Ecology of Oceanic Coccolithophores. I. Nutritional Preferences of the Two Stages in the Life Cycle of Coccolithus Braarudii and Calcidiscus Leptoporus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Vol. 44: 291–301, 2006 Published October 10 Aquat Microb Ecol Ecology of oceanic coccolithophores. I. Nutritional preferences of the two stages in the life cycle of Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus Aude Houdan, Ian Probert, Céline Zatylny, Benoît Véron*, Chantal Billard Laboratoire de Biologie et Biotechnologies Marines, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie, Esplanade de la Paix, 14032 Caen Cedex, France ABSTRACT: Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus are 2 coccolithophores (Prymnesio- phyceae: Haptophyta) known to possess a complex heteromorphic life cycle, with alternation between a motile holococcolith-bearing haploid stage and a non-motile heterococcolith-bearing diploid stage. The ecological implications of this type of life cycle in coccolithophores are currently poorly known. The nutritional preferences of each stage of both species, and their growth response to conditions of turbulence were investigated by varying their growth conditions. Of the different cul- ture media tested, only the synthetic seawater medium did not support the growth of both stages of C. braarudii and C. leptoporus. With natural seawater-based media, the growth rate of the haploid phase of both coccolithophores was stimulated by the addition of soil extract (K/2: 0.23 ± 0.02 d–1 and K/2 with soil extract 0.35 ± 0.01 d–1 for the C. braarudii haploid stage), while the diploid phase was not, indicating that the motile stage is capable of utilizing compounds present in soil extract or ingest- ing bacteria that are activated in enriched media. The addition of sodium acetate to the medium also stimulated the haploid phase of C. braarudii, and further experiments using labeled bacteria demon- strated the capacity for phagotrophy of this motile stage. The effect of nutrient concentrations on the growth rates of both species was evaluated, showing clear differences between the 2 phases of the life cycle, with higher growth rates for the diploid stage in nutrient-rich media (K/2: 0.34 ± 0.04 d–1, K/25: 0.29 ± 0.01 d–1, K/100: 0.16 ± 0.01 d–1 for the haploid stage of C. leptoporus). Responses of the 2 phases of both coccolithophores to physical turbulence were also different, with a haploid flagellate stage sensitive to mixing and a more resistant non-motile diploid stage. The results of these experi- ments strongly indicate that each morphological stage of C. braarudii and C. leptoporus corresponds to a different ecological niche, the motile haploid stage exploiting a more stable oligotrophic niche than the diploid non-motile stage, in accordance with field observations. The 2-dimensional phyto- plankton niche space model of Margalef (1978; Oceanol Acta 1:493–509), defined by nutrients and turbulence, was amended to integrate this hypothesis. KEY WORDS: Coccolithophore · Ecology · Life cycle · Nutrient · Turbulence · Heterotrophy Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION therein). They play a key role in the global cycles of carbon (production of calcified scales) and sulfur (pro- Coccolithophores are considered 1 of the 3 main duction of dimethyl sulfide, see review by Malin & marine eukaryotic phytoplankton groups in terms of Steinke 2004). Coccolithophores are present in all natural abundance, along with diatoms and dinoflagel- oceans, with the highest biodiversity in temperate and lates. These groups are responsible for the bulk of the subtropical zones (Okada & McIntyre 1979). These cal- export flux of organic matter to the ocean interior and cified haptophytes are generally associated with sediments (see Falkowski et al. 2004 and references oceanic and oligotrophic waters, even if some species *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2006 · www.int-res.com 292 Aquat Microb Ecol 44: 291–301, 2006 appear to be ubiquitous and some restricted to coastal Price et al. (1998), Cachão & Moita (2000), Renaud & zones. Certain coccolithophores are known to form Klaas (2001), Beaufort & Heussner (2001) and Renaud extensive blooms in the ocean, such as Emiliania hux- et al. (2002). leyi, the most cosmopolitan species in present day In our laboratory, clonal cultures of both phases of oceans (see Paasche 2001 and references therein), and the life cycle of Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus Coccolithus pelagicus (Tarran et al. 2001). The latter leptoporus (the heterococcolith phase associated with taxon was recently revised, and now is subdivided into Crystallolithus rigidus), among other species, have Coccolithus pelagicus (Wallich) Schiller and Cocco- been established (Houdan et al. 2004). We have con- lithus braarudii (Gaarder) Baumann, Cachao, Young et ducted a series of experiments in order to compare the Geisen (Sáez et al. 2003). Hereafter, Coccolithus autecology of the different phases within the cocco- pelagicus s.l. will be used in a collective sense when lithophore life cycle. Responses to a suite of environ- precise definition of the organism studied is difficult mental parameters have been studied, and this paper (the morphological variation between the 2 Cocco- focuses on experiments designed to determine the lithus species is very low). Preliminary results on the relative nutritional preferences of each life-cycle biogeography of the 2 species composing C. pelagicus phase, with a complementary study of the effect of s.l. show that C. pelagicus s.s. has an arctic or sub- turbulence. arctic distribution, while C. braarudii inhabits temper- ate waters and upwelling regimes (Geisen et al. 2002, Parente et al. 2004). MATERIALS AND METHODS The discovery by Parke & Adams (1960) some 40 yr ago of a potential complex life cycle for Coccolithus Strains and culture conditions. The original (non- was unexpected. Traditional coccolithophore taxon- axenic) cultures of the species studied were obtained omy had been based on coccolith morphology; cocco- from the ALGOBANK–Caen culture collection at lithophores produce 2 very different types of calcified the University of Caen Basse-Normandie, France scales, i.e. heterococcoliths (formed of complex calcite (Table 1). The cultures were clonal, 1 cell in the hete- crystal units of variable shape) and holococcoliths rococcolith-bearing phase having been isolated from a (formed of numerous minute euhedral crystallites) (for mixed sample with a micropipette. Following phase a review see Young et al. 2003). Parke & Adams (1960) change in culture, pure cultures of each phase (i.e. showed that the heterococcolithophore C. braarudii (as only 1 life-cycle phase present) were established by C. pelagicus in Parke & Adams 1960) and the holococ- isolating 1 cell of each phase from the mixed-phase colithophore Crystallolithus braarudii (as Cr. hyalinus) culture using the same method. The first phase change were, in fact, a single species linked in a heteromor- in cultures occurred for both species during the spring phic life cycle. Using flow cytometric techniques, following their isolation, in May 1999 for Coccolithus Houdan et al. (2004) recently confirmed this life cycle braarudii and in April 2001 for Calcidiscus leptoporus. and established that these 2 distinct stages have differ- The stock cultures were maintained in sterile, single- ent ploidy levels, the non-motile heterococcolitho- use polystyrene culture flasks (Iwaki), in filter-steril- phore being diploid (2N), while the motile holococco- ized enriched seawater K/2 (without Tris buffer) lithophore is haploid (N). This type of life cycle linking medium (modified from Keller et al. 1987; Table 2) at a heterococcolithophore with a holococcolithophore 17°C. Daylight fluorescent tubes provided an ir- was also demonstrated for Calcidiscus leptoporus radiance level of 25 µmol photons m–2 s–1 measured (Murray et Blackman) Loeblich et Tappan (Houdan et with a 4π quantum radiometer photometer (LiCor), al. 2004), Coronosphaera mediterranea (Lohmann) with a photoperiod of 16:18 h light:dark. All experi- Gaarder (Houdan et al. 2004), was confirmed for Emil- ments were performed under the temperature and iania huxleyi (Houdan et al. 2004) and was established light conditions described above and with triplicate for Calyptrosphaera sphaeroidea (Noel et al. 2004), cultures. The seawater used as the base for the and is probably widespread in oceanic coccol- medium was collected from surface waters of the Eng- ithophores (Billard & Inouye 2004, Jordan et al. 2004). lish Channel, approximately 5 km from the Normandy Although sometimes placed in different families, C. coast, and aged for 2 or 3 mo before utilization, as gen- braarudii (Coccolithaceae) and C. leptoporus (Cal- erally recommended for the cultivation of microalgae. cidiscaceae) are closely related morphologically and The batch cultures were conducted in triplicate, and genetically (Edvardsen et al. 2000, Sáez et al. 2004), experiments were initiated following an acclimatiza- and both are temperate coccolithophores (Sáez et al. tion period of 4 transfers (duration approximately 2003). However, their ecology is still poorly under- 3 wk), as recommended by Brand & Guillard (1981), for stood, despite investigations into their distribution and each environmental condition tested. Growth was ecological strategies through surveys such as those of monitored daily (at the same hour of the day) by man- Houdan et al.: Ecology of oceanic coccolithophores 293 ual counting using a Malassez counting slide and/or Nutrient concentration experiments and experi- fluorometric measurement of in vivo chlorophyll