DOCSLIB.ORG

COMMISSION DECISION of 28 March 2008 Adopting, Pursuant to Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMMISSION DECISION of 28 March 2008 Adopting, Pursuant to Council L 123/76 EN Official Journal of the European Union 8.5.2008 COMMISSION DECISION of 28 March 2008 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a first updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (notified under document number C(2008) 1148) (2008/335/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (4) In the context of a dynamic adaptation of the Natura 2000 network, the lists of sites of Community importance are reviewed. The update of that initial list is therefore necessary. Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, (5) On the one hand, the update of the initial list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeo- Having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 graphical region is necessary in order to include additional on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and sites that have been proposed since March 2006 by the flora (1) and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 4(2) Member States as sites of Community importance for the thereof, Mediterranean biogeographical region within the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC. The obligations result- ing from Articles 4(4) and 6(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC are applicable as soon as possible and within six years at most Whereas: from the adoption of the first updated list of sites of Com- munity importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. (1) The Mediterranean biogeographical region referred to in Article 1(c)(iii) of Directive 92/43/EEC, comprises the ter- (6) On the other hand, the update of the initial list of sites of ritory of Greece, Malta and Cyprus, in accordance to Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeo- Article 1 of Protocol No 10 of the 2003 Act of Accession, graphical region is necessary in order to reflect any changes and parts of the territory of France, Italy, Portugal, Spain in site related information submitted by the Member States and, in accordance to Article 299(4) of the Treaty, the ter- following the adoption of the Community list. In that ritory of Gibraltar for whose external relations the United sense, the first updated list of sites of Community impor- Kingdom is responsible, as specified in the biogeographi- tance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region con- cal map approved on 25 April 2005 by the Committee set stitutes a consolidated version of the initial list of sites of up by Article 20 of that Directive, hereinafter, ‘the Habi- Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeo- tats Committee’. graphical region. However, it should be stressed that the obligations resulting from Articles 4(4) and 6(1) of Direc- tive 92/43/EEC are applicable as soon as possible and within six years at most from the adoption of the initial list (2) It is necessary in the context of a process initiated since of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean 1995 to make further progress in the actual establishment biogeographical region. of the Natura 2000 network, which is an essential element of the protection of biodiversity in the Community. (7) For the Mediterranean biogeographical region, lists of sites proposed as sites of Community importance within the (3) An initial list of sites of Community importance for the meaning of Article 1 of Directive 92/43/EEC have been Mediterranean biogeographical region, within the meaning transmitted to the Commission between January 2003 and of Directive 92/43/EEC was adopted by Commission Deci- September 2006, in accordance with Article 4(1) of the sion 2006/613/EC (2). On the basis of Articles 4(4) and 6(1) Directive, by Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Cyprus, Malta, of Directive 92/43/EEC, the Member State concerned shall Portugal and United Kingdom. designate the sites included in the list of sites of Commu- nity importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region as special areas of conservation as soon as possible (8) The lists of proposed sites were accompanied by informa- and within six years at most, establishing conservation pri- tion on each site, supplied in the format established by orities and the necessary conservation measures. Commission Decision 97/266/EC of 18 December 1996 concerning a site information format for proposed Natura 2000 sites (3). (1) OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7. Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/105/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p. 368). (2) OJ L 259, 21.9.2006, p. 1. (3) OJ L 107, 24.4.1997, p. 1. 8.5.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 123/77 (9) That information includes the most recent and definitive should not be concluded that the network is either com- map of the site transmitted by the Member State in ques- plete or incomplete. The list should be revised, if necessary, tion, the site’s name, location and extent, and the data in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 of Directive yielded by application of the criteria specified in Annex III 92/43/EEC. to Directive 92/43/EEC. (14) In the interests of clarity and transparency Decision (10) On the basis of the draft list drawn up by the Commission 2006/613/EC should be replaced. in agreement with each of the Member States concerned, which also identifies sites hosting priority natural habitat (15) The measures provided for in this Decision are in accor- types or priority species, a first updated list of sites selected dance with the opinion of the Habitats Committee, as sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region should be adopted. HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: (11) Knowledge of the existence and distribution of the natural habitat types and species is constantly evolving, as a result Article 1 of the surveillance in accordance with Article 11 of Direc- tive 92/43/EEC. Therefore, the evaluation and selection of The first updated list of sites of Community importance for the sites at Community level was done using the best available Mediterranean biogeographical region in accordance with the information at present. third subparagraph of Article 4(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC is set out in the Annex to this Decision. (12) However, some Member States have not proposed suffi- cient sites to meet the requirements in Directive 92/43/EEC Article 2 for certain habitat types and species. For those species and habitat types it can therefore not be concluded that the net- Decision 2006/613/EC is repealed. work is complete. However, taking into account the delay in receiving the information and reaching agreement with the Member States, the Commission considers that it Article 3 should adopt a first updated list of sites which will need to be revised in accordance with the provisions of Article 4 of This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Directive 92/43/EEC. (13) Given that knowledge on the existence and distribution of Done at Brussels, 28 March 2008. the natural habitat types of Annex I and species of Annex II to Directive 92/43/EEC that occur in both marine territo- For the Commission rial waters as well as marine waters under national juris- Stavros DIMAS diction beyond territorial waters remains incomplete, it Member of the Commission L 123/78 EN Official Journal of the European Union 8.5.2008 ANNEX First updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region Each site of Community importance (SCI) is identified by the information supplied in the Natura 2000 format, including the corresponding map. This has been transmitted by the competent national authorities in accordance with the second sub- paragraph of Article 4(1). The table below gives the following information: A: SCI code comprising nine characters, the first two being the ISO code for the Member State; B: name of SCI; C: * = presence on the SCI of at least one priority natural habitat type and/or species within the meaning of Article 1 of Direc- tive 92/43/EEC; D: surface area of SCI in hectares or length in km; E: geographical coordinates of SCI (latitude and longitude). All the information given in the Community list below is based on the data proposed, transmitted and validated by Cyprus, Spain, France, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal and United Kingdom. ABCDE Area of SCI Length of SCI SCI code Name of SCI * Geographical coordinates of SCI (ha) (km) Longitude Latitude CY2000001 Mammari — Deneia * 108 E 33 11 N 35 10 CY2000002 Alykos Potamos — Agios Sozomenos * 434 125 E 33 24 N 35 3 CY2000003 Periochi Mitserou * 910 E 33 8 N 35 3 CY2000004 Dasos Machaira * 4 144 8,5 E 33 12 N 34 55 CY2000005 Madari — Papoutsa * 4 486 E 33 0 N 34 57 CY2000007 Periochi Platy * 621 E 32 46 N 34 55 CY2000008 Koilada Kedron — Kampos * 18 286 E 33 34 N 35 24 CY2000009 Fountoukodasi Pitsilias * 127 E 33 2 N 34 56 CY2000010 Koilada Potamou Maroullenas * 72 E 33 9 N 35 1 CY2000011 Potamos Peristeronas * E 33 4 N 35 3 CY2000012 Koilada Kargoti * 107 E 32 53 N 35 1 CY3000005 Kavo Gkreko * 1 855 E 34 3 N 34 58 CY3000006 Thalassia Periochi Nisia * 189 E 34 5 N 35 0 CY4000001 Periochi Polis — Gialia * 1 724 11,5 E 32 27 N 35 4 CY4000002 Cha-Potami * 2 629 E 32 39 N 34 43 CY4000003 Koilada Diarizou * 1 355 E 32 42 N 34 48 CY4000004 Vouni Panagias * 971 E 32 37 N 34 54 CY4000005 Episkopi Morou Nerou * 418 E 32 32 N 34 49 CY4000006 Thalassia Periochi Moulia * 201 E 32 26 N 34 43 CY4000007 Xeros Potamos * 4 109 E 32 36 N 34 47 CY4000008 Mavrokolympos * 1 344 0 E 32 26 N 34 51 CY4000009 Periochi Skoulli * 118 E 32 25 N 35 0 CY4000011 Periochi Agiatis * 514 E 32 46 N 34 55 CY4000012 Periochi Stayros Tis Psokas — Karkavas * 4 948 E 32 55 N 35 2 8.5.2008
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.3. Initial Characterisation
    Member Statesare requested to carry out the first volcanic structures and it contains important groundwater bodies characterisation in accordance aquifers; with Artide 5 of the WFD in arder to identify water The alluvial secter, located in the centrai part of bodies at risk of failingto reach the WFD objectives. the river basin,near the main watercourses and in Water bodies at risk will be subject to a further; the intra-montane depressions,contains alluvial more detailed analysis. aquifers and marine and continental clastic deposits; This chapter describesgroundwater bodies in the Tevere river basin and examples offurther characterisation. 2.3. Initial characterisation Hydrogeological structures and aquifers The WFD provides indications on the analyses to carry out on groundwater; such as: location, perimeter; geological characteristics, pressures, and interdependence with surface aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. First of all, the necessity of identifying a reference hydrogeological context emerged from the analyses carried out in the Tevere river basinoGeological and hydrostructural conditions influence aquifertypology and the interrelation between surface water and groundwater: Therefore, theTevere river basin..which is characterized by abundant groundwater resources, was schematically subdivided into four main sectors with different hydrostructural characteristics (Figure 17): The karstic sector, locatedin the easternpart of the river basin,is constitutedmainly by carbonate rocksand contains complex hydrostructures; The volcanic sector, locatedin the westernpart of the river basin,is composedof pery-thyrrenian Fig. 17 - MQin hydroge%gica/ sectorsin the Tevereriver basin The flysch sector, located in the upper part ofthe basin,is characterized by turbidites sequences consistingof marls, shales,clays and sandstoneswith evaporites.Only in the more permeable arenaceous sediments,water circulation sustainsan appreciable perennial base flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Prog Salvaguardia E Tutela Del Parco Aurunci
    PROGETTO SALVAGUARDIA E TUTELA DEL PARCO DEI MONTI AURUNCI e PARCO DEI MONTI AUSONI E LAGO DI FONDI ALLEGATO 3A - Scheda progetto per l’impiego di operatori volontari in servizio civile in Italia ENTE 1) Denominazione e codice SU dell’ente titolare di iscrizione all’albo SCU proponente il progetto (*) PARCO DEI MONTI AURUNCI SU00204 2) Denominazione e codice SU di eventuali enti di accoglienza dell’ente proponente il progetto ……………………………………… 3) Eventuali enti coprogettanti 3.a) denominazione e codice SU degli enti di accoglienza dell’ente titolare di iscrizione all’albo SCU proponente il progetto ……………………………………………… 3.b) denominazione e codice SU degli enti titolari di iscrizione all’albo SCU ed eventuali propri enti di accoglienza PARCO NATURALE REGIONALE MONTI AUSONI E LAGO DI FONDI - SU00347 Numero N. Sede di attuazione Comune Codice sede Nominativo Olp volontari PARCO AURUNCI Sede centrale Domenico Sepe Uff. serv. CAMPODIMELE 1 171032 2 Marzella Antonio Vigilanza e comunicazione PARCO AURUNCI CAMPODIMELE 2 Sede centrale Domenico Sepe Uff.promozione 171030 1 Tedeschi Antonio PARCO AURUNCI 3 ITRI 171043 2 Ialongo Giampaolo Vivaio del Parco Uff. patrimonio ambientale PARCO AURUNCI Soscia Fulvio 4 ITRI 171041 2 Vivaio del Parco Centro visitatori parco Antonio PARCO AURUNCI Monumento Naturale Settecannelle Mola della 5 FONDI 171019 2 Izzi Fabrizio Corte Uff. educaz. Ambientale PARCO AURUNCI Centro studi De Santis Ufficio promozione- FORMIA 6 171015 2 Buttaro Raffaele archivio dei Monti Aurunci PARCO AURUNCI SPIGNO 7 171020 4 Tarantino Marco Museo Naturalistico SATURNIA PARCO AURUNCI Palazzo Spinelli-Museo del Carsismo(percorso ESPERIA 8 171022 6 Perrella Paolo grotta carsica) 2 PARCO AURUNCI Monticelli Esperia-Uff.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Pietro Lazzari, 1964
    Oral history interview with Pietro Lazzari, 1964 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Interview HP: DR. HARLAN PHILLIPS PL: PIETRO LAZZARI HP: I think while we have the opportunity it's, I think, important to assess in a way what one begins with. You have at least, you know, a dual cultural view, more, probably, so what did you fall heir to in the way of luggage and baggage that you've carried? PL: Well, I do believe I was quite lucky, if we can put it this way, I was born in the last century, 1898, in Rome and not from a family were cultural marked point was strong. My father was very inventive himself, he could draw horses. He loved to walk long distances. I remember as a young boy we used to walk outside the gates of Rome in Via Solaria or toward Ostia, and he was not a very tall man but while he walked, and while he talked he grew, I thought he was very tall, and he was inspired, his chest forward because he was the bandolier, which is a sort of an elite corps in the Italian army and he volunteered very young. So going back to our walks, he was familiar with the Roman ruins and frescoes in churches particularly those churches on the outskirts of Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Senderismo Télécharger
    EL SENDERISMO PERMITE OBTENER UNA EXPERIENCIA DIRECTA Y ÚNICA DE TODOS LOS ESPACIOS NATURALES QUE OFRECE ARAGÓN, DESDE LOS GLACIARES MÁS MERIDIONALES DE EUROPA, AFERRADOS A LAS MAYORES CUMBRES DE LOS PIRINEOS, HASTA LAS ÁRIDAS ESTEPAS DEL VALLE DEL EBRO Y LAS FASCINANTES SIERRAS DE TERUEL. / SENDEROS TURÍSTICOS DE ARAGÓN Aragón es un territorio privilegiado desde el punto de vista paisajístico y natural. Son atractivos bien conocidos el Pirineo más elevado y alpino, con el pico Aneto como su máxima altura; las sierras prepirenaicas, con Guara y los mallos de Riglos como referencias internacionales de los deportes de aventura; y un Sistema Ibérico que también tiene en el Moncayo su mayor cumbre y en Teruel algunos de sus parajes más agrestes. El complemento a la montaña es la propia depresión del Ebro, con todos los parajes asociados al río más caudaloso de la Península Ibérica, pero también a las singulares estepas que lo bordean. Igual de especial es la cuenca endorreica de Gallocanta, con sus grandes bandos de grullas y la multitud de aves que la visitan, y, por supuesto, los numerosos rincones que se esconden en todas estas grandes áreas de paisaje. 4 turísticos de Aragón 5 ARAGÓN SENDERISTA Más de 20 000 kilómetros de senderos señalizados, repartidos en unas 600 rutas de todos los niveles de dificultad, distancia, desnivel y pericia, recorren todo Aragón. Las opciones son muchas y variadas: desde los senderos de Gran Recorrido (algunos de ellos emblemáticos a nivel internacional) a los familiares Senderos Locales, pasando por los más abundantes Junto a los Senderos Turísticos de Aragón, sigue senderos de Pequeño Recorrido y por muchos otros habiendo senderos que todavía no han alcanzado esta con diversas denominaciones.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Comitato Esecutivo
    “CARTA INVENTARIO DEI PERCORSI SCURSIONISTICI DELLA IGURIA E L ” EX ART. 4, L.R. 24/09 (QUINTO AGGIORNAMENTO – MAGGIO 2019) ALLEGATO A (pdGr NP/14220/2019) ESTIONE FORMALIZZATA G 2 ENTE CODICI LUNGHEZZA NOME SENTIERO MANUTENTORE PROPONENTE PERCORSO (M) Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10106CE Bivio Cascina Gargassina - Cascina Veirera 2.077 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10106PE Sciarborasca - Monte Rama 6.850 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10206PD Lerca - Bric Camulà - Monte Rama 5.663 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10306PE Arenzano - Monte Argentea 10.074 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10406PE Voltri - Passo della Gava - Monte Reixa 9.132 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10506PE Badia di Tiglieto - Bric del Dente 7.333 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10606PE Tiglieto - Colle Cima di Masca 7.847 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10706PA Bivio Cascina Gargassina - Cascina Veirera 2.845 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10806PE Cascina Gargassina - Monte Calvo 5.490 Beigua Campo Ligure - Passo Fruia - Bric del Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA10906PE 9.834 Dente Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11006PE Masone - Passo Fruia 5.945 Beigua Badia di Tiglieto - Frera da Bassu - Badia Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11106PE 6.498 di Tiglieto Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11206PE Masone - Cascina Troia - Bric Dentino 7.130 Beigua Arenzano - Passo della Gava - Passo del Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11306PE 9.148 Faiallo Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11406PD Fiorino - Sella del Barné - Bric del Dente 6.086 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11506PE Rossiglione - Sella del Barné 14.022 Beigua Ente Parco del Provincia di Genova GGEA11606PE S.
    [Show full text]
  • Testo Integrale Parere Regione Lazio Sul Progetto
    D I R E Z I O N E P O L I T I C H E AMBIENTALI E CIC LO DEI RIFIUTI Area Valutazione di Incidenza e Risorse Forestali All’Area Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale Oggetto: Interventi per la ristrutturazione e l’ampliamento degli impianti sciistici nel comprensorio sciistico del Monte Terminillo” di cui all’art. 39 della Legge Regionale n. 31 del 24/12/2008. Revisione del Progetto in attuazione della DGR n. 162 del 11/4/2017 nei comuni di Micigliano, Leonessa, Rieti, Cantalice in provincia di Rieti – Registro elenco progetti 065/2014 Premesso che: - La Legge Regionale n. 31/2008 all’art. 39 prevede lo stanziamento per interventi di ristrutturazione e ampliamento degli impianti sciistici siti nel comprensorio sciistico Monte Terminillo, dalla quale si passa poi al protocollo d’intesa sottoscritto nel 2011 dalla Regione Lazio con i comuni e la Provincia interessata, alla Delibera di Giunta n. 605 del 14.12.2012, fino alla D.G.R. Lazio n. 162 del 11.4.2017. - In data 24/12/2014 è stata attivata la procedura di Valutazione di Impatto Ambientale ai sensi dell’art. 23, parte II del D.Lgs. 152/2006 (pubblicazione sul quotidiano “Il Messaggero” del 22/12/2014). - Nell’ambito dell’istruttoria di VIA l’Area Sistemi Naturali ha espresso parere non favorevole con nota Prot. n.377891 del 13/07/2015, ai sensi dell’art. 5 del D.P.R. 8 settembre 1997 n. 357. In particolare ha trasmesso propria relazione tecnica che esprime parere non favorevole. Nella relazione è indicato che l’intervento proposto ricade all’interno dei Siti di Importanza Comunitaria (SIC) cod.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aromanians in Macedonia
    Macedonian Historical Review 3 (2012) Македонска историска ревија 3 (2012) EDITORIAL BOARD: Boban PETROVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editor-in-chief) Nikola ŽEŽOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Dalibor JOVANOVSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Toni FILIPOSKI, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia Charles INGRAO, Purdue University, USA Bojan BALKOVEC, University of Ljubljana,Slovenia Aleksander NIKOLOV, University of Sofia, Bulgaria Đorđe BUBALO, University of Belgrade, Serbia Ivan BALTA, University of Osijek, Croatia Adrian PAPAIANI, University of Elbasan, Albania Oliver SCHMITT, University of Vienna, Austria Nikola MINOV, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Macedonia (editorial board secretary) ISSN: 1857-7032 © 2012 Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, Macedonia University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius - Skopje Faculty of Philosophy Macedonian Historical Review vol. 3 2012 Please send all articles, notes, documents and enquiries to: Macedonian Historical Review Department of History Faculty of Philosophy Bul. Krste Misirkov bb 1000 Skopje Republic of Macedonia http://mhr.fzf.ukim.edu.mk/ [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Nathalie DEL SOCORRO Archaic Funerary Rites in Ancient Macedonia: contribution of old excavations to present-day researches 15 Wouter VANACKER Indigenous Insurgence in the Central Balkan during the Principate 41 Valerie C. COOPER Archeological Evidence of Religious Syncretism in Thasos, Greece during the Early Christian Period 65 Diego PEIRANO Some Observations about the Form and Settings of the Basilica of Bargala 85 Denitsa PETROVA La conquête ottomane dans les Balkans, reflétée dans quelques chroniques courtes 95 Elica MANEVA Archaeology, Ethnology, or History? Vodoča Necropolis, Graves 427a and 427, the First Half of the 19th c.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone Speciali Di Conservazione (Zsc) Della Regione Biogeografica Mediterranea
    Misure di conservazione dei sic della regione geografica mediterranea approvate con DGR 4 luglio 2017 n. 537 ZONE SPECIALI DI CONSERVAZIONE (ZSC) DELLA REGIONE BIOGEOGRAFICA MEDITERRANEA MISURE DI CONSERVAZIONE approvate con DGR 4 luglio 2017 n. 537 (testo collazionato dagli Uffici regionali con le DGR 3 febbraio 2015 n. 73, 20 maggio 2016 n. 16) INDICE: IT1324818 Castell'Ermo - Peso Grande IT1342813 Rio Borsa - Torrente Vara IT1324896 Lerrone - Valloni IT1342824 Rio di Colla IT1314723 Campassu - Grotta Sgarbu Du Ventu IT1324908 Isola Gallinara IT1342907 Monte Antessio - Chiusola IT1315313 Gouta - Testa d'Alpe - Valle Barbaira IT1324909 Torrente Arroscia e Centa IT1342908 Monte Gottero - Passo del Lupo IT1315407 Monte Ceppo IT1324910 Monte Acuto - Poggio Grande - Rio Torsero IT1343412 Deiva Marina - Bracco - Pietra di Vasca - Mola IT1315408 Lecceta di Langan IT1325624 Capo Mele IT1343415 Guaitarola IT1315503 Monte Carpasina IT1330893 Rio Ciaè IT1343419 Monte Serro IT1315504 Bosco di Rezzo IT1331402 Beigua - Monte Dente - Val Gargassa - IT1343425 Rio di Agnola IT1315602 Pizzo d'Evigno Pavaglione IT1343502 Parco della Magra - Vara IT1315714 Monte Abellio IT1331501 Praglia - Pracaban - Monte Leco - Punta IT1343511 Monte Cornoviglio - Monte Fiorito - Monte IT1315715 Castel d'Appio Martin Dragnone IT1315716 Roverino IT1331606 Torre Quezzi IT1343518 Gruzza di Veppo IT1315717 Monte Grammondo - Torrente Bevera IT1331615 Monte Gazzo IT1343520 Zona Carsica Cassana IT1315719 Torrente Nervia IT1331718 Monte Fasce IT1343526 Torrente Mangia IT1315720
    [Show full text]
  • Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N
    Map 44 Latium-Campania Compiled by N. Purcell, 1997 Introduction The landscape of central Italy has not been intrinsically stable. The steep slopes of the mountains have been deforested–several times in many cases–with consequent erosion; frane or avalanches remove large tracts of regolith, and doubly obliterate the archaeological record. In the valley-bottoms active streams have deposited and eroded successive layers of fill, sealing and destroying the evidence of settlement in many relatively favored niches. The more extensive lowlands have also seen substantial depositions of alluvial and colluvial material; the coasts have been exposed to erosion, aggradation and occasional tectonic deformation, or–spectacularly in the Bay of Naples– alternating collapse and re-elevation (“bradyseism”) at a staggeringly rapid pace. Earthquakes everywhere have accelerated the rate of change; vulcanicity in Campania has several times transformed substantial tracts of landscape beyond recognition–and reconstruction (thus no attempt is made here to re-create the contours of any of the sometimes very different forerunners of today’s Mt. Vesuvius). To this instability must be added the effect of intensive and continuous intervention by humanity. Episodes of depopulation in the Italian peninsula have arguably been neither prolonged nor pronounced within the timespan of the map and beyond. Even so, over the centuries the settlement pattern has been more than usually mutable, which has tended to obscure or damage the archaeological record. More archaeological evidence has emerged as modern urbanization spreads; but even more has been destroyed. What is available to the historical cartographer varies in quality from area to area in surprising ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegato C Al Rapporto Ambientale Studio Di Incidenza
    ALLEGATO C AL RAPPORTO AMBIENTALE FINALIZZATO ALLA FASE DI VAS AI SENSI DELLA LR 32/2012 e s. m. e i. STUDIO DI INCIDENZA Proponente: Dipartimento TERRITORIO, AMBIENTE, INFRASTRUTTURE E TRASPORTI Vicedirezione Generale TERRITORIO Settore TUTELA DEL PAESAGGIO, DEMANIO MARITTIMO E ATTIVITÀ ESTRATTIVE PTRAC 1 Rapporto Ambientale VALUTAZIONE AMBIENTALE STRATEGICA DEL PIANO TERRITORIALE REGIONALE DELLE ATTIVITÀ DI CAVA Gruppo di lavoro: Settore TUTELA DEL PAESAGGIO, DEMANIO MARITTIMO E ATTIVITÀ ESTRATTIVE LIGURIA RICERCHE S. p. A. Autorità Competente Dipartimento TERRITORIO, AMBIENTE, INFRASTRUTTURE E TRASPORTI TERRITORIO Vicedirezione Generale TERRITORIO Settore PIANIFICAZIONE E VAS PTRAC 2 Rapporto Ambientale Sommario BIODIVERSITÀ IN LIGURIA .................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Biodiversità inquadramento ed elementi di valutazione di incidenza ............................................ 6 1.2 Biodiversità e Atlante degli habitat ................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Rete Natura 2000 in Liguria ........................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Caratterizzazione dei siti ............................................................................................................. 12 2. ELEMENTI DI VALUTAZIONE DI INCIDENZA ........................................................................... 18 2.1 Introduzione ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Valutazione Ambientale Del Piano Di Sviluppo 2011
    Valutazione Ambientale del Piano di Sviluppo 2011 Rapporto Ambientale Volume Regione LIGURIA INDICE 1 Introduzione 4 3.3 Paesaggio e beni culturali, architettonici, monumentali e archeologici 13 1.1 Struttura del rapporto regionale 4 3.3.1 Siti UNESCO 13 1.2 Modalità di collaborazione attivate per la VAS 4 4 Contesto Economico 14 1.3 Fonti dati disponibili 4 5 Contesto Tecnico 15 2 Contesto Ambientale 5 5.1 Pianificazione energetica regionale 15 2.1 Caratterizzazione geografica 5 5.2 Stato della rete di trasmissione nazionale nell’area 2.2 Biodiversità ed aree protette 5 del Nord Ovest d’Italia 15 2.2.1 Aree naturali protette 5 6 Interventi 17 2.2.2 Rete Natura 2000 6 2.2.3 Aree Ramsar 9 6.1 Nuove esigenze 17 2.3 Assetto del territorio 9 6.2 Interventi presenti in Piani precedenti già approvati 31 2.4 Pianificazione territoriale 10 6.3 Sintesi degli indicatori regionali 33 3 Contesto Sociale 12 3.1 Demografia 12 3.2 Uso del suolo 12 Indice | 3 1 Introduzione dell’economia regionale, anche in relazione a 1.1 Struttura del rapporto regionale dati nazionali; − Il Rapporto Regionale relativo al Piano di Sviluppo Contesto Tecnico, che descrive lo stato della rete (PdS) 2011 riporta i principali interventi previsti, a livello regionale; suddivisi tra interventi in corso di concertazione, da − Interventi, che sono oggetto della VAS, proposti avviare alla concertazione, privi di potenziali effetti sul territorio regionale. significativi sull’ambiente, al di fuori dell’ambito VAS (in fase autorizzativa, autorizzati, in 1.2 Modalità di collaborazione attivate per la realizzazione, ecc.).
    [Show full text]
  • La Route De Thoè 2010
    Bienvenue à bord ! Ce livre est correspond sans doute à une nouvelle manière de concevoir un guide de navigation. Ce n'est cependant pas un « guide de navigation » à proprement parler, ni pas son contenu, ni par sa présentation. C'est un livre de bord illustré qui peut servir à plus qu'un livre de bord traditionnel, car il contient : • une description de la plupart des endroits où l'ancre de Thoè a laissé son empreinte. • 200 lieux dont 180 mouillages forains, 100 photographies, 50 cartes. • 250 liens vers les images agrandies. • 350 liens contextuels vers Google Earth® • 1000 liens hypertextes et... seulement 1 table des matières. 3 modes d'expression intégrés Ce livre intègre (1) écriture & photographie conventionnelles, (2) pages Web et (3) Google Earth® 3 versions & 3 modes de consultation Son contenu peut se matérialiser (ou se dématérialiser !) de trois manières, selon les besoins : • c'est une livre électronique (eBook) consultable connecté ou non à Internet • ce peut être un livre imprimé comme au bon vieux temps (en imprimant cet eBook) • c'est le même contenu informatif intégré sur le Web et dans Google Earth® lecture « off-line » L'eBook contient 1000 liens hypertextes permettant de « voyager » dans le document. Vous pouvez cliquer : • sur les entrées de la « Table de navigation hypertexte » pour aller à la section sélectionnée. • sur les liens insérés dans cette typogra phie-ci et dans la Table de Matières. • sur les symboles suivants : ♠ pour revenir à la Table de navigation ♣ pour les mouillages sauvages et ♥ pour les coups de cœur de Thoè. lecture « on-line » Si votre ordinateur est connecté à Internet, vous pouvez en plus, cliquer : • sur les photographies (pour les agrandir à côté d'un cadre de navigation Google Earth calé sur la position du mouillage) • sur les positions GPS (pour ouvrir Google Earth sur la position sélectionnée) • sur les cartes et sur le l'icône-globe (pour ouvrir Google Earth sur la zone de navigation sélectionnée) Thoè et Pierre Lang vous souhaitent bonne lecture et bon voyage.
    [Show full text]