DOCSLIB.ORG

Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment – Roundabout, Bike Path, Fencing Language, and Traffic Mitigation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment – Roundabout, Bike Path, Fencing Language, and Traffic Mitigation PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT – ROUNDABOUT, BIKE PATH, FENCING LANGUAGE, AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION Z 16‐02 PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy March 27, 2018 PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT – ROUNDABOUT, BIKE PATH, FENCING LANGUAGE, AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION Z 16‐02 PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy, Planning Division Susan O’Strander, Planning Manager 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 Tel 408 846‐0451 PREPARED BY EMC Planning Group Inc. 301 Lighthouse Avenue, Suite C Monterey, CA 93940 Tel 831.649.1799 Fax 831.649.8399 Stuart Poulter, MCRP, Associate Planner [email protected] March 27, 2018 This document was produced on recycled paper. Community Development Department Planning Division (408) 846-0440 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION City of Gilroy 7351 Rosanna St. Gilroy, CA 95020 City File Number: Z 16‐02 Project Description: Name of Project: Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment – Roundabout, Bike Path, Fencing Language, and Traffic Mitigation Nature of Project: The proposed project includes four components: 1) Changing the planned Hecker Pass Highway and Third Street intersection from a standard intersection to a one-lane roundabout; 2) Addition of a Class I bike path south of Hecker Pass Highway (State Route 152); 3) Changes to specific plan language related to fencing within the Hecker Pass Highway setback corridor, as well as other fencing restriction modifications in the specific plan; and 4) Elimination/modification of two specific plan EIR transportation-related mitigation measures. Project Location: Location: Hecker Pass Specific Plan area (Hecker Pass Highway – State Route 152) Entity or Person(s) Undertaking Project: Name: Meritage Homes (c/o Mark Currington, Forward Planning Manager) Address: 2603 Camino Ramon, Suite 140, San Ramon, CA 94583 Staff Planner: Stuart Poulter, Contract Planner Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment (Z 16-02) 2 March 27, 2018 Mitigated Negative Declaration Initial Study: An initial study of this project was undertaken and prepared for the purpose of ascertaining whether this project might have a significant effect on the environment. A copy of this study is attached. Findings & Reasons: The initial study identified potentially significant effects on the environment. However, this project has been mitigated (see Mitigation Measures below which avoid or mitigate the effects) to a point where no significant effects will occur. On the basis of the whole record, there is no substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The following reasons will support these findings: The proposal is a logical component of the existing land use of this area. Identified adverse impacts are proposed to be mitigated and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program have been prepared. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted goals and policies of the General Plan of the City of Gilroy and the Hecker Pass Specific Plan. City staff independently reviewed the Initial Study, and this Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of Gilroy. With the application of the following Mitigation Measures the proposed project will not have any significant impacts on the environment. The Gilroy Planning Division is the custodian of the documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based. Aesthetics AES-1. The design of the fencing associated with the roundabout project must be in compliance with the fencing restrictions of the specific plan. The following changes shall be made to the plans: The six-foot high chain link fence proposed along the northern boundary of the roundabout must be eliminated from the plans. If some type of fencing is required here by Caltrans or requested by the adjacent property owner associated with the roundabout design, it must be in compliance with the fencing modifications proposed as part of this project, if the fencing modifications are approved by the City Council. If the fencing modifications are not approved by the City Council, the design of the fence shall be subject to review and approval by the City of Gilroy Planning Manager or her designee, and must meet the rural landscape design requirements associated with all development in the specific plan area. Party Responsible for Implementation: Meritage Homes Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment (Z 16-02) 3 March 27, 2018 Mitigated Negative Declaration AES-2. The design of the fencing associated with the bike path project must be in compliance with the fencing restrictions of the specific plan. The following changes shall be made to the plans: Any new fencing proposed as part of the project, including but not limited to the proposed fencing along the southern boundary of the bike path, must be consistent with the fencing restrictions in the specific plan, subject to review and approval by the City of Gilroy Planning Manager or her designee. Party Responsible for Implementation: Meritage Homes Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Air Quality AQ-1. The applicant shall specify in project plans the implementation of the following dust control measures during grading and construction activities for any proposed development. The measures shall be implemented as necessary to adequately control dust, subject to the review and approval by the City of Gilroy Planning Division: The following measures shall be implemented at all construction sites: Water all active construction areas at least twice daily; Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least two feet of freeboard; Pave, apply water three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construction sites; Sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets; Hydroseed or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for ten days or more); Enclose, cover, water twice daily or apply (non-toxic) soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.); Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph; Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways; Replant vegetation in disturbed areas; Place a minimum of 100 linear feet of 6 to 8 inch average diameter cobble at all exit points to dislodge and trap dirt from vehicle tires; Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment (Z 16-02) 4 March 27, 2018 Mitigated Negative Declaration Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour; and Limit the area subject to excavation, grading and other construction activity at any one time. Party Responsible for Implementation: Applicant Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division Biological Resources BIO-1. (HPSP Policy 5-44) Pre-construction surveys for protected birds shall be conducted for improvements or development proposed in or adjacent to potential nesting habitat (i.e., riparian woodland) if development is proposed during the nesting and/or breeding season of loggerhead shrike (generally February through June) or raptors (generally March through August). If any active nests are found within the survey area, at the discretion of the biologist, clearing and construction within 250 feet shall be postponed or halted until nests are vacated and juveniles have fledged, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Party Responsible for Implementation: Meritage Homes Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division BIO-2. (HPSP Policy 5-40) Prior to construction of the roundabout and bike path, Meritage Homes will retain a qualified biologist to inform workers of potential presence of the special-status species, their protected status, work boundaries, and measures to be implemented to avoid loss of these species during construction activities. Party Responsible for Implementation: Meritage Homes Party Responsible for Monitoring: Gilroy Planning Division BIO-3. (HPSP Policy 5-43) For all proposed Class I bike path improvements adjacent to the Uvas Creek riparian corridor (westernmost limit of the bike path), which contains potential habitat for California tiger salamander, western spadefoot toad, yellow-legged frog, California red-legged frog, western pond turtle, steelhead, yellow-breasted chat, and/or yellow warbler, construction related activities should be conducted outside of the rainy season. Meritage Homes will retain a qualified biologist to monitor construction activities occurring within 100 feet of the Uvas Creek riparian corridor. If any special-status species are observed at the site, a qualified biologist will salvage and relocate individual(s) to an appropriate area outside of the construction zone. If California red-legged frog, a federally listed threatened species, or California tiger salamander, a federally and state-listed threatened species, are observed at the site, construction activities will be halted and the USFWS and/or CDFW shall be contacted for further assistance. Hecker Pass Specific Plan Amendment (Z 16-02) 5 March 27, 2018 Mitigated Negative Declaration Party Responsible for Implementation: Meritage Homes Party Responsible for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wine Map Cover Inside Back Cover
    BAY AREA WINE TASTING WINE TRAIL 20 19 LEARN EXPLORE AND IMMERSE Just a short drive By the early 1900’s, Our winemakers are producing from Silicon Valley with over expansion, globally recognized wines, winning and Santa Cruz in the Great Depression, medals for best of class, gold and a lush valley between Prohibition and then silver as well as being honored as the Santa Cruz Mountains Phylloxera, over 10,000 having some of the top wines in the and the Diablo Mountain acres vanished. In 1910, over state. Range sits the Wineries of half the wineries were gone. Expect to taste an array of wines, Santa Clara Valley, an Those families with deep roots from traditional Santa Clara Valley association of over thirty endured, and within time, Zinfandel and Carignane to grapes wineries representing the winemaking made a roaring from the French regions of first premier wine production comeback. Burgandy (Pinot Noir & region in California. In 1989, the Santa Clara Valley Chardonnay), Bordeaux (Cabernet The history of the Santa Clara was designated a distinct Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc & Valley dates back to the 1700s American Viticultural Area Merlot) and Rhone (Viognier, when Spanish padres first (AVA) which also includes two Grenache and Syrah) as well as arrived. Seeing snarls of native smaller AVAs, Pacheco Pass Italian varietals such as Charbono grapevines along the creeks AVA and San Ysidro District and Sangiovese - all proudly and valleys was a sign that AVA. exhibiting a spectacular blend of COME FOR THE DAY OR their grape cuttings would In 2014, the 30 mile Santa microclimate, geography and history.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecker Pass Specific Plan/South Valley Community Church
    VOLUME I – DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN/SOUTH VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH SCH #2003012119 PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy May 24, 2004 HECKER PASS SPECIFIC PLAN/SOUTH VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH Volume I –Draft Environmental Impact Report PREPARED FOR City of Gilroy Melissa Durkin Planner II 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy, CA 95020 PREPARED BY EMC Planning Group Inc 301 Lighthouse Avenue Suite C Monterey CA 93940 Tel 831.649.1799 Fax 831.649.8399 [email protected] www.emcplanning.com May 24, 2004 Table of Contents Summary .......................................................................... S-1 1.0 Introduction .................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Authorization and Purpose ........................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Location and Setting ...................................................... 1-3 1.3 Project Background and Description .......................................... 1-17 1.4 Consistency with Local and Regional Plans ................................. 1-37 1.5 EIR Uses ............................................................................. 1-44 2.0 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ....... 2-1 2.1 Aesthetics .............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Agricultural Resources ........................................................... 2-21 2.3 Air Quality .......................................................................... 2-41 2.4 Biological Resources .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uvas Creek Levee Rehabilitation Project
    Uvas Creek Levee Rehabilitation Project Draft Initial Study and Negative Declaration Project No. 62084001 April 2018 Prepared by: Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118-3614 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................III KEY TERMINOLOGY .............................................................................................................. IIV SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 3 SECTION 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................... 244 SECTION 4: ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ......................................................................25 SECTION 5: REPORT PREPARATION ...................................................................................86 SECTION 6: REFERENCES ....................................................................................................87 TABLES TABLE 1.1: SUMMARY OF AGENCY APPROVALS ................................................................ 3 TABLE 2.1: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE ........................................................12 TABLE 2.2: CONSTRUCTION OFF-SITE TRIPS .....................................................................12 TABLE 2.3: CONSTRUCTION HAUL TRIPS
    [Show full text]
  • Loma Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17,1989: Performance of the Built Environment
    The Lorna Prieta, California, Earthquake/ of October 17, 1989-Lifelines ANSHEL J. SCHIFF, Editor PERFORMANCE OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Thomas L. Holzer, Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1552-A Prepared in cooperation with the National Science Foundation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles GoGroat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does no$ imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Manuscript approved for publication, August 5, 1997 Text edited by George A. Havach Library of Congress catalog-card No. 92-32287 For sale by the U. S . Geological Survey Information Services Box 25286 Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Pages Modeling the impact of the earthquake on telecommunication services------ 37 By Michael L. Cohen Water and wastewater systems...................................................... 47 By LeVal Lund, John McLaughlin, Curt Edwards, Gordon Laverty, Holly Cornell, Alvin R. Guerrero, Michael Cassaro, Andries Godshack, George Brodt, Donald B. Ballantyne, Ronald Eguchi, Mary Pickett, Omar Abu-Yasein, Chenwun Lay, Anshel J. Schiff, James R. Blacklock, and Steven French Water- and wastewater-treatment plants------ - - - ---------- - ------ - - 79 By William Heuback and Donald B. Ballantyne Lessons learned by water and wastewater utilities-------------------------------- 87 By Mark Pickett and Gordon L. Laverty Transportation systems...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Field-Trip Guide to the Southeastern Foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains in Santa Clara County, California
    Field-Trip Guide to the Southeastern Foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains In Santa Clara County, California U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-121 2002 By Philip W. Stoffer1 and Paula Messina2 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Geological Survey http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of02-121/ 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 2San Jose State University, Department of Geology, 321 Duncan Hall, San Jose, CA 95192-0102 1 Field-Trip Guide to the Southeastern Foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains In Santa Clara County, California By Philip W. Stoffer1 and Paula Messina2 Introduction This field trip is an introduction to the geology of the southeastern foothills of the Santa Cruz Mountains in southern Santa Clara County. Seven stops include four short hikes to access rock exposures and views of the foothills east of Loma Prieta Peak between Gilroy and San José. Field-trip destinations highlight the dominant rock types of the “Franciscan assemblage” including outcrops of serpentinite, basalt, limestone, ribbon chert, graywacke sandstone, and shale. General discussions include how the rocks formed, and how tectonism and stream erosion have changed the landscape through time. All field trip stops are on public land; most are near reservoir dams of the Santa Clara Valley Water District.
    [Show full text]
  • MAY 2 4 ZOO? National Register of Historic Places NAT
    NFS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MAY 2 4 ZOO? National Register of Historic Places NAT. REGISTER OTTtlSWcllACES Registration Form NATiQNAlMK.im"rc This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and clistricts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Highway 1 52 Tree Row other names/site number Hecker Highway Tree Row 2. Location street & number Highway 152 N/A not for publication city or town Gilroy N/A ["] vicinity state California code CA county Santa Clara code 085 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designa ed authority under th e National Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amended, I hereby certify that this [3 nomination n request fo/'i etermination of eli^ t) lity meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Pjarfes and meets the pjroc 5 ural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Public Utilities
    8 PUBLIC UTILITIES The purpose of the Public Utilities Chapter is to facilitate an orderly development of infrastructure in the Specific Plan Area and to ensure adequate capacity of utilities for future uses. This chapter addresses the existing and future demands for domestic water, recycled water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, solid waste disposal, and gas and electric distribution systems within the Specific Plan Area. 8.1 WATER According to the City of Gilroy Water Master Plan, May 1993, the City of Gilroy uses local groundwater from the Llagas sub-basin as its sole source of domestic water. The Llagas sub- basin is approximately 15 miles long, 3 miles wide along its northerly boundary and 6 miles wide along its southerly boundary. The basin is located below the City of Gilroy and flows south towards the Pajaro River. The sub-basin has a storage capacity of 475,000 acre-feet and has an estimated long-term natural groundwater yield of 45,200 acre-feet per year. Llagas and Uvas Creeks, which flow into the basin’s western side, recharge Llagas sub-basin. Coyote Creek may also recharge the sub-basin through infiltration on the northern end. The natural recharge into the sub-basin is low. Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), the principal groundwater management agency in the County of Santa Clara, artificially recharges the sub-basin with imported surface water through the San Filipe Water Project. SCVWD is also the contracting agency for both the State Water Project and the Federal Central Valley Project. The City of Gilroy operates 12 existing wells to serve the City; only 8 are active.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loma Prieta (Santa Cruz Mountains), California, Earthquake of 17 October 1989
    SPECIAL PUBLICATION 104 PHYSICAL SCIENCES | LIBRARY UC DA I CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION D Division of Mines and Geology ( THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION GORDON K. VAN VLECK GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN RANDALL M.WARD SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES GOVERNOR DIRECTOR DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY JAMES F. DAVIS STATE GEOLOGIST Cover Photo: View to the south of Hazel Dell Road, located in the Santa Cruz Mountains about 8.5 kilometers north of Watsonville. The large fissures in the road were caused by lateral spreading due to lique- faction of saturated sediments in Simas Lake and intense shaking associated with the fVL 7.1 Loma Prieta earthquake (note leaning telephone pole). Simas Lake, located just west of Hazel Dell Road, is a closed depression formed by recurring surface fault rupture along the San Andreas fault. Photo by W. A. Bryant, 10/18/89. irf . y//V THE LOMA PRIETA (SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS), CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE OF 17 OCTOBER 1989 Edited by Stephen R. McNutt and Robert H. Sydnor Special Publication 104 1990 Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1341 Sacramento, CA 95814 3 .- v«^ 1 '" ''* * * .' C3Mte* it Si J r- f %lti' i--' /J '-%J. #• 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION v Stephen R. McNult and Robert H. Sydnor SECTION I. The Earthquake \ Geologic and Tectonic Setting of the Epicentral Area of the Loma Prieta Earthquake, Santa Cruz Mountains, Central California 1 David L. Wagner Seismological Aspects of the 17 October 1989 Earthquake 1 Stephen R. McNutt and Tousson R. Toppozada SECTION II. Earthquake Effects Strong Ground Shaking from the Loma Prieta Earthquake of 17 October 1989 and Its Relation to Near Surface Geology in the Oakland Area 29 Anthony F.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13: Literature Cited
    Chapter 13 Literature Cited 13.1 Chapter 1 13.1.1 Printed References California Department of Fish and Game. 2002. Guidance for the NCCP Independent Science Advisory Process. August. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/nccp/scienceprocess.pdf>. California Department of Fish and Game. 2003. Mammal, Reptile, Fish, Amphibian, and Bird Species of Special Concern Lists. May. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/hcpb/species/ssc/ssc.shtml>. Accessed: June 2007. California Department of Fish and Game. 2006. Special Animals List. February. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/bdb/pdfs/spanimals.pdf>. Accessed: June 2007. California Department of Fish and Game. 2007. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. April. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/bdb/pdfs/spplants.pdf>. Accessed: June 2007. California Native Plant Society. 2007. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (7th edition). Sacramento, CA. Available: <www.cnps.org>. Accessed: January 2007. California Natural Diversity Database. 2008. Occurrence information. RareFind Version 3.1.0 (Updated May, 2008). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. City of Gilroy. 2002. Gilroy General Plan 2002–2020. Adopted June 13, 2002. Gilroy, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2001. Morgan Hill General Plan. Revised July 2006. Morgan Hill, CA. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan August 2012 13-1 05489.05 Chapter 13. Literature Cited City of San José, County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2004. Memorandum of Understanding by and among the City of San José, the County of Santa Clara, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District Regarding Preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan and Related Environmental Documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilroy Getaway
    A VISITOR’S GUIDE TO SPICING UP YOUR GILROY GETAWAY visitgilroy.com 6 Coming in July 201 WHAT’S INSIDE 2015-2016 Gilroy Visitors Guide Suggested Itineraries 4 Annual Event Calendar 5 Gilroy Garlic Festival 6 Garlic Shops and Restaurants 8 Gilroy Gardens Family Theme Park 10 Shopping 12 Historic Downtown Gilroy 14 Wineries 16 Golf 18 Explore the Outdoors 20 Celebrate the Harvest 22 Dining Directory 24 Things to Do Directory 26 Lodging Directory 29 Visitor Essentials 30 Gilroy Welcome Center 31 Maps 32 For more visitor information, stop by the Gilroy Welcome Center. We’re conveniently located at Gilroy Premium Outlets in Building A (near Forever 21). Gilroy Welcome Center 8155-6 Arroyo Circle Gilroy, CA 95020 408.842.6436 www.visitgilroy.com Open daily at 10am Photos by Bill Strange, Lora Schraft, and Hawk Photography. Visitor guide design and writing by Articulate Solutions, Inc. Copyright © 2016 Gilroy Welcome Center. All rights reserved. 2 GILROY VISITORS GUIDE WELCOME TO GILROY arlic put Gilroy on the map, and we are still proud to call ourselves the Garlic Capital of the World. Every summer on the last full weekend in July, thousands of visitors from Garound the globe come to the Gilroy Garlic Festival for three full days of great garlicky food, live entertainment, and family fun. But there’s a lot more going on in Gilroy all year long, and you’ll soon discover that there’s too much to do in just one day! Gilroy Gardens Family Theme Park is a local treasure for children and families, and Gilroy Premium Outlets is truly a shopper’s paradise.
    [Show full text]