DOCSLIB.ORG

Phonological Acquisition and Development in Arabic- English Bilingual Children

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phonological Acquisition and Development in Arabic- English Bilingual Children ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Phonological acquisition and development in Arabic- English bilingual children https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40380/ Version: Full Version Citation: Al-Amer, Asma (2019) Phonological acquisition and develop- ment in Arabic-English bilingual children. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Phonological Acquisition and development in Arabic- English Bilingual Children Asma Alamer Student ID: 12801661 Supervisors 1st Supervisor - Professor Zhu Hua 2nd Supervisor - Professor Marjorie Lorch A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in TESOL Birkbeck Collage, University of London June 2018 I Declaration I declare that the thesis submitted is my own work and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. Asma Alamer 5-6-2018 II Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of my three special participants. I would like to express my gratitude and endless appreciation to their mothers who dedicated their time in eliciting and recording their children speech for one year. At one point or another, I almost lost hope of completing this thesis. Giving birth to two children while immersing myself in the process of analyzing and writing was almost an impossible mission. Thus, towards the end it felt that I have finally giving birth to my third child. I was very fortunate to have a supervisor like Prof. Zhu whose support and encouragements were valuable. The support that I received from my supervisor was not merely academic; at times of despair and self-doubt she would restore my self-confidence with her kind words and encouragements. Special thanks goes to my mother, father and husband who at times put every thing on hold just to come and support me. Moreover, the prayers of my grandmother always echo in my air and gave me strength against all odds. Finally I am grateful to my two children who have been my greatest joy and company throughout this long and at times desolate journey. III Abstract The main aim of this thesis is to explore the effect of cross-linguistic interaction on the phonological acquisition and development of simultaneous pre-school bilingual children. Data sample comprise of elicited single words and spontaneous speech obtained for three children acquiring English and Arabic languages and recorded by their mothers at home on a monthly basis for a period of one year. The extent of cross-linguistic interaction between the bilingual children's two language was examined through three manifestations: (a) transfer; (b) delay; and (c) acceleration (Paradis & Genesee, 1996) against consonant accuracy PCC, phonemic repertoire, and error patterns. Findings revealed evidence of cross-linguistic interaction through transfer and acceleration at variable degrees across the participants. For transfer, bi-directional transfer was observed in the production of the phoneme /r/ by two of the participants, while unidirectional transfer was more frequent and influenced the production of the following phonemes; /r/, /l/, /ɫ/ and /ŋ/. The directionality of transfer and its frequency corresponded to language exposure patterns the children were exposed to. Acceleration was observed in segmental inventories of shared and unshared sounds. One of the participants had an accelerated inventory of shared sound cross-linguistically when she was less than three years. Conversely, the other participants reported an accelerated segmental inventory in Arabic of unshared sounds over the age of three. In addition, acceleration of the PCC scores in both languages was evident in the results of one of the participants who received amble language exposure in both languages. Delay on the other hand was not found to be a manifestation of interaction and was the result of insufficient language exposure received in the participants' concerned languages. This was also the case of error pattern in which its frequency is contingent on the amount of language exposure received. Longitudinally, interaction either decreased or resolved demonstrating the boosting mechanism of interaction that could manifest at varying degrees during acquisition. The main contribution of this thesis, apart from its being the first longitudinal exploration of English/Arabic simultaneous preschool bilingual children in the UK, is the positive effect of a certain threshold of language exposure across the bilinguals' languages in promoting higher accuracy and larger segmental inventory in comparison to their age matched monolinguals. IV Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ II Abstract ................................................................................................................................. III Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ IV List of Tables .................................................................................................................... VIII List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ V 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Concepts and Definitions ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Bilingual first language acquisition research: Theoretical background ............................ 4 1.2.1 One vs. two phonological systems ................................................................................ 4 1.2.1.1 Unitary Language Model (ULM) .................................................................... 4 1.2.1.2 Dual Language System Hypothesis (DLS) ...................................................... 7 1.2.2 Cross-linguistic Interaction ......................................................................................... 10 1.2.2.1 Manifestations of cross-linguistic interaction ................................................. 10 1.2.2.2 Influential factors ............................................................................................ 16 1. Linguistic domain ...................................................................................... 17 2. Language dominance ................................................................................. 18 3. Cross-linguistic structural differences ....................................................... 20 4. Input ........................................................................................................... 21 5. Individual variations .................................................................................. 21 1.2.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 22 2 Phonological Acquisition: Monolingual- vs. Bilingual-Speaking Children ................. 24 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 24 2.2 Phonological systems of English and Arabic languages .................................................... 25 2.2.1 English ........................................................................................................................ 25 2.2.2 Arabic .......................................................................................................................... 27 2.2.3 Cross-linguistic comparison between English and Arabic phonological systems ...... 29 2.3 Monolingual and bilingual phonological acquisition ......................................................... 31 2.3.1 Monolingual acquisition ............................................................................................. 32 2.3.1.1 Phonemic inventory ........................................................................................ 31 2.3.1.2 Error patterns .................................................................................................. 41 2.3.2 Bilingual acquisition ................................................................................................... 45 2.3.2.1 Phonemic inventory ........................................................................................ 47 2.3.2.2 Error patterns .................................................................................................. 55 2.3.3 Research questions ...................................................................................................... 56 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 57 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 57 3.2 Participants ............................................................................................................................. 57 3.2.1 MF ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indo-European: History, Families & Origins
    Indo-European: History, Families & Origins 1 Historical Linguistics Early observations pointed to language relatedness: The Sanscrit language, whatever by its antiquity, is of a wonderful structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than the Latin, and more exquisitely refined than either, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three, without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists .... Sir William Jones -- Presidential Discourse at the February 2, 1786 meeting of the Asiatic Society 2 Darwin & Historical Linguistics Darwin's On The Origin of Species published in 1859 German biologist Ernst Haeckel persuades his friend - philologist August Schleicher, to read it Schleicher (and generations of historical linguists) apply evolutionary principle to comparative/historical linguistics 3 Test The Methodology Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) used the comparative method to predict that a certain group of sounds had to have existed in Indo-European 20 years later, when Hittite texts were discovered, Saussure's laryngeals were attested! 4 Indo-European Family 5 Indo-European Homeland 6 Family Branching 7 Earliest Attestation of IE Daughter Languages Anatolian 17th c. B.C.E Indo-Aryan (Sanskrit) 15th c. B.C.E Greek 13th c. B.C.E. Iranian (Avestan / Old Persian) 7th c. B.C.E / 6th c. B.C.E. Italic 6th c. B.C.E Tocharian 6th c. B.C.E Germanic 1st c.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction
    This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- sification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the first time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of the World--Native America
    REPOR TRESUMES ED 010 352 46 LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD-NATIVE AMERICA FASCICLE ONE. BY- VOEGELIN, C. F. VOEGELIN, FLORENCE N. INDIANA UNIV., BLOOMINGTON REPORT NUMBER NDEA-VI-63-5 PUB DATE JUN64 CONTRACT MC-SAE-9486 EDRS PRICENF-$0.27 HC-C6.20 155P. ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS, 6(6)/1-149, JUNE 1964 DESCRIPTORS- *AMERICAN INDIAN LANGUAGES, *LANGUAGES, BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA, ARCHIVES OF LANGUAGES OF THE WORLD THE NATIVE LANGUAGES AND DIALECTS OF THE NEW WORLD"ARE DISCUSSED.PROVIDED ARE COMPREHENSIVE LISTINGS AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE LANGUAGES OF AMERICAN INDIANSNORTH OF MEXICO ANDOF THOSE ABORIGINAL TO LATIN AMERICA..(THIS REPOR4 IS PART OF A SEkIES, ED 010 350 TO ED 010 367.)(JK) $. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,EDUCATION nib Office ofEduc.442n MD WELNicitt weenment Lasbeenreproduced a l l e a l O exactly r o n o odianeting es receivromed f the Sabi donot rfrocestarity it. Pondsof viewor position raimentofficial opinions or pritcy. Offkce ofEducation rithrppologicalLinguistics Volume 6 Number 6 ,Tune 1964 LANGUAGES OF TEM'WORLD: NATIVE AMER/CAFASCICLEN. A Publication of this ARC IVES OF LANGUAGESor 111-E w oRLD Anthropology Doparignont Indiana, University ANTHROPOLOGICAL LINGUISTICS is designed primarily, butnot exclusively, for the immediate publication of data-oriented papers for which attestation is available in the form oftape recordings on deposit in the Archives of Languages of the World. This does not imply that contributors will bere- stricted to scholars working in the Archives at Indiana University; in fact,one motivation for the publication
    [Show full text]
  • RJSSER ISSN 2707-9015 (ISSN-L) Research Journal of Social DOI: Sciences & Economics Review ______
    Research Journal of Social Sciences & Economics Review Vol. 1, Issue 4, 2020 (October – December) ISSN 2707-9023 (online), ISSN 2707-9015 (Print) RJSSER ISSN 2707-9015 (ISSN-L) Research Journal of Social DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss4-2020(225-232) Sciences & Economics Review ____________________________________________________________________________________ Urdubic as a Lingua Franca in the Arab Countries of the Persian Gulf * Dr. Riaz Hussain, Head ** Dr. Muhamad Asif, Head *** Dr. Muhammad Din __________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract A new lingua franca, Urdubic, is emerging in the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf. Its linguistic composition is defined by the reduced and simplified forms of Arabic and Urdu. The paper examines linguistic, social, and historical aspects of its sociolinguistic make-up. Recurrent patterns of mutual migration between Arabs and Indians have played a pivotal role in the development of this lingua franca. Today, it appears to permeate the very homes of the Arabs. The examples of linguistic features (combinations of Urdu and Arabic) of the pidgin mentioned in the current study show that Urban Arabic is accepting foreign influences. This influx of foreign languages has alarmed those Arabs who want to preserve the purity of Arabic. How long Urdubic is going to survive amid Arabs’ efforts to save Arabic from such foreign influences? The paper concludes with speculations about the future of Urdubic. Keywords: Pidgins, creoles, Persian Gulf, Arabic, Urdu Introduction Change is an integral part of life. There are changes in human society that are noticed at the time of occurrences such as economic reforms and sudden political changes. But, there are finer changes regarding human linguistic behavior that may occur as a result of large-scale social, economic, and political changes and may be noticed only after years of latent development.
    [Show full text]
  • Disharmonic Headedness in Early Indo-European
    Disharmonic headedness in early Indo-European Innovative reconstruction: disharmonic headedness in early Indo-European Ryan Hearn Cornell University [email protected] June 19, 2018 DiGS 20 Disharmonic headedness in early Indo-European Overview Main goals Main goals 1. Define \parallel syntactic innovation" for the purposes of this paper I Establish parallel syntactic innovation as a reliable basis for syntactic reconstruction 2. Examine complementizer development across the early Indo-European (IE) languages I Reconstruct a left-headed CP domain for Proto-Indo-European (PIE) 3. Examine auxiliary construction development across the early IE languages, especially Tocharian and ancient Greek I Reconstruct a right-headed TP domain for PIE Disharmonic headedness in early Indo-European Parallel Syntactic Innovation Syntactic Reconstruction I Historically, syntactic reconstruction worked very similarly to phonological/morphological reconstruction I Set up correspondence sets of either exact phrases, or of general word order I Now, generative syntax greatly constrains the possible structures we generate I This allows us to go a step further, and reconstruct the structure underlying our word orders I So, not only can we reconstruct the phonological form of function words, but also the features of their functional heads Disharmonic headedness in early Indo-European Parallel Syntactic Innovation But, what if a given function word is not reconstructible for the proto-language? I What if the words that fill a functional role aren't cognate I Or, what
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Relationship Among Languages: an Overview Ghayeth Ersheidat1* and Hafsa Tahir2 1Department of Translation, Faculty of Arts, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION AND APPLIED LINGUISTICS (IJLEAL) ISSN: 2289-7208 e-ISSN: 2289-9294 VOL. 10, ISSUE 1, 17 – 27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v10.3320 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic Relationship among Languages: An Overview Ghayeth Ersheidat1* and Hafsa Tahir2 1Department of Translation, Faculty of Arts, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordon. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Scence and Technology, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan. ARTICLE HISTORY ABSTRACT – This paper reviews the basic concepts of historical linguistics and the comparative Revised: 4 March 2020 techniques used by various linguists who studied Indo-European and American languages to Accepted: 9 March 2020 determine a shared ancestry among languages. This paper also evaluates the major concepts of historical linguistics and the well-grounded theories and classifications that have guided and KEYWORDS shaped the modern linguistic classification practices. For over one and a half century, historical Historical comparative-method linguists have been deducing the origins of different languages. Genetic classifications have been Historical linguistics proposed for languages from all parts of the world and thus far, 142 language-families have been Indo-European languages identified. Although all of these classification schemes are controversial in terms of their validity Language family and reliability but with the progress in the field of bioinformatics, the problems in linguistic Linguistic-tree Proto-language reconstruction have been greatly resolved. Therefore, the historical classification schemes that have been proposed earlier are being radically revised as further progress is made. It is suggested that, to develop further understanding of the typical pattern of language diversification and genetic classification of languages, more recent studies based on sophisticated bioinformatics and statistical techniques for linguistic data analysis should be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Origins of Language Structures∗
    Geographical Origins of Language Structures∗ Oded Galor,y Omer¨ Ozak¨ ,z and Assaf Saridx January 5, 2018 Abstract This research explores the geographical origins of the coevolution of cultural and linguistic traits in the course of human history, relating the geographical roots of long-term orientation to the struc- ture of the future tense, the agricultural determinants of gender bias to the presence of sex-based grammatical gender, and the ecological origins of hierarchical orientation to the existence of polite- ness distinctions. The study advances the hypothesis and establishes empirically that: (i) variations in geographical characteristics that were conducive to higher natural return to agricultural invest- ment contributed to the existing cross-language variations in the structure of the future tense, (ii) the agricultural determinants of gender gap in agricultural productivity fostered the existence of sex-based grammatical gender, and (iii) the ecological origins of hierarchical societies triggered the emergence of politeness distinctions. Keywords: Comparative Development, Cultural Evolution, Language Structure, Future Tense, Po- liteness Distinctions, Long-Term Orientation, Grammatical Gender, Gender Bias, Hierarchy, E- mergence of States JEL Classification: D01, D03, J16, Z10, Z13 ∗The authors are grateful to Alberto Alesina, Joan Bybee, Justin Cook, Lewis Davis, Klaus Desmet, Delia Furtado, Paola Giuliano, Luigi Guiso, Stelios Michalopoulos, and David Weil, as well as conference participants at the NBER Culture and Institutions
    [Show full text]
  • Afrikaans and Dutch As Closely-Related Languages: a Comparison to West Germanic Languages and Dutch Dialects
    Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, Vol. 47, 2015, 1-18 doi: 10.5842/47-0-649 Afrikaans and Dutch as closely-related languages: A comparison to West Germanic languages and Dutch dialects Wilbert Heeringa Institut für Germanistik, Fakultät III – Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Germany Email: [email protected] Febe de Wet Human Language Technology Research Group, CSIR Meraka Institute, Pretoria, South Africa | Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, South Africa Email: [email protected] Gerhard B. van Huyssteen Centre for Text Technology (CTexT), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa Email: [email protected] Abstract Following Den Besten‟s (2009) desiderata for historical linguistics of Afrikaans, this article aims to contribute some modern evidence to the debate regarding the founding dialects of Afrikaans. From an applied perspective (i.e. human language technology), we aim to determine which West Germanic language(s) and/or dialect(s) would be best suited for the purposes of recycling speech resources for the benefit of developing speech technologies for Afrikaans. Being recognised as a West Germanic language, Afrikaans is first compared to Standard Dutch, Standard Frisian and Standard German. Pronunciation distances are measured by means of Levenshtein distances. Afrikaans is found to be closest to Standard Dutch. Secondly, Afrikaans is compared to 361 Dutch dialectal varieties in the Netherlands and North-Belgium, using material from the Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen, a series of dialect atlases compiled by Blancquaert and Pée in the period 1925-1982 which cover the Dutch dialect area. Afrikaans is found to be closest to the South-Holland dialectal variety of Zoetermeer; this largely agrees with the findings of Kloeke (1950).
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of Scots: Clues from Germanic *A Reflexes1 Rhona Alcorn, Benjamin Molineaux, Joanna Kopaczyk, Vasilis Karaiskos, Bettelou Los and Warren Maguire
    The emergence of Scots: Clues from Germanic *a reflexes1 Rhona Alcorn, Benjamin Molineaux, Joanna Kopaczyk, Vasilis Karaiskos, Bettelou Los and Warren Maguire 1 Introduction This paper is concerned with the phonological origins of the linguistic variety known today as Scots. We begin with a review of traditional and more recent scholarship on this topic before describing the particular research project from which this paper arises. In Section 2 we examine the circumstances in which the nascent Scots language emerged, noting in particular how contact between multiple Germanic varieties complicates the identification of its most likely progenitor(s). Such complications lead us to consider the problem of origin from the perspective of one particular segment, that of Germanic *a. In Section 3 we, first, introduce this particular case study, then trace the development of the vowel in each relevant daughter variety. On the basis of our findings, we reconstruct the most likely developments of Germanic *a in Scots. An evaluation of the candidate scenarios follows in Section 4, where we conclude that the particular development of Germanic *a in Scots sits at the crossroads of contact-induced and internally-motivated change. 1.1 Background There is no contemporaneous linguistic evidence for the emergence of the language known today as Scots. While it is generally accepted that it evolved from the northern variety of Old English known as Old Northumbrian (McClure 1994, Macafee and Aitken 2002) the latter is itself poorly documented. Nevertheless sufficient Old Northumbrian materials survive to show that by c.1100 the Old English of the north was already recognizably different from that of the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Curious Daughters: Language, Literacy, and Jewish Female Desire in German and Yiddish Literature from 1793 to 1916
    CURIOUS DAUGHTERS: LANGUAGE, LITERACY, AND JEWISH FEMALE DESIRE IN GERMAN AND YIDDISH LITERATURE FROM 1793 TO 1916 Lea H. Greenberg A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Carolina- Duke Graduate Program in German Studies. Chapel Hill 2021 Approved by: Ruth von Bernuth Eric Downing Stefani Engelstein Kata Gellen Jeffrey Grossman ©2021 Lea H. Greenberg ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Lea H. Greenberg: Curious Daughters: Language, Literacy, and Jewish Female Desire in German and Yiddish Literature from 1793 to 1916 (Under the direction of Ruth von Bernuth) This dissertation examines the interplay of language politics and romantic politics in German and Yiddish literature confronting the challenges faced by Judaism in the long nineteenth century. The project brings into dialogue both German and Yiddish texts, from West Yiddish farces to the literature of a new German Jewish elite to the popular stories of Tevye the Dairyman. This diverse body of literature uses a concern with the sexual purity and loyalty of the Jewish daughter to encode anxieties toward Jewish assimilation into the non-Jewish world. Yet these works also share another layer of the daughter’s subversion: an act of rebellion in the form of a linguistic or cultural departure from tradition. Each of these texts depicts how the Jewish daughter’s adoption of European language and literacy operates in conjunction with her romantic transgressions. I read these works in conversation with the gendered discourse on Jewish language and the history of Jewish women in Europe; these dynamics create a framework for understanding an ambivalence toward new modes of Jewish life.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalyan, François, Hammarström
    Journal of Historical Linguistics SPECIAL ISSUE Understanding language genealogy Alternatives to the tree model volume 9 number 1 2019 John Benjamins Publishing Company Journal of Historical Linguistics volume 9 number 1 2019 General Editor Review Editor Silvia Luraghi Eugenio R. Luján University of Pavia University of Madrid Complutense Associate Editors Michela Cennamo Heiko Narrog University of Naples Tohoku University Gunther De Vogelaer Sarah G. Thomason Universität Münster University of Michigan Eitan Grossman Hebrew University of Jerusalem Consulting Editor Joseph C. Salmons University of Wisconsin Editorial Assistant Hope Wilson The Ohio State University John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia Journal of Historical Linguistics Founding Editors Silvia Luraghi Jóhanna Barðdal University of Pavia Ghent University Eugenio R. Luján University of Madrid Complutense Advisory Board Claire Bowern Harold Koch Yale University Australian National University Concepción Company Company Leonid Kulikov Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Ghent University Wolfgang U. Dressler Rosemarie Lühr Austrian Academy of Sciences University of Jena Thórhallur Eythórsson Marianne Mithun University of Iceland University of California, Santa Barbara Jan Terje Faarlund Geoffrey S. Nathan University of Oslo Wayne State University Elly van Gelderen Muriel Norde Arizona State University Humboldt-Universtät zu Berlin Dag T. Haug John Charles Smith University of Oslo University of Oxford Bernd Heine Elizabeth Closs Traugott University of Cologne Stanford University Willem Hollmann Ans van Kemenade Lancaster University Radboud University, Nijmegen Paul J. Hopper Margaret E. Winters Carnegie Mellon University Wayne State University Ritsuko Kikusawa National Museum of Ethnology, Japan special issue Understanding language genealogy Alternatives to the tree model Edited by Siva ,alyan, Alexandre François and Harald Hammarström Australian National University / LaTTiCe, CNRS, École Normale Supérieure, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Two Minority Language Communities in France1 Jonathan Robert Ference Swarthmore College Department of Linguistics
    1 Sell ase ur gudenn dit : A comparison of two minority language communities in France1 Jonathan Robert Ference Swarthmore College Department of Linguistics 0.0 Abstract Since 1970, cultural changes in France have allowed for a softening of the country’s formerly destructive language policy, though this is happening at a time when both Breton and the langues d’oc have shifted from dominant monolingualism in the regional languages through bilingualism to French monolingualism in just three generations. Despite similarities in usage and attitude patterns, the language maintenance efforts for Breton and Oc have occurred in very different forms. Brief profiles of Oc, Breton, and the language policy situation in France are given before moving into a discussion of the characteristics the two language communities have in common. Each language community and its attributes are then discussed, with particular attention being drawn to the different characters of the revitalization movements. These situations are then discussed in terms of recognized linguistics theory, including the work of Fishman, Dorian, Gal and others. Finally, the prospects for the future of Breton and Oc are evaluated in the context of the hope placed on schooling as the new site of language transmission, with examples like that of Gaelic in Ireland serving as comparison points. Though it relies on the work of Breton linguists like Timm and Broudic and Occitan/Oc linguists like La Font, Blanchet and Dompmartin, this paper is unique in that it compares these two French regional languages in a comparative and contrastive discussion of their linguistic situation and language maintenance efforts.
    [Show full text]