Hart Opposes Reagan Economics in South Bend Campaign Speech

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hart Opposes Reagan Economics in South Bend Campaign Speech ~~~~~- ~~-~- - Pope- page4 VOL XVIII, NO. 141 the independent ~tudcnt nl'w~paptT ~en ing notrt danK and ~ailll man·~ MONDAY, MAY 7, 1984 Alcohol policy gets mixed reviews from South Bend groups By TIMOTHY GIANOTTI pects they are afraid minors will Senior Staff Reporter venture off campus to drink and take to the streets drunk. The city of South Bend cannot It will create a "larger area of con­ make up its mind about Notre gestion" at times when there is Dame's new alcohol policy. usually no traffic problem, Jackson On one hand, owners and said. managers of local bars think the Owner of Corby's, Harold A. policy will drastically increase the . Rowley, Jr., agreed. "It is going to circulation of false identification and precipitate a number of problems." the number of minors in their es­ The tavern industry has not had tablishments. many problems this year, Jackson On the other hand, Mayor Roger said. Alcohol-related vandalism and Parent feels the new policy is a violence is at a low. necessary step on the road to "a new "It has been a good year," he said. consciousness." One contributor to the an­ Assistant Manager of Bridget ticipated off-campus drinking surge McGuire's Filing Station, Greg Jack· will be the new identification sys­ son, admits the new policyis going to tem at Senior Bar, said general make the tavern's job a lot tougher manager John Bowie. than it presently is. A computer, similar to those "We are kind of disheartened presently stationed in the dining Democratic Senator Gary Hart of Colorado receives crowd Friday at South Bend's Century Center. More on about the new policy," said Jackson. halls, will be installed to verify the age of customers. he said. The new, a T-shirl from Bernie Pellegrino, campus coordinator the presidential hopeful's address is in the story below. "We are going to be flooded with permanent student identification for Hart's campaign, after Hart spoke to an overflow young people and fake !.D.'s." He said Bridget's tries very hard to cards wll feature a magnetized birth prevent illegal drinking, and he an­ date which the computer will regis­ Hart opposes Reagan economics ticipates a great challenge facing his ter. security people next year. In addition to this, said Bowie, South Bend Police will be jacking Senior Bar will continue to require up patrols and watching local bars in South Bend campaign speech much more closely, he. said. He ex- see POLICY, page 5 By TOM MOWLE defense cuts because they are a "cut . provide the "new leadership" the Assistant News Editor in pay and readiness and more into country needs. "The old approach of nuclear weapons this country simp­ my own party," he added, was to Committee requests Democratic Presidential hopeful ly doesn't need." promise everything to various con­ Sen. Gary Hart of Colorado told an Hart supports a freeze on deploy­ stituency groups in hope of putting overflow crowd at South Bend's ment and testing of nuclear together a winning coalition. But it more required courses Century Center Friday that Presi­ weapons, "a ban on weapons in is not fair, nor is it wise government, dent Ronald Reagan's policies are an space, whether nuclear or non­ to mortgage the future to pay for By SARAH HAMILTON University-required courses in its "economic Vietnam." nuclear, and an end to the prolifera­ political generosity now." News Editor final report. An additional course in Besides the dangers of deficits, tion of nuclear technologies in the Hart concluded his 19-minute history/social science and one in Hart mentioned education, health third world." He does not support address by saying he offered the kind The Curriculum Committee fine arts/literature have been sug­ care, defense and the nation's physi­ Selective Service in its current form, of leadership that would "call forth recommended the addition of two gested for all students. cal plant as areas of special concern. but would prefer some form of uni­ the best in the American people." courses to the present 13 According to the report, concern The Senator cited a group of past versal service with no exemptions. was expressed during committee Secretaries of the Treasury who said This service would have a non­ deliberations that "the arts should "a weakening economy in 1985 military option such as the Peace Questions on alcohol be better integrated into University threatens to send the deficits Corps. life in general and specifically into soaring ... to S300 billion to S400 He promoted more spending in the curriculum." The committee billion in the late 1980's. education because "human minds answered by Hesburgh discussed the need for one require­ The danger of such high deficits, and human skills are our most im­ ment in literature and one in fine he said, is they "soak up capital, com­ portant and most precious asset." He By KEITH HARRISON,Jr. make responsible decisions, said arts, but due to constraints on the pete with other borrowers for warned Reagan, "if you think educa­ Senior StaffReporter Hesburgh. "People say that we're curriculum, one course in either of money, and confuse the relationship tion is too expensive, wait till you taking away student responsibility," the two fields was considered suffi­ between the dollar and other cur­ see how much ignorance costs." "I think it's a very moderate said Hesburgh. "That's not true. The cient. rencies, to the point where it is vir­ Hart said he would go beyond the policy," said Father Theodore Res­ new policy gives people a chance to As the curriculum stands, a stu-· tually impossible for us to compete education progrms of the '60s and burgh, University president, refer­ exercise some responsibility. If they dent can graduate without taking a in world trade." '70s and increase teacher salaries ring to the new campus alcohol don't exercise responsibility, then social science class. This is also true Hart said the deficits are "stealing and training and "elevate the overall policy. we may have to take further action." for history. Recognizing this from our future" and the recovery quality of education." He said a Many people have misunderstood "What we're not doing is telling problem, the committee advised will be "paid for entirely out of the reduction to 70 percent from the the policy because they have not people to go break the law," said that the quantity of required courses pockets of coming generations." current I 00 percent tax deduction read it, said Hesburgh, who spoke at Hesburgh. in these areas be increased to two. Continuing the theme of future on business lunches would "fully Cavanaugh Hall last night. Hesburgh also commented on the The curricular choice must con­ generations, Hart added "if these finance the hot-lunch program and "When I first came here, we were student rallies and protests that have tinue because of the sizes of the deficits continue to grow as they add three million children to the at 'A,' which was totally dry," said recently taken place on campus. Al­ departments as well as the limits of have, by the time your three-year­ program." Hesburgh. "Then later we went to though he was not on campus at the the majors. old child is 18, she will have to earn More jobs would be created by in­ 'Z,' which was pretty wet. Now time of the rallies, he saw the televi­ Another recommendation in the no,ooo a year just to pay his or her vestments in the physical structure we're going to 'M,' which is some­ sion coverage of them. "I can say committee's report is "the lengthen­ share of the interest on the national of the nation - bridges, roads, and where in between the two ex­ that we have a great student body, ing of the time frame within which debt." dams - Hart said. More industrial tremes." they are intelligent, bright and ded­ certain courses must be taken." Hart blamed Reagan for these growth would be promoted, he said, The new alcohol policy will not icated. The way they were portrayed "It was what we needed to do to problems, saying "the first thing we with tax reform that would "take the deny students the opportunity to is not the way they are," he said. let students have more freedom" in have to do is send Ronald Reagan premium off mergers, buyouts and Releasing the University fulf"Liling requirements said commit- back to the ranch for a well­ runaway plants, and place it on directives the day after the an­ see CLASSES, page 6 deserved retirement. I don't know if productivity and growth." nouncement of the alcohol policy he deserves it, but certainly we do!" After his speech, Hart specified "confused the issue," said Hesburgh. Hart outlined his solutions to the some proposals in this area, such as "You're talking about two things," deficit as requiring "sacrifice of all requiring three to six month he said. "First there is the policy it· Americans except those least able to notification before a plant closing self, which has been approved and is do so." He favors reversing some of and establishing an individual train­ not negotiable. Then there are the the Reagan tax cut and postponing ing account for each worker which directives, which are the regulations tax indexing. could be used to pay for retraining which will be used to carry out the In defense, the Senator would can­ or relocation ofthe worker. new policy," said Hesburgh. The cel the MX missile and the B-1 He felt SI 3 billion could be saved directives are being negotiated, and bomber, and stress "larger numbers by "reorganizing our health system, a final draft should be ready by sum­ Today's issue is the last Observer ofless costly weapons and readiness with a new concentration on mer, according to Hesburgh.
Recommended publications
  • More Than a Municipal Campaign: Speech in Haverhill, Massachusetts (November 27, 1899)
    More Than a Municipal Campaign: Speech in Haverhill, Massachusetts (November 27, 1899) Ladies and Gentlemen, Citizens of Haverhill:— A year ago the name of Haverhill was flashed around the world. On Wednesday next [Dec. 6, 1899] the magnificent victory achieved then will have ben ratified by an increased majority. This is something more than a municipal campaign. There are issues involved that are of vital and commanding interest to every man, woman, and child in Haverhill, in Massachusetts, throughout the length and breadth of the land. The competitive system, with its extreme wealth upon the one hand, its abject and widespread poverty upon the other, its political corruption, its economic servitude, its social demoralization is on trial. What pen or tongue, from primeval man to the dullest intellect, can describe the effect of this struggle upon the great mass of the working people? Multiplied millions of them answer to the description of the embruted peasant in the poem of Edwin Markham, a poem fraught with such significance that it blazed the immortality of the author on wings of lightning around the world: Bowed by the weight of centuries he leans Upon his hoe and gazes on the ground, The emptiness of ages in his face, And on his back the burden of the world. Who made him dead to rapture and despair, A thing that grieves not and that never hopes. Stolid and stunned, a brother to the ox? Who loosened and let down this brutal jaw? Whose was the hand that slanted back this brow? Whose breath blew out the light within this brain? 1 The capitalist system must answer for this appalling indictment at the bar of humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. IOWA Iowa Is the State Famous for Holding Presidential Caucuses Rather Than a Presidential Primary. There Is a Good Reason F
    4. IOWA Iowa is the state famous for holding presidential caucuses rather than a presidential primary. There is a good reason for that. The state of New Hampshire has a tradition of holding the first presidential primary. In fact, New Hampshire has a law requiring that the New Hampshire primary be one week before the presidential primary of any other state. By scheduling caucuses rather than a primary, Iowa is able to hold its caucuses ahead of New Hampshire and thereby escape the political ire of New Hampshirites. Iowa also thus prevents New Hampshire from scheduling its primary one week ahead of the presidential caucuses in Iowa. That is what that famous New Hampshire law would require if Iowa held a primary. It was in 1972 that Iowa first scheduled its "First In The Nation" presidential caucuses. Four years later, in 1976, the Iowa caucuses were propelled to major importance when Jimmy Carter, a little-known former governor of Georgia, devoted virtually a year of his life to campaigning in Iowa. Carter's surprise victory in the Iowa caucuses made him the instant front-runner for the Democratic nomination. It was an advantage which Carter exploited so well he was eventually elected president of the United States. But there is also a downside to the Iowa caucuses for presidential hopefuls. Iowa can be the burial ground for a candidacy instead of the launching pad. That is what happened to U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts in 1980 when he challenged incumbent President Jimmy Carter for the Democratic nomination. President Carter polled 59 percent of the Iowa caucuses vote to 31 percent for Kennedy.
    [Show full text]
  • How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates
    University of Central Florida STARS Honors Undergraduate Theses UCF Theses and Dissertations 2019 Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates Gary M. Bogers University of Central Florida Part of the Music Commons, and the United States History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the UCF Theses and Dissertations at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Undergraduate Theses by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Bogers, Gary M., "Music and the Presidency: How Campaign Songs Sold the Image of Presidential Candidates" (2019). Honors Undergraduate Theses. 511. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses/511 MUSIC AND THE PRESIDENCY: HOW CAMPAIGN SONGS SOLD THE IMAGE OF PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES by GARY MICHAEL BOGERS JR. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Music Performance in the College of Arts and Humanities and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term, 2019 Thesis Chair: Dr. Scott Warfield Co-chairs: Dr. Alexander Burtzos & Dr. Joe Gennaro ©2019 Gary Michael Bogers Jr. ii ABSTRACT In this thesis, I will discuss the importance of campaign songs and how they were used throughout three distinctly different U.S. presidential elections: the 1960 campaign of Senator John Fitzgerald Kennedy against Vice President Richard Milhouse Nixon, the 1984 reelection campaign of President Ronald Wilson Reagan against Vice President Walter Frederick Mondale, and the 2008 campaign of Senator Barack Hussein Obama against Senator John Sidney McCain.
    [Show full text]
  • Name Photo Bio Aaron Jaffee Aaron Jaffe Is a Current Senior at Columbia
    Name Photo Bio Aaron Jaffe is a current senior at Columbia University where he studies political science and applied mathematics. He is particularly passionate about the intersection of data and politics, through both policy and the electoral system. He’s worked and is working as a data Aaron science fellow on multiple democratic campaigns through Bluebonnet Data, ranging from school board elections in Florida to congressional Jaffee campaigns in Texas. Aaron has proudly represented the Democratic values of the state of Connecticut since his junior year of high school when he was chosen as a Senator to represent the state at American Legion Boys Nation. He was elected to lead the Senate as President Pro Tempore where he was responsible for introducing more legislation than in the programs 70 year history. I was born and raised in Fairfield County and am the former DTC Chair in Weston. My political experience in Connecticut started as the Campaign Manager for the 2002 Congressional Candidate, Stephanie Sanchez. Prior to that when I lived in LA, I was a member of the Amy Hollywood Women’s Political Committee and was the Volunteer Coordinator for all of LA on Gary Hart’s 1984 campaign. I have lived in Shapiro Weston since 2004 and have been a DTC member since 2005. I am the head of Programming for an entertainment startup and was a VP at Universal Pictures. I am passionate about electing VP Biden and would love to be a delegate to the convention. I started off my career in politics by joining the Town Committee at the age of 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Strategies in Political Campaigns
    MEDIA STRATEGIES IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS Week 10 – Comm1A; Nov. 18-Dec. 4 Rational Candidates Historical Development Media Strategies Going Negative Effects of Campaigns on Election Outcomes Candidates as Rational Actors 3 Reaching Goals Anticipation Voters “Retail politics” – face to face campaigns for What will To receive one national office ended in journalists do to more vote than any the 1940s keep you honest? other candidate How do you Since 1950s, main respond? media platform = TV where all the voters are What will your Maximize turnout among opponent do and supporters and minimize TV ads and televised how to counter her turnout among potential debates as major messages? opponents forms of campaign media; web audience not yet competitive From Party- to Candidate-Based Campaigns 4 In the era of de-polarized parties, candidates were selected by party leaders; most voters were moderates and candidates converged on the median voter With party polarization and the adoption of primary elections and the need for $$ in the 1970s, candidates now converge on the extremes Party ID is the most important determinant of voter behavior, imperative that you “hold the base” (i.e. receive at least 90 percent of the vote from co-partisans Two Channels of Campaign Communication 5 Advertising and News = “Paid vs. free” channels • Mix depends on newsworthiness • Presidential campaigns generate considerable news coverage • Statewide and local races generate none at all Advertising > news coverage in sub-presidential contests • For referenda and initiatives, advertising is the only media Distinction between ads and news is now blurred • Ad watches, fake ads, and news about ads and ad strategy Top Press Strategy 6 Avoid feeding frenzies that sound alarm bells over your candidacy: Gary Hart, Jesse Jackson, Joe Biden case studies More recent instances – Sarah Palin interviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Federal Election Commission (FEC)
    Analysis of H.R. 1 (Part Two) Establishing a Campaign Speech Czar and Enabling Partisan Enforcement: An Altered FEC Structure Poses Risks to First Amendment Speech Rights Bradley A. Smith, Chairman January 2019 Introduction While most of the attention on H.R. 1 has focused on “hot” issues, such as earmarking government subsidies for political campaigns, gerrymandering, and new restrictions on grassroots organizations that engage in public affairs,1 twenty pages of the bill are devoted to the unsexy, yet vitally important, issue of the Federal Election Commission’s (FEC) composition and operating procedures.2 If you’re a Democrat, do you think Donald Trump should be able to appoint a campaign speech czar to determine and en- force the rules on political campaigns? And if you’re a Republican, would you have wanted those rules enforced by a partisan selected by Barack Obama? Of course not. That’s why for over 40 years, Republicans and Democrats have agreed that campaign regulations should be enforced by an independent, bipartisan agency. The Watergate scandal that forced Richard Nixon to resign the presidency showed the dangers of allowing one party to use the power of government against the other.3 As the late Sen. Alan Cranston (D-Ca.) warned during debate on legislation creating the agency, “We must not allow the FEC to become a tool for harassment by future imperial Presidents who may seek to repeat the abuses of Watergate. I un- derstand and share the great concern expressed by some of our colleagues that the FEC has such a potential for abuse in our democratic society that the President should not be given power over the Commission.”4 That concern led to Congressional adoption of the present method of selecting Commission members.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H2574
    H2574 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 19, 2021 Sewell (DelBene) Wilson (FL) Young (Joyce NAYS—208 Ruppersberger Slotkin (Axne) Wilson (SC) Slotkin (Axne) (Hayes) (OH)) (Raskin) Waters (Timmons) Aderholt Gohmert Moolenaar Waters Wilson (SC) Rush (Barraga´ n) Young (Joyce Allen (Barraga´ n) (Timmons) Gonzales, Tony Mooney (Underwood) Wilson (FL) Amodei (OH)) Gonzalez (OH) Moore (AL) Sewell (DelBene) (Hayes) The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Armstrong Good (VA) Moore (UT) question is on the resolution. Arrington Gooden (TX) Mullin f Babin Gosar Murphy (NC) The question was taken; and the Bacon Granger Nehls NATIONAL COMMISSION TO INVES- Speaker pro tempore announced that Baird Graves (LA) Newhouse TIGATE THE JANUARY 6 ATTACK the ayes appeared to have it. Balderson Graves (MO) Norman Banks Green (TN) Nunes ON THE UNITED STATES CAP- Mr. RESCHENTHALER. Mr. Speak- Barr Greene (GA) Obernolte ITOL COMPLEX ACT Bentz Griffith er, on that I demand the yeas and nays. Owens Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi. Mr. Bergman Grothman Palazzo The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Bice (OK) Guest Palmer Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution ant to section 3(s) of House Resolution Biggs Guthrie Pence 409, I call up the bill (H.R. 3233) to es- 8, the yeas and nays are ordered. Bilirakis Hagedorn Perry tablish the National Commission to In- Bishop (NC) Harris Pfluger The vote was taken by electronic de- Boebert Harshbarger Posey vestigate the January 6 Attack on the vice, and there were—yeas 216, nays Bost Hartzler Reed United States Capitol Complex, and for 208, not voting 5, as follows: Brady Hern Reschenthaler other purposes, and ask for its imme- Brooks Herrell Rice (SC) diate consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Insurgent Campaigns Rarely Win the Democratic Presidential Primary in the United States
    Athens Journal of Social Sciences Volume 6, Issue 2 – Pages 139-154 Why Insurgent Campaigns Rarely Win the Democratic Presidential Primary in the United States By L. Jan Reid* The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines insurgent as "one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one’s own political party." In this paper, an "insurgent presidential campaign" is defined as the campaign of a candidate who did not have the support of the United States of America’s (U.S.) Democratic Party establishment. A "populist campaign" is a subset of an insurgent campaign, because although all populist campaigns are insurgent campaigns, not all insurgent campaigns are populist campaigns. This paper defines a "populist campaign" as one that seeks to mobilize an unrepresented segment of the population against an institution or government, usually in defense of the unrepresented. Whether left-wing or right-wing, populist candidates seek to unite the supposedly uncorrupt and unsophis¬ticated unrepresented against supposedly corrupt dominant elites. Insurgent campaigns have rarely been successful in capturing the Democratic Party presidential nomination in the United States. Only three insurgent campaigns have been successful over the past 50 years: the campaigns of George McGovern in 1972, Jimmy Carter in 1976, and Barack Obama in 2008, all of which were populist campaigns. The paper analyzes U.S. presidential campaigns for the period 1968- 2016; reviews books and academic literature; and makes conclusions concerning the success and failure of insurgent campaigns. Finally, the paper recommends ways in which future insurgent campaigns could be more successful. Keywords: Insurgent Campaigns, Populism, Presidential Campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION E·
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION e· May 1988 009 E Street NW Washington DC Volume 14. Number 5 FEC APPROVES MATCHING FUNDS FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE Lyndon H. LaRouche, a Democratic candi­ date, was declared eligible to receive primary matching funds for his 1988 Presidential primary campaign. After finding LaRouche eligible, the FEC TERMINATES MATCHING FUND Commission certified his first payment to the ELIGmlLITY FOR EIGHT CANDIDATES U.S. Treasury on March 24, 1988. This certifica- During recent months, the Commission deter­ tion, supplemented by certifications to eight mined that four Republican candidates and four other eligible candidates on March 30, raised to Democratic candidates were no longer eligible for $48,101,890.40 the total amount of payments the primary matching funds under the Presidential agency had certified to the Treasury by the end Primary Matching Payment Account. The of March. candidates became ineligible for primary match­ The summary chart below provides cumula­ ing funds when each candidate announc:d publicly tive information on certifications of primary that he would no longer actively campaign for his matching funds made to fifteen eligible Presi­ party's Presidential nomination. II CPR 9033.5­ dential candidates between January I and March (a)( I). The chart below lists each candidate and 30, 1988. The chart also indicates the most his date of lneligiblity, recent certifications.made to eligible candidates. The Presidential primary candidates listed During 1988, an eligible Presidential candi­ below became ineligible for public funds on the date may submit requests for primary matching date each candidate ceased to be an active funds on the second and fourth Mondays of each candidate for the Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Women's and Gender Studies: a Collection of Teaching
    Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 1 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Collection of Teaching Resources Edited by Elizabeth M. Curtis Fall 2007 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 2 Copyright National Women's Studies Association 2007 Introducing Women’s and Gender Studies: A Teaching Resources Collection 3 Table of Contents Introduction……………………..………………………………………………………..6 Lessons for Pre-K-12 Students……………………………...…………………….9 “I am the Hero of My Life Story” Art Project Kesa Kivel………………………………………………………….……..10 Undergraduate Introductory Women’s and Gender Studies Courses…….…15 Lecture Courses Introduction to Women’s Studies Jennifer Cognard-Black………………………………………………………….……..16 Introduction to Women’s Studies Maria Bevacqua……………………………………………………………………………23 Introduction to Women’s Studies Vivian May……………………………………………………………………………………34 Introduction to Women’s Studies Jeanette E. Riley……………………………………………………………………………...47 Perspectives on Women’s Studies Ann Burnett……………………………………………………………………………..55 Seminar Courses Introduction to Women’s Studies Lynda McBride………………………..62 Introduction to Women’s Studies Jocelyn Stitt…………………………….75 Introduction to Women’s Studies Srimati Basu……………………………………………………………...…………………86 Introduction to Women’s Studies Susanne Beechey……………………………………...…………………………………..92 Introduction to Women’s Studies Risa C. Whitson……………………105 Women: Images and Ideas Angela J. LaGrotteria…………………………………………………………………………118 The Dynamics of Race, Sex, and Class Rama Lohani Chase…………………………………………………………………………128
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion Page 2/The Battalion/Wednesday, June 6, 1984 Jackson Resurrecting Ike's Ploy 1 Percent Ur by DAVID S
    Opinion Page 2/The Battalion/Wednesday, June 6, 1984 Jackson resurrecting Ike's ploy 1 percent Ur By DAVID S. BRODER delegates were seated, “the nomination would be seating. Taft resisted, as he was hound todoif jm ^ati Columnist lor The Los Angeles Times Syndicate - tarnished,” as the Times put it. “The ‘steal’ there­ hoped to be nominated, and the first natioj :aiiy ur WASHINGTON — With some prompting from fore was reinforcement of the basic Eisenhower television audience ever to see a nominatingcn Tuesday landslides Gary Hart and the ghost of Dwight Eisenhower, vention heard hours of oratory from the Esc Ihe state slogan, ‘Taft can’t win.’” Jesse Jackson has put his finger on the tactic that Hart launched the same tactic against Mondale hower side on the theme, “Thou shall not steal oldie ait Every time an election comes around, could create a national television drama this sum­ several weeks ago by claiming that 587 Mondale Pressured by this propaganda assault plii ^a’^ ^ people are reminded to get out and mer, destroy Democratic hopes for a calm con­ delegates are “tainted” by the fact that they were public opinion it generated, the delegates it budge vote. Some candidates call you on the vention, and conceivably frustrate Walter Mon­ chosen in states where union political-action com­ rowly approved the “fair play” rules amendmet ,ear’s en phone and ask if you’ve voted yet. Cam­ dale’s plan for neatly nailing down the party mittee (PAG) money was used to finance the and then forced Taft to yield most of thedi ; In ar paign workers may knock on your door presidential nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Privacy
    William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 3-2020 Candidate Privacy Rebecca Green William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs Part of the Election Law Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Repository Citation Green, Rebecca, "Candidate Privacy" (2020). Faculty Publications. 2006. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/2006 Copyright c 2020 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs CANDIDATE PRIVACY Rebecca Green* Abstract: In the United States, we have long accepted that candidates for public office who have voluntarily stepped into the public eye sacrifice claims to privacy. This refrain is rooted deep within the American enterprise, emanating from the Framers' concept of the informed citizen as a bedrock of democracy. Voters must have full information about candidates to make their choices at the ballot box. Even as privacy rights for ordinary citizens have expanded, privacy theorists and courts continue to exempt candidates from privacy protections. This Article suggests that two disruptions warrant revisiting the privacy interests of candidates. The first is a changing information architecture brought on by the rise of the internet and digital media that drastically alters how information about candidates is collected and circulated. The second is a shift in who runs for office. As women and minorities-targets of the worst forms of harassment-increasingly throw their hats in the ring, this Article argues that competing democratic values should challenge previous assumptions about candidate privacy.
    [Show full text]