DOCSLIB.ORG

Ten Open Source Tools Which Will Transform Your Library and Your Library Budget*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ten Open Source Tools Which Will Transform Your Library and Your Library Budget* Ten Open Source Tools Which Will Transform Your Library and Your Library Budget* David Hughes Systems Librarian Dublin Business School * Free and Open Source Software You Can Think About Using in Your Library So, What Is Open Source Software? History -1 1980s Four Software Freedoms: Freedom to run a program for any purpose Freedom to study the mechanics of the program and modify it Freedom to redistribute copies Freedom to improve and change modified versions for public use History - 2 1990s History - 3 Rebranding (1998) + Open Source Initiative Eric S. Raymond and others Non-profit Promote open source software Pragmatic, business friendly approach “to dump the moralizing and confrontational attitude that had been associated with 'free software'" and instead promote open source ideas on "pragmatic, business-case grounds” – Michael Tiemann Acronyms OSS – Open Source Software F(/)OSS – Free & Open Source Software FLOSS – Free/Libre Open Source Software "Near as I can figure ... people think they’d be making an ideological commitment ... if they pick 'open source' or 'free software'. Well, speaking as the guy who promulgated 'open source' to abolish the colossal marketing blunders that were associated with the term 'free software', I think 'free software' is less bad than 'FLOSS'. Somebody, please, shoot this pitiful acronym through the head and put it out of our misery.“ – Eric S. Raymond Acronyms are used interchangeably A Distinction Without a Difference? Activist Pragmatist “Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement” – Richard Stallman ‘…despite philosophical differences, proponents of open source and free software "often work together on practical projects.“’ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Source_Initiative Free Software Foundation 4 freedoms Software made available with source code Anyone, for any purpose, can study, change, and distribute the software on any platform Open Source Initiative Definition Free Redistribution of program Source Code included Derived Works must be allowed Integrity of The Author's Source Code* No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavour Distribution of License License Must Not Be Specific to a Product License Must Not Restrict Other Software License Must Be Technology-Neutral * Modification may not be permitted under specific circumstances/derived works may require a different name https://opensource.org/osd Practical Differences Free Software Foundation No Restrictions Open Source “You can look at the source code” May prevent modification Also “Tivoization”: hardware blocks execution of modified programs “Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are exceptions” Is a program “free” or “open source” – check the license! A Disclaimer Open ≠ Free 1) ‘To understand the concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free beer”’ – Richard Stallman 2) “Support for openness usually requires people, and they are often the most expensive component” - Martin Weller Why Use Free/Open Source? Free! Lower costs No lock-in “Real-time” modification Better quality Better security Better privacy Modify and adapt A Brief Note on Quality But only if the eyeballs are paying attention A Brief Note on Security Digital Rights Management World-Wide Web Consortium (W3C) “Encrypted Media Extensions” “Anti-Circumvention” Laws https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/standardized-drm-will- make-us-less-safe A Brief Note on Security 2 http://www.cfr.org/privacy/protecting-data-privacy-user-friendly- software/p37551 A Brief Note on Privacy http://www.wired.co.uk/article/avg-privacy- policy-browser-search-data 18/09/15 A Brief Note on Privacy 2 https://www.statnews.com/2016/03/08/health- apps-sell-medical-data/ 08/03/16 Why Not Use Free/Open Source? Hidden Costs Support Set up Hosting User friendliness Developer driven Vulnerabilities But… You may be using open source software already Open Source & Libraries Why? More Why Open Access Open Education Resources Open Scholarship …Open Source Open Source fits well with Library Philosophy and Values Yet More Why Diversity of the Library sofware ecosystem Proprietary systems Open source systems Keeps vendors honest http://librarytechnology.org/Mergers/ Last Why Everybody wins! Activist: Using FOSS is kicking back against neoliberalism/the commodification of the information profession Pragmatist: using FOSS is sound business sense The Open Source Library 10 Software Systems – 1. Firefox Browser Mozilla Foundation (non-profit) Derived from Netscape Navigator Rich collection of extensions Download and run Mozilla Public License 2.0 Recommended Extensions 1a. Tor Browser “The Onion Router” US Naval Research Laboratory Anonymous Web Browsing Modified Firefox Download and run Tor License (BSD) 2. LibreOffice - Office Application Suite Word Processor / Spreadsheet/ Presentation / Drawing / Formula Editor / Database Manager ODF format (ISO standard) Supports Microsoft Office formats Default Office suite of most Linux distributions Now recommended for UK government use Download and run Mozilla Public License 2.0 3. Koha - LMS Created in 1999 in New Zealand “Gift” in Maori (one of the original developers is Maori) Access by web browser (optimised for Firefox!) Large user base Installation required GNU General Public License version 2 (GPL 2) Koha Features Tagging, comments, sharing RSS feeds Book covers Cataloguing templates Z39.50 Off-line circulation Browse virtual shelf Integration with EBSCO Discovery Service Alternatively… Georgia Public Libraries Service 2006 “stable, robust, flexible, secure, and user-friendly” Browser-based Uses same technology (XULRunner) as Firefox Smaller user base than Koha “consortia of small to midsized public libraries” Installation required GNU General Public License version 2 (GPL 2) Evergreen Features Book reviews RSS feeds Facet searching Book covers Browse virtual shelves Watch This Space https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2016/04/22/ebsco-kuali-open- source-project/ 4. Repository Software MIT/HP Labs 2002 Open Access Repositories Cross-platform PDF, Word, Image files Customisable Installation required DSpace License Alternatively… Developed by University of Southampton PDF, HTML, JPEG, TIFF, MP3, and AVI Perl plugins Authority files Integration with SHERPA/RoMEO for quickly checking publisher policies and author rights Installation required GNU General Public License (version 3) Or… “Digital asset management architecture” DuraSpace (non-profit) Store all kinds of content and metadata Multiple front-ends Hydra Islandora Installation required Apache License 2.0 5. Digital Collection Management Roy Rosenzweig Center for History & New Media at George Mason University “Repository-Lite” Publish and exhibit digital objects Themes and plugins Dublin Core metadata Installation required GNU General Public Licence Omeka @DBS Alternatively New York software development team/US & European partner institutions Main focus on cataloguing and data management Separate web access application Plugins and customisation GNU General Public Licence 6. Library Discovery Tool Villanova University 2010 Google-like interface Modular and configurable Faceted search API to connect to EBSCO Discovery GNU General Public Licence Alternatively University of Virginia/Stanford University OPAC replacement/enhancement Faceted Search Part of Hydra Project (Fedora) API to connect to EBSCO Discovery Installation required Apache License 2.0 An Aside: 7. Content Management System Joyner Library, East Caroline University, Ithaca College Library, University of Miami Libraries Open Source equivalent of LibGuides Fully customisable A to Z database list, staff list FAQs Summon integration Installation required GNU General Public Licence Alternatively… Dries Buytaert 2001 Used as back-end framework for >2% of websites 1 million member community, 30,000 developers Installation required GNU General Public Licence Or… 2005 fork of Mambo 2nd most used Content Management System used on web Installation required GNU General Public Licence 8. Zotero – Reference Management Roy Rosenzweig Center for History & New Media at George Mason University (again) 2006 Firefox add-on (standalone version 2011) Online synching Generation of in-text citations, footnotes and bibliographies Integrates with word processing software (Relatively) easy to write connectors Download and run Affero General Public License 9. MRBS – Room Booking Meeting Room Booking System Daniel Gardner 2000 Browser based Different authority levels Integrate with authentication systems (e.g LDAP, Shibboleth) Installation required GNU General Public Licence Alternatively Ball State University 2010 Web-based LDAP authentication “Well-written” & “aesthetically pleasing” Installation required GNU General Public Licence 3.0 10. LORLS – Reading List Software Loughborough University (Gary Brewerton) 2000 ‘Bibgrab’ citation capture applet Integrates with OPAC Installation required GNU General Public Licence But Wait, There’s More! Guide on the Side And More! https://foss4lib.org/ The Benefits of Open-Source Innovation Own* not Licence Customisation Interoperability Community Security Privacy *How easy would it be for you to switch your LMS? Is Open Source for ? Yes! Easier for bigger libraries, but.. Smaller libraries Develop a business case Forge relationships (NETWORK!): IT department Other libraries Hosting Download and run Internal hosting External hosting Thank You! Resources - 1 General Free Software Foundation https://fsfe.org/index.en.html
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Producing Open Source Software How to Run a Successful Free Software Project
    Producing Open Source Software How to Run a Successful Free Software Project Karl Fogel Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project by Karl Fogel Copyright © 2005-2018 Karl Fogel, under the CreativeCommons Attribution-ShareAlike (4.0) license. Version: 2.3098 Home site: http://producingoss.com/ Dedication This book is dedicated to two dear friends without whom it would not have been possible: Karen Under- hill and Jim Blandy. i Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................. vi Why Write This Book? ............................................................................................... vi Who Should Read This Book? .................................................................................... vii Sources ................................................................................................................... vii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... viii For the first edition (2005) ................................................................................ viii For the second edition (2017) ............................................................................... x Disclaimer .............................................................................................................. xiii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Online Content and Community with Drupal
    Collaborative Librarianship Volume 1 Issue 4 Article 10 2009 Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Gabrielle Wiersma University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship Part of the Collection Development and Management Commons Recommended Citation Wiersma, Gabrielle (2009) "Building Online Content and Community with Drupal," Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 1 : Iss. 4 , Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29087/2009.1.4.10 Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol1/iss4/10 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collaborative Librarianship by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Wiersma: Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Gabrielle Wiersma ([email protected]) Engineering Research and Instruction Librarian, University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries use content management systems Additionally, all users are allowed to post in order to create, manage, edit, and publish content without using code, which enables content on the Web more efficiently. Drupal less tech savvy users to contribute content (drupal.org), one such Web-based content just as easily as their more proficient coun- management system, is unique because it terparts. For example, a library could use employs a bottom-up strategy for Web de- Drupal to allow library staff to view and sign that separates the content of the site edit the library Web site, blog, and staff from the formatting which means that “you intranet.
    [Show full text]
  • Linux at 25 PETERHISTORY H
    Linux at 25 PETERHISTORY H. SALUS Peter H. Salus is the author of A n June 1991, at the USENIX conference in Nashville, BSD NET-2 was Quarter Century of UNIX (1994), announced. Two months later, on August 25, Linus Torvalds announced Casting the Net (1995), and The his new operating system on comp.os.minix. Today, Android, Google’s Daemon, the Gnu and the Penguin I (2008). [email protected] version of Linux, is used on over two billion smartphones and other appli- ances. In this article, I provide some history about the early years of Linux. Linus was born into the Swedish minority of Finland (about 5% of the five million Finns). He was a “math guy” throughout his schooling. Early on, he “inherited” a Commodore VIC- 20 (released in June 1980) from his grandfather; in 1987 he spent his savings on a Sinclair QL (released in January 1984, the “Quantum Leap,” with a Motorola 68008 running at 7.5 MHz and 128 kB of RAM, was intended for small businesses and the serious hobbyist). It ran Q-DOS, and it was what got Linus involved: One of the things I hated about the QL was that it had a read-only operating system. You couldn’t change things ... I bought a new assembler ... and an editor.... Both ... worked fine, but they were on the microdrives and couldn’t be put on the EEPROM. So I wrote my own editor and assembler and used them for all my programming. Both were written in assembly language, which is incredibly stupid by today’s standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software
    EKONOMI OCH SAMHÄLLE ECONOMICS AND SOCIETY LINUS NYMAN – UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE SOURCE OPEN IN FORKING CODE UNDERSTANDING – NYMAN LINUS UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE AN EXAMINATION OF CODE FORKING, ITS EFFECT ON OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE, AND HOW IT IS VIEWED AND PRACTICED BY DEVELOPERS LINUS NYMAN Ekonomi och samhälle Economics and Society Skrifter utgivna vid Svenska handelshögskolan Publications of the Hanken School of Economics Nr 287 Linus Nyman Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Helsinki 2015 < Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software: An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Key words: Code forking, fork, open source software, free software © Hanken School of Economics & Linus Nyman, 2015 Linus Nyman Hanken School of Economics Information Systems Science, Department of Management and Organisation P.O.Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland Hanken School of Economics ISBN 978-952-232-274-6 (printed) ISBN 978-952-232-275-3 (PDF) ISSN-L 0424-7256 ISSN 0424-7256 (printed) ISSN 2242-699X (PDF) Edita Prima Ltd, Helsinki 2015 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who either helped make this book possible, or at the very least much more enjoyable to write. Firstly I would like to thank my pre-examiners Imed Hammouda and Björn Lundell for their insightful suggestions and remarks. Furthermore, I am grateful to Imed for also serving as my opponent. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to Liikesivistysrahasto, the Hanken Foundation, the Wallenberg Foundation, and the Finnish Unix User Group.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS Philosophy 6 the FOSS Development Method 7
    1 Published by the United Nations Development Programme’s Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia www.apdip.net Email: [email protected] © UNDP-APDIP 2004 The material in this book may be reproduced, republished and incorporated into further works provided acknowledgement is given to UNDP-APDIP. For full details on the license governing this publication, please see the relevant Annex. ISBN: 983-3094-00-7 Design, layout and cover illustrations by: Rezonanze www.rezonanze.com PREFACE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 What is Free/Open Source Software? 6 The FOSS philosophy 6 The FOSS development method 7 What is the history of FOSS? 8 A Brief History of Free/Open Source Software Movement 8 WHY FOSS? 10 Is FOSS free? 10 How large are the savings from FOSS? 10 Direct Cost Savings - An Example 11 What are the benefits of using FOSS? 12 Security 13 Reliability/Stability 14 Open standards and vendor independence 14 Reduced reliance on imports 15 Developing local software capacity 15 Piracy, IPR, and the WTO 16 Localization 16 What are the shortcomings of FOSS? 17 Lack of business applications 17 Interoperability with proprietary systems 17 Documentation and “polish” 18 FOSS SUCCESS STORIES 19 What are governments doing with FOSS? 19 Europe 19 Americas 20 Brazil 21 Asia Pacific 22 Other Regions 24 What are some successful FOSS projects? 25 BIND (DNS Server) 25 Apache (Web Server) 25 Sendmail (Email Server) 25 OpenSSH (Secure Network Administration Tool) 26 Open Office (Office Productivity Suite) 26 LINUX 27 What is Linux?
    [Show full text]
  • GNU/Linux Operating System
    A Bibliography of Publications about the GNU/Linux Operating System Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 07 April 2021 Version 2.135 Title word cross-reference [Tho05]. 0-13-167984-8 [Sta07b]. 0-596-00482-6 [Sch04]. 0-7821-4428-4 [Koh06]. '03 [ACM03b]. 046 [Sav11]. '05 [ACM05b, MS05]. + [Ste01e]. $100 [CS95]. $39.95 [Sch04]. $44.99 [Sta07b]. $49.95 [Jen05]. $49.99 1 [FOP06, Jen05, She03]. 1-59327-036-4 [Hid04, Tho05]. $59.99 [Koh06]. $99 [Jen05]. 1-GHz [Ano03b]. 1.0 [Coc01]. 1.2 [Kro00]. = [Ste01e]. × [Hun99]. [Gar98]. 1.x [KGG00]. 10 [DWV06]. 10-Gigabit [cFJH+03]. 10th [USE96a]. * [TYKZ07]. */ [TYKZ07]. *BSD [Den99a]. 12-step [Mil01]. 12th [MS05]. 1394 *icomment [TYKZ07]. [Ale00, HKP09]. 14-16 [ACM06]. 18th [KD96]. 1999 [Den99b, Tim99]. 19th -dienste [WF03]. [ACM03b, SS05b]. 1Z0 [Sav11]. 1Z0-046 [Sav11]. /*icomment [TYKZ07]. /GNOME [Wri00, Pen99]. 2 [Ano94c, Com00, Com03, Gab07, MK04]. 2.0 [B¨ol01, Car98, McN99, PF97, Swe01]. 0 [Hid04, Koh06, Sch04, Sta07b, Tho05]. 2.0.1 [ISO05]. 2.1 [BR95, CV00]. 2.2 0-13-101415-3 [Hid04]. 0-13-144853-6 1 2 [Ano00b, BB99b, Bra04]. 2.4 [Cal00]. 2.6 [Mon00b, GR09]. Action [NR03]. ActiveX [BS05, PTS+14, TCM07]. 2000 [Kro99]. activity [MB08]. Acumen [Kro99]. [Bru02, Kro00, MYH00, War01]. 2003 Ada [SB99]. Ada95 [Gar09].
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Free and Open Source Licenses: Features That Define Strategy
    Elements Of Free And Open Source Licenses: Features That Define Strategy CAN: Use/reproduce: Ability to use, copy / reproduce the work freely in unlimited quantities Distribute: Ability to distribute the work to third parties freely, in unlimited quantities Modify/merge: Ability to modify / combine the work with others and create derivatives Sublicense: Ability to license the work, including possible modifications (without changing the license if it is copyleft or share alike) Commercial use: Ability to make use of the work for commercial purpose or to license it for a fee Use patents: Rights to practice patent claims of the software owner and of the contributors to the code, in so far these rights are necessary to make full use of the software Place warranty: Ability to place additional warranty, services or rights on the software licensed (without holding the software owner and other contributors liable for it) MUST: Incl. Copyright: Describes whether the original copyright and attribution marks must be retained Royalty free: In case a fee (i.e. contribution, lump sum) is requested from recipients, it cannot be royalties (depending on the use) State changes: Source code modifications (author, why, beginning, end) must be documented Disclose source: The source code must be publicly available Copyleft/Share alike: In case of (re-) distribution of the work or its derivatives, the same license must be used/granted: no re-licensing. Lesser copyleft: While the work itself is copyleft, derivatives produced by the normal use of the work are not and could be covered by any other license SaaS/network: Distribution includes providing access to the work (to its functionalities) through a network, online, from the cloud, as a service Include license: Include the full text of the license in the modified software.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software As Intangible Capital: Measuring the Cost and Impact of Free Digital Tools Preliminary Draft October 31, 20181 Carol A
    Open Source Software as Intangible Capital: Measuring the Cost and Impact of Free Digital Tools Preliminary Draft October 31, 20181 Carol A. Robbins*(1), Gizem Korkmaz (2), José Bayoán Santiago Calderón (3), Daniel Chen (2), Claire Kelling (4) , Stephanie Shipp (2), Sallie Keller (2) Abstract Open source software is everywhere, both as specialized applications nurtured by devoted user communities, and as digital infrastructure underlying platforms used by millions daily, yet its value and impact are not currently measured (with small exceptions). We develop an approach to document the scope and impact of open source software created by all sectors of the economy: businesses, universities, government research institutions, nonprofits, and individuals. We use a bottom-up approach to measure subset of OSS projects and languages, collecting data on open source software languages R, Python, Julia, and JavaScript, as well as from the Federal Government’s code.gov website. Using lines of code and a standard model to estimate package developer time, we convert lines of code to resource cost. We estimate that the resource cost for developing R, Python, Julia, and JavaScript exceeds $3 billion dollars, based on 2017 costs. Applying this approach to open source software available on code.gov results in an estimated value of more than $1 billion, based on 2017 costs, as a lower bound for the resource cost of this software. We analyze the dependencies between software packages through network analysis and estimate re-use statistics. This reuse is one measure of relative impact. Key words: Open Source Software, Intangibles, Network Analysis National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation; 2) Social & Decision Analytics Division, Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia; 3) Claremont Graduate University; 4) Pennsylvania State University 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented August 21, 2018 at the International Association for Research on Income and Wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software Licensing FAQ
    Open Source Software Licensing FAQ Here we attempt to address some common questions that academics and researchers have about licensing software as open source. Most of the issues raised can be complex, so for more details we include links to relevant information on the OSSWatch website. What type of software can be licensed? Anything from stand-alone programs and code libraries to programming languages and operating systems. The OSSWatch website lists some examples of OSS. Content (e.g. images, text) either as part of an application or website or as documentation and data may also be licensed openly, although it is important to note the considerations for licensing software are somewhat different (so, for example, Creative Commons licences are not recommended for software). What does a software licence cover? (See An Introduction To Ownership And Licensing Issues.) “When you write software, you are creating a kind of property.” The owner of this property will have certain rights (including copyrights and potentially patent rights) which limit the ability of other people to use, copy, alter and redistribute the software. Through a licence the owner provides permissions for these acts, providing certain conditions are met. The conditions may cover issues such as attribution, limitations of liabilities, and requirements regarding the sharing of code that has been altered. (An Introduction To Ownership And Licensing Issues.) The issue of software patents has been a contentious one, and the legal details vary around the world, however it is the general view that an open source licence is also a grant of a licence to the user regarding any patents necessary for using the software, either implicit or explicit.
    [Show full text]
  • OSS Disclosure
    Tape Automation Scalar i6000, Firmware Release i11.1 (663Q) Open Source Software Licenses Open Source Software (OSS) Licenses for: Scalar i6000 Firmware Release i11.1 (663Q). The firmware/software contained in the Scalar i6000 is an aggregate of vendor proprietary pro- grams as well as third party programs, including Open Source Software (OSS). Use of OSS is subject to designated license terms and the following OSS license disclosure lists all open source components and their respective, applicable licenses that are part of the tape library firmware. All software that is designated as OSS may be copied, distributed, and/or modified in accordance with the terms and conditions of its respective license(s). Additionally, for some OSS you are entitled to obtain the corresponding OSS source files as required by the respective and applicable license terms. While GNU General Public License ("GPL") and GNU Lesser General Public Li- cense ("LGPL") licensed OSS requires that the sources be made available, Quantum makes all tape library firmware integrated OSS source files, whether licensed as GPL, LGPL or otherwise, available upon request. Please refer to the Scalar i6000 Open Source License CD (part number 3- 01638-xx) when making such request. For contact information, see Getting More Information. LTO tape drives installed in the library may also include OSS components. For a complete list- ing of respective OSS packages and applicable OSS license information included in LTO tape drives, as well as instructions to obtain source files pursuant to applicable license requirements, please reference the Tape Automation disclosure listings under the Open Source Information link at www.quantum.com/support.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software: What Business Lawyers, Entrepreneurs and IT Professionals Should Know
    Open Source Software: What Business Lawyers, Entrepreneurs and IT Professionals Should Know Stuart R. Hemphill Partner Minneapolis P: (612) 340-2734 F: (612) 340-8856 [email protected] © 2016 Dorsey & Whitney LLP Source vs. Object Source Code Object Code Programmer readable statements in Machine readable Binary: a computer language, such as C, C++, Cobol, Fortran, Java, Perl, 000010100010001010 PHP 110001010000010100 000100101010001011 // Create a button and add it to the applet. // Also, set the button's colors clear_button = new Button("Clear"); Or Hexadecimal clear_button.setForeground(Color.black); clear_button.setBackground(Color.lightGray); 3F7A this.add(clear_button); (translates to the following binary number: 0011 1111 0111 1010) 2 History of Open Source Software . Term coined in February 1998 by Silicon Valley insiders in anticipation of Netscape’s announcement that it would release the source code for its browser software . This meant software coders could understand the browser’s working details and potentially modify them . 1998 was a momentous time for open source movement given mainstream adoption of internet . But concept significantly pre-dates coining of term 3 Free Software Foundation . Free Software Foundation (FSF), created in 1983 by Richard Stallman of MIT with goal of developing free version of UNIX operating system; everyone could share and change this version . According to FSF, “‘Free software’ is a matter of liberty, not price … think of ‘free’ as in ‘free speech,’ not as in ‘free beer.’” . Stallman wrote a license leveraging copyright in base code and intended to keep derivatives of base software “free” by requiring source code disclosure . Non-negotiable terms; accept by use .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source and Sustainability
    OPEN SOURCE AND SUSTAINABILITY: THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITY Dr. Giorgio F. SIGNORINI, PhD Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Firenze via della Lastruccia, 3 I-50019 Sesto F. (Firenze), Italy giorgio.signorini@unifi.it Abstract One important goal in sustainability is making technologies available to the maximum possi- ble number of individuals, and especially to those living in less developed areas (Goal 9 of SDG). However, the diffusion of technical knowledge is hindered by a number of factors, among which the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) system plays a primary role. While opinions about the real effect of IPRs in stimulating and disseminating innovation differ, there is a growing number of authors arguing that a different approach may be more effective in promoting global development. The success of the Open Source (OS) model in the field of software has led analysts to speculate whether this paradigm can be extended to other fields. Key to this model are both free access to knowledge and the right to use other people’s results. After reviewing the main features of the OS model, we explore different areas where it can be profitably applied, such as hardware design and production; we finally discuss how academical in- stitutions can (and should) help diffusing the OS philosophy and practice. Widespread use of OS software, fostering of research projects aimed to use and develop OS software and hardware, the use of open education tools, and a strong commitment to open access publishing are some of the discussed examples. Keywords Open Source, Sustainable Development, University, Open Education, Open Access arXiv:1910.06073v1 [cs.CY] 8 Oct 2019 1 Introduction What is sustainability about? According to the widely accepted definition of the Brundtland Report (Brundtland 1987), human development is sustainable when it can satisfy the needs of the current gener- ation without compromising the ability of future generations to do the same.
    [Show full text]