DOCSLIB.ORG

Nikea Street (Kutaisi Municipality) Rehabilitation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nikea Street (Kutaisi Municipality) Rehabilitation Nikea Street (Kutaisi Municipality) Rehabilitation Sub-Project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental Management Plan WORLD BANK FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Environmental Screening Under the sub-project (SP), Nikea street, Nikea street first lane, and Sanapiro street will get rehabilitated in the city of Kutaisi. The streets are located in the southern part of the city. Last section of the Nikea street turns into the road which connects Kutaisi bypass highway with Geguti interchange. Total length of the Nikea and Sanapiro streets (with Nikea street first lane) to be rehabilitated within the SP is about 3.492 km. The SP envisages the following works: Rehabilitation of the Nikea street pavement (removal of the damaged pavement, arrangement of asphalt/concrete pavement, total length of Nikea street is 2400 m and width 25 m); Rehabilitation of the Nikea street lighting; Rehabilitation of sidewalks along the length of Nikea street (5300 m, sidewalk width of 3 m); Installation of the new storm water network at the last section of the Nikea street (513 m) besides of existing ones and manholes (21 units); Arrangement of the drainage network at the last section of the Nikea street (513 m); Arrangement of the 3-meter-wide separation line (with grass) in the middle of Nikea street; Rehabilitation of the Sanapiro street and Nikea street first lane pavement (total length – 1092 m); Rehabilitation of sidewalks along the Sanapiro street and Nikea street first lane (3,222 m); Correction of alignment of sewage and storm water manholes on Sanapiro street (8 units). Existing Storm water system together of new section will cover total length of both streets. (A) IMPACT IDENTIFICATION Has sub-project a tangible impact The SP has a modest short term negative environmental impact on the environment? while its long term impact is expected to be positive. The main impact will be during the construction phase, which includes works for road pavement rehabilitation, movement and operation of heavy vehicles, supply of materials. What are the significant beneficial The SP will have a long term positive social impact through and adverse environmental improving living and transportation conditions of the local effects of sub-project? population. It will decrease existing negative impacts on community such as dust, emissions and noise. The expected negative environmental and social impacts are likely to be short term and typical for small to medium scale rehabilitation works in urban landscape: noise, dust, vibration, and emissions from the operation of construction machinery; generation of construction waste; disruption of traffic and pedestrian access. Works near the river Rioni will imply moderate risk of riverbed and water stream pollution. To minimize road crossing ponding and flooding risk, works for arrangement of the new storm water drainage network is planned within the SP. Storm water will be discharged into the existing manhole and finally into the river Rioni. May the sub-project have any No land take and relocation are expected. significant impact on the local communities and other affected The long term social impact will be beneficial (improvement of local people? population’s living conditions, better traffic safety conditions, convenience of travelling). Negative impacts are short term and limited to the construction site. They are related to the possible disturbance described above. (B) MITIGATION MEASURES Were there any alternatives to Given that the SP envisages rehabilitation of the existing the sub-project design infrastructure, no alternatives have been considered. considered? What types of mitigation The expected negative impacts of the construction phase can be measures are proposed? easily mitigated. The contractor will be responsible for the waste disposal at the permitted location, prevention of waste duping into river bed, use the quarry materials from the licensed quarries only, prevent water and soil from pollution (fuel spills due to equipment failure, raw asphalt/concrete spills), avoid disturbance of population (noise, dust, emissions) through proper work/supplies scheduling, traffic management, good maintenance of the construction machinery. What lessons from the previous MDF have wide experience of implementation of medium and similar projects have been large scale road and streets rehabilitation subprojects financed by incorporated into the sub-project various donor organizations. Based on lessons learned from design? previous similar projects, design envisages not only rehabilitation of road pavement but also rehabilitation of storm water drainage network, sidewalks, curbs, pedestrian passes which will increase traffic and pedestrians’ safety and backing further maintenance of the street cover. Have concerned communities The SP has been developed by the Kutaisi Municipality in been involved and have their consultation with the affected communities and as a response to interests and knowledge been the current situation. adequately taken into consideration in sub-project Local population is informed about scheduled rehabilitation works preparation? and has no claim on related disturbances. Draft EMP was disclosed on the web-site of MDF. Hard copies of the document was made available at the MDF and Kutaisi municipality. Announcement on the public consultation meeting was placed on public information board in the administration building of Kutaisi municipality Governance. MDF and local municipality organized consultation meeting with local population on October 2, 2015. (C) RANKING The project has been classified as environmental Category B according to the World Bank safeguards (OP 4.01) and requires Completion of the Environmental Management Checklist for Small Construction and Rehabilitation Activities. Social Screening Social safeguards screening information Yes No 1 Is the information related to the affiliation, ownership and land use status of the sub-project site available and verifiable? (The screening cannot be completed until this is available) 2 Will the sub-project reduce people’s access to their economic resources, such as land, pasture, water, public services, sites of common public use or other resources that they depend on? 3 Will the sub-project result in resettlement of individuals or families or require the acquisition of land (public or private, temporarily or permanently) for its development? 4 Will the sub-project result in the temporary or permanent loss of crops, fruit trees and Household infra-structure (such as ancillary facilities, fence, canal, granaries, outside toilets and kitchens, etc.)? If answer to any above question (except question 1) is “Yes”, then OP/BP 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement is applicable and mitigation measures should follow this OP/BP 4.12 and the Resettlement Policy Framework PART A: GENERAL PROJECT AND SITE INFORMATION INSTITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE Country Georgia Project title Second Regional and Municipal Infrastructure Development Sub-Project title Nikea street (Kutaisi Municipality) Rehabilitation Scope of site-specific Under the SP, Nikea street, Nikea street first lane and Sanapiro street activity will get rehabilitated in the city Kutaisi. Total length of the Nikea and Sanapiro streets (with Nikea street first lane) to be rehabilitated within the SP is about 3,492 km. The SP envisages the following works: Rehabilitation of the Nikea street pavement (removal of the damaged pavement, arrangement of asphalt/concrete pavement, total length of Nikea street is 2400 m and width 25 m); Rehabilitation of the Nikea street lighting; Rehabilitation of sidewalks along the length of Nikea street (5300 m, sidewalk width of 3 m); Installation of the new storm water network at the last section of the Nikea street (513 m) besides of existing ones and manholes (21 units); Arrangement of the drainage network at the last section of the Nikea street (513 m); Arrangement of the 3-meter-wide separation line (with grass) in the middle of Nikea street; Rehabilitation of the Sanapiro street and Nikea street first lane pavement (total length – 1,092 m); Rehabilitation of sidewalks along the Sanapiro street and Nikea street first lane (3,222 m); Correction of alignment of sewage and storm water manholes on Sanapiro street (8 units). Existing Storm water system together of new section will cover total length of both streets. Institutional arrangements Task Team Leader: Safeguards Specialist: (WB) Xiaolan Wang Darejan Kapanadze Implementation Implementing entity: Works supervisor: Works contractor: arrangements (Borrower) Municipal Consulting LLC Development Fund of company Eptisa ``Saqmilsadenmsheni`` Georgia Servicios de Ingenieria S.L. Spain SITE DESCRIPTION Name of institution whose Kutaisi Municipality premises are to be rehabilitated Address and site location 3, Rustaveli avenue, Kutaisi of institution whose Tel: +(995 431) 24 54 54 premises are to be E-mail: [email protected] rehabilitated Who owns the land? Municipal property Who uses the land (formal/informal)? Description of physical and City Kutaisi is Georgia's second largest city. It is located in Imereti natural environment region of western Georgia (220 km from Tbilisi) with the population around the site of 196.5 thousand. Nikea and Sanapiro streets, which get rehabilitated within the SP, are located in the southern part of the city. Last section of the Nikea street turns into the road which connects Kutaisi bypass highway with Geguti interchange.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION at the LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI and TBILISI © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
    YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI AND TBILISI © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung This Publication is funded by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung. Commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is not permitted without the written consent of the FES. YOUTH POLICY IMPLEMENTATION AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: IMERETI AND TBILISI Tbilisi 2020 Youth Policy Implementation at the Local Level: Imereti and Tbilisi Tbilisi 2020 PUBLISHERS Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, South Caucasus South Caucasus Regional Offi ce Ramishvili Str. Blind Alley 1, #1, 0179 http://www.fes-caucasus.org Tbilisi, Georgia Analysis and Consulting Team (ACT) 8, John (Malkhaz) Shalikashvili st. Tbilisi, 0131, Georgia Parliament of Georgia, Sports and Youth Issues Committee Shota Rustaveli Avenue #8 Tbilisi, Georgia, 0118 FOR PUBLISHER Felix Hett, FES, Salome Alania, FES AUTHORS Plora (Keso) Esebua (ACT) Sopho Chachanidze (ACT) Giorgi Rukhadze (ACT) Sophio Potskhverashvili (ACT) DESIGN LTD PolyGraph, www.poly .ge TYPESETTING Gela Babakishvili TRANSLATION & PROOFREADING Lika Lomidze Eter Maghradze Suzanne Graham COVER PICTURE https://www.freepik.com/ PRINT LTD PolyGraph PRINT RUN 150 pcs ISBN 978-9941-8-2018-2 Attitudes, opinions and conclusions expressed in this publication- not necessarily express attitudes of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung does not vouch for the accuracy of the data stated in this publication. © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 2020 FOREWORD Youth is important. Many hopes are attached to the “next generation” – societies tend to look towards the young to bring about a value change, to get rid of old habits, and to lead any country into a better future.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Election Monitoring of October 8, 2016 Parliamentary Elections Second Interim Report July 17 - August 8
    International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy Pre-Election Monitoring of October 8, 2016 Parliamentary Elections Second Interim Report July 17 - August 8 Publishing this report is made possible by the generous support of the American people, through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The views expressed in this report belong solely to ISFED and may not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID, the United States Government and the NED. 1. Introduction The International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED) has been monitoring October 8, 2016 elections of the Parliament of Georgia and Ajara Supreme Council since July 1, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The present report covers the period from July 18 to August 8, 2016. 2. Key Findings Compared to the previous reporting period, campaigning by political parties and candidates has become more intense. ISFED long-term observers (LTOs) monitored a total of 114 meetings of electoral subjects with voters throughout Georgia, from July 18 through August 7. As the election campaigning moved into a more active phase, the number of election violations grew considerably. Failure of relevant authorities to take adequate actions in response to these violations may pose a threat to free and fair electoral environment. During the reporting period ISFED found 4 instances of intimidation/harassment based on political affiliation, 2 cases of physical violence, 3 cases of possible vote buying, 4 cases of campaigning by unauthorized persons, 8 cases of misuse of administrative resources, 4 cases of interference with pre- election campaigning, 4 cases of use of hate speech, 7 cases of local self-governments making changes in budgets for social and infrastructure projects; 3 cases of misconduct by election commission members.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Screening of Subprojects
    Public Disclosure Authorized Gas Supply and Access Road Rehabilitation for Vartsikhe Cellar LTD in Village Vartsikhe, Baghdati Municipality Public Disclosure Authorized Sub-Project Environmental and Social Screening and Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD BANK FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL AND MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (SRMIDP) Public-Private Investment (PPI) Public Disclosure Authorized November 2018 The Sub-Project Description The Subproject (SP) site is located in village Vartsikhe, Baghdati municipality, Imereti region, Western Georgia. The SP includes rehabilitation of a 775-meter-long road from Vartsikhe-Didveli motorway main road to the Vartsikhe Cellar. The road is registered as a municipal property (with the cadastral code: 30.06.33.008) and the road bed does not overlap with the privately-owned agricultural land plots under vineyards and other crops located on the sides of the road, so works will be completed within the ROW. Furthermore, contractor does not need any access to the adjacent lands to complete the civil works. No residential houses are located at the road sides. The road to be rehabilitated is in a very poor condition. The first half section is covered with ground and gravel surface, while another half has no cover and only traces of car tires are visible marks of the road bed. According to the SP design, the road will be covered by asphalt and road signs will be arranged. Along the road, there are two culverts, one of them is in a satisfactory condition and one pipe needs to be repaired. The road will be rehabilitated within the following parameters: the width of the carriageway - 6.0m; the width of the shoulders - 0.5m.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Imereti – Historical-Cultural Overview
    SFG2110 SECOND REGIONAL DEVELOPMETN PROJECT IMERETI REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IMERETI TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Public Disclosure Authorized STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL HERITAGE AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tbilisi, December, 2014 ABBREVIATIONS GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System IFI International Financial Institution IRDS Imereti Regional Development Strategy ITDS Imereti Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MoJ Ministry of Justice MoESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit PPE Personal protective equipment RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 0 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 PROJECT CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Realizing the Urban Potential in Georgia: National Urban Assessment
    REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA National Urban Assessment ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REALIZING THE URBAN POTENTIAL IN GEORGIA NATIONAL URBAN ASSESSMENT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2016 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved. Published in 2016. Printed in the Philippines. ISBN 978-92-9257-352-2 (Print), 978-92-9257-353-9 (e-ISBN) Publication Stock No. RPT168254 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Asian Development Bank. Realizing the urban potential in Georgia—National urban assessment. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2016. 1. Urban development.2. Georgia.3. National urban assessment, strategy, and road maps. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. This publication was finalized in November 2015 and statistical data used was from the National Statistics Office of Georgia as available at the time on http://www.geostat.ge The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by ADB in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers Program
    PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA (PROLoG) CA # AID-114-A-15-00004 QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR FOUR APRIL 1, 2018 – JUNE 30, 2018 1 PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA ACTIVITY (PROLoG) QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR FOUR APRIL 1, 2018 – JUNE 30, 2018 Prepared under the USAID’s Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia (PROLoG) Activity, Cooperative Agreement Number AID-114-A-15-00004 Submitted to: USAID/Georgia as of July 23, 2018 Implementer East-West Management Institute, Inc. Responsible Parties: Giorgi Chkheidze, Chief of Party, Tbilisi, [email protected] Mark Dietrich, Project Director, Washington, D.C. [email protected] Disclaimer This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of East-West Management Institute, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 TABLE OF ACRONYMS ACCESS Advancing CSO Capacities and Engaging Society for Sustainability ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution CA Cooperative Agreement CEPEJ European Community for the Efficiency of Justice CIDA Civil Development Agency CRRC Caucasus Resource Research Center CLE Continuing Legal Education COE Council of Europe COP Chief of Party DCOP Deputy Chief of Party ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EHRAC European Human Rights Advocacy Centre EMC Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center EWMI East-West Management Institute Free-Uni Free University of Tbilisi GDI Georgian Democracy Imitative GBA Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • VET Reform in Georgia
    Brief Summary of the Progress Achieved under the Vocational Education Reform in Georgia 2014-2016 years Background Information: Since 2013 Georgia started VET sector reform. Poor image of vocational education from soviet time, abolished system, required fundamental intervention for achieving the goals on the way to approximation to EU education system. The volume of transformation set ambitious agenda for the government and generated the need of well-structured strategy for guiding the reform. On December 26, 2013 GoG adopted the strategy of VET sector reform (2013-2020) together with its action plan and initiated the development of the VET field facilitated by the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia and supported by EU representation to Georgia. Main Goals of the Reform: Increasing relevance of vocational education system to social-economic challenges of the country; fulfilling the current and future requirements of the labor market; Enhancing life-long learning opportunities, social inclusion, and personal and professional development of individuals; Approximation of Georgian VET system to European education system; Reform Objectives: Creating legislation base for the reform; Enhancement of quality and accessibility; Improving infrastructure; Developing inclusive vocational education and training; Developing of human resources; Institutional strengthening and Private Sector involvement; Popularization of Vocational Education and Training; Financial support; Monitoring and evaluation. Main Achievements 2014-2016: Legislation: In 2016, Ministry of Education and Science completed the work on development of new Law on Vocational Education. New draft framework law ensures the development of the sector in line with the strategy goals, eradicates the dead ends existing in the system, ensures life-long learning principle, increases the access to VET for all groups of population etc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rural Development Strategy of Georgia (2017-2020)
    a Rural Development Strategy of Georgia (2017-2020) 2018-2020 Action Plan Monitoring Report for 2020 Tbilisi Georgia March, 2021 Content Executive Summary ................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Priority area1: Economy and Competetiveness ..................................................................................... 7 Objective 1.1. The economic recovery of farming, restructuring, and modernizations through the diversification and development of effective supply chains .................................................................. 7 Objective 1.2. Diversification of the rural economy through strengthening the agricultural-related value chain and promoting various sustainable non-agricultural activities ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. Objective 1.3. Development of tourism in rural areas and related tourism products based on rural specificity and unique cultural identity .............................................................................................. 34 Priority area 2: Social status and standard of living ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Objective 2.1. Raising awareness in innovation and entrepreneurship. Also, the promotion of cooperation through contributing to the skills development and employment issues (especially for young people and women) ................................................................................................................ 41 Objective 2.2. Infrastructure and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers Program
    PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA (PROLoG) CA # AID-114-A-15-00004 QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 1 PROMOTING RULE OF LAW IN GEORGIA ACTIVITY (PROLoG) QUARTERLY REPORT YEAR THREE APRIL 1, 2017 – JUNE 30, 2017 Prepared under the USAID’s Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia (PROLoG) Activity, Cooperative Agreement Number AID-114-A-15-00004 Submitted to: USAID/Georgia as of July 28, 2017 Implementer East-West Management Institute, Inc. Responsible Parties: Giorgi Chkheidze, Chief of Party, Tbilisi, [email protected] Mark Dietrich, Project Director, Washington, D.C. [email protected] Disclaimer This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of East-West Management Institute, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government 2 TABLE OF ACRONYMS ACCESS Advancing CSO Capacities and Engaging Society for Sustainability ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution CA Cooperative Agreement CEPEJ European Community for the Efficiency of Justice CIDA Civil Development Agency CRRC Caucasus Resource Research Center CLE Continuing Legal Education COE Council of Europe COP Chief of Party DCOP Deputy Chief of Party ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EHRAC European Human Rights Advocacy Centre EMC Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center EWMI East-West Management Institute Free-Uni Free University of Tbilisi GDI Georgian Democracy Imitative GBA Georgian
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Project Development Assessment
    Hydropower Investment Promotion Project (HIPP) KHANI 5 HPP PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY UPPER KHANISTSKALI RIVER BASIN Wednesday, March 27, 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Deloitte Consulting. KHANI 5 HPP PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY UPPER KHANISTSKALI RIVER BASIN USAID HYDROPOWER INVESTMENT PROMOTION PROJECT (HIPP) CONTRACT NUMBER: EEM-I-00-07-00005-0 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP USAID/CAUCASUS OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2013 DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Date of Draft Publication March 27, 2013 This document was prepared by: Author Organization Contact Details Roland Sikharulidze Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Keti Skhireli Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Gigla Sikharulidze Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Irakli Sulkhanishvili Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Guram Rodonaia Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Gvantsa Pochkhua Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Reviewer Organization Contact Details Jake Delphia Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] George Chikovani Deloitte Consulting Overseas Projects [email protected] Note to Reader: This document is based largely on existing information, and information gathered during field visits by a small group of professionals from Deloitte Consulting. DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS PREFEASIBILITY STUDY This Pre-Feasibility Study has been sponsored by USAID and prepared for the use of the Georgian Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR) and is distributed for information purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • 53178-001: East–West Highway (Shorapani–Argveta Section) Improvement Project
    Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 53178-001 May 2019 GEO: East–West Highway (Shorapani–Argveta Section) Improvement Project Part 8 (Sections F–G) Prepared by the Roads Department of the Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure of Georgia for the Asian Development Bank. This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Section F4 of the Khevi-Ubisa-Shorapani-Argveta Road (E60 Highway) Environmental Impact Assessment Sample ID Coordinates Rationale for Site Selection SW02 42 ° 06’12.29”N / 43° 03’57.67”E At location of Bridge BRI 4.1.04-AT/TA, Kvirila River Figure 48: Surface Water Monitoring Locations 443. The results of the water quality monitoring are presented in Table 34 below show that both the Dzirula and Kvirila rivers meet the national MACs for surface water quality at the sampling locations, although the levels of manganese in the Kvirila sample was above the recommended standards for drinking water. This reflects the findings of the study on manganese in the Kvirila river
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Population Census
    NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF GEORGIA (GEOSTAT) 28.04.2016 2014 General Population Census Main Results General Information The General Population Census of Georgia has been conducted during November 5-19, 2014. The Census reference date (the moment of enumerating the individual) defined as 12 a.m. of November 5, (Thus, data on children born and persons deceased after the reference date was not collected). For its part, selection of November 5-19 period for the Census was conditioned by relatively lower mobility of the population during this period, as studies in schools and universities were under way. Wednesday – the middle day of the week – was selected as the reference date also for the reason of lower mobility. Census duration (15 days) was determined by the fact that population should be able to recall where they were on the census reference date (at midnight of November 5). Taking into account that in November visiting households in some mountainous areas could become problematic due to a possible deterioration in weather conditions, the Population Census was conducted in September 2014 in the municipalities of Mestia and Kazbegi well as in the mountainous areas of the municipalities of Dusheti and Akhmeta. The Census covered 82% (57 000 square kilometers) of the whole area of the country. The Census could not be carried out in the occupied territories, in particular, in the Autonomous Republic of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (total area of 13000 square kilometers). The Census was conducted in 79 % of the settlements (urban, community, rural) of the country, and covered 71 self-governed units and 3726 settlements.
    [Show full text]