DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 13: Literature Cited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 13: Literature Cited Chapter 13 Literature Cited 13.1 Chapter 1 13.1.1 Printed References California Department of Fish and Game. 2002. Guidance for the NCCP Independent Science Advisory Process. August. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/nccp/scienceprocess.pdf>. California Department of Fish and Game. 2003. Mammal, Reptile, Fish, Amphibian, and Bird Species of Special Concern Lists. May. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/hcpb/species/ssc/ssc.shtml>. Accessed: June 2007. California Department of Fish and Game. 2006. Special Animals List. February. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/bdb/pdfs/spanimals.pdf>. Accessed: June 2007. California Department of Fish and Game. 2007. Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. April. Available: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/bdb/pdfs/spplants.pdf>. Accessed: June 2007. California Native Plant Society. 2007. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (7th edition). Sacramento, CA. Available: <www.cnps.org>. Accessed: January 2007. California Natural Diversity Database. 2008. Occurrence information. RareFind Version 3.1.0 (Updated May, 2008). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game. City of Gilroy. 2002. Gilroy General Plan 2002–2020. Adopted June 13, 2002. Gilroy, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2001. Morgan Hill General Plan. Revised July 2006. Morgan Hill, CA. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan August 2012 13-1 05489.05 Chapter 13. Literature Cited City of San José, County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Water District, and Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2004. Memorandum of Understanding by and among the City of San José, the County of Santa Clara, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District Regarding Preparation of a Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan and Related Environmental Documents. June. City of San José. 2011. Envision San José 2040 General Plan. San José, CA. Available: <http://www.sanjoseca.gov/planning/gp_update/FinalText/ESJ2040GeneralP lan_12-1-2011.pdf>. Accessed: March 2012. County of Santa Clara, Parks and Recreation Department. 2003. Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation System: Strategic Plan. August 2003. Los Gatos, CA. County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Valley Water District, City of Gilroy, City of Morgan Hill, City of San José, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, California Department of Fish and Game, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Planning Agreement by and among the County of Santa Clara, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, the City of Gilroy, the City of Morgan Hill, the City of San José, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Regarding the Santa Clara Valley Natural Community Conservation Plan and Habitat Conservation Plan. September. County of Santa Clara. 1994. Santa Clara County General Plan: Charting a Course for Santa Clara County’s Future: 1995–2010. Adopted December 20, 1994. San José, CA. Available: <http://www.sccgov.org/portal/site/planning/agencychp?path=%2Fv7%2FPl anning%2C%20Office%20of%20%28DEP%29%2FPlans%20%26%20Progr ams%2FGeneral%20Plan>. Accessed: July 2010. County of Santa Clara. 2006. South County Airport Master Plan Report. July. San Martin, CA. Prepared by: Mead & Hunt in association with Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Bay Area Economics 3D Visions. Available: <http://www.countyairports.org/new_website/forms.html>. Accessed: July 2010. Goals Project. 1999. Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals. A Report of Habitat Recommendations Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA, and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, CA. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan August 2012 13-2 05489.05 Chapter 13. Literature Cited RMC Water and Environment, Jones & Stokes. 2006. Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. November 2006. In Association with: Association of Bay Area Governments, Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting, Greg Bourne, Center for Collaborative Policy, M. Cubed, MIG, San Francisco Estuary Institute, San Francisco Estuary Project. San Francisco, CA. San Francisco Estuary Institute. 2006. Coyote Creek Historical Ecology Study. Prepared for the Santa Clara Valley Water District. January. Oakland, CA: San Francisco Estuary Institute. 230 pages. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. 2009. Valley Transportation Plan 2035. January. San José, CA. Available: <http://www.vta.org/studies/vtp2035/index.html>. Accessed: July 2010. Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2000. Flood Protection and Stream Stewardship Program. San José, CA. Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2002a. Coyote Watershed Stream Stewardship Plan: First Compilation February 2002. San José, CA: Santa Clara County Water District. Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2002b. Fisheries and Aquatic Habitat Collaborative Effort. Last Revised: 2002. Available: <http://www.valleywater.org/Water/Watersheds_- _streams_and_floods/Taking_care_of_streams/FAHCE/index.shtm>. Accessed: January 19, 2006. Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2005a. Reservoirs. Last revised: 2005. Available: <http://www.valleywater.org/Water/Where_Your_Water_Comes_From/Loca l_Water/Reservoirs/index.shtm>. Accessed: May 4, 2006. Santa Clara Valley Water District. 2005b. Urban Water Management Plan 2005. Santa Clara, CA. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service. 1996. Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook, as Amended. November. Amended June 2000. Washington, DC. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Biological Opinion on the Coyote Valley Research Park and Four Other Related Developments. Provided to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2006. Species list for Santa Clara County. Available at: <http://www.fws.gov/sacramento/es/spp_lists/auto_list_form.cfm>. Accessed: January 30, 2006. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan August 2012 13-3 05489.05 Chapter 13. Literature Cited 13.2 Chapter 2 13.2.1 Printed References Association of Bay Area Governments. 2005. Projections 2005. Oakland, CA. As reported by Santa Clara County Planning Office, 2005. Available: <http://www.sccgov.org/SCC/docs/Planning,%20Office%20of%20(DEP)/att achments/884019SCCProjections2005.pdf>. Biotic Resources Group. 2001. Alum Rock Park Riparian Management Plan. Prepared for the City of San José, Department of Public Works, Parks and Recreation Facilities Division. April 30. 116 pp. California Department of Parks and Recreation. 2004. Home Page. Available: <http://www.parks.ca.gov>. Last revised 2004. Accessed: May 18, 2006. City of Gilroy. 2002a. Gilroy General Plan 2002–2020. Adopted June 13, 2002. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2002b. Map of Gilroy 2020 General Plan Land Use Plan. Adopted June 13, 2002. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2002c. Bicycle Master Plan. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2002d. Parks and Recreation Systems Master Plan. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/engineering/pdf/pr_master_plan.pdf>. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2004a. City of Gilroy Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/engineering/pdf/Sewer.pdf>. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2004b. City of Gilroy Storm Drain Master Plan. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/engineering/pdf/Storm.pdf>. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2004c. City of Gilroy Traffic Master Plan. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2004d. City of Gilroy Water Master Plan. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/engineering/pdf/Water.pdf>. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2005a. Glen Loma Ranch Specific Plan. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2005b. Draft Hecker Pass Specific Plan. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2005c. Trails Master Plan. Approved May 2, 2005. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/engineering/pdf/GilroyTrailsMasterPlan.pdf>. Gilroy, CA. City of Gilroy. 2006a. Gilroy at a Glance. Available: <http://www.ci.gilroy.ca.us/living/demography.html>. Accessed: February 28, 2006. Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan August 2012 13-4 05489.05 Chapter 13. Literature Cited City of Gilroy. 2006b. City of Gilroy Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan. Gilroy, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2001a. Map of General Plan Land Use Diagram. Adopted July 25, 2001. Revised April 4, 2005. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2001b. Morgan Hill General Plan. Adopted July 2001. Revised July 2006. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2001c. Parks, Facilities & Recreation Programming Master Plan. Available: <http://www. morgan- hill.ca.gov/html/DocCenter.asp?category_id=240000016>. Accessed: June 20, 2006. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2002a. Capital Improvement Program. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2002b. Sewer System Master Plan. Available: <http://www.morgan- hill.ca.gov/html/DocCenter.asp?category_id=240000262>. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2002c. Storm Drainage System Master Plan. Available: <http://www.morgan- hill.ca.gov/html/DocCenter.asp?category_id=240000263>. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2002d. Water Master Plan. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2004. City of Morgan Hill Redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2003. Citywide Burrowing Owl Habitat Mitigation Plan. June. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2006. About Morgan Hill. Available: <http://www.morgan- hill.ca.gov/html/about/index.asp>. Accessed: February 28, 2006. City of Morgan Hill. 2007. Environmental Programs. Morgan Hill, CA. City of Morgan Hill. 2008. Bikeways Master Plan Update. A Bicycle Transportation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2-009.01 Santa Clara Valley - Niles Cone
    2-009.01 SANTA CLARA VALLEY - NILES CONE Basin Boundaries Summary The Niles Cones groundwater subbasin is a portion of the Santa Clara Valley groundwater gasin in California. The northern boundary of the subbasin is the statutory boundary of the Alameda County Water District (ACWD). The eastern boundary is the Diablo Mountain Range. The southern boundary is Coyote Creek and Santa Clara County. The western boundary is the San Francisco Bay. The boundary is defined by 6 segments detailed in the descriptions below. Segment Descriptions Segment Segment Description Ref Label Type 1-2 I Begins from point (1) and follows the Alameda County Water District Statutory {a} Water boundary to point (2). Agency 2-3 I Begins from point (1) and follows the Alameda County Water District Statutory {a} Water boundary to point (2). Agency 3-4 E Continues from point (2) and follows the contact of Alluvium with various {b} Alluvial marine sedimentary rocks to point (3). 4-5 I Continues from point (3) and follows the Alameda and Santa Clara County {c} County Boundary to point (4). 5-6 I Continues from point (4) and follows Coyote Creek to point (5). {d} Stream 6-7 E Continues from point (5) and follows the San Francisco Bay to point (6). {d} Ocean 7-1 E Continues from point (6) and follows the Alameda County Water District {a} Water Statutory boundary to the end at point (1). Agency Page 1 of 3 02/05/18 3:49 PM Significant Coordinates Point Latitude Longitude 1 37.649387754 -122.155370502 2 37.617682554 -122.101084144 3 37.611327957 -122.02363347 4 37.470391831 -121.889169705 5 37.453950119 -121.924732232 6 37.466631797 -121.997018393 7 37.581516338 -122.143414204 Page 2 of 3 02/05/18 3:49 PM Map 2-009.01 SANTA CLARA VALLEY - NILES CONE https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=160718113212&subbasinid=2-009.01 References Ref Citation Pub Global Date ID {a} California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Water Agencies Dataset.URL: 2016 48 https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bbat/ {b} California Geological Survey (CGS), Regional Geologic Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley
    PROJECT: COYOTE VALLEY CONSERVATION AREAS MASTER REQUEST PLAN The Authority is issuing this Request for Proposals for Ecological Restoration & FOR Landscape-Scale Master Planning Consulting Services. PROPOSALS DUE: JUNE 16, 2021 by 5 PROPOSALS P.M. PACIFIC DAYLIGHT TIME #RFP-2021-10 Request for Proposals Coyote Valley Conservation Areas Master Plan Background Purpose of Request for Proposals (RFPs) The Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority (“Authority”) is soliciting proposals for professional services for the Coyote Valley Conservation Areas Master Plan (“Master Plan”). The Authority is seeking a consultant team to provide a comprehensive spectrum of skills and expertise needed to create an innovative, integrated, science- based, community-informed plan for the recently conserved lands in Coyote Valley; a unique natural and rural landscape, within an urban setting, located between the cities of San Jose and Morgan Hill, in Santa Clara County, California. The Authority is seeking proposals from an experienced prime firm and their subconsultants that would be responsible for conducting the work outlined in this RFP, culminating in a final Master Plan document and construction documents for the first round of implementation projects identified through the planning process. Consultant work will be authorized and funded on as “as needed” basis over the course of a six-year term through a series of Authority-authorized task orders. The selected firms will be asked to respond to any number of task orders, issued as the planning process progresses and funding is available. The selected professionals will have proven experience working on habitat/ecological and hydrological restoration, green infrastructure solutions for water management, wildlife connectivity, public use and access, and many related and associated skills for public agencies and be fully qualified to perform services requested by the Authority in this RFP.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley Landscape Linkage a Vision for a Resilient, Multi-Benefit Landscape
    Coyote Valley Landscape Linkage A Vision for a Resilient, Multi-benefit Landscape December 2017 Prepared by the with the SANTA CLARA VALLEY OPEN SPACE AUTHORITY CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE The Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority conserves the natural environment, supports agriculture, and connects people to nature, by protecting open spaces, natural areas, and working farms and ranches for future generations. OpenSpaceAuthority.org The Conservation Biology Instituteprovides scientific expertise to support conservation and recovery of biological diversity in its natural state through applied research, education, planning, and community service. consbio.org Open Space Authority Linkage Planning Team Matt Freeman, M.C.R.P., Assistant General Manager Galli Basson, M.S., Resource Management Specialist Jake Smith, M.S., Conservation GIS Coordinator Suggested Citation Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority and Conservation Biology Institute. 2017. Coyote Valley Landscape Linkage: A Vision for a Resilient, Multi-benefit Landscape. Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority, San José, CA. 74p. Photo credits: Patty Eaton, Janell Hillman, Cait Hutnik, Stephen Joseph, Tom Ingram, William K. Matthias, Deborah Mills, Derek Neumann, Pathways for Wildlife, Ryan Phillips, and Stuart Weiss. Coyote Valley Landscape Linkage A Vision for a Resilient, Multi-benefit Landscape December 2017 Foreword In 2014, the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority released the Santa Clara Valley Greenprint, its 30-year roadmap which identifies goals, priorities, and
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Survey
    ANNUAL SURVEY March 2019 Fiscal Year 2017-18 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency FY 2017-18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BAWSCA OVERVIEW PAST AND CURRENT PURCHASES FROM SFPUC TOTAL WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND CURRENT WATER USE BY CUSTOMER CLASS CLIMATOLOGICAL DATA SERVICE AREA POPULATIONS CURRENT WATER USE PER CAPITA CURRENT RESIDENTIAL WATER BILLS AGENCY PROFILES MARCH 2019 BAWSCA WATER FACTS AT-A-GLANCE – FY 2017-18 BAWSCA Member Agencies San Mateo County - City of Brisbane / Guadalupe Valley Municipal Improvement District, City of Burlingame, California Water Service Company (Bear Gulch District, Mid-Peninsula District, South San Francisco District), Coastside County Water District, City of Daly City, City of East Palo Alto, Estero Municipal Improvement District, Town of Hillsborough, City of Menlo Park, Mid-Peninsula Water District, City of Millbrae, North Coast County Water District, City of Redwood City, City of San Bruno, and Westborough Water District Santa Clara County - City of Milpitas, City of Mountain View, City of Palo Alto, Purissima Hills Water District, San Jose Municipal Water System – North, City of Santa Clara, Stanford University, and City of Sunnyvale Alameda County - Alameda County Water District, City of Hayward Service Areas Size (sq. mi.) Population Number of Agencies San Mateo County 185 746,013 16 Santa Clara County 117 561,898 8 Alameda County 166 516,500 2 Total 468 1,824,411 26 Supply by Source ccf mgd af % San Francisco RWS 65,134,913 133.48 149,529 66.7% Groundwater 9,459,252 19.38 21,715 9.7% Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Calfornia Water Districts & Water Supply Sources
    WHERE DOES OUR WATER COME FROM? Quincy Corning k F k N F , M R , r R e er th th a a Magalia e Fe F FEATHER RIVER NORTH FORK Shasta Lake STATE WATER PROJECT Chico Orland Paradise k F S , FEATHER RIVER MIDDLE FORK R r STATE WATER PROJECT e Sacramento River th a e F Tehama-Colusa Canal Durham Folsom Lake LAKE OROVILLE American River N Yuba R STATE WATER PROJECT San Joaquin R. Contra Costa Canal JACKSON MEADOW RES. New Melones Lake LAKE PILLSBURY Yuba Co. W.A. Marin M.W.D. Willows Old River Stanislaus R North Marin W.D. Oroville Sonoma Co. W.A. NEW BULLARDS BAR RES. Ukiah P.U. Yuba Co. W.A. Madera Canal Delta-Mendota Canal Millerton Lake Fort Bragg Palermo YUBA CO. W.A Kern River Yuba River San Luis Reservoir Jackson Meadows and Willits New Bullards Bar Reservoirs LAKE SPAULDING k Placer Co. W.A. F MIDDLE FORK YUBA RIVER TRUCKEE-DONNER P.U.D E Gridley Nevada I.D. , Nevada I.D. Groundwater Friant-Kern Canal R n ia ss u R Central Valley R ba Project Yu Nevada City LAKE MENDOCINO FEATHER RIVER BEAR RIVER Marin M.W.D. TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL STATE WATER PROJECT YUBA RIVER Nevada I.D. Fk The Central Valley Project has been founded by the U.S. Bureau of North Marin W.D. CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT , N Yuba Co. W.A. Grass Valley n R Reclamation in 1935 to manage the water of the Sacramento and Sonoma Co. W.A. ica mer Ukiah P.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin, East Bay Plain Subbasin
    San Francisco Bay Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin, East Bay Plain Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 2-9.04 • County: Alameda, Contra Costa • Surface Area: 77,800 acres (122 square miles) Basin Boundaries & Hydrology The East Bay Plain Subbasin is a northwest trending alluvial plain bounded on the north by San Pablo Bay, on the east by the contact with Franciscan Basement rock, on the south by the Niles Cone Groundwater Basin. The East Bay Plain Basin extends beneath San Francisco Bay to the west. Numerous creeks including San Pablo Creek, Wildcat Creek, San Leandro Creek, and San Lorenzo Creek flow from the western slope of the Coast Ranges westward across the plain and into the San Francisco and San Pablo bays (CRWQCB 1999). Average precipitation in the subbasin ranges from about 17 inches in the southeast to greater than 25 inches along the eastern boundary, most of which occurs between the months of November and March. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations The East Bay Plain subbasin aquifer system consists of unconsolidated sediments of Quaternary age. Deposits include the early Pleistocene Santa Clara Formation, the late Pleistocene Alameda Formation, the early Holocene Temescal Formation, and Artificial Fill. The cumulative thickness of the unconsolidated sediments is about 1,000 feet (CRWQCB 1999). The average specific yield of the basin was calculated to be about 6% (DWR 1994). Early Pleistocene Santa Clara Formation. The Santa Clara Formation consists of alluvial fan deposits inter-fingered with lake, swamp, river channel, and flood plain deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley Agriculture Feasibility Study Phase 1 Report
    CONSERVING COYOTE VALLEY AGRICULTURE FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE ONE REPORT Sustainable Agriculture Education (SAGE) March 2012 Page 2 Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................7 Background........................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Inspiration, Purpose and Phasing ............................................................................................ 7 Components of Phase One Feasibility Study ........................................................................................ 8 Overview of Existing Conditions .........................................................................................................9 Current Land Uses ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Location and Regional Context ............................................................................................................ 9 Acreage, Parcelization and Major Land Uses ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
    ed ne 30, 2020 anta Clara Val ey Y. Transportation Authority Solutions that move you VTA, BART and elected officialscelebrate the start of First VTA Bus to pull out of the Cerone Division on New BART service to Silicon Valley Transit Service Day: December 28, 2019 . -- - > - •" ·---" :.,.:. .1 · ·· ,,. , . , ,, ,, ( " - ' - --- ·.· VTA's Berryessa/North San Jose Transit Center VTA bus serving the new Milpitas BART Station VTA staff and project partners celebrate the opening of FTA announced the allocation of $125 million to VTA for the State Route 237 Express Lanes Phase II, December 2019 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BARTI Silicon Valley Phase II project VTA performing Rail Rehab to keep our light rail VTA is the first agency to submit the expedited federal system in shape funding request for BART Phase II SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Prepared by: Finance and Administration THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letter of Transmittal ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................................................... 1-10 Organizational Chart......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley Safe Passage
    Safe Passage for Coyote Valley A Wildlife Linkage for the Highway 101 Corridor A User’s Guide to Developing Protective Highway Crossings for Wildlife While Connecting California’s Students with Science and Nature By Julie Phillips, Ryan Phillips, Neela Srinivasan, Deborah Aso, Wendy Lao, & Pat Cornely De Anza College, Environmental Studies Department Safe Passage for Coyote Valley A Wildlife Linkage for the Highway 101 Corridor A User’s Guide to Developing Protective Highway Crossings for Wildlife While Connecting California’s Students with Science and Nature By Julie Phillips, Ryan Phillips, Neela Srinivasan, Deborah Aso, Wendy Lao, & Pat Cornely De Anza College, Environmental Studies Department Safe Passage for Coyote Valley © 2012 Julie Phillips, Ryan Phillips, Neela Srinivasan, Deborah Aso, Wendy Lao, Pat Cornely. All rights reserved. Kirsch Center for Environmental Studies, De Anza College 21250 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014 www.deanza.edu/es/wildlifecorrproj 408.864.8316 McAndrews, Anneke Spanjaart, Daniel Valencia, Daniel Gray, City of San José upon which they depend, for their ecological values and for their use Acknowledgements Chris Choi, Renee Good, Sharon Hudak, Jason Vasquez, Danielle The City of San José is committed to an open and honest government and enjoyment by the public. Christensen, Hugo Hernandez, Rosemary Alvarez, Patti Conens, and strives to consistently meet the community’s expectations by pro- We gratefully acknowledge the leadership and format of Meagan Beaver, Dan Yocum, Tom Cervantes, Laura Coatney, Ray viding excellent service, in a positive and timely manner, and in the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service the safe passage guide provided by: Lerwill, Kristy St.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley, California
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA A case of arrested subsidence CALIFORNIA he Santa Clara Valley is part of a structural trough that ex- tends about 90 miles southeast from San Francisco. The northern third of the trough is occupied by the San Fran- San Francisco Bay T cisco Bay, the central third by the Santa Clara Valley, and the south- San Francisco ern third by the San Benito Valley. The northern Santa Clara Valley, roughly from Palo Alto to the Coyote Narrows (10 miles southeast of downtown San Jose), is now densely populated and known as Santa Clara Valley “Silicon Valley,” the birthplace of the global electronics industry. Palo Alto Alviso In the first half of this century, the Santa Clara Valley was intensively San Jose cultivated, mainly for fruit and vegetables. The extensive orchards, Coyote Narrows dominated by apricots, plums, cherries, and pears, led local boosters to dub the area a Garden of Eden or “The Valley of Heart’s Delight.” P In the post-World War II era (circa 1945–1970), rapid population a c i growth was associated with the transition from an agriculturally f i c based economy to an industrial and urban economy. The story of O land subsidence in the Santa Clara Valley is closely related to the c San Benito Valley e a changing land and water use and the importation of surface water to n support the growing urban population. 0 30 Miles 0 30 Kilometers San Jose and its surrounding communities sprawl across the Santa Clara Valley. The view is looking southeast from downtown San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Valley Use & Management Plan
    USE AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Coyote Valley Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan As approved by the Santa Clara County Open Space Authority Board of Directors September 26, 2013 Prepared for: Prepared by: 2M Associates in collaboration with: Coyote Valley Open Space Preserve Vision The Coyote Valley Open Space Preserve is a gateway to the Santa Cruz Mountains with a strong sense of place and time. Through resource conservation and stewardship, the Preserve’s cultural and agrarian values past and future, habitats and endangered species, and its position in a cross-valley wildlife corridor will be protected, celebrated, and enjoyed by visitors. P LAN O VERVIEW Photo: xmxncm xmxmcn In Santa Clara County, The Coyote Valley Open Space Preserve Use and Management Plan addresses how the open space preservation and creation of a Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (the Authority)will develop and manage the greenbelt are immediate habitat resources of meadows drainages, and hills of this 348-acre site and public high priorities needed to counter the continuing access within them. The Preserve is regionally significant because of its location along and serious conversion of these lands to urban uses, the western edge of the Coyote Valley. The Preserve’s contained drainage patterns to preserve the quality of provide a key ecological link in a cross-valley wildlife corridor. The Preserve has a life in the county, and to encourage agricultural deeply rich history of human presence and occupation. The Preserve is highly activities. accessible to the populations of Santa Clara County and particularly to the residents the All persons owning south San Jose and Morgan Hill.
    [Show full text]