DOCSLIB.ORG

John the Baptist Was the Last Prophet of the Old Covenant, the Covenant Between God and the Jewish People

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
John the Baptist Was the Last Prophet of the Old Covenant, the Covenant Between God and the Jewish People John the Baptist was the last prophet of the old covenant, the covenant between God and the Jewish people. God raised him up to prepare the Jewish people for the coming of Jesus, and we heard his call today: “Prepare the way of the Lord; make straight his paths.” He proclaimed a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. His baptism was symbolic. It was symbolic of a person’s willingness to turn from sin. This willingness to turn from sin was necessary before the coming of the Lord because our sin blocks God’s way to our hearts. So John readied people to receive Jesus by helping them with his preaching and baptism to turn from sin. But John’s baptism didn’t do anything. It was only symbolic. It was only a preparation, but it didn’t take away sin. The Baptism that Christ brings and gives through His church is more than mere symbol. It does something. It takes away sin. John said as much: “I have baptized you with water. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit.” This is the baptism that we have received, a baptism which takes away the stain and guilt of original sin. However, as we all know, our baptism does not take away our ability to sin. We can still block God’s way to our hearts and lives by our own sinful choices, and so on this 2nd Sunday of Advent, John’s words are still appropriate for us: “Prepare the way of the Lord; make straight His paths.” Jesus has given us a sacrament by which He removes the sins we commit after baptism: the Sacrament of Reconciliation, also known as Confession. And so, in light of St. John the Baptist’s words today, I would like to speak to you about sin, about our need to repent, and about the great sacrament of Reconciliation. Sin is a terrible thing. When we sin, either in desire, word, deed, or by omission, what we are really saying is “I love myselfishness more than I love God” or “I love myselfishness more than I love this other person.” Sin, in other words, is perverse selfishness. Sin has a disfiguring effect on humans. We were created to love; we were created to be selfless, and, beginning with baptism, God’s grace enables us to live this way. So, sin has a disfiguring effect on humans, emotionally, spiritually, even physically, sometimes. Sin wreaks havoc on our ability to love and, if serious enough, even breaks our relationship with God. Christ Jesus wants to free us from this disfigurement that we do to ourselves. He wants to open our relationship back up to God, and He wants to do this in a real and personal way. He wants to forgive our sins in a real and personal way. That is why He has given us this sacrament of confession, so that we can have a real and personal encounter with Him when we repent and are forgiven. This is the answer to the question that we as priests hear often: “Why do I have to go to a priest to have my sins forgiven? Can’t I just say I’m sorry in my room alone?” Well, we can say we are sorry in our rooms for less serious sins, but Jesus wants even more for us than just that. Jesus wants us to meet Him in a real and personal way, a way which engages our senses, a way which fully engages our hearts, a way which prompts our contrition even more fully. Jesus wants us to hear Him speak to us and in that sacramental moment to feel His grace pour into us as the priest says “Your sins are forgiven; go in peace.” Just as Jesus said those words to many people long ago, so He speaks those words now through the priest in this sacrament - and you can’t get that in your room. He also wants for us to verbalize our sins. In doing this we are better able to claim them, to really come to grips with the reality of our own sin. We are able to say, “Lord this is what I have done; this is how I have been selfish.” This helps our contrition to be very real. Christ gives us the priest in that sacramental moment so that in and through Him we can say to the Lord with our voices and our hearts in a very real and personal way, “I’m sorry; I want you to change me” - and you can’t really do that in your room. There are some too who say that a human being like a priest does not have the power to forgive sins, but this is not what the Bible says, and this is not what the Church has always believed. The Gospel of John, chapter 20, says that Jesus breathed on the disciples and said “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven. If you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” Jesus gave human beings, the Apostles, the power to forgive sins. The Apostles passed that power and authority down through all bishops of every time and place, and every priest has received this power and authority through ordination. To deny that priests have the power to forgive sins is to be in the same boat as the Scribes in the Gospel story of the crippled man who doubted that Jesus Himself could forgive sins while on earth. What does this mean for you and me and for our practice of the celebration of this sacrament? The Church has always taught that if a person is conscious of grave sin, that person must go to this sacrament in order to be forgiven. In fact, a person conscious that they have committed grave sin should not receive communion until they have repented, confessed, and have received absolution through this sacrament. This is the primary reason for the sacrament. It is primarily for those who have committed mortal sins. But the sacrament is also for all of us. We are all sinners. We all fail in one way or another to love and give of ourselves as we were created to do. And so, even if our sins, since our last confession are venial, or light sins, it is for our spiritual health that we should bring these sins to the Lord through this sacrament on a regular basis. What are some important things to do when going to confession? Make a good examination of conscience before going. Ask the Holy Spirit to help you to know your sins and to be sorry for them and to be fully willing to turn away form them and toward God completely. If it’s been a long time since your last confession, don’t be afraid. Just tell the priest that it’s been a long time, and if you need some help getting through it just tell the priest; it’s no problem. In the confession itself, on must confess every mortal sin and how many times we committed them. If we don’t remember how many times, we should give a general idea as best we can remember. Purposely to withhold grave sin in confession is itself a grave sin and invalidates our confession. Each and every venial sin need not be confessed in order to be forgiven. One can leave it up to one’s own good judgement regarding what needs to be confessed. Don’t worry about what the priest may or may not think of you. As you know, we are bound by the seal of confession. This seal includes our own thoughts. We are not allowed even purposely to think about what we’ve heard in confession except to pray for you. And, of course, to indicate to another person in any way what we’ve heard in confession would be a grave sin that can only be fully removed by the Pope himself. So don’t worry, we priests don’t sit around the dinner table talking about your sins! The priest will give you a penance which is a sign of contrition and a true making up for sin. It’s good to know an act of contrition, but don’t worry if you don’t. The priest will help you. And then the words of absolution: “I absolve you from your sins.” I wash you clean. What a privilege and grace to hear the words of Jesus. We too have been given the gift of meeting our merciful Lord in a very real and personal way through the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Don’t miss out on this gift this Advent season. Give the time. Make the effort to receive this sacrament, and have a new way made for God in your heart as you prepare for the great celebration of our Savior’s birth at Christmas. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconciliation
    RECONCILIATION a Short Guide The sacrament of Reconciliation is the story of God's love that never turns away from us. What is Reconciliation? Reconciliation (also known as Confession or Penance) is a sacrament instituted by Jesus Christ in His love and mercy to offer sinners forgiveness for offenses committed against God. At the same time, sinners reconcile with the Church because it is also wounded by our sins. Every time we sin, we hurt ourselves, other people and God. In Reconciliation, we acknowledge our sins before God and His Church. We express our sorrow in a meaningful way, receive the forgiveness of Christ and His Church, make reparation for what we have done and resolve to do better in the future. The forgiveness of sins involves four parts: • Contrition : a sincere sorrow for having offended God, and the most important act of the penitent. There can be no forgiveness of sin if we do not have sorrow and a firm resolve not to repeat our sin. The Return of the Prodigal Son Rembrandt - 1669 • Confession : confronting our sins in a profound way to God by speaking about them —aloud— to the priest. • Penance : an important part of our healing is the “penance” the priest imposes in reparation for our sins. Absolution • : the priest speaks the words by which “God, the Father of Mercies” reconciles a sinner to Himself through the merits of the Cross. Rite of Reconciliation Reconciliation may be face-to-face or anonymous, with a screen between you and the priest. Choose the option that is the most comfortable for you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtue of Penance in the United States, 1955-1975
    THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Maria Christina Morrow UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON Dayton, Ohio December 2013 THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina APPROVED BY: _______________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Committee Chair _______________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Committee Member Mary Ann Spearin Chair in Catholic Theology _______________________________________ Kelly S. Johnson, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ Jana M. Bennett, Ph.D. Committee Member _______________________________________ William C. Mattison, III, Ph.D. Committee Member iii ABSTRACT THE VIRTUE OF PENANCE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1955-1975 Name: Morrow, Maria Christina University of Dayton Advisor: Dr. Sandra A. Yocum This dissertation examines the conception of sin and the practice of penance among Catholics in the United States from 1955 to 1975. It begins with a brief historical account of sin and penance in Christian history, indicating the long tradition of performing penitential acts in response to the identification of one’s self as a sinner. The dissertation then considers the Thomistic account of sin and the response of penance, which is understood both as a sacrament (which destroys the sin) and as a virtue (the acts of which constitute the matter of the sacrament but also extend to include non-sacramental acts). This serves to provide a framework for understanding the way Catholics in the United States identified sin and sought to amend for it by use of the sacrament of penance as well as non-sacramental penitential acts of the virtue of penance.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel 1. Who Was Daniel? the Name the Name Daniel Occurs Twice In
    Daniel 1. Who was Daniel? The name The name Daniel occurs twice in the Book of Ezekiel. Ezek 14:14 says that even Noah, Daniel, and Job could not save a sinful country, but could only save themselves. Ezek 28:3 asks the king of Tyre, “are you wiser than Daniel?” In both cases, Daniel is regarded as a legendary wise and righteous man. The association with Noah and Job suggests that he lived a long time before Ezekiel. The protagonist of the Biblical Book of Daniel, however, is a younger contemporary of Ezekiel. It may be that he derived his name from the legendary hero, but he cannot be the same person. A figure called Dan’el is also known from texts found at Ugarit, in northern Syrian, dating to the second millennium BCE. He is the father of Aqhat, and is portrayed as judging the cause of the widow and the fatherless in the city gate. This story may help explain why the name Daniel is associated with wisdom and righteousness in the Hebrew Bible. The name means “God is my judge,” or “judge of God.” Daniel acquires a new identity, however, in the Book of Daniel. As found in the Hebrew Bible, the book consists of 12 chapters. The first six are stories about Daniel, who is portrayed as a youth deported from Jerusalem to Babylon, who rises to prominence at the Babylonian court. The second half of the book recounts a series of revelations that this Daniel received and were interpreted for him by an angel.
    [Show full text]
  • Micah at a Glance
    Scholars Crossing The Owner's Manual File Theological Studies 11-2017 Article 33: Micah at a Glance Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/owners_manual Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "Article 33: Micah at a Glance" (2017). The Owner's Manual File. 13. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/owners_manual/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Theological Studies at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Owner's Manual File by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICAH AT A GLANCE This book records some bad news and good news as predicted by Micah. The bad news is the ten northern tribes of Israel would be captured by the Assyrians and the two southern tribes would suffer the same fate at the hands of the Babylonians. The good news foretold of the Messiah’s birth in Bethlehem and the ultimate establishment of the millennial kingdom of God. BOTTOM LINE INTRODUCTION QUESTION (ASKED 4 B.C.): WHERE IS HE THAT IS BORN KING OF THE JEWS? (MT. 2:2) ANSWER (GIVEN 740 B.C.): “BUT THOU, BETHLEHEM EPHRATAH, THOUGH THOU BE LITTLE AMONG THE THOUSANDS OF JUDAH, YET OUT OF THEE SHALL HE COME FORTH” (Micah 5:2). The author of this book, Micah, was a contemporary with Isaiah. Micah was a country preacher, while Isaiah was a court preacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Prophet Mohammed's (Pbuh)
    1 2 3 4 ﷽ In the name Allah (SWT( the most beneficent Merciful INDEX Serial # Topic Page # 1 Forward 6 2 Names of Holy Qur’an 13 3 What Qur’an says to us 15 4 Purpose of Reading Qur’an in Arabic 16 5 Alphabetical Order of key words in Qura’nic Verses 18 6 Index of Surahs in Qur’an 19 7 Listing of Prophets referred in Qur’an 91 8 Categories of Allah’s Messengers 94 9 A Few Women mentioned in Qur’an 94 10 Daughter of Prophet Mohammed - Fatima 94 11 Mention of Pairs in Qur’an 94 12 Chapters named after Individuals in Qur’an 95 13 Prayers before Sleep 96 14 Arabic signs to be followed while reciting Qur’an 97 15 Significance of Surah Al Hamd 98 16 Short Stories about personalities mentioned in Qur’an 102 17 Prophet Daoud (David) 102 18 Prophet Hud (Hud) 103 19 Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) 103 20 Prophet Idris (Enoch) 107 21 Prophet Isa (Jesus) 107 22 Prophet Jacob & Joseph (Ya’qub & Yusuf) 108 23 Prophet Khidr 124 24 Prophet Lut (Lot) 125 25 Luqman (Luqman) 125 26 Prophet Musa’s (Moses) Story 126 27 People of the Caves 136 28 Lady Mariam 138 29 Prophet Nuh (Noah) 139 30 Prophet Sho’ayb (Jethro) 141 31 Prophet Saleh (Salih) 143 32 Prophet Sulayman Solomon 143 33 Prophet Yahya 145 34 Yajuj & Majuj 145 5 35 Prophet Yunus (Jonah) 146 36 Prophet Zulqarnain 146 37 Supplications of Prophets in Qur’an 147 38 Those cursed in Qur’an 148 39 Prophet Mohammed’s hadees a Criteria for Paradise 148 Al-Swaidan on Qur’an 149۔Interesting Discoveries of T 40 41 Important Facts about Qur’an 151 42 Important sayings of Qura’n in daily life 151 January Muharram February Safar March Rabi-I April Rabi-II May Jamadi-I June Jamadi-II July Rajab August Sh’aban September Ramazan October Shawwal November Ziqad December Zilhaj 6 ﷽ In the name of Allah, the most Merciful Beneficent Foreword I had not been born in a household where Arabic was spoken, and nor had I ever taken a class which would teach me the language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biographical Study of Aaron
    Scholars Crossing Old Testament Biographies A Biographical Study of Individuals of the Bible 10-2018 A Biographical Study of Aaron Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ot_biographies Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "A Biographical Study of Aaron" (2018). Old Testament Biographies. 4. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/ot_biographies/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Biographical Study of Individuals of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Old Testament Biographies by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Aaron CHRONOLOGICAL SUMMARY I. His service A. For Moses 1. Aaron was a spokesman for Moses in Egypt. a. He was officially appointed by God (Exod. 4:16). b. At the time of his calling he was 83 (Exod. 7:6-7). c. He accompanied Moses to Egypt (Exod. 4:27-28). d. He met with the enslaved Israelites (Exod. 4:29). e. He met with Pharaoh (Exod. 5:1). f. He was criticized by the Israelites, who accused him of giving them a killing work burden (Exod. 5:20-21). g. He cast down his staff in front of Pharaoh, and it became a serpent (Exod. 7:10). h. He saw his serpent swallow up the serpents produced by Pharaoh's magicians (Exod. 7:12). i. He raised up his staff and struck the Nile, causing it to be turned into blood (Exod.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection Or Miraculous Cures? the Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against Its Ancient Near Eastern Background
    Bar, “Resurrection or Miraculous Cures?” OTE 24/1 (2011): 9-18 9 Resurrection or Miraculous Cures? The Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against its Ancient Near Eastern Background SHAUL BAR (UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS) ABSTRACT The Elijah and Elisha cycles have similar stories where the prophet brings a dead child back to life. In addition, in the Elisha story, a corpse is thrown into the prophet’s grave; when it comes into con- tact with one of his bones, the man returns to life. Thus the question is do these stories allude to resurrection, or “only” miraculous cures? What was the purpose of the inclusion of these stories and what message did they convey? In this paper we will show that these are legends that were intended to lend greater credence to prophetic activity and to indicate the Lord’s power over death. A INTRODUCTION There is consensus among scholars that Dan 12:2-3, which they assign to the 1 second century B.C.E., refers to the resurrection of the dead. The question be- comes whether biblical texts earlier than this era allude to this doctrine. The phrase “resurrection of the dead” never appears in the Bible. Scholars searching for biblical allusions to resurrection have cited various idioms.2 They list verbs including “arise,”3 “wake up,”4 and “live,”5 all of which can denote a return to life. We also find “take,”6 which refers to being taken to Heaven, the noun “life,”7 and “see.”8 In the present paper however, we shall examine the stories of the Elijah and Elisha cycles which include similar tales in which the prophet brings a dead child back to life: in Elijah’s case, the son of the widow of Zare- phath (1 Kgs 17:17-24); in Elisha’s, the son of the Shunammite matron (2 Kgs 4:31-37).
    [Show full text]
  • Bede's Ecclesiastical History of England
    Bede©s Ecclesiastical History of England Author(s): Bede, St. ("The Venerable," c. 673-735) (Translator) Publisher: Description: The Ecclesiastical History of England examines the religious and political history of the Anglo-Saxons from the fifth century to 731 AD. St. Bede©s historical survey opens with a broad outline of Roman Britain©s geography and history. St. Bede pays special attention to the disagreement between Roman and Celtic Christians, the dates and locations of significant events in the Christian calendar, and political upheaval during the 600©s. St. Bede collected information from a variety of monasteries, early Church and government writings, and the oral histories of Rome and Britain. This book is useful to people looking for a brief survey of religious and political fig- ures and events in Anglo-Saxon history. Readers should re- cognize that St. Bede©s religious and political biases are subtly reflected in his historiography, diminishing its objectiv- ity. Nonetheless, his Ecclesiastical History of England is one of the most important texts of the Anglo-Saxon history. The book©s historical import is evidenced by the fact that nearly 200 hand written copies were produced in the Middle Ages. St. Bede©s text has since been translated into several different languages. Emmalon Davis CCEL Staff Writer Subjects: Christianity History By Region or Country i Contents Title Page 1 Preface 2 Introduction 3 Life of Bede 11 The Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation 18 Book I 18 I. Of the Situation of Britain and Ireland, and of their ancient inhabitants 19 II. How Caius Julius Caesar was the first Roman that came into Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Daniel Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character
    G. Ch. Aalders, “The Book of Daniel: Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character,” The Evangelical Quarterly 2.3 (July 1930): 242-254. The Book of Daniel Its Historical Trustworthiness and Prophetic Character G. Ch. Aalders [p.242] In the January issue of this periodical I endeavoured to throw light upon the turn of the tide which has been accomplished in Pentateuchal criticism during the last decennia. I now want to draw the attention of our readers to another problem of the Old Testament which has been of no less importance in negative Bible criticism. The vast majority of Old Testament students have been wont to deny to the Book of Daniel any historical value and to dispute its real prophetic character. In the case of this book it again was regarded as one of the most certain and unshakable results of scientific research, that it could not have originated at an earlier date than the Maccabean period, and, therefore, neither be regarded as a trustworthy witness to the events it mentions, nor be accepted as a proper prediction of the future it announces. Now as to this date, criticism certainly is receding; and this retreat is characterised by the fact that, in giving up the unity of the book, for some parts a considerably higher age is accepted. Meinhold took the lead: he separated the narrative part (chs. ii-vi) from the prophetic part (chs. vii-xii), and leaving the latter to the Maccabean period claimed for the former a date about 300 B.C.1 Various scholars followed, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Why God's People Should Fast
    Why God’s People Should Fast God begin the building where the first injury originated.”2 Joel Rishel Whether or not fasting can be traced back to Many people fast today for a variety of health Adam as a creation ordinance may be debated. and psychological reasons. Some even fast for But it was certainly given as part of the Mosaic religious reasons, which can be defined as delib- Law for the Day of Atonement—the only pre- erately abstaining from food for spiritual pur- scribed day of fasting. poses. I contend that God desires his people to !is shall be a statute forever for you: in the fast and I want to explain why. seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, you shall afflict your souls, and do Is Fasting Meant For Today? no work at all, whether a native of your First, it is necessary to demonstrate that fast- own country or a stranger who sojourns ing is biblical and meant for today. Many Chris- among you. For on that day the priest shall tians may be surprised to hear that we ought to make atonement for you, to cleanse you, fast. !ey would claim that it is simply a phe- that you may be clean from all your sins nomenon of the Old Testament, and that today before the Lord. It is a sabbath of solemn we are to be joyful in Christ, not sad and mourn- rest for you, and you shall afflict your souls. ful. Such an a"itude neglects the biblical empha- It is a statute forever (Leviticus 16:29–31).
    [Show full text]
  • Elisha the Life & Times of Elisha We Know Next to Nothing About Elisha’S Early Life Until Sometime Around the Year 856 BC, When He Was Probably in His Twenties
    Elisha The Life & Times of Elisha We know next to nothing about Elisha’s early life until sometime around the year 856 BC, when he was probably in his twenties. He appears to have come from a wealthy land owning family, if the number of oxen they had for ploughing is anything to go by (1 Kings 19:19). When the prophet Elijah arrived suddenly his response to his call was immediate. Elijah made it clear that it was up to him whether or not he responded to God’s call when Elisha asked permission to say farewell to his parents. To demonstrate his determination to follow Elisha dramatically severed his links to his past life by slaughtering the pair of oxen he was ploughing with and cooked their meat over the wood of his plough and gave it to his friends and relatives. Scripture tells us that he then left and became Elijah’s attendant or servant in similar way, perhaps, to that in which Joshua had served Moses (cf. Exod. 24:13; 33:11; Num. 11:28). We hear nothing more of Elisha for at least the next four years, but we can assume that he faithfully served Elijah during that period and learned from him. Knowing that the Lord was about to take him Elijah tested his servant’s devotion by asking him three times to remain while he went on in turn to Bethel (2 Kings 2:2), Jericho (2:4) and then over the Jordan (2:6). Elisha and the other prophets of the Lord were well aware of what was about to happen and he refused to leave his master.
    [Show full text]
  • Stories of the Prophets
    Stories of the Prophets Written by Al-Imam ibn Kathir Translated by Muhammad Mustapha Geme’ah, Al-Azhar Stories of the Prophets Al-Imam ibn Kathir Contents 1. Prophet Adam 2. Prophet Idris (Enoch) 3. Prophet Nuh (Noah) 4. Prophet Hud 5. Prophet Salih 6. Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham) 7. Prophet Isma'il (Ishmael) 8. Prophet Ishaq (Isaac) 9. Prophet Yaqub (Jacob) 10. Prophet Lot (Lot) 11. Prophet Shuaib 12. Prophet Yusuf (Joseph) 13. Prophet Ayoub (Job) 14 . Prophet Dhul-Kifl 15. Prophet Yunus (Jonah) 16. Prophet Musa (Moses) & Harun (Aaron) 17. Prophet Hizqeel (Ezekiel) 18. Prophet Elyas (Elisha) 19. Prophet Shammil (Samuel) 20. Prophet Dawud (David) 21. Prophet Sulaiman (Soloman) 22. Prophet Shia (Isaiah) 23. Prophet Aramaya (Jeremiah) 24. Prophet Daniel 25. Prophet Uzair (Ezra) 26. Prophet Zakariyah (Zechariah) 27. Prophet Yahya (John) 28. Prophet Isa (Jesus) 29. Prophet Muhammad Prophet Adam Informing the Angels About Adam Allah the Almighty revealed: "Remember when your Lord said to the angels: 'Verily, I am going to place mankind generations after generations on earth.' They said: 'Will You place therein those who will make mischief therein and shed blood, while we glorify You with praises and thanks (exalted be You above all that they associate with You as partners) and sanctify You.' Allah said: 'I know that which you do not know.' Allah taught Adam all the names of everything, then He showed them to the angels and said: "Tell Me the names of these if you are truthful." They (angels) said: "Glory be to You, we have no knowledge except what You have taught us.
    [Show full text]