DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Diel Transcriptional Oscillations of Light-Sensitive Regulatory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Diel Transcriptional Oscillations of Light-Sensitive Regulatory Supplementary Information for Diel transcriptional oscillations of light-sensitive regulatory elements in open ocean eukaryotic plankton communities Sacha N. Coesel1*, Bryndan P. Durham2, Ryan D. Groussman1, Sarah K. Hu3, David A. Caron4, Rhonda L. Morales1, François Ribalet1, and E. Virginia Armbrust1. 1School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. 2Department of Biology, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA 3Marine Chemistry & Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 3616 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0371, USA *Sacha N. Coesel Email: [email protected] This PDF file includes: Figures S1 to S10 Table S1 Legends for Datasets S1 to S7 Other supplementary materials for this manuscript include the following: Datasets S1 to S7 1 two-comp system sensor kinase 1 0.870.930.99 0.99 0.910.91 0.99 0.96 0.93 0.98 CYCc 0.99 1 0.96 0.89 10.96 A 0.98 0.89 histidine kinase 0.91 0.93 0.99 10.97 0.97 0.92 0.87 0.92 0.98 0.99 enzyme 0.97 0.88 0.86 0.99 two-comp system sensor kinase 0.99 0.98 0.98 1 0.85 CYCc 1 1 Enzyme rhodopsin 0.96 0.99 0.99 0.92 0.89 0.98 1 0.98 0.99 0.92 11 1 0.92 0.87 0.960.9 0.91 0.98 0.98 0.98 PDE & Guan Cyc 1 1 0.88 0.88 1 1 0.95 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.89 0.98 0.9 0.99 0.92 0.95 0.9 two-comp system sensor kinase 0.99 0.86 1 0.97 0.92 0.99 0.95 1 1 0.87 0.92 Archaea 0.93 0.96 0.97 0.96 0.92 0.9 0.99 0.99 0.991 1 Bacteria 0.921 0.96 two-comp system sensor kinase 0.94 0.95 1 0.94 0.97 0.95 Opisthokonta 0.97 1 0.990.990.87 CYCc 0.97 0.95 0.91 0.85 Rhizaria 0.88 0.97 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.98 0.95 0.9 Alveolata 0.94 0.97 0.88 0.89 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 Cryptophyta 0.95 0.95 0.99 1 0.86 0.99 0.87 0.96 0.95 0.99 1 Haptophyta 0.94 1 0.920.95 1 1 0.98 0.941 Stramenopiles 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.97 SMC_N 0.98 0.930.871 0.86 1 1 0.880.950.86 Chlorophyta/Streptophyta 1 0.95 0.940.94 1 Apolipoprotein 0.94 Rhodophyta 0.96 0.850.880.890.90.98 0.85 1 1 0.94 Neuromodulin Glaucophyta 1 0.97 1 0.88 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.97 1 0.9 0.98 Viruses 0.89 1 0.97 0.911 0.91 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.86 C2 domain Other 1 1 0.92 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.90.94 1 0.97 0.850.90.9 0.97 0.97 0.92 1 0.980.88 - 0.85 1 Chl - pump (archaeal) 0.97 0.98 0.95 1 0.96 0.94 0.9 0.96 1 1 0.97 0.98 B 0.96 1 0.96 0.98 0.9 0.99 1 0.88 0.98 1 Channel rhodopsin (phototaxis) 1 0.98 0.94 0.94 0.87 channel 0.97 0.98 0.940.86 0.86 1 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.96 1 1 0.970.99 1 0.99 1 0.98 1 1 0.88 1 0.910.87 0.88 1 1 1 0.99 0.890.930.93 1 0.97 0.97 0.950.92 1 0.86 0.89 1 1 0.880.870.99 C 0.91 0.99 0.92 1 1 0.951 0.93 0.97 1 0.94 0.93 0.99 sensory 1 0.99 1 0.910.92 0.91 0.93 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.950.99 0.930.9 0.9 1 1 0.940.920.96 0.97 0.94 1 0.92 0.96 0.91 1 0.89 1 0.97 0.910.99 0.930.99 1 1 0.99 0.94 0.98 0.92 0.98 0.970.98 1 1 0.97 0.98 1 0.93 0.85 1 0.86 0.97 0.96 0.890.87 0.95 1 0.99 0.90.96 1 Sensory rhodopsin 1 0.94 1 0.98 0.89 0.97 1 1 0.91 0.98 0.99 0.9 0.93 0.91 0.94 1 0.9 0.850.93 1 0.99 0.99 1 + 0.92 0.98 0.99 0.93 0.91 1 Sensory (phototaxis) / H -pump (archaeal) 0.99 1 0.991 0.96 1 0.98 0.96 0.951 Viral rhodopsin 1 0.980.94 0.94 11 0.89 0.910.92 0.96 0.91 1 D 0.96 0.910.94 Proteorhodopsin ( H+ pump) 0.99 0.890.961 0.980.94 1 0.88 1 0.97 0.96 1 ion-pump 0.911 1 0.9 0.97 0.9 0.93 1 0.93 0.9 0.950.930.98 0.95 0.890.98 + - 1 Na and Chl -pump rhodopsins 1 1 0.99 0.96 0.87 0.95 1 0.98 1 0.93 0.96 0.93 0.99 0.97 0.97 1 0.9 0.98 1 0.910.9 0.97 0.99 0.951 0.91 0.91 1 0.851 E 0.9 1 1 0.95 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.930.980.85 1 0.94 0.92 helio 0.98 0.910.9 1 0.99 0.91 1 0.98 0.89 0.850.86 0.93 0.93 0.98 0.910.91 0.94 1 0.94 0.87 1 1 0.98 0.97 Heliorhodopsin (sensory) 0.88 0.95 0.88 0.95 0.950.88 0.99 1 0.96 0.91 0.9 0.99 0.970.96 0.87 1 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.92 1 0.85 1 1 0.96 0.92 0.91 1 1 0.93 Fig. S1. Marine-relevant reference tree for rhodopsin. A mid-point rooted approximate maximum likelihood tree (Fasttree) of 933 reference sequences with known taxonomy. Local support values (Shimodaira-Hasegawa test, 1,000 resamples) of > 0.85 are indicated. The edges are colored according to taxonomy. The main functional clades (A~E) are grey-shaded. The red circles indicate the JGI and NCBI- derived sequences used to build the HMM-profile, all others are obtained by hmmsearches on marine relevant genomes and transcriptomes. Functional annotations (black text) are based on the NCBI-derived reference sequences, and protein domain annotations (blue text) are derived from cd-hit blast (NCBI) domains of the full-length sequences. The abbreviations are as follows: CYCc, Adenylyl-/guanylyl cyclase, catalytic domain; SMC_N, structural maintenance chromosomes; PDE, rhodopsin phosphodiesterase; Guan cyc, rhodopsin guanylate cyclase. 2 0.99 0.890.96 0.850.97 1 0.99 0.98 0.94 0.99 0.880.96 0.94 0.86 0.9 1 A 0.960.890.87 0.930.86 1 0.99 0.930.89 1 0.98 0.95 0.93 0.91 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.940.9 0.99 1 1 1 0.98 6-4/Dual-function CPF 1 0.97 0.910.95 0.92 0.930.870.89 1 0.95 0.96 0.94 1 0.95 0.98 0.950.89 0.97 0.87 0.95 0.99 0.930.850.95 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.98 0.87 0.95 0.98 0.88 0.9 0.96 0.990.97 0.94 0.87 0.96 1 0.98 0.99 0 1 0.94 0.91 0.97 0.99 0.86 1 0.99 0.89 1 0.950.88 0.88 1 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.99 6-4 photolyase 0.910.9 1 0.980.93 0.92 1 0.99 0.951 0.98 1 0.89 1 0.940.98 1 0.940.99 0.98 0.97 0.99 1 0.99 0.970.96 0.99 1 0.980.980.95 0.920.980.95 Animal cryptochrome 0.99 1 1 0.92 1 1 1 1 1 0.98 0.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.98 1 0.91 0.93 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.96 0.99 0.98 0.911 0.92 0.97 0.98 0.98 Bacterial cryptochrome 1 0.85 0.99 1 0.98 0.91 0.98 0.87 1 0.99 0.95 0.98 B 1 0.99 0.94 0.99 0.890.91 0.95 0.860.88 Cry-DASH-like 0.94 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.98 0.980.92 0.97 1 1 0.9 0.91 0.96 1 0.87 0.93 1 0.85 0.94 0.89 0.95 Archaea 0.93 1 1 0.94 0.98 1 0.93 Bacteria 0.91 1 0.9 0.95 11 0.94 0.85 0.87 0.970.96 1 Opisthokonta 0.95 0.88 0.99 0.92 1 0.95 0.9 0.9 1 0.99 0.93 0.850.87 0.91 Rhizaria 1 0.94 0.97 0.87 0.94 0.99 0.9 1 0.99 0.95 Alveolata 1 0.91 0.930.96 0.86 1 1 1 1 1 0.85 0.96 Cryptophyta 0.99 0.89 0.98 1 1 11 0.85 0.98 0.920.97 Haptophyta 0.88 0.99 0.92 Cry-DASH 0.94 1 0.97 0.910.96 0.98 1 0.89 Stramenopiles 0.9 0.96 0.910.91 1 0.931 Chlorophyta / Streptophyta 0.91 0.99 1 0.98 0.92 0.9 0.991 Rhodophyta 0.98 0.88 0.98 0.91 0.99 0.930.95 0.89 0.94 0.95 0.99 0.970.9 1 0.89 1 Glaucophyta 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.92 1 0.96 0.99 0.96 1 0.98 Viruses 0.980.95 0.98 0.95 0.870.91 0.97 0.99 0.980.890.87 Other 0.86 0.9 0.98 1 1 0.870.870.99 0.89 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.98 1 0.91 1 0.96 0.91 0.97 1 1 0.99 1 0.890.88 0.980.96 1 0.93 1 0.97 0.99 0.910.96 class I-III CPD photolyase 0.97 0.85 0.91 0.970.96 0.89 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.94 viruses C 1 0.89 1 1 0.9 1 1 0.97 1 0.95 1 1 1 1 0.98 0.99 0.941 0.96 0.860.9 0.95 1 0.94 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.96 1 0.96 1 0.92 0.91 1 1 0.95 1 0.92 1 plant cryptochrome-like 0.99 0.98 0.91 1 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.96 0.890.88 0.98 0.85 0.97 0.990.91 0.95 1 0.94 0.93 1 1 0.94 0.86 0.99 0.91 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.961 1 0.89 0.960.98 0.99 1 0.92 0.99 0.990.99 0.87 0.91 0.89 1 plant cryptochrome 1 0.86 1 0.991 0.93 0.98 1 0.870.99 0.941 0.91 0.951 0.95 0.98 1 0.87 0.99 0.88 0.86 1 0.9 0.99 unknown 1 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.940.91 0.89 0.94 0.880.91 0.87 1 0.98 0.94 1 0.92 0.870.95 1 0.95 0.991 0.95 0.91 0.96 class II CPD-like 0.99 0.94 0.94 0.98 1 0.95 0.970.96 0.95 0.99 0.91 0.98 D1 0.92 0.98 0.96 1 0.94 1 0.93 0.99 0.88 0.940.9 0.99 0.98 0.92 1 0.93 0.99 0.9 0.9 0.99 0.93 1 0.94 0.98 1 0.99 0.99 1 0.89 1 0.97 0.87 0.96 1 D2 0.98 0.92 0.9 0.99 1 0.9 1 0.850.88 0.96 1 0.97 0.98 0.9 0.99 0.98 0.94 1 0.85 0.990.9 0.950.980.910.97 1 0.890.910.97 0.88 0.91 0.95 0.99 0.98 0.99 1 0.991 0.92 1 0.890.930.860.860.94 0.970.87 0.99 Class II CPD 0.9 0.90.960.96 0.96 1 1 1 1 0.90.940.89 1 0.98 0.950.990.94 0.940.88 0.99 1 1 0.98 0.94 0.98 0.890.92 0.98 0.940.98 0.86 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.93 1 0.920.95 1 0.97 0.990.98 0.94 0.97 0.92 1 0.93 0.89 0.96 1 0.92 0.97 0.97 Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecology of Oceanic Coccolithophores. I. Nutritional Preferences of the Two Stages in the Life Cycle of Coccolithus Braarudii and Calcidiscus Leptoporus
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 44: 291–301, 2006 Published October 10 Aquat Microb Ecol Ecology of oceanic coccolithophores. I. Nutritional preferences of the two stages in the life cycle of Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus Aude Houdan, Ian Probert, Céline Zatylny, Benoît Véron*, Chantal Billard Laboratoire de Biologie et Biotechnologies Marines, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex, France ABSTRACT: Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus are 2 coccolithophores (Prymnesio- phyceae: Haptophyta) known to possess a complex heteromorphic life cycle, with alternation between a motile holococcolith-bearing haploid stage and a non-motile heterococcolith-bearing diploid stage. The ecological implications of this type of life cycle in coccolithophores are currently poorly known. The nutritional preferences of each stage of both species, and their growth response to conditions of turbulence were investigated by varying their growth conditions. Of the different cul- ture media tested, only the synthetic seawater medium did not support the growth of both stages of C. braarudii and C. leptoporus. With natural seawater-based media, the growth rate of the haploid phase of both coccolithophores was stimulated by the addition of soil extract (K/2: 0.23 ± 0.02 d–1 and K/2 with soil extract 0.35 ± 0.01 d–1 for the C. braarudii haploid stage), while the diploid phase was not, indicating that the motile stage is capable of utilizing compounds present in soil extract or ingest- ing bacteria that are activated in enriched media. The addition of sodium acetate to the medium also stimulated the haploid phase of C.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Explanation for the 18O Excess in Noelaerhabdaceae Coccolith Calcite
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 189 (2016) 132–142 www.elsevier.com/locate/gca An explanation for the 18O excess in Noelaerhabdaceae coccolith calcite M. Hermoso a,⇑, F. Minoletti b,c, G. Aloisi d,e, M. Bonifacie f, H.L.O. McClelland a,1, N. Labourdette b,c, P. Renforth g, C. Chaduteau f, R.E.M. Rickaby a a University of Oxford – Department of Earth Sciences, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3AN, United Kingdom b Sorbonne Universite´s, UPMC Universite´ Paris 06 – Institut de Sciences de la Terre de Paris (ISTeP), 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France c CNRS – UMR 7193 ISTeP, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France d Sorbonne Universite´s, UPMC Universite´ Paris 06 – UMR 7159 LOCEAN, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France e CNRS – UMR 7159 LOCEAN, 4 Place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France f Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cite´, Universite´ Paris-Diderot, UMR CNRS 7154, 1 rue Jussieu, 75238 Paris Cedex, France g Cardiff University – School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Parks Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom Received 10 November 2015; accepted in revised form 11 June 2016; available online 18 June 2016 Abstract Coccoliths have dominated the sedimentary archive in the pelagic environment since the Jurassic. The biominerals pro- duced by the coccolithophores are ideally placed to infer sea surface temperatures from their oxygen isotopic composition, as calcification in this photosynthetic algal group only occurs in the sunlit surface waters. In the present study, we dissect the isotopic mechanisms contributing to the ‘‘vital effect”, which overprints the oceanic temperatures recorded in coccolith calcite.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587
    Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review Progress and promise of omics for predicting the impacts of climate change T on harmful algal blooms Gwenn M.M. Hennona,c,*, Sonya T. Dyhrmana,b,* a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States c College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Climate change is predicted to increase the severity and prevalence of harmful algal blooms (HABs). In the past Genomics twenty years, omics techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics have trans- Transcriptomics formed that data landscape of many fields including the study of HABs. Advances in technology have facilitated Proteomics the creation of many publicly available omics datasets that are complementary and shed new light on the Metabolomics mechanisms of HAB formation and toxin production. Genomics have been used to reveal differences in toxicity Climate change and nutritional requirements, while transcriptomics and proteomics have been used to explore HAB species Phytoplankton Harmful algae responses to environmental stressors, and metabolomics can reveal mechanisms of allelopathy and toxicity. In Cyanobacteria this review, we explore how omics data may be leveraged to improve predictions of how climate change will impact HAB dynamics. We also highlight important gaps in our knowledge of HAB prediction, which include swimming behaviors, microbial interactions and evolution that can be addressed by future studies with omics tools. Lastly, we discuss approaches to incorporate current omics datasets into predictive numerical models that may enhance HAB prediction in a changing world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: a Digital Tool to Increase The
    Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2021-171 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 21 July 2021 Science c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data The Plankton Lifeform Extraction Tool: A digital tool to increase the discoverability and usability of plankton time-series data Clare Ostle1*, Kevin Paxman1, Carolyn A. Graves2, Mathew Arnold1, Felipe Artigas3, Angus Atkinson4, Anaïs Aubert5, Malcolm Baptie6, Beth Bear7, Jacob Bedford8, Michael Best9, Eileen 5 Bresnan10, Rachel Brittain1, Derek Broughton1, Alexandre Budria5,11, Kathryn Cook12, Michelle Devlin7, George Graham1, Nick Halliday1, Pierre Hélaouët1, Marie Johansen13, David G. Johns1, Dan Lear1, Margarita Machairopoulou10, April McKinney14, Adam Mellor14, Alex Milligan7, Sophie Pitois7, Isabelle Rombouts5, Cordula Scherer15, Paul Tett16, Claire Widdicombe4, and Abigail McQuatters-Gollop8 1 10 The Marine Biological Association (MBA), The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK. 2 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquacu∑lture Science (Cefas), Weymouth, UK. 3 Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale, Université de Lille, CNRS UMR 8187 LOG, Laboratoire d’Océanologie et de Géosciences, Wimereux, France. 4 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. 5 15 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), CRESCO, 38 UMS Patrinat, Dinard, France. 6 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Angus Smith Building, Maxim 6, Parklands Avenue, Eurocentral, Holytown, North Lanarkshire ML1 4WQ, UK. 7 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK. 8 Marine Conservation Research Group, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK. 9 20 The Environment Agency, Kingfisher House, Goldhay Way, Peterborough, PE4 6HL, UK. 10 Marine Scotland Science, Marine Laboratory, 375 Victoria Road, Aberdeen, AB11 9DB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Analysis of Balantidium Ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) Based on Single-Cell Transcriptome Sequencing
    Parasite 24, 43 (2017) © Z. Sun et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017043 Available online at: www.parasite-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenomic analysis of Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) based on single-cell transcriptome sequencing Zongyi Sun1, Chuanqi Jiang2, Jinmei Feng3, Wentao Yang2, Ming Li1,2,*, and Wei Miao2,* 1 Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China 2 Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 7 Donghu South Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Province, PR China 3 Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, PR China Received 22 April 2017, Accepted 12 October 2017, Published online 14 November 2017 Abstract- - In this paper, we present transcriptome data for Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni Chen, 1955 collected from the hindgut of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). We evaluated sequence quality and de novo assembled a preliminary transcriptome, including 43.3 megabits and 119,141 transcripts. Then we obtained a final transcriptome, including 17.7 megabits and 35,560 transcripts, by removing contaminative and redundant sequences. Phylogenomic analysis based on a supermatrix with 132 genes comprising 53,873 amino acid residues and phylogenetic analysis based on SSU rDNA of 27 species were carried out herein to reveal the evolutionary relationships among six ciliate groups: Colpodea, Oligohymenophorea, Litostomatea, Spirotrichea, Hetero- trichea and Protocruziida. The topologies of both phylogenomic and phylogenetic trees are discussed in this paper. In addition, our results suggest that single-cell sequencing is a sound method of obtaining sufficient omics data for phylogenomic analysis, which is a good choice for uncultivable ciliates.
    [Show full text]
  • Within-Arctic Horizontal Gene Transfer As a Driver of Convergent Evolution in Distantly Related 1 Microalgae 2 Richard G. Do
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.31.454568; this version posted August 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Within-Arctic horizontal gene transfer as a driver of convergent evolution in distantly related 2 microalgae 3 Richard G. Dorrell*+1,2, Alan Kuo3*, Zoltan Füssy4, Elisabeth Richardson5,6, Asaf Salamov3, Nikola 4 Zarevski,1,2,7 Nastasia J. Freyria8, Federico M. Ibarbalz1,2,9, Jerry Jenkins3,10, Juan Jose Pierella 5 Karlusich1,2, Andrei Stecca Steindorff3, Robyn E. Edgar8, Lori Handley10, Kathleen Lail3, Anna Lipzen3, 6 Vincent Lombard11, John McFarlane5, Charlotte Nef1,2, Anna M.G. Novák Vanclová1,2, Yi Peng3, Chris 7 Plott10, Marianne Potvin8, Fabio Rocha Jimenez Vieira1,2, Kerrie Barry3, Joel B. Dacks5, Colomban de 8 Vargas2,12, Bernard Henrissat11,13, Eric Pelletier2,14, Jeremy Schmutz3,10, Patrick Wincker2,14, Chris 9 Bowler1,2, Igor V. Grigoriev3,15, and Connie Lovejoy+8 10 11 1 Institut de Biologie de l'ENS (IBENS), Département de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, 12 INSERM, Université PSL, 75005 Paris, France 13 2CNRS Research Federation for the study of Global Ocean Systems Ecology and Evolution, 14 FR2022/Tara Oceans GOSEE, 3 rue Michel-Ange, 75016 Paris, France 15 3 US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 16 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley,
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review of the Microalga Prymnesium Parvum and Its Associated Toxicity
    Literature Review of the Microalga Prymnesium parvum and its Associated Toxicity Sean Watson, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, August 2001 Introduction Recent large-scale fish kills associated with the golden-alga, Prymnesium parvum, have imposed monetary and ecological losses on the state of Texas. This phytoflagellate has been implicated in fish kills around the world since the 1930’s (Reichenbach-Klinke 1973). Kills due to P. parvum blooms are normally accompanied by water with a golden-yellow coloration that foams in riffles (Rhodes and Hubbs 1992). The factors responsible for the appearance of toxic P. parvum blooms have yet to be determined. The purpose of this paper is to present a review of the work by those around the globe whom have worked with Prymnesium parvum in an attempt to better understand the biology and ecology of this organism as well as its associated toxicity. I will concentrate on the relevant biology important in the ecology and identification of this organism, its occurrence, nutritional requirements, factors governing its toxicity, and methods used to control toxic blooms with which it is associated. Background Biology and Diagnostic Features Prymnesium parvum is a microalga in the class Prymnesiophyceae, order Prymnesiales and family Prymnesiaceae, and is a common member of the marine phytoplankton (Bold and Wynne 1985, Larsen 1999, Lee 1980). It is a uninucleate, unicellular flagellate with an ellipsoid or narrowly oval cell shape (Lee 1980, Prescott 1968). Green, Hibberd and Pienaar (1982) reported that the cells range from 8-11 micrometers long and 4-6 micrometers wide. The authors also noted that the cells are PWD RP T3200-1158 (8/01) 2 Lit.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Proof: Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 FIG
    Page 1 of 61 Molecular Biology and Evolution 1 2 3 Submission intended as an Article for the section Resources of MBE 4 5 6 PhyloToL: A taxon/gene rich phylogenomic pipeline to explore genome evolution of 7 8 diverse eukaryotes 9 10 11 Cerón-Romero M. A a,b, Maurer-Alcalá, X. X. a,b,d, Grattepanche, J-D. a, e, Yan, Y. a, Fonseca, M. 12 c a,b. 13 M. , Katz, L. PDFA Proof: Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 15 16 a Department of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA. 17 b Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 18 19 Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. 20 c 21 CIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of 22 Porto, Porto, Portugal. 23 24 d Current address: Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 25 e Current address: Biology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ScholarOne, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901 Support: (434) 964-4100 Molecular Biology and Evolution Page 2 of 61 1 2 3 ABSTRACT 4 5 Estimating multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and inferring phylogenies are essential for 6 many aspects of comparative biology. Yet, many bioinformatics tools for such analyses have 7 8 focused on specific clades, with greatest attention paid to plants, animals and fungi. The rapid 9 10 increase of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data from diverse lineages now provides 11 opportunities to estimate evolutionary relationships and gene family evolution across the 12 13 eukaryotic treePDF of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciliophora, Heterotrichea
    Phylogeny of two poorly known ciliate genera (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea), with notes on the redenition of Gruberia uninucleata Kahl, 1932 and Linostomella vorticella (Ehrenberg, 1833) based on populations found in China Yong Chi Ocean University of China Yuqing Li Ocean University of China Qianqian Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences Mingzhen Ma Ocean University of China Alan Warren Natural History Museum Xiangrui Chen ( [email protected] ) Weibo Song Ocean University of China Research article Keywords: Heterotrichous, Morphology, Phylogeny, SSU rDNA Posted Date: February 3rd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.22447/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on October 2nd, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01879-4. Page 1/27 Abstract Background Heterotrichous ciliates are common members of microeukaryote communities which play important roles in the transfer of material and energy ow in aquatic food webs. This group has been known over two centuries due to their large body size and cosmopolitan distribution. Nevertheless, species identication and phylogenetic relationships of heterotrichs remain challenging due to the lack of accurate morphological information and insucient molecular data. Results The morphology and phylogeny of two poorly known heterotrichous ciliates, Gruberia uninucleata Kahl, 1932 and Linostomella vorticella (Ehrenberg, 1833) Aescht in Foissner et al. , 1999, were investigated based on their living morphology, infraciliature, and small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequence data. Based on a combination of previous and present studies, detailed morphometric data and the improved diagnoses of both species are supplied here.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Life History, Autecology and Toxicity of Prymnesium Parvum
    Phylogeny, life history, autecology and toxicity of Prymnesium parvum Bente Edvardsen1,2 and Aud Larsen3 1 University of Oslo, Norway, 2 NIVA, Norway 3 University of Bergen, Norway Distribution of Prymnesium parvum record bloom s s Overview • morphology - what it looks like • phylogeny - how is P. parvum related to other organisms • life cycle – with alternating cell types • physiology - nutrition and toxicity • autecology - growth as a function of environmental factors • occurrence of P. parvum - interpreting environmental conditions that cause blooms • how can we reduce the risk for harmful blooms? Division: Haptophyta Class: Prymnesiophyceae Species: Prymnesium parvum forms: f. parvum and f. patelliferum Morphology of P. parvum haptonema flagella chloroplast Ill.: Jahn Throndsen Photos: Wenche Eikrem scales A Light micrograph of cell B Electron micrograph of scales Organic scales covering the cells - character for species identification inside outside (Larsen 1998) Prymnesium species Species Habitat Distribution Toxic P. parvum brackish worldwide, temperate yes zone P. annuliferum marine France (Med. Sea) unknown P. calathiferum marine New Zealand yes P. faveolatum marine France, Spain yes P. nemamethecum marine S Africa, Australia unknown P. zebrinum marine France (Med. Sea) unknown P. czosnowskii, P. gladiociliatum, P. minutum, P.papillarum and P. saltans have uncertain status Haptophyte phylogeny 100/100 Pavlova aff. salina 87/57 Pavlova gyrans Pavlova CCMP1416 99/100 Pavlova CCMP 1394 Phaeocystis sp. 1 100/100 OLI51004 99/ Phaeocystis
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Taxonomy of the Pavlovophyceae (Haptophyta): a Reassessment
    Protist, Vol. 162, 738–761, November 2011 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 28 June 2011 ORIGINAL PAPER Integrative Taxonomy of the Pavlovophyceae (Haptophyta): A Reassessment El Mahdi Bendifa,b,1, Ian Proberta,2, Annie Hervéc, Chantal Billardb, Didier Gouxd, Christophe Lelongb, Jean-Paul Cadoretc, and Benoît Vérona,b,3 aUniversité de Caen Basse-Normandie, Algobank-Caen, IFR 146, 14032 Caen, France bUniversité de Caen Basse-Normandie, UMR 100 PE2 M - IFREMER, 14032 Caen, France cIFREMER, Laboratoire de Physiologie et Biotechnologie des Algues, rue de l’Ile d’Yeu, BP21105, 44311 Nantes, France dUniversité de Caen Basse-Normandie, Centre de Microscopie Appliquée à la Biologie, IFR 146, 14032 Caen, France Submitted October 18, 2010; Accepted March 15, 2011 Monitoring Editor: Barry S. C. Leadbeater. The Pavlovophyceae (Haptophyta) contains four genera (Pavlova, Diacronema, Exanthemachrysis and Rebecca) and only thirteen characterised species, several of which are important in ecological and eco- nomic contexts. We have constructed molecular phylogenies inferred from sequencing of ribosomal gene markers with comprehensive coverage of the described diversity, using type strains when avail- able, together with additional cultured strains. The morphology and ultrastructure of 12 of the described species was also re-examined and the pigment signatures of many culture strains were determined. The molecular analysis revealed that sequences of all described species differed, although those of Pavlova gyrans and P. pinguis were nearly identical, these potentially forming a single cryptic species complex. Four well-delineated genetic clades were identified, one of which included species of both Pavlova and Diacronema. Unique combinations of morphological/ultrastructural characters were iden- tified for each of these clades.
    [Show full text]