Niue Sustainable Coastal Fisheries Pilot Project: Marine Baseline Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Niue Sustainable Coastal Fisheries Pilot Project: Marine Baseline Survey ISSN 1818-5614 Niue sustainable coastal fisheries pilot project: Marine baseline survey By Dave Fisk IWP-Pacific Technical Report (International Waters Project) no. 39 Global United Nations Pacific Regional Environment Development Environment Facility Programme Programme SPREP IRC Cataloguing-in-Publication data Fisk, Dave Niue sustainable coastal fisheries pilot project : Marine baseline survey / by Dave Fisk. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP. 2007. vi, 78 p. ; 29 cm (IWP-Pacific Technical report, ISSN 1818 – 5614 ; no.39). ISBN: 978-982-04-0362-8 1. Coastal fisheries – Sustainability – Niue. 2.Coastal fisheries – Management – Niue. 3. Resource allocation – Management – Planning – Niue. I. International Waters Project (IWP). II. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP). III. Title. IV. Series This report (originally written in 2004) was produced by SPREP’s International Waters Project, which is implementing the Strategic Action Programme for the International Waters of the Pacific Small Island Developing States, with funding from the Global Environment Facility. The views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the publisher. Cover design by SPREP's Publication Unit Editing and layout: Mark Smaalders, IWP editorial consultant SPREP PO Box 240, Apia Samoa E: [email protected] T: +685 21 929 F: +685 20 231 Website: www.sprep.org © Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme, 2007 All rights for commercial/for profit reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPREP authorises the partial reproduction of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that SPREP and the source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and/or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing. Original SPREP artwork may not be altered or separately published without permission. ii Contents Abbreviations............................................................................................................................. v Executive summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Cyclone damage ...................................................................................................................... 3 Management options ............................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 6 1 Background............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Objective and aims of the baseline assessment phase...................................................... 8 2 Approaches and methods....................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Rationale............................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Approach ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Manta tow method........................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Timed surveys ................................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Belt transects ................................................................................................................... 11 2.6 Analysis........................................................................................................................... 13 3 Results.................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Reef slope assessments................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Habitat characteristics .............................................................................................. 14 3.1.2 Biotic features .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 Disturbance and health indices................................................................................. 18 3.2. Selected reef slope site surveys...................................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Site descriptions ....................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Coral communities and species................................................................................ 25 3.2.3 Macro algae.............................................................................................................. 26 3.3 Belt transects ................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1 Impact of Cyclone Heta on selected macro invertebrates........................................ 27 3.3.2 Other macro invertebrates........................................................................................ 30 3.3.3 Distribution patterns of macro invertebrates in reef flat pilot sites.......................... 30 4 Discussion.............................................................................................................................. 45 4.1 Status and health of coastal resources ............................................................................. 45 4.1.1 Reef structure ........................................................................................................... 45 4.1.2 Corals and coral communities.................................................................................. 45 4.1.3 Macro invertebrates: molluscs ................................................................................. 46 4.1.4 Macro invertebrates: holothurians............................................................................ 49 4.1.5 Algae (macro, turf, blue-green)................................................................................ 50 4.1.6 Fish........................................................................................................................... 50 4.1.7 Health and disturbance indicators ............................................................................ 51 4.2. Capacity building for volunteers and national staff ....................................................... 53 5 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 54 5.1 Natural disturbances........................................................................................................54 Recommendation 1 ........................................................................................................... 55 5.2 Refuge areas .................................................................................................................... 55 Recommendation 2 ........................................................................................................... 56 5.3 Regional isolation............................................................................................................ 56 Recommendation 3 ........................................................................................................... 57 Recommendation 4 ........................................................................................................... 57 5.4 Harvest pressure .............................................................................................................. 57 Recommendation 5 ........................................................................................................... 57 iii Recommendation 6 ........................................................................................................... 57 5.5 Indicator species.............................................................................................................. 57 5.5.1 Reef flat indicators................................................................................................... 57 5.5.2 Slope indicators........................................................................................................ 58 Recommendation 7 ........................................................................................................... 59 6 References ............................................................................................................................. 60 6.1 References referred to in the text .................................................................................... 60 6.2 References used to identify organisms referred to in the text ......................................... 61 Appendix 1. Manta tow data .................................................................................................. 62 Appendix 2. Manta tows: position and direction.................................................................. 65 Appendix 3. Coral genera and species recorded .................................................................. 69 Appendix 4. Macro invertebrate
Recommended publications
  • High Resolution Met-Ocean Modelling for Storm Surge Risk Analysis in Apia, Samoa – Final Report
    The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology High Resolution Met-Ocean Modelling for Storm Surge Risk Analysis in Apia, Samoa – Final Report Ron Hoeke, Kathy McInnes, Julian O’Grady, Felix Lipkin and Frank Colberg CAWCR Technical Report No. 071 June 2014 High Resolution Met-Ocean Modelling for Storm Surge Risk Analysis in Apia, Samoa – Final Report Ron Hoeke, Kathy McInnes, Julian O’Grady, Felix Lipkin and Frank Colberg Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research (CAWCR), Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia, 3008 CAWCR Technical Report No. 071 June 2014 ISSN: 1835-9884 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Authors: Ron Hoeke, Kathy McInnes, Julian O’Grady, Felix Lipkin and Frank Colberg Title: High resolution met-ocean modelling for storm surge risk analysis in Apia, Samoa. ISBN: 9781486303212 Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Storm surges--Samoa--Apia--Mathematical models. Storm winds--Samoa--Apia--Mathematical models. Wind waves--Samoa--Apia--Mathematical models. Sea level--Samoa--Apia--Mathematical models. Cyclones--Samoa--Apia. Dewey Number 551.463099614 Enquiries should be addressed to: Ron Hoeke Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research: A partnership between the Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO GPO Box 1289, Melbourne Victoria 3001, Australia [email protected] Copyright and Disclaimer © 2013 CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology.
    [Show full text]
  • Biocontrol in Support of Island Ecosystems
    Biocontrol in support of island ecosystems Tracy Johnson, Julie Denslow and Warea Orapa Tropical islands are famous as hotspots of diversity, both biological and cultural Biodiversity Hotspots: Which stand to lose most to invasion? 0.07 Eastern Arc and Coastal Forests of Tanzania/Kenya 0.06 Endemic Philippines Density 0.05 (# endemic plant 0.04 2 Western Ghats/Sri Lanka spp. per km of 0.03 remaining habitat) Caribbean 0.02 (data from Myers Polynesia/Micronesia New Caledonia Madagascar* et al. 2000 Nature) 0.01 0.00 103 104 105 106 Size of remaining habitat (km2) Political Units (ShareAlike 3.0) Languages Austronesian: ~400 Papuan: ~800 Micronesian: 20 Polynesian: 20+ Strong cultural traditions Polynesian voyaging Maisu and Hokule'a at Chuuk. Photo: Mike Taylor Decision making in Palau Juan Wilson Hawaiian agriculture Challenges for conserving island ecosystems: Impacts of land use Rarotonga Coastal areas have been converted for agriculture and homes; Upland forests continue to be valued culturally … and as a water resource Land conversion on Hawai`i Island 1 km2 Mauna Kea (4,000m) American Samoa Samoan agroforestry Native forests extend to the sea Severe climates / Dynamic ecosystems Fiji Vanuatu Tropical Cyclone Ron, 1998 (NOAA) Severe climates / Dynamic ecosystems Miconia in Tahiti (J.-Y. Meyer) Aftermath of Cyclone Heta, American Samoa 2004 Challenges for conserving island ecosystems: #1: Spread of Invasive species Established invaders continue to spread allhawaiinews.com Existing biosecurity measures often are inadequate HDOA Carnegie Airborne Observatory Denslow et al. 2009 Biotropica # Invasive (or potentially invasive) non-native plant species in Pacific Substrate Type islands Volcanic/Metamorphic Coralline/Limestone Larger islands (esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Ethnohistory of Rapa Island, French Polynesia, AD 1791–1840
    2 ‘Dwelling carelessly, quiet and secure’ A brief ethnohistory of Rapa Island, French Polynesia, AD 1791–1840 Atholl Anderson Department of Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, [email protected] Introduction In 1826, the first European missionary to Rapa, the Rev. John Davies, quoted Judges 18:7 in seeing the Rapans as ‘dwelling carelessly, quiet and secure, and having no business with any man’ (in Stokes n.d.:28; an idiomatic rendering of the passage). It was to some extent, possibly to a great extent, quite illusory. Rapa was certainly isolated by comparison with most of East Polynesia, and it was small, mountainous and relatively cold, but even the first European visitors found that Rapans exhibited evidence of contact with the outside world, and within Rapan traditions, historical observations and ethnographic data which together form the stuff of ethnohistory, the theme of contact and change is illustrated continually. Rapan society was East Polynesian in ancestry and culture. Rapans spoke an East Polynesian language, but its closest affinities were puzzling for a long time. The earliest historical contacts with Rapans showed that they found both Hawaiian and Tahitian largely unintelligible and later characterisation of Rapan by European scholars was confused because of the early introduction of Tahitian by missionaries and, after 1863, of other Polynesian languages by Tongans, Tokelauans and Cook Islanders, whose descendants came eventually to represent nearly half of the population (Stokes 1955). Samuel Stutchbury had observed, presciently, in 1826 (in Richards 2004:5) that the Rapan language was ‘something resembling the Marquesan’, but Horatio Hale (1968:141), about 1840, ‘obtained at Tahiti, from a native of Rapa, a brief vocabulary of the language spoken there, which turns out to be, with a few verbal exceptions, pure Rarotongan, and this in its minute peculiarities’, while the missionaries William Ellis (1838) and M.
    [Show full text]
  • Year (05 January 2004) There Have Been Some Noticeable Observations of the Changes to the Number and Settlement of the Population of Niue
    Economic, Planning, Development and Statistics Unit, Premiers Department, Government of Niue. Phone 4219, E-mail : [email protected] , web: www.gov.nu/stats 1 Economic, Planning, Development and Statistics Unit, Premiers Department, Government of Niue. Phone 4219, E-mail : [email protected], web: www.gov.nu/statsniue Niue National Head Count - September 2004 Introduction Fakaalofa lahi atu. Following the devastating events of cyclone Heta in the opening weeks of this year (05 January 2004) there have been some noticeable observations of the changes to the number and settlement of the population of Niue. There was movement of people to and from overseas as well as from one village to another, more so the most affected coastal villages from Hikutavake to Avatele. In order to know the true picture of these movements and changes the national statistics office of the Government of Niue was tasked with the exercise to conduct a comprehensive “Population Head Count of Niue”. The objectives of this exercise was seen as: • To determine the total population of Niue and at the same time re-establish the nominal roll of all people living in Niue and where they are at a certain point in time to be used in estimating the population during that period; • To record the changes and update the appropriate information (Population and Households Census 2001 and the compilation of the National Accounts) contained in the department to reflect; • To serve as a data source for the electoral rolls, planning for school rolls, and social policy in general; and • To be used in times of emergencies such as cyclones as a “guiding roll” of residents or occupiers of the households in each villages.
    [Show full text]
  • When Risk Management of Natural Hazards
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Not if but when Adapting to natural hazards in the Pacific Islands Region A policy note Public Disclosure Authorized 2006 Sofia Bettencourt | Richard Croad | Paul Freeman | John Hay | Roger Jones Peter King | Padma Lal | Alan Mearns | Geoff Miller | Idah Pswarayi-Riddihough Alf Simpson | Nakibae Teuatabo | Ulric Trotz | Maarten Van Aalst The World Bank East Asia and Pacific Region Pacific Islands Country Management Unit Adapting to Natural Hazards in the Pacific Islands Region 1 This Policy Note is dedicated to the memory of Savenaca Siwatibau for his efforts and vision in mainstreaming hazard risk management into economic planning in the Pacific. Note: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this Policy Note are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent nor to the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, SOPAC or AusAID. Contents List of Acronyms iii Prologue iv Contributors vi Executive summary viii 1 High vulnerability 1 1.1 Fifty years of disasters 1 1.2 Recent trends 4 1.3 The future climate 6 2 Key lessons learned 9 2.1 Early action pays 9 2.2 Some action but too little impact 11 3. Future directions 17 3. 1 Strengthening the enabling national environment 18 3.2 Supporting decision-making 20 3.3 Mainstreaming 24 3.4 Implementation 28 3.5 Monitoring and evaluation 30 3.6
    [Show full text]
  • Successive Bleaching Events Cause Mass Coral Mortality in Guam, Micronesia
    Successive bleaching events cause mass coral mortality in Guam, Micronesia L. J. Raymundo, D. Burdick, W. C. Hoot, R. M. Miller, V. Brown, T. Reynolds, J. Gault, J. Idechong, J. Fifer & A. Williams Coral Reefs Journal of the International Coral Reef Society ISSN 0722-4028 Volume 38 Number 4 Coral Reefs (2019) 38:677-700 DOI 10.1007/s00338-019-01836-2 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer- Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Coral Reefs (2019) 38:677–700 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-019-01836-2 REPORT Successive bleaching events cause mass coral mortality in Guam, Micronesia 1 1 2 1 3 L. J. Raymundo • D. Burdick • W. C. Hoot • R. M. Miller • V. Brown • 1 1 1 1,4 1 T. Reynolds • J. Gault • J. Idechong • J. Fifer • A. Williams Received: 15 October 2018 / Accepted: 17 June 2019 / Published online: 25 June 2019 Ó Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract The reefs of Guam, a high island in the Western Preliminary evidence suggests that some coral species are at Pacific, were impacted by an unprecedented succession of high risk of extirpation from Guam’s waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Normal.Dot with MFAT Styles
    FRANZ 2007 - Heta on Niue Scenario – Background material Niue - Characteristics Niue is a small independent state comprising a single, small limestone island of approximately 260sqkms (roughly 23 by 18km) and with an estimated (and declining) population of around 1500. Niue is on top of a large dormant volcano that rises steeply from a 3000-4000m deep ocean. It rises to only 68m above sea level, with most of the island no higher than 30m. Located between Tonga on the west and the Cook Islands to the east, it marks the boundary of the paths taken by large tropical cyclones, which originate in the warm tropical seas to the north. Niue experiences regular trade winds from the south- east, which renders this part of the island inhospitable. The NW side of the island is more sheltered. As a result, most of the population lives here and goods are landed here by ship. But this is also the side facing the path of cyclones. Infrastructure Niue has 14 villages which are linked by an 86km paved ring road. In total 96% of the islands roads are sealed. Most households have at least one vehicle. There is one airport in the capital of Alofi that has a paved runway. Air New Zealand operates a weekly service from Auckland and Polynesian Airlines operate a weekly service from Apia. There are no ports with only offshore anchorage available. Reef Shipping operates a monthly service. Communications infrastructure includes internet access as well as landline and mobile telephone communications. All the villages are connected by a single-line telephone system.
    [Show full text]
  • Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes
    SCLERACTINIAN REEF CORALS: IDENTIFICATION NOTES By JACKIE WOLSTENHOLME James Cook University AUGUST 2004 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24656.51205 Scleractinian Reef Corals: Identification Notes by Jackie Wolstenholme is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................. 2 FAMILY ACROPORIDAE.................................................................................................................................... 3 Montipora ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & tuberculae/papillae ................................................................................... 3 Montipora monasteriata .............................................................................................................................. 3 Massive/thick plates/encrusting & papillae ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Corals Supplemental Information Report
    Supplemental Information Report on Status Review Report And Draft Management Report For 82 Coral Candidate Species November 2012 Southeast and Pacific Islands Regional Offices National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................................................... 3 SRR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Background on Corals and Coral Reefs .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Taxonomy & Distribution .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FDM 2017 Coral Species Reef Survey
    Submitted in support of the U.S. Navy’s 2018 Annual Marine Species Monitoring Report for the Pacific Final ® FARALLON DE MEDINILLA 2017 SPECIES LEVEL CORAL REEF SURVEY REPORT Dr. Jessica Carilli, SSC Pacific Mr. Stephen H. Smith, SSC Pacific Mr. Donald E. Marx Jr., SSC Pacific Dr. Leslie Bolick, SSC Pacific Dr. Douglas Fenner, NOAA August 2018 Prepared for U.S. Navy Pacific Fleet Commander Pacific Fleet 250 Makalapa Drive Joint Base Pearl Harbor Hickam Hawaii 96860-3134 Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific Technical Report number 18-1079 Distribution Statement A: Unlimited Distribution 1 Submitted in support of the U.S. Navy’s 2018 Annual Marine Species Monitoring Report for the Pacific REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Service, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To) 08-2018 Monitoring report September 2017 - October 2017 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER FARALLON DE MEDINILLA 2017 SPECIES LEVEL CORAL REEF SURVEY REPORT 5b.
    [Show full text]