DOCSLIB.ORG

S Bezos Says National Enquirer Owner Tried to Blackmail Him

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S Bezos Says National Enquirer Owner Tried to Blackmail Him Amazon’s Bezos Says National Enquirer Owner Tried To Blackmail Him WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Jeff Bezos, chief executive of Amazon.com Inc, has accused the owner of the National Enquirer of trying to blackmail him with the threat of publishing “intimate photos” he allegedly sent to his girlfriend unless he said in public that the supermarket tabloid’s reporting on him was not politically motivated. The accusation, published in a blog post (bit.ly/2WOLuOf), is the latest twist in a weeks-long saga that has brought the world’s richest person’s private life into the spotlight and thrusts him deeper into a battle with the leading U.S. tabloid publisher, which has had close links with the president of the United States. “Of course I don’t want personal photos published, but I also won’t participate in their well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, political attacks, and corruption,” Bezos wrote. “I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out.” American Media Inc (AMI), the owner of the National Enquirer, did not immediately return a request for comment. Bezos and his wife announced last month that they were divorcing after 25 years of marriage, following a period of “loving exploration” and trial separation. That same day, the National Enquirer touted it was publishing alleged intimate text messages between Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, a former television anchor whom he was said to be dating. Shortly after that, Bezos opened an investigation into the leak led by Gavin de Becker, a longtime security consultant and former appointee of U.S. President Ronald Reagan. De Becker proceeded to tell media that the leak was politically motivated. Bezos, Amazon and the newspaper he owns privately, the Washington Post, have all been targets of attacks on Twitter by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Washington Post has published many articles critical of the president. It acts as Amazon’s “chief lobbyist,” Trump has said on Twitter, without presenting evidence. Trump called Bezos “Jeff Bozo” in a tweet last month about the National Enquirer’s coverage of his divorce. “It’s unavoidable that certain powerful people who experience Washington Post news coverage will wrongly conclude I am their enemy,” Bezos wrote. “President Trump is one of those people, obvious by his many tweets.” The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In his blog, Bezos cited an email from AMI deputy general counsel, Jon Fine, to a lawyer representing de Becker. In it, AMI proposed a public acknowledgment from Bezos and de Becker that “they have no knowledge or basis for suggesting that (AMI’s) coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces.” In return for such an acknowledgement, according to the email, AMI offered “not to publish, distribute, share, or describe unpublished texts and photos.” Bezos said the statement AMI was proposing was false and described the offer as an “extortionate proposal.” Fine and de Becker could not immediately be reached for comment. The alleged extortion raises questions among some legal observers about whether AMI and its chief executive David Pecker have violated a cooperation agreement AMI made last year with federal prosecutors in connection with a $150,000 hush-money payment given to Karen McDougal, the Playboy model who claims she had an affair with President Donald Trump. The payment was made during the 2016 presidential election to influence that election, according to the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The deal not to prosecute was conditional on AMI not committing another crime, the office said. A spokesman for the SDNY attorney’s office declined to comment on the matter. Bezos, who owns more than $120 billion in Amazon stock, said in his blog: “If in my position I can’t stand up to this kind of extortion, how many people can?” Reporting by Nandita Bose and Jeffrey Dastin in Washington; Additional reporting by Nathan Layne in New York, Chris Sanders in Washington and Bill Tarrant in Los Angeles; Editing by Bill Rigby Reuters, posted on SouthFloridaReporter.com, Feb. 8, 2019.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: Pryan@Commo
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 June 1, 2021 CERTIFIED MAIL – RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Via Email: [email protected] Paul S. Ryan Common Cause 805 15th Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 RE: MUR 7324 Dear Mr. Ryan: The Federal Election Commission (“Commission”) has considered the allegations contained in your complaint dated February 20, 2018. The Commission found reason to believe that respondents David J. Pecker and American Media, Inc. knowingly and willfully violated 52 U.S.C. § 30118(a). The Factual and Legal Analysis, which formed a basis for the Commission’s finding, is enclosed for your information. On May 17, 2021, a conciliation agreement signed by A360 Media, LLC, as successor in interest to American Media, Inc. was accepted by the Commission and the Commission closed the file as to Pecker and American Media, Inc. A copy of the conciliation agreement is enclosed for your information. There were an insufficient number of votes to find reason to believe that the remaining respondents violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”). Accordingly, on May 20, 2021, the Commission closed the file in MUR 7324. A Statement of Reasons providing a basis for the Commission’s decision will follow. Documents related to the case will be placed on the public record within 30 days. See Disclosure of Certain Documents in Enforcement and Other Matters, 81 Fed. Reg. 50,702 (Aug. 2, 2016), effective September 1, 2016. MUR 7324 Letter to Paul S. Ryan Page 2 The Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the Commission’s dismissal of this action.
    [Show full text]
  • A CAMPAIGN to DEFRAUD President Trump’S Apparent Campaign Finance Crimes, Cover-Up, and Conspiracy
    A CAMPAIGN TO DEFRAUD President Trump’s Apparent Campaign Finance Crimes, Cover-up, and Conspiracy Noah Bookbinder, Conor Shaw, and Gabe Lezra Noah Bookbinder is the Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Previously, Noah has served as Chief Counsel for Criminal Justice for the United States Senate Judiciary Committee and as a corruption prosecutor in the United States Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section. Conor Shaw and Gabe Lezra are Counsel at CREW. The authors would like to thank Adam Rappaport, Jennifer Ahearn, Stuart McPhail, Eli Lee, Robert Maguire, Ben Chang, and Lilia Kavarian for their contributions to this report. citizensforethics.org · 1101 K St NW, Suite 201, Washington, DC 20005 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 5 TABLE OF POTENTIAL CRIMINAL OFFENSES .............................................................................. 7 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 8 A. Trump’s familiarity with federal laws regulating campaign contributions ...........................................8 B. Trump, Cohen, and Pecker’s hush money scheme.................................................................................... 10 C. AMI’s
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Enquirer Rate Card
    2020 CLASSIFIED ADVERTISING RATES Combine your ad with the Globe Group and reach more than 10.8 million loyal readers! MARKETPLACE Estimated total audience: 6,578,000* Readers have spent more than $1.78 billion on mail / phone / internet orders in the last 12 months.* (800) 223-6226 • (727) 443-7667 • Fax: (888) 767-2849 • [email protected] (*Source: Gfk MRI Spring 2017) CLASSIFIED DISPLAY RATES ISSUE & CLOSING DATES Cost per column inch 4 Times* 8 Times* 12 Times* Published weekly, every Monday. On sale no later than one week before cover date. Closing date is six weeks prior to issue date, subject to space Four Color $995 $838 $785 availability. This lead time may change without notice during peak periods and we reserve the right to reschedule issue dates previously confirmed. Combination w/ Globe Group Cost per column inch 4 Times* 8 Times* 12 Times* ADVERTISING GUIDELINES Four Color $1,737 $1,462 $1,371 A. Advertiser must submit a non-returnable sample of that being offered. B. Advertisers using a P.O. Box in their ad copy are required to provide a Black & White – Black & White is also available. complete street address for our records. Deduct 25% from the Four Color ad cost. C. Advertisers using 900 numbers must comply with telephone regulatory guidelines in copy. CLASSIFIED ONLINE RATES Online Listing with Purchase of Print Ad 4-Week Rate CATEGORY HEADINGS Text Listing (145 character max.) $200 Featured Listing Upgrade* $25 No special categories permitted. When no category is requested, we will use our own judgment in classifying an ad.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 CAROLYN CONDIT, Plaintiff, V. NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC
    Page 1 CAROLYN CONDIT, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ENQUIRER, INC., Defendant. CIV F 02-5198 OWW LJO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 248 F. Supp. 2d 945; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16107; 90 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5717; 30 Me- dia L. Rep. 2537 July 10, 2002, Decided July 10, 2002, Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Motion denied by Condit OR STRIKE, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY v. Nat'l Enquirer, Inc., 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19257, 31 JUDGMENT AND ATTORNEY'S FEES Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2331 (E.D. Cal., June 20, 2003) I. INTRODUCTION DISPOSITION: [**1] Defendant's motions were Carolyn Condit ("Plaintiff") sues National Enquirer, DENIED. Inc. ("Defendant"), and unnamed [*948] Does for libel based on statements published in two issues of De- fendant's weekly publication, The National Enquirer, COUNSEL: For CAROLYN CONDIT, plaintiff: Brian dated August 7 and September 4, 2001. See Doc.1, Anthony Rishwain, Johnson and Rishwain LLP, Los Complaint, filed February 21, 2002. Diversity jurisdic- Angeles, CA. Rodney Smolla, University of Richmond, tion is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, [**2] based on T C Williams School of Law, Richmond, VA. the parties' citizenship in different states and the amount in controversy in excess of the $ 75,000 jurisdictional For NATIONAL ENQUIRER INC, defendant: Bruce minimum. Defendant moves to dismiss or strike Plain- Alan Owdom, Dietrich Glasrud Mallek and Aune, Fres- tiff's Complaint under Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or alterna- no, CA. Adam White Scoville, PRO HAC VICE, Thom- tively, for summary judgment and attorney's fees under as B Kelley, PRO HAC VICE, Steven D Zansberg, PRO California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 pro- HAC VICE, Faegre & Benson, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Reasons, MUR 6992
    MUR699200075 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20463 BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) MUR 6992 Donald J. Trump ) Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. and Bradley T. ) Crate in his official capacity as treasurer ) The Trump Organization LLC ) STATEMENT OF REASONS OF CHAIR SHANA M. BROUSSARD AND COMMISSIONER ELLEN L. WEINTRAUB This matter under review (“MUR”) involves yet another instance of Donald Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign receiving what may have been illegal contributions, this time in the form of high-ranking Trump Organization employees performing campaign activities that appear to have been undertaken at the direction of the candidate himself.1 Former Trump Organization Executive Vice President and Special Counsel Michael Cohen and General Counsel Alan Garten appear to have performed work on behalf of Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (the “Trump Committee,” “campaign”) – work that was paid for by the Trump Organization and thus likely constituted impermissible in-kind contributions. The ban on corporate contributions to federal candidates is one of the foundational principles underpinning the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA,” or the “Act”), having been firmly ensconced in federal law for well over a century.2 Though the Act includes provisions that permit individuals, including corporate employees, to provide personal volunteer services to campaigns without making a corporate contribution, if the individual is being compensated for his or her services the activity is no longer
    [Show full text]
  • Title Publisher ISSN Category Start Date Expire Date (Inside) Niche Media Pty Ltd 13269631 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 .Net Future Publishing Ltd
    Title Publisher ISSN Category Start Date Expire Date (inside) Niche Media Pty Ltd 13269631 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 .net Future Publishing Ltd. 13557602 Science & Technology 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Immediate Media London Company 220 Triathlon 0958675X Sports 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Limited 24 Images Revue 24 Images 7079389 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 25 Beautiful Homes Time Inc. UK 14475693 Home & Garden 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3D Artist Future Publishing Ltd. 17599636 Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3D World Future Publishing Ltd. 14704382 Science & Technology 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 3x3: The Magazine of Contemporary Illustration ARTISANAL MEDIA LLC 1546640X Art & Design 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5 Ingredients 15 Minutes Editions Pratico-Pratiques 19235038 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 50 United States Coloring Book Really Big Coloring Books Adult Coloring Books 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5280 5280 Publishing Inc. 10826815 Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 5280 Home 5280 Publishing Inc. Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 7 Habits of Highly Effective Teens Workbook FranklinCovey Teens 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 7 Jours TVA Publications 8470952 French 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 AARP Bulletin AARP 10441123 Lifestyle 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 AARP: The Magazine AARP 15482014 Lifestyle 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABAJUB Dream Wave Publishing Inc. Family & Kids 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABC Soaps In Depth Bauer Publishing Company, L.P. 15257800 Entertainment 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 ABC-123 Learn My Letter & Numbers Really Big Really Big Coloring Books Adult Coloring Books 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Coloring Book Abstract Patterns: Magic Dot Adult Coloring for Skyhorse Publishing Hobbies, Interests & DIY 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Artists Abstract Patterns: Magic Dot Adult Coloring for Skyhorse Publishing Hobbies, Interests & DIY 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Everyone Acadiana Profile: Magazine of the Cajun Country Renaissance Publishing, LLC 14397 Travel & Regional 01/01/2019 12/31/2019 Acres U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? Donald E
    Digital Commons @ Georgia Law Popular Media Faculty Scholarship 12-27-2017 Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? Donald E. Wilkes Jr. University of Georgia School of Law, [email protected] Repository Citation Wilkes, Donald E. Jr., "Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK?" (2017). Popular Media. 283. https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_pm/283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Popular Media by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Georgia Law. Please share how you have benefited from this access For more information, please contact [email protected]. Did J. Edgar Hoover Kill JFK? By Donald E. Wilkes, Jr. National Enquirer Conspiracy Theories The tabloid newspaper National Enquirer cannot make up its mind about who was responsible for the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of President John F. Kennedy. On Apr. 20, 2016, it published an article which referred to Lee Harvey Oswald as “the man who murdered America’s 35th president,” and excitedly screamed it was Oswald who “blew President John F. Kennedy’s brains out!” That article, “Ted Cruz’s Father Linked to JFK Assassination,” infamously and falsely accused Texas U.S. Senator Ted Cruz’s father of being a “pal” of Oswald. Seven months later, on Dec. 19, 2016, the Enquirer published another article on the JFK assassination, “Dying Castro Admits Killing JFK!” This article claimed that JFK had been slain by a team of hired assassins sent to Dallas by Cuban communist dictator Fidel Castro. The fatal shots, the article asserted, had been fired from the grassy knoll by a named Cuban-born mercenary who eluded detection and made his way back to Cuba.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Says Michael Cohen Didn't Commit Crimes. He's Wrong
    The Washington Post PostEverything Perspective Trump says Michael Cohen didn’t commit crimes. He’s wrong. Campaign finance law is clear. And Cohen clearly broke it. By Trevor Potter Trevor Potter is the president of the Campaign Legal Center and a Republican former chairman of the Federal Election Commission. August 24 On Tuesday, Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to making an excessive and unreported in-kind contribution to President Trump’s 2016 campaign by paying $130,000 to Stephanie Clifford — better known by her stage name, Stormy Daniels — for the purposes of keeping her alleged affair with Trump under wraps during the crucial closing days of the election. Cohen was later reimbursed by Trump based on phony invoices for “legal services.” Cohen stated in court, under penalty of perjury, that he made the payment “for the principal purpose of influencing the election” for president in 2016, and “in coordination and at the direction of” Trump. Cohen’s plea document states that he paid Daniels “to ensure that she did not publicize damaging allegations before the 2016 election and thereby influence that election.” For election law purposes, the two crucial facts in those sentences are that the payment was “for the purposes of influencing the election” and that it was done “in coordination and at the direction of” Trump. Cohen also stated in court that a similar payment was made by American Media Incorporated (AMI), a corporation that owns the National Enquirer and other tabloids, to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, for the same purpose and also with the involvement of Cohen, Trump and the Trump campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton Crisis and the Press a Second Look
    The Clinton Crisis and the Press A Second Look Project for Excellence in Journalism 1900 M Street NW Suite 210 | Washington DC 2009 202-293-7394 | www.journalism.org Overall Summary As a rule, the press has tended to describe anonymous sources in the vaguest terms in covering the Clinton-Lewinsky saga, according to the results of a new study of what and how the press has reported. Only occasionally has the press offered audiences a glimpse of what the biases or allegiances are that might be influencing what an anonymous source is revealing. The study, a follow up to an earlier one in February, raises basic questions about whether the press has become too lax about offering readers as much information as possible, and whether journalists have allowed sources to dictate terms too easily. At the same time, there are signs the coverage over time has moved more toward factual reporting and named sources and away from commentary. The study, conducted by the Committee of the Concerned Journalists, involved a examination of 2,051 statements and allegations contained in the reporting by major television programs, newspapers, magazines and the Associated Press over four days in January and March. For comparison, the study included a list of tabloid publications and television programs. The goal for this, the second part of a study conducted by the Committee in February, was to find out how sources were described, how the mainstream press compared to the tabloids, and how the coverage may have changed by the seventh week. Among the findings: • Six in ten statements from anonymous sources in the mainstream media (59% of all anonymously sourced reporting) were characterized in the vaguest terms, "sources said," "sources told our news organization" or "sources familiar" with the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormy Daniels's Former Lawyer Said to Be Cooperating with Federal Probe
    April 20, 2018 - Washington Post Link to original article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/stormy-danielss-former-lawyer-said-to-be-cooperating- with-federal-probe-of-michael-cohen/2018/04/20/3011745e-44ae-11e8-baaf-8b3c5a3da888_sto ry.html Stormy Daniels’s former lawyer said to be cooperating with federal probe of Michael Cohen By Beth Reinhard and Emma Brown Keith Davidson, the former attorney for two women who were paid to keep quiet about their alleged affairs with Donald Trump, has been contacted by federal authorities investigating Trump attorney Michael Cohen and is cooperating with them, a spokesman for Davidson confirmed. Davidson was asked to provide “certain limited electronic information” for the probe led by prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, spokesman Dave Wedge said. “He has done so and will continue to cooperate to the fullest extent possible under the law,” Wedge said in a statement Friday. Shortly before the 2016 election, Davidson negotiated a confidentiality agreement with Cohen under which porn star Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000. Davidson also represented Karen McDougal, a Playboy centerfold, in the $150,000 agreement she struck in August 2016 with the National Enquirer’s parent company, American Media Inc., for the rights to her story. AMI never published the story. Both Daniels and McDougal have filed lawsuits to get out of their non-disclosure agreements. Earlier this week, McDougal settled with AMI — whose chief executive, David Pecker, is a friend of Trump — and is no longer bound by her contract with the tabloid publisher. FBI agents raided Cohen’s Manhattan office last week, as well as his home and a hotel room.
    [Show full text]
  • ED462865.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 462 865 FL 027 206 AUTHOR Sjolie, Dennis TITLE U.S. Culture: What You Need To Know To Survive. PUB DATE 2001-10-00 NOTE 19p. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Awareness; *English (Second Language); Higher Education; Immigrants; Mass Media; *Newspapers; *Periodicals; Popular Culture; *Printed Materials; Second Language Learning ABSTRACT This paper addresses the issue of encouraging students to read and experience culture first hand, rather than read about culture as defined by or channeled through textbooks. Students new to the United States learn about the culture through a variety of publications: "Sun," "The National Enquirer," "People Weekly," "Newsweek," and "Time." Utilizing this series of print media, students touch the pulse of mainstream U.S. culture and understand that a large percentage of U.S. citizens believe "first hand accounts" of UFO abductions, "learn about the future" through fàrtune tellers, and discover what their favorite Hollywood celebrities eat for breakfast. Likewise, students learn how a large percentage of U.S. citizens focus on world events, global political situations, and hard news that bears consequence to all. As the broad and varied aspects of U.S. culture reveal themselves to students, follow-up language/culture learning activities are limited only by the creativity of the instructor. (Contains 26 references.) (Author/SM) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. U.S. Culture: What You Need to Know to Survive Dennis Sjolie University of South Dakota U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND EDwetATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS CENTER (ERIC) BEEN GRANTED BY This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”).1 The
    violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices – Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”).1 The DTPA grants authority to the Attorney General to seek injunctive relief and civil penalties for violations of its provisions.2 DEFENDANTS 3.1 Defendant Liberty Publishers Service, Inc. (“Liberty”) is a foreign corporation doing business in Texas, as alleged specifically below. This proceeding arises out of such business done in this state. Defendant Liberty may be served with process by serving its president, Laura Lovrien, at its principal place of business located at 1750 Delta Waters Road #102-204, Medford, Oregon 97504. 3.2 Defendant Express Publishers Service, Inc. (“Express”) is a foreign corporation doing business in Texas, as alleged specifically below. This proceeding arises out of such business done in this state. Defendant Express may be served with process by serving its registered agent, David Lennon, at 3922 Bellinger Lane, Medford, Oregon 97501. 3.3 Defendant Orbital Publishing Group, Inc. (“Orbital”) is a foreign corporation doing business in Texas, as alleged specifically below. This proceeding arises out of such business done in this state. Defendant Orbital may be served with process by serving its president and registered agent, Laura Lovrien, at 1750 Delta Waters Road #102-204, Medford, Oregon 97504. JURISDICTION 4.1 This enforcement action is brought by the Attorney General, Ken Paxton, through his Consumer Protection Division, in the name of the State of Texas and in the public interest under the authority granted by section 17.47 of the DTPA upon the ground that the Defendants have 1 Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann.
    [Show full text]