Gazette No 133 of 23 August 2002
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2016-2017 Native Fish Stocking Plan for Dams and Lakes
2016/2017 NATIVE FISH STOCKING PLAN FOR DAMS AND LAKES There are many impoundments and reservoirs suitable for native fish stocking throughout NSW and over the last two decades a large number of excellent recreational fisheries have been established. To ensure that the best use continues to be made of publicly funded fish stocking programs, Department of Primary Industries (DPI) is seeking input from people who have an interest in the State’s stocked native freshwater fisheries. The attached draft native fish stocking plan has been prepared for consideration by the recreational fishing community. Fish are stocked from Government hatcheries as a service to the anglers of NSW. Locations are selected based on recent stocking history and experience with those waters. The plan is also developed in accordance with the policies and guidelines set out in the Environmental Impact Statement and Fishery Management Strategy (FMS) on freshwater fish stocking in NSW. The water quality and storage status of impoundments will also be assessed prior to stocking and where necessary changes will be made. Please note: Planned fish release figures listed in the attached tables are targets only, and may be exceeded, or not attained, depending on hatchery production. Other seasonal factors such as water quality issues or unforeseen circumstances could preclude planned fish releases. As a result, allocations may be amended prior to release. Impoundments are listed as Priority 1 or 2. Priority 1 impoundments support large recreational fisheries or have not received stockings in recent years. Priority 2 impoundments are either smaller fisheries, suffer intermittent water quality issues or have recently received large stockings of that species. -
Shaping a Diverse City
FAIRFIELD CITY 2040 A LAND USE VISION Shaping A Diverse City Local Strategic Planning Statement 30 March 2020 The vision for Fairfield City to 2040 builds upon the existing strengths of the City. The foundation of the successful community’s diversity showcased by celebration, inclusion and integration will extend to a transformation of the physical city, providing a greater diversity of housing, employment, education, and lifestyle choices as well enhancing the City’s environmental attributes. Specifically, the City’s vision of ‘Shaping a Diverse City’ will be achieved in the following targeted ways: Theme 1: Community wellbeing – healthy & liveable places Theme 2: Infrastructure & places – supporting growth & change Theme 3: Environmental sustainability Theme 4: Strong & resilient economy Theme 5: Good governance – advocacy & consultation 2 FAIRFIELD CITY 2040 – SHAPING A DIVERSE CITY | Draft Local Strategic Planning Statement CONTENTS ABOUT THIS PLAN 6 THEME 3: ENVIRONMENTAL 57 Policy Context 6 SUSTAINABILITY Community Engagement 8 Planning Priority 8 Protect areas of high 62 natural value and STRATEGIC CONTEXT 12 environmental significance and improve the health of PLACE IN THE REGION 14 catchments & waterways Local profile 16 Planning Priority 9 Realise the Parkland City 64 Fairfield City Areas 18 Vision Eastern Area 20 Planning Priority 10 Adapt to natural hazards 66 Central Area 22 and environmental impacts Western Area 24 VISION STATEMENT 2040 28 THEME 4: STRONG 69 THEMES & PLANNING PRIORITIES 29 & RESILIENT ECONOMY Planning Priority -
Allocation of the Administration of Acts 2009 (No 4—General Allocation)
2009 No 565 Allocation of the Administration of Acts 2009 (No 4—General Allocation) The Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney 8 December 2009 HER Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has approved of the administration of the Acts listed in the attached Schedule being vested in the Ministers indicated. The allocation replaces previous allocations relating to Acts generally. KRISTINA KENEALLY, MP Premier Published LW 8 December 2009 Page 1 2009 No 565 Schedule PREMIER Anzac Memorial (Building) Act 1923 No 27, jointly with the Minister Assisting the Premier on Veterans’ Affairs Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 No 109 Community Relations Commission and Principles of Multiculturalism Act 2000 No 77, jointly with the Minister for Citizenship Competition Policy Reform (New South Wales) Act 1995 No 8 Constitution Act 1902 No 32 Constitution Further Amendment (Referendum) Act 1930 No 2 Constitution (Legislative Council Reconstitution) Savings Act 1993 No 19 Election Funding and Disclosures Act 1981 No 78 Essential Services Act 1988 No 41, Parts 1 and 2 (remainder, the Minister for Industrial Relations) Freedom of Information Act 1989 No 5 Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 No 35 Independent Commission Against Corruption (Commissioner) Act 1994 No 61 Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal Act 1992 No 39 Infrastructure Implementation Corporation Act 2005 No 89 Interpretation Act 1987 No 15 Legislation Review Act 1987 No 165 Licensing and Registration (Uniform Procedures) Act 2002 No 28 Mutual -
Dredging in the State Funding to Dredge Ettalong Budget Each Year but We Have to Channel Following a Fortnight Sit Here and Wait
Edition 445 21 May 2018 Council goes for 50-50 dredge funding Central Coast Council has “The North Coast has a specifi c agreed to apply for 50-50 list item for dredging in the State funding to dredge Ettalong Budget each year but we have to Channel following a fortnight sit here and wait. “I can’t understand how anyone of sustained community and can say it is not a navigable political pressure, which waterway when it is a public saw 400 residents attend a transport corridor. meeting at Ettalong. “My interpretation of the The Council has also called, community meeting at the Diggers again, for the NSW Government was the long term solution was a to complete another round of State Government responsibility emergency dredging to ensure but short term people wanted to the navigation channel is at see Council apply for the funding. least restored, temporarily, to a “They were annoyed by the navigable state. stalemate and wanted to get it The indefi nite cancellation of done, with the State Government ferry services to Ettalong and being obstinate. Wagstaffe prompted a well- “A change of government was attended community meeting at the only way the meeting believed Ettalong Diggers on May 10. the State would take responsibility. Following the meeting, “As Cr Bruce McLachlan told chaired by Diggers chief Mr Bill the community meeting, the State Jackson, Central Coast mayor Government was not going to and councillors were advised of a move on this,” he said. motion calling for “joint funding by Cr McLachlan along with Council and State Government for Crs Jilly Pilon, Gale Collins and dredging of the Ettalong Channel Mehrtens spoke at the community area this month”. -
Appendix 3G Further Perspectives on the Financial Benefits of Local Government Amalgamations
3G-1 Appendix 3G Further Perspectives on the Financial Benefits of Local Government Amalgamations Appendix 3G has five sections which support the section in Chapter 3 on estimates of the financial benefits of local government amalgamations. The first section further examines the KPMG estimates that savings of up to $845 million per annum could be achieved in NSW through local government amalgamations. This first section also includes a critique of the KPMG estimates by Judith McNeill. The second section presents a Darwinian survival perspective to the debate on the preferred sizes of local governments. The third section briefly discusses the self-limiting effect whereby the strength of the argument in favour of local government amalgamations must in some senses diminish with each successfully achieved amalgamation. The fourth section, in Table 3G-3, provides a compilation of extracts from 113 Australian and international literature sources which provide valuable insights on the local government amalgamation debate generally and which appear to provide important lessons for this current study. KPMG's Financial Benefit Estimates Consultants KPMG explored four local government amalgamation options, and establishes estimates of cost savings possible through each of these options, in a 1998 report prepared for the Property Council of NSW. Table 3G-1 below summarises the key findings in this report, where savings estimates are based on 1995-96 data. Table 3G-1: KPMG (1998) Estimates of Cost Savings Possible Through Local Government Amalgamations -
The Builders Labourers' Federation
Making Change Happen Black and White Activists talk to Kevin Cook about Aboriginal, Union and Liberation Politics Kevin Cook and Heather Goodall Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Cook, Kevin, author. Title: Making change happen : black & white activists talk to Kevin Cook about Aboriginal, union & liberation politics / Kevin Cook and Heather Goodall. ISBN: 9781921666728 (paperback) 9781921666742 (ebook) Subjects: Social change--Australia. Political activists--Australia. Aboriginal Australians--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--20th century. Australia--Social conditions--20th century. Other Authors/Contributors: Goodall, Heather, author. Dewey Number: 303.484 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover images: Kevin Cook, 1981, by Penny Tweedie (attached) Courtesy of Wildlife agency. Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History RSSS and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National -
National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2016
National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2016 made under sections 22, 23, 25, 27 and 209 of the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 Compilation No. 4 Compilation date: 27 February 2018 Includes amendments up to: National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Amendment Rules 2018 - F2018L00148 Prepared by the Department of Social Services Authorised Version F2018C00165 registered 22/03/2018 About this compilation This compilation This is a compilation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (Becoming a Participant) Rules 2016 that shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 27 February 2018 (the compilation date). The notes at the end of this compilation (the endnotes) include information about amending laws and the amendment history of provisions of the compiled law. Uncommenced amendments The effect of uncommenced amendments is not shown in the text of the compiled law. Any uncommenced amendments affecting the law are accessible on the Legislation Register (www.legislation.gov.au). The details of amendments made up to, but not commenced at, the compilation date are underlined in the endnotes. For more information on any uncommenced amendments, see the series page on the Legislation Register for the compiled law. Application, saving and transitional provisions for provisions and amendments If the operation of a provision or amendment of the compiled law is affected by an application, saving or transitional provision that is not included in this compilation, details are included in the endnotes. Modifications If the compiled law is modified by another law, the compiled law operates as modified but the modification does not amend the text of the law. -
Government Gazette of the STATE of NEW SOUTH WALES Number 57 Wednesday, 17Th March 2004 Published Under Authority by Cmsolutions
1219 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 57 Wednesday, 17th March 2004 Published under authority by cmSolutions SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1993 – PROCLAMATION MARIE BASHIR,Governor I, Professor Marie Bashir AC, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of Part 1, Chapter 9 and sections 736 and 737 of the Local Government Act 1993, do, by this Proclamation, declare that the Proclamation published in the Special Supplement of the Government Gazette No 32 of 11 February 2004, amalgamating the former Areas of Cooma-Monaro, Crookwell, the City of Goulburn, Gunning, Mulwaree, the City of Queanbeyan, Tallaganda, Tumut, Yarrowlumla and Yass so as to constitute the new Areas of Cooma-Monaro, Eastern Capital City Regional, Greater Argyle, Greater Queanbeyan City, Tumut, Upper Lachlan and Yass Valley, is amended as follows: (a) Omit clause 2 (1) from Schedules A to G in said Proclamation and insert instead: (1) The date for the first election of the Councillors of the new Council is 26 June 2004. (b) Insert new clauses 3 (1A) and 3 (1B) after clause 3(1) in Schedules A to G in said Proclamation: (1A) Any matters before the new Council with respect to the local development process or any other matter in which the Administrator has a pecuniary interest within the meaning of the Local Government Act 1993 is to be determined by a substitute Administrator appointed by the Minister for that limited purpose. (1B) The Administrator is to complete and lodge with the Acting General Manager by 8 April 2004, a disclosure of interests written return in accordance with Chapter 14, Part 2, Division 2 of the Act in the form prescribed by the regulations. -
Download the Paper (Pdf)
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF SPREAD FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF THE CORE ALLIGATOR WEED INFESTATIONS IN AUSTRALIA - TAKING STOCK FINAL REPORT October 2008 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia- ‘Taking Stock’ CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR ISSUE OF DOCUMENTS Report Title: Final Report Document Status: Final Report Document No: NE210541-2008 Date of Issue: 10/10/2008 Assessment of Risk of Spread for Strategic Management Client: Department of Agriculture, Project Title: of the Core Alligator Weed Infestations in Australia - Fisheries & Forestry Taking Stock Comments: Position Name Signature Date Prepared by: Principal Consultant Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 DAFF, CMAs, DPI, Peer Review by: LGAs and various Given in acknowledgements July-August 2008 others For further information on this report, contact: Name: Dr. Nimal Chandrasena Title: Principal Ecologist, Ecowise Environmental Address: 24 Lemko Place, Penrith, NSW 2750 Phone: 4721 3477 Mobile: 0408 279 604 E-mail: [email protected] Document Revision Control Version Description of Revision Person Making Issue Date Approval 1 Working Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 27 July 2008 2 Final Draft Dr. Nimal Chandrasena 10 October 2008 © Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd This Report and the information, ideas, concepts, methodologies, technologies and other material remain the intellectual property of Ecowise Environmental Pty Ltd. Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the Client named above and is to be used only for the purposes for which it was commissioned. No warranty is given as to its suitability for any other purpose. -
From: Tony Moore
From: Tony Moore [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 27 February 2020 8:10 PM To: DPE PSVC Central Coast Mailbox Subject: 2020 03 10 Moore, Tony Individual Warnervale Airport (Restrictions) Act 1996 Review Categories: Reply Sent The Director Central Coast and Hunter Region Department of Planning, Industry and Environment PO Box 1148 GOSFORD NSW 2250 Email: [email protected] Dear Director, Submission in relation to the Warnervale Airport (Restrictions) Act 1996 review. I understand and agree that my submission will be made public. The statement below represents my personal opinion pertaining to the act review: In any discussion about the WAR act and its relevance to current operations at Warnervale airport it is essential to determine what the original intention of the act is. If we accept as a given that the purpose of the act is to protect local residents from undue aircraft noise and the impact that large aircraft operations would have on the environment then it is easy to mount an argument that the ACT is totally irrelevant. It is easy to establish that for geographical, economic and logistical reasons operations of large aircraft would not be feasible at Warnervale. Contrary to the ‘scare campaign’ being run by a select few individuals, the reality of the situation is that we will never see ‘747’ aircraft operating out of our small, regional airport. It is indeed due to such a ‘scare campaign’ run in the 1990’s by in some cases the same individuals that the ACT came into existence. For the last twenty odd years the airport has had the ‘scimitar’ of the act hanging over its head with the resultant lack of security and tenure for the Aero club. -
Gazette No 141 of 7 November 2008
10627 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 141 Friday, 7 November 2008 Published under authority by Government Advertising LEGISLATION Allocation of Administration of Acts The Department of Premier and Cabinet, Sydney 5 November 2008 TRANSFER OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE WESTERN SYDNEY PARKLANDS ACT 2006 HER Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has approved of the administration of the Western Sydney Parklands Act 2006 being vested in the Premier, subject to the administration of any Act, to the extent that it directly amends another Act, being vested in the Minister administering the other Act or the relevant portion of it. The arrangements are in substitution for those in operation before the date of this notice. NATHAN REES, Premier 10628 LEGISLATION 7 November 2008 Regulations New South Wales Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment (Warnervale Contributions) Regulation 2008 under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council, has made the following Regulation under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. KRISTINA KENEALLY, M.P., Minister for Planning Explanatory note The object of this Regulation is to prohibit a development application being determined in relation to land in the State significant site of Warnervale Town Centre, as described in State Environmental Planning Policy (Major Projects) 2005, until a contributions plan under section 94EA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 has been approved for the State significant site. A contributions plan is not required for the determination of a development application if: (a) the development application is, in the opinion of the consent authority, of a minor nature, or (b) the developer has entered into an agreement with the consent authority that makes adequate provision in relation to the matters that may be the subject of the contributions plan. -
Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government
EXPERT PANEL ON Constitutional Recognition of Local Government Final Report www.localgovrecognition.gov.au December 2011 ISBN 978-0-9870837-6-0 All material presented in this document is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/) licence. The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links provided) as is the full legal code for the CC BY 3.0 AU licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode). The document must be attributed as Final Report, Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government, Commonwealth of Australia represented by the Expert Panel Secretariat within the Department of Regional Australia, Regional Development and Local Government. The views expressed herein are those of the Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Local Government and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commonwealth of Australia. Contents Summary and conclusion .................................................................................................................1 Financial recognition ........................................................................................................................3 Consequences of financial recognition ...................................................................................6 Specific amendments to the Constitution ..............................................................................8 Democratic recognition