OEB51 Lecture 9 Mollusk Embryology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

OEB51 Lecture 9 Mollusk Embryology OEB51 Lecture 9 Mollusk Embryology Ctenophora Animals Porifera Placozoa Cnidaria Xenacoelomorpha Parahoxozoa Ambulacraria Echinodermata Hemichordata Planulozoa Deuterostomia Cephalochordata Chordata Urochordata Bilateria Craniata Chaetognatha Bryozoa Entoprocta Cycliophora Nephrozoa Annelida Trochozoa Mollusca Nemertea Brachiopoda Phoronida Spiralia Gastrotricha Protostomia Platyhelminthes Gnathostomulida Micrognathozoa Gnathifera Rotifera Nucleariida Orthonectida Fungi Dicyemida Opisthokonta Filasterea Priapulida Ichthosporea Scalidophora Holozoa Animals Loricifera Choanoflagellata Kinorhyncha Nematoida Nematoda Ecdysozoa Nematomorpha Tardigrada Panarthropoda Onychophora Arthropoda Spiral cleavage general proper=es II • Four cell stage: – May be equal sized blastomeres or unequal • (at 2 and 4 cell stages) Some Spiralia show Polar Lobe formaon Polar Lobe Formaon. Example 1. Acila castrensis Remember the polar lobe is not the same as the polar body! You can see both of these “polar things” in this movie. Make sure you know which is which! Polar Lobe Formaon. Example 2. Pulsellum sp. Phylum Mollusca Snails, bivalves, squid • direct and indirect development • vast majority of classes show spiral cleavage • e.g. Ilyanassa obsoleta (snail) • emerging system for molecular embryology • cephalopod classes have very modified cleavage (and modified body plans) • e.g. Loligo pealei (squid): no spiral cleavage Spiral cleavage can be sinistral (to the leT) or dextral (to the right) Lymnaea stagnalis Shibazaki et al. (2010) Curr Biol Microtubules (red) and microfilaments (green) during third cleavage: Sinistral Dextral Turns aer Turns before cleavage cleavage The spiral arrangement can be achieved by different mechanisms Lymnaea stagnalis Shibazaki et al. (2010) Curr Biol The roles of microtubules (red) and microfilaments (green) during third cleavage: Turns aer Turns before cleavage cleavage Nocodazole inhibits Latrunculin A inhibits microtubule polymerizaon ac=n polymerizaon Microtubules needed for Polymerized acn needed for Dextral cleavage Sinistral cleavage Cytoskeletal elements play different roles in dextral and sinistral embryos Lymnaea stagnalis Shibazaki et al. (2010) Curr Biol NATURE | Vol 462 | 10 December 2009 LETTERS Sinistral or dextral arrangement of cleavage can be changed manually Lucifer Yellow Sinistralization of Dextralization of dextral embryo sinistral embryo a d g k + Trace b e h l o 1Q c f i m p 2q 2Q 1q j n q Lymnaea stagnalis 1 Kuroda et al. (2009) Nature 1q 1q2 Figure 1 | Reversal of the third cleavage directions by micromanipulation chirality by manipulating as in d–f and culturing them. The resultant and the resultant 8-, 12- and 16-cell stage embryos. Dextral embryos at the dextral-typeeight-cellstage sinistralembryo (g, k) was compacted(h, l, o) and metaphase-anaphase (a) and sinistral embryos at the telophase (d) of the then cleaved into 12- (i, m, p) and 16-cell (j, n, q) embryos, which arose from third cleavage were manipulated. The first quartet of micromeres getting the typical non-synchronous division of macromeres (1Q) and micromeres generated was continuously pushed towards the direction opposite to (1q). Each blastomere of 1Q (o) and 1q (p) divided in the dextral-type normal by glass rods (sinistrally for the dextral embryo (b) and dextrally for anticlockwise direction and produced their descendants 2q-2Q (p) and 1q1- the sinistral embryo (e)), which resulted in chirality-inverted sinistral-type 1q2(q), respectively. a–j, Bright field image; k–q, fluorescence image with (c) and dextral-type (f) eight-cell embryos, respectively. Fluorescence- outline of blastomeres (o–q). Arrows (o, p) indicate the spindle orientation. imaged cell-lineage tracing was carried out by injecting Lucifer Yellow dye Scale bar, 100 mm. into one quadrant of the four-cell stage sinistral embryo, then reversing the Fig. 2p, v) and their internal organ asymmetry was examined in detail. do not show them20 (see below). SD is a helical deformation of the Fully grown ‘sinistralized’ and ‘dextralized’ snails had pulmonary sac, blastomeres at the metaphase–anaphase, and SI is a spiral orientation anus, male and female genital pores open at the left or right side of the of the four spindles, as a consequence of SD, before the cleavage 20 body (Fig. 2e, k), just like the normal sinistral (Fig. 2q) and the dextral furrow ingression . We have succeeded in making F7 congenic ani- (Fig. 2w) snails, respectively, and internal organs, such as heart, mals, which inherit 99.2% of sinistral strain-derived and 0.8% of the stomach, liver coiling and gut looping, with the shape and positions dextral strain-derived genome. Remarkably, SD and SI were observed (Fig. 2f, l) just like the normal sinistral (Fig. 2r) and dextral (Fig. 2x) in all the dextral embryos oviposited by F7 animals that inherit the snails, respectively. Thus, the chirality-reversed embryos at the eight- dextrality gene(s), but not in any of the sinistral embryos oviposited cell stage developed to situs inversus. We did not observe situs solitus by F7 snails devoid of the dextrality gene(s). Thus, the organismal or situs ambiguus. The reversed-coiled snails were fertile, and pro- handedness-determining gene(s) is strongly linked to, or is, the gene duced sinistral or dextral progenies dictated by their genotype and that induces or activates SD and/or SI. We made dextral snails by not the reversed body handedness (Supplementary Table 1). pushing the micromeres of sinistral embryos from the telophase Although chirality is the most prominent at the third cleavage, it without SD. can be traced back to the first and second cleavages21. We altered, by These results suggest that chiral blastomere configuration is the key manipulation, the directions of blastomere rotations of both the factor in handedness determination, which is achieved by SD and SI sinistral and dextral embryos at the first or the second cleavage to genetically in the wild, and by micromanipulation in our experiments. produce reversed blastomere configuration at the four-cell stage. The epigenetic manipulation reprograms the left–right asymmetry However, the manipulated embryos all reverted to the original-type determination most probably by altering blastomere arrangement third cleavage (Supplementary Fig. 2). We also observed that sinistral around the 3D organizer which is specified at the 24-cell stage23. In embryos occasionally showed dextral-type blastomere arrangement the case of C. elegans, it has been reported13 that mechanical treatment at the four-cell stage even in the egg capsules, but they all showed at the six-cell stage produced chirality-reversed animals, similar to the normal anticlockwise cleavage at the third division. Thus, macro- case of L. stagnalis. Although spindle orientation is important in both mere–micromere cell contacts at the eight-cell stage embryo appear species, L. stagnalis appears to adopt a different chirality determining to be the first determining step for asymmetric development of snails. pathway (see below). We have studied the orthologues of Ga and We have previously reported that dextral and sinistral snail several cell polarity-related proteins (for example, Par6, atypical embryos are not mirror images of each other at the third cleavage PKC) for the sinistral and the dextral L. stagnalis, but no chirality- (refs 20, 22). The dominant dextral snails exhibit spiral deformation dependent difference was observed in their expression (T. Homma, (SD) and spindle inclination (SI), while the recessive sinistral snails M.S. and R.K., unpublished results). 791 ©2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved Ilyanassa obsoleta – development to veliger larva Ilyanassa obsoleta – micromere fate maps 8 cell stage First quartet micromeres: 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d 1a and 1c make eyes normally When 1a and 1c are removed, eyes are missing Ilyanassa obsoleta – micromere poten=als Cytoplasmic determinants are not the whole story Put 1a into the posi=on of 1b: 1a no longer makes eyes! What prevents 1b and 1d from making eyes? Ilyanassa obsoleta – micromere poten=als Experiment: FIRST Remove the polar lobe contents at first cleavage THEN Put 1d into the posi=on of 1a 1d can make eyes! The polar lobe contents give 1D the power to repress 1d’s eye making poten?al Ilyanassa obsoleta – recall that micromeres have different poten=als What is special about the polar lobe (and the D lineage) that makes it able to repress poten=als of neighbouring cells? Ilyanassa obsoleta – one molecular mechanism for segregang cytoplasmic determinants The D lineage inherits specific mRNAs encoding for signaling molecules This enables 1D to signal to neighboring cells like 1d mRNA tubulin centrosome DNA mRNAs segregate to specific cell lineages Loligo pealeii – these mollusc embryos look nothing like spiralian embryos Cephalopod hatching hps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6geyV0i3QI RESEARCH | REPORTS ORIGIN OF NOTOCHORD by double WMISH (Fig. 2, F to L). Although none of the genes were exclusively expressed in the annelid mesodermal midline, their combined Development of the annelid coexpression was unique to these cells (implying that mesodermal midline in annelids and chor- damesoderm in vertebrates are more similar to axochord: Insights into each other than to any other tissue). It is unlikely that the molecular similarity between annelid notochord evolution and vertebrate mesodermal midline is due to in- dependent co-option of a conserved gene cas- Antonella Lauri,1*† Thibaut Brunet,1* Mette Handberg-Thorsager,1,2‡ sette,
Recommended publications
  • Systema Naturae∗
    Systema Naturae∗ c Alexey B. Shipunov v. 5.802 (June 29, 2008) 7 Regnum Monera [ Bacillus ] /Bacteria Subregnum Bacteria [ 6:8Bacillus ]1 Superphylum Posibacteria [ 6:2Bacillus ] stat.m. Phylum 1. Firmicutes [ 6Bacillus ]2 Classis 1(1). Thermotogae [ 5Thermotoga ] i.s. 2(2). Mollicutes [ 5Mycoplasma ] 3(3). Clostridia [ 5Clostridium ]3 4(4). Bacilli [ 5Bacillus ] 5(5). Symbiobacteres [ 5Symbiobacterium ] Phylum 2. Actinobacteria [ 6Actynomyces ] Classis 1(6). Actinobacteres [ 5Actinomyces ] Phylum 3. Hadobacteria [ 6Deinococcus ] sed.m. Classis 1(7). Hadobacteres [ 5Deinococcus ]4 Superphylum Negibacteria [ 6:2Rhodospirillum ] stat.m. Phylum 4. Chlorobacteria [ 6Chloroflexus ]5 Classis 1(8). Ktedonobacteres [ 5Ktedonobacter ] sed.m. 2(9). Thermomicrobia [ 5Thermomicrobium ] 3(10). Chloroflexi [ 5Chloroflexus ] ∗Only recent taxa. Viruses are not included. Abbreviations and signs: sed.m. (sedis mutabilis); stat.m. (status mutabilis): s., aut i. (superior, aut interior); i.s. (incertae sedis); sed.p. (sedis possibilis); s.str. (sensu stricto); s.l. (sensu lato); incl. (inclusum); excl. (exclusum); \quotes" for environmental groups; * (asterisk) for paraphyletic taxa; / (slash) at margins for major clades (\domains"). 1Incl. \Nanobacteria" i.s. et dubitativa, \OP11 group" i.s. 2Incl. \TM7" i.s., \OP9", \OP10". 3Incl. Dictyoglomi sed.m., Fusobacteria, Thermolithobacteria. 4= Deinococcus{Thermus. 5Incl. Thermobaculum i.s. 1 4(11). Dehalococcoidetes [ 5Dehalococcoides ] 5(12). Anaerolineae [ 5Anaerolinea ]6 Phylum 5. Cyanobacteria [ 6Nostoc ] Classis 1(13). Gloeobacteres [ 5Gloeobacter ] 2(14). Chroobacteres [ 5Chroococcus ]7 3(15). Hormogoneae [ 5Nostoc ] Phylum 6. Bacteroidobacteria [ 6Bacteroides ]8 Classis 1(16). Fibrobacteres [ 5Fibrobacter ] 2(17). Chlorobi [ 5Chlorobium ] 3(18). Salinibacteres [ 5Salinibacter ] 4(19). Bacteroidetes [ 5Bacteroides ]9 Phylum 7. Spirobacteria [ 6Spirochaeta ] Classis 1(20). Spirochaetes [ 5Spirochaeta ] s.l.10 Phylum 8. Planctobacteria [ 6Planctomyces ]11 Classis 1(21).
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's Genetic Diversity
    1.13 NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY NEW ZEALAND’S GENETIC DIVERSITY Dennis P. Gordon National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie, Wellington 6022, New Zealand ABSTRACT: The known genetic diversity represented by the New Zealand biota is reviewed and summarised, largely based on a recently published New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. All kingdoms and eukaryote phyla are covered, updated to refl ect the latest phylogenetic view of Eukaryota. The total known biota comprises a nominal 57 406 species (c. 48 640 described). Subtraction of the 4889 naturalised-alien species gives a biota of 52 517 native species. A minimum (the status of a number of the unnamed species is uncertain) of 27 380 (52%) of these species are endemic (cf. 26% for Fungi, 38% for all marine species, 46% for marine Animalia, 68% for all Animalia, 78% for vascular plants and 91% for terrestrial Animalia). In passing, examples are given both of the roles of the major taxa in providing ecosystem services and of the use of genetic resources in the New Zealand economy. Key words: Animalia, Chromista, freshwater, Fungi, genetic diversity, marine, New Zealand, Prokaryota, Protozoa, terrestrial. INTRODUCTION Article 10b of the CBD calls for signatories to ‘Adopt The original brief for this chapter was to review New Zealand’s measures relating to the use of biological resources [i.e. genetic genetic resources. The OECD defi nition of genetic resources resources] to avoid or minimize adverse impacts on biological is ‘genetic material of plants, animals or micro-organisms of diversity [e.g. genetic diversity]’ (my parentheses).
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Living Species in Australia and the World
    Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World 2nd edition Arthur D. Chapman Australian Biodiversity Information Services australia’s nature Toowoomba, Australia there is more still to be discovered… Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study Canberra, Australia September 2009 CONTENTS Foreword 1 Insecta (insects) 23 Plants 43 Viruses 59 Arachnida Magnoliophyta (flowering plants) 43 Protoctista (mainly Introduction 2 (spiders, scorpions, etc) 26 Gymnosperms (Coniferophyta, Protozoa—others included Executive Summary 6 Pycnogonida (sea spiders) 28 Cycadophyta, Gnetophyta under fungi, algae, Myriapoda and Ginkgophyta) 45 Chromista, etc) 60 Detailed discussion by Group 12 (millipedes, centipedes) 29 Ferns and Allies 46 Chordates 13 Acknowledgements 63 Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, etc) 31 Bryophyta Mammalia (mammals) 13 Onychophora (velvet worms) 32 (mosses, liverworts, hornworts) 47 References 66 Aves (birds) 14 Hexapoda (proturans, springtails) 33 Plant Algae (including green Reptilia (reptiles) 15 Mollusca (molluscs, shellfish) 34 algae, red algae, glaucophytes) 49 Amphibia (frogs, etc) 16 Annelida (segmented worms) 35 Fungi 51 Pisces (fishes including Nematoda Fungi (excluding taxa Chondrichthyes and (nematodes, roundworms) 36 treated under Chromista Osteichthyes) 17 and Protoctista) 51 Acanthocephala Agnatha (hagfish, (thorny-headed worms) 37 Lichen-forming fungi 53 lampreys, slime eels) 18 Platyhelminthes (flat worms) 38 Others 54 Cephalochordata (lancelets) 19 Cnidaria (jellyfish, Prokaryota (Bacteria Tunicata or Urochordata sea anenomes, corals) 39 [Monera] of previous report) 54 (sea squirts, doliolids, salps) 20 Porifera (sponges) 40 Cyanophyta (Cyanobacteria) 55 Invertebrates 21 Other Invertebrates 41 Chromista (including some Hemichordata (hemichordates) 21 species previously included Echinodermata (starfish, under either algae or fungi) 56 sea cucumbers, etc) 22 FOREWORD In Australia and around the world, biodiversity is under huge Harnessing core science and knowledge bases, like and growing pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Abstract Book
    1 Exploring the male-induced female reproduction of Schistosoma mansoni in a novel medium Jipeng Wang1, Rui Chen1, James Collins1 1) UT Southwestern Medical Center. Schistosomiasis is a neglected tropical disease caused by schistosome parasites that infect over 200 million people. The prodigious egg output of these parasites is the sole driver of pathology due to infection. Female schistosomes rely on continuous pairing with male worms to fuel the maturation of their reproductive organs, yet our understanding of their sexual reproduction is limited because egg production is not sustained for more than a few days in vitro. Here, we explore the process of male-stimulated female maturation in our newly developed ABC169 medium and demonstrate that physical contact with a male worm, and not insemination, is sufficient to induce female development and the production of viable parthenogenetic haploid embryos. By performing an RNAi screen for genes whose expression was enriched in the female reproductive organs, we identify a single nuclear hormone receptor that is required for differentiation and maturation of germ line stem cells in female gonad. Furthermore, we screen genes in non-reproductive tissues that maybe involved in mediating cell signaling during the male-female interplay and identify a transcription factor gli1 whose knockdown prevents male worms from inducing the female sexual maturation while having no effect on male:female pairing. Using RNA-seq, we characterize the gene expression changes of male worms after gli1 knockdown as well as the female transcriptomic changes after pairing with gli1-knockdown males. We are currently exploring the downstream genes of this transcription factor that may mediate the male stimulus associated with pairing.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen, Zoological Museum, Review Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark CN, 0000-0001-6898-7655 Cite This Article: Nielsen C
    Early animal evolution a morphologist's view Nielsen, Claus Published in: Royal Society Open Science DOI: 10.1098/rsos.190638 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Nielsen, C. (2019). Early animal evolution: a morphologist's view. Royal Society Open Science, 6(7), 1-10. [190638]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190638 Download date: 30. sep.. 2021 Early animal evolution: a morphologist’s view royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos Claus Nielsen The Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Zoological Museum, Review Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark CN, 0000-0001-6898-7655 Cite this article: Nielsen C. 2019 Early animal evolution: a morphologist’s view. R. Soc. open sci. Two hypotheses for the early radiation of the metazoans are vividly discussed in recent phylogenomic studies, the ‘Porifera- 6: 190638. first’ hypothesis, which places the poriferans as the sister group http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190638 of all other metazoans, and the ‘Ctenophora-first’ hypothesis, which places the ctenophores as the sister group to all other metazoans. It has been suggested that an analysis of morphological characters (including specific molecules) could Received: 5 April 2019 throw additional light on the controversy, and this is the aim of Accepted: 4 July 2019 this paper. Both hypotheses imply independent evolution of nervous systems in Planulozoa and Ctenophora. The Porifera- first hypothesis implies no homoplasies or losses of major characters. The Ctenophora-first hypothesis shows no important synapomorphies of Porifera, Planulozoa and Placozoa. It implies Subject Category: either independent evolution, in Planulozoa and Ctenophora, of Biology (whole organism) a new digestive system with a gut with extracellular digestion, which enables feeding on larger organisms, or the subsequent Subject Areas: loss of this new gut in the Poriferans (and the re-evolution of the evolution collar complex).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Marine Meiofauna of the Azores – from Discovery to Scientific Publication (15.7.-24.7.19) Preliminary Program
    Exploring the marine meiofauna of the Azores – from discovery to scientific publication (15.7.-24.7.19) Preliminary program: Schedule Monday 15.7.19 Tuesday 16.7.19 Wednesday 17.7.19 Thursday 18.7.19 Friday 19.7.19 09.00 - Morning session Introduction to the Meiofaunal Intertidal and Taxonomy and diversity The Proseriata Lecture workshop (people, Scalidophora (Andreas meiofaunal annelids of meiofaunal molluscs (Platyhelminthes): the facilities, schedule and Schmidt-Rhaesa) (Alejandro Martínez (Katharina Jörger) interest of unappealing aims; Ana Ricardo Garcia) worms (Marco Curini- Costa/ Katharina Galetti) Jörger) Opening lecture: Azores marine biodiversity (Ana Costa) Lab work Laboratory set-up, Sampling and handling Sampling and handling Sampling and handling Sampling and handling handling and Scalidophora Annelida Mollusca Platyhelminthes documentation of specimens LUNCH TIME 14.00 - Afternoon session Acoelomorpha – Marine nematodes: Geology and Taxonomy, systematics Rhabdocoel flatworms, phylogenetic position, taxonomy and ecology paleobiogeography of and biogeography of a diverse component of systematic and how to (Alberto Navarrete) the Azores (Sérgio meiofaunal Nemertea marine meiofauna (Tom identify them (Ulf Avila) and relevant research Artois) Jondelius) opportunities (Jon Norenburg) Sampling and handling Sampling and handling Lab session Sampling and handling Sampling and handling Acoelomorpha Nematoda Nemertea Platyhelminthes DINNER Evening gathering Sampling strategies and Open discussion on Adressing biodiversity Open discussion
    [Show full text]
  • Six3 Demarcates the Anterior-Most Developing Brain Region In
    Steinmetz et al. EvoDevo 2010, 1:14 http://www.evodevojournal.com/content/1/1/14 RESEARCH Open Access Six3 demarcates the anterior-most developing brain region in bilaterian animals Patrick RH Steinmetz1,6†, Rolf Urbach2†, Nico Posnien3,7, Joakim Eriksson4,8, Roman P Kostyuchenko5, Carlo Brena4, Keren Guy1, Michael Akam4*, Gregor Bucher3*, Detlev Arendt1* Abstract Background: The heads of annelids (earthworms, polychaetes, and others) and arthropods (insects, myriapods, spiders, and others) and the arthropod-related onychophorans (velvet worms) show similar brain architecture and for this reason have long been considered homologous. However, this view is challenged by the ‘new phylogeny’ placing arthropods and annelids into distinct superphyla, Ecdysozoa and Lophotrochozoa, together with many other phyla lacking elaborate heads or brains. To compare the organisation of annelid and arthropod heads and brains at the molecular level, we investigated head regionalisation genes in various groups. Regionalisation genes subdivide developing animals into molecular regions and can be used to align head regions between remote animal phyla. Results: We find that in the marine annelid Platynereis dumerilii, expression of the homeobox gene six3 defines the apical region of the larval body, peripherally overlapping the equatorial otx+ expression. The six3+ and otx+ regions thus define the developing head in anterior-to-posterior sequence. In another annelid, the earthworm Pristina, as well as in the onychophoran Euperipatoides, the centipede Strigamia and the insects Tribolium and Drosophila,asix3/optix+ region likewise demarcates the tip of the developing animal, followed by a more posterior otx/otd+ region. Identification of six3+ head neuroectoderm in Drosophila reveals that this region gives rise to median neurosecretory brain parts, as is also the case in annelids.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transcriptional Blueprint for a Spiral-Cleaving Embryo Hsien-Chao Chou1,2, Margaret M
    Chou et al. BMC Genomics (2016) 17:552 DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2860-6 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A transcriptional blueprint for a spiral-cleaving embryo Hsien-Chao Chou1,2, Margaret M. Pruitt1,3, Benjamin R. Bastin1 and Stephan Q. Schneider1* Abstract Background: The spiral cleavage mode of early development is utilized in over one-third of all animal phyla and generates embryonic cells of different size, position, and fate through a conserved set of stereotypic and invariant asymmetric cell divisions. Despite the widespread use of spiral cleavage, regulatory and molecular features for any spiral-cleaving embryo are largely uncharted. To addressthisgapweuseRNA-sequencingonthespiralian model Platynereis dumerilii to capture and quantify the first complete genome-wide transcriptional landscape of early spiral cleavage. Results: RNA-sequencing datasets from seven stages in early Platynereis development, from the zygote to the protrochophore, are described here including the de novo assembly and annotation of ~17,200 Platynereis genes. Depth and quality of the RNA-sequencing datasets allow the identification of the temporal onset and level of transcription for each annotated gene, even if the expression is restricted to a single cell. Over 4000 transcripts are maternally contributed and cleared by the end of the early spiral cleavage phase. Small early waves of zygotic expression are followed by major waves of thousands of genes, demarcating the maternal to zygotic transition shortly after the completion of spiral cleavages in this annelid species. Conclusions: Our comprehensive stage-specific transcriptional analysis of early embryonic stages in Platynereis elucidates the regulatory genome during early spiral embryogenesis and defines the maternal to zygotic transition in Platynereis embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • No 158, December 2018
    FROGCALL No 158, December 2018 THE FROG AND TADPOLE STUDY GROUP NSW Inc. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/FATSNSW/ Email: [email protected] Frogwatch Helpline 0419 249 728 Website: www.fats.org.au ABN: 34 282 154 794 MEETING FORMAT President’s Page Friday 7th December 2018 Arthur White 6.30 pm: Lost frogs: 2 Green Tree Frogs Litoria caerulea, seeking forever homes. Priority to new pet frog owners. Please bring your membership card and cash $50 donation. Sorry, we don’t have EFTPOS. Your current NSW NPWS amphibian licence must be sighted on the night. Rescued and adopted frogs can 2017 –2018 was another strong year for FATS. FATS is one of the few conservation groups that is man- never be released. aging to maintain its membership numbers and still be active in the community. Other societies have seen numbers fall mainly because the general public seems to prefer to look up information on the web 7.00 pm: Welcome and announcements. and not to attend meetings or seek information firsthand. It is getting harder for FATS to get people to 7.45 pm: The main speaker is John Cann, talking about turtles. be active in frog conservation but we will continue to do so for as long as we can. Last year we made the decision to start sending out four issues of FrogCall per year electronically. 8.30 pm: Frog-O-Graphic Competition Prizes Awarded. This saves FATS a lot of postage fees. Our members have informed us that when FrogCall arrives as an email attachment it is often not read, or simply ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy, Affinity, and Phylogenetic Significance of Markuelia
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 7:5, 468–482 (2005) The anatomy, affinity, and phylogenetic significance of Markuelia Xi-ping Dong,a,Ã Philip C. J. Donoghue,b,Ã John A. Cunningham,b,1 Jian-bo Liu,a andHongChengc aDepartment of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK cCollege of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China ÃAuthors for correspondence (email: [email protected], [email protected]) 1Present address: Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Liverpool, 4 Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK. SUMMARY The fossil record provides a paucity of data on analyses have hitherto suggested assignment to stem- the development of extinct organisms, particularly for their Scalidophora (phyla Kinorhyncha, Loricifera, Priapulida). We embryology. The recovery of fossilized embryos heralds new test this assumption with additional data and through the insight into the evolution of development but advances are inclusion of additional taxa. The available evidence supports limited by an almost complete absence of phylogenetic stem-Scalidophora affinity, leading to the conclusion that sca- constraint. Markuelia is an exception to this, known from lidophorans, cyclonerualians, and ecdysozoans are primitive cleavage and pre-hatchling stages as a vermiform and direct developers, and the likelihood that scalidophorans are profusely annulated direct-developing bilaterian with terminal primitively metameric. circumoral and posterior radial arrays of spines. Phylogenetic INTRODUCTION et al. 2004b). Very early cleavage-stage embryos of presumed metazoans and, possibly, bilaterian metazoans, have been re- The fossil record is largely a record of adult life and, thus, covered from the late Neoproterozoic (Xiao et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Annelids, Platynereis Dumerilii In: Boutet, A
    Annelids, Platynereis dumerilii In: Boutet, A. & B. Schierwater, eds. Handbook of Established and Emerging Marine Model Organisms in Experimental Biology, CRC Press Quentin Schenkelaars, Eve Gazave To cite this version: Quentin Schenkelaars, Eve Gazave. Annelids, Platynereis dumerilii In: Boutet, A. & B. Schierwater, eds. Handbook of Established and Emerging Marine Model Organisms in Experimental Biology, CRC Press. In press. hal-03153821 HAL Id: hal-03153821 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03153821 Preprint submitted on 26 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Annelids, Platynereis dumerilii Quentin Schenkelaars, Eve Gazave 13.1 History of the model 13.2 Geographical location 13.3 Life cycle 13.4 Anatomy 13.4.1 External anatomy of Platynereis dumerilii juvenile (atoke) worms 13.4.2 Internal anatomy of Platynereis dumerilii juvenile (atoke) worms 13.4.2.1 Nervous system: 13.4.2.2 Circulatory system 13.4.2.3 Musculature 13.4.2.4 Excretory system 13.4.2.5 Digestive system 13.4.3 External and internal anatomy of Platynereis dumerilii
    [Show full text]