Nasialiopanyi1976.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF TRIBALISM IN KENYA A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Special Major by Opanyi Kivai Nasiali July 21, 1975 I I I I I I l .J The thesis of Opanyi Kivai Nasiali is approved: California State University, Northridge November, 1975 I __j To the Youth of Africa for lvhom the future is CCitling. 1 I. I I I I i iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ;pag__e No. DEDICATION. iii ABSTRACT .. vii CHAPTER I. 1 INTRODUCTION .1 CHAPTER II. 19 TRIBALISM ARISES FROM OTHER FACTORS. 19 CHAPTER III ..... .......50 DECISION-:HAK IN G DILEMHA. 50 CHAPTER IV. 57 !t REMEDIES. .57 CHAPTER V. .72 ! CONCLUSION. .72 APPENDIX I. 80 APPENDIX IIA. 81 APPENDIX IIB. 83 APPENDIX III. 84 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY. .• . 85 Books. .............. 85 Articles and Periodicals ......... 91 Dissertations. 96 Miscellaneous. 96 iv LIST OF TABLES TABLE I Kenya's P.opula tion Breakdmvn. 19 TABLE 2 ; Tribrtlism in Nairobi. 20-21 TABLE 3a: Occupants by Tribal Origin of the .... 22-23 Kenya Cabinet Posts in 1967-1968 TABLE 3b: Occupants by Tribal Origin of. .24-25 Kenya Cabinet Posts in October, 1974 TABLE 4: Kenya Elite by Tribal Group. 28 TABLE 5 ; Profession and Tribe in Kenya. 30 TABLE 6: Responses to the Question: ..... .34 "In the past, have these smaller tribes been neglected in any ways? TABLE 7: African Education in Kenya, 1946 ...... 36 TABLE 8: Enrollment in African Schools, 1958 .. 36 TABLE 9: Educational Enrollment in Kenya, 1965. 37 TABLE 10: Breakdown of African Educational. .39 Achievement ·.. LIST OF MAPS Map 1: Luyia Sub-Tribes. 9 Map 2: Secondary Schools, 1964. 42 Map 3: African Primary Education. 43 Map 4: African Adult Literacy. .44 Map 5: African Post-Secondary Ed.. .45 Map 6: Education Quality. 46 ~ I vi ABSTRACT ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS OF TRIBALISM IN KENYA by Opanyi Kivai Nasiali Master of Arts in Special Major July 21, 1975 I Tribalism is a phenomenon which causes not only I friction between the various tribal groups in Kenya, but lwhich also causes problems in the Nation's administration. ! Being embedded in the African social tradition, tribalism I I is aggravated by three factors: (i) the use of a ~oreign J administrative system, (ii) the co-existence of numerous I tribal groups that were aggregated into one nation during I~olonization, and. (iii) the dominance by one tribal group -~ I the Kikuyu - in the new system. I Administratively, frustration comes from having to i distribute limited national resources to tribal groups Ii un d er con d.ltlons · o f liD· b a 1 ances. ln· opportunlty· to partlcl-· · 1 !pate equitably in the new system. Because of these ! imbalances in tribal opportunity, the Kikuyu (and to some I i 'extent the other major tribes such as Luo, Luyia and Kamba)l :have excelled tremendously and dominate the others. This ~ i l ___ -- .. .. .... ······ ..... .J vii !condition and fear of domination prompts the less advan- 1 1 taged tribes to make accusations of tribalism. But I I 'tribalism is not just a condition of tribal opportunity ;i ·.imbalances, it is also a practice of favouritism between l ' 'and among members of the same tribe over others. This is lwhy tribalism is a problem which has to be dealt with in I 1 order to have both a tranquil nation and an efficiently !smooth running administration. I Administrative implications of trjbalism are numerous and far reaching. They require more study and 1 !collection of empirical data than works referred to in this~ I 1 thesis have delt with. Even with limited data, discussion I 1 ihere takes into consideration factors which contribute to !the problem of tribalism: tribal opportunity imbalances in I !civil service, education, and loans allocation, and the ! decision-making dilemma arising from these imbalances. [Remedy for the problem requires short-term actions such as ~compromising between merit and need, and long-term actions ! such as amendment of the constitution to provide for more !participation in power and resource distribution, as well I las change of attitudes between the various tribes so that I· socla· 1 b arrlers· are remove d to. a 11 ow f or more contacts b y ! i such means as intertribal marriages. Kenya has so far managed to maintain a mutual bond I between the various tribal groups. ~.n1ile this is a healthy: sign, the real and potential friction that may arise from viii [tribalism cannot be underestimated. That is why it is l I 'necessary to do something about tribalism for the good of I I ·the country, and all of Africa as \vell. ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The Third World countries face problems which are i 1 basically economic, but which are also problems related to I :the administration of limited resources. In a modern world I l,v-hich is plagued by wide gaps between the haves and have- lnots, the latter problems are particularly acute. In I 'addition to these common problems among the Third World /countries, the African nations face a further problem I !resulting from the presence of different tribal groups in leach nation. This aspect that is unique to African nations i 'is the essence of discussion in this paper. i I The African people belong to various tribal groups ! ;which are distinct entities with definite cultural and it~aditional development in their individual setting. ! I . !During colonization by European nations, the African 1continent was subdivided into nations whose boundaries did ' 1.not coincide with original tri?al boundaries. The result was creation of the present "artificial" national states, I vJhich - in most cases - comprise various tribal groups that 1 previously had nothing in common. After a long period of I ,colonial domination, most of these artificial nations are :now under African administration. ... _____ j 1 2 I' J The form of this administration is, in essence, a I :transplant of Western bureaucratic systems brought in by the colonizing po-v1ers. While this system can be a signif- 1icant factor in some of Africa's problems, the focus of this paper is on the role of tribal groupings in the sys- I tern. Utilization of this imported administrative system i coupled with old tribal social structures, will be examine~ I 1 I 1 as a common phenomenon in Sub-Sahara Africa. Although thei !paper examines sub-Sahara nations in general, focus is on I I Kenya. \vhy Focus on Kenya? Any African nation in this study can be used as the! ! prototype for discussion of the problem. However, focus on: 1Kenya is mainly due to speculation, at the time of indepen-1 I dence, which suggested that the nation \vould disintegrate 1 I following a struggle for power by various tribal groups. :~ontrary to this view, it should be noted that, perhaps, II :Kenya is the only African nation today that apparently :demonstrates a mutual bond. between the various tribes. I This mutual bond between the tribes can be witnessed in the! !ten years during which Kenya has had a stable government I I I l free of tribal uprising such as that experienced by other l , African nations (for example, Nigeria) . 1 In spite of the stability in Kenya, there is the ;constant threat both in actual and potential terms of what i is now knmvn as "tribalism" the subject of this '· 3 ~--·- l discussion. Kenya, therefore, lends itself to the study of tribalism. The Problem: ---·-·-··---·----~- The task here is to identify real or potential friction among the various tribes in Kenya, and the role of the bureaucratic government in resolving this friction. I Another aspect of the discussion is to examine the !operation of the modern Kenya African governmental and i !bureaucratic systems which are engaged infue development I 1 and distribution of the ·nation's resources under conditions! I of dominance by one tribe - the Kikuyu, and the foreign- ! i :ness of the governmental system ~o the African tribal I masses in the "artificial" nation. Roots of the Problem: Friction among the tribal groups may arise from various causes: i l 1. Because of lack of interest groups in the 1 political system at the moment, demands on the government I and distribution of resources may be done through the tribal groups. However, as James C. Scott points out, '\..;;hen demands are made on behalf of a wider grouping they are likely to refer to ethnic, linguistic, or regional 2 blocs, and can seldom be given legislative form." This situation may present problems if some groups are ignored, - .. ". ,. '··.. -.--.,~-~~ ...,..,. ·- i --- 4 r . 1 or if some groups think they are ignored. 1 I I 2. Because the governmental system is unfamiliar I ·to many Africans, most of them do not know what is ex- l I :pexted of themselves and others in terms of exerting ;' . demands and expecting rewards. During this transitional .period, most Africans will be caught between traditional I I tribal ways and the ways of the new bureaucratic system. 3 i ; Since the traditional ways will most readily be applied, I l 1 ethnic discrimination can occur. It is not surprising, I :then, that competition for jobs would be seen in ethnic or i tribal terms, with the resulting tensions merely increas : ing the tendency to categorize individuals primarily in I 1 ethnic terms. In this process, tribal tensions may be I I 1 created where they may not have existed previously. 3. Related to (2) above, is the point that fear of dominance by one or the other tribe may also create friction among the various tribal factions.