 42°52'00" G ordon A. Williams, Jr., RBN, extending from the 8.5-mile radius area N., longitude 112°11'45" W., thence clock­ Acting Director, Southern Region. to 8.5 miles west of the RBN; within an 8.5- wise via a 23-mile radius arc centered on the mile radius of Malcolm-McKinnon Airport Pooatello VORTAC to latitude 43°05'20" N., [F.R. Doc. 69-10897; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; (latitude 31°09'05" N„ longitude 81°23'20" longitude 113°00'00” W., thence to latitude 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14317

SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [Reg. Docket No. 9816; Amdt. 666J PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classification now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: 1. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to delete low or medium frequency range (L/MF), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures as follows: Borger, Tex.—Hutchinson County, VOR Runway 17, Amdt. 1, 18 Mar. 1967 (established under Subpart C). Las Vegas, N. Mex.—Las Vegas Municipal, Amdt. 5, 21 Jan. 1967 (established under Subpart C). Las Vegas, N. Mex.—Las Vegas Municipal, Orig., 17 June 1967 (established under Subpart C). Truth or Consequences, N. Mex.—Truth or Consequences Municipal, VOR 1, Amdt. 5, 10 Apr. 1965 (established under Subpart C ). 2. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to cancel low or medium frequency range (L/MF), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures as follows: Lima, Ohio—Allen County, NDB (ADF) Runway 27, Orig., 5 June 1969, canceled, effective 2 Oct. 1969. 3. By amending § 97.17 of Subpart B to establish instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach ^Procedure-—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radiais are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with thé following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified . routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and ' Minimum ------2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 66 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

Owossolnt...... LOM (final)...—...... Direct...... 2000 T-dn%______300-1 300-1 200-J^ FNT VOR...... LOM...... — ...... Direct...... 2100 C-dn...... 400-1 500-1 600—1 Russell In t...... n . 1 ______LOM______Direct;...... 2700 S-dn-9#*...... 200-M 200-A m -'A Fosters Int...... LOM...... Direct...... -. 2500 A-dn...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 St. Johns In t...!__ .1___...... : Vernon Int______: ___...... Via FNT R 272°.. 2500 VernonInt_: . ^ LOM (final)...... Direct...... 2000 Bancroft Int_____ I...... LOM (final)______Via crs 045° and 2000 FNT ILS LQC. R 172° FNT VOR CW ...... 10-mile DME Fix and FNT R 272°__ Via 10-mile DME 2700 10-mile DME Fix and FN T R 272°...... LOM (final)...... — Direct.:...... —. 2000 R 340°, FNT VOR CCW...... : ...... 10-mile DME Fix and FNT R 272°.... Via 10-mile DME 2600 Arc.

Procedure turn S side of crs, 271° Outbnd, 091° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2000'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1988'—3.9 miles; at MM, 986'—0.5 mile. J f0visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make left-climbing turn and proceed to Davis Int. via FN T R 078 at 2400'; or, when directed by ATC, make climbing right turn and proceed direct to FN LOM at 2100'. # 400-?4 required when glide slope not utilized and 400-J3 authorized with operative ALS, except for 4-engine turbojets. %RVR 2400' authorized Runway 9. RVR 2400'. Descent below 981' not authorized unless approach lights are visible. City, Flint; State, Mich.; Airport name, Bishop; Elev., 781'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-FN T; Procedure No. ILS Runway 9, Amdt. Orig.; Efl. date, 15 Aug. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14318 RULES AND REGULATIONS 4, By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to establish very high frequency omnirange (VOR) and very high frequency-distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— Type VOR Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances aré in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. _ . If an Instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To_ Via altitudes MAP: fi miles after passing BGD VOR. (feet)

Climb to 5000' on R 174° within 15 miles. Supplementary charting Information: Tower 0.6 mile SE of airport, 3305'. Runway 17, TDZ elevation, 3017'.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 354° Outbnd, 174° Inbnd, 5000' within 10 miles of BGD VOR. FAF, BGD VOR. Final approach crs, 174°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6 miles.' Minimum altitude over BGD VOR, 4300'. *When

. A B C ¿ COnd\ MDA Vii HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

S_X7*...... 3440 1 423 3440 1 423 3440 1 423 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA * VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA c *...... _____...... 3620 1 566 3620 1 566 3620 VA 566 N NA A...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—Standard.%

City, Borger; State, Tex.; Airport name, Hutchinson County; Elev., 3054'; Facility, BGD; Procedure No. VOR Runway 17, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt.No. 1; Dated, 18 Mar. 67

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum T o - Via altitudes MAP: LVS VORTAC. From— . i (feet)

Climb to 9000' on R 012° within 15 miles. Supplementary charting .information: Final approach crs intercepts runway cen­ terline 5200' from threshold. Runway 2, TDZ elevation, 6865'.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 207° Outbnd, 027° Inbnd, 9000' within 10 miles of LVS VORTAC. Final approach crs, 027°. Minimum altitude over 4-mile DME R 027°, 7580. MSA: 000°-090°—9500'; 090°-180°—8000'; 180°-270°—12,700'; 270°-360 —13,600'. Day and Night Minimums

A ft B C D Cond. VIS VIS MDA, : VIS HAT MDA VISHAT -

S+2...... 7580 . T • iM; 715 7580 1 715 , . NA NA MDA ' VISHAA MDA VIS HAA C...... _...... 7580 1 714 7580 1 714 NA NA VOR/DME Minimums: MDA v i s ' , HATMDA VIS HAT S-2...... 7280 1 415 7280 1 415 NA NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VISHAA NA C...... 7280 1 414 7380 1 614 NA A______Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City Las Vegas; State, N. Mex.; Airport name, Las Vegas Municipal; Elev., 6866'; Facility, LVS; Procedure No. VOR Runway 2, Amdt. 6; Eff. date. 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 21 Jan. 67

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 196V 1 ' - A>~'’ A«—. M RULES AND REGULATIONS 14319

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure— Type VOR

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: LVS VORTAC. (feet)

Climb to 10,000' on R 215° within 20 miles. Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 4937' from threshold. Runway 20, TDZ elevation, 6858'.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 012° Outbnd, 192° Inbnd, 8500' within 10 miles of LVS VORTAC. Final approach crs, 192°. MSA: 000°-090°—9500'; 090°-180°—8000'; 180°-270°—12,700'; 270°-360°—13,600'.

Day and Night Minimums

A B C D C o n d . ------'______MDA VIS HAT MD A VIS HAT VIS VIS

8-20...... 7220 1 362 7220 1 362 NA NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C—— ------4 - c . 7260 1 394 7360 1 494 NA NA A— —r...... -...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over2-eng.—Standard.

City, Las Vegas; State, N. Mex.; Airport name, Las Vegas Municipal; Elev., 6866'; Facility, LVS; Procedure No. VOR Runway 20, Arndt, ft Eff. date 2 Oct 69- Sud Arndt' ' No. Orig.; Dated, 17 June 67 ’

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: 2.4 miles after passing TCS VOR- From— To— Via altitudes TAC. (feet)

Climbing left turn, direct TCS VORTAC, climb in holding pattern on R 360° to 8000', left turns. Supplementary charting information: Runway 13, TDZ elevation, 4850'; 132° magnetic.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 360° Outbnd, 180° Inbnd, 8000' within 10 miles of TCS VO RTAC. \ FAF, TCS VORTAC. Final approach crs, 162°. Distance FAF to MAP, 2.4 miles. Minimum altitude over TCS VOR, 6600'. MSA: 000°-220°—8600'; 220°-360°—11,400'. pa“” n B *"■ “ , m 10 » ra“e «■ * * ■*“" » « 31' «»“ “ n. Day and Night Minimums

Cond. ------;____ 2 ______2 ______P MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS VIS

C" ...... 5640 1 780 5640 l \ i 780 NA NA A...... ------1200-2. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—Standard.%

City, Truth or Consequences; State, N. Mex.; Airport name, Truth or Consequences Municipal; Elev., 4860'; Facility, TCS; Procedure No. VOR Runway 13 Amdt 6- EfL ' date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. VOR 1, Amdt. 5; Dated, 10 Apr. 65 ’

No. 175----- 2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14320 RULES AND REGULATIONS 5. By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to amend very high frequency omnirange (VOR) and very high frequency-distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type VOR Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. ~ If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: CLT VORTAC. (feet)

Bradley Int...... -...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 3000 Climb to 3000' on CLT VORTAC R 063° Weddington In t...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 2300 to Bradley Int; or, When directed by Bethany Int______— CLT VORTAC.------Direct. 2300 ATC, climbing right turn to 2300' on Wacolnt ...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 2900 CLT VORTAC R 133° to Weddington Stanley Int...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 2900 Int. Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 2500' from threshold. REIL Runway 36. TDZ elevation, 717'.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 225° Outbhd, 045° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of Lake Int or 5.6-mile DME Fix. Final approach crs, 045°. ‘ Minimum altitude over Lake Int or 5.5-mile DME Fix, 1700'. MSA: 000°-090°—3000'; 090°-180°—3000'; 180°-270°—2800'; 270°-360°—4000'. N ote: ASR. - Day and Night Minimums

A B C ______D______

COnd- MDA vts ttZt MDA vis HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

S_5_ - ...... 1160 RVR 24 443 1160 RVR 24 443 1160 RVR 24 443 1160 RVR 50 443 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA c ...... 1220 1 ' 472 1220 1 472 1220 1'A 472 1300 2 552 » ...... S tandard, T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24', Runway ^Standard all other T over 2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway 5; Standard all other runways. runways.

City Charlotte- State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Facility, CLT; Procedure No. VOR Runway 5, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt. No.3 ; Dated, 30 Jan. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— - Via altitudes MAP: CLT VORTAC.

2300 Climb to 2300'on CLT VORTAC R185c FML VORTAC. CLT VORTAC — ...... Direct. Bradley Int...... CLT VORTAC____-----...... Direct. 3000 and proceed to FML VORTAC; or> W eddington In t. CLT VORTAC___ ...... — Direct. 2300 when directed by ATC, climb to 2300 Bethany Int___ CLT VORTAC...... — ...... Direct. 2300 right turn to York Int via CL i Waco Int...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 2900 VORTAC R 229°. " ,, CLT VORTAC...... Direct. 2900 Supplementary charting ' information. Stanley In t...... Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 4100' from threshold. REIL Runway 36. TDZ elevation, 747'.

Procedure tum W side of crs, 005° Outbnd, 185° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of CLT VORTAC. Final approach crs, 185°. % Minimum altitude over Railroad 5-niile DME Fix, 1640 . MSA: 000°-090°—3000'; 090°-180°—3000'; 180°-270°—2800'; 270°-360°—4000'. Notes: (1) ASR. (2) Inoperative component table does not apply to H IRL Runway 18. ^Standard alternate minimums for V O R/DME/R AD A R. For VOR only aircraft all categories 900-2. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D ____1 Cond. HAT MDA ■ VIS- ■ HATMDA VIS HAT MDA . VIS HAT MDA VIS 893 S-18... ___ 1640 1H 893 1640 893 1640 1H 893 1640 2 HAA MDA VISHAA MDA VISHAA MDA VISHAA MDA VIS 2 892 C...... 1640 M 892 1640 m t 892 . 1640 m 892 1640 VOR/DME/RADAR minimums: HAT - MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HATMDA VIS HATMDA VIS 553 S-18...... 1300 1 553 1300 1 553 1300 1 553 1300 m HAA MDA VISHAA MDA VISHAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS 2 552 C...... 1300 ,1 552 1300 1 552 1300 552 1300 24', Runway 5; Standard all other A...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24 ’, Runway 5; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—RVR ...... - ...... runways. runways.

Citv Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Facility, CLT; Procedure No. VOR Runway 18, Arndt. 6; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt. NoA Dated, 27 Mar. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14321

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: CLT VORTAC. (feet)

Bradley Int...... CLTVORTAC...... D irect...... 3000 Climb to 2300' on CLT VORTAC R 229° Weddington Int...... CLTVORTAC...... Direct...... Jt___ 3000 to York Int; or, when directed by ATC, "Bethany I n t...... ______CLTVORTAC...... Direct...... 3000 climb to 2300' left turn via R 185° CLT Waco Int...... —...... ____ CLTVORTAC______Direct...... 3000 VORTAC to FML VORTAC. Stanley Int...... — ...... ______CLTVORTAC.. - . . . . . Direct...... 3000 Supplementary charting inform ation: Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 3000' from threshold. RElL Runway 36. TDZ elevation, 748'.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 060° Outbnd, 240° Inbnd, 3000' within 10 miles of Parks Int. Final approach crs, 240°. Minimum altitude over Parks Int or 5 -mile DME Fix, 1800'. MSA: 000°-090°—3000'; 090°-180°—3000'; 180°-270°—2800'; 270°-360°—4000'. Notes: (1) ASE. (2) Inoperative component table does not apply to HIRL Runway 23. I)at and Night Minimums

ABC D Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA VISHATMDA VISHAT MDA VIS HAT

8-23______1300 1 552 1300 \ 552 1300 1 552 1300 VA 562 MDA VISHAAMDAVIS HAAMDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 1300 1 552 1300 1 552 1300 VA 552 1300 2 552 A...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24', Runway 5; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway ;i; Standard all other runways. runways.

City, Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Facility, CLT; Procedure No. VOR Runway 23, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 30 Jan. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: CLT VORTAC. (feet)

FML VORTAC______. ______Ross Int (NOPT)______... Direct. _. 1800 Climb to 23Q0' left turn via R 229° CLT Bradley Int...... _...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct... 3000 VORTAC to York Int; or, when directed Weddington Int...... CLT VORTAC...... Direct... 2300 by ATC, climb to 2300' left turn via R 186° Bethany In t...... CLT VORTAC...... D irect... 2300 CLT VORTAC TO FML VORTAC. W acoInt...... ;...... ______CLT VORTAC______Direct... 2900 Supplementary charting information: NStanley In t...... CLT VORTAC...... D irect... 2900 Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 2500' from threshold. REIL Runway 36. TDZ elevation, 726'.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 173° Outbnd, 353° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles of Ross Int. Final approach crs, 353°. Minimum altitude over Ross Int or 5.5-mile DME Fix, 1800'. MSA: 000°-090°—3000'; 090°-180°—3000'; 180°-270°—2800'; 270°-360°—4000'. Note: ASR. Day and Night Minimums A B C D Cond. ------— ------:------.——— . MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT' MDA VIS HAT

s“36...... 1120 A 394 1120 % 394 1120 H 394 1120 1 394 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... — ...... 1220 1 472 1220 1 472 1220 VA 472 1300 2 552 ...... Standard. T 2-eng or less—RVR 24', Runway 5; Standard all other T over 2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway 5; Standard all other runways. runways.

City, Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Facility, CLT; Procedure No. VOR Runway 36, Amdt. 4; Eli. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Amdt .No. 3; Dated, 30 Jan. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14322 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype Terminal VOR—.Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach

Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: CKV VOR. (feet)

♦ Climbing right turn to 2200' to CKV VO R and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold S, 1 minute, right turns, 348° Inbnd. Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 3000' from threshold. LRCO 122.1R, 126.7R. Depict restricted areas (R-3702 and R- 3703) W of CKV. TDZ elevation, 549'.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 168° Outbnd, 348° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles of CKV VOR. Final approach crs, 348°. MSA: 000°-270°—2200'; 270°-36e°—2100'. Notes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Night minimums not authorized Runways 5/23. (3) Use Campbell approach control altimeter setting. ¡¡¡Alternate minimums not authorized except operators with approved weather reporting service. Day and Night Minimums ABCD Cond. MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT S-34__ ...... 900 1 351 900 1 351 900 1 , 351 900 1 351 MDA VIS HAA MDAVIS,HAAMDA VIS HAÀMDA VIS HAA C...... ___ 1040 1 491 1040 1 491 1040 VA 491 1100 2 ' 551 A...... Not authorized.)) T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Clarksville; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Outlaw Field; Elev., 549'; Facility CKV; Procedure No. VOR Runway 34, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup Arndt. No. i; Dated, 17 Apr. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 10.1 miles after passing HKY VOR. (feet)

C imb to 4000', right turn, to HKY VOR via R 224° and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold NE, 1 minute, right turns, 240° Inbnd. REIL, Runway 24. Runway 24, TDZ elevation, 1189'.

Procedure tum S Side of crs, 060° Outbnd, 240° Inbnd, 3500' within 10 miles of HKY VOR. FAF, HKY VOR. Final apjfloach crs, 224°. Distance FAF to MAP, 1Q.1 miles. Minimum altitude over HKY VOR, 3000'; over Taylorsville FM, 2400'. MSA: 000°-090°—4700'; 090°-180°—4000'; 180°-270°—5000'; 270°-360°—8000'. ‘ Standard minimums for VOR/FM equipped aircraft. For VOR only aircraft, Categories A and B 1300-2, Category C 1300-2)4. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. MDAVIS HAT MDAVIS HAT MDAVIS HAT VIS

S-24__ ...... 2400 m 1211 2400 2 1211 2400 2K 1211 NA MDAVISHAA MDAVISHAA MDAVISHAA C...... 2400 194 1211 2400 2 1211 2400 m • 1211 NA VOR/FM: MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT S-24...... ____ 1560 1 371 1560 1 371 1560 i 371 NA

MDA VIS HAA* MDAVISHAA MDA VIS 0 •. HAA e ...... 1640 1 ' 451 1640 1 451 1640 IX 451 NA A...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.

City, Hickory; State, N.C.; Airport name, Hickory Municipal; Elev., 1189'; Facility, HKY; Procedure No. VOR Runway 24, Amdt. 11; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 10; Dated, 24 Apr. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14323

6. By amending. § 97.27 of Subpart C to establish non directional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADF) procedures as follows: Standard instrument Approach P rocedure—-ty pe NDB (ADP) Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RAi Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation/ Distances are In nautical miles unless otherwise Indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR; If an Instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be In accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below;

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: SNL NDB. (feet)

Shawnee Int...... ~ ...... Shawnee NDB------Direct...... 2600 Climb to 2600', left turn to SNL NDB and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold N on bearing 360°-180° Inbnd, 1 minute, right turns. Final approach crs intercepts runway centerline 3958' from threshold.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 360° Outbnd, 180° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of SNL NDB. Final approach crs, 180°. Minimum altitude over SNL NDB, 1800'. MSA: 226°-3150—2900'; 315°-225°—2600'. Note: Use Oklahoma City FSS altimeter setting. Day and Night Minimums

MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

S-17____,._r_ ...... 1800 1 720 . 1800 1 720 1800 1720 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 1800 1 720 1800 1 720 1800 1M 720 NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Shawnee; State, Okla.; Airport name, Shawnee Municipal; Elev., 1080'; Facility, SNL; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 17, Amdt. Orig.; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69 7. By amending § 97.27 of Subpart C to amend nondirectional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADF) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype NDB (ADF) Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following Instrument approach procedure unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 4 miles after passing PDA NDB. (feet)

H0UVORTAC...... PDA N D B .i.______Direct. 1600 Climb to 2000' direct to HO LOM and na Porte Int. _____ PDA NDB...... Direct. 1600 hold; or, when directed by ATC, climb i/yint...... PDA NDB______Direct. 1600 to 1800' on R 306° HOU VORTAC Monument I n t...... PDA NDB (NOPT)...... Direct. 1100 within 15 miles. Supplementary charting information: Hold SW, 1 minute, right turns, 036° Inbnd. TV tower 1549', 13 miles SW of airport. Runway 21, TDZ elevation, 44'.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 036° Outbnd, 216° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles of PDA NDB. ¡.AF, PDA NDB. Final approach crs, 216°. Distance FAF to MAP, 4 miles. Minimum altitude over PDA NDB, 1100'. MSA within 25 miles of PDA NDB: 000°-090°—1600'; 090°-180°—2300'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—1800'. Note: ASR. # RVR 2400' authorized Runway 3. Day and Night Minimums

„ . A B C D C o n d . ------MDAVIS HAT MDAVIS HATMDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 8-21.. 1 496 540 1 496 540 i 496 540 1 496 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDAVISHAA MDA VIS HAA C... .- 04U A... T* , o Cl 1 ■

Clty’Houston; State, Tex.; Airport name, William P. Hobby; Elev., 48', Facility, PDA; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 21, Amdt. 6; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. A m dt; No. 6; Dated, 29 May 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14324 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocédure—T ype NDB (ADF)—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 2 miles after passing SRW NDB.

...... SRW NDB...... _____Direct...... ______2400 Climb to 2400', right turn, direct to SRW Hazel I n t-...... SRW NDB______Direct______2400 NDB and hold. Barber In t.____ ...___ _ SRW NDB______Direct...... 2400 Supplementary charting information: Hold N, 1 minute, right turns, 197* Inbnd.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 017° Outbnd, 197° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of SRW NDB. FAF, SRW NDB. Final approach crs, 197°. Distance FAF to MAP, 2 miles. Minimum altitude over SRW N D B ,1700'. MSA: 000°-180°—2400'; 180°-360°—4D00'. Note: Use Winston-Salem altimeter setting. D ay and Night Minimums

A B ' C D mda vis haa mda vis haa vis vis c ...... 1480 1 705 1480 1 705 NA NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Not authorized.

Citv. Salisbury: State, N.C.; Airport name, Rowan County; Elev., 775'; Facility, SRW; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 20, Arndt. 1; Efi. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 1 Aug. 68 8. By amending § 97.31 of Subpart C to amend precision approach radar (PAR) and airport surveillance radar (ASR) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P eocedtjre—Type Radar Bearings, headings, courses and radlals are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized for such airport by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be established with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final author­ ized landing minimum«, the instructions of the radar controller Me mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the autbor- ized landing minimums, or (B) at Pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach. Except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; .(C) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D) if landing Is not accomplished.

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude

000° 360° 0-15 ‘ 2300 . 1. Descend aircraft after passing FAF. 000° 105° 15-30 3000 . 2. Runway 18, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Minimum 105° 260° 15-30 2300 . altitude over 2-mile Radar Fix, 1300'. TDZ eleva­ 260° 360° 15-30 4000 . tion, 747'. - , 3. Runway 23, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Minimum altitude over 2-mile Radar Fix, 1300'. TDZ eleva­ tion, 748'. 4. Runway 36, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Minimum altitude over 3-mile Radar Fix, 1380'. TDZ eleva­ tion, 726'. . . 5. RUnway 5, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Minimum altitude over 2-mile Radar Fix, 1160'. TDZ eleva- tion, 717'. Notes: MTI required for all surveillance approaches. REIL Runway 36. T Inoperative component table does not apply to HIKE Runways 18 and 23.

All airways segments 0-35 miles published ME A or sector altitudes whichever is lower. All bearings and distance are from radar site on Douglas Municipal Airport with sector azimuths progressing clockwise. ‘ Radar control will provide 1000' vertical clearance within a 3-mile radius of the following towers: 1932', 10 miles NE; 2049', 13 miles E; 1733', 16.5 miles W; 1866', 10 miles fi«. Missed approach: Runway 18—Climb to 2300' direct to FML VORTAC, hold S, 1 minute, right turns, 006° Inbnd. Runway 23—Climb to 2300' direct to CLT LOM, hold SW, 1 minute, left turns, 050° Inbnd. Runway 36—Climb to 2600' on FML VORTAC R 007° to Mount Holly Int, hold N, 1 minute, left turns 187° Inbnd. Runway 5—Turn right, climb to 3000' on CLT VORTAC R 063° to Bradley Int. Hold NE, 1 minute, right turns, 219° Inbnd. Day and Night Minimums

Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

S-18...... 1160 1 413 1160 1 413 1160 1 413 1160 1 413 S-23...... 1160 1 412 1160 1 412 1160 1 412 1160 1 412 S-36...... 1060 H 334 1060 H 334 1060 H 334 1060 1 334 S-5...... 1080 RVR 24 363 1080 RVR 24 363 1080 RVR 24 363 1080 RVR 50 363 MDAVIS HAAMDAVIS HAAMDA VISHAAMDA VIS HAA C...... - 1220 1 472 1220 1 472 1220 1A 472 1300 2 652 A...... Standard, T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24', Runway 5; Standard all T over 2-eng.—RV R 24', Runway 5; Standard all other other runways. runways.

City, Charlotte; State, N.C.; Airport name, Douglas Municipal; Elev., 748'; Facility, Charlotte Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1, Amdt. 10; Eff. date, 2 Oct. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 9; Dated, 10 July 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14325 These procedures shall become effec­ result of meetings with the rice industry, time of filing may be extended by the tive on the dates specified therein. on July 2, 1969, notice of proposed Supervising Inspector for good cause (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), 601, Federal Aviation amendments of the revised Part 68 regu­ shown. Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; lations was published in the F ederal (e) Subject to the limitations in para­ 72 Stat. 749, 752,776) R egister (34 FR. 11147). After consid­ graphs (f) and (g) of this section, an Issued in Washington, D.C., on Au­ eration of all relevant matters, the appellant may request that an appeal lot amendments as proposed are hereby inspection be based on the official file gust 27,1969. adopted, and the revised regulations as sample, or based on a new sample if the R. S. S liff, Acting Director, so amended shall become effective 30 days lot can be positively identified by the Flight Standards Service. after the date of publication of this Supervising Inspector as the lot which notice in the F ederal R egister. was previously inspected and the entire [F.R. Doc. 69-10607; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; lot is available for sampling and exam­ 8:45 a.m.] (Secs. 203, 205, Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 60 Stat, 1087, 1090, as amended, 7 ination. However, only one appeal in­ U.S.C. 1622, 1624, 29 F.R. 16210, as amended, spection may be obtained from any 33 F.R. 10750) original inspection. Done at Washington, D.C., this 8th day (f ) Subject to the limitations in para­ Title 7— AGRICULTURE of September 1969. graph (g) of this section, at the option Chapter I— Consumer and Marketing of the Supervising Inspector, an appeal G. R. G range, lot inspection shall be based on the Service (Standards, Inspection, Mar­ Deputy Administrator, sample or samples which are considered keting Practices), Department of Marketing Services. most representative of the lot. Agriculture 1. Section 68.16a is amended to read: (g) An appeal inspection shall be limited to a review of the sampling pro­ PART 51— FRESH FRUITS, VEGE­ § 68.16a Issuance of corrected certifi­ cedure and an analysis of the official file TABLES AND OTHER PRODUCTS cate. sample when, as a result of the original (INSPECTION, CERTIFICATION AND (a) If any error is made in an inspec­ inspection, the commodity was found to STANDARDS) tion, a corrected inspection certificate be contaminated with filth or to contain may be issued in accordance with in­ a deleterious substance. If It is deter­ Subpart—-U.S. Standards for Grades structions issued by the Director. The mined that the sampling procedures of Oranges (Texas and States Other term “error” shall be deemed to include were improper, a new sample shall be Than Florida, California, and any error of commission or error of obtained if the lot can be positively iden­ Arizona) omission. tified by the Supervising Inspector as the (b) The original and copies of the cor­ lot which was previously inspected a.r>d General; Correction rected certificate shall be issued as the entire lot is available for sam pling In F:R. Doc. 69-10358 appearing in the promptly as possible to the same inter­ and examination. issue of Saturday, August 30, 1969 (34 ested persons as received the incorrect [FR. Doc. 69-10845; Filed, Sept. II, 1969; F.R. 13909), § 51.680 General was inad­ certificate. 8:45 a.m.] vertently omitted and is corrected by in­ (c) The corrected certificate shall sertion after the authority statement in supersede the incorrect inspection certif­ column 2 of page 13909 as follows: icate previously issued. The corrected Chapter IV— Federal Crap Insurance certificate shall clearly identify by cer­ Corporation, Department of Agri­ § 51.680 General. tificate number and date the incorrect culture The standards in this subpart apply certificate which it supersedes. only to the common or sweet orange (d) The issuing inspector shall obtain PART 401— FEDERAL CROP group and varieties belonging to the the original and all copies of the super­ INSURANCE Mandarin group except tangerines for seded incorrect certfficate if possible. If which separate TT.S. Standards are the inspector is unable to obtain the Subpart— Regulations for the 1969 issued. original and all copies of the superseded and Succeeding Crop Years certificate, he shall, to the extent possi­ Dated: September 8,1969. Appendix; Counties D esignated for ble, notify all parties to the transaction, Combined Crop Insurance G. R. G range, to prevent misuse of the superseded Deputy Administrator, certificate. Correction Marketing Services. 2. Section 68.21 is amended to read: In F.R. Doc. 69-10173 appearing at IFh. Doc. 69-10881; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; § 68.21 How to obtain an appeal inspec­ page 13645 in the issue of Tuesday, Au­ 8:46 a.m.] tion. gust 26, 1969, the crop “Corn” appearing beside the county of Grand Forks, (a) An application for appeal inspec­ N. Dak., should be deleted, and the crop part 68— REGULATIONS AND tion may be made by any interested “Flex” beside the county of Ransom, party who is dissatisfied with the results STANDARDS FOR INSPECTION AND of an inspection. N. Dak., is corrected to read “Flax”. CERTIFICATION OF CERTAIN AGRI­ (b) The application shall be made in CULTURAL COMMODITIES AND writing or by telegraph and shall be filed PART 401— FEDERAL CROP PRODUCTS THEREOF in the office of a Supervising Inspector. INSURANCE (c) The inspection certificate for the Miscellaneous Amendments inspection appealed from shall be sub­ Subpart— Regulations Tor the 1969 , of consideration. On June 5, mitted with the application or as soon and Succeeding Crop Years ^ o t ic e of postponement of the effec- thereafter as possible. Appendix; Counties D esignated for (7 168 °* revised Part 68 regulations (d) This paragraph is applicable to fir-™ Part 68, 34 FR. 5709) thereto- rice inspection only: Except as may be Corn Crop I nsurance irpf?J ,pted under the Agricultural Mar- agreed upon by the interested parties, Correction • Act of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. the application shall be filed before the rice has left the place where the inspec­ In FR . Doc. 69-10174 appearing at 1 et seq.), was published in the F ed- page 13645 in the issue of Tuesday, Au­ ^ Register (34 F.R. 8963) to allow tion appealed from was made and not later than the close of business on the gust 26, 1969, under the State of South of comments and views second business day following the date Dakota the entry for “Deul” should read “knitted by the rice industry. As a of the inspection appealed from, which “Deuel”.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 196» 14326 RULES AND REGULATIONS Chapter IX— Consumer and Marketing inches in diameter: Provided, That not economic reasons, the commodities can­ Service (Marketing Agreements and more than 10 percent, by count, of such not be commercially processed in the oranges in any lot of containers, and not United States. Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts), more than 15 percent, by count, of such (1) If the commodities cannot be Department of Agriculture oranges in any individual container in processed in the United States for tech­ [Orange Beg. 8, Arndt. 5] such lot, may be of a size smaller than nological reasons, the application shall include: PART 944— FRUIT; IMPORT 2946 inches in diameter. (i) A statement describing the com­ REGULATIONS ♦ * % * * modities, with an analysis of the metal (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. Oranges content, and an explanation of the dif­ 601-674) ficulty in processing them in the United On September 3, 1969, notice of pro­ Dated: September 10,1969. States; posed rule making was published in the P aul A. N icholson, (ii) The following certification: F ederal R egister (34 F.R. 13994) that Acting Director, Fruit and Veg­ I (we) certify that, to my (our) best consideration was being given to a pro­ knowledge and belief, the commodities de­ posed further amendment of § 944.307 etable Division, Consumer and Marketing Service. scribed on this application cannot be com­ Orange Regulation 8, which would limit mercially processed in the United States; the importation of oranges into the [F.R. Doc. *69-10973; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; United States, pursuant to Part 944— 8:45 am.] and Fruits; Import Regulations (7 CFR Part (iii) A copy of correspondence with 944.307), This amendment of the import one or more recognized U.S. nickel proc­ regulation sets forth grade and size re­ essors confirming that the commodities quirements which are the same as the Title 15— COMMERCE AND described in the application can not be domestic grade and size requirements be­ commercially processed in the United ing made effective September 15, 1969, FOREIGN TRADE States.1 for oranges grown in the State of Texas. (2) An exception will also be con­ The import regulation is effective pur­ Chapter III— Bureau of International sidered in cases where failure to export suant to section 8e (7 U.S.C. 608e—1) of Commerce, Department of Commerce the commodities will subject the appli­ the Agricultural Marketing Agreement cant to a definite economic hardship in Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. SUBCHAPTER B— EXPORT REGULATIONS the form of a substantial financial 601-674). [12th Gen. Rev. of Export Regs (Arndt. 4)] liability. An example of such hardship is a situation where a contract is in effect, It is hereby found that good cause PART 390— GENERAL ORDERS exists for not postponing the effective the commodities have been specially time of amendatory provisions of this Short Supply Licensing Controls Over processed and packed for shipping, and regulation beyond that hereinafter spec­ Nickel Products freight arrangements have been made. ified (5 U.S.C. 553) in that (a) the re­ Another example is a situation where, quirements of this amendment of the Part 390 of the Code of Federal Reg­ because of geographic location, a loss import, regulation are imposed pursuant ulations is amended as set forth below. would be suffered if the applicant had to to section 8e of the Agricultural Market­ (Sec. 3, 63 Stat. 7; 50 U.S.O. App. 2023; E.O. dispose of the commodities in the United ing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended 10945, 26 F.R. 4487, 3 CFR 1959-1963 Comp.; States. A mere decrease in an expected (7 U.S.C. 601-674), which makes such E.O. 11038, 27 F.R. 7003, 3 CFR 1959-1963 profit does not impose a financial liabil­ requirements mandatory; (b) such Comp.) ity and does not constitute an economic amendatory provisions contain the sajne Effective date: September 9,1969. hardship within the meaning of this grade and size requirements as those of section. To establish an economic hard­ the domestic grade and size regulation R auEr H. Meyer, ship, an applicant shall submit in sup­ for oranges grown in Texas under Director, Office of Export Control. port of his license application a copy of Orange Regulation 21, which becomes A new § 390.6 is established to read as his sales contract with the foreign pur­ effective September 1,5. 1969; (c) notice follows: chaser. In addition, he shall disclose the that such amendatory action was being date he purchased the commodities, the considered was published in the Septem­ § 390.6 Short supply licensing controls over nickel products. price he paid for them, their current ber 3,1969, issue of the F ederal R egister U.S. market price, and any' other facts (34 F.R. 13994) ; (d) compliance with (a) Licensing policy and exceptions. this amendment of the import regulation To conserve the domestic supply of nickel, to establish his potential economic will not require any special preparation it has been necessary to discontinue the hardship.1 which cannot be completed by the effec­ granting of licenses to export the follow­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10890; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969! tive time hereof; (e) notice hereof in ing primary and secondary forms of 8:47 a.m.] excess of 3 days, the minimum prescribed nickel: by said section 8e, is given with respect Export Control Commodity Number and to this amendment of the import reg­ Commodity Description ulation; and (f) such notice is hereby Title 16— COMMERCIAL 28200 Iron and steel scrap containing 1 determined, under the circumstances, to percent or more nickel by weight, be reasonable. including scrap melted into crude PRACTICES Paragraph (a) of § 944.307 Orange forms. Regulation 8 (7 CFR Part 944; 34 F.R, 28401 Nickel bearing residues and dross. Chapter I— Federal Trade 5156) is amended to read as follows: 28403 Other nickel or nickel alloy waste and Commission scrap. [Docket No. C-1568] § 944.307 Orange Regulation 8. 51369 Nickel oxide. (a) On and after September 16, 1969,51470 Nickel sulfate. PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE the importation into the United States 67160 Ferronickel containing 90 percent or PRACTICES of any oranges is prohibited unless such less nickel. 68310 Nickel based magnetic materials, Hilco Homes Corp. oranges are inspected and grade U.S. unwrought. Fancy, U.S. No. 1, U.S. No. 1 Bright, U.S. 68310 Other nickel or nickel alloys, un­ Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis­ No. 1 Bronze, U.S. Combination, with not wrought. leadingly: §13.155 Prices: 13.155-5 less than 60 percent, by count, of the 68324 Nickel or nickel alloy electroplating anodes. oranges in each container thereof grad­ iction 376.4 of the Export Control Begu- ing at least U.S. No. 1 grade and the re­ However, the Office of Export Control will is of this chapter contains addition mainder grading U.S. No. 2, or U.S. No. 2; consider requests for exceptions to this il requirements regarding applicatio and are of a size not smaller than 2%6 licensing policy if, for technological or senses to export nickel commodities.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14327 Additional charges unmentioned; 13.155- built are 100 percent complete or are [Docket No. 87721 10 Bait. Subpart—Misrepresenting one­ custom-built. self and goods—Prices: § 13.1778 Addi­ 8. Failing to disclose, clearly and PART 13— PROHIBITED TRADE tional costs unmentioned; § 13.1779 conspicuously, in advertising and promo­ PRACTICES Bait. Subpart—Neglecting, unfairly or tional material, that respondent’s houses Market Fur Dressing Corp. and deceptively, to make material disclosure: which are incomplete homes are incom­ § 13.1882 Prices; § 13.1905 Terms and plete homes. Milton Mainwold conditions. 9. Quoting prices, terms or conditions Subpart—Invoicing products falsely: (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Inter­ in advertising which does not include all § 13.1108 Invoicing products falsely: prets or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat.^ 719, as of the features of the house or other 13.1108-45 Fur Products Labeling Act. amended; 15 U.S.C. 45) [Cease and desist products illustrated or described. (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret order, Hilco Homes Corp., Philadelphia, Pa., 10. Representing, directly or by impli­ or apply sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended, sec. Docket C—1568, July 28, 1969] cation, that respondent’s offers are made 8, 65 Stat 179; 15 U.S.C. 45, 69f) [Cease and In the Matter of Hilco Homes Corp., a available to owners of lots or parcels of desist order, Market Fur Dressing Corp., et Corporation real estate without clearly and conspicu­ al., New York, N.Y., Docket 8772, July 24, ously revealing any requirements, condi­ 19691 Consent order requiring a Philadel­ tions, or limitations applicable to said In the Matter of Market Fur Dressing phia, Pa., housing and building contrac­ property such as but not limited to value, Corp., a Corporation, and Milton tor to cease using bait tactics, false location, size or improvements. Mainwold, Individually and as an advertising, and deceptive pricing repre­ 11. Representing, directly or by impli­ Officer of Said Corporation sentations, and failing to disclose that cation, that houses or other products settlement and other costs are to be may be purchased without down pay­ Order requiring a New York City borne by the purchaser of its houses. ment, settlement, or closing costs, or manufacturer of fur garments to cease The order to cease and desist, includ­ other initial payment. falsely invoicing its fur products. ing further order requiring report of 12. Failing clearly and conspicuously The order to cease and desist is as compliance therewith, is as follows: to disclose and separately to designate follows: It is ordered, That respondent Hilco both orally and in contracts of sale or It is ordered, That the respondents Homes Corp., a corporation, and its of­ contracts of purchase or papers which Market Fur Dressing Corp., a corpora­ ficers, and respondent’s agents, repre­ list the charges of respondent’s products, tion, and its officers, and Milton Main­ sentatives, and employees, directly or the amounts of the down payment, set­ wold, individually and as an officer of through any corporate or other device, tlement charges, closing costs, or other said corporation, and respondents’ rep­ in connection with the advertising, of­ initial payment. resentatives, agents, and employees, fering for sale, sale or distribution or 13. Furnishing any advertising and directly or through any corporate or construction of houses, or other struc­ promotional material, brochures, or mail­ other device, in connection with the in­ tures, or products in commerce, as “com­ ings, suggested sales talks and presenta­ troduction, or manufacture for intro­ merce” is defined in the Federal Trade tions, contracts of sale or contracts of duction, into commerce, or the sale, Commission Act, do forthwith cease and purchase, or any other means of similar advertising or offering for sale in com­ desist from: import whereby the public may be misled merce, or the transportation or distri­ 1. Using, in any manner, a sales plan, or deceived as to any of the matters pro­ bution in commerce, of any fur product; scheme, or device wherein false, mis­ hibited by this order. or in connection with the manufacture leading, or deceptive statements or rep­ 14. Failing to deliver a copy of this for sale, sale, advertising, offering for resentations are made in order to obtain order to cease and desist to all respond­ sale, transportation or distribution of leads or prospects for the sale of houses ent’s present and future salesmen or any fur product which is made in whole or other products. other persons engaged in the sale of re­ or in part of fur which has been shipped 2. Making representations purporting spondent’s products or services, and fail­ and received in commerce; or in con­ to offer houses or other products for sale ing to secure from each such, salesman nection with the introduction into com­ when the purpose of the representation or other person a signed statement ac­ merce, or the sale, advertising or offering is not to sell the offered house or other knowledging receipt of said order. for sale in commerce, or the transporta­ product but to obtain leads or prospects 15. Failing, after the acceptance by the tion and distribution in commerce of for the sale of other houses or other Commission of respondent’s initial re­ furs, as the terms “commerce,” “fur,” Products. port of compliance, to submit to the Com­ and “fur product” are defined in the Fur mission on June 1st of each of the suc­ Products Labeling Act, do forthwith 3- Representing, directly or by impli- ceeding 3 years a report: (1) Describing cation, that any houses or other products every complaint involving the acts and cease and desist from falsely or decep­ are offered for sale when such offer is not practices prohibited by this order re­ tively invoicing fur products or furs by: a,“ona fide offer to sell such houses or 1. Failing to furnish invoices, as the other products. ceived by respondent from or on behalf of their customers during the 12 months term “invoice” is defined in the Fur 4; Representing, directly or by impli- preceding the date of the report; (2) Products Labeling Act, showing in words cation, that houses or other products are setting forth the facts uncovered by re­ and figures plainly legible all the in­ offered for sale for certain prices or on spondent in connection with the investi­ formation required to be disclosed by tated terms, conditions or financing ar­ gation made of each such complaint; each of the subsections of section 5(b) rangements unless fully applicable and and (3) stating the action taken by re­ (1) of the Fur Products Labeling Act. available with respect thereto; or mis- spondent with respect to each such com­ 2. Describing fur products or furs : Presenting in any manner the prices, plaint. which have been bleached, dyed, or ^rn *S’ conditions and financing arrange- It is further ordered, That the respond­ otherwise artificially colored by the name ents for respondent’s houses or other ent herein shall, within sixty (60) days mink or by any other animal name or Products. after service upon it of this order, file names without disclosing that the said D P’Jj^strating or describing a higher- with the Commission a report in writing fur products or furs were bleached, dyed nri^ home in conjunction with the setting forth in detail the manner and or otherwise artificially colored. ^ of a lower-priced home. form in which it has complied with this 3. Failing when a fur or fur product is order. pointed or contains or is composed of ariv i'fdang to quote and to disclose in bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially and promotional material the Issued: July 28,1969. colored fur, to disclose such facts as a with °f an ^ stra ted or described home part of the required information on in­ the«^

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 No. 175----- 3 14328 RULES AND REGULATIONS regulations promulgated thereunder to therapeutic serum, toxin, anitoxin, or (d) Shipments of such products for describe such fur products or furs which analogous product, or arsphenamine or use in the treatment of man but made are not pointed, bleached, dyed, tip- its derivatives (or any other trivalent from or with material of animal origin dyed, or otherwise artificially colored. organic arsenic compound), applicable other than human, shall, unless accom­ By “Final Order” further order re­ to the prevention, treatment, or cure of panied by a Department of Agriculture, quiring report of compliance is as diseases or injuries of man is prohibited Animal Health Division, permit, be de­ follows: unless such virus, serum, toxin, antitoxin, tained until proof is presented to the It is further ordered, That respondents, or other product has been manufactured district director that their importation Market Fur Dressing Corp., a corpora­ at an establishment holding an un- is not prohibited under 9 CFR Part 94 tion, and Milton Mainwold, individually sUspended and unrevoked license issued or Part 122. and as an officer of said corporation, by the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare for such manufacture. (Sec. 351, 58 Stat. 702, as amended; 42 U.S.C. shall, within sixty (60) days after service 262) of this order upon them, file with the (Sec. 351, 58 Stat. 702, as amended; 42 U.S.C. Commission a report in writing, signed 262) Effective date. These amendments shall be effective on publication in the by such respondents, setting forth in §12.22 Labels; samples. detail the manner and form of their com­ F ederal R egister. Eaclj package of such products im­ pliance with the order to cease and [seal] Myles J. Ambrose, desist. ported for sale, barter, or exchange shall Corrtmissioner of Customs. , be labeled or plainly marked with the Issued: July 24,1969, name, address, and license number of Approved: September 3, 1969. By the Commission. the manufacturer, and the date beyond Eugene T: R ossides, which the contents cannot be expected Assistant Secretary [seal] Joseph W. S hea, to yield their specific results. From each Secretary. lot of product the district director shall of the Treasury. [F.R. Doc. 69-10870; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; select at random at least two final con­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10902; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:46 a.m.] tainers. The random sample together 8:48 a.m.] with a copy of the associated documents which describe and identify the ship­ ment shall be forwarded to the Director, Title 19— CUSTOMS DUTIES Division of Biologies Standards, National Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS Chapter I— Bureau of Customs, Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis­ 20014. For shipments of 20 or less final tration, Department of Health, Edu­ Department of the Treasury containers, samples need not be for­ [T.D. 69-201] warded, provided a copy of an official cation, and Welfare release from the Division of Biologies SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS PART 12— SPECIAL CLASSES OF Standards accompanies each shipment. MERCHANDISE PART 120— TOLERANCES AND EX­ (Sec. 351, 58 Stat. 702, as amended; 42 U.S.C. Importation of Viruses, Serums, 262) EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON Toxins, Antitoxins, and Analogous § 12.23 Detention; examination; dispo­ Products for Use in Treatment of sition. RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ TIES Man (a) District directors shall detain all The bringing into the United States of importations of unlicensed viruses, thera­ Definitions and Interpretations peutic serums, toxins, antitoxins, and any virus, therapeutic serum, toxin, Information provided by the University antitoxin, or analogous product, or analogous products, and arsphenamines or its derivatives (or any other trivalent of California Agricultural Extension arsphenamine or its derivatives (or any Service, Berkeley, Calif. 94720, and by the other trivalent organic arsenic com­ organic arsenic compound) for the treat­ ment or cure of diseases or injuries of U.S. Department of Agriculture indicates pound) applicable to the prevention, that the same pesticides are useful on treatment, or cure of diseases or injuries man pending examination by the Direc­ tor, Division of Biologies Standards, un­ various varieties of peppers, including of man is subject to section 351 of the pimentos', and that the same tolerances Public Health Service Act, as amended less satisfied from evidence furnished at the time of entry that the products are should apply. The Commissioner of Food (42 U.S.C. 262), and to regulations and Drugs concurs. promulgated by the Public Health Serv­ intended solely for purposes of controlled investigation and not for sale, barter, Therefore, pursuant to the provisions ice. Such products may also be subject of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic to restrictions under the Department of or exchange, as evidenced by a copy of a filed “Notice of Claimed Investigational Act (secs. 408, 701(a), 68 Stat. 511-18, as Agriculture animal quarantine regula­ Exemption for a New Drug,” pursuant to amended, 52 Stat. 1055; 21 U.S.C. 346a, tions in 9 CFR Parts 94 and 122, if made 371(a)) and under authority delegated from or with material of animal origin § 130.3 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act Regulations (21 CFR 130.3), or are to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.120), other than human. In order to conform being imported under the short supply § 120.1(h) is amended by alphabetically §§ 12.21-12.23 of the Customs Regula­ inserting in the table a new item, as tions (19 CFR 12.21-12.23) to current provisions of § 73.16 of the Public Health laws and regulations of the Department Service Regulations (42 CFR 73.16). follows: of Health, Education, and Welfare in­ (b) If the shipment is imported for § 120.1 Definitions and interpretations. cluding a recent change in § 73.23 of the sale, barter, or exchange and is' found by the Director, Division of Biologies * * * * * Public Health Service Regulations (42 (h) * * * CFR 73.23) regarding the inclusion of Standards, to be admissible, the district samples in packages of imported viruses, director shall release it upon receipt of A . B serums, toxins, antitoxins, and similar a report from him that the shipment is * * * * * * products, for the treatment of man, and admissible. Peppers — __ All varieties of peppers (c) If the Director, Division of Bio­ including pimentos to clarify that such products may also and bell, hot, and be subject to restrictions under the De­ logies Standards, reports that the ship­ ment was found upon examination not to sweet peppers. partment of Agriculture animal quaran­ * * * tine regulations, §§ 12.21-12.23 of the conform to the law and the regulations, * * * Customs Regulations are amended to the district director shall not release * * * * read as follows: the shipment but shall permit the expor­ Since the amendment in this order is § 12.21 Licensed establishments. tation or destruction thereof under cus­ interpretative, nonrestrictive, and non- The bringing into the United States toms supervision at the option of the controversial in nature, notice and Pu ' for sale, barter, or exchange, of any virus, importer. * lie procedure and delayed effective da

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 14329 are not prerequisites to this promulga­ be granted if the objections are supported (Secs. 6, 8, 52 Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; tion. by grounds legally sufficient to justify 29 U.S.C. 206, 208) Effective date. This order shall be ef­ the relief sought. Objections may be Signed at Washington, D.C., this 9th fective upon publication in the F ederal accompanied by a memorandum or brief day of September 1969. in support thereof. Register. R obert D. Moran, (Secs. 408, 701(a), 68 Stat. 511-18, as Effective date. This order shall become Administrator, Wage and Hour amended, 52 Stat. 1055; 21 U.S.C. 346a, 371 effective on the date of its publication in and Public Contracts Divisions. the F ederal R egister. (a)) [F.R. Doc. 69-10921; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Dated: September 5, 1969. (Sec. 408(d) (2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a 8:49 a.m.] (d )(2)) J. K . K i r k , Associate Commissioner Dated: September 5,1969. for Compliance. PART 720— RUBBER PRODUCTS J. K. K irk, INDUSTRY IN PUERTO RICO [F.R. Doc. 69-10871; Piled, Sept. U , 1969; Associate Commissioner 8:46 a.m.] for Compliance. Wage Order (F.R. Doc. 69-10872; Filed, Sept, ft, 1969; Pursuant to sections 5, 6 and 8 of the 8:46 am.] Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (52 PART 120— TOLERANCES AND EX­ Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; 29 U.S.C. EMPTIONS FROM TOLERANCES FOR 205, 206, 208) and Reorganization Plan PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON No. 6 of 1950 (3 CFR 1949-1953 Comp., ' RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ Title 29— LABOR p. 1004), and by means of Administrative TIES Chapter V— Wage and Hour Division, Order No. 607 (34 FJEt. 9346), the Secre­ tary of Labor appointed and convened Succinic Acid 2,2-Dimethylhydrazlde Department of Labor Industry Committee No. 84-B for the A petition (FP 9F0813) was filed with PART 601— SHOE A N D RELATED rubber products industry in Puerto Rico, fee Food and Drug Administration by PRODUCTS INDUSTRY IN PUERTO referred to the Committee the question Uniroyal Inc., Bethany, Conn. 06525, of the minimum wage rate or rates to be RICO paid under section 6(c) of the Act to proposing the establishment of toler­ Wage Order ances for residues of the plant regulator employees in the industry, and gave no­ succinic acid 2,2-dimethylhydrazide in or Pursuant to sections 5, 6, and 8 of tice of a hearing to be held by the on the raw agricultural commodities the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (52 Committee. peaches and sweet cherries at 30 parts Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; 29 U.S.C. Subsequent to an investigation and a per million. 205, 206, 208) and by means of Adminis­ hearing conducted pursuant to the no­ The Secretary of Agriculture has cer­ trative Order No. 607 and Reorganiza­ tice, the Committee has filed with the tified that this pesticide chemical is use­ tion Plan No. 6 of 1960 (3 CFR 1949- Administrator of the Wage and Hour ful for the purposes for which the toler­ 1953 Comp. p. 1004), the Secretary of and Public Contracts Divisions of the ances are being established. Labor appointed and convened Industry Department of Labor a report containing Committee No. 84-A for the Shoe and its findings of fact and recommendation Based on consideration given the data Related Products Industry in Puerto with respect to the matters referred to submitted in the petition, and other rele­ Rico. The Committee was referred the it. vant material, the Commissioner of question of the minimum wage rate or Accordingly, as authorized and re­ Food and Drugs concludes that the toler­ rates to be paid, to employees of the in­ ances established by this order will quired by section 8 of the Fair Labor dustry under section 6(c) of the Fair Standards Act of 1939, Reorganization protect the public health. Therefore, Labor Standards Act. The order also pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Plan No. 6 of 1950, and 29 CFR 511.18, provided timely notice of the hearing to the recommendations of Industry Com­ Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (sec. be held by the Committee. 408(d)(2), 68 Stat. 512; 21 U.S.C. 346a mittee No. 84-B are hereby published to (d) (2)) and under authority delegated Following an investigation and hearing be effective September 28, 1969, in this to the Commissioner (21 CFR 2.120), conducted pursuant to the notice, the order amending § 720.2 of Title 29, Code § 120.246 is revised to read as follows to Committee has filed with the Adminis­ of Federal Regulations. As amended, establish the subject tolerances: trator of the Wage and Hour and Public § 720.2 reads as follows: Contracts Divisions of the Department §120.246 Succinic acid 2,2-dimetliylhy- of Labor a report of its findings of fact § 720.2 Wage rates. drazide ; tolerances for residues. and recommendations with respect to ***** Tolerances are established for resi­ the matters referred to it. (a) Pre-1961 coverage classifications. dues of the plant regulator succinic acid Accordingly, as authorized and required The classifications for pre-1961 coverage 2,2-dimethylhydrazide in or on raw agri­ by section 8 of the Fair Labor Standards apply to all activities in the industry cultural commodities as follows: Act of 1938, Reorganization Plan No. 6 to which section 6 of the Fair Labor 30 parts per million in or on apples, of 1950, and 2g CFR 511.18, the recom­ Standards Act would have applied prior Peaches, sweet cherries. mendations of Industry Committee No. to the Fair Labor Standards Amendments 10 parts per million in or on grapes. 84-A are hereby published, to be effec­ of 1961. . Any person who will be adversely af­ tive September 28, 1969, in this order * * * * * fected by the foregoing order may at any amending § 601.2 of Title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: (3) The rubber bucket classification. time within 30 days from the date of (i) The minimum wage for this classifi­ Publication in the F ederal R egister § 601.2 Wage rates. cation is $1.35 an hour. me with the Hearing Clerk, Department * * * * * of Health, Education, and Welfare, Room * * * * * «440, 330 Independence Avenue • SW., (a) Pre-1966 coverage classification. (4) The rubber footwear classification. Washington, D.C. 20201, written objec­ (1) The minimum wage for this classi­ (i) The minimum wage for this classi­ tions thereto, preferably in quintu- fication is $1.45 per hour. fication is $1.43 an hour. Pucate. Objections shall show wherein * * * * * * * * * * the person filing will be adversely af­ (b) 1966 coverage classification. (1) (b) 1961 coverage classification. (1) fected by the order and specify with The minimum wage for this classifica­ The minimum wage for this classification Particularity the provisions of the order tion is $1.30 per hour through Janu­ heemed objectionable and the grounds ary 31, 1970; is $1.45 per hour after that is $1^0 an hour. for the objections. If a hearing is re­ date through January 31,1971; and $1.60 ***** quested, the objections must state the per hour after that date. (c) 1966 coverage classification. (1) «sues for the hearing. A hearing will * ♦ * * * The minimum wage for this classification

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14330 RULES AND REGULATIONS is $1.15 per hour for the period ending Part 0 of Chapter I of Title 47 of the Fisheries and Wildlife, Federal Building, January 31, 1969; $1.30 per hour for the; Code of Federal Regulations is amended Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minn. 55111. period beginning February li, 1969, R,nd as follows: ; ? ^’ The provisions of this special regula­ ending January 31, 1970; $1.45 per hour 1. Section 0.12 is revised to read as tion supplement the regulations which for the period beginning February 1, follows: govern public access, use, and recreation 1970, and ending January 31, 1971, and § 0.12 Units in the Office. on wildlife refuge areas generally which $1.60 per hour thereafter. are set forth in Title 50, Code of Federal * * * * (a) Immediate Office of the Executive Regulations, Part 28, and are effective (Secs. 5,6, 8, 52 Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; Director. „ through December 31, 1969. 29 U.S.C. 205, 206, 208) (b) Administrative Services Division. , (c) Budget and Fiscal Division. D avid J. B rown, Signed at Washington, D.C;, this 8th (d) Data Processing Division. Refuge Manager, Necedah Na­ day Of September 1969, • (e) Emergency Communications Divi­ tional Wildlife Refuge, Nece­ dah, Wis. R obert D. Moran, sion. Administrator, Wage and Hour (f) Management Information Divi­ August 27, 1969. sion. and Public Contracts Divi­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10886; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; sions, U.S. Department of (g) Personnel Division. 8s47 a.m.] Labor. (h) Property Management Division. [F.JR. Doc. 69-10888; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; §§0.13-0.20 [Deleted] 8:47 a.m.] . PART 32— HUNTING 2. Sections 0.13-0.20 are deleted in their entirety. Brigantine National Wildlife Refuge, [F.R. Doc. 69-10891; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; N.J. Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION 8:47 a.m ] The following special regulation is is­ sued and is effective on date of publica­ Chapter I— Federal Communications tion in the F ederal R egister. Commission Title 50— WILDLIFE AND § 32.12 Special regulations; migratory PART 0— COMMISSION game birds; for individual wildlife ORGANIZATION FISHERIES refuge areas. Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries N ew J ersey Miscellaneous Amendments and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife BRIGANTINE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Order. 1. The amendments to Part 0 Service, Department of the Interior Public hunting of "waterfowl and coots of the rules and regulations set forth be- , PART 28— PUBLIC ACCESS, USE AND on the Brigantine National Wildlife Ref­ low are editorial in nature: uge, N.J., is permitted during established Changes in § 0.12 reflect the reorga­ RECREATION * State and Federal waterfowl seasons on nization and renaming of several divi­ the areas designated by signs as open to sions of the Office of the Executive Necedah National Wildlife Refuge, Wis. hunting. Director. These open areas are delineated as The elimination of §§ 0.13-0.20 results The following special regulations are Hunting Units 1, 2, and 3 on maps avail­ from a determination that functional issued and are effective on date of pub­ able at Refuge Headquarters, Ocean- statements for bureaus and staff offices lication in the F ederal R egister. ville, N.J., and from the Regional Direc­ only should be set forth. ' § 28.28 Special regulations;, public ac- tor, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wild­ 2. Authority for the amendments set ; cess, use, and recreation; for indiyid- life, U.S. Post Office and Courthouse, forth below is contained in sections 4(1), :ual wildlife refuge areas., Boston, Mass. 02109. 5(b), and 303 (r) of the Communications Hunting shall be in accordance with Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154 fd b W isconsin applicable State and Federal regulations (i), 155(b), and 303(r), and § 0.261, Part NECEDAH NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE covering the hunting of waterfowl and 0 of the rules and regulations. Because coots subject to the following special the amendments relate to internal Com* , Public recreational activities are per­ conditions: mission organization and because they mitted on the Necedah National Wild­ (1) Hunting on Unit 3 during the wa­ are editorial in nature, the prior notice life Refuge subject to the following spe­ terfowl hunting season is restricted to and effective date provisions of section cial conditions: certified, Young Waterfowler Program 4 of the Administrative Procedure Act* (1) Public recreational activities are trainees by permit from designated blind 5 TJ.S.C. 553, do not apply. ' v - limited to sightseeing, nature observa­ sites. In view of the foregoing: It is ordered, tion, and photography. The provisions of this special regula­ (2) General public recreational use is tion supplement the regulations which Effective September 16, 1969, that part 0 permitted as follows: govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas of the rules and regulations is amended Area 1. September 19, through Decem­ generally, as set forth in Title 50, Code as set forth below. ber 31, 1969 of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and are (Secs. 4, 5, 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1066, Area 2. November 21, through Decem­ effective through January 30, 1970. 1068,1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 155, 303) i b O ^ ber 31; 1969 Area 3. December 6, through Decern-- D on R eese, * Adopted; September 5,1969. ber 31, 1969 Acting Regional Director, Bu­ Released: September 9,1969. reau of Sport Fisheries and These open areas, comprising approxi­ ' r Wildlife. F ederal Communications mately 39,500 acres are delineated oil a S eptember 8,1969. Commission, $ map available at the refuge headquar­ [ seal] B en F. W aple, , ters, Necedah, Wis. 54646, and from the [F.R. Doc. 69-10885; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Secretary. Regional Director, Bureau of Sport 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14331 Proposed Rule Making

Within the next 600 hours’ time in service, Section 61.3(a) Pilot certificate of the after the effective date of this AD, replace Federal Aviation Regulations allows a DEPARTMENT OF the aluminum engine breather pipes lo­ cated between the firewall and drains col­ person acting as pilot in command or. in TRANSPORTATION lector box with stainless steel pipes in ac­ any other capacity as a required pilot cordance with British Aircraft Corp. Bul­ flight crewmember of a civil aircraft of Federal Aviation Administration letin for Modification No. D. 3226 dated U.S. registry operated within a foreign 14 CFR Part 39 1 March 17, 1969, or later ARB-approved issue, country to use a current pilot certificate l or FAA-approved equivalent. issued by the country in which the air­ [Docket No. 9844] (b) For Viscount Model 810 airplanes— craft is operated. This provision was in­ Within the next 600 hours’ time In serv­ AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE ice after the effective date of this AD, replace serted by Amendment 61-22, effective the aluminum engine breather pipes located September 19, 1966, that accompanied Vickers Viscount Models 744, 745D, between the firewall and drains collector box amendments to Part 91 prescribing rules and 810 Airplanes and the engine accessory gearbox aluminum applicable to civil aircraft operated out­ breather pipes which connect into the en­ side of the United States to conform the The Federal Aviation Administration gine breather piping, with stainless steel regulations with the Convention on In­ is considering amending Part 39 of the pipes in accordance 'With British Aircraft ternational Civil Aviation (Chicago Con­ Federal Aviation Regulations by adding Corp. Bulletin for Modification No. FG. 2102, vention). However, the regulations do an airworthiness directive (AD) appli­ dated March 17, 1969, or later ARB-approved issue, or an FAA-approved equivalent. not provide that the pilot in these cir­ cable to Vickers Viscount Models 744, cumstances may use evidence of medical 745D, and 810 Airplanes. There have been Issued in Washington, D.C., on Sep­ qualification issued by the foreign coun­ failures of the aluminum breather pipes tember 5,-1969. try. The proposed amendment would located between the firewall and drains R. S. S liff, allow the pilot to do this. collection box; and the gearbox breather Acting Director, Paragraphs (a) and (b) of § 63.3, that pipe connecting into the engine breather Flight Standards Service. prescribe certificates for flight engineers piping on certain yickers Viscount air­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10899; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; and flight navigators, do not have provi­ planes that could result in a nacelle fire. 8:47 a.m.] Since this condition is likely to exist or sions for these airmen similar to the develop in other airplanes of the same § 61.3(a) provision as to use of foreign [ 14 CFR Parts 61, 63 1 certificates. For the purpose of maintain­ type design, the proposed airworthiness ing consistent regulatory provisions and directive would require replacement of [Docket No. 9843; Notice 69-40] the aluminum breather pipes with stain­ of extending to other flight crewmembers less steel pipes. USE OF FOREIGN PILOT, FLIGHT EN­ the same opportunity to use foreign-is- GINEER, AND FLIGHT NAVIGATOR sued certificates, it is proposed to allow Interested persons are invited to par­ flight engineers and flight navigators also ticipate in the making of the proposed CERTIFICATES AND MEDICAL to use the appropriate certificates issued rule by submitting such written data, QUALIFICATION EVIDENCE by a foreign country in which the air­ views, or arguments as they may desire. Notice of Proposed Rule Making craft is operated, and evidence of medi­ Communications should identify the cal qualification for these certificates docket number and be submitted in dup­ The Federal Aviation Administration issued by that country. licate to the Federal Aviation Adminis­ is considering amending § 63.3 of the The language of paragraph (a) of tration, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Aviation Regulations to provide Attention: Rules Docket, GC-24, 800 § 63.3 would be amended to conform with that when a civil aircraft of U.S. registry the language in § 61.3 by deleting the Independence Avenue SW., Washington, is operated within a foreign country a D.C. 20590. All communications received phrases “assisting a pilot in the me­ current flight engineer or flight naviga­ chanical operation of an” and “as his on or before October 13, 1969, will be tor certificate issued by the country in considered by the Administrator before primary assigned duty in flight”. The which the aircraft is operated may be certificate requirements in paragraphs taking action upon the proposed rule. used. This section, as well as § 61.3, also The proposals contained in this notice (a) and (b) of that section would apply would be amended to provide that under the flight navigator or flight engineer may be changed in the light of comments these circumstances evidence of medical received. All comments will be available certificate requirement to a person act­ qualification issued for the foreign ing in that capacity on a civil aircraft both before and after the closing date certificate could be used. for comments, in the Rules Docket for of U.S. registry. The requirements would examination by interested persons. Interested persons are invited to par­ also be divided into those applicable ticipate in the making of the proposed generally or those applicable in a for­ This amendment is proposed under rule by submitting such written data, eign country without reference to air the authority of sections 313(a), 601, and commerce. 603 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 views, or arguments as they may desire. (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) and of Communications should identify the In consideration of the foregoing, it is section 6(c) of the Department of Trans­ regulatory docket or notice number and proposed to amend Parts 61 and 63 of portation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)). be submitted in duplicate to: Federal the Federal Aviation Regulations as ; In consideration of the foregoing, it Aviation Administration, Office of the follows: is proposed to amend § 39.13 of Part 39 General Counsel, Attention: Rules 1. By amending paragraph (c) of Docket, GC-24, 800 Independence Ave­ § 61.3 to read as follows: °f toe Federal Aviation Regulations by nue SW., Washington, D.C. 20590. All adding the following new airworthiness § 61.3 Certificates and ratings required. directive: communications received on or before December 11, 1969, will be considered by ***** British Aircraft Corp. Applies to Vickers the Administrator before taking action (c) Medical certificate. Except for Viscount Models 744, 745D, and 810 Air­ planes. on the proposed rule. The proposal con­ glider pilots piloting gliders, no person Compliance required as indicated unless tained in this notice may be changed in may act as pilot in command or in any already accomplished. light of comments received. All com­ other capacity as a required pilot crew­ To prevent burn-through of aluminum ments submitted will be available, both member of an aircraft under a certificate Piping, accomplish the following: before and after the closing date for com­ issued to him under this part, unless he (a) For Viscount Models 744, 745D air­ ments, in the Rules Docket for examina­ has in his personal possession an appro­ planes— tion by interested persons. priate current medical certificate issued

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175-^-FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14332 PROPOSED RULE MAKING under Part 67 of this chapter. However, of the Federal Aviation Regulations that Issued in East Point, Ga., on Septem­ when the aircraft is operated within a would alter the Greenville, Miss., control ber 3, 1969. foreign country with a current pilot cer­ zone and transition area. Gordon A. W illiams, Jr., tificate issued by that country, evidence Interested persons may submit such Acting Director, Southern Region. of current medical qualification for that written data, views, or arguments as they [F.R. Doc. 69-10900; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; certificate, issued by that country, may may desire. Communications should be 8:47 a.m.] be used. Also, in the case of a pilot cer­ submitted in triplicate to the Federal tificate issued under § 61.33, evidence of Aviation Administration, Area Manager, [1 4 CFR Part 75 ] current medical qualification accepted Memphis Area Office, Air Traffic Branch, for the issue of that certificate is used in Post Office Box 18097, Memphis, Tenn. [Airspace Docket No. 69-EA-95] place of a medical certificate. 38118. All communications received 'JET ROUTE SEGMENTS * * * * * within 30 days after publication of this ,2. By amending paragraphs (a) and notice in the F ederal R egister will be Proposed Alteration (b) of § 63.3 to read as follows: considered before action is taken on the The Federal Aviation Administration § 63.3 Certificates and ratings required. proposed amendment. No hearing is is considering amendments to Part 75 contemplated at this time, but arrange­ of the Federal Aviation Regulations that (a) No person may act as a flight ments for informal conferences with would realign segments of Jet Route engineer of a civil aircraft of U.S. reg­ Federal Aviation Administration officials Nos. 6, 8, and 42 in the vicinity of Wil­ istry unless he has in his personal pos­ may be made by contacting the Chief, mington, Del. session a current flight engineer certifi­ Air Traffic Branch. Any data, views, or Interested persons may participate in cate with appropriate ratings issued to arguments presented during such con­ the proposed rule making by submitting him under this part and a second-class ferences mUst also be submitted in writ­ such written data, views, or arguments (or higher) medical certificate issued ing in accordance with this notice in as they may desire. Communications to him under Part 67 of this chapter order to become part of the record for should identify the airspace docket num­ within the preceding 12 months. How­ consideration. The proposal contained in ber and be submitted in triplicate to ever, when the aircraft is operated with­ this notice may be changed in the light the Director, Eastern Region, Attention; in a foreign country, a current flight of comments received. Chief, Air Traffic Division, Federal Avi­ engineer certificate issued by the country The official docket will be available for ation Administration, Federal Building, in which the aircraft is operated, with John F. Kennedy International Airport, evidence of current medical qualifica­ examination by interested persons at the Federal Aviation Administration, South­ Jamaica, N.Y. 11430. All communica­ tion for that certificate, may be used. tions received within 30 days after pub­ Also, in the case of a flight engineer cer­ ern Regional Headquarters, Room 724, 3400 Whipple Street, East Point, Ga. lication of this notice in the F ederal tificate issued under § 63.42, evidence of R egister will be considered before action current medical qualification accepted The Greenville control zone described in §71.171 (34 FJR. 4557) would be is taken on the proposed amendments. for the issue of that certificate is used The proposals contained in this notice in place of a medical certificate. altered by deleting “* * * within 2 miles each side of the Greenville VOR may be changed in the light of com­ (b) No person may act as a flight ments received. navigator of a civil aircraft of U.S. reg­ 358° radial * * *” and substitut­ ing “* * * within 3 miles each side of An official docket will be available for istry unless he has in his personal pos­ examination by interested persons at the session a current flight navigator certifi­ the Greenville VOR 358° radial * * *” Federal Aviation Administration, Office cate issued to him under this part and a therefor. of the General Counsel, Attention: Rules second-class (or higher) medical certifi­ The Greenville transition area de­ Docket, 800 Independence Avenue SW., cate issued to him under Part 67 of this scribed in § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637) would Washington, D.C. 20590. An informal chapter within the preceding 12 months. be redesignated as : docket also will be available for exam­ However, when the aircraft is operated That airspace extending upward from 700 ination at the office of the Regional Air within a foreign country, a current flight feet above the surface within an 8.5-mlle Traffic Division Chief. navigator certificate issued by the coun­ radius of GreenviUe Municipal Airport; The Federal Aviation Administration try in which the aircraft is operated, with within 3 miles each side of the GreenviUe is considering the following airspace evidence of current medical qualification VOR 368° radial, extending from the 8.5- actions: for that certificate, may be used. mile radius area to 8.5 mUes north of the VOR; and that airspace extending upward a. Realign J-6 segment from West­ * * * * * from 1,200 feet above the surface within 9.5 minister, Md., via the intersection of These amendments are proposed under miles west and 4.5 miles east of the Green­ Westminister 080° T (088° M) and ROb- the authority of sections 313(a), 601- ville VOR 358° radial, extending from the binsville, N.J., 239' T (249° M) radials; 610, and 1102 of the Federal Aviation VOR to 18.5 miles north, excluding the por­ to Robbinsville. Act of 1958 (49 UJ3.C. 1354(a), 1421- tion within the State of Mississippi. b. Realign J-8 and J-42 segments 1430, 1502) ; Article 32(a) of the Con­ The application of Terminal Instru­ from Casanova, Va., via the intersection vention on International Civil Aviation ment Procedures (TERPs) and current of Casanova 051* T (057* M) and West­ (61 Stat. 1180) ; and section 6(c) of the airspace criteria to the Greenville termi­ minister 080° T (088° M) radials; inter­ Department of Transportation Act (49 nal area requires an increase in the section of Westminister 080° T (088° M> U.S.C. 1655(c)). width of the control zone extension and Robbinsville 239° T (249° M) radi- als; to Robbinsville. Issued in Washington, D.C., on Sep­ predicated on the Greenville VOR 358° These proposed realignments will per­ tember 8, 1969. radial from 2 to 3 miles; an increase in mit the jet route segments to conform to R. S. Sliff, the transition area basic radius circle Standard Terminal Arrival Routes being Acting Director, from 8 to 8.5 miles; an increase of 1 mile developed for the Newark, N.J., and Flight Standards Service. in the width and 6.5 miles in the length LaGuardia, N.Y., airports. [F.R. Doc. 69-10898; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; of the 1,200-foot transition area exten­ These proposals are made under the 8:47 a.m .] sion predicated on the Greenville VOR authority of section 307(a) of the Fed' 358° radial, and permits the revocation eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348) of the 1,200-foot transition area exten­ and section 6(c) of the Department oi [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 sion predicated on the Greenville VOR Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c))- [Airspace Docket No. 69-SO-84] 178° radial. Issued in Washington, D.C., on Sep- CONTROL ZONE AND TRANSITION This amendment is proposed under the tember 4, 1969. AREA authority of section 307(a) of the Fed­ H. B. Helstrom, eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. Chief, Airspace and Air Proposed Alteration 1348(a)) and of section 6(c) of the De­ Traffic Rules Division- The Federal Aviation Administration partment of Transportation Act (49 [F.R. Doc. 69-10879; Filed, Sept. H, l069’ is considering an amendment to Part 71 U.S.C. 1655(c)). 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— -FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 14333 1. The undesignated center head pre­ are not required for (1) unprocessed ores ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ceding § 40.61 of 10 CFR Part 40 is containing uranium or thorium, or (2) amended to read as follows: “Records, processed ores containing less than five [10 CFR Parts 40, 150 ] Reports, and Inspections”. (5) percent of uranium or thorium, or SOURCE MATERIAL REPORTS 2. A new § 40.64 is added to 10 CFR any combination thereof, by dry weight. Part 40 to read as follows: Notice of Proposed Rule Making 3. Section 150.10 of 10 CFR Part 150 § 40.64 Reports. is amended to read as follows: The Atomic Energy Commission is (a) Except as specified in paragraph § 150.10 Persons exempt. considering the amendment of its regu­ (d) of this section, each licensee who lations in 10 CFR Part 40, “Licensing of transfers, receives, imports or exports at Except as provided in §§ 150.15, 150.16, Source Material,” and 10 CFR Part 150, any one time 1,000 kilograms or more of and 150.17, any person in an Agreement “Exemptions and Continued Regulatory uranium or thorium, or any combina­ State who manufacturers, produces, re­ Authority in Agreement States under tion thereof, shall complete and dis­ ceives, possesses, uses, or transfers by­ Section 274,” to prescribe new reporting tribute a Nuclear Material Transfer Re­ product material, source material, or requirements for source material in the port on Form AEC-741, in accordance special nuclear material in quantities not possession of Commission and Agreement with the printed instructions for com­ sufficient to form a critical mass is ex­ State licensees. These reports will pro­ pleting the form. Each licensee who empt from the requirements for a license vide information needed by the Commis­ contained in Chapters 6, 7, and 8 of the sion in carrying out its responsibility for transfers or exports such material shall submit a completed copy of Form AEC- Act, regulations of the Commission im­ assuring that source material is ade­ 741 to the Commission and to the re­ posing licensing Requirements upon per­ quately safeguarded in the interest of sons who manufacture, produce, receive, the common defense and security. ceiver of the material promptly after the transfer or export takes place. Each li­ possess, use, or transfer such materials, Licensees would be required to submit and from regulations of the Commission to the Commission : censee who receives or imports such ma­ terial shall submit a completed copy of applicable to licensees. The exemptions 1. A report concerning each transfer, in this section do not apply to agencies receipt, export, and import of 1,000 kilo­ Form AEC-741 to the Commission and to the shipper of the material within ten of the Federal Government as defined in grams or more of source material per § 150.3. shipment; (10) days after the material is received. 2. A statement of their inventories of The reports shall be submitted to the 4. A new § 150.17 is added to 10 CFR source material, within 30 days of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Post Part 150 to read as follows: Office Box E, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 37830. effective date of the proposed amend­ § 150.17 Submission to Commission of ments and June 30 of each year there­ (b) Except as specified in paragraph source material transfer reports. after (by licensees authorized to possess (d) of this section, each licensee who is authorized to possess at any one time (a) Except as specified in paragraph more than 1,000 kilograms of source ma­ (d) of this section, each person who, pur­ terial at any one time and location) ; and and location more than 1,000 kilograms 3. A report concerning any attempted of uranium or thorium, or any combina­ suant to an Agreement State license, theft or unlawful diversion of source tion thereof, shall submit to the Com­ transfers or receives at any one time material (by licensees identified in Item mission within thirty (30) days after 1,000 kilograms or more of uranium or 2 above). ®=— ------,x and within thirty (30) thorium, or any combination thereof, or The proposed new requirements would days after June 30 of each year there­ who imports such material pursuant to not apply to source material in the mill­ after, a statement of his source material § 40.24 of this chapter, shall complete ing process. They would apply only to inventory. The reports shall be submitted and distribute a Nuclear Material Trans­ source material after it becomes a prod­ to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, fer Report on Form AEC-741, in accord­ uct of a mill and the product contains 5 Post Office Box E, Oak Ridge, Tenn. ance with the printed instructions for Percent or more uranium or thorium by 37830,, and shall include the Reporting completing the form. Each person who dry weight. Identification Symbol (RIS) assigned by transfers such material shall submit a A copy of Form AEC-741, on which the Commission to the licensee. completed copy of Form AEC-741 to the transfers of source material would be re­ (c) Except as specified in paragraph Commission and a completed copy to the ported, and related printed instructions, (d) of this section, each licensee who is receiver of the material promptly after is availalbe for inspection at the Com­ authorized to possess at any one time the transfer takes place. Each person Who mission’s Public Document Room, 1717 and location more than 1,000 kilograms receives or imports such material shall H Street NW., Washington, D.C. Copies of uranium or thorium, or any combina­ submit a completed copy of Form may be obtained by addressing a request tion thereof, shall report promptly to AEC-741 to the Commission and the to the Director, Division of Nuclear Ma­ the Director, Division of Nuclear Ma­ shipper of the material within ten (10) terials Safeguards, U.S. Atomic Energy terials Safeguards, by telephone, tele­ days after the material is received. The Commission, Washington, D.C. 20545. gram, or teletype, any incident in which reports shall be submitted to the U.S. Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of an attempt has been made or is believed Atomic Energy Commission, Post Office 1954, as amended, and section 553 of title to have been made to commit a theft or Box E, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 37830. * the United States Code, notice is unlawful diversion of such material. The Ob) Except as specified in paragraph hereby given that adoption of the follow- initial report shall be followed within a (d) of this section, each person who is mg amendments of 10 CFR Parts 40 and period of fifteen (15) days by a written authorized to possess at any one time 150 is contemplated. All interested per­ report submitted to the Director, Divi­ and location, pursuant to an Agreement sons who desire to submit written com­ sion of Nuclear Materials Safeguards, State license, more than 1,000 kilograms ments or suggestions should send them which sets forth the details of the in­ of uranium or thorium, or any combina­ J® the Secretary, U.S. Atomic Energy cident and its consequences. Subsequent tion thereof, shall submit to the Commis­ commission, Washington, D.C. 20545, to the submission of the written report sion within thirty (30) days after Attention: Chief, Public Proceedings required by this paragraph, a licensee — ------,l and within thirty (30) branch, within sixty (60) days after pub­ shall promptly inform the Division of days after June 30 of each year there­ lication of this notice in the F ederal Nuclear Materials Safeguards by means after, a statement of his source material register. Comments received after that of a written report of any substantive inventory. The reports shall be submitted Ponod will be considered if it is prac- additional information, which becomes to the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, «cable to do so, but assurance of consid- available to the licensee, concerning an Post Office Box E, Oak Ridge, Tenn. «ation cannot be given except as to com­ attempted or apparent theft or unlawful 37830, and shall include the Reporting ments filed within the period specified, diversion of source material. Identification Symbol (RIS) assigned by opies of comments on the proposed (d) The reports described in para­ mendments may be examined at the graphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section the Commission to such person. Public Document Room at H Street NW., Washington, D.C. 1 Effective date of this amendment. 1 Effective date of this amendment.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14334 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

ers, buyers, and consumers. Official grad­ Authority : The provisions of this subpart (c) Except as specified in paragraph issued under sec. 205, 60 Stat. 1090 as (d) of this section, each person who is ing services are also provided under this amended; 7 U.S.C. 1624. authorized to possess at any one time and Act upon request of the applicant and location, pursuant to an Agreement State upon payment of a fee to cover the cost P roduct D escription, S tyles, Color, license, more than 1,000 kilograms of of such services. G rades uranium or thorium, or any combination All persons who desire to submit writ­ § 52.931 Product description. thereof, shall report promptly to the Di­ ten data, views, or arguments for consid­ rector, Division of Nuclear Materials eration in connection with the proposal Frozen corn-on-the-cob is the prod­ Safeguards, by telephone, telegram, or should file the same in duplicate, not uct which is prepared from sound, prop­ teletype any incident in which an attempt later than March 1,1970, with the Hear­ erly matured, fresh, sweet com ears by has been made or is believed to have been ing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agricul­ removing husk and silk; by sorting, made to commit a theft or unlawful di­ ture, Room 112, Administration Build­ trimming, and washing as necessary to version of such material. The initial re­ ing, Washington, D.C. 20250. All written assure a clean and wholesome product. port shall be followed within a period of submittals made pursuant to this notice The ears are blanched, then frozen and fifteen (15) days by a written report sub­ will be available for public review at the stored at temperatures necessary for the mitted to the Director, Division of Nu­ office of the Hearing Clerk during regu­ preservation of the product; clear Materials Safeguards, which sets lar business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). § 52.932 Styles. forth the details of the incident and its Statement of consideration leading to consequences. Subsequent to the submis­ the proposed revision. The current U.S. (a) Trimmed. Ears trimmed at both sion of the . written report required by Standards v for Grades of Frozen Corn- ends to remove tip and stalk ends and/or this paragraph, each person siibject to on-the-Cob have been in effect since cut to specific lengths. 1958. Since that time there have been a (b) Natural. Ears untrimmed except the provisions of this paragraph shall to remove all or most of the stalk. promptly inform the Division of Nuclear number of significant changes in grow­ Materials Safeguards by means of a ing, processing, and marketing practices § 52.933 Colors o f frozen com-on-the- written report of any substantive addi­ which are reflected in this proposal. Cer­ cob. tional information, which becomes avail­ tain terms have been added or redefined (a) Golden (oryellow). able to such person, concerning an and more specific allowances provided (b) White. attempted or apparent theft or unlawful for simplicity, uniformity of interpreta­ diversion of source material. tion, and ease of application. The re­ § 52.934 Grades. (d) The reports described in para­ quirements in this proposal are a result (a) “U.S. Grade A” (or U.S. Fancy) graphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section of many seasons’ experience in grading frozen com-on-the-cob is composed of are not required for (1) unprocessed ores the product and will furnish more ob­ ears with similar varietal characteristics containing uranium or thorium, or (2) jective criteria in applying the grades. and that have a good flavor and odor. The processed ores containing less than five The principal changes proposed are in ears have a good color, are at least rea­ (5) percent of uranium or thorium, or presentation, revised and expanded def­ sonably uniform in size, are at least any combination thereof, by dry weight. initions, and the inclusion of specific reasonably well developed, are practically measurements to replace the general re­ free from defects, and are tender. The (Secs. 65, 161, 274, 68 Stat. 933, 948, 73 Stat. quirements in the currently effective 688; 42 U.S.C. 2095, 2201, 2021) product scores not less than 90 points standards. Specific allowances are now when rated in accordance with the scor­ Dated at Germantown, Md., this 29th proposed for: ing system outlined in this subpart. day of August 1969. (1) Off-color kernels, (b) “U.S. Grade B” (or U.S. Extra For the Atomic Energy Commission. (2) Length and width variation of the Standard) frozen com-on-the-cob is ears, composed of ears with similar varietal W. B. McCool, (3) Number of newly defined develop­ characteristics and that have at least a . Secretary. ment defects, and reasonably good flavor and odor. The ears fF J B . Doc. 69-10848; Piled, Sept. 11/1969; (4) A more precise interpretation of have at least a reasonably good color; 8:45 a.m.] other occurring defects. and are at least reasonably uniform in The proposal also realigns the score size, reasonably well developed, reason­ points to allow 10 points in each grade ably free from defects, and reasonably to conform to those in most UJS. grade tender. The product scores not less than DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE standards for processed fruits and 80 points when rated in accordance with Consumer and Marketing Service vegetables. the scoring system outlined in this „ The proposed revision is as follows: subpart. [ 7 CFR Part 52 1 Product Description, Styles, Color, Grades (c) “Substandard” is the quality of FROZEN CORN-ON-THE-COB Sec. frozen com-on-the-cob that fails to meet 52.931 Product description. the requirements of U.S. Grade B. Standards for Grades1 52.932 Styles. F actors of Quality 52.933 Colors of frozen corn-on-the-cob. Notice is hereby given that the U.S. 52.934 Grades. § 52.935 Ascertaining the grade of » Department of Agriculture is consider­ sample unit- F actors op Quality ing a revision to the U.S. Standards for fa) General. The grade of a sample Grades of Frozen Corn-on-the-Cob (7 52.935 Ascertaining the grade of a sample unit of frozen com-on-the-cob is ascer­ CFR 52.931-52.942). unit. tained by considering: The flavor ano This revision, if made effective, will be 52.936 Ascertaining the rating for the fac­ tors which are scored. odor which are not scored; the ratings the third issue by the Department of 52.937 Color. for the factors of color, uniformity grade standards for this product. These 52.938 Uniformity of size. size, development, defects, and tender­ grade standards are issued under au­ 52.939 Development. ness and maturity which are scored; w* thority of the Agricultural Marketing 52.940 Defects. total score; and the limiting rules whicn Act of 1946 (sec. 202-208, 60 Stat. 1087 52.941 Tenderness and maturity. may be applicable. as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627) which Explanations and Methods op Analysis proyides for the issuance of official U.S. (b) Sample unit size. For purposes oj grades to designate different levels of 52.942 Preparation and evaluation. rating the quality factors, a sample uri quality for the voluntary use of produc- 52.943 Cooking procedure. shall consist of four (4) ears; or, if ^ Lot Compliance ears are trimmed to 3 inches or less » length, the sample unit shall be eig*1 1 Compliance with the provisions of these 52.944 Ascertaining the grade of a lot. (8) such ears. standards shall not excuse failurè to comply Score Sheet (c) Assigning the scores. The scor with the provisions of the Federal Pood, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or with applicable 52.945 Score sheet for frozen oom-on-the- for the factors of color and defects a state laws and regulations. cob. determined immediately after thawing

FEDERÀL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 14335

the extent that the surfaces of the cobs T a b l e I are substantially free from ice crystals. REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIFORMITY OF COLOR AND OFF-VARIETY KERNELS The evaluation of the factor of tender­ ness and maturity and of flavor and Uniformity of color Off-variety kernels odor is made on the thawed product and Each ear in the All ears in the Each ear in the All ears in the also after cooking as prescribed in sample unit sample §§ 52.941,52.942, and 52.943. — sample unit sample (d) Definitions of flavor and odor. (1) , Maximum number “Good flavor and odor” means that the U.S. Grade A...... Practically uniform. Reasonably 3 kernels...... 6 kernels. product has a good, characteristic, nor­ uniform. U.S. Grade B_...... Reasonably Fairly uniform...... 15 kernels...... 30 kernels. mal flavor and odor and is free from ob­ uniform. jectionable flavors and objectionable odors of any kind. § 52.938 Uniformity o f size. (c) (23) Classification. Frozen corn- (2) “Reasonably good flavor and on-the-cob that is only reasonably uni­ odor” means that the product may be (a) General. The rating for uniformity of size is based on the variations in form in size may be given a score of 8 lacking in good flavor and odor but is points. “Reasonably uniform in size” free from objectionable flavors and ob­ length and diameter of the ears. The diameter is the largest diameter meas­ means that the variations in the diam­ jectionable odors of any kind. eter and/or length of the ears do not ex­ (e) Factors rated by score points. The ured at right angles to the longitudinal axis. ceed the variations allowed for U.S. relative importance of each factor which Grade B, for the applicable style, in Table is scored is expressed numerically on the (b) (A) Classification. Frozen com- on-the-cob that is practically uniform in II of this subpart. scale of 100. The maximum number of (d) (SStd) Classification. Frozen points that may be given such factors size may be given a score of 9 or 10 points. are: “Practically uniform in size” means that com-on-the-cob that exceeds the varia­ the variations in the diameter and/or tions allowed for U.S. Grade B, for the Factors: P oin ts applicable style, in Table II of this sub­ Color------20 length of the ears do not exceed the vari­ ations allowed for U.S. Grade A, for the part may be given a score of 0 to 7 points Uniformity of size______10 and shall not be graded above Substand­ Development______10 applicable style, in Table II of this ard, regardless of the total score (limit­ Defects ______30 subpart. Tenderness and Maturity______30 ing rule). Total score______loo T a b l e II § 52.936 Ascertaining the rating for the VARIATION LIMITS FOR DIAMETER AND LENGTH factors which are scored. The essential variations within each Trimmed style factor which is scored are so described Ears, trimmed to exceed Ears, trimmed to 3 inches (Untrimmed) that the value may be ascertained for ______3 inches______or less each factor and expressed numerically. ______Diameter Length Diameter Length Diameter Length The numerical range within each factor which is scored is inclusive. (For exam­ Maximum variation in the sample unit ple, “27 to 30 points” rheans 27, 28, 29, or 30 points.) U.S. Grade A ...... — ...... */g inch...... inch...... ys inch...... X inch...... % in c h ...... 1 inch; U.S. Grade B ...... * inch------1 inch...... U inch...... yt inch...... Jiin ch ____ 2inches. § 52.937 Color. (a) General. The factor of color is § 52.939 Development. evaluated when the product has been (a) (A) Classification. Frozen com- Classification thawed to the extent that the outer sur­ Type of development defect on-the-cob that is well developed may be Minor Major faces are free from ice crystals. given a score of 9 or 10 points. “Well (b) Definition of “off variety” ker­ developed” means that the ears are well Twisted ear: nels. Com kernels which are not damaged An ear twisted more than the filled with kernels and the appearance is width of 4 rows of kernels or but which vary markedly from the pre­ not materially affected by missing and more than one-fourth of the dominant color of the ear are considered shrunken kernels. In addition, any circumference from one end to "off variety” kernels. the other_____ “development defects” present (as de­ Nonparallel kernels: (c) (A) Classification. Frozen com- fined and classified in this section) do Nonparallel rows totaling more on-the-cob that has a good color may be than 2 inches lengthwise of the not exceed the allowances in Table III of ear______; . 8iven a score of 18 to 20 points. “Good this subpart. Separation of rows exceeding one- color” means a color that is bright and half the length of the ear: typical of tender sweet corn. Such color (b) (23) Classification. Frozen corn- One such space showing cob more on-the-cob that is reasonably well devel­ than one-fourth the width of an also complies with the requirements for average-size kernel...... X U.S. Grade A in Table I in this subpart. oped may be given a score of 8 points. Two or more such spaces showing (d) (23) Clasification. Frozen corn- “Reasonably well developed” means that cob more than one-fourth but the ears are reasonably well filled with not more than one-half the on-the-cob that has a reasonably good width of an average-size kernel...... X color may be given a score of 16 or 17 kernels and the appearance is not seri­ A space or spaces showing cob more than one-half the width of Points. Frozen com-on-the-cob that falls ously affected by missing and shrunken an average-size kernel...... X wto this classification shall not be graded kernels. In addition, any “development 3w)ve U.S. Grade B, regardless of the defects” present (as defined and classi­ T a b l e I I I total score (limiting rule). “Reasonably DEVELOPMENT DEFECTS FOR good color” means a color that may be fied in this section) do not exceed the EACH GRADE lightly dull but is typical of reasonably allowances in Table HI of this subpart. Total minor Limit for nder sweet corn. Such color also com­ (c) (SStd) Classification. Frozen com- and major major piles with the requirements for U.S. on-the-cob that fails to meet the re­ development development defects defects «fade B in Table I in this subpart. quirements of paragraph (b) of this sec­ (e) (SStd) Classification. Frozen tion may be given a score of 0 to 7 points Maximum in the sample unit orn-on-the-cob that fails to meet the U.S. Grade A____ 2 l eqiurements of paragraph (d) of this and shall not be graded above Sub­ U.S. Grade B____ 4 2 section may be given a score of 0 to 15 standard, regardless of the total score

No. 175- 4 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14336 PROPOSED RULE MAKING broken kernels, blemished kernels, poorly (2) “Milk stage”: The kernel contents (b) For the purposes of this subpart, trimmed ears, husk, and silk. Defects are are opaque and viscous. Light pressure frozen com-on-the-cob is cooked as identified and classified as to seriousness is required to remove contents. follows: in accordance with paragraph (e) of this (3) “Early cream stage”: The kernel (1) Place the air-thawed sample units section. The number of damaged ker­ contents are slightly creamy and viscous. into rapidly boiling water with sufficient nels, husk, and strands of silk applies Reasonably firm pressure is required to amount of water to cover the cobs com­ to the entire sample unit; remove contehts which show only slight pletely; (b) (A) Classification. Frozen corn- separation of clear liquid. (2) Return the water to a rapid boil; on-the-cob that is practically free from (4) “Cream stage”: The kernel con­ (3) Maintain a rolling boil for ex­ defects may be given a total score of 27 tents are creamy and thick. Firm pres­ actly five (5) minutes; to 30 points. “Practically free from de­ sure is required to remove contents which (4) Remove cooked ears immediately, fects” means that not more than a total show no free liquid. and allow to cool sufficiently to evaluate of four (4) minor and major defects may (5) “Dough or overmature stage”: factors of maturity, tenderness of peri­ be present, of which not more than one The kernel contents are semisolid or carp, and flavor and odor. (1) may be a major defect. hard and require considerable pressure to Lot Compliance (c) (B) Classification. Frozen com- remove contents which appears starchy § 52.944 Ascertaining thé grade of a lot. on-the-cob that is reasonably free from or doughlike. defects may be given a score of 24 to 26 (c) (A) Classification. Frozen corn- The grade of a lot of frozen com-on- points. “Reasonably free from defects” on-the-cob that is tender, but none of the the-cob covered by the standards in this means that not more than a total of six ears in the blister stage, may be given subpart is determined by the procedures (6) minor and major defects may be a score of 27 to 30 points. “Tender” set forth in the Regulations Governing present, of which not more than two (2) means that the kernels are in the milk Inspection and Certification of Processed may be major defects. Frozen com-on- or early cream stage of maturity and the Fruits and Vegetables, Processed Prod­ the-cob that falls into this classification pericarp is reasonably tender. ucts thereof, and Certain Other Proc­ shall not be graded above U.S. Grade B, essed Food Products (§§ 52.1-52.87), regardless of the total score for the (d) (B) Classification. If the frozen except that these provisions apply wher­ product (limiting rule) . corn-on-the-cob is fairly tender, and ever applicable: none of the ears are in the blister stage, (a) Container size. In considering the (d) (SStd) Classification. Frozen a score of 24 to 26 points may be given. com-on-the-cob that fails to meet the size of a container for purposes of select­ Frozen corn-on-the-cob that falls into ing samples from a lot, an ear shall be requirements of paragraph (c) of this this classification shall not be graded section may be given a score of 0 to 23 above U.S. Grade B, regardless of the considered to weigh 8 ounces except that points and shall not be graded above ears which are trimmed to approximately total score for the product (limiting 3 inches or less in length shall be con­ Substandard, regardless of the total rule). “Reasonably tender” means that score for the product (limiting rule). sidered to weigh 4 ounces each. the kernels are in the cream stage of (b) Dozen. In calculating the number (e) Definitions and classification of maturity and the pericarp is fairly defects. of dozens of ears, ears which are trim­ tender. med to approximately 3 inches or less in (e) (SStd) Classification. Frozen Classification length shall be considered as 24 of such Type of defect and definition ------com-on-the-cob that fails to meet the ears being the equivalent of 1 dozen ears. Minor Major requirements of paragraph (d) of this section may be given a score of 0 to 23 S core S heet Crushed or Broken Kernels (other points and shall not be graded above § 52.945 Score sheet for frozen com-on- than those at end of ears caused by trimming). Substandard, regardless of the total the-cob. More than 10 kernels but not score for the product (limiting rule). more than 25 kernels ...... X Size and kind of container...... More than 25kernels ...... X Explanations and M ethods of Analysis Container marks or identification. Blemished Kernels: Label...... 1...... (discoloration, pathological in­ § 52.942 Preparation and evaluation. Net weight (ounces)...... jury, similar damage or imper­ Style (trimmed or natural)...... fections) (a) The sample unit is air-thawed to Length of ears (inches)...... More than 3 kernels but not more than 6 kernels. _...... X the extent that the ears are substantially More than 6 kernels______. . . ------X free from ice crystals. Factors Score points Poorly trimmed ears: More than 30°, but not more than (b) At least three complete adjacent 45°, from a right-angle cut ...... X rows of kernels from each ear (or an [(A) 18-20 More than 45° from a right-angle equivalent number of kernels if kernels Color...... (B) «16-17 c u t..------X [(SStd) ‘ 0-15 Attached or Loose Husk: are not in rows) are removed by cutting (A) 0-10 More than 2 square inches but the kernels off, near but above their at­ Uniformity of size______(B) 8 not more than 3 square inches. . X .(SStd) ‘ 0-7 More than 3 square inches...... X tachment to the cob. (A) 9-10 Silk: Development______..... (B) 8 More than 10 strands but not (c) A representative number of ker­ l(SStd) *0-7 more than 30 strands of any nels thus removed are squeezed to evalu­ f(A) 27-30 color, each more than 1 inch ate the degree of maturity in accordance Defects..:...... 30 ((B) ‘ 24-26 long...... X I (SStd) ‘ 0-23 More than 30 strands of any color, with definitions in § 52.491. f(A) 27-30 each more than 1 inch long______X Tenderness and Maturity.. 30 1(B) ‘ 24-26 (d) A representative number of ears l(SStd) ‘0-23 in the sample unit are evaluated, after Total score...... 10Q § 52.941 Tenderness and maturity. cooking as prescribed in § 52.943, to as­ (a) General. The tenderness and certain: Flavor and odor...... (A) Good; (B) Reasonably good; maturity of the frozen com-on-the-cob (1) The degree of maturity of kernel (SStd) Objectionable. is determined in accordance with the contents, Grade______methods outlined in §§ 52.942 and 52.943. (2) Tenderness of the pericarp, and (b) Definitions of stages of kernel de­ (3) The flavor and odor. i Indicates limiting rule. velopment. (1) “Blister stage”: The ker­ § 52.943 Cooking procedure. Dated: September 8,1969. nel contents are thin and watery or slightly cloudy or translucent and the (a) This cooking procedure is not in­ G. R. Grange, pericarp is generally very pale in color. tended as a recipe for proper cooking Deputy Administrator, An ear is considered to be in the blister but is used in the evaluation of the fac­ Marketing Services. stage if more than one-fifth of the ker­ tor of tenderness and maturity and [F.R. Doc. 69-10882; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; nels are in the blister stage. flavor and odor. 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14337 Notices

S ec. 3. Responsibility for coordina­ trail as defined by the Department of DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY tion and management of rivers and Agriculture. Upon approval of an Agri­ trails, (a) The Assistant Secretary for culture Department plan by the Con­ Office of Foreign Assets Control Public Land Management will coordinate gress, where Interior Department lands CHINESE-TYPE CARPETS AND RUGS Interior’s programs in support of the are involved, the responsible bureau will National Rivers and Trails Systems, and develop and manage its lands in accord­ Importation Directly From Singapore; provide liaison on these matters with ance with the approved plan. Available Certifications the Department of Agriculture and other S ec. 4. Responsibility for study of concerned Federal agencies. rivers and trails at potential additions to Notice is hereby given that certificates (b) The Assistant Secretary for Pub­ systems, (a) The Bureau of Outdoor of origin issued by the Trade Division, lic Land Management will establish a Recreation will have the lead role in car­ Ministry of Finance of the Government National Rivers and Trails Committee rying out the Secretary’s responsibilities of Singapore under procedures agreed (Interior Department) to advise him on for studying all rivers and trails specifi­ upon between that Government and the overall program direction. Each bureau cally designed as potential additions to Office of Foreign Assets Control in con­ which administers land over which na­ the National Rivers and Trails Systems, nection with the Foreign Assets Control tional rivers or trails might pass and the and other unnamed rivers and trails that Regulations are now available with re­ Bureau of Outdoor Recreation shall be may be considered as potential additions spect to the importation into the United represented on the National Rivers and to such systems. The Bureau of Outdoor States directly, or on a through bill of Trails Committee. The Bureau of Out­ Recreation will prepare for submission lading, from Singapore of the following door Recreation will furnish staff as­ to the Secretary reports of all such stud­ additional commodity : sistance to the meetings and to the work ies in accordance with the provisions Carpets and rugs, Chinese-type. of this Committee. of Public Laws 90-542 and 90-543. In­ (c) Interior components of the Na­ terested land administering bureaus will [seal] Margaret W. S chwartz, Director, tional Rivers and Trails Systems, includ­ be consulted and assist BOR in preparing Office of Foreign Assets Control. ing those components which in the fu­ these studies and their views will be ex­ ture are brought into the Systems, will pressed in the report to the Secretary. [P.R. Doc. 69-10901; Filed, Sept. If, 1969; be planned, developed, and managed by (b) The Bureau of Outdoor Recrea­ 8:48 a.m.] land administering bureaus. The initial tion will make studies and investigations assignments of management responsi­ to determine which additional river areas bility by the Secretary of the Interior are within the United States should be DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR as follows: evaluated as wild, scenic, or recreation National Rivers and Bureau rivers in planning reports by all Federal Office of the Secretary Rio Grande, New Mexico, Bureau of Land agencies as potential alternative uses of [Order 2924] Management. the water and related land resources in­ Rogue, Oregon, Bureau of Land Management. volved. (Sec. 5(d) of Public Law 90-542.) national w il d a n d s c e n ic r iv e r s St. Croix, Minnesota and Wisconsin, National S ec. 5. Addition of State-administered SYSTEM AND NATIONAL TRAILS Park Service. rivers and trails to systems. The Assistant SYSTEM Wolf, Wisconsin, National Park Service. Secretary for Public Land Management National Trails and Bureau will exercise the Secretary’s authority to Responsibility for Planning and Op­ Appalachian Trail, National Park Service. approve, establish, or designate State eration of Programs and Projects and locally administered rivers and trails Future assignment of management re­ as part of the National Rivers and Trails Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of sponsibility of Interior Department Systems, with the staff assistance of the this Secretarial Order is to assign components will be made by the Secre­ Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. When­ responsibility for carrying out the plan­ tary. Primary consideration for such ever such rivers and trails involve lands t s for and the operation of programs assignments will be given to the land under the jurisdiction of any Interior and projects of the National Wild and administering bureau having jurisdiction bureau or other Federal agency, the Scenic Rivers and National Trails Sys­ over the majority of the land over which Bureau of Outdoor Recreation will con­ tems, hereinafter referred to as the rivers and trails in the national system sult with such bureaus or agencies and “National Rivers and Trails Systems”. pass. incorporate their views in recommenda­ The order also sets out the means by (d) The bureaus assigned manage­ tions to the Assistant Secretary. which intradepartmental matters are ment responsibility for components of coordinated and how cooperative plan­ the National Rivers and Trails System R ussell E. T rain, t s and administration will be carried are delegated through this order, all of Acting Secretary of the Interior, °ut with other Federal, State, and local the Secretary’s authority necessary for S eptember 4, 1969. agencies and private interests. carrying out the purpose of Public Laws Sec. 2. [F.R. Doc. 69-10887; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Policy. The National Wild and 90-542 and 90-543 relating to the selec­ 8:47 a.m.] Scenic Rivers System and the National tion and location of boundaries, property Trails System have been established by acquisition, development and adminis­ law during the 90th Congress; Public tration under guidelines and policies de­ 90-542 and 90-543, respectively. veloped by the National Rivers and DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE These laws place the responsibility for and Trails Committee (Interior Depart­ administration upon the Secretaries of ment) as approved by the Assistant Office of the Secretary interior and Agriculture and provide Secretary for Public Land Management. mat such river and trail systems which (e) The bureaus have the responsibil­ IOWA are establishedwill be effectively planned, ity for development and management Designation of Areas for Emergency developed, and operated as national sys- of Interior lands under their jurisdiction îeiïls- it is departmental policy that In- which may be included in components of Loans enor will cooperate in every way and the National Rivers and Trails Systems For the purpose of making emergency nf +Iery leve^ assis^ hi the fulfillment where administration is assigned to the loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con­ 1 these programs and in doing so will Department of Agriculture. The respon­ solidated Farmers Home Administration with other Federal, State, and local sible bureau will coordinate with over­ Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it has been agencies and private interests. all planning objectives for the river or determined that in the hereinafter-

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14338 NOTICES named counties in the State of Iowa, nat­ Standards (NBS) in a memorandum correction coil must be capable of reduc­ ural disasters have caused a need for dated May 20, 1969,. that the only known ing the stray field upon the salt due to agricultural credit not readily available comparable domestic instrument manu­ high field coil to less than 100 gauss. from commercial banks, cooperative factured by the Westinghouse Corpora­ We are advised by the National Bureau lending agencies, or other responsible tion has a minimum focal spot size of Standards (NBS) in a memorandum sources. (1 mm. x 10 mm.) which is larger by a dated May 2, 1969, that the capability I owa factor of 100 than that of the foreign for homogeneity at the field strength is article. We, therefore, find that the ro­ a pertinent characteristic. NBS further Black Hawk. R inggold. advises that it’ knows of no instrument Bremer, Shelby. tating anode X-ray generator manufac­ Butler. Warren. tured by the Westinghouse Corp. is not or apparatus manufactured in the United Lucas. Wayne. of equivalent scientific value to the for­ States of equivalent scientific value to the Marion. eign article for such purposes as the foreign article for the purposes for which Pursuant to the authority set forth foreign article is intended to be used. the foreign article is intended to be used. above, emergency loans will not be made The Department of Commerce knows Charley M. Denton, in the above-named counties after of no other instrument or apparatus of Assistant Administrator for In­ June 30, 1970, except to applicants who equivalent scientific value to the foreign dustry Operations, Business previously received emergency or special article, for the purposes for which such and Defense Services Admin­ livestock loan assistance and who can article is intended to be used, which is istration. qualify under established policies and being manufactured in the United States. [FJt. Doc. 69—10850; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; procedures. Charley M. Denton, 8:45 a.m.] Assistant Administrator for In­ Done at Washington, D.C., this 9th day UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI of September 1969. dustry Operations, Business and Defense Services Admin­ Notice of Decision on Application for J. P hil Campbell, istration. Under Secretary. Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article [F.R. Doc. 69-10849; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; [F.R. Doc. 69-10915; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:45 a.m.} The following is a decision on an appli­ 8:48 a.m.] cation or duty-free entry of a scientific article pursuant to section 6(c) of the HARVARD UNIVERSITY Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Ma­ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notice of Decision on Application for terials Importation Act of 1966 (Public Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the regu­ Business and Defense Services lations issued thereunder (32 F.R. 2433 The following is a decision on an appli­ etseq.). Administration cation for duty-free entry of a scientific A copy of the record pertaining to this HARVARD UNIVERSITY article pursuant to section 6(c) of the decision is available for public review Educational, Scientific, and Cultural during ordinary business hours of the De­ Notice of Decision on Application for Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ partment of Commerce, at the Scientific Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the Instrument Evaluation Division, Depart­ regulations issued thereunder (32 F.R. ment of Commerce, Washington, D.C. The following is a decision on an ap­ 2433 et seq.). Docket No. 69-00387-33-43780. Appli­ plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ cant: University of Miami, Coral Gables, tific article pursuant to section 6(c) of A copy of the record pertaining to this decision is available for public review Fla. 33124. Article: Lidwell’s phage typ­ the Educational, Scientific and Cultural ing machine. Manufacturer: Biddulph & Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ during ordinary business hours of the Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ Co., United Kingdom. Intended use of lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the article: The article will be used to sup­ regulations issued thereunder (32 P.R. tific Installment Evaluation Division, Department of Commerce, Washington, port medical research concerning typing 2433 et seq.). of bacteria. Comments: No comments A copy of the record pertaining to this D.C. have been received with respect to this decision is available for public review Docket No. 69-00406-75-43000. Appli­ application. Decision: Application ap­ during ordinary business hours of the cant: Harvard University, 75 Mount proved. No instrument or apparatus of Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ Auburn Street, Cambridge, Mass. 02138. equivalent scientific value to the foreign tific Instrument Evaluation Division, Article: Super conducting magnet sys­ article, for such purposes as this article Department of Commerce, Washington, tem. Manufacturer: Oxford Instrument is intended to be used, is being manufac­ Co., Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended use D.C. tured in the United States. Reasons: The Docket No. 69-00407-01-90000. Appli­ of article: The article will be used to foreign article is to be used for tiring cant: Harvard University, 75 Mount investigate spin interactions and relaxa­ of bacteria as part of a medical research Auburn Street, Cambridge, Mass. 02138. tion in high magnetic fields and ultra- program. Domestic custom-made bacte­ Article: Rotating anode X-ray diffrac­ low temperatures, which include the in­ rial replicating apparatus and other bac­ tion equipment, Model GX 3. Manufac­ vestigation of solid hydrogen (H2) and teria typing machines are available. We turer: Elliott Electronic Tubes, Ltd., solid hydrogen-deuterium (HD). Com­ are informed by the Department of United Kingdom. Intended use of arti­ ments: No comments have been received Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) cle: The article will be used in the deter­ with respect to this application. Decision: in its memorandum dated April 9, 196», mination of the structure of macromole­ Application approved. No instrument or that in addition to requiring extensive cules such as enzymes carboxypeptidase apparatus of equivalent scientific value laboratory support such domestic cus- A and aspartate transcarbamylase. In to the foreign article, for the purposes for tom-made apparatus are not comparable addition, certain large boron compounds which such article is intended to be used, to the foreign article. HEW advises fur* will be investigated. Comments: No com­ is being manufactured hi the United ther that it knows of no commercially ments have been received with respect States. Reasons: The foreign article is a standard apparatus being manufactured to this application. Decision: Application magnet coil system consisting of a nu­ in the United States which is of eQthva- approved. No instrument or apparatus clear resonance coil, a demagnetisation lent scientific value to the foreign ortic of equivalent scientific value to the for­ coil and a salt field correction coil capa­ for such purposes as this article is in­ eign article, for such purposes as this ble of providing a field of not less than tended to be used. 77 kilogauss in a 2-inch bore, a homo­ article is intended to be used, is being Charley M. Denton, manufactured in the United States. geneity of at least 1 part in 100,000 over Assistant Administrator for In­ Reasons: The foreign article is a rotat­ 1 centimeter diameter spherical or equiv­ dustry Operations, Business ing anode X-ray diffraction instrument alent cylindrical volume at 70 kilogauss, and Defense Services Ad­ a field decay less than 1 part per million which has the capability of fine focus to ministration. a 2.0 millimeter (mm.) x 0.2 mm. or per day after stabilization and capable of withstanding quenching at 77 kilo­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10851; Filed, Sept. H. 1969, 1.0 mm. x 0.1 mm. focal spot size. We 8:45 a.m.] are advised by the National Bureau of gauss without damage. The salt field

> FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14339 the conditions of use prescribed, recom­ enteral Hemostat for human use (NDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ mended, or suggested in its labeling. 1 and NDA 4-336) in the hearing on Chatham Pharmaceuticals, Inc., has Koagamin Veterinary Parenteral Hemo­ CATION, AND WELFARE elected to avail themselves of the oppor­ stat. (NDA 4-336V) *' tunity for a hearing on this proposed If such persons elect not to avail them­ Food and Drug Administration action. In accordance with the New selves of the opportunity for a hearing CANNED SWEET POTATOES DEVIAT­ Animal Drug Amendments of 1968 (Pub­ as described under 1 above, the Com­ lic Law 90-399), which became effective missioner without further notice will ING FROM IDENTITY STANDARD on August 1, 1969, this proposed action enter a final order withdrawing approval Notice of Temporary Permit for will proceed pursuant to section 512(e) of the new-drug applications. Failure of Market Testing (1) (c) of the Federal Pood, Drug, and such persons to file such written ap­ Cosmetic Act, observing the hearing pro­ pearance of election within such 30 days Pursuant to § 10.5 (21 CPU 10.5) con­ cedures established in Part 130 (21 CFR will be construed as an election by such cerning temporary permits to facilitate Part 130). persons not to avail themselves of the market testing of foods deviating from In a notice published March 29, 1969 opportunity for a hearing. the requirements of standards of iden­ (34 F it. 5960), the Commissioner an­ This notice is issued pursuant to the tity promulgated pursuant to section 401 nounced his intention to initiate pro­ provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, (21 U.S.C. 341) of the Federal Food, ceedings to withdraw approval of the and Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 505, 512, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, notice is given new-drug applications for the drug 52 Stat. 1050-53, as amended, 82 Stat. that a temporary permit has been issued Koagamin Parenteral Hemostat, for 343-51; 21 U.S.C. 352, 355, 360b) and to Green Giant Co., Le Sueur, Minn. human use (one drug containing oxalic under authority delegated to the Com­ 56058. This permit covers interstate mar­ add and related dicarboxylic adds and missioner (21 CFR 2.120). keting tests of canned “cut” sweet pota­ the other 5 milligrams of oxalic acid and toes that deviate from the standard of 2.5 milligrams of malonic acid per cubic Dated: September 3, 1969. identity (21 CFR 51.990) in that they centimeter—NDA No. 1 and 4-336) on H erbert L. Ley, Jr., contain added calcium salts (either cal­ the basis that the Food and Drug Ad­ Commissioner of Food and Drugs. ministration has evaluated reports re­ cium chloride, calcium citrate, calcium [F.R. Doc. 69-10874; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; sulfate, monocalcium phosphate, or any ceived from the National Academy of 8:46 a.m .] mixture of two or more such calcium Sciences—National Research Council, salts) and pectin as firming agents. The Drug Efficacy Study Group, and con­ quantity of calcium added thereby does cluded that there is a lack of sub­ [DESI 10021 not exceed 0.15 percent by weight of the stantial evidence that Koagamin Paren­ finished food and the quantity of pectin teral Hemostat is effective for any of the CETYLPYRIDINIUM CHLORIDE WITH not more than 0.1 percent by weight of daims in its labeling. BENZYL ALCOHOL THROAT LOZ­ the finished food. The principal display The holder of the new-drug applica­ ENGES AND CERTAIN OTHER panel of the label on each container shall tions for these drugs and any interested DRUGS prominently bear the statement “Cal­ person were invited to submit any per­ cium salts and pectin added to improve tinent data in support of the drugs’ Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy firmness.” effectiveness. The information received, Study Implementation This permit expires September 5, 1970. considered with the evidence available when the applications were approved, The Food and Drug Administration Dated: September 5,1969. shows that there is a lack of substantial has evaluated reports received from the J. K. K irk, evidence that the drugs have the effect National Academy of Sciences-National Associate Commissioner they purport or are represented to have Research Council, Drug Efficacy Study for Compliance. under the conditions of use prescribed, Group, on the following drugs: 1. Cepacol Throat Lozenges contain­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10873; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; recommended, or suggested in their 8:46 a.m.] labeling. ing cetylpyridinium chloride 1:1500 and Therefore, Chatham Pharmaceuticals, 0.3 percent benzyl alcohol; marketed by Inc., Newark, N.J., and any interested the Wm. S. Merrell Co., Division of [Docket No. FDC-D-127; NDA Nos. 1, 4-336, person who may be adversely affected are Richardson-Merrell, Inc., HO Amity 4—336V] hereby notified that the Notice of Oppor­ Road, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215 (NDA CHATHAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. tunity for Hearing published in the F ed­ 5-422). eral R egister of May 10, 1969, is 2. Aclor Capsules containing 5 grains Notice of Opportunity for Hearing amended to include a proposal to issue glutamic acid hydrochloride per capsule; Regarding Combination Drugs Con­ and order under the provisions of sec­ marketed by Cole Pharmacal Co., Inc., taining Oxalic Acid and Malonic tion 505(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, 3721 Laclede Avenue, St. Louis, Mo. Acid or Their Ethyl Esters and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(e)) 63108 (NDA 4-484). withdrawing approval of all new-drug 3. Flanithin Capsules containing 325 A notice of opportunity for hearing applications for Koagamin Parenteral milligrams glutamic acid hydrochloride was published in the F édéral R egister Hemostat for human use (NDA 1 and per capsule; marketed by Table Rock of May 10,1969 (34 F.R. 7584), on a pro­ NDA 4-336). Laboratories, Inc., 812 Hampton Avenue, posal to issue an order withdrawing Within 30 days after the date of pub­ Greenville, S.C. 29601 (NDA 1-002). approval of new-drug application No. lication hereof in the F ederal R egister, 4. Ritonic Capsules containing 5 mil­ 4-336V and all amendments and sup­ such persons are required to file with ligrams hydrochloride, plements thereto held by Chatham Phar­ the Hearing Clerk, Department of 1.25 milligrams methyl testosterone, 5 maceuticals, Inc., 901 Broad Street, Health, Education, and Welfare, Office micrograms ethinyl estradiol, 5 milli­ Newark, N.J. 07102, for the drug Koaga- of the General Council, Food, Drug, and grams thiamine mononitrate, 1 milli­ min Veterinary Parenteral Hemostat, Environmental Health Division, Room gram riboflavin, 2 milligrams pyridoxine pursuant to section 505(e) of the Federal 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., hydrochloride, 2 micrograms cobalamin Pood, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 UJS.C. Washington, D.C. 20201, a written ap­ concentrate, 25 milligrams niacinamide, 355(e)), on the grounds that informa- pearance electing whether: and 250 milligrams dibasic calcium phos­ hon before the Commissioner of Food 1. To avail themselves of the op­ phate per capsule; marketed by Ciba and Drugs with respect to such drug, portunity of including Koagamin Par­ Pharmaceutical Co., 556 Morris Avenue, evaluated with the evidence available to enteral Hemostat for human use (NDA Summit, N.J. 07901 (NDA 11-591). him when the application was approved, 1 and NDA 4-336) in the hearing sched­ uled on Koagamin Veterinary Parenteral 5. Am Plus Improved Capsules con­ shows that there is a lack of substantial Hemostat (NDA 4-336V); or taining per capsule 5 milligrams dextro­ evidence that the drug has the effect it 2. Not to avail themselves of the op­ sulfate, 5 milligrams hy­ Purports or is represented to have under portunity for including Koagamin Par­ droxyzine hydrochloride, and Vitamin A

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14340 NOTICES palmitate, ergocalciferol, thiamine mon­ This announcement of the proposed other available evidence, and concludes onitrate, riboflavin, pyridoxine hydro­ action and implementation of the NAS- that disulflram is an effective adjunct in chloride, niacinamide, sodium ascorbate, NRC report for the above drugs is made the management of selected chronic al­ ascorbic acid, calcium pantothenate, to give notice to persons who might be coholic patients. cobalamin concentrate, dibasic calcium adversely affected by withdrawal of these B. Form of drug. Disulflram prepara­ phosphate, cobaltous sulfate, cupric sul­ drugs from the market. Promulgation of tions are in tablet form suitable for oral fate, potassium iodide, ferrous fumarate, an order withdrawing approval of the administration and contain per dosage manganous sulfate, sodium molybdate, new drug applications will cause any unit an amount appropriate for admin­ magnesium sulfate, potassium sulfate such drug on the market offered for istration in the dosage range described and zinc sulfate; marketed by J. B. these uses, to be a new drug for which an in the labeling conditions in this Roerig & Co., Division, Chas. Pfizer & approved new drug application is not in announcement. Co., Inc., 235 East 42d Street, New York, effect, and will make it subject to regu­ C. Labeling conditions. 1. The label N.Y. 10017 (NDA 11-852). latory action. bears the statement “Caution: Federal 6. Liquid Germicidal Detergent con­ A copy of the NAS-NRC report has law prohibits dispensing without taining 21/2 percent benzéthonium chlo­ been furnished to each firm referred to prescription.” ride; marketed by Parke, Davis and Co., above. Any other interested person may 2. The drug is labeled to comply with Joseph Campau at the River, Detroit, obtain a copy by request to the appro­ all requirements of the Act and regula­ Mich. 48232 (NDA 5-616). priate office named below. tions and those parts of its labeling indi­ 7. Phemerol Tincture containing ben­ Communications forwarded in re­ cated below are substantially as follows: zéthonium chloride 1:500, and alcohol 65 sponse to this announcement should be (Optional additional information, appli­ percent; marketed by Parke, Davis and identified with the reference number, cable to the drug, may be proposed under Co. (NDA 4-232). DESI 1002, and should be directed to the other appropriate paragraph headings 8. Phemerol Solution containing ben­ attention of the following appropriate and should follow the information set zéthonium chloride 1:750; marketed by office and addressed to the Food and forth below.) Parke, Davis and Co. (NDA 4-231). Drug Administration, 200 C Street SW., 9. Phemerol Topical containing 3 per­ Washington, D.C. 20204: WARNING cent benzéthonium chloride; marketed Requests for NAS-NRC report: Press Rela­ Disulflram should n ever be adminis­ by Parke, Davis and Co. (NDA 5-113). tions Office (CE-300). tered to a patient when he is in a state 10. Bilcain Tablets containing 3 grains All other communications regarding this an­ of alcohol intoxication or without his ox bile extract, Va grain aloin, and V2 nouncement: Special Assistant for Drug full knowledge. grain cascara sagrada extract per tablet; Efficacy Study Implementation (MD-16), The physician should instruct rela­ marketed by Cole Pharmacal Co.-(NDA Bureau of Medicine. tives accordingly. 3-420). This notice is issued pursuant to the 11. Ethylene Disulphonate (Allergosil provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, Description Brand) Ampoules containing ethylene and Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 505, 52 Stat. (Descriptive information to be included disulfonate in a dilution of 10-16 sterile 105(1-53, as amended, 21 U.S.C. 352, 355) by the manufacturer or distributor should be water for injection; marketed by Spicer - and under the authority delegated to the confined to an appropriate description of the Gerhart Co., 23 North Sycamore, Pasa­ physical and chemical properties of the drug Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 and the formulation.) dena, Calif. 91107 (NDA 5-127). CFR 2.120). 12. Alertonic Elixir containing in each Action 45 cubic centimeters: 2 milligrams pi­ Dated: September 4, 1969. Disulflram alters the metabolism of ethyl pradrol hydrochloride, 10 milligrams thi­ H erbert L. Ley, Jr., alcohol so that acetaldehyde blood levels are hydrochloride, 5 milligrams ribo­ Commissioner of Food and Drugs. 5 to 10 times higher than would otherwise occur; the result is a highly unpleasant reac­ flavin, 1 milligram pyridoxine hydro­ [PR. Doc. 69-10875; Piled, Sept. 11, 1969; tion following the ingestion of alcohol. chloride, 50 milligrams niacinamide, 100 8:46 a.m.] milligrams choline chloride, 100 milli­ I ndication grams inositol, 100 milligrams calcium Disulflram is an aid in the management of glycerophosphate, 1 milligram manga­ [DESI 7883] selected chronic alcoholic patients; used nous sulfate, 1 milligram magnesium DISULFIRAM alone, without proper motivation and with­ acetate, 1 milligram zinc acetate, 1 mil­ out supportive therapy, it is not a cure for Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy alcoholism, and it is unlikely that it will ligram ammonium molybdate, and alco­ have more than a brief effect on the drink­ hol; marketed by The Wm. S. Merrell Co. Study Implementation ing pattern of the chronic alcoholic. (NDA 10-740). The Pood and Drug Administration The Food and Drug Administration Contraindications has evaluated a report received from the Patients who are receiving or have recently has concluded that there is a lack of National Academy of Sciences-National substantial evidence that these drugs are received paraldehyde or alcohol-containing effective for all the uses recommended Research Council, Drug Efficacy Study preparations, e.g. cough syrups, tonics. or suggested in their labeling and that Group, on the following drug: Hypersensitivity. each component of the combination Antabuse Tablets (disulflram 0.5 Warnings drugs contributes to the total effects gram); marketed by Ayerst Laboratories, Disulflram should be used with extreme claimed for such drugs. Division American Home Products Corp., caution in patients with any of the following The Commissioner of Food and Drugs 685 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017 conditions: diabetes mellitus, hypothyroid­ intends to initiate proceedings to with­ (NDA 7-883). ism, epilepsy, cerebral damage, chronic and The drug is regarded as a new drug (21 acute nephritis, hepatic cirrhosis or insuffi­ draw approval of the new drug applica­ ciency. The possibility of an accidental or tions for these drugs. Prior to initiating U.S.C. 321(p)). Supplemental new drug intentional alcohol-disulflram reaction, with such action, however, the Commissioner applications are required to revise the its accompanying hypotension, presents sig­ invites the holders of new drug applica­ labeling in and to update previously ap­ nificant risks. • tions for these drugs, and any interested proved applications providing for such Usage in pregnancy: The safe use of ^-nis person who may be adversely affected by drug. A new drug application is required drug in pregnancy has not been established. removal of these drugs from the market, from any person marketing such drug Therefore, disulflram should be used dur.ng to submit any pertinent data bearing on without approval. pregnancy only when, in the judgment o The Food and Drug Administration is the physician, the probable benefits outweign the proposal within 30 days following the the possible risks. . date of publication of this notice in the prepared to approve new drug applica­ The alcohol-disulfiram reaction: Disu - F ederal R egister. The only material tions and supplements to previously ap­ firam plus alcohol, even small amounts, pro­ which will be considered acceptable for proved new drug applications under con­ duces flushing, throbbing in head and nec , review must be well-organized, and con­ ditions described in this announcement. throbbing headache, respiratory difficu ry> sist of adequate and well-controlled A. Effectiveness classification. The nausea, copious vomiting, sweating, Inirs , studies bearing on the efficacy of the Food and Drug Administration has con­ chest pain, palpitation, dyspnea, hyperve products and not previously submitted. sidered the Academy report, as well as tilation, tachycardia, hypotension, syncope,

FED2RAL REGISTER, VO L. 34, NO. 1 7 5 — FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14341 marked uneasiness, weakness, vertigo, blurred unsupervised ingestion of alcohol, supportive under A above, should submit an abbre­ vision and confusion. The blood pressure may measures to restore blood pressure and treat viated new drug application meeting the fall to shock level. Duration of the reaction shock should be Instituted. Other recom­ usually lasts from 30 minutes to several mendations include: oxygen, carbogen (95 conditions specified in the proposed reg­ hours. Drowsiness and sleep follow. The in­ percent oxygen and 5 percent carbon ulation, § 130.4(f ) (1), (2), and (3), pub­ tensity of the reaction varies with individuals dioxide), vitamin C intravenously in massive lished in the F ederal R egister of but is generally proportional to the amounts doses (1 Gm.), and sulphate. February 27, 1969. Such applications of disulflram and alcohol ingested. Antihistamines have also been used intra­ should include proposed labeling which In severe reactions there may be respira­ venously. Potassium levels should be moni­ is in accord with the labeling conditions tory depression, cardiovascular collapse, ar­ tored particularly in patients on digitalis described herein and adequate data to rhythmias, myocardial infarction, acute since hypokalemia has been reported. congestive heart failure, unconsciousness, assure the biologic availability of the convulsions, and death. Dosage and Administration drug in the formulation which is mar­ The patient must be fully informed of the Disulflram should never be initiated nor keted or proposed for marketing. alcohol-disulfiram. reaction. He should also administered within 12 hours after the 2. Distribution of any such prepara­ be warned to avoid alcohol in sauces, vine­ patient has consumed any quantity of tion currently on the market without gars, cough mixtures, and even aftershave alcohol. an approved new drug application may lotions and back rubs. It is important that The usual dose is 500 mg. in a single dose be continued provided that: the patient be strongly cautioned against daily. Although usually taken in the morn­ surreptitious drinking while taking the drug ing, disulflram may be taken on retiring by a. Within 60 days from the date of and be fully aware of possible consequences. patients who experience a sedative effect. publication of this announcement in the He should also be warned that reactions may Maintenance dose may be reduced to 250 mg. F ederal R egister, the labeling of such occur with alcohol up to 14 days after ingest­ daily (range 125 to 500 mg.); it should not preparation shipped within the jurisdic­ ing disulflram. exceed 500 mg./day. Maintenance therapy tion of the Act is in accord with the may be required up to several years. Alcohol-Disulfiram T rial labeling conditions described herein. During early experience with disulflram it D. Previously approved applications. b. The manufacturer, packer, or dis­ was thought advisable for each patient to 1. Each holder of a “deemed approved" tributor of such drug submits, within have at least one supervised alcohol-drug re­ new drug application (i.e., an applica­ 180 days from the date of this publica­ action. These test reactions have now been tion which became effective on the basis tion, a new drug application to the Food largely abandoned. When deemed necessary, of safety prior to Oct. 10, 1962) for such and Drug Administration. however, the following procedure is drug Is requested to bring the applica­ suggested: c. The applicant submits additional After the first 2 to 3 weeks’ therapy with tion up to date by submitting supple­ information that may be required for 0.5 gm daily, a drink of 15 cc. of 100 proof ments containing: the approval of the application within whiskey or equivalent is taken slowly. This a. Revised labeling, as needed to con­ a reasonable time as specified in a writ­ test dose of alcoholic beverage may be re­ form to the labeling conditions described ten communication from the Food and peated once only so that the total dose does herein for the drug. Drug Administration. not exceed 30 cc. (1 oz.) of whiskey. Once a b. Adequate data to assure the biologic d. The application has not been ruled reaction develops no more alcohol should be availability of the drug in the formula­ consumed. Such tests should be carried out incomplete or unapprovable. only when the patient is hospitalized or com­ tion which is marketed; if such data are F. Unapproved use or form of drug. parable supervision and facilities including already included in the application, spe­ 1. If the article is labeled or advertised oxygen are available. The test should never cific reference thereto may be made. for use in any condition other than those be administered to a patient over 50 years of c. Updating information, as needed to provided for in this announcement, it age. make the application current in regard to may be regarded as an unapproved new Precautions items 6 (components), 7 (composition), drug subject to regulatory proceedings Dining Initial treatment certain patients and 8 (methods, facilities, and controls) until such recommended use is approved with a history of prolonged and heavy alcohol of the new drug application form FD- in a new drug application or is otherwise consumption may be able at first to take 356H to the extent described in the pro­ in accord with this announcement. large quantities of alcohol without discom­ posal for abbreviated new drug applica­ fort; in the majority of cases this tolerance 2. If the article is proposed for mar­ disappears with continued use of the drug. tions, § 130.4(f), published in the F ed­ keting in another form or for a use The longer the patient remains on therapy eral R egister February 27, 1969. (One other than the use provided for Jn this the more sensitive he becomes to alcohol. supplement may contain all the infor­ announcement, appropriate additional Alcoholism may accompany or be followed mation described in this paragraph.) information as described in § 130.4 or by dependence on narcotics or sedatives. Bar­ 2. Such supplements should be sub­ § 130.9 of the regulations (21 CFR 130.4, biturates have been administered concur­ mitted within the following time periods 130.9) may be required, including results rently with disulflram, but the possibility of after the date of publication of this no­ of animal and clinical tests intended initiating a new abuse should be considered. tice in the F ederal R egister : It is suggested that a patient receiving to show whether the drug is safe and disulflram carry an identification card stat­ a. 60 days for revised labeling. The effective. ing that he is receiving disulflram, describ­ supplement should be submitted under Representatives of the Administration ing the symptoms of the disulfiram-alcohol the provisions of § 130.9 (d) and (e) of are willing to meet with any interested reaction, and indicating the physician or the new drug regulations (21 CFR 130.9) person who desires to have a conference institution to be contacted in emergency. which permit certain changes to be put concerning proposed changes in the Disulflram should be used with caution in into effect at the earliest possible time. those patients receiving diphenylhydantoin labeling set forth herein. Requests for or its congeners. Toxic levels of these anti- b. 180 days for biologic availability such meetings should be made to the epileptic agents have been reported during data. Office of Marketed Drugs (MD-300) at concomitant disulflram therapy. c. 60 days for updating information. the address given below, within 30 days Baseline and followup transaminase tests 3. Marketing of the drug may continue after the publication of this notice in (10-14 days) are suggested to detect any until the supplemental applications sub­ the F ederal R egister. hepatic dysfunction that may result with mitted in accord with the preceding sub- disulflram therapy. A copy of the NAS-NRC report has paragraphs 1 and 2 are acted upon, pro­ been furnished to the firm referred to Adverse Reactions vided that within 60 days after the date above. Any other interested person may Acneform eruptions, allergic dermatitis, of this publication, the labeling of the obtain a copy by request to the appropri­ drowsiness, fatigability; impotence; head- preparation shipped within the jurisdic­ ate office named below. ache; metallic or garlic-like aftertaste. tion of the Act is in accord with the label­ Communications forwarded in response Psychotic episodes, usually at higher doses. ing conditions described in this to this announcement should be identi­ Polyneuropathy and peripheral neuritis. announcement. fied with the reference number, DESI Cholestatic hepatitis reported but causal E. New applications. 1. Any other per­ 7883, and be directed to the attention relationship not clearly established. son who distributes or intends to dis­ of the following appropriate office and tt^nagement of alcohol-disulfiram reac- tribute such drug which is intended for addressed to the Food and Drug Admin­ a n: In severe reactions whether caused by the conditions of use for which it has istration, 200 C Street SW., Washington, excessive test dose or by the patient’s been shown to be effective, as described D.C. 20204: ' ‘

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14342 NOTICES Bequests for NAS-NRC report: Press Rela­ bic acid, and 15 milligrams pyrilamine ethicillin equivalent to 62.5 mg. tions Office (CE-300). maleate per 5 milliliters; and phenethicillin, hydro­ Supplements (Identify with new drug ap­ 3b. Achrocidin Compound Tablets con­ chloride 2.5 mg., plication number) : Office of Marketed hydrochloride 10 mg., phenyltoloxamine Drugs (MD—300), Bureau of Medicine. taining 125 milligrams tetracycline hy­ Original abbreviated new drug applications: drochloride, 120 milligrams phenacetin, citrate 3.75 mg., chlorpheniramine ma­ Office of Marketed Drugs (MD-300), Bu­ 30 milligrams , 150 milligrams leate 1.25 mg., and acetaminophen 120 reau of Medicine. salicylamide, and 25 milligrams chloro- mg.; both drugs marketed by Bristol All other communications regarding this then citrate per tablet; both marketed by Laboratories, Division Bristol-Myers Co., announcement : Special Assistant for Lederle Laboratories, Division of Amer­ Thompson Road, Post Office Box 657, Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (MD- ican Cyanamid Co., Post Office Box 500, Syracuse, N.Y. 13201. 16), Bureau of Medicine. Pearl River, N.Y. The Food and Drug Administration re­ This notice is issued pursuant to the 4a. Tao-AC Capsules containing tri­ gards the above -listed drugs as ineffec­ provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and acetyloleandomycin equivalent to 125 tive or ineffective as a fixed combination Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 505, 52 Stat. milligrams oleandomycin, 120 milligrams for their claimed indications: For the 1050-53, as amended; 21 U.S.C. 352, 355) phenacetin, 30 milligrams caffeine and prophylaxis or control of infections and under the authority delegated to the 150 milligrams salicylamide per capsule; caused susceptible organisms, when com­ Commissioner of Food and Drugs (21 and bined with ingredients offered for symp­ CFR 2.120). 4b. Tao-AC Capsules containing tri­ tomatic relief for their analgesic, antipy­ acetyloleandomycin equivalent to 125 retic, mild cerebral and respiratory Dated: September 4, 1969. milligrams oleandomycin, 120 milligrams , or activity. H erbert L. Ley, Jr., phenacetin, 30 milligrams caffeine, 150 Accordingly, the Commissioner of Commissioner of Food and Drugs. milligrams salicylamide and 15 milli­ Food and Drugs intends to initiate pro­ ceedings to amend the antibiotic regula­ [P.R. Doc. 69-10876; Piled, Sept. 11, 1969; grams buelizine hydrochloride per cap­ 8:46 a.m.] sule; and tions, as necessary, to delete from the 4c. Tetracydin Capsules containing 125 list of drugs acceptable for certification milligrams tetracycline hydrochloride, the above listed antibiotic combinations [DESI 11-587] 120 milligrams phenacetin, 30 milligrams and any other drug containing penicillin, TRIACETYLOLEANDOMYCIN, TETRA­ caffeine, and 150 milligrams salicylamide triacetyloleandomycin or tetracycline (or per capsule; all three marketed by J. B. derivative) in combination with an an­ CYCLINE, OR PENICILLIN IN COM­ Roerig, Division Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., algesic, antihistamine, and/or decon­ BINATION WITH ANTIHISTAMINES 235 East 42d Street, New York, N.Y. gestant and intended for oral use in man. AND/OR ANALGESICS AND/OR 10017. Prior to initiating such action, how­ FOR ORAL USE 5a. Tetrex-APC with Bristamin Cap­ ever, the Commissioner invites all inter­ sules containing tetracycline phosphate ested persons who may be adversely Drugs for Human Use; Drug Efficacy complex equivalent to 125 milligrams affected by removal of these drugs from Study Implementation tetracycline hydrochloride, 25 milligrams the market to submit pertinent data phenyltoloxamine citrate, 150 milligrams bearing on the proposal within 30 days The Food and Drug Administration has aspirin, 120 milligrams phenacetin, and following the date of publication of this evaluated reports received from the Na­ 30 milligrams caffeine per capsule; and notice in the F ederal R egister. T o be tional Academy of Sciences-National 5b. Tetrex-AP Syrup containing tetra­ acceptable, such data must be well- Research Council, Drug Efficacy Study cycline equivalent to 125 milligrams tet­ organized and consist of adequate and Group, on the following antibiotics with racycline hydrochloride, 120 milligrams well-controlled studies not previously antihistamines, and/or analgesics and/ acetaminophen, and 12.5 milligrams submitted. Any data should be identi­ or decongestants: phenyltoloxamine citrate per 5 milliliters, fied with the reference number, DESI la. Tain Tablets containing triace- both marketed by Bristol Laboratories, 11-587, and be addressed to the Special tyloleandomycin equivalent to 125 milli­ lnc. , Division of Bristol-Myers Co., Post Assistant for Drug Efficacy Study Imple­ grams oleandomycin, 12.5 milligrams Office Box 657, Syracuse, N.Y. 13201. mentation (MD-16), Bureau of Medi­ phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, 6. V-Kor Tablets containing potas­ cine, Food and Drug Administration, 200 6.25 milligrams pheniramine maleate, sium phenoxymethyl penicillin equiva­ C Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20204. 6.25 milligrams pyrilamine maleate and lent to 62.5 mg. phenoxymethyl This announcement of the proposed carbaspirin calcium equivalent to 300 penicillin; pyrrobutamine, as the naph­ action and implementation of the NAS- milligrams aspirin per tablet; and thalene disulfonate, 7.5 mg.; methapyri- NRC reports for these drugs is made lb. Tain Oral Suspension containing lene hydrochloride, as the hydroxyben- to give notice to persons who might be triacetyloleandomycin equivalent to 125 zoyl benzoate, 12.5 mg.; cyclopentamine adversely affected by removal of these milligrams oleandomycin, 12.5 milli­ hydrochloride, as the hydroxybenzoyl drugs from the market. grams phenylpropanolamine hydrochlo­ benzoate, 6.25 mg.; aspirin 114 mg.; Each firm listed above has been mailed ride, 6.25 milligrams pheniramine male­ phenacetin 80 mg.; and caffeine 16 mg.; a copy of the NAS-NRC report. Any in­ ate, 6.25 milligrams pyrilamine maleate Eli Lilly and Co., Box 618, Indianapolis, terested person may obtain a copy of the NAS-NRC report on any of the above and 150 milligrams acetaminophen per lnd. 42605. 5 milliliters; both marketed by Dorsey 7. Pen-Vee-Cidin Capsules containing named products by writing to the Food Laboratories, Division of The Wander phenoxymethyl penicillin 62.5 mg., sali­ and Drug Administration, Press Rela­ Co., Northeast U.S. 6 and Interstate 80, cylamide 194 mg., promethazine hydro­ tions Office (CE-300), 200 C Street SW., Lincoln, Nebr. 68501. chloride 6.25 mg., phenacetin 130 mg. Washington, D.C. 20204. 2. Novahistine with Penicillin Capsules arid sulfate 3 mg.; This notice is issued pursuant to the containing 200,000 units potassium peni­ Wyeth Laboratories, Post Office Box provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, cillin G, 12.5 milligrams, pheniramine 8299, Philadelphia, Pa. 19101. and Cosmetic Act (secs. 502, 507, 52 Stat. maleate, and 10 milligrams phenyleph­ 8a. Syndecon Tablets containing po­ 1050-51, as amended, 59 Stat. 463, as rine hydrochloride per capsule; marketed tassium phenethicillin equivalent to 62.5 amended; 21 U.S.C. 352, 357) and under by Pitman-Moore Division of the Dow mg. phenethicillin, phenylephrine hy­ the authority delegated to the Commis­ Chemical Co., Post Office Box 1656, drochloride 2.5 mg., phenylpropanola­ sioner of Food and Drugs (21 CFR 2.120). Indianapolis, Ind. 46206. mine hydrochloride 10 mg., phenyltolox­ Dated: September 9, 1969. amine citrate 3.75 mg., chlorpheniramine 3a. Achrocidin Compound Syrup con­ Herbert L. Ley, Jr., taining tetracycline equivalent to 125 maleate 1.25 mg. and acetaminophen 120 Commissioner of Food and Drugs. milligrams tetracycline hydrochloride, mg.; and 120 milligrams phenacetin, 150 milli­ 8b ^ Syndecon for Oral Solution con­ [P.R. Doc.. 69-10884; Piled, Sept. 11, 1969> grams salicylamide, 25 milligrams ascor­ taining in 5 milliliters potassium phen- 8:46 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14343 with Type CW-75-M lifeboat which (Ap­ 11101, effective July 15, 1969. (It superb DEPARTMENT OF proval 160.015/96/0), manufactured by sedes Approval No. 162.017/64/2, dated Carroll Engineering Co., 313 State Street, Aug. 12, 1965, to show approval of 10" TRANSPORTATION Box 711, Perth Amboy, N.J. 08862, effec­ and 12" sizes.) Coast Guard tive June 20,1969. Approval No. 162.017/65/3, Figure No. 110 [CGFR 69-91] Mechanical D isengaging Apparatus, , pressure-vacuum relief valve with Lifeboat, for Merchant Vessels lifting gear, atmospheric pattern, weight- loaded poppets, bronze Nl-Resist Type 2 EQUIPMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND Approval No. 160.033/60/0, Rottmer MATERIALS (20 percent nickel cast iron) and stain­ type releasing gear, approved for a maxi­ less steel Type 304, drawing No. 110-C, Approval Notice mum working load of 15,000 pounds per Alt. 4, dated December 22,1958, approved hook, identified by Hook Release In­ for 3", 4", 5", and 6" sizes, manufac­ 1. Certain laws and regulations (46 stallation drawing No. 9090-111 dated tured by Mechanical Marine Co., Inc., CFR Ch. I) require that various items April 18, 1969, manufactured by Whit­ 45-15 37th Street, Long Island City, N.Y. of lifesaving, firefighting and miscel­ taker Corp., 5159 Baltimore Drive, La 11105, effective July 18, 1969. (It is an laneous equipment, construction, and Mesa, Calif. 92042, effective June 20, extension of Approval No. 162.017/65/3, materials used on board vessels subject 1969. dated Aug. 25,1964.) to Coast Guard inspection, on certain Lifeboats for M erchant Vessels Approval No. 162.017/66/4, Figure No. motorboats and other recreational ves­ 120, pressure-only relief valve, atmos­ sels, and on the artificial islands and Approval No. 160.035/464/0, 24.0' x 8.0' pheric pattern, weight-loaded poppets, fixed structures on the outer Continental x 3.5' aluminum, motor-propelled, Class bronze, nickel cast iron, or corrosion- Shelf be of types approved by the Com­ 1 lifeboat, 37-person capacity, identified resistant alloy steel body, drawing No. mandant, U.S. Coast Guard. The pur­ by general arrangement and construc­ 120-A, Alt. 4, dated February 13, 1961, pose of this document is to notify all tion dwg. No. 24-002-02, dated June 18, approved for sizes 3", 4", 6", 8", and interested persons that certain approvals 1969, 46 CFR 160.035—13(c) Marking, 10", manufactured by Mechanical Ma­ have been granted as herein described Weights: Condition “A”=3,600 pounds; rine Co., Inc., 45-15 37th Street, Long during the period from June 13, 1969, Condition “B”=10,610 pounds, manu­ Island City, N.Y. 11105, effective July 18, to July 18, 1969 (List Nos. 19-69 and factured by Lane Lifeboat and Davit 1969. (It is an extension of Approval No, 20-69). These actions were taken in Corp., 150 Sullivan Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. accordance with the procedures set 11231, effective June 24, 1969. 162.017/66/4, dated Aug. 14, 1964.) forth in 46 CFR 2.75-1 to 2.75-50. Approval No. 162.017/98/0, Figure 160 2. The statutory authority for equip­ B uoyant Cushions, U nicellular (2 sheets) pressure,relief valve, dwg. No. P lastic F oam 160-A, Alt. 1, dated December 27, 1963, ment, construction, and material ap­ approved for 6" and 8" sizes, manufac­ provals is generally set forth in sections N o t e : Approved for use on motorboats o f 367, 375, 390b, 416, 481, 489, 526p, and Classes A, 1, or 2 not carrying passengers for tured by Mechanical Marine Co., Inc., hire. 45-15 37th Street, Long Island City, N.Y. 1333 of title 46, United States Code, 11105, effective July 18, 1969. (It is an section 1333 of title 43, United States Approval No. 160.049/74/0, special ap­ extension of Approval No. 162.017/98/0, Code, and section 198 of Title 50, United proval 18" x 14" x 2»/2" rectangular dated Aug. 25, 1964.) States Code. The Secretary of Transpor­ vinyl-dipped unicellular plastic foam tation has delegated authority to the buoyant cushion, dwg. No. BC-2, revision I ndicators, B oiler W ater Level, | Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard with re­ 2, dated April 2, 1969, manufactured by S econdary T ype spect to these approvals (49 CFR 1.4 Martin Industries, Post Office Box 423, Approval No. 162.025/97/0, secondary (a) (2) and (g )). The specifications pre­ Clayton, Ala. 36016, effective June 13, type boiler water level indicator, remote scribed by the Commandant, U.S. Coast 1969. (It supersedes Approval No. 160.- reading, 1,500 p.s.i. maximum pressure, Guard for certain types of equipment, 049/74/0, dated Oct. 3, 1968, to show comprised of force balance IR type construction and materials are set forth minor changes.) level transmitter and a pointer type in­ m 46 CFR Parts 160 to 164. Approval No. 160.049/75/0, special ap­ dicator, manufactured by Bailey Meter 3. The approvals listed in this docu­ proval 15" x 15" x 3Yz” rectangular Co., Wickliffe, Ohio 44092, effective ment shall be in effect for a period of 5 vinyl-dipped unicellular plastic foam July 16, 1969. (It is an extension of Ap­ years from the date of issuance, unless buoyant cushion, dwg. No. BC-i, revision proval No. 162.025/97/0, dated July 30, sooner cancelled or suspended by 2, dated April 2, 1969, manufactured by 1964.) Proper authority. Martin Industries, Post Office Box 423, B ulkhead P anels for Merchant Vessels Lifeboat Winches for Merchant Clayton, Ala. 36016, effective June 13, Vessels 1969. (It supersedes Approval No. 160.- Approval No. 164.008/46/0, “UNARCO- 049/75/0, dated Oct. 3, 1968, to show BOARD 33”> bulkhead panel identical to Approval No. 160.015/96/0, Type CW- minor changes.) that described in National Bureau of "5-M lifeboat winch; approval limited to Approval No. 160.049/78/0, special ap­ Standards Test Report No. TG10230-25: mechanical components only, and for a proval 15" X 15" x 2%" rectangular FR 3639, dated August 13, 1964; ap­ maximum working load of 7,500 pounds vinyl-dipped unicellular plastic foam proved as meeting Class B-15 require­ pull at the drums (3,750 pounds per fa ll); buoyant cushion, dwg. No. BC-2D, revi­ ments in a %-inch thickness, 33 pounds identified by general arrangement draw­ sion 1, dated April 2, 1969, manufactured per cubic foot density, manufactured by ing WA-9230 dated August 21, 1967, and by Martin Industries, Post Office Box UNARCO Industries, Inc., Chembest Di­ drawing list dated May 28,1969, approval 423, Clayton, Ala. 36016, effective June 13, vision, 1111 West Perry Street, ­ is limited for use with Type CG-150-P 1969. (It supersedes Approval No. 160.- ington, 111. 61701, effective July 3, 1969. gravity davit (Approval 160.032/182/0), 049/78/0, dated Dec. 19, 1968, to show (It is an extension of Approval No. 164. manufactured by Carroll Engineering minor changes.) 008/46/0, dated August 27, 1964.) £?•.* 313 State Street, Box 711, Perth Am- d°y, N.J. 08862, effective June 20,1969. P ressure Vacuum R elief Valves and Approval No. 164.008/53/0, “Alliance S pill Valves for Tank Vessels Wall Marine Panel CAL-ROC SEA- Davits for Merchant Vessels PORCEL No. 33” bulkhead panel with Approval No. 162.017/64/3, Figure No. porcelain on steel facing on core ma^ Approval No. 160.032/182/0, gravity 100, pressure-vacuum relief valve, atmos­ davit, Type CG-150-P; approved for a terial identical to that described in Na­ pheric pattern, weight-loaded poppets, tional Bureau of Standards Test Report m a x im u m working load of 15,000 pounds bronze, nickel cast iron, or stainless steel No. TG 10230-25: FR 3639, dated Au­ P e r s e t (7,500 pounds per arm) using body, drawing No. 100-A, Rev. 2, dated wo-part falls; identified by general ar­ gust 13, 1964, and Alliance Wall letters April 7, 1969, approved for sizes 2%"> dated, July 5, 1968; approved as meeting r a n g e m e n t drawing DA-9234 dated 3", 4", 6", 8", 10", and 12", manufac­ Class B-15 requirements with a 33 Jny 23, 1968, and drawing list dated tured by Mechanical Marine Co., tnc., 45- pounds per cubic foot, %-inch-thick core, 28, 1969, approval is limited for use 15 37th Street, Long Island City, N.Y. manufactured by Alliance Wall Corp., J

No. 175- FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14344 NOTICES Wyncote, Pa. 19095 (plant: Alliance, be increased from $2 to $10. Scott does By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Ohio), effective July 16, 1969. (It super­ not accompany its filing with any expla­ [seal] H arold R. Sanderson, sedes Approval No. 164.008/53/0, dated nation or justification of its proposal, Secretary. and has made no showing that its current July 25, 1968, to show change of name [F.R. Doc. 69-10913; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; of product.) c.o.d. fees are unduly low and that its 8:48 a.m.] proposed fees would not be unreasonably Dated: September 9,1969. high. W. J. S mith, The Board has previously suspended a [Docket No. 18078; Order 69-9-48] Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, 7 percent increase in c.o.d. fees proposed Commandant. by REA Air Express, and, after investiga­ SERVICE MAIL RATES FOR MILITARY ORDINARY MAIL [F.R. Doc 69-10904; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; tion found such increase to be unjust and 8:48 a.m.] unreasonable.1 REA’s c.o.d. fees for col­ Order To Show Cause lections of $25 or less were lower than the c.o.d. fees of the direct air carriers in Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics their air freight service. Board, at its office in Washington, D.C., CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD The current proposal of Scott is sub­ on the 8th day of September 1969. [Docket No. 18650; Order 69-9-42] stantially higher than the existing c.o.d. In recent mail rate orders, the Board fees of other air freight forwarders. An has provided for equalization of rates INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT exceptionally high c.o.d. fee level, as among the carriers of domestic priority1 ASSOCIATION proposed by Scott, presents a potential and nonpriority2 mail, SAM mail,8 trans­ pitfall for the unwary shipper or con­ atlantic and transpacific priority mail,* Order Regarding Specific signee. This would be particularly true and mail carried in Latin American Commodity Rates when the selection of the carrier is made services.5 However, a provision to Issued under delegated authority Sep­ by the shipper without the advance equalize rates has never been included tember 8, 1969. knowledge or blessing of the consignee, in any military ordinary mail (MOM) Agreement adopted by Traffic Confer­ and when the consignee is to pay the rate order. ence 1 of the International Air Transport^ c.o.d. fee, as is the usual case. The Board last established rates for Association relating to specific commod­ In these circumstances, the Board finds the transportation of MOM by Order 68- ity rates; Docket 18650, Agreement CAB that the proposed fees of Scott may 9-8, dated September 4,1968, and at that 20806, R-33 through R-38. be unjust, unreasonable, unjustly dis­ time there did not seem to be any ap­ By Order 69-8-135, dated August 25, criminatory, unduly preferential or parent need for equalization provisions. 1969, action was deferred, with a view unduly prejudicial, or otherwise unlaw­ Since such time, however, significant toward eventual approval, on certain rés­ ful and should be suspended pending route awards have been made in the olutions adopted by the International Air investigation. Transpacific Route Investigation, Docket Transport Association (IATA) relating Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal 16242. The addition of new carriers8 in to specific commodity rates. In deferring Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly transpacific services and the new route action on the agreement 10 days were sections 204(a) and 1002 thereof: structures awarded to those carriers al­ granted in which interested persons It is ordered, That: ready authorized to operate in the Pa­ might file petition? in support of or in 1. An investigation be instituted to cific 7 require that consideration now be opposition to the proposed action. determine whether the provisions and given to equalization provisions for No petitions have been received within charges in Rule No. 100 appearing on 1st MOM. The considerations in providing the filing period, and the tentative con­ Revised Page 7 of Scott Air Freight, Inc., for equalizations in the various mail clusions in Order 69-8-135 will herein be CAB No. 1, and rules, regulations, and rates have been that they (1) afford made final. practices affecting such provisions and greater flexibility in the dispatch of mail, Accordingly, it is ordered, That: charges, are or will be unjust or unrea­ (2) permit carriers operating over longer Agreement CAB 20806, R-33 through sonable, unjustly discriminatory, unduly routings between points to share in the R-38, be, and it hereby is, approved: preferential, unduly prejudicial, or transportation of mail, and (3) result in Provided, That approval shall not con­ otherwise unlawful, and if found to be the movement of mail upon the basis of stitute approval of the specific commodity unlawful, to determine and prescribe the service iather than price considerations. descriptions contained therein for pur­ lawful provisions and charges, and In our view, with the additional services poses of tariff publication. rules, regulations, or practices affecting that will how be available to the Post such provisions and charges; Office Department and the Department This order will be published in the 2. Pending hearing and decision by of Defense, there is no factor which F ederal R egister. the Board, the provisions and charges in would distinguish MOM from other types [seal] Harold R. Sanderson, Rule No. 100 appearing on 1st Revised of mail in these respects, and the Board Secretary. Page 7 of Scott Air Freight, Inc., CAB has concluded that rate equalization [F.R. Doc. 68-10912; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; No. 1, are suspended and their use de­ provisions should be established for 8:48 a.m.] ferred to and including December 9,1969, MOM. unless otherwise ordered by the Board, One further matter warrants consid­ and that no changes be made therein [Docket No. 21400; Order 69-9-50] eration. There are presently pending be­ during the period o t suspension except fore the Board requests by Northwest SCOTT AIR FREIGHT, INC. by order or special permission of the Board; Airlines8 and Trans World Airlinesn for Order of Investigation and Suspension 3. The proceeding herein be assigned equalization provisions for MOM. These Regarding Proposed Increase in for hearing before an examiner of the C.O.D. Fees Board at a time and place hereafter to 1 Order E-25610, Aug. 28, 1967. be designated; and 3 Order E-17255, July 31, 1961. Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Board 4. A copy of this order shall be filed 3 Order E-25654, Sept. 8, 1967. at is office in Washington, D.C., on the with the tariff and served upon Scott * Order 68-9-9, Sept. 4, 1968. 9th day of September 1969. 5 Order E-23753, May 31, 1966. Air Freight, Inc., which is hereby made a * American Airlines .(Order 69-7-104) in By tariff filing of August 11, 1969, and party to this proceeding. marked to become effective September 11, the South Pacific. The Flying Tiger Line, and This order will be published in the Trans World Airlines (Order 69-4-90) were 1969, Scott Air Freight, Inc. (Scott)-, an services. F ederal R egister. authorized to provide transpacific air freight forwarder, proposes to in­ 3 By Order 69-4-90, Northwest Airlines and crease its c.o.d. service fees by 500 per­ Pan American World Airways were awarde cent. The present fee of 1 cent per dollar 1 Increased Valuation and C.O.D. Charges new route authority. or fraction thereof is to be increased to Proposed by Railway Express Agency, Inc., 27 * Application filed Nov. 20,1968. 5 cents, and the minimum c.o.d. fee is to C.A.B. 54$ (1958). 9 Application filed July 29,1968.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14345 requests were supported by the Post Of­ Any equalized rate established pursu­ In reviewing such application, the fice Department and the Department of ant to this order shall be effective for the Board will consider, among other per­ Defense. However, Pan American World electing carrier or carriers as of the date tinent factors, the need for the proposed Airways filed objections to MOM equali­ of filing of the notice required by such service, the historical participation 6f zation. These requests predated the paragraphs or such later date as may be electing carrier or carriers in the trans­ transpacific route awards, and many of specified in the notice and shall continue portation of mail between such stated the contentions and objections posed rel­ in effect until such election is terminated. points, the amount of absorption re­ ative to equalization have to a large de­ Elections may be terminated by any quired, and the grounds for refusal by the gree been made moot by the route electing carrier upon 10 days’ notice filed carrier or carriers to enter into an equali­ awards. The Board" has therefore deter­ with the Board and served upon the Post­ zation agreement. After hearing the car­ mined to dismiss the applications filed by master General and each carrier provid­ riers concerned, either in writing or orally Northwest and Trans World Airlines and ing on-line or connecting service between in those cases where it deems such action instead initiate this proceeding.“ Any in­ the stated points. appropriate, the Board will, by order, terested person will, of course, have the Division of equalized rates. In case of prescribe the method for apportioning opportunity to respond to this proposal, equalization of rates by agreement pur­ the total compensation between such and such responses will be more mean­ suant to the equalization paragraph carriers, but in no event shall the carrier ingful than those which were submitted above, the agreement shall provide for or carriers which refuse to enter into an prior to our determination in the Trans­ the proration of the mail compensation agreement to equalize compensation be pacific Route Investigation. between participating carriers on the required to accept less than the compen­ Proposed findings and conclusions. In basis of the relative compensation which sation which would have been payable if order that the carriers may equalize rates would otherwise be payable to each car­ the service were performed under volun­ for the carriage of military ordinary rier in the absence of the provisions of tary agreement pursuant to the equaliza­ mail, the Board proposes to issue an the equalization paragraph above. In the tion paragraph above. order including the following findings absence of an agreement among carriers Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal and conclusions: pursuant to the equalization paragraph Aviation Act çf 1958 and particularly (1) There is presently in effect a final above for equalization of rates for inter­ sections 204(a) and 406 thereof, and pur­ service mail rate for the transportation line or interchange shipments between suant to the regulations promulgated in of military ordinary mail established by a stated pair of points, any carrier (or 14 CFR Part 302: Order 68-9-8, as amended, which does two or more carriers jointly) may, by no­ It is ordered, That; not provide for rate equalization. ~ tice, elect to receive as its portion of the 1. All interested persons and particu­ (2) Rate equalization provisions are total compensation for each shipment larly American Airlines, Inc., Braniff Air­ contained In currently effective rate the amount remaining after subtracting ways, Inc., Caribbean-Atlantic Airlines, orders for the transportation of various from such total compensation the com­ Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Eastern Air types of mail. pensation due the other carrier or car­ Lines, Inc., The Flying Tiger Line, Inc.; (3) There appears to be no reason for riers involved (nonelecting carriers). Northwest Airlines, Inc., Pan American distinguishing military ordinary mail Such total compensation shall be com­ World Airways, Inc., Seaboard World with respect to permitting voluntary puted on the basis of the lowest rate then Airlines, Inc., Trans Caribbean Airways; equalization of rates. in effect for service between the stated Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., Western pair of points for any carrier or carriers. (4) In order to remedy this situation, Air Lines, Inc., the Department of De­ The compensation due the nonelecting fense, and the Postmaster General are Order 68-9-8, dated September 4, 1968, carrier or carriers shall be that otherwise shall be amended by inserting the equali­ directed to show cause why the Board applicable to the point-to-point service it should not adopt the foregoing proposed zation provisions set forth below before actually provides. In those instances the paragraph on page 3 thereof which findings and conclusions and amend Or­ where there is a nonelecting carrier or der 68-9-8 in accordance therewith. begins with the words, “The rate here carriers involved in providing the fixed and determined * * 2. Further procedures herein shall be through service and two or more carriers in accord with 14 CFR Part 302, and if Election to equalize. Any air carrier, elect to receive payment under this pro­ or, pursuant to agreement, any two or there is any objection to the findings and vision, the total payment due such elect­ conclusions proposed herein, notice of more air carriers providing service on an ing carriers shall be prorated by them on interline or interchange basis, may, by objection shall be filed within 10 days, the basis of the relative compensation and written answer and supporting doc­ notice, elect to establish a reduced charge which would otherwise be payable to each for the carriage of military ordinary mail uments shall be filed within 30 days after of them in the absence of the provisions the date of service of this order. between stated points equal to the charge of this paragraph. then in effect for service between such 3. If notice of objection or answer is Divisions of equalized rates prescribed not filed, as specified in 14 CFR Part 302, points by any other air carrier or air by the Board. In the event that any car­ carriers. and this order, all persons shall be rier is unable to enter into an agreement deemed to have waived further procé­ Notice of election to equalize rate. An with any other carrier to transport mn.il dural steps herein and the Board may original and three copies of each notice between any stated points at a reduced enter an order incorporating the find­ of election and agreement pursuant to rate pursuant to the equalization para­ ings and conclusions proposed herein the equalization paragraph above shall graph above, it may file an application and amending Order 68-9-8 as herein be filed with the Board and a copy with the Board requesting it to determine specified. thereof shall be served upon the Post­ and fix a different method of apportion­ master General and each carrier provid­ ing the total compensation for each such 4. The application filed by Northwest ing on-line or connecting service between Airlines, Inc., in this docket dated No­ shipment of mail between the participat­ vember 20, 1968, is hereby dismissed. the stated points. Such notices shall con­ ing carriers. Such applications shall not tain a complete description of the re­ be deemed to reopen the mail rates fixed 5. The application filed by Trans duced charge being established, the World Airlines, Inc., in Docket 11083 et by this order. Applications filed pursuant al., dated July 26, 1968, is hereby routing over which it applies, how it is to this paragraph shall conform gen­ dismissed. constructed, and the charge with which erally to the provisions of the rules of equalization is sought. • practice governing the filing of petitions 6. This order shall be served upon the in mail rate cases. Within 7 days after parties named in paragraph 1 above. “ Trans World Airlines also requested cer­ the application is served any party may This order will be published in the tain revisions to standard mileages. To the file an answer in support of or in opposi­ F ederal R egister. xtent these requests have not become moot tion to the application together with any By the Civil Aeronautics Board. O?, mccpt revisions to standard mileages documentary material upon which it re­ iOrder 69-7-11 ), and/or by the previously lies. Any order upon an application filed [seal] Harold R. S anderson, ««cussed route awards, our dismissal erf pursuant to this paragraph shall be ef­ Secretary. J r i1®, World's application is without Prejudice. fective no earlier than the filing date of [F.R. Doc. 69-10914; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; the application with the Board. 8:48 ajm.J

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14346 14346 DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE— C ontinued filed application; or (b) within 60 days after the date of the public notice list­ 1177-C2-P-70—General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin (New), C.P. for a new station to be FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ing the first prior filed application (with located at 525 Superior Street, Antigo, Wis., to operate on base frequency 152.84 MHz. which subsequent applications are in Major Amendment and Correction COMMISSION conflict) as having been accepted for 7013-C2-P-69—Mahaffey Message Relay (New), Correct entry ln *^l% ™ ic***\* [Report 456] filing. An application which is subse­ May 26, 1969, Report No. 441, to read: M a j o r A m e n d m e n t : 4428-C2-P-6AI Mahaffey COMMON CARRIER SERVICES quently amended by a major change will Message Relay (New), Amend to add an additional channel: Frequency. ™ be considered to be a newly filed appli­ Location: 165 Madison Avenue, Memphis, Tenn. All other particulars same as reported INFORMATION 1 cation. It is to be noted that the cutoff in public notice dated February 3,1969, Report No. 425. Domestic Public Radio Services dates are set forth in the alternative— C orrection applications will be entitled to consid­ Applications Accepted for Filing 2 eration with those listed below if filed 7559-C2-P-(3 )-69—James D. and Lawrence D. Garvey, doing business as Radiofone (New), S eptem ber 8, 1969. by the end of the 60-day period, only Correct can sign to read KKC349 and correct to read: C.P to ^ b ^ ^ e q u e n c ie s if the Commission has not acted upon 454.125, 454.175, 454.200 MHz. All other particulars remain the same as reported on Pursuant to §§ 1.227(b) (3) and 21. 26 public notice dated June 23,1969, Report No. 445. (to) of the Commission’s rules, an appli­ the application by that time pursuant to cation, in order to be considered with any the first alternative earlier date. The RURAL RADIO SERVICE domestic public radio services applica­ mutual exclusivity rights of a new appli­ 1171-C1-P/L-70—Andrew J. Dibrell (New), C.P. and license for a new station to be located tion appearing on the list below, must cation, are governed by the earliest action in any temporary fixed location within territory of grantee to operate on frequency be substantially complete and tendered with respect to any one of the earlier filed conflicting applications. 158.49 MHz. for filing by whichever date is earlier: POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS) (a) The close of business 1 business day The attention of any party in interest preceding the day on which the Com­ desiring to file pleadings pursuant to sec­ 393— Ci-ML-70—The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KMQ36), Modification of license mission takes action on the previously tion 309 of the Communications Act of to add 6197 2 MHz directed toward San Francisco, Calif., at its station located 1587 1934, as amended, concerning any do­ Franklin Street, Oakland, Calif., from American Telephone & Telegraph Co. under Call : i All applications listed below are subject mestic public radio services application to further consideration and review and may accepted for filing, is directed to §§ 21.27 394- C ^ ^ ^ 70^Theatpacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KNB53), Modification of license be returned and/or dismissed if not found to to add 5945 2 directed toward Oakland, Calif., at its station located 99 Moultrie

of the Commission’s rules for provisions NOTICES be in accordance with the Commission’s Street Ian Francisco, Calif., from American Telephone & Telegraph Co. under Call rules, regulations, and other requirements. governing the time for filing and other aThe above alternative cutoff rules apply requirements relating to such pleadings. 1117- C ^P-7^ P a cificdpower & Light Co. (New), C.P. for a new station. Frequencies: 10,175 to {those applications listed below as having F ederal Communications and 10 955 MHz. Location: 527 Second Street, Whitefish, Mont. _ been accepted in Domestic Public Land Mo­ C o m m is s io n , 1118- C1-P-70—Pacific Power & Light Co. (KKU21), Modification of C.P. to add ll,245 and bile Radio, Rural Radio, Point-to-Point Mi­ [sea l! B e n F . W aple, 11,485 MHz directed toward Whitefish, Mont., via passive reflector ^ .i ^ s t a ^ ^ l o w t ^ crowave Radio, and Local Television Trans­ Secretary. 3 3 miles south-southwest of La Salle, Mont. All other terms same as File No. 533-C1-P-69. mission Services (Part 21 of the rules). in g - S l- S ^ T a - S e Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. (W A D 75), Modification of C.P to A pplications A c c e p t e d f o r F i l i n g “ L n g e f t e q u ^ y 10,995 MHz to 10,955 MHz toward Angels Peak, Calif., via passive reflector at its station located 31 East W illiam , Street, Sonora, Calif. All other terms same DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE File No., applicant, call sign, and nature of application 1 i^ ^ l - P - 7^ V ^ t e m 6Union International, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fl^ B t a t io n ^ , be located 2.5 miles east of Talkeetna, Alaska, to operate on frequencies 11,365, 11,525, 1120-C2-P-70—Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new Develop­ and 11,685 MHz toward Scotty Lake, Alaska. mental Air-Ground station. Frequencies:- 454.675 MHz (signaling) and 454.775 MHz 1175- C1-P-70—Western Union International, Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to (Ground). Location: Sweat Mountain, approximately 10.miles northeast of Marietta, Ga. be located at Scotty Lake, 5.9 miles west of Talkeetna, Alaska, ^ op erate requencies 1128- C2—MP-70—California Interstate Telephone Co. (KOF901), Modification of C.P. to 10,755, 10,915, and 11,705 MHz toward Talkeetna, Alaska, and 6595, 6675, and 6635 MHz change base frequency 152.63 MHz to 152.75 MHz of the location No. 2: 681 West Lake Mead Boulevard, Henderson, Nev. All other terms same as File No. 5260-C2-P-68. toward Twelvemile Lake, Alaska. 1129- C2-P-70—Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (KLB601), C.P. to replace base station 1176- Cl-P-7<)—Western Union International Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed b e antenna operating on 152.60 MHz at its station located near State Highway No. 66, 7 miles located 1 mile west of Twelvemile Lake, Alaska, to operate on frequencies 6776 6815 and 6855 MHz toward Scotty Lake, Alaska, and 6063.8, 6093.5, and 6 i 23.1 MHz tow southwest of Waxahachie, Tex. _ . __. ... 1130 - C2—P—(3) —70—Michigan Radio Dispatch Service (KQC573), C.P. for additional facili­ Anchorage, Alaska. Informative: Applicant has requested waiver of section 21.701 of ties 454.125, 454.175, and 454.275 MHz at location No. 2: 16500 North Park Drive, the FCC rules to use noncommon carrier frequencies. Southfield, Mich. ___ ...... __ 218- C1-P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPQ57), Change frequency 1131_C2-P-(3)-70—Instant Communications, Inc. (KQA338), C.P. to add 454.25, 454.30, from 2162.0 to 2162.4 MHz in Casper, Wyo. 454.35 base facilities at a new site identified as location No. 2: Pnobscott Building, 219— C1—P-70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPQ58), Change fre­ Griswold and Fort Streets, Detroit, Mich. quencies from 2112.0 and 2118.0 to 2112.4 and 2118.8 MHz ¡ J f TS? 2 8 1172— C2—P—70—Tel-Page Corp. (New), C.P. for a new station to be located at 0.25 mile Mountain, Wyo. (All other particulars same as reported in public notice dated July 28, southwest of junction of Parish and McCarthy Roads, Ionia, N.Y., to operate on base 1969, Report No. 450.) frequency 35.58 MHz. ' 5492—C1—P—69—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland (New), Change 1173- C2-P-70—Henry M. Zachs (KCC803), C.P. to install a standby transmitter to op­ frequency from 6004.5 to 11,035 MHz and change transmitter from Western Electric, erate on frequencies 152.06 and 152.12 MHz at location No. 3: 14 Haynes Street, Hartford, TH-3, to Raytheon, KTR-3A-11. Conn. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175 ----FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIERS) continued POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (NONTELEPHONE) io n tin u ed 5493- Cl—P—69—Tlie Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland (New), Change 1163- Cl—P—70—United Video, Inc. (New), C.P. for new station 1.68 miles west-northwest of frequencies toward Arnold, Md., from 6256.5, 6375.2, and 11,685 MHz to 6301.0, 6404.8, Windsor, Mo., at lat. 38°32'26" N., long. 93°33'16" W. Frequency 11,425 MHz on azimuth and 11,525 MHz. Change frequency toward Owlngs Mills, Md., from 6256.5 to 11,485 MHz 228"12\ (Informative: Applicant proposes to provide the television signal of KPLR-TV and change transmitter from Western Electric TH-3 to Raytheon KTR-3A—11. of St. Louis, Mo., to Clinton Cablevision System, Inc., in Clinton, Mo.) 5494- C1-P-69—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland (New), Change 1164- C1—MP-70—'Western Microwave, Inc. (KPY90), Modification of C.P. to change frequen­ frequencies toward Baltimore, Md., from 6004.5, 6123.1, and 10,775 to 6049.0, 6152.8, and cies and transmitters at Baldy Mountain, 15 miles west o t White Sulphur Springs, Mont. 11,075 MHz. Change frequencies toward Wye Mills, Md., from 6004.5, 6160.2, and Lat. 46°28'35" N„ long. 111"15'04" W. Frequencies 6019.3, 6049.0, 6078.6, and 6108.3 MTTg: Î0.955 to 6152.8, 6108.3, and 10,795 MHz. on azimuth 228°32' 73"10', 284"12', 282"42', and 356"55'. 5495- C1-P-69—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland (New), Change 1165- C1—MP—70—Western Microwave, Inc. (¿SQ33), Modification of C.P. to change frequen- frequencies toward Arnold, Md., from 6256.5, 6412.2, and 11,405 to 6360.3, 6404.8 and 11,245 i cies and transmitters at Blackhorse, 6 miles north of Great Falls, Mont. Lat. 47 "35.'42" N.-, MHz. Change point of communication from Cambridge, Md., to Federalsburg, Md. (New long. 111°20'25" W. Frequencies 6241.7, 6330.7, 6390.0 MHz on azimuths 204°01', 6360 0, path azimuth 131 Ml'.) and frequencies from 6256.5, 6397.4, and 11,685, to 6301.0, 6404.8, 6390.0 MHz, 150° 10', 6241.7, 6330.7, 6360.0 MHz, 06°00', 6330.7 MHz, 146°41'. and 11,525 MHz. 1166- Cl-P—70—Microrelay pf New Mexico, Inc.' (New), C.P. for new station 2 miles, southeast 5497tC1-P-69t—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Go. of Maryland (New) . Change of Whitesboro, Tex., at lat. 33"37'22" N„ long. 96"52'49" W. Frequencies 11,505, 11,585, point of copimunication from Cambridge, Md., to Federalsburg, .Md. (New path azimuth and 11,665 MHz on azimuth 346°44'. 339"29',) and frequencies from 6256,5, 6412.2, and 11,405 to 6360.3, 6404,8, and 11,245 MHz. 1167- C1-P-70—Microrelay of New Mexico, Inc. (New), C.P. for new station at Gene Autry, All other particulars same as stated in public notice, Report No. 432, dated Mar. 24, 1969. 4 miles east-northeast of Ardmore, Okla., at lat. 34°11'44" N.,Jong. 97°02'37" W. Frequen­ 1969. . cies 11,015,11,095, and 11,175 MHz on azimuth 2"53'. ' • 1178— Cl-P-r7CH-Soutb Central Bell Telephone Co. (KJA77), C.P. to add frequencies 11,425 1168- Cl—P—70—Microrelay of New Mexico, Inc. (New), C.P. for new station 3 miles north­ and li,665 MHz toward’ Beattyville, Ky. (new point of communication), via a passive west of Stratford, Okla., at lat. 34°49'19" N., long. 97"do'19" W. Frequencies 11,505,' redector; and to change antenna, system a t , station located 2.3 miles northeast of 11,585, and. 11,665 MHz on azimuth 340°05'. Beattyville, Ky. 1179— Cl—P—70—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (New); C.P: for a new fixed station to be 1169- C1-P-70—Microrelay of New Mexico, Inc. (New), C.P for new station 6 miles east of located on West Street, Beattyville, Ky., to operate on frequencies 10,775 and 11,015 MHz Midwest City, Okla., at lat. 35°25'53" N„ long. 97°16'35" W. Frequencies 11,015, 11,095, toward Station KJA77, 2.3 miles northeast of Beattyville, Ky. 11,175 MHz on azimuths 03"30' and 56°58'. 1180— C1—P—70—The Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Maryland (New), C.P. for new 1170- C1-P-70—Microrelay of New Mexico, Inc. (New), CR, for new station 8.5 miles west of fixed station to be located 2.3 miles north-northeast of Federalsburg, Md., to operate on Stillwater, Okla., at lat. 36°04'26" N., long. 97°13'40" W, Frequencies 11,505, 11,585, and frequencies 6049.0, 6152.8, and 11,075 MHz toward Wye Mills, Md., and bn frequencies 11,665 MHz on azimuth 307"36'. (Informative: Applicant proposes to provide the tele­ vision signals of Stations KDTV, KMEC, and KTVT of Dallas-Fort Worth, Tex., to, 6108.3, 6152.8, and 10,795 MHz toward Salisbury, Md. NOTICES Mid-America Cablevision, Inc., and Community Cables, Inc., in Stroud and Enid, Okla.) LOCAL TELEVISION TRANSMISSION SERVICE 8096— C1-MP—69—East Texas Transmission Co. (KLH74), Modification of C.P. (6729-C1-P- 1132-C1-P-70—The Ohio Bell Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new station. Frequency: 69) to change designation of Tyler, Tex., receiving site to (Drop-Relay) in order to pro­ 6323.3 MHz. location: 121 Huron Street, Toledo, Ohio, (informative: This station pro­ vide the TV signals of Stations KMEC-TV, KERA-TV, KFWT-TV, and KDTV of Dallas- poses to provide a network feed for Television Station WDHO-TV at Toledo, Ohio.) Fort Worth, Tex., to Gencoe, Inc., in Tyler, Tex.

POINT-TO-POINT MICRO'WAVE RADIO s e r v ic e (NONTELEPHONE) 8097— Cl—MP—69—East Texas Transmission Co. (KLH75), Modification of C.P. (6730-C1-P-69) to change designation of Jacksonville, Tex., receiving site to (Drop-Relay) in order to 636-01—ML-7Q—West Texas Microwave Co.: (KZS70)“ Modification of license to deliver, via provide the TV signals of Stations KMEL-TV, KERA-TV, KFWT-TV, and KDTV of Dallas- audio subcarrier, the signal of station KWXI—FM, Texas State Network; to radio station Fort Worth, Tex., to Gencoe, Inc., in Jacksonville, Tex. KHOB in Hobbs, N. Mex. Transmitter location: 0.6 mile east of Seminole, Tex. 8098— C1-MP-69—East Texas Transmission Co. (KLU31), Modification of C.P. (6731-C1-P-69) 1134- C1-TC-(3)-70—Telecommunications, inc. (KPR28), '(KPR29), (KPZ61), Consent, to to add frequency 11,295 MHz, via power split, toward Alto, fex. (lat. 31"39'58"' Ni, transfer of control from Robert S. McCaw, Fred G. Goddard, and Robert A. Purdue, long. 95"05'22" W.), on azimuth 152°30'. _ Transferors to Western Microwave, Inc., Transferee. Stations: Capitol. Peak, Wash.; Aberdeen, Wash.; Wickiup Mountain, Oreg. Informative 1135- Cl^TC-(3) -70-^-Telecommunications of Oregon, Inc. (KPV56), (KPV59), (KOS36), Consent to transfer of control from Robert S. McCaw, Fred G. Goddard, and Robert A. As noted in the Common Carrier Public Notice of January 13, 1969 (Report No. 422). Purdue, Transferors to Western Microwave, Inc., Transferee. Stations: Goodnoe Hill, microwave applications proposing new service to CATV systems will not be processed Wash., near Spout Springs, Oreg.; Mount Harris, Oreg. unless and until the applicant submits a showing that the proposal is consistent with the 1002-C1—P—70—-Brentwood Co. (KTG34), C.P. for power split of frequencies proposed in rules proposed in the Commission's notice In Docket 18397 (15 FCC 2d 417). Many appli­ application File No. 7166-C1-P-66. Location : Breckenridge Mountain, Calif., at lat. cations recently filed contain only a statement that the proposal is consistent with Docket 35°27'14" N., long. 118"35'37" W. Frequencies 6212.0, 6271.4, 6330.7, and 6360.3 mttz on 18397. Applicants are reminded that such a statement, standihg alone, does not comprise azimuth 317"30'. (Informative: Application was filed to reflect the possibility of inter­ an adequate showing. To be satisfactory the showing should contain sufficient facts to connection with proposed facilities of Microwave Service Co. at Iron Mountain, Calif.) identify the applicable proposed rule and to enable the Commission to make a positive 1162-C1-P-70—United Vidéo, Inc. (New), C.P. for new station 1.68 miles west-northwest determination as to the consistency of the application with that rule. Applications without of Windsor, Mo., at lat. 38°32'26" N„ long. 93"33'16" W. Frequency 11,425 MHz on a satisfactory showing will be retained on file but not processed, pending further order of azimuth 345"43'. (Informative:, Applicant proposes to provide the television signal of the Commission. .. r KPLR-TV of St. Louis, Mo.,' to Warrensburg Cable, Inc., in Warrensburg, Mo. [F.R. Doc. 69-10892; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:47 a.m.J 14347

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14348 NOTICES ence to an agreement including a request New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION for hearing, if desired, may be submitted San Francisco, Calif. Comments with to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Com­ reference to an agreement including a ITALY, SOUTH FRANCE, SOUTH mission, Washington, D.C. 20573, within request for hearing, if desired, may be SPAIN, PORTUGAL/U.S. GULF AND 20 days after publication of this notice submitted to the Secretary, Federal PUERTO RICO CONFERENCE in the F ederal R egister. A copy of any Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. such statement should also be forwarded 20573, within 20 days after publication Notice of Agreement Filed to the party filing the agreement (as in­ of this notice in the F ederal R egister. A Notice is hereby given that the follow­ dicated hereinafter), and the comments copy of any such statement should also be ing agreement has been filed with the should indicate that this has been done. forwarded to the party filing the agree­ Commission for approval pursuant to Notice of agreement filed for approval ment (as indicated hereinafter), and section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as by: the comments should indicate that this amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Robert A. Peavy, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, has been done. U.S.C. 814). 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ Notice of agreement filed for approval Interested parties may inspect and ton, D.C. 20036. by: obtain a copy of the agreement at the Agreement No. FF 69-8 between Novo Robert A. Peavy, Morgan, Lewis ¿5 Bockius, Washington office of the Federal Mari­ Corp., and Barnett International For­ 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., warders, Inc. (Barnett, Federal Maritime ton, D.C. 20036. Room 1202; or may inspect agreements Commission License No. 865) , is in- Agreement No. FF 69-9 between Novo at the offices of- the District Managers, intended to secure Federal Maritime Corp. and Freeslate International Corp. New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and Commission approval, pursuant to sec­ (Freeslate, Federal Maritime Commis­ San Francisco, Calif. Comments with tion 15, Shipping Act, 1916, of the ac­ sion License No. 1240) is intended to reference to an agreement including a quisition of Barnett by Novo Corp. secure Federal Maritime Commission request for hearing, if desired, may be (Novo). Novo currently owns Barnett, approval pursuant to section 15, Ship­ submitted to the Secretary, Federal Trans-World Forwarding & Air Expedit­ ping Act, 1916, of the acquisition of Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. ing Co. (Federal Maritime Commission Freeslate by Novo Corp. (Novo). Novo 20573, within 20 days after publication License No. 773), Barnett International currently owns Freeslate, Barnett Inter­ of this notice in the F ederal R egister. Forwarders, Inc., of California (Federal national Forwarders, Inc. of California A copy of any such statement should Maritime Commission License No. 689) (Federal Maritime Commission License also be forwarded to the party filing the and Freeslate International Corp. (Fed­ No. 689), Trans-World Forwarding & Air agreement (as indicated hereinafter) eral Maritime Commission License No, Expediting Co. (Federal Maritime Com­ and the comments should indicate that 1240). - mission License No. 773) and Barnett this has been done. Barnett has been merged, pursuant to International Forwarders, Inc. (Federal Notice of agreement filed by: New York Business Corporation Law, Maritime Commission License No. 865). Mr. Q. Ravera, Secretary, Italy, South. France, with and into a wholly owned subsidiary Further, Freeslate is affiliated with South Spain, Portugal/U.S. Gulf and of Novo, incorporated'for that purpose. Freedman & Slater, Inc. (Federal Mari­ Puerto Rico Conference, Vico San Luca 4, The name of the surviving corporation is time Commission License No. 223). 16100 Genova, Italy. Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. Freeslate. has been merged pursuant Agreement No. 9522-12 between the In consideration of the merger, Novo is­ to New York Business Corporation Law, member lines of the Italy, South France, sued to the then stockholders of Barnett, with and into a wholly owned, New York South Spain, Portugal/U.S. Gulf and in equal parts as to each, 61,052 shares of subsidiary of Novo, incorporated for that Puerto Rico Conference, amends Article Novo common stock, $1 par value. purpose. The name of the surviving cor­ 9 of the basic agreement to provide that As additional consideration for the poration is Freeslate International Corp. the Lines must offer a service in the 90- merger, Novo has agreed to issue to said In consideration of the merger, Novo day period preceding each meeting to be former stockholders of Barnett, in equal issued to the stockholders of Freeslate, eligible to participate in rate commit­ parts as to each, on or before April 30th 20,500 shares of Novo common stock, tee meetings for the various sections of of the years 1969 through and including $1 par value. the Conference trade. 1973, additional shares of Novo common Dated: September 9, 1969. stock pursuant to calculations and limi­ Dated: September 9,1969. tations set forth in the agreement. By order of the Federal Maritime Commission. By Order of the Federal Maritime Dated: September 9,1969. Commission. ' ' , T homas Lisi, T homas Lis i, By order of the Federal Maritime Com­ Secretary. Secretary. mission. [F.R. Doc. 69-10909; Piled, Sept. 11, 1969; JF.R. Doc. 69-10905; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; T homas Lis i, 8:48 ajn.] 8:48 a.m.] Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 69-10907; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:48 a.m.] NOVO CORP. AND TRANS-WORLD NOVO CORP. AND BARNETT INTER­ FORWARDING & AIR EXPEDITING CO. NATIONAL FORWARDERS, INC. NOVO CORP. AND FREESLATE Notice of Agreement Filed for INTERNATIONAL CORP. Notice of Agreement Filed for Approval Approval Notice of Agreement Filed for Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Approval ing agreement has been filed with the ing agreement has been filed with the Commission for approval pursuant to Notice is hereby given that the follow­ Commission for approval pursuant to section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as ing agreement has been filed with the section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Commission for approval pursuant to sec­ amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 4o U.S.C. 814). tion 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as U.S.C. 814). Interested parties may inspect and amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Interested parties may inspect and ob­ obtain a copy of the agreement at the U.S.C. 814). tain a copy of the agreement at the Washington office of the Federal Mari­ Interested parties may inspect and ob­ Washington office of the Federal Man­ time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., tain a copy of the agreement at the time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., Room 1202, or may inspect agreements at Washington office of the Federal Mari­ Room 1202, or may inspect agreements the offices of the District Managers, New time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., at the offices of the District Managers, York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San Room 1202, or may inspect agreements New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., ana Francisco, Calif. Comments with refer­ at the offices of the District Managers, San Francisco, Calif. Comments wit

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14349 reference to an agreement including a section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as request for hearing, if desired, may be amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Robert J. Pfeiffer, vice president. submitted to the Secretary, Federal U.S.C. 814) . Cecil J. River, vice president. W. Russell Starr, vice president. Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. Interested parties may inspect and ob­ Fulton W. Wright, vice president. 20573, within 20 days after publication tain a copy of the agreement at the E. S. N. Wong, vice president. of this notice in the Federal R egister. Washington office of the Federal Mari­ Edward Heagen, treasurer. A copy of any such statement should time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., L. F. Hughes, controller. also be forwarded to the party filing the Room 1202; or may inspect agreements R. G. Jamieson, assistant secretary. agreement (as indicated hereinafter), at the offices of the District Managers, Warren Bean, assistant secretary. and the comments should indicate that New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and John R. Kuykendall, assistant secretary. this has been done. Daniel J. Duckhorn, assistant treasurer. San Francisco, Calif. Comments with ref­ A. C. Wilcox, Jr., director. Notice of agreement filed for approval erence to an agreement including a re­ H. M. Hochfeld, director. by: quest for hearing, if desired, may be Robert A. Peavy, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, submitted to the Secretary, Federal Mari­ Dated: September 9,1969. 1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ time Commission, Washington, D.C. T homas Lis i, ton, D.C. 20036. 20573, within 20 days after publication Secretary. of this notice in the F ederal R egister. A Agreement No. FF 69-7 between Novo copy of any such statement should also [F.R. Doc. 69-10906; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Corp. and Trans-World Forwarding & 8:48 a.m.] Air Expediting Co. (Trans-World, Fed­ be forwarded to the party filing the eral Maritime Commission License No. agreement (as indicated hereinafter) and the comments should indicate that [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder 773) is intended to secure'Federal Mari­ this has been done. License 568] time Commission approval, pursuant to section 15, Shipping Act, 1916, of the ac­ Notice of agreement filed by: RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. quisition of Trans-World by Novo Corp. Seymour H. Kligler, Esq., Herman Goldman, (Novo). Novo currently owns Trans- Attorneys & Counselors at Law, Equitable Order of Revocation World, Barnett International Forward­ Building, 120 Broadway, New York, N.Y. By letter dated August 26, 1969, Rail­ ers, Inc., of California (Federal Maritime 10005. way Express Agency, Inc.,'219 East 42d Commission License No. 689). Barnett Agreement No. 9819, between South Street, New York, N.Y. 10017, notified the International Forwarders, Inc. (Federal African Marine Corp., Ltd. and The Uni­ Commission that they no longer required Maritime Commission License No. 865), corn Shipping Lines (Pty) Ltd. estab­ their Independent Ocean Freight For­ and Freeslate International Corp. (Fed­ lishes a through billing arrangement for warder License No. 568. eral Maritime Commission License No. the movement of cargo between ports in By virtue of authority vested in me by 1240). Mauritius, Reunion, Malagasy Repub­ the Federal Maritime Commission as set Trans-World has assigned and trans- lic, Comoro Islands, Mozambique, and forth in Manual of Orders, Commission fered to Novo stock certificates repre­ Seychelles and U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Order 201.1, section 6.03: senting all issued and outstanding shares ports with transshipment at ports in It is ordered, That the Independent of capital stock of Trans-World in ex­ the Republic of South Africa in accord­ Ocean Freight Forwarder License No. change for the number of Novo common ance with the terms and conditions set 568 of Railway Express Agency, Inc., be shares, $1 par value, determined by divid­ forth in the agreement. and is hereby revoked effective August 26, ing into $325,000 the average closing 1969. market price of Novo’s common shares Dated: September 9, 1969. It is further ordered, That this can­ on the American Stock Exchange during By order of the Federal Maritifne cellation is without prejudice to reappli­ a 30-day trading period set forth in the Commission. cation at a later date. agreement. T homas Lis i, It is further ordered, That License No. As additional consideration for the Secretary. 568 be returned to the Commission purchase of Trans-World, Novo agrees to [F.R. Doc. 69-10911; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; promptly, and that a copy of this order issue to Trans-World, on or before April 8:48 a.m.] be published in the F ederal R egister 30th in the years 1969 through and in­ and served upon Railway Express cluding 1973, aditional shares of Novo’s Agency, Inc. common stock to the extent of 25 percent MATSON NAVIGATION CO. J ohn F. G ilson, of Trans-World’s net operating revenues Deputy Director, in excess of $320,000 in each calendar Application for Independent Ocean Bureau of Domestic Regulation. year 1968 through and including 1972. Freight Forwarder License [F.R. Doc. 69-10910; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; The number of such additional shares 8:48 a.m.] of Novo stock, if any, are to be deter­ Notice is hereby given that the fol­ mined by the average closing price of lowing applicant has filed with the Novo’s common stock on the American Federal Maritime Commission an appli­ Stock Exchange during the month of cation for a license as an independent FOREIGN-TRADE ZONES BOARD March each year 1969 through 1973. ocean freight forwarder, pursuant to sec­ tion 44(a) of the Shipping Act, 1916 (75 [Order 79] Dated: September 9, 1969. Stat. 522 and 46 U.S.C. 841 (b)). NEW ORLEANS, LA. By order of the Federal Maritime Com­ Persons knowing of any reason why the mission. applicant should not receive a license Adjustment of Boundaries and Con­ T homas Lis i, are requested to communicate with the tiguous Expansion of Foreign-Trade Secretary. Director, Bureau of Domestic Regula­ tion, Federal Maritime Commission, Sub-Zone [PR. Doc. 69-10908; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Washington, D.C. 20573. 8:48 a.m.] Pursuant to its authority under the Matson Navigation Co., 100 Mission Street, Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, Matson Building, San Francisco, Calif. 1934, as amended (48 Stat. 998; 19 U.S.C. SOUTH AFRICAN MARINE CORP., 94105. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Officers and directors: LTD., AND UNICORN SHIPPING Board has adopted the following order Stanley Powell, Jr., president and which is promulgated for the information LINES (PTY), LTD. director. Norman Scott, executive vice president and guidance of all concerned: Notice of Agreement Filed and director. Whereas, the Board of Commissioners Willis R. Deming, vice president, secretary, of the Port of New Orleans, Grantee of . Notice is hereby given that the follow- general counsel, and director. Foreign-Trade Zone No. 2, New Orleans, agreement has been filed with the Chester G. Gifford, vice president. La., was issued a grant for the establish­ Commission for approval pursuant to L. A. Harlander, vice president. ment and operation of Foreign-Trade

FEDERAL REGISTER, VQL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14350 NOTICES Sub-Zone No. 2-B, New Orleans, on Directors from twenty-one (21) to Watkins Glen, N.Y., and Akron, Ohio, to November 19,1968; twentsfctwo (22) members and the Henderson, N.C. Whereas, said Grantee filed with the quorum thereof from seven (7) to eight Grounds for relief—Market competi­ Foreign-Trade Zones Board on May 28, (8) members; increase the membership tion. 1969, an application requesting authority of the Rates and Tariffs Committee from Tariffs—Supplements 56 and 84 to to adjust the boundaries of Sub-Zone No. eight (8) to ten (10) members and re­ Traffic Executive Association-Eastern 2-B, New Orleans, and to add an addi­ quire six (6) votes in lieu of five (5) for Railroads, agent, tariffs ICC C-262 and tional 45,927 square feet (1.05 acres) of committee action; and make other col­ A-907, respectively. space to the existing authorized area of lateral changes made necessary by the FSA No. 41748—Freight all kinds from foregoing changes. and to points in southwestern territory. 158,210 square feet (3.64 acres); Filed by Southwestern Freight Bureau, Whereas, notice of said application was The Supplemental Application is dock­ eted and may be inspected at the office agent (No. B-70), for interested rail car­ published on June 10,1969 (34 FR. 9145), riers. Rates on freight all kinds, less- and opportunity has been afforded all of the Commission, in Washington, D.C. Any interested person desiring to pro­ than-carloads, as described in the ap­ interested parties to submit their views; plication, from and to points in Arkansas, Whereas, the requested adjustment of test and participate in this proceeding shall notify the Commission in writing Louisiana, Missouri (including Kansas boundaries and contiguous expansion City, Kans.), Oklahoma, and Texas, also will result in more efficient operation and within 20 days from the date of this improved Customs protection and secu­ notice. As provided by the general rules of Memphis, Tenn. practice of the Commission, persons other Grounds for relief—Short-line dis­ rity; and tance formula and grouping. Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones than applicants should fully disclose their interests, and the position they intend T a r if f — Supplement 49 to Southwest­ Board has found that the said applica­ ern Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC tion satisfies all the applicable provisions to take with respect to the application. of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act and Otherwise, the Commission, in its dis­ 4656. cretion, may proceed to investigate and PSA No. 41749—Flour or meal between Regulations. points in Texas. Filed by Texas-Louisiana Now, therefore, the Foreign-Trade determine the matters involved without public hearing. Freight-Bureau, agent (No. 632), for Zones Board hereby orders: interested rail carriers. Rates on flour That the Grantee is authorized to ad­ [seal] H. N eil Garson, or meal, in carloads, as described in the just the boundaries and expand the sub­ Secretary. application, between points in Texas, for zone in conf ormity with Exhibits 1-13 of [F.R. Doc. 69-10916; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; export, also from various points in Texas, the application filed with the Foreign- 8:48 a.m-.] on the one hand, to various Louisiana Trade Zones Board on May 28,1969. The gulf ports, for export, on the other. authority given in this order is subject to Grounds for relief—Rate relationship. local approval of the District Director of FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS FSA No. 41750—Soda ash to Farming- Customs and the District Army Engineer FOR RELIEF ton, Minn. Filed by Western Trunk Line regarding compliance with their re­ Committee, agent (No. A-2597), for in­ S eptember 9,1969. spective requirements for protection of terested rail carriers. Rates on soda ash the revenue of the United States and the Protests to the granting of an appli­ (other than modified soda ash), in bulk, installation of suitable facilities. cation must be prepared in accordance in hopper cars, in carloads, as described with Rule 1100.40 of the general rules in the application, from Alchem, Stauffer, Signed at Washington, D.C., this 8th of practice (49 CFR 1100.40) and filed and Westvaco, Wyo., to Farmington, day of September 1969. This order will within 15 days from the date of publica­ Minn. be published in the F ederal R egister. tion of this notice in the F ederal Grounds for relief—Rate relationship. [seal] Maurice H. S tans, R egister. Tariff—Supplement 294 to Western Secretary of Commerce, Chair­ Long-and-S hort Haul Trunk Line Committee, agent, tariff ICC man and Executive Officer, A-4411. Foreign-Trade Zones Board. FSA No. 41744—Ethylene glycol from Highlands, Tex. Filed by Southwestern A ggregate- o f -I ntermediates Attest: Freight Bureau, agent (No. B-80), for FSA No. 41745—Ethylene glycol from interested rail carriers. Rates on ethylene J ohn J. D a P onte, Highlands, Tex. Filed by Southwestern Acting Executive Secretary, glycol, in tankcar loads, as described in Freight Bureau, agent (No. B-81), for Foreign-Trade Zones Board. the application, from Highlands, Tex., interested rail carriers. Rates on ethylene to Clinton, Iowa. glycol, in tank carloads, as described in [F.R. Doc. 69-10883; Filed, Sept, i t , 1969; 8:46 a.m.] Grounds for relief—Market competi­ the application, from Highlands, Tex., to tion. Clinton, Iowa. Tariff—Supplement 4 to Southwestern Grounds for relief—Maintenance of Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC 4867. depressed rates published to meet market FSA No. 41746—Iron or steel articles to competition without use of such rates INTERSTATE COMMERCE points in Louisiana and Texas. Filed by as factors in constructing combination Southwestern Freight Bureau, agent rates. COMMISSION (No. B-79), for interested rail carriers. Tariff—Supplement 4 to Southwestern [Section 5a Application No. 1; Supp. Arndt. 5] Rates on iron or steel articles, in car­ Freight Bureau, agent, tariff IOC 4867. loads, as described in the application, HOUSEHOLD GOODS CARRIERS' from Minneapolis, Minn., transfer and By the Commission. BUREAU St. Paul, Minn., to points in Louisiana [seal] H. Neil Garson, Secretary. Supplemental Application Regarding and Texas. Grounds for relief—Market competi­ [P.R. Doc. 69-10917; Filed, Sept. 11, 1960! Changes in Bylaws tion. 8:49 a.m.] S eptember 9, 1969. Tariff—Supplement 126 to Southwest­ Supplemental application filed Au­ ern Freight Bureau, agent, tariff ICC [Notice 903] gust 8,1969, by Francis L. Wyche, Execu­ 4753. tive Secretary, Household Goods Carriers’ FSA No. 41747—Salt to Henderson, MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY Bureau, 1424 16th Street NW., Washing­ N.C. Filed by Traffic Executive Associa­ AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS tion-Eastern. Railroads, agent (E.R. No. ton, D.C., in lieu of the application filed S eptember 9, 1969. March 18, 1969, on which notice was 2956), for interested rail carriers. Rates given on April 18, 1969, 34 F.R. 6670, on salt, common (sodium chloride), in The following are notices of filing of involves: Changes in the Bylaws to in­ bulk, in covered hopper cars, in carloads, applications for temporary authority un­ crease the membership of the Board of as described in the application, from der section 210a(a) of the Interstate

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14351 Commerce Act provided for under the a common carrier, by motor vehicle, in bulk from the plant of Kaiser Alumi­ new rules of Ex Parte No. MC-67 (49 over irregular routes, transporting: Gen­ num & Chemical Corp. near Gramercy, CFR Part 1131, published in the F ed­ eral commodities in substituted service La., and the plant of Dow Chemical Co., eral R egister, issue of April 27, 1965, ef­ for Air Transportation, between the air­ Plaquemine, La., to the New Orleans, La., fective July 1, 1965. These rules provide port cities of New York, N.Y.; Newark, docks for export to Kaiser facility in Ja­ that protests to the granting of an ap­ N.J.; Philadelphia, Pa.'; Boston, Mass.; maica for 180 days. N ote : Applicant does plication must be filed with the field of­ and points within 25 miles of the city not intend to tack authority with pres­ ficial named in the F ederal R eg ister limits of said airport cities on the one ently authorized routes. Supporting publication, within 15 calendar days hand, and, on the other the airport city shipper: Kaiser Chemicals (R. L. Weber, after the date of notice of the filing of of Chicago, 111., and points within 25 Traffic Manager), 300 Lakeside Drive, the application is published in the F ed­ miles of the city limits of the airport city Oakland, Calif. 94604. Send protests to: eral R eg ister. One copy of such protests of Chicago, HI., for 180 days. N ote: Ap­ District Supervisor John C. Redus, In­ must be served on the applicant, or its plicant states it intends to tack with its terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau authorized representative, if any, and the presently held authority in MC 70083. of Operations, Post Office Box 61212, protests must certify that such service Supporting shipper: Shulman, Inc., doing Houston, Tex. 77061. has been made. The protests must be business as Shulman Air Freight, 20 Ol­ No. MC 127991 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed specific as to the service which such ney Avenue, Cherry Hill Industrial Park, September 4, 1969. Applicant: P. F. Protestant can and will offer, and must Cherry Hill, N.J. Send protests to: Ray­ HUNTLEY COMPANY, East 6305 Mal- consist of a signed original and six copies. mond T. Jones, District Supervisor, In­ lon Avenue, Spokane, Wash. 99206. Ap­ A copy of the application is on file, and terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau plicant’s representative: Joseph O. Earp, can be examined at the Office of the Sec­ of Operations, 410 Post Office Building, 402 East State Street, Trenton, N.J. 411 Lyon Building, 607 Third Avenue, retary, Interstate Commerce Commis­ Seattle, Wash. 98104. Authority sought sion, Washington, D.C., and also in field 08608. No. MC 82841 (Sub-No. 61 TA), filed to operate as a common carrier, by motor office to which protests are to be vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ transmitted. September 3, 1969. Applicant: HUNT TRANSPORTATION, INC., 801 Live­ ing: Quarry tile, from Spokane Indus­ M otor C arriers o f P roperty stock Exchange Building, Omaha, Nebr. trial Park (Spokane County), Wash., to points in Los Angeles and Orange Coun­ No. MC 31600 (Sub-No. 645 TA), filed 68107. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, over ties, Calif., for 150 days. Supporting September 4, 1969. Applicant: P. B. shipper: Quarry Tile Co., Spokane In­ MUTRIE MOTOR TRANSPORTATION, irregular routes, transporting: Irriga­ tion systems and parts for irrigation dustrial Park, Building 12, Spokane, INC., Calvary Street, Waltham, Mass. Wash. 99216. Send protests to: L. C. Applicant’s representative: Frank Hand systems, from Douglas County, Nebr., to points in North Dakota, South Dakota, Taylor, District Supervisor, Bureau of (same address as above). Authority Operations, Interstate Commerce Com­ sought to operate as a common carrier, Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Maine, Illinois, Colorado, and Wyoming, for 180 mission, 401 U.S Post Office, Spokane, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Wash. 99201. transporting: Petroleum and petroleum days. Supporting shipper: Valmont In­ products, from New Haven, Conn., to dustries, Inc., Valley, Nebr. Send protests No. MC 128180 (Sub-No. 2 TA), filed Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long to: Keith P. Kohrs, District Super­ September 4, 1969. Applicant: WILLIAM Island, N.Y., for 180 days. Supporting visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, E. WALSH, Jr., doing business as BILL shipper: American Oil Co., Post Office Bureau of Operations, 705 Federal Office WALSH TRUCKING, 2131 Northeast Box 5690, Chicago, 111. 60680. Send pro­ Building, Omaha, Nebr. 68102. 132d Avenue, Portland, Oreg. 97203. Ap­ tests to: James F. Martin, Jr., Assistant No. MC 106398 (Sub-No. 418 TA), filed plicant’s representative: Lawrence V. Regional Director, Interstate Commerce September 2, 1969. Applicant: NA­ Smart, Jr., 419 Northwest 23d Avenue, Commission, Bureau of Operations, John TIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., 1925 Portland, Oreg. 97210. Authority sought P. Kennedy Building, Government Cen­ National Plaza, Tulsa, Okla. 74151. Ap­ to operate as a contract carrier, by motor ter, Boston, Mass. 02203. plicant’s representative: Irvin Tull vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ (same address as above). Authority ing: Wood chips, sawdust, shavings, and No. MC 59680 (Sub-No. 171 TA), filed sought to operate as a common carrier, hog fuel, from Banks and Laurelwood, Sept. 4, 1969. Applicant: STRICK­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Oreg., to Longview, Wash., for the ac­ LAND TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., transporting: Trailers, designed to be count of Longview Fibre Co., for 180 Post Office Box 5689, Dallas, Tex. 75222. drawn by passenger automobiles, from days. Supporting shipper: Longview Fi­ Applicant’s representative: Oscar Peck Hancock, Md., to points in Alabama, bre Co., Longview, Wash. 98632. Send (same address as above). Authority Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, protests to: A. E. Odoms, District Super­ sought to operate as a common carrier, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, by motor vehicle, over regular routes, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michi­ Bureau of Operations, 450 Multnomah transporting: General commodities serv- gan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hamp­ Building, Portland, Oreg. 97204. jng the plantsite of Remington Arms ivision of E. I. du Pont de Nemours & shire^ New Jersey, New York, North No. MC 133091 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed Lo. located between Little Rock and Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode September 4, 1969. Applicant: ALLEN Lonoke, Ark., as an off route point in Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ver­ WAREHOUSES, INC., 1210 Davis Ave­ mont, Virginia, and West Virginia, for nue, Laredo, Tex. 78040. Applicant’s rep­ connection with carrier’s operations be­ 180 days. Supporting shipper: Prowler resentative: Richard Kissinger, Post tween Memphis, Term., and Little Rock, Industries of Maryland, Inc., Elden L. Ark for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Office Box 1148, Austin, Tex. 78767. Au­ Smith, Plant Manager, 35 South Street, thority sought to operate as a common I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Wil- Post Office Box 458, Hancock, Md. bungton, Del. 19898. Send protests to: carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular 21750. Send protests to: C. L. Phillips, routes, transporting: Household goods, K. Willis, Jr., District Supervisor, In­ District Supervisor, Interstate Commerce terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau between points in Brooks, Val Verde, Commission, Bureau of Operations, La Salle, Kinney, Maverick, Duval, ot Operations, 513 Thomas Building, 1314 Room 240, Old Post Office Building, 215 Zavala, Dimmit, Webb, Zapata, Jim wood Street, Dallas, Tex. 75202. N o t e : Northwest Third, Oklahoma City, Okla. Wells, and Jim Hogg Counties, Tex., on Applicant states it intends to tack with 73102. its presently held authority in MC 59680 the one hand, and, on the other, points and subs. No. MC 116077 (Sub-No. 277 TA), filed in Val Verde County and Webb County, September 4,1969. Applicant: ROBERT­ Tex., and the international boundary be­ No. MC 70083 (Sub-No. 15 TA), Sep- SON TANK LINES, INC., 5700 Polk Ave­ tween the United States and Mexico at 2, 1969. Applicant: DRAKE nue, Post Office Box 1505, Houston, Tex. Laredo and Del Rio, Tex., for 180 days. C)TOR LINES, INC., 20 Olney Avenue, 77001. Applicant’s representative: J. C. N o t e : The operations above described tjnerry Hill Industrial Park, Cherry Hill, Browder (same address as above). Au­ will be restricted to shipments having a j °8034. Applicant’s representative: thority sought to operate as a common prior or subsequent movement, beyond oseph w. Watson (same address as carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular said points. Supporting shippers: CTI- ove). Authority sought to operate as routes, transporting: Hydrochloric acid, Container Transport International, Inc.,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 No. 175- -6 14352 NOTICES 17 Battery Place, New York, N.Y. 10004; ricultural commodities, between specified mon carrier certificates in Nos. MC-17006 Express Forwarding & Storage, Inc., 17 points and areas in Maryland, Pennsyl­ and MC-17006 (Sub-No. 1) authorize the Battery Place, New York, N.Y. 10004; vania, New Jersey, and New York. transportation of (a) general commodi­ Davidson Forwarding Co., 3180 V Street, S. Maxwell Flitter, 200 South Seventh ties (with usual exceptions, and except NE., Washington, D.C. 20018; Home- Street, Easton, Pa. 18042, attorney for the commodities authorized to be trans­ Pack Transport, Inc., 57-48 49th Street, + VO TT Q f P T P P ported under the name permits) between Maspeth, N.Y. 11378. Send protests to: No. MC-FC—71548. By order of Sep­ specified points in New York, New Jersey, Richard H. Dawkins, District Supervisor, tember 5, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board Pennsylvania, Maryland, Massachusetts, Interstate Commerce Commission, Bu­ approved the transfer to Gobel Freight Rhode Island, Connecticut, Virginia, and reau of Operations, 301 Broadway, Room Lines, Inc., Chicago, HI., of permit No. Delaware, and the District of Columbia, 206, San Antonio, Tex. 78205. MC—115430, issued October 8, 1956, to and (b) rock wool, from Dover, N.J., to No. MC 133996 TA, filed September 4, Earl Gobel, doing -business as Gobel Washington, D.C., and points in specified 1969. Applicant: CHRIS DRAKOS, do­ Freight Lines, Niles, 111., authorizing the portions of Maryland and Virginia. The ing business as MONTANA BRAND transportation of: Malt beverages, adver­ contract carrier permits in Nos. MC-3582 PRODUCE CO., I ll West Fireclay Ave­ tising matter, and premiums, from La and MC-3582 (Sub-No. 3) authorize the nue, Murray, Utah 84107. Applicant’s Crosse, Wis., to Chicago, 111., and empty transportation of rags, skids, paper, and representative: Irene Warr, 419 Judge containers used in transporting malt paper products, machinery, and mate­ Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. beverages, from Chicago, HI., to La rials and supplies used in the manufac­ Authority sought to operate as a con­ Crosse, Wis. Philip A. Lee, 110 South ture of paper and paper products, be­ tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ Dearborn Street, Chicago., 111. 60603, at­ tween New York, N.Y., and specified regular routes, transporting: Such torney for applicants. points in New Jersey, in radial and non- merchandise as is dealt in by wholesale, No. MC-FC-71579. By order of Septem­ radial movements, and between the re­ retail, and chain grocers and food busi­ ber 5. 1969, the Motor Carrier Board ferred to New York and New Jersey ness houses, between Albertson’s retail approved the transfer to Charles H. Har- points, on the one hand, and, on the stores, wholesale stores, warehouses, sup­ butt, Scotch Plains, N.J., of a portion of other, points in New Jersey, New York, pliers, and manufacturing plants in the certificate in No. MC-123063 (Sub- Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C., Mary­ Washington, Oregon, California, Nevada, No. 5), issued September 30, 1968, to land, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and Kirbery Transportation, Inc., Wood- Connecticut. Dual operations were au­ Colorado, under a continuing contract bridge, N.J., authorizing the transporta­ thorized. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., 24 with Albertson’s, Inc., for 180 days. Sup­ tion of magazines between Dunellen, N.J., Branford Street, Newark, N J. 07102, and porting shipper: Albertson’s, Inc., Gen­ and New York, N.Y., on the one hand, A. David Millner, 744 Broad Street, eral Offices, Post Office Box 20, 1623 and, on the other, points in Bergen, Un­ Newark, N.J. 07102, attorneys for Washington, Boise, Idaho 83707. Send ion, Essex, Middlesex, Passaic, and Hud­ applicants. * protests to: John T. Vaughan, District son Counties, N.J. George A. Olsen, 69 [seal] H. Neil Garson, Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Com­ Tbnnele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J. 07306, Secretary. representative for applicants. mission, Bureau of Operations, 6201 Fed­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10920; Filed, Sept. II, 1969; eral Building, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111. [seal] H. Neil Garson, 8:49 a.m.J By the Commission. Secretary. [seal] H. Neil Garson, [FJa. Doc. 69-10919; Filed; Sept. 11, 1969; Secretary. 8:49 a.m.] FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION [F.R. Doc. 69-10918; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:49 a.m.] [Notice 406A] [Docket No. RI69-358] MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER AMERADA PETROLEUM CORP. [Notice 406] PROCEEDINGS Order Accepting Letter Agreement, MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER September 9,1969. and Accepting Related Decreased PROCEEDINGS Synopses of orders entered pursuant to Rate Filing Subject to Refund in Ex­ September 9, 1969. section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ isting Rate Suspension Proceeding merce Act, and rules and regulations Synopses of orders entered pursuant prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part September 5, 1969. to section 212(b) of the Interstate 1132), appear below: On August 4,1969, Amerada Petroleum Commerce Act, and rules and regulations Corp. (Amerada), filed a proposed re­ prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part As provided in the Commission’s gen­ eral rules of practice any interested per­ determined rate decrease from a pres­ 1132), appear below: ently effective 14.2678 cents per Mcf rate As provided in the Commission’s spe­ son may file a petition seeking reconsid­ eration of the following numbered pro­ now being collected subject to refund in cial rules of practice any interested per­ Docket No. RI69-358, to 13.2486 cents per son may file a petition seeking reconsid­ ceedings within 30 days from the date of service of the order. Pursuant to section Mcf (designated as Supplement No. 9 eration of the following numbered to Amerada’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule proceedings within 20 days from the date 17(8) of the Interstate Commerce Act, the filing of such a petition will post­ No. 49) for gas sold from acreage in the of publication of this notice. Pursuant San Juan Basin, Rio Arriba County, to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ pone the effective date of the order in that proceeding pending its disposition. N. Mex. (San Juan Basin Area) to El merce Act, the filing of such a petition Paso Natural Gas Co. (El Paso). On will postpone the effective date of the The matters relied upon by petitioners must be specified in their petitions with June 19, 1969, Amerada submitted a order in that proceeding pending its dis­ letter agreement dated May 6, 1969 position. The matters relied upon by pe­ particularity. No. MC-FC-71434. By order of Septem­ (designated as Supplement No. 8 to titioners must be specified in their Amerada’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. petitions with particularity. ber 8, 1969, Division 3, acting as an No. MC-FC-71483. By order of Sep­ Appellate Division, approved the transfer 49) which provides for the switching of tember 5, 1969, the Motor Carrier Board to All Cargo Transport, Inc., Newark, certain wells from El Paso’s high pres­ approved the transfer to R. F. Sell, Inc., N.J., of the operating rights in certifi­ sure system to low pressure system with Allentown, Pa., of certificate No. MC- cates Nos. MC-17006 and MC-17006 a 1 cent per Mcf reduction in price. The 1856 issued August 8, 1968 to Robert F. (Sub-No. 1) and of the operating rights aforementioned rate filings are set forth Sell, 1200 North Irving Street, Allentown, in permits Nos. MC-3582 and MC-3582 in Appendix “A” hereof. Pa. 18101, authorizing the transporta­ (Sub-No. 3) issued October 22, 1943, The proceeding in Docket No. RI69- tion of: Brick, cement, and supplies used October 17, 1949, October 22, 1943, and in its manufacture, roofing materials, March 11,1966, respectively, to Cardinale 358 involves a rate increase from 14.2486 loose bulk commodities, humus, and ag­ Trucking Corp., Secaucus, N.J. The com­ cents to 14.2678 cents per Mcf filed

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14353 Amerada on November 29,1968. The pro­ existing rate proceeding in Docket No. (A) The proposed decreased rate of posed rate was suspended, among others, RI69-358; and accept for filing the pro­ 13.2486 cents per Mcf contained in by the Commission’s order issued De­ posed letter agreement dated May 6, Supplement No. 9 to Amerada’s FPC Gas cember 27, 1968, in Docket No. RI69-358, 1969, effective as of August 1, 1969, the Rate Schedule No. 49, is accepted for and was made effective subject to refund proposed effective date. filing and permitted to become effective by the Commission's notice dated July The Commission finds: Good cause as of August 1, 1969, subject to refund 10, 1969, as of June 1, 1969. exists for accepting for filing Amerada’s in the existing rate suspension proceed­ Amerada’s proposed 13.2486 cents per proposed rate decrease, designated as ing in Docket No. RI69-358 and refund Mcf rate decrease exceeds the area in­ Supplement No. 9 to Amerada’s PPC Gas obligation related thereto. creased rate ceiling of 13 cents per Mcf Rate Schedule No. 49, to become effec­ (B) Amerada’s letter agreement dated for the San Juan Basin Area as an­ tive as of August 1, 1969, the proposed May 6, 1969, designated as Supplement nounced in the Commission’s statement effective date, subject to refund in the No. 8 to Amerada’s FPC Gas Rate of general policy No. 61-1, as amended. rate suspension proceeding in Docket Schedule No. 49, is accepted for filing Since the proposed rate decrease is pro­ No. RI69-358; and to accept for filing and permitted to become effective as of vided for by letter agreement we con­ the letter agreement dated May 6, 1969, August 1, 1969, the proposed effective clude that it would be in the public designated as Supplement No. 8 to date. interest to accept for filing Amerada’s Amerada’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. proposed rate decrease to become effec­ 49, to become effective as of August 1, By the Commission. tive as of August 1, 1969, the proposed 1969, the proposed effective date. t seal 3 Gordon M. G rant, effective date, subject to refund in the The Commission orders: Secretary. A p p e n d ix a

Effec­ Rate in Rate Sup­ Amount Date tive Date Cents per Mcf effect Docket Respondent sched­ ple­ Purchaser and producing area of filing date suspended subject to No. ule ment annual ten­ unless until— Rate in Proposed refund in No. No. decrease dered sus­ effect decreased rate dockets pended Noe.

RI69-358-. Amerada Petroleum 49 *8 El Paso Natural Gas Co. (San Juan 6-19-69 >8-1-69 (Accepted) Corp., Post Office Box 49 *9 Basin, Rio Arriba County, N. $855 8- 4-69 >8-1-69 (Accepted- •14.2678 *•»«13.2486 RI69-358. 2040, Tulsa, Okla. Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). Subject to 74102. Refund)

'Letter agreement dated May 6, 1969, which provides for the switching of certain * Applicable only to Jlcarilla Apache A-3, A-6, and B-13 Wells. wells (Jlcarilla Apache A-3, A-6, and B-13 Wells) from El Paso’s high pressure sys­ 4 Redetermined rate increase. tem with a 1 cent per Mcf reduction in price—deletes 1 cent per Mcf minimum guar­ 8 Pressure base is 15.025 p.s.La. antee for liquids and favored nations provisions insofar as they pertain to said wells. • Includes partial reimbursement for the full 2.55 percent New Mexico Emergency * The stated effective date is the effective date requested by Respondent. School Tax. [FJR. Doc. 69-10802; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; 8:46 a.m.J

[Docket No. CP70-47] Any person desiring to be heard or to Under the procedure herein provided ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS CO. make any protest with reference to said for, unless otherwise advised, it will be application should on or before October 3» unnecessary for Applicant to appear or Notice of Application 1969, file with the Federal Power Com­ be represented at the hearing. mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a peti­ S eptember 5, 1969. tion to intervene or a protest in accord­ G ordon M. Grant, Take notice that on August 29, 1969, ance with the requirements of the Com­ Secretary. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. (Applicant), mission’s rules of practice and procedure [F.R. Doc. 69—10852; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Post Office Box 1126, Shreveport, La. (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regulations 8:45 a.m.] 71102, filed in Docket No. CP70-47 an under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR application pursuant to section 7(c) of 157.10). All protests filed with the Com­ [Docket No. CP70-46] the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of mission will be considered by it in de­ public convenience and necessity author­ termining the appropriate action to be EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. izing the construction and operation of a taken, but will not serve to make the tap and delivery facilities to effect di­ protestants parties to the proceeding. Notice of Application rect sale and delivery of gas for industrial Any person wishing to become a party S eptember 5,1969. consumption to General Electric Co. un­ to a proceeding or to participate as a Take notice that on August 29, 1969, der an industrial gas sales contract dated party in any hearing therein must file El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Applicant), April 18, 1969, for the fuel requirements a petition to intervene in accordance Post Office Box 1492, El Paso, Tex. 79999, of General Electric Co.’s manufacturing with the Commission’s rules. filed in Docket No. CP70-46 an applica­ plant near Shreveport, La., all as more Take further notice that, pursuant to tion pursuant to section 7(c) of the Nat­ fully set forth in the application which the authority contained in and subject to ural Gas Act for a certificate of public is on file with the Commission and open the jurisdiction conferred upon the Fed­ convenience and necessity authorizing to public inspection. eral Power Commission by sections 7 and the construction and operation of certain The estimated annual and peak day 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Corp- natural gas facilities and the sale and requirements of the customer are: mission’s rules of practice and procedure, delivery of natural gas to California- a hearing will be held without further Pacific Utilities Co. (Cal-Pac) for resale Annual Peak day notice before the Commission on this volume volume and distribution in the community of (Mcf) (Mcf) application if no petition to intervene Winchester, Oreg., and environs, all as is filed within the time required herein, more fully set forth in the application First Year...... 190,000 1,200 if the Commission on its own review of which is on file with the Commission and Year...... 190,000 1,200 the matter finds that a grant of the cer­ open to public inspection. rmrdYear...... 190,000 1,200 tificate is required by the public conveni­ ence and necessity. If a petition for leave Applicant proposes to construct and The total estimated cost of the pro­ to intervene is timely filed, or if the operate additional metering facilities at posed facilities is $28,350, which will be Commission on its own motion believes its existing Winchester Sales Meter Sta­ financed from cash on hand and short- that a formal hearing is required, further tion, located on Applicant’s 10%-inch term borrowings. notice of such hearing will be duly given. O.D. Grants Pass lateral in Douglas

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14354 NOTICES County. The total estimated cost of Ap­ unnecessary for Applicant to appear or Federal Power Commission by sections 7 plicant’s proposed facilities is $2,375, be represented at the hearing, and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ which Applicant proposes to finance Gordon M. Grant, through working funds. Applicant states Secretary. cedure, a hearing will be held without that the Winchester Sales Meter Station further notice before the Commission on [F.R, Doc. 69-10853; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; this application if no petition to inter­ sales have been limited to two industrial 8:45 a.m.] customers on an interruptible basis and vene is filed within the time required that Cal-Pac now proposes to provide herein, if the Commission on its own [Docket No. CP70-48] review of the matter finds that a grant of firm service to the community of Win­ the certificate is required by the public chester, Oreg., and environs. EL PASO NATURAL GAS CO. convenience and necessity. If a petition To provide service to the community Notice of Application for leave to intervene is timely filed, or of Winchester, Cal-Pac proposes to con­ if the Commission on its own motion struct facilities consisting of mains, serv­ S eptember 5,1969. ... believes that a formal hearing is required ices and meters and a regulating sta­ Take notice that on August 29, 1969, further notice of such hearing will be tion, at an estimated cost for the first El Paso Natural Gas Co. (Applicant), duly given. 3 full years of operation of $123,043. Post Office Box 1492, El Paso, Tex. 79999, Under the procedure herein provided The estimated peak day and annual filed in Docket No. CP70-48 an applica­ for, unless otherwise advised, it will be gas requirements of Cal-Pac during the tion pursuant to section 7 (c) of the Nat­ unnecessary for Applicant to appear or third full year of the proposed firm serv­ ural Gas Act for a certificate of public be represented at the hearing. ice are 114 Mcf and 23,695 Mcf, respec­ convenience and necessity authorizing G ordon M. G rant, tively. Applicant’s proposed sale and de­ the operation of existing facilities and Secretary. livery for resale to Winchester and en­ the delivery of natural gas on an ex­ virons will be initiated on a firm basis change basis to Colorado Interstate Gas [F.R. Doc. 69-10854; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; in accordance with and at rates con­ Co., a division of Colorado Interstate 8:45 a.m.] tained in Applicant’s Rate Schedule Corp. (Colorado), all as more fully set DI-5, FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume forth in the application which is on file [Docket No. E-7494] No. 3. Sales to Cal-Pac for resale to in­ with the Commission and open to public dustrial customers will continue to be inspection. IOWA POWER AND LIGHT CO. AND made in accordance with and at rates Applicant and Colorado have entered IOWA-ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC contained in Applicant’s Rate Schedule into a Letter Agreement dated August 1, CO. 1-5, FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume 1969, whereby Applicant will deliver by No. 3._ use of existing tap facilities previously Order Providing for Hearing and Any person desiring to be heard or to installed, natural gas for a limited term Permitting Intervention make any protest with reference to said and on an emergency standby basis to S eptember 3, 1969. Colorado in exchange for the delivery application should on or before Octo­ Iowa Power and Light Co. and Iowa- ber 3, 1969 file with the Federal Power of like quantities of gas by Colorado to Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a Northern Natural Gas Co. for the ac­ Illinois Gas and Electric Co. (Appli­ petition to intervene or a protest in ac­ count of Applicant. Applicant will deliver cants) filed on June 27, 1969, an appli­ cordance with the requirements of the gas to Colorado at a point on its pipeline cation, as amended on AugUst 12, 1969, Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ located in Hutchinson County, Tex., in pursuant to section 203 of the Federal amounts and at times specified by Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 824b ), requesting cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the authorization to consummate a plan of regulations under the Natural Gas Act Colorado, up to but not in excess of consolidation under which Applicants (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with 16,000 Mcf per day. Such gas shall be the Commission will be considered by it delivered by Colorado to Hill Chemical, would be consolidated into .a new cor­ in determining the appropriate action to Inc., for use in its anhydrous ammonia poration, Iowa Energy Corp. be taken but will not serve to make the plant located near Boyer, Tex. The agree­ The Iowa State Commerce Commis­ Protestants parties to the proceeding. ment provides for a term continuing sion on July 24, 1969, pursuant to the Any person wishing to become a party through July 31, 1974. It is this limited Commission’s rules of practice and to a proceeding or to participate as a term for which the certificate is procedure, filed a notice of intervention party in any hearing therein must file requested. in this proceeding; and Iowa Public a petition to intervene in accordance Any person desiring to be heard or to Service Co. and Interstate Power Co. make any protest with reference to said (Petitioners) filed petitions to intervene with the Commission’s rules. on July 25, 1969, and July 28, 1969, Take further notice that, pursuant to application should on or before Octo­ ber 3, 1969, file with the Federal Power respectively. the authority contained in and subject Iowa Public Service Co. alleges, inter to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a Federal Power Commission'by sections petition to intervene or a protest in ac­ alia, that it is engaged in the generation, 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the cordance with the requirements of the transmission, and sale of electricity Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ within the State of Iowa; that it as well cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ as each applicant is a member of the cedure, a hearing will be held without Iowa Power Pool and Mid-Continent further notice before the Commission lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 on this application if no petition to inter­ CFR 157.10) All protests filed with the Area Power Planners; and that if cer­ vene is filed within the time required Commission will be considered by it in tain allegations made in support of the herein, if the Commission on its own determining the appropriate action to be subject application are true, the proposed review of the matter finds that a grant taken but will not serve to make the consolidation would give Applicants a of the certificate is required by the public protestants parties to the proceeding. competitive advantage over Iowa Public convenience and necessity. If a petition Any person wishing to become a party to Service Company not now enjoyed by for leave to intervene is timely filed, or a proceeding or to participate as a party either applicant. if the Commission on its own motion in any hearing therein must file a peti­ Interstate Power Co. contends: That believes that a formal hearing is re­ tion to intervene in accordance with the it is engaged in the generation, purchase, quired, further notice of such hearing Commission’s rules. transmission, and distribution of electric­ will be duly given. Take further notice that, pursuant to ity in the States of Iowa and Iflinoi& Under the procedure herein provided the authority contained in and subject among others; and that it is one of tne for, unless otherwise advised, it will be to the jurisdiction conferred upon the several competitors of the Applicants

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— -FRIDAY, SEPTÈMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14355 and as such has an interest which may be aggrieved by any order entered in this 4 and 15 thereof, the Commission’s rules be directly affected by the disposition of proceeding. of practice and procedure, and the regu­ this proceeding and which is not ade­ By the Commission. lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 quately represented by existing parties. CFR Ch. I), a public hearing be held In answer to the petitions to intervene, [ seal] G ordon M. Grant, commencing October 6, 1969, in a hear­ Applicants state that although they do Secretary. ing room of the Federal Power Com­ not agree with certain of the allegations [F.R. Doc. 69-10855; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; mission, 441 G Street NW., Washington, made, they have no objection to the in­ 8:45 a.m.] D.C. 20426, concerning the lawfulness of tervention by Petitioners in this proceeding. the rates, charges, classifications, and [Docket No. RP70-4] services contained in Pacific’s FPC Gas In view of the legal and policy issues Tariff, as proposed to be amended raised by the proposed transaction, and PACIFIC GAS TRANSMISSION CO. herein. in accordance with our previously ex­ pressed policy of requiring public hear­ Order Providing for Hearing and (B) Pending such hearing and deci­ ings on all applications requesting ap­ sion thereon, Pacific’s revised tariff Suspending Proposed Revised Tariff sheets listed hereinbefore are hereby proval of the merger or consolidation of Sheets two or more Class A electric utilities1 we suspended and the use thereof is de­ believe that the public interest and the S eptember 3,1969. ferred until February 8, 1970, and until requirements of the Federal Power Act On August 8, 1969, Pacific Gas Trans­ such further time as they are made ef­ mission Co. (Pacific) tendered for filing fective in the manner prescribed by the will be best served by granting the peti­ Natural Gas Act. tions to intervene and setting this mat­ a proposed increase in the rate of return ter for hearing, as hereinafter provided. component of its cost of service (for­ (C) At the hearing on October 6,1969, The Commission finds: mula) tariff for sales of natural gas under Pacific’s prepared testimony (Statement (1) The participation by Petitioners its FPC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. P) filed and served on August 25, 1969, in this proceeding may be in the public 1, to become effective on September 8, together with its entire rate filing as interest. 1969.1 The proposed increase in rate of submitted and served on August 8, 1969, (2) It is appropriate and in the public return, to 7.5 percent, would be applica­ shall be admitted to the record as Pa­ interest that a hearing be held in this ble to Pacific’s Rate Schedules T -l and cific’s complete case-in-chief as provid­ proceeding as hereinafter provided. PL-1. Based on sales for the 12- ed by § 154.63(e) (1) of the Commis­ month period ended May 31,1969, as ad­ sion’s regulations under the Natural Gas (3) The period of public notice of the Act, and Order No. 254, 28.FPC 495, sub­ initial convening of the hearing to be justed, the requested increase in rate of return would increase charges for juris­ ject to appropriate motions, if any, by held in this proceeding is reasonable and parties to the proceeding. consistent with the public interest. dictional sales by approximately $1,554,- 235 annually. (D) Following admission of Pacific’s The Commission orders: Pacific’s filing consists of revised tar­ complete case-in-chief, the parties shall (A) Pursuant to the authority con­iff sheets for Pacific’s Rate Schedules present their views and the Presiding tained in and subject to the jurisdiction T -l and PL-1, in its FPC Gas Tariff Examiner, in the exercise of his discre­ conferred upon the Federal Power Original Volume No. 1, which sheets ef­ tion, shall fix dates for service of Staff’s Commission by the Federal Power Act fect a revision in the rate of return ele­ and Intervenors’ evidence on such issues and pursuant to the Commission’s rules ment of the two schedules above named. and service of Pacific’s rebuttal testi­ of practice and procedure, a public hear­ Pacific states the reason for the pro­ mony; fix dates for witnesses and to ing shall be held in the above-entitled posed rate of return increases is to re­ stand cross-examination thereon; and matter in a hearing room of the Federal place the inadequate 1961-vintage rate proceed with such hearing as expedi­ Power Commission, 441 G Street NW., of return with a new 7.50 percent rate. tiously as feasible. Washington, D.C., before the Presiding Review of the filing indicates that the (E) Presiding Examiner Harry C. Examiner respecting the issue of proposed increase in rate of return has Shriver, or any other designed by the whether granting the application herein not been shown to be justified and may Chief Examiner for that purpose (See will be consistent with the public interest be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discrim­ Delegation of Authority, 18 CFR 3.5(d)), as expressed in section 203 of the Act. inatory, or preferential, or otherwise un­ shall preside at the hearing in this pro­ ine time for the hearing will be fixed by lawful. There may, however, be other is­ ceeding; shall prescribe relevant pro­ the Presiding Examiner following the sues in the cost of service formula that cedural matters not herein provided, and Prehearing conference hereinafter may also be raised. directed. shall control this proceeding in accord­ The Commission finds: ance with the policies expressed in § 2.59 , (®) A prehearing conference shall be (1) It is necessary and proper in the of the Commission’s rules of practice and held before the Presiding Examiner com- public interest and to aid in the enforce­ procedure. *0 am., e.d.t., September 17, ment of the provisions of the Natural 1969, in a hearing room of the Federal Gas Act that the Commission enter upon By the Commission. fower Commission, Washington, D.C., a hearing concerning the lawfulness of [seal] Gordon M. Grant, lor purposes as specified in the Com­ the rates and charges contained in Pa­ Secretary. cific’s FPC Gas Tariff, as proposed to be mission’s rules of practice and procedure. [F.R. Doc. 69-10856; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; (C) The Petitioners are hereby per­ amended herein, and that thè proposed 8:45 a.m.) mitted to intervene in this proceeding tariff sheets listed hereinbefore be sus­ subject to the rules and regulations of pended, and the use thereof be deferred h6 Commission: Provided, however, as herein provided. [Docket No. CP70-45] chlii parfciciPation of such interveners (2) It is necessary and proper in the SEA ROBIN PIPELINE CO. snail be limited to the matters affecting public interest and to aid in the enforce­ asserted rights and interests specifically ment of the provisions of the Natural Notice of Application set forth in their petitions to intervene: Gas Act that the disposition of this pro­ *na Provided, further, That the admis­ ceeding be expedited in accordance with S eptember 5, 1969. sion of such interveners shall not be con- the procedures set forth below. Take notice that on August 29, 1969, S e5 .as re°ognition by the Commis- The Commission orders: Sea Robin Pipeline Co. (Applicant), Post h that they or either of them might (A) Pursuant to the authority of the Office Box 1407, Shreveport, La. 71102, Natural Gas Act, particularly Sections filed in Docket No. CP67-45 an applica­ tion pursuant to section 7(c) of the Nat­ ■iR1 £ i?Lmonwealth Edison Company, et ai., irThe tariff sheets hereinafter suspended ural Gas Act for a certificate of public FPC 927, 930; affirmed sub nom., Utility are as follows: Second Revised Sheet No. 6 convenience and necessity authorizing 1968)' League v< FPC> 394. F- 2d 16 (CA7, and Second Revised Sheet No. 13 of Original the construction and operation of certain Volume No. 1. facilities to connect Block 222, Ship Shoal

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14356 NOTICES Area, offshore Louisiana, to Applicant’s motion requesting the Commission to feasible because we have been advised offshore pipeline to take into its pipeline amend the order issued in this proceed­ that a Presiding Examiner will not be system additional supplies of natural gas ing on August 11, 1969, suspending the available in this proceeding until the to be purchased in this area, all as more proposed rate increase of Texas Gas week in which the hearing on Memphis fully set forth in the application which Transmission Corp. and providing for is scheduled to commence. is on file with the Commission and open hearing thereon. Memphis moves that, The Commission -orders : The proce­ to public inspection. in lieu of the hearing procedure pre­ dural matters urged by Memphis in its Applicant proposes to construct and scribed in that order which leaves deci­ motion filed August 21, 1969, should be operate approximately 26 miles of 20- sions on procedural matters to the submitted to the Presiding Examiner for inch pipeline from Block 206, Eugene Is­ Presiding Examiner, the Commission consideration and appropriate ruling land Area, offshore Louisiana, to connect order that the issues of rate of return, thereon, and for the reason hereinbefore the Block 222 reserves. Applicant also re­ liberalized depreciation, and related in­ stated, Memphis’ alternative proposal quests authority to install 3,600 horse­ come taxes and the purchased gas ad­ to advance the date of hearing is denied. power of additional compressor facili­ justment clause be tried in an initial By the Commission. ties at Erath, La. phase of the hearing, in accordance with the schedule proposed by Memphis for [seal] - Gordon M. Grant, The total estimated cost of proposed Secretary. facilities is $7,687,500, which will be fi­ the service of further evidence and cross- nanced initially by short-term bank examination. As alternate relief, Mem­ [F.R. Doc. 69-10858; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; loans. phis requests that, the September 25, 8:45 a.m.] Any person desiring to be heard or to 1969, date fixed for hearing by the Com­ make any protest with reference to said mission in the suspension order be [Docket No. CP70—44] application should on or before Octo­ advanced to September 8, 1969. The ber 2, 1969, file with the Federal Power Commission staff and Texas Gas filed UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO. answers to Memphis’ motion on Septem­ Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a Notice of Application petition to intervene or a protest in ac­ ber 2 1969. cordance with the requirements of the In support of its motion Memphis con­ S eptember 5, 1969. Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ tends that, in the Commission’s utiliza­ Take notice that on August 28, 1969, cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ tion of the two-phase procedure for the United Gas Pipe Line Co. (Applicant), lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 trial of rate increase proceedings for the Post Office Box 1407, Shreveport, La. CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the purpose of reducing the amount of ex­ 71102 filed an abbreviated application Commission will be considered by it in cess charges collected and refunded, the pursuant to section 7 (c) of the Natural determining the appropriate action to be time between the issuance of the suspen­ Gas Act for a certificate of public con­ taken but will not serve to make the sion order and the initial hearing date, venience and necessity authorizing the is not used productively, thus delaying construction and operation of certain Protestants parties to the proceeding. the prospect of a Commission decision in A n y person wishing to become a party to natural gas facilities to serve Georgia- a proceeding or to participate as a party Phase I prior to expiration of the sus­ Pacific Corp. (Georgia-Pacific), Smith in any hearing therein must file a peti­ pension period. Memphis claims that if County, Miss., all as more fully set forth tion to intervene in accordance with the the Commission would amend its order in the application which is on file with to specify the issues in Phase I and the Commission and open to public Commission’s rules. direct that cross-examination begin on Take further notice that, pursuant to September 25, 1969, there will be a sub­ inspection. the authority contained in and subject stantial gain in moving these issues to Specifically, Applicant proposes to to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Commission decision within thè suspen­ construct 7.5 miles of 4-inch pipeline, Federal Power Commission by sections sales meter station, and appurtenant sion period or not long after expiration facilities on the Jackson-Mobile Mam 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the of the suspension period. Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ The staff objects to Memphis’ motion Line located in Smith County, Miss., and cedure, a hearing will be held without extending in a northeasterly direction to on the grounds that the relief requested Georgia-Pacific’s plantsite located in further notice before the Commission on would entirely revise the intent of the this application if no petition to inter­ suspension order by removing from the Smith County, Miss. vene is filed within the time required Presiding Examiner the authority in­ Applicant states that it has entered herein, if the Commission on its own re­ vested in him to determine appropriate into a Gas Sales Contract with Georgia- view of the matter finds that a grant of hearing procedures, and by depriving the Pacific, dated July 16, 1969, to deliver the certificate is required by the publip parties of the opportunity to present a maximum of 2,400 Mcf of natural gas convenience and necessity. If a petition their views on procedural matters which, per day. It is also stated that the esti­ for leave to intervene is timely filed, or the staff contends, is also contrary to mated annual volumes under said con­ if the Commission on its own motion be­ orderly administrative procedure. tract range from 180,000 Mcf in the first lieves that a formal hearing is required, Contrary to Memphis’ contention that year to 420,000 Mcf of natural gas in the further notice of such hearing will be our order provides for a two-phase hear­ third year. Applicant states further that duly given. it has been advised by Georgia-Pacific ing, the procedure which we prescribed that the gas will be required on or about Under the procedure herein provided leaves determinations with respect to for, unless otherwise advised, it will be procedural matters to the Presiding Ex­ October 15, 1969. ... unnecessary for Applicant to appear or aminer’s discretion as the most practical The total cost of the proposed facul­ be represented at the hearing. way of disposing of this proceeding in an ties, as estimated by Applicant, is orderly and expeditious manner. We ex­ $298,100. G ordon M. G rant, Any person desiring to be heard or to Secretary. pressly authorized him to determine, after hearing the parties’ views, the is­ make any protest with reference to said [F.R. Doc. 69-10857; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; sues, if any, which may be tried in an application should on or before Septem­ 8:45 a.m.] initial phase of the hearing and to pre­ ber 29, 1969, file With the Federal Power scribe the dates for service of further Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, [Docket No. RP69—41 ] evidence and cross-examination. Mem­ petition to intervene or a protest in ac­ phis’ proposal would require the Com­ cordance with the requirements of the TEXAS GAS TRANSMISSION CORP. mission to rule upon these detailed pro­ Commission’s rules of practice and P*o® ' dure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ Order Denying Motion to Amend cedural matters. In our opinion these rulings are more appropriately a func­ lations under the Natural Gas Act Order Providing for Hearing and tion of the Presiding Examiner who is CFR 157.10). All protests filed w ith tu Suspension of Proposed Increased familiar with the issues and will have Commission will be considered by it . Rates the parties directly before him. determining the appropriate action to S eptember 5, 1969. Memphis alternatively proposes that taken but will not serve to uiake _ protestants parties to the proceed • Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division the hearing date be advanced to Septem­ (Memphis), on August 21, 1969, filed a ber 8, 1969. Grant of this request is not Any person wishing to become a Pa

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 NOTICES 14357 to a proceeding or to participate as a dure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the regu­ T.4S..R.7E., party in any hearing therein must file lations under the Natural Gas Act (18 Sec. 18, lots 3,4, SW&SEft; a petition to intervene in accordance CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Sec. 19, NE%, NE % SE %; with the Commission’s rules. Commission will be considered by it in Sec. 20, SW14NW14, NWJ4SW&, SyaSW%; Take further notice that, pursuant to determining the appropriate action to be Sec. 28, SW^NWi/i, SWV4; the authority contained in and subject Sec. 29, NE14NW14, NE]4; taken but will not serve to make the sec. 3 3 , Nwy4NEy4, sy2NEy4 , n e %n w &, to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Protestants parties to the proceeding. N%SE%, SE]4SE^; Federal Power Commission by sections 7 Any person wishing to become a party Sec. 34, SW14SW14. and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the to a proceeding or to participate as a T. 5 S., R. 7 E., Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ party in any hearing therein must file Sec. 3, NWy4, N E^SW ^, NW ^SEti, SV2 cedure, a hearing will be held without a petition to intervene in accordance SEV4; further notice before the Commission on Sec. 4, lot 1; with the Commission’s rules. Sec. 10, E14 NE ; this application if no petition to inter­ Take further notice that, pursuant to vene is filed within the time required Sec. 11, NW14NW&, Sy2NWi4, Ny2SWi4 , the authority contained in and subject SEi4SWy4, SW 14SE 14 ; herein, if the Commission on its own re­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the sec. 1 3 , NW14SW14 , sy2sw y4 ; view of the matter finds that a grant of Federal Power Commission by sections 7 Sec. 14, NEJ4, NE14SE14; the certificate is required by the public and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the Sec. 24, N14NW14, SE]4NW^4, NE14SW14, convenience and necessity. If a petition Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Nwy4 sEy4 ,sy 2 SEy4; for leave to intervene is timely filed, or Sec. 25, E14NE]4 . cedure, a hearing will be held without T. 5 S., R. 8 E., if the Commission on its own motion further notice before the Commission on believes that a formal hearing is required, Sec. 30, lots 1, 2, 3, E14SW14, SW%SE^; this application if no petition to inter­ Sec. 31, Ny2NE}4, SE^NE^, Ey2SE%. further notice of such hearing will be vene is filed within the time required T. 6 S., R. 8 E. (unsurveyed), duly given. herein, if the Commission on its own re­ Sec. 4, SW14SW14; Under the procedure herein provided view of the matter finds that a grant of Sec. 5, Ni/2NWy4, SE^NW^, SW14NE14, for, unless otherwise advised, it will be the certificate is required by the public Ny2 SEi4,SEt4SEi4; unnecessary for Applicant to appear or convenience and necessity. If a petition Sec. 9, SW^NE%, Ny2 NW%, SE^NWyi, be represented at the hearing. N y2 SE 14, SE 14 SE 14; for leave to intervene is timely filed, or Sec. 10, Sy2SWi/4; Gordon M. Grant, if the Commission on its own motion Sec. 13, SW14SW14; Secretary. > believes that a formal hearing is required, Sec. 14, S14NW14, Ni/2SWy4, SE%; further notice of such hearing will be Sec. 15, Ni/2NWy4, NE%; [F.R. Doc. 69—10659; Piled, Sept. 1 1 , 1969; duly given. Sec. 24, Ni/2NWi/4, SE^NW ^, NW&NE^, 8:45 a.m.] S y> NE 1,4 , NE % SE 1,4 . Under the procedure herein provided T. 6 S., R. 8y> E. (unsurveyed), for, unless otherwise advised, it will be [Docket No. CP70-42] Sec. 23, NW^4SW%, Si^SW^; unnecessary for Applicant to appear or Sec. 25,Si/2NW i4,N^SW i4,SEi4; . UNITED NATURAL GAS CO. be represented at the hearing. Sec. 26, NE %, NE % NW %; Sec. 36, NE%NE]4. Notice of Application Gordon M. Grant, T. 6 S., R. 9 E„ Secretary. Sec. 30, lot 4; S eptember 3,1869. [F.R. Doc. 69-10860; Filed, Sept. 11, 1969; Sec. 31, lot 1, E^NWy4, NE%; Take notice that on August 22, 1969, 8:45 a.m.] Sec. 32, Si/2Ni/2, Ni/2SEy4; United Natural Gas Co. (Applicant), 308 Sec. 33, Ni/2SWi/4, SE^SW ^, SE%; sec. 3 4 , sy2sw y4 , s w ^ s e ^ . Seneca Street, Oil City, Pa. 16301, filed in [Project 57] T. 7 S., R. 9 E. (unsurveyed), Docket No. CP70-42 an abbreviated ap­ Sec. 1, SW14, SW14 SE ; plication pursuant to section 7(c) of the OREGON Sec. 2, Si/2NE]4, NW%, N^SEi4; Natural Gas Act for a certificate of pub­ Order Partially Vacating Withdrawal Sec. 3, Ni/2NEi,4, NEy4NW%; lic convenience and necessity authoriz­ Sec. 12, N ^N E ^, SE^NE^, NEi4NW?4. ing the construction and operation of of Lands T. 7 S., R. 10 E., Sec. 7, SW 1,4NW14, N14SW14 , SEI4 SW14, certain replacement natural gas trans­ S eptember 3, 1969. mission facilities, all as more fully set NWi4SEy4,Si/2SEi4; forth in the application which is on file Application has been filed by the U.S. Sec. 16, SW14SW14; Forest Service (Applicant) for partial Sec. 17, NW1/4 NW1/4 , Si/2 NWi/4, NE14SW14, wh the Commission and open to pub­ SE yA; lic inspection. vacation of the power withdrawal per­ taining to the following described lands Sec, 18, N%NEi4 ; Specifically, Applicant proposes to con­ of the United States: Sec. 20, NEi^NE^; struct and operate the following facil­ ^ec. 2 1 , N14NW14, SE14NW1/4', NW^NEi^, ities: The replacement of approximately W i l l a m e t t e M e r i d i a n , O r e g o n Si/2 NEi4 ; . nule of existing deteriorated 8-inch All portions of the following described Sec; 22, SW1/4 NW1/4 , Ni/2SWy4, SE14; Pipeline with a 12-inch pipeline in Knox tracts lying within 200 feet of the centerline Sec. 26, Ny-NE^, SE14NE14, NE^NWiA; and Rose Townships, Jefferson County, of the transmission line location shown on a Sec. 36, NEy4NE54- map designated “Exhibit K, Supplement No.; All portions of the following described 2” (sheets 2, 3, 4, and 5), and entitled tracts lying within 100 feet of the center line Applicant states that the proposed “Project No. 57, Oregon, of Columbia Valley of the transmission line location shown on Project will have the effect of increasing Power Co., Transmission Line, Pelton to sheets 1 and 2 of the above described map its system’s capacity and ability to meet Portland Route”, and filed in the office of the designated “Exhibit K, Supplement Np. 2 ”, uie increasing requirements of its exist­ Federal Power Commission on October 14 and filed in the office of the Federal Power ing markets. 1925: Commission on October 14, 1925: The total cost of the proposed project, T. 3 S.,R. 6 E„ T. 7 S., R. 11 E., estimated by Applicant, is $31,818. Sec. 19, Si/aSW^; Sec. 31, lot 1. applicant states that it will finance the Sec. 29, SW]4, SW y4 SE 14 ; T. 8 S.,R. 11 E., Proposed project with funds on hand. Sec. 30, NW]4NE]4, S^N E ^, N]4NW14; ; Sec. 5, SW14NW14, SW14; Sec. 32, N14NE14, SE^NE%; Sec. 8, NEi/4NW 14 , NW ^NE^, S14NE14; Any person desiring to be heard or to Sec. 33, lots 3, 4, NW14NWI4 , SVoNWW, Sec. 9, SE%SWi4; ®ake any protest with reference to said NE&SW 14, NW14SEÎ4. Sec. 15, SWi^SWi^; PPucation should on or before Septem- T. 4 S., R. 6 E., Sec. 2, lot 7; Sec. 16, NWi/4NEi/4 , Sy2 NE^,Ei/2NWi4 ; "; 29, 1969, file with the Federal Power Sec. 22, SW14NE14, N]4NW]4» SE^NW ^, omnussion, Washington, D.C. 20426, a Sec. 3, N W ^.SE^; SE14; Sec. 11, lots 3,4,6, 7,9, 10,16; Petition to intervene or a protest in ac- Sec. 12, S^SWi/4; Sec. 23, SW*4SW]4; ’ raance with the requirements of the Sec. 13, NW&NE&, Si/2NE]4, Ni/2NWi/4, Sec. 26, NWi,4,NEi,4SW}4, SEi/4; ^mission’s rules of practice and proce­ Sec. 35, NE%NE^4; NE 14 SE 14. • Sec. 36, NW]4NWi4.

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 14358 NOTICES

T. 9 S., R. 11 E„ to be utilized for a transmission line poses, their retention in a withdrawal Sec. 1, lots 1, 2, and 8. right-of-way. Most of the lands lie within status is no longer necessary. T. 9 S., R. 12 E.f the Mount Hood National Forest. A 50- The Commission finds: The with­ Sec. 8rSW%SE%: year license for Project No. 57 was issued drawal of the subject lands pursuant to Sec. 7, Ni/2NEiA; to Columbia Valley Power Co. on June 25, the above mentioned application for Sec. 16, lots 13,14; 1924, and authorized the construction of amendment for the license for Project Sec. 17, NW%NE»4, Sy2NE%, NE^SE^; Sec. 21, lots 17, 24, 25, NW ^NE^, NE& dams at the Pelton and Metolius (Round No. 57 serves no useful purpose and NWi/4; Butte) sites on the Deschutes River. The should be vacated. Sec. 27, lots 10, 15, 26, N'^NW^, SE^4 licensee failed to construct the project, The Commission orders: The with­ NW*4. and the license was canceled Decem­ drawal of the subject lands pursuant to T. 10 S., R. 13 E., ber 19, 1936, by a decree of the U.S. Dis­ the application for amendment for the Sec. 18, lots 5, 6; trict Court, District of Oregon. license for Project No. 57 is hereby va­ Sec. 19, lot 5. Dams at the Pelton and Round Butte Approximately 2,225 acres. sites were subsequently constructed by cated insofar as it affects the subject lands. The lands are withdrawn pursuant to the Portland General Electric Co. under authorization contained in the license for By the Commission. the filing on October 14, 1925, of an ap­ Project No. 2030. The transmission lines plication for amendment of license for for Project No. 2030 follow a different (seal! G ordon M. Grant, Project No. 57. The lands lie between route than that proposed for Project No. Secretary. Pelton Dam on the Deschutes River and 57. Since there are no plans known for [P.R. Doc. 69-10861; Piled, Sept. 11, 1969; the city of Portland, Oreg., and were use of the subject lands for power pur­ 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 175— FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1969 FEDERAL REGISTER 14359 CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— SEPTEMBER

The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during September

3 CFR Page 12 CFR Pase 21 CFR— Continued Page Proclamations: 265— ______14279 P roposed R ules: 3926 ______14165 22— — ______13999 3927 ____.______14269 14 CFR 148m ______14078 Executive Orders: 21______14067 191______14129 10994 (superseded by 11480) __ 14273 39______13968, 11018 (superseded by 11480) __ 14273 13969, 14025-14027, 14123, 14207, 24 CFR 11479 ______14271 14208, 14280, 14315 1600-______14027 11480 ______14273 71______14027, 11481 ______14277 14068, 14069, 14124, 14208, 14209, 26 CFR 14280, 14281, 14315, 14316 P roposed R ules: 5 CFR 73__—______14069, 14124 213______:______13968,14066,14201 75______14209 151______14224 713______14023 97______'______13970, 14317 127______14069 29 CFR 7 CFR 183______14124 601------14329 51______14325 250______14281 720------14329 68______14325 P roposed R ules: 31 CFR 81______13991 13______I______14079 215______14167 39______14226, 14227, 14331 251------14126 301______14167 47______!______14079 253 ______14126 401______14325 61______14081, 14331 254 ------14126 722_.______— 14065 63______14331 256----- ______14126 729______14121,14201 71 13999 290------14126 855______14201 ~ 14082l~14176ll4285,- 14286, 14332 908______14025,14279 75______14002, 14227, 14332 32 CFR 910______14122 91______14079 163------______14027 926______14206 167____ 14129 501—------14126 944______14326 288______14078 806.,______14209 948______14065 399___ 14078 981______14279 809------14210 987______14280 32A CFR 993______14206 15 CFR 1421...... _____ 14206 390______14326 OIA (Ch. X ) : 1475______14206 OI Reg. 1------14283 16 CFR Proposed R ules: 33 CFR 29______14035 13 ______14326, 14327 52______14334 15______13988 40------14211 906______14129 P roposed R ules: 927____;______14224 3 6 CFR 932______14225 245______14176 2— ______14170 944______13994 5______14212 948______14035,14225 17 CFR 7______14212 1007______. _____ 13994 P roposed R ules: 1090______13994 231__ 14125 1126______._____ 14226 240______14209 13994, 14035 249______14209 8 CFR P roposed R ules: 3 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 103______14123 210______14227 230______14228 14176 9 CFR 239 ______14234 240 _____ 14235 3 9 CFR 73______14024 249______14238, 14240 123_____ 14170 74___ 14824,14066 317. I” —II” ! 126_____ 14170 _____ 13992 1 9 CFR 127_____ 14171 Proposed R ules: 12------14328 132_____ 14171 156—___ 112______14224 14171 113 ___ 21 CFR 221_____ 14028 14224 222 14028 114 ___ 14224 _____ 1—------14070 243__ — 14028 3------14167 247_____ 14028 10 CFR 19 ______14070 40______20 ------14071 14067 41 CFR Proposed R ules: 120----- 14073, 14126, 14168, 14328, 14329 121 ______14168,14169 12-1___ _ 14213 40___ 14333 131______14167 12-3____ 14221 150...... 14333 191______- ______14169 12-7____ 14222

No. 175-----7 14360 FEDERAL REGISTER 43 CFR Page 47 CFR—Continued Page 50 CFR Page P roposed R ules: 2240______14075 10______14028, 14223 73— ______14000 Public Land Orders: 28______14330 4582 (modified by PLO 4682) __ 14076 49 CFR 32 ______— 13991, 4682______14076 1033______14172 14032-14034, 14074, 14075, 14174, 1048______14174 14283, 14284, 14330 P roposed R ules: 33 ______------14074 47 CFR Ch. IV. 14054 o______14330 1002— 14000 P roposed R ules: 73______13989, 14222 1300— 14242 91______13990 1 3 0 7 - 14242 32_— ______14079

\