DOCSLIB.ORG

GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 1 of 21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 1 of 21 Case 1:07-cv-01112-OWW -GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 1 of 21 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ANGELA YOW, 1:07-CV-1112-OWW-GSA 7 Plaintiff, 8 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. RE GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 9 TO DISMISS (DOC. 8) NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC. and 10 DOES 1 through 50 11 Defendants. 12 1. INTRODUCTION 13 Defendant National Enquirer, Inc. (“National Enquirer”) 14 moves to dismiss Plaintiff Angela Yow’s (“Yow”) complaint for 15 failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 16 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff’s complaint 17 alleges a cause of action for defamation per se arising from 18 statements made in the publication of the August 21, 2006 edition 19 of the National Enquirer. Diversity jurisdiction is invoked 20 under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, based on the parties' citizenship in 21 different states and the amount in controversy in excess of the 22 $75,000 jurisdictional minimum. Oral argument on this matter was 23 heard on February 11, 2008. 24 2. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff filed her complaint on July 31, 2007. (Doc. 1, 26 Complaint) Defendant National Enquirer moved to dismiss the 27 Complaint on October 2, 2007. (Doc. 8, Motion) Plaintiff opposed 28 1 Case 1:07-cv-01112-OWW -GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 2 of 21 1 the Motion on November 5, 2007. (Doc. 11, Opposition) Defendant 2 filed its reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition on November 26, 2007. 3 (Doc. 13, Reply) 3. FACTUAL HISTORY 4 In its August 21, 2006 weekly edition, the National Enquirer 5 magazine published a story alleging that the well-known film 6 celebrity Mel Gibson had traveled to Modesto, California in 1990, 7 and engaged in a binge of drinking, cocaine use, and sexual 8 promiscuity. (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ 7) The following passage of 9 the National Enquirer August 21, 2006 story, alleged in haec 10 verba in Plaintiff’s Complaint, form the basis for ANGELA YOW’s 11 claim for defamation: 12 During one binge at a Modesto, California bar, Mel not 13 only swooped down on many of the women but also did drugs, charges a source. 14 He was snorting cocaine in a back room surrounded by girls at the Easy Street Saloon back in 1990, according 15 to the source, who barged in on the party. “Mel was huddled over a small mound of cocaine on top of the 16 glass-topped desk. “He was snorting through a small brass tube. 17 “There were four or five women around the table with him who were sharing the coke with him.” 18 When the manager learned what was going on, Mel and company were shown the door according to the source. 19 “They escorted him out with a couple of girls in tow to continue the party elsewhere.” 20 On that same trip to Modesto, Fred Yow told The ENQUIRER his daughter brought Mel home after a wild 21 night. “Mel ended up sleeping with her friend. He wanted to 22 sleep with my daughter Angela, but I told him if he tried to I’d break his face!” 23 (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ 9 and Exhibit A to the Complaint)1 24 Plaintiff alleges that the words of the offending passage 25 quoted above although not literally stating that Plaintiff 26 27 1 The National Enquirer article of August 21, 2006 story is 28 attached to the Complaint as Exhibit A. 2 Case 1:07-cv-01112-OWW -GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 3 of 21 1 snorted cocaine with film personality Mel Gibson, have the 2 meaning and would be understood by the ordinary reasonable reader 3 as communicating precisely that Plaintiff ANGELA YOW was one of 4 the “four or five women” who snorted cocaine with Mel Gibson, a 5 felony under the law. (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ 10) Plaintiff 6 alleges the article asserts that ANGELA YOW was one of the couple 7 of girls with whom Mel Gibson left the Easy Street Saloon after 8 the manager of the saloon discovered that Mel and a group of 9 “four or five women,” including the couple of girls who left the 10 saloon with Gibson, were snorting cocaine with Gibson. Plaintiff 11 asserts the ordinary reasonable reader would understand the 12 article to convey the meaning that the couple of girls who left 13 with Gibson from the Easy Street Saloon were the same two women, 14 who went on to continue “a wild night” with Gibson, referred to 15 in the sentences that immediately follow, in the next paragraph, 16 which actually name Plaintiff. (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ 11) 17 Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that the passage is false as 18 she did not use cocaine with Mel Gibson, was not in the presence 19 of cocaine that evening, nor did she witness anyone using 20 cocaine, nor has she ever used cocaine. (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ 12) 21 Plaintiff alleges the defamatory statements proximately caused 22 damages to her reputation, and inflicted severe emotional 23 distress, humiliation, anguish, and embarrassment. (Doc. 1, 24 Complaint, ¶ 16) Plaintiff is a private figure for purposes of 25 this defamation action. 26 4. JURISDICTION 27 Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the state and Eastern 28 District of California. (Doc. 1, Complaint, ¶ ¶ 1, 15) Defendant 3 Case 1:07-cv-01112-OWW -GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 4 of 21 1 is a corporation with its principal place of business in Florida 2 and the publisher of a weekly tabloid magazine. (Doc. 1, 3 Complaint, ¶¶ 1, 4) The Complaint seeks damages in excess of 4 $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. Jurisdiction exists 5 under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 6 5. STANDARD OF REVIEW 7 A. 12(b)(6) MOTION 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) provides that a motion to dismiss 9 may be made if the plaintiff fails “to state a claim upon which 10 relief can be granted.” However, motions to dismiss under Fed. 11 R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) are disfavored and rarely granted. Gilligan 12 v. Jamco Development Corp., 108 F.3d 246, 249 (9th Cir. 1997). 13 In deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss, the Court 14 “accept[s] all factual allegations of the complaint as true and 15 draw[s] all reasonable inferences” in the light most favorable to 16 the nonmoving party. TwoRivers v. Lewis, 174 F.3d 987, 991 (9th 17 Cir. 1999); see also Rodriguez v. Panayiotou, 314 F.3d 979, 983 18 (9th Cir. 2002). A court is not “required to accept as true 19 allegations that are merely conclusory, unwarranted deductions of 20 fact, or unreasonable inferences.” Sprewell v. Golden State 21 Warriors, 266 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2001). 22 The question presented is not whether the plaintiff will 23 ultimately prevail; rather, it is whether the plaintiff could 24 prove any set of facts in support of her claim that would entitle 25 her to relief. See Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 26 (1984). “A complaint should not be dismissed unless it appears 27 beyond doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support 28 of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Van Buskirk v. 4 Case 1:07-cv-01112-OWW -GSA Document 18 Filed 03/11/08 Page 5 of 21 1 CNN, Inc., 284 F.3d 977, 980 (9th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted). 2 6. STATE CLAIMS 3 Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint one cause of action for 4 defamation per se. 5 A. DEFAMATION PER SE 6 Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s claim on the ground 7 that the portion of the article Plaintiff alleges to be 8 defamatory per se is not “of and concerning” Plaintiff. 9 Plaintiff’s claim is for defamation per se against Defendant 10 National Enquirer. Plaintiff asserts: 11 8. The National Enquirer story named the Plaintiff ANGELA YOW as one of the group of “four to five women” 12 who engaged in illicit activity with Mel Gibson. The stor[y] would have been understood by the ordinary 13 reasonable reader as communicating the defamatory allegation that the Plaintiff ANGELA YOW used cocaine 14 with Mel Gibson and the other woman referred to in the story. 15 --- 10. The offending passage quoted above in paragraph 9 16 does not literally state "ANGELA YOW snorted cocaine with Mel Gibson.” The passage quoted above in Paragraph 17 9, however, would be understood by the ordinary reasonable reader as communicating precisely that. The 18 ordinary reasonable reader would conclude that the passage was intended to convey the meaning, and did in 19 fact convey the meaning that Plaintiff ANGELA YOW snorted cocaine with Mel Gibson. 20 11. The ordinary reasonable reader would understand the passage quoted above in paragraphs 9 as intended to 21 convey, and as in fact conveying, the following meaning: Angela YOW was on[e] of the two girls with 22 whom Mel Gibson left the Easy Street Saloon, after the manager of the saloon discovered that Mel and a group 23 of "four or five women," including the two women who left the saloon with Gibson, were snorting cocaine with 24 Gibson... --- 25 13. The passage...is defamatory per se, in that the plain and manifest meaning of the passage is that 26 ANGELA YOW used cocaine, a felony.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: Pryan@Commo
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: [email protected] Paul S. Ryan Common Cause 805 15th Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 RE: MUR 7324 Dear Mr. Ryan: The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) has considered the allegations contained in your complaint dated February 20, 2018. The Commission found reason to believe that respondents David J. Pecker and American Media, Inc. knowingly and willfully violated 52 U.S.C. § 30118(a). The Factual and Legal Analysis, which formed a basis for the Commission’s finding, is enclosed for your information. On May 17, 2021, a conciliation agreement signed by A360 Media, LLC, as successor in interest to American Media, Inc. was accepted by the Commission and the Commission closed the file as to Pecker and American Media, Inc. A copy of the conciliation agreement is enclosed for your information. There were an insufficient number of votes to find reason to believe that the remaining respondents violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). Accordingly, on May 20, 2021, the Commission closed the file in MUR 7324. A Statement of Reasons providing a basis for the Commission’s decision will follow. Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016), effective September 1, 2016. MUR 7324 Letter to Paul S. Ryan Page 2 The Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the Commission’s dismissal of this action.
    [Show full text]
  • A CAMPAIGN to DEFRAUD President Trump’S Apparent Campaign Finance Crimes, Cover-Up, and Conspiracy
    A CAMPAIGN TO DEFRAUD President Trump’s Apparent Campaign Finance Crimes, Cover-up, and Conspiracy Noah Bookbinder, Conor Shaw, and Gabe Lezra Noah Bookbinder is the Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Previously, Noah has served as Chief Counsel for Criminal Justice for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee and as a corruption prosecutor in the United States Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section. Conor Shaw and Gabe Lezra are Counsel at CREW. The authors would like to thank Adam Rappaport, Jennifer Ahearn, Stuart McPhail, Eli Lee, Robert Maguire, Ben Chang, and Lilia Kavarian for their contributions to this report. citizensforethics.org · 1101 K St NW, Suite 201, Washington, DC 20005 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 TABLE OF POTENTIAL CRIMINAL OFFENSES .............................................................................. 7 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 8 A. Trump’s familiarity with federal laws regulating campaign contributions ...........................................8 B. Trump, Cohen, and Pecker’s hush money scheme.................................................................................... 10 C. AMI’s
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Enquirer Rate Card
    2020 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING RATES Combine your ad with the Globe Group and reach more than 10.8 million loyal readers! MARKETPLACE Estimated total audience: 6,578,000* Readers have spent more than $1.78 billion on mail / phone / internet orders in the last 12 months.* (800) 223-6226 • (727) 443-7667 • Fax: (888) 767-2849 • [email protected] (*Source: Gfk MRI Spring 2017) CLASSIFIED DISPLAY RATES ISSUE & CLOSING DATES Cost per column inch 4 Times* 8 Times* 12 Times* Published weekly, every Monday. On sale no later than one week before cover date. Closing date is six weeks prior to issue date, subject to space Four Color $995 $838 $785 availability. This lead time may change without notice during peak periods and we reserve the right to reschedule issue dates previously confirmed. Combination w/ Globe Group Cost per column inch 4 Times* 8 Times* 12 Times* ADVERTISING GUIDELINES Four Color $1,737 $1,462 $1,371 A. Advertiser must submit a non-returnable sample of that being offered. B. Advertisers using a P.O. Box in their ad copy are required to provide a Black & White – Black & White is also available. complete street address for our records. Deduct 25% from the Four Color ad cost. C. Advertisers using 900 numbers must comply with telephone regulatory guidelines in copy. CLASSIFIED ONLINE RATES Online Listing with Purchase of Print Ad 4-Week Rate CATEGORY HEADINGS Text Listing (145 character max.) $200 Featured Listing Upgrade* $25 No special categories permitted. When no category is requested, we will use our own judgment in classifying an ad.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 CAROLYN CONDIT, Plaintiff, V. NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC
    Page 1 CAROLYN CONDIT, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Defendant. CIV F 02-5198 OWW LJO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 248 F. Supp. 2d 945; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16107; 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5717; 30 Me- dia L. Rep. 2537 July 10, 2002, Decided July 10, 2002, Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Motion denied by Condit OR STRIKE, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY v. Nat'l Enquirer, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19257, 31 JUDGMENT AND ATTORNEY'S FEES Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2331 (E.D. Cal., June 20, 2003) I. INTRODUCTION DISPOSITION: [**1] Defendant's motions were Carolyn Condit ("Plaintiff") sues National Enquirer, DENIED. Inc. ("Defendant"), and unnamed [*948] Does for libel based on statements published in two issues of De- fendant's weekly publication, The National Enquirer, COUNSEL: For CAROLYN CONDIT, plaintiff: Brian dated August 7 and September 4, 2001. See Doc.1, Anthony Rishwain, Johnson and Rishwain LLP, Los Complaint, filed February 21, 2002. Diversity jurisdic- Angeles, CA. Rodney Smolla, University of Richmond, tion is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, [**2] based on T C Williams School of Law, Richmond, VA. the parties' citizenship in different states and the amount in controversy in excess of the $ 75,000 jurisdictional For NATIONAL ENQUIRER INC, defendant: Bruce minimum. Defendant moves to dismiss or strike Plain- Alan Owdom, Dietrich Glasrud Mallek and Aune, Fres- tiff's Complaint under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or alterna- no, CA. Adam White Scoville, PRO HAC VICE, Thom- tively, for summary judgment and attorney's fees under as B Kelley, PRO HAC VICE, Steven D Zansberg, PRO California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 pro- HAC VICE, Faegre & Benson, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Reasons, MUR 6992
    MUR699200075 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20463 BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) MUR 6992 Donald J. Trump ) Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and Bradley T. ) Crate in his official capacity as treasurer ) The Trump Organization LLC ) STATEMENT OF REASONS OF CHAIR SHANA M. BROUSSARD AND COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB This matter under review (“MUR”) involves yet another instance of Donald Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign receiving what may have been illegal contributions, this time in the form of high-ranking Trump Organization employees performing campaign activities that appear to have been undertaken at the direction of the candidate himself.1 Former Trump Organization Executive Vice President and Special Counsel Michael Cohen and General Counsel Alan Garten appear to have performed work on behalf of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (the “Trump Committee,” “campaign”) – work that was paid for by the Trump Organization and thus likely constituted impermissible in-kind contributions. The ban on corporate contributions to federal candidates is one of the foundational principles underpinning the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA,” or the “Act”), having been firmly ensconced in federal law for well over a century.2 Though the Act includes provisions that permit individuals, including corporate employees, to provide personal volunteer services to campaigns without making a corporate contribution, if the individual is being compensated for his or her services the activity is no longer
    [Show full text]
  • Title Publisher ISSN Category Start Date Expire Date (Inside) Niche Media Pty Ltd 13269631 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 .Net Future Publishing Ltd
    Title Publisher ISSN Category Start Date Expire Date (inside) Niche Media Pty Ltd 13269631 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 .net Future Publishing Ltd. 13557602 Science & Technology 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Immediate Media London Company 220 Triathlon 0958675X Sports 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Limited 24 Images Revue 24 Images 7079389 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 25 Beautiful Homes Time Inc. UK 14475693 Home & Garden 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3D Artist Future Publishing Ltd. 17599636 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3D World Future Publishing Ltd. 14704382 Science & Technology 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3x3: The Magazine of Contemporary Illustration ARTISANAL MEDIA LLC 1546640X Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5 Ingredients 15 Minutes Editions Pratico-Pratiques 19235038 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 50 United States Coloring Book Really Big Coloring Books Adult Coloring Books 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5280 5280 Publishing Inc. 10826815 Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5280 Home 5280 Publishing Inc. Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens Workbook FranklinCovey Teens 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 7 Jours TVA Publications 8470952 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 AARP Bulletin AARP 10441123 Lifestyle 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 AARP: The Magazine AARP 15482014 Lifestyle 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABAJUB Dream Wave Publishing Inc. Family & Kids 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABC Soaps In Depth Bauer Publishing Company, L.P. 15257800 Entertainment 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABC-123 Learn My Letter & Numbers Really Big Really Big Coloring Books Adult Coloring Books 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Coloring Book Abstract Patterns: Magic Dot Adult Coloring for Skyhorse Publishing Hobbies, Interests & DIY 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Artists Abstract Patterns: Magic Dot Adult Coloring for Skyhorse Publishing Hobbies, Interests & DIY 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Everyone Acadiana Profile: Magazine of the Cajun Country Renaissance Publishing, LLC 14397 Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Acres U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? Donald E
    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 12-27-2017 Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Wilkes, Donald E. Jr., "Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK?" (2017). Popular Media. 283. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_pm/283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Popular Media by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. National Enquirer Conspiracy Theories The tabloid newspaper National Enquirer cannot make up its mind about who was responsible for the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of President John F. Kennedy. On Apr. 20, 2016, it published an article which referred to Lee Harvey Oswald as “the man who murdered America’s 35th president,” and excitedly screamed it was Oswald who “blew President John F. Kennedy’s brains out!” That article, “Ted Cruz’s Father Linked to JFK Assassination,” infamously and falsely accused Texas U.S. Senator Ted Cruz’s father of being a “pal” of Oswald. Seven months later, on Dec. 19, 2016, the Enquirer published another article on the JFK assassination, “Dying Castro Admits Killing JFK!” This article claimed that JFK had been slain by a team of hired assassins sent to Dallas by Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro. The fatal shots, the article asserted, had been fired from the grassy knoll by a named Cuban-born mercenary who eluded detection and made his way back to Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Says Michael Cohen Didn't Commit Crimes. He's Wrong
    The Washington Post PostEverything Perspective Trump says Michael Cohen didn’t commit crimes. He’s wrong. Campaign finance law is clear. And Cohen clearly broke it. By Trevor Potter Trevor Potter is the president of the Campaign Legal Center and a Republican former chairman of the Federal Election Commission. August 24 On Tuesday, Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making an excessive and unreported in-kind contribution to President Trump’s 2016 campaign by paying $130,000 to Stephanie Clifford — better known by her stage name, Stormy Daniels — for the purposes of keeping her alleged affair with Trump under wraps during the crucial closing days of the election. Cohen was later reimbursed by Trump based on phony invoices for “legal services.” Cohen stated in court, under penalty of perjury, that he made the payment “for the principal purpose of influencing the election” for president in 2016, and “in coordination and at the direction of” Trump. Cohen’s plea document states that he paid Daniels “to ensure that she did not publicize damaging allegations before the 2016 election and thereby influence that election.” For election law purposes, the two crucial facts in those sentences are that the payment was “for the purposes of influencing the election” and that it was done “in coordination and at the direction of” Trump. Cohen also stated in court that a similar payment was made by American Media Incorporated (AMI), a corporation that owns the National Enquirer and other tabloids, to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, for the same purpose and also with the involvement of Cohen, Trump and the Trump campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton Crisis and the Press a Second Look
    The Clinton Crisis and the Press A Second Look Project for Excellence in Journalism 1900 M Street NW Suite 210 | Washington DC 2009 202-293-7394 | www.journalism.org Overall Summary As a rule, the press has tended to describe anonymous sources in the vaguest terms in covering the Clinton-Lewinsky saga, according to the results of a new study of what and how the press has reported. Only occasionally has the press offered audiences a glimpse of what the biases or allegiances are that might be influencing what an anonymous source is revealing. The study, a follow up to an earlier one in February, raises basic questions about whether the press has become too lax about offering readers as much information as possible, and whether journalists have allowed sources to dictate terms too easily. At the same time, there are signs the coverage over time has moved more toward factual reporting and named sources and away from commentary. The study, conducted by the Committee of the Concerned Journalists, involved a examination of 2,051 statements and allegations contained in the reporting by major television programs, newspapers, magazines and the Associated Press over four days in January and March. For comparison, the study included a list of tabloid publications and television programs. The goal for this, the second part of a study conducted by the Committee in February, was to find out how sources were described, how the mainstream press compared to the tabloids, and how the coverage may have changed by the seventh week. Among the findings: • Six in ten statements from anonymous sources in the mainstream media (59% of all anonymously sourced reporting) were characterized in the vaguest terms, "sources said," "sources told our news organization" or "sources familiar" with the event.
    [Show full text]
  • S Bezos Says National Enquirer Owner Tried to Blackmail Him
    Amazon’s Bezos Says National Enquirer Owner Tried To Blackmail Him WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Jeff Bezos, chief executive of Amazon.com Inc, has accused the owner of the National Enquirer of trying to blackmail him with the threat of publishing “intimate photos” he allegedly sent to his girlfriend unless he said in public that the supermarket tabloid’s reporting on him was not politically motivated. The accusation, published in a blog post (bit.ly/2WOLuOf), is the latest twist in a weeks-long saga that has brought the world’s richest person’s private life into the spotlight and thrusts him deeper into a battle with the leading U.S. tabloid publisher, which has had close links with the president of the United States. “Of course I don’t want personal photos published, but I also won’t participate in their well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, political attacks, and corruption,” Bezos wrote. “I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out.” American Media Inc (AMI), the owner of the National Enquirer, did not immediately return a request for comment. Bezos and his wife announced last month that they were divorcing after 25 years of marriage, following a period of “loving exploration” and trial separation. That same day, the National Enquirer touted it was publishing alleged intimate text messages between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, a former television anchor whom he was said to be dating. Shortly after that, Bezos opened an investigation into the leak led by Gavin de Becker, a longtime security consultant and former appointee of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormy Daniels's Former Lawyer Said to Be Cooperating with Federal Probe
    April 20, 2018 - Washington Post Link to original article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/stormy-danielss-former-lawyer-said-to-be-cooperating- with-federal-probe-of-michael-cohen/2018/04/20/3011745e-44ae-11e8-baaf-8b3c5a3da888_sto ry.html Stormy Daniels’s former lawyer said to be cooperating with federal probe of Michael Cohen By Beth Reinhard and Emma Brown Keith Davidson, the former attorney for two women who were paid to keep quiet about their alleged affairs with Donald Trump, has been contacted by federal authorities investigating Trump attorney Michael Cohen and is cooperating with them, a spokesman for Davidson confirmed. Davidson was asked to provide “certain limited electronic information” for the probe led by prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, spokesman Dave Wedge said. “He has done so and will continue to cooperate to the fullest extent possible under the law,” Wedge said in a statement Friday. Shortly before the 2016 election, Davidson negotiated a confidentiality agreement with Cohen under which porn star Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000. Davidson also represented Karen McDougal, a Playboy centerfold, in the $150,000 agreement she struck in August 2016 with the National Enquirer’s parent company, American Media Inc., for the rights to her story. AMI never published the story. Both Daniels and McDougal have filed lawsuits to get out of their non-disclosure agreements. Earlier this week, McDougal settled with AMI — whose chief executive, David Pecker, is a friend of Trump — and is no longer bound by her contract with the tabloid publisher. FBI agents raided Cohen’s Manhattan office last week, as well as his home and a hotel room.
    [Show full text]
  • ED462865.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 462 865 FL 027 206 AUTHOR Sjolie, Dennis TITLE U.S. Culture: What You Need To Know To Survive. PUB DATE 2001-10-00 NOTE 19p. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Awareness; *English (Second Language); Higher Education; Immigrants; Mass Media; *Newspapers; *Periodicals; Popular Culture; *Printed Materials; Second Language Learning ABSTRACT This paper addresses the issue of encouraging students to read and experience culture first hand, rather than read about culture as defined by or channeled through textbooks. Students new to the United States learn about the culture through a variety of publications: "Sun," "The National Enquirer," "People Weekly," "Newsweek," and "Time." Utilizing this series of print media, students touch the pulse of mainstream U.S. culture and understand that a large percentage of U.S. citizens believe "first hand accounts" of UFO abductions, "learn about the future" through fàrtune tellers, and discover what their favorite Hollywood celebrities eat for breakfast. Likewise, students learn how a large percentage of U.S. citizens focus on world events, global political situations, and hard news that bears consequence to all. As the broad and varied aspects of U.S. culture reveal themselves to students, follow-up language/culture learning activities are limited only by the creativity of the instructor. (Contains 26 references.) (Author/SM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. U.S. Culture: What You Need to Know to Survive Dennis Sjolie University of South Dakota U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDwetATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]