Embracing Change Murray Irrigation Annual Report 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Murrumbidgee Regional Fact Sheet
Murrumbidgee region Overview The Murrumbidgee region is home The river and national parks provide to about 550,000 people and covers ideal spots for swimming, fishing, 84,000 km2 – 8% of the Murray– bushwalking, camping and bird Darling Basin. watching. Dryland cropping, grazing and The Murrumbidgee River provides irrigated agriculture are important a critical water supply to several industries, with 42% of NSW grapes regional centres and towns including and 50% of Australia’s rice grown in Canberra, Gundagai, Wagga Wagga, the region. Narrandera, Leeton, Griffith, Hay and Balranald. The region’s villages Chicken production employs such as Goolgowi, Merriwagga and 350 people in the area, aquaculture Carrathool use aquifers and deep allows the production of Murray bores as their potable supply. cod and cotton has also been grown since 2010. Image: Murrumbidgee River at Wagga Wagga, NSW Carnarvon N.P. r e v i r e R iv e R v i o g N re r r e a v i W R o l g n Augathella a L r e v i R d r a W Chesterton Range N.P. Charleville Mitchell Morven Roma Cheepie Miles River Chinchilla amine Cond Condamine k e e r r ve C i R l M e a nn a h lo Dalby c r a Surat a B e n e o B a Wyandra R Tara i v e r QUEENSLAND Brisbane Toowoomba Moonie Thrushton er National e Riv ooni Park M k Beardmore Reservoir Millmerran e r e ve r i R C ir e e St George W n i Allora b e Bollon N r e Jack Taylor Weir iv R Cunnamulla e n n N lo k a e B Warwick e r C Inglewood a l a l l a g n u Coolmunda Reservoir M N acintyre River Goondiwindi 25 Dirranbandi M Stanthorpe 0 50 Currawinya N.P. -
Water Recovery in the Murray Irrigation Area of Nsw
Disclaimer This report has been generated as part of the Living Murray initiative. Its contents do not represent the position of the Murray-Darling Basin Commission. It is presented as a document which informed discussion for improved management of the Basin’s natural resources in November 2003. Preparation of the social impact assessment scoping and profiling studies preceded the Living Murray First Step decision and the signing on 25 June 2004 at the Council of Australian Governments meeting of the Intergovernmental Agreement on Addressing Water Overallocation and Achieving Environmental Objectives in the Murray- Darling Basin. The communiqué from this COAG meeting is provided at www.coag.gov.au. These decisions provide the framework under which $500m will be invested by governments over 5 years to begin addressing water overallocation in the Murray-Darling Basin and achieve specific environmental outcomes in the Murray-Darling Basin. The first priority for this investment will be water recovery for six significant ecological assets first identified by the Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council in November 2003: the Barmah-Millewa Forest, Gunbower and Koondrook-Perricoota Forests, Hattah Lakes, Chowilla floodplain, the Lindsay-Wallpolla system, the Murray Mouth, Coorong and Lower Lakes, and the River Murray Channel. The water will come from a matrix of options with a priority for on-farm initiatives, efficiency gains, infrastructure improvements and rationalisation, and market based approaches, and purchase of water from willing sellers, rather than by way of compulsory acquisition. Consequently, the assumptions that were made to enable the social impact assessment scoping and profiling studies to be undertaken in mid 2003, while reasonable at the time, have been overtaken by these decisions and the consequential benefits that will flow from them. -
Report for the Week Ending 17 5 2006
REPORT FOR THE WEEK ENDING Wednesday, 17 May 2006 Our Ref : M2006/00012 kes/dwg 19 May, 2006 Trim Ref : 06/10050 Rain and Inflows Very little rain fell across the Basin during the week (see attached map) and consequently unregulated inflows to Hume and Dartmouth Reservoirs declined. Inflow from the Kiewa River at Bandianna fluctuated between 400 and 1 000 ML/day primarily due to increased releases for electricity generation. Flow in the Ovens River at Wangaratta has been maintained at about 800 ML/day following an increase in release from Lake Buffalo from 160 ML/day to 400 ML/day. River Murray Operations Release from Hume Dam has been further reduced this week, which has reduced the flow at Doctors Point from 4 500 ML/day to about 2 000 ML/day. Storage in Hume Reservoir is now increasing and is currently 397 GL (13% capacity). Release from Yarrawonga Weir has been gradually reduced in recent weeks in order to slow the rate of recession in river levels downstream of Yarrawonga Weir. This has been aimed at reducing the potential for bank erosion along the River Murray through the Barmah-Millewa Forest. The level of Lake Mulwala is expected to temporarily drop several centimetres below 124.60 m AHD over the coming week. With a number of consecutive reductions in release from Hume Reservoir over the past fortnight, it is expected there will be significant reductions in river levels along the River Murray and Edward Wakool System over the coming weeks without further significant rain (see media release attached). -
River Murray Weekly Report for the Week Ending Wednesday, 20 February 2019
River Murray Weekly Report For the week ending Wednesday, 20 February 2019 Trim Ref: D19 8405 Rainfall and inflows There was little to no rainfall across the Murray-Darling Basin this week, with only small patches of light rainfall recorded in New South Wales and Queensland (Map 1). Map 1 - Murray-Darling Basin rainfall map week ending 20 February 2019 (Source: Bureau of Meteorology). In comparison to the previous week where tributaries increased with widespread rainfall, most upper Murray tributaries have receded with dry conditions this week. The flow in the upper Mitta Mitta River at Hinnomunjie fell from 190 ML/day to the current flow near 140 ML/day; likewise the upper Murray at Biggara eased from 160 to 100 ML/day. Downstream of Hume Reservoir, inflow from the Kiewa River at Bandiana averaged 210 ML/day, while the Ovens River flow reduced from 340 ML/day to 240 ML/day through the week at Wangaratta. Subscribe to the River Murray Weekly Report River Data website Water in Storages River Murray Weekly Report Photo 1: Swampy Plain river upstream of Khancoban in the Snowy Mountains (Photo courtesy: Tom Zouch, MDBA) Subscribe to the River Murray Weekly Report River Data website Water in Storages River Murray Weekly Report River operations • Transfers between Dartmouth to Hume winding down • Delivery of Goulburn Valley IVT water via the Goulburn River to ease • Reductions in Murray Irrigation Limited escapes bypassing water around the Barmah Choke to begin • Euston weir pool level returning to the full supply level • Flow over Weir 32 in the lower Darling River ceased System operations Following an extended period of near capacity flows and transfers to ensure supply through the system, latest operations forecasting is indicating flows through the system can now start to be eased. -
NSW Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan
NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales IMPORTANT NOTE During the preparation of this report, the following administrative changes occurred in the New South Wales Government: the Department of Water and Energy (DWE) was abolished and the functions relating to the administration of water legislation transferred to the Office of Water within the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW), previously the Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC). The energy functions of DWE were transferred to the newly created Industry and Investment NSW, previously the Department of Primary Industries (DPI). References throughout this report are to the former agencies. Publisher NSW Office of Water Level 17, 227 Elizabeth Street GPO Box 3889 Sydney NSW 2001 T 02 8281 7777 F 02 8281 7799 [email protected] www.water.nsw.gov.au NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan. Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales December 2009 ISBN 978 1 921546 94 5 Related publication NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan: Final report Published in December 2009 ISBN 978 1 921546 95 2 Acknowledgements Contributing agencies: NSW Office of Water (the Office), formerly Department of Water and Energy (DWE), Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW), formerly Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC), Industry & Investment NSW, formerly Forests NSW in Department of Primary Industry (DPI), Sydney Catchment Authority This publication may be cited as: Malone D., Torrible L., Hayes J., 2009, NSW strategic water information and monitoring plan: Water inventory and observation networks in New South Wales, NSW Office of Water, Sydney. -
Racism Survey: 'Murray and Far West' Statistical Division
Regional response profile- Racism Survey: ‘Murray and Far West’ Statistical Division This page contains information on the attitudes, experiences and demographics of the ‘Murray and Far West’ Statistical Division. There are also links that provide a description of the groupings in this Statistical Division, suggested anti-racism initiatives, and details about the survey. LGAs Albury, Balranald, Broken Hill, Berrigan, Central Darling, Conargo, Corowa Shire, Deniliquin, Greater Hume Shire, Jerilderie, Murray, Tumbarumba, Unincorporated NSW, Urana, Wakool, Wentworth. Grouping A characterisation of the above LGAs is provided through the links above. These characterisations describe the mix of attitudes, demographics and experiences of residents in those areas. The descriptions are followed by a list of suggested anti-racism initiatives which may be useful in those areas. Sample size The sample size for the ‘Murray and Far West’ SD was 84 respondents. This represents 2.6% of the survey respondents from New South Wales (3217) and 0.7% of respondents from all of Australia (12512). 1 1. Racist attitude indicators Table 1.1: Comparison of racist attitudes, ‘Murray and Far West’ Statistical Divisions with total New South Wales and Australian survey, 2001. % of SD Total Total Australia Variation Variation from Nation respondents New South Wales survey% from State survey % Anti-cultural difference1 7.1 8.1 6.5 -1 0.6 Insecurity with difference2 11.9 11.0 9.4 0.9 2.5 Diversity = weak nation3 46.4 46.1 41.1 0.3 5.3 Self identify as racist4 14.3 12.9 -
NSW Department of Lands Hay Office SA895
Regional Archives NSW Department of Lands Hay Office SA895 Download Accession List Use ‘Ctrl + F’ to search list RIVERINA-MURRAY INSTITUTE ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE Accession List Hay Lands Off ice Accession No: 8 9 5 Box 1. Land Board Files 28/44 Village of Barnes 46/37 S.L. 1926/7:: Hillston 56/151 S.L. 1956/7:: Narrandera 57/23 S.L. 1956 and 1957/3:: Deniliquin 67/406 Removal of material from travelling stock reserve C.Nicholson P.Bogia.:: Hillston 68/275 Relocation of reserve for access under the control of Deniliquin Pastures Protection Board. County Townsend. P. South Deniliquin :: Deniliquin 70/114 P.O. 1970/2:: Narrandera 72/173 Forestry leased within Hay Land Board District 73/269 P.O. 1976/12:: Deniliquin 73 I 3~ - ~ D~lsy ih plan drawing etc. 74/308 Narrandera Cemetery bOX 2. 69/385 Village of Barooga:: Corowa 72/256 R.60141 and R. 60143. Tabbita: Hillston 76/86 Village of Langtree: Hillston 75/52 R.704 and R. 3045: Deniliquin 76/172 R.P.1934/34:: Deniliquin 76/221 A.B. 1976/210: Denitiquin 77/71 H.F. 1961/2: Na:r::.randera 77/129 Forestry Leases 77/169 S.H. 1928/12: Narrandera 77/171 S.L. 1977/3: Deniliquin 77/177 Berrigan Memorial Hall 77/185 C.P. 1979/7:Deniliquin 77/228 C.P. 1977/9: Narrandera 77/237 S.H. 1966/21: Deniliquin 77/269 A.P. 1977/316: Narrandera ( 77/270 A.P. 1977/315: Narrandera 17/303 A.P. 1917/1001: Deniliquin 77 I 30~8 R. -
Draft Floodplain Management Plan: Edward and Wakool Rivers Stage 1 250000 300000
Stage 1 floodway network maps Figure 1.0 Key map Figure 1.1 Sheet 1 of 7 Figure 1.2 Sheet 2 of 7 Figure 1.3 Sheet 3 of 7 Figure 1.4 Sheet 4 of 7 Figure 1.5 Sheet 5 of 7 Figure 1.6 Sheet 6 of 7 Figure 1.7 Sheet 7 of 7 62 Draft Floodplain Management Plan: Edward and Wakool Rivers Stage 1 250000 300000 Stage 1 Draft FMP Floodway Network Deniliquin to Moama - Moulamein Railway Moulamein Key Map Figure 1.0 Figure 1.7 6100000 Figure 1.5 6100000 Figure 1.2 Jimaringle Figure 1.6 Morago Moonahcullah Burraboi Figure 1.3 Dahwilly Figure 1.1 Wakool LEGEND Figure 1.4 1.X Figure Number Abc Towns Major Rivers/creeks Deniliquin Roads Railways Draft FMP floodway network Stage 1 FMP floodplain ± 0 5 10 km (MGA Zone 55) Waterways: © NSW Depart ment of Information and Technology Managem ent (200 6). Barham Koondrook 250000 300000 290000 300000 310000 West 8844 OLD MORAGO ROAD LEGEND Stage 1 Draft FMP Floodway Network Draft FMP floodway network EDWARD RIVER Deniliquin to Moama - Moulamein Railway 1981 Guidelines floodway network Sheet 1 of 7 Rivers/ creeks Figure 1.1 6080000 Roads 6080000 East 5494 Railways HYDRAULIC MEASURES (Refer Table 4.1) South 5475 Dahwilly Issu e 1 .X Hy draulic I ssue I D Existing flood control work - West 5540 HOLSCHLERS ROAD modifications required COBB HI GHW AY ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES (Refer Table 5.1) COLLIGEN CREEK ROAD 5870 Environmental Issue ID (Murray Wetlands Working Group No.) 1981 G uidelines floodway boundary realigned to encompass FDE site EDWARD RIVER Phy sical works modifications required to restore/maintain floodwater access to FDE site COLLI GIB BS RO AD GE EK N C R E ± CALIMO ROAD Issue 1.2 Issue 1.6 0 1 2 3 km (MGA Zone 55) Base photography:SPOT Image 2004-2005, Copyright CNRS 2004-2005 Issue 1.4 5632 Issue 1.1 reproduced under licence from SPO T Image and Raytheon Australia, all rights reserved. -
Myth & the Murray
Myth & the Murray Measuring the real state of the river environment by Jennifer Marohasy We have all heard about the declining health of the Murray River, including poor water quality, dying red gums and threats to the continued survival of the Murray cod—this is the popular view in urban Australia. Along the river, communities believe that the end of commercial fishing, a substantial restocking effort, improvements in on-farm practices and the construction of salt-interception schemes have resulted in a healthier river. The available evidence supports the local view and suggests that, with the possible exception of native fish stocks, the river environment is healthy. Many of the scientific reports that have led to the perception that the Murray River is in poor health make their comparisons with a natural river, which is one without dams and locks, one that gushes and then runs dry. Such comparisons are misplaced. If the ultimate objective of the conservation movement is a natural river, then we must reject the cultural heritage and economic wealth created by the engineering works, including the Snowy Mountains Scheme. In its natural state, the Murray River could not provide for Adelaide’s water needs and it could not support the irrigation industries that have made the region the food bowl of Australia. Backgrounder December 2003, Vol. 15/5, rrp $22.00 Myth & the Murray: Measuring the real state of the river environment 2. INTRODUCTION buy the total amount of water proposed (1,500 gigalitres). ‘Myths embody popular ideas on natural and While spending money on the environment may social phenomena.’ seem like a worthy cause in itself, what would actually Oxford English Dictionary be achieved if this quantity of water were released? The Murray River environment is highly modified as In Australian cities, a popular idea about the Murray a consequence of the many dams and locks constructed River has emerged. -
Weekly Report 23 December 2020
River Murray Weekly Report For the week ending Wednesday, 23 December 2020 Trim Ref: D20/51035 Please note that MDBA offices will be closed from Christmas Day to New Year’s Day. As such this will be the final Weekly Report issued for the 2020 calendar year. There will be no Weekly Report issued for the week ending Wednesday, 30th December 2020. The first report for 2021 will cover the two‐week period ending Wednesday, 6th January 2021 and will be available from Friday, 8th January 2021. Rainfall and inflows This week there were widespread and varied rainfall totals across the Murray‐Darling Basin, the highest totals of which were observed in North East NSW (Map 1). In the southern Basin, the highest totals were recorded in the Murrumbidgee catchment, with slightly lower totals in upper Murray catchments and along the mid‐Murray. In NSW, Tumut in the Murrumbidgee catchment recorded 64 mm, and in the Central Murray catchment, Albury recorded 53 mm. In Victoria, Falls Creek in the Victorian Alps recorded 39 mm and Kerang in the mid‐Murray recorded 43 mm. Map 1 ‐ Murray‐Darling Basin rainfall totals for week ending 23 December 2020 (Source: Bureau of Meteorology). Streamflow in the upper Murray catchments experienced a small rise in some locations following some rainfall during the week. However, streamflows have now begun to recede again. Further specific information about flows at key locations can be found at the MDBA’s River Murray data webpage. Up‐to‐date river data for sites in the upper Murray can also be found on BoM’s website and in the Murray River Basin Daily River Report at the WaterNSW website. -
2016 National Plant Biosecurity Status Report
The National Plant Biosecurity Status Report 2016 © Plant Health Australia 2017 Disclaimer: This publication is published by Plant Health Australia for information purposes only. Information in the document is drawn from a variety of sources outside This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Plant Health Australia. Although reasonable care was taken in its preparation, Plant Health permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part Australia does not warrant the accuracy, reliability, completeness or currency of the may be reproduced by any process without prior information, or its usefulness in achieving any purpose. permission from Plant Health Australia. Given that there are continuous changes in trade patterns, pest distributions, control Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction measures and agricultural practices, this report can only provide a snapshot in time. and rights should be addressed to: Therefore, all information contained in this report has been collected for the 12 month period from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016, and should be validated and Communications Manager confirmed with the relevant organisations/authorities before being used. A list of Plant Health Australia contact details (including websites) is provided in the Appendices. 1/1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Plant Health Australia will not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred in or arising by reason of any person relying on the ISSN 1838-8116 information in this publication. Readers should make and rely on their own assessment An electronic version of this report is available for and enquiries to verify the accuracy of the information provided. -
Deliverabiliy of Environmental Water in the Murray Valleyx
Deliverability of Environmental Water in the Murray Valley Report to Murray Group of Concerned Communities May 2012 Final Report Version: 3.0 Page 1 of 41 Citation Murray Catchment Management Authority (2012) Deliverability of Environmental Water in the Murray Valley. © 2012 Murray Catchment Management Authority This work is copyright. With the exception of the photographs, any logo or emblem, and any trademarks, the work may be stored, retrieved and reproduced in whole or part, provided that it is not sold or used for commercial benefit. Any reproduction of information from this work must acknowledge Murray Group of Concerned Communities, Murray Catchment Management Authority, or the relevant third party, as appropriate as the owner of copyright in any selected material or information. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) or above, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Murray Group of Concerned Communities or Murray Catchment Management Authority. Murray Group of Concerned Communities Disclaimer This report has been prepared for Murray Group of Concerned Communities and is made available for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion regarding the development of the Draft Murray Darling Basin Plan. The opinions, comments and analysis (including those of third parties) expressed in this document are for information purposes only. This document does not indicate the Murray Group of Concerned Communities’ commitment to undertake or implement a particular