DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Online Content and Community with Drupal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Collaborative Librarianship Volume 1 Issue 4 Article 10 2009 Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Gabrielle Wiersma University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship Part of the Collection Development and Management Commons Recommended Citation Wiersma, Gabrielle (2009) "Building Online Content and Community with Drupal," Collaborative Librarianship: Vol. 1 : Iss. 4 , Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29087/2009.1.4.10 Available at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/collaborativelibrarianship/vol1/iss4/10 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Collaborative Librarianship by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Wiersma: Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Gabrielle Wiersma ([email protected]) Engineering Research and Instruction Librarian, University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries use content management systems Additionally, all users are allowed to post in order to create, manage, edit, and publish content without using code, which enables content on the Web more efficiently. Drupal less tech savvy users to contribute content (drupal.org), one such Web-based content just as easily as their more proficient coun- management system, is unique because it terparts. For example, a library could use employs a bottom-up strategy for Web de- Drupal to allow library staff to view and sign that separates the content of the site edit the library Web site, blog, and staff from the formatting which means that “you intranet. Separately, patrons would have can more easily change either without hav- permission to view the blog and the Web ing to recode your entire Web site.”1 Drupal site to post comments. The combination of appeals to many libraries both because it is libraries-contributed content and the com- free open source software, and because it munity content results in a Web site that is allows individuals and communities to easi- dynamic and collaborative in nature. ly contribute content to the library’s Web site. Drupal also makes it easy to incorporate feedback from the community through in- Dries Buytaert created Drupal in 2000. He teractive forms that can facilitate communi- was inspired to find a way to collaborate cation and discussion between the library and keep in touch with friends during and and its patrons. Drupal’s administrative in- after college. Drupal began as on online terface collates all comments and feedback message board that migrated into an online so that libraries can manage this information Web site and is now available as open and respond accordingly. source software. Buytaert had intended to use the Dutch word for village, “dorp,” as a Drupal provides the core content out of the domain name for this online community. box, however it requires additional modules However, a typo caused the site to be called to customize it and to make it useful. Ac- drop.org. “Drupal, pronounced ‘droo-puhl,’ cording to the Getting Started Guide, these derives from the English pronunciation of “modules are plug-ins that extend Drupal’s the Dutch word ‘druppel,’ which means functionality,” enabling the addition of ‘[to] drop.’”.2 Although Buytaert’s name for blogs, books, images, and interactive polls.3 his site did not turn out as he had planned, The Drupal.org community has also contri- his vision of creating an open, collaborative buted additional modules that are available Web site where people could develop and to all users. Drupal’s core content also al- share their ideas has been fully realized lows libraries to change the look and feel of through Drupal.org. the site and to dictate how the site displays to the end users. Traditionally, organizations have had a Webmaster(s) in charge of formatting and System Requirements posting content to a Web site. Drupal as- signs permissions to various users based on As an open source platform, Drupal is re- their role (administrator or other user) so quired to comply with the Open Source In- that multiple users can edit the Web site itiative’s (OSI) criteria for open source soft- without going through a designated Web- ware. OSI requires open source software to master. Depending on a user’s assigned role have free redistribution, an open and access- he/she will have permission to edit or view ible source code, and a non-restrictive li- Web sites, blogs, wikis, or staff intranet sites. cense that allows for derivative works.4 Collaborative Librarianship 1(4): 169-171 (2009) 169 Wiersma: Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Drupal is available free at http://drupal.org do 2009 and more than one thousand are and is licensed under a software license expected to attend DrupalCon Paris, Sep- called the GNU General Public License Ver- tember 2009. Like many open source opera- sion 3. tions, Drupal’s greatest asset is its communi- ty of users that contributes modules and Drupal is compatible with Windows, Mac, continually works to improve the functio- and Linux operating systems. It requires a nality of the software, not the least of which Web server, a database program, and a pro- are the thousands of modules that have al- gramming language. Drupal is most com- ready been created by the burgeoning monly used in conjunction with an Apache Drupal community and hundreds of Drupal Web server, MySQL database, and PHP Groups have formed to allow people to col- programming language, all open source laborate on projects. software systems that provide open code through a General Public License. This com- Drupal and Libraries bination embodies the powerful potential of the open source movement and is a tribute The Drupal Group for Libraries, to its success. (http://groups.drupal.org/libraries), both includes lists and reviews of the library re- While Drupal is designed to allow users to lated modules and provides information edit Web sites easily, the initial set up can be and updates for various presentations. The challenging for site administrators. Many site contains a directory of public, academic, have criticized Drupal for having a steep school, and special libraries that currently learning curve because it requires both use Drupal. The Drupal community has al- technical knowledge of the PHP program- ready created several library-specific Appli- ming language and familiarity of the cation Protocol Interfaces (APIs): a biblio- MySQL database. This is further compli- graphy module that uses management tools cated by Drupal’s use of a unique set of ter- like EndNote and RefWorks; a MARC minology that describes its site components. record module; a book review module; a For example, Drupal uses “node” as a ge- book post module that links to WorldCat, neric term for “content.” Nodes can be blog LibraryThing, or Google Books; and a Z entries, forums, pages, polls, or stories. For- 39.50 module that is capable of searching Z tunately, Drupal terminology and jargon are 39.50 compliant metadata (including most well documented in the Getting Started sec- Web OPACS). Other modules interface with tion, (http://drupal.org/getting- specific library OPACs including SOPAC started/before/terminology). In addition, (an open source OPAC) and the Millennium Drupal’s online handbook includes The Integration Project Module for connection to Drupal Cookbook (for beginners), Innovative Interfaces Inc.’s Web OPAC. The (http://drupal.org/handbook/customizatio Drupal Group for Libraries tracks the latest n/tutorials/beginners-cookbook). Although updates, announces new modules, and pro- it can be complicated to learn this new vo- vides a forum for discussion. cabulary, persistent programmers will be rewarded with the potential to build a func- University of Illinois at Chicago librarian tional, attractive, and customizable Web site. Leo Klein maintains a listserv for librarians interested in Drupal: DRUPAL4LIB The Drupal Community (http://listserv.uic.edu/archives/drupal4li b.html). Librarians can use the listserv to Drupal is not just a platform; it is an active post questions about Drupal and to connect community of collaborative users. Drupal with peers. enthusiasts meet online and in person at Drupal conferences and camps around the world. More than two hundred Drupal de- votees participated in DrupalCamp Colora- Collaborative Librarianship 1(4): 169-171 (2009) 170 Wiersma: Building Online Content and Community with Drupal Could Drupal Work for Your Library? End Notes Since Drupal is an open source project re- 1 Austin, Andy, and Christopher Harris, leased under the GNU General Public Li- “Drupal in libraries,” Library Technology Re- cense Version 3 (GPLV3), libraries should be ports 44 (May/June 2008): 5. aware that any project developed using Drupal also needs to be released under the 2 Drupal.org, “Drupal”, http://drupal.org same license, “Anyone considering the use (accessed June 29, 2009). of Drupal [needs to read] and understand the requirements of the GPLV3 and how it 3 Ibid. interacts with any institutional policies or 4 Open Source Initiative, “The open source expectations for development projects.”5 definition”, Employing an organized and knowledgea- http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd (ac- ble project manager is key to implementing cessed June 29, 2009). Drupal. As with any open source product, there are concerns that Drupal is not sup- 5 Austin and Harris, 8. ported by a vendor. Therefore the responsi- bility to maintain and develop Drupal is 6 Irene E. McDermott, “Joomla! looms.” transferred to the library. Searcher 16 (May 2008): 8-13. When considering content management Bibliography systems, libraries should investigate their options. For example, there is a significant Austin, Andy, and Christopher Harris, overlap in functionality between Drupal and “Drupal in libraries,” Library Technology Joomla, another open source content man- Reports 44 (May/June 2008): 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joomla Vs Drupal - Website Content Management Systems]
    [JOOMLA VS DRUPAL - WEBSITE CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS] Joomla or Drupal? CMS’s are generally used to manage and control a large, dynamic collection of Web material (HTML documents and their associated images). And yes, they can take the web maintenance person out of the picture, as clients can update their own content, as and when required There are numerous Web CMS (Content Management Systems), and each one can ether fall into Open Source or proprietary. The ones that tend to stand out from the crowd, or should I say those that are more commonly used by small website design agencies are Word Press, Joomla and Drupal. So which one do you choose as a customer, or do you leave this to your web developer? Generally speaking, Joomla has a cleaner and smoother user interface; on the other hand Drupal is more flexible. Drupal and Joomla developers could argue all day,, so I’m going to go in as a bipartisan developer. • For starters both are easy to install and deploy, and many hosting companies have a one click install for these. • Both have plenty of modules and extensions you can use. • Joomla has a lighter learning curve than Drupal. • Joomla support SSL logins and SSL pages. Drupal not known to support it. • Server resources utilization is more compared to drupal © 2009 www.visualwebz.com Seattle Web Development Company [JOOMLA VS DRUPAL - WEBSITE CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS] Summary of Joomla & Drupal Features • Limited technical knowledge need to get started. • Short learning curve • Cannot integrate other scripts etc. to your site • Generally you cannot create high-end sites, without additional investment of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Details
    Home Program Hotel Be an Exhibitor Be a Sponsor Review Committee Press Room Past Events Contact Us Program Details Monday, November 3, 2014 08:30-10:00 MORNING TUTORIALS Track 1: An Introduction to Writing Systems & Unicode Presenter: This tutorial will provide you with a good understanding of the many unique characteristics of non-Latin Richard Ishida writing systems, and illustrate the problems involved in implementing such scripts in products. It does not Internationalization provide detailed coding advice, but does provide the essential background information you need to Activity Lead, W3C understand the fundamental issues related to Unicode deployment, across a wide range of scripts. It has proved to be an excellent orientation for newcomers to the conference, providing the background needed to assist understanding of the other talks! The tutorial goes beyond encoding issues to discuss characteristics related to input of ideographs, combining characters, context-dependent shape variation, text direction, vowel signs, ligatures, punctuation, wrapping and editing, font issues, sorting and indexing, keyboards, and more. The concepts are introduced through the use of examples from Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Hebrew, Thai, Hindi/Tamil, Russian and Greek. While the tutorial is perfectly accessible to beginners, it has also attracted very good reviews from people at an intermediate and advanced level, due to the breadth of scripts discussed. No prior knowledge is needed. Presenters: Track 2: Localization Workshop Daniel Goldschmidt Two highly experienced industry experts will illuminate the basics of localization for session participants Sr. International over the course of three one-hour blocks. This instruction is particularly oriented to participants who are Program Manager, new to localization.
    [Show full text]
  • Desarrollo De Una Aplicación Web De Gestión Colaborativa Para Un Club De Triatlón
    Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Informàtica Universitat Politècnica de València Desarrollo de una aplicación web de gestión colaborativa para un club de triatlón Trabajo Fin de Grado Grado en Ingeniería Informática Autor: Jose Enrique Pérez Rubio Tutor/a: Manuela Albert Albiol Victoria Torres Bosch 2016 - 2017 Desarrollo de una aplicación web de gestión colaborativa para un club de triatlón 2 Resumen Se ha desarrollado una intranet para sustituir el actual método de contacto y navegación de los usuarios el cual es un foro. La nueva aplicación cuenta con más funcionalidades que no estaban disponibles anteriormente. La página web está desarrollada en web2py, un framework de Python. Como patrón de diseño para la implementación se utilizará el conocido Modelo Vista Controlador (MVC), arquitectura estándar hoy en día el cual separa los datos y la lógica de las vistas del usuario. Este diseño facilita el desarrollo y mantenimiento de las aplicaciones. Palabras clave: triatlón, intranet, web2py, framework, Python. MCV Abstract This Intranet has been developed to replace the current users contact and navigation method, nowadays it is a forum. The new application has more functionality than previously available. This web page is developed in Python web2py’s framework. As design for the implementation we'll be using the Model View Controller (MVC), standard architecture because it separates the data and the logic from user's view. This design improves the development and maintenance of applications. Keywords: triathlon, intranet, web2py, framework, Python, MVC 3 Desarrollo de una aplicación web de gestión colaborativa para un club de triatlón Agradecimientos Antes de nada, me gustaría dar las gracias a: Mis padres, por alentarme a continuar mi educación y han trabajado siempre muy duro para poder brindarme la oportunidad que ellos nunca tuvieron para poder continuar mis estudios.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software
    EKONOMI OCH SAMHÄLLE ECONOMICS AND SOCIETY LINUS NYMAN – UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE SOURCE OPEN IN FORKING CODE UNDERSTANDING – NYMAN LINUS UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE AN EXAMINATION OF CODE FORKING, ITS EFFECT ON OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE, AND HOW IT IS VIEWED AND PRACTICED BY DEVELOPERS LINUS NYMAN Ekonomi och samhälle Economics and Society Skrifter utgivna vid Svenska handelshögskolan Publications of the Hanken School of Economics Nr 287 Linus Nyman Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Helsinki 2015 < Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software: An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Key words: Code forking, fork, open source software, free software © Hanken School of Economics & Linus Nyman, 2015 Linus Nyman Hanken School of Economics Information Systems Science, Department of Management and Organisation P.O.Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland Hanken School of Economics ISBN 978-952-232-274-6 (printed) ISBN 978-952-232-275-3 (PDF) ISSN-L 0424-7256 ISSN 0424-7256 (printed) ISSN 2242-699X (PDF) Edita Prima Ltd, Helsinki 2015 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who either helped make this book possible, or at the very least much more enjoyable to write. Firstly I would like to thank my pre-examiners Imed Hammouda and Björn Lundell for their insightful suggestions and remarks. Furthermore, I am grateful to Imed for also serving as my opponent. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to Liikesivistysrahasto, the Hanken Foundation, the Wallenberg Foundation, and the Finnish Unix User Group.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS Philosophy 6 the FOSS Development Method 7
    1 Published by the United Nations Development Programme’s Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia www.apdip.net Email: [email protected] © UNDP-APDIP 2004 The material in this book may be reproduced, republished and incorporated into further works provided acknowledgement is given to UNDP-APDIP. For full details on the license governing this publication, please see the relevant Annex. ISBN: 983-3094-00-7 Design, layout and cover illustrations by: Rezonanze www.rezonanze.com PREFACE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 What is Free/Open Source Software? 6 The FOSS philosophy 6 The FOSS development method 7 What is the history of FOSS? 8 A Brief History of Free/Open Source Software Movement 8 WHY FOSS? 10 Is FOSS free? 10 How large are the savings from FOSS? 10 Direct Cost Savings - An Example 11 What are the benefits of using FOSS? 12 Security 13 Reliability/Stability 14 Open standards and vendor independence 14 Reduced reliance on imports 15 Developing local software capacity 15 Piracy, IPR, and the WTO 16 Localization 16 What are the shortcomings of FOSS? 17 Lack of business applications 17 Interoperability with proprietary systems 17 Documentation and “polish” 18 FOSS SUCCESS STORIES 19 What are governments doing with FOSS? 19 Europe 19 Americas 20 Brazil 21 Asia Pacific 22 Other Regions 24 What are some successful FOSS projects? 25 BIND (DNS Server) 25 Apache (Web Server) 25 Sendmail (Email Server) 25 OpenSSH (Secure Network Administration Tool) 26 Open Office (Office Productivity Suite) 26 LINUX 27 What is Linux?
    [Show full text]
  • Dotnetnuke Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Cve®1-2017-9822
    DOTNETNUKE REMOTE CODE EXECUTION VULNERABILITY CVE®1-2017-9822 DISCUSSION DotNetNuke®2 (DNN), also known as DNN Evoq and DNN Evoq Engage, is a web-based Content Management System (CMS) developed on the Microsoft®3 .NET framework. DNN is a web application commonly deployed on local or cloud Microsoft Internet Information Service (IIS) servers. On July 7, 2017, security researchers revealed a vulnerability within DNN versions 5.2.0 through 9.1.0 that allows an attacker to forge valid DNN credentials and execute arbitrary commands on DNN web servers. Web-based applications, such as DNN, can be overlooked in routine patching since vulnerability scans may be unaware of their presence. Furthermore, administrators often postpone major version updates to web applications due to the frequent user impact and incompatibility with customized features. Web applications are a frequent target for attackers and vulnerabilities can be exploited days or even hours after their release. For this reason, configuring web applications to update automatically is imperative to secure web application servers. There are many web-based CMSs similar to DNN. Other common CMS’s are WordPress®4, Drupal®5 and Joomla®6. Organizations should be aware of CMS instances within their purview (i.e., blog, wiki, etc.) and ensure adequate processes are in place for timely updates. MITIGATION ACTIONS The most effective mitigation action is to update to the latest version of DNN, version 9.1.1, which is not vulnerable. A hotfix is available at dnnsoftware.com for older versions of DNN, but NSA recommends to only use the hotfix as a temporary measure while migrating to the latest version.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drupal Decision
    The Drupal Decision Stephen Sanzo | Director of Marketing and Business Development | Isovera [email protected] www.isovera.com Agenda 6 Open Source 6 The Big Three 6 Why Drupal? 6 Overview 6 Features 6 Examples 6 Under the Hood 6 Questions (non-technical, please) Open Source Software “Let the code be available to all!” 6 Software that is available in source code form for which the source code and certain other rights normally reserved for copyright holders are provided under a software license that permits users to study, change, and improve the software. 6 Adoption of open-source software models has resulted in savings of about $60 billion per year to consumers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software www.isovera.com Open Source Software However… Open source doesn't just mean access to the source code. The distribution terms of open-source software must comply criteria established by the Open Source Initiative. http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd www.isovera.com Open Source Software Free as in… Not this… www.isovera.com Open Source CMS Advantages for Open Source CMS 6 No licensing fees - allows you to obtain enterprise quality software at little to no cost 6 Vendor flexibility - you can choose whether or not you want to hire a vendor to help you customize, implement, and support it, or do this internally. If at any point along the way you decide you don’t like your vendor, you are free to find another. 6 Software flexibility – in many cases, proprietary software is slow to react to the markets needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Free and Open Source Licenses: Features That Define Strategy
    Elements Of Free And Open Source Licenses: Features That Define Strategy CAN: Use/reproduce: Ability to use, copy / reproduce the work freely in unlimited quantities Distribute: Ability to distribute the work to third parties freely, in unlimited quantities Modify/merge: Ability to modify / combine the work with others and create derivatives Sublicense: Ability to license the work, including possible modifications (without changing the license if it is copyleft or share alike) Commercial use: Ability to make use of the work for commercial purpose or to license it for a fee Use patents: Rights to practice patent claims of the software owner and of the contributors to the code, in so far these rights are necessary to make full use of the software Place warranty: Ability to place additional warranty, services or rights on the software licensed (without holding the software owner and other contributors liable for it) MUST: Incl. Copyright: Describes whether the original copyright and attribution marks must be retained Royalty free: In case a fee (i.e. contribution, lump sum) is requested from recipients, it cannot be royalties (depending on the use) State changes: Source code modifications (author, why, beginning, end) must be documented Disclose source: The source code must be publicly available Copyleft/Share alike: In case of (re-) distribution of the work or its derivatives, the same license must be used/granted: no re-licensing. Lesser copyleft: While the work itself is copyleft, derivatives produced by the normal use of the work are not and could be covered by any other license SaaS/network: Distribution includes providing access to the work (to its functionalities) through a network, online, from the cloud, as a service Include license: Include the full text of the license in the modified software.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Content Management Software's Joomla and Drupal
    Open Source Content Management Software’s Joomla and Drupal: A Comparative Study Subhankar Ray Chowdhury Abstract: Content management is an effective tool for creating, collecting, organising and retrieving electronic document as well as web resources. Content management system can provide us various types’ web-based information service. At present open source is a popular choice in the field of Library and Information science. This paper covers two open source content management software i.e. Joomla and Drupal with their technical requirements, features, functions, service, importance etc. This paper will also give a complete overview about content management system with its advantage and need in organisation and dissemination of information in the library. Key Words: Content Management Software’s, Joomla, Drupal, comparative study Introduction: In today’s world library users are became more web savvy for the availability of internet. For that user expectations have also changed from traditional document to web based or e-documents. Now user’s wants training videos, presentations, white paper, scholarly article and much more. Blogs, wikis, social networking sites, twitter, RSS and other tools included as web 2.0 technologies have transformed the way content is created, developed, managed and shared. In recent time information in any form is typically referred to as content or digital content. Content management system is an effective tool for content or resource sharing. Libraries have also adopted these new technologies to provide services among all user groups. With the help of these content management systems libraries can collaboratively produce, share and disseminate information to the users. Along with that libraries can also create and develop a web site for their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software As Intangible Capital: Measuring the Cost and Impact of Free Digital Tools Preliminary Draft October 31, 20181 Carol A
    Open Source Software as Intangible Capital: Measuring the Cost and Impact of Free Digital Tools Preliminary Draft October 31, 20181 Carol A. Robbins*(1), Gizem Korkmaz (2), José Bayoán Santiago Calderón (3), Daniel Chen (2), Claire Kelling (4) , Stephanie Shipp (2), Sallie Keller (2) Abstract Open source software is everywhere, both as specialized applications nurtured by devoted user communities, and as digital infrastructure underlying platforms used by millions daily, yet its value and impact are not currently measured (with small exceptions). We develop an approach to document the scope and impact of open source software created by all sectors of the economy: businesses, universities, government research institutions, nonprofits, and individuals. We use a bottom-up approach to measure subset of OSS projects and languages, collecting data on open source software languages R, Python, Julia, and JavaScript, as well as from the Federal Government’s code.gov website. Using lines of code and a standard model to estimate package developer time, we convert lines of code to resource cost. We estimate that the resource cost for developing R, Python, Julia, and JavaScript exceeds $3 billion dollars, based on 2017 costs. Applying this approach to open source software available on code.gov results in an estimated value of more than $1 billion, based on 2017 costs, as a lower bound for the resource cost of this software. We analyze the dependencies between software packages through network analysis and estimate re-use statistics. This reuse is one measure of relative impact. Key words: Open Source Software, Intangibles, Network Analysis National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation; 2) Social & Decision Analytics Division, Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia; 3) Claremont Graduate University; 4) Pennsylvania State University 1 An earlier version of this paper was presented August 21, 2018 at the International Association for Research on Income and Wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Software Licensing FAQ
    Open Source Software Licensing FAQ Here we attempt to address some common questions that academics and researchers have about licensing software as open source. Most of the issues raised can be complex, so for more details we include links to relevant information on the OSSWatch website. What type of software can be licensed? Anything from stand-alone programs and code libraries to programming languages and operating systems. The OSSWatch website lists some examples of OSS. Content (e.g. images, text) either as part of an application or website or as documentation and data may also be licensed openly, although it is important to note the considerations for licensing software are somewhat different (so, for example, Creative Commons licences are not recommended for software). What does a software licence cover? (See An Introduction To Ownership And Licensing Issues.) “When you write software, you are creating a kind of property.” The owner of this property will have certain rights (including copyrights and potentially patent rights) which limit the ability of other people to use, copy, alter and redistribute the software. Through a licence the owner provides permissions for these acts, providing certain conditions are met. The conditions may cover issues such as attribution, limitations of liabilities, and requirements regarding the sharing of code that has been altered. (An Introduction To Ownership And Licensing Issues.) The issue of software patents has been a contentious one, and the legal details vary around the world, however it is the general view that an open source licence is also a grant of a licence to the user regarding any patents necessary for using the software, either implicit or explicit.
    [Show full text]
  • Magento Vs Drupal Vs Joomla Vs Wordpress: a Comparison Here, We Are Going to Compare 4 Major Content Management Systems Available in the Market for Free
    Magento vs Drupal vs Joomla vs WordPress: A Comparison Here, we are going to compare 4 major content Management Systems available in the market for free. Now, since we are in the market ourselves and our team is also one that has a lot of experience in many different technologies, we think that the key point is that there is no one CMS that is better than another. It just depends on your situation and what is that you are trying to do with your website. And if you are looking for a Content Management System (CMS) to build your website, it’s highly possible that you have come across WordPress, Joomla, Drupal and Magento along with a few others during your due diligence. These are the four main software programs used to create websites and all have their pros and cons. But again, it all comes down to what your goals are and what kind of features you are trying to implement in your website. In this post, we’ll compare the programs to give you a stronger idea. What is a CMS? CMS is just an acronym for Content Management System. A Content Management System is a program that helps you manage a lot of content. For an instance, if you want to create a blog or just a website to showcase your products or services, you could use a CMS without having any extensive knowledge about coding and still be able to give the general public a user friendly and an easy-to-use website. Magento, Drupal, Joomla and WordPress are a clean fit to these needs.
    [Show full text]