DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority ed ne 30, 2020 anta Clara Val ey Y. Transportation Authority Solutions that move you VTA, BART and elected officialscelebrate the start of First VTA Bus to pull out of the Cerone Division on New BART service to Silicon Valley Transit Service Day: December 28, 2019 . -- - > - •" ·---" :.,.:. .1 · ·· ,,. , . , ,, ,, ( " - ' - --- ·.· VTA's Berryessa/North San Jose Transit Center VTA bus serving the new Milpitas BART Station VTA staff and project partners celebrate the opening of FTA announced the allocation of $125 million to VTA for the State Route 237 Express Lanes Phase II, December 2019 Bay Area Rapid Transit (BARTI Silicon Valley Phase II project VTA performing Rail Rehab to keep our light rail VTA is the first agency to submit the expedited federal system in shape funding request for BART Phase II SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Prepared by: Finance and Administration THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letter of Transmittal ....................................................................................................................................... 1-1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................................................... 1-10 Organizational Chart....................................................................................................................................... 1-13 Principal Officials........................................................................................................................................... 1-13 Service Area Map ........................................................................................................................................... 1-14 FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditor’s Report........................................................................................................................... 2-1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Required Supplementary Information) ........................................... 2-4 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position............................................................................................................................. 2-18 Statement of Activities ................................................................................................................................. 2-19 Fund Financial Statements: Proprietary Funds: Statement of Fund Net Position ................................................................................................................. 2-20 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position..................................................... 2-22 Statement of Cash Flows ........................................................................................................................... 2-23 Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet ............................................................................................................................................... 2-25 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances....................................................... 2-26 Fiduciary Funds: Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ............................................................................................................ 2-27 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ......................................................................................... 2-28 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ........................................................................................................... 2-29 i SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents (continued) Page Required Supplementary Information (other than MD&A): Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios – ATU Pension Plan............................... 2-89 Schedule of Employer Contributions - ATU Pension Plan............................................................................. 2-90 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios – CalPERS Plan..................................... 2-91 Schedule of Employer Contributions – CalPERS Plan .................................................................................. 2-92 Schedule of Changes in the Plan's Net OPEB Asset and Related Ratios – OPEB Trust................................ 2-93 Schedule of Employer Contributions - OPEB Trust....................................................................................... 2-94 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – 2000 Measure A Program Special Revenue Fund ................................. 2-95 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – 2016 Measure B Program Special Revenue Fund ................................. 2-96 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – Congestion Management Program Special Revenue Fund.................... 2-97 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – Congestion Management & Highway Program Special Revenue Fund 2-98 Note to Required Supplementary Information ............................................................................................... 2-99 Supplementary Information - Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules: Enterprise Funds: Comparative Schedule of Fund Net Position ............................................................................................... 2-100 Comparative Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position................................... 2-102 Comparative Schedule of Cash Flows ......................................................................................................... 2-103 Budgetary Comparison Schedule – VTA Transit Fund................................................................................ 2-105 Comparative Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, & Changes in Fund Balance – Special Revenue Fund . 2-107 Fiduciary Funds: Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position – ATU Pension, OPEB and Medical Funds.................... 2-108 Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position – ATU Pension, OPEB and Medical Funds . 2-109 Combining Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities – Agency Funds................................................ 2-110 Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Agency Funds ............................................. 2-111 STATISTICAL SECTION: Financial Trends: Changes in Net Position ............................................................................................................................... 3-1 Net Position by Component ......................................................................................................................... 3-3 Fund Balances and Changes in Fund Balances, Governmental Funds ........................................................ 3-4 Current Ratio ................................................................................................................................................ 3-5 Operating Revenues and Operating Expenses ............................................................................................. 3-6 Non-Operating Assistance............................................................................................................................ 3-7 Targeted Operating Reserves........................................................................................................................ 3-8 ii SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents (continued) Page Revenue Capacity: Revenue Base and Revenue Rates ............................................................................................................... 3-9 Sales Tax Rates............................................................................................................................................. 3-10 Principal Sales Tax Payers in Santa Clara County by Segments ................................................................. 3-11 Debt Capacity: Total Outstanding Debt by Type................................................................................................................... 3-12 Ratios of Outstanding Debt.......................................................................................................................... 3-13 Direct and Overlapping Debt and Debt Limitation...................................................................................... 3-14 Pledged Revenue Coverage - 1976 Half-Cent Sales Tax Revenue Bonds................................................... 3-15 Pledged Revenue Coverage - 2000 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax Revenue Bonds................................. 3-16 Projected Pledged Revenue Coverage.......................................................................................................... 3-17 Demographic and Economic Information: Population Trends......................................................................................................................................... 3-18 Income and Unemployment Rates ............................................................................................................... 3-19 Wage
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn Transit Primary Source Packet
    BROOKLYN TRANSIT PRIMARY SOURCE PACKET Student Name 1 2 INTRODUCTORY READING "New York City Transit - History and Chronology." Mta.info. Metropolitan Transit Authority. Web. 28 Dec. 2015. Adaptation In the early stages of the development of public transportation systems in New York City, all operations were run by private companies. Abraham Brower established New York City's first public transportation route in 1827, a 12-seat stagecoach that ran along Broadway in Manhattan from the Battery to Bleecker Street. By 1831, Brower had added the omnibus to his fleet. The next year, John Mason organized the New York and Harlem Railroad, a street railway that used horse-drawn cars with metal wheels and ran on a metal track. By 1855, 593 omnibuses traveled on 27 Manhattan routes and horse-drawn cars ran on street railways on Third, Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Avenues. Toward the end of the 19th century, electricity allowed for the development of electric trolley cars, which soon replaced horses. Trolley bus lines, also called trackless trolley coaches, used overhead lines for power. Staten Island was the first borough outside Manhattan to receive these electric trolley cars in the 1920s, and then finally Brooklyn joined the fun in 1930. By 1960, however, motor buses completely replaced New York City public transit trolley cars and trolley buses. The city's first regular elevated railway (el) service began on February 14, 1870. The El ran along Greenwich Street and Ninth Avenue in Manhattan. Elevated train service dominated rapid transit for the next few decades. On September 24, 1883, a Brooklyn Bridge cable-powered railway opened between Park Row in Manhattan and Sands Street in Brooklyn, carrying passengers over the bridge and back.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-009.01 Santa Clara Valley - Niles Cone
    2-009.01 SANTA CLARA VALLEY - NILES CONE Basin Boundaries Summary The Niles Cones groundwater subbasin is a portion of the Santa Clara Valley groundwater gasin in California. The northern boundary of the subbasin is the statutory boundary of the Alameda County Water District (ACWD). The eastern boundary is the Diablo Mountain Range. The southern boundary is Coyote Creek and Santa Clara County. The western boundary is the San Francisco Bay. The boundary is defined by 6 segments detailed in the descriptions below. Segment Descriptions Segment Segment Description Ref Label Type 1-2 I Begins from point (1) and follows the Alameda County Water District Statutory {a} Water boundary to point (2). Agency 2-3 I Begins from point (1) and follows the Alameda County Water District Statutory {a} Water boundary to point (2). Agency 3-4 E Continues from point (2) and follows the contact of Alluvium with various {b} Alluvial marine sedimentary rocks to point (3). 4-5 I Continues from point (3) and follows the Alameda and Santa Clara County {c} County Boundary to point (4). 5-6 I Continues from point (4) and follows Coyote Creek to point (5). {d} Stream 6-7 E Continues from point (5) and follows the San Francisco Bay to point (6). {d} Ocean 7-1 E Continues from point (6) and follows the Alameda County Water District {a} Water Statutory boundary to the end at point (1). Agency Page 1 of 3 02/05/18 3:49 PM Significant Coordinates Point Latitude Longitude 1 37.649387754 -122.155370502 2 37.617682554 -122.101084144 3 37.611327957 -122.02363347 4 37.470391831 -121.889169705 5 37.453950119 -121.924732232 6 37.466631797 -121.997018393 7 37.581516338 -122.143414204 Page 2 of 3 02/05/18 3:49 PM Map 2-009.01 SANTA CLARA VALLEY - NILES CONE https://sgma.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=160718113212&subbasinid=2-009.01 References Ref Citation Pub Global Date ID {a} California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Water Agencies Dataset.URL: 2016 48 https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/bbat/ {b} California Geological Survey (CGS), Regional Geologic Map No.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City
    CASE STUDY Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City In 2019, Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) released a tender to Shared Mobility providers to develop a new scalable and sustainable on-demand transit proposal. At a glance Liftango was engaged by the MTA for a The MTA network comprises the nation’s simulation service to predict the uptake largest bus fleet and more subway and for an implemented on-demand service. commuter rail cars than all other U.S. Liftango’s simulation technology was transit systems combined. The MTA’s provided to MTA as a benchmark to operating agencies are MTA New York City measure the realism and efficiency of Transit, MTA Bus, Long Island Rail Road, tender proposals from shared mobility Metro-North Railroad, and MTA Bridges and providers. Essentially, enabling MTA to Tunnels. make an educated decision on whom they should choose as their on-demand provider. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America’s largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people across a 5,000-square-mile travel area surrounding New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. 01 The Problem MTA needed to provide a one of the largest growing As MTA’s first time launching better transport solution sectors in the next five to ten this type of project, there to the people of New York years. The census shows was some risk surrounding City’s outer areas. Why? that a number of people are launch. By engaging Liftango, Existing bus services being leaving for work between 3-6 the aim was to mitigate risk, less frequent than a subway pm and therefore returning simulate possible outcomes service or completely during the overnight period.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD)
    Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Law ---------------------------------------------------------------------- With corresponding provisions of the Southern California Rapid Transit District Law and Los Angeles County Transportation Commission Law Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority California Public Utilities Code Page 2 of 110 Introduction The Southern California Rapid Transit District, also known as the SCRTD or the “District” (1964-1993) was created by the State as the successor to the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority or “LAMTA” (1958-1964). LAMTA was the first publicly governed transit operator in Los Angeles and also responsible for the planning of a new mass transit system to replace the aging remnants of the transit systems built by Pacific Electric (1899-1953) and Los Angeles Railway (1895-1945). Unfortunately, the LAMTA had no ability to raise tax revenues or powers of eminent domain, and its board was appointed by the Governor, making the task building local support for mass transit improvements difficult at best. Dissatisfaction with the underpowered LAMTA led to a complete re-write of its legislative authority. While referred to in state legislation as a merger, the District law completely overwrote the LAMTA Act of 1957. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, also known as LACTC or the “Commission” (1977-1993) was created by the State in 1976 as a separate countywide transportation planning agency, along with transportation commissions in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange counties. At the time the District was initially created, there were no transit or transportation grant programs available from the State or Federal governments. Once funding sources became available from the Urban Mass Transit Administration, now the Federal Transit Administration, the California Transportation Commission, and others, the creation of county transportation commissions ensured coordination of multimodal transportation planning and funding programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Bus Planning Process
    The 2018 South Carolina Intercity Bus Program Evaluation Prepared for the South Prepared by: Carolina Department of RLS & Associates, Inc. Transportation, Office of Public Transit December, 2018 955 Park St, Room 201 –POBox 191 Columbia, SC 29202 (803) 737‐2146 https://www.scdot.org/inside/inside-PublicTransit.aspx#services Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Statutory Requirements ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Work Program ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 South Carolina Intercity Busy Service ........................................................................................................................ 1 State’s Intercity Bus Needs ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 5311(f) Funding Recommendations........................................................................................................... 2 II. Project Background and Context ............................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Draft Eis
    CHAPTER 12: DISTRIBUTION OF THE DRAFT EIS The Draft EIS was transmitted to the officials, agencies, organizations, and individuals listed in this chapter. The Draft EIS is available for review during normal business hours at several libraries in Santa Clara and Alameda counties and at the VTA office at 3331 North First Street, Building B in San Jose. Copies of the document may be obtained by contacting VTA at (408) 321-5789. VTA has notified all property owners/tenants who may be impacted by the Build Alternatives and has advertised the availability of the EIS in local periodicals, including the Fremont Argus, San Jose Mercury News, The Milpitas Post, El Observador, Thoi Boa, and Santa Clara Weekly. See Chapter 11.0: Agency and Community Participation for additional information. 12.1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS Federal Elected Officials The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Barbara Boxer U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate District 8 501 First Street, Suite 7-600 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 14th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 San Francisco, CA 94102 The Honorable Diane Feinstein The Honorable Barbara Lee U.S. Senate U.S. House of Representatives 1 Post Street, Suite 2450 District 9 San Francisco, CA 94104 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1000-N Oakland, CA 94612 The Honorable George Miller U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable Ellen Tauscher District 7 U.S. House of Representatives 1333 Willow Pass Road District 10 Concord, CA 94520 2121 North California Boulevard, Suite 555 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Agencies and Organizations Notified of Draft EIS Availability 12-1 Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor EIS The Honorable Jerry McNerney State Elected Officials U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratransit Contracting and Service Delivery Methods
    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 31 Paratransit Contracting and Service Delivery Methods A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1998 PROJECT SELECTION COMMITTEE OFFICERS CHAIRMAN Chairwoman: SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit, Oakland, California MICHAEL S. TOWNES Vice Chair: WAYNE SHACKELFORD, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation Peninsula Transportation District Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Commission Washington, D.C. MEMBERS MEMBERS BRIAN J.L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, University SHARON D. BANKS of Texas at Dallas AC Transit SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement Inc., Washington, D.C LEE BARNES E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation Barwood Inc JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland GERALD L. BLAIR JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center. Lehigh University Indiana County Transit Authority GORMAN GILBERT, Director, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO University New Jersey Transit Corporation DELON HAMPTON, Chairman & CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates, Washington, D.C., ROD J. DIRIDON LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering (Past Chair, International Institute for Surface 1986) Transportation Policy Study JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York SANDRA DRAGGOO THOMAS F. LARWIN, San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board CATA BRADLEY L.
    [Show full text]
  • DOT Is Committed to Ensuring That
    Signed and Anticipated Capital Investment Grant (CIG) Funding Agreements Since 1/20/2017 FTA has advanced funding for 41 new CIG projects throughout the nation under this Administration since January 20, 2017, totaling approximately $10.7 billion in funding commitments. Date Signed by CIG Funding Project Name Project Sponsor Mode Total Project Cost FTA Commitments 1 Caltrain Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (CA) Caltrain Commuter rail 5/23/2017 $1,930,670,934 $647,000,000 2 Purple Line LRT (MD) Maryland Transit Administration Light rail 8/22/2017 $2,407,030,286 $900,000,000 3 Laker Line BRT (MI) Interurban Transit Partnership BRT 2/9/2018 $72,761,922 $56,189,668 4 Jacksonville First Coast Flyer BRT East Corridor (FL) Jacksonville Transportation Authority BRT 2/23/2018 $34,009,455 $16,930,000 5 Prospect MAX BRT (MO) Kansas City Area Transportation Authority BRT 4/9/2018 $55,810,330 $29,890,000 6 Everett Swift II BRT (WA) Community Transit BRT 4/9/2018 $73,631,772 $43,190,000 7 SMART Regional Rail - San Rafael to Larkspur Extension (CA) Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit Commuter rail 4/9/2018 $55,435,057 $20,032,873 8 IndyGo Red Line (IN) Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation BRT 5/14/2018 $96,329,980 $74,989,685 9 Tacoma Link Extension (WA) Sound Transit Light rail 5/15/2018 $214,613,395 $74,999,999 10 Albuquerque Rapid Transit (NM) ABQ Ride BRT 8/30/2018 $133,671,298 $75,035,549 11 Santa Ana Streetcar (CA) Orange County Transportation Authority Streetcar 11/30/2018 $407,759,966 $148,955,409 12 Lynnwood Link (WA) Sound
    [Show full text]
  • Complementary Paratransit Service Compliance Review Guam
    U.S. Department Headquarters East Building, 5m Floor, TCR Of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Federal Transit Administration APR 0 3 2012 Mr. Rudy Cabana Interim General Manager Guam Regional Transit Authority Government of Guam P.O. Box 2896 Hagatna GU 96932 Re: ADA Complimentary Paratransit Service Compliance Review Final Report Dear Mr. Cabana: Thank you for your responses to the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Complementary Paratransit Service Compliance Review conducted at the Guam Regional Transportation Authority (GRTA) from February 9-12, 2010. FTA would like to thank you and your staff for the cooperation provided during the review. At that time, you were informed that FTA would issue a draft report of the findings, on which GRTA would have an opportunity to provide comment, and a final report would then be released. GRTA's comments were to be included in the attachments to the final report. Upon receiving GRTA's comments to the draft report on December 16, 2011, this report is considered final. A copy so marked is enclosed for your records. As of the date of this letter, the Final Report became a public document and is subject to dissemination under the Freedom of Information Act of 1974. FTA recognizes that it has been over two years since our onsite review and that changes have likely occurred in GRTA's paratransit program. We appreciate the efforts that GRTA has already taken to correct the deficiencies identified. We also value the ongoing cooperation and assistance that you and your staff have provided during this review.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratransit Plan Exhibits
    ADA Paratransit Plan Exhibits for Public Comment, December 2017 to January 5, 2018 Paratransit Plan Exhibits Table of Contents EXHIBIT 1: RTS SYSTEM MAP AND SCHEDULES........................... 2 EXHIBIT 2: PARATRANSIT SERVICE AREA MAPS .......................... 2 EXHIBIT 3: SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE ............................................ 8 EXHIBIT 4: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & NOTIFICATION ............... 20 EXHIBIT 5: NO-SHOWS (MISSED RIDES) .................................... 38 EXHIBIT 6: COMPLAINTS ........................................................... 53 EXHIBIT 7: TIMELY SERVICE ....................................................... 58 EXHIBIT 8: PICKUP PERIODS FOR RETURN TRIPS AND “NO STRAND” POLICY ....................................................................... 76 EXHIBIT 9: TIME-LINE OF IMPLEMENTATION ........................... 79 EXHIBIT 10: ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION ................................. 110 EXHIBIT 11: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC COMMENTS ..................... 162 EXHIBIT 12: CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES .................... 163 EXHIBIT 13: MPO CERTIFICATION ........................................... 181 EXHIBIT 14: RATIFIED BOARD RESOLUTION ............................ 182 Page 1 of 182 ADA Paratransit Plan Exhibits for Public Comment, December 2017 to January 5, 2018 EXHIBIT 1: RTS SYSTEM MAP AND SCHEDULES This exhibit provides the link to the RTS Service Map for April 2017 https://www.myrts.com/Portals/0/Schedules/RTS- System-Map-April-3-2017.pdf and the link to the portion of the RTS website containing
    [Show full text]
  • An Econometric Analysis of Public Transportation in Montreal Vincent Chakour Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechani
    An econometric analysis of public transportation in Montreal Vincent Chakour Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics McGill University, Montreal Submitted Electronically August 14, 2013 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Civil Engineering © Vincent Chakour 2013 Acknowledgments I would first and foremost like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Naveen Eluru, whose inspiring guidance, supervision, and constant support throughout my Master’s program made the completion of this thesis possible. I would also like to thank Guillaume Barreau for modeling the transit trips to McGill in Google Maps, Alex Burkley for his help with land use variable generation, and the transportation team in the Department of Civil Engineering as well as the TRAM research group in the School of Urban Planning for their help and support. I would like to give a special thanks to Ahmed El-Geneidy from the School or Urban Planning, Daniel Bergeron from the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport (AMT), and Jocelyn Grondines from the Société de Transport de Montréal (STM) for providing the necessary data to carry out the studies. I would also like to acknowledge financial support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada under the Discovery Grants program and from the McGill Sustainability Projects Fund. 1 Contributions of Authors Chapters 2, 3 and 4 of this report are based on three separate papers. The paper from Chapter 2 has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Public Transport on September 8th 2012 and presented at the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting, whereas the paper from Chapter 3 has been presented at the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting and submitted for publication in the journal of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Worth Transportation Authority Financial Report September 30, 2019
    Fort Worth Transportation Authority Financial Report September 30, 2019 C O N T E N T S Page Independent Auditor's Report ................................................................................................................................... 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis .................................................................................................................. 4 Financial Statements Statements of Net Position ................................................................................................................................ 12 Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position .............................................................. 13 Statements of Cash Flows ................................................................................................................................. 14 Notes to Financial Statements .......................................................................................................................... 16 Supplementary Information Schedule of Revenues and Expenses - Budget and Actual ........................................................................ 30 Federal and State Awards Section Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards ................................................................................................ 31 Schedule of Expenditures of State Awards .................................................................................................... 32 Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State
    [Show full text]