“Eye of Horus”. (The Educational-Hypothetical Approach)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE MAGIC OF THE RENAISSANCE TODAY: THE PICTURE AND THE IDEOGRAMMATIC WRITTING OF “EYE OF HORUS”. (THE EDUCATIONAL-HYPOTHETICAL APPROACH) Associate Prof. Dr. Vladimir Vinokurov Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia Associate Prof. Dr. Marina Vorontsova Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia ABSTRACT According to the historian of writing systems, Ignace Gelb, the picture writing carries a magical load as such, - or in other words, the effect of magical spells is enhanced by the fact that they are expressed with the help of picture writing. According to the historian of religions, Fridrich Yeiler, since Babylon, astrologers have tried to penetrate the mystery of the heavenly ideogrammatic writing. The alchemists used ideogrammatic writing. Ideogrammatic writing was also used by astrologers. The application of the ideogrammatic form of a picture letter is a regression to the child's learning to count. Telling a certain legend about the Egyptian god Thoth (deity of scribes), Plato informs that he was an inventor. Among his inventions - counting, writing and astrology, as well as land surveying and gaming. The writing in question is primarily an Egyptian hieroglyph. Ancient Egyptian god Thoth was connected with the Ennead Theogony, which develops in the myth of Isis and Osiris, and their son Horus. Born of Isis and Osiris, god Horus enters the battle with Set to avenge his father. In one of the episodes of the “litigation” of Horus and Set, the latter managed to wrest the left eye of Horus and break it into 64 parts, which, however, god Thoth collected, “repaired” the eye, but left 1/64 part to him, hiding it. Only after this intervention of Thoth, Horus - son of Isis managed to win. Regarding the episode with the torn and assembled “Eye of Horus and its meaning”, as well as the meaning of the grapheme itself, Egyptologists and writing historians Alan Gardiner and Ignace Gelb note that the episode has an encoded mathematical interpretation - the creation of signs for fractions. The individual parts of the eye correspond to hieroglyphic signs to denote fractional numbers, which in total are 63/64. The missing one sixty-fourth part remained with Thoth. However, in the further analysis of this plot, the opinions of scientists differ. The essence of Gardiner's position is that the myth led the Egyptians to create signs for fractions. According to Gelb, the situation is completely different: not parts of the Eye of Horus led to the creation of signs for fractions, but, conversely, the signs for fractions used in measuring grain, originally representing, most likely, geometric figures were subsequently joined by an inventive scribe so as to form the image of this sacred eye. In this moment a new conjugation of scientific and mythological ideas is taking place. To solve the issue, necessary analyze the on-the-scene figures, which appear in this episode. The comprehension of life through the myth is related to the search for approximations of the numbers π and Φ (“Golden Ratios”). Ideogram “The Eye of Horus” is not only a rendition of the myth, but a hidden approximation of the calculation of the numbers π (3.149) and Φ. The spiral be Fibonacci, the drawing of a man's body in a pentagram by Leonardo da Vinci suggests relationships to the golden ratio. Keywords: eye of Horus, sacred eye, ideogrammatic writing, Fibonacci, Leonardo da Vinci. INTRODUCTION The educational-hypothetical approach is a complex synthetic inversion of the scientific-historical and educational approaches. It is formed, on the one hand, holding an educational setting with regard to the problem of Hermetic teachings, and on the other hand, as a hypercritical attitude towards the Enlightenment. Thus, its authors seek enlightenment, pointing out a problem that stayed out of the sight of science, and even seek exposing the incorrect actions of scientists, charging them with bias in the analysis and selectivity of materials, and at the same time, they speak of the ‘dark core’ of Hermetic teachings which was formed in the depths of history and manifested in social and individual psychology. This is the ‘shadow of the Enlightenment’. This approach is close to psychoanalysis in relation to method of study. Science, bringing the enlightenment to its logical conclusion, allowed noticing this ‘indivisible nucleus’, the ‘shadow’ that disappears whenever science explores its object or whenever there are attempts to grasp it with the help of scientific methods, but at the same time, it finds, covers and captures new areas of knowledge, lives in the secrets of history and social psychology, in the depths of the individual and collective psyche. In studies of esoteric disciplines, it manifests itself as an unexpected hypothesis, requiring it to be included in the structure of scientific research. The works undertaken in this direction include the works of J. Weidner and R. Cook [1], R. Bauval and A. Gilbert [2], M. Baigent, R. Leigh [3], M. Livio [4]. A clear artistic illustration of the application of this approach is Dan Brown's bestsellers. DISCUSSION AND RESULTS The cultural-symbolic approach, The interest of the Renaissance to the antique culture and to the hermeticism consequential led to the study of the Old Egypt and to the research of the Egypt writing. But at the moment of appearance of this interest the understanding of it was lose. 1419 priest from Florence Christoforo de Buoldemonti found on the island Andros in the Aegean See the manuscript “The Hieroglyphics of Horapollo Nilous”. He bought it and got to Italy. 1505 the manuscript was published in Ancient Greek in Venice [5]. It became clear that: “In around the fifth century, the Egyptian Horapollo Niliaci, a grammarian from Phanebytis, under Theodosius II (408 – 450 AD), rendered 189 hieroglyphs into plain Egyptian. When a Greek translation of his work, Hieroglyphica, was found in the fifteenth century, it was widely believed. Centuries after Dürer, the Rosetta Stone showed that Horapollo was usually wrong but not always. In 1512/1513 Willibald Pirckheimer (1470-1530), Dürer’s learned neighbor, best friend, Humanist, state councillor, and translator of Greek and Hebrew classics, translated Hieroglyphica from Greek into Latin. Dürer illustrated this translation and it was widely disseminated, providing a fresh graphic vocabulary that influenced the visual arts of Europe” [6]. 1515 the translation in Latin by Horapollo with the Dürer’s engravings was published. David Ritz Finkelstein wrote: “Sources demonstrably used by Dürer in his body of works and arguably used in MELENCOLIA I: the Bible, the De Occulta Philosophia of Agrippa, the Hieroglyphica of Horapollo, and works of Dürer himself” [7]. The images of Dürer’s were complemented by descriptions from the “Hieroglyphica” by Horapollo. For example, for the dog’s image in “MELENCOLIA I” is important not only the figure in the picture, but the dog’s hieroglyph in the version of Horapollo. The scientific-educational approach When Finkelstein speaks of certain images – say the image of a dog – as symbols, he is speaking of interpretation; and of what the reader can to accept as an interpretation. He wrote: “The Dog was especially obscure to me from the start. MELENCOLIA I, The Knight, and Jerome each have a dog and an hour glass. The hour-glasses remind us that life is brief. What do the dogs mean? <...> To us, dogs represent love and fidelity, to Agrippa, they represent love or flattery. <...> We may infer this by elimination and guesswork, but we have to understand how this could have been understood by Dürer’s viewership. To read this Dog I first looked at Dürer’s other dogs. He had drawn at least two in the year before that are still extant, in the Triumphal Arch and the Hieroglyphica. The dog drawn by Dürer for the Hieroglyphica resembles the one in MELENCOLIA I in its gaunt belly and its unusual head, which some take for a sheep’s. In his Triumphal Arch Dürer represented the Emperor Maximilian I as a dog with a stole, as the Hieroglyphica required. In the Hieroglyphica we learn that the Egyptians represent a prophet by a dog, ‘because the dog looks intently beyond all other beasts upon the images of the gods, like a prophet’. The Dog is actually a prophet, worker of the Celestial Sphere, an astrologer. Reading the language of Hieroglyphica is trickier than writing it. Besides a prophet, Horapollo’s naked dog can also represent an embalmer, the spleen, odour, laughter, sneezing, and rule. Apparently one goes by context. I think the Dog means the prophet this time” []. Horapollo mentioned the dog directly in 39th and 40th interpretations, indirectly in 38th interpretation. 38. “How the Egyptian letters”: “Thoth, the sacred scribe, is usually in this position, behind Osiris in the judgment of the dead”. 39. “Sacred scribe”: “And again when they would denote a sacred scribe, or a prophet, or an embalmer, or the spleen, or smelling, or laughter, or sneezing, [or government, or a judged] they depict a dog” [8]. 40. “In what manner they represent government, or a judge”: “In what manner they represent government, or a judge”: “When they denote government, or a judge, they place close against the clog a ROYAL ROBE, the undress garment: because like the dog, who, as I said before, gazes intently on the images of the gods, so likewise the minister, being in the more ancient times a judge also, used to see the king naked, and on this account they add the royal garment” []. “Horapollo’s naked dog”. This utterance is understandable with using “embalmer” as keyword. So made Alexander Turner Cory in the book “The Hieroglyphics of Horapollo Nilous” (Fig.1, left). Fig. 1, left. “Anubis on a tomb”. Fig. 1, right.