The Thematic Structure of the Castle of Perseverance
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tikrit University College of Education for Humanities English Department First Year 2019-2020
Tikrit University College of Education for Humanities English Department First year 2019-2020 Medieval Theatre Assist. Prof. Marwa Sami Hussein Medieval Theatre Medieval times started after the fall of Rome and lasted through to 15th century, roughly to the Protestant Reformation. In this time before the printing press made it necessary or even possible for the great majority of people to read, the primary method of teaching and learning was through the oral tradition. Throughout this time, the church had grown to become the most powerful and most consistent institution throughout Europe. Since theatre tells stories, it was a natural mechanism for telling the bible stories and delivering any other information the church wanted communicated to the people, particularly as this period was a time of turmoil (chaos) and the church was the only stable government. In fact, the church had become so strong that it was able to close all theatre productions except for those that it officially sanctioned (acceptable). Those plays fell into three categories: morality, mystery and miracle plays. 1-Mystery play Mystery play: is a dramatic genre, one of three principal kinds of vernacular (colloquial) drama in Europe during the Middle Ages (along with the miracle play and the morality play). The mystery plays, usually representing biblical subjects, developed from plays presented in Latin by churchmen on church premises (building) and depicted such subjects as the Creation, Adam and Eve, the murder of Abel, and the Last Judgment. 1 During the 13th century, various guilds began producing the plays in the vernacular at sites removed from the churches. -
Everystudent Collection 2011
Everystudent A Collection of Allegorical Plays In the Style of the Medieval Morality Play “The Summoning of Everyman” By Students of the 2011-12 MYP 10 Drama Class Gyeonggi Suwon International School - 1 - Table of Contents Introduction by Daren Blanck .................................................................. page 3 Seven by Nick Lee and Lyle Lee .................................................................. page 4 Slayers by Mike Lee, Daniel Choi and Eric Cho ......................................... page 9 True Friendship by Yealim Lee and Hannah Seo .................................... page 12 Graduation by Judy Oh and Jaimie Park .................................................. page 16 FC society by JH Hyun and Jacob Son ...................................................... page 19 It’s Just Too Late by Jeeho Oh, Ryan Choi and Jee Eun Kim ................. page 22 The Freedom of Will by Eric Han and Bryan Ahn ................................. page 26 Everystudent Justine Yun, Rick Eum, and Seong Soo Son ...................... page 32 Everystudent by Lilly Kim, Seungyeon Rho, Erin Yoon .......................... page 37 Appendix: The Summoning of Everyman abridged by Leslie Noelani Laurio .... page 39 - 2 - Introduction An allegory is a narrative having a second meaning beneath the surface one - a story with two meanings, a literal meaning and a symbolic meaning. In an allegory objects, persons, and actions are metaphors or symbols for ideas that lie outside the text. Medieval drama was wrapped in the stories and doctrines of the medieval Christian church. Most plays could be classified as Mystery Plays - plays that told the stories of the Bible, Miracle Plays - plays that told the stories of saints and martyrs, and Morality plays - allegorical works that sought to convey a moral or some doctrine of the church. Everyman is perhaps the most famous of this last category. -
Comparison of the Two Plays
Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Eliška Poláčková Everyman and Homulus: analysis of their genetic relation Bachelor’s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Mgr. Pavel Drábek, Ph.D. 2010 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. …………………………………………….. Eliška Poláčková Acknowledgement I would like to thank my supervisor Mgr. Pavel Drábek, Ph.D. for his patient and kind help, Prof. PhDr. Eva Stehlíková for useful advice, and Mgr. Markéta Polochová for unprecedented helpfulness and support. Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 Morality Play and Its Representatives ........................................................................... 3 1.1 Morality Play .......................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Everyman ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Homulus .................................................................................................................. 7 2 Concept of Translation in The Middle Ages ................................................................. 9 3 Comparison of Everyman and Homulus ...................................................................... 11 3.1 Composition ......................................................................................................... -
Literature of the Low Countries
Literature of the Low Countries A Short History of Dutch Literature in the Netherlands and Belgium Reinder P. Meijer bron Reinder P. Meijer, Literature of the Low Countries. A short history of Dutch literature in the Netherlands and Belgium. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague / Boston 1978 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/meij019lite01_01/colofon.htm © 2006 dbnl / erven Reinder P. Meijer ii For Edith Reinder P. Meijer, Literature of the Low Countries vii Preface In any definition of terms, Dutch literature must be taken to mean all literature written in Dutch, thus excluding literature in Frisian, even though Friesland is part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, in the same way as literature in Welsh would be excluded from a history of English literature. Similarly, literature in Afrikaans (South African Dutch) falls outside the scope of this book, as Afrikaans from the moment of its birth out of seventeenth-century Dutch grew up independently and must be regarded as a language in its own right. Dutch literature, then, is the literature written in Dutch as spoken in the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the so-called Flemish part of the Kingdom of Belgium, that is the area north of the linguistic frontier which runs east-west through Belgium passing slightly south of Brussels. For the modern period this definition is clear anough, but for former times it needs some explanation. What do we mean, for example, when we use the term ‘Dutch’ for the medieval period? In the Middle Ages there was no standard Dutch language, and when the term ‘Dutch’ is used in a medieval context it is a kind of collective word indicating a number of different but closely related Frankish dialects. -
History of Theatre the Romans Continued Theatrical Thegreek AD (753 Roman Theatre fi Colosseum Inrome, Which Was Built Between Tradition
History of theatre Ancient Greek theatre Medieval theatre (1000BC–146BC) (900s–1500s) The Ancient Greeks created After the Romans left Britain, theatre purpose-built theatres all but died out. It was reintroduced called amphitheatres. during the 10th century in the form Amphitheatres were usually of religious dramas, plays with morals cut into a hillside, with Roman theatre and ‘mystery’ plays performed in tiered seating surrounding (753BC–AD476) churches, and later outdoors. At a the stage in a semi-circle. time when church services were Most plays were based The Romans continued the Greek theatrical tradition. Their theatres resembled Greek conducted in Latin, plays were on myths and legends, designed to teach Christian stories and often involved a amphitheatres but were built on their own foundations and often enclosed on all sides. The and messages to people who could ‘chorus’ who commented not read. on the action. Actors Colosseum in Rome, which was built between wore masks and used AD72 and AD80, is an example of a traditional grandiose gestures. The Roman theatre. Theatrical events were huge works of famous Greek spectacles and could involve acrobatics, dancing, playwrights, such as fi ghting or a person or animal being killed on Sophocles, Aristophanes stage. Roman actors wore specifi c costumes to and Euripedes, are still represent different types of familiar characters. performed today. WORDS © CHRISTINA BAKER; ILLUSTRATIONS © ROGER WARHAM 2008 PHOTOCOPIABLE 1 www.scholastic.co.uk/junioredplus DECEMBER 2008 Commedia dell’Arte Kabuki theatre (1500s Italy) (1600s –today Japan) Japanese kabuki theatre is famous This form of Italian theatre became for its elaborate costumes and popular in the 16th and 17th centuries. -
History of Greek Theatre
HISTORY OF GREEK THEATRE Several hundred years before the birth of Christ, a theatre flourished, which to you and I would seem strange, but, had it not been for this Grecian Theatre, we would not have our tradition-rich, living theatre today. The ancient Greek theatre marks the First Golden Age of Theatre. GREEK AMPHITHEATRE- carved from a hillside, and seating thousands, it faced a circle, called orchestra (acting area) marked out on the ground. In the center of the circle was an altar (thymele), on which a ritualistic goat was sacrificed (tragos- where the word tragedy comes from), signifying the start of the Dionysian festival. - across the circle from the audience was a changing house called a skene. From this comes our present day term, scene. This skene can also be used to represent a temple or home of a ruler. (sometime in the middle of the 5th century BC) DIONYSIAN FESTIVAL- (named after Dionysis, god of wine and fertility) This festival, held in the Spring, was a procession of singers and musicians performing a combination of worship and musical revue inside the circle. **Women were not allowed to act. Men played these parts wearing masks. **There was also no set scenery. A- In time, the tradition was refined as poets and other Greek states composed plays recounting the deeds of the gods or heroes. B- As the form and content of the drama became more elaborate, so did the physical theatre itself. 1- The skene grow in size- actors could change costumes and robes to assume new roles or indicate a change in the same character’s mood. -
Orality in Medieval Drama Speech-Like Features in the Middle English Comic Mystery Plays
Dissertation zur Erlangung des philosophischen Doktorgrades Orality in Medieval Drama Speech-Like Features in the Middle English Comic Mystery Plays vorgelegt von Christiane Einmahl an der Fakultät Sprach-, Literatur- und Kulturwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Dresden am 16. Mai 2019 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Premises and aims ................................................................................................................2 1.2 Outline of the study .............................................................................................................10 2 Comedy play texts as a speech-related genre ........................................................................13 2.1 Speech-like genres and 'communicative immediacy'...........................................................13 2.2 Play texts vs. 'real' spoken discourse...................................................................................17 2.3 Conclusions.........................................................................................................................25 3 'Comedy' in the mystery cycles................................................................................................26 3.1 The medieval sense of 'comedy'..........................................................................................26 3.2 Medieval attitudes to laughter..............................................................................................37 -
The Staging of the Theatrical Corpse in Early Modern Drama
University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2010 Corpses revealed: The staging of the theatrical corpse in early modern drama N M. Imbracsio University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Imbracsio, N M., "Corpses revealed: The staging of the theatrical corpse in early modern drama" (2010). Doctoral Dissertations. 520. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/520 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CORPSES REVEALED: THE STAGING OF THE THEATRICAL CORPSE IN EARLY MODERN DRAMA BY N. M. IMBRACSIO Baccalaureate of Arts, Clark University, 1 998 Master of Arts, University of Massachusetts-Boston, 2001 Master of Fine Arts, Emerson College, 2004 DISSERTATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English September, 2010 UMI Number: 3430774 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Dissertation Publishing UMI 3430774 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. -
Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 06:39:03AM Via Free Access 92 Verena Demoed
CHAPTER FOUR THE MORALITY OF HYPOCRISY: GNAPHEUS’S LATIN PLAY HYPOCRISIS AND THE LUTHERAN REFORMATION Verena Demoed Introduction In drama, moral judgment is not uttered through words alone; it can also be expressed through non-verbal and seemingly subsid- iary things such as props, costumes and stage action.1 This paper will attempt to clarify how Gnapheus used his Latin plays, especially his Hypocrisis (‘Hypocrisy’, published in 1544 and 1564), in debates on religious matters. Gulielmus Gnapheus Hagiensis, or Willem de Volder (Fuller), or Van de Voldersgraft, of The Hague (1493–1568) is an example of a committed writer. He held outspoken views on the Protestant reformations, which he expounded in pamphlets and plays. Because of his commitment, his oeuvre is pre-eminently suitable as material in an investigation of the role literature played within public debate, and the effect it may have had on public opinion. Hypocrisis is his most outspoken play. It was written and produced in East Prussia, where Lutheranism was proclaimed as a state religion. This enabled the author (he may even have felt obliged) to expound his reforma- tional ideas in a more direct, explicit and uncompromising manner than he would have done in the Low Countries and West Prussia, where he lived before the 1540s, and which at that time still remained officially Catholic. Though even here, in Lutheran East Prussia, Gnapheus came into conflict with the ecclesiastical authorities: he was indicted for heresy by the Lutheran theologian Staphylus. 1 This paper was written within the scope of the Vidi-projectLatin and Vernacular Cultures: Theatre and Public Opinion in the Netherlands (ca. -
Medieval Drama Teaches the Spectators What They Already Know; It Therefore Lacks Excitement, Surprise and Alienation.” Discuss, with Reference to the Morality Plays
Alistair Welch for Katie Walter Girton College King’s College, 558 “Medieval drama teaches the spectators what they already know; it therefore lacks excitement, surprise and alienation.” Discuss, with reference to the morality plays. There appears to be some critical debate concerning the number of extant morality plays available to the modern reader. Pamela M. King asserts authoritatively: “only five medieval English morality plays survive”1, whereas Robert Potter suggests a number close to twenty2. However, this essay deals with the three examples published in the New Mermaid3 edition edited by G.A Lester, namely Mankind, Everyman and Mundus et Infans. As such my reading is admittedly confined to a selection of texts canonically recognised and consciously labelled as examples of morality play. If such a dull opening paragraph has a purpose it is to suggest that the very definition of a text as a morality play is problematic. It suggests that the plays operate as a coherent group and, more significantly, encourages a reading of the texts within the received limitations of their genre. The OED defines morality play as follows: “morality play now chiefly hist., a kind of drama popular in the 15th and early 16th centuries, intended to inculcate a moral or spiritual lesson, in which the chief character are personifications of abstract qualities.” So, according to the OED, morality play as a genre is tied to a notion of teaching and moralizing through stock allegorical technique. By definition, therefore, its dramatic potential might be understood to be limited. Indeed, the terms of the question and the OED’s definition might appear to be corroborated by the closing speeches, essentially the epilogues, of Mankind and Everyman: “Thynke and remembyr the world ys but a wanite As yt ys prowyd daly by diverse transmutacyon.” (Mankind, 908-09) “Ye hearers take it of worth olde and yonge. -
The Origin of the European Mediaeval Drama
International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology ISSN: 2313-3759 Vol. 3 No. 1; January 2016 The Origin of the European Mediaeval Drama P. Wijith Rohan Fernando Department of Western Classical Culture and Christian Culture University of Kelaniya Sri Lanka Historical Background The starting point of drama is religion.1 The root of the modern drama is based on the ritualistic resources of primitive religions. “Such is the case of the notion of ‘ritual drama’, the idea that serious drama is historically grounded in sacred ritual and may still draw on ritualistic resources for its substance.”2 The ritualistic character of religion is found not only in Greek theatre but in the dramas of other countries as well. “Scholars had long known and accepted the Greek theatre (and analogous traditions in Mediaeval and Renaissance Europe, Japan, China, and India) had roots in religion and ritual. Aristotle and other commentators had canonized that fact. Indeed Aristotle’s classic statements from the Poetics – that tragedy originated from the leader of the sacred (presumably Dionysian) dithyramb ritual and comedy from the leader of the phallic processions – provided the starting point for every study of the origins of drama.”3 Thus, the origin of the modern theatre goes back as far as the Greek ritual plays centred on the altar of Dionysus, the wine-god and the god of fertility and procreation, around 1200 BC.4 The chant or the hymn that was sung in praise of god Dionysius is known as Dithyramb. It is a choric hymn which is considered as the root of Greek drama.5 It was Thespis who introduced an actor (Protagonist) in the Dithyramb around 594 BC.6 With Thespis thus began the classical Greek drama. -
Download Download
S K E N È Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies 3:1 2017 SKENÈ Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies Founded by Guido Avezzù, Silvia Bigliazzi, and Alessandro Serpieri. General Editors Guido Avezzù (Executive Editor), Silvia Bigliazzi. Editorial Board Simona Brunetti, Lisanna Calvi, Nicola Pasqualicchio, Gherardo Ugolini. Managing Editor Lisanna Calvi. Assistant Managing Editor Francesco Lupi. Copyeditors Francesco Dall’Olio, Marco Duranti, Antonietta Provenza, Carlo Vareschi. Layout Editor Alex Zanutto. Advisory Board Anna Maria Belardinelli, Anton Bierl, Enoch Brater, Jean-Christophe Cavallin, Marco De Marinis, Tobias Döring, Pavel Drábek, Paul Edmondson, Keir Douglas Elam, Ewan Fernie, Patrick Finglass, Enrico Giaccherini, Mark Griffith, Stephen Halliwell, Robert Henke, Pierre Judet de la Combe, Eric Nicholson, Guido Paduano, Franco Perrelli, Didier Plassard, Donna Shalev, Susanne Wofford. Copyright © 2017 SKENÈ All rights reserved. ISSN 2421-4353 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from the publisher. SKENÈ Theatre and Drama Studies http://www.skenejournal.it [email protected] Mandy Lowell Albert* The Play about Common Trade and Play about Empty Purse: Cornelis Everaert’s Prequels to Elckerlijc/Everyman? Abstract This paper proposes a possible link betweenElckerlijc , the Dutch-language allegorical play that provided the basis for the well-known English translation Everyman, and two plays by Cornelis Everaert, a sixteenth-century playwright from Bruges writing from within the amateur literary society Chambers of Rhetoric (rederijkerskamers). The two plays areThe Play about Common Trade (Spil van Ghemeene Neerrynghe), a serious play, and The Comedy about Empty Purse (Esbattement van Aerm in de Buerse), a lighter comic play.