DOCSLIB.ORG

Regulation of Dbl Family Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regulation of Dbl Family Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors REGULATION OF DBL FAMILY GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTORS By: MEGHANA BALARAM GUPTA Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Danny Manor Department of Pharmacology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January 2014 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Meghana Balaram Gupta candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree* Dissertation Advisor: Danny Manor Committee Chair: Amy Wilson-Delfosse Committee Member: Bingcheng Wang Committee Member: Vera Moiseenkova-Bell Committee Member: Cathy Carlin Date of Defense: December 2, 2013 * We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my parents. Without them, I would not be the person that I am today. Their unconditional love, support, and encouragement has helped me achieve something that at times I did not think was possible. I share the success of completing this thesis and earning my Ph.D. with my parents and my entire family. Without them, I am sure it would have been impossible. Mom and Dad, I hope that one day, I will be as loving and supportive towards my children as you have been to me. Thank you for everything you have given me and for all that you continue to do for me. I love you both. iii Table of Contents CHAPTER PAGE Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... ix Dbl Family GEFs................................................................................................................1 Abstract ...............................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................2 Literature Review ..............................................................................................................2 I. Mitogenic Pathways ......................................................................................................2 II. The Ras Superfamily GTPases ....................................................................................3 II.1 Ras Subfamily of GTPases ............................................................................................4 II.2 Ran Subfamily of GTPases ...........................................................................................4 II.3 Rab Subfamily of GTPases ...........................................................................................4 II.4 Arf Subfamily of GTPases ............................................................................................5 III. Rho Family GTPases: Activation and regulation of their cycle .............................7 III.1 Rho GTPase structure: requirements for nucleotide binding, GTP hydrolysis and effector recognition ..............................................................................................................7 III.2 Regulation of Rho GTPase cycling .............................................................................9 IV. The Dbl Family GEFs ..............................................................................................13 IV.1 The Dbl-Homology (DH) Domain: Structure & Function .......................................14 IV.2 The Pleckstrin Homology (PH) Domain ..................................................................16 V. Regulation of Dbl Family GEFs ................................................................................18 V.1 Coupling to Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and G-Protein Coupled Receptors .............18 V.2 Regulation of Dbl GEFs: Intra- and Inter- Molecular Modes of Regulation .............21 V.2.1 Examples of intra-molecular modes of regulation ......................................22 iv V.2.2 Release of inhibitory intra-molecular interactions ......................................22 V.2.3 Inter-molecular modes of regulation ...........................................................24 V.3 Other Modes of Dbl Regulation .................................................................................25 V.3.1 GEFs in signaling pathways .........................................................................25 V.3.2 Dbl GEFs mediate cross talk between pathways ........................................27 VI. GEF Dysfunction and Diseases ...............................................................................29 VI.1 Cancers .........................................................................................................29 VI.2 Developmental/Neurological Disorders .......................................................30 VI.3 Viral Infections .............................................................................................31 Statement of Purpose ......................................................................................................32 Chapter 2 .........................................................................................................................33 Plekhg4 is a novel Dbl-family GEF for Rho-family GTPases ......................................33 Capsule ...............................................................................................................................34 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................34 Introduction ........................................................................................................................35 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................37 Results ................................................................................................................................40 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................47 Chapter 2 Figures ...............................................................................................................50 Chapter 3 .........................................................................................................................57 Tyrosine phosphorylation of Dbl regulates GTPase signaling ....................................57 Capsule ...............................................................................................................................58 Abstract ..............................................................................................................................58 Introduction ........................................................................................................................59 Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................61 Results ................................................................................................................................64 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................67 v Chapter 3 Figures ...............................................................................................................71 Chapter 4 ..........................................................................................................................80 Overall Summary and Future Directions ......................................................................80 4.1 Overall Summary .........................................................................................................80 4.1.1 Plekhg4 .........................................................................................................80 4.1.2 Dbl.................................................................................................................81 4.2 Future Directions .........................................................................................................82 4.2.1 Plekhg4 .........................................................................................................82 4.2.2 Dbl.................................................................................................................82 4.2.3 510Tyr is highly conserved in other Dbl-family GEFs ..................................83 4.3 Concluding Remarks .................................................................................................92 Literature Cited ...............................................................................................................93 vi List of Tables Table 1 List depicting coupling between cell surface receptors and GEFS ......................20 vii List of Figures Figure 1.1 Activation of cell surface receptor leads to Rho GTPase activitation ................3 Figure 1.2 General features of the G-Domain .....................................................................8 Figure 1.3 Cycling of Rho GTPases is tightly regulated ...................................................10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Structure of the Dock2âˆ'elmo1 Complex Provides Insights Into
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17271-9 OPEN Structure of the DOCK2−ELMO1 complex provides insights into regulation of the auto-inhibited state Leifu Chang1,7, Jing Yang1, Chang Hwa Jo 2, Andreas Boland 1,8, Ziguo Zhang 1, Stephen H. McLaughlin 1, Afnan Abu-Thuraia 3, Ryan C. Killoran2, Matthew J. Smith 2,4,9, Jean-Francois Côté 3,5,6,9 & ✉ David Barford 1 DOCK (dedicator of cytokinesis) proteins are multidomain guanine nucleotide exchange 1234567890():,; factors (GEFs) for RHO GTPases that regulate intracellular actin dynamics. DOCK proteins share catalytic (DOCKDHR2) and membrane-associated (DOCKDHR1) domains. The structurally-related DOCK1 and DOCK2 GEFs are specific for RAC, and require ELMO (engulfment and cell motility) proteins for function. The N-terminal RAS-binding domain (RBD) of ELMO (ELMORBD) interacts with RHOG to modulate DOCK1/2 activity. Here, we determine the cryo-EM structures of DOCK2−ELMO1 alone, and as a ternary complex with RAC1, together with the crystal structure of a RHOG−ELMO2RBD complex. The binary DOCK2−ELMO1 complex adopts a closed, auto-inhibited conformation. Relief of auto- inhibition to an active, open state, due to a conformational change of the ELMO1 subunit, exposes binding sites for RAC1 on DOCK2DHR2, and RHOG and BAI GPCRs on ELMO1. Our structure explains how up-stream effectors, including DOCK2 and ELMO1 phosphorylation, destabilise the auto-inhibited state to promote an active GEF. 1 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. 2 Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada. 3 Montreal Institute of Clinical Research (IRCM), Montréal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapshot: Axon Guidance Pasterkamp R
    494 1 Cell Cell ??? SnapShot: Axon Guidance 153 SnapShot: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1 2 , ??MONTH?? ??DATE??, 200? ©200? Elsevier Inc. 200?©200? ElsevierInc. , ??MONTH?? ??DATE??, DOI R. Jeroen Pasterkamp and Alex L. Kolodkin , April11, 2013©2013Elsevier Inc. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.031 AUTHOR XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 1 AFFILIATIONDepartment of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2Department of Neuroscience, HHMI, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21212, USA Axon attraction and repulsion Surround repulsion Selective fasciculation Topographic mapping Self-avoidance Wild-type Dscam1 mutant Sema3A A Retina SC/Tectum EphB EphrinB P D D Mutant T A neuron N P A V V Genomic DNA P EphA EphrinA Slit Exon 4 (12) Exon 6 (48) Exon 9 (33) Exon 17 (2) Netrin Commissural axon guidance Surround repulsion of peripheral Grasshopper CNS axon Retinotectal mapping at the CNS midline nerves in vertebrates fasciculation in vertebrates Drosophila mushroom body XXXXXXXXX NEURITE/CELL Isoneuronal Sema3 Slit Sema1/4-6 Heteroneuronal EphrinA EphrinB FasII Eph Genomic DNA Pcdh-α (14) Pcdh-β (22) Pcdh-γ (22) Variable Con Variable Con Nrp Plexin ** *** Netrin LAMELLIPODIA Con DSCAM ephexin Starburst amacrine cells in mammalian retina Ras-GTP Vav See online version for legend and references. α-chimaerin GEFs/GAPs Robo FARP Ras-GDP LARG RhoGEF Kinases DCC cc0 GTPases PKA cc1 FAK Regulatory Mechanisms See online versionfor??????. Cdc42 GSK3 cc2 Rac PI3K P1 Rho P2 cc3 Abl Proteolytic cleavage P3 Regulation of expression (TF, miRNA, FILOPODIA srGAP Cytoskeleton regulatory proteins multiple isoforms) Sos Trio Pcdh Cis inhibition DOCK180 PAK ROCK Modulation of receptors’ output LIMK Myosin-II Colin Forward and reverse signaling Actin Trafcking and endocytosis NEURONAL GROWTH CONE Microtubules SnapShot: Axon Guidance R.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Cdc42 and Its Effectors in Epithelial Morphogenesis Franck Pichaud1,2,*, Rhian F
    © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2019) 132, jcs217869. doi:10.1242/jcs.217869 REVIEW SUBJECT COLLECTION: ADHESION Regulation of Cdc42 and its effectors in epithelial morphogenesis Franck Pichaud1,2,*, Rhian F. Walther1 and Francisca Nunes de Almeida1 ABSTRACT An overview of Cdc42 Cdc42 – a member of the small Rho GTPase family – regulates cell Cdc42 was discovered in yeast and belongs to a large family of small – polarity across organisms from yeast to humans. It is an essential (20 30 kDa) GTP-binding proteins (Adams et al., 1990; Johnson regulator of polarized morphogenesis in epithelial cells, through and Pringle, 1990). It is part of the Ras-homologous Rho subfamily coordination of apical membrane morphogenesis, lumen formation and of GTPases, of which there are 20 members in humans, including junction maturation. In parallel, work in yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans the RhoA and Rac GTPases, (Hall, 2012). Rho, Rac and Cdc42 has provided important clues as to how this molecular switch can homologues are found in all eukaryotes, except for plants, which do generate and regulate polarity through localized activation or inhibition, not have a clear homologue for Cdc42. Together, the function of and cytoskeleton regulation. Recent studies have revealed how Rho GTPases influences most, if not all, cellular processes. important and complex these regulations can be during epithelial In the early 1990s, seminal work from Alan Hall and his morphogenesis. This complexity is mirrored by the fact that Cdc42 can collaborators identified Rho, Rac and Cdc42 as main regulators of exert its function through many effector proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Pi3kp110-, Src-, FAK-Dependent and DOCK2-Independent Migration and Invasion of CXCL13-Stimulated Prostate Cancer Cells
    El Haibi et al. Molecular Cancer 2010, 9:85 http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/9/1/85 RESEARCH Open Access PI3Kp110-,Research Src-, FAK-dependent and DOCK2-independent migration and invasion of CXCL13-stimulated prostate cancer cells Christelle P El Haibi1, Praveen K Sharma2, Rajesh Singh3, Paul R Johnson4, Jill Suttles2, Shailesh Singh3 and James W Lillard Jr*3 Abstract Background: Most prostate cancer (PCa)-related deaths are due to metastasis, which is mediated in part by chemokine receptor and corresponding ligand interaction. We have previously shown that PCa tissue and cell lines express high levels of the chemokine receptor CXCR5, than compared to their normal counterparts, and interaction of CXCR5 with its specific ligand (CXCL13) promoted PCa cell invasion, migration, and differential matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression. This study dissects some of the molecular mechanisms following CXCL13-CXCR5 interaction that mediate PCa cell migration and invasion. Results: Using Western blot analysis, kinase-specific cell-based ELISAs, and migration and invasion assays, we show that PCa cell lines differentially express phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit isoforms and dedicator of cytokinesis 2 (DOCK2). Specifically, we show that PC3 and normal prostatic epithelial (RWPE-1), but not LNCaP cell lines expressed DOCK2, while RWPE, PC3, and LNCaP cell lines expressed PI3K-p110α and -p110β. Moreover, PC3 selectively expressed PI3K-p110γ, but LNCaP and RWPE cell lines expressed PI3Kp110δ. CXCL13 caused CXCR5-dependent activation of the PI3Kp85α in LNCaP cells, and p85α as well as -p101 in PC3 cells. CXCL13-CXCR5 interaction regulated LNCaP and PC3 cell migration and invasion through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activation that was primarily dependent on the PI3Kp110 isoform(s), Src, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK), but not DOCK2.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Stress Signaling in Targeted Cancer Therapy Resistance
    Oncogene (2015) 34, 5599–5606 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/15 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Adaptive stress signaling in targeted cancer therapy resistance E Pazarentzos1,2 and TG Bivona1,2 The identification of specific genetic alterations that drive the initiation and progression of cancer and the development of targeted drugs that act against these driver alterations has revolutionized the treatment of many human cancers. Although substantial progress has been achieved with the use of such targeted cancer therapies, resistance remains a major challenge that limits the overall clinical impact. Hence, despite progress, new strategies are needed to enhance response and eliminate resistance to targeted cancer therapies in order to achieve durable or curative responses in patients. To date, efforts to characterize mechanisms of resistance have primarily focused on molecular events that mediate primary or secondary resistance in patients. Less is known about the initial molecular response and adaptation that may occur in tumor cells early upon exposure to a targeted agent. Although understudied, emerging evidence indicates that the early adaptive changes by which tumor cells respond to the stress of a targeted therapy may be crucial for tumo r cell survival during treatment and the development of resistance. Here we review recent data illuminating the molecular architecture underlying adaptive stress signaling in tumor cells. We highlight how leveraging this knowledge could catalyze novel strategies to minimize
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 (Mtorc2)
    Regulation of the Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin Complex 2 (mTORC2) Inauguraldissertation Zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Klaus-Dieter Molle aus Heilbronn, Deutschland Basel, 2006 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät Auf Antrag von Prof. Michael N. Hall und Prof. Markus Affolter. Basel, den 21.11.2006 Prof. Hans-Peter Hauri Dekan Summary The growth controlling mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) is a conserved Ser/Thr kinase found in two structurally and functionally distinct complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. The tumor suppressor TSC1-TSC2 complex inhibits mTORC1 by acting on the small GTPase Rheb, but the role of TSC1-TSC2 and Rheb in the regulation of mTORC2 is unclear. Here we examined the role of TSC1-TSC2 in the regulation of mTORC2 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Induced knockdown of TSC1 and TSC2 (TSC1/2) stimulated mTORC2-dependent actin cytoskeleton organization and Paxillin phosphorylation. Furthermore, TSC1/2 siRNA increased mTORC2-dependent Ser473 phosphorylation of plasma membrane bound, myristoylated Akt/PKB. This suggests that loss of Akt/PKB Ser473 phosphorylation in TSC mutant cells, as reported previously, is due to inhibition of Akt/PKB localization rather than inhibition of mTORC2 activity. Amino acids and overexpression of Rheb failed to stimulate mTORC2 signaling. Thus, TSC1-TSC2 also inhibits mTORC2, but possibly independently of Rheb. Our results suggest that mTORC2 hyperactivation may contribute to the pathophysiology of diseases such as cancer and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. i Acknowledgement During my PhD studies in the Biozentrum I received a lot of support from many people around me who I mention here to express my gratefulness.
    [Show full text]
  • CXCL13/CXCR5 Interaction Facilitates VCAM-1-Dependent Migration in Human Osteosarcoma
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article CXCL13/CXCR5 Interaction Facilitates VCAM-1-Dependent Migration in Human Osteosarcoma 1, 2,3,4, 5 6 7 Ju-Fang Liu y, Chiang-Wen Lee y, Chih-Yang Lin , Chia-Chia Chao , Tsung-Ming Chang , Chien-Kuo Han 8, Yuan-Li Huang 8, Yi-Chin Fong 9,10,* and Chih-Hsin Tang 8,11,12,* 1 School of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City 11031, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzi City, Chiayi County 61363, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Nursing, Division of Basic Medical Sciences, and Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion Research Center, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Puzi City, Chiayi County 61363, Taiwan 4 Research Center for Industry of Human Ecology and Research Center for Chinese Herbal Medicine, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 33303, Taiwan 5 School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 Department of Respiratory Therapy, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan; [email protected] 7 School of Medicine, Institute of Physiology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei City 11221, Taiwan; [email protected] 8 Department of Biotechnology, College of Health Science, Asia University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan; [email protected] (C.-K.H.); [email protected] (Y.-L.H.) 9 Department of Sports Medicine, College of Health Care, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan 10 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin 65152, Taiwan 11 Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan 12 Chinese Medicine Research Center, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.-C.F.); [email protected] (C.-H.T.); Tel.: +886-4-2205-2121-7726 (C.-H.T.); Fax: +886-4-2233-3641 (C.-H.T.) These authors contributed equally to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atypical Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Factor, Dock7, Negatively Regulates Schwann Cell Differentiation and Myelination
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 31, 2011 • 31(35):12579–12592 • 12579 Cellular/Molecular The Atypical Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Factor, Dock7, Negatively Regulates Schwann Cell Differentiation and Myelination Junji Yamauchi,1,3,5 Yuki Miyamoto,1 Hajime Hamasaki,1,3 Atsushi Sanbe,1 Shinji Kusakawa,1 Akane Nakamura,2 Hideki Tsumura,2 Masahiro Maeda,4 Noriko Nemoto,6 Katsumasa Kawahara,5 Tomohiro Torii,1 and Akito Tanoue1 1Department of Pharmacology and 2Laboratory Animal Resource Facility, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Setagaya, Tokyo 157-8535, Japan, 3Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan, 4IBL, Ltd., Fujioka, Gumma 375-0005, Japan, and 5Department of Physiology and 6Bioimaging Research Center, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan In development of the peripheral nervous system, Schwann cells proliferate, migrate, and ultimately differentiate to form myelin sheath. In all of the myelination stages, Schwann cells continuously undergo morphological changes; however, little is known about their underlying molecular mechanisms. We previously cloned the dock7 gene encoding the atypical Rho family guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and reported the positive role of Dock7, the target Rho GTPases Rac/Cdc42, and the downstream c-Jun N-terminal kinase in Schwann cell migration (Yamauchi et al., 2008). We investigated the role of Dock7 in Schwann cell differentiation and myelination. Knockdown of Dock7 by the specific small interfering (si)RNA in primary Schwann cells promotes dibutyryl cAMP-induced morpholog- ical differentiation, indicating the negative role of Dock7 in Schwann cell differentiation. It also results in a shorter duration of activation of Rac/Cdc42 and JNK, which is the negative regulator of myelination, and the earlier activation of Rho and Rho-kinase, which is the positive regulator of myelination.
    [Show full text]
  • Related Malignant Phenotypes in the Nf1-Deficient MPNST
    Published OnlineFirst February 19, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0593 Molecular Cancer Genomics Research RAS/MEK–Independent Gene Expression Reveals BMP2- Related Malignant Phenotypes in the Nf1-Deficient MPNST Daochun Sun1, Ramsi Haddad2,3, Janice M. Kraniak2, Steven D. Horne1, and Michael A. Tainsky1,2 Abstract Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a type of soft tissue sarcoma that occurs in carriers of germline mutations in Nf1 gene as well as sporadically. Neurofibromin, encoded by the Nf1 gene, functions as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) whose mutation leads to activation of wt-RAS and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) patients' tumors. However, therapeutic targeting of RAS and MAPK have had limited success in this disease. In this study, we modulated NRAS, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (MEK)1/2, and neurofibromin levels in MPNST cells and determined gene expression changes to evaluate the regulation of signaling pathways in MPNST cells. Gene expression changes due to neurofibromin modulation but independent of NRAS and MEK1/2 regulation in MPNST cells indicated bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) signaling as a key pathway. The BMP2-SMAD1/5/8 pathway was activated in NF1-associated MPNST cells and inhibition of BMP2 signaling by LDN-193189 or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to BMP2 decreased the motility and invasion of NF1-associated MPNST cells. The pathway-specific gene changes provide a greater understanding of the complex role of neurofibromin in MPNST pathology and novel targets for drug discovery. Mol Cancer Res; 11(6); 616–27.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model for X-Linked Tremor/Ataxia
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Disease Models & Mechanisms (2016) 9, 553-562 doi:10.1242/dmm.022848 RESEARCH ARTICLE Spontaneous shaker rat mutant – a new model for X-linked tremor/ ataxia Karla P. Figueroa1, Sharan Paul1, Tito Calì2, Raffaele Lopreiato2, Sukanya Karan1, Martina Frizzarin2, Darren Ames3, Ginevra Zanni4, Marisa Brini5, Warunee Dansithong1, Brett Milash3, Daniel R. Scoles1, Ernesto Carafoli6 and Stefan M. Pulst1,* ABSTRACT mode of inheritance. Here, we describe the genetic analysis of the The shaker rat is an X-linked recessive spontaneous model of shaker rat, a model of Purkinje cell (PC) degeneration. This mutant progressive Purkinje cell (PC) degeneration exhibiting a shaking arose spontaneously and was observed in Sprague Dawley (SD) ataxia and wide stance. Generation of Wistar Furth (WF)/Brown outbred stock in 1991 at Saint Louis University, first described by Norwegian (BN) F1 hybrids and genetic mapping of F2 sib-sib La Regina et al. (1992), and the phenotype of whole-body tremor, ‘ ’ offspring using polymorphic markers narrowed the candidate gene ataxia and wide stance designated as shaker . The shaker trait was region to 26 Mbp denoted by the last recombinant genetic marker reported as an X-linked recessive trait. DXRat21 at 133 Mbp to qter (the end of the long arm). In the WF Various animal models of spontaneously occurring mutants that background, the shaker mutation has complete penetrance, results in parallel some aspects of human hereditary ataxia have been a stereotypic phenotype and there is a narrow window for age of reported; for example, weaver, lurcher, stumbler, tottering and disease onset; by contrast, the F2 hybrid phenotype was more varied, teetering mice (Chou et al., 1991; Frankel et al., 1994; Green and with a later age of onset and likely non-penetrance of the mutation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rac/Cdc42 Exchange Factor Complex Promotes Formation of Lateral filopodia and Blood Vessel Lumen Morphogenesis
    ARTICLE Received 1 Oct 2014 | Accepted 26 Apr 2015 | Published 1 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8286 OPEN A Rac/Cdc42 exchange factor complex promotes formation of lateral filopodia and blood vessel lumen morphogenesis Sabu Abraham1,w,*, Margherita Scarcia2,w,*, Richard D. Bagshaw3,w,*, Kathryn McMahon2,w, Gary Grant2, Tracey Harvey2,w, Maggie Yeo1, Filomena O.G. Esteves2, Helene H. Thygesen2,w, Pamela F. Jones4, Valerie Speirs2, Andrew M. Hanby2, Peter J. Selby2, Mihaela Lorger2, T. Neil Dear4,w, Tony Pawson3,z, Christopher J. Marshall1 & Georgia Mavria2 During angiogenesis, Rho-GTPases influence endothelial cell migration and cell–cell adhesion; however it is not known whether they control formation of vessel lumens, which are essential for blood flow. Here, using an organotypic system that recapitulates distinct stages of VEGF-dependent angiogenesis, we show that lumen formation requires early cytoskeletal remodelling and lateral cell–cell contacts, mediated through the RAC1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) DOCK4 (dedicator of cytokinesis 4). DOCK4 signalling is necessary for lateral filopodial protrusions and tubule remodelling prior to lumen formation, whereas proximal, tip filopodia persist in the absence of DOCK4. VEGF-dependent Rac activation via DOCK4 is necessary for CDC42 activation to signal filopodia formation and depends on the activation of RHOG through the RHOG GEF, SGEF. VEGF promotes interaction of DOCK4 with the CDC42 GEF DOCK9. These studies identify a novel Rho-family GTPase activation cascade for the formation of endothelial cell filopodial protrusions necessary for tubule remodelling, thereby influencing subsequent stages of lumen morphogenesis. 1 Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Biology, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • NICU Gene List Generator.Xlsx
    Neonatal Crisis Sequencing Panel Gene List Genes: A2ML1 - B3GLCT A2ML1 ADAMTS9 ALG1 ARHGEF15 AAAS ADAMTSL2 ALG11 ARHGEF9 AARS1 ADAR ALG12 ARID1A AARS2 ADARB1 ALG13 ARID1B ABAT ADCY6 ALG14 ARID2 ABCA12 ADD3 ALG2 ARL13B ABCA3 ADGRG1 ALG3 ARL6 ABCA4 ADGRV1 ALG6 ARMC9 ABCB11 ADK ALG8 ARPC1B ABCB4 ADNP ALG9 ARSA ABCC6 ADPRS ALK ARSL ABCC8 ADSL ALMS1 ARX ABCC9 AEBP1 ALOX12B ASAH1 ABCD1 AFF3 ALOXE3 ASCC1 ABCD3 AFF4 ALPK3 ASH1L ABCD4 AFG3L2 ALPL ASL ABHD5 AGA ALS2 ASNS ACAD8 AGK ALX3 ASPA ACAD9 AGL ALX4 ASPM ACADM AGPS AMELX ASS1 ACADS AGRN AMER1 ASXL1 ACADSB AGT AMH ASXL3 ACADVL AGTPBP1 AMHR2 ATAD1 ACAN AGTR1 AMN ATL1 ACAT1 AGXT AMPD2 ATM ACE AHCY AMT ATP1A1 ACO2 AHDC1 ANK1 ATP1A2 ACOX1 AHI1 ANK2 ATP1A3 ACP5 AIFM1 ANKH ATP2A1 ACSF3 AIMP1 ANKLE2 ATP5F1A ACTA1 AIMP2 ANKRD11 ATP5F1D ACTA2 AIRE ANKRD26 ATP5F1E ACTB AKAP9 ANTXR2 ATP6V0A2 ACTC1 AKR1D1 AP1S2 ATP6V1B1 ACTG1 AKT2 AP2S1 ATP7A ACTG2 AKT3 AP3B1 ATP8A2 ACTL6B ALAS2 AP3B2 ATP8B1 ACTN1 ALB AP4B1 ATPAF2 ACTN2 ALDH18A1 AP4M1 ATR ACTN4 ALDH1A3 AP4S1 ATRX ACVR1 ALDH3A2 APC AUH ACVRL1 ALDH4A1 APTX AVPR2 ACY1 ALDH5A1 AR B3GALNT2 ADA ALDH6A1 ARFGEF2 B3GALT6 ADAMTS13 ALDH7A1 ARG1 B3GAT3 ADAMTS2 ALDOB ARHGAP31 B3GLCT Updated: 03/15/2021; v.3.6 1 Neonatal Crisis Sequencing Panel Gene List Genes: B4GALT1 - COL11A2 B4GALT1 C1QBP CD3G CHKB B4GALT7 C3 CD40LG CHMP1A B4GAT1 CA2 CD59 CHRNA1 B9D1 CA5A CD70 CHRNB1 B9D2 CACNA1A CD96 CHRND BAAT CACNA1C CDAN1 CHRNE BBIP1 CACNA1D CDC42 CHRNG BBS1 CACNA1E CDH1 CHST14 BBS10 CACNA1F CDH2 CHST3 BBS12 CACNA1G CDK10 CHUK BBS2 CACNA2D2 CDK13 CILK1 BBS4 CACNB2 CDK5RAP2
    [Show full text]