2019 Development Charges
Background Study
DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
DRAFT February 25, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 4 CHAPTER 4: CALCULATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE RATE ...... 16 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND STUDY PURPOSE & PROCESS ...... 7 4.1 Planning Period 4.2 Growth Forecasts 2.1 Purpose of the Development Charge Background Study 4.3 Forecasting Future Capital Needs 2.2 2019 Development Charge Process 4.4 Legislated Adjustments to Arrive at Net DC Eligible Amount 2.2.1 DC External Stakeholder Committee 4.5 Examination of Existing Levels of Service 2.2.2 Policy Decisions 4.6 Calculating DC Rates 2.2.3 Growth Forecasts TABLE 4-1: Proposed Development Charge Rates 2.2.4 Servicing Needs and DC Master Plans 2.2.5 Draft Rate Calculations CHAPTER 5: SUMMARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT CHARGE RATES ...... 21 2.2.6 Council Review and Public Input Process TABLE 5-1: All Services CHAPTER 3: DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ACT & POLICIES ...... 10 TABLE 5-2: Residential 3.1 Amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997 – Bill 73 TABLE 5-3: Non-Residential 3.1.1 Area Rating TABLE 5-4: Timing of Expenditures 3.1.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure 3.1.3 60 Day Circulation Period for DC Background Study APPENDIX A: Growth Forecasts ...... 26 3.1.4 Timing of DC Collection 3.1.5 Transit TABLE A-1: Employment 3.1.6 Changes to Ineligible Services TABLE A-2: Population TABLE A-3: Housing 3.2 Services & Types of Work Identified for DC Recovery TABLE A-4: Residential 3.3 Additional Services TABLE A-5: Summary of Annual Housing Growth 1996 - 2044 3.4 When a DC is Calculated and Payable TABLE A-6: Non-Residential Floor Space 3.5 Demolition Credits TABLE A-7: Residential Forecast Summary 3.6 Non-Residential Rates TABLE A-8: Non-Residential Forecast Summary 3.7 Conversion Credits 3.8 Local Service Policy APPENDIX B: Fire Services ...... 38 3.9 Retirement of the Urban Works Reserve Fund (UWRF) Service Standards: Table B-1: Vehicles 3.10 Rural Area Charges Table B-2: Facilities 3.11 Intention Not to Introduce Credits into the System Table B-3: Outfitting 3.12 Reserve Funds Rate Calculations: Table B-4: Vehicles 3.13 Interim Financing for Growth Infrastructure Projects Table B-5: Facilities 3.14 Annual Indexing of DC Rates Table B-6: Outfitting 3.15 Effective Date of By-law Table B-7: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
3.16 Administration of By-law APPENDIX C: Police Services ...... 51 3.17 Fund Reporting and Monitoring Service Standards: 3.18 Growth Management Implementation Strategy (GMIS) Table C-1: Facilities 3.19 Municipal Servicing and Financing Agreements (MSFA) Table C-2: Vehicles Table C-3: Outfitting
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rate Calculations: Rate Calculations: Table C-4: Facilities Table G-1: Facilities Table C-5: Outfitting Table G-2: Vehicles Table C-6: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table G-3: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
APPENDIX D: Corporate Growth Studies ...... 61 APPENDIX H: Waste Diversion Services ...... 143 Rate Calculations: Service Standards: Table D-1: Rate Calculation Table H-1: Facilities Table D-2: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Rate Calculations: Table H-2: Facilities APPENDIX E: Library Services ...... 69 Table H-3: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
Map E-1: 2019 London Public Library Districts Service Standards: APPENDIX I: Operations Centre Services ...... 150 Table E-1: Collections Service Standards: Table E-2: Facilities Table I-1: Facilities Rate Calculations: Rate Calculations: Table E-3: Collections Table I-2: Facilities Table E-4: Facilities Table I-3: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table E-5: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation APPENDIX J: Roads Services ...... 157 APPENDIX F: Parks & Recreation Services ...... 81 Table J-1: Rate Calculation Service Standards: Table J-2: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table F-1: Summary Table F-2: Parkland Development Summary APPENDIX K: Wastewater Services ...... 170 Table F-3: Facilities Summary Table K-1: Rate Calculation Table F-4: Equipment Summary Table K-2: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table F-5: Parkland Development Detail Table F-6: Parkland Development – Thames Valley Parkway APPENDIX L: Stormwater Management Services ...... 178 Table F-7: Parkland Development – Open Space SWM Block Pathways Table L-1: Rate Calculation Table F-8: Parkland Development – Foot Bridges & Tunnels Table L-2: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table F-9: Facilities – Arenas
Table F-10: Facilities – Community / Senior Centres Table F-11: Facilities – Aquatics APPENDIX M: Water Distribution Services ...... 187 Table F-12: Facilities – Wading Pools & Spray Pads Table M-1: Rate Calculation Table F-13: Facilities – Specialty Table M-2: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation Table F-14: Facilities – Fieldhouses Rate Calculations: APPENDIX N: Urban Works Reserve Fund Retirement ...... 195 Table F-15: Parkland Development Table N-1: UWRF Obligations to be Transferred to the Respective CSRF Table F-16: Facilities Table F-17: Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation APPENDIX O: Lifecycle & Operating Cost Impacts ...... 198 Table O-1: Hard Services APPENDIX G: Transit Services ...... 131 Table O-2: Soft Services
Hemson Consulting Technical Appendix APPENDIX P: Proposed 2019 DC-By-law ...... 195
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 3
DraftCHAPTER 2019 Development 1: Charge Rates Executive Summary
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 4
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Executive Summary
Development Charges (DCs) provide a method for municipalities to recover the capital costs of The primary objective of the 2019 DC Study was to be consistent with the London Plan provision that providing infrastructure and services associated with growth. In Ontario, the Development Charges “Growth pays for Growth”. With that as a key guiding principle, DC rates have been calculated based Act (DCA) governs the calculation of rates and the collection of DCs. Since the passing of the 2014 on projected growth, associated infrastructure needs and the requirements of the DCA. DC Study, the Province has updated the DCA through Bill 73 (Smart Growth for Our Communities Act) which came into force and effect January 1, 2016. Some of the key changes resulting from Bill A further objective of the 2019 DC Study was to conduct a consultative process where information 73 include the following: pertinent to policy matters and rate calculations were reviewed and discussed with various stakeholders. The DC External Stakeholder Committee that was established during the 2014 DC • Transit has been removed from the required 10% statutory deduction; Study was carried forward to the 2019 DC Study. This Committee’s composition includes • The service standard calculation for Transit is now forward looking based on ridership, rather representatives from the London Home Builders’ Association, the Urban League of London, and the than a backward looking historical service standard; London Development Institute that represent the interests of the community and industry. This • The list of ineligible services for which DCs could not be imposed has changed so that Committee has met approximately 25 times since the initiation of the 2019 DC process, providing municipal infrastructure for Waste Diversion can now be recovered from DCs; valuable input and perspectives that have been reflected in the Background Study and By-law. In • Municipalities must consider the use of an Area Rating to reflect different needs for services in addition, Staff have held numerous targeted review meetings with individual stakeholders to address different areas; more detailed and technical matters. • DCs must be collected at the time of the first building permit; • An asset management plan must be prepared to deal with all assets whose capital costs are A key element of the 2019 DC Study is the full retirement of the Urban Works Reserve Funds (UWRF). proposed to be funded under the DC By-law and demonstrate that all of the assets are Under the 2019 DC Background Study and By-law, all outstanding UWRF obligations, revenues and financially sustainable over their full lifecycle; and uncommitted balances will be transferred to the respective City Services Reserve Fund and the • A DC Background Study must be made available to the public at least 60 days prior to the UWRF will be formally closed. passing of the DC By-law and until the By-law expires or is repealed. This Study reflects the rates that are calculated within the bounds of the governing legislation and are These legislative requirements have been incorporated into the 2019 DC Background Study and By- a reasonable representation of the estimated costs resulting from projected growth over the planning law to ensure compliance with the DCA. horizon. The rates are grouped into a “base” rate which represent the DC recoverable services approved in the 2014 DC Study and additional services identified for DC recovery in the 2019 DC The DCA also dictates that a background study be completed which demonstrates that the DC rates Study. The DC rates resulting from this study are summarized below: were calculated in accordance with the requirements of the legislation. Included in the DC Study are:
Additional Type of Development Base DC Rate Total DC Rate • A forecast of the amount, type and location of population, employment, housing and non- Services 1 Residential residential development (Institutional, Commercial, Industrial); $32,637 $499 $33,136 (Single & Semi Detached) • Identification of future servicing needs associated with growth were determined for all DC Institutional ($/m2) $166.82 $1.47 $168.29 recoverable service areas; • The estimated capital costs and timing of growth infrastructure needs and operating impact Commercial ($/m2) $276.32 $2.42 $278.74 required to support growth; Industrial ($/m2) $205.12 $1.03 $206.15 • Statutory deductions and service standard limitations were applied to arrive at net capital costs (1) Two additional services that support growth have been included for consideration into the total 2019 DC rate. These include Operation Centres attributable to development; and and Waste Diversion. • Allocation of net capital costs amongst benefitting forms of development (residential and non-
residential).
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 5
Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Executive Summary
For single & semi-detached units, the draft 2019 base rate represents a 2.0% increase over the indexed rates effective January 1, 2019, and a 3.5% increase if the additional services for DC recovery are also included. For a detailed breakdown on all DC rate categories refer to Chapter 5.
A public participation meeting will be held on March 25, 2019 for public input followed by deliberations on May 6, 2019 with Council approval targeted for May 7, 2019.
______Jason Senese Kevin Edwards Manager, Development Finance Manager, Development Finance
______Paul Yeoman Director, Development Finance
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 6
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 2:
Background Study Purpose & Process
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 7
Table of Contents CHAPTER 2: Background Study Purpose & Process
2.1 Purpose of the Development Charge Background Study iii. DC rate calculations.
Development Charges (DCs) play an important part in how growth infrastructure is financed in Since the initiation of the 2019 DC Study, the DC External Stakeholder Committee has met London. Each new house, commercial centre, educational facility, and/or manufacturing plant approximately 25 times. These meetings have resulted in positive and constructive conversations requires infrastructure and servicing (e.g. sewers, stormwater ponds, fire stations, road that have helped shape the 2019 DC Study. In addition to the Committee meetings, Staff have also improvements, etc.) in order to function efficiently and effectively. DCs are fees that are paid by new held a number of targeted review meetings with individual stakeholders to address more detailed and development to fund growth infrastructure and services constructed throughout the City. technical matters that have provided another layer of review and consultation. The DC External Stakeholder Committee is actively involved throughout the entire DC process providing input and In Ontario, the Provincial government regulates the setting of DC rates through the Development valuable perspectives. Charges Act (DCA). The purpose of DCs is to collect funds from new development to finance capital works supporting current and future growth. DCs are calculated and collected at the time of building 2.2.2 Policy Decisions permit issuance. The City’s DC policy choices can have a significant impact on the cost and allocation of growth-related At least every five years, as required by the DCA, the City of London conducts a DC Background costs. Decisions on DC policy issues can impact the information gathered to complete the rate Study to forecast the City’s future residential and non-residential growth to determine infrastructure calculations and the drafting of the DC Background Study and By-law. As a result, a number of key needs and costs. This information is used to calculate the amount of money that new development policy issues were reviewed early in the process of the 2019 DC Study. Early identification and vetting needs to pay in order to support growth infrastructure and services. of key policy matters is critical because implementation and associated adjustments can be difficult if introduced towards the end of the process. A comprehensive listing of policy matters addressed as 2.2 2019 Development Charge Process part of the development of the 2019 DC Study can be found in Chapter 3.
A comprehensive process was undertaken to develop the 2019 DC Background Study and By-law. 2.2.3 Growth Forecasts The process is described below. Under section 5 (1)1 of the DCA, “the anticipated amount, type and location of development for which 2.2.1 DC External Stakeholder Committee development charges can be imposed must be estimated”. This study began with a projection of development activity for the DC recovery period. These projections are necessary for prudent The DC External Stakeholder Committee plays an integral part in the DC process. This Committee planning of municipal services and facilities. They represent the base assumption from which growth was established during the 2014 DC Study and was carried forward to the 2019 DC Study. This needs were projected. Committee is composed of representatives from the London Home Builders’ Association, the Urban League of London and the London Development Institute, which represent the interests of the To satisfy this requirement, Watson & Associates Economists was retained to prepare growth community and industry. The purpose and mandate of this Committee is to: forecasts for population, employment, housing and non-residential construction (Institutional, Commercial and Industrial) to the year 2044. The growth forecasts were used for analysis necessary a. Review, analyze and provide informed opinions to shape DC policy matters from a to determine infrastructure requirements for the 2019 DC Study. More detailed information pertaining Stakeholder perspective; to growth projections can be found in Appendix A. b. Discuss viable alternative policy directions; c. Provide suggestions on communicating policy issues; d. Provide input and comment on items such as: i. Growth forecasts; ii. Servicing needs and studies to support growth; and
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 8
Table of Contents CHAPTER 2: Background Study Purpose & Process
2.2.4Servicing Needs and DC Master Plans
Once the growth forecasts have been completed, the determination of municipal infrastructure, equipment and facility requirements resulting from growth are estimated. This step in the process satisfies section 5 (1)2 of the DCA. The capital needs study for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater termed ‘One Water’ was undertaken in-house by Staff from Environmental and Engineering Services. The Roads Service capital needs study was completed by IBI Group Inc., in conjunction with Hemson Consulting Ltd. The findings from each of these studies can be referenced in the corresponding Appendices.
The capital needs for soft services including Police, Fire, Library, Parks & Recreation, Transit, Corporate Growth Studies, Waste Diversion and Operations Centres, were estimated based on capital budgets and master planning up to a historical level of service.
2.2.5 Draft Rate Calculations
The culmination of the prior steps in the DC process ultimately feed into determining the draft rate calculations. The draft rates determine the growth related net capital costs which are attributable to forecasted development in the City of London. These net capital costs are then apportioned to the various types of development (residential and non-residential) in a manner that reflect the increase in need for each DC recoverable service to each type of development.
2.2.6 Council Review and Public Input Process
The public meeting required under Section 12 of the DCA is scheduled for a Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee Meeting on March 25, 2019. Its purpose is to table the 2019 DC Background Study and By-law to Committee and solicit public input. Prior to this meeting, public disclosure of the 2019 DC Background Study and By-law was posted to the City website on February 25, 2019, meeting the legislative requirement of 20 days in advance of the public meeting.
The public review process is initiated by posting the Background Study on the City’s website at least 60 days prior to the passing of a By-law as required under section 10 (4) of the DCA. This allows interested parties to comment and provide feedback prior to Council consideration. The date for adoption of the By-law is scheduled for May 7, 2019 which allows sufficient lead time from the public disclosure of February 25, 2019.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 9
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 3:
Development Charges Act & Policies
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 10
Table of Contents CHAPTER 3: Development Charges Act & Policies
This chapter provides an overview of the amendments to the Development Charges Act (DCA) and each municipality. However, the DCA regulations provide specific criteria related to the Transit summarizes the policy matters reviewed as part of the 2019 Development Charges (DC) Study. Services Asset Management Plan. More information related to these Asset Management Plans can be found in Appendix O. 3.1 Amendments to Development Charges Act, 1997 – Bill 73 3.1.3 60 Day Circulation Period for DC Background Study Effective January 1, 2016, a number of amendments to the DCA were enacted as a result of Bill 73 (Smart Growth for Our Communities Act). Amendments to the DCA included a number of Prior to the DCA amendments, the DC Background Study was to be publicly available at least two considerations to be made which were not required in the 2014 DC Study. The following provides weeks prior to the public meeting. The amended legislation now requires public release at least 60 brief explanations of the key changes to the DCA and how these changes have been incorporated days prior to the passage of the DC By-law and includes posting on the City’s website. into the 2019 DC Study. The 2019 DC Study is being provided to the public on February 25th, 2019 to ensure the legislative 3.1.1 Area Rating requirement is met prior to the passage of the By-law targeted for May 7, 2019.
Section 2 (9) of the DCA requires a municipality to investigate area-specific DCs for specific services 3.1.4 Timing of DC Collection which are prescribed and/or for specific municipalities which are to be regulated. It is noted that at this time no municipalities or services are prescribed by the Regulations. Further to the above, An amendment to the DCA now requires DCs be collected at the time of the first building permit. This Section 10 (2) c.1 requires consideration for the use of more than one DC By-law to reflect different is consistent with the City’s existing policy. DCs are payable at the time of building permit issuance needs for services in different areas. and are collected by the City of London Building Department.
In order to address this legislative requirement, Staff brought forward a report addressing area rating 3.1.5 Transit early in the 2019 DC process. On January 30, 2018, Council resolved the following: The DC calculation with respect to Transit Services was amended with the new DCA and incorporated a) the staff report dated January 29, 2018 BE ENDORSED for use in the preparation of the into O. Reg. 428/15 & 82/98. A number of prescribed elements are referenced in these regulations 2019 Development Charges Background Study, consistent with the Development Charges as follows: Act requirements related to area rating; • removal of the 10% statutory deduction from the growth-related costs; b) the current policy to distinguish Development Charges rates inside the Urban Growth • prescriptive methodology for determining the level of service; and Boundary from those outside the Urban Growth Boundary, BE CONTINUED; and • change to forecasted approach for ridership capacity for all modes over the ten year planning horizon, and identification of whether the new ridership is attributable from existing or planned c) the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to continue its analysis to review services that are development. candidates for differential recovery areas, and that the City work towards an area rating servicing policy to be implemented beyond 2019; The City engaged IBI Group Inc. along with Hemson Consulting Ltd. to undertake a review of the new requirements and incorporate the necessary changes in the 2019 DC Study. The service standard 3.1.2 Asset Management Plan for New Infrastructure calculation for Transit is now forward looking based on ridership, rather than a backward looking historical service standard. The calculations and background can be found in Appendix G. The DCA now requires a municipality to include an Asset Management Plan for all capital costs which are proposed to be funded in whole or in part under the DC By-law. The DCA does not provide specifics on how the Asset Management Plan is to be prepared which leaves it to the discretion of
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 11
Table of Contents CHAPTER 3: Development Charges Act & Policies
3.1.6 Changes to Ineligible Services Hard Services
Through Bill 73, the list of DC ineligible services has changed so that municipal infrastructure related to Waste Diversion can now be recovered from DCs. As a result of these changes, Waste Diversion • Low Level System has been included as a new service for DC recovery in the City’s 2019 DC Rate. The details • Southeast Pressure Zone surrounding the inclusion of this new service can be found in Appendix H. • High Level System • Water Distribution Watermain Internal Oversizing • Built Area Works Servicing 3.2 Services & Types of Work Identified for DC Recovery • Strategic Links Servicing • Industrial Servicing (trunk & oversizing) The tables below outlines the services and types of works that are included in the 2019 DC rate • Water Distribution Facilities calculations.
Hard Services Soft Services
• Arterial Road Works • Facility • Two-Lane Arterial Upgrades Fire • Outfitting Roads • BRT Related Arterial Road Works • Vehicles • Minor Road Works • Additional Programs • Police Facility • Outfitting • Wastewater Trunk Sewers • Wastewater Internal Oversizing Sewers Corporate Growth • Built Area Works Servicing • Various Studies Studies Wastewater • Strategic Links Servicing • Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades • • Facility Wastewater Pumping Station Works Library • Industrial Land Servicing (trunk & oversizing) • Collections
• • Parkland Development Community Growth SWM Works Parks and Recreation • Storm Trunk Sewers • Facility • Stormwater Internal Oversizing Sewers Stormwater • Management Built Area Works Servicing • Facility • Low Impact Development Transit • Industrial SWM Ponds • Vehicles • Industrial Land Servicing (trunk & oversizing)
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 12
Table of Contents CHAPTER 3: Development Charges Act & Policies
3.6 Non-Residential Rates Additional Services The DCA provides municipalities with the authority to impose DCs on new development to recover the capital costs to service those new developments. Section 2(1) of the DCA states: Waste Diversion • Facility “The council of a municipality may by By-law impose development charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services arising from • Operation Centres Facility development of the area to which the By-law applies.”
The DCA speaks to the development of land, but provides limited guidance regarding subcategorizing 3.3 Additional Services uses of the land. Some references to residential development are made in the DCA, and by inference non-residential, but no framework is provided to guide municipalities in the establishment of Three additional services were endorsed by Council for consideration in the 2019 DC Study. Through categorizing DCs. As a result, municipalities across Ontario define non-residential uses in different discussions and review with the DC External Stakeholder Committee, Water Supply will not be ways. The City’s current approach to non-residential DCs is to maintain separate DC rates for brought forward for inclusion in the 2019 DC Study, however both Waste Diversion and Operation Institutional, Commercial, and Industrial (ICI) development after discussions with the broader DC Centres will be included. The inclusion of Water Supply will be revisited in the next DC Study. External Stakeholder Committee. On December 18th, 2018 Council endorsed the continual use of
the ICI rate structure for non-residential development in the City 3.4 When a DC is Calculated and Payable 3.7 Conversion Credits In accordance with section 26 (1) of the DCA, a DC shall be payable at the time of issuance of a
building permit, which is consistent with the City’s current practice. A change that is included in the A change to the conversion policy is incorporated in the 2019 DC By-law with respect to one form of 2019 DC By-law is when a DC is calculated. Currently the DC is calculated at the time of building non-residential use to another form of non-residential use. As a result of the non-residential rate policy permit application. Upon approval of the 2019 DC By-law, the charge will now be calculated at time consultation and review, a key issue was raised in terms of the existing policy. The City of London of permit issuance. Calculating the DC charge at the time of application does not align with the time classifies non-residential development by ICI which results in different DC rates. Thus, the issue of at which the growth is actually occurring; a disconnect from an assumption of the growth forecasts. converting a lower rate non-residential use to a higher rate non-residential use (i.e. Industrial to This shift will better align revenues with growth. Further, it will mitigate administrative challenges Commercial) triggers a DC payment. This approach may act as a barrier to redeveloping existing non- associated with the receipt of a large influx of applications prior to the Holiday closure at year end as residential space, even though the servicing impacts of the change of the use may be marginal. In applicants seek to avail of lower DC rates. order to address this issue, the 2019 DC By-law includes a provision to exempt DC payments resulting from conversion from one non-residential use to another non-residential use when no additional floor 3.5 Demolition Credits space is being added. Further details on conversions can be found in the 2019 DC By-law.
If a development involves the demolition of and replacement of a building or structure on the same 3.8 Local Service Policy site, demolition credits for the demolished units and/or gross floor area are available. A key caveat
is that the demolition permit related to the site must be issued less than 10 years prior to the issuance The City’s Local Service Policies related to Roads, Wastewater, Stormwater, Water Distribution and of a building permit. The specified period is extended to less than 20 years in the Downtown and Old Parks & Recreation are referenced within each individual service area chapter of the DC Background East areas identified on Schedule 2 of the By-law. The credit can, in no case, exceed the amount of Study. For a comprehensive and complete list, all Local Service Policies are included in the DC By- development charges that would otherwise be payable. law. All DC claimable works are paid for from the CSRF, and the Local Service Policy provides a
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 13
Table of Contents CHAPTER 3: Development Charges Act & Policies
guideline for the cost responsibilities related to construction of engineered infrastructure. Under the compete with the existing system of payments under current practices. There is currently no intention Local Service Policies, the costs of engineered infrastructure are determined to be either DC eligible to introduce a credit system under the 2019 DC By-law. or a local service cost, which is the Owner’s responsibility pursuant to a registered Development Agreement. 3.12 Reserve Funds
The Local Service Policy has been developed in accordance with Section 59 of the DCA and through A separate fund is maintained for each of the service components listed in the City’s DC rate structure. consultation with the DC External Stakeholder Committee. The new services proposed for collection under the 2019 DC Study (Waste Diversion and Operation Centres) will require a reserve fund to be established in accordance with section 35 of the DCA. 3.9 Retirement of the Urban Works Reserve Fund (UWRF) Draws from the Reserve Fund shall be made for the purposes which form the basis of the rate calculations. As part of the 2014 DC Study, Council approved the retirement of the UWRF and the consolidation of UWRF funding under the various CSRFs. The 2014 DC By-law established clear rules related to 3.13 Interim Financing for Growth Infrastructure Projects claimability from both “families” of reserve funds and recognized that no future claims to the UWRF would occur for agreements entered into following the in-force date of the 2014 DC By-law (August For many years, it has been the practice of the City to finance expenditures on capital projects from 4, 2014). As part of the 2019 DC Study, the UWRF will be formally retired and the remaining legacy its general working capital in the intervening period prior to debt issuance. The working capital projects will be transferred to the CSRF. Refer to Appendix N for further details including a list of accumulates through the City’s business operations and has been collected from taxpayer and user outstanding UWRF obligations. rate-based sources. Historically, there has not been a DC contribution towards the use of this working capital due to limited DC funded debt. Due to the growing number of debt obligations in specific 3.10 Rural Area Charges reserve funds, it was prudent to establish a policy for the transfer to working capital from DC reserve funds. DCs outside the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are lower than those that exist within the UGB due to the fact municipal owned infrastructure (water distribution, wastewater and stormwater servicing) 3.14 Annual Indexing of DC Rates are not planned to be extended to service this area. The DCA provides for the annual indexing of the calculated rates by a prescribed index. The index Services that are “urban” in nature (wastewater, water distribution, stormwater servicing) are not that will be applied on an annual basis will be the Statistics Canada Quarterly Construction Price applicable to development outside of the UGB; therefore, no policy changes have been proposed for Index, Non-residential (Toronto). Costs contained in this Study have been estimated in 2019 dollars, rural area charges therefore indexing is required to ensure that DC rates keep pace with municipal servicing costs.
3.11 Intention Not to Introduce Credits Into the System 3.15 Effective Date of By-law
The DCA provides for the potential for a City to provide credits for work performed relating to a service The proposed 2019 DC By-law is scheduled to take effect on August 4, 2019, coinciding with the to which the DC By-law relates. expiration of the existing By-law C.P.– 1496-244. The 2019 DC By-law may be in effect for up to 5 years. The City’s current and past approach for financing growth works completed by an Owner is through a claim submission process. The works identified in a registered Development Agreement are eligible for reimbursement from the applicable CSRF upon approval of a claim submission. A credit system that reimburses Owners for works they construct, opposed to payment upon claim approval, would
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 14
Table of Contents CHAPTER 3: Development Charges Act & Policies
3.16 Administration of By-law assess the appropriateness of MSFAs and identifies a ‘cap’ on total obligations as a key component of those criteria. No changes are proposed under the 2019 DC Study. The administration of the By-law is assigned in part to the Chief Building Official, and in part to the City Treasurer (safekeeping of Reserve Funds, etc.), consistent with current practice.
3.17 Fund Reporting and Monitoring
As required under the DCA, an annual report on the activity in the DC Reserve Funds is to be filed with the Minister of Municipal Affairs. The monitoring program will continue as established from the 2014 DC Study. This annual Staff report will continue to advance the City’s knowledge of how revenues in the CSRF compare to those predicted by the growth forecasts. It should also provide observations of how actual costs compare with those incorporated into the rate calculations. This monitoring will assist in further improving the DC rate calculation methods employed in the future, and help to ensure that rates are an accurate reflection of growth costs.
Based on the analysis provided in the report, Staff may recommend that a DC Background Study and By-law amendment be initiated should it be deemed that the actual costs consistently exceed estimates provided in the DC Study, resulting in the City collecting insufficient funds through DCs to pay for growth infrastructure and service costs.
3.18 Growth Management Implementation Strategy
The Growth Management Implementation Strategy (GMIS) is an important tool for the City to coordinate growth infrastructure with development approvals and correspond with the pace of growth across the city, while maintaining an acceptable financial position. In the intervening years of a DC Study, the GMIS is a valuable policy tool to proactively manage growth in the City of London. The GMIS considers the pace of development, the status of DC reserve funds and the desires of Owners to progress development applications in areas approved for growth. It provides flexibility to respond to changes in market conditions or to make adjustments that reflect the financial status of the DC reserve funds. Annual updates are provided to Council in the form of a Staff report.
3.19 Municipal Servicing and Financing Agreements
Municipal Servicing and Financing Agreements (MSFA) are a means to accelerate infrastructure projects from GMIS timing on a limited basis. An MSFA Policy was enacted by Council on July 30, 2013 for accepting, assessing and administering applications for the acceleration of DC-funded works through Front-Ending Agreements under the DCA. The MSFA Policy includes evaluation criteria to
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 15
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 4:
Calculation of the Development Charge Rate
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 16
Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: Calculation of the Development Charge Rate
4.1 Planning Period Capital needs resulting from growth forecasts were identified for “soft service” categories (ie. Fire, Police, Library, Transit, Parks & Recreation, Growth Studies, Waste Diversion and Operation Centres) The service needs of the City have been planned on varying time horizons. The Development by the Service Area, Board or Commission responsible for service delivery. The types of expenditures Charges Act (DCA) limits, for the purpose of Development Charge (DC) rate calculations, the planning that are eligible for inclusion in the cost of capital needs are specified in section 5 (3) of the DCA, period of certain services to 10 years under the DCA section 5 (1) 4. Consistent with this provision, being: the planning period for Fire, Police, Library, Parks and Recreation, Transit, Corporate Growth Studies, Waste Diversion and Operation Centres is limited to ten years. The planning horizon for other services 1. Costs to acquire land or an interest in land, including a leasehold interest. (Roads, Water Distribution, Wastewater, Stormwater Management) have been planned over a 20 2. Costs to improve land. year time horizon. 3. Costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve buildings and structures. 4. Costs to acquire, lease, construct or improve facilities including, 4.2 Growth Forecasts i. rolling stock with an estimated useful life of seven years or more, ii. furniture and equipment, other than computer equipment, and The DCA requires under section 5 (1) 1, that “the anticipated amount, type and location of iii. materials acquired for circulation, reference or information purposes by a library board development for which development charges can be imposed must be estimated”. The 2019 DC as defined in the Public Libraries Act. Study began with a forecast of development activity; these forecasts are necessary for prudent 5. Costs to undertake studies in connection with any of the matters referred to in paragraphs 1 to planning of municipal services and facilities and represent the base assumption from which growth 4. needs were forecasted. 6. Costs of the development charge background study required under section 10.
7. Interest on money borrowed to pay for costs described in paragraphs 1 to 4. Watson and Associates Economists Limited was engaged to prepare population, employment, housing
and non-residential space forecasts for the City of London. On February 13, 2018 Council endorsed the use of the reference growth scenario provided by Watson and Associates Economists for 2019 DC 4.4 Legislated Adjustments to Arrive at Net DC Eligible Amount Study purposes, based on Staff’s recommendation. Before arriving at amounts eligible for inclusion in DC rates, there are several adjustments that must be addressed: Ultimately, the growth forecasts become the basis for the determination of the growth-related capital needs used in the DC rate calculations. 1. Any excess capacity in existing facilities must be taken into account in arriving at the amount of the capital needs used for DC rate calculation purposes (s.5 (1) 5). Excess capacity is A complete explanation of the growth forecast study methodology and its conclusions can be found considered in planning all growth related works. Where there is excess capacity that Council in Appendix A. has stated an intention would be paid for by new development, an exception exists. This exception pertains, for example, to “oversized services”1 constructed in the past and which 4.3 Forecasting Future Capital Needs have been funded by private debt. In this case, the existing debt on the works which benefits growth in the time horizon of this study is included in rate calculations. Assumptions about the location of the anticipated growth were prerequisite to the next phase of the
DC Study, that being the determination of municipal infrastructure and facility needs that result from 2. The DC rate calculation cannot include an increase in need which provides benefit to existing anticipated growth. The determination of municipal needs answers ‘what infrastructure or service development (s.5 (1) 6). The benefit to “existing development” is also commonly referred to needs arise from anticipated growth in London?’ This step is required under section 5 (1) 2 of the as the “non-growth share”. The assessment of benefit to existing development is unique to DCA.
1 The term “oversized services” refers to services which were designed to serve growth beyond the particular development that triggered the works.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 17
Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: Calculation of the Development Charge Rate
each projected capital need and to when the need was identified and is excluded from the These are the key elements of the rate calculations as set out in the legislation. Each element has determination of net DC eligible costs. been addressed in arriving at the DC rate eligible amount in the respective Appendices B through M.
3. The rate calculation must exclude anticipated capital grants, subsidies or other contributions 4.5 Examination of Existing Levels of Service (s.5 (2)) subject to whether the person making it expressed a clear intention that all or part of the grant, subsidy or other contribution be used to benefit existing development or new To ensure that municipalities do not improve their existing levels of service through capital development. Where applicable, these contributions have been identified and accounted for improvements funded by growth, the DCA provides protection under section 5 (1) 4. in the rate calculations. Section 5 (1) 4 of the DCA prohibits inclusion of infrastructure and facilities in rate calculations if their 4. For certain service categories identified in this Study – Corporate Growth Studies, Library, inclusion would improve municipal service standards above those that existed in the ten years Parks and Recreation, Waste Diversion and Operations Centres – a 10% deduction from the preceding this DC Study. The regulations provide additional detail on this point: costs otherwise determined to be eligible for inclusion in DC rate calculations is mandated (s.5 (1) 8). Where applicable, these deductions are identified in the respective rate calculations. o First, the regulations provide that where existing service standards are lower than those provided by another Act, the standard of service provided under the other Act prevails. In cases 5. In order to facilitate the calculation of separate residential and non-residential rates for each where the historical standard exceeds the forecasted growth capital needs, then the capital service, an allocation of the eligible costs to the various types of growth is made. The need remains the plan for future works. Services subject to an examination of a historical level determination of this allocation is driven by the Council endorsed growth forecasts. of service include roads, police, fire, library, parks & recreation, operation centres and waste diversion. Transit is subject to a planned level of service approach. 6. The rate calculations included in this study incorporate an offset to the costs otherwise included in the rate calculations to recognize the amount of uncommitted reserve funds. These o Secondly, the regulations specify that in measuring existing service levels, both the quantity uncommitted reserve funds have been accumulated in the past, for projects that remain to be and quality of those services should be taken into account. The City interprets quality to refer completed in the future, and are available to fund a portion of the growth needs identified in to the ‘nature and grade of excellence’ of a service. Quantity refers to the ‘number and size’ this study. They have therefore been deducted from the amounts to be collected from future of the facilities used to provide services. By assessing the existing services with respect to growth. these two characteristics, this study has arrived at an objective measure of existing service standards (where required). By using replacement costs to calculate the existing standard (as 7. Finally, the rate calculations include financing costs. These financing costs have been required by regulation), a rational, objective comparison can be made between: determined through a cash flow analysis that combines: • the current cost estimate of planned future services; and, a. the opening uncommitted balance of the Reserve Fund; • the current cost equivalent (considering quality and quantity) of existing services. b. the projected revenues from DC rates (prior to inclusion of the financing costs in the rate); Analysis of existing levels of service are included in the Appendices, where applicable. c. the projected drawdowns from the DC reserve funds, based on the portion eligible for DC funding; and, d. the projected ending balance, which includes provision for funding the post period benefit from future growth.
The cash flow model that simulates reserve fund activity and incorporates the above elements then produces the DC rates that include financing costs.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 18
Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: Calculation of the Development Charge Rate
4.6 Calculating DC Rates
The forecast of growth provides the basis for the growth needs calculation (denominator). The capital needs that result from the forecasted growth have been determined through the master plan studies and service areas. The cost of each identified need was estimated, along with its expected timing (numerator). Through attention to the various exclusions required by the legislation, an amount eligible for inclusion in the DC rate calculation has been determined.
DC rates are ultimately calculated by:
Net Eligible Capital Needs ($)
Growth Forecasts (units or square metres)
Refer to Table 4-1 for the proposed DC rates. DC rate summary tables can be found in Chapter 5.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 19
Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: Calculation of the Development Charge Rate TABLE 4-1: Proposed Development Charge Rates
Single & Semi Apartments with < 2 Apartments with > = Commercial Institutional Industrial Rowhousing Service Component: Detached bedrooms 2 bedrooms (per sq. m. of gross (per sq. m. of gross (per sq. m. of gross (per dwelling unit) (per dwelling unit) (per dwelling unit) (per dwelling unit) floor area) floor area) floor area)
Fire $ 78.74 $ 53.25 $ 34.83 $ 47.19 $ 0.62 $ 0.33 $ 0.05
Police $ 524.66 $ 354.82 $ 232.06 $ 314.46 $ 3.52 $ 1.77 $ 0.34
Corporate Growth Studies $ 539.40 $ 364.79 $ 238.58 $ 323.30 $ 4.14 $ 2.52 $ 2.10
Library $ 127.35 $ 86.12 $ 56.33 $ 76.33 $ - $ - $ -
Parks & Recreation $ 3,506.39 $ 2,371.31 $ 1,550.90 $ 2,101.59 $ - $ - $ -
Transit $ 235.90 $ 159.53 $ 104.34 $ 141.39 $ 2.69 $ 1.36 $ 0.58 (Existing) City Services Roads $ 15,336.90 $ 10,372.07 $ 6,783.63 $ 9,192.31 $ 158.36 $ 96.68 $ 66.82
Wastewater $ 3,794.55 $ 2,566.18 $ 1,678.36 $ 2,274.30 $ 24.51 $ 13.86 $ 48.19
Stormwater $ 6,868.28 $ 4,644.89 $ 3,037.89 $ 4,116.56 $ 63.91 $ 38.75 $ 69.08
Water Distribution $ 1,624.46 $ 1,098.59 $ 718.51 $ 973.63 $ 18.57 $ 11.54 $ 17.95
Operation Centres $ 271.93 $ 183.90 $ 120.28 $ 162.99 $ 2.42 $ 1.47 $ 1.03 City (New) Waste Diversion $ 227.23 $ 153.67 $ 100.51 $ 136.19 $ - $ - $ - Services
TOTAL RATE - City Services and Urban Works $ 33,135.79 $ 22,409.14 $ 14,656.21 $ 19,860.23 $ 278.74 $ 168.29 $ 206.15 (applied within the Urban Growth Area)
TOTAL RATE - City Services (Rural Rate)
Total Rates $ 20,848.51 $ 14,099.47 $ 9,221.45 $ 12,495.74 $ 171.76 $ 104.14 $ 70.92 (applied outside of the Urban Growth Area)
Subject to rounding
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 20
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 5:
Summaries of the Development Charge Rates
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 21
Table of Contents CHAPTER 5: Summaries of the Development Charge Rates TABLE 5-1: All Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 22
Table of Contents CHAPTER 5: Summaries of the Development Charge Rates TABLE 5-2: Residential
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 23
Table of Contents CHAPTER 5: Summaries of the Development Charge Rates TABLE 5-3: Non-Residential
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 24
Table of Contents CHAPTER 5: Summaries of the Development Charge Rates TABLE 5-4: Timing of Expenditures
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 25
Table of Contents
APPENDIX A:
Growth Forecasts
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 26
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts
Background 2. Population forecasts by age and sex using a standard cohort survival model. This model recognizes age-specific fertility and death rates, and an estimated rate of net migration is In November 2016, Watson & Associates Economists Ltd. (Watson) was retained by the City through added (in-migration to the City, less out-migration, by age group). a Request for Proposals process to prepare growth forecasts for population, employment, housing 3. A housing model forecasts the anticipated household growth associated with the population and non-residential construction which includes Industrial, Commercial and Institutional ICI) to the forecasts. This model relies on assumptions regarding headship rates (the propensity of year 2044. Watson has extensive experience in preparing growth forecasts for a multitude of persons within an age group to head up a household or ‘household maintainers’). municipalities, developers, agencies and other levels of government. 4. A non-residential building space model produced forecasts based largely on employment growth forecasts presented in the economic model (see 1. above) and the use of floor space In February 2018, the Watson finalized and presented to Council a report, entitled “City of London to employment ratios. Population, Housing and Employment Growth Forecast, 2016 to 2044”. The housing and non- residential reference growth scenarios contained in the report were endorsed by Council for use in DC Study Growth Forecasts the 2019 Development Charges (DC) Study. These forecasts are used to forecast growth-related capital needs and provide the quantum of growth over which costs were spread and DC rates were The report prepared by Watson provides a full account of historical employment, population, housing calculated. and ICI floor space growth in London, in addition to forecasted growth. The following sections provide excerpts of this information. This Appendix describes, in condensed form, the contents and conclusions of the Watson report that are pertinent to the DC rate setting process. It contains the following sections: Employment Forecast
Table A-1 shows forecasted employment growth, by major sector, for the City of London. It shows • Growth Forecast Methodology that employment growth is expected across a wide range of sectors driven by the continued economic • DC Study Growth Forecast diversification of the regional and local economic base. Over the course of the period 2016-2031, the • Distribution of Growth Forecast employment base is forecasted to increase at an annual rate of 1.0%. Following 2031, the annual • Growth Forecast Summary employment growth rate is forecasted to slow, largely as a result of an aging population and labour force base. Growth Forecast Methodology Population Forecast The methodology Watson applied in preparing the growth forecasts is reviewed in detail in chapter 2 of the 2018 Watson report. A combined forecasting approach is used to derive population, household Population growth is a function of several variables. Birth, death and net migration assumptions were and employment forecasts, which incorporates both the traditional top-down cohort-survival forecast applied to existing populations to forecast population by age group. Table A-2 shows both historical method and a bottom-up household formation method. This combined approach is used to ensure and forecasted population by age group (cohorts). that both regional economic/demographic trends and local housing market conditions are adequately assessed. The approach and methodology involved several phases to arrive at the ultimate forecasts For DC Study purposes, both 10 year net population growth (2019-2029) and 20 year net population of housing and non-residential construction activity including: growth (2019-2039) are calculated. To determine growth-related capital need requirements, 10 year forecasts are used by soft services and 20 year forecasts are applicable to hard services. 1. Employment forecasts, taking into account the macro-economic environment for Canada and Ontario, as well as the economic drivers of local labour force growth and forecasted labour During the 10 year period of 2019-2029, net population growth is forecasted to be 49,100 persons. force growth by age. Net population growth over the 20 year period 2019-2039 is 80,700 persons.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 27
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts
Watson’s population growth forecast includes an upward adjustment of approximately 2.7% to Table A-6 also provides required non-residential space for 2019-2039. These net space requirements account for the net Census undercount, which represents the net number of persons missed during and their associated employees produce demands for new servicing and were used for growth Census enumeration. This has become a conventional approach employed by municipalities allocations and rate calculation purposes. throughout Ontario for DC rate setting purposes. For the forecast period of 2019-2039, demand for ICI space is as follows: Housing Forecast • Industrial: 6,423,500 square feet (596,763 square metres) Headship rates are defined as the number of primary household maintainers or heads of households • Commercial: 7,153,700 square feet (664,600 square metres) by major population age group (cohorts). Primary maintainers are low among the under 25 population • Institutional: 8,246,500 square feet (766,125 square metres) and rise rapidly in the 20-30 year old cohorts. The highest rates are in the ‘over 50’ age groups.
Forecasted population growth in households in London will come from both overall population growth, The twenty year ICI split based on net employment growth is 18%/48%/34%. and growth in cohorts that display the highest headship rate. This is important because, as the City’s
population ages, the ratio of household maintainers is anticipated to increase. Headship rates inform As noted, the Watson report formed the basis of the residential and ICI final growth forecasts used in the household forecast as well as required housing construction. Table A-3 shows forecasted the 2019 DC study; the forecasts are summarized in Tables A-7 & A-8 at the end of this appendix. households by the age cohort of primary maintainers. The tables reflect both residential population growth and non-residential space forecasts, in five year
increments, beginning in 2019 and ending in 2039. The figures differ from the Watson forecasts Housing mix was another important factor used to prepare the forecasts. Table A-4 shows the adopted by Council only to the extent that they have been interpolated to match the timeframe used housing mix of historical housing construction and provides the forecasted mix. Nearly 52,500 new to forecast capital needs for DC Study purposes. housing units are anticipated to be constructed between 2016 and 2044.
Distribution of Growth Forecasts Over the forecasted period, housing growth is forecasted to be comprised of 44% low-density
housing, 23% medium-density housing and 33% high-density housing between 2016 and 2044. Growth results in different demands for infrastructure and services depending upon where it occurs. To forecast capital needs, it was necessary to distribute the growth forecasts into smaller geographic Table A-5 shows a summary of the historic and forecasted population and housing growth aligned areas. Forecasted growth by type was allocated to locations designated to accommodate with DC Study periods. A total of 42,420 housing units are forecasted between 2019 and 2039. corresponding residential and non-residential development in accordance with Map 1 of the City’s Official Plan, The London Plan, which has been adopted by Council and approved by the Province. Over this period, the capture share of Medium density (townhouse) and high density (apartment) housing units are forecasted to increase in relation to Low density (single and semi- detached) In general, the timing of this allocation was completed employing certain assumptions regarding the housing units. timing of development relative to each vacant land parcel’s status in the planning approvals process, GMIS infrastructure timelines, contiguity of development and service outlets, previous build-out in the Non-Residential Building Space Forecast general area (as a proxy for market demand) and a reasonable allocation of growth to differing regions
In order to determine required non-residential space, Watson used assumptions for the number of and market segments within the City. Assumptions were also made relating to infill and intensification. The 2019 Growth Management Implementation Strategy Update confirmed the assumptions used by square feet per employee. These space factors are applied to net employment growth by general categories Industrial, Commercial (Office and Retail) and Institutional. Table A-6 provides the space Administration in distributing growth and forecasting infrastructure needs. factors utilized in the 2019 DC Study. Having allocated the population, unit, employment and space forecasts, the allocated population, unit employment and space forecasts were re-aggregated using land segmentation that was meaningful
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 28
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts
for each municipal service being planned. For example, forecasts of growth into traffic zones allowed for the City’s consulting engineers to forecast road capacity expansion needs, growth by library district for Library capital needs, etc.
Capital needs planning based on forecasts ensures that the 2019 DC Study process complies with sections 5 (1) 1 and 5 (1) 2 of the Development Charges Act (DCA).
Growth Forecasts Summary
Growth forecasts for use in the 2019 DC Study were prepared by Watson. Using the Watson forecasts, Staff allocated growth to geographic areas in accordance with Map 1 of The London Plan to determine capital needs for DC recoverable services, consistent with the requirements of the DCA. The growth forecasts and methodology described in this appendix were reviewed and discussed with the DC External Stakeholder Committee.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 29
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-1: Employment
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 30
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-2: Population
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 31
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-3: Housing
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 32
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-4: Residential
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 33
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-5: Summary of Annual Housing Growth 1996 - 2044
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 34
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-6: Non-Residential Floor Space
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 35
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-7: Residential Forecast Summary
Population, Residential Units, and Growth Forecasts Allocation of Total Unit Growth to Housing Types
Total of Units per High Density High Density Total High Unit Growth Allocation at Apts < 1 Apts > 2 Density Population Net. Pop Growth Res. Units Forecast right Low Med bedroom bedroom Apartments 2016 394,300 175,558 2019 409,000 182,602 2024 435,100 26,100 194,054 11,452 11,452 5,446 2,587 1,368 2,051 3,419 2029 458,100 23,000 204,638 10,584 10,584 4,803 2,432 1,340 2,009 3,349 2034 475,100 17,000 214,932 10,294 10,294 4,464 2,432 1,359 2,039 3,398 2039 489,700 14,600 225,022 10,090 10,090 4,100 2,422 1,427 2,141 3,568 2044 504,000 14,300 235,098 10,076 10,076 3,623 2,418 1,614 2,421 4,035 Total 95,000 52,496 52,496 22,436 12,291 7,108 10,661 17,769
10 yr. 2019-2029 Net pop'n growth: 49,100 22,036 10,249 5,019 2,708 4,060 6,768
Gross pop'n growth in new units (Note 2) 53,896 (Note 2) density: 3.12 2.11 1.38 1.87 1.68
20 yr. 2019-2039 Net pop'n growth: 80,700 42,420
Gross pop'n growth in new 102,519 (Note 2) density: 3.12 2.11 1.38 1.87 1.68
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 36
Table of Contents Growth Forecasts TABLE A-8: Non-Residential Forecast Summary
Total Place of Work Growth of Space - 2019-2039 (4) Employment Growth - 2019-2039 (3) (POW) Employment
Industrial (sq.m) Commercial (sq.m) Institutional (sq.m.) Total (sq.m) Industrial Emp. Commercial Emp. Institutional Emp. At Home/ Other Total Emp't Total 2019-2024 159,468 159,143 212,562 531,173 1,716 4,030 3,269 661 9,676 193,142 2024-2029 157,238 165,256 207,824 530,318 1,693 4,186 3,195 660 9,734 202,875 2029-2034 149,946 172,279 186,642 508,867 1,614 4,363 2,871 901 9,749 212,624 2034-2039 130,111 167,922 159,096 457,129 1,400 4,254 2,446 752 8,852 221,476 Total 596,763 664,600 766,125 2,027,488 6,423 16,833 11,781 2,974 38,011
10 yr. 2019-2029 316,706 324,399 420,386 1,061,492 3,409 8,216 6,464 1,321 19,410 29.84% 30.56% 39.60% 100.00% 20 yr. 2019-2039 596,763 664,600 766,125 2,027,488 6,423 16,833 11,781 2,974 38,011 29.43% 32.78% 37.79% 100.00%
Floor Area Ratio (5) 23% 30% 42% Notes:
Land Needs associated with Growth of Space forecast 2019-2039 (1) 'Population growth', 'Unit growth' and 'Density assumptions' provided by Watson & Associates, Industrial (ha) Commercial (ha) Institutional (ha) adjusted for the DC Study periods. 2019-2024 69 53 51 (2) Gross population in new units derived from multiplying unit forecasts (italicized above) by unit density 2024-2029 68 55 49 figures (italicized). 2029-2034 65 57 44 (3) Employment growth forecast by Watson & Associates, adjusted by Watson for the DC Study 2034-2039 57 56 38 periods. Total 259 222 182 (4) Floor Space conversions based on Watson & Associates space factors by ICI category. (5) Floor area ratio calculations based on City of London 2011 Land Needs Background Study. (6) Conversion based on floor area ratio assumptions.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 37
Table of Contents
APPENDIX B:
Fire Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 38
Table of Contents Fire Services
Existing Service Levels In planning services for new areas, LFD relies upon industry standards and guidelines to establish levels of service. These standards and guidelines include: The City of London Fire Department (LFD) is organized into seven divisions that provide proactive and reactive services including, but not limited to: Fire Fighting; Communications; Fire Prevention; • Public Fire Safety Guideline PFSG 04-08-10 Operational Planning: An Official Guide to Apparatus, Training, Stores and Administration. At peak staffing, the LFD employs 415 people. Matching Resource Deployment and Risk
In 2018, the LFD responded to 10,062 calls for emergency response, 2,554 of which were pre-hospital The Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, through the Ontario Fire medical emergencies. Working a 24-hour shift schedule based on a four-platoon system, emergency Marshal's (OFM) Office, is responsible for creating fire service guidelines for municipalities personnel respond from fourteen fire stations strategically located across the City. within the Province of Ontario. Public Fire Safety Guideline PFSG 04-08-10: Operational Planning: An Official Guide to Matching Resource Deployment and Risk outlines the In order to measure the existing service standard in a way that would make it useful for comparison Province's expectations with respect to analyzing risk and providing response capability and to standards for new stations, the City undertook a detailed inventory of its assets used in delivery of fire ground staffing. It replaced PFSG 04-08-12. Fire services. The inventory includes valuation of all existing facilities (based on their size, quality and nature of construction, land value, and estimated building contents), Fire service vehicles, and PFSG 04-08-12 required that a minimum of four firefighters arrive at the scene of a fire virtually Firefighter outfitting equipment. A per capita measure of Fire services was calculated. That measure simultaneously. The guideline also required that a minimum of ten firefighters arrive within combines the quality and the quantity of assets used for delivery of Fire services which assists in ten minutes, 90% of the time. The ten minutes is broken down as follows: one minute to ensuring that the amounts included in the rate calculations did not exceed existing historical dispatch the call, one minute for the crew to turnout and eight minutes to travel to the scene. standards. Refer to tables B-1 through B-3 for Service Standards related to Fire Services. It should be noted that only firefighting or rescue but not both could be achieved with this staffing level. Additional staff is required to perform both tasks safely and efficiently. A Approach to Planning Fire Services municipality the size of London was expected to provide both simultaneously.
With respect to the delivery of front line fire apparatus and staff, the adequacy of fire and emergency PFSG 04-08-10 was introduced to assist municipalities in meeting their obligations as set out service levels is measured in two ways. The first key indicator, which is ‘response time of the first in Section 2 of the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 (FPPA). Section 2 identifies that Engine Company’, is a measure of the elapsed time from when the vehicle begins to respond to an “Every municipality shall (a) establish a program in the municipality which must include public alarm and when it arrives on scene. The measure looks at the geography covered within a set time education with respect to fire safety and certain components of fire prevention and (b) provide frame, as well as the risks within the same. For example, if the area is not populated or very sparsely such other fire protection services as it determines may be necessary in accordance with its populated, there is no need to add a fire station; however, that need increases as the area is needs and circumstances”. Where the previous guideline focused on the response to a single populated. Furthermore, for planning purposes the industry standard is to use a vehicle speed of family dwelling the new guideline provides an evaluation system that looks at the overall approximately 50 km/h, which results in the fire apparatus travelling 3.3 km to meet the 4 minute structural fire risk in a community and the need to plan for it. response time discussed below.
Based on the critical tasks from the incident management system the guideline includes a five The second key indicator is also time sensitive, albeit it refers to when the balance of the necessary step process that offers a systematic and logical method of assessment, planning and vehicles and fire fighters arrive on scene, which is defined as the ‘weight of the response’. Both are implementation. The intent of the process is to identify the risks within the community and critical components with respect to the fire department’s primary goals: saving lives, preserving identify the LFD’s ability to respond to those risks. Unlike the previous guideline there is no property and conservation of the environment. When engine company response times exceed reference to the time to respond but rather the staffing required to adequately respond to accepted industry norms, the need for a new station is triggered. An additional vehicle with staffing structural fire events. may also be necessary if the department is unable to maintain an acceptable ‘response weight’ based
on industry norms.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 39
Table of Contents Fire Services
In the absence of a standard from the OFM for response times, LFD, like other fire Capital Needs Identified departments in the province, uses the NFPA 1710 for guidance. With the four minute response standard in mind, and using the ten year growth forecasts (see • NFPA 1710 Appendix A), LFD undertook a capital needs forecast to update the capital requirements identified in the 2014 DC Study. This forecast identified the location and timing of fire station construction, with The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), an international standard setting body, uses the intention of providing four minute response times, 90% of the time (NFPA standard as described NFPA 1710 to define the service levels for urban communities which use career fire fighters. above). Once the location of a station was known, it employed modeling software, that incorporates It defines fire service response times, vehicle staffing requirements, and speaks to a broad arterial road patterns and traveling speeds from which the service area of the new station was range of fire service issues including, but not limited to, "minimum requirements relating to the delineated. organization and deployment of fire suppression operations, emergency medical operations, and special operations to the public by substantially all career fire departments". Components The result of the process suggests that there are some significant capital challenges the City will face of that standard define acceptable response times, as well as fire ground staffing. as a result of the anticipated growth and its geographic distribution. Below are some of the implications resulting from the capital needs forecast: With respect to the response time to a fire in a 2,000 ft2 single family house with no basement, • Subject to the speed of growth in the southeast area of the City, there is a need for one new NFPA states that the first arriving Engine Company be on-scene within four minutes of leaving station in the ten year time horizon (Station #15 – Southeast) currently scheduled to be the station. Further, every other piece of fire apparatus deemed necessary on an initial operational in 2022. The new station will need to be equipped with a Quint vehicle to provide dispatch arrive within eight minutes with a minimum of 14 fire fighters on-site, 15 if an aerial the best overall coverage. Other related capital costs identified are firefighting gear needed truck is in use. These requirements must be achieved 90% of the time. The use of city-wide to outfit the firefighters who will provide service from the new station. The capital needs for averages is unacceptable; instead, the results must be reported by geographic service area. Station #15 and its associated vehicle and outfitting are carried forward from the 2014 DC Higher risk building types such as, but not limited to, high-rise, multi-residential occupancies, Study. propane facilities, manufacturing and processing plants, hospitals, long term care homes, etc., • Growth allocations have supported the identified need for an Aerial Company to address the require a greater number of staff, as well as the type of fire apparatus dispatched. The number increasing number of high rise buildings being constructed in the central part of the City. This of fire fighters required could easiliy reach 30 to 60 depending on the type of occupancy, the fire vehicle is proposed to be located at Fire Station 1, and will provide support to other areas perceived risk and the extent of the fire. of the City as backup to existing aerial vehicles (and vice-versa). Buildings requiring the
dispatch of an aerial company for fire suppression generally require response by two aerial LFD data demonstrates that its performance for the first ‘Engine Company’ is consistent with the vehicles. The capital needs for the Aerial Company is carried forward from the 2014 DC Study. standard of the international standard setting body (i.e. four minutes). With the implementation of the
Business Intelligence tool, the LFD is further able to identify response by area of the City. Portion of Capital Needs Eligible for DC Rate Calculations At the time of preparation of the 2019 Development Charges (DC) Study, LFD is in the preliminary Growth associated with Station #15 and the Aerial Company will benefit beyond the forecast period. review stages of its future staffing and associated capital needs. Identified capital needs in the 2019 A provision has been made in the determination of the growth amount for the purposes of rate DC Study are therefore based on a review of growth allocations, projects identified in the previous calculations, to recognize a benefit to growth occurring beyond the ten year horizon. Fire Master Study, and previously approved reports to Council regarding anticipated growth and fire service needs. That being said, the LFD can state that its current coverage is aimed at servicing the The determination of the amount eligible for inclusion in the DC rate calculations also includes populated areas within the Urban Growth Boundary and, to an extent, some areas that are not yet provision for the benefit to existing development as required by section 5 (1) 6 of the Development built out. Charges Act. For Station #15 and its associated vehicle and outfitting, the non-growth share reflects existing development as of 1999 (the year the project was first identified). The benefit to existing allocation for the Aerial Company recognizes that the vehicle will provide service for existing
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 40
Table of Contents Fire Services
properties in the central part of the City, albeit the need is being driven by the number of new high rises being added to the core area.
Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation
The required Fire Services projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Fire Services projects are shown in Tables B-4 through B-6.
Financing Costs
Table B-7 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Fire Services projects for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the ten year study period; d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon.
Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 41
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-1 Vehicles Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Arundhati Mohile Unit of Measure Vehicle Type of Measure Quantity
2018 Unit Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $value/unit Aerial 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Platform Aerial 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Aerial Spare 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Tanker (1500 gal) 2 2 2 1 1 $0 Tanker (2500 gal) 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Tanker Spare (1500 gal) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Engine 7 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 $0 Engine (spare) 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 $0 Pumper Rescue 4 4 5 5 5 7 7 8 8 8 $0 Quint 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $0 Rescue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Rescue Pumper 1 1 $0 Platoon Car 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 $0 Marine Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Service Units (2, 4, 9) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $0 Service Units (1 - air bottle transport) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Training Units (1, 2, 3) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $0 Zodiac Boat 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Zodiac Boat (spare) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Zodiac Trailer 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Zodiac Trailer (spare) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 HAZMAT Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Decontamination Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Air Light Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Investigation Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Service Vehicles (3, Stores) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 $0 Safety House Trailer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Fire Prevention Inspection 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 19 19 19 $0 Public Education 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 $0 Administration 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $0 Total 69 69 70 70 70 69 69 73 73 74
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.000186 0.000185 0.000186 0.000184 0.000183 0.000178 0.000177 0.000185 0.000183 0.000183
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.000183 1) Quantity of v ehicles taken f rom inv entory reports and $ v alues based on actual replacement costs maintained by Fire Administration.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 42
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-1 Vehicles Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Arundhati Mohile Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Unit Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Aerial $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 $2,542 Platform Aerial $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 $1,354 Aerial Spare $1,271 $1,271 $1,271 $1,271 $1,271 Tanker (1500 gal) $714 $714 $714 $357 $357 Tanker (2500 gal) $428 $428 $856 $856 $856 $856 $856 Tanker Spare (1500 gal) $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 $357 Engine $4,711 $4,038 $4,038 $4,038 $4,038 $2,019 $2,019 $2,019 $2,019 $2,019 Engine (spare) $2,019 $2,019 $2,692 $2,692 $2,692 $2,692 $2,692 $2,019 $2,019 $2,019 Pumper Rescue $2,664 $2,664 $3,330 $3,330 $3,330 $4,662 $4,662 $5,328 $5,328 $5,328 Quint $1,922 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 $2,883 Rescue $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 $657 Rescue Pumper $666 $666 Platoon Car $92 $92 $92 $92 $92 $92 $92 $92 $92 $138 Marine Vehicles $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 $78 Service Units (2, 4, 9) $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 $117 Service Units (1 - air bottle transport) $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 $43 Training Units (1, 2, 3) $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 $84 Zodiac Boat $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 Zodiac Boat (spare) $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 $13 Zodiac Trailer $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 $6 Zodiac Trailer (spare) $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 HAZMAT Vehicle $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 $600 Decontamination Trailer $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 Air Light Vehicle $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 $550 Investigation Vehicle $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 $38 Service Vehicles (3, Stores) $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 $68 Safety House Trailer $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 $4 Fire Prevention Inspection $315 $315 $336 $336 $336 $336 $336 $399 $399 $399 Public Education $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 $124 Administration $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 $27 Total $21,094.0 $21,382.0 $20,805.0 $20,876.0 $20,876.0 $20,260.0 $20,260.0 $21,587.0 $21,587.0 $21,633.0
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $56.93 $57.27 $55.31 $54.97 $54.45 $52.34 $51.86 $54.75 $54.08 $53.53
10 Year Average DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Level of Service per Capita $54.55 Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ Per Capita $54.55 DC Rate Eligible Amount (Gross) $2,678,405 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 43
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-2 Facilities Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. No. 1 300 Horton Street 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 32,937 $328 No. 2 1101 Florence St 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 24,700 $338 No. 3 550 Commissioners Rd W 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 8,052 $371 No. 4 807 Colborne St 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 4,418 $326 No. 5 751 Deveron Cr 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 8,120 $464 No. 6 590 Oxford St E 8,490 8,490 8,490 8,490 9,666 9,666 9,666 9,666 9,666 9,666 $400 No. 7 - OLD 1192 Highbury Ave 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 $370 No. 7 - NEW 1295 Webster St 7,535 7,535 7,500 7,535 7,535 $299 No. 8 1565 Western Rd. 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 6,594 $380 No. 9 746 Wellington Rd S 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 15,388 $461 Training Tower 746 Wellington Rd S 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 4,220 $148 Storage Garage 746 Wellington Rd S 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 $33 No. 10 2125 Trafalgar St 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 9,063 $355 No. 11 - OLD (Note 2) 7109 Westminster Dr 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 10,187 $199 No. 11 - NEW 3970 Savoy Street 6,500 6,500 $384 No. 12 275 Boler Road 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 $371 No. 13 790 Fanshawe Park Rd E 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 $338 No. 14 2225 Hyde Park Road 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 8,429 $260 N/E Communications Tower 1795 Oxford St. E 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 $939 Total 155,703 164,132 164,132 164,132 165,308 166,249 166,249 166,214 172,749 172,749
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.420219 0.439615 0.436312 0.432149 0.431132 0.429526 0.425542 0.421542 0.432738 0.427491
10 Year Average 1) Building measures prov ided by Facility Serv ices div ision. Land v alues prov ided by Realty Serv ices div ision. Quantity Standard per Capita 0.429627 2) A new Station No. 11 was built at 3970 Sav oy Street in 2017 and the existing Station No. 11 was repurposed to a Fire Training Facility .
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 44
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-2 Facilities Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. 1 300 Horton Street $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 $10,803.3 No. 2 1101 Florence St $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 $8,348.6 No. 3 550 Commissioners Rd W $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 $2,987.3 No. 4 807 Colborne St $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 $1,440.3 No. 5 751 Deveron Cr $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 $3,767.7 No. 6 590 Oxford St E $3,396.0 $3,396.0 $3,396.0 $3,396.0 $3,866.4 $3,866.4 $3,866.4 $3,866.4 $3,866.4 $3,866.4 No. 7 - OLD 1192 Highbury Ave $2,439.8 $2,439.8 $2,439.8 $2,439.8 $2,439.8 No. 7 - NEW 1295 Webster St $2,253.0 $2,253.0 $2,242.5 $2,253.0 $2,253.0 No. 8 1565 Western Rd. $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 $2,505.7 No. 9 746 Wellington Rd S $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 $7,093.9 Training Tower 746 Wellington Rd S $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 $624.6 Storage Garage 746 Wellington Rd S $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 $7.9 No. 10 2125 Trafalgar St $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 $3,217.4 No. 11 - OLD (Note 2) 7109 Westminster Dr $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 $2,027.2 No. 11 - NEW 3970 Savoy Street $2,496.0 $2,496.0 No. 12 275 Boler Road $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 $4,452.0 No. 13 790 Fanshawe Park Rd E $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 $1,487.2 No. 14 2225 Hyde Park Road $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 $2,191.5 N/E Communications Tower 1795 Oxford St. E $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 $281.7 Total $54,880.5 $57,072.0 $57,072.0 $57,072.0 $57,542.4 $57,355.6 $57,355.6 $57,345.2 $59,851.6 $59,851.6
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $148.11 $152.86 $151.71 $150.27 $150.07 $148.19 $146.81 $145.44 $149.93 $148.11
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $149.15
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ Per Capita $149.15 DC Rate Eligible Amount (Gross) $7,323,265 1) The v aluations abov e include the 2018 replacement v alue of building, land, and site improv ements.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 45
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-3 Outfitting Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Arundhati Mohile Unit of Measure Firefighter Type of Measure Quantity
2018 Type 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $value/unit Firefighters 356 356 360 360 360 375 375 375 375 375 $6,054 Total 356 356 360 360 360 375 375 375 375 375
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.000961 0.000954 0.000957 0.000948 0.000939 0.000969 0.000960 0.000951 0.000939 0.000928
10 Year Average 1)Number of Firef ighters and outf itting costs compiled by Fire Administration. Quantity Standard per Capita 0.000951 2) As of 2014 Firef ighter outf itting also includes Fire Prev ention Inspectors as they are required to hav e Bunker Gear f or Fire Inv estigations. 3) As of 2015 Firef ighter outf itting includes 2 sets of Bunker Gear
Contact Person(s) Arundhati Mohile Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Type 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Firefighters $2,155 $2,155 $2,179 $2,179 $2,179 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270 Total $2,155 $2,155 $2,179 $2,179 $2,179 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270 $2,270
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $5.82 $5.77 $5.79 $5.74 $5.68 $5.86 $5.81 $5.76 $5.69 $5.62
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $5.75
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ Per Capita $5.75 DC Rate Eligible Amount (Gross) $282,325
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 46
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-4 Vehicles Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
growth share
cipated s Non-gr Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns antic A ifapp plicable) or Years
Prior
existing g standard (see
horizon nfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
growth expected to occur rants, s subsidies orother Projec ss ect CostFunded In benefits ts (portion of growth deductio on (if applicable) ble for r rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DCr rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Vehicles DC14-FS00003 Quint - Station 15 Vehicle 2022 $899.9 $.0 $.0 $899.9 49.6% $446.4 $453.5 35.3% $160.1 $.0 $293.4 $.0 $293.4 79.4% $233.0 11.8% $34.6 7.7% $22.6 1.1% $3.2 DC14-FS00004 Aerial Company - Cental London 2022 $1,805.0 $.0 $.0 $1,805.0 62.1% $1,120.9 $684.1 20.0% $136.8 $.0 $547.3 $.0 $547.3 79.4% $434.5 11.8% $64.6 7.7% $42.1 1.1% $6.0
SUBTOTAL $2,704.9 $.0 $.0 $2,704.9 57.9% $1,567.3 $1,137.6 26.1% $296.9 $.0 $840.7 $.0 $840.7 79.4% $667.5 11.8% $99.2 7.7% $64.7 1.1% $9.2
Debentures PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 79.4% $.0 11.8% $.0 7.7% $.0 1.1% $.0 FINANCED WITH DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
TOTAL $2,704.9 $.0 $.0 $2,704.9 57.9% $1,567.3 $1,137.6 26.1% $296.9 $.0 $840.7 $.0 $840.7 79.4% $667.5 11.8% $99.2 7.7% $64.7 1.1% $9.2
Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 54.55 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $453.1 79.7% $361.2 11.8% $53.5 7.2% $32.6 1.3% $5.9 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 2,678,405 Growth Needs $ 840,723 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation $387.6 79.0% $306.4 11.8% $45.7 8.3% $32.1 0.9% $3.4 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 5.68 $ 0.14 $ 0.08 $ 0.01 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Only growth related vehicle purchases are reflected on this schedule. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 2) The future growth benefit has been applied consistent with the benefit for the Station in which the vehicle will be used. Pre Financing 3) Allocation between Residential and non-residential based on 2018 tax assessment roll analysis. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 17.74 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 11.99 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 7.84 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 10.63
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 47
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-5 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
growth share
cipated s Non-gr Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns antic A ifapp plicable) or Years
Prior
existing g standard (see
horizon nfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
growth expected to occur rants, s subsidies or other Projec ss ect CostFunded In benefits ts (portion of growth deductio on (if applicable) ble for r rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DCr rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Facility Expansion DC14-FS00001 Fire Station 15 - New Station 2022 $3,856.6 $.0 $500.0 $3,356.6 49.6% $1,664.9 $1,691.7 35.3% $597.2 $.0 $1,094.5 $.0 $1,094.5 79.4% $869.1 11.8% $129.2 7.7% $84.3 1.1% $12.0 SUBTOTAL $3,856.6 $.0 $500.0 $3,356.6 49.6% $1,664.9 $1,691.7 35.3% $597.2 $.0 $1,094.5 $.0 $1,094.5 79.4% $869.1 11.8% $129.2 7.7% $84.3 1.1% $12.0
Debentures PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 79.4% $.0 11.8% $.0 7.7% $.0 1.1% $.0 FINANCED WITH DEBT (PRINCIPLE) TOTAL $3,856.6 $.0 $500.0 $3,356.6 49.6% $1,664.9 $1,691.7 35.3% $597.2 $.0 $1,094.5 $.0 $1,094.5 79.4% $869.1 11.8% $129.2 7.7% $84.3 1.1% $12.0
Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 149.15 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $390.7 79.7% $311.4 11.8% $46.1 7.2% $28.1 1.3% $5.1 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 7,323,265 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth needs $ 1,094,547 purposes $703.8 79.2% $557.6 11.8% $83.0 8.0% $56.2 1.0% $7.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 10.35 $ 0.26 $ 0.13 $ 0.02 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Estimated costs include building fees, construction, land, furniture and equipment. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 2) Allocation between Residential and non-residential based on 2018 tax assessment roll analysis. Pre Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 32.28 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 21.83 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 14.28 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 19.35
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 48
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-6 Outfitting Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
growth share
cipated s Non-gr Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns antic A if app plicable) or Years
Prior
existing g standard (see
horizon nfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
growth expected to occur rants, s subsidies or other Projec ss ect CostFunded In benefits ts (portion of growth deductio on (if applicable) ble for r rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DCr rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Outfitting DC14-FS00005 Fire Fighter Outfitting - Station 15 2022 $121.1 $.0 $.0 $121.1 49.6% $60.1 $61.0 35.3% $21.5 $.0 $39.5 $.0 $39.5 79.4% $31.4 11.8% $4.7 7.7% $3.0 1.1% $.4 SUBTOTAL $121.1 $.0 $.0 $121.1 0.0% $.0 $61.0 35.3% $21.5 $.0 $39.5 $.0 $39.5 79.4% $31.4 11.8% $4.7 7.7% $3.0 1.1% $.4
Debentures PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 79.4% $.0 11.8% $.0 7.7% $.0 1.1% $.0 FINANCED WITH DEBT (PRINCIPLE) TOTAL $121.1 $.0 $.0 $121.1 49.6% $60.1 $61.0 35.3% $21.5 $.0 $39.5 $.0 $39.5 79.4% $31.4 11.8% $4.7 7.7% $3.0 1.1% $.4
Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 5.75 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $11.9 79.7% $9.5 11.8% $1.4 7.2% $.9 1.3% $.2 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 282,325 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 39,485 purposes $27.6 79.3% $21.9 11.8% $3.3 7.9% $2.2 1.0% $.3 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 0.41 $ 0.01 $ 0.01 $ 0.00 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) The outfitting costs associated with Station 15 represents 20 new staff. Outfit costs represent $6,054/firefighter. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 2) The future growth benefit has been applied consistent with the benefit for the Station in which the vehicle will be used. Pre Financing 3) The non-growth benefit has been applied consistent with the benefit for the Station in which the vehicle will be used. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 1.27 4) Allocation between Residential and non-residential based on 2018 tax assessment roll analysis. Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 0.86 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 0.56 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 0.76
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 49
Table of Contents Fire Services TABLE B-7 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's) FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
Post- Growth projection for each year of forecast period Pre-Financing Financing % Collected Planning Horizon - yrs 10 DC Rate DC Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 16.44 $ 25.24 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ 0.41 $ 0.62 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ 0.22 $ 0.33 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ 0.03 $ 0.05 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Other Information: Pre Post Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$2,301.5 Residential share 79% 79% Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). Non-residential The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Commercial 12% 12% Institutional 8% 8% Industrial 1% 1%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 50
Table of Contents
APPENDIX C:
Police Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 51
Table of Contents Police Services
Existing Service Levels replacement period beyond 7 years. This need will be further investigated by LPS as part of their planning process for possible inclusion in the next DC Background Study. The City of London Police Service (LPS) employs more than 600 sworn officers and 257 vehicles from its headquarters of over 200,000 square feet at 601 Dundas Street. Existing service standards Growth Needs – Outfitting have been measured using capital budgets and data employed by LPS. These measures assisted in ensuring that the amounts included in the Police Service Development Charge (DC) rate There are significant costs involved in outfitting new officers. Based on the existing ten year average calculations did not exceed existing historical standards. Refer to tables C-1 through C-3 for Service (2009-2018) of sworn officers to population (1.552 officers per 1,000 population), and with an Standards related to Police Services. expected net growth in population over the next ten years of 49,100 (per Appendix A Table A-7) growth forecasts), the City can expect an additional complement of 76 sworn officers over the Capital Needs – Facility planning horizon. Each of these officers require non-personal gear and radio at a total current cost of $6,758 per officer. This results in a total projected capital need of $513,456 for outfitting new LPS has identified a need to expand its facilities to accommodate growth. This expansion is identified officers (sworn and auxiliary) to serve growth over the next ten years. in the capital budget as a project timed for 2023 and having a cost of $80 million. LPS is currently undertaking a Facility Needs Assessment to determine whether this expansion should be to the Allocation of Costs of Growth to Growth Types existing police headquarters or the construction of additional community ‘hubs’. The DC eligible portion of the project is estimated to be $8.1 million after the various deductions discussed below. The allocation of growth costs amongst the different types of growth (residential and non-residential) have been apportioned on the basis of city-wide 2018 assessed property values by category, The non-growth portion of this project is identified as 74.4% or approximately $52 million. This reflects consistent with the methodology employed in previous DC Studies. the percentage of developed area in 2019 (the initiation of the collection of DC’s for this project) in relation to the total developable area within the urban growth boundary. A 12.3% future growth benefit Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation has been applied to the project based on the percentage of undeveloped hectares beyond 2028 (beyond the ten year planning horizon) to the total developable hectares. The required LPS projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for LPS projects are shown in Tables Growth Needs – Vehicles and Equipment C-4 and C-5.
Police patrol vehicles account for most of the equipment used by the LPS. The majority of vehicles Financing Costs are routinely disposed of on a five year cycle. The Development Charges Act allows the inclusion of growth related vehicles with an expected useful life of seven years or more and makes no allowance Table C-6 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded LPS projects for the purpose of for the fact that these vehicles are used around the clock. Police patrol vehicles are therefore calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs generally excluded from the DC rate calculations, although some municipalities include them on the involved: basis of around the clock usage. a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for The LPS vehicle fleet does contain a number of eligible vehicles that have a lifecycle replacement growth projects identified in past DC studies; period that extends beyond seven years (e.g., motorcycles, passenger vans, R.I.D.E vehicles, b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; emergency response units, etc.). These are identified in the Police vehicles service standard. None c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified of these specialized vehicles have been identified as a growth need within the next ten years. LPS in the ten year study period; have preliminarily identified additional vehicle needs related to growth that would have a lifecycle d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 52
Table of Contents Police Services
e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon.
Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Background Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 53
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-1 Facilities Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. London Police Headquarters 601 Dundas St 153,112 $328 London Police Headquarters Expand. 601 Dundas St 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 207,790 $372 Sub Station (Lambeth) Main St Lambeth 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 $165 Court Offices/Cells 824 Dundas St. 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 7,983 $302 Sub Station (Covent Garden Market) 130 King Street 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 $165 Communications & 911 Backup Confidential 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 2,042 $192 Total 163,661 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339 218,339
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.441697 0.584804 0.580411 0.574873 0.569439 0.564108 0.558875 0.553738 0.546941 0.540309
10 Year Average 1) Land values have been excluded from the rented and non-City ow ned facilities.
Quantity Standard per Capita 0.551520 2) Building and land measures provided by Police in cooperation w ith City of London Facility Services division and Realty Services division
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 London Police Headquarters 601 Dundas St $50,220.7 London Police Headquarters Expand. 601 Dundas St $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 $77,297.9 Sub Station (Lambeth) Main St Lambeth $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 $49.5 Court Offices/Cells 824 Dundas St. $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 $2,410.9 Sub Station (Covent Garden Market) 130 King Street $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 $37.0 Communications & 911 Backup Confidential $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 $392.1 Total $53,110.1 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3 $80,187.3
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $143.34 $214.78 $213.16 $211.13 $209.13 $207.17 $205.25 $203.37 $200.87 $198.43
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $200.66
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $200.66
DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $9,852,406 1) Land values have been excluded from the rented and non-City ow ned facilities.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 54
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-2 Vehicles Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Mike Weaver Unit of Measure Number of Vehicles Type of Measure Quantity
Unit Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/Item Motorcycles 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 $28,051 Court Security Van 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $48,615 Court Multi Prisoner Transport Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $133,234 Community Service Vehicles 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $33,034 Explosive Disposal Unit Van 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $361,655 Mobile Command Vehicle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $525,552 Emergency Response.Unit (Truck) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $241,890 Facilities Pickup 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $33,039 Facilities Stake Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $55,800 Facilities Cube Truck 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $50,556 Bicycle Recovery Pickup 1 1 1 1 1 $21,630 R.I.D.E. Van 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $40,600 Reconstruction Van 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $53,709 Passenger Van - 15 passenger 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 $31,600 Surveillance Vehicle/Module 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $141,658 Court Security Van (new style) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $137,200 ERS Response Unit (new style) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $248,300 Search and Rescue Truck 1 1 1 $62,500 Delivery / Raid Vehicle 1 $50,000 Total 28 28 28 30 30 29 29 30 30 30
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service Per Capita 0.000076 0.000075 0.000074 0.000079 0.000078 0.000075 0.000074 0.000076 0.000075 0.000074
10 Year Average
Quantity Standard per Capita 0.000076 1) Quantity of v ehicles taken f rom inv entory reports and $ v alues based on actual replacement costs maintained by Police Fleet Serv ices.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 55
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-2 Vehicles Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Mike Weaver Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Unit Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Motorcycles $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 $140.0 Court Security Van $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 $49.0 Court Multi Prisoner Transport Vehicle $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 $133.0 Community Service Vehicles $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 $264.0 Explosive Disposal Unit Van $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 $362.0 Mobile Command Vehicle $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 $526.0 Emergency Response.Unit (Truck) $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 $242.0 Facilities Pickup $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 $33.0 Facilities Stake Truck $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 $56.0 Facilities Cube Truck $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 $51.0 Bicycle Recovery Pickup $22.0 $22.0 $22.0 $22.0 $22.0 R.I.D.E. Van $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 $41.0 Reconstruction Van $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 $54.0 Passenger Van - 15 passenger $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 $95.0 Surveillance Vehicle/Module $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 Court Security Van (new style) $137.0 $137.0 $137.0 $137.0 $137.0 $137.0 $137.0 ERS Response Unit (new style) $248.0 $248.0 $248.0 $248.0 $248.0 $248.0 $248.0 Search and Rescue Truck $63.0 $63.0 $63.0 Delivery / Raid Vehicle $50.0 Total $2,210.0 $2,210.0 $2,210.0 $2,595.0 $2,595.0 $2,573.0 $2,573.0 $2,636.0 $2,636.0 $2,635.0
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service Per Capita $5.96 $5.92 $5.87 $6.83 $6.77 $6.65 $6.59 $6.69 $6.60 $6.52
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $6.44
DC Eligible amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $6.44 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $316,204
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 56
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-3 Outfitting Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Kim Darling Unit of Measure Number of Equipped Officers Type of Measure Quantity
Type 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/Officer Officers 586 586 592 606 606 606 593 598 607 605 $6,758 Auxiliary Officers 50 50 50 50 196 196 193.5 194.5 200 202 $546 Total 636 636 642 656 802 802 786.5 792.5 807 807
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita (Officers) 0.001582 0.001570 0.001574 0.001596 0.001580 0.001566 0.001518 0.001517 0.001521 0.001497 Level of Service per Capita (combined) 0.001716 0.001703 0.001707 0.001727 0.002092 0.002072 0.002013 0.002010 0.002022 0.001997
10 Year Average
Quantity Standard per Capita (Officers) 0.001552 1) Number of Of f icers , Volunteers & Outf itting costs taken f rom personnel records maintained by Police Administration.
Quantity Standard per Capita (combined) 0.001906 2) Of f icer Outf itting costs include the cost of radios.
Contact person(s) Kim Darling Unit of measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of measure Quality & Quantity
Type 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Officers $320 $320 $323 $331 $331 $331 $324 $327 $331 $330 Auxiliary Officers $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total $320 $320 $323 $331 $331 $331 $324 $327 $331 $330
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $0.86 $0.86 $0.86 $0.87 $0.86 $0.86 $0.83 $0.83 $0.83 $0.82
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $0.85
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $0.85 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $41,735
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 57
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-4 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A ifap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo onfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies orother Pro ss oject CostFunded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Facility Expansion DC19-PS01001 Police Headquarters Expansion 2023 $80,000.0 $.0 $.0 $80,000.0 12.3% $9,840.0 $70,160.0 74.4% $52,199.0 $.0 $17,961.0 $9,803.2 $8,157.8 79.4% $6,477.3 11.8% $962.6 7.7% $628.1 1.1% $89.7
SUBTOTAL $80,000.0 $.0 $.0 $80,000.0 12.3% $9,840.0 $70,160.0 74.4% $52,199.0 $.0 $17,961.0 $9,803.2 $8,157.8 79.4% $6,477.3 11.8% $962.6 7.7% $628.1 1.1% $89.7 Debentures PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED $3,731.0 $3,731.0 $3,731.0 $3,731.0 $2,036.4 $1,694.6 100.0% $1,694.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 WITH DEBT (PRINCIPLE) $83,731.0 $.0 $.0 $83,731.0 11.8% $9,840.0 $73,891.0 70.6% $52,199.0 $.0 $21,691.987 $11,839.6 $9,852.4 82.9% $8,171.9 9.8% $962.6 6.4% $628.1 0.9% $89.7 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 200.66 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $464.2 98.8% $458.5 0.7% $3.4 0.4% $2.0 0.1% $.4 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 9,852,406
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 21,691,987 purposes $9,388.2 82.2% $7,713.4 10.2% $959.3 6.7% $626.1 1.0% $89.4 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ 11,839,581 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 143.12 $ 2.96 $ 1.49 $ 0.28 /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 446.53 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 301.98 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 197.50 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 267.63 Notes: 1) Allocation of benefit to future growth for the future expansion has been based on the percentage of undeveloped hectares beyond 2028 to the total developable hectares. 2) Non-growth share for the future expansion reflects the percentage of developed area at the initiation of collection of DC’s in relation to the total developable area. 3) Growth Projects Financed with Debt represents debt outstanding for the expansion to the London Police Service headquarters building in 2010. DC recovery for this item is 100% residential, consistent 4) Allocation between Residential and non-residential based on 2018 tax assessment roll analysis.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 58
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-5 Outfitting Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A ifap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo onfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject CostFunded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Outfitting DC19-PS02001 Officer Outfitting (due to growth) 2019-2028 $513.5 $.0 $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $513.5 $.0 $513.5 79.4% $407.7 11.8% $60.6 7.7% $39.5 1.1% $5.6
SUBTOTAL $513.5 $.0 $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $513.5 $.0 $513.5 79.4% $407.7 11.8% $60.6 7.7% $39.5 1.1% $5.6 Debentures PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 79.4% $.0 11.8% $.0 7.7% $.0 1.1% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE) $513.5 $.0 $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $513.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $513.5 $.0 $513.5 79.4% $407.7 11.8% $60.6 7.7% $39.5 1.1% $5.6 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 10.68 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $30.3 98.8% $30.0 0.7% $.2 0.4% $.1 0.1% $.0 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 524,388 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 513,456 purposes $483.1 78.2% $377.7 12.5% $60.4 8.2% $39.4 1.2% $5.6 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 7.01 $ 0.19 $ 0.09 $ 0.02 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Reflects expectation of 76 new officers attributable to growth over 10 year growth period (ie. Continuation of 10 year historical per capita standard). Outfitting costs represent $6,756/officer. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 2) Outfitting costs only represent officer needs due to growth during the 10 year period. Therefore, no future benefit or non-growth share has been allocated. Pre Financing 3) Allocation between Residential and non-residential based on 2018 tax assessment roll analysis. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 21.87 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 14.79 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 9.67 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 13.11
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 59
Table of Contents Police Services TABLE C-6 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 DC Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 150.13 $ 168.16 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ 3.14 $ 3.52 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ 1.58 $ 1.77 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ 0.30 $ 0.34 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from futur -$2,519.0
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 82% 82% Non-residential Commercial 10% 10% Institutional 7% 7% Industrial 1% 1%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 60
Table of Contents
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 61
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies
Background • Southeast Area EA: Funding is required to conduct EAs associated with stormwater management facilities in the southeast area of the city. To facilitate municipal service planning, various studies to project facility and servicing needs must be completed. The Development Charges Act provides for the recovery through Development • Dingman Creek Floodplain Corridor EA: This project will review previously recommended Charge (DC) rates of these growth related study costs under section 5 (3) 5. These studies may works in the context of current stormwater management practices, including Low Impact include: Development and natural channel design and will incorporate the UTRCA’s review of the 250- year Regulatory Floodplain. • a detailed growth projection study; • EA Addendums: In the event that changes are required to approved stormwater EA, this • detailed studies to project the infrastructure, facility and equipment needs arising from the project will provide a source of funding. growth projections. Infrastructure studies may be preceded by area planning studies that are • Wastewater Future DC Studies (2024 & 2029): Two studies have been identified to fund necessary to appropriately plan growth and servicing strategies. They may also include master analysis of wastewater capital needs for future DC Studies. planning studies for engineered services (i.e. the Transportation Master Plan) as well as similar studies for soft services (i.e. Fire, Police, Library, etc.); and • Bio-Solids Master Plan: A master planning level study considering the handling of sanitary • the preparation of the DC Study, which consolidates the information mentioned above, servicing generated bio-solids. This study will consider both bio-solids generated by the rationalizes the calculated charge and demonstrates compliance with the legislation. existing population and by future growth. • Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Reduction Study: The objective of the I&I Reduction Study will be The studies are generally necessary every five years which is the legislated maximum life of the DC to reduce wet weather flows from the wastewater collection system and identify opportunities By-law. for increased capacity as a result of reduced I&I.
• Capital Needs Program Built Area Specific Studies: Provides a source of funding for evaluating sanitary servicing in specific areas due to growth in the built area. The forecast of needs includes projection of future studies which: • Cycling Master Plan: The Cycling Master Plan will assess future bicycle infrastructure needs and cycling networks across the City and linkages for new subdivisions. • reflect that the City undertakes the planning studies prerequisite to development in both intensification and greenfield areas; • Transportation Master Plan: This project will be a major update of the City’s 2030 • are necessary to facilitate planning of infrastructure; Transportation Master Plan. Scheduled to begin in 2022 to be completed prior to the • will be the responsibility of the City to complete (as opposed to the development community commencement of the 2024 Transportation DC Study. directly, or as part of a DC funded infrastructure work); • Transportation DC Studies (2024 & 2029): Two studies have been identified to provide • where study scope is generally the entire City, or a large geographic segment of it (i.e. large analysis of transportation capital needs for future DC Studies. watershed study); and • Long Term Corridor Protection – EA Studies: Funding for future EA studies related to long • include studies formerly included with associated rate components (i.e. stormwater term transportation corridor projects. management Environmental Assessments (EA), transportation impact assessments, etc.) • Traffic Impact Studies: Growth related traffic impact studies that are completed by the City’s A brief description for each study incorporated in the ten year growth horizon for this service Transportation Engineering Division. component follows: • Transportation Master Plan Monitoring: A transportation monitoring program to be completed as recommended by the Council adopted Transportation Master Plan. This monitoring program • Stormwater Future DC Studies (2024 & 2029): Two studies have been identified to provide includes: comprehensive household surveys, a cordon count program, travel time surveys, and analysis of stormwater capital needs for future DC Studies. transit and active transportation surveys (Table 22, 2030 TMP). This
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 62
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies
information will serve as background data for the various Transportation Master Plans and basis for transitioning from the existing built form to a higher density form of development and Master Plan Updates scheduled over the 20 year growth period. address compatibility issues. • Water Future DC Studies (2024 & 2029): Two studies have been identified to fund analysis of • Official Plan Review: The Planning Act requires that a municipality review its Official Plan in water capital needs for future DC Studies. accordance with the Planning Act. This typically involves a new series of growth forecasts, policy analyses, public engagement, etc. • Water Efficiency Program/Investigations: One of the goals of the water efficiency program is to promote awareness of water usage conservation. Increasing awareness has been shown to • Zoning By-law Update: After each Official Plan review, a corresponding Zoning By-law update reduce water usage and free up water distribution capacity. Existing capacity is considered is required according to the Planning Act. first, in determining growth needs. Conservation practices provide capacity for future • Industrial Land Development Strategy: The Industrial Land Development Strategy will review development and therefore provide a benefit to growth. trends, identify industrial sector targets, review supply and its adequacy to accommodate future • South London Water Servicing Study: This study will review the southern part of the urban projected demand, and will develop an acquisition, servicing and marketing plan. area to determine the most appropriate manner to provide water servicing. • Subwatershed Studies; review and implementation update: The purpose of this study is to • Trunk Watermain and Pumping Station Growth Study: This study will examine growth needs review subwatershed study recommendations and targets more comprehensively and for trunk watermains and pump stations not included in the South London Water Servicing document successes/challenges in meeting established targets. The findings will impact future Study. environmental policies and natural heritage lands development. • Growth-related Secondary Plans: Future secondary plans will set the context for new • Parks and Recreation (P&R) Master Plan (2021 & 2027): The purpose of the P&R Strategic development. A variety of areas represent opportunities for such plans. These areas require Master Plan is to provide overall direction and guidance for making decisions about parks and servicing studies, environmental studies and other reviews. recreation programming, public use facilities and infrastructure, and investment in the community. It identifies facility service standards and projects future needs based on Council • Community Improvement Plans: These plans set the context for revitalization and growth by approved population projections. A new 10 year Strategic Master Plan was initiated in 2017 evaluating economic barriers and establishing projects and incentives aimed at stimulating and is scheduled to be completed in 2019. The 2021 study is an update of the 2019 P&R development and revitalization. Strategic Master plan based on new census data, updated population projections and a review • Comprehensive Zoning By-law: After a major 20 year review of the Official Plan, a major of emerging trends. The 2027 study is to develop with significant public engagement a new comprehensive review of the Zoning By-law is required. The last comprehensive zoning review P&R Strategic Plan to replace the 2019 Master Plan. was in 1993. • Urban Forestry Studies Impacted by Growth: Several Urban Forestry studies will be completed • Subdivisions and Infill Urban Design Guidelines: These guidelines will provide planning and during the years identified. The studies will evaluate growth impacts and best management design guidance for greenfield development and sensitive and appropriate infill and practices for new initiatives (i.e. street tree inventory) and updates of existing plans (i.e. urban intensification within existing neighbourhoods. They will also include engagement and forestry strategy). All studies will examine how future development can ensure that tree education strategies to address neighbour and community issues. canopy cover targets are met. A minor growth share has been allocated for these studies. • Rapid Transit Village Plans: These plans will establish a detailed framework to direct growth • New ESA Conservation Master Plans: These studies are completed for the management of and re-development within the planned Rapid Transit Village Areas. They will identify ESA lands acquired by the City due to growth, and were previously included within the cost of developable lands and anticipated timing of growth for use in servicing studies. P&R ESA park projects. For the 2019 DC Study, these studies are identified as Corporate • Rapid Transit Corridor Plans: These plans will establish a detailed framework for infill and Growth Studies. intensification along the rapid transit and urban corridors. They will identify developable lands • Post Development Environmental Impact Study (EIS) Monitoring: Beginning in 2022, it is and anticipated timing of growth for use in servicing studies. The studies will also establish a anticipated that the City will undertake monitoring and studies to assess the efficacy of
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 63
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies
growth-related EIS recommendations and the City’s environmental policies. The results will Financing Costs be used in considering future EIS requirements and determine if corrective actions are required to better protect environmental lands.DC Process Consultant (2022 & 2027): Funding is Table D-2 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Corporate Growth Studies for the required in both 2022 and 2027 to pay for costs associated with DC consultants assisting with purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and the preparation of DC policy matters and Background Study preparation. financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for Under the current legislation, the City will complete no less than two sets of DC Studies over the growth projects identified in past DC studies; coming ten year period. The estimated cost of completing these studies as well as the proposed b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; allocation of costs to benefiting growth are reflected in the attached DC rate tables. The following are c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified noteworthy aspects of the DC rate calculation for this service component: in the ten year study period;
d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth Expected cost of growth studies to be incurred over the period 2019 through 2028 (i.e. a ten o works funded by debt; and year growth horizon) amount to approximately $21.6 million. e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to Future Growth Benefit (post-period): Approximately 22% of the overall costs have been o fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon. allocated to growth in a period beyond the ten year planning horizon for Growth Studies. These
costs therefore have been removed from the rate calculations and reduce the amount being Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the collected in the ten year horizon for growth studies. The balance of the collections will be made expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the in future years. post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately Non-growth share: Studies may be directed specifically at identifying the needs resulting solely o preceding the DC Background Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the from growth (i.e. Future DC studies for each service component), or may be directed at appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon. studying the needs in a certain service area as a result of both growth and needs of the
population generally (i.e. Cycling Master Plan). The DC rate calculations for Growth Studies reflect approximately 29% of the costs of this component have been identified as being of benefit to the existing population. o Existing debt associated with previously approved growth studies which benefit the period 2019-2028 is also included in the rate calculation ($0.6 million). These costs generally reflect the Future Benefit included in past DC studies. o The net costs incorporated in the rate calculations attributed to growth in the ten year horizon are approximately $11.4M.
Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation
The required Corporate Growth Studies form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Corporate Growth Studies are shown in Table D-1.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 64
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies TABLE D-1 Rate Calculation Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Stormwater Servicing Studies
Dingman Creek Floodplain Corridor Environmental DC19-GS00001 2019 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $500.0 $.0 $500.0 73.1% $365.5 12.2% $61.0 9.6% $48.0 5.1% $25.5 Assessment
DC14-GS00006 Southeast Area Environmental Assessments 2022 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $250.0 $.0 $250.0 73.1% $182.8 12.2% $30.5 9.6% $24.0 5.1% $12.8
DC14-GS00002 Stormwater Future Development Charge Studies 2024 2022 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3
DC19-GS00002 Stormwater Future Development Charge Studies 2029 2027 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 100.0% $300.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
DC19-GS01001 Stormwater Unidentified EA Addendums 2019-2028 $1,200.0 $.0 $.0 $1,200.0 0.0% $.0 $1,200.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,200.0 $.0 $1,200.0 73.1% $877.2 12.2% $146.4 9.6% $115.2 5.1% $61.2
SUBTOTAL $2,800.0 $.0 $.0 $2,800.0 19.6% $550.0 $2,250.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,250.0 $.0 $2,250.0 73.1% $1,644.8 12.2% $274.5 9.6% $216.0 5.1% $114.8
Wastewater Servicing Studies
DC14-GS00027 Bio-Solids Master Plan 2019 $400.0 $.0 $.0 $400.0 50.0% $200.0 $200.0 83.1% $166.2 $.0 $33.8 $.0 $33.8 73.1% $24.7 12.2% $4.1 9.6% $3.2 5.1% $1.7
DC19-GS00003 Built Area Specific Studies 2019-2023 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3
DC19-GS00004 Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Study 2020 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3
DC14-GS00009 Wastewater Future Development Charge Studies 2024 2022 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3
DC19-GS00005 Wastewater Future Development Charge Studies 2029 2027 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 100.0% $300.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,600.0 $.0 $.0 $1,600.0 31.3% $500.0 $1,100.0 15.1% $166.2 $.0 $933.8 $.0 $933.8 73.1% $682.6 12.2% $113.9 9.6% $89.6 5.1% $47.6
Transportation Servicing Studies
DC19-GS00006 Cycling Master Plan 2022 $200.0 $.0 $.0 $200.0 0.0% $.0 $200.0 50.0% $100.0 $.0 $100.0 $.0 $100.0 73.1% $73.1 12.2% $12.2 9.6% $9.6 5.1% $5.1
DC14-GS00017 Transportation Master Plan 2022 $750.0 $.0 $.0 $750.0 40.0% $300.0 $450.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 73.1% $329.0 12.2% $54.9 9.6% $43.2 5.1% $23.0
Transportation Future Development Charge Studies DC14-GS00018 2022 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3 2024
DC19-GS00007 Transportation Development Charge Studies 2029 2027 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 100.0% $300.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
DC19-GS01002 Long Term Corridor Protection - EA Studies 2019-2028 $1,400.0 $.0 $.0 $1,400.0 50.0% $700.0 $700.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $700.0 $.0 $700.0 73.1% $511.7 12.2% $85.4 9.6% $67.2 5.1% $35.7
DC19-GS01003 Traffic Impact Studies 2019-2028 $1,000.0 $.0 $.0 $1,000.0 0.0% $.0 $1,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,000.0 $.0 $1,000.0 73.1% $731.0 12.2% $122.0 9.6% $96.0 5.1% $51.0
DC19-GS01004 Transportation Master Plan Monitoring 2019-2028 $350.0 $.0 $.0 $350.0 0.0% $.0 $350.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $350.0 $.0 $350.0 73.1% $255.9 12.2% $42.7 9.6% $33.6 5.1% $17.9
SUBTOTAL $4,300.0 $.0 $.0 $4,300.0 30.2% $1,300.0 $3,000.0 3.3% $100.0 $.0 $2,900.0 $.0 $2,900.0 73.1% $2,119.9 12.2% $353.8 9.6% $278.4 5.1% $147.9
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 65
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies TABLE D-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
Non-growth share Commercial Institutional Industrial
Prior Years
contributions anticipated
Supplement A if applicable)
beyond planning horizon for this service)
improvement over existing standard (see costs attributable to growth expected to occur DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital grants, subsidies or other Less: Portion of Gross Project Cost Funded In Subtotal Less: Future growth benefits (portion of growth Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory deduction (if applicable) Subtotal Less: Amount ineligible for rate calculation - Net Amount Eligible for DC rate calculation % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20) Water Servicing Studies
DC19-GS00008 South London Water Servicing Study 2020 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $500.0 $.0 $500.0 73.1% $365.5 12.2% $61.0 9.6% $48.0 5.1% $25.5
DC19-GS00009 Trunk Watermain and Pumping Station Growth Study 2021 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $500.0 $.0 $500.0 73.1% $365.5 12.2% $61.0 9.6% $48.0 5.1% $25.5
DC14-GS00013 Water Future Development Charge Studies 2024 2022 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $300.0 $.0 $300.0 73.1% $219.3 12.2% $36.6 9.6% $28.8 5.1% $15.3
DC19-GS00010 Water Future Development Charge Studies 2029 2027 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 100.0% $300.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
DC19-GS00011 Water Efficiency Program/Investigations 2019-2023 $3,100.0 $.0 $.0 $3,100.0 0.0% $.0 $3,100.0 92.0% $2,852.0 $.0 $248.0 $.0 $248.0 73.1% $181.3 12.2% $30.3 9.6% $23.8 5.1% $12.6
SUBTOTAL $4,700.0 $.0 $.0 $4,700.0 6.4% $300.0 $4,400.0 64.8% $2,852.0 $.0 $1,548.0 $.0 $1,548.0 73.1% $1,131.6 12.2% $188.9 9.6% $148.6 5.1% $78.9
Planning and Growth Management Studies
DC19-GS00012 Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2019 $1,000.0 $.0 $607.1 $392.9 25.0% $98.2 $294.6 50.0% $147.3 $.0 $147.3 $.0 $147.3 73.1% $107.7 12.2% $18.0 9.6% $14.1 5.1% $7.5
DC19-GS00013 Community Improvement Plans 2019, 2024 $400.0 $.0 $.0 $400.0 25.0% $100.0 $300.0 50.0% $150.0 $.0 $150.0 $.0 $150.0 73.1% $109.7 12.2% $18.3 9.6% $14.4 5.1% $7.7
2020, 2022, DC19-GS00014 Growth-related Secondary Plans 2024, 2026, $750.0 $.0 $240.0 $510.0 25.0% $127.5 $382.5 20.0% $76.5 $.0 $306.0 $.0 $306.0 73.1% $223.7 12.2% $37.3 9.6% $29.4 5.1% $15.6 2028
DC19-GS00015 Rapid Transit Village Plans 2019-2023 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 50.0% $150.0 $150.0 20.0% $30.0 $.0 $120.0 $.0 $120.0 73.1% $87.7 12.2% $14.6 9.6% $11.5 5.1% $6.1
DC19-GS00016 Rapid Transit Corridor Plans 2020-2023 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 20.0% $50.0 $.0 $200.0 $.0 $200.0 73.1% $146.2 12.2% $24.4 9.6% $19.2 5.1% $10.2
DC19-GS00017 Urban Design Guidelines - subdivisions and infill 2021 $150.0 $.0 $.0 $150.0 0.0% $.0 $150.0 10.0% $15.0 $.0 $135.0 $.0 $135.0 73.1% $98.7 12.2% $16.5 9.6% $13.0 5.1% $6.9
DC19-GS00018 Industrial Development Strategy 2022 $150.0 $.0 $.0 $150.0 50.0% $75.0 $75.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $75.0 $.0 $75.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $75.0
DC19-GS00019 Official Plan Review 2022 $400.0 $.0 $242.9 $157.1 0.0% $.0 $157.1 50.0% $78.6 $.0 $78.6 $.0 $78.6 73.1% $57.4 12.2% $9.6 9.6% $7.5 5.1% $4.0
DC19-GS00020 Zoning By-law Update 2026 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 50.0% $150.0 $150.0 20.0% $30.0 $.0 $120.0 $.0 $120.0 73.1% $87.7 12.2% $14.6 9.6% $11.5 5.1% $6.1
SUBTOTAL $3,950.0 $.0 $1,090.0 $2,860.0 33.2% $950.7 $1,909.3 30.2% $577.4 $.0 $1,331.9 $.0 $1,331.9 69.0% $918.8 11.5% $153.3 9.1% $120.7 10.4% $139.1
Parks and Recreation Studies
DC19-GS00021 Master Plan Substudies 2020 $150.0 $.0 $.0 $150.0 0.0% $.0 $150.0 25.0% $37.5 $.0 $112.5 $.0 $112.5 100.0% $112.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-GS00022 Master Plan Update (2021) 2021 $150.0 $.0 $.0 $150.0 0.0% $.0 $150.0 25.0% $37.5 $.0 $112.5 $.0 $112.5 100.0% $112.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-GS00023 Master Plan Update (2027) 2027 $350.0 $.0 $.0 $350.0 50.0% $175.0 $175.0 25.0% $43.8 $.0 $131.3 $.0 $131.3 100.0% $131.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 66
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies TABLE D-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
2020, 2023, DC19-GS00024 New ESA Conservation Master Plans $1,050.0 $.0 $.0 $1,050.0 0.0% $.0 $1,050.0 33.0% $346.5 $.0 $703.5 $.0 $703.5 100.0% $703.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 2026
Subwatershed Studies, review and implementation DC19-GS00025 2019-2023 $200.0 $.0 $.0 $200.0 25.0% $50.0 $150.0 20.0% $30.0 $.0 $120.0 $.0 $120.0 73.1% $87.7 12.2% $14.6 9.6% $11.5 5.1% $6.1 update (Parks & Recreation)
2021, 2022, DC19-GS00026 Urban Forestry Studies Impacted by Growth 2023, 2025, $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 72.0% $360.0 $.0 $140.0 $.0 $140.0 73.1% $102.3 12.2% $17.1 9.6% $13.4 5.1% $7.1 2026
DC19-GS00027 Post Development EIS Monitoring 2022-2028 $280.0 $.0 $.0 $280.0 0.0% $.0 $280.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $280.0 $.0 $280.0 73.1% $204.7 12.2% $34.2 9.6% $26.9 5.1% $14.3
SUBTOTAL $2,030.0 $.0 $.0 $2,030.0 2.5% $50.0 $1,980.0 37.2% $736.5 $.0 $1,243.5 $.0 $1,243.5 88.3% $1,098.2 5.3% $65.9 4.2% $51.8 2.2% $27.5
Finance and Corporate Services Studies
DC19-GS00028 DC Process Consultant - DC 2024 2022 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $250.0 $.0 $250.0 73.1% $182.8 12.2% $30.5 9.6% $24.0 5.1% $12.8
DC19-GS00029 DC Process Consultant - DC 2029 2027 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 100.0% $500.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,000.0 $.0 $.0 $1,000.0 75.0% $750.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $250.0 $.0 $250.0 73.1% $182.8 12.2% $30.5 9.6% $24.0 5.1% $12.8
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $600.0 $600.0 $600.0 $600.0 $600.0 75.5% $453.2 8.3% $49.6 7.6% $45.5 8.6% $51.6 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$21,630.0 $.0 $1,090.0 $20,540.0 22.3% $4,575.7 $15,964.3 28.5% $4,550.8 $.0 $11,413.4 $.0 $11,413.4 75.2% $8,588.1 10.8% $1,230.4 8.5% $974.7 5.4% $620.3 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Notes: Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $264.7 75.5% $199.9 8.3% $21.9 7.6% $20.1 8.6% $22.8 1) Engineering servicing studies provided by City of London Environmental and Engineering Services. Identified projects, timing and non-growth share based on a review of past projects and estimates of future needs. 2) Planning and Growth Management studies provided by City of London Planning Division. Identified projects, timing and non-growth share based on a review of past projects and estimates of future Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation needs. purposes $11,148.8 75.2% $8,388.2 10.8% $1,208.5 8.6% $954.6 5.4% $597.5 3) Parks and Recreation studies provided by City of London Planning Division and Community Services. Identified projects, timing and non-growth share based on a review of past projects and estimates of future needs. Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 4) Identified projects, cost, timing and non-growth share based on Development Finance staff estimates for consultants to assist with future Development Charges Background Studies. Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 155.64 $ 3.73 $ 2.27 $ 1.89 5) Future benefit allocated to growth studies based on the ‘shelf life’ of individual study. If study expires before the end of the 10 year planning horizon, the future benefit is deemed to be 0%. /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 6) RICI splits are generally based on the percentage of projected population growth and employment growth over the 10 year planning horizon, with the following exceptions: Industrial Land Development Strategy 100% industrial, and Parks & Recreation Master Plan and Master Plan Update 100% residential. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Post Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 485.59 $ 539.40 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 328.39 $ 364.79 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 214.78 $ 238.58 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 291.04 $ 323.30
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 67
Table of Contents Corporate Growth Studies TABLE D-2 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 155.64 $ 172.89 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ 3.73 $ 4.14 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ 2.27 $ 2.52 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ 1.89 $ 2.10 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$4,121.2
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 75% 75% Non-residential Commercial 11% 11% Institutional 9% 9% Industrial 5% 5%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 68
Table of Contents
APPENDIX E:
Library Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 69
Table of Contents Library Services
Existing Service Levels projections, as outlined in Appendix A. These allocations served as the basis for projecting growth needs for 2019-2028. The London Public Library (LPL) provides library services to its citizens through a single Central Library and 15 branch libraries. Capital Needs Identified
A comprehensive inventory and valuation of library facilities for each of the preceding ten years was Various factors affect the determination of need for new or redeveloped library branches including: completed. This valuation is necessary to facilitate an objective comparison of the historical service standard to the proposed needs with the intention of demonstrating that no improvement in the • anticipated population growth in an area; historical standard is being incorporated into the Development Charge (DC) rate calculations. • socio-economic and literacy needs of a specific community; and • changing demographics. The inventory includes valuation of all existing facilities based on the size, quality and nature of construction, land value and building contents. A separate inventory of the value of existing Content of the collections is governed by size of population served and the borrowing needs of the collections was undertaken. Both inventories reflect current replacement value of the library assets patrons. to arrive at an average per capita historical service level. The LPL examined the ‘population to sq.ft.’ ratios of its existing facilities, and projected future needs By projecting this historical service level over the future population increase, a theoretical level of based on existing and projected populations in each library planning district. A straightforward expenditure at which the City would be maintaining existing service levels has been established. By projection of the existing space standard applied to forecast population growth suggests that at least comparing this theoretical level with the calculated amounts eligible for the DC rate for this two new branches (assuming approximate size of 13,000 – 17,000 sq. ft. per branch) will be component, these rate calculations demonstrate that they exclude any increase to the existing library necessary within the next ten years to serve growth and maintain the existing facility standard. service standard. Refer to tables E-1 and E-2 for Service Standards related to Library Services. The LPL also established a population per square foot standard (2.6 population/sq.ft.) by reviewing existing libraries. This standard assists in determining service areas requiring library facilities, as well Planning for Capital Needs as informing the timing of project construction.
Each year, the LPL reviews its capital building projects in preparation for the capital budget Based on a review of the population growth in each Library Service Area (LSA), the following needs submission, based on the factors identified below. As part of the library DC rate calculations, the were identified: library service areas and collections were reviewed to determine the growth needs for the growth
period from 2019 – 2028 while maintaining a rate that would not result in an increase over the existing 1. Sherwood Forest Northwest Branch (LSA 12): This facility was previously included in the 2014 service standard as required under the DC Act. DC Study. The new branch is required to replace or expand the existing space in LSA 12. A
review of population projections indicates that the population/sq.ft. standard will be exceeded Growth Population in 2019. The new branch is anticipated to serve growing population needs in LSA 12 beyond The LPL delineates service based on 16 service areas across the City which align with the City the ten year planning horizon of this rate study. Planning Districts to be more responsive to the needs of the community. These service area boundaries were reviewed in 2019 by the LPL and are displayed on MAP E-1. These boundaries 2. Pond Mills Southeast Branch (LSA 13): The Pond Mills library was previously included in the reflect the construction of the Stoney Creek library as well as the new Bostwick library, which replaced 2014 DC Study. The new branch is required to replace or expand the existing space in LSA the Westmount Branch. For the purposes of projecting capital needs, growth allocations were 13. A review of population projections indicates that the population/sq.ft. standard was prepared for the LPL based on population and housing construction by library service area. The exceeded in 2011. The new branch is anticipated to serve growing population needs in LSA growth allocations were based on the 2018 Council endorsed Watson population and housing
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 70
Table of Contents Library Services
13 beyond the ten year planning horizon of this rate study. Collection costs have also been continue to lease. Building designs of between 13,000-15,000 square feet represent the optimum identified for the Sherwood Forest and Pond Mills future library branches. Each library is size for both adequacy of space and geographic convenience of location. Buildings over 15,000 anticipated to require $250,000 in collections materials over the ten year period (2019-2028). square feet may serve more patrons, but may also result in branches that are too far apart to provide The collection materials are to meet incremental inventory needs to serve growth in the area a convenient level of service to the entire area being served. and represent additional acquisitions beyond the existing collection materials contained at the present branches. Collections – Growth Needs Projected
Design of Future Library Branches The collections of new or replacement branches also require expansion to maintain service standards and provide adequate choice and variety to increasing number of patrons accessing the new branch. Various elements were considered in the design of the new library branches as follows: These additions to collections have been projected and are reflected in the attached tables. As with library facility calculations, collections from prior growth have been removed through recognition of a) Design Standards the existing reserve fund balance, which represents contributions of earlier growth towards the projects which make up the rate calculations. The Building Code in Ontario contains various standards for the design of Libraries. The City’s Facility Accessibility Design Standard (FADS) and the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Allocation of Costs of Growth to Growth Types as they relate to the Built Environment standard also have an impact on the library buildings being designed today. These standards require more space in buildings to accommodate the concept of The forecasted library service needs are presented in the attached tables. universal design, accommodating through design features the needs of people with ambulatory, visual and other disabilities impairments, and enable them to access services and programs in an integrated The costs eligible for DC rate calculation purposes have been adjusted: manner with other users. All of these standards are incorporated into the design of the future facility needs. Additionally, future branch libraries will be constructed to Leadership in Energy and a) to remove the benefit to existing development. These deductions have been determined based Environmental Design (LEED) standards, with the goal of a LEED designation for the facility. on the proportion of developed area (at the time of collection for the identified growth related libraries began in 1999) in relation to the total service area of the new library. b) Campus Design b) for new libraries, an approximation of the benefit accruing to growth beyond the ten year Through previous Parks and Recreation Master Planning Studies, the desirability of a campus design planning horizon for this service (i.e. post-period benefit) has also been made. The benefit for public facilities was identified. This design would see a number of distinct municipal services calculation is based on the total service area that is expected to benefit beyond the planning incorporated into multi-use facilities in the future. For example, aquatic facilities, ice pads, community horizon (i.e. beyond 2028) in relation to the total service area of the new branch. The post- meeting space, gymnasium and library might all be incorporated into the design of future municipal period benefit will be recovered from future growth that will benefit in the construction of these facilities. The recent completion of the Bostwick Community Centre and library was constructed new libraries and those costs have been removed from the costs eligible for the ten year DC based on this concept. Where possible, the LPL intends to incorporate future branches with other rate calculations. City of London community and recreational facilities, pending any new direction flowing from future Parks and Recreation Strategic Master Plan updates. The resulting net amount represents only the growth costs reasonably recoverable from growth expected to occur in the 2019-2028 timeframe. c) Library Size
The LPL presently leases several of its branches. As communities grow, research suggests it is most cost effective to construct and own facilities (beyond a size of 10,000 square feet), rather than
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 71
Table of Contents Library Services
The net growth cost of providing library services has been allocated 100% to residential growth, consistent with the 2009 & 2014 DC Studies. This allocation recognizes the virtually exclusive use of new libraries in growth areas of the City by residents of the surrounding community. This allocation approach is consistent with many other urban municipalities in the province. Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation The required LPL projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for LPL projects are shown in Tables E-3 and E-4.
Financing Costs
Table E-5 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded LPL projects for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the ten year study period; d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon.
Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. post- period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 72
Table of Contents Library Services MAP E-1: 2019 London Public Library Districts
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 73
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-1 Collections Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Emily Schinbein Unit of Measure Collection Item Type of Measure Quantity
Item Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/Item Catalogued Volumes 804,470 780,080 788,392 762,085 760,415 739,929 731,438 734,471 700,524 666,527 $29 Government Documents 3,901 4,059 3,803 1,374 1,382 1,382 1,375 1,382 1,383 1,131 $38 Magazines, Newspapers, Periodicals 28,870 27,576 26,189 26,395 27,261 25,336 24,700 24,916 23,764 22,341 $5 Vertical Files, Technical Reports, Pamphlets 351 290 201 161 98 98 84 75 75 73 $35 Micromaterials 467 467 467 469 471 471 469 470 446 439 $300 Sound Recordings (LP's & Cassettes) 12,820 9,956 6,688 1,965 1,156 1,144 646 202 337 267 $40 Compact Discs 55,403 59,154 62,633 66,978 69,960 67,790 67,904 69,144 68,470 67,747 $30 Talking Books 5,335 4,777 4,150 1,664 1,824 1,694 1,828 1,451 2,105 2,229 $48 Videos - VHS 29,319 24,375 17,649 9,657 7,921 7,359 6,222 4,402 938 834 $28 CD -ROMs 429 442 442 442 442 $15 DVDS 27,441 34,266 42,048 48,954 58,797 57,616 63,440 68,819 70,042 71,952 $29 Subscriptions - Electronic Resources 83 52 52 52 46 38 39 49 28 33 $10,221 Digital Holdings (E-Books, E-Audio, Digital Magazines) 4,522 5,332 7,593 12,496 16,334 18,866 21,497 23,531 32,503 36,942 $9 Access Workstations 383 396 396 477 477 $950 Equipment 174 359 1,606 1,660 1,598 559 602 652 336 357 $47 iPad Stations 30 30 $500 Total 973,968 951,581 962,309 934,829 948,182 922,282 920,244 929,564 900,981 870,902
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 2.63 2.55 2.56 2.46 2.47 2.38 2.36 2.36 2.26 2.16
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 2.417768 1) Values and quantity of collections taken f rom Library inv entory reports.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 74
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-1 Collections Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Emily Schinbein Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Item Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Catalogued Volumes $23,329.6 $22,622.3 $22,863.4 $22,100.5 $22,052.0 $21,457.9 $21,211.7 $21,299.7 $20,315.2 $19,329.3 Government Documents $148.2 $154.2 $144.5 $52.2 $52.5 $52.5 $52.3 $52.5 $52.6 $43.0 Magazines, Newspapers, Periodicals $144.4 $137.9 $130.9 $132.0 $136.3 $126.7 $123.5 $124.6 $118.8 $111.7 Vertical Files, Technical Reports, Pamphlets $12.3 $10.2 $7.0 $5.6 $3.4 $3.4 $2.9 $2.6 $2.6 $2.6 Micromaterials $140.1 $140.1 $140.1 $140.7 $141.3 $141.3 $140.7 $141.0 $133.8 $131.7 Sound Recordings (LP's & Cassettes) $512.8 $398.2 $267.5 $78.6 $46.2 $45.8 $25.8 $8.1 $13.5 $10.7 Compact Discs $1,662.1 $1,774.6 $1,879.0 $2,009.3 $2,098.8 $2,033.7 $2,037.1 $2,074.3 $2,054.1 $2,032.4 Talking Books $256.1 $229.3 $199.2 $79.9 $87.6 $81.3 $87.7 $69.6 $101.0 $107.0 Videos - VHS $820.9 $682.5 $494.2 $270.4 $221.8 $206.1 $174.2 $123.3 $26.3 $23.4 CD -ROMs $6.4 $6.6 $6.6 $6.6 $6.6 DVDS $795.8 $993.7 $1,219.4 $1,419.7 $1,705.1 $1,670.9 $1,839.8 $1,995.8 $2,031.2 $2,086.6 Subscriptions - Electronic Resources $848.3 $531.5 $531.5 $531.5 $470.2 $388.4 $398.6 $500.8 $286.2 $337.3 Digital Holdings (E-Books, E-Audio, Digital Magazines) $40.7 $48.0 $68.3 $112.5 $147.0 $169.8 $193.5 $211.8 $292.5 $332.5 Access Workstations $363.9 $376.2 $376.2 $453.2 $453.2 Equipment $8.2 $16.9 $75.5 $78.0 $75.1 $26.3 $28.3 $30.6 $15.8 $16.8 iPad Stations $15.0 $15.0 Total $29,089.8 $28,122.2 $28,403.4 $27,470.6 $27,697.1 $26,404.0 $26,316.2 $26,634.7 $25,458.6 $24,579.8
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $78.51 $75.32 $75.50 $72.33 $72.24 $68.22 $67.36 $67.55 $63.77 $60.83
10 year average Level of Service per Capita $70.16
DC Eligible amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 year 49,100 $ Per Capita $70.16 DC Rate Eligible Amount (Gross) $3,444,856
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 75
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-2 Facilities Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Buildings Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. Beacock 1280 Huron St 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 13,232 $340 Byron 1295 Commissioners Rd W 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 $339 Carson 465 Quebec St 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 2,930 $355 Central Library 251 Dundas Street 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 188,179 $351 Cherryhill (formerly Westown) Leased 301 Oxford St W 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 10,225 $242 Crouch 550 Hamilton Rd 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 11,322 $323 East London (Note 1) 2016 Dundas St E 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 7,642 $401 Glanworth 2950 Glanworth Dr 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 $405 Jalna 1119 Jalna Blvd 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 10,590 $385 Lambeth 7112 Beattie Ave 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 3,394 $347 Landon 167 Wortley Rd 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 7,422 $335 Masonville 30 North Center 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 $382 Northridge (Leased) 1444 Glenora Dr 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 2,170 $198 Pond Mills (Leased) 1166 Commissioners Rd E 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 7,090 $198 Sherwood Forest (Leased) 1225 Wonderland Rd N 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 13,214 $242 Southwest (Note 2) 501 Southdale Rd W 16,598 $292 Stoney Creek 920 Sunningdale Rd E 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 7,943 $333 Westmount 3200 Wonderland Rd 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 14,602 $391 Total 317,532 325,475 325,475 325,475 325,475 325,475 325,475 325,475 325,475 327,471
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.856972 0.871760 0.865211 0.856955 0.848856 0.840908 0.833107 0.825450 0.815318 0.810371
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.842491 1) Building measures prov ided by Facility Serv ices div ision. Land v alues prov ided by Realty Serv ices div ision. 2) East London Library and Community Centre is a total of 23,500 sq. f t with the YMCA occupy ing 10,500 sq. f t. (Library portion is 7,642 sq.f t.)
3) Southwest Library and Community Centre is a total of 175,286 sq. f t with the YMCA occupy ing 82,710 sq. f t. (Library portion is 16,598 sq.f t.)
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 76
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-2 Facilities Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Beacock 1280 Huron St $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 $4,499 Byron 1295 Commissioners Rd W $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 $4,068 Carson 465 Quebec St $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 $1,040 Central Library 251 Dundas Street $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 $66,051 Cherryhill (formerly Westown) Leased 301 Oxford St W $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 $2,474 Crouch 550 Hamilton Rd $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 East London 2016 Dundas St E $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 $3,064 Glanworth 2950 Glanworth Dr $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 $130 Jalna 1119 Jalna Blvd $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 $4,077 Lambeth 7112 Beattie Ave $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 $1,178 Landon 167 Wortley Rd $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 $2,486 Masonville 30 North Center $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 $5,042 Northridge (Leased) 1444 Glenora Dr $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 $430 Pond Mills (Leased) 1166 Commissioners Rd E $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 $1,404 Sherwood Forest (Leased) 1225 Wonderland Rd N $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 $3,198 Southwest 501 Southdale Rd W $4,847 Stoney Creek 920 Sunningdale Rd E $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 $2,645 Westmount 3200 Wonderland Rd $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 $5,709 Total $108,508 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $111,153 $110,290
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $292.85 $297.71 $295.48 $292.66 $289.89 $287.18 $284.51 $281.90 $278.44 $272.93
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $287.35
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 year 49,100 $ per Capita $287.35 1) The v aluations abov e include the 2018 replacement v alue of building, land, site improv ements and building contents DC Rate Eligible Amount (Gross) $14,108,885 (excluding computers and collections[latter is v alued separately ])
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 77
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-3 Collections Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Collections
DC14-LS00003 LSA 13 - Southeast (Collections) 2019 $250.0 $.0 $.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $25.0 $225.0 $.0 $225.0 100.0% $225.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-LS00004 LSA 12 - Northwest (Collections) 2020 $250.0 $.0 $.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $250.0 0.0% $.0 $25.0 $225.0 $.0 $225.0 100.0% $225.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 50.0% $225.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 70.16 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 3,444,856 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 450,000 purposes $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs (Note 1) $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ - $ - $ - $ - Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) No service standard deduction is required, growth needs are within the allowable service standard limitation. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 2) Estimated costs of additions to existing Library collections. Pre Financing 3) Collection materials assumed expended within the time frame of the study due to their relatively short "shelf life"; therefore, no allocation made for benefit to future growth. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ - 4) Collection materials are to meet incremental inventory needs to serve growth in the area, therefore no benefit assessed to existing population (the existing collections located at the leased space serving the existing population will be transferred to the new library). Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ - 5) Residential share of growth costs 100% (consistent with 2014 DC Study). Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ - Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ -
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 78
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-4 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A ifap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo onfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies orother Pro ss oject CostFunded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion ofGross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Library Facilities
DC14-LS00001 LSA 13 - Southeast (Facility) 2019 $5,118.0 $.0 $750.0 $4,368.0 25.7% $1,122.6 $3,245.4 19.9% $645.8 $260.0 $2,339.6 $.0 $2,339.6 100.0% $2,339.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-LS00002 LSA 12 - Northwest (Facility) 2020 $6,686.0 $.0 $750.0 $5,936.0 16.6% $985.4 $4,950.6 59.4% $2,940.7 $201.0 $1,809.0 $.0 $1,809.0 100.0% $1,809.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $11,804.0 $.0 $1,500.0 $10,304.0 20.5% $2,108.0 $8,196.0 43.8% $3,586.5 $461.0 $4,148.6 $.0 $4,148.6 100.0% $4,148.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$11,804.0 $.0 $1,500.0 $10,304.0 20.5% $2,108.0 $8,196.0 43.8% $3,586.5 $461.0 $4,148.6 $.0 $4,148.6 100.0% $4,148.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 287.35 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $2,573.7 100.0% $2,573.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 14,108,885 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 4,148,584 purposes $1,574.8 100.0% $1,574.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs (Note 1) $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 29.22 $ - $ - $ - /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Notes: Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 1) No service standard deduction is required, growth needs are within the allowable service standard limitation. Pre Financing 2) Estimated costs include building fees, construction, land, furniture and equipment. Excludes the costs of collections. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 91.17 3) Allocation of benefit to future growth has been based on the percentage of total population in Library branch service area beyond 2028. Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 61.65 4) Non-growth share reflects the percentage of developed area at the initiation of collection of DC's for new library in relation to the total developable area in the service area of the new library. Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 40.32 5) Residential share of growth costs 100% (consistent with 2009 DC Study). Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 54.64
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 79
Table of Contents Library Services TABLE E-5 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 29.22 $ 40.82 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ - $ - 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ - $ - 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ - $ - 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$1,169.3
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth.
Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 100% 100% Non-residential Commercial 0% 0% Institutional 0% 0% Industrial 0% 0%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 80
Table of Contents
APPENDIX F:
Parks and Recreation Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 81
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
Background Population Growth Projected
In November 2009 Council adopted the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Strategic As with other services, planning of Parks and Recreation service expansion first involves an estimate Master Plan subject to the budget review process. In early 2017, an Interim Update to the Master of the extent and location of growth. The projection of growth and location were presented to the DC Plan was undertaken that reviewed and updated components of the 2009 Master Plan to reflect External Stakeholder Committee at several meetings over the second half of 2017 and the projections current conditions and ensure alignment with current priorities and strategies. In 2018, a new Parks for DC purposes formally endorsed by Council at its February 13, 2018 meeting. The DC rate and Recreation Master Plan was commenced to test community priorities and ensure that proposed calculation for this service component contemplates a ten year planning horizon. Over the 2019-2028 directions remain relevant to current and future generations. Together, these documents inform the period, the City’s net population is estimated to increase by 49,100 people. capital projects identified in this Development Charges (DC) Study and provide direction and guidance Growth allocations were prepared to inform Parks and Recreation projects included in the DC Study: for managing parks and recreation programs, infrastructure, and investment in a fiscally responsible • For parkland development projects, the population and housing projections were used to manner. determine the quantum of parkland by category required for the next ten years, based on standards established in the 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and the Parks and Existing Service Standards Recreation chapter of the London Plan. Growth projections were also used to create a build- The City provides Parks and Recreation services to its residents through numerous facilities, sports out of subdivisions and intensification lands throughout the City for the ten year timeframe. fields and play structures throughout the municipality. Specific locations of anticipated future growth are necessary for parks planning, especially for localized parks (i.e. neighbourhood parks, urban parks, etc.). For both Parks and Recreational facilities, a valuation of the historical service standard has been • Projections by Planning District were prepared for evaluating recreation facility needs. The prepared. It is substantiated by a comprehensive inventory and valuation of parkland development planning district allocations provided ten year growth at a scale conducive to examining future and recreation facilities for the preceding ten years. This valuation makes possible an objective growth within recreation facility catchment areas. comparison of the historical service standard with the proposed future needs. The comparison is necessary to demonstrate that no improvement in the future service standard is being incorporated Recreation into the DC rate calculations. Recreation Facilities Needs The inventories reflect an approximation of the current replacement value of nearly all Parks and The capital needs listed include two multi-purpose recreational facilities with various components. Recreation assets. The inventory includes valuation of all existing recreation facilities and takes into These facilities are planned in the Southeast and Northwest. Also included are two smaller-scale account the size, quality and nature of construction and land value (lands ancillary to facility only).2 Neighbourhood Community Centres planned in the North and Central areas of the urban area. Some non-parkland properties have been excluded from the inventory where the amenity or facility
is unique or unlikely to be replicated (for example golf courses are excluded from the inventory). The The 2017 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Interim Update identified a need for an indoor aquatic inventories arrive at an average per capita historical service level. facility for the ten year period that has been included as a component of the planned Northwest multi-
purpose recreation facility. This aquatic facility will serve both existing populations and future growth. By projecting the historical per capita service level using the future population increase, a ceiling level The Master Plan also identifies a need for new community centre/gymnasium space in each of the of expenditure at which the City would be maintaining existing service levels is calculated. This multi-purpose and Neighbourhood facilities it recommends. ceiling, or ‘cap’, is used to demonstrate that there is no increase to the existing service standard
included in the DC rate calculation as required under the Development Charges Act. The Master Plan Interim Update recommended new Field Houses and Spray Pads to serve growth areas.
2 The land valuation excludes the value of park land.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 82
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
Growth projections prepared for this DC Study were examined in comparison to the 2009 Master Plan development, and their need reflects an examination of growth projections and demographics and 2017 Interim Update to assess capital needs previously identified and the timing of facility in relation to the 2009 Master Plan standard for spray pads (1 spray pad per 4,500 children construction. Additional information on the projects contained in the 2019 DC Study is as follows: aged 0-14). Spray pads provide an important recreational amenity for the City’s children.
• Southeast Recreation Centre: The 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and 2017 Interim Determination of Growth Share of New Recreation Facilities Update identified the need for recreation facility components to be located in the southeast Growth/non-growth shares for projects identified in the 2014 DC Study were maintained. The growth part of the City. A recreation centre including an arena3, community centre and gymnasium is share of these projects was determined by defining a geographic service area for each of the existing planned. Apart from refined cost estimates, this project remains consistent with the 2014 DC facilities in the City. From this point, the benefiting area that would be served by each new multi- Study. At present a site for this facility is being sought, with construction anticipated to purpose facility was approximated. In one instance (Southeast) it was considered appropriate to commence in 2019. distinguish between the benefiting area of the pool in contrast to the benefiting area of the community • Northwest Recreation Centre: The 2017 Master Plan Interim Update identified the need for centre and gymnasium. a pool-anchored recreation facility over the 10 year period. The northwest portion of the urban area is developing and is not sufficiently served by a community centre, gymnasium or For new 2019 DC projects, a similar method was applied as used in the 2014 DC Study. First, community pool. A multi-purpose facility with these components is planned in this area for 2023 geographic service areas were identified outside of the boundaries of previously identified service based on population and housing projections, and standards established in the 2009 Parks areas. Second, the 2019 population for the new geographic service areas was compared to the total and Recreation Master Plan. future build-out population for each new multi-purpose and neighbourhood recreation facility. This fraction is used in the calculations to represent the benefit to existing development (i.e., the non- The Southeast Recreation Facility double icepad arena is replacing existing older arenas in the growth share). As in previous DC studies, it was considered appropriate to distinguish between the southern part of the city. As a result, no costs related to the arena portion are attributable to growth. benefiting area of the pool in contrast to the benefiting area of the community centre for the planned Northwest multi-use recreation centre.
• North and Central Neighbourhood Community Centres: The 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and 2017 Interim Update identified a need for Neighbourhood Community Centres One twin-pad arena is identified as part of the multi-purpose community centre in the Southeast. for the 10 year period. These facilities are intended to serve a smaller radius than multi-purpose 100% of the cost of these is allocated to existing development. This allocation is based on the recreation facilities. Based on the growth projections, two facilities are planned including one expectation that these ice surfaces will simply replace existing single-pad arenas intended for for the northern portion of the urban area (2025), and one for the central portion of the urban decommissioning in the future, and no arena needs related to growth are required. area (2027). These areas have been identified by City’s Neighbourhood, Children & Fire Services Service Area based on a lack of existing and planned municipal gymnasiums and The works needed to complete the multi-purpose facilities are what may be termed site development neighbourhood community centre space to accommodate the growth need. costs. These include land acquisition, design, site works, change rooms, architects fees and permits. The non-growth share of these works was determined in proportion to the non-growth share of the • Field Houses: Several field houses have been identified for DC funding. These buildings functional components (i.e. arena, community centre, gym and indoor pool), consistent with the generally provide washrooms, equipment storage and spray pad operations infrastructure for method used in the 2014 DC Study. district parks and sports parks. As such, the need for field houses are associated with growth- related sports park and district park development. With respect to Field Houses and Spray Pads, the benefit to existing development mirrors the district • Spray pads: Five spray pads have been identified for DC funding. These spray pads were park or sports park where the facilities will be located. Five future field houses presently lack precise identified in the 2017 Master Plan Interim Update. They are linked with district park locations and as such they have been allocated a 1/3 non-growth share.
3 The Southeast Recreation Facility double icepad arena is replacing existing older arenas in the southern part of the city. As a result, no costs related to the arena portion are attributable to growth.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 83
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
Determination of Post-Period Benefit of Recreation Facilities • Neighbourhood Parks are intended to serve as a focal point of a neighbourhood and are designed to serve the needs of the local neighbourhood by supporting both unorganized and The new facilities are expected to serve growth beyond the ten year planning horizon for this service organized activities and programs. Typical service/grade/seeding costs for neighbourhood component. As a consequence, it was necessary to estimate this post-period benefit and remove it parks are not included in DC calculation as these costs are a Local Service incurred by the from the rate calculations. Post-period benefit was approximated by looking at the portion of the subdivision Owner as per the subdivision agreement. Installation of soccer field amenities has future build-out population in the service area in the post-ten year horizon. This portion was then also been removed from DC calculation for the same reason because they form part of the removed from the rate calculation. typical service/grade/seed requirement. Infrastructure installed in neighbourhood parks
includes asphalt pathways, fencing, parking lots, trees, benches, bike racks, playground Other Deductions in Recreation Facilities DC Rate Calculations equipment, baseball diamonds/basketball courts, and infrastructure installation costs. Consistent with rate calculations for other soft services, the DC rate calculations for Recreation • District Parks are intended to serve groups of neighbourhoods and are designed with an facilities also reflect: emphasis on facilities for organized sports and unorganized activities. Costs associated with • An estimate of the portion of the costs in question that were collected in prior years as the Thames Valley Parkway (TVP), spray pads and field houses have not been included in represented by the uncommitted balance in the DC Parks and Recreation Reserve fund. This district park DC calculations. Typical service/grade/seeding costs for district parks are not amount is removed from the rate calculation so as not to overstate the amount that should be included in DC calculation as these costs are considered a Local Service incurred by the collected from the growth horizon in question (2019-2028). For Recreation facilities, this subdivision Owner as per the subdivision agreement. Infrastructure installed in district parks deduction amounted to approximately $2.8 million. includes asphalt pathways, parking lots, trees, benches, bike racks, playground equipment, soccer fields, ball diamonds, skate park infrastructure, and infrastructure installation costs. • Any capital grants, subsidies or other contributions from other sources that are anticipated for this service were also considered. In this case, there were no such contributions anticipated. • Urban Parks are relatively small spaces that provide a higher level of design quality and are intended to be focal points within neighbourhoods. The Urban Park category was • A calculation of the amount that would otherwise represent an improvement over the existing recommended by the 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update and incorporated into combined quantity/quality service standard (an improvement prohibited by legislation) is made. the 1989 Official Plan and London Plan. These parks are designed to accommodate large No service standard reductions are required for recreation facilities for the 2019 DC Study. public gatherings and evening use. Costs associated with increased hard surface areas and • The 10% statutory deduction which applies to most soft services (Parks, Recreation, Library, formal lighting have been included in the urban park DC calculation. Typical etc.), resulting in the removal of $1.9 million of project costs that will need to be funded from service/grade/seed requirements are not included in the urban park DC calculation as these non-DC funding sources. costs are a Local Service incurred by the subdivision Owner as per the subdivision agreement.
• Civic Spaces are small parcels of municipally owned land in the Downtown core and along Parkland Development older main street areas that are designed to a high standard. They are meant to accommodate large public gatherings/events. These parks are typically composed of hard surfaces, seating In determining capital needs for the 2019 DC Study, Parks Planning staff conducted a detailed areas, incorporate high end horticultural components and are fully lit. analysis of numerous park development projects for each category completed in recent years, as well as replacement costs associated with sample parks. The survey included parks of varying sizes, • Woodland Parks have typically been established and protected for their environmental project complexity and degree of amenities provided to establish a representative dollar per hectare significance and may have been identified by the City through a previous study or have a valuation that is applied to both parks contained in the service standard inventory and future growth- development-related Environmental Impact Study (EIS) with recommendations for their related parks projects. This valuation approach is consistent with the methodology used in the 2014 protection, management and enhancement. Smaller woodlands may not meet the test for DC Study. Definitions and descriptions of parkland types, infrastructure components and inclusions in the service standard per hectare valuation and future growth project cost estimates are as follows:
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 84
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
significance, but are retained for their aesthetics and as a recreational amenity. Infrastructure • Bridges and Tunnels are the City’s major recreational bridge and tunnel infrastructure. Given installed in Woodland Parks includes asphalt and woodchip trails, boardwalks, trees, strategic the scale of these facilities, they are calculated separately from the parkland type where they tree clearing, and infrastructure installation costs. are located. The DC rate for Bridges and Tunnels is a linear metre calculation.
• Major Open Space Networks generally buffers and protects natural features and is often linear in nature following tributaries of the Thames River, upland corridors or utility easements. Parkland Development – Capital Needs Open space includes asphalt pathway systems, boardwalks and/or bridges, trees, and The Parkland Development needs for the ten year time horizon are influenced by parkland additions infrastructure installation costs. Costs associated with significant woodlands are not included as identified through current or anticipated site-specific development approval processes and by in the Open Space DC rate calculation. recommendations contained in the 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan and 2017 Interim Update. • Open Space SWM is a new category that reflects the parkland development portion of To ensure there is no increase to the existing service standard as required by the Development Stormwater Management Facilities. Costs associated with Open Space SWM include asphalt Charges Act, several park development projects needed to accommodate the projected ten year pathway links. population have been removed from the Capital program. • Sports Parks are designed to accommodate multiple high-end sport fields and service larger • The Master Plan identified amenities and additions to the development of park space in areas in the City. These parks have Soccer fields and ball diamonds that are built to a higher neighbourhoods and districts (skate parks, basketball hoops, play structures, tennis courts, standard. Athletic fields in sport parks are often irrigated and fully lit. Costs associated with soccer fields, baseball diamonds & sports field development), as well as additions and the TVP, field houses and typical service/grade/seed conditions are not included in Sport Park extensions to the City’s inventory of natural open space and TVP. The park development DC calculation. Infrastructure installed in sports parks includes asphalt pathways, parking lots, projects identified for inclusion in the DC rate calculations are consistent with the Master Plan benches, trees, playground equipment, ball diamonds, soccer fields, irrigation systems, for Parks and Recreation Services and in conformity with the 1989 Official Plan and London lighting, volleyball courts, and infrastructure installation costs. Plan. Only those projects with a growth component are included in the list of Capital Needs. • Thames Valley Parkway (TVP) is the City’s multi-use pathway system which generally follows • The Neighbourhood Parks program addresses the development of new parks in growing the Thames River. Future extensions of the TVP will occur as lands along the branches of the areas of London. Of the twenty-two identified projects, fifteen relate to currently known or Thames River come under urban development. The DC rate for the TVP is a linear metre anticipated site-specific development approvals from 2019 to 2023. The seven remaining calculation. This calculation takes into account costs associated with routine structures found projects respond to future Neighbourhood Park needs from 2024 to 2028. along the pathway system (road underpasses, pedestrian bridges), as well as asphalt • The District Parks program services the development of new larger-scale parks in growing pathways, initial tree clearing, and tree planting. Costs associated with tunnels and large areas of the City. Projects identified in the Capital Needs list are consistent with the Master bridges are not included in the TVP DC calculation. These are captured under their own Plan. These future parks will be developed with a mix of amenities that are consistent with category. existing parks of this level. Five District Park projects relate to currently known or anticipated • Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs) are identified as components of the Natural site-specific development approvals from 2019 to 2023. Two District Park projects respond to Heritage System and include lands that are to be maintained in their natural state through future District Park needs from 2025 to 2028. appropriate management for the purposes for which they have been recognized. Costs • The 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommended the establishment of a new associated with the TVP abutting ESAs have not been included in the ESA DC calculation. A category of park: Urban Parks. This category was identified in the 2014 DC Study. These higher percentage for consulting (based on anticipated construction costs) has been parks reflect emerging development patterns and a movement toward improved walkability incorporated into DC calculation due to the level of review required for environmental and placemaking. The ten year Urban Parks program includes sixteen projects, of which approvals. In the 2019 DC Study, costs for conservation plans in individual ESAs have been eleven relate to currently known or anticipated site-specific development approvals from 2019 moved from the ESA category to the Corporate Growth Studies service. Infrastructure installed to 2023. Five Urban Park projects respond to future Urban Park needs from 2024 to 2028. in ESAs include asphalt and woodchip pathways, dirt trails, boardwalks, parking lots, bridges, benches, and infrastructure installation costs. • The need for Civic Spaces has been identified in Placemaking Design Guidelines, the
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 85
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
Downtown Master Plan, the London Psychiatric Hospital Plan and the Old Victoria Hospital • Through the DC Study process, it was identified by Parks Planning that the TVP replacement Secondary Plan. These projects provide city-wide benefits, while providing high-quality cost identified in the 2014 DC Study was incorrect. The $327/m was unchanged from the value amenity space for populations in the immediate vicinity. Two projects are identified over the identified in the 2009 DC Study; the correct 2013 replacement cost was actually $557/m that period. has been updated to $655/m in the 2019 DC Study. • Woodland Parks were established as a new category of parkland in the 2009 DC Study. • The Capital Needs in the Bridges and Tunnels category mainly support the recreational Historically, these parks were captured in the open space category. Woodlands have their bridge and tunnel infrastructure needed to connect growing areas of the City with the primary own category due to environmental considerations affecting trail development and unique tree recreational pathway system. Eight projects are identified, of which seven relate to approved hazard/environmental restoration needs. The Woodland Parks program includes eight or under review site-specific development applications. projects, six of which relate to approved or under review site-specific development applications. Two projects respond to future needs from 2024 to 2028. Rate Calculation Adjustments • The category reflects a park-type with a concentration of major sports-related Sports Parks Consistent with other rate calculations for soft services, the DC rate calculations for Parkland activities. The sports parks included in the capital needs are consistent with the Parks and Development reflect: Recreation Master Plan recommendations related to sports infrastructure requirements. Of the three projects identified over the ten year horizon, two reflect identified site-specific projects. • Gross cost of projects considered to benefit growth. One project responds to needs from 2024 to 2028. • Any capital grants, subsidies or other contributions from other sources that are anticipated for • The 1989 Official Plan and London Plan include numerous policies that speak to the this service were also considered. In this case, there were no such grants anticipated. importance of the city’s natural heritage system, and its role as a significant • An estimate of the portion of the costs collected in prior years is represented by the environmental/ecological resource, recreational asset and framework of the City’s structure. uncommitted balance in the Parks and Recreation DC Reserve fund. For Parkland Within the Open Space, Environmental, Parks and Recreation, and Services and Utilities development, this amounted to approximately $2.9 million. This amount is removed from the chapters of the 1989 Official Plan, policies that identify the importance of a linked and rate calculation so as not to overstate the amount that should be collected over the growth accessible natural heritage system are found. These policies direct that opportunities to horizon. enhance these linkages be pursued, and that these areas be protected. • As many of the areas targeted for new major facilities will grow over a number of years, a • The capital needs in the Major Open Space Network and Environmentally Significant Area portion of the costs associated with district parks, sports parks, civic spaces and TVP projects categories are also consistent with the existing policies and the recommendations of the Parks beyond 2024 are also deferred for inclusion in future rate calculations. These post-period and Recreation Master Plan relating to the development of a linked natural heritage system. benefits are removed from the ten year rate calculation. Estimates are inherent in the For open space areas that are not linked through the extension of the City’s primary allocations. This meets the statutory objective that the increase in need for service be recreational pathway system (the TVP), the Master Plan recommends that a fully linked attributable to the anticipated development. pathway system be developed. The projects identified in the Capital Needs include • components of the natural heritage system within growth areas that will be linked to the City’s The growth share for parks development projects is determined based on two categories: existing system of pathways. • Major future parks have the potential to draw users from locations across the city (i.e., • The capital needs in the TVP category are also drawn from the recommendations of the Parks district parks, ESAs, open space, sports parks, civic spaces and the TVP). Benefit to and Recreation Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan, and reflect the priorities established for existing development for projects in this category reflects the additional capacity built into the City’s multi-purpose pathway system. Through the public consultation process for the their design to serve more than the local growth needs and their probable use by residents Master Plans, Londoners identified improving the pathway network as the top priority for parks of the existing city. development. The projects identified extend the City’s existing linear parkway into growing • Local Parks are used by and benefit the local growth area (i.e., neighbourhood parks, urban areas of the City. parks, woodland parks and the majority of bridges and tunnels). Projects in this category do
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 86
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services
not have a benefit to existing development given that they are being constructed to service Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the new subdivisions in the immediate area of the park. These parks are built primarily for the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the immediate, local growth area and the benefit to existing development of these local parks is post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately remote. The 10% statutory deduction which applies to most soft services (Parks, Recreation, preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate Library, etc.), resulting in the removal of $3.5 million in project costs from the rate calculations. cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon. A calculation of the amount that would otherwise represent an improvement over the existing combined quantity/quality service standard (an improvement prohibited by legislation) is made. This amount ($2.6 million) is also removed from the rate calculation, all in accordance with the underlying legislation.
Allocation of Net Costs of Growth to Growth Types
There is no compelling case for attribution of capital costs associated with expansion of Parks and Recreation amenities to any group other than Residential growth (generally, population growth impacts Parks and Recreation capital needs, rather than non-residential employment growth). For this reason, 100% of growth costs have been attributed to Residential growth. This is consistent with the practice of previous DC Studies and many other municipalities in the Province.
Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation
The required Parks and Recreation projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Parks and Recreation projects are shown in Table F-15 and F-16.
Financing Costs
Table F-17 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Parks and Recreation projects for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC Studies (for both Park Development and Recreation Facilities combined); b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the ten year study period; d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 87
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-1 Summary Service Standard
Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Category 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Parkland Development $207,731.8 $213,530.0 $215,943.8 $220,659.4 $225,795.6 $236,629.5 $240,633.4 $242,869.1 $247,138.0 $258,452.1 Recreation Facilities $291,484.8 $316,769.3 $317,780.0 $318,259.3 $318,259.3 $318,260.3 $335,065.4 $337,436.0 $334,456.9 $326,792.3 Recreation Equipment $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 Total $500,321.6 $531,404.4 $534,828.8 $540,023.7 $545,159.9 $556,079.8 $576,888.7 $581,495.1 $582,784.9 $586,434.4
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $1,350.29 $1,423.33 $1,421.74 $1,421.85 $1,421.81 $1,436.71 $1,476.64 $1,474.75 $1,459.88 $1,451.21
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $1,433.82
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $1,433.82 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $70,400,562
1) Building, site improvements and contents derived from information compiled by City of London - Facility Services Division. Land values from information provided by Realty Services Division.
2) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building, land, and site improvements.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 88
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-2 Parkland Development Summary Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neighbourhood Parks Notes 1 & 2 $23,790.6 $24,225.6 $24,783.6 $25,579.7 $25,743.8 $25,493.5 $25,761.8 $25,663.4 $25,911.2 $25,911.2 Environmentally Significant Areas Notes 2 & 3 $4,476.3 $4,637.3 $4,662.2 $4,781.4 $4,819.5 $5,264.7 $5,134.3 $5,134.3 $5,243.7 $5,243.7 Open Space Notes 2 & 3 $27,149.3 $27,687.1 $28,502.4 $29,120.6 $29,947.5 $31,366.6 $33,945.8 $34,766.9 $36,692.5 $36,692.5 District Park Notes 1 & 2 $46,390.0 $49,430.4 $49,430.4 $50,477.3 $50,477.3 $50,007.2 $50,112.2 $50,861.3 $52,209.1 $48,153.1 Woodland Parks $1,269.1 $1,269.1 $1,451.7 $1,454.0 $1,792.1 $2,637.0 $2,831.3 $3,032.8 $3,111.0 $3,111.0 Urban Parks Note 2 $2,274.3 $2,274.3 $2,547.2 $3,638.8 $4,912.4 $5,813.0 $5,813.0 $5,813.0 $5,813.0 $5,813.0 Sports Parks Notes 1 & 2 $23,332.0 $23,332.0 $23,332.0 $23,332.0 $23,332.0 $23,924.8 $24,348.3 $24,348.3 $24,348.3 $24,348.3 City Wide Park Note 2 $11,847.6 $11,847.6 $11,847.6 $11,847.6 $11,847.6 $11,323.4 $11,323.4 $11,323.4 $11,323.4 $24,890.5 Civic Spaces $16,866.7 $17,173.3 $17,173.3 $17,173.3 $17,173.3 $24,073.3 $24,073.3 $24,073.3 $24,073.3 $24,073.3 Thames Valley Parkway Notes 2 & 3 $26,357.2 $26,416.2 $26,416.2 $26,897.6 $26,897.6 $27,313.5 $27,313.5 $27,313.5 $27,313.5 $27,313.5 Open Space SWM Block Pathways Note 8 $87.3 $87.3 $87.3 $87.3 $87.3 $87.3 $91.3 $93.7 $93.7 $93.7 Footbridges and Tunnels $15,220.8 $15,919.2 $15,919.2 $15,919.2 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $19,097.6 Springbank Park Notes 1, 2, 6 & 7 $8,670.6 $9,230.6 $9,790.6 $10,350.6 $10,910.6 $11,470.6 $12,030.6 $12,590.6 $13,150.6 $13,710.6 Total $207,731.8 $213,530.0 $215,943.8 $220,659.4 $225,795.6 $236,629.5 $240,633.4 $242,869.1 $247,138.0 $258,452.1 Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $560.64 $571.92 $574.04 $580.98 $588.89 $611.36 $615.94 $615.95 $619.08 $639.57
Level of Service per Capita $597.84
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $597.84 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $29,353,944
1) Includes pathways, minor footbridges (creeks & streams), driveways, parking lots, boardwalks, stairs, benches, plantings, play equipment, sportsfields, hard playing surfaces, irrigations systems, lighting and signage.
2) Excludes enclosed structures, major footbridges, wading pools, spray pads.
3) Includes pathways, driveways, parking lots, boardwalks, minor footbridges (creeks & streams), stairs, benches, plantings and signage.
4) Valuations were determined using a representative sample of all the parks in this category. A weighted average per hectare (2018) value was calculated, and this value applied to all parks (which all have similar level of development) in this category.
5) Values were determined through an individual approximation of 2018 replacement cost for each location.
6) Excludes the Pumphouse and all waterworks facilities, Springbank Dam, Civic Garden Complex, Springbank footbridge, Storybook Gardens, boat dock/shelter, train station, concession, and washrooms. Includes 2 picnic pavilions and train tracks.
7) The valuation for Springbank Park represents a park-specific replacement cost, rather than a $/ha cost.
8) Includes non-SWMF pathways only; all SWM works including structures, shared maintenance driveways/pathways, etc excluded.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 89
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-3 Facilities Summary Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Buildings Type of Measure Quantity
Type of Facility 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Arenas 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 Community/Senior Centres 140,587 206,948 211,334 213,116 213,116 213,116 251,394 251,394 246,988 246,988 Pools 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 Wading Pools/Spray Pads Special Facilities 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 Fieldhouses, Washrooms, etc. Total 254,988 321,349 325,735 327,517 327,517 327,517 365,795 365,795 361,389 361,389
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.69 0.86 0.87 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.93 0.91 0.89
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.87 1) Building, site improvements and contents derived from information compiled by City of London - Facility Services Division. Land values from information provided by Realty Services Division. Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Type of Facility 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Arenas $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 Community/Senior Centres $39,614.5 $63,386.2 $64,649.3 $65,128.7 $65,128.7 $65,128.7 $81,932.7 $81,932.7 $80,602.1 $80,602.1 Pools $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 Wading Pools/Spray Pads $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 Specialty Facilities $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 Fieldhouses, Washrooms, etc. $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 Total $58,006.7 $81,778.4 $83,041.5 $83,520.9 $83,520.9 $83,520.9 $100,324.9 $100,324.9 $98,994.3 $98,994.3
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $156.55 $219.04 $220.75 $219.91 $217.83 $215.79 $256.80 $254.44 $247.98 $244.97
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $225.41
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $225.41 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $11,067,631 1) The valuations above reflect the current (2018) replacement value of building, land, and site improvements.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 90
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-4 Equipment Summary Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Duncan Sanders Unit of Measure Number of Machines Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/machine Ice Resurfacing Equipment 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 $85,000 Total 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.0000351 0.0000348 0.0000346 0.0000342 0.0000339 0.0000362 0.0000358 0.0000355 0.0000351 0.0000346
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.0000350 1) Ice Resurfacing equipment is replaced on an 10 year cycle.
Contact Person(s) Duncan Sanders Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ice Resurfacing Equipment $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 Total $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,105.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0 $1,190.0
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $2.98 $2.96 $2.94 $2.91 $2.88 $3.07 $3.05 $3.02 $2.98 $2.94
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $2.98
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $2.98 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $146,318
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 91
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure Hectares of Parkland Type of Measure Quantity
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neighbourhood Parks Note 1 A. L. Furanna Park 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Admiral Park 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Ambleside Park 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.7 Arthur Ford Park 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Ashley Oaks Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Bellwood Park - East 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Bellwood Park - West 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Belmont Park 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Belvedere Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Bevledere Place Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Berkshire Park 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Blackacres Park 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Blackfriars Park 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Boyle Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Brookside Park 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Broughdale Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Butler Park 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Byron Hills Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Camden Crescent Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Cantebury Park 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 Capulet Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Carling Park 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 Carriage Hill Park 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Carroll Park 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Cayuga Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Cedar Hollow Park 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Cheltenham Park 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Chelsea Green Park 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Chesham Heights Park 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Cheswick Park 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Cleardale Park 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 Cnra Park 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Colville Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Coronation Park North 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 Coves - Elmwood Gateway 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Creekside Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Cresthaven Park 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Culver Park 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Dalkeith Park 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 92
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neighbourhood Parks Cont'd Doidge Park 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Duchess Avenue Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Dunkirk Place Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Earl Nichols Park 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 East Lions Park 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Ebury Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Empress Avenue Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Essex Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Evergreen Park 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Fairmont Park 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 Fanshawe Optimist Little League Park 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Farnsborough Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Flanders Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Forest Hill Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 Forest View Park 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Frederick Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Gainsborough Meadows 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Gartshore Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Genevive Park 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Glanworth Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Glass Avenue Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Grampian Woods 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Grand View Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Gretna Green Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Griffith Street Park 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Halls Mills Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Hastings Park 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 Hazelden Park 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Helen Mott Shaw Park 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 Helen Mott Shaw Park - West 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Heritage Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Heron Haven Park 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Hill Street Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Huntington Park 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 Huron Heights Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Huronview Park 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Jaycee Park 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Jubilee Park 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Kelly Park 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Kensal Park 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Kensington Park 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Lambeth Optimist Park 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Lambeth Veterans Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Laurier Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Lynngate Grove Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Maple Grove Park 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Mckillop Park 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 93
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neighbourhood Parks Cont'd Mcmahen Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Meander Creek Park 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Meredith Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Mildred Barons Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Mitchell Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Murray Park 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Naiomi Almedia Park 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Nelson Park 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Nicholas Wilson Park 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Northbrook Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Northcrest Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Northeast Recreation Centre 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Norwest Optimist Park 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Oak Park 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Oakland Avenue Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Odessa Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Past Presidents Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Paul Haggis Park 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Pawnee Park 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Pebblecreek Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Peppertree Park 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Powell Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Ralph Hamlyn Park 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 Reservoir Park 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 Richard B. Harrison Park 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 River East Optimist Park 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 River Forks Park 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 Rollingwood Circle Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Rosecliffe Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Rosel Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Rowntree Park 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Ruskin Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Scenic View Park 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 Sevilla Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Shaftesbury Park 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Sherwood Forest Park 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Smith Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Southcrest Park 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Southeast Optimist Park 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Southwinds Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Springbank Flats 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 St. Anthony'S Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 94
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Neighbourhood Parks Cont'd St. Lawrence Park 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 St. Stephen'S Park 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Stanhope Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Stephen'S Farm Park 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Summercrest Park 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 Sunrise Park 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.1 1.1 Talbot Park 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Thamesridge Park 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Thistledown Park 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Thornwood Park 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Trooper Mark Wilson Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 University Heights Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Village Green Park 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Virginia Park 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 Vista Woods 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.6 1.6 Walnut Woods 3.6 3.6 3.6 Water Oak Park 0.2 0.2 Wellingsboro Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Wenige Park 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Westdale Park 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Westbury Park 0.8 0.8 Westmount Lions Park 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 Westmount Park 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Whetherfield Park 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 Whisperwood Park 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Wilton Grove Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Windblest Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Wood Street Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Total 289.9 295.2 302.0 311.7 313.7 310.7 313.9 312.7 315.7 315.7 Number of Parks 134 138 141 145 149 150 152 151 153 153 Average Size (hectares) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 95
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Woodland Parks Beaverbrook Woods 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Briscoe Woods 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Burnett Woods 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Cheddar Woods 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 Clara Brenton Woods 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 Cresthaven Woods 2.7 2.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 Crestwood Woods 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Dragon Fly Woods 5.6 5.6 5.6 Egelton Woods 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 Fekete Woods 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 14.9 Forest Hill Woods 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Foxfield Woods 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Hickory Woods 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Highland Woods 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 Huron Street Woods 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 Lord Nelson Woods 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Northdale Woods 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 Powell Woods 3.6 3.6 Sandra Mcinnis Woods 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Somerset Woods 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Sovereign Woods 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.38 Talltree Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Three Valley Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Tokala Woods 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 Trafalgar Woods 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Viscount Woods 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Walnut Woods 0.1 0.1 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Wonderland Road Park 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total 56.3 56.3 64.4 64.5 79.5 117.0 125.6 134.5 138.0 138.0 Number of Parks 14 14 15 16 18 25 27 28 28 28 Average Size (hectares) 4.33 4.33 4.60 4.30 4.68 4.87 4.83 4.98 5.11 5.11
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 96
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Environmentally Significant Areas Ballymote ESA 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Coves ESA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Coves - East Pond Woods 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 Coves - West Pond Woods 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Euston Park ESA 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Elsie Perrin Williams Estate 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 26.6 Felner Subdivision - Medway Valley 5.1 Hyde Park Woods 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Kains Woods ESA 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 Kelly Stanton ESA - North 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 Kains Woods ESA - South 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Kelly Stanton South ESA 5.6 5.6 Kilally Meadows ESA 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 119.5 Kilally Woods ESA 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Kilally Woods ESA (Killarney) 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lower Dingman ESA 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 Meadowlily Woods ESA 43.8 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 Meadowlily Woods ESA (Killarney) 15.8 15.8 Medway Valley Heritage Forest ESA 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 Medway Valley Heritage Forest ESA - East 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Medway Valley Heritage Forest ESA - North 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 10.9 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 Medway Valley Heritage Forest ESA - South 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Miggsie Lawson Park 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 Naomee Park 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Sifton Bog ESA 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 South Thames Terraced Forest 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 Warbler Woods ESA 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.9 28.9 29.1 29.1 38.0 38.0 Westminster Ponds - East - Pond Mills ESA 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 Westminster Ponds - North East - Pond Mill 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 Westminster Ponds - Pond Mills ESA 113.4 113.4 113.4 113.4 113.4 113.4 99.2 99.2 99.2 99.2 Westminster Ponds - South - Pond Mills ESA 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 Westminster Ponds - South East - Pond Mill 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Total 593.6 615.0 618.3 634.1 639.1 698.2 680.9 680.9 695.4 695.4 Number of Parks 24 26 27 28 29 30 29 29 30 30 Average Size (hectares) 108.44 101.0 97.4 94.5 91.5 90.4 93.0 93.0 90.4 90.4
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 97
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Open Space Note 1 Adelaide Street Wells Park 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ann Street Park 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Ballymote Trail 0.5 0.5 Blackfriars Park - North 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Blackfriars Park 2.6 2.6 2.6 Boler Mountain Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Boler Road Park 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Braemar Block 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Burr Reed Woods 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Button Bush Wetland - South 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Button Bush Wetland - North 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Byron Pits Open Space 8.1 8.1 Byron River Valley 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.1 10.1 10.1 Byron View Park 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 10.6 10.6 Ceasar'S Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 Carfrae Park East 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Carfrae Park West 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Cavendish Park 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Cavendish Park - East 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Chelsea Green Park 2.3 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Charles Hunt Park 1.1 1.1 1.1 Chelsea Green - North 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Clarke Road Park 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 37.6 Clayton Walk Park 0.5 0.5 Coves - Elmwood Gateway 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Coves Lookout 0.2 0.2 0.2 Coves - Open Space 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 Creekside Meadows 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 Cresthaven Woods 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Deer Ridge Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 Devon Park 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 Dingman Creek Open Space 13.3 13.3 Dingman Wetlands 29.3 29.3 29.3 29.3 Eldon House 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Elron Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Euston Park 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Evergreen Park 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Fairhaven Park 0.6 0.6
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 98
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Open Space Cont'd Fairmont Trail 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Falls View Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Forest Hill 0.1 0.1 0.1 Forest Hill Pond 2.9 2.9 2.9 Fox Hollow Ravine - North 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Fox Hollow Ravine - South 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Gainsborough Valley Park 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Garden Plots 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Gibbons/Uwo Wetland 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Glen Cairn / Open Space 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 21.7 21.7 21.7 Gore Road Open Space 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Graham Place Park 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Grosvenor Lodge 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Hampton Valley 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 Herbert Park 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Highbury Wetland 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 Highbury Woods 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 Highview Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Hillside Ravine 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Hill Street Park 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Horton Park Central 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Horton Park North 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Horton Park South 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Huron Street Woods 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 Hutton Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Jalna South Park 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Kains Woods Trail 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 Kelly Stanton Esa - North 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9 Kilally Fields 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 18.3 Kilally Valley Park 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 Kilally Woods (Killarney) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Krupp Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 London Hyde Park Rotary Link 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 Longview Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Lord Nelson Woods 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Ltc - Brydges Park 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Marr Drain 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Mathers Stream 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 99
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Open Space Cont'd Mccormick Park 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Mcgarrell Walk 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Mcnay Drain - North / Open Space 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Mcnay Drain - South / Open Space 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Mud Creek East - North 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Mud Creek East - Central 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Mud Creek East - South 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Norlan Ave / Open Space 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Norlan Ave / Open Space - South 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 North Branch Park 1 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 10.4 North Mud Creek 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Northdale Tributary 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Northbrook Valley 9.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 Parkhurst Park North 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Parkhurst Park South 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 Pebble Creek Park Central 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Pebble Creek Park East 0.5 0.5 Pebble Creek Park West 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Pibline Park 1.8 1.8 Pincombe Park - North 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Pincombe Drain 0.8 0.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 Pinnacle Park - East 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Pinnacle Park - West 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Pottersburg Park 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 Pond Edge Berm 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Proudfoot Park - East 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Proudfoot Park - West 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Remembrance Gardens 0.5 0.5 0.5 Richmond Trail 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 River Forks Park - East 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 River Forks Park - West 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 River Road Park 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 Riverside Boat Launch 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Riverside Park 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 Riverside Walk 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 Ross Park 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Salisbury Open Space 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Scanlan Drain 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Sandra Mcinnis Woods 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Shelborne Park - North 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Shelborne Park - South 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Snake Creek 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.0 Snake Hill Open Space 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Somerset Woods 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 100
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Open Space Cont'd South Branch Park 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 South East Reservoir 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 South Mud Creek 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 South River Valley 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 Southcrest Ravine 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Southcrest Ravine - North 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Southwinds Park - North 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Sovereign Woods East 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 Staffordshire Park 1.1 1.1 Stoney Creek Meadow Marsh 0.7 0.7 Stoney Creek Valley - Central (Inc. East & West) 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 18.7 18.7 18.7 Stoney Creek Valley - North 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 Stoney Creek Valley - North Privet 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Stoney Creek Valley - South 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Stoney Creek Valley - South East 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 Stoneycreek Meadows 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Sun Valley Park 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Talbot Village Wetland 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 Talltree Park 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Tallwood Valley 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Tetherwood Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Third Street Park 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Thompson Ravine 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Thompson Road Park 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 Uplands North Wetland 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Uplands Trail 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 Valley Run Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Waldorf Park 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Walker Drain 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Watson Street Park 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 Waubano Creek - South / Open Space 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Waubano Creek - North / Open Space 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Wellington Valley 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 Western Counties H.O.C. Grounds 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 White Oaks Drain 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 White Oaks Drain South 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Wonderland Road Park 0.1 0.1 Woodhull 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 York Park 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total 469.5 478.8 492.9 503.6 517.9 542.4 587.0 601.2 634.5 634.5 Number of Parks 99 104 107 110 116 127 134 138 148 148 Average Size (hectares) 4.89 4.74 4.74 4.71 4.58 4.37 4.48 4.45 4.38 4.38 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 101
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 District Pa rks Note 1 Basil Grover Park 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 Bonaventure Meadows Park 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Carling Heights Optimist Community Park 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 Constitution Park 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 East Lions Park 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 Ed Blake Park 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 Foxfield District Park 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Glen Cairn Park - West 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Glen Cairn Park - East 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 Glen Cairn Park - North 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Gibbons Park 23.8 23.8 23.8 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 25.9 Greenway Park 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 38.8 Jesse Davidson Park 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Jorgenson Park 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Kiwanis Park - Central North 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Kiwanis Park - Central South (North Of CN) 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.1 Kiwanis Park - Central South (South Of CN) 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 17.8 26.3 26.3 Kiwanis Park - North 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.6 14.6 14.6 Kiwanis Park - South 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 Lambeth Centennial Park 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 Meadowgate Park 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.8 Medway Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Mitches Park 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 Oakridge Optimist Community Park 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 Osgoode Drive Park 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 Plane Tree Park 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Pottersburg Park 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 River'S Edge Disc Golf Course 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 Riverbend Park 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.4 10.4 10.4 Ross Park 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Silverwoods Park 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Southwest Community Centre 4.5 4.5 4.5 Southeast Optimist Park 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Southwest Optimist Park 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 Stoney Creek Community Centre 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Thames Park 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 West Lions Park And Kinsmen Recreation Centre 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Westminster Optimist Park 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 White Oaks Optimist Park 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 White Oaks Park 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Total 296.0 315.4 315.4 322.1 322.1 319.1 319.8 324.5 333.1 307.3 Number of Parks 32 34 34 35 35 38 38 39 39 38 Average Size (hectares) 9.25 9.28 9.28 9.20 9.20 8.40 8.41 8.32 8.54 8.09
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 102
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Sports Pa rks City Wide Sports Park 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 8.8 Glanworth Park 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Labatt Park 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Mornington Park 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 North London Athletic Fields 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 St. Julien Park 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 17.2 17.2 17.2 17.2 Stoneybrook Recreation Field 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 Stronach Park 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 Ted Early Sports Complex 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 Vauxhall Park 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.9 Windermere Fields 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 Total 110.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 113.0 115.0 115.0 115.0 115.0 Number of Parks 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 Average Size (hectares) 11.02 11.02 11.02 11.02 11.02 10.27 10.45 10.45 10.45 10.45
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Urban Parks Campbell Memorial Park 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 M A Barran Park 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Piccadilly Park 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Raleigh Parkette 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Sugarcreek Park 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Sugarcreek Park - Sugarcreek 0.3 The Green 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Vanderlinder Parkette 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 Village Walk Commons 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Total 2.5 2.5 2.8 4.0 5.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Number of Parks 3 3 4 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 Average Size (hectares) 0.83 0.83 0.70 0.80 0.68 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 103
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-5 Parkland Development Service Standard Cont’d
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 City-wide Parks Civic Garden Centre Complex 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 6.4 Covent Market Plaza 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Gibbons Park 25.9 Harris Park 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Ivey Park 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 Queens Park 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Victoria Park 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Wonderland Park 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 21.6 47.5 Number of Parks 7 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 Average Size (hectares) 3.23 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 4.32 4.32 4.32 4.32 7.91
Parkland Classification 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Civic Spaces Covent Market Plaza 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Golden Jubilee Square 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Ivey Park 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 R. H. Cooper Square 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Rotary Square 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Market Lane 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 Number of Parks 3 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 Average Size (hectares) 0.73 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52
Grand Total (hectares) 1,842.8 1,898.2 1,930.8 1,975.0 2,012.7 2,131.4 2,173.3 2,200.0 2,262.9 2,262.9 Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita (hectares per person) 0.004973 0.005084 0.005133 0.005200 0.005249 0.005507 0.005563 0.005580 0.005669 0.005600 Persons per hectare of Park Space 201.07 196.69 194.83 192.31 190.50 181.59 179.76 179.23 176.41 178.58
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.005356
1) Portions of larger District and Neighbourhood Parks are reported under the "Open Space" category . This allows the assignment of dif f erent v alues to portions of the park, appropriate to its lev el of dev elopment.
2) Open Space SWM category ref lects 25% of the area of SWM lands (excluding pond areas), and category includes only those lands managed by the Parks and Recreation Department.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 104
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-6 Parkland Development - Thames Valley Parkway Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure Metres of Linear Parkway Type of Measure Quantity
Thames Valley Parkway 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/m Linear Parkway (length in metres) 40,240 40,330 40,330 41,065 41,065 41,700 41,700 41,700 41,700 41,700 $ 655
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.1086 0.1080 0.1072 0.1081 0.1071 0.1077 0.1067 0.1058 0.1045 0.1032 Persons per Linear Metre of Parkway 9.2080 9.2575 9.3275 9.2488 9.3371 9.2818 9.3687 9.4556 9.5731 9.6906
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita (m./person) 0.1067
Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Thames Valley Parkway 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Value of Linear Parkway $ 26,357.2 $ 26,416.2 $ 26,416.2 $ 26,897.6 $ 26,897.6 $ 27,313.5 $ 27,313.5 $ 27,313.5 $ 27,313.5 $ 27,313.5
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $71.13 $70.75 $70.22 $70.82 $70.15 $70.57 $69.91 $69.27 $68.42 $67.59 Persons per Linear Metre of Parkway 14.06 14.13 14.24 14.12 14.26 14.17 14.30 14.44 14.62 14.79
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $69.88
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 105
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-7 Parkland Development - Open Space SWM Block Pathways Service Standard Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure Metres of Linear Pathway Type of Measure Quantity
Open Space SWM Block Pathways Note 1 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/m Cedar Hollow SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 161 City Wide Sports Park SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Devos Drive SWMF 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Dyer Crescent SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 Enterprise SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 Fanshawe Ridge North SWMF 25 25 25 25 Hamilton Road SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hyde Park 1B1 SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hyde Park North SWMF 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 Kains Woods SWMF (Oxford/Commissioners) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kains Woods SWMF (Riverbend Road) 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 Lambeth Centenial SWMF 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 McNay Drain SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mccormick SWMF 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Meander Creek Park SWMF 0 0 0 Meander Creek SWMF 0 0 0 Medway North SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Medway Valley SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Murray - Marr SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Northdale SWMF 0 0 0 Paul Haggis SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pincombe Drain SWMF #1 0 0 0 River Road Swm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shelborne SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Southwest Optimist SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summercrest SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ted Early SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trooper Mark Wilson SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Uplands North SWMF 15 15 15 Uplands SWMF 0 0 0 Walker Drain / SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wenige SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 White Oaks Drain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wickerson Road SWMF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wilton Grove SWMF - South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wiltongrove SWMF - North 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 542.0 542.0 542.0 542.0 542.0 542.0 567.0 582.0 582.0 582.0 Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.0015 0.0015 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015 0.0014 Persons per Linear Metre of Parkway 683.6310 688.8450 694.0590 700.7454 707.4317 714.1181 689.0229 677.4914 685.9107 694.3299
10 Year Average 1) Includes non-SWMF pathw ays only; all SWM w orks including structures, shared maintenance Quantity Standard per Capita (m./person) 0.0014 drivew ays/pathw ays excluded. City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 106
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-7 Parkland Development - Open Space SWM Block Pathways Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Andrew Macpherson Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Open Space SWM Block Pathways 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Value of Open Space SWM Block Pathways $ 87.3 $ 87.3 $ 87.3 $ 87.3 $ 87.3 $ 87.3 $ 91.3 $ 93.7 $ 93.7 $ 93.7
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $0.24 $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 $0.23 $0.24 $0.23 $0.23 Persons per Linear Metre of Parkway 4,246.16 4,278.54 4,310.93 4,352.46 4,393.99 4,435.52 4,279.65 4,208.02 4,260.31 4,312.61
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $0.23
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 107
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-8 Parkland Development - Foot Bridges & Tunnels Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Karl Grabowski Unit of Measure Square Metre of Deck (deck size of structure & length OR width and depth of tunnel) Type of Measure Quantity
Classification Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $sq.m. Thames Valley Pathway System Spingbank Bridge 1-FB-02 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 495 $5,339 Gibbons Bridge 1-FB-01 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 420 $5,599 Meadowlilly Bridge Note 1 4-FB-02 225 225 225 225 405 405 405 405 405 405 $10,752 King Street Bridge 6-FB-02 292 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 $8,415 Kiwanis Park over CN Rail Note 2 4-FB-07 125 $9,944 Tunnels Horton Ave to Evergreen Under CN Rail Note 1 6-PT-01 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 158 $13,093 Commissioners Rd West Near Oxford Note 1 7-PT-01 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 $7,428 Riverside Drive Pedestrian Tunnel 1-PT-04 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 $25,627 Bradley Ave at White Oaks PS 6-PT-01 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 $7,536 Total 1,873 1,956 1,956 1,956 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,136 2,261
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.005055 0.005239 0.005200 0.005150 0.005571 0.005519 0.005467 0.005417 0.005351 0.005595
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.0054
1) Bridge and tunnel sq. m. measures derived from AECOM "2017 Structure Inventory Inspection, Summary Report" and w ere provided by Transportation Design and Planning, City of London. The 2017 values w ere updated for inflation to derive 2018 $/sq.m. No land value associated
2) Meadow lily Footbridge w as rehabilitated in 2013, and this w ork expanded the useable deck area back out to the original structure dimensions
3) New - Kiw anis Park Bridge over CN Rail constructed in 2017-2018
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 108
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-8 Parkland Development - Foot Bridges & Tunnels Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Karl Grabowski Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Classification Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thames Valley Pathway System Spingbank Bridge 1-FB-02 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 $2,642.8 Gibbons Bridge 1-FB-01 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 $2,351.6 Meadowlilly Bridge 4-FB-02 $2,419.2 $2,419.2 $2,419.2 $2,419.2 $4,354.6 $4,354.6 $4,354.6 $4,354.6 $4,354.6 $4,354.6 King Street Bridge 6-FB-02 $2,457.2 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 $3,155.6 Kiwanis Park over CN Rail 4-FB-07 $1,243.0 Tunnels Horton Ave to Evergreen Under CN Rail 6-PT-01 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 $2,068.7 Commissioners Rd West Near Oxford 7-PT-01 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 $631.4 Riverside Drive Pedestrian Tunnel 1-PT-04 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 $1,640.1 Bradley Ave at White Oaks PS 6-PT-01 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 $1,009.8 Total $15,220.8 $15,919.2 $15,919.2 $15,919.2 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $17,854.6 $19,097.6
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $41.08 $42.64 $42.32 $41.91 $46.57 $46.13 $45.70 $45.28 $44.73 $47.26
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $44.36
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 109
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-9 Facilities - Arenas Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Area Type of Measure Quantity
Facility name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. Argyle 1948 Wavell St 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 49,260 $270 Carling(expanded) 675 Grosvenor St 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 52,390 $263 Farquharson 411 Tecumseh Ave 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 38,573 $262 Glen Cairn (Note 1) 370 Chippendale Cr 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 29,370 $261 Kinsmen(expanded) 20 Granville Ave 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 56,520 $261 Lambeth (expanded) 7112 Beattie St 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 38,519 $285 Medway 119 Sherwood Forest Sq 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 25,022 $273 Nichols(expanded) 799 Homeview Rd 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 75,560 $265 Oakridge (Note 1) 825 Valetta St 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 29,989 $266 Silverwood 50 Sycamore St 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 25,032 $258 Stronach (Gym) Expansion 1221 Sanford Ave 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 $267 Stronach (Arena/pool) Expansion 1221 Sanford Ave 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 61,888 $261 Western Fair Sportsplex (note 2) 865 Florence St 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 106,667 $125 Total 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 601,790 572,420
Number of Ice pads reflected in inventory 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 1.624141 1.611847 1.599739 1.584474 1.569498 1.554803 1.540380 1.526223 1.507489 1.416530
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 1.5535
1)Building square footage measures and total value provided by City of London Facility Services. Land value associated w ith facility provided by City of London Realty Services.
2) Facility w ith pool excludes the filter room associated w ith the pool.
3) Land ow ned and contributed by Western Fair Association & is excluded from "2018 $/sq.ft." values. Due to partial, but not complete use agreement, only tw o-thirds of the facility (total sq. ft of 160,000) value incorporated into Quality & Quantity Calculations
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 110
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-9 Facilities - Arenas Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Argyle 1948 Wavell St $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 $13,300.2 Carling(expanded) 675 Grosvenor St $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 $13,778.6 Farquharson 411 Tecumseh Ave $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 $10,106.1 Glen Cairn (Note 1) 370 Chippendale Cr $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $7,665.6 $0.0 Kinsmen(expanded) 20 Granville Ave $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 $14,751.7 Lambeth (expanded) 7112 Beattie St $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 $10,977.9 Medway 119 Sherwood Forest Sq $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 $6,831.0 Nichols(expanded) 799 Homeview Rd $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 $20,023.4 Oakridge (Note 1) 825 Valetta St $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 $7,977.1 Silverwood 50 Sycamore St $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 $6,458.3 Stronach (Gym) Expansion 1221 Sanford Ave $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 $3,471.0 Stronach (Arena/pool) Expansion 1221 Sanford Ave $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 $16,152.8 Western Fair Sportsplex (note 2) 865 Florence St $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 $13,333.3 Total $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $144,826.9 $137,161.4
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $390.87 $387.91 $384.99 $381.32 $377.72 $374.18 $370.71 $367.30 $362.79 $339.42
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $373.72
1) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building, land, and site improvements.
2) The City is a major contributor to the financing of the Western Fair Sportsplex (4 pad) w hen it w as constructed in 2000 ($5 million grant, $12 million loan). The City has a joint venture agreement w hich assures access to prime time ice at the 4 pad facility (240 hours
per w eek). The facility provides a significant contribution to the prime time ice needs of the City. The facility has been included to the extent of 2/3 of its total estimated replacement value to recognize the major tenancy position the City enjoys and as a conservative
estimate of the value this facility amongst the City inventory of arenas.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 111
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-10 Facilities – Community / Seniors Centres Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Building Space Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft Senior Centers Hamilton Rd Senior's Annex 898 Trafalgar Rd 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 2,780 $367 Hamilton Rd Senior's Centre 525 Hamilton Rd 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 5,836 $452 Kiwanis Senior Community Centre 78 Riverside Dr. 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 18,283 $529 Subtotal 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 26,899 Community Centers Boyle Community Centre 530 Charlotte 6,740 6,740 6,740 8,522 8,522 8,522 8,522 8,522 8,522 8,522 $269 Byron Optimist 1308 Norman Ave 3,904 3,904 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 $288 Lambeth Community Centre 7112 Beattie St 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 17,600 $350 North London Optimist Centre 1345 Cheapside St 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 55,200 $250 South London Community Centre 1119 Jalna Blvd 8,265 8,265 8,265 8,265 8,265 8,265 46,543 46,543 46,543 46,543 $439 Carling Heights Community Centre 656 Elizabeth St 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 43,030 $263 East Lions Artisans Community Centre 1731 Churchill Ave 4,406 4,406 4,406 4,406 4,406 4,406 4,406 4,406 $302 Springbank Gardens Community Centre 205 Wonderland Rd S 1,442 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 2,422 $306 Stoney Creek Community Centre 920 Sunningdale Rd E 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 65,381 $359 Subtotal 140,587 206,948 211,334 213,116 213,116 213,116 251,394 251,394 246,988 246,988 Grand Total 167,486 233,847 238,233 240,015 240,015 240,015 278,293 278,293 273,887 273,887
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Senior's Center Level of Service per Capita 0.0726 0.0720 0.0715 0.0708 0.0702 0.0695 0.0689 0.0682 0.0674 0.0666 Community Centres Level of Service per Capita 0.3794 0.5543 0.5618 0.5611 0.5558 0.5506 0.6435 0.6376 0.6187 0.6112 Total Level of Service per Capita 0.4520 0.6263 0.6333 0.6319 0.6260 0.6201 0.7123 0.7058 0.6861 0.6778
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.6372
1) Building square footage measures and total value provided by City of London Facility Services. Land value associated w ith facility provided by City of London Realty Services.
2) Above list does not include community and programming space provided at various non-community centre facilities (including the Canada Games Aquatic Center, Civic Garden Center and space at various arenas - Carling, Kinsmen, Medw ay, Nichols, Oakridge). These community and
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 112
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-10 Facilities – Community / Seniors Centres Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Seniors Centers Hamilton Rd Seniors Annex 898 Trafalgar Rd $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 $1,020.3 Hamilton Rd Seniors Centre 525 Hamilton Rd $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 $2,637.9 Kiwanis Senior Community Centre 78 Riverside Dr. $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 $9,671.7 Subtotal $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 $13,329.8 Community Centres Boyle Community Centre 530 Charlotte $1,813.1 $1,813.1 $1,813.1 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 $2,292.4 Byron Optimist 1308 Norman Ave $1,124.4 $1,124.4 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 $2,387.5 Lambeth Community Centre 7112 Beattie St $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 $6,160.0 North London Optimist Centre 1345 Cheapside St $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 $13,800.0 South London Community Centre 1119 Jalna Blvd $3,628.3 $3,628.3 $3,628.3 $3,628.3 $3,628.3 $3,628.3 $20,432.4 $20,432.4 $20,432.4 $20,432.4 Carling Heights Community Centre 656 Elizabeth St $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 $11,316.9 East Lions Artisans Community Centre 1731 Churchill Ave $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 $1,330.6 Springbank Gardens Community Centre 205 Wonderland Rd S $441.3 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 $741.1 Stoney Creek Community Centre 920 Sunningdale Rd E $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 $23,471.8 Subtotal $39,614.5 $63,386.2 $64,649.3 $65,128.7 $65,128.7 $65,128.7 $81,932.7 $81,932.7 $80,602.1 $80,602.1 Grand Total $52,944.3 $76,716.0 $77,979.2 $78,458.5 $78,458.5 $78,458.5 $95,262.6 $95,262.6 $93,932.0 $93,932.0
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Senior's Center Level of Service per Capita $35.98 $35.70 $35.43 $35.10 $34.76 $34.44 $34.12 $33.81 $33.39 $32.99 Community Centres Level of Service per Capita $106.91 $169.77 $171.86 $171.48 $169.86 $168.27 $209.72 $207.79 $201.91 $199.46 Total Level of Service per Capita $142.89 $205.48 $207.29 $206.58 $204.62 $202.71 $243.84 $241.60 $235.30 $232.45
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $212.28
1) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building, land, and site improvements.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 113
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-11 Facilities –Aquatics Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Indoor Building Area Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018$/sq.ft. Byron Bathhouse & Pool 1308 Norman Ave 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 $1,254 Canada Games Aquatic Center 1045 Wonderland N 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 51,248 $315 Carling Heights 656 Elizabeth St 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 11,690 $326 East Lions Artisans Pool (DEMOLISHED) 1731 Churchill Ave 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276 2,276 $1,553 Gibbons Park Bathhouse / Pool 2 Grosvenor St. 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 3,746 $50 Glen Cairn Pool Note 1 370 Chippendale Cres 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 $0 Northeast Park Community Pool 1050 Victoria Drive 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 1,690 $1,198 Northridge Bathhouse & Pool 15 Mclean Drive 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 1,540 $1,494 Oakridge Pool Note 1 825 Valetta Street 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 $0 Silverwood Bathhouse & Pool 56 Sycamore Street 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 3,720 $663 South London Community Pool 565 Bradley Ave 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 18,116 $238 Southcrest Bathhouse & Pool 10 Hazelwood Ave 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 4,636 $610 Stronach Pool Note 1 1221 Sandford Street 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 1,650 $0 Thames Park Bathhouse & Pool 15 Ridout Street South 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 5,264 $592 Westminster Park Bathhouse & Pool 650 Osgoode Drive 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 1,803 $1,045 Total 109,769 109,769 109,769 109,769 109,769 109,769 109,769 109,769 107,493 107,493
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.2963 0.2940 0.2918 0.2890 0.2863 0.2836 0.2810 0.2784 0.2693 0.2660
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.2836
1) Includes the filter & Pump room only. Change room space is included in space for adjoining arena, and therefore not duplicated here. The resulting value/sq.ft. is not comparable and is therefore not provided.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 114
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-11 Facilities –Aquatics Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Byron Bathhouse & Pool 1308 Norman Ave $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 $1,931.2 Canada Games Aquatic Center 1045 Wonderland N $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 $16,143.1 Carling Heights 656 Elizabeth St $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 $3,810.9 East Lions Artisans Pool (DEMOLISHED) 1741 Churchill Ave $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 $3,534.6 Gibbons Park Bathhouse / Pool 2 Grosvenor St. $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 $1,914.2 Glen Cairn Pool 370 Chippendale Cres $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 $1,266.5 Northeast Park Community Pool 1050 Victoria Drive $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 $2,024.6 Northridge Bathhouse & Pool 15 Mclean Drive $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 $2,300.8 Oakridge Pool 825 Valetta Street $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 $1,381.2 Silverwood Bathhouse & Pool 56 Sycamore Street $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 $2,466.4 South London Community Pool 565 Bradley Ave $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 $4,311.6 Southcrest Bathhouse & Pool 10 Hazelwood Ave $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 $2,828.0 Stronach Pool 1221 Sandford Street $3,450.0 $3,450.0 $3,450.0 $3,450.0 $3,450.0 $3,451.0 $3,452.0 $3,453.0 $3,454.0 $3,455.0 Thames Park Bathhouse & Pool 15 Ridout Street South $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 $3,116.3 Westminster Park Bathhouse & Pool 650 Osgoode Drive $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 $1,884.1 Total $52,363.5 $52,363.5 $52,363.5 $52,363.5 $52,363.5 $52,364.5 $52,365.5 $52,366.5 $48,832.9 $48,833.9
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $141.32 $140.25 $139.20 $137.87 $136.57 $135.29 $134.04 $132.81 $122.33 $120.85
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $134.05
1) Total value provided by City of London Facility Services.
2) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building, pool and site improvements.
3) Full replacement of concrete deck, pool tank, and all associated mechanical equipment/piping is included in overall cost.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 115
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-12 Facilities – Wading Pools & Spray Pads Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Number of Facilities Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/Facility Byron Wading Pool Charlotte Street 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Bonaventure Park Spray Pad 141 Bonaventure Drive 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Constitution Spray Pad 725 Grenfell Dr 1 1 $480,900 Doidge Park Wading Pool Wellington/Cheapside 1 $345,820 East Lions Wading Pool 1731 Churchill Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Fairmont Wading Pool 15 Gibbons 1 1 $345,820 Gibbons Park Spray Pad Victoria St 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Kinsmen Rec Center Wading Pool 20 Granville Av 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 West Lions Spray Pad 20 Granville Av 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Jesse Davidson Park Spray Pad Monte Vista/Ensign Cr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Kiwanis Wading Pool 311 Kiwanis Pk Dr 1 1 $345,820 Kiwanis Park Spray Pad 311 Kiwanis Pk Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 McMahen Wading Pool Adelaide Steet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Meadowgate Spray Pad 1165 Darnley Blvd 1 1 1 $430,400 Meredith Wading Pool Nelson/Maitland 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Murray Wading Pool Cliftonvale Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Oakridge Spray Pad 825 Valetta Street 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Ray Lanctin Park Spray Pad 1045 Wonderland Rd. N. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $439,100 Rowntree Park Spray Pad Whetter Ave/Trevithen St. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 Silverwood Wading Pool 56 Sycamore Street 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Smith Park Wading Pool Brampton Rd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Springbank Wading Pool Springbank Park 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 University Heights Wading Pool Trott Drive 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 White Oaks Wading Pool 1119 Jalna Blvd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $345,820 Lambeth Centennial Park Spray Pad Beattie Steet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $406,200 SE Optimist Spray Pad 237 Deveron Crescent 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $466,600 Forks of the Thames Spray Pad King St. & Thames St. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $576,400 Total 24 23 22 22 22 22 22 23 24 24
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.000065 0.000062 0.000058 0.000058 0.000057 0.000057 0.000056 0.000058 0.000060 0.000059
1) The follow ing pools incorporate a w ading pool, the value of w hich has been included in the value of the pool: 10 year average - Northeast Park Community Pool, - Stronach Pool Quantity Standard per 1,000 persons 0.00005912 - Northridge Bathhouse & pool, - Westminster Park Bathhouse and Pool
- Westminster Park Bathhouse and Pool
2) Spray Pads and Wading Pools are located in community parks acquired through Parkland Dedications
3) No land value computed w ith these facilities. Most facilities are located in Neighbourhood Parks or are located on very minor
land associated w ith each facility. City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 116
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-12 Facilities – Wading Pools & Spray Pads Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Byron Wading Pool Charlotte Street $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Bonaventure Park Spray Pad 141 Bonaventure Drive $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Constitution Spray Pad 725 Grenfell Dr $480.9 $480.9 Doidge Park Wading Pool Wellington/Cheapside $345.8 East Lions Wading Pool 1731 Churchill Ave $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Fairmont Wading Pool 15 Gibbons $345.8 $345.8 Gibbons Park Spray Pad Victoria St $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Kinsmen Rec Center - West Lions Pk 20 Granville Av $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 West Lions Spray Pad 20 Granville Av $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Jesse Davidson Park Spray Pad Monte Vista/Ensign Cr $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Kiwanis Wading Pool 311 Kiwanis Pk Dr $345.8 $345.8 Kiwanis Spray Pad 311 Kiwanis Pk Dr $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 McMahen Wading Pool Adelaide Steet $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Meadowgate Spray Pad 1165 Darnley Blvd $430.4 $430.4 $430.4 Meredith Wading Pool Nelson/Maitland $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Murray Wading Pool Cliftonvale Ave $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Oakridge Spray Pad 825 Valetta Street $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Ray Lanctin Park Spray Pad 1045 Wonderland Rd. N. $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 $439.1 Rowntree Park Spray Pad Whetter Ave/Trevithen St. $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 Silverwood Wading Pool 56 Sycamore Street $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Smith Park Wading Pool Brampton Rd $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Springbank Wading Pool Springbank Park $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 University Heights Wading Pool Trott Drive $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 White Oaks Wading Pool 1119 Jalna Blvd $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 $345.8 Lambeth Centennial Park Spray Pad Beattie Steet $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 $406.2 SE Optimist Spray Pad 237 Deveron Crescent $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 $466.6 Forks of the Thames Spray Pad King St. & Thames St. $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 $576.4 Total $9,194.5 $8,848.6 $8,596.1 $8,596.1 $8,596.1 $8,596.1 $8,596.1 $9,026.5 $9,507.4 $9,507.4
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $24.81 $23.70 $22.85 $22.63 $22.42 $22.21 $22.00 $22.89 $23.82 $23.53
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $23.09
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 117
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-13 Facilities –Specialty Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. Civic Garden Centre 625 Springbank Dr 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 $963 Civic Garden Greenhouse 645 Springbank Dr 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 13,036 $181 EW Curtis Gardens 605 Springbank Dr 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 6,240 $165 Labatts Park Grandstand 25 Wilson Ave 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 17,736 $223 Labatts Park Bleachers 25 Wilson Ave 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 2,850 $60 McManus Canoeing/Rowing Bldg 199 Wonderland Rd 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 6,127 $170 Springbank Gardens 295 Wonderland Rd 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 5,931 $253 Total 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196 58,196
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.15710 0.15590 0.15470 0.15320 0.15180 0.15040 0.14900 0.14760 0.14580 0.14400
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per 1,000 persons 0.15095
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Civic Garden Centre 625 Springbank Dr $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 $6,043.8 Civic Garden Greenhouse 645 Springbank Dr $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 $2,359.5 EW Curtis Gardens 605 Springbank Dr $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 $1,029.6 Labatts Park Grandstand 25 Wilson Ave $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 $3,955.1 Labatts Park Bleachers 25 Wilson Ave $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 $171.0 McManus Canoeing/Rowing Bldg 199 Wonderland Rd $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 $1,041.6 Springbank Gardens 295 Wonderland Rd $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 $1,500.5 Total $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2 $16,101.2
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $43.45 $43.13 $42.80 $42.39 $41.99 $41.60 $41.21 $40.83 $40.33 $39.84
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $41.76
1) Total value provided by City of London Facility Services. 2) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building, but exclude land and site improvements.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 118
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-14 Facilities – Fieldhouses Service Standard Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Citywide Fieldhouse 120 Meadowlily Rd S $1,669.5 $1,669.5 $1,669.5 $1,669.5 $1,669.5 $1,669.5 $3,019.1 $3,019.1 $3,019.1 Constitution Fieldhouse 725 Grenfell Dr $306.3 $306.3 Doidge Park Fieldhouse Grosvenor/Cheapside $97.7 Ed Blake Park 449 Barker St $286.9 $286.9 $286.9 $286.9 $286.9 $286.9 $548.9 $548.9 $548.9 Gibbons Park Picnic Shelter 15 Gibbons $29.0 $29.0 $29.0 $29.0 $29.0 $29.0 $29.0 $64.4 $64.4 $64.4 Gibbons Park Washroom 15 Gibbons $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 $43.9 Glanworth Fieldhouse Bradish Rd $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 $511.0 Greenway Park Washroom S/W Riverside & Wonderland $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 Basil Grover Park Washroom Wharncliffe/Commissioners $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 Harris Park Pavilion Harris Park $700.6 $700.6 Jesse Davidson Park Fieldhouse Monte Vista/Ensign Cr $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 $103.0 Kiwanis Park Fieldhouse #1 Trafalgar St/Pottersburg Creek $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 $153.1 Kiwanis Park New Fieldhouse Trafalgar St/Pottersburg Creek $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 $274.8 Lambeth Lawn Bowling Clubhouse 4326 Col Talbot Rd $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 $24.7 Lambeth Optimist WR & Concession Campbell St $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 $156.3 Lambeth Park Washroom #3 7112 Beattie St $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 $37.9 McKillop Pk Shelter / Washroom Riverside/Wonderland $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 $128.4 McMahon Park Bathhouse Adelaide St N $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 $753.8 Meadowgate Fieldhouse 1165 Darnley Blvd $292.2 $292.2 $292.2 Meredith Park Fieldhouse Nelson/Maitland $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 Mornington Fieldhouse 800 High Holborn St $397.4 $397.4 Murray Playground Fieldhouse Tecumseh/Wharncliffe $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 North London Fieldhouse 1225 Adelaide St N $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 $744.3 Oakridge Acres Fieldhouse Tarbutt/Valetta $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 $389.7 Reservoir Park Washroom Commissioners/Crestwood $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 $42.4 Ralph Hamlyn Park Washroom #1 East End Dennis Ave $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 $208.5 Rowntree Playground Fieldhouse Whetter/Fairview $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 $147.6 Smith Playground Service Building Brampton/Cheapside $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 Southeast Optimist Fieldhouse Deveron Cres $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 $218.7 Southwest Optimist Fieldhouse Deveron Cres $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 $333.0 Springbank Park Concession # 1 Commissioners/Springbank $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 $167.0 Springbank Park New Fieldhouse Commissioners/Springbank $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 $384.7 Springbank Park Old Pump House Commissioners/Springbank $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 $2,998.8 St. Julien Park Fieldhouse 81 Sanders St $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 $92.2 Stoneybrook Washrooms 747 Windermere Rd $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 $149.9 Stronach Ball Diamond Service Building Huron/Highbury/Sanford $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 $346.6 Thames Park Fieldhouse 55 Ridout St S $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 $217.7 Univ. Heights Fieldhouse Trott Dr/Coombs $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 $148.2 Vauxhaul Park Fieldhouse 59 Price St/Homan $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 $312.8 Victoria Park Bandshell 580 Clarence St $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 $3,308.6 Victoria Park Outdoor Rink 580 Clarence St $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 $1,276.7 Springbank Park Washrooms Commissioners/Springbank $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 $161.4 Covent Gardens Outdoor Rink Covent Garden Market $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 $1,097.8 Total $16,054.4 $17,913.1 $17,913.1 $17,913.1 $17,913.1 $17,913.1 $17,913.1 $19,852.3 $21,256.6 $21,256.6
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $43.33 $47.98 $47.62 $47.16 $46.72 $46.28 $45.85 $50.35 $53.25 $52.60 1) The valuations above include the current (2018) replacement value of building only. Other site
10 Year Average improvements are included in the value of the parkland. Values w ere determined through an individual City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Level of Service per Capita $48.11 approximation of the replacement value of each facility. Page 119
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Neighbourhood Parks
DC14-PR00017 Drewlo Edge Valley (39T-05505) 2019 $82.1 $.0 $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $8.2 $73.9 $6.0 $67.8 100.0% $67.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00027 Jackson Road (39T-06507) 2019 $139.5 $.0 $.0 $139.5 0.0% $.0 $139.5 0.0% $.0 $14.0 $125.6 $10.3 $115.3 100.0% $115.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05001 Deer Ridge Park Area 2020 $41.0 $.0 $.0 $41.0 0.0% $.0 $41.0 0.0% $.0 $4.1 $36.9 $3.0 $33.9 100.0% $33.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05002 Drewlo Edge Valley - #2 (39T-05505) 2020 $32.8 $.0 $.0 $32.8 0.0% $.0 $32.8 0.0% $.0 $3.3 $29.5 $2.4 $27.1 100.0% $27.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00022 Kent Subdivision (39T-04510) 2020 $73.9 $.0 $.0 $73.9 0.0% $.0 $73.9 0.0% $.0 $7.4 $66.5 $5.4 $61.0 100.0% $61.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05003 Richardson (39T-15501) 2020 $139.5 $.0 $.0 $139.5 0.0% $.0 $139.5 0.0% $.0 $14.0 $125.6 $10.3 $115.3 100.0% $115.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05004 Warbler Woods Ph. 2 (39T-16502) 2020 $106.7 $.0 $.0 $106.7 0.0% $.0 $106.7 0.0% $.0 $10.7 $96.0 $7.9 $88.2 100.0% $88.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00023 Applewood (39T-09501) 2021 $82.1 $.0 $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $8.2 $73.9 $6.0 $67.8 100.0% $67.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05005 Sifton - Kilally Road (2023) 2023 $82.1 $.0 $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $82.1 0.0% $.0 $8.2 $73.9 $6.0 $67.8 100.0% $67.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05006 Talbot Village-Southside (39T-14506) 2021 $102.6 $.0 $.0 $102.6 0.0% $.0 $102.6 0.0% $.0 $10.3 $92.3 $7.6 $84.8 100.0% $84.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05007 Lambeth - York (39T-17503) 2022 $114.9 $.0 $.0 $114.9 0.0% $.0 $114.9 0.0% $.0 $11.5 $103.4 $8.5 $94.9 100.0% $94.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00029 LPH Dundas 2023 $173.2 $.0 $.0 $173.2 0.0% $.0 $173.2 0.0% $.0 $17.3 $155.8 $12.8 $143.1 100.0% $143.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00020 Ross Lands North (39T-07502) 2023 $114.9 $.0 $.0 $114.9 0.0% $.0 $114.9 0.0% $.0 $11.5 $103.4 $8.5 $94.9 100.0% $94.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00021 Ross Lands South (39T-07502) 2023 $28.7 $.0 $.0 $28.7 0.0% $.0 $28.7 0.0% $.0 $2.9 $25.9 $2.1 $23.7 100.0% $23.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05008 Copps - Lambeth 2023 $41.0 $.0 $.0 $41.0 0.0% $.0 $41.0 0.0% $.0 $4.1 $36.9 $3.0 $33.9 100.0% $33.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05009 Future Neighbourhood Parks (Central) 2024 $65.7 $.0 $.0 $65.7 0.0% $.0 $65.7 0.0% $.0 $6.6 $59.1 $4.8 $54.3 100.0% $54.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05010 Future Neighbourhood Parks (N/W) 2024 $90.3 $.0 $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.7 $74.6 100.0% $74.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05011 Future Neighbourhood Parks (N/E) 2024 $90.3 $.0 $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.7 $74.6 100.0% $74.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05012 Future Neighbourhood Parks (S/E) 2025 $90.3 $.0 $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.7 $74.6 100.0% $74.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05013 Future Neighbourhood Parks (S/W) 2025 $90.3 $.0 $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.7 $74.6 100.0% $74.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05014 Future Neighbourhood Parks (S/W) 2026 $90.3 $.0 $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $90.3 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.7 $74.6 100.0% $74.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05015 Future Neighbourhood Parks (Central) 2027 $65.7 $.0 $.0 $65.7 0.0% $.0 $65.7 0.0% $.0 $6.6 $59.1 $4.8 $54.3 100.0% $54.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,937.6 $.0 $.0 $1,937.6 0.0% $.0 $1,937.6 0.0% $.0 $193.8 $1,743.8 $142.7 $1,601.1 100.0% $1,601.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 120
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
District Parks 0.0%
DC14-PR00035 Southwest District Pk 2019 $940.3 $.0 $.0 $940.3 0.0% $.0 $940.3 33.0% $310.3 $63.0 $567.0 $46.4 $520.6 100.0% $520.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00034 District Park in OVHL Thames Corridor 2019 $517.2 $.0 $450.0 $67.2 0.0% $.0 $67.2 33.0% $22.2 $4.5 $40.5 $3.3 $37.2 100.0% $37.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05016 Hunt Lands - Auburn (39T-12503) 2020 $141.1 $.0 $.0 $141.1 0.0% $.0 $141.1 33.0% $46.5 $9.5 $85.1 $7.0 $78.1 100.0% $78.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00036 Beaverbrook/Esam (39T-99502) 2022 $987.4 $.0 $.0 $987.4 0.0% $.0 $987.4 33.0% $325.8 $66.2 $595.4 $48.7 $546.6 100.0% $546.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00033 Clarke Subdivision (39T-05511) 2023 $203.7 $.0 $.0 $203.7 0.0% $.0 $203.7 33.0% $67.2 $13.7 $122.9 $10.1 $112.8 100.0% $112.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05017 Future District Parks (N/W or N/E) 2025 $783.6 $.0 $.0 $783.6 10.0% $78.4 $705.3 33.0% $232.7 $47.3 $425.3 $34.8 $390.5 100.0% $390.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05018 Future District Parks (S/W or S/E) 2028 $783.6 $.0 $.0 $783.6 20.0% $156.7 $626.9 33.0% $206.9 $42.0 $378.0 $30.9 $347.1 100.0% $347.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $4,356.9 $.0 $450.0 $3,906.9 6.0% $235.1 $3,671.8 33.0% $1,211.7 $246.0 $2,214.1 $181.2 $2,032.9 100.0% $2,032.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Urban Parks
DC14-PR00040 Urban Park in OVHL Thames Corridor 2019 $909.7 $.0 $850.0 $59.7 30.0% $17.9 $41.8 0.0% $.0 $4.2 $37.6 $3.1 $34.5 100.0% $34.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05019 Kent Subdivision (39T-04510) 2020 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $54.6 $491.2 $40.2 $451.0 100.0% $451.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05020 Corlon Sunninglea (39T-16504) 2020 $181.9 $.0 $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $18.2 $163.7 $13.4 $150.3 100.0% $150.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00042 Hydro Lands 2020 $454.9 $.0 $.0 $454.9 0.0% $.0 $454.9 0.0% $.0 $45.5 $409.4 $33.5 $375.9 100.0% $375.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05021 Richardson (39T-15501) 2020 $909.7 $.0 $.0 $909.7 0.0% $.0 $909.7 0.0% $.0 $91.0 $818.7 $67.0 $751.7 100.0% $751.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05022 Warbler Woods Ph. 2 Trail Heads (39T-16502) 2020 $181.9 $.0 $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $18.2 $163.7 $13.4 $150.3 100.0% $150.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05023 Centre Street /Drewlo (39T-12501) 2020 $181.9 $.0 $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $18.2 $163.7 $13.4 $150.3 100.0% $150.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05024 Jackson (39T-06507) 2021 $909.7 $.0 $.0 $909.7 0.0% $.0 $909.7 0.0% $.0 $91.0 $818.7 $67.0 $751.7 100.0% $751.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05025 Riverbend - Kains TVP Trail Head (39T-17501) 2021 $181.9 $.0 $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $181.9 0.0% $.0 $18.2 $163.7 $13.4 $150.3 100.0% $150.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00041 Applewood Urban Park (39T-09501) 2022 $618.6 $.0 $.0 $618.6 0.0% $.0 $618.6 0.0% $.0 $61.9 $556.7 $45.6 $511.2 100.0% $511.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05026 Tennant Hyde Park 2023 $363.9 $.0 $.0 $363.9 0.0% $.0 $363.9 0.0% $.0 $36.4 $327.5 $26.8 $300.7 100.0% $300.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05027 Future Urban Parks (N/W) 2024 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $54.6 $491.2 $40.2 $451.0 100.0% $451.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 121
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Urban Parks Cont'd 0.0%
DC19-PR05028 Future Urban Parks (N/E) 2025 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $54.6 $491.2 $40.2 $451.0 100.0% $451.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05029 Future Urban Parks (S/W) 2026 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $545.8 0.0% $.0 $54.6 $491.2 $40.2 $451.0 100.0% $451.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05030 Future Urban Parks (S/E) 2027 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 20.0% $109.2 $436.7 0.0% $.0 $43.7 $393.0 $32.2 $360.8 100.0% $360.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05031 Future Urban Parks (Central) 2028 $545.8 $.0 $.0 $545.8 20.0% $109.2 $436.7 0.0% $.0 $43.7 $393.0 $32.2 $360.8 100.0% $360.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $8,169.2 $.0 $850.0 $7,319.2 3.2% $236.2 $7,082.9 0.0% $.0 $708.3 $6,374.6 $521.8 $5,852.8 100.0% $5,852.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Civic Spaces
DC19-PR05032 Future Civic Spaces (Central) 2021 $1,533.3 $.0 $.0 $1,533.3 0.0% $.0 $1,533.3 75.0% $1,150.0 $38.3 $345.0 $28.2 $316.8 100.0% $316.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05033 Future Civic Spaces (Central) 2023 $3,066.7 $.0 $.0 $3,066.7 0.0% $.0 $3,066.7 75.0% $2,300.0 $76.7 $690.0 $56.5 $633.5 100.0% $633.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $4,600.0 $.0 $.0 $4,600.0 0.0% $.0 $4,600.0 75.0% $3,450.0 $115.0 $1,035.0 $84.7 $950.3 100.0% $950.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Woodland Parks
DC19-PR05034 Kent Subdivision (39T-04510) 2020 $33.8 $.0 $.0 $33.8 0.0% $.0 $33.8 0.0% $.0 $3.4 $30.4 $2.5 $27.9 100.0% $27.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00053 Summerside Wetland (39T-92020) 2020 $509.4 $.0 $.0 $509.4 0.0% $.0 $509.4 0.0% $.0 $50.9 $458.5 $37.5 $421.0 100.0% $421.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Old Victoria Hospital Lands Woodlands (Wellington- DC19-PR05035 2020 $58.6 $.0 $.0 $58.6 0.0% $.0 $58.6 0.0% $.0 $5.9 $52.7 $4.3 $48.4 100.0% $48.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Maitland)
DC19-PR05036 Talbot Village-Southside (39T-14506) 2021 $94.7 $.0 $.0 $94.7 0.0% $.0 $94.7 0.0% $.0 $9.5 $85.2 $7.0 $78.2 100.0% $78.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00052 Jackson 2 - Woodlots (39T-06507) 2022 $184.8 $.0 $.0 $184.8 0.0% $.0 $184.8 0.0% $.0 $18.5 $166.4 $13.6 $152.7 100.0% $152.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05037 Lambeth - York (39T-17503) 2023 $198.4 $.0 $.0 $198.4 0.0% $.0 $198.4 0.0% $.0 $19.8 $178.5 $14.6 $163.9 100.0% $163.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05038 Future Sigificant Woodlands 2024 $90.2 $.0 $.0 $90.2 0.0% $.0 $90.2 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.6 $74.5 100.0% $74.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05039 Future Significant Woodlands 2025 $90.2 $.0 $.0 $90.2 0.0% $.0 $90.2 0.0% $.0 $9.0 $81.2 $6.6 $74.5 100.0% $74.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,260.1 $.0 $.0 $1,260.1 0.0% $.0 $1,260.1 0.0% $.0 $126.0 $1,134.1 $92.8 $1,041.3 100.0% $1,041.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Major Open Space Network
DC14-PR00075 Kent Subdivision (39T-04510) 2019 $57.8 $.0 $.0 $57.8 0.0% $.0 $57.8 25.0% $14.5 $4.3 $39.0 $3.2 $35.8 100.0% $35.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00058 Marsman Stoney Creek (39T-04512) 2019 $27.8 $.0 $.0 $27.8 0.0% $.0 $27.8 25.0% $6.9 $2.1 $18.7 $1.5 $17.2 100.0% $17.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00065 Old Oak Richmond North 2019 $69.4 $.0 $.0 $69.4 0.0% $.0 $69.4 25.0% $17.3 $5.2 $46.8 $3.8 $43.0 100.0% $43.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 122
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Major Open Space Cont'd 0.0%
DC19-PR05040 Hyde Park CP underpass - Sarnia 2020 $215.0 $.0 $.0 $215.0 0.0% $.0 $215.0 25.0% $53.8 $16.1 $145.1 $11.9 $133.2 100.0% $133.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Sarnia Road - link btwn CP ped bridge East & south to DC19-PR05041 2020 $190.0 $.0 $.0 $190.0 0.0% $.0 $190.0 25.0% $47.5 $14.3 $128.3 $10.5 $117.8 100.0% $117.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Road Crossings
DC14-PR00080 Centre Street/Drewlo (39T-12501) 2020 $456.8 $.0 $.0 $456.8 0.0% $.0 $456.8 25.0% $114.2 $34.3 $308.4 $25.2 $283.1 100.0% $283.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00085 Corlon Sunninglea (39T-16504) 2020 $202.4 $.0 $.0 $202.4 0.0% $.0 $202.4 25.0% $50.6 $15.2 $136.6 $11.2 $125.4 100.0% $125.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00079 Graham Place - Southside (39T-09503) 2020 $92.5 $.0 $.0 $92.5 0.0% $.0 $92.5 25.0% $23.1 $6.9 $62.5 $5.1 $57.3 100.0% $57.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00083 Hunt Lands - Auburn (39T-12503) 2020 $214.0 $.0 $.0 $214.0 0.0% $.0 $214.0 25.0% $53.5 $16.0 $144.4 $11.8 $132.6 100.0% $132.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05042 Norquay South/Riverbend (39T-17501) 2020 $115.7 $.0 $.0 $115.7 0.0% $.0 $115.7 25.0% $28.9 $8.7 $78.1 $6.4 $71.7 100.0% $71.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05043 Richardson (39T-15501) 2020 $231.3 $.0 $.0 $231.3 0.0% $.0 $231.3 25.0% $57.8 $17.3 $156.1 $12.8 $143.4 100.0% $143.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05044 Warbler Woods Ph. 2 (39T-16502) 2020 $86.7 $.0 $.0 $86.7 0.0% $.0 $86.7 25.0% $21.7 $6.5 $58.5 $4.8 $53.8 100.0% $53.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05045 Warbler Woods South - Link to Byron Baseline 2020 $208.2 $.0 $.0 $208.2 0.0% $.0 $208.2 25.0% $52.0 $15.6 $140.5 $11.5 $129.0 100.0% $129.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00076 Applewood (39T-09501) 2021 $289.1 $.0 $.0 $289.1 0.0% $.0 $289.1 25.0% $72.3 $21.7 $195.2 $16.0 $179.2 100.0% $179.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05046 Corlon Golf Course (39T-05508) 2021 $335.4 $.0 $.0 $335.4 0.0% $.0 $335.4 25.0% $83.8 $25.2 $226.4 $18.5 $207.9 100.0% $207.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05047 Jackson Woodland Buffers (39T-06507) 2021 $306.5 $.0 $.0 $306.5 0.0% $.0 $306.5 25.0% $76.6 $23.0 $206.9 $16.9 $189.9 100.0% $189.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05048 Sifton - Kilally Road (2023) 2023 $109.9 $.0 $.0 $109.9 0.0% $.0 $109.9 25.0% $27.5 $8.2 $74.2 $6.1 $68.1 100.0% $68.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05049 Beaverbrook/Esam (39T-99502) 2022 $306.5 $.0 $.0 $306.5 0.0% $.0 $306.5 25.0% $76.6 $23.0 $206.9 $16.9 $189.9 100.0% $189.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05050 Lambeth - York (39T-17503) 2022 $86.7 $.0 $.0 $86.7 0.0% $.0 $86.7 25.0% $21.7 $6.5 $58.5 $4.8 $53.8 100.0% $53.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05051 Tennant Hyde Park 2022 $40.5 $.0 $.0 $40.5 0.0% $.0 $40.5 25.0% $10.1 $3.0 $27.3 $2.2 $25.1 100.0% $25.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05052 Vista Woods -Southside (39T-03505) 2022 $92.5 $.0 $.0 $92.5 0.0% $.0 $92.5 25.0% $23.1 $6.9 $62.5 $5.1 $57.3 100.0% $57.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00077 Comfort Lands -Sergautis (39T-11502) 2023 $104.1 $.0 $.0 $104.1 0.0% $.0 $104.1 25.0% $26.0 $7.8 $70.3 $5.8 $64.5 100.0% $64.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05053 Hyman Development - east of Hamlyn Park 2023 $925.2 $.0 $.0 $925.2 0.0% $.0 $925.2 25.0% $231.3 $69.4 $624.5 $51.1 $573.4 100.0% $573.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00084 LPH Dundas 2023 $86.7 $.0 $.0 $86.7 0.0% $.0 $86.7 25.0% $21.7 $6.5 $58.5 $4.8 $53.8 100.0% $53.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 123
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Major Open Space Cont'd 0.0%
DC14-PR00073 Ross Lands South (39T-07502) 2023 $34.1 $.0 $.0 $34.1 0.0% $.0 $34.1 25.0% $8.5 $2.6 $23.0 $1.9 $21.1 100.0% $21.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05054 Copps - Lambeth 2023 $578.3 $.0 $.0 $578.3 0.0% $.0 $578.3 25.0% $144.6 $43.4 $390.3 $32.0 $358.4 100.0% $358.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00074 CPRI 2023 $1,619.1 $.0 $.0 $1,619.1 0.0% $.0 $1,619.1 25.0% $404.8 $121.4 $1,092.9 $89.5 $1,003.5 100.0% $1,003.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05055 Byron - Southside (39T-15503) 2023 $75.2 $.0 $.0 $75.2 0.0% $.0 $75.2 25.0% $18.8 $5.6 $50.7 $4.2 $46.6 100.0% $46.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05056 Open Space SWM Block Pathway Connections 2019-2028 $150.0 $.0 $.0 $150.0 0.0% $.0 $150.0 25.0% $37.5 $11.3 $101.3 $8.3 $92.962 100.0% $93.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05057 Future Open Space Parks (N/W) 2024 $693.9 $.0 $.0 $693.9 0.0% $.0 $693.9 25.0% $173.5 $52.0 $468.4 $38.3 $430.1 100.0% $430.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05058 Future Open Space Parks (N/E) 2025 $693.9 $.0 $.0 $693.9 0.0% $.0 $693.9 25.0% $173.5 $52.0 $468.4 $38.3 $430.1 100.0% $430.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05059 Future Open Space Parks (S/W) 2026 $693.9 $.0 $.0 $693.9 0.0% $.0 $693.9 25.0% $173.5 $52.0 $468.4 $38.3 $430.1 100.0% $430.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05060 Future Open Space Parks (S/E) 2027 $693.9 $.0 $.0 $693.9 0.0% $.0 $693.9 25.0% $173.5 $52.0 $468.4 $38.3 $430.1 100.0% $430.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $10,083.0 $.0 $.0 $10,083.0 0.0% $.0 $10,083.0 25.0% $2,520.7 $756.2 $6,806.0 $557.1 $6,248.9 100.0% $6,248.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Sports Parks
DC14-PR00087 Southwest Sports Park 2019 $1,693.8 $.0 $.0 $1,693.8 0.0% $.0 $1,693.8 25.0% $423.4 $127.0 $1,143.3 $93.6 $1,049.7 100.0% $1,049.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05061 Expand Ralph Hamlyn Park (Hyman Dev) 2021 $1,905.5 $.0 $.0 $1,905.5 0.0% $.0 $1,905.5 25.0% $476.4 $142.9 $1,286.2 $105.3 $1,180.9 100.0% $1,180.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05062 Future Sports Parks 2022 $1,482.1 $.0 $.0 $1,482.1 0.0% $.0 $1,482.1 25.0% $370.5 $111.2 $1,000.4 $81.9 $918.5 100.0% $918.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $5,081.4 $.0 $.0 $5,081.4 0.0% $.0 $5,081.4 25.0% $1,270.3 $381.1 $3,429.9 $280.8 $3,149.2 100.0% $3,149.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Thames Valley Parkway
DC14-PR00099 Centre Street/Drewlo (39T-12501) 2019 $719.4 $.0 $.0 $719.4 0.0% $.0 $719.4 25.0% $179.9 $54.0 $485.6 $39.7 $445.8 100.0% $445.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05063 Old Victoria Hospital Lands 2019 $686.7 $.0 $.0 $686.7 0.0% $.0 $686.7 25.0% $171.7 $51.5 $463.5 $37.9 $425.6 100.0% $425.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05064 North Branch (Edgevalley - Clarke) 2020 $1,308.0 $.0 $.0 $1,308.0 0.0% $.0 $1,308.0 25.0% $327.0 $98.1 $882.9 $72.3 $810.6 100.0% $810.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05065 South Branch Meadowlily/Sports Complex 2020 $784.8 $.0 $.0 $784.8 0.0% $.0 $784.8 25.0% $196.2 $58.9 $529.7 $43.4 $486.4 100.0% $486.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05066 Riverbend - Kains TVP (39T-17501) 2021 $1,177.2 $.0 $.0 $1,177.2 0.0% $.0 $1,177.2 25.0% $294.3 $88.3 $794.6 $65.0 $729.6 100.0% $729.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05067 South Branch Meadowlily/VoR/Jackson 2022 $1,177.2 $.0 $.0 $1,177.2 0.0% $.0 $1,177.2 25.0% $294.3 $88.3 $794.6 $65.0 $729.6 100.0% $729.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05068 South Branch Tridon (East Hamilton 39T-17502) 2023 $784.8 $.0 $.0 $784.8 0.0% $.0 $784.8 25.0% $196.2 $58.9 $529.7 $43.4 $486.4 100.0% $486.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05069 Future TVP (North Branch) 2025 $327.0 $.0 $.0 $327.0 20.0% $65.4 $261.6 25.0% $65.4 $19.6 $176.6 $14.5 $162.1 100.0% $162.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $6,965.1 $.0 $.0 $6,965.1 0.9% $65.4 $6,899.7 25.0% $1,724.9 $517.5 $4,657.3 $381.2 $4,276.1 100.0% $4,276.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 124
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Environmentally Significant Areas
DC19-PR05070 Riverbend - Kains ESA at West Limit (39T-17501) 2020 $249.9 $.0 $.0 $249.9 0.0% $.0 $249.9 33.0% $82.5 $16.7 $150.7 $12.3 $138.3 100.0% $138.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00106 CPRI 2021 $67.3 $.0 $.0 $67.3 0.0% $.0 $67.3 33.0% $22.2 $4.5 $40.6 $3.3 $37.2 100.0% $37.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05071 Woodhull 2022 $163.4 $.0 $.0 $163.4 0.0% $.0 $163.4 33.0% $53.9 $10.9 $98.5 $8.1 $90.4 100.0% $90.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05072 Comfort Lands -Sergautis (39T-11502) 2023 $69.2 $.0 $.0 $69.2 0.0% $.0 $69.2 33.0% $22.8 $4.6 $41.7 $3.4 $38.3 100.0% $38.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05073 Hyman Development - East of Hamlyn Park 2023 $67.3 $.0 $.0 $67.3 0.0% $.0 $67.3 33.0% $22.2 $4.5 $40.6 $3.3 $37.2 100.0% $37.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00107 Ross Lands North (39T-07502) 2023 $24.0 $.0 $.0 $24.0 0.0% $.0 $24.0 33.0% $7.9 $1.6 $14.5 $1.2 $13.3 100.0% $13.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05074 Crich/Applewood Wetland 2023 $50.5 $.0 $.0 $50.5 0.0% $.0 $50.5 33.0% $16.6 $3.4 $30.4 $2.5 $27.9 100.0% $27.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05075 Future ESAs (N/W) 2025 $48.1 $.0 $.0 $48.1 0.0% $.0 $48.1 33.0% $15.9 $3.2 $29.0 $2.4 $26.6 100.0% $26.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05076 Future ESAs (N/E) 2026 $48.1 $.0 $.0 $48.1 0.0% $.0 $48.1 33.0% $15.9 $3.2 $29.0 $2.4 $26.6 100.0% $26.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05077 Future ESAs (S/W) 2027 $48.1 $.0 $.0 $48.1 0.0% $.0 $48.1 33.0% $15.9 $3.2 $29.0 $2.4 $26.6 100.0% $26.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05078 Future ESAs (S/E) 2028 $48.1 $.0 $.0 $48.1 0.0% $.0 $48.1 33.0% $15.9 $3.2 $29.0 $2.4 $26.6 100.0% $26.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $883.6 $.0 $.0 $883.6 0.0% $.0 $883.6 33.0% $291.6 $59.2 $532.8 $43.6 $489.2 100.0% $489.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Bridges and Tunnels
DC19-PR05079 Kent - Pedestrian crossing of Heard Drain (39T-04510) 2020 $525.0 $.0 $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $52.5 $472.5 $38.7 $433.8 100.0% $433.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05080 Corlon Sunningdale Underpass (39T-16504) 2023 $600.0 $.0 $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $60.0 $540.0 $44.2 $495.8 100.0% $495.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05081 OVHL - Pedestrian Bridge 2020 $1,800.0 $.0 $.0 $1,800.0 20.0% $360.0 $1,440.0 25.0% $360.0 $108.0 $972.0 $79.6 $892.4 100.0% $892.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05082 South Branch Tridon (east Hamilton 39T-17502) 2021 $525.0 $.0 $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $52.5 $472.5 $38.7 $433.8 100.0% $433.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05083 Beaverbrook/Esam - CP Tunnel upgrade (39T-99502) 2022 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 25.0% $125.0 $37.5 $337.5 $27.6 $309.9 100.0% $309.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05084 Victoria on River Ravine Crossing (39T-13502) 2023 $600.0 $.0 $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $60.0 $540.0 $44.2 $495.8 100.0% $495.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05085 S/W Community Center Pedestrian Bridge 2023 $375.0 $.0 $.0 $375.0 30.0% $112.5 $262.5 0.0% $.0 $26.3 $236.3 $19.3 $216.9 100.0% $216.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR05086 Future Bridges 2024 $525.0 $.0 $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $525.0 0.0% $.0 $52.5 $472.5 $38.7 $433.8 100.0% $433.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $5,450.0 $.0 $.0 $5,450.0 8.7% $472.5 $4,977.5 9.7% $485.0 $449.3 $4,043.3 $331.0 $3,712.3 100.0% $3,712.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 125
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-15 Parkland Development Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A ifap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo onfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies orother Pro ss oject CostFunded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$48,786.8 $.0 $1,300.0 $47,486.8 2.1% $1,009.2 $46,477.6 23.6% $10,954.3 $3,552.3 $31,971.0 $2,617.0 $29,353.9 100.0% $29,353.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 597.84
Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $2,862.4 100.0% $2,862.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 29,353,944 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 31,970,955 purposes $26,491.6 100.0% $26,491.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ 2,617,011 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 491.53 $ - $ - $ - /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Non-growth share for Neighbourhood Parks, Urban Parks and Woodland Parks is 0% as these benefit and serve the immediate growth area and are typically located in new growth neighbourhoods. Open Space, ESAs, and the Thames Valley Parkway are allocated a non-growth share reflective of these projects being routinely used by residents from other areas of the City due to parkland purpose or additions to an existing network that extends well beyond growing neighbourhoods. The non-growth share for District Parks reflects a gross estimate of the benefit and usage of the individual district park by persons in new developments and by existing residents. Due to the location and nature of Civic Spaces, a high non-growth share has been allocated reflecting the benefit to existing residents. These park type non-growth shares are consistent with the 2014 DC Study.
2) Amounts otherwise included in the DC rate calculations for this component are reduced based on limitations of the historical standard of service, as calculated in ‘Supplement A’ above. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 3) Residential share of growth 100% (consistent with 2014 DC Study). Benefit to ICI considered negligible. Pre Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 1,533.58 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 1,037.13 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 678.31
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 126
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-16 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Multi Purpose Recreation Centre (Southeast)
DC14-PR00002 Double Icepad Arena 2019 $8,734.3 $.0 $5,918.5 $2,815.9 0.0% $.0 $2,815.9 100.0% $2,815.9 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00002 Community Centre / Gymnasium 2019 $9,406.8 $.0 $3,684.5 $5,722.4 15.8% $904.1 $4,818.2 69.4% $3,343.8 $147.4 $1,326.9 $.0 $1,326.9 100.0% $1,326.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00002 Change Rooms 2019 $1,561.0 $.0 $1,057.7 $503.2 15.8% $79.5 $423.7 88.3% $374.1 $5.0 $44.6 $.0 $44.6 100.0% $44.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00002 Furniture / Fittings / Equipment 2019 $472.0 $.0 $319.8 $152.2 15.8% $24.0 $128.1 88.3% $113.1 $1.5 $13.5 $.0 $13.5 100.0% $13.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00002 Land / Site Works / Professional Fees 2019 $9,751.0 $.0 $6,607.4 $3,143.6 15.8% $496.7 $2,646.9 88.3% $2,337.3 $31.0 $278.7 $.0 $278.7 100.0% $278.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $29,925.1 $.0 $17,587.8 $12,337.3 0.0% $.0 $10,832.9 82.9% $8,984.2 $184.9 $1,663.8 $.0 $1,663.8 100.0% $1,663.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Multi Purpose Recreation Centre (Northwest)
DC19-PR02001 Indoor Swimming Pool 2023 $8,275.1 $.0 $.0 $8,275.1 16.3% $1,348.8 $6,926.3 72.4% $5,014.6 $191.2 $1,720.5 $.0 $1,720.5 100.0% $1,720.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02002 Community Centre / Gymnasium 2023 $13,083.6 $.0 $.0 $13,083.6 17.9% $2,342.0 $10,741.7 70.5% $7,572.9 $316.9 $2,851.9 $.0 $2,851.9 100.0% $2,851.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02003 Change Rooms 2023 $3,802.1 $.0 $.0 $3,802.1 17.3% $657.8 $3,144.3 71.2% $2,238.8 $90.6 $815.0 $.0 $815.0 100.0% $815.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02004 Furniture / Fittings / Equipment 2023 $693.5 $.0 $.0 $693.5 17.3% $120.0 $573.5 71.2% $408.3 $16.5 $148.6 $.0 $148.6 100.0% $148.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02005 Land / Site Works / Professional Fees 2023 $6,130.9 $.0 $.0 $6,130.9 17.3% $1,060.6 $5,070.2 71.2% $3,610.0 $146.0 $1,314.2 $.0 $1,314.2 100.0% $1,314.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $31,985.1 $.0 $.0 $31,985.1 17.3% $5,529.2 $26,455.9 71.2% $18,844.6 $761.1 $6,850.3 $.0 $6,850.3 100.0% $6,850.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Neighbourhood Community Centre (North)
DC19-PR02006 Community Centre / Gymnasium 2025 $10,004.3 $.0 $.0 $10,004.3 11.3% $1,130.5 $8,873.8 78.4% $6,957.1 $191.7 $1,725.1 $.0 $1,725.1 100.0% $1,725.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02007 Furniture / Fittings / Equipment 2025 $279.1 $.0 $.0 $279.1 11.3% $31.5 $247.6 78.4% $194.1 $5.3 $48.1 $.0 $48.1 100.0% $48.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02008 Land / Site Works / Professional Fees 2025 $3,168.0 $.0 $.0 $3,168.0 11.3% $358.0 $2,810.1 78.4% $2,203.1 $60.7 $546.3 $.0 $546.3 100.0% $546.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $13,451.5 $.0 $.0 $13,451.5 11.3% $1,520.0 $11,931.5 78.4% $9,354.3 $257.7 $2,319.5 $.0 $2,319.5 100.0% $2,319.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Neighbourhood Community Centre (Central)
DC19-PR02009 Community Centre / Gymnasium 2027 $10,004.3 $.0 $.0 $10,004.3 9.1% $910.4 $9,093.9 83.9% $7,629.8 $146.4 $1,317.7 $.0 $1,317.7 100.0% $1,317.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02010 Furniture / Fittings / Equipment 2027 $279.1 $.0 $.0 $279.1 9.1% $25.4 $253.7 83.9% $212.9 $4.1 $36.8 $.0 $36.8 100.0% $36.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02011 Land / Site Works / Professional Fees 2027 $3,168.0 $.0 $.0 $3,168.0 9.1% $288.3 $2,879.7 83.9% $2,416.1 $46.4 $417.3 $.0 $417.3 100.0% $417.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $13,451.5 $.0 $.0 $13,451.5 9.1% $1,224.1 $12,227.4 83.9% $10,258.8 $196.9 $1,771.8 $.0 $1,771.8 100.0% $1,771.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 127
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-16 Facilities Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Field Houses
DC14-PR00009 Foxfield Park 2019 $300.0 $.0 $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $300.0 0.0% $.0 $30.0 $270.0 $.0 $270.0 100.0% $270.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00008 Southwest London 2020 $600.0 $.0 $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $60.0 $540.0 $.0 $540.0 100.0% $540.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02012 Future Field House (North) 2021 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 33.0% $165.0 $33.5 $301.5 $.0 $301.5 100.0% $301.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02013 Future Field House (South) 2022 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 33.0% $165.0 $33.5 $301.5 $.0 $301.5 100.0% $301.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02014 Future Field House (West) 2024 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 33.0% $165.0 $33.5 $301.5 $.0 $301.5 100.0% $301.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02015 Future Field House (East) 2026 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 33.0% $82.5 $16.8 $150.8 $.0 $150.8 100.0% $150.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02016 Future Field House (West) 2028 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 33.0% $82.5 $16.8 $150.8 $.0 $150.8 100.0% $150.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $3,400.0 $.0 $.0 $3,400.0 14.7% $500.0 $2,900.0 22.8% $660.0 $224.0 $2,016.0 $.0 $2,016.0 100.0% $2,016.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Spray Pads
DC14-PR00013 Growth-related Spray Pad (Foxfield) 2020 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-PR00011 Growth-related Spray Pad (Riverbend) 2022 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02017 Growth-related Spray Pad (South) 2023 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02018 Growth-related Spray Pad (North) 2025 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-PR02019 Growth-related Spray Pad (South) 2027 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $50.0 $450.0 $.0 $450.0 100.0% $450.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $2,500.0 $.0 $.0 $2,500.0 0.0% $.0 $2,500.0 0.0% $.0 $250.0 $2,250.0 $.0 $2,250.0 100.0% $2,250.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $15,283.5 $15,283.5 $15,283.5 $15,283.5 $.0 $15,283.5 100.0% $15,283.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$109,996.7 $.0 $17,587.8 $92,408.8 11.1% $10,277.7 $82,131.2 58.6% $48,101.9 $1,874.6 $32,154.7 $.0 $32,154.7 100.0% $32,154.7 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 TOTAL
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 128
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-16 Facilities Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 833.01
Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $2,810.3 100.0% $2,810.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 40,900,791 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 17,533,462 purposes $29,344.5 100.0% $29,344.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 544.46 $ - $ - $ - /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) The double ice pad for the Southeast Multi-Purpose Recreation Centre is classified as 100% non-growth as it is assumed these ice surfaces will replace facilities being decommissioned (Farqharson, Glen Cairn). That is, these parts of the new facilities will not provide new capacity but rather replace existing capacity. 2) Allocation of benefit to future growth has been based on the percentage of population in the Neighbourhood Community Centre service area beyond 2028 to the estimated Neighbourhood Community Centre service area population in 2028. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 3) Non-growth share reflects the percentage of population in the Neighbourhood Community Centre service area at the initiation of collection of DC’s in relation to the population in the Neighbourhood Pre Financing 4) The cost of furniture/fittings/equipment, change rooms and land/infrastructure/site works/architectural fees has been allocated among the three components (arena, community centre, pool) that benefit from these ‘common’ expenses. The growth/non-growth splits for these components of the facility are based on the growth share of the double ice pad arena, community centre and gymnasium in relation to the gross cost of all three components. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 1,698.73 5) Residential share of growth 100% (consistent with 2014 DC Study). Benefit to ICI considered negligible. Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 1,148.82 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 751.36 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 1,018.15
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 129
Table of Contents Parks & Recreation Services TABLE F-17 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 1,036.00 $ 1,123.84 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ - $ - 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ - $ - 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ - $ - 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$3,262.7
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 100% 100% Non-residential Commercial 0% 0% Institutional 0% 0% Industrial 0% 0%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 130
Table of Contents
APPENDIX G:
Transit Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 131
Table of Contents Transit Services
Background for the BRT project as outlined in the draft Environmental Project Report that was approved by Council in May 2018. The London Transit Commission (LTC) is charged with the delivery of public transit services for the citizens of London. The present conventional service is a fixed route modified radial service. There The LTC will purchase and operate future transit vehicles, buildings and structures associated with are 41 routes plus one community bus operation with 4 routings defined by day. While service levels the BRT system. Over the ten year period, it is anticipated that the BRT project will be constructed vary by route, by time of day and by day of week, overall service periods cover 18 hours a day on and in service. Monday to Saturday, and 15.5 hours a day on Sundays and Statutory Holidays. Currently, a total of 627,500 revenue service hours are provided annually to accommodate the 22.9 million annual Level of Service passenger trips. Amendments to the Development Charges Act, which came into force on January 1, 2016, have Efficient high quality public transit services contribute to the environmental health and economic several implications for the treatment of transit services. In particular, capital costs for transit services competitiveness of a City, which benefits the entire community. Public transit services: are no longer subject to a 10% statutory deduction, and transit capital programs are no longer constrained by a ten year historical level of service. Now an increase in the need for the service is • provide Londoners with opportunity, choice and access to the community and employment restricted by a planned level of service over the ten year period following the preparation of the DC opportunities; Study. In accordance with the Act, the Transportation Background Study prepared by IBI Group and • have a positive impact on the environment in terms of air quality; Transit Services Technical Appendix prepared by Hemson Consulting present the following: • enable city-building by linking growth nodes and activity/employment centres; • support the retention of natural green space that would otherwise be used to build new • the calculations that were used to prepare the estimate for the planned level of service for roads and/or parking lots in concert with effective land use planning; the Transit Services; • are a critical part of the solution to mitigate the negative economic and environmental • an identification of the portion of the total estimated capital cost relating to the transit service impact of traffic congestion whether the negative impact be on business or on the that would benefit the anticipated development over the ten year period immediately environment; and following the preparation of the Development Charge (DC) Study; • are supportive of building and maintaining a healthy downtown. • an identification of the anticipated excess capacity that would exist at the end of the ten year period immediately following the preparation of the DC Study; Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) • an assessment of ridership forecasts for all modes of transit services proposed to be funded by the DC over the ten year period immediately following the preparation of the DC Study, In 2012, Council approved a new Transportation Master Plan (TMP) for the City of London. The 2012 categorized by development types, and whether the forecasted ridership will be from TMP was an integrated plan that sought to improve mobility for residents of the City by providing existing or planned development; and viable choices through all modes of travel. The findings suggested that investments in transit • an assessment of the ridership capacity for all modes of transit services proposed to be infrastructure could significantly increase the share of non-automobile trip making and support a funded by the DC over the ten year period following the preparation immediately following viable rapid transit system in the City. The approved TMP also established an intensification target the preparation of the DC Study. for future residential growth to support investments in transit infrastructure and to defer a large number of arterial road projects that would be required without a rapid transit system. Growth Allocations
The identified BRT network is located along major employment areas, nodes and activity centres As part of the 2019 London DC Transportation Background Study, population and employment growth across the city, including shopping centres, post-secondary institutions, hospitals and other medical was allocated to traffic zones throughout the City. This information was used to estimate centres and the downtown. The network builds upon the London Plan adopted by Council in June 2016, the Rapid Transit Master Plan approved by Council in July 2017, and the recommended design
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 132
Table of Contents Transit Services
existing and future transit ridership demand. The capital needs projections are based on the and workers. As such, a Non-Growth share of 57% was applied to the cost of the maintenance facility recommendations contained in the Rapid Transit Master Plan and draft Environmental Project Report. and BRT stops.
Growth Needs Projections Given that the Transit service is restricted by the ten year planning horizon and this transit infrastructure will service growth beyond this period, the growth share was proportionally allocated to a) Fleet the population and employment growth within the first ten years (in period Growth) and the subsequent ten years (Future Growth). Based on the forecasted growth, a Future Growth benefit of Over the 2019-2028 period, the BRT will be completed and in service. A total of 28 articulated buses 18% was applied to the cost of the maintenance facility and BRT stops. will be purchased to accommodate growth for BRT purposes. It is anticipated that 72.6% of the $28 million cost of these buses will be paid for from federal and provincial grants. The conventional fleet Allocation of Growth Costs - Residential / Non –Residential is projected to increase by 21 buses over the next ten years. Transit service demands have been allocated to Residential and Non-Residential growth on the basis Based on planned transit ridership growth over the ten year planning horizon from 2019-2028, a of population growth vs. employment growth for the ten year time horizon of this DC Study. benefit to existing development of 60% is allocated that reflects the amount of additional transit trips attributed to the existing population. The remaining 40% are attributed to the City’s ten year growth Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation in population and employment. As planned bus fleet additions within the ten year horizon have an immediate relationship to service needs when placed into service, and as the City will continue to add The required Transit projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the to its transit fleet as ridership grows, it is unnecessary to attribute a Future Growth Benefit share to numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Transit projects are shown in transit fleet items. Tables G-1 and G-2.
Financing Costs b) Facilities Table G-3 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Transit projects for the purpose of
calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs To accommodate the increase in transit fleet for the BRT and conventional bus networks, the LTC involved: has determined that a new transit facility or expansion of an existing maintenance facility will be
required. A total of $12.5 million is allocated to this project that is timed for 2021. It is anticipated that a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth 72.6% of the cost of facilities, including the maintenance facility and BRT stops noted below, will be projects identified in past DC Studies; paid for from federal and provincial grants. b) Projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified The costs of BRT stops to support the expansion of the transit network are also included in the Transit in the ten year DC Study period; program. These stops are required to provide access and accommodate transfers between transit d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth routes. Thirty-eight accessible transit stops are proposed with enclosed areas and real-time works funded by debt; and information. e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon. Using the ridership-based approach, the change in mode share between 2019 and 2039 equates to an additional 57,300 daily transit trips. Of these, 32,400 trips (57%) will be made by existing residents Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 133
Table of Contents Transit Services
preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 134
Table of Contents Transit Services HEMSON CONSULTING Technical Appendix
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 135
Table of Contents Transit Services HEMSON CONSULTING Technical Appendix
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 136
Table of Contents Transit Services HEMSON CONSULTING Technical Appendix
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 137
Table of Contents Transit Services HEMSON CONSULTING Technical Appendix
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 138
Table of Contents Transit Services HEMSON CONSULTING Technical Appendix
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 139
Table of Contents Transit Services TABLE G-1 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Facilities
DC19-TS01001 BRT Maintenance Facility 2021 $12,500.0 $9,080.1 $.0 $3,419.9 18.0% $615.6 $2,804.3 57.0% $1,598.5 $.0 $1,205.8 $.0 $1,205.8 73.1% $881.5 12.2% $147.1 9.6% $115.8 5.1% $61.5
DC19-TS01002 BRT Downtown - Stops 2020-2023 $3,906.3 $2,837.5 $.0 $1,068.7 18.0% $192.4 $876.3 57.0% $499.5 $.0 $376.8 $.0 $376.8 73.1% $275.5 12.2% $46.0 9.6% $36.2 5.1% $19.2
DC19-TS01003 BRT East - Stops 2020-2023 $8,000.0 $5,811.3 $.0 $2,188.7 18.0% $394.0 $1,794.8 57.0% $1,023.0 $.0 $771.7 $.0 $771.7 73.1% $564.1 12.2% $94.2 9.6% $74.1 5.1% $39.4
DC19-TS01004 BRT North - Stops 2022-2026 $8,203.1 $5,958.8 $.0 $2,244.3 18.0% $404.0 $1,840.3 57.0% $1,049.0 $.0 $791.3 $.0 $791.3 73.1% $578.5 12.2% $96.5 9.6% $76.0 5.1% $40.4
DC19-TS01005 BRT South - Stops 2023-2026 $8,984.4 $6,526.3 $.0 $2,458.0 18.0% $442.4 $2,015.6 57.0% $1,148.9 $.0 $866.7 $.0 $866.7 73.1% $633.6 12.2% $105.7 9.6% $83.2 5.1% $44.2
DC19-TS01006 BRT West - Stops 2025-2028 $5,078.1 $3,688.8 $.0 $1,389.3 18.0% $250.1 $1,139.2 57.0% $649.4 $.0 $489.9 $.0 $489.9 73.1% $358.1 12.2% $59.8 9.6% $47.0 5.1% $25.0
SUBTOTAL $46,671.9 $33,902.9 $.0 $12,769.0 18.0% $2,298.4 $10,470.6 57.0% $5,968.2 $.0 $4,502.3 $.0 $4,502.3 73.1% $3,291.2 12.2% $549.3 9.6% $432.2 5.1% $229.6
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$46,671.9 $33,902.9 $.0 $12,769.0 18.0% $2,298.4 $10,470.6 57.0% $5,968.2 $.0 $4,502.3 $.0 $4,502.3 73.1% $3,291.2 12.2% $549.3 9.6% $432.2 5.1% $229.6 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $414.7 74.8% $310.3 9.0% $37.4 9.1% $37.9 7.0% $29.1
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation purposes $4,087.6 72.9% $2,980.9 12.5% $511.9 9.6% $394.3 4.9% $200.5 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 55.31 $ 1.58 $ 0.94 $ 0.63 /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 172.56 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 116.70 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 76.33 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 103.43
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 140
Table of Contents Transit Services TABLE G-2 Vehicles Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Vehicles
DC19-TS02001 BRT Transit (28 Buses) 2024-2028 $28,000.0 $20,339.5 $.0 $7,660.5 0.0% $.0 $7,660.5 60.0% $4,596.3 $.0 $3,064.2 $.0 $3,064.2 73.1% $2,239.9 12.2% $373.8 9.6% $294.2 5.1% $156.3
DC19-TS02002 Conventional Transit (21 Buses) 2019-2028 $11,550.0 $.0 $.0 $11,550.0 0.0% $.0 $11,550.0 60.0% $6,930.0 $.0 $4,620.0 $.0 $4,620.0 73.1% $3,377.2 12.2% $563.6 9.6% $443.5 5.1% $235.6
SUBTOTAL $39,550.0 $20,339.5 $.0 $19,210.5 0.0% $.0 $19,210.5 60.0% $11,526.3 $.0 $7,684.2 $.0 $7,684.2 73.1% $5,617.2 12.2% $937.5 9.6% $737.7 5.1% $391.9
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$39,550.0 $20,339.5 $.0 $19,210.5 0.0% $.0 $19,210.5 60.0% $11,526.3 $.0 $7,684.2 $.0 $7,684.2 73.1% $5,617.2 12.2% $937.5 9.6% $737.7 5.1% $391.9 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $5,579.3 74.8% $4,174.4 9.0% $502.6 9.1% $510.4 7.0% $391.9 1) Rate calculations assume 72.6% of funding from Provincial/Federal sources. 2) No benefit to future growth identified as bus fleet additions would have an immediate relationship to service needs at the time of deployment, and the City will likely continue to add to its transit fleet as Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation ridership grows beyond 2029. purposes $2,104.9 68.5% $1,442.8 20.7% $434.9 10.8% $227.3 0.0% $.0 3) Non-growth share reflects the portion of new ridership to 2029 attributed the existing 2019 population. Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706 4) Residential/Institutional/Commercial/Industrial splits based on ratio of Population to Employment growth for the ten year planning horizon for this service.
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 26.77 $ 1.34 $ 0.54 $ 0.00 /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 83.52 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 56.48 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 36.94 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 50.06
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 141
Table of Contents Transit Services TABLE G-3 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 82.08 $ 75.61 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ 2.92 $ 2.69 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ 1.48 $ 1.36 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ 0.63 $ 0.58 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$988.3
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 71% 71% Non-residential Commercial 15% 15% Institutional 10% 10% Industrial 3% 3%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 142
Table of Contents
APPENDIX H:
Waste Diversion Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 143
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services
Existing Service Levels Allocation of Costs of Growth
The City provides waste diversion services to its citizens through curbside recycling, multi-residential The costs eligible for DC rate calculation purposes have been adjusted: recycling, four drop-off EnviroDepots and a two stream recycling facility. a) to remove the benefit to existing development. These reductions have been determined based To measure the existing service standard, a comprehensive inventory and valuation of waste on the portion of the existing population as of 2019 in relation to the total build-out population; diversion facilities for each of the preceding ten years was completed. This valuation is necessary to b) a portion of the costs have been deferred for inclusion in future rate calculations. These post- provide an objective comparison of the historical service standard with the proposed needs to period benefits reflect the portion of the estimated population beyond the ten year period; and demonstrate that no improvement in the historical standard is being incorporated into the c) to remove the 10% statutory deduction which applies to most soft services as required under Development Charge (DC) rate calculations. the Development Charges Act.
The inventory includes valuation of existing facilities based on the size, quality and nature of Allocation of Net Costs of Growth to Growth Types construction, land value and building contents and reflects current replacement value of Waste Diversion assets to arrive at an average per capita historical service level. Identified capital needs are intended to solely service residential waste diversion. For this reason, 100% of growth costs have been attributed to residential growth. By applying this historical service level to the projected ten year population increase, a cap on the maximum amount of money recoverable through a DC is established. The rate calculations provide Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation that the growth related capital needs for Waste Diversion will result in no increase over the existing The required Waste Diversion projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and service standard as required by legislation. represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Waste Diversion
projects are shown in Table H-2. Approach to Planning Waste Diversion In waste diversion matters, the City is guided by a Resource Recovery Strategy to maximize waste Financing Costs reduction, reuse, recycling and resource recovery in an economically viable and environmentally Table H-3 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Waste Diversion projects for the responsible manner. In September 2018, Council approved an element of this strategy, the 60% purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and Waste Diversion Action Plan, that identifies a set of actions to achieve 60% diversion of residential financing costs involved: waste including reducing food waste, implementing a Green Bin program and increasing recycling
options for furniture and textiles. a) Starting with projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate;
b) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the Capital Needs ten year study period; c) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth To accommodate the organic waste diversion program, the need for a processing program for works funded by debt; and organics has been identified that may result in a stand-alone organics or mixed waste processing d) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to facility. As such, Council approved a ten year capital program that identifies a $20 million project for fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon. advanced waste diversion and/or resource recovery technologies. This is identified on Table H-2 as an Organic Waste Diversion Facility timed for 2027.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 144
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services
Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 145
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services TABLE H-1 Facilities Service Standard
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Buildings Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. Site 1 - Material Recovery Facility 3438 Manning Drive Materials Recycling Centre 93,657 93,657 93,657 93,657 93,657 93,657 93,657 93,657 $331 Site 2 - Oxford Street EnviroDepot 1450 Oxford Street West Operations Building 1176 1176 1176 1176 1176 1176 1176 1176 1176 $265 Green Bin Storage Bunkers 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 $356 Site 3 - Clarke Road EnviroDepot 28 Clarke Road Operations Building 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 $200 Green Bin Storage Bunkers 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 6770 $148 Site 4 - Hazardous and Special Waste 3502 Manning Drive Hazardous or Special Waste Building 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 3485 $233 Administration Building 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 3049 $342 Weigh Scales 436 436 436 436 436 436 436 436 436 436 $601 Equipment Services Building 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 1742 $183 Covered Building 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 3400 $150 Total 12,822 27,538 121,195 121,195 121,195 121,195 121,195 121,195 121,195 121,195
Population 345,702 348,528 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.03709 0.07901 0.32217 0.31910 0.31608 0.31312 0.31022 0.30737 0.30359 0.29991
10 Year Average Quantity Standard per Capita 0.26080
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 146
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services TABLE H-1 Facilities Service Standard Cont’d
Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure 2018 Replacement Value ($000's) Type of Measure Quality & Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Site 1 - Material Recovery Facility 3438 Manning Drive Land $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 Materials Recycling Centre $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 $31,000.5 Site 2 - Oxford Street EnviroDepot 1450 Oxford Street West Land $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 $2,300.0 Operations Building $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 $311.6 Green Bin Storage Bunkers $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 $2,410.1 Site 3 - Clarke Road EnviroDepot 28 Clarke Road Land $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 $500.0 Operations Building $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 $142.0 Green Bin Storage Bunkers $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 $1,002.0 Site 4 - Hazardous and Special Waste 3502 Manning Drive Land $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 Hazardous or Special Waste Building $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 $812.0 Administration Building $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 $1,042.8 Weigh Scales $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 $262.0 Equipment Services Building $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 $318.8 Covered Building $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 Total $5,087.6 $11,111.3 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8 $43,611.8
Population 345,702 348,528 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita $14.72 $31.88 $115.93 $114.83 $113.74 $112.68 $111.63 $110.61 $109.25 $107.92
10 Year Average Level of Service per Capita $94.32
DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Year 49,100 $ per Capita $94.32 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $4,631,112
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 147
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services TABLE H-2 Facilities Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Waste Diversion Facility
DC19-WT01001 Organic Waste Diversion Facility 2027 $20,000.0 $.0 $.0 $20,000.0 20.4% $4,080.0 $15,920.0 71.2% $11,335.0 $458.5 $4,126.5 $.0 $4,126.5 100.0% $4,126.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $20,000.0 $.0 $.0 $20,000.0 20.4% $4,080.0 $15,920.0 71.2% $11,335.0 $458.5 $4,126.5 $.0 $4,126.5 100.0% $4,126.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$20,000.0 $.0 $.0 $20,000.0 20.4% $4,080.0 $15,920.0 71.2% $11,335.0 $458.5 $4,126.5 $.0 $4,126.5 100.0% $4,126.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) 94.32 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 4,631,112 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs 4126464 purposes $4,126.5 100.0% $4,126.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 76.56 $ - $ - $ - /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 1) Estimated costs include building fees, construction, land, furniture and equipment. Pre Financing Post Financing 2) Allocation of benefit to future growth has been based on the percentage of City population beyond 2028 to the estimated City population in 2028. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 238.88 $ 227.23 3) Non-growth share reflects the percentage of population at the initiation of collection of DC’s in relation to the population estimated at full build-out. Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 161.55 $ 153.67 4) Residential share of growth costs 100%. Benefit to ICI sector considered inappropriate as facility would service residential organics only. Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 105.66 $ 100.51 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 143.17 $ 136.19
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 148
Table of Contents Waste Diversion Services TABLE H-3 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 76.56 $ 72.83 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ - $ - 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ - $ - 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ - $ - 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$1,057.5
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 100% 100% Non-residential Commercial 0% 0% Institutional 0% 0% Industrial 0% 0%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 149
Table of Contents
APPENDIX I:
Operations Centre
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 150
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services
Existing Service Levels Determination of Growth Share
The City of London Environmental and Engineering Services operates from several Operation The Operation Centre (North) project on Table I-2, identifies the various planned components. The Centres located throughout the City to provide repair and maintenance services for water, sewer, growth/non-growth share for each of these components have been determined as follows: roads, sidewalks, streetlights and other infrastructure. The City also operates a centralized fleet maintenance operation for the vehicles of nearly all municipal departments, with the exception of the • Administration and Garage Building; Salt Storage Building: The non-growth share for these London Police Service and London Fire Department which maintain their own rolling stock. components accounts for the replacement of space located at other Operation Centre locations; To measure the existing service standard, a comprehensive inventory and valuation of the City’s • Storage and Vehicle Buildings: The non-growth share of these components reflects the Operation Centre facilities for each of the preceding ten years was completed. This valuation provides potential use of the facility by non-eligible vehicles; and an objective comparison of the historical service standard with proposed needs to demonstrate that • Land: The identified land cost for the project reflects the potential for the future site to contain no improvement in the historical standard is being incorporated into the development charge (DC) non-operation/non-recoverable uses. rate calculations. The Traffic Management Centre is intended to operate infrastructure more efficiently by adding The inventory includes valuation of existing facilities based on the size, quality and nature of capacity to the road network to address growing travel needs. This improvement is considered construction, land value and building contents and reflects current replacement value of Operation primarily a Growth need and 10% is allocated Non-Growth, consistent with the share assigned to the Centre assets to arrive at an average per capita historical service level. traffic signal infrastructure components identified in the Road Services DC component.
By applying this historical service level to the projected ten year population increase, a cap on the Post-Period Benefit maximum amount of money recoverable through a DC is established. The rate calculations provide that the growth related capital needs for Operation Centres will result in no increase over the existing These projects are expected to serve growth beyond the ten year planning horizon. For the Operation service standard as required by legislation. Centre, the post-period benefit recognizes that the North Operation Centre will service the build out of the north central area of the City beyond the planning period. Capital Needs For the Traffic Management Centre, the post-period benefit is based on the forecasted population The continued growth of the City produces greater operational demands, resulting in the need for and employment growth beyond the ten year planning horizon. The post-period benefit amount is more service vehicles, storage and maintenance facilities. Over the ten year period, the need for an applied to the Phase 2 project first, then the remaining amount is applied to the Phase 1 project. Operation Centre in north London has been identified to service forecasted growth as the Adelaide Operation Centre which services the northern part of the City has reached capacity and there is no Allocation of Net Costs of Growth to Growth Types ability to further expand the facility. Operation Centre demands have been allocated to Residential and Non-Residential growth on the As identified by the 2019 London DC Transportation DC Background Study, there is the need for a basis of population growth vs. employment growth for the ten year planning horizon of this DC Study. Transportation Intelligent Mobility Management System (TIMMS) project to mitigate the impacts of forecasted growth on the transportation network. This will include new central traffic signal software, Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation additional vehicle sensors to assist in real-time incident management, pilot adaptive traffic signals to modify timings in real-time, and a communications system upgrade to support modern sensors and The required Operation Centres projects form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and devices. The various components of the TIMMS project are eligible for DCs under different service represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Operation categories. The Traffic Management Centre to oversee operations on the transportation network Centres projects are shown in Table I-2. and the necessary software to run the system is included under the Operation Centres category.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 151
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services
Financing Costs
Table I-3 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Operation Centres projects for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with projecting DC revenues using the pre-finance rate; b) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the ten year study period; c) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and d) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the ten year planning horizon.
Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the ten year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 152
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services TABLE I-1 Facilities Service Standard Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Buildings Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 $/sq.ft. AJ Tyler Operations Centre 663-665 Bathurst St Storage Building #1 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 6,105 $60 Storage Building #2 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 6,115 $60 Storage Building #4 (DEMOLISHED) 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 1,645 $60 Storage Building #4 2,000 $233 Storage Building (5) 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 $60 Storage Building - Paint Storage 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 430 $40 Waterworks Storage 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 2,545 $60 Storage Building (16) 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 2,315 $60 Salt Dome - Rectangular 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 $110 Salt Dome/Storage - Large 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 4,165 $100 Salt Dome - Small 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 2,572 $100 Main Admin Building/Garage 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 55,380 $200 Water/Sewer Admin and Operations 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $150 Body Shop/Blacksmith 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 7,172 $250 Road Oil Building - Colas System 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 $600 Gate House/Guard Shack 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 84 $100 AJT Fueling System Building & tanks 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 $5,000 Adelaide Operations Centre 1145 Adelaide St Adelaide Operations Centre 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 27,895 $150 Salt Storage Dome 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 2,969 $100 Storage Building 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 $100 ISF Waste Water Storage Building 0 0 3,615 3,615 3,615 3,615 3,615 3,615 3,615 3,615 $100 Oxford Operations Centre 1420-1570 Oxford St Operations Building 0 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 6,770 $509 Salt Storage Building 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 17,050 $105 Salt Storage Building 0 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 16,942 $58 Exeter Road Operations Centre 707-708 Exeter Rd Operations Building 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000 $208 Cold Storage Building 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $219 Salt Storage Building 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 25,850 $60 ISF Storage Building Extension 0 0 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 $85 Wilton Grove Operations Centre 1484 Wilton Grove R Grader Shed 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 $75 Garage/Storage Building 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 $75 Salt Dome 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 10,700 $80 Sand Dome 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 $102 Wolseley Operations Centre 654 Elizabeth St Operations Building 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 7,700 $150 Civic Gardens Complex 605-625 Springbank Rose Garden Operations Building 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 6,276 $100 St. Julien Operations Centre 42 St. Julien St Operations Building 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 16,344 $150 Total 275,469 299,181 308,796 318,796 318,796 318,796 318,796 318,796 318,796 319,151
Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 Level of Service per Capita 0.74 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.80 0.79
10 Year Average 1) Building measures provided by Facility Services division. Land values provided by Realty Services division. Quantity Standard per Capita 0.81 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 153
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services TABLE I-1 Facilities Service Standard Cont’d Contact Person(s) Tim Wellhauser Unit of Measure Square Feet of Buildings Type of Measure Quantity
Facility Name Location 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 AJ Tyler Operations Centre 663-665 Bathurst St Land $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 $1,090.0 Storage Building #1 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 $366.3 Storage Building #2 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 $366.9 Storage Building #4 (DEMOLISHED) $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 $98.7 Storage Building #4 $466.0 Storage Building (5) $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 Storage Building - Paint Storage $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 $17.2 Waterworks Storage $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 $152.7 Storage Building (16) $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 $138.9 Salt Dome - Rectangular $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 $282.9 Salt Dome/Storage - Large $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 $416.5 Salt Dome - Small $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 $257.2 Main Admin Building/Garage $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 $11,076.0 Water/Sewer Admin and Operations $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 $1,500.0 Body Shop/Blacksmith $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 $1,793.0 Road Oil Building - Colas System $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 Gate House/Guard Shack $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 $8.4 AJT Fueling System Building & tanks $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 Adelaide Operations Centre 1145 Adelaide St Land $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 Adelaide Operations Centre $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 $4,184.3 Salt Storage Dome $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 $296.9 Storage Building $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 $250.0 ISF Waste Water Storage Building $0.0 $0.0 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 $361.5 Oxford Operations Centre 1420-1570 Oxford St Land $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 $2,060.0 Operations Building $0.0 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 $3,445.9 Salt Storage Building $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 $1,790.3 Salt Storage Building $0.0 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 $982.6 Exeter Road Operations Centre 707-708 Exeter Rd Land $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 $1,950.0 Operations Building $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 $9,984.0 Cold Storage Building $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 $1,095.0 Salt Storage Building $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 $1,551.0 ISF Storage Building Extension $0.0 $0.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 $510.0 Wilton Grove Operations Centre 1484 Wilton Grove Rd Land $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 $350.0 Grader Shed $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 $75.0 Garage/Storage Building $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 $300.0 Salt Dome $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 $856.0 Sand Dome $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 $632.4 Wolseley Operations Centre 654 Elizabeth St Land $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 $640.0 Operations Building $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 $1,155.0 Civic Gardens Complex 605-625 Springbank Dr Land $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 $793.8 Rose Garden Operations Building $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 $627.6 10 Year Average St. Julien Operations Centre 42 St. Julien St Quantity Standard per Capita $144.40 Land $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 $100.0 Operations Building $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 $2,451.6 Total $49,946.4 $54,375.0 $55,246.5 $56,746.5 $56,746.5 $56,746.5 $56,746.5 $56,746.5 $56,746.5 $57,113.8 DC Eligible Amount (before adjustments) Net Forecast Population - 10 Yea 49,100 Population 370,528 373,354 376,180 379,804 383,428 387,052 390,676 394,300 399,200 404,100 $ Per Capita $144.40 Level of Service per Capita $134.80 $145.64 $146.86 $149.41 $148.00 $146.61 $145.25 $143.92 $142.15 $141.34 DC Rate Eligible Amount (gross) $7,090,040 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 154
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services TABLE I-2 Facilities Rate Calculation Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2028
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Operations Centre (North)
DC19-OC01001 Administration and Garage Building 2025 $10,440.0 $.0 $.0 $10,440.0 50.0% $5,220.0 $5,220.0 55.4% $2,891.9 $232.8 $2,095.3 $.0 $2,095.3 73.1% $1,531.3 12.2% $256.2 9.6% $201.6 5.1% $106.3
DC19-OC01002 Salt Storage Building 2025 $1,495.0 $.0 $.0 $1,495.0 50.0% $747.5 $747.5 11.5% $86.0 $66.2 $595.4 $.0 $595.4 73.1% $435.1 12.2% $72.8 9.6% $57.3 5.1% $30.2
DC19-OC01003 Vehicle Wash Building 2025 $1,000.0 $.0 $.0 $1,000.0 50.0% $500.0 $500.0 25.0% $125.0 $37.5 $337.5 $.0 $337.5 73.1% $246.6 12.2% $41.3 9.6% $32.5 5.1% $17.1
DC19-OC01004 Fueling Station Building 2025 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 50.0% $250.0 $250.0 25.0% $62.5 $18.8 $168.8 $.0 $168.8 73.1% $123.3 12.2% $20.6 9.6% $16.2 5.1% $8.6
DC19-OC01005 Gate House/Guard Shack 2025 $75.0 $.0 $.0 $75.0 50.0% $37.5 $37.5 25.0% $9.4 $2.8 $25.3 $.0 $25.3 73.1% $18.5 12.2% $3.1 9.6% $2.4 5.1% $1.3
DC19-OC01006 Storage Building 2025 $506.3 $.0 $.0 $506.3 50.0% $253.1 $253.1 25.0% $63.3 $19.0 $170.9 $.0 $170.9 73.1% $124.9 12.2% $20.9 9.6% $16.4 5.1% $8.7
DC19-OC01007 Coverall Equipment Building 2025 $1,000.0 $.0 $.0 $1,000.0 50.0% $500.0 $500.0 25.0% $125.0 $37.5 $337.5 $.0 $337.5 73.1% $246.6 12.2% $41.3 9.6% $32.5 5.1% $17.1
DC19-OC01008 Land 2025 $6,460.0 $.0 $.0 $6,460.0 50.0% $3,230.0 $3,230.0 50.0% $1,615.0 $161.5 $1,453.5 $.0 $1,453.5 73.1% $1,062.2 12.2% $177.7 9.6% $139.9 5.1% $73.7
SUBTOTAL $21,476.3 $.0 $.0 $21,476.3 50.0% $10,738.1 $10,738.1 46.4% $4,978.0 $576.0 $5,184.1 $.0 $5,184.1 73.1% $3,788.6 12.2% $633.8 9.6% $498.8 5.1% $262.9
Traffic Management Centre
DC19-OC01009 Traffic Management Centre - Phase 1 2019 $830.0 $.0 $.0 $830.0 21.1% $174.8 $655.2 10.0% $65.5 $59.0 $530.7 $.0 $530.7 73.1% $387.8 12.2% $64.9 9.6% $51.1 5.1% $26.9
DC19-OC01010 Traffic Management Centre - Phase 2 2024 $310.0 $.0 $.0 $310.0 100.0% $310.0 $.0 10.0% $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,140.0 $.0 $.0 $1,140.0 42.5% $484.8 $655.2 10.0% $65.5 $59.0 $530.7 $.0 $530.7 73.1% $387.8 12.2% $64.9 9.6% $51.1 5.1% $26.9
Debentures
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 73.1% $.0 12.2% $.0 9.6% $.0 5.1% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$22,616.3 $.0 $.0 $22,616.3 49.6% $11,223.0 $11,393.3 44.3% $5,043.5 $635.0 $5,714.8 $.0 $5,714.8 73.1% $4,176.4 12.2% $698.7 9.6% $549.9 5.1% $289.8 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost) Supplement A: Existing Service Standard Limitation Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial Existing Service Standard Measure (per capita) $ 144.40 Net 10 year Growth Projection 49,100 Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $.0 100.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 Maximum Eligible Amount for DC Rate Calculation $ 7,090,040 Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation Growth Needs $ 5,714,796 purposes $5,714.8 73.1% $4,176.4 12.2% $698.7 9.6% $549.9 5.1% $289.8 Total Excess of Growth Needs $ - Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 53,896 324,399 420,386 316,706
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $ 77.49 $ 2.15 $ 1.31 $ 0.92 /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: 1) Rate calculations assume 72.6% of funding from Provincial/Federal sources. Pre Financing Post Financing 2) No benefit to future growth identified as bus fleet additions would have an immediate relationship to service needs at the time of deployment, and the City will likely continue to add to its transit fleet as ridership grows beyond 2029. Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 241.77 $ 271.93 3) Non-growth share reflects the portion of new ridership to 2029 attributed the existing 2019 population. Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 163.50 $ 183.90 4) Residential/Institutional/Commercial/Industrial splits based on ratio of Population to Employment growth for the ten year planning horizon for this service. Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 106.94 $ 120.28 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 144.91 $ 162.99 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 155
Table of Contents Operations Centre Services TABLE I-3 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
($000's)
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 10 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Residential (Persons In New Housing) 53,896 $ 77.49 $ 87.16 100% 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 5,389.6 53,896.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 324,399 $ 2.15 $ 2.42 100% 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 32,439.9 324,399.0 Institutional 420,386 $ 1.31 $ 1.47 100% 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 42,038.6 420,386.0 Industrial 316,706 $ 0.92 $ 1.03 100% 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 31,670.6 316,706.0 Total Non-Res. 1,061,491 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 106,149.1 1,061,491.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$5,576.8
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth. Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 73% 73% Non-residential Commercial 12% 12% Institutional 10% 10% Industrial 5% 5%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 156
Table of Contents
APPENDIX J:
Roads Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 157
Table of Contents Roads Services
The 2019 London Development Charge (DC) Transportation Background Study prepared by IBI (b) Minor Road Works (CSRF - Roads) Group, in association with Hemson Consulting, formed the basis for determining the transportation growth works and eligible growth costs used in the DC rate calculation. Minor road works that would be constructed as part of the major road project are eligible to be claimed from the CSRF. These works include but are not limited to: new traffic signals, Strategic documents that provided context and direction for the City of London’s long-term channelization, sidewalks, and streetlights. Where a multi-use pathway is constructed in lieu of a transportation system include: sidewalk within an Arterial road allowance, the sidewalk equivalent cost is considered claimable. In some cases, these works are done in advance of the road capacity expansion project as a • Complete Streets Design Manual (2018) means of addressing a network wide benefit to growth, without completing the entire road • Rapid Transit Master Plan (2017) expansion. It is noted that ‘Arterial’ refers to street classifications of Rapid Transit Boulevard, • The London Plan (2016) Urban Thoroughfare, Civic Boulevard, Main Street and Rural Thoroughfare. • LTC Transit Network – Rapid Transit Integrated Framework (2016) • London 2030 Transportation Master Plan (2012) Channelization on an arterial road into a new public street is eligible for a claim from the CSRF. The following subsections list the various additional components of the channelization which are The outputs of this work drove the needs incorporated into the 2019 DC Study. considered claimable:
Policy Considerations • Tree Plantings When replacement trees are planted as part of external road works to compensate for The following policies were used to establish the quantum of works included in the Roads Services removed trees, other than those removed to facilitate an access, the cost of the removal DC: and replacement is claimable. All other tree plantings are not claimable.
(a) Major Road Works (CSRF - Roads) • Ditching When ditching and/or the installation of catchbasins is required to facilitate claimable Major transportation road works typically consist of large-scale road expansion projects or two external road work the drainage works may be incorporated in the minor road works claim lane road upgrades triggered by increased traffic volumes associated with growth across the City. to the CSRF. All major transportation road works are constructed by the City and the growth related cost is eligible for a claim from the CSRF. • Utility Relocations Utility relocations necessitated by the claimable road works can be claimed upon The costs of the following items are incorporated into road projects and are required as a result of providing a copy of the invoices from the utility and proof of payment in full. The City shall growth: issue a letter to the utility company stating that this work is required by the City under the Public Service Works on Highways Act and will pay for 50% of cost of labor and trucking. • Structures to be widened or replaced; This 50% share is claimable from the CSRF; the other 50% is the utility’s share and is not • Noise barrier and retaining wall where required; and claimable. Should the utility refuse to pay these costs, the 50% “utility share” shall be the • Land acquisition (raw land cost, appraisals, surveying, legal, etc.) but only where lands responsibility of the proponent Owner. Engineering fees associated with these relocations cannot be acquired through dedications under the Planning Act on a timely basis. are not claimable.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 158
Table of Contents Roads Services
(c) Road Oversizing (CSRF - Roads) • Connections Connections of all public and private new streets, ramps or entrances (including features Where a new arterial is to be constructed in whole or in part through or adjacent to a development, and design details such as: roundabouts, culverts, signage, gateway treatments, noise wall the Owner is responsible for the cost of constructing a Neighbourhood Connector as defined in alterations, sidewalks, cycling lanes, multi-use pathways, directional traffic islands, road re- the City of London’s Design Specifications & Requirements Manual and Complete Streets Design profiling, decorative features) to the existing road infrastructure; Manual. If the required road is wider or at a higher standard, the Owner is responsible for the cost of a standard road, including sidewalks, street lights, etc., and is eligible for a claim to the CSRF • Placing Fill for the difference in cost of granular and asphalt between a standard road and the road actually Re-grading, cutting and placing fill on lands beyond the road allowance along their frontage constructed. The construction responsibilities shall be defined by the conditions of an agreement in accordance with City standards. In addition, all grading and restoration of road allowance between the City and the Owner. If the Owner wishes to construct the road at an enhanced along the development frontage if no claimable road works are required; standard beyond that acceptable to the City Engineer (or designate), then the Owner shall pay for the additional costs of enhancement with no eligibility for a claim from any Fund. • Topsoil and Sod Topsoil and sod to the edge of any existing sidewalk fronting the development; (d) Strategic Links (CSRF - Roads) • Tree Planting Portions of proposed Neighbourhood Connectors or Neighbourhood Streets that are required for Planting of new trees fronting the development, except as provided in the Minor Road transportation network connectivity, are not implementable in a timely manner due to reasons Works Channelization policies; beyond the control of the surrounding Owners and are identified as a strategic need by the City Engineer (or designate), may be constructed by the City and the cost is eligible for a claim from • Sidewalk Reinforcement the CSRF. Any upgrade or reinforcement from a standard 100mm thickness sidewalk across the development’s new access; (e) Active Transportation (CSRF - Roads) • Retaining Walls Where on-road cycling lanes are identified through development areas in the Cycling Master Plan, Retaining walls along the development frontage, where acceptable to the City Engineer (or on Neighbourhood Connectors or Neighbourhood Streets, the Owner shall be responsible to designate); construct the cycling lanes. If the required road is wider or at a higher standard, the Owner is responsible for the cost of a standard road, including sidewalks, street lights, etc., and is eligible • Temporary Works for a claim to the CSRF for the difference in cost between a standard road and the road actually 100% of the cost of temporary asphalt sidewalks, roads, paths, swales along the frontage constructed. The construction responsibilities shall be defined by the conditions of an agreement abutting arterials where installation in ultimate location is deemed premature; between the City and the Owner.
• Traffic Signals at Private Streets (f) Local Service Costs (Owner Cost) Traffic signal installations at all private entrances, and at public entrances which do not
meet MTO warrants; The following subsections list the various road components which are considered a local service
cost and therefore completed at the expense of the Owner: • Other Works
Any other services, removals, relocations, etc., required including but not limited to, utility
relocation, sidewalk alterations, and curb cuts
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 159
Table of Contents Roads Services
• Restoration and Damage • Major road works, such as new arterial roads, extending an arterial road, widening an Restoration of any utility cuts, and or damage created by construction activities and /or arterial road, and major intersection improvements; construction traffic in and out of the development, including but not limited to daily removal • Two lane arterial upgrades; of mud tracking, daily dust suppression, milling and paving of deteriorated asphalt caused • Minor road works, such as traffic signals, channelization, sidewalks, and street lighting; by construction traffic, grading of gravel shoulders to remove rutting caused by construction • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) related arterial road works; and traffic; • Additional transportation programs, such as urban and rural intersections, active transportation, advance purchase of land, the City’s share of road class oversizing, • Noise Attenuation Measures strategic links, and Transportation Intelligent Mobility Management System (TIMMS). All noise berms, window streets, fences and privately maintained noise walls; Establishing Cost Estimates • Grading and BMPs Grading elements such as: swales, ditches, best management practices, (BMPs) and any The estimated costs for the roads program (major road works, two-lane arterial upgrade, BRT related other feature to address over land flow route needs created by the development’s grading; arterial road works, and minor road works) were developed and assembled from various sources as described below. • Paths and Walkways Pedestrian paths, walkways, bridges, tunnels, including the related lighting and signage, a) Major Road Works except as provided in the Minor Road Works Channelization policies; (Note: Parkways are constructed by the City and are specifically provided in the DC Study); Per metre roadway construction costs were developed for this DC update. These roadway unit costs assumed a typical cross-section, in line with examples in the City’s Complete Street Design • Utility Upgrades Manual that included vehicular travel lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, environmental mitigation, street The costs related to the upgrading of any utility plant, or the relocation of the same, unless lighting and traffic signals and incorporated cost information from recent road construction bids necessitated by the roadwork; received by the City of London.
• Relocation and Replacement Costs The roadway unit cost (per metre) was used as the basis for the roadway construction cost. The relocation and/or replacement costs of any encroachment on the City’s road allowance Additional costs that were incorporated in the development of the total project included: or easement including but not limited to hedges, sprinklers systems and fences; • New or widened structures (culverts, bridges, interchanges); • Street Lighting • Traffic signal modifications; Street lighting at intersections with existing roads where required by the development • Environmental mitigation; agreement. • Retaining walls, noise walls or other barriers and fencing; • Landscaping; Types of DC Eligible Road Works • Lighting; • Utility relocation (10% of construction cost); Building upon the planned road network identified in the 2014 DC Study, planned projects in the • Engineering (15% of construction cost); Capital Budget, input from City staff and review of network needs identified through travel demand modelling, a recommended road network was developed. Road projects that are fully or partially driven by growth are eligible for DC funding. DC eligible road works include:
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 160
Table of Contents Roads Services
• Contingency (10% of construction cost); • Lighting; • Property (including raw land cost, on-site alterations, appraisals, surveying • Modifications to municipal services (storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and watermains) due • and legal); and to conflict and Rapid Transit infrastructure; • Additional complexities on a project-specific basis (i.e. railway diversions, environmentally • Property (including raw land cost, on-site alterations, appraisals, surveying sensitive areas, fill, poor soil conditions, hydro towers, etc.). • and legal); and • Utilities, due to conflict and BRT infrastructure and in accordance with applicable cost Where recent Environmental Assessment studies or other more detailed cost estimates sharing agreements. undertaken by the City were available, those cost estimates were used. The BRT costs used in the DC program are costs in real dollars (current values) which is consistent b) 2-Lane Arterial Upgrades with values assigned to all other DC eligible projects. The BRT related Arterial road works cost excludes all costs related to stops, platforms, vehicles and maintenance facilities. These The cost of two-lane arterial upgrades are based on the per metre roadway cost. Additional costs components of the BRT project are included under the Transit Program. that were incorporated in the development of the total project included: (d) Minor Road Works • New or widened structures (culverts, bridges, interchanges); • Utility relocation (10% of construction cost); Costs for minor road works are based on the average recent actual costs in the City of London. • Engineering (15% of construction cost); The unit costs are presented below: • Contingency (10% of construction cost); and • Additional complexities on a project-specific basis (i.e. environmentally sensitive areas, fill, Minor Road Work Unit Cost poor soil conditions, hydro towers, etc.). Channelization each $400,000 Sidewalks m $170 Where recent Environmental Assessment studies or other more detailed cost estimates Streetlights m $400 undertaken by the City were available, those cost estimates were used. Traffic Signals each $325,000
(c) BRT Related Arterial Road Works Post-Period Benefit: Major Road Works
The cost for all BRT related arterial road works are consistent with the cost estimates developed A future growth benefit or post-period benefit (PPB) is applied where there is anticipated excess for the draft Environmental Project Report (April 2018) for the BRT project. The BRT related capacity at the end of the DC period. As in the 2014 DC Study, the future growth benefit was arterial road works includes costs for the following elements: determined with consideration of the recommended timing of the project relative to the DC planning period as presented below. • General traffic lanes, BRT lanes, intersection turn lanes, and any related road widenings required to accommodate the BRT lanes; Project Timing PPB% • Traffic signal modifications; 0-5 10% • Environmental mitigation; 5-10 20% • Retaining walls, noise walls or other barriers and fencing; 10-15 30% • Bridge structures; 15-20 45% • Landscaping;
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 161
Table of Contents Roads Services
Post-Period Benefit: 2-Lane Arterial Upgrades accommodate increasing traffic demands. These improvements are considered primarily a growth need and 10% is allocated to non-growth. The program of infrastructure improvements includes two-lane arterial upgrades located outside of • For the replacement of freeway interchanges, the ratio of the existing interchange footprint / the urban growth boundary. Along these arterials on or near the urban boundary, the improvement of proposed footprint is identified as the non-growth share (including gore areas for ramps on the intersections can lead to improvement of intersection approaches at or near future residential or structure). The non-growth share for each freeway interchange in the 2019 DC Study is commercial entrances. While these will not occur until the future, it is cost effective to include these consistent with the 2014 DC Study. improvements as part of the arterial upgrade construction. As there is no immediate need for these • For new grade separations required for railway crossings where a bridge does not currently intersection improvements within the planning period, the cost of the intersection improvement is exist, the ratio of the delay attributed to growth is taken as the growth share. The non-growth allocated to future growth. share for each new rail grade separations is consistent with the 2014 DC Study. • For the reconstruction of existing rail grade separations the ratio of the existing footprint / Post-Period Benefit Considerations for Minor Road Works proposed footprint of the structure is identified as the non-growth share. The non-growth share for each reconstructed rail grade separation is consistent with the 2014 DC Study. Due to the immediate nature of the need for minor road works to support imminent adjacent
development the benefiting period for minor road works has been considered to align with the 20- (b) Residential / Institutional, Commercial, Industrial (ICI) year benefitting period outlined in the DC Study. As such, no post-period benefit exists for minor road
works. Net growth costs for identified transportation growth projects must also be apportioned to the various
benefiting land uses (i.e. Residential / ICI). The Residential / ICI split for arterial road network Allocation Splits improvements is based on the relative proportion of projected growth in population and jobs of the (a) Growth/Non-Growth 2019-2038 period for which transportation needs were determined. The resulting major road works residential/ICI split is as follows. Consistent with the previous DC Study and By-law, the benefit to existing (allocation to non-growth) determination for major road works is described below: Residential Institutional Commercial Industrial 69.7% 10.2% 14.5% 5.6% • For arterial road works and two-lane arterial upgrades required to address traffic growth and safety concerns, the benefit to existing development was calculated using 20-year This allocation was globally applied to the growth share of the roads program. rehabilitation costs for the existing roadway. The benefit to existing for major intersection improvements was calculated using the average rehabilitation cost for major road works Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation excluding intersections and structures. The required road works form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represents the • For arterial road works related to BRT, the 2014 DC Study provided an 8.5% non-growth numerator in the rate calculation. The final net costs for these works attributable to the 20 year growth allocation for the total cost of the 11 BRT related road projects based on the 20-year window are shown in Table J-1. rehabilitation costs for the respective roadways. For the 2019 DC Study, the BRT related road
projects have been presented as five corridors rather than 11. Funds through taxes and DCs have been collected towards the BRT project. To maintain consistency, the average 8.5% non- Contributions by Others growth share for the BRT related arterial road works is being carried forward. The costs related to BRT are anticipated to be partially funded by both the provincial and federal • New roads and road extensions are considered to be a 100% growth need and 0% is allocated governments. The anticipated funding is included in the column titled “Less: future capital grants, to non-growth. Improvements at existing intersections and conversions of one-way streets to subsidies or other contributions anticipated” which provides for a lower DC estimate. two way streets address traffic operations, network circulation and access required to
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 162
Table of Contents Roads Services
Financing Costs
Table J-2 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Road Works for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance which reflects accumulated funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; b) Projecting DC revenues using the “pre-finance” rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the 20-year study period; and d) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the 20-year planning horizon.
The deficit at the end of the planning period for the cash flow equates to the amounts of the expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the 20-year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 163
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-1 Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Arterial Road Works
DC14-RS00056 Adelaide Street - CPR (Grade Separation) 2020 $58,275.7 $8,280.4 $7,550.0 $42,445.4 10.0% $4,244.5 $38,200.8 67.3% $25,709.2 $.0 $12,491.7 $.0 $12,491.7 69.7% $8,706.7 14.5% $1,811.3 10.2% $1,274.2 5.6% $699.5
Adelaide Street North - Fanshawe to Sunningdale DC14-RS00019 2029 $6,280.0 $.0 $357.6 $5,922.4 30.0% $1,776.7 $4,145.6 13.2% $548.0 $.0 $3,597.6 $.0 $3,597.6 69.7% $2,507.6 14.5% $521.7 10.2% $367.0 5.6% $201.5 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Boler Road / Sanatorium Road - Oxford to DC14-RS00029 DC1 2034 $21,586.6 $.0 $.0 $21,586.6 45.0% $9,714.0 $11,872.6 9.5% $1,123.4 $.0 $10,749.2 $.0 $10,749.2 69.7% $7,492.2 14.5% $1,558.6 10.2% $1,096.4 5.6% $602.0 Commissioners (2 to 4 through lanes)
Bostwick Road - Pack to Wharncliffe DC19-RS00016 2026 $18,128.4 $.0 $.0 $18,128.4 20.0% $3,625.7 $14,502.7 6.4% $931.6 $.0 $13,571.1 $.0 $13,571.1 69.7% $9,459.1 14.5% $1,967.8 10.2% $1,384.3 5.6% $760.0 (2 to 4 through lanes with realignment)
Bradley Avenue - Dearness to Pond Mills DC14-RS00027 2029 $18,963.8 $.0 $.0 $18,963.8 30.0% $5,689.1 $13,274.6 10.3% $1,370.0 $.0 $11,904.6 $.0 $11,904.6 69.7% $8,297.5 14.5% $1,726.2 10.2% $1,214.3 5.6% $666.7 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Bradley Avenue - Pond Mills to Highbury DC14-RS00031 2036 $14,240.6 $.0 $.0 $14,240.6 45.0% $6,408.3 $7,832.3 6.8% $534.3 $.0 $7,298.0 $.0 $7,298.0 69.7% $5,086.7 14.5% $1,058.2 10.2% $744.4 5.6% $408.7 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Bradley Avenue Extension - Jalna to Wharncliffe DC14-RS00022 2022 $11,720.0 $.0 $797.1 $10,922.9 10.0% $1,092.3 $9,830.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $9,830.6 $.0 $9,830.6 69.7% $6,851.9 14.5% $1,425.4 10.2% $1,002.7 5.6% $550.5 (New 4 through lanes)
Bradley Avenue Extension - Wonderland to Bostwick DC14-RS00047 2028 $7,899.8 $.0 $.0 $7,899.8 20.0% $1,580.0 $6,319.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,319.8 $.0 $6,319.8 69.7% $4,404.9 14.5% $916.4 10.2% $644.6 5.6% $353.9 (New 4 through lanes)
Clarke Road - Veterans Memorial Parkway Extension to DC14-RS00025 2033 $24,917.5 $.0 $593.1 $24,324.4 30.0% $7,297.3 $17,027.1 4.4% $753.5 $.0 $16,273.6 $.0 $16,273.6 69.7% $11,342.7 14.5% $2,359.7 10.2% $1,659.9 5.6% $911.3 Fanshawe Park Road (2 to 4 through lanes )
Colonel Talbot Interchange - Highway 401 DC14-RS00013 2023 $5,000.0 $.0 $.0 $5,000.0 10.0% $500.0 $4,500.0 50.0% $2,250.0 $.0 $2,250.0 $.0 $2,250.0 69.7% $1,568.3 14.5% $326.3 10.2% $229.5 5.6% $126.0 (City's share)
Commissioners Road East - Highbury Ave to Jackson DC14-RS00044 2036 $7,425.0 $.0 $.0 $7,425.0 45.0% $3,341.3 $4,083.8 22.1% $904.2 $.0 $3,179.6 $.0 $3,179.6 69.7% $2,216.1 14.5% $461.0 10.2% $324.3 5.6% $178.1 Rd (2 to 4 through lanes)
Commissioners Road West - Wonderland Road to DC14-RS00059 Cranbrook Road (2 to 4 through lanes with centre turn 2033 $7,070.0 $.0 $.0 $7,070.0 30.0% $2,121.0 $4,949.0 14.1% $698.7 $.0 $4,250.3 $.0 $4,250.3 69.7% $2,962.5 14.5% $616.3 10.2% $433.5 5.6% $238.0 lane) Commissioners Road West - Cranbrook Road to DC14-RS00055 Springbank Drive - new alignment 2037 $20,200.0 $.0 $300.0 $19,900.0 45.0% $8,955.0 $10,945.0 5.5% $602.8 $.0 $10,342.2 $.0 $10,342.2 69.7% $7,208.5 14.5% $1,499.6 10.2% $1,054.9 5.6% $579.2 (3 through lanes)
Dingman Drive - Eastern approach of Dingman/Hwy 401 DC19-RS00001 2021 $10,966.3 $.0 $.0 $10,966.3 10.0% $1,096.6 $9,869.6 8.1% $794.6 $.0 $9,075.0 $.0 $9,075.0 69.7% $6,325.3 14.5% $1,315.9 10.2% $925.7 5.6% $508.2 bridge to 150m east of Wellington (2 to 4 through lanes )
Dingman Drive - Hwy 401 Bridge (City's share) DC19-RS00002 2026 $4,000.0 $.0 $.0 $4,000.0 20.0% $800.0 $3,200.0 55.0% $1,760.0 $.0 $1,440.0 $.0 $1,440.0 69.7% $1,003.7 14.5% $208.8 10.2% $146.9 5.6% $80.6 (Hwy 401 Bridge Expansion)
Hamilton Road - Old Victoria to Veterans Memorial DC14-RS00048 2028 $6,597.5 $.0 $.0 $6,597.5 20.0% $1,319.5 $5,278.0 9.6% $506.9 $.0 $4,771.1 $.0 $4,771.1 69.7% $3,325.5 14.5% $691.8 10.2% $486.7 5.6% $267.2 Parkway (2 to 4 through lanes with centre turn lane)
Oxford Street West - Commissioners to Westdel Bourne DC14-RS00052 2025 $8,525.0 $.0 $.0 $8,525.0 20.0% $1,705.0 $6,820.0 8.0% $548.0 $.0 $6,272.0 $.0 $6,272.0 69.7% $4,371.6 14.5% $909.4 10.2% $639.7 5.6% $351.2 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Oxford Street West - Sanatorium to Commissioners DC14-RS00036 2031 $16,618.8 $.0 $.0 $16,618.8 30.0% $4,985.6 $11,633.1 8.6% $1,000.1 $.0 $10,633.0 $.0 $10,633.0 69.7% $7,411.2 14.5% $1,541.8 10.2% $1,084.6 5.6% $595.4 (2 to 4 through lanes)
DC14-RS00076a Philip Aziz - Western Intersection to the Thames River 2022 $2,578.1 $.0 $2,490.0 $88.1 10.0% $8.8 $79.3 10.0% $7.9 $.0 $71.4 $.0 $71.4 69.7% $49.8 14.5% $10.4 10.2% $7.3 5.6% $4.0
Pond Mills Underpass - Hwy 401 (City's share) DC14-RS00020 2022 $1,500.0 $.0 $.0 $1,500.0 45.0% $675.0 $825.0 50.0% $412.5 $.0 $412.5 $.0 $412.5 69.7% $287.5 14.5% $59.8 10.2% $42.1 5.6% $23.1 (Hwy 401 Bridge Expansion)
Southdale Road West - Bostwick to Colonel Talbot DC14-RS00038 2031 $11,693.5 $.0 $111.2 $11,582.3 30.0% $3,474.7 $8,107.6 13.5% $1,096.0 $.0 $7,011.6 $.0 $7,011.6 69.7% $4,887.1 14.5% $1,016.7 10.2% $715.2 5.6% $392.7 (2 to 4 through lanes with centre turn lane) City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 164
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Arterial Road Works Cont'd
Southdale Road West - Bostwick to Pine Valley DC14-RS00030 2022 $4,872.3 $.0 $500.5 $4,371.8 10.0% $437.2 $3,934.6 8.4% $328.8 $.0 $3,605.8 $.0 $3,605.8 69.7% $2,513.2 14.5% $522.8 10.2% $367.8 5.6% $201.9 (2 to 4 through lanes with centre turn lane)
Sunningdale Road – Wonderland to 150m west of DC14-RS00017 2023 $20,966.9 $.0 $1,050.4 $19,916.4 10.0% $1,991.6 $17,924.8 7.2% $1,287.8 $.0 $16,637.0 $.0 $16,637.0 69.7% $11,596.0 14.5% $2,412.4 10.2% $1,697.0 5.6% $931.7 Richmond (2 to 4 through lanes)
Sunningdale Road – 150m west of Richmond to 150m DC14-RS00016 2023 $4,587.9 $.0 $.0 $4,587.9 10.0% $458.8 $4,129.1 4.0% $164.4 $.0 $3,964.7 $.0 $3,964.7 69.7% $2,763.4 14.5% $574.9 10.2% $404.4 5.6% $222.0 east of Richmond (2 to 4 through lanes)
Sunningdale Road - 150m east of Richmond to Bluebell DC14-RS00033 2025 $8,539.4 $.0 $.0 $8,539.4 20.0% $1,707.9 $6,831.5 9.2% $630.2 $.0 $6,201.3 $.0 $6,201.3 69.7% $4,322.3 14.5% $899.2 10.2% $632.5 5.6% $347.3 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Sunningdale Road - Adelaide to Bluebell DC14-RS00021 2025 $15,613.8 $.0 $.0 $15,613.8 20.0% $3,122.8 $12,491.0 4.8% $602.8 $.0 $11,888.2 $.0 $11,888.2 69.7% $8,286.1 14.5% $1,723.8 10.2% $1,212.6 5.6% $665.7 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Veterans Memorial Parkway - Huron Street to Clarke DC14-RS00009 2019 $12,376.9 $.0 $5,916.6 $6,460.3 10.0% $646.0 $5,814.3 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,814.3 $.0 $5,814.3 69.7% $4,052.5 14.5% $843.1 10.2% $593.1 5.6% $325.6 Road (New 2 through lanes)
Veterans Memorial Parkway - Huron Street to Clarke DC19-RS00003 2037 $9,666.3 $.0 $.0 $9,666.3 45.0% $4,349.8 $5,316.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,316.4 $.0 $5,316.4 69.7% $3,705.6 14.5% $770.9 10.2% $542.3 5.6% $297.7 Road (2 to 4 through lanes)
Veterans Memorial Parkway - Oxford Street to Huron DC14-RS00043 2034 $11,755.4 $.0 $.0 $11,755.4 45.0% $5,289.9 $6,465.5 15.3% $986.4 $.0 $5,479.1 $.0 $5,479.1 69.7% $3,818.9 14.5% $794.5 10.2% $558.9 5.6% $306.8 Street (2 to 4 through lanes )
Veterans Memorial Parkway - Bradley Avenue DC14-RS00061 2035 $30,073.3 $.0 $.0 $30,073.3 45.0% $13,533.0 $16,540.3 0.0% $.0 $.0 $16,540.3 $.0 $16,540.3 69.7% $11,528.6 14.5% $2,398.3 10.2% $1,687.1 5.6% $926.3 Interchange
Victoria Bridge Bike Lanes - (prorated share of bridge DC19-RS00004 2022 $3,300.0 $.0 $.0 $3,300.0 10.0% $330.0 $2,970.0 50.0% $1,485.0 $.0 $1,485.0 $.0 $1,485.0 69.7% $1,035.0 14.5% $215.3 10.2% $151.5 5.6% $83.2 widening) (Bridge widening)
Wharncliffe Road - Becher Street to Springbank Drive DC14-RS00018 2020 $41,396.3 $2,399.0 $3,761.3 $35,236.0 10.0% $3,523.6 $31,712.4 37.2% $11,797.0 $.0 $19,915.4 $.0 $19,915.4 69.7% $13,881.0 14.5% $2,887.7 10.2% $2,031.4 5.6% $1,115.3 (2 to 4 through lanes)
Windermere Road - Western Road to 150m east of DC19-RS00005 2024 $3,568.8 $.0 $.0 $3,568.8 20.0% $713.8 $2,855.0 10.7% $306.9 $.0 $2,548.2 $.0 $2,548.2 69.7% $1,776.1 14.5% $369.5 10.2% $259.9 5.6% $142.7 Richmond (2 to 4 through lanes)
Wonderland Road North - Sunningdale Road to DC14-RS00034 2032 $10,806.3 $.0 $.0 $10,806.3 30.0% $3,241.9 $7,564.4 9.4% $712.4 $.0 $6,852.0 $.0 $6,852.0 69.7% $4,775.8 14.5% $993.5 10.2% $698.9 5.6% $383.7 Fanshawe Park Road (2 to 4 through lanes)
Wonderland Road - Oxford to Beaverbrook DC14-RS00024a 2031 $3,150.0 $.0 $.0 $3,150.0 30.0% $945.0 $2,205.0 32.9% $726.1 $.0 $1,478.9 $.0 $1,478.9 69.7% $1,030.8 14.5% $214.4 10.2% $150.8 5.6% $82.8 (4 to 6 through lanes)
Wonderland Road - Beaverbrook to Sarnia DC14-RS00024b 2034 $11,830.0 $.0 $.0 $11,830.0 45.0% $5,323.5 $6,506.5 11.8% $767.2 $.0 $5,739.3 $.0 $5,739.3 69.7% $4,000.3 14.5% $832.2 10.2% $585.4 5.6% $321.4 (4 to 6 through lanes & CP Structure)
Wonderland Road - Oxford to Riverside DC14-RS00028a 2030 $4,680.0 $.0 $.0 $4,680.0 30.0% $1,404.0 $3,276.0 23.0% $753.5 $.0 $2,522.5 $.0 $2,522.5 69.7% $1,758.2 14.5% $365.8 10.2% $257.3 5.6% $141.3 (4 to 6 through lanes)
Wonderland Road - CN Structure between Riverside and DC14-RS00028b 2038 $56,250.0 $900.0 $.0 $55,350.0 45.0% $24,907.5 $30,442.5 41.9% $12,755.4 $.0 $17,687.1 $.0 $17,687.1 69.7% $12,327.9 14.5% $2,564.6 10.2% $1,804.1 5.6% $990.5 Oxford (Widening CN Structure)
Wonderland Road - Riverside to Springbank DC14-RS00023 2030 $36,065.0 $.0 $1,009.5 $35,055.5 30.0% $10,516.7 $24,538.9 5.3% $1,301.5 $.0 $23,237.4 $.0 $23,237.4 69.7% $16,196.4 14.5% $3,369.4 10.2% $2,370.2 5.6% $1,301.3 (4 to 6 through lanes)
Wonderland Road - Springbank to Commissioners DC14-RS00026a 2027 $4,850.0 $.0 $.0 $4,850.0 20.0% $970.0 $3,880.0 25.4% $986.4 $.0 $2,893.6 $.0 $2,893.6 69.7% $2,016.8 14.5% $419.6 10.2% $295.1 5.6% $162.0 (4 to 6 through lanes) Wonderland Road - Commissioners to Southdale DC14-RS00026b 2028 $16,800.0 $.0 $.0 $16,800.0 20.0% $3,360.0 $13,440.0 20.4% $2,740.0 $.0 $10,700.0 $.0 $10,700.0 69.7% $7,457.9 14.5% $1,551.5 10.2% $1,091.4 5.6% $599.2 (4 to 6 through lanes)
Wonderland Road - Exeter to Hwy 402 DC14-RS00032 2026 $19,600.0 $.0 $.0 $19,600.0 20.0% $3,920.0 $15,680.0 7.0% $1,096.0 $.0 $14,584.0 $.0 $14,584.0 69.7% $10,165.0 14.5% $2,114.7 10.2% $1,487.6 5.6% $816.7 (2 to 4 through lanes) City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 165
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Arterial Road Works Cont'd
DC19-RS00006 Intersection - Dingman / White Oak (Roundabout) 2027 $5,091.3 $.0 $.0 $5,091.3 20.0% $1,018.3 $4,073.0 12.5% $509.1 $.0 $3,563.9 $.0 $3,563.9 69.7% $2,484.0 14.5% $516.8 10.2% $363.5 5.6% $199.6
DC19-RS00007 Intersection - Exeter / Wellington - (Intersection) 2019 / 2030 $5,500.0 $.0 $.0 $5,500.0 30.0% $1,650.0 $3,850.0 12.5% $481.3 $.0 $3,368.8 $.0 $3,368.8 69.7% $2,348.0 14.5% $488.5 10.2% $343.6 5.6% $188.7
DC14-RS00077 Intersection - Fanshawe / Richmond - (Intersection) 2022 $12,595.1 $.0 $3,950.0 $8,645.1 10.0% $864.5 $7,780.6 12.5% $972.6 $.0 $6,808.0 $.0 $6,808.0 69.7% $4,745.2 14.5% $987.2 10.2% $694.4 5.6% $381.2
DC14-RS00075 Intersection - Hamilton / Highbury - (Intersection) 2029 $10,481.1 $.0 $990.0 $9,491.1 30.0% $2,847.3 $6,643.8 12.5% $830.5 $.0 $5,813.3 $.0 $5,813.3 69.7% $4,051.9 14.5% $842.9 10.2% $593.0 5.6% $325.5
DC14-RS00051 Intersection - Hamilton / Egerton (Optimization) 2019 $1,718.8 $.0 $.0 $1,718.8 10.0% $171.9 $1,546.9 12.5% $193.4 $.0 $1,353.5 $.0 $1,353.5 69.7% $943.4 14.5% $196.3 10.2% $138.1 5.6% $75.8
DC19-RS00008 Intersection - Hamilton / Commissioners - (Roundabout) 2029 $7,287.5 $.0 $.0 $7,287.5 30.0% $2,186.3 $5,101.3 12.5% $637.7 $.0 $4,463.6 $.0 $4,463.6 69.7% $3,111.1 14.5% $647.2 10.2% $455.3 5.6% $250.0
DC19-RS00009 Intersection - Hamilton / Gore - (Roundabout) 2024 $4,137.5 $.0 $.0 $4,137.5 20.0% $827.5 $3,310.0 12.5% $413.8 $.0 $2,896.3 $.0 $2,896.3 69.7% $2,018.7 14.5% $420.0 10.2% $295.4 5.6% $162.2
DC19-RS00010 Intersection - Oxford / Gideon - (Roundabout) 2024 $3,437.5 $.0 $.0 $3,437.5 20.0% $687.5 $2,750.0 12.5% $343.8 $.0 $2,406.3 $.0 $2,406.3 69.7% $1,677.2 14.5% $348.9 10.2% $245.4 5.6% $134.8
DC14-RS00015 Intersection - Oxford / Hyde Park - (Intersection) 2026 $2,956.3 $.0 $310.0 $2,646.3 20.0% $529.3 $2,117.0 12.5% $264.6 $.0 $1,852.4 $.0 $1,852.4 69.7% $1,291.1 14.5% $268.6 10.2% $188.9 5.6% $103.7
DC19-RS00011 Intersection - Oxford / Wharncliffe - (Intersection) 2025 $3,437.5 $.0 $.0 $3,437.5 20.0% $687.5 $2,750.0 12.5% $343.8 $.0 $2,406.3 $.0 $2,406.3 69.7% $1,677.2 14.5% $348.9 10.2% $245.4 5.6% $134.8
DC19-RS00012 Intersection - Oxford / Wonderland (Intersection) 2028 $3,781.3 $.0 $.0 $3,781.3 20.0% $756.3 $3,025.0 12.5% $378.1 $.0 $2,646.9 $.0 $2,646.9 69.7% $1,844.9 14.5% $383.8 10.2% $270.0 5.6% $148.2
DC19-RS00017 Intersection - Pack / Colonel Talbot (Intersection) 2021 $2,406.3 $.0 $.0 $2,406.3 10.0% $240.6 $2,165.6 12.5% $270.7 $.0 $1,894.9 $.0 $1,894.9 69.7% $1,320.8 14.5% $274.8 10.2% $193.3 5.6% $106.1
Intersection - Riverside / Wonderland DC19-RS00013 2023 $11,000.0 $.0 $.0 $11,000.0 10.0% $1,100.0 $9,900.0 12.5% $1,237.5 $.0 $8,662.5 $.0 $8,662.5 69.7% $6,037.8 14.5% $1,256.1 10.2% $883.6 5.6% $485.1 (Intersection)
Intersection - Sarnia / Philip Aziz / Western DC14-RS00076b 2023 $7,734.4 $.0 $.0 $7,734.4 10.0% $773.4 $6,960.9 12.5% $870.1 $.0 $6,090.8 $.0 $6,090.8 69.7% $4,245.3 14.5% $883.2 10.2% $621.3 5.6% $341.1 (Intersection)
DC19-RS00018 Intersection - Southdale / Colonel Talbot (Roundabout) 2024 $3,750.0 $.0 $.0 $3,750.0 20.0% $750.0 $3,000.0 12.5% $375.0 $.0 $2,625.0 $.0 $2,625.0 69.7% $1,829.6 14.5% $380.6 10.2% $267.8 5.6% $147.0
Intersection - Springbank / Wonderland DC19-RS00014 2027 $8,250.0 $.0 $.0 $8,250.0 20.0% $1,650.0 $6,600.0 12.5% $825.0 $.0 $5,775.0 $.0 $5,775.0 69.7% $4,025.2 14.5% $837.4 10.2% $589.1 5.6% $323.4 (Intersection)
DC19-RS00015 Intersection - Sunningdale / Hyde Park - (Roundabout) 2021 $4,037.5 $.0 $.0 $4,037.5 10.0% $403.8 $3,633.8 12.5% $454.2 $.0 $3,179.5 $.0 $3,179.5 69.7% $2,216.1 14.5% $461.0 10.2% $324.3 5.6% $178.1
SUBTOTAL $712,536.6 $11,579.3 $29,687.4 $671,269.9 26.6% $178,247.3 $493,022.7 18.3% $90,380.4 $.0 $402,642.2 $.0 $402,642.2 69.7% $280,641.6 14.5% $58,383.1 10.2% $41,069.5 5.6% $22,548.0
Two-Lane Arterial Upgrades
Bostwick - Pack to Southdale DC14-RS00210 2025 $2,923.4 $.0 $.0 $2,923.4 0.0% $.0 $2,923.4 13.9% $405.5 $.0 $2,517.9 $.0 $2,517.9 69.7% $1,754.9 14.5% $365.1 10.2% $256.8 5.6% $141.0 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Colonel Talbot - 300m South of Southdale to James DC14-RS00212 2023 $11,670.3 $.0 $.0 $11,670.3 3.9% $450.0 $11,220.3 14.3% $1,602.9 $.0 $9,617.4 $.0 $9,617.4 69.7% $6,703.3 14.5% $1,394.5 10.2% $981.0 5.6% $538.6 Street (2 Lane Upgrade)
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 166
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Two-Lane Arterial Upgrades Cont'd Dingman Drive - White Oak Rd to Western approach of DC19-RS00202 Dingman/Hwy 401 bridge 2035 $6,380.0 $.0 $.0 $6,380.0 7.1% $450.0 $5,930.0 14.8% $876.8 $.0 $5,053.2 $.0 $5,053.2 69.7% $3,522.1 14.5% $732.7 10.2% $515.4 5.6% $283.0 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Huron - Veterans Memorial Parkway easterly to Railway DC14-RS00220 2019 $1,794.4 $.0 $196.0 $1,598.4 0.0% $.0 $1,598.4 15.4% $246.6 $.0 $1,351.8 $.0 $1,351.8 69.7% $942.2 14.5% $196.0 10.2% $137.9 5.6% $75.7 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Kilally - Webster to Clarke DC14-RS00222 2030 $9,625.0 $.0 $.0 $9,625.0 0.0% $.0 $9,625.0 11.4% $1,096.0 $.0 $8,529.0 $.0 $8,529.0 69.7% $5,944.7 14.5% $1,236.7 10.2% $870.0 5.6% $477.6 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Pack Rd - Colonel Talbot to Bostwick DC14-RS00211 2032 $9,625.0 $.0 $.0 $9,625.0 0.0% $.0 $9,625.0 11.4% $1,096.0 $.0 $8,529.0 $.0 $8,529.0 69.7% $5,944.7 14.5% $1,236.7 10.2% $870.0 5.6% $477.6 (2 Lane Upgrade)
DC19-RS00203 South Street & Grey Street - (2 way conversion) 2027 $600.0 $.0 $.0 $600.0 0.0% $.0 $600.0 10.0% $60.0 $.0 $540.0 $.0 $540.0 69.7% $376.4 14.5% $78.3 10.2% $55.1 5.6% $30.2
Southdale - Wickerson to Byronhills DC14-RS00207 DC1 2020 $11,289.9 $.0 $2,032.5 $9,257.4 14.6% $1,350.0 $7,907.4 14.3% $1,134.4 $.0 $6,773.0 $.0 $6,773.0 69.7% $4,720.8 14.5% $982.1 10.2% $690.8 5.6% $379.3 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Sunningdale - South Wenige to Highbury DC14-RS00204 2028 $4,571.9 $.0 $437.2 $4,134.7 0.0% $.0 $4,134.7 12.6% $520.6 $.0 $3,614.1 $.0 $3,614.1 69.7% $2,519.0 14.5% $524.0 10.2% $368.6 5.6% $202.4 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Sunningdale - Highbury to Clarke DC19-RS00204 2024 $9,769.4 $.0 $.0 $9,769.4 9.2% $900.0 $8,869.4 15.1% $1,342.6 $.0 $7,526.8 $.0 $7,526.8 69.7% $5,246.2 14.5% $1,091.4 10.2% $767.7 5.6% $421.5 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Sunningdale - Hyde Park Road to Wonderland Road DC19-RS00205 2025 $11,742.5 $.0 $.0 $11,742.5 0.0% $.0 $11,742.5 11.4% $1,337.1 $.0 $10,405.4 $.0 $10,405.4 69.7% $7,252.5 14.5% $1,508.8 10.2% $1,061.3 5.6% $582.7 North (2 Lane Upgrade)
White Oak Road - Exeter Road to 400 m south DC19-RS00206 2022 $2,220.0 $.0 $.0 $2,220.0 0.0% $.0 $2,220.0 9.9% $219.2 $.0 $2,000.8 $.0 $2,000.8 69.7% $1,394.6 14.5% $290.1 10.2% $204.1 5.6% $112.0 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Wickerson - Southdale to 650 m North DC14-RS00206 2020 $3,545.1 $.0 $2,579.5 $965.6 0.0% $.0 $965.6 36.9% $356.2 $.0 $609.4 $.0 $609.4 69.7% $424.8 14.5% $88.4 10.2% $62.2 5.6% $34.1 (2 Lane Upgrade)
Wilton Grove - Commerce Road to City Limits DC14-RS00221 2019 $12,551.0 $.0 $1,668.9 $10,882.1 16.5% $1,800.0 $9,082.1 27.8% $2,526.3 $.0 $6,555.8 $.0 $6,555.8 69.7% $4,569.4 14.5% $950.6 10.2% $668.7 5.6% $367.1 (2 Lane Upgrade)
SUBTOTAL $98,307.8 $.0 $6,914.1 $91,393.7 5.4% $4,950.0 $86,443.7 14.8% $12,820.2 $.0 $73,623.5 $.0 $73,623.5 69.7% $51,315.6 14.5% $10,675.4 10.2% $7,509.6 5.6% $4,122.9
BRT Related Arterial Road Works
DC19-RS00301 Downtown 2020-2023 $22,276.2 $16,181.6 $517.7 $5,576.8 10.0% $557.7 $5,019.1 8.1% $408.4 $.0 $4,610.7 $.0 $4,610.7 69.7% $3,213.6 14.5% $668.5 10.2% $470.3 5.6% $258.2
DC19-RS00302 East 2020-2023 $90,828.5 $65,978.7 $2,111.0 $22,738.7 10.0% $2,273.9 $20,464.9 7.0% $1,441.4 $.0 $19,023.4 $.0 $19,023.4 69.7% $13,259.3 14.5% $2,758.4 10.2% $1,940.4 5.6% $1,065.3
DC19-RS00303 North 2022-2026 $104,159.8 $75,662.7 $2,420.9 $26,076.2 20.0% $5,215.2 $20,861.0 7.7% $1,597.3 $.0 $19,263.7 $.0 $19,263.7 69.7% $13,426.8 14.5% $2,793.2 10.2% $1,964.9 5.6% $1,078.8
DC19-RS00304 South 2023-2026 $97,121.2 $70,549.8 $2,257.3 $24,314.1 20.0% $4,862.8 $19,451.3 10.4% $2,019.3 $.0 $17,431.9 $.0 $17,431.9 69.7% $12,150.1 14.5% $2,527.6 10.2% $1,778.1 5.6% $976.2
DC19-RS00305 West 2025-2028 $49,554.8 $35,997.1 $1,151.8 $12,406.0 20.0% $2,481.2 $9,924.8 9.8% $969.8 $.0 $8,955.0 $.0 $8,955.0 69.7% $6,241.6 14.5% $1,298.5 10.2% $913.4 5.6% $501.5
SUBTOTAL $363,940.4 $264,369.9 $8,458.7 $91,111.8 16.9% $15,390.8 $75,721.0 8.5% $6,436.3 $.0 $69,284.7 $.0 $69,284.7 69.7% $48,291.4 14.5% $10,046.3 10.2% $7,067.0 5.6% $3,879.9
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 167
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Minor Road Works
DC19-RS01001 Channelization 2019-2038 $8,398.7 $.0 $.0 $8,398.7 0.0% $.0 $8,398.7 0.0% $.0 $.0 $8,398.7 $.0 $8,398.7 69.7% $5,853.9 14.5% $1,217.8 10.2% $856.7 5.6% $470.3
DC19-RS01002 Sidewalks 2019-2038 $4,444.0 $.0 $.0 $4,444.0 0.0% $.0 $4,444.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,444.0 $.0 $4,444.0 69.7% $3,097.5 14.5% $644.4 10.2% $453.3 5.6% $248.9
DC19-RS01003 Streetlights 2019-2038 $6,195.9 $.0 $.0 $6,195.9 0.0% $.0 $6,195.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,195.9 $.0 $6,195.9 69.7% $4,318.5 14.5% $898.4 10.2% $632.0 5.6% $347.0
DC19-RS01004 Traffic Signals 2019-2038 $9,425.0 $.0 $.0 $9,425.0 0.0% $.0 $9,425.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $9,425.0 $.0 $9,425.0 69.7% $6,569.2 14.5% $1,366.6 10.2% $961.4 5.6% $527.8
SUBTOTAL $28,463.5 $.0 $.0 $28,463.5 0.0% $.0 $28,463.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $28,463.5 $.0 $28,463.5 69.7% $19,839.1 14.5% $4,127.2 10.2% $2,903.3 5.6% $1,594.0
Additional Programs
DC19-RS01005 Urban Intersections 2019-2038 $20,000.0 $.0 $.0 $20,000.0 0.0% $.0 $20,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $20,000.0 $.0 $20,000.0 69.7% $13,940.0 14.5% $2,900.0 10.2% $2,040.0 5.6% $1,120.0
DC19-RS01006 Rural Intersections 2019-2038 $4,000.0 $.0 $.0 $4,000.0 0.0% $.0 $4,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,000.0 $.0 $4,000.0 69.7% $2,788.0 14.5% $580.0 10.2% $408.0 5.6% $224.0
DC19-RS01007 Active Transportation 2019-2038 $26,738.8 $.0 $.0 $26,738.8 0.0% $.0 $26,738.8 50.0% $13,369.4 $.0 $13,369.4 $.0 $13,369.4 69.7% $9,318.5 14.5% $1,938.6 10.2% $1,363.7 5.6% $748.7
DC19-RS01008 Advance Purchase of Land 2019-2038 $4,400.0 $.0 $.0 $4,400.0 0.0% $.0 $4,400.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,400.0 $.0 $4,400.0 69.7% $3,066.8 14.5% $638.0 10.2% $448.8 5.6% $246.4
DC19-RS01009 Road Class Oversizing / City Share 2019-2038 $2,000.0 $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 $.0 $2,000.0 69.7% $1,394.0 14.5% $290.0 10.2% $204.0 5.6% $112.0
DC19-RS01010 Strategic Links 2019-2038 $13,380.0 $.0 $.0 $13,380.0 0.0% $.0 $13,380.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $13,380.0 $.0 $13,380.0 69.7% $9,325.9 14.5% $1,940.1 10.2% $1,364.8 5.6% $749.3
DC19-RS01011 Transportation Intelligent Mobility Management System 2019-2028 $16,830.0 $.0 $.0 $16,830.0 0.0% $.0 $16,830.0 10.0% $1,683.0 $.0 $15,147.0 $.0 $15,147.0 69.7% $10,557.5 14.5% $2,196.3 10.2% $1,545.0 5.6% $848.2
SUBTOTAL $87,348.8 $.0 $.0 $87,348.8 0.0% $.0 $87,348.8 17.2% $15,052.4 $.0 $72,296.4 $.0 $72,296.4 69.7% $50,390.6 14.5% $10,483.0 10.2% $7,374.2 5.6% $4,048.6
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $35,677.7 $35,677.7 $35,677.7 $35,677.7 $35,677.7 69.3% $24,731.7 11.3% $4,032.0 8.4% $2,995.6 11.0% $3,918.5 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$1,326,274.9 $275,949.2 $45,060.2 $1,005,265.5 19.8% $198,588.1 $806,677.4 15.5% $124,689.3 $.0 $681,988.1 $.0 $681,988.1 69.7% $475,210.0 14.3% $97,747.0 10.1% $68,919.3 5.9% $40,111.9 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost)
Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance - CSRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $43,835.6 69.3% $30,386.7 11.3% $4,953.9 8.4% $3,680.6 11.0% $4,814.4 - UWRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $2,361.8 74.0% $1,747.7 11.0% $259.8 5.0% $118.1 10.0% $236.2
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation purposes $635,790.8 69.7% $443,075.6 14.6% $92,533.3 10.2% $65,120.6 5.5% $35,061.2 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 102,519 664,600 766,125 596,763
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $4,321.89 $139.23 $85.00 $58.75 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1)Total estimated cost, non-growth share, and RICI splits referenced from the 2019 London Development Charges Transportation Background Study prepared by IBI Group in consultation with Hemson Consulting. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Post Financing
Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 13,484.29 $ 15,336.90 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 9,119.18 $ 10,372.07 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 5,964.21 $ 6,783.63 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 8,081.93 $ 9,192.31 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 168
Table of Contents Roads Services TABLE J-2 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 20 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Res. (Persons In New Housing) 102,519 $ 4,321.89 $ 4,915.67 100% 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 102,519.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 664,600 $ 139.23 $ 158.36 100% 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 664,600.0 Institutional 766,125 $ 85.00 $ 96.68 100% 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 766,125.0 Industrial 596,763 $ 58.75 $ 66.82 100% 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 596,763.0 Total Non-Res. 2,027,488 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 2,027,488.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$168,097.2
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth.
Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 70% 70% Non-residential Commercial 15% 15% Institutional 10% 10% Industrial 6% 6%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 169
Table of Contents
APPENDIX K:
Wastewater Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 170
Table of Contents Wastewater Services
The 2014 Wastewater Servicing Master Plan Update and Development Charge (DC) Background In order to be eligible for a claim as a regional trunk sewer, the sewer must have no Private Study prepared by AECOM was used as a foundational document in the development of the 2019 Drain Connections to individual residential units otherwise the “Sewer Oversizing” policy One Water DC Update Study. The 2019 One Water DC Update Study prepared by in-house City of applies. London staff provides an updated 20 year plan for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater servicing to support development related growth within the City of London. For Wastewater, the update looked (b) Sewer Oversizing (CSRF - Wastewater) at the full system including wastewater collection system, pumping station and pollution control facilities. The 2019 One Water DC Update Study reached its conclusions by: Sewers, which are not regional trunk sewers, with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF: • Updating the City of London 2014 Wastewater Servicing DC Background Study to address 20 year growth, on a 5 year incremental basis, with consideration of the ultimate system • The sewer services external developable areas; and requirements over 50 years. • The sewer is greater than 250mm in diameter. • Confirming existing system operating conditions, related regulatory requirements and service level needs and reconfirm/identify any new growth related requirements. The oversized portion (>250mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on the diameter of • Updating costs for required growth works, growth/non-growth components and appropriate pipe and the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is residential, institutional, commercial and industrial allocations for trunk sewer upsizing, new determined by rounding the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes to the nearest collection works required, including pumping station/forcemain and pollution control plant depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in the DC By-law. facilities. • Considering ultimate build-out requirements to ensure appropriate Wastewater system The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of oversized sewer components and facilities are identified and post 2038 development can be determined. to determine the total oversizing subsidy. • Incorporating outputs from more recently completed works, Environmental Assessments (EA), and/or community plans; when possible ensure consistency with the City’s updated Where oversized Box and Elliptical sewers are constructed, an additional non-circular subsidy DC Transportation Background Study, and update project timing in accordance with the percentage is applied to the subsidy unit cost per metre. most recent Growth Management Implementation Strategy (GMIS). If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized sewer, the This Appendix summarizes the methods applied to the above work. More detailed information is upset claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost. available in the AECOM 2014 Wastewater Servicing DC Background Study and 2019 One Water DC Update Study. The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, manholes, restoration, etc. Policy Considerations (c) Pumping Stations (CSRF - Wastewater) The following policies were used to establish the quantum of works included in the Wastewater DC: The upgrading or construction of new regional pumping stations are to be identified as separate (a) Regional Trunk Sewers (CSRF - Wastewater) projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF.
All sewers required to service future development with a diameter greater than 450mm are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Study and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 171
Table of Contents Wastewater Services
(d) Wastewater Treatment Upgrades (CSRF - Wastewater) (h) Temporary Wastewater Systems (Owner Cost)
All wastewater treatment upgrades are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and Costs of all Wastewater systems that are temporary or are not defined in the DC Study shall are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Study and are eligible for a claim from the be borne by the Owner. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer CSRF. (or designate). Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision (e) Strategic Links for the permanent facility (i.e. secure land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions All sewers of any diameter required to service future development that are identified as a for the permanent work within the current DC Study. strategic link by the City Engineer (or designate) and are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. (i) Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
(f) Built Area Works The following subsections list the various Wastewater components which are considered a local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner: Infill and intensification servicing needs that meet the following requirements will be classified as Built Area Works: • Any pipe or portion of a larger pipe that is less than or equal to 250mm in diameter are referred to as local works; and • Service lands inside the Built Area; • Connections from a local sewer to existing external infrastructure. • Provide a regional benefit to growth; • Replace existing infrastructure; and 2019 DC Update Methodology • Are located within the municipal right-of-way or easement. Pollution control plant facilities and pumping station expansions and improvements will be needed to Built Area Works are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. For a determination of the eligible handle future sewage flows, in addition to more stringent effluent requirements. Given the size of the growth portion of the Built Area Work, refer to the DC By-law. pollution control plant facilities involved and the fact that sewage flows are conveyed to these facilities under varying conditions, expansion needs were driven by the following: (g) Temporary Pumping Stations (Owner Cost) • Average existing and future sewage flows (i.e. not peaked); The cost of any temporary pumping stations or forcemains is borne by the Owner. Approval of • An inflow and infiltration (I&I) allowance of 8,640 L/ha/day per the standard design temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). Where a temporary parameter; facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary • Expansion needs being closely matched to the 2038 sewage flow requirements with facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. provide minimal oversizing; and land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a • Sewage flows being balanced, wherever possible, among the pollution control plants to temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the maximize the utilization of available sewage treatment capacity and minimize the need current DC Study. for added expansions unless absolutely necessary.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 172
Table of Contents Wastewater Services
Establishing Costing Estimates growth/growth and residential/ICI splits were determined based on applying design criteria for residential and ICI Wastewater demands. In order to prepare costs estimates, a number of tools and analysis were used including a review of past cost estimating methodologies, a review of inflationary pressures and market adjustments in the (b) Residential/ICI London area, a review of recent EA estimates and tender results. The unit cost estimates provided in the 2014 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater DC studies were updated with the support provided Net eligible DC costs are allocated to residential and non-residential growth (i.e. ICI). The by a professional cost estimator employed at one of London’s major heavy construction contractors. residential and ICI allocations were generated using Watson and Associates Economists growth forecasts. Costs for engineering studies, EAs, design and construction administration along with the inclusion of a contingency amount for capital projects are included in the calculation of the cost of each growth Three types of allocation splits were used based on the particular project. Projects that provide project. Since many of the projects in this DC Study have not been considered through an EA process servicing primarily to non-industrial areas have been applied a “Community Growth” value that or gone through a preliminary design, a 20% contingency and 15% engineering allowance have been exclude industrial related growth. An “Industrial Growth” allocation is applied to infrastructure applied. These values mirror those used in previous DC studies. that strictly services industrial lands and projects that service city-wide growth have been allocated using a city-wide residential and ICI allocation. Post-Period Benefit Adjustments
The Development Charges Act requires that adjustments be applied to costs attributable to the rate Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation calculations for works considered to benefit post-period growth. Only those costs attributable to The required Wastewater works form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the servicing the defined growth period (20 years) are to be included in the establishment of a DC rate. numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Wastewater works are shown in In some cases, the total calculated cost of the works have been adjusted to represent the proportion Table K-1. of costs attributable to the defined growth period. Remaining costs are identified in the DC Study as post-period benefits. The post-period benefit values identified in the 2014 DC Study were updated Financing Costs as part of the 2019 update work. Any new projects to the 2019 DC Study have been analyzed and a post-period benefit applied where appropriate. Table K-2 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Wastewater works for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs Allocation Splits involved:
(a) Growth/Non-Growth a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; The growth and non-growth allocations for Wastewater works vary by project. Growth/non- b) Projecting DC revenues using the “pre-finance” rate; growth splits for Wastewater works were determined as follows: c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the 20-year study period; • City allocated the growth forecast for Residential / Institutional, Commercial and d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth Industrial across the City's transportation planning zones based on the Watson and works funded by debt; and Associates Economists growth forecasts which were endorsed by Council in 2018. e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to • Sub-divided the transportation zones by Wastewater service areas and tied to existing fund deficits throughout the 20-year planning horizon. or new nodes in the Wastewater model. • For new works added as part of this DC update, existing Wastewater demands were Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the determined based on current flow information within the GMIS Boundary and then non- expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 173
Table of Contents Wastewater Services
post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the 20-year planning horizon.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 174
Table of Contents Wastewater Services TABLE K-1 Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A ifap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo onfor this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies orother Pro ss oject CostFunded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10%statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib NetAmount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Wastewater Trunk Sewers
SS15A - Lambeth Growth Area Greenway PCP DC14-WW00005 2019 $5,000.0 $.0 $2,765.7 $2,234.3 0.0% $.0 $2,234.3 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,234.3 $.0 $2,234.3 73.8% $1,648.9 15.4% $344.1 10.8% $241.3 0.0% $.0 sewershed
DC14-WW00010 SS15B - Talbot Growth Area Greenway PCP Sewershed 2025 $2,964.9 $.0 $.0 $2,964.9 0.0% $.0 $2,964.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,964.9 $.0 $2,964.9 73.8% $2,188.1 15.4% $456.6 10.8% $320.2 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $7,964.9 $.0 $2,765.7 $5,199.2 0.0% $.0 $5,199.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,199.2 $.0 $5,199.2 73.8% $3,837.0 15.4% $800.7 10.8% $561.5 0.0% $.0
Wastewater Internal Oversizing Subsidy
DC19-WW01001 Wastewater Internal Oversizing Subsidy 2019-2038 $4,702.2 $.0 $.0 $4,702.2 0.0% $.0 $4,702.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,702.2 $.0 $4,702.2 73.8% $3,470.2 15.4% $724.1 10.8% $507.8 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $4,702.2 $.0 $.0 $4,702.2 0.0% $.0 $4,702.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,702.2 $.0 $4,702.2 73.8% $3,470.2 15.4% $724.1 10.8% $507.8 0.0% $.0
Wastewater Servicing - Built Area Works
DC19-WW01002 Wastewater Servicing - Built Area Works 2019-2038 $33,523.0 $.0 $.0 $33,523.0 5.0% $1,676.1 $31,846.8 62.4% $19,859.0 $.0 $11,987.9 $.0 $11,987.9 73.8% $8,847.1 15.4% $1,846.1 10.8% $1,294.7 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $33,523.0 $.0 $.0 $33,523.0 5.0% $1,676.1 $31,846.8 62.4% $19,859.0 $.0 $11,987.9 $.0 $11,987.9 73.8% $8,847.1 15.4% $1,846.1 10.8% $1,294.7 0.0% $.0
Wastewater Servicing - Strategic Links
DC19-WW01003 Wastewater Servicing - Strategic Links 2019-2038 $13,322.9 $.0 $.0 $13,322.9 0.0% $.0 $13,322.9 10.0% $1,332.3 $.0 $11,990.7 $.0 $11,990.7 73.8% $8,849.1 15.4% $1,846.6 10.8% $1,295.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $13,322.9 $.0 $.0 $13,322.9 0.0% $.0 $13,322.9 10.0% $1,332.3 $.0 $11,990.7 $.0 $11,990.7 73.8% $8,849.1 15.4% $1,846.6 10.8% $1,295.0 0.0% $.0
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades
DC19-WW00001 Adelaide Expansion Studies 2026 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 0.0% $.0 $500.0 19.0% $95.0 $.0 $405.0 $.0 $405.0 69.7% $282.3 14.5% $58.7 10.2% $41.3 5.6% $22.7
DC19-WW00002 Greenway Expansion Studies 2020/2024 $800.0 $.0 $.0 $800.0 0.0% $.0 $800.0 29.0% $232.0 $.0 $568.0 $.0 $568.0 69.7% $395.9 14.5% $82.4 10.2% $57.9 5.6% $31.8
DC19-WW00003 Greenway Incinerator Upgrade 2035 $75,000.0 $.0 $.0 $75,000.0 94.0% $70,500.0 $4,500.0 72.4% $3,258.0 $.0 $1,242.0 $.0 $1,242.0 69.7% $865.7 14.5% $180.1 10.2% $126.7 5.6% $69.6
DC19-WW00004 Oxford Expansion 2020/2032 $10,500.0 $.0 $.0 $10,500.0 81.0% $8,505.0 $1,995.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,995.0 $.0 $1,995.0 69.7% $1,390.5 14.5% $289.3 10.2% $203.5 5.6% $111.7
DC19-WW00005 Pottersburg/ Vauxhall Transfer PSs 2019 $5,000.0 $.0 $.0 $5,000.0 0.0% $.0 $5,000.0 10.0% $500.0 $.0 $4,500.0 $.0 $4,500.0 73.8% $3,321.0 15.4% $693.0 10.8% $486.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-WW01002 Vauxhall Expansion 2024 $6,000.0 $.0 $.0 $6,000.0 19.0% $1,140.0 $4,860.0 50.0% $2,430.0 $.0 $2,430.0 $.0 $2,430.0 73.8% $1,793.3 15.4% $374.2 10.8% $262.4 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $97,800.0 $.0 $.0 $97,800.0 81.9% $80,145.0 $17,655.0 36.9% $6,515.0 $.0 $11,140.0 $.0 $11,140.0 72.3% $8,048.7 15.1% $1,677.7 10.6% $1,177.9 2.1% $235.8
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 175
Table of Contents Wastewater Services TABLE K-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Wastewater Pumping Station Works
DC19-WW00006 Byron PS Upgrade 2019/2023 $3,500.0 $.0 $.0 $3,500.0 12.4% $434.0 $3,066.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,066.0 $.0 $3,066.0 69.7% $2,137.0 14.5% $444.6 10.2% $312.7 5.6% $171.7
DC19-WW00007 Colonel Talbot PS Upgrade 2028 $500.0 $.0 $.0 $500.0 46.2% $231.0 $269.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $269.0 $.0 $269.0 69.7% $187.5 14.5% $39.0 10.2% $27.4 5.6% $15.1
DC19-WW00008 Dingman Creek PS Peak Shaving 2025 $7,300.0 $.0 $.0 $7,300.0 0.0% $.0 $7,300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $7,300.0 $.0 $7,300.0 69.7% $5,088.1 14.5% $1,058.5 10.2% $744.6 5.6% $408.8
DC14-WW01005 East Park PS Upgrade 2021 $4,000.0 $.0 $1,653.0 $2,347.0 0.0% $.0 $2,347.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,347.0 $.0 $2,347.0 69.7% $1,635.9 14.5% $340.3 10.2% $239.4 5.6% $131.4
SUBTOTAL $15,300.0 $.0 $1,653.0 $13,647.0 4.9% $665.0 $12,982.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $12,982.0 $.0 $12,982.0 69.7% $9,048.5 14.5% $1,882.4 10.2% $1,324.2 5.6% $727.0
Industrial Wastewater Servicing Works
Industrial Wastewater Servicing Internal Oversizing DC19-WW01004 2019-2028 $472.5 $.0 $.0 $472.5 0.0% $.0 $472.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $472.5 $.0 $472.5 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $472.5 (250ha)
DC19-WW01005 Industrial Wastewater Servicing (250ha) 2019-2028 $8,174.9 $.0 $.0 $8,174.9 0.0% $.0 $8,174.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $8,174.9 $.0 $8,174.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $8,174.9
DC19-WW01006 Industrial Wastewater Servicing (300ha) 2029-2038 $10,080.0 $.0 $.0 $10,080.0 97.0% $9,777.6 $302.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $302.4 $.0 $302.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $302.4
Industrial Wastewater Servicing Internal Oversizing DC19-WW01007 2029-2038 $210.0 $.0 $.0 $210.0 97.0% $203.7 $6.3 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6.3 $.0 $6.3 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $6.3 (300ha)
SUBTOTAL $18,937.4 $.0 $.0 $18,937.4 52.7% $9,981.3 $8,956.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $8,956.1 $.0 $8,956.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $8,956.1
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $73,180.0 $73,180.0 $73,180.0 $73,180.0 $73,180.0 75.3% $55,133.4 5.2% $3,793.8 2.7% $2,008.3 16.7% $12,244.5 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$1,326,274.9 $275,949.2 $45,060.2 $1,005,265.5 19.8% $198,588.1 $806,677.4 15.5% $124,689.3 $.0 $681,988.1 $.0 $681,988.1 69.7% $475,210.0 14.3% $97,747.0 10.1% $68,919.3 5.9% $40,111.9 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost)
Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance - CSRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $1,496.0 75.3% $1,127.1 5.2% $77.6 2.7% $41.1 16.7% $250.3 - UWRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $1,239.0 90.0% $1,115.1 6.7% $83.0 3.0% $36.6 0.4% $4.3
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation purposes $137,403.0 69.1% $94,991.8 9.0% $12,410.8 5.9% $8,091.8 15.9% $21,908.7 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 102,519 664,600 766,125 596,763
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $926.58 $18.67 $10.56 $36.71 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Total estimated cost, non-growth share, and RICI splits referenced from the 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Post Financing
Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 2,890.92 $ 3,794.55 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 1,955.08 $ 2,566.18 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 1,278.68 $ 1,678.36 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 1,732.70 $ 2,274.30
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 176
Table of Contents Wastewater Services TABLE K-2 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 20 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Res. (Persons In New Housing) 102,519 $ 926.58 $ 1,216.20 100% 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 102,519.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 664,600 $ 18.67 $ 24.51 100% 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 664,600.0 Institutional 766,125 $ 10.56 $ 13.86 100% 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 766,125.0 Industrial 596,763 $ 36.71 $ 48.19 100% 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 596,763.0 Total Non-Res. 2,027,488 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 2,027,488.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$39,810.2
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth.
Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 69% 69% Non-residential Commercial 9% 9% Institutional 6% 6% Industrial 16% 16%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 177
Table of Contents
APPENDIX L:
Stormwater Management Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 178
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services
The 2014 Stormwater and Drainage Development Charge (DC) Update Study prepared by Delcan (b) Regional Open Channels (CSRF - Stormwater) was used as a foundational document in the development of the 2019 One Water DC Update Study. The 2019 One Water DC Update Study prepared by in-house City of London staff provides the 20 Any open channel works identified through the EA process that are considered to satisfy a year plan for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater servicing to support development related growth regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Study and are within the City of London. For Stormwater, the update looked at the full system including Stormwater eligible for a claim from the CSRF. Management (SWM) Facilities, trunk storm sewers, Stormwater conveyance and oversizing, Low Impact Development (LID) and open watercourse works. The DC update reached its conclusions by: (c) Storm Sewer Oversizing (CSRF - Stormwater)
• Updating the City of London 2014 Stormwater and Drainage DC Update Study for Stormwater Storm Sewers with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF: to address 20 year growth, on a 5 year incremental basis, with consideration of the ultimate system requirements over 50 years. • The sewer services external developable areas; and • Confirming existing system operating conditions, related regulatory requirements and service • The sewer is greater than 1050mm in diameter. level needs and reconfirm/identify any new growth related requirements. • Updating costs for required growth works, growth/non-growth components and appropriate The oversized portion (>1050mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on the diameter of residential, institutional, commercial and industrial allocations for Stormwater management pipe and the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is works. determined by rounding the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes to the nearest • Considering ultimate build-out requirements to ensure appropriate Stormwater works are depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in the DC By-law. identified and post 2038 development can be determined. • Incorporating outputs from more recently completed works, Environmental Assessments (EA), The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of oversized sewer and/or community plans; ensuring consistency with the City’s updated DC Transportation to determine the total oversizing subsidy. Background Study, and update project timing in accordance with the most recent Growth Management Implementation Strategy (GMIS). Where oversized Box and Elliptical sewers are constructed, an additional non-circular subsidy percentage is applied to the subsidy unit cost per metre. This Appendix summarizes the methods applied to the above work. More detailed information is available in the Delcan 2014 Stormwater and Drainage DC Update Study and 2019 One Water DC If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized sewer, the Update Study. upset claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost.
Policy Considerations The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, manholes, restoration, etc. The following policies were used to establish the quantum of works included in the Stormwater Management DC: (d) Open Channel Oversizing (CSRF - Stormwater)
(a) Regional Trunk Sewers (CSRF - Stormwater) Open Channels with all of the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF:
All sewers to be constructed within existing City owned lands that service multiple new • An open channel design is required for the reason of inherent site drainage constraints development areas are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to be and the design has been accepted by the City Engineer (or designate); identified as separate projects in the DC Study are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. • The open channel services external developable areas; and
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 179
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services
• The open channel has a 2-year storm design flow cross-sectional area greater than a (g) Major SWM Facility Inlet and Outlet Sewers within the SWM Block (CSRF - Stormwater) 1050mm sewer using the City’s minimum design standards. Any storm sewers or engineered channels within a Major SWM Facility block that are either The oversized portion represents the cross-sectional area required in excess of a 1050mm upstream or downstream of a facility are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and sewer for a 2-year storm design. The oversizing subsidy will be calculated based on the are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. additional cost of oversizing beyond an area equivalent to a 1050mm pipe size using the City’s minimum design standards for a 2-year storm design flow. The oversizing subsidy is payable (h) Major SWM Facility Outlet Sewers Outside the SWM Block (CSRF - Stormwater) based on an average oversizing cost in the form of a $/m of channel constructed as calculated by the Owner’s professional engineer and as accepted by the City Engineer (or designate). An Any major SWM Facility outlet system, including storm sewers or engineered channels, that allowance of 15% will be added to the calculated oversizing amount to cover applicable extend outside of the SWM Facility is considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and is engineering costs. eligible for a claim from the CSRF if it is a dedicated outlet system to convey flow from the SWM Facility to the allocated downstream storm sewer or watercourse. (e) Stormwater Management Works (CSRF - Stormwater) (i) Low Impact Development Subsidy – Linear Works (CSRF – Stormwater) EA Complete Linear LID works with all of the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF: Any municipally owned or operated Stormwater management works designed to provide capacity to facilitate growth that are identified through the EA process and are considered to • The LID works are infiltration systems designed to improve water quality or the water satisfy a regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Study balance within the new development; and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. • The LID works are constructed in conjunction with local Stormwater servicing on City- owned lands or within a dedicated municipal easement; and, EA Not Complete • The design has been accepted by the City Engineer (or designate).
Stormwater Management Works for which an EA has not been completed that are anticipated Linear LID infiltration works are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate area specific eligible for a subsidy payable in terms of a $/m of pipe constructed. contingencies in the DC Study and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. The subsidy payable for LID pipe systems is based on the average depth of pipe between Upon completion of the applicable EA (i.e. no outstanding Part 2 orders), a review of the related maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is determined by rounding the average pipe depth area specific contingency and the DC rate will be undertaken and, if required, an amendment between maintenance holes to the nearest depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in to the DC By-law will be made. the DC By-law. The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of pipe to determine the total LID subsidy. (f) Stormwater Management Facility Land Policies (CSRF - Stormwater) For other LIDs, such as rain gardens or infiltration swales, the subsidy payable is based on a With respect to land acquisition for SWM Facilities, the value of the land shall align with the 5 m depth for the length of the LID feature. CP-9 By-law for Conveyance of Land and Cash in Lieu Thereof Park and Other Purposes. Land will be reimbursed at a specific rate, with different land values assigned to different The subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including categories as outlined in the DC By-law. engineering, construction, etc. LID works constructed within a site plan are not eligible for subsidy.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 180
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services
(j) Built Area Works precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. secure land for Infill and intensification servicing needs that meet the following requirements will be classified permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a temporary as Built Area Works: work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study. • Service lands inside the Built Area; • Provide a regional benefit to growth; 2019 DC Update Methodology • Replace existing infrastructure; and The 2019 DC project list is comprised of eligible Stormwater servicing projects required for lands • Are located within the municipal right-of-way or easement. scheduled for development within the 20 year growth period. The starting point for updating the list
of projects was to remove all works that have been completed since the adoption of the 2014 DC Built Area Works are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. For a determination of the eligible Study and then updating the list of projects based on information derived from several Stormwater growth portion of the Built Area Work, refer to the DC By-law. studies that have been completed. In addition, timing of projects were reviewed and adjusted, if
necessary, to align with Transportation, Wastewater, and Water Distribution works and GMIS. (k) Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
The following subsections list the various Stormwater components which are considered a Establishing Cost Estimates local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner: In order to prepare costs estimates, a number of tools and analyses were used including a review of past cost estimating methodologies, a review of inflationary pressures and market adjustments in the • Any pipe or portion of a larger pipe that is less than or equal to 1050mm in diameter are London area, a review of recent EA estimates and tender results. The unit cost estimates provided referred to as local works; in the 2014 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater DC studies were updated with the support provided • Connections from a local sewer to existing external infrastructure; by a professional cost estimator employed at one of London’s major heavy construction contractors. • Mitigation/compensation works recommended by an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that are related to the subdivision; and Costs for engineering studies, EAs, design and construction administration along with the inclusion • Construction of road side ditches, swales without an infiltration component, and of a contingency amount for capital projects are included in the calculation of the cost of each growth overland flow routes. project. Since many of the projects in this DC Study have not been considered through an EA process or advanced through a preliminary design, a 20% contingency and 15%-20% engineering allowance (l) Temporary Storm Sewers (Owner Cost) have been applied. These values mirror those used in previous DC studies.
Costs of all storm sewer systems that are temporary or not defined in the DC Study shall be Post-Period Benefit Adjustments borne by the Owner. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Study. Approval of temporary works is at the The Development Charges Act requires that adjustments be applied to costs attributable to the rate discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). calculations for works considered to benefit post-period growth. Only those costs attributable to servicing the defined growth period (20 years) are to be included in the establishment of a DC rate. (m)Temporary Stormwater Management Works (Owner Cost) In some cases, the total calculated cost of the works have been adjusted to represent the proportion of costs attributable to the defined growth period. Remaining costs are identified in the DC Study as Any temporary works or works not included in the approved DC Study are at the sole expense post-period benefits. The post-period benefit values identified in the 2014 DC Study were updated of the Owner including operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Approval of temporary as part of the 2019 update work. Any new projects to the 2019 DC Study have been analyzed and a works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). Where a temporary facility post-period benefit applied where appropriate.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 181
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services
Allocation Splits d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth works funded by debt; and (a) Growth/Non-Growth e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to fund deficits throughout the 20-year planning horizon. SWM Facilities and their related components are generally considered to be 100% growth driven due the nature of these facilities being required to service new development. However, Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the where a non-growth component is deemed appropriate, it has been calculated using a ratio of expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the the growth area to developed area. post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate (b) Residential/ICI cost recovery from growth for the 20-year planning horizon.
Net eligible DC costs are allocated to residential and non-residential growth (i.e. ICI). The residential and ICI allocations were generated using Watson and Associates Economists growth forecasts which were endorsed by Council in 2018.
Three types of allocation splits were used based on the particular project. Projects that provide servicing primarily to non-industrial areas have been applied a “Community Growth” value that exclude industrial related growth. An “Industrial Growth” allocation is applied to infrastructure that strictly services industrial lands and projects that service city-wide growth have been allocated using a city-wide residential and ICI allocation.
Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation
The required Stormwater servicing works form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total costs calculated for Stormwater works are listed in Table L-1.
Financing Costs
Table L-2 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Stormwater works for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance, which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; b) Projecting DC revenues using the "pre-finance" rate; c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified in the 20-year study period;
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 182
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services TABLE L-1 Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Community Growth SWM Works
DC14-MS00006 Fox Hollow 1 - Phase 2 2019 $2,702.7 $.0 $620.0 $2,082.7 27.7% $576.9 $1,505.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,505.8 $.0 $1,505.8 73.8% $1,111.2 15.4% $231.9 10.8% $162.6 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00009 Kilally South, East Basin 2022 $4,485.8 $.0 $250.0 $4,235.8 0.0% $.0 $4,235.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,235.8 $.0 $4,235.8 73.8% $3,126.0 15.4% $652.3 10.8% $457.5 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00011 London Psychiatric Hospital (LPH) SWMF 2019 $3,954.1 $.0 $500.0 $3,454.1 0.0% $.0 $3,454.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,454.1 $.0 $3,454.1 73.8% $2,549.1 15.4% $531.9 10.8% $373.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00033 Stoney Creek 7.1 2023 $1,747.5 $.0 $.0 $1,747.5 11.1% $194.0 $1,553.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,553.5 $.0 $1,553.5 73.8% $1,146.5 15.4% $239.2 10.8% $167.8 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00036 Stoney Creek SWMF 8 2020 $1,851.2 $.0 $.0 $1,851.2 0.0% $.0 $1,851.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,851.2 $.0 $1,851.2 73.8% $1,366.2 15.4% $285.1 10.8% $199.9 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00034 Stoney Creek SWMF 10 2025 $2,624.6 $.0 $.0 $2,624.6 12.5% $328.1 $2,296.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,296.6 $.0 $2,296.6 73.8% $1,694.9 15.4% $353.7 10.8% $248.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00038 Sunningdale SWMF E1 2021 $3,146.0 $.0 $.0 $3,146.0 0.0% $.0 $3,146.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,146.0 $.0 $3,146.0 73.8% $2,321.8 15.4% $484.5 10.8% $339.8 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00003 Dingman Creek Online 2 2019 $5,000.0 $.0 $710.0 $4,290.0 0.0% $.0 $4,290.0 85.0% $3,646.5 $.0 $643.5 $.0 $643.5 69.7% $448.5 14.5% $93.3 10.2% $65.6 5.6% $36.0
DC14-MS00001 Dingman Creek Channel Remediation Works 2020 $10,100.0 $.0 $1,100.0 $9,000.0 0.0% $.0 $9,000.0 86.0% $7,740.0 $.0 $1,260.0 $.0 $1,260.0 69.7% $878.2 14.5% $182.7 10.2% $128.5 5.6% $70.6
DC14-MS00030 Pincombe Drain SWMF 4 - Phase 1 2020 $5,354.0 $.0 $354.0 $5,000.0 0.0% $.0 $5,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,000.0 $.0 $5,000.0 73.8% $3,690.0 15.4% $770.0 10.8% $540.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00031 Pincombe Drain SWMF 5 2025 $1,900.0 $.0 $.0 $1,900.0 0.0% $.0 $1,900.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,900.0 $.0 $1,900.0 73.8% $1,402.2 15.4% $292.6 10.8% $205.2 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00039 White Oaks SWMF 3 2022 $4,725.0 $.0 $425.0 $4,300.0 5.6% $240.8 $4,059.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,059.2 $.0 $4,059.2 73.8% $2,995.7 15.4% $625.1 10.8% $438.4 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00040 White Oaks SWMF 4 2027 $4,400.0 $.0 $.0 $4,400.0 33.3% $1,465.2 $2,934.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,934.8 $.0 $2,934.8 73.8% $2,165.9 15.4% $452.0 10.8% $317.0 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00059 DC1Old Oak SWM 2 2027 $2,933.3 $.0 $416.7 $2,516.7 25.0% $629.2 $1,887.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,887.5 $.0 $1,887.5 73.8% $1,393.0 15.4% $290.7 10.8% $203.8 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00014 Murray Marr SWMF 1 2029 $3,100.0 $.0 $.0 $3,100.0 34.8% $1,078.8 $2,021.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,021.2 $.0 $2,021.2 69.7% $1,408.8 14.5% $293.1 10.2% $206.2 5.6% $113.2
DC14-MS00024 North Lambeth P8 2020 $3,950.0 $.0 $550.0 $3,400.0 0.0% $.0 $3,400.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,400.0 $.0 $3,400.0 73.8% $2,509.2 15.4% $523.6 10.8% $367.2 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00017 North Lambeth P1 2033 $3,000.0 $.0 $.0 $3,000.0 61.0% $1,830.0 $1,170.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,170.0 $.0 $1,170.0 73.8% $863.5 15.4% $180.2 10.8% $126.4 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00019 North Lambeth P3 (Dingman Tributary D4) 2026 $3,700.0 $.0 $.0 $3,700.0 36.3% $1,343.1 $2,356.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,356.9 $.0 $2,356.9 73.8% $1,739.4 15.4% $363.0 10.8% $254.5 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00020 North Lambeth P4 (Dingman Tributary D3) 2023 $2,800.0 $.0 $.0 $2,800.0 0.0% $.0 $2,800.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,800.0 $.0 $2,800.0 73.8% $2,066.4 15.4% $431.2 10.8% $302.4 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 183
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services TABLE L-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Community Growth SWM Works Cont'd
DC14-MS00021 North Lambeth P5 2030 $2,100.0 $.0 $.0 $2,100.0 0.0% $.0 $2,100.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,100.0 $.0 $2,100.0 73.8% $1,549.8 15.4% $323.4 10.8% $226.8 0.0% $.0
DC14-MS00022 North Lambeth P6 2026 $3,000.0 $.0 $.0 $3,000.0 7.1% $213.0 $2,787.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,787.0 $.0 $2,787.0 73.8% $2,056.8 15.4% $429.2 10.8% $301.0 0.0% $.0
North Lambeth P10 (Dingman Tributary D2) DC14-MS00018 2021 $4,300.0 $.0 $.0 $4,300.0 0.0% $.0 $4,300.0 91.0% $3,913.0 $.0 $387.0 $.0 $387.0 73.8% $285.6 15.4% $59.6 10.8% $41.8 0.0% $.0 Phase 1
Mud Creek East Branch Phase 2 DC19-MS00001 2020 $7,169.6 $.0 $2,294.2 $4,875.4 0.0% $.0 $4,875.4 63.1% $3,074.9 $.0 $1,800.5 $.0 $1,800.5 73.8% $1,328.7 15.4% $277.3 10.8% $194.5 0.0% $.0 (CN to Oxford)
Mud Creek East Branch Phase 3 DC19-MS00002 2022 $3,669.6 $.0 $.0 $3,669.6 0.0% $.0 $3,669.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,669.6 $.0 $3,669.6 73.8% $2,708.2 15.4% $565.1 10.8% $396.3 0.0% $.0 (Oxford St to CP Rail)
DC19-MS00063 Interim Works As Identified In EAs 2019-2028 $2,000.0 $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 $.0 $2,000.0 69.7% $1,394.0 14.5% $290.0 10.2% $204.0 5.6% $112.0
DC19-MS00065 Pre-Assumption Monitoring 2019-2028 $2,000.0 $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $2,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,000.0 $.0 $2,000.0 73.8% $1,476.0 15.4% $308.0 10.8% $216.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-MS00003 Subwatershed Impact Monitoring 2019-2038 $5,000.0 $.0 $.0 $5,000.0 0.0% $.0 $5,000.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,000.0 $.0 $5,000.0 73.8% $3,690.0 15.4% $770.0 10.8% $540.0 0.0% $.0
DC19-MS00004 Contingency Facility 2023 $5,500.0 $.0 $.0 $5,500.0 0.0% $.0 $5,500.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,500.0 $.0 $5,500.0 73.8% $4,059.0 15.4% $847.0 10.8% $594.0 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $106,213.5 $.0 $7,219.9 $98,993.6 8.0% $7,899.0 $91,094.6 20.2% $18,374.4 $.0 $72,720.2 $.0 $72,720.2 73.5% $53,424.6 15.3% $11,145.6 10.8% $7,818.2 0.5% $331.8
Community Growth Trunk Storm Sewer Works
DC19-MS01000 Community Growth Trunk Storm Sewer Works 2019-2038 $7,245.6 $.0 $.0 $7,245.6 10.5% $760.1 $6,485.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,485.5 $.0 $6,485.5 73.8% $4,786.3 15.4% $998.8 10.8% $700.4 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $7,245.6 $.0 $.0 $7,245.6 10.5% $760.1 $6,485.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,485.5 $.0 $6,485.5 73.8% $4,786.3 15.4% $998.8 10.8% $700.4 0.0% $.0
Storm Sewer Internal Oversizing Subsidy
DC19-MS01001 Storm Sewer Internal Oversizing Subsidy 2019-2038 $34,059.8 $.0 $.0 $34,059.8 0.0% $.0 $34,059.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $34,059.8 $.0 $34,059.8 73.8% $25,136.1 15.4% $5,245.2 10.8% $3,678.5 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $34,059.8 $.0 $.0 $34,059.8 0.0% $.0 $34,059.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $34,059.8 $.0 $34,059.8 73.8% $25,136.1 15.4% $5,245.2 10.8% $3,678.5 0.0% $.0
Storm Sewer - Built Area Works
DC19-MS01002 Storm Sewer - Built Area Works 2019-2038 $69,774.1 $.0 $.0 $69,774.1 5.0% $3,488.7 $66,285.3 44.5% $29,490.4 $.0 $36,795.0 $.0 $36,795.0 73.8% $27,154.7 15.4% $5,666.4 10.8% $3,973.9 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $69,774.1 $.0 $.0 $69,774.1 5.0% $3,488.7 $66,285.3 44.5% $29,490.4 $.0 $36,795.0 $.0 $36,795.0 73.8% $27,154.7 15.4% $5,666.4 10.8% $3,973.9 0.0% $.0
Low Impact Development
DC19-MS01003 Low Impact Development 2019-2038 $38,710.9 $.0 $.0 $38,710.9 0.0% $.0 $38,710.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $38,710.9 $.0 $38,710.9 73.8% $28,568.7 15.4% $5,961.5 10.8% $4,180.8 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $38,710.9 $.0 $.0 $38,710.9 0.0% $.0 $38,710.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $38,710.9 $.0 $38,710.9 73.8% $28,568.7 15.4% $5,961.5 10.8% $4,180.8 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 184
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services TABLE L-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Industrial SWM Ponds
DC14-MS00053 Huron Industrial SWMF 2019 $5,252.0 $.0 $4,782.8 $469.2 0.0% $.0 $469.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $469.2 $.0 $469.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $469.2
DC14-MS00054 Industrial Facility 2 2022 $5,252.0 $.0 $1,195.7 $4,056.3 10.5% $425.9 $3,630.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,630.4 $.0 $3,630.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $3,630.4
DC14-MS00055 Industrial Facility 3 2024 $5,252.0 $.0 $.0 $5,252.0 6.3% $330.9 $4,921.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,921.1 $.0 $4,921.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $4,921.1
DC14-MS00056 Industrial Facility 4 2028 $5,252.0 $.0 $.0 $5,252.0 31.3% $1,643.9 $3,608.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,608.1 $.0 $3,608.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $3,608.1
DC14-MS00057 Industrial Facility 5 2030 $5,252.0 $.0 $.0 $5,252.0 44.9% $2,358.1 $2,893.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,893.8 $.0 $2,893.8 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $2,893.8
DC14-MS00060 Pottersburg Channel 2024 $3,533.4 $.0 $.0 $3,533.4 0.0% $.0 $3,533.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,533.4 $.0 $3,533.4 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $3,533.4
SUBTOTAL $29,793.3 $.0 $5,978.5 $23,814.8 20.0% $4,758.8 $19,056.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $19,056.0 $.0 $19,056.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $19,056.0
Industrial Trunk Storm Sewer Works
DC19-MS01004 Industrial Storm Trunk Sewers (250ha) 2019-2028 $566.6 $.0 $.0 $566.6 0.0% $.0 $566.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $566.6 $.0 $566.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $566.6
DC19-MS01005 Industrial Storm Trunk Sewers (300ha) 2029-2038 $2,200.0 $.0 $.0 $2,200.0 97.0% $2,134.0 $66.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $66.0 $.0 $66.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $66.0
DC19-MS01006 Industrial Storm Servicing Internal Oversizing (250ha) 2019-2028 $4,300.0 $.0 $.0 $4,300.0 0.0% $.0 $4,300.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,300.0 $.0 $4,300.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $4,300.0
DC19-MS01007 Industrial Storm Servicing Internal Oversizing (300ha) 2029-2038 $4,400.0 $.0 $.0 $4,400.0 97.0% $4,268.0 $132.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $132.0 $.0 $132.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $132.0
SUBTOTAL $11,466.6 $.0 $.0 $11,466.6 55.8% $6,402.0 $5,064.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,064.6 $.0 $5,064.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $5,064.6
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $73,106.7 $73,106.7 $73,106.7 $73,106.7 $73,106.7 70.8% $51,733.0 8.9% $6,527.6 6.1% $4,462.9 14.2% $10,383.3 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$370,370.4 $.0 $13,198.4 $357,172.0 6.5% $23,308.6 $333,863.4 14.3% $47,864.7 $.0 $285,998.7 $.0 $285,998.7 66.7% $190,803.4 12.4% $35,545.1 8.7% $24,814.6 12.2% $34,835.6 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost)
Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance - CSRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $7,654.5 70.8% $5,416.6 8.9% $683.5 6.1% $467.3 14.2% $1,087.2 - UWRF reserve fund at December 31, 2018 $784.2 82.0% $643.1 12.0% $94.1 6.0% $47.1 0.0% $.0
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation purposes $277,559.9 66.6% $184,743.6 12.5% $34,767.5 8.8% $24,300.3 12.2% $33,748.5 Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 102,519 664,600 766,125 596,763
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $1,802.04 $52.31 $31.72 $56.55 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Total estimated cost, non-growth share, and RICI splits referenced from the 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Post Financing
Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 5,622.37 $ 6,868.28 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 3,802.31 $ 4,644.89 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 2,486.82 $ 3,037.89 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 3,369.82 $ 4,116.56 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 185
Table of Contents Stormwater Management Services TABLE L-2 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 20 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Res. (Persons In New Housing) 102,519 $ 1,802.04 $ 2,201.37 100% 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 102,519.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 664,600 $ 52.31 $ 63.91 100% 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 664,600.0 Institutional 766,125 $ 31.72 $ 38.75 100% 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 766,125.0 Industrial 596,763 $ 56.55 $ 69.08 100% 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 596,763.0 Total Non-Res. 2,027,488 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 2,027,488.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$21,756.5
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth.
Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 67% 67% Non-residential Commercial 13% 13% Institutional 9% 9% Industrial 12% 12%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 186
Table of Contents
APPENDIX M:
Water Distribution Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 187
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services
The 2014 Water Servicing Development Charge (DC) Background Study prepared by AECOM was (a) Major Watermains (CSRF-Water Distribution) used as a foundational document in the development of the 2019 One Water DC Update Study. The 2019 One Water DC Update Study prepared by in-house City of London staff provides the 20 year All watermains required to service future development greater than or equal to 400mm in plan for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater servicing to support development related growth within diameter are considered to satisfy a network wide benefit to growth and are to be identified the City of London. For Water, the update looked at the full system including the Southeast, low and separately as projects in the DC Study and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. high pressure systems, pumping and storage systems. The DC update reached its conclusions by: (b) Watermain Oversizing (CSRF-Water Distribution) • Updating the City of London 2014 Water Servicing DC Background Study for water distribution to address 20 year growth, on a 5 year incremental basis, with consideration of Watermains with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF: the ultimate system requirements over 50 years. • The watermain services external developable areas, and • Confirming existing system operating conditions, related regulatory requirements and • The watermain is greater than 250mm in diameter. service level needs and reconfirm/identify any new growth related requirements. The oversized portion (>250mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on an average • Updating costs for required growth works, growth/non-growth components and appropriate oversizing cost and is stated in terms of a $/m of pipe constructed. The oversizing subsidy residential, institutional, commercial and industrial allocations for both the City’s water amounts will be identified in a schedule provided in the approved DC By-law distribution system and facilities. If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized watermain, • Considering ultimate build-out requirements to ensure appropriate water distribution the upset claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost. system components and facilities are identified and post 2038 development can be determined. The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, appurtenances, restoration, etc. • Incorporating outputs from more recently completed works, Environmental Assessments (EA), and/or community plans; ensure consistency with the City’s updated DC (c) Water Facilities (CSRF-Water Distribution) Transportation Background Study, and update project timing in accordance with the most recent Growth Management Implementation Strategy (GMIS). Where the upgrading or construction of new public water booster pumping stations and reservoir projects are designed to increase capacity or improve service to acceptable This Appendix summarizes the methods applied to the above work. More detailed information is standards and as a result of growth, these works are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. These available in the AECOM 2014 Water Servicing DC Background Study and 2019 One Water DC projects must also be identified in the DC Study. Update Study. (d) Temporary Facilities (Owner Cost) Policy Considerations Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that The following policies were used to establish the quantum of works included in the Water Distribution requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the DC: permanent facility (i.e. secure land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 188
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services
designate). In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the within the Southwest Area Secondary Plan (SWAP). The recommendation from this assignment was permanent work within the current DC Study. added to the Strategic Links program.
(e) Strategic Links Establishing Costing Estimates
The DC rate setting process requires the estimated costs of the identified growth works be reasonable All watermains of any diameter required to service future development that are identified as a and defensible. In order to prepare costs estimates, a number of tools and analysis were used strategic link by the City Engineer (or designate) are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to including a review of past cost estimating methodologies, a review of inflationary pressures and growth and are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. market adjustments in the London area, a review of recent EA estimates and tender results. The unit
cost estimates provided in the 2014 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater DC studies were updated (f) Built Area Works with the support provided by a professional cost estimator employed at one of London’s major heavy
construction contractors. Infill and intensification servicing needs that meet the following requirements will be classified
as Built Area Works: Costs for engineering studies, EAs, design and construction administration along with the inclusion
of a contingency amount for capital projects are included in the calculation of the cost of each growth • Service lands inside the Built Area; project. Since many of the projects in this DC Study have not been considered through an EA process • Provide a regional benefit to growth; or advanced through a preliminary design, a 20% contingency and 15% engineering allowance have • Replace existing infrastructure; and been applied. These values mirror those used in previous DC studies. • Are located within the municipal right-of-way or easement.
Post-Period Benefit Adjustments Built Area Works are eligible for a claim from the CSRF. For a determination of the eligible growth portion of the Built Area Work, refer to the DC By-law. The Development Charges Act requires that adjustments be applied to costs attributable to the rate calculations for works considered to benefit post-period growth. Only those costs attributable to (g) Local Service Costs (Owner Cost) servicing the defined growth period (20 years) are to be included in the establishment of a DC rate. In some cases, the total calculated cost of the works have been adjusted to represent the proportion The following subsections list the various water components which are considered a local of costs attributable to the defined growth period. Remaining costs are identified in the DC Study as service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner: post-period benefits. The post-period benefit values identified in the 2014 DC Study were updated as part of the 2019 update work. Any new projects to the 2019 DC Study have been analyzed and a • Any watermain or portion of a larger watermain that is less than or equal to 250mm in post-period benefit applied where appropriate. diameter is referred to as local works; and • Connections from a local watermain to existing external infrastructure. Allocation Splits
2019 DC Update Methodology (a) Growth/Non-Growth
To update the 2014 DC project list, an analysis was done of current growth projections, hydraulic The growth and non-growth allocations for water servicing works vary by project. Growth/Non- modeling, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) to assess actual existing flows and Growth splits for watermains were determined as follows: water demand projections. Timing of the work was informed by the GMIS. A modeling assignment was carried out by a consultant to determine a strategy for servicing a small, high elevation area
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 189
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services
• City allocated the growth forecast for Residential / Institutional, Commercial and Industrial c) Incorporating DC drawdowns in the cash flow projection based on the growth projects identified across the City’s transportation planning zones based on the Watson and Associates in the 20-year study period; Economists growth forecasts which were endorsed by Council in 2018. d) Incorporating provisions for debt payments for previously approved commitments on growth • Sub-divided the transportation zones by water service areas and tied to existing or new works funded by debt; and watermain nodes in the water model. e) Estimating annual interest revenues to be earned and/or financing costs to be incurred due to • For new works added as part of this DC update, existing water demands were determined fund deficits throughout the 20-year planning horizon. based on current flow information within the GMIS Boundary and then non-growth/growth and residential/ICI splits were determined based on applying design criteria for residential and ICI Any deficit in the cash flow analysis at the end of the planning period equates to the amounts of the water demands. expenditures incurred during the planning period to be recovered from growth in the future (i.e. the post-period benefit). All figures are un-inflated and were determined for the period immediately (b) Residential/ICI preceding the DC Study. The rates generated from this cash flow analysis reflect the appropriate cost recovery from growth for the 20-year planning horizon. Net eligible DC costs are allocated to residential and non-residential growth (i.e. ICI). The residential and ICI allocations were generated using Watson and Associates Economists growth forecasts.
Three types of allocation splits were used based on the particular project. Projects that provide servicing primarily to non-industrial areas have been applied a “Community Growth” value that exclude industrial related growth. An “Industrial Growth” allocation is applied to infrastructure that strictly services industrial lands and projects that service city-wide growth have been allocated using a city-wide residential and ICI allocation.
Final Costs for DC Rate Calculation
The required Water Distribution Works form the basis for determining DCs for the CSRF and represent the numerator in the rate calculation. The final total net costs incorporated into the DC rate calculation for Water Distribution works is shown in Table M-1.
Financing Costs
Table M-2 was produced to simulate cash flows for CSRF funded Water Distribution works for the purpose of calculating the final DC rate inclusive of financing costs. Forecasting cash flow and financing costs involved:
a) Starting with the 2019 opening balance (if any), which reflects accumulated uncommitted funds for growth projects identified in past DC studies; b) Projecting DC revenues using the “pre-finance” rate;
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 190
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services TABLE M-1 Rate Calculation
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Watermain – Low Level System
Growth Needs (A1) - New Pipe - Medway Rd. DC14-WD00001 2024 $5,454.0 $.0 $.0 $5,454.0 24.2% $1,319.9 $4,134.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,134.2 $.0 $4,134.2 73.8% $3,051.0 15.4% $636.7 10.8% $446.5 0.0% $.0 (Arva PS to Wonderland Rd.)
Growth Needs (A2) - New Pipe - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00002 2024 $5,448.1 $.0 $.0 $5,448.1 24.2% $1,318.4 $4,129.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,129.6 $.0 $4,129.6 73.8% $3,047.7 15.4% $636.0 10.8% $446.0 0.0% $.0 (Medway Rd. to City Limit)
Growth Needs (A3) - New Pipe - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00003 2024 $4,785.0 $.0 $.0 $4,785.0 24.2% $1,158.0 $3,627.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $3,627.0 $.0 $3,627.0 73.8% $2,676.7 15.4% $558.6 10.8% $391.7 0.0% $.0 (City Limit to Sunningdale Rd.)
Growth Needs (A8) - Upsizing - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00004 2032 $4,283.4 $.0 $.0 $4,283.4 30.0% $1,285.0 $2,998.4 55.0% $1,649.1 $.0 $1,349.3 $.0 $1,349.3 73.8% $995.8 15.4% $207.8 10.8% $145.7 0.0% $.0 (Sunningdale Rd. to Fanshawe Park Rd.)
Growth Needs (ADD 2) - Wonderland Rd. (Gainsborough DC14-WD00006 2032 $3,579.7 $.0 $.0 $3,579.7 0.0% $.0 $3,579.7 54.1% $1,936.9 $.0 $1,642.9 $.0 $1,642.9 73.8% $1,212.5 15.4% $253.0 10.8% $177.4 0.0% $.0 Rd. to Lawson Rd.)
Growth Needs (ADD 3) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00007 2032 $2,890.6 $.0 $.0 $2,890.6 0.0% $.0 $2,890.6 54.1% $1,564.0 $.0 $1,326.6 $.0 $1,326.6 73.8% $979.0 15.4% $204.3 10.8% $143.3 0.0% $.0 (Lawson Rd. to Sarnia Rd.)
Longwoods (A20) - Dingman Dr. DC14-WD00009 2026 $6,696.2 $.0 $.0 $6,696.2 0.0% $.0 $6,696.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,696.2 $.0 $6,696.2 73.8% $4,941.8 15.4% $1,031.2 10.8% $723.2 0.0% $.0 (Wonderland Rd. to White Oak Rd.)
Lambeth Phase 1 (A21a) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00010a 2021 $1,707.5 $.0 $.0 $1,707.5 0.0% $.0 $1,707.5 5.0% $85.4 $.0 $1,622.1 $.0 $1,622.1 73.8% $1,197.1 15.4% $249.8 10.8% $175.2 0.0% $.0 (Exeter Rd to Hamlyn St)
Lambeth Phase 2 (A21b) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00010b 2026 $1,020.9 $.0 $.0 $1,020.9 0.0% $.0 $1,020.9 5.0% $51.0 $.0 $969.8 $.0 $969.8 73.8% $715.7 15.4% $149.4 10.8% $104.7 0.0% $.0 (Hamlyn St. to Dingman Dr.)
Growth Needs (A8a) - Upsizing - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00032 2029 $6,905.8 $.0 $.0 $6,905.8 0.0% $.0 $6,905.8 55.0% $3,798.2 $.0 $3,107.6 $.0 $3,107.6 73.8% $2,293.4 15.4% $478.6 10.8% $335.6 0.0% $.0 (Fanshawe Park Rd. to Gainsborough Rd.)
Growth Needs (New-14a) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00033a 2034 $1,261.7 $.0 $.0 $1,261.7 0.0% $.0 $1,261.7 54.0% $681.3 $.0 $580.4 $.0 $580.4 73.8% $428.3 15.4% $89.4 10.8% $62.7 0.0% $.0 (Sarnia Rd. to Beaverbrook Ave.)
Growth Needs (New-14b) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00033b 2031 $955.8 $.0 $.0 $955.8 0.0% $.0 $955.8 54.0% $516.1 $.0 $439.7 $.0 $439.7 73.8% $324.5 15.4% $67.7 10.8% $47.5 0.0% $.0 (Beaverbrook Ave. to Oxford St. W)
Growth Needs (New-14c) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00033c 2028 $764.6 $.0 $.0 $764.6 0.0% $.0 $764.6 54.0% $412.9 $.0 $351.7 $.0 $351.7 73.8% $259.6 15.4% $54.2 10.8% $38.0 0.0% $.0 (Oxford St. Intersection)
Growth Needs (New-14d) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00033d 2030 $1,137.4 $.0 $.0 $1,137.4 0.0% $.0 $1,137.4 54.0% $614.2 $.0 $523.2 $.0 $523.2 73.8% $386.1 15.4% $80.6 10.8% $56.5 0.0% $.0 (Oxford St. W to 150m N of Riverside Dr.)
Growth Needs (New-14e) - Hutton Pl/Thames DC14-WD00033e 2033 $3,089.3 $.0 $.0 $3,089.3 0.0% $.0 $3,089.3 54.0% $1,668.2 $.0 $1,421.1 $.0 $1,421.1 73.8% $1,048.8 15.4% $218.8 10.8% $153.5 0.0% $.0 (150m N of Riverside Dr. to Greenway Park)
Kilally Rd. (A30) Phase 2 - Kilally Rd. DC14-WD00040 2022 $6,055.9 $.0 $.0 $6,055.9 0.0% $.0 $6,055.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6,055.9 $.0 $6,055.9 73.8% $4,469.2 15.4% $932.6 10.8% $654.0 0.0% $.0 (Webster St. to Clarke Rd.)
Growth Needs (New-7) - Upsizing - Western Rd. (Platt's DC19-WD00001 2021 $1,853.3 $.0 $.0 $1,853.3 0.0% $.0 $1,853.3 90.0% $1,668.0 $.0 $185.3 $.0 $185.3 73.8% $136.8 15.4% $28.5 10.8% $20.0 0.0% $.0 Lane to Sarnia Rd.)
SUBTOTAL $57,889.1 $.0 $.0 $57,889.1 8.8% $5,081.3 $52,807.8 27.7% $14,645.3 $.0 $38,162.6 $.0 $38,162.6 73.8% $28,164.0 15.4% $5,877.0 10.8% $4,121.6 0.0% $.0
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 191
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services TABLE M-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Watermain – Southeast Pressure Zone
Existing System (B3) (New additional pipe) - Highbury DC14-WD00013 2033 $9,803.4 $.0 $.0 $9,803.4 0.0% $.0 $9,803.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $9,803.4 $.0 $9,803.4 73.8% $7,234.9 15.4% $1,509.7 10.8% $1,058.8 0.0% $.0 Ave. (Southeast PS to Dingman Dr.)
Wilton Grove (New-4) - Wilton Grove Rd. DC14-WD00019 2029 $1,953.1 $.0 $.0 $1,953.1 0.0% $.0 $1,953.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,953.1 $.0 $1,953.1 73.8% $1,441.4 15.4% $300.8 10.8% $210.9 0.0% $.0 (Hubrey Rd. to Pond Mills Rd.)
Green Valley (New-3) - Green Valley Rd. DC14-WD00037 2019 $151.0 $.0 $6.1 $144.8 0.0% $.0 $144.8 0.0% $.0 $.0 $144.8 $.0 $144.8 73.8% $106.9 15.4% $22.3 10.8% $15.6 0.0% $.0 (Hubrey Rd. Intersection)
Pond Mills 401 crossing (New-5a) - Pond Mills Rd. DC14-WD00020a 2019 $600.9 $.0 $.0 $600.9 0.0% $.0 $600.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $600.9 $.0 $600.9 73.8% $443.5 15.4% $92.5 10.8% $64.9 0.0% $.0 (Hwy 401 crossing)
Pond Mills (New-5b) - Pond Mills Rd. DC14-WD00020b 2029 $5,392.3 $.0 $.0 $5,392.3 0.0% $.0 $5,392.3 0.0% $.0 $.0 $5,392.3 $.0 $5,392.3 73.8% $3,979.5 15.4% $830.4 10.8% $582.4 0.0% $.0 (Hwy 401 to Southdale Rd.)
Pond Mills (New-5c) - Pond Mills Rd. DC14-WD00020c 2029 $2,113.5 $.0 $.0 $2,113.5 0.0% $.0 $2,113.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,113.5 $.0 $2,113.5 73.8% $1,559.7 15.4% $325.5 10.8% $228.3 0.0% $.0 (Wilton Grove Rd. to Hwy 401)
SUBTOTAL $20,014.1 $.0 $6.1 $20,008.0 0.0% $.0 $20,008.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $20,008.0 $.0 $20,008.0 73.8% $14,765.9 15.4% $3,081.2 10.8% $2,160.9 0.0% $.0
Watermain – High Level System
Sumercrest Growth Area (2004) - Southdale DC14-WD00021 2020 $2,257.6 $.0 $125.7 $2,131.9 0.0% $.0 $2,131.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,131.9 $.0 $2,131.9 73.8% $1,573.3 15.4% $328.3 10.8% $230.2 0.0% $.0 (Bramblewood to Wickerson Rd.)
Westmount (3000) - Wonderland Rd. DC14-WD00026 2021 $3,077.7 $.0 $200.0 $2,877.7 0.0% $.0 $2,877.7 0.0% $.0 $.0 $2,877.7 $.0 $2,877.7 73.8% $2,123.8 15.4% $443.2 10.8% $310.8 0.0% $.0 (Commissioners Rd. to Viscount Rd.)
Westmount (3001/3002) - Viscount Rd. DC14-WD00027 2024 $4,290.5 $.0 $.0 $4,290.5 0.0% $.0 $4,290.5 0.0% $.0 $.0 $4,290.5 $.0 $4,290.5 73.8% $3,166.4 15.4% $660.7 10.8% $463.4 0.0% $.0 (Wonderland to Andover Dr.)
Westmount (3004) - Andover Dr. DC14-WD00028 2029 $737.7 $.0 $.0 $737.7 0.0% $.0 $737.7 0.0% $.0 $.0 $737.7 $.0 $737.7 73.8% $544.5 15.4% $113.6 10.8% $79.7 0.0% $.0 (Viscount to Ensign Dr.)
Westmount (3005) - Ensign Dr. DC14-WD00029 2029 $1,454.1 $.0 $.0 $1,454.1 0.0% $.0 $1,454.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,454.1 $.0 $1,454.1 73.8% $1,073.1 15.4% $223.9 10.8% $157.0 0.0% $.0 (Andover Dr. to Notre Dame Dr.)
Westmount (3006) - Notre Dame Dr. DC14-WD00030 2029 $609.4 $.0 $.0 $609.4 0.0% $.0 $609.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $609.4 $.0 $609.4 73.8% $449.8 15.4% $93.9 10.8% $65.8 0.0% $.0 (Ensign Dr. to Belmont Dr.)
SUBTOTAL $12,427.1 $.0 $325.7 $12,101.4 0.0% $.0 $12,101.4 0.0% $.0 $.0 $12,101.4 $.0 $12,101.4 73.8% $8,930.8 15.4% $1,863.6 10.8% $1,306.9 0.0% $.0
Watermain – Internal Oversizing Subsidy
DC19-WD01001 Watermain Internal Oversizing Subsidy 2019-2038 $1,776.6 $.0 $.0 $1,776.6 0.0% $.0 $1,776.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,776.6 $.0 $1,776.6 73.8% $1,311.1 15.4% $273.6 10.8% $191.9 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,776.6 $.0 $.0 $1,776.6 0.0% $.0 $1,776.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $1,776.6 $.0 $1,776.6 73.8% $1,311.1 15.4% $273.6 10.8% $191.9 0.0% $.0
Watermain – Built Area Works
DC19-WD01002 Watermain – Built Area Works 2019-2038 $1,060.5 $.0 $.0 $1,060.5 5.0% $53.0 $1,007.5 44.0% $443.3 $.0 $564.2 $.0 $564.2 73.8% $416.4 15.4% $86.9 10.8% $60.9 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $1,060.5 $.0 $.0 $1,060.5 5.0% $53.0 $1,007.5 44.0% $443.3 $.0 $564.2 $.0 $564.2 73.8% $416.4 15.4% $86.9 10.8% $60.9 0.0% $.0
Watermain – Strategic Links
DC19-WD01003 Watermain – Strategic Links 2019-2038 $2,673.0 $.0 $.0 $2,673.0 0.0% $.0 $2,673.0 10.0% $267.3 $.0 $2,405.7 $.0 $2,405.7 73.8% $1,775.4 15.4% $370.5 10.8% $259.8 0.0% $.0
SUBTOTAL $2,673.0 $.0 $.0 $2,673.0 0.0% $.0 $2,673.0 10.0% $267.3 $.0 $2,405.7 $.0 $2,405.7 73.8% $1,775.4 15.4% $370.5 10.8% $259.8 0.0% $.0 City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 192
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services TABLE M-1 Rate Calculation Cont’d
Planning horizon for this component : 2019-2038
RESIDENTIAL NON - RESIDENTIAL
n-growth share
nticipated ars Non Commercial Institutional Industrial
ns ant A if ap applicable) or Yea
Prior
existin ng standard (see
horizo on for this service) contribution
Supplement A
grow wth expected to occur rants, s, subsidies or other Pro ss oject Cost Funded In bene efits (portion of growth deduc ction (if applicable) ble fo or rate calculation - t
beyond planning h for DC C rate calculation
improvement over e costs attributable to g DC ID # Project Description Expected Year Total Estimated Cost Less: future capital gr Less: Portion of Gross Subtotal Less: Future growth b Subtotal % benefit Less: 10% statutory d Subtotal Less: Amount ineligib Net Amount Eligible fo % $ % $ % $ % $ (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (all $'s in ,000's) (1) - sum(2,3) (4) * (5) (4) - (6) (7) * (8) [(7) - (9)] * 10% (7) - sum(9,10) (11) - (12) (13) * (14) (13) * (16) (13) * (18) (13) * (20)
Watermain – Industrial
DC19-WD01004 Industrial Water Servicing Internal Oversizing (250ha) 2019-2028 $104.0 $.0 $.0 $104.0 0.0% $.0 $104.0 0.0% $.0 $.0 $104.0 $.0 $104.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $104.0
DC19-WD01005 Industrial Water Servicing Internal Oversizing (300ha) 2029-2038 $207.9 $.0 $.0 $207.9 97.0% $201.7 $6.2 0.0% $.0 $.0 $6.2 $.0 $6.2 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $6.2
DC19-WD01006 Industrial Water Servicing (250ha) 2019-2028 $14,236.6 $.0 $.0 $14,236.6 0.0% $.0 $14,236.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $14,236.6 $.0 $14,236.6 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $14,236.6
DC19-WD01007 Industrial Water Servicing (300ha) 2029-2038 $15,436.6 $.0 $.0 $15,436.6 97.0% $14,973.5 $463.1 0.0% $.0 $.0 $463.1 $.0 $463.1 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $463.1
SUBTOTAL $29,985.0 $.0 $.0 $29,985.0 50.6% $15,175.1 $14,809.9 0.0% $.0 $.0 $14,809.9 $.0 $14,809.9 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 0.0% $.0 100.0% $14,809.9
Watermains - Water Distribution Facilities
DC14-WD02003 Hyde Park PS 2021 $800.0 $.0 $.0 $800.0 5.3% $42.4 $757.6 0.0% $.0 $.0 $757.6 $.0 $757.6 69.7% $528.0 14.5% $109.9 10.2% $77.3 5.6% $42.4
DC14-WD02006 Arva PS 2022 $3,320.0 $.0 $.0 $3,320.0 0.0% $.0 $3,320.0 50.0% $1,660.0 $.0 $1,660.0 $.0 $1,660.0 69.7% $1,157.0 14.5% $240.7 10.2% $169.3 5.6% $93.0
SUBTOTAL $4,120.0 $.0 $.0 $4,120.0 1.0% $42.4 $4,077.6 40.7% $1,660.0 $.0 $2,417.6 $.0 $2,417.6 69.7% $1,685.1 14.5% $350.6 10.2% $246.6 5.6% $135.4
PORTION OF GROWTH PROJECTS FINANCED WITH $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 $.0 57.9% $.0 4.7% $.0 2.2% $.0 35.2% $.0 DEBT (PRINCIPLE)
$129,945.4 $.0 $331.8 $129,613.6 15.7% $20,351.9 $109,261.7 15.6% $17,015.9 $.0 $92,245.9 $.0 $92,245.9 61.8% $57,048.6 12.9% $11,903.4 9.1% $8,348.6 16.2% $14,945.2 TOTAL
Development Charge Rate Calculation (Pre-Financing Cost)
Residential Commercial Institutional Industrial
Less: Uncommitted Reserve Fund Balance $14,850.6 57.9% $8,603.7 4.7% $703.3 2.2% $322.9 35.2% $5,220.7
Total net cost eligible for DC rate calculation purposes $77,395.2 62.6% $48,445.0 14.5% $11,200.1 10.4% $8,025.7 12.6% $9,724.5
Divided By: Total Gross Growth Projections 102,519 664,600 766,125 596,763
Calculated DC Rate - Pre-Financing $472.55 $16.85 $10.48 $16.30 Notes: /person /sq. m. /sq. m. /sq. m. 1) Total estimated cost, non-growth share, and RICI splits referenced from the 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study. Pre- Financing Cost Residential Rates: Pre Financing Post Financing
Single Family Dwelling 3.12 $ 1,474.34 $ 1,624.46 Multiple unit dwelling 2.11 $ 997.07 $ 1,098.59 Apartment - bach. & 1 bed 1.38 $ 652.11 $ 718.51 Apartment - ≥ 2 bedroom 1.87 $ 883.66 $ 973.63
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 193
Table of Contents Water Distribution Services TABLE M-2 Cash Flow Analysis & Final Rate Calculation
FINAL RESULT 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Total Post- Pre-Financing DC Financing DC % Collected Growth projection for each year of forecast period Planning Horizon - yrs 20 Rate Rate assumption Growth - Res. (Persons In New Housing) 102,519 $ 472.55 $ 520.66 100% 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 5,126.0 102,519.0 Growth - Non-Res. (sq. m.) Commercial 664,600 $ 16.85 $ 18.57 100% 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 33,230.0 664,600.0 Institutional 766,125 $ 10.48 $ 11.54 100% 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 38,306.3 766,125.0 Industrial 596,763 $ 16.30 $ 17.95 100% 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 29,838.2 596,763.0 Total Non-Res. 2,027,488 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 101,374.4 2,027,488.0
Reserve Fund Projections: Opening Surplus /
Target which reflects growth costs incurred in the forecast period and recoverable from future growth -$19,621.8
Explanatory note This worksheet projects future activity in this reserve fund. It ultimately determines the rates necessary to recover all costs intended for recovery from growth (including financing costs). The deficit in the fund at the end of the planning horizon reflects costs intended for recovery from future growth.
Other Information: Pre Post Residential share 63% 63% Non-residential Commercial 14% 14% Institutional 10% 10% Industrial 13% 13%
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 194
Table of Contents
APPENDIX N:
Urban Works Reserve Funds Retirement
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 195
Table of Contents Urban Works Reserve Funds
Background • All revenues and uncommitted UWRF balances will be transferred to the respective CSRF. The Urban Works Reserve Funds (UWRF) have been used by the City as the Development Charge (DC) fund to finance works (road works, sanitary and storm sewers, storm water management A list of the outstanding obligations are detailed in Table N-1. It is anticipated that all obligations will facilities) where these works are triggered by, or necessary as a direct result of development. One of be completed in 2019. Upon the completion of these transfers, the UWRF will be discontinued and the attributes of the UWRF is that claims are only paid when a sufficient balance exists to finance the formally closed. works.
In 2007, Council created a “Blue Ribbon Panel” to review the workings of the Funds, based in part, on its concerns about a persistent and growing backlog of claims. The “Blue Ribbon Panel” observed the uniqueness of the UWRF in Ontario, and recommended a reduction in the scope of works for which the funds were being used. Accordingly, in the 2009 DC Study, steps were introduced to reduce the scope of UWRF works.
As part of the 2014 DC Study, Council approved the retirement of the UWRF and the consolidation of UWRF funding under the various City Services Reserve Funds (CSRF). The 2014 DC By-law established clear rules related to claimability from both “families” of reserve funds and recognized that no future claims to the UWRF would occur for agreements entered into following the in-force date of the 2014 DC By-law. Although the DC By-law formalized the intent to retire the UWRF, the logistics of the retirement were still an outstanding matter.
In July 2018, Staff brought forward a report seeking endorsement for the implementation process to wind-up the UWRF. Council ultimately resolved the following:
“the implementation process for full retirement of the Urban Works Reserve Fund with the adoption of the 2019 Development Charges By-law BE ENDORSED”
UWRF Wind-up
Upon the adoption of the 2019 DC By-Law, the following actions will be taken to facilitate the wind- up of the UWRF:
• All outstanding UWRF obligations where no claim has been submitted prior to the adoption of the 2019 DC By-Law will be transferred to the respective CSRF. Claims submitted for eligible works will be paid from the respective CSRF. This approach is simply shifting payment from one fund to another with no impact to the Owner’s claim submission.
• Prior approved claims that were subject to payment cap restrictions that were outlined in the 2014 DC Study and are a currently waiting in the “queue” will be paid out in full.
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 196
Table of Contents APPENDIX N - Urban Works Reserve Funds TABLE N-1 Obligations to be Transferred to the Respective CSRF
Capital Works to be Transferred Estimated Amount
Outstanding Obligations Subject to Review/Approval
UWRF General
SP-09-003212 & SP11-007383 – 800 Commissioners Rd East • Road works on Wellington and Commissioners $350,000 M-429 – Riverbend Phase 1 • Wastewater Pumping Station land $68,750 M-517 – Riverbend West • Sidewalk and street lighting on Westdel Bourne $160,000 M-528 – Summerside Phase 9 • Trunk sanitary sewer $1,605,000 M-603 – Meadowlilly • Sanitary sewer oversizing $14,000 • Storm sewer oversizing $4,000 • Internal road widening, pavement markings and sidewalk $200,000 M-622 – Foxhollow Phase 2 • Channelization on Sunningdale $778,000 M-652 – Creekview • Internal road widening $10,000
UWRF Stormwater Management Facilities
M-394 – Crestwood Phase 1 • SWMF landscaping $40,000 M-583 – Uplands Crossing Phase 2 • SWMF construction $232,000 • SWMF land $118,000 M-701 – Stoney Creek South • SWMF earth berm $10,000 • SWMF landscaping $142,000 M-757 – Edgevalley • SWMF construction $4,865,000 SWM Facility Remediation Contingency $1,877,300
Prior Approved SWM Claims to be Paid in Full
M-633 – Richmond North • SWMF 8A $209,375 M-701 – Stoney Creek South • SWMF 4 construction $897,781 • SWMF 4 land $314,641 TOTAL $11,895,847
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 197
Table of Contents
APPENDIX O:
Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 198
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts
The Development Charge Act (DCA) as amended by Bill 73, Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, The table below reflects the assumed average estimated useful lives of the growth related assets. 2015 requires the Development Charges (DC) Background Study to include an Asset Management The “sinking fund factor” is applied to the original capital cost to determine the contribution that would Plan for all growth capital projects identified. Subsection 10 (2) & (3) of the DCA provides that the be required for replacement of the asset at the end of its useful life. following:
10. (2) The development charge background study shall include,
(c) an examination, for each service to which the development charge by-law would relate, of 2019 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY the long term capital and operating costs for capital infrastructure required for the service;
(c.2) an asset management plan prepared in accordance with subsection (3); LIFECYCLE COST FACTORS (3) The asset management plan shall, ASSET AVERAGE SINKING FUND USEFUL LIFE RATE FACTOR (a) deal with all assets whose capital costs are proposed to be funded under the development charge (YEARS) by-law; Facilities, Buildings 40 0.014836 2.5% (b) demonstrate that all the assets mentioned in clause (a) are financially sustainable over their full life cycle; Fire & Police Vehicles 15 0.055766 2.5% (c) contain any other information that is prescribed; and Transit Vehicles 12 0.072487 2.5% (d) be prepared in the prescribed manner. Fire and Police Equipment 8 0.114467 2.5%
At this time, there is no prescribed approach for municipalities to implement these requirements of Wastewater & Storm Sewers 80 0.004026 2.5% the DCA, except for Transit. O. Reg. 428/15 amends O. Reg. 82/92 Section 8, to include subsections Watermains and Related Works 70 0.005397 2.5% (2), (3) & (4) which set out detailed requirements for Transit asset management plans. For the Pumping Stations 30 0.022778 2.5% purposes of Transit related infrastructure, the proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Conventional Reservoirs 40 0.014836 2.5% Transit will be analyzed and discussed separately. Facilities 40 0.014836 2.5% The requirements of (2) & (3) are met by identifying the incremental operating costs associated with Roads 40 0.014836 2.5% each growth related project or project category and the long term capital cost. Where facilities or Library Collection Materials 7 0.132495 2.5% amenities are being expanded, only the incremental cost is reported. Where a network is expanded Parkland Development, Spray Pads 20 0.039147 2.5% (e.g. watermains or sewers), the incremental operating costs may be derived from application of the average costs of operating the existing system to the total linear length of operating the present system.
The second part of the examination involves what the DCA refers to as ‘the long term capital costs’
of the infrastructure required for the service. This has been interpreted to mean ‘the eventual cost of Refer to Tables O-1 and O-2 for a complete list of Lifecycle and Operating Cost Impacts related to replacement of the asset’ which is consistent with previous DC Studies. For the purpose of this the projects included in the 2019 DC Study. analysis, we employ a sinking fund method. This method determines the equal annual contribution required to a sinking fund, such that at the end of the asset’s useful life, there is sufficient capital available to replace the asset. The assumed growth rate of the sinking fund is 2.5% (net of inflation).
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 199
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts
Transit Services Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended Compliance subsection 8(3) Requirements O.Reg. 428/15 Capital needs incorporated in the DC Study for Transit includes facilities for the proposed BRT 1. A section that sets out the state of local infrastructure and program, as well as vehicles for BRT and conventional transit. The London Transit Commission as a that sets out, Board and Commission of the City of London, prepares an Asset Management Plan externally to the LTC – 2017 Annual Report i. the types of assets and their quantity or extent; Section “Effective Utilization of Infrastructure” City. A key strategic objective of this plan is “effective utilization of infrastructure”. The strategy calls
for acquisition and maintenance of required infrastructure supporting service reliability, noting that LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan
infrastructure includes fleet, facility, technology and other fixed assets. Strict adherence to the Section - “Asset Maintenance, Servicing and ii. the financial accounting valuation and replacement cost Investment” strategy over the past 10 years has resulted in the elimination of the infrastructure deficit. valuation for all assets; 2017 LTC Audited Financial Statements (see above) For a snapshot of the 2017 year end depreciation schedule for Transit services see below: iii. the asset age distribution and asset age as a proportion of expected useful life for all assets; and LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan Section - “Asset Administration” Subsection – “Fixed Asset Inventory Management” iv. the asset condition based on standard engineering
practices for all assets.
LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan Section - “Asset Maintenance, Servicing and Investment”
2. A section that sets out the proposed level of service and that, i. defines the proposed level of service through LTC 2015 – 2018 Business Plan timeframes and performance measures; Section “Demonstrated Fiscal Accountability” & “Effective Utilization of Infrastructure” Subsection – “Operating Expenditure Investment –
Vehicle Maintenance and Servicing”
ii. discusses any external trends or issues that may affect the LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan proposed level of service or the municipality’s ability to Section - “Asset Administration” meet it; and Subsection – Risk Management
The asset management requirements for Transit services have been amended under the DCA. The iii. shows current performance relative to the targets set out. 2017 LTC Annual Report reference sources for these requirements can be found from various published documents as outlined Section – “Effective Utilization of Infrastructure” below:
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 200
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts
Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended Compliance Ontario Regulation 82/98, as amended subsection 8(3) Requirements O.Reg. 428/15 Compliance subsection 8(3) Requirements O.Reg. 428/15 3. An asset management strategy that, 4. A financial strategy that, i. sets out planned actions that will enable the assets to LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan provide the proposed level of service in a sustainable way, Section – “Asset Management Plan and 2015 – 2018 i. shows the yearly expenditure forecasts that are proposed while managing risk, at the lowest life cycle cost; Business Plan” to achieve the proposed level of service, categorized by,
A. non-infrastructure solutions, LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan ii. is based on an assessment of potential options to B. maintenance activities, LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan Section – “Going Forward” achieve the proposed level of service, which C. renewal and rehabilitation activities, Section – “Asset Administration” D. replacement activities, assessment compares, E. disposal activities, and
F. expansion activities; A. life cycle costs,
B. all other relevant direct and indirect costs and benefits, and ii. provides actual expenditures in respect of the categories C. the risks associated with the potential options; 2015 – 2018 Financial Plan set out in sub-subparagraphs i A to F from the previous Section – “Overall Expenditure Investment” iii. contains a summary of, in relation to achieving the two years, if available, for comparison purposes; proposed level of service, (not defined clearly) A. non-infrastructure solutions, LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan iii. gives a breakdown of yearly revenues by source; B. maintenance activities, Section – “Asset Administration” 2017 LTC Audited Financial Statements C. renewal and rehabilitation activities, - Statement of Operations & of Change in Net D. replacement activities, Financial Assets E. disposal activities, and iv. discusses key assumptions and alternative F. expansion activities; scenarios where appropriate, (see associated text); 2015 -2018 LTC Financial Plan and Section “Sources of Capital Investment”
iv. discusses the procurement measures that are intended
to achieve the proposed level of service; and v. identifies any funding shortfall relative to financial LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan requirements that cannot be eliminated by revising Section – “Asset Administration” Section – “Going Forward” v. includes an overview of the risks associated with the service levels, asset management or financing Subsection – “Acquisition and Disposition of Fixed strategy and any actions that will be taken in response to (Capita) Assets strategies, and discusses the impact of the shortfall those risks. and how the impact will be managed. LTC 2015 – 2018 Asset Management Plan Section – “Asset Administration” Subsection – “Risk Management”
Reference Sources:
http://www.londontransit.ca/annual-reports/2016-annual-report/
http://www.londontransit.ca/annual-reports/2016-audit-report-and-financial-statements/
http://www.londontransit.ca/business-plans/2015-2018-asset-management-plan/
http://www.londontransit.ca/business-plans/2015-2018-business-plan/
http://www.londontransit.ca/business-plans/2015-2018-financial-plan/
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 201
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts TABLE O-1: Hard Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 202
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts TABLE O-2: Soft Services
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 203
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts TABLE O-2: Soft Services Cont’d
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 204
Table of Contents Lifecycle & Operating Costs Impacts TABLE O-2: Soft Services Cont’d
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 205
Table of Contents
APPENDIX P:
Proposed 2019 DC By-law
City of London 2019 Development Charges Background Study Page 206
Table of Contents Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
Bill No. ____ 2019
By-law C.P.- ______-____
A By-law respecting the payment of Development Charges.
WHEREAS the Development Charges Act, 1997 S.O. 1997, c.27, as amended authorizes By-laws of the council of a municipality for the imposition of Development Charges against land to pay for increased capital costs required because of increased needs for services arising from Development of the area to which the By-law applies.
THEREFORE the MUNICIPAL COUNCIL of The Corporation of the City of London hereby enacts as follows:
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BY-LAW
PART I
INTERPRETATION
1. Definitions
In this By-law, unless a contrary intention appears,
"Accessory use" means the part of a Development that is incidental, subordinate and exclusively devoted to the principal use;
“Agricultural use” means the growing of crops, including nursery, biomass, and horticultural crops; raising of livestock, raising of other animals for food, fur or fibre, including poultry and fish, aquaculture, apiaries, agro-forestry, maple syrup production, and associated on-farm buildings and structures, including, but not limited to livestock facilities, manure storages, value-retaining facilities, and accommodation for full-time farm labour when the size and nature of the operation requires additional employment, but excluding in all circumstances any residential or commercial component threof;
“Arterial” refers to street classifications of Rapid Transit Boulevard, Urban Thoroughfare, Civic Boulevard, Main Street and Rural Thoroughfare in the Council-adopted London Plan;
“Apartment” means a residential building, divided vertically and/or horizontally, containing two or more Dwelling units each of which has an independent entrance either directly from the outside or through a common corridor, hallway or vestibule, and does not include Rowhousing or Semi- detached dwellings;
“Built Area” means the Built Area existing from time to time as identified in the City’s Official Plan as approved and identified on Schedule 3;
“Chief Building Official” means the individual appointed by Municipal Council in accordance with the Building Code Act;
“City” means the Corporation of the City of London;
“City Engineer” means individual holding the title of City Engineer in accordance with the City’s Civic Administration By-law;
“City Services” are services that serve, in whole or in part, growth needs which are normally constructed or provided by the City or its Boards or Commissions, including, but not limited to Roads, Wastewater, Stormwater, Water, Fire, Police, Library, Waste Diversion, Operation Centres, Parks and Recreation, Transit and Growth Studies;
“City Services Reserve Fund” (CSRF) means any one of several reserve funds used as a depository for collection of Development Charges and as a funding source for growth works and administered in accordance with the Development Charges Act;
1
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
“City Treasurer” means the individual appointed by Municipal Council in accordance with the Municipal Act, 2001;
“Claim” may represent an Owner request for reimbursement from a Development Charge reserve fund or a draw made on the City Services Reserve Fund all in accordance with the provisions made for such work in the Development Charges Background Study and the provisions of this By-law;
“Commercial Building” is a building used for: (a) Office or administrative uses, including the practice of a profession, or the carrying on of a business or occupation or where most of the activities in the building provide support functions to an enterprise in the nature of trade, and for greater certainty shall include, but not be limited to, the office of a physician, lawyer, dentist, architect, engineer, accountant, real estate or insurance agency, veterinarian, surveyor, appraiser, contractor, builder, land Owner, employment agency, security broker, mortgage company, medical clinic; or
(b) Retail purposes including activities of offering foods, wares, merchandise, substances, articles or things for sale or rental directly to the public and includes offices and storage within the same building, which support, are in connection with, related or ancillary to such uses, or activities providing entertainment and recreation. Retail purposes shall include but not be limited to: conventional restaurants; fast food restaurants; night clubs, concert halls, theatres, cinemas, movie houses, and other entertainment related businesses; automotive fuel stations with or without service facilities; special automotive shops/vehicle repairs/collision services/car or truck washes; vehicle dealerships; commercial truck service establishments, regional shopping centres; community shopping centres; neighbourhood shopping centres, including more than two stores attached and under one ownership; department/discount stores; banks and similar financial institutions, including credit unions (excluding freestanding bank kiosks), money handling and cheque cashing facilities; warehouse clubs or retail warehouses; Food stores, pharmacies, clothing stores, furniture stores, department stores, sporting goods stores, appliance stores, garden centres (but not a garden centre defined as exempt under section 35 of this By-law), government owned retail facilities, private daycare, private schools, private lodging and retirement homes, private recreational facilities, sports clubs, golf courses, skiing facilities, race tracks, gambling operations, funeral homes, motels, hotels, restaurants, theatres, facilities for motion picture, audio and video production and distribution, sound recording services, Passenger stations and depots, Dry cleaning establishments, Laundries, establishments for commercial self-service uses, automotive recycling/wrecking yards, kennels;
“Committed Financing” is the funding that has been assigned to the respective growth capital project for works where a contractor/consultant has been engaged and a cost estimate is known;
"Development" means the construction, erection or placing of one or more buildings or structures on land or the making of an addition or alteration to a building or structure that has the effect of changing the size or usability thereof, and includes all enlargement of existing Development which creates new Dwelling units or additional Non-residential space and includes work that requires a change of use building permit as per Section C.1.3.1.4 of the Ontario Building Code; and "Redevelopment" has a corresponding meaning;
"Development Agreement” means an agreement between the City and an Owner required as a condition of an approval under Sections 41, 51 or 53 of the Planning Act and Section 9 of the Condominium Act entered into prior to the date this By-law comes into effect;
"Development Charge" means any Development Charge that may be imposed pursuant to this By-law under the Development Charges Act;
"Dwelling unit" means a suite operated as a housekeeping unit, used or intended to be used as a domicile by one or more persons and usually containing cooking, eating, living, sleeping, and sanitary facilities;
2
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
“First storey” is defined as the storey that has its floor closest to grade and its underside of finished ceiling more than 1.8m above the average grade;
"Force majeure" means any act of God, any act of the Queen's enemies, wars, blockades, insurrections, riots, civil disturbances, landslides, lightening, earthquakes, storms, floods, washouts, fires, or explosions;
"Gross floor area" means the total floor space, measured between the outside of exterior walls or between the outside of exterior walls and the centre line of party walls dividing the building from another building, of the First storey and all storeys or part of storeys (including mezzanines) above the First storey;
“Growth Management Implementation Strategy” (GMIS) is the strategy adopted by Council that provides a framework for the timing and locating of future infrastructure works required to serve growth;
“Industrial building” is a building used for: (a) manufacturing, producing, fabricating, assembling, compounding or processing of raw materials, goods, component parts or ingredients where the physical condition of such materials, goods, parts or components is altered to produce a finished or semi-finished tangible product, or the packaging, crating, bottling, of semi-processed goods or materials, but not including any of these activities where they primarily serve retail purposes to the general public;
(b) storing or distributing something derived from the activities mentioned in a) above and for greater certainty, shall include the operation of a truck terminal, warehouse or depot and does not include self-storage warehousing for use by the general public or retail sales associated with the goods stored or distributed, or accessory storage of a Commercial Building;
(c) research or development in connection with activities mentioned in (a) above;
(d) retail sales of goods produced by activities mentioned in section a) at the site where the manufacturing, producing or processing from raw materials or semi-processed goods takes place and for greater certainty, includes the sale of goods or commodities to the general public where such sales are accessory or secondary to the Industrial use, and does not include the sale of goods or commodities to the general public through a warehouse club;
(e) office or administrative purposes, if they are carried out:
i. with respect to the activity mentioned in section (a), and ii. in or attached to the building or structure used for activities mentioned in section a) and iii. for greater certainty, shall include an office building located on the same property as, and used solely to support, the activities mentioned in section a);
(f) a business that stores and processes data for retrieval, license or sale to end users and are on lands zoned for Industrial uses;
(g) businesses that develop computer software or hardware for license or sale to end users that are on lands zoned for Industrial uses; or
(h) and Industrial Use shall have the corresponding meaning;
“Institutional building” is a building used for or designed or intended for use by: (a) a government entity, not in the nature of trade;
(b) an organized body, society or religious group promoting a public or non-profit purpose and shall include but not be limited to: public hospitals, schools, churches and other places of worship, cemetery or burial grounds, a college established under the Ontario Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Act, a university as defined in section 171.1 of the Education
3
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
Act, other buildings used for not-for-profit purposes defined in, and exempt from taxation under, section 3 of the Assessment Act;
(c) and Institutional Use shall have the corresponding meaning;
“Lawfully demolished” means a residential or Non-residential building that was demolished according to the provisions of a demolition permit or due to a Force majeure;
“Lawfully existing” with reference to a Dwelling unit means a Dwelling unit: (a) that is not prohibited by a By-law passed under section 34 of the Planning Act or a predecessor of that section; or
(b) that is a legal non-conforming use; or
(c) that is allowed by a minor variance authorized under section 45 of the Planning Act or a predecessor of that section;
"Mixed Use Development" means a Development, building or structure used, designed or intended for any combination of Residential, Commercial, Institutional or Industrial uses;
“Non-residential” means a Commercial, Institutional or Industrial use but excludes Agricultural use”;
“Nursing Home” means a building which has been built using the long term care facility design and service standards established by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, in which rooms or lodging are provided for hire or pay in conjunction with the provision of meals in a designated dining area, personal care 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, nursing services and medical care and treatment, and for purposes of this By-law is deemed to be a Residential use where three beds are equivalent to a two bedroom Apartment unit;
“Official Plan” means the in-force and effect policies of either the 1989 City of London Official Plan or the London Plan, as may be amended from time to time;
"Owner" means the registered Owner of the property and includes the authorized agent in lawful control of the property;
"Parking structure" means an attached or detached building or structure or part thereof, (a) that is used principally for the purpose, whether or not for profit, of providing parking space to the general public for a fee; or
(b) that provides parking space in connection with the use for Residential, Commercial, Industrial or Institutional purposes or any combination thereof of any attached or detached building or structure or part thereof;
“Reserve funds” means the reserve funds, new and continued, under section 21 of this By-law;
“Rowhousing” means a building divided vertically into three or more attached Dwelling units by common walls;
"Semi-detached dwelling" means a building which contains two single Dwelling units which are attached vertically by a common wall;
"Single detached dwelling" means a residential building consisting of one Dwelling unit and not attached to another building or structure;
“Single Source” means that there is more than one source of supply in the open market, but only one source is recommended due to predetermined and approved specifications;
“Source of Financing” means a schedule (or report) issued by the City’s Finance Division outlining the source of funding for capital work triggered by Development;
“Statistics Canada Index” means the Statistics Canada Quarterly Construction Price Index, Non-residential (Toronto);
4
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
“Temporary garden suite” means a one-unit detached residential structure containing bathroom and kitchen facilities that is ancillary to an existing residential Dwelling structure;
"Urban Growth Area" (UGA) means the Urban Growth Area existing from time to time as identified in the City's Official Plan as approved and identified on Schedule 3;
“Wastewater” means sanitary sewage including human, commercial and industrial waste, septic waste and greywater and such other matter or substances as is specified by regulations made under clause 75(1)(j) of the Ontario Water Resources Act but does not include Stormwater; and
“Work Plan” is a document prepared by an engineering consultant that outlines the various tasks related to an engineering design. The document will outline the associated construction cost estimate for each task and will serve as an upset cost limit for the engineering design assignment.
PART II
RATES AND CALCULATIONS
2. Owner to Pay Development Charge
The Owner of any land in the City of London who develops or redevelops the land or any building or structure thereon shall, at the time mentioned in section 4, pay Development Charges to the City calculated in accordance with the applicable rate or rates in Schedule 1 as described in section 7.
3. Mixed Use Development
(1) Where the Development of land, or any building or structure thereon is a Mixed Use Development, the Chief Building Official (or designate) shall determine the total Development Charge payable according to the sum of the Development Charges payable on the individual uses.
(2) The Development Charge on an Accessory use to the principal use of a building shall be determined in accordance with the charges applicable to the principal use, unless the Accessory use is specifically exempted elsewhere in this By-law.
4. Calculation of Development Charge and Time of Payment
A Development Charge under section 2 shall be calculated,
(1) where a permit is required under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure, at the time of the issuance of a permit; and
(2) where no permit is required under that Act for the Development or Redevelopment of the land or any building or structure thereon, at the time of commencing the Development or Redevelopment; and the Owner shall pay the Development Charge at the earlier of the issuance of the permit or at the commencement of Development or Redevelopment.
5. City Hall Year-end Closure – Deemed Receipt of Application
Where a building permit application is submitted to the Chief Building Official after the close of business prior to the holiday break being the period generally between December 24 and December 31 each year, then the application shall be deemed to be received in the new year.
6. Calculation Form
A calculation form shall be as established by the Chief Building Official in consultation with the City Treasurer, from time to time, to record details of the Development Charge calculation for each building permit application.
5
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
7. Development Charge Rates Commencing August 4, 2019
On and after August 4, 2019, Development Charges designated in Schedule 1 shall be levied for the uses of land, buildings or structures as defined in section 1 at the total of the rates shown.
8. Development Charge Rates – January 1, 2020 and beyond
(1) On January 1, 2020 and the first day of January in each year thereafter, Development Charges designated in Schedule 1 shall be levied for the uses of land, buildings or structures as defined in section 1 at the total of the rates shown as adjusted using the following formula:
A x C = D B
Where:
A = the rate shown in Schedule 1;
B = the Statistics Canada Index (see Definitions) for the quarter ending, December, 2018;
C = the Statistics Canada Index for the latest month for which the Index is available (likely the index for the quarter ending in September) in the year preceding the subject year; and
D = the rate for the subject year.
(2) Every rate derived by adjustment under subsection (1) shall, in the case of residential rates, be correct to the nearest dollar, fifty cents being raised to the next higher dollar, and, in the case of Non-residential rates, be correct to the nearest cent.
9. Allocation of Charge To Reserve Funds
Each Development Charge for City Services received by the City shall be paid into a Reserve fund for each component identified in Schedule 1 as described in section 7 and shall be apportioned according to the proportion that each service component of the rate is of the total rate.
10. Additional Units In Enlarged or Converted Residential Building
Where an existing residential building is enlarged or converted for the purpose of residential use, the number of Dwelling units for which a Development Charge is payable shall be calculated using the following formula:
A - B = C
Where:
A = the total number of Dwelling units actually existing after the enlargement or conversion;
B = the number of Dwelling units Lawfully existing immediately before the enlargement or conversion; and
C = the number of Dwelling units for which a Development Charge is payable, a negative difference being converted to zero.
Where a service is not provided (e.g. water or Wastewater) to a residential building or structure prior to its enlargement or conversion, that component of the Development Charge shall be excluded from the rate applied in item B above.
6
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
11. Residential Building Converted To Non-Residential Use
Where, in conjunction with a change from a residential use to a Non-residential use, an existing building or structure is enlarged or wholly or partially converted, the Development Charge which is payable shall be calculated using the following formula:
A - B = C
Where:
A = the Development Charge that would be payable for the Non-residential use at the current rate in respect of the area involved in the enlargement or conversion;
B = the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the Lawfully existing Dwelling units eliminated by the enlargement, conversion or replacement; and
C = the Development Charge payable in respect of the area involved in the enlargement or conversion, a negative difference being converted to zero.
Where a service is not provided (e.g. water or Wastewater) to a residential building or structure prior to its conversion, that component of the Development Charge shall be excluded from the rate applied in item B above.
12. Non-Residential Building Converted To Residential Use
Where, in conjunction with a change to a residential use from a Non-residential use, an existing building or structure is enlarged or wholly or partially converted, the Development Charge which is payable shall be calculated using the following formula:
A – B = C
Where:
A = the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the Dwelling units comprising the Gross floor area existing after the enlargement or conversion;
B = the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the previous Lawfully existing Non-residential Gross floor area involved in the enlargement, conversion or replacement; and
C = the Development Charge payable in respect of the successor residential units, a negative number being converted to zero.
Where a service is not provided (e.g. water or Wastewater) to a Non-residential building or structure prior to its conversion, that component of the Development Charge shall be excluded from the rate applied in item B above.
13. Conversion From One Form Of Non-Residential Use To Another Form Of Non Residential Use
Where in conjunction with a change from one form of Lawfully existing Non-residential use to another form of Non-residential use, a Lawfully existing building or structure is wholly or partially converted, no Development Charge will be imposed on the existing Non-residential Gross floor area so converted. However, if there is a conversion plus expansion of a Non-residential use to another form of Non-residential use, the applicable Development Charges would be imposed on the expansion.
Notwithstanding the above, where the building permit for the Non-residential building for which the use is being converted was issued within the past ten (10) years and where the applicant for that permit was not required to pay a Development Charge by virtue of a tax supported program, discount or exemption that reduced or eliminated Development Charges otherwise payable at the time of the permit, the Owner shall pay the portion funded by a taxpayer supported program,
7
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
discount or exemption at the current rate at the time of issuance of the building permit, and the same shall be returned to the original City funding source (i.e. Reserve fund or General fund) by the City Treasurer, in cooperation with the Chief Building Official.
14. Replacement Of Demolished Or Destroyed Non-Residential Premises or Dwelling unit(s) with Dwelling units
(1) In this section and section 15, "specified period" means the period of time that is up to ten (10) years prior to the application for a building permit for a replacement building, except in the Downtown and Old East Areas identified on Schedule 2, in which case, the “specified period” means the period of time that is up to twenty (20) years prior to the application for a building permit for replacement Dwelling units.
(2) Where a Lawfully existing Non-residential premises (“former premises”) or Dwelling unit, is destroyed by a Force majeure or accidental fire, or is Lawfully demolished or removed, the Development Charge payable in respect of a replacement Dwelling unit that is to be constructed, erected or placed on the site of the former Non-residential premises or Dwelling unit shall be calculated using the following formula, so long as the former Non- residential premises or Dwelling unit was destroyed, demolished or removed during the specified period:
A - B = C
Where:
A = the Development Charge that, were it not for this section, would otherwise be payable at the current rate in respect of the replacement Dwelling unit(s);
B = the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the Non-residential premises or former Dwelling unit(s) (by using the applicable rate for the particular type of unit destroyed, demolished or removed) if that Non- residential premises or Dwelling unit(s) were currently being constructed, erected or placed for the first time; and
C = the Development Charge payable in respect of the successor building or Dwelling unit, a negative number being converted to zero.
Where a service is not provided (e.g. water or Wastewater) to a Non-residential premises or Dwelling units prior to its demolition, that component of the Development Charge shall be excluded from the rate applied in item B above.
15. Replacement of Demolished or Destroyed Non-Residential Premises or Dwelling unit(s) with Non- Residential Premises
Where Non-residential premises (“former premises”) or Dwelling units are destroyed by a Force majeure or accidental fire, or are Lawfully demolished or removed, the Development Charge payable in respect of replacement Non-residential premises that are constructed, erected or placed on the site of the former premises shall be calculated using the following formula so long as the former premises were destroyed, demolished or removed during the specified period:
A - B = C
Where:
A = the Development Charge that, were it not for this section, would otherwise be payable at the current rate in respect of the Gross floor area of the replacement Non-residential premises;
B = the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the former Non-residential premises or former Dwelling units (by using the applicable rate for the particular type of Non-residential premises or Dwelling units destroyed, demolished or removed), as the case may be, as if those premises or Dwelling units were currently being constructed, erected or placed for the first time; and
8
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
C = the Development Charge payable in respect of the successor premises, a negative number being converted to zero.
Where a service is not provided (e.g. water or Wastewater) to a Non-residential premises or Dwelling units prior to its demolition, that component of the Development Charge shall be excluded from the rate applied in item B above.
16. Phased Building Replacement – prohibition against duplicate use of demolition credit
For greater clarity, the calculation of Redevelopment credits provided in sections 14 and 15 of this By-law (item B in the formulas in those sections) can only be applied once to the construction of replacement buildings on the site of a former Lawfully demolished or replaced unit or Non- residential premises. For the purposes of sections 14 and 15 above, when the first building that replaces a demolished building (the value B exceeds A) the excess can be referred to as “surplus Redevelopment credit.” In the event of subsequent building construction on the same site of a former Lawfully demolished or replaced unit or Non-residential premises, only the value of any surplus Redevelopment credits may be used as item B in the formula derived from the calculation of Development Charges under sections 14 or 15 of this By-law. This may be repeated only until the entire value of the surplus demolition credit has been used up. This provision limits the total demolition credit applied to all charges to the value of the demolition credit on the original building demolished. All of the above is also subject to the restriction that any replacement buildings on the site be built within the specified period as defined in section 15.
17. Building Replacement Prior to Demolition
Where a building or structure (“former premises”) is replaced by another building or structure on the same site prior to demolition of the former premises, the Owner of the building or structure who has paid a Development Charge on the construction of the replacement building may submit a request to the Chief Building Official for a refund from the Development Charge Reserve funds for all or part of the Development Charge paid under this By-law, or a predecessor By-law. The refund shall be granted so long as:
(1) the former premises is Lawfully demolished or removed from the land within thirty six (36) months from the date the interior final inspection process has been closed by the Chief Building Official or an occupancy permit has been issued where applicable for the replacement building or structure; and
(2) the replacement building uses the existing municipal services which serviced the former premises.
The refund shall be calculated by determining the Development Charge that would be payable at the current rate in respect of the former premises (by using the applicable current rate for the particular type of Non-residential premises or Dwelling units demolished) as if those former premises were currently being constructed, erected or placed for the first time.
18. Demolition or Removal of Temporary Buildings
Where a building or structure is demolished or removed in its entirety from the land on which it is located within twenty-four months (24) from the date of issuance of the building permit for the construction, erection or placing of the building or structure at such location, the Owner of the building or structure may submit a request to the Chief Building Official for refund from the Reserve funds, of the amount paid at the issuance of the building permit toward all or part of the Development Charge paid under section 2 of this By-law or a predecessor of that section.
19. Revocation or Cancellation of Building Permit
Where, upon the application for a building permit or the issuance of a building permit, an amount is paid toward all or part of the Development Charge payable under section 2 of this By-law or a predecessor of that section, that amount is to be refunded in the event that the application for the building permit is abandoned or the building permit is revoked or surrendered.
9
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
PART III
RESERVE FUNDS
20. Purpose of the Reserve Funds
The money in the Reserve funds shall be used by the City toward the growth-related portion of capital costs incurred in providing the services listed in Schedule 1 as described in section 7.
21. Reserve Funds – New and Continued
(1) Ten Reserve funds established by By-law C.P. 1496-244, one for each of the City Service categories shown in Schedule 1 as described in section 7, are hereby continued;
(a) The City Treasurer is hereby authorized to transfer the balances and commitments of the City Services Reserve Fund existing on termination of the predecessor Development Charge By-law, as amended, to the respective funds continued under this By-law;
(2) Two new Reserve funds entitled ‘Waste Diversion’ and ‘Operation Centres’ are hereby established for the purpose of administering revenues collected and expended on capital works related to these services as described in the 2019 Development Charges Background Study.
22. Composition of Reserve Funds
(1) Money deposited into the thirteen Reserve funds referred to in sections 21 may include,
(a) the portion relating to each service component of a Development Charge for City Services paid to the City mentioned in Schedule 1 as described in section 7 of this By-law; and
(b) interest earnings derived through the investment of the money deposited in the Fund as part of the City's cash management program.
23. Claims for Oversized Works
Re-imbursement for Owner constructed oversizing works shall be in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 4. No payment shall be made from the City Services Reserve Fund and no credit under section 38 of the Development Charges Act shall be given except as provided for in an agreement entered into pursuant to the Planning Act or the Development Charges Act.
24. Reserve Funds for the Purpose of Funding Development Charge Exemptions
(1) The City Treasurer is authorized to establish such Reserve funds as are deemed necessary for the purpose of financing an exemption under this By-law.
(2) The Chief Building Official shall, in respect of every building permit issued for any Development Charge otherwise payable but for which an exemption is permitted under this By-law, provide such information from time to time as may be required by the City Treasurer regarding the Development Charges that would have been paid were it not for the exemption.
(3) The City Treasurer is authorized to transfer from time to time from the Reserve funds mentioned in subsection (1) to the Reserve funds established and continued under section 21 an amount in respect of the Development Charges mentioned in subsection (2) and, in so doing, the City Treasurer shall have regard to the amounts and proportions referred to in section 9 of this By-law.
(4) The City Treasurer shall provide in the annual estimates of the City such sums as may be considered necessary to make the transfers mentioned in subsection (3), noting that the contributions for any single Development shall be financed over a period of not more than ten years.
10
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
(5) Money deposited in the Reserve fund or funds mentioned in subsection (1) may include,
(a) the amount provided in the annual estimates mentioned in subsection (4); and
(b) interest earnings derived through the investment of the money deposited in the fund or funds as part of the City's cash management program.
(6) The money withdrawn from the Reserve funds mentioned in subsection (1) shall be used only for the purpose of transfers to the Reserve funds, under subsection (3).
PART IV
COMPLAINTS
25. Corporate Services Committee to Hear Complaints
The Corporate Services Committee is hereby appointed pursuant to section 23.1 of the Municipal Act, 2001 to act in the place and stead of Council to deal with complaints under section 20 of the Development Charges Act.
26. Grounds of Complaint
An Owner may complain in writing to the Corporate Services Committee (with a copy provided to the Chief Building Official) upon such grounds as are established by and in accordance with the Development Charges Act in respect of the Development Charge imposed by the City
(1) that the amount of the Development Charge was incorrectly determined;
(2) whether a credit is available to be used against the Development Charge, or the amount of the credit or the service with respect to which the credit was given, was incorrectly determined; or
(3) that there was an error in the application of this By-law.
27. When Complaint to be Made
A complaint may not be made under section 26 later than ninety (90) days after the day the Development Charge, or any part of it, is payable.
28. Particulars of Complaint
The complaint must be in writing, must state the complainant’s name, the address where notices can be given to the complainant and the reasons for the complaint, which reasons shall be consistent with section 27.
29. Hearing
The Corporate Services Committee shall hold a hearing into the complaint and shall give the complainant an opportunity to make representations at the hearing.
30. Notice of Hearing
The Clerk of the municipality shall mail a notice of the hearing to the complainant at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing.
31. Determination by Council
After hearing the evidence and submissions of the complainant, the Corporate Services Committee shall as soon as practicable make a recommendation to Council on the merits of the complaint and Council may,
(1) dismiss the complaint; or
11
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
(2) rectify any incorrect determination or error that was the subject of the complaint.
32. Notice of Decision
The Clerk of the municipality shall mail to the complainant a notice of the Council’s decision, and of the last day for appealing the decision, which shall be the day that is forty (40) days after the day the decision is made. The notice required under this section must be mailed not later than twenty (20) days after the day the Council’s decision is made.
PART V
EXEMPTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
33. City And School Boards Exempt
(1) In accordance with the Development Charges Act, no land is exempt from a Development Charge by reason only that it is exempt from taxation under section 3 of the Assessment Act, 1997, with the following exceptions:
(a) land owned by and used for the purposes of City; and
(b) land owned by and used for the purposes of a board as defined in subsection 1(1) of the Education Act.
(2) For the purpose of subsection (1)(a), land owned by and used for the purposes of the City shall include lands owned by the City and used for the purposes of:
(a) The London Public Library Board; (b) The Covent Garden Market Corporation; (c) The London Convention Center Corporation; (d) The London Transit Commission; or (e) London Police Service.
34. Certain Developments Exempt
No Development Charge under section 2 is payable where the Development or Redevelopment;
(1) is an enlargement of an existing Dwelling unit;
(2) creates one or two additional Dwelling units in an existing Single detached dwelling if the total Gross floor area of the additional Dwelling unit or units does not exceed the Gross floor area of the Dwelling unit already in the building;
(3) creates one additional Dwelling unit in a Semi-detached or Rowhousing Dwelling if the Gross floor area of the additional Dwelling unit does not exceed the Gross floor area of the Dwelling unit already in the building;
(4) creates one additional Dwelling unit in any existing residential building other than a Single detached dwelling, a Semi-detached dwelling or a Rowhousing Dwelling if the Gross floor area of the additional Dwelling unit does not exceed the Gross floor area of the smallest Dwelling unit already in the building;
(5) creates one Dwelling unit contained within an accessory building per parcel if the Gross floor area of the additional Dwelling unit does not exceed the Gross floor area of the primary Dwelling unit located on the parcel;
(6) is a parking building or structure;
(7) is a bona fide Non-residential farm building used for an Agricultural use;
(8) is a structure that does not have municipally provided water and Wastewater facilities and that is intended for seasonal use only; or
12
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
is a ‘Temporary garden suite’ installed in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act, as amended;
35. Industrial Use Exemptions
In accordance with the Development Charges Act, and except as exempted under part (b) below, if a Development includes the enlargement of the Gross floor area of an existing Industrial building, the amount of the Development Charge that is payable in respect of the enlargement is determined in accordance with this section.
(1) For the purpose of this section, the term “existing Industrial building” shall have the same meaning as that term has in the Regulation made pursuant to the Development Charges Act.
(2) If the Gross floor area of an existing Industrial building is enlarged by 50 per cent or less, the amount of the Development Charge in respect of the enlargement is zero.
(3) If the Gross floor area of an existing Industrial building is enlarged by more than 50 per cent, the amount of the Development Charge in respect of the enlargement is the amount of the Development Charge that would otherwise be payable multiplied by the fraction determined as follows:
(a) Determine the amount by which the enlargement exceeds 50 per cent of the Gross floor area before the enlargement.
(b) Divide the amount determined under paragraph 1 by the amount of the enlargement.
(4) For greater certainty in applying the exemption in this section, the Gross floor area of an existing Industrial building is enlarged where there is a bona fide increase in the size of the existing Industrial building, the enlarged area is attached to the existing Industrial building, there is a direct means of ingress and egress from the existing Industrial building to and from the enlarged area for persons, goods and equipment and the existing Industrial building and the enlarged area are used for or in connection with an industrial purpose as set out in Regulation made pursuant to the Development Charges Act. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the exemption in this section shall not apply where the enlarged area is attached to the existing Industrial building by means only of a tunnel, bridge, canopy, corridor or other passageway, or through a shared below-grade connection such as a service tunnel, foundation, footing or parking facility.
(5) The exemption for an existing Industrial building provided by this section shall be applied up to a maximum of 50 percent of the Gross floor area before the first enlargement for which an exemption from the payment of Development Charges was granted pursuant to this By-law or any previous Development Charges By-law of the City made pursuant to the Development Charges Act or its predecessor legislation.
36. City Services Reserve Fund – Institutional Discount
Development Charges identified on Schedule 1 as described in section 7 shall be reduced by 50% with respect to the following:
(1) lands, buildings or structures used or to be used for a public hospital as defined under the Public Hospitals Act, and used for the purposes set out in the Act;
(2) lands, buildings or structures that are exempt from taxation under the enabling legislation of a college established under the Ontario Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology Act or a university as defined in section 171.1 of the Education Act, and used for the purposes set out under such enabling legislation;
(3) lands, buildings or structures used or to be used for a place of worship or for the purposes of a cemetery or burial ground; and
(4) other land, buildings or structures used for not-for-profit purposes defined in, and exempt from taxation under, section 3 of the Assessment Act.
13
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
37. Development Outside Urban Growth Area
Where a Development occurs outside the Urban Growth Area as shown in Schedule 3 to this By- law, the Development Charge payable under section 2 with respect to rates in section 7 shall exclude the following rate service components identified in Schedule 1 as described in section 7: Wastewater, Water Distribution and Stormwater.
PART VI
TRANSITIONAL
38. Permit Applications Submitted on or before August 3, 2019
Notwithstanding section 4, where a permit required under the Building Code Act in relation to a building or structure has been submitted on or before August 3 2019, a Development Charge under section 2 shall be calculated at the time of the application for the permit.
PART VII
MISCELLANEOUS
39. Administration of By-law
(1) The administration of this By-law, except as otherwise provided in this section, is assigned to the Chief Building Official.
(2) The administration of Part III is assigned to the City Treasurer.
40. Former By-laws Repealed
By-law C.P. – 1496-244 of the Corporation of the City of London, respecting Development Charges is hereby repealed effective August 4, 2019.
41. Commencement
This By-law comes into force on August 4, 2019 or, in the event of an appeal pursuant to the Development Charges Act, in accordance with that Act.
PASSED in Open Council on ______, 2019.
Ed Holder Mayor
Catharine Saunders City Clerk
First Reading – ______, 2019 2019 Second Reading – ______, 2019 Third Reading – ______, 2019
14
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
SCHEDULE 1 to By-law C.P.- ______-___
Development Charge Rates 2019 $ - Section 8 and 37
charges for some institutional buildings. forinstitutional some charges
(industrial building additions exemption) shall apply to the calculation of development charges for industrial buildings. buildings. for industrial charges development of calculation the to apply shall exemption) additions building (industrial of development calculation the to shall apply discount) building (institutional IMPORTANT NOTES 35 Section 1) 36 Section 2) theSee specific section for details. See theSee specific sections for details.
15
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
SCHEDULE 2 to By-law C.P.- ______-___
DOWNTOWN AREA BOUNDARY –Section 14
OLD EAST VILLAGE BOUNDARY – Section 14
16
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
SCHEDULE 3 to By-law C.P. -______-___
URBAN GROWTH AREA AND BUILT AREA
17
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
SCHEDULE 4 To By-law No. C.P.- ______-___ CITY SERVICES RESERVE FUND - CLAIMS POLICY
1. GENERAL
1.1. Scope
For all Development projects involving claimable works for which final approval of a Development Agreement was obtained the following policy and rules will apply to the eligibility for and payment of Claims under this By-law.
1.2. Introduction
This policy establishes the guidelines, procedures and requirements relating to the submission and processing of a Claim to the City Services Reserve Fund (“CSRF”). All Claims considered to be complete shall be processed as per the Council approved “Source of Financing” and consistent with provisions of this Schedule.
1.3. Claimability
Any item listed as claimable, subsidizable, or eligible for funding from a Development Charge (DC) reserve fund must also be provided for in the approved DC rate calculations as reflected in the current DC Background Study. To the extent that specific cost sharable works and projects cannot be identified as to location or timing, there should be a contingency provided for in the estimates that is incorporated into the rates.
The ultimate ability to Claim for reimbursement, for work constructed by an Owner shall be subject to authorization to construct the work in the Development Agreement or subject to execution of a servicing agreement prior to commencement of the work, and to other provisions of this Schedule. Coincident with the inclusion of a provision to construct a claimable work in a Development Agreement, the City shall generate a Source of Financing Report demonstrating the availability of financing for the work in relation to the approved capital budget for the particular category of works. Where the approved budget is not sufficient to absorb the new funding commitment for the work, the capital budget approval may be deferred until the following year’s budget cycle. The Owner may proceed at their own risk of refusal of the Claim, should they proceed with works authorized in the Development Agreement until a commitment approving the funding of such works from an approved project budget has been obtained.
It is important that the City continue to monitor between DC Background Studies, the accuracy of the estimates and assumptions used to establish the rates. To the extent that substantial variations are identified, Council should be advised and will need to consider whether to increase or decrease the rates in accordance with the monitoring observations.
1.4. Non-Growth Works that Benefit the Existing Population
Where works funded in part from the CSRF are subject to this policy and also include a non- growth component in the DC Background Study, funding of that portion of the works must wait until the City has approved sufficient funds in its Council approved capital budgets, or Council makes provision for a Reserve Fund designated for use in funding the non-growth share of DC funded works, to pay for that non-growth portion of the works. The non-growth portion of the funding shall be identified in the City’s Capital Budget and be subject to approval by Council.
1.5. Phasing
Prior to Phasing of any works the Owner must obtain written approval from the City Engineer (or designate) to construct the infrastructure in phases and to also make Claim for the incremental cost of phasing the works. Permission to construct works in phases shall not automatically permit partial Claims.
The City Engineer (or designate) may consider a request for internal construction phasing of a subdivision and could determine that it should be staged in a manner that will balance all of
18
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
a geographical area’s needs. The construction of entire systems may be linked, at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate), to a Claim’s eligibility for payment from the CSRF.
Additionally, if property easements are required to service adjacent developments and are not provided by an Owner then any payment of CSRF Claim associated with that Development may be withheld until the easement is provided.
1.6. Completeness of Claims
Prior to acceptance of a Claim, the following requirements shall be satisfied:
(1) The Claim must conform to an Agreement that has been approved by Council, or a delegated authority or officer, signed and registered on title to the affected property. The works for which the Claim is made shall be 100% complete with certain exceptions allowed by the City Treasurer (or designate) for seasonal condition preventing completion;
(2) The Claims for the works are to be submitted by a Registered Professional Engineer retained by the Owner. The City Treasurer (or designate) reserves the right to accept only Claims stamped by the same professional engineering consultant who designed, inspected and certified as complete the works for which the Claim is being made;
(3) No consideration will be given to Claims for works which have previously been claimed and authorized. Works omitted from a previous Claim will be considered for payment upon submission;
(4) No Claims to the Fund will be accepted for works that form part of an agreement for which the warranty period has expired and all the securities have been released;
(5) The following documentation (hard copy & digital) shall be included with the Claim for it to be considered complete:
(a) Completed City of London “Development Charge Claimable Works Checklist:
(b) A covering letter from the Owner’s Professional Engineer stating that a Claim is being made to the CSRF on behalf of the Owner with reference to the specific Agreement and clauses. The location and nature of the works shall be described and the costs representing the amount being claimed from the CSRF should be stated inclusive of applicable sales tax. The mailing address as well as the HST Registration Number of the Owner shall be provided;
(c) The “Certificate of Completion of Work” pertaining to the works being claimed in the format specified in the Agreement with an added statement certifying the quantities and final costs relating to the Claim;
(d) Any specific documentation that may be required by the Agreement such as an inspection report, condition report, or survey. Such documentation shall be satisfactory to the City Treasurer (or designate);
(e) Summary sheets detailing the sharing of costs, engineering and HST calculations;
(f) The Professional Engineer’s calculations of all quantities and final costs relating to the Claim;
(g) Servicing drawings for the related claimable works;
(h) Copy of summary of unit prices and/or a copy of all tenders for the entire project;
(i) Copy of the final payment certificates;
(j) All paid invoices for claimable engineering fees;
(k) An affidavit with reference to the Claim signed by both the Professional Engineer and the Owner certifying that all invoices included in the Claim package have been paid;
19
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
(l) Copy of the advertisement for tender, where a public tender is required;
(m) A summary of all bids, where a public tender is not required (see “Tendering” below);
(n) All backup information relevant to the Claim including invoices, change orders, fees etc;
(o) Copy of the Certificate of Publication of Substantial Performance, prepared in accordance with the Construction Act. This publication is generally carried in the Daily Commercial News and should include both the name of the Owner and the City of London. Similarly both should be mentioned under “Office to which claim for lien must be given to preserve lien”; and
(p) Completed “Summary of Claimable Works” with current information for the subdivision or development.
(6) All Claims shall be submitted to the Development Finance Division.
1.7. Tendering
The following rules shall apply to the tendering of works under this Schedule. Works paid as per the fixed subsidy (storm, watermain and wastewater sewer oversizing) are not subject to these tendering requirements;
(1) Projects undertaken by agreement between the City and an Owner with an estimated claimable amount in excess of $100,000 are to be undertaken by public tender;
(2) Projects undertaken by agreement between the City and an Owner with an estimated claimable amount less than $100,000 may be undertaken by a public tender, or by invitation with a minimum of 3 invited tenders;
(3) Works requiring an Owner to perform horizontal drilling may be undertaken by invitation with a minimum of 3 invited tenders;
(4) Single sourcing of a construction project is permissible when:
(a) Work is an extension of existing work and is a result of a change in scope during the project; there is no increase in individual tender item prices; and the Owner has obtained written approval from the City Treasurer (or designate) before Single Source, or
(b) Works where no portion of which are eligible for Claims;
(5) The Owner’s Professional Engineer will provide a cost estimate prior to issuing any tender;
(6) All claimable external works shall be identified as a separate tender schedule listing items, quantities, plan locations of quantities (chainage from station to station), and unit costs within larger construction contracts;
(7) Tender documents for the works which are eligible for Claims must be standard City of London Contract Documents. They must be in a unit price format and follow a formal tender opening procedure to the specifications of the City Treasurer (or designate);
(8) Calculation of eligible items in the Claim will be based on the successful lowest bidder’s tendered unit prices regardless of which contractor ultimately performs the work;
(9) Advance notification to the City of the time and location of the tender opening shall be provided to the City’s Development Finance Division; and
(10) Tender results and unit price summaries shall be provided to the City’s Development Finance Division for review upon the closing of tenders and prior to awarding the contract.
20
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
1.8. Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous items in the contract that apply partially to the cost shareable works such as Bonding, Field Office Trailer , Traffic Control, Mobilization/Demobilization and Permits can be claimed as a percentage of the total tendered contract amount using the following formula;
Claimable costs excluding bonding, Costs of trailer etc. Claimable X bonding, trailer = Amount Total tendered etc. contract excluding bonding, trailer etc.
Profit margin, administration and overhead costs of the Owner are deemed ineligible for Claim reimbursement from the CSRF.
1.9. Engineering Fees
1.9.1. Initiation of Engineering Design for Claimable Works
Prior to initiating the engineering design for a claimable work the Owner’s Professional Engineer shall submit a Work Plan outlining the anticipated engineering tasks and associated costs related to design and construction administration related to the claimable works. The Work Plan will be reviewed and approved by both the City Engineer (or designate) and City Treasurer (or designate). Any engineering fees incurred prior to the acceptance of the Work Plan cannot be submitted as part of the Claim. Engineering fee invoices submitted as part of claimable works should breakout separately fees related to the claimable tasks outlined in the accepted Work Plan. The invoiced engineering fees will be processed for payment at the actual invoiced costs.
No Claim in excess of the value included in the accepted Work Plan shall be considered. When there is a material change in the scope of work, an addendum to the Work Plan may be requested at the sole discretion of the City. The Work Plan addendum shall be subject to the acceptance of the City Engineer (or designate) and City Treasurer (or designate) and is to be submitted prior to any overage of the project value included in the Work Plan. In the event that costs have been incurred following an overage in the Work Plan upset limit and prior to the acceptance of a Work Plan addendum the fees incurred over said time period will not be claimable.
The Engineering fees related to the following activities are not claimable:
(1) Land acquisition costs, (2) Works performed and invoiced by utility companies, (3) Ministry of the Environment application fees, (4) The design of Stormwater Management Best Management Practices and Private systems, (5) Sewers and watermains claimed under the oversizing provisions of this By-law, and (6) Permits, fees, incidental expenses necessary for completion of the works.
1.10. Payment
The following rules shall apply to payments under this schedule:
(1) Valid Claims will be eligible for payment to the Owner in accordance with the terms of the applicable Agreement and the approvals discussed in this section.
(a) Claims approval will only be possible where budget approval for the particular Claim in question has been sought and granted. Budget approval shall be sought at the time of tabling for approval, a final Development Agreement which contains reference to claimable works. Where Council has delegated authority for approval of the agreement in question, budget approval shall be deemed to have been provided upon approval of the Development Agreement that contains reference to the
21
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
construction and Claim of claimable works. Where budget approval cannot be granted due to budget restrictions in relation to previous approved Claims, a subsequent approval will be sought in the following budget year.
(b) Upon the approval in the previous paragraph being granted, the Claim will be considered to have achieved “Committed Financing”.
(2) The Owner may provide the City with a properly executed “Assignment and Direction”, in a format acceptable by the City Solicitor, to transfer the payment(s) of Claims to another party;
(3) The payment of Claims from the Fund will be processed following the receipt of a complete Claim. Timing of payment of the Claim is subject to timing outlined in the Source of Financing approved by Council to come forward with the related Development Agreement. Draws from the CSRF (including payment of Claims) will be limited to the extent of the Committed Financing previously approved by Council through the annual budget approval process and as discussed in section a) above. Claims which exceed the level of funding previously committed may be deferred for approval to the next year’s budget process. This payment policy ensures that Claims are paid only in accordance with approved commitments, and that the annual commitments are generally consistent with the average annual provision made in the DC rate calculations.
(4) Holdback under the Construction Act:
(a) 10% holdback is retained on a Claim until the entire contract has been substantially performed and the 45 days statutory period from the day of publication in a Daily Commercial News of the substantial performance has expired, and all clearances have been obtained; and (b) If there is no certificate of publication included with the Claim, the holdback will not be released until the certificate is provided and 45 days has elapsed from the date of publication and all clearances have been obtained.
1.11. Claims by Non-Contributing Entities (City of London)
When the City acts as or in place of an Owner it shall be eligible to make Claims from the Fund.
1.12. Dispute Resolution for Claims
Exceptions to the procedures mentioned herein may occur. The preferred methodology to resolve any dispute regarding payment of Claim would be to seek interpretation and clarification through the City Treasurer (or designate), who shall consult with the City Engineer (or designate) as necessary. Should the Owner still feel aggrieved by a given policy interpretation then their avenue to seek remedy / relief is to submit a complaint in writing to a Hearings Officer appointed under the City’s Hearings Officer By-law for consideration. No complaint would be considered for works that form part of an agreement for which the warranty period has expired and all the securities have been released.
1.13. Construction of Major Infrastructure
Significant infrastructure projects would usually be paid and managed by the City though the CSRF, as identified in the DC Background Study. The City Engineer (or designate) shall determine which works may be constructed in conjunction with a Development or Subdivision Agreement.
1.14. Acceleration of Timing of Construction
Acceleration of works provided for in the City’s future capital budget may occur, subject to execution of a separate Municipal Servicing and Financing Agreement (MSFA) and subject to a separate policy adopted with respect to MSFAs as contained in the DC Background Study.
1.15. Municipal Land Requirements – Lands Owned by the Owner
Provisions of a Development Agreement or consent authority under the Planning Act may
22
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
include conditions relating to the dedication of lands at no cost to the City or Road widenings, sewers, paths, commuter parking lots, transit stations and related infrastructure for the use of the general public. As noted in the City of London Official Plan all municipal property requirements including easements (with the exception of lands required for regional Stormwater Management Facility lands as identified in the DC Background Study) identified in a consent or Development Agreement shall be provided at no cost to the City of London and/or any DC Fund.
Any land or easements that are owned by the Owner and which are transferred permanently to the City as a condition of a Development approval are not eligible for Claim with the exception of storm water management facilities. Temporary easements are not eligible for Claim.
If the Owner chooses to relocate an existing internal watercourse or conveyance channel outside of the subdivision, when the water course or channel could have been located inside the plan, then no Claim for easement acquisition may be made for the open channel.
Costs relating to existing watercourse improvements are not claimable unless specifically mentioned as projects in the DC Background Study.
2. ROAD WORKS
2.1. General
Where a Development abuts, faces, flanks or backs onto, or is divided by an existing Arterial road, and the City requires the Owner to construct minor works beyond their immediate access work, such road works may be claimable to the CSRF - Roads.
2.2. Works on lower order streets
The City may identify road works along lower order streets (Neighbourhood Connector and Neighbourhood Streets) that require improvements due to localized growth in an area that is not specifically attributable to one single development.
2.3. Limits of payment due to property extent and grade
Payment for claimable works is restricted to that portion of the works that is situated upon public or future public lands. As illustrated below there shall be no payment for spillage of fill or grading on privately owned lands.
23
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
2.4. Major Road Works (CSRF - Roads)
Major Transportation road works typically consist of large-scale road expansion projects or two lane road upgrades triggered by increased traffic volumes associated with growth across the City. All Major Transportation Road Works are constructed by the City and the growth related cost is eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Roads.
The costs of the following items are incorporated into road projects and are required as a result of growth:
(1) Structures to be widened or replaced; (2) Noise barrier and retaining wall where required; and (3) Land acquisition (raw land cost, appraisals, surveying, legal, etc.) but only where lands cannot be acquired through dedications under the Planning Act on a timely basis.
2.5. Minor Road Works (CSRF - Roads)
Minor Road Works that would be constructed as part of the major road project are eligible to be claimed from the CSRF - Roads. These works include but are not limited to: new traffic signals, channelization, sidewalks, and streetlights. Where a multi-use pathway is constructed in lieu of a sidewalk within an Arterial road allowance, the sidewalk equivalent cost is considered claimable. In some cases, these works are done in advance of the road capacity expansion project as a means of addressing a network wide benefit to growth, without completing the entire road expansion.
2.5.1. Channelization (CSRF - Roads)
Channelization on an Arterial road into a new public street is eligible for a Claim from the CSRF – Roads. The following subsections list the various additional components of the channelization which are considered claimable:
(1) Tree Plantings When replacement trees are planted as part of external road works to compensate for removed trees, other than those removed to facilitate an access, the cost of the removal and replacement is claimable. All other tree plantings are not claimable.
(2) Ditching When ditching and/or the installation of catchbasins is required to facilitate claimable external road work the drainage works may be incorporated in the minor road works Claim to the CSRF - Roads.
(3) Utility Relocations Utility relocations necessitated by the claimable road works can be claimed upon providing a copy of the invoices from the utility and proof of payment in full. The City shall issue a letter to the utility company stating that this work is required by the City under the Public Service Works on Highways Act and will pay for 50% of cost of labour and trucking. This 50% share is claimable from the CSRF - Roads; the other 50% is the utility’s share and is not claimable. Should the utility refuse to pay these costs, the 50% “utility share” shall be the responsibility of the proponent Owner. Engineering fees associated with these relocations are not claimable.
2.6. Road Oversizing (CSRF - Roads)
Where a new Arterial is to be constructed in whole or in part through or adjacent to a Development, the Owner is responsible for the cost of constructing a Neighbourhood Connector as defined in the City of London’s Design Specifications & Requirements Manual and Complete Streets Design Manual. If the required road is wider or at a higher standard, the Owner is responsible for the cost of a standard road, including sidewalks, street lights, etc., and is eligible for a Claim to the CSRF – Roads for the difference in cost of granular and asphalt between a standard road and the road actually constructed. The construction responsibilities shall be defined by the conditions of an agreement between the City and the Owner. If the Owner wishes to construct the road at an enhanced standard beyond that acceptable to the City Engineer (or designate), then the Owner shall pay for the additional costs of enhancement with no eligibility for a Claim from any Fund.
24
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
2.7. Strategic Links (CSRF – Roads)
Portions of proposed Neighbourhood Connectors or Neighbourhood Streets that are required for transportation network connectivity, are not implementable in a timely manner due to reasons beyond the control of the surrounding Owners and are identified as a strategic need by the City Engineer (or designate), may be constructed by the City and the cost is eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Roads.
2.8. Active Transportation (CSRF – Roads)
Where on-road cycling lanes are identified through Development areas in the Cycling Master Plan, on Neighbourhood Connectors or Neighbourhood Streets, the Owner shall be responsible to construct the cycling lanes. If the required road is wider or at a higher standard, the Owner is responsible for the cost of a standard road, including sidewalks, street lights, etc., and is eligible for a Claim to the CSRF – Roads for the difference in cost between a standard road and the road actually constructed. The construction responsibilities shall be defined by the conditions of an agreement between the City and the Owner.
2.9. Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
The following subsections list the various road components which are considered a local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner:
(1) Connections Connections of all public and private new streets, ramps or entrances (including features and design details such as: roundabouts, culverts, signage, gateway treatments, noise wall alterations, sidewalks, cycling lanes, multi-use pathways, directional traffic islands, road re-profiling, decorative features) to the existing road infrastructure;
(2) Placing Fill Re-grading, cutting and placing fill on lands beyond the road allowance along their frontage in accordance with City standards. In addition, all grading and restoration of road allowance along the Development frontage if no claimable road works are required;
(3) Topsoil and Sod Topsoil and sod to the edge of any existing sidewalk fronting the Development;
(4) Tree Planting Planting of new trees fronting the Development, except as provided in the Minor Road Works Channelization policies.
(5) Sidewalk Reinforcement Any upgrade or reinforcement from a standard 100mm thickness sidewalk across the Development’s new access;
(6) Retaining Walls Retaining walls along the Development frontage, where acceptable to the City Engineer (or designate);
(7) Temporary Works 100% of the cost of temporary asphalt sidewalks, roads, paths, swales along the frontage abutting Arterials where installation in ultimate location is deemed premature;
(8) Traffic Signals at Private Streets Traffic signal installations at all private entrances, and at public entrances which do not meet MTO warrants;
(9) Other Works Any other services, removals, relocations, etc., required including but not limited to, utility relocation, sidewalk alterations, and curb cuts;
(10) Restoration and Damage
25
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
Restoration of any utility cuts, and or damage created by construction activities and /or construction traffic in and out of the Development including but not limited to daily removal of mud tracking, daily dust suppression, milling and paving of deteriorated asphalt caused by construction traffic, grading of gravel shoulders to remove rutting caused by construction traffic;
(11) Noise Attenuation Measures All noise berms, window streets, fences and privately maintained noise walls;
(12) Grading and BMPs Grading elements such as: swales, ditches, best management practices, (BMPs) and any other feature to address over land flow routes needs created by the Development’s grading;
(13) Paths and Walkways Pedestrian paths, walkways, bridges, tunnels, including the related lighting and signage, except as provided in the Minor Road Works Channelization policies; (Note: Parkways are constructed by the City and are specifically provided in the DC Background Study);
(14) Utility Upgrades The costs related to the upgrading of any utility plant, or the relocation of the same, unless necessitated by the roadwork;
(15) Relocation and Replacement Costs The relocation and/or replacement costs of any encroachment on the City’s road allowance or easement including but not limited to hedges, sprinklers systems and fences;
(16) Street Lighting Street lighting at intersections with existing roads where required by the Development Agreement.
3. WASTEWATER WORKS
3.1. Regional Trunk Sewers (CSRF - Wastewater)
All sewers required to service future Development with a diameter greater than 450mm are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF – Wastewater.
All sewers of any diameter required to service future Development that are identified as a strategic link by the City Engineer (or designate) and are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Wastewater.
In order to be eligible for a Claim as a Regional Trunk Sewer, the sewer must have no Private Drain Connections to individual residential units otherwise the “Sewer Oversizing” policy applies.
3.2. Sewer Oversizing (CSRF – Wastewater)
Sewers, which are not Regional Trunk Sewers, with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF - Wastewater:
(1) The sewer services external developable areas; and (2) The sewer is greater than 250mm in diameter.
The oversized portion (>250mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on the diameter of pipe and the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is determined by rounding the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes to the nearest depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in Appendix 4-A.
The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of oversized sewer to determine the total oversizing subsidy.
26
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
Where oversized Box and Elliptical sewers are constructed, an additional non-circular subsidy percentage is applied to the subsidy unit cost per metre.
If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized sewer, the upset Claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost.
The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, manholes, restoration, etc.
3.3. Pumping Stations (CSRF - Wastewater)
The upgrading or construction of new regional pumping stations are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Wastewater.
3.4. Temporary Pumping Stations (Owner Cost)
The cost of any temporary pumping stations or forcemains is borne by the Owner. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. provide land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study.
3.5. Wastewater Treatment Upgrades (CSRF - Wastewater)
All wastewater treatment upgrades are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Wastewater.
3.6. Temporary Wastewater Systems (Owner Cost)
Costs of all wastewater systems that are temporary or are not defined in the DC Background Study shall be borne by the Owner. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. secure land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study.
3.7. Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
The following subsections list the various wastewater components which are considered a local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner:
(1) Any pipe or portion of a larger pipe that is less than or equal to 250mm in diameter are referred to as local works; and (2) Connections from a local sewer to existing external infrastructure.
4. STORMWATER WORKS
4.1. Claimable Storm Water Works
In order to be claimable, Stormwater management works must be a permanent facility and be contained in, or alternative to, works contained in the current DC Background Study and must be incorporated into an executed Development Agreement.
4.2. Regional Trunk Sewers (CSRF- Stormwater)
All sewers to be constructed within existing City owned lands that service multiple new Development areas are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater.
27
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
4.3. Regional Open Channels (CSRF- Stormwater)
Any open channel works identified through the Environmental Assessment process that are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater.
4.4. Storm Sewer Oversizing (CSRF- Stormwater)
Storm Sewers with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF - Stormwater:
(1) The sewer services external developable areas; and (2) The sewer is greater than 1050mm in diameter.
The oversized portion (>1050mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on the diameter of pipe and the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is determined by rounding the average depth of sewer between maintenance holes to the nearest depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in Appendix 4-B.
The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of oversized sewer to determine the total oversizing subsidy.
Where oversized Box and Elliptical sewers are constructed, an additional non-circular subsidy percentage is applied to the subsidy unit cost per metre.
If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized sewer, the upset Claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost.
The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, manholes, restoration, etc.
4.5. Open Channel Oversizing (CSRF- Stormwater)
Open Channels with all of the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF - Stormwater:
(1) An open channel design is required for the reason of inherent site drainage constraints and the design has been accepted by the City Engineer (or designate), (2) The open channel services external developable areas; and (3) The open channel has a 2-year storm design flow cross-sectional area greater than a 1050mm sewer using the City’s minimum design standards.
The oversized portion represents the cross-sectional area required in excess of a 1050mm sewer for a 2-year storm design. The oversizing subsidy will be calculated based on the additional cost of oversizing beyond an area equivalent to a 1050mm pipe size using the City’s minimum design standards for a 2-year storm design flow. The oversizing subsidy is payable based on an average oversizing cost in the form of a $/m of channel constructed as calculated by the Owner’s Professional Engineer and as accepted by the City Engineer (or designate). An allowance of 15% will be added to the calculated oversizing amount to cover applicable engineering costs.
4.6. Stormwater Management Works (CSRF- Stormwater)
4.6.1. Environmental Assessment Complete
Any municipally owned or operated stormwater management works designed to provide capacity to facilitate growth that are identified through the Environmental Assessment process and are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater.
28
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
4.6.2. Environmental Assessment Not Complete
Stormwater Management Works for which an Environmental Assessment has not been completed that are anticipated to satisfy a regional benefit to growth are to be identified as separate area specific contingencies in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater.
Upon completion of the applicable Environmental Assessment (i.e. no outstanding Part 2 orders), a review of the related area specific contingency and the DC rate will be undertaken and, if required, a revision to the DC By-law will be made.
4.7. Stormwater Management Facility Land Policies (CSRF- Stormwater)
With respect to land acquisition for storm water management facilities the value of the land shall align with the ‘open space land’, ‘hazard land’ and ‘table land’ to be purchased by the City for parkland use’ values, as amended from time to time, by By-law CP-9 for the Conveyance of Land and Cash in Lieu Thereof for Park and Other Purposes as follows:
4.7.1. Non-Developable lands
Non-Developable lands include:
Lands containing significant natural heritage features or ecological functions as defined in the City’s Official Plan, or any area located outside the limit of Development and not constrained by flooding or erosion hazards as determined through accepted Development studies and/or the draft plan or site plan process: the CP-9 value effective September 1, 2018 is $27,026/hectare ($10,938/acre)
Lands constrained by flood or erosion hazards as defined in the City’s Official Plan, or any area subject to flooding or erosion hazards located outside the limit of Development as determined through accepted Development studies and/or the draft plan or site plan process: the CP-9 value effective September 1, 2018 is $16,036/hectare ($6,490/acre)
Lands under existing open water are not claimable as defined by the London 2 year design storm high water elevation.
4.7.2. Park Land
Lands set aside as a dedication for parks and not designated for Development: $ Nil
Where there is a shared use of a stormwater or wastewater work such as a maintenance road/ pathway, the use and maintenance of the road/pathway shall be viewed as functioning solely for the wastewater or stormwater service use and not the park use. The costs associated with the maintenance access path shall be borne by the related service’s CSRF.
4.7.3. Developable Lands
Developable lands are located inside the urban growth boundary and include table land within the limit of Development as established by accepted Development studies and/or the draft plan or site plan approval process: the CP-9 rate effective September 1, 2018 is $432,420/hectare ($175,000/acre).
4.7.4. Lands Required Outside the Urban Growth Boundary
Where lands are required outside the Urban Growth Boundary for the purposes of stormwater management the value of the required lands will be determined via a property appraisal completed by the City to the satisfaction of the City Treasurer (or designate).
4.7.5. Legal Fees
Legal fees directly related to the land transfer may be claimable subject to the review and acceptance of the City Solicitor.
29
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
4.8. Major SWM Facility Inlet and Outlet Sewers within the SWM Block (CSRF- Stormwater)
Any storm sewers or engineered channels within a Major SWM Facility block that are either upstream or downstream of a facility are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater.
4.9. Major SWM Facility Outlet Sewers Outside the SWM Block (CSRF- Stormwater)
Any major SWM facility outlet system, including storm sewers or engineered channels, that extend outside of the SWM block facility is considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and is eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Stormwater if it is a dedicated outlet system to convey flow from the SWM Facility to the allocated downstream storm sewer or watercourse.
4.10. Low Impact Development Subsidy – Linear Works (CSRF Stormwater)
Linear Low Impact Development (LID) works with all of the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF – Stormwater:
(1) The LID works are infiltration systems designed to improve water quality or the water balance within the new Development; (2) The LID works are constructed in conjunction with local stormwater servicing on City- owned lands or within a dedicated municipal easement; and (3) The design has been accepted by the City Engineer (or designate).
Linear LID infiltration works are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are eligible for a subsidy payable in terms of a $/m of pipe constructed.
The subsidy payable for LID pipe systems is based on the average depth of pipe between maintenance holes. The subsidy unit cost is determined by rounding the average pipe depth between maintenance holes to the nearest depth correlating to the dollar values reflected in Appendix 4-B. The subsidy unit cost per metre of pipe is applied to each segment length of pipe to determine the total LID subsidy.
For other LIDs, such as rain gardens or infiltration swales, the subsidy payable is based on a 5 m depth for the length of the LID feature.
The subsidy amounts are reflected in Appendix 4-B. The subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, construction, etc.
LID works constructed within a site plan are not eligible for subsidy.
4.11. Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
The following subsections list the various stormwater components which are considered a local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner:
(1) Any pipe or portion of a larger pipe that is less than or equal to 1050 mm in diameter are referred to as local works; (2) Connections from a local sewer to existing external infrastructure; (3) Mitigation/compensation works recommended by an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that are related to the subdivision; and (4) Construction of road side ditches, swales without an infiltration component, and overland flow routes.
4.12. Temporary Storm Sewers (Owner Cost)
Costs of all storm sewer systems that are temporary or not defined in the DC Background Study shall be borne by the Owner. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate).
30
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
4.13. Temporary Stormwater Management Works (Owner Cost)
Any temporary works or works not included in the approved DC Background Study are at the sole expense of the Owner including operation, maintenance and decommissioning. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. secure land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study.
5. WATER DISTRIBUTION
5.1. Major Watermains (CSRF-Water Distribution)
All watermains required to service future Development greater than or equal to 400mm in diameter are considered to satisfy a network wide benefit to growth and are to be identified separately as projects in the DC Background Study and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF-Water Distribution.
All watermains of any diameter required to service future Development that are identified as a strategic link by the City Engineer (or designate) are considered to satisfy a regional benefit to growth and are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF- Water Distribution.
5.2. Watermain Oversizing (CSRF-Water Distribution)
Watermains with the following attributes are eligible for a subsidy from the CSRF-Water Distribution:
(1) The watermain services external developable areas; and (2) The watermain is greater than 250mm in diameter.
The oversized portion (>250mm) is eligible for a subsidy payable based on an average oversizing cost and is stated in terms of a $/m of pipe constructed. The oversizing subsidy amounts are identified in Appendix 4-C.
If the total oversizing subsidy exceeds the actual cost to construct the oversized watermain, the upset Claim limit shall not exceed the actual construction cost.
The oversizing subsidy amounts cover the cost per metre of all associated eligible costs including engineering, appurtenances, restoration, etc.
5.3. Water Facilities (CSRF-Water Distribution)
Where the upgrading or construction of new public water booster pumping stations and reservoir projects are designed to increase capacity or improve service to acceptable standards and as a result of growth, these works are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF-Water Distribution. These projects must also be identified in the DC Background Study.
5.4. Temporary Facilities (Owner Cost)
Where a temporary facility precedes the construction of a permanent facility, the Owner that requires the temporary facility will be required to also assist in making provision for the permanent facility (i.e. secure land for permanent facility) as a condition of approval for the temporary facility. Approval of temporary works is at the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate). In order for a temporary work to proceed there must first be provisions for the permanent work within the current DC Background Study.
5.5. Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
The following subsections list the various water components which are considered a local service cost and are therefore constructed at the expense of the Owner:
31
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
(1) Any watermain or portion of a larger watermain that is less than or equal to 250mm in diameter is referred to as local works; and (2) Connections from a local watermain to existing external infrastructure.
6. BUILT AREA WORKS
6.1. Claimable Works (CSRF)
Built Area Works are defined as linear water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure works that satisfy all of the following conditions:
(1) Service lands inside the Built Area (Schedule 3); (2) Provide a regional benefit to growth; (3) Replace existing infrastructure; and (4) Are located within the municipal right-of-way or easement.
Built Area Works are eligible for a Claim from the City Services Reserve Fund.
6.2. Constructor of Built Area Works (CSRF)
The City shall lead the construction of Built Area Works unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer (or designate).
6.3. Claimable Built Area Costs (CSRF)
The claimable costs for Built Area Works shall include construction, engineering, and restoration, subject to a deduction for the non-growth share.
6.4. Determining the Eligible Growth Portion of Built Area Works (CSRF)
The following steps are required to determine the eligible growth portion of Built Area Works.
Step 1: Determine the Cost of Existing Pipe and Oversized Portion
The 2019 Development Charges Background Study unit rate tables are used to determine the ratio of the existing pipe and new pipe recommended for construction. These ratios are then applied to the per meter tender cost of the new pipe being constructed.
Step 2: Determine Eligible Growth Portion of Existing Pipe
The City of London’s Asset Condition Rating is used to assign the growth / non-growth splits to the per meter tender cost associated with replacing the existing pipe. Table 1 provides the correlation between the Asset Condition Rating and the growth / non-growth splits.
Table 1- Asset Condition Rating and Growth / Non-Growth Splits
Asset Non- Growth Condition Growth Asset Definition % Rating % 1 90 10 Very Good – Fit for Future 2 75 25 Good – Adequate for now 3 50 50 Fair – Requires attention 4 25 75 Poor – At risk 5 10 90 Very Poor – Unfit for sustained Service
The Asset Condition Rating’s growth / non-growth splits are applied to the costs apportioned to the per meter existing pipe cost to determine the eligible growth portion.
Step 3: Determine Eligible Growth Portion of Oversized Pipe
The costs apportioned to pipe oversizing shall be 100% attributed to growth.
32
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
The total eligible growth portion of the new pipe being constructed is the sum of the cost of the oversized portion plus the growth share of the existing portion.
6.5. Built Area Combined Wastewater and Storm Sewers (CSRF - Wastewater)
When determining the eligible growth portion of a combined sewer replacement, the existing combined sewer is assigned an Asset Condition Rating of 5 (very poor) with a 10% growth and 90% non-growth split. These growth / non-growth splits are applied to the per meter tender costs of the separated wastewater and storm sewers.
6.6. Distribution of Restoration Costs (CSRF)
Restoration costs necessitated by the Built Area Works will be split equally between the reconstructed services (i.e. water, wastewater and/or stormwater). The eligible growth portion of these splits will be determined based on the Asset Condition Rating, subject to a deduction for the non-growth share.
6.7. Local Service Costs (Owner Cost)
Built Area Works are assumed to provide a regional benefit to growth with no local service components.
7. PARKS
7.1. Parkland Development (CSRF – Parks & Recreation)
Pathways and parkland infrastructure are generally constructed by the City. At the request and approval of the City, the Owner may construct pathways and parkland infrastructure which are eligible for a Claim from the CSRF - Parks & Recreation as outlined in the registered Agreement. Claimable costs would include excavation, granular bases, finished surface treatments, supply/installation of amenities (ex. arbors, play equipment, etc.) as well as grading and seeding within 1 meter of the finished pathway and/or amenity construction. Grading and seeding beyond the limits of the pathway/amenity space would be an Owner cost.
7.2 Parkland (Owner Cost)
Costs to bring Neighbourhood Parks, District Parks, Sports Parks, Urban Parks and Civic Spaces dedicated under the Planning Act to a base condition shall be borne by the Owner. This includes grading, seeding, servicing, fencing and the associated engineering and landscape architect design costs as required by City standards.
For Open Space, Woodland Parks and Environmentally Significant Areas (ESAs), costs for fencing as required by City standards, and measures (i.e. implementation of mitigation, monitoring, Development limits) as outlined in an approved Environmental Impact Study and/or Tree Preservation Plan shall be borne by the Owner.
Where the Owner desires to enhance Parkland Development above City standards, these costs shall be borne by the Owner.
7.3. Cul-de-sac Islands, Roundabout Islands and Window Streets (Owner Cost)
Development costs for landscape features, cul-de-sac islands, roundabout islands and window streets shall be borne by the Owner. This includes grading, seeding, landscaping, fencing, plantings and the associated engineering and landscape architect design costs as required by City standards.
8. CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR CSRF WORKS BY OWNER
At the discretion of the City Engineer (or designate) construction of Major CSRF works may be undertaken by the Owner where acknowledged by the City Engineer (or designate) in writing. The following activities must take place to ensure claimability of the works:
33
Appendix P: Proposed 2019 DC By-law
(1) The City Engineer (or designate) shall acknowledge the commencement of the work by the Owner or their agent, in writing, with any conditions associated with costs to be incurred. Any costs incurred prior to the City Engineer’s (or designate) acknowledgement will be undertaken strictly at the risk of the Owner or their agent.
(2) Engineering fees will be payable as outlined in Section 1.9 “Engineering Fees” of this schedule.
(3) The Owner shall provide the draft tender documents to the City Engineer (or designate) and City Treasurer (or designate) for acceptance. The City will ensure that the Owner has made an appropriate distinction of costs between claimable costs to be funded from City administered funding sources, and local costs which are the responsibility of the Owner to bear.
(4) Costs ultimately eligible for reimbursement must comply with Section 1.3 “Claimability” and Section 1.10 “Payment” of this schedule and be provided for in an approved capital budget.
(5) Payment of the Claim will be subject to the submission of Claim documentation as outlined in Section 1.6 “Completeness of Claim”.
(6) Elements of the City’s Purchasing Policy as it relates to Public Tenders, Requests for Proposal and Single Sourcing must be met.
(7) Submitted invoices shall include a description of the work completed with reference to the applicable Work Plan task, the cost and duration of the work, and indicate the date the work was completed.
(8) No Claim shall be paid on reimbursable work unless it is completed. Whether a work is completed shall be determined by the City Engineer (or designate).
34
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-A Applicable to agreements approved prior to August 4, 2019. Based on Table 3-6: Oversizing Cost Schedule, AECOM Sanitary Servicing Development Charge Background Study (March 2014).
Subsidy Amount Pipe Diameter (mm) ($/m) 250 $0 300 $25 375 $55 450 $95 525 $160 600 $240 675 $350 750 $460 825 $585 900 $655 975 $780
35
SCHEDULE 4
Appendix 4-A Applicable to agreements approved post August 3, 2019. Based on Table 1.4 Sanitary Sewer Oversizing Subsidy, City of London, Water and Wastewater Services, 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study, February 2019. Diameter (mm) Depth (m) 250 300 375 450 525 600 675 750 825 900 2.5 $0 $12 $22 $57 $77 $183 $222 $261 $377 $487 3.0 $0 $22 $32 $68 $99 $199 $241 $282 $410 $513 3.5 $0 $33 $43 $80 $122 $215 $260 $304 $444 $540 4.0 $0 $43 $53 $91 $144 $231 $278 $325 $477 $566 4.5 $0 $53 $63 $102 $166 $247 $297 $347 $510 $592 5.0 $0 $63 $73 $113 $188 $263 $316 $368 $543 $618 5.5 $0 $91 $102 $142 $206 $278 $331 $384 $559 $634 6.0 $0 $119 $130 $170 $223 $293 $346 $399 $575 $649 6.5 $0 $147 $158 $198 $240 $308 $361 $414 $591 $664 7.0 $0 $174 $186 $226 $258 $323 $376 $430 $606 $679 7.5 $0 $202 $214 $254 $275 $338 $392 $445 $622 $694 8.0 $0 $280 $292 $332 $373 $457 $520 $582 $815 $910 8.5 $0 $359 $371 $411 $472 $576 $648 $720 $1,008 $1,127 9.0 $0 $437 $449 $489 $570 $694 $776 $857 $1,202 $1,343 9.5 $0 $516 $528 $568 $669 $813 $904 $995 $1,395 $1,560 10.0 $0 $594 $606 $646 $767 $932 $1,032 $1,132 $1,588 $1,776 10.5 $0 $783 $796 $836 $938 $1,097 $1,204 $1,311 $1,727 $1,915 11.0 $0 $972 $987 $1,026 $1,109 $1,262 $1,375 $1,489 $1,866 $2,054 11.5 $0 $1,160 $1,177 $1,217 $1,280 $1,426 $1,547 $1,668 $2,004 $2,192 12.0 $0 $1,349 $1,368 $1,407 $1,451 $1,591 $1,719 $1,846 $2,143 $2,331 12.5 $0 $1,538 $1,558 $1,597 $1,622 $1,756 $1,891 $2,025 $2,282 $2,470 36
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-B Applicable to agreements approved prior to August 4, 2019. Based on Table 3.1: Oversizing Compensation, Delcan 2014 Stormwater and Drainage Development Charges Update Study (March 2014).
Pipe Diameter or Circular Pipe Elliptical Pipe Box Culvert Pipe Closest Circular ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) Equivalent (mm) 1050 $0 $0 $0 1200 $250 $400 $250 1350 $520 $670 $520 1500 $831 $1,031 $831 1650 $1,168 $1,368 $1,718 1800 $1,593 $1,843 $2,143 1950 $1,978 $2,278 $2,528 2100 $2,430 $2,730 $2,980 2250 $2,851 $3,201 $3,401 2400 $3,272 $3,722 $4,122 2550 $3,693 $4,143 $4,543 2700 $4,113 $4,563 $4,963 2850 $4,534 $4,984 $5,384 3000 $4,955 $5,405 $5,805
37
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-B Applicable to agreements approved post August 3, 2019. Based on Table 1.4 Storm Sewer Oversizing Subsidy, City of London, Water and Wastewater Services, 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study, February 2019. Diameter (mm) Depth (m) 1050 1200 1350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 2700 2850 3000 2.5 $0 $380 $545 $740 $1,010 $1,285 $1,545 $1,815 $2,085 $2,355 $2,625 $2,895 $3,165 $3,435 3.0 $0 $395 $573 $776 $1,043 $1,336 $1,604 $1,886 $2,168 $2,450 $2,732 $3,014 $3,296 $3,578 3.5 $0 $410 $602 $812 $1,076 $1,387 $1,663 $1,957 $2,251 $2,545 $2,839 $3,133 $3,427 $3,721 4.0 $0 $425 $630 $848 $1,109 $1,438 $1,721 $2,027 $2,333 $2,639 $2,945 $3,251 $3,557 $3,863 4.5 $0 $440 $659 $884 $1,142 $1,489 $1,780 $2,098 $2,416 $2,734 $3,052 $3,370 $3,688 $4,006 5.0 $0 $455 $687 $920 $1,175 $1,540 $1,839 $2,169 $2,499 $2,829 $3,159 $3,489 $3,819 $4,149 5.5 $0 $484 $716 $949 $1,224 $1,580 $1,878 $2,209 $2,539 $2,870 $3,200 $3,530 $3,861 $4,191 6.0 $0 $513 $746 $979 $1,274 $1,619 $1,918 $2,249 $2,579 $2,910 $3,241 $3,572 $3,903 $4,233 6.5 $0 $543 $775 $1,008 $1,323 $1,659 $1,957 $2,288 $2,620 $2,951 $3,282 $3,613 $3,944 $4,276 7.0 $0 $572 $805 $1,038 $1,373 $1,698 $1,997 $2,328 $2,660 $2,991 $3,323 $3,655 $3,986 $4,318 7.5 $0 $601 $834 $1,067 $1,422 $1,738 $2,036 $2,368 $2,700 $3,032 $3,364 $3,696 $4,028 $4,360 8.0 $0 $894 $1,140 $1,388 $1,737 $2,069 $2,383 $2,727 $3,072 $3,416 $3,761 $4,106 $4,450 $4,795 8.5 $0 $1,186 $1,446 $1,708 $2,051 $2,401 $2,729 $3,086 $3,444 $3,801 $4,158 $4,515 $4,872 $5,230 9.0 $0 $1,479 $1,753 $2,029 $2,366 $2,732 $3,076 $3,446 $3,815 $4,185 $4,555 $4,925 $5,295 $5,664 9.5 $0 $1,771 $2,059 $2,349 $2,680 $3,064 $3,422 $3,805 $4,187 $4,570 $4,952 $5,334 $5,717 $6,099 10.0 $0 $2,064 $2,365 $2,670 $2,995 $3,395 $3,769 $4,164 $4,559 $4,954 $5,349 $5,744 $6,139 $6,534 10.5 $0 $2,126 $2,426 $2,731 $3,055 $3,455 $3,829 $4,223 $4,618 $5,012 $5,407 $5,802 $6,196 $6,591 11.0 $0 $2,187 $2,487 $2,792 $3,116 $3,515 $3,888 $4,282 $4,677 $5,071 $5,465 $5,859 $6,253 $6,648 11.5 $0 $2,249 $2,549 $2,852 $3,176 $3,575 $3,948 $4,342 $4,735 $5,129 $5,523 $5,917 $6,311 $6,704 12.0 $0 $2,310 $2,610 $2,913 $3,237 $3,635 $4,007 $4,401 $4,794 $5,188 $5,581 $5,974 $6,368 $6,761 12.5 $0 $2,372 $2,671 $2,974 $3,297 $3,695 $4,067 $4,460 $4,853 $5,246 $5,639 $6,032 $6,425 $6,818
38
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-B Applicable to agreements approved post August 3, 2019. Based on Table 1.4 Sanitary and Storm Sewer Oversizing Subsidy, City of London, Water and Wastewater Services, 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study, February 2019.
Non-Circular Additional Subsidy
Diameter (mm) Type 1050 1200 1350 1500 1650 1800 1950 2100 2250 2400 2550 2700 2850 3000 Box 0% 228% 202% 177% 151% 159% 129% 129% 128% 128% 127% 127% 126% 126% Elliptical 0% 138% 135% 132% 130% 130% 129% 126% 124% 123% 121% 119% 117% 116%
39
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-B Based on Table 1.5 LID Subsidy Unit Cost Table for Construction and Restoration Work, City of London, Water and Wastewater Services, 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study, October 5, 2018
Depth LID Subsidy (m) ($/m) 2.5 $279 3.0 $301 3.5 $324 4.0 $346 4.5 $369 5.0 $391 5.5 $414 6.0 $436 6.5 $458 7.0 $481 7.5 $503 8.0 $648 8.5 $792 9.0 $937 9.5 $1,081 10.0 $1,225
40
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-C Applicable to agreements approved prior to August 4, 2019. Based on Table 4-2 Oversizing Subsidy for Watermains, AECOM 2014 Water Servicing Development Charge Background Study (March 2014).
Subsidy Amount Pipe Diameter (mm) ($/m) 250 $0 300 $60 400 $155 450 $245 500 $420 600 $700 750 $1,125 900 $1,455
41
SCHEDULE 4 Appendix 4-C Applicable to agreements approved post August 3, 2019. Based on Table 1.2 Watermain Oversizing Subsidy, City of London, Water and Wastewater Services, 2019 One Water Development Charge Update Study, February 2019.
Diameter (mm) Subsidy 250 300 400 450 500 600 750 900 Amount ($/m) $0 $55 $180 $261 $598 $700 $1,085 $1,466
42