Arxiv:2103.12494V4 [Math.AT] 27 Jun 2021 Orsodn Author: Corresponding Dimension Mological E Od N Phrases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PROPERTIES OF THE COMBINATORIAL HANTZSCHE-WENDT GROUPS J. POPKO AND A. SZCZEPANSKI´ Abstract. The combinatorial Hantzsche-Wendt group Gn = −1 2 2 {x1, ..., xn | xi xj xixj , ∀i 6= j} was defined by W. Craig and P. A. Linnell in [3]. For n = 2 it is a fundamental group of 3-dimensional oriented flat manifold with no cyclic holonomy group. We calculate the Hilbert-Poincar´eseries of Gn,n ≥ 1 with Q and F2 coefficients. Moreover, we prove that a cohomological dimension of Gn is equal to n +1. Some other properties of this group are also considered. 1. Introduction Let Γ3 be the fundamental group of an oriented flat 3-manifold with non-cyclic holonomy, which was the first time defined by W. Hantzsche & H. Wendt and W. Nowacki in 1934, see [7], [11]. From [18, ch. 9], Γ3 is a torsion free crystallographic group of a rank 3. Where, by crystallo- graphic group of dimension n we understand a discrete and cocompact subgroup of a group E(n)= O(n) ⋉Rn of isometries of the Euclidean space Rn. From Bieberbach theorems [18] any crystallographic group Γ of rank n defines a short exact sequence (1) 1 → Zn → Γ → H → 1, where Zn is a free abelian subgroup of all translations of Γ and H is a finite group, called a holonomy group of Γ. In the case of Γ3 a group H = Z2 ⊕ Z2. As a subgroup of E(3) 1 0 0 −1 0 0 Γ3 = gen{A =( 0 −1 0 , (1/2, 1/2, 0)), B =( 0 1 0 , (0, 1/2, 1/2))}. 0 0 −1 0 0 −1 The Hantzsche-Wendt groups/manifolds are also defined in higher odd arXiv:2103.12494v4 [math.AT] 27 Jun 2021 dimensions, as fundamental groups of oriented flat manifolds of dimen- n−1 sions, n ≥ 3 with holonomy group (Z2) . We shall denote it by Γn, see [18, ch. 9]. From Bieberbach theorems there exist, for given n, a finite number L(n) of Hantzsche-Wendt groups (HW groups), up to isomorphism. However, the number L(n) growths exponentially, see 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 20J05; Secondary: 20H15 20E06 55R20 Key words and phrases. Hantzsche-Wendt groups, Hilbert-Poincar´eseries, coho- mological dimension Corresponding author: A. Szczepa´nski Date: June 29, 2021. 1 2 J. POPKO AND A. SZCZEPANSKI´ [16, Theorem 2.8]. Let us define an example of the HW group Γn of dimension ≥ 3 which is a generalization of Γ3. Example 1. Let n be an odd number. Then Γn = −1 0 ... 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 −1 ... 0 0 0 ... 0 0 ... 0 0 ... −1 0 0 ... 0 0 = gen{γi =( 0 0 ... 0 1 0 ... 0 0 , (0, ..., 0, 1/2, 1/2, 0, ..., 0))}, 0 0 ... 0 0 −1 ... 0 0 ... 0 0 ... 0 0 0 ... −1 0 0 0 ... 0 0 0 ... 0 −1 where 1 is at the i-th place and the first 1/2 is at the i-th place, 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1. In 1982, see [18], the second author proved that for odd n ≥ 3, Γn are rational homology spheres. Moreover, for n ≥ 5 the commutator sub- group of the group Γn is equal to the translation subgroup [18, Theorem 9.3]. Moreover, for m ≥ 7 there exist many isospectral manifolds non pairwise homeomorphic, [16, Corollary 3.6]. HW groups have an in- teresting connection with Fibonacci groups (see below) and the theory of quadratic forms over the field F2, [18, Theorem 9.5]. HW-manifolds have not Spin and SpinC-structures, [8] and [18, page 109]. Finally HW manifolds are cohomological rigid that means two HW manifolds are homeomorphic if and only if their cohomology rings over F2 are isomorphic, [13]. G is called a unique product group if given two nonempty finite sub- set X,Y of G, then exists at least one element g ∈ G which has a unique representation g = xy with x ∈ X and y ∈ Y. A unique product group is torsion free, though the converse is not true in general. Origi- nal motivation for studying unique product groups was the Kaplansky zero divisor conjecture, namely that if k is a field and G is a torsion free group, then kG is a domain. It was proved in 1988 [15] that a group G2 is a nonunique product group. To prove it the author uses the combinatorial presentation ([12, Lemma 13.3.1, p. 606-607]) −1 2 2 −1 2 2 (2) Γ3 = {x, y | x y xy ,y x yx }. However the counterexample to the Kaplansky unit conjecture was given in 2021 by G. Gardam [4]. Again the counterexample was found in the group ring F2[Γ3]. The Kaplansky unit conjecture states that every unit in K[G] is of the form kg for k ∈ K \{0} and g ∈ G. In [3] is proposed the following generalization of Γ3. Definition 1. By combinatorial Hantzsche-Wendt group we shall un- derstand a finite presented group −1 2 2 Gn = {x1, ..., xn|xi xj xixj ∀ i =6 j}. PROPERTIES OF THE COMBINATORIAL HANTZSCHE-WENDT GROUPS 3 It is easy to see that, G0 = 1 and G1 = Z. Moreover G2 is the Hantzsche - Wendt group of dimension 3. Let n 2 2 2 (3) Z ≃ An ≃hx1, x2, ..., xni, be a free abelian subgroup of Gn. In [3, Lemma 3.1] is proved that n n n Z ⊳ Gn. Later we shall denote An by Z . Moreover, Wn = Gn/Z = 2 2 2 n hx1, ..., xn | x1, x2, ..., xni≃∗ Z2. Finally in [3, Theorem 3.3] is proved that Gn is torsion free for all n ≥ 1. This is also the corollary from Theorem 2. For any 1 ≤ m ≤ n, Gm embeds in Gn and for n ≥ 2,Gn is a nonunique product group [3, Corollary 3.5]. Another interesting result of [3, Theorem 3.6] is following. There is for n ≥ 3 a surjective n−1 homomorphism Φn : Gn−1 → Γn. It is easy to see that Φn(Z ) is a free abelian subgroup of the translation subgroup of Γn of a rank n−1. n−1 n−1 Since Γn/Φn(Z ) is an infinite group and KerΦn ∩ Z = 1 then KerΦn is an infinite generated free group. At that point we would like to mention the following related result, see [10]. Recall that the Fibonacci group F(r, n) is defined by the presentation F (r, n)= {a0, ..., an−1|aiai+1 ··· ai+r−1 = ai+r, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1}, where the indices are understood modulo n. There exists connection of these groups with our family Gn. We know that F (2, 6) is isomorphic to Γ3, and there is, for any n ≥ 3 an epimorphism Ψn : F (n−1, 2n) → Γn. In the first part of a paper we shall show two models of BGn (or K(Gn, 1)). They are a topological realization of two algebraic repre- sentations of Gn. The first model is an appriopriate gluing of n copies of generalized fat Klein bottles. It corresponds to isomorphism Gn n with ∗Zn Kn where Kn is a generalized Klein bottle crystallographic group and amalgamated are translation lattices. The second model is some Borel construction. It corresponds to representation Gn as an extension: n (4) 1 → Z → Gn → Wn → 1. From the first model we obtain that a cohomological dimension of Gn is equal to n +1 for n> 1. In the second part we calculate the Hilbert-Poincar´eseries of Gn, n ≥ 1 with Q and F2 coefficients and explicate algebra structure on coho- mologies. Here our main tools will be the Lyndon-Hochschild-Serre (LHS) spectral sequence of the group extension (4). The case with F2 coefficients use a multiplicative structure of LHS. In F2 case it is ⋆,⋆ enough to use E3 groups, but in the raional coefficient we only need ⋆,⋆ a E2 . (See formulas 12 and 16.) In the last part we calculate some other invariants and propeties of Gn. For example abelianization and the Euler characteristic. 4 J. POPKO AND A. SZCZEPANSKI´ Acknowledgements We are grateful to Giles Gardam for pointing out a small typo in an earlier version of the paper. 2. Two models of BGn 2.1. Gluing fat Klein bottles. We start with an example. Example 2. Let K− be a fundamental group of the Klein bottle and Z2 its maximal abelian subgroup of index two. It is well known (see [9, Chapter 8.2, p. 153]) that Γ3 ≃ K− ∗Z2 K−. A generalization of the above example gives us the following char- (i) acterization of the combinatorial Hantzsche - Wendt group. Let Gn denotes a subgroup of Gn generated by {xi} and an abelian subgroup (3) Zn. We shall call it a generalized Klein bottle. Proposition 1. The natural group homomorphism n i (5) ∗Z Gn → Gn is an isomorphism. Proof: It follows from a definition and a structure of the free products with amalgamation. i Gn is a torsion free crystallographic group of dimension n and acts n freely on R (in a way analogous to K− sa has classifying space which is n dimensional closed flat manifold Ki (the generalized Klein bot- tle). A topological interpretation of the isomorphism (5) gives us a n + 1 dimensional classifying space BGn as a (homotopicaly) gluing together n generalized Klein bottles K(1),K(2), ..., K(n) after common n dimensional torus Rn/Zn. This space has dimension n + 1 since we must convert maps Rn/Zn → K(i) to inclusions. More precisely it may n be done as follows.
Recommended publications
  • Unsolved Problems in Group Theory. the Kourovka Notebook

    Unsolved Problems in Group Theory. the Kourovka Notebook

    Unsolved problems in group theory. The Kourovka notebook. No. 18 Edited by: Mazurov, V. D. and Khukhro, E. I. 2014 MIMS EPrint: 2014.1 Manchester Institute for Mathematical Sciences School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Reports available from: http://eprints.maths.manchester.ac.uk/ And by contacting: The MIMS Secretary School of Mathematics The University of Manchester Manchester, M13 9PL, UK ISSN 1749-9097 Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian Division q INSTITUTEOFMATHEMATICS UNSOLVED PROBLEMS IN GROUP THEORY THE KOUROVKA NOTEBOOK No. 18 Novosibirsk 2014 q Editors: V. D. Mazurov and E. I. Khukhro New problems and comments can be sent to the Editors: V. D. Mazurov or E. I. Khukhro Institute of Mathematics Novosibirsk-90, 630090, Russia e-mails: [email protected] [email protected] c V. D. Mazurov, E. I. Khukhro, 2014 Contents Preface ......................................................................... 4 Problems from the 1st Issue (1965) . 5 Problems from the 2nd Issue (1966) . 7 Problems from the 3rd Issue (1969) . 10 Problems from the 4th Issue (1973) . 12 Problems from the 5th Issue (1976) . 16 Problems from the 6th Issue (1978) . 19 Problems from the 7th Issue (1980) . 23 Problems from the 8th Issue (1982) . 27 Problems from the 9th Issue (1984) . 33 Problems from the 10th Issue (1986) . 39 Problems from the 11th Issue (1990) . 47 Problems from the 12th Issue (1992) . 59 Problems from the 13th Issue (1995) . 67 Problems from the 14th Issue (1999) . 73 Problems from the 15th Issue (2002) . 85 Problems from the 16th Issue (2006) . 98 Problems from the 17th Issue (2010) . 111 New Problems .
  • On Automorphisms of Structures in Logic and Orderability of Groups In

    On Automorphisms of Structures in Logic and Orderability of Groups In

    On Automorphisms of Structures in Logic and Orderability of Groups in Topology By Ataollah Togha A Dissertation Submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences ofTheGeorgeWashingtonUniversity in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 30, 2004 Dissertation Co-directed by Valentina Harizanov The George Washington University and Ali Enayat American University Contents Dedication iv Acknowledgements v Abstract vii 1 Model-theoretic Preliminaries 1 1.1TheAutomorphismGroup...................... 1 1.2Saturation,Categoricity,andHomogeneity............. 6 1.3RecursivelySaturatedModels.................... 8 2 Automorphisms of Models of Set Theory 16 2.1Friedman’sTheorem......................... 16 2.2AutomorphismsthatFixOrdinalsFixaLotMore........ 22 2.3CutsinModelsofSetTheory.................... 24 2.4OpenProblems............................ 32 3 (Left-)orderability of Groups 34 i 3.1 (Left-)ordered Groups and (Left-)orderability . .......... 34 3.2CharacterizationsandConnectionswithLogic........... 39 3.3TheAbelianCase........................... 42 3.4 Left-orderability of Non-abelian Groups .............. 43 4 Non-left-orderability of Fundamental Groups of 3-Manifolds 49 4.1TopologicalPreliminaries...................... 49 4.2Non-left-orderable3-ManifoldGroups............... 52 4.3OpenProblems............................ 63 ii List of Figures Figure3.1.................................. 45 Figure3.2.................................. 46 Figure4.1.................................
  • ^H ^Fibonacci Quarterly

    ^H ^Fibonacci Quarterly

    ^h ^Fibonacci Quarterly THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE FIBONACCI ASSOCIATION VOLUME 15 [l^WST NUMBER 1 CONTENTS Residues of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences C. C. Yalavigi 1 Composites and Primes Among Powers of Fibonacci V. E. Hoggatt, Jr., and Numbers, Increased or Decreased by One Marjorie Bicknell-Johnson 2 Divisibility by Fibonacci and Lucas Squares V. E. Hoggatt, Jr., and Marjorie Bicknell-Johnson 3 Letter to the Editor . John W. Jameson 8 An Elementary Proof of Kronecker's Theorem J. Spencer 9 Fibonacci Numbers in the Count of Spanning Trees Peter J. Slater 11 The Diophantine Equation 3 3 3 (x1 + x2 + - +xnf = x + x 2 + - + x . W. R. Utz 14 An Application of W. Schmidt's Theorem Transcendental Numbers and Golden Number Maurice Mignotte 15 The Reciprocal Law W. E. Greig 17 Binet's Formula Generalized A. K. Whitford 21 On the Multinomial Theorem David Lee Hilliker 22 A Fibonacci Formula of Lucas and its Subsequent Manifestations and Rediscoveries . H. W. Gould 25 Numerator Polynomial Coefficient Arrays for Catalan V. E. Hoggatt, Jr., and and Related Sequence Convolution Triangles. Marjorie Bicknell-Johnson 30 Fibonacci-Like Groups and Periods of Fibonacci-Like Sequences .Lawrence Somer 35 Solution of a Certain Recurrence Relation .Douglas A. Fults 41 On Tribonacci Numbers and Related Functions Krishnaswami Alladi and V. E. Hoggatt, Jr. 42 Sums of Fibonacci Reciprocals W. E. Greig 46 Fibonacci Notes — 5. Zero-One Sequences Again L. Carlitz 49 On the A/"-Canonical Fibonacci Representations of Order N . Robert Silber 57 A Rearrangement of Series Based on a Partition of the Natural Numbers H.
  • Kaplansky's Conjectures

    Kaplansky's Conjectures

    Kaplansky’s conjectures Giles Gardam University of Münster New York Group Theory Seminar 11 March 2021 Giles Gardam (University of Münster) Kaplansky’s conjectures 11 March 2021 1 / 17 Links Giles Gardam. A counterexample to the unit conjecture for group rings. arXiv:2102.11818. These slides are available at www.gilesgardam.com/slides/nygt.pdf. Giles Gardam (University of Münster) Kaplansky’s conjectures 11 March 2021 2 / 17 Group rings Let G be a group and R be a ring. The group ring R[G] is the ring nX o rg g j rg 2 R; g 2 G of finite formal sums with multiplication X X X rg g · shh := (rg sh)(gh): × Note that g 7! 1R g is an embedding G ,! (R[G]) of G in the group of units and r 7! r1G embeds R as a subring of R[G]. An expression like r − g makes sense. G-actions on R-modules (e.g. vector spaces) are the same thing as R[G]-modules, so group rings are natural objects of study in representation theory, topology, etc. If K is a field then K[G] is an algebra over K and one might say “group algebra” instead of “group ring”. Giles Gardam (University of Münster) Kaplansky’s conjectures 11 March 2021 3 / 17 Group rings (continued) If G = Z = hti then R[G] is just finite formal sums of multiples of powers of −1 P i t, that is, the Laurent polynomials R[t; t ] = i ai t . k Similarly R[Z ] is just the Laurent polynomials in k unknowns.
  • Non-Commutative Gröbner Bases and Applications

    Non-Commutative Gröbner Bases and Applications

    Dissertation Non-Commutative Gr¨obnerBases and Applications Xingqiang Xiu Eingereicht an der Fakult¨atf¨urInformatik und Mathematik der Universit¨atPassau als Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften Submitted to the Department of Informatics and Mathematics of the Universit¨atPassau in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of a Doctor in the Domain of Science Betreuer / Advisor: Prof. Dr. Martin Kreuzer Universit¨atPassau May 2012 Non-Commutative Gr¨obnerBases and Applications Xingqiang Xiu Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Martin Kreuzer Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Rosenberger M¨undliche Pr¨ufer: Prof. Dr. Franz Brandenburg Prof. Dr. Tobias Kaiser Der Fakult¨atf¨urInformatik und Mathematik der Universit¨atPassau vorgelegt im Mai 2012 Dedicated to my parents and grandma ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 7 2.1 Monoids and Groups . 7 2.2 Rings . 15 2.3 Modules . 21 3 Gr¨obnerBases in KhXi 27 3.1 Admissible Orderings . 28 3.2 The Division Algorithm . 34 3.3 Gr¨obnerBases . 40 3.4 Syzygies . 46 3.5 Gr¨obnerBases of Right Ideals . 52 4 Gr¨obnerBasis Computations in KhXi 55 4.1 The Buchberger Procedure . 57 4.2 Improved Buchberger Procedures . 68 4.2.1 Interreduction on Obstructions . 69 4.2.2 Improved Buchberger Procedures . 77 4.3 Homogenization and Dehomogenization . 96 4.4 Gr¨obnerBasis Computations for Right Ideals . 108 5 Gr¨obnerBasis Theory in (KhXi ⊗ KhXi)r 111 5.1 Module Term Orderings and the Division Algorithm . 112 5.2 Gr¨obnerBases and Gr¨obner Basis Computations . 118 iv CONTENTS 5.3 Improved Buchberger Procedures . 124 5.4 The F4 Procedure .