DOCSLIB.ORG

DTM Sudan DTM Sudan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DTM Sudan DTM Sudan Displacement Tracking Matrix DTM Sudan DTM Sudan January - March 2019 OVERVIEW From January to March 2019, DTM conducted 71,583 registration figures for returnees – totaling 31,586 and registrations across five states in Sudan – 93 per cent of 31,843 individuals respectively. Through its flow monitoring which were returnees. South Darfur hosted the largest component, the DTM also registered 2,536 South Sudanese presence of internally displaced persons (IDPs), with a entering Sudan through Abyei over the three-month period, total registered population count of 4,193 individuals. as well as 3,519 Sudanese returning from the Kingdom of Both Central Darfur and North Darfur had the highest Saudi Arabia. REGISTRATION Khartoum El Malha 66,444 Jebrat El Sheikh Returnees Um Buru Sodari Kornoi El Tina North Darfur North Kordofan 5,139 Umm Ram�a Kulbus Kutum IDPs Mellit El Kuma Jebel Moon El Sireaf Bara El Douiem Sirba El Fasher Saraf Omra Kebkabiya West Darfur Tawilla Umm Keddada El GeneinaKreinik Legend Rokoro Wad Banda El Nehoud Kos� Dar El Salam Kalimendo Um Rawaba Zalingei Ner�� Shiekan Abu Zabad Tendal� Returnees Beida Azum Sharg Jabel Marra Habila White Nile MarshangNiteaga 39 - 157 Central Darfur KassAlwehda El Taweisha Wadi Salih Sheiria Al Qoz 158 - 403 Nyala North El Salam Foro Baranga Sha�ai El Abassiya 404 - 850 Ghubaysh Al Sunut 4,193 Dilling Ailliet 447 Rashad 851 - 1,705 West Kordofan Bindisi Mukjar Kubum Yassin Ed El Fursan Bielel Ed Daein Habila 1,706 - 31,586 El Salam Abu Karinka El Salam South Kordofan Adila Assalaya Lagawa Reif Ashargi Umm Dukhun Gereida Heiban Tullus Babanusa Kadugli Abu Jubaiha IDPs Rahad El Berdi Katayla East Darfur Dimsu 499 Umm Durein Buram El Ferdous 0 - 447 Sunta Al Buram 448 - 499 Um Dafug Keilak Abyei - Muglad Talodi Abu Jabra 500 - 4193 South Darfur Bahr El Arab Abyei PCA Area locality El Radoom Abyei PCA Area State International Abyei PCA area Kilometers Data Source | IOM registration data since 2010 0 30 60 120 180 240 Map Published | 16-9-2019 . This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and boundaries on this map do not imply ocial endorsement or acceptance by IOM. Map 1 Registration of IDPS and returnees, January to March 2019 HIGHLIGHTS 47,241 Months IDPs Returnees Grand Total Individuals January 2,059 47,241 49,300 16,094 February 0 3,109 3,109 3,109 March 3,080 16,094 19,174 2,059 3,080 Grand Total Individuals 5,139 66,444 71,583 January February March IDPs Returnees Table 1 Total number of IDP and returnee individuals registered, January to March 2019 1 Graph 1 Total number of IDP and returnee individuals registered, January to March 2019 1. Registration activities are conducted upon request 1 DTM Sudan DTM Sudan January - March 2019 INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (IDPs) SOUTH KORDOFAN Registration of IDPs in South Kordofan was conducted in Dalami (Habeila locality) and Kadugli town (Kadugli locality) in both January and March 2019. IDPs were displaced from surrounding localities, arriving from Agour, Darei, Sabat, Tunguli, Togor, Nigeir, Alburam, Heiban and Um Dorain amongst others. This has largely been a result of political 5,139 violence emerging between SPLA-N and government forces. Individuals In Dalami, 146 households – comprising 447 individuals – were registered by IOM. Similarly, 216 households and 499 individuals were registered in Kadugli. SOUTH DARFUR In South Darfur, IOM registered 1,612 individuals (354 households) at the Otash IDP camp in Nyala North locality. In March 2019, an additional 2,581 individuals (605 82% 18% households) were registered in the same camp. Reasons for the displacement were attributed to – as outlined in South Kordofan the initial interagency mission report – the 2018 conflict South Darfur between the SLA/AW and government forces. All IDP 4,193 946 Individuals Individuals individuals arrived at the camp from Beliel locality. RETURNEES CENTRAL DARFUR In 2015, a peace agreement between the two tribes of Salamat and Massirya (who had been engaged in conflict since 2013) was reached – initiating an improvement in the security situation in Central Darfur. Since then, displaced persons have been returning to their villages in Um Dukhun 66,444 locality. In January 2019, IOM verified and registered 31,586 Individuals individual returnees (8,759 households) in 33 villages across Um Dukhun – individuals since having returned from Chad, the Central African Republic and other areas in Central Darfur. NORTH DARFUR Central Darfur North Darfur In January 2019, IOM verified and registered 14,905 returnee 31,586 31,838 Individuals Individuals individuals (2,595 households) in El Sireaf locality in North 47% 48% Darfur. These returnees returned to their place of origin from Central Darfur and other El Sireaf areas. In the initial interagency mission report, all returnees were confirmed to have returned voluntarily, in part, due to the improved 5% security situation in El Sireaf. West Darfur Additionally, over the duration of the three-month period, 3,020 IOM registered a new caseload of 16,933 returnee WEST DARFUR Individuals individuals (3,166 households) across nine localities in North In March 2019, IOM registered 3,020 individual returnees Darfur – namely, Elfasher, Kornoi, Darelsalam, Kalimando, (932 households) in Jabel Moon and Sirba, West Darfur, Eltina, Kutum, Um Baru, Mellit and Tawilla. Tawilla alone who had returned from displacement in the surrounding hosted 14,131 of these individuals, which is by far the areas. The security situation had subsequently improved highest concentration. IOM further assessed the general since the death of a Mysrian man in January – considered conditions of returns, the site appropriateness, as well as the catalyst for the preceding tribal violence and retaliation. the level voluntariness. DTM 2 Sudan DTM Sudan January - March 2019 FLOWFLOW MONITORINGMONITORING SOUTHSOUTH SUDANESESUDANESE ININ ABYEIABYEI DTM’sDTM’s flowflow monitoringmonitoring pointpoint inin Abyei,Abyei, fromfrom wherewhere SouthSouth 2,536 individuals2,536 SudaneseSudanese areare registeredregistered uponupon arrivalarrival intointo Sudan,Sudan, registeredregistered aa individuals totaltotal numbernumber ofof 2,5362,536 individualsindividuals (665(665 households)households) betweenbetween 49% 51% JanuaryJanuary andand MarchMarch 2019.2019. OfOf thosethose registered,registered, therethere waswas aa 49%Male 51%Female Male Female relativelyrelatively eveneven gendergender distributiondistribution –– 1,2341,234 individualsindividuals werewere male and 1,302 were female. As evident in the map, the South male and 1,302 were female. As evident in the map, the Abyei PCA Area Upper Nile Upper Nile SouthSudanese Sudanese came camefrom afrom broad a broadrange rangeof South of SouthSudanese Sudanese states Abyei PCA Area Northern Bahr el Ghazal Unity states– the –majority the majority being being from fromthe Abyei the Abyei PCA PCA area, area, Warrap Warrap and Northern Bahr el Ghazal Unity Warrap andUnity. Unity. Sixty-six Sixty-six per centper centof the of totalthe totalpopulation population count count were Warrap Western Bahr el Ghazal adults (over the age of 18 years) – 1,683 individuals – whilst Western Bahr el Ghazal Jonglei were adults (over the age of 18 years) – 1,683 individuals – Jonglei whilst562 individuals 562 individuals were between were between the ages the of five ages and of five17 years, and and17 Lakes Lakes years,291 individuals and 291 individualswere aged were four andaged younger. four and With younger. regards With to regardsadditional to additionalvulnerabilities, vulnerabilities, only two individualsonly two individualswere registered were Western Equatoria Western Equatoria South Sudanese Eastern Equatoria registeredas ‘chronically as ‘chronically ill’, two as ‘mentallyill’, two asill’, ‘mentallytwo as ‘unaccompanied disabled’, two South Sudanese Eastern Equatoria 2 - 0 Central Equatoria elders,’ five as ‘disabled’ and 54 as ‘lactating’ – accounting for a 2 - 0 Central Equatoria as ‘unaccompanied elders,’ five as ‘physically disabled’ and 9 - 3 total three per cent of all South Sudanese individuals in need 9 - 3 54 as ‘lactating’ – accounting for a total three per cent of all 474 - 10 This map is for illustration purposes only. Names and 474 - 10 boundariesThis map is onfor thisillustration map do purposes not imply only. ocial Names and of additional assistance and support. 949 - 475 endorsementboundaries on or this acceptance map do not by implyIOM. ocial South Sudanese individuals in need of additional assistance and 949 - 475 endorsement or acceptance by IOM. support. Map 2 South Sudanese registered in Abyei, January to March 2019 SUDANESESUDANESE RETURNINGRETURNING FROMFROM SAUDISAUDI ARABIAARABIA SinceSince thethe KingdomKingdom ofof SaudiSaudi ArabiaArabia (KSA)(KSA) implementedimplemented aa were male (85(85%) per – cent) 2,653 – individuals2,653 individuals – and –only and 478 only were 478 newnew migration migration policypolicy inin 20172017 –– resultingresulting inin thethe departuredeparture ofof femalewere female (15%). (15 Sixty-eight per cent). per Sixty-eight cent of returneeper cent ofmales returnee were millionsmillions ofof irregularirregular migrantsmigrants fromfrom itsits territoryterritory –– IOMIOM hashas betweenmales were the between ages of 18the andages 59 of years.18 and 59 years. beenbeen monitoringmonitoring allall returneesreturnees toto SudanSudan throughthrough thethe twotwo At the port of Sawakin, in comparison, there were far centralcentral entryentry points;points; namely,namely,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights
    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur
    The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur John Prendergast, Omer Ismail, and Akshaya Kumar August 2013 WWW.ENOUGHPROJECT.ORG WWW.SATSENTINEL.ORG The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur John Prendergast, Omer Ismail, and Akshaya Kumar August 2013 COVER PHOTO Displaced Beni Hussein cattle shepherds take shelter on the outskirts of El Sereif village, North Darfur. Fighting over gold mines in North Darfur’s Jebel Amer area between the Janjaweed Abbala forces and Beni Hussein tribe started early this January and resulted in mass displacement of thousands. AP PHOTO/UNAMID, ALBERT GONZALEZ FARRAN Overview Darfur is burning again, with devastating results for its people. A kaleidoscope of Janjaweed forces are once again torching villages, terrorizing civilians, and systematically clearing prime land and resource-rich areas of their inhabitants. The latest ethnic-cleans- ing campaign has already displaced more than 300,000 Darfuris this year and forced more than 75,000 to seek refuge in neighboring Chad, the largest population displace- ment in recent years.1 An economic agenda is emerging as a major driver for the escalating violence. At the height of the mass atrocities committed from 2003 to 2005, the Sudanese regime’s strategy appeared to be driven primarily by the counterinsurgency objectives and secondarily by the acquisition of salaries and war booty. Undeniably, even at that time, the government could have only secured the loyalty of its proxy Janjaweed militias by allowing them to keep the fertile lands from which they evicted the original inhabitants. Today’s violence is even more visibly fueled by monetary motivations, which include land grabbing; consolidating control of recently discovered gold mines; manipulating reconciliation conferences for increased “blood money”; expanding protection rackets and smuggling networks; demanding ransoms; undertaking bank robberies; and resum- ing the large-scale looting that marked earlier periods of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • North Darfur II
    Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annexes: I. North Darfur II. South Darfur III. West Darfur Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annex I: North Darfur North Darfur Main Humanitarian Agencies Table 1.1: UN Agencies Table 1.2: International NGOs Table 1.3: National NGOs Intl. Natl. Vehicl Intl. Natl. Vehic Intl. Natl. Vehic Agency Sector staff staff* es** Agency Sector staff staff* les** Agency Sector staff staff les FAO 10 1 2 2 ACF 9 4 12 3 Al-Massar 0 1 0 Operations, Logistics, Camp IOM*** Management x x x GAA 1, 10 1 3 2 KSCS x x x OCHA 14 1 2 3 GOAL 2, 5, 8, 9 6 117 10 SECS x x x 2, 3, 7, UNDP*** 15 x x x ICRC 12, 13 6 20 4 SRC 1, 2 0 10 3 2, 4, 5, 6, UNFPA*** 5, 7 x x x IRC 9, 10, 11 1 5 4 SUDO 5, 7 0 2 0 Protection, Technical expertise for UNHCR*** site planning x x x MSF - B 5 5 10 0 Wadi Hawa 1 1 x 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Oxfam - UNICEF 9 11, 12 4 5 4 GB 2, 3, 4 5 30 10 Total 1 14 3 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, UNJLC*** 17 x x x SC-UK 11, 12 5 27 8 Technical Spanish UNMAS*** advice x x x Red Cross 3, 4 1 0 1 UNSECOORD 16 1 1 1 DED*** x x x WFP 1, 9, 11 1 12 5 NRC*** x x x WHO 4, 5, 6 2 7 2 Total 34 224 42 Total 10 29 17 x = information unavailable at this time Sectors: 1) Food 2) Shelter/NFIs 3) Clean water 4) Sanitation 5) Primary Health Facilities *Programme and project staff only.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of South Sudan
    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY Food Security Update
    SUDAN Food Security Outlook Update April 2017 Food security continues to deteriorate in South Kordofan and Jebel Marra KEY MESSAGES By March/April 2017, food insecurity among IDPs and poor residents in Food security outcomes, April to May 2017 SPLM-N areas of South Kordofan and new IDPs in parts of Jabal Mara in Darfur has already deteriorated to Crisis (IPC Phase 3) and is likely to deteriorate to Emergency (IPC Phase 4) by May/June through September 2017 due to displacement, restrictions on movement and trade flows, and limited access to normal livelihoods activities. Influxes of South Sudanese refugees into Sudan continued in March and April due to persistent conflict and severe acute food insecurity in South Sudan. As March 31, more than 85,000 South Sudanese refugees have arrived into Sudan since the beginning of 2017, raising total number arrived to nearly 380,000 South Sudanese refugees since the start of the conflict in December 2013. Following above-average 2016/17 harvests, staple food prices either remained stable or started increases between February and March, particularly in some arid areas of Darfur and Red Sea states, and South Source: FEWS NET Kordofan, which was affected by dryness in 2016. Prices remained on Projected food security outcomes, June to September average over 45 percent above their respective recent five-year 2017 average. Terms of trade (ToT) between livestock and staple foods prices have started to be in favor of cereal traders and producers since January 2017. CURRENT SITUATION Staple food prices either remained stable or started earlier than anticipated increases, particularly in the main arid and conflicted affected areas of Darfur, Red Sea and South Kordofan states between February and March.
    [Show full text]
  • ABYEI CASE STUDY Improving Livelihoods, Social Peace and Stability in Abyei
    EVALUATION IN HARD TO REACH AREAS Conflict Sensitivity: A criterion for evaluations in the contexts of violent conflicts ABYEI CASE STUDY Improving Livelihoods, Social Peace and Stability in Abyei Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Brussels, 17 May 2019 [email protected] Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Abyei Map [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure FAO, 2016. Land and people in protracted crises [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Conflicts resulting from different types of tenure [email protected] Marco De Gaetano – Natural Resource Management Expert Improving livelihoods, social peace and stability in the Abyei Area Project intervention strategy Three Pillars I. Assessing the natural resources to promote its efficient utilization and future development II. Promoting dialogue, confidence and peacebuilding
    [Show full text]
  • DTM MONTHLY REGIONAL REPORT Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM)
    NOV 2018 DTM MONTHLY REGIONAL REPORT Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) East & the Horn of Africa Flow monitoring in Uganda continued through the four FMPs located along the border with South Sudan in close coordi- nation with the DTM South Sudan team. Mixed Migration Flow monitoring was also initiated at an additional six points in Uganda, along the Flow Monitoring Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) border, bringing the total number of and Uganda Reporting Period FMPs in Uganda to 10. November 2018 Regionally, a total of 126,366 individuals were observed at the FMPs during the Active Flow Monitoring Network month of November 2018. A large pro- Burundi 8 FMPs portion of the migrants tracked were Djibouti 10 FMPs moving along the eastern corridor in the Ethiopia 5 FMPs Horn of Africa (HoA) region (48%). Of Somalia 7 FMPs these, the majority were Ethiopian na- South Sudan 5 FMPs tionals (65%), while the second-largest Uganda 10 FMPs population was Somali nationals (30%), which is comparable to what was tracked A network of 45 Flow Monitoring Points in October (31%). (FMPs) is currently operational in six countries. Fifty-two per cent of the movements tracked were incident-based move- Flow monitoring registry continued in ments, mainly between Burundi and the Burundi, and an additional four points United Republic of Tanzania, South Su- were opened in the provinces of Ruyigi dan and Sudan, as well as between and Rutana, bringing the total to eight Uganda, South Sudan and the United Re- Burundi, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan FMPs. Djibouti Flow Monitoring contin- public of Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Monitoring Report United Nations Mission in Sudan/ Public Information Office
    09 Dec 2010 Media Monitoring Report www.unmissions.unmis.org United Nations Mission in Sudan/ Public Information Office Referendum Watch • We have not achieved what we sought of the CPA – VP Taha (Al-Akhbar) • Voter registration comes to a close (Al-Rai Al-aam) • Almost three million sign up for south Sudan vote (AFP) • There is a likelihood of war with the south – Dr. Nafei (Al-Rai Al-Aam et al) • SSRC denies allegations of irregularities levelled by the NCP (Al-Rai Al-Aam) • Higher Committee formed for referendum appeals (Khartoum Monitor/ SUNA) • NCP, SPLM resume post-referendum negotiations (The Citizen) • Armed men fail in attempt at Deputy Abyei Administrator (Al-Ahram Al-Youm) • Misseriya challenge SPLM to bar it from participating at the Abyei referendum (Al- Tayyar) • Opposition parties to meet Misseriya representatives (Al-Rai Al-Aam) • S. Africa's Tutu calls for peaceful Sudan referendum (AFP) Other Highlights • Thousands displaced by Sudanese army bombs - aid agency (AlertNet) • Northern Bahr el Ghazal gets humanitarian assistance for victims of air attacks (Sudantribune.com) • Authorities release students arrested in Bahr-el-Ghazal (Al-Rai Al-Aam; Akhir Lahza) • SPLM fears Athor may have been transferred to Khartoum (Al-Sudani) • Minnawi orders his troops to cross over to southern Sudan (Al-Rai Al-Aam) • Kidnapped Latvian pilots released in South Darfur (SUNA) • ICC prosecutor accuses Sudanese rebels of killings (Reuters) • Pirates’ catch exposed route of arms in a tense Sudan (Boston.com) • Rise in commodity prices in Khartoum (Ajras Al-Hurriya) • Sudan men fined over "indecent" fashion show makeup (Reuters) NOTE: Reproduction here does not mean that the UNMIS PIO can vouch for the accuracy or veracity of the contents, nor does this report reflect the views of the United Nations Mission in Sudan.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection Situation Update Sudan, October 2020 the Overall Security Situation Remained Relatively Stable in the Camps, Return A
    Protection situation update Sudan, October 2020 The overall security situation remained relatively stable in the camps, return and conflict affected areas of Darfur, Kordofan and Kassala states, however, unpredictable with current concerns due to the dynamic security environment. Sporadic violence and clashes in some areas continue to cause human casualties, displacement, damage to houses and belongings of population, thus creating high vulnerability. During October, a total of 27 protection incidents have been recorded including: twelve cases of generalized violence, eleven cases of Armed attack, two cases of abduction and two cases of intercommunal armed conflict. Major concerns include: Central Darfur - In Hamedia, Khamsa Daqeq and Hasahisa camps IDPs expressed their concerns about their physical safety and protection following UNAMID withdrawal. Specifically, they referred to the presence of armed nomads, occupation of their lands in areas of origin and inability of the GoS to protect them as the nomads are not part of the Juba peace agreements and like in the past enjoying impunity. - In Toga and Sabanga areas of Jabal Mara, IDP women are risking their physical wellbeing outside the area of displacement during the farming or firewood collection period due the presence if illegal armed groups and individuals. Additionally, all the IDPS further suffer from movement restrictions caused by the presence of SLA Mubarak Alduk faction. It was further reported by the IDPs that approximately 40 persons were killed in Daya and surrounding villages due to fighting between SLA/AW and SLA/Mubarak Alduk. They also reported 15 rape cases prior to displacement and three more during displacement allegedly committed by SLA/Mubarak Al Duk in the same location.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the Internally Displaced Persons (Idps)
    COI QUERY Country of Origin Sudan Main subject IDPs in Darfur and the Two Areas Question(s) Information on the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Darfur and the Two Areas in the period of August 2019 - May 2020: - overview of numbers of IDPs and returnees: Darfur, The Two Areas, - living conditions and personal safety: Darfur, The Two Areas, - treatment by the Sovereign Council government: Darfur, The Two Areas. Date of completion 1 July 2020 Query Code Q15-2020 Contributing EU+ COI -- units (if applicable) Disclaimer This response to a COI query has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this response has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in the response does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and decision making authorities. The answer was finalised on 1 July 2020. Any event taking place after this date is not included in this answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Abyei Jenn Christian and John Prendergast October 11, 2012
    Forgotten Again: How the World Has Failed Abyei Jenn Christian and John Prendergast October 11, 2012 On September 27, 2012, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir and South Sudanese President Salva Kiir signed agreements concerning a host of issues resulting from South Sudan’s July 2011 secession. The agreements concern issues of oil and other financial matters, border security, and citizenship. They represent the culmination of a nearly two and half year-long negotiation process and, if implemented, have the potential to further consolidate peace and security within and between the two Sudans. However, the suc- cess of these agreements ultimately hinges on the resolution of the remaining outstand- ing issues on which the two presidents were unable to agree, chief among them the final status of the disputed Abyei area. Straddling the ill-defined international border separating the two Sudans, Abyei is the traditional homeland of the nine Ngok Dinka chiefdoms, a group with strong ethnic, cultural, and linguistic ties with the Dinka of South Sudan. Misseriya herders, members of a northern nomadic Arab tribe, seasonally traverse the Abyei area with their cattle. While Abyei was administratively transferred to the North in 1905, its Ngok Dinka inhabitants sided with the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement, or SPLM, and its pre- decessor, the Anyanya movement, during Sudan’s successive North-South civil wars.1 Despite Abyei’s central role as a catalyst for North-South tensions, the international com- munity has historically dodged the difficult issue of the area’s final status – or the question of whether the area should be part of Sudan or South Sudan – and, in doing so, has repeat- edly sacrificed the safety, security, and livelihoods of the Ngok Dinka people for the sake of other concerns and interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing Sudan's 2010 National Elections
    Observing Sudan’s 2010 National Elections April 11–18, 2010 Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. Observing Sudan’s 2010 National Elections April 11–18, 2010 Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword . .1 Postelection Developments ..................47 Executive Summary .........................3 Counting . 47 Historical and Political Tabulation . 49 Background of Sudan . .8 Election Results . .50 Census . .10 Electoral Dispute Resolution . 51 Political Context of the April Election . 10 Darfur and Other Special Topics .............54 Overview of the Carter Darfur . .54 Center Observation Mission .................13 Enfranchising the Displaced . 55 Legal Framework of the Sudan Elections.......15 Political Developments Following the Election . 56 Electoral System . 17 Census in South Kordofan Participation of Women, Minorities, and Southern Sudan . .57 and Marginalized Groups. 17 Pastoralists and the Election . 57 Election Management . 18 Bashir’s Threats . 57 Boundary Delimitation . .20 Conclusions and Recommendations ...........59 Voter Registration and the General Election Recommendations . 59 Pre-election Period . 24 Southern Sudan Referendum Voter Registration . .24 Recommendations . .70 Voter Education . 30 Abyei Referendum Candidates, Parties, and Campaigns . .31 Recommendations . .80 The Media . 35 Appendix A: Acknowledgments . .81 Civil Society . .36 Appendix B: List of Delegation and Staff ......83 Electoral Dispute Resolution. 37 Appendix C: Terms and Abbreviations ........86 Election-Related Violence. 39 Appendix D: The Carter Center in Sudan .....87 The Election Period . .40 Appendix E: Carter Center Statements Poll Opening . .40 on the Sudan Elections .....................89 Polling. 42 Appendix F: Carter Center Observer Poll Closing. 45 Deployment Plan .........................169 Appendix G: Registration and Election Day Checklists ...........................170 Appendix H: Letter of Invitation .
    [Show full text]