PDF Proof: Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 FIG

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDF Proof: Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 FIG Page 1 of 61 Molecular Biology and Evolution 1 2 3 Submission intended as an Article for the section Resources of MBE 4 5 6 PhyloToL: A taxon/gene rich phylogenomic pipeline to explore genome evolution of 7 8 diverse eukaryotes 9 10 11 Cerón-Romero M. A a,b, Maurer-Alcalá, X. X. a,b,d, Grattepanche, J-D. a, e, Yan, Y. a, Fonseca, M. 12 c a,b. 13 M. , Katz, L. PDFA Proof: Mol. Biol. Evol. 14 15 16 a Department of Biological Sciences, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA. 17 b Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 18 19 Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. 20 c 21 CIIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of 22 Porto, Porto, Portugal. 23 24 d Current address: Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 25 e Current address: Biology Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ScholarOne, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901 Support: (434) 964-4100 Molecular Biology and Evolution Page 2 of 61 1 2 3 ABSTRACT 4 5 Estimating multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and inferring phylogenies are essential for 6 many aspects of comparative biology. Yet, many bioinformatics tools for such analyses have 7 8 focused on specific clades, with greatest attention paid to plants, animals and fungi. The rapid 9 10 increase of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data from diverse lineages now provides 11 opportunities to estimate evolutionary relationships and gene family evolution across the 12 13 eukaryotic treePDF of life. At Proof:the same time, theseMol. types ofBiol. data are known Evol. to be error-prone (e.g. 14 substitutions, contamination). To address these opportunities and challenges, we have refined a 15 16 phylogenomic pipeline, now named PhyloToL, to allow easy incorporation of data from HTS 17 studies, to automate production of both MSAs and gene trees, and to identify and remove 18 19 contaminants. PhyloToL is designed for phylogenomic analyses of diverse lineages across the 20 21 tree of life (i.e. at scales of >100 million years). We demonstrate the power of PhyloToL by 22 assessing stop codon usage in Ciliophora, identifying contamination in a taxon- and gene-rich 23 24 database and exploring the evolutionary history of chromosomes in the kinetoplastid parasite 25 Trypanosoma brucei, the causative agent of African sleeping sickness. Benchmarking 26 27 PhyloToL’s homology assessment against that of OrthoMCL and a published paper on 28 superfamilies of bacterial and eukaryotic organelle outer membrane pore-forming proteins 29 30 demonstrates the power of our approach for determining gene family membership and inferring 31 32 gene trees. PhyloToL is highly flexible and allows users to easily explore HTS data, test 33 hypotheses about phylogeny and gene family evolution and combine outputs with third-party 34 35 tools (e.g. PhyloChromoMap, iGTP). 36 37 38 Keywords: Phylogenomic pipeline, high-throughput sequencing data, contamination removal, 39 40 genome evolution, chromosome mapping. 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ScholarOne, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901 Support: (434) 964-4100 Page 3 of 61 Molecular Biology and Evolution 1 2 3 INTRODUCTION 4 5 An important way to study biodiversity is through phylogenomics, which uses the 6 generation of multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), gene trees and species trees (e.g. Katz 7 8 and Grant 2015; Hug, et al. 2016). During the last two decades, advances in DNA sequencing 9 10 technology (e.g. 454, Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio) have led to the rapid accumulation of 11 data (transcriptomes and genomes) from diverse lineages across the tree of life, greatly 12 13 expanding thePDF opportunities Proof: for phylogenomic Mol. studies Biol.(Katz and Grant Evol. 2015; Burki, et al. 2016; 14 Brown, et al. 2018; Heiss, et al. 2018). Such approaches are powerful by using increasingly 15 16 large molecular datasets to reduce the discordance between gene and species trees. Indeed, 17 studies relying on a small number of genes are often impacted by lateral gene transfer, gene 18 19 duplication and loss, and incomplete lineage sorting (e.g. Maddison 1997; Tremblay-Savard and 20 21 Swenson 2012; Mallo and Posada 2016). Large-scale phylogenomic analyses allow for the 22 exploration of deep evolutionary relationships (dos Reis, et al. 2012; Wickett, et al. 2014; Katz 23 24 and Grant 2015; Hug, et al. 2016), but such analyses require data-intensive computing 25 methods. As a result, numerous laboratories have developed custom phylogenomic pipelines 26 27 proposing different methods to efficiently process and analyze massive gene and taxon 28 databases (e.g. Sanderson, et al. 2008; Wu and Eisen 2008; Smith, et al. 2009; Kumar, et al. 29 30 2015). 31 32 In general, phylogenomic pipelines are composed of three steps: 1) construction of a 33 collection of homologous gene datasets from various input sources (e.g. whole genome 34 35 sequencing, transcriptome analyses, PCR based studies), 2) production of MSAs, and 3) 36 generation of gene trees and sometimes a species tree. Phylogenomic pipelines typically put 37 38 more effort in the first two steps (collecting homologous genes and MSA curation) to ensure a 39 40 more accurate tree inference. For instance, pipelines such as PhyLoTA (Sanderson, et al. 2008) 41 and BIR (Kumar, et al. 2015) focus on the identification and collection of homologous genes by 42 43 exploring public databases such as GenBank (Benson, et al. 2017). On the other hand, 44 pipelines such as AMPHORA (Wu and Eisen 2008) and Mega-phylogeny (Smith, et al. 2009) 45 46 focus on the construction and refinement of robust alignments rather than the collection of 47 homologs. A recently published tool, SUPERSMART (Antonelli, et al. 2017), incorporates more 48 49 efficient methods for data mining than PhyLoTA (Sanderson, et al. 2008). SUPERSMART 50 51 includes sophisticated methods for tree inference using a multilocus coalescent model, which 52 benefits biogeographical analyses. Although these pipelines incorporate sophisticated methods 53 54 for data mining, alignment and tree inference, a major issue is that they are optimized for either 55 56 57 58 59 60 ScholarOne, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901 Support: (434) 964-4100 Molecular Biology and Evolution Page 4 of 61 1 2 3 a relatively narrow taxonomic sampling (e.g. plants) or for relatively narrow sets of conserved 4 5 genes/gene markers. 6 A major problem for phylogenomic analyses using public sequence data, including 7 8 GenBank and EMBL (Baker, et al. 2000), is the inherent difficulty in identifying and removing 9 10 annotation errors and contamination (e.g. data from food sources, symbionts or organelles). 11 Additional errors are introduced when non-protein coding regions (e.g. pseudogenes, promoters 12 13 and repeats) PDFare inferred Proof: as open reading Mol. frames (ORFs) Biol. by gene-prediction Evol. tools such as 14 GENESCAN (Burge and Karlin 1997), SNAP (Korf 2004), AUGUSTUS (Stanke and 15 16 Morgenstern 2005) and MAKER (Cantarel, et al. 2008). Similarly, some public databases are 17 more prone to contain annotation errors than others depending on how much effort they invest 18 19 in manual curation of public submissions. For instance, data from GenBank NR, TrEMBL 20 21 (Bairoch and Apweiler 2000) and KEGG (Kanehisa and Goto 2000) may have very high rates of 22 these errors, whereas curated resources like Gene Ontology (GO; Ashburner, et al. 2000) and 23 24 SwissProt (Bairoch and Apweiler 2000) are more likely to have low to moderate rates of such 25 errors (Schnoes, et al. 2009). The misidentification errors in these databases often stem from 26 27 problems surrounding accurate taxonomic identification of sequences from HTS data sets, as 28 contamination by other taxa can be frequent, particularly of organisms that cannot be cultured 29 30 axenically (Shrestha, et al. 2013; Lusk 2014; Parks, et al. 2015). Hence, a crucial element of 31 32 any phylogenomic pipeline that relies on public databases is the ability to identify and exclude 33 annotation errors and contaminants from its analyses. 34 35 At the same time, the availability of curated databases and third-party tools provide 36 considerable power and efficiency for phylogenomic analyses. We rely on OrthoMCL, a 37 38 database generated initially to support analyses of the genome of Plasmodium falciparum and 39 40 other apicomplexan parasites (Li, et al. 2003; Chen, et al. 2006), for the initial identification of 41 homologous gene families (i.e. GFs). We also incorporate GUIDANCE V2.02 (Penn, et al. 2010; 42 43 Sela, et al. 2015) for assigning statistical confidence MSA scores based on the robustness of 44 the MSA to guide-tree uncertainty. GUIDANCE allows an efficient identification and removal of 45 46 potentially non-homologous sequences (i.e. sequences having very low scoring values) and 47 unreliably aligned columns and residues under various parameters (Privman, et al. 2012; Hall 48 49 2013; Vasilakis, et al. 2013). This flexibility is critical – while concepts such as homology and 50 51 paralogy have clear definitions in textbooks, when it comes to deploy phylogenomic tools on 52 inferences at the scale of >100 million years, they become working definitions that depend of 53 54 parameters and sampling of both genes and taxa. Finally, we have chosen RAxML V8 55 (Stamatakis, et al. 2005; Stamatakis 2014) for tree inference as its efficient algorithms allow for 56 57 58 59 60 ScholarOne, 375 Greenbrier Drive, Charlottesville, VA, 22901 Support: (434) 964-4100 Page 5 of 61 Molecular Biology and Evolution 1 2 3 robust estimation of maximum likelihood trees [though users can access the MSAs from our 4 5 pipeline for analyses with other software].
Recommended publications
  • Novel Interactions Between Phytoplankton and Microzooplankton: Their Influence on the Coupling Between Growth and Grazing Rates in the Sea
    Hydrobiologia 480: 41–54, 2002. 41 C.E. Lee, S. Strom & J. Yen (eds), Progress in Zooplankton Biology: Ecology, Systematics, and Behavior. © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Novel interactions between phytoplankton and microzooplankton: their influence on the coupling between growth and grazing rates in the sea Suzanne Strom Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1900 Shannon Point Rd., Anacortes, WA 98221, U.S.A. Tel: 360-293-2188. E-mail: [email protected] Key words: phytoplankton, microzooplankton, grazing, stability, behavior, evolution Abstract Understanding the processes that regulate phytoplankton biomass and growth rate remains one of the central issues for biological oceanography. While the role of resources in phytoplankton regulation (‘bottom up’ control) has been explored extensively, the role of grazing (‘top down’ control) is less well understood. This paper seeks to apply the approach pioneered by Frost and others, i.e. exploring consequences of individual grazer behavior for whole ecosystems, to questions about microzooplankton–phytoplankton interactions. Given the diversity and paucity of phytoplankton prey in much of the sea, there should be strong pressure for microzooplankton, the primary grazers of most phytoplankton, to evolve strategies that maximize prey encounter and utilization while allowing for survival in times of scarcity. These strategies include higher grazing rates on faster-growing phytoplankton cells, the direct use of light for enhancement of protist digestion rates, nutritional plasticity, rapid population growth combined with formation of resting stages, and defenses against predatory zooplankton. Most of these phenomena should increase community-level coupling (i.e. the degree of instantaneous and time-dependent similarity) between rates of phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing, tending to stabilize planktonic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor Coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Biology) Department of Biology 2-20-2017 The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Mark M. Slabodnick University of California, San Francisco J. G. Ruby University of California, San Francisco Sarah B. Reiff University of California, San Francisco Estienne C. Swart University of Bern Sager J. Gosai University of Pennsylvania See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers Recommended Citation Slabodnick, M. M., Ruby, J. G., Reiff, S. B., Swart, E. C., Gosai, S. J., Prabakaran, S., Witkowska, E., Larue, G. E., Gregory, B. D., Nowacki, M., Derisi, J., Roy, S. W., Marshall, W. F., & Sood, P. (2017). The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell. Current Biology, 27 (4), 569-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.057 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers/49 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Abstract The giant, single-celled organism Stentor coeruleus has a long history as a model system for studying pattern formation and regeneration in single cells. Stentor [1, 2] is a heterotrichous ciliate distantly related to familiar ciliate models, such as Tetrahymena or Paramecium. The primary distinguishing feature of Stentor is its incredible size: a single cell is 1 mm long. Early developmental biologists, including T.H. Morgan [3], were attracted to the system because of its regenerative abilities—if large portions of a cell are surgically removed, the remnant reorganizes into a normal-looking but smaller cell with correct proportionality [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Is a Ubiquitous, Ancient, and Inherent Attribute of Eukaryotic Life
    PAPER Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of COLLOQUIUM eukaryotic life Dave Speijera,1, Julius Lukešb,c, and Marek Eliášd,1 aDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; bInstitute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic; cCanadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1Z8; and dDepartment of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 8, 2015 (received for review February 14, 2015) Sexual reproduction and clonality in eukaryotes are mostly Sex in Eukaryotic Microorganisms: More Voyeurs Needed seen as exclusive, the latter being rather exceptional. This view Whereas absence of sex is considered as something scandalous for might be biased by focusing almost exclusively on metazoans. a zoologist, scientists studying protists, which represent the ma- We analyze and discuss reproduction in the context of extant jority of extant eukaryotic diversity (2), are much more ready to eukaryotic diversity, paying special attention to protists. We accept that a particular eukaryotic group has not shown any evi- present results of phylogenetically extended searches for ho- dence of sexual processes. Although sex is very well documented mologs of two proteins functioning in cell and nuclear fusion, in many protist groups, and members of some taxa, such as ciliates respectively (HAP2 and GEX1), providing indirect evidence for (Alveolata), diatoms (Stramenopiles), or green algae (Chlor- these processes in several eukaryotic lineages where sex has oplastida), even serve as models to study various aspects of sex- – not been observed yet.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Protozoa and Oxygen
    Acta Protozool. (2014) 53: 3–12 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ActA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.13.0020.1117 Protozoologica Special issue: Marine Heterotrophic Protists Guest editors: John R. Dolan and David J. S. Montagnes Review paper Protozoa and Oxygen Tom FENCHEL Marine Biological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract. Aerobic protozoa can maintain fully aerobic metabolic rates even at very low O2-tensions; this is related to their small sizes. Many – or perhaps all – protozoa show particular preferences for a given range of O2-tensions. The reasons for this and the role for their distribution in nature are discussed and examples of protozoan biota in O2-gradients in aquatic systems are presented. Facultative anaerobes capable of both aerobic and anaerobic growth are probably common within several protozoan taxa. It is concluded that further progress in this area is contingent on physiological studies of phenotypes. Key words: Protozoa, chemosensory behavior, oxygen, oxygen toxicity, microaerobic protozoa, facultative anaerobes, microaerobic and anaerobic habitats. INTRODUCTION low molecular weight organics and in some cases H2 as metabolic end products. Some ciliates and foraminifera use nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor in a respira- Increasing evidence suggests that the last common tory process (for a review on anaerobic protozoa, see ancestor of extant eukaryotes was mitochondriate and Fenchel 2011). had an aerobic energy metabolism. While representa- The great majority of protozoan species, however, tives of different protist taxa have secondarily adapted depend on aerobic energy metabolism. Among pro- to an anaerobic life style, all known protists possess ei- tists with an aerobic metabolism many – or perhaps ther mitochondria capable of oxidative phosphorylation all – show preferences for particular levels of oxygen or – in anaerobic species – have modified mitochon- tension below atmospheric saturation.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Analysis of Balantidium Ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) Based on Single-Cell Transcriptome Sequencing
    Parasite 24, 43 (2017) © Z. Sun et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2017043 Available online at: www.parasite-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogenomic analysis of Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) based on single-cell transcriptome sequencing Zongyi Sun1, Chuanqi Jiang2, Jinmei Feng3, Wentao Yang2, Ming Li1,2,*, and Wei Miao2,* 1 Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, PR China 2 Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 7 Donghu South Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430072, Hubei Province, PR China 3 Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Medicine, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, PR China Received 22 April 2017, Accepted 12 October 2017, Published online 14 November 2017 Abstract- - In this paper, we present transcriptome data for Balantidium ctenopharyngodoni Chen, 1955 collected from the hindgut of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). We evaluated sequence quality and de novo assembled a preliminary transcriptome, including 43.3 megabits and 119,141 transcripts. Then we obtained a final transcriptome, including 17.7 megabits and 35,560 transcripts, by removing contaminative and redundant sequences. Phylogenomic analysis based on a supermatrix with 132 genes comprising 53,873 amino acid residues and phylogenetic analysis based on SSU rDNA of 27 species were carried out herein to reveal the evolutionary relationships among six ciliate groups: Colpodea, Oligohymenophorea, Litostomatea, Spirotrichea, Hetero- trichea and Protocruziida. The topologies of both phylogenomic and phylogenetic trees are discussed in this paper. In addition, our results suggest that single-cell sequencing is a sound method of obtaining sufficient omics data for phylogenomic analysis, which is a good choice for uncultivable ciliates.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Protist Mitochondria: Introns, Gene Content and Genome Architecture
    Diversity and Evolution of Protist Mitochondria: Introns, Gene Content and Genome Architecture 著者 西村 祐貴 内容記述 この博士論文は内容の要約のみの公開(または一部 非公開)になっています year 2016 その他のタイトル プロティストミトコンドリアの多様性と進化:イン トロン、遺伝子組成、ゲノム構造 学位授与大学 筑波大学 (University of Tsukuba) 学位授与年度 2015 報告番号 12102甲第7737号 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/00144261 Diversity and Evolution of Protist Mitochondria: Introns, Gene Content and Genome Architecture A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Tsukuba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science (Doctral Program in Biologial Sciences) Yuki NISHIMURA Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 1 Genes encoded in mitochondrial genomes of eukaryotes ..................................................... 3 Terminology .......................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1. General introduction ................................................................................ 5 The origin and evolution of mitochondria ............................................................................ 5 Mobile introns in mitochondrial genome .............................................................................. 6 The organisms which are lacking in mitochondrial genome data ........................................ 8 Chapter 2. Lateral transfers of mobile introns
    [Show full text]
  • Introns, Gene Content and Genome Architecture
    Diversity and Evolution of Protist Mitochondria: Introns, Gene Content and Genome Architecture A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, the University of Tsukuba in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Science (Doctral Program in Biologial Sciences) Yuki NISHIMURA Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 1 Genes encoded in mitochondrial genomes of eukaryotes ..................................................... 3 Terminology .......................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 1. General introduction ................................................................................ 5 The origin and evolution of mitochondria ............................................................................ 5 Mobile introns in mitochondrial genome .............................................................................. 6 The organisms which are lacking in mitochondrial genome data ........................................ 8 Chapter 2. Lateral transfers of mobile introns among distantly related mitochondrial genomes ................................................................................................ 11 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 11 2-1. Leucocryptos
    [Show full text]
  • Ciliophora, Heterotrichea
    Phylogeny of two poorly known ciliate genera (Ciliophora, Heterotrichea), with notes on the redenition of Gruberia uninucleata Kahl, 1932 and Linostomella vorticella (Ehrenberg, 1833) based on populations found in China Yong Chi Ocean University of China Yuqing Li Ocean University of China Qianqian Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences Mingzhen Ma Ocean University of China Alan Warren Natural History Museum Xiangrui Chen ( [email protected] ) Weibo Song Ocean University of China Research article Keywords: Heterotrichous, Morphology, Phylogeny, SSU rDNA Posted Date: February 3rd, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.22447/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on October 2nd, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01879-4. Page 1/27 Abstract Background Heterotrichous ciliates are common members of microeukaryote communities which play important roles in the transfer of material and energy ow in aquatic food webs. This group has been known over two centuries due to their large body size and cosmopolitan distribution. Nevertheless, species identication and phylogenetic relationships of heterotrichs remain challenging due to the lack of accurate morphological information and insucient molecular data. Results The morphology and phylogeny of two poorly known heterotrichous ciliates, Gruberia uninucleata Kahl, 1932 and Linostomella vorticella (Ehrenberg, 1833) Aescht in Foissner et al. , 1999, were investigated based on their living morphology, infraciliature, and small subunit (SSU) rDNA sequence data. Based on a combination of previous and present studies, detailed morphometric data and the improved diagnoses of both species are supplied here.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Lysis of a Phagotrophic Dinoflagellate, Polykrikos Kofoidii Feeding on Alexandrium Tamarense
    Plankton Biol. Ecol. 47 (2): 134-136,2000 plankton biology & ecology f The Plankton Society of Japan 2(100 Note Cell lysis of a phagotrophic dinoflagellate, Polykrikos kofoidii feeding on Alexandrium tamarense Hyun-Jin Cho1 & Kazumi Matsuoka2 'Graduate School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nagasaki University, 1-14 Bunkyo-inachi, Nagasaki 852-8521. Japan 2Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries. Nagasaki University. 1-14 Bunkyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521. Japan Received 9 December 1999; accepted 10 April 2000 In many cases, phytoplankton blooms terminate suddenly dinoflagellate, Alexandrium tamarense (Lebour) Balech. within a few days. For bloom-forming phytoplankton, grazing P. kofoidii was collected from Isahaya Bay in western is one of the major factors in the decline of blooms as is sexual Kyushu, Japan, on 3 November, 1998. We isolated actively reproduction to produce non-dividing gametes and planozy- swimming P. kofoidii using a capillary pipette and individually gotes (Anderson et al. 1983; Frost 1991). Matsuoka et al. transferred them into multi-well tissue culture plates contain (2000) reported growth rates of a phagotrophic dinoflagellate, ing a dense suspension of the autotrophic dinoflagellate, Polykrikos kofoidii Chatton, using several dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum Graham (approximately 700 cells species as food organisms. They noted that P. kofoidii showed ml"1) isolated from a bloom near Amakusa Island, western various feeding and growth responses to strains of Alexan Japan, 1997. The P. kofoidii were cultured at 20°C with con drium and Prorocentrum. This fact suggests that for ecological stant lighting to a density of 60 indiv. ml"1, and then starved control of phytoplankton blooms, we should collect infor until no G.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Genome Sequence of the Plastid-Lacking
    Cenci et al. BMC Biology (2018) 16:137 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0593-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Nuclear genome sequence of the plastid- lacking cryptomonad Goniomonas avonlea provides insights into the evolution of secondary plastids Ugo Cenci1,2†, Shannon J. Sibbald1,2†, Bruce A. Curtis1,2, Ryoma Kamikawa3, Laura Eme1,2,11, Daniel Moog1,2,12, Bernard Henrissat4,5,6, Eric Maréchal7, Malika Chabi8, Christophe Djemiel8, Andrew J. Roger1,2,9, Eunsoo Kim10 and John M. Archibald1,2,9* Abstract Background: The evolution of photosynthesis has been a major driver in eukaryotic diversification. Eukaryotes have acquired plastids (chloroplasts) either directly via the engulfment and integration of a photosynthetic cyanobacterium (primary endosymbiosis) or indirectly by engulfing a photosynthetic eukaryote (secondary or tertiary endosymbiosis). The timing and frequency of secondary endosymbiosis during eukaryotic evolution is currently unclear but may be resolved in part by studying cryptomonads, a group of single-celled eukaryotes comprised of both photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic species. While cryptomonads such as Guillardia theta harbor a red algal-derived plastid of secondary endosymbiotic origin, members of the sister group Goniomonadea lack plastids. Here, we present the genome of Goniomonas avonlea—the first for any goniomonad—to address whether Goniomonadea are ancestrally non-photosynthetic or whether they lost a plastid secondarily. Results: We sequenced the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of Goniomonas avonlea and carried out a comparative analysis of Go. avonlea, Gu. theta, and other cryptomonads. The Go. avonlea genome assembly is ~ 92 Mbp in size, with 33,470 predicted protein-coding genes. Interestingly, some metabolic pathways (e.g., fatty acid biosynthesis) predicted to occur in the plastid and periplastidal compartment of Gu.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Biological Sciences Faculty Publications Biological Sciences 9-26-2018 Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Christopher E. Lane Et Al Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/bio_facpubs Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology ISSN 1066-5234 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes Sina M. Adla,* , David Bassb,c , Christopher E. Laned, Julius Lukese,f , Conrad L. Schochg, Alexey Smirnovh, Sabine Agathai, Cedric Berneyj , Matthew W. Brownk,l, Fabien Burkim,PacoCardenas n , Ivan Cepi cka o, Lyudmila Chistyakovap, Javier del Campoq, Micah Dunthornr,s , Bente Edvardsent , Yana Eglitu, Laure Guillouv, Vladimır Hamplw, Aaron A. Heissx, Mona Hoppenrathy, Timothy Y. Jamesz, Anna Karn- kowskaaa, Sergey Karpovh,ab, Eunsoo Kimx, Martin Koliskoe, Alexander Kudryavtsevh,ab, Daniel J.G. Lahrac, Enrique Laraad,ae , Line Le Gallaf , Denis H. Lynnag,ah , David G. Mannai,aj, Ramon Massanaq, Edward A.D. Mitchellad,ak , Christine Morrowal, Jong Soo Parkam , Jan W. Pawlowskian, Martha J. Powellao, Daniel J. Richterap, Sonja Rueckertaq, Lora Shadwickar, Satoshi Shimanoas, Frederick W. Spiegelar, Guifre Torruellaat , Noha Youssefau, Vasily Zlatogurskyh,av & Qianqian Zhangaw a Department of Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5A8, SK, Canada b Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom
    [Show full text]