DOCSLIB.ORG

Michelangelo and Pope Paul III, 1534-49

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Michelangelo and Pope Paul III, 1534-49 Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Spring 5-15-2015 Michelangelo and Pope Paul III, 1534-49: Patronage, Collaboration and Construction of Identity in Renaissance Rome Erin Christine Sutherland Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons Recommended Citation Sutherland, Erin Christine, "Michelangelo and Pope Paul III, 1534-49: Patronage, Collaboration and Construction of Identity in Renaissance Rome" (2015). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 451. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/451 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Art History & Archaeology Dissertation Examination Committee: William E. Wallace, chair Marisa Bass Daniel Bornstein Nathaniel Jones Angela Miller Michelangelo and Pope Paul III, 1534-49: Patronage, Collaboration and Construction of Identity in Renaissance Rome by Erin Sutherland A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2015 St. Louis, Missouri ©2015, Erin Sutherland Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... iv List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... x Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... xii Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. Frameworks and Foundations ................................................................................. 13 1.1 Patronage: Finances and Favors ....................................................................................... 13 1.2 Strategic spending: Patrons as Heroes and Authors ......................................................... 17 1.3 Michelangelo and Patronage ............................................................................................ 21 1.4 Michelangelo’s Objectives ............................................................................................... 34 1.5 The Church and Rome prior to 1534 ................................................................................ 34 1.5 Ruins and Relics of the Vatican and Rome ...................................................................... 37 1.6 Pauline Objectives ............................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 2: The Last Judgment .................................................................................................. 41 2.1 Pope Paul III as Patron ..................................................................................................... 42 2.2 Artistic Innovations .......................................................................................................... 56 2.3 The Last Judgment and Papal Objectives ......................................................................... 65 2.3.1 Christ’s Celestial and Earthly Kingdoms ...................................................................... 65 2.3.2 The Vatican: Sacred Capital of Christendom ................................................................ 72 2.3.3 The Respublica Christiana ............................................................................................ 102 2.3.4 Reconstructing the Identity of the Church and Defending the Faith ............................ 107 2.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 115 Chapter 3: The Pauline Chapel frescoes:.................................................................................. 117 3.1 Creating a locus sanctus in the Apostolic Palace ............................................................. 117 3.1.1 Connections Between the Last Judgment and the Pauline frescoes .............................. 120 3.1.2 Behind Closed Doors: The Parva and Pauline Chapels................................................. 122 ii 3.1.3 A Visit to the Pauline Chapel ........................................................................................ 132 3.1.4 Michelangelo’s Frescoed Narratives ............................................................................. 137 3.2 The Commission:.............................................................................................................. 140 3.2.1 Vasari and Mistakes or Changes .................................................................................. 141 3.2.2 Which Fresco was Painted First? .................................................................................. 143 3.2.3 The Pairing of Scenes .................................................................................................... 144 3.2.4 Raphael’s Tapestries ...................................................................................................... 146 3.3 Apostolic Predecessors ..................................................................................................... 151 3.4 Paul’s Ceremonial Complex ............................................................................................. 159 3.5 Michelangelo’s Final Frescoes ......................................................................................... 163 3.6 Rituals and Representations ............................................................................................. 170 3.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 183 Chapter 4: Kid Gloves and Carrots: The Artist’s Benefits ....................................................... 185 4.1 A Papal Brief, 1 September 1535 ..................................................................................... 186 4.1.1 Unprecedented Honors .................................................................................................. 186 4.1.2 Salary and Benefits ........................................................................................................ 189 4.1.3 The Artist as Papal Familiar ......................................................................................... 196 4.1.4 Expectations .................................................................................................................. 199 4.2 Comparison of Michelangelo to Court Artists ................................................................. 200 4.2.1 Contracts and Gentlemen’s Agreements ....................................................................... 204 4.2.2 Money Matters............................................................................................................... 206 4.3 Social Standing of Michelangelo and the Buonarroti....................................................... 207 4.4 Summoned, Slighted and Enticed: Michelangelo and the Popes ..................................... 213 4.5 Social Networks................................................................................................................ 216 4.6 Fellowship of the Aged .................................................................................................... 217 4.6.1 Friendship and Noble Delicacies ................................................................................... 218 4.7 “For the love of God” ....................................................................................................... 224 4.8 Michelangelo Distinguishes Himself From the Setta Sangallesca ................................... 228 4.9 Artistic legacy ................................................................................................................... 233 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 241 iii Bibliography ............................................................................................................................. 245 Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 261 Curriculum Vitae ...................................................................................................................... 316 iv List of Figures (measurements are given as height x width) Figure 1: Last Judgment, Sistine Chapel, Vatican, fresco, 14 m. x 13.18 m. Figure 2: Conversion of Saul, Pauline Chapel, Vatican, fresco, 6.25 m. x 6.61 m. Figure 3: Crucifixion of Peter, Pauline Chapel, Vatican, fresco, 6.25 m. x 6.62 m. Figure 4: Partial plan of Apostolic Palace, after
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Art Offers a Glimpse at a Different World Than That Which The
    chapter 5 Art Art offers a glimpse at a different world than that which the written narratives of early Rome provide. Although the producers (or rather, the patrons) of both types of work may fall into the same class, the educated elite, the audience of the two is not the same. Written histories and antiquarian works were pro- duced for the consumption of the educated; monuments, provided that they were public, were to be viewed by all. The narrative changes required by dyadic rivalry are rarely depicted through visual language.1 This absence suggests that the visual narratives had a different purpose than written accounts. To avoid confusion between dyadic rivals and other types of doubles, I con- fine myself to depictions of known stories, which in practice limits my inves- tigation to Romulus and Remus.2 Most artistic material depicting the twins comes from the Augustan era, and is more complimentary than the literary narratives. In this chapter, I examine mainly public imagery, commissioned by the same elite who read the histories of the city. As a result, there can be no question of ignorance of this narrative trope; however, Roman monuments are aimed at a different and wider audience. They stress the miraculous salvation of the twins, rather than their later adventures. The pictorial language of the Republic was more interested in the promo- tion of the city and its elite members than problematizing their competition. The differentiation between artistic versions produced for an external audi- ence and the written narratives for an internal audience is similar to the dis- tinction made in Propertius between the inhabitants’ knowledge of the Parilia and the archaizing gloss shown to visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo's Locations
    1 3 4 He also adds the central balcony and the pope’s Michelangelo modifies the facades of Palazzo dei The project was completed by Tiberio Calcagni Cupola and Basilica di San Pietro Cappella Sistina Cappella Paolina crest, surmounted by the keys and tiara, on the Conservatori by adding a portico, and Palazzo and Giacomo Della Porta. The brothers Piazza San Pietro Musei Vaticani, Città del Vaticano Musei Vaticani, Città del Vaticano facade. Michelangelo also plans a bridge across Senatorio with a staircase leading straight to the Guido Ascanio and Alessandro Sforza, who the Tiber that connects the Palace with villa Chigi first floor. He then builds Palazzo Nuovo giving commissioned the work, are buried in the two The long lasting works to build Saint Peter’s Basilica The chapel, dedicated to the Assumption, was Few steps from the Sistine Chapel, in the heart of (Farnesina). The work was never completed due a slightly trapezoidal shape to the square and big side niches of the chapel. Its elliptical-shaped as we know it today, started at the beginning of built on the upper floor of a fortified area of the Apostolic Palaces, is the Chapel of Saints Peter to the high costs, only a first part remains, known plans the marble basement in the middle of it, space with its sail vaults and its domes supported the XVI century, at the behest of Julius II, whose Vatican Apostolic Palace, under pope Sixtus and Paul also known as Pauline Chapel, which is as Arco dei Farnesi, along the beautiful Via Giulia.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 2020 I
    NEWSLETTER EMBASSY OF MALAYSIA TO THE HOLY SEE JAN - JUN 2020 | 1ST ISSUE 2020 INSIDE THIS ISSUE • Message from His Excellency Westmoreland Palon • Traditional Exchange of New Year Greetings between the Holy Father and the Diplomatic Corp • Malaysia's contribution towards Albania's recovery efforts following the devastating earthquake in November 2019 • Meeting with Archbishop Ian Ernest, the Archbishop of Canterbury's new Personal Representative to the Holy See & Director of the Anglican Centre in Rome • Visit by Secretary General of the Ministry of Water, Land and Natural Resources • A Very Warm Welcome to Father George Harrison • Responding to COVID-19 • Pope Called for Joint Prayer to End the Coronavirus • Malaysia’s Diplomatic Equipment Stockpile (MDES) • Repatriation of Malaysian Citizens and their dependents from the Holy See and Italy to Malaysia • A Fond Farewell to Mr Mohd Shaifuddin bin Daud and family • Selamat Hari Raya Aidilfitri & Selamat Hari Gawai • Post-Lockdown Gathering with Malaysians at the Holy See Malawakil Holy See 1 Message From His Excellency St. Peter’s Square, once deserted, is slowly coming back to life now that Italy is Westmoreland Palon welcoming visitors from neighbouring countries. t gives me great pleasure to present you the latest edition of the Embassy’s Nonetheless, we still need to be cautious. If Inewsletter for the first half of 2020. It has we all continue to do our part to help flatten certainly been a very challenging year so far the curve and stop the spread of the virus, for everyone. The coronavirus pandemic has we can look forward to a safer and brighter put a halt to many activities with second half of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Fr Cantalamessa Gives First Advent Reflection to Pope and Roman Curia
    Fr Cantalamessa gives first Advent reflection to Pope and Roman Curia The Preacher of the Papal Household, Fr Raniero Cantalamessa, gives his first Advent reflection at the Redemptoris Mater Chapel in the Apostolic Palace. Below is the full text of his sermon. P. Raniero Cantalamessa ofmcap BLESSED IS SHE WHO BELIEVED!” Mary in the Annunciation First Advent Sermon 2019 Every year the liturgy leads us to Christmas with three guides: Isaiah, John the Baptist and Mary, the prophet, the precursor, the mother. The first announced the Messiah from afar, the second showed him present in the world, the third bore him in her womb. This Advent I have thought to entrust ourselves entirely to the Mother of Jesus. No one, better than she can prepare us to celebrate the birth of our Redeemer. She didn’t celebrate Advent, she lived it in her flesh. Like every mother bearing a child she knows what it means be waiting for somebody and can help us in approaching Christmas with an expectant faith. We shall contemplate the Mother of God in the three moments in which Scripture presents her at the center of the events: the Annunciation, the Visitation and Christmas. 1. “Behold, / am the handmaid of the Lord” We start with the Annunciation. When Mary went to visit Elizabeth she welcomed Mary with great joy and praised her for her faith saying, “Blessed is she who believed there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken her from the Lord” (Lk 1:45). The wonderful thing that took place in Nazareth after the angel’s greeting was that Mary “believed,” and thus she became the “mother of the Lord.” There is no doubt that the word “believed” refers to Mary’s answer to the angel: “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word (Lk 1:38).
    [Show full text]
  • Observing Protest from a Place
    VISUAL AND MATERIAL CULTURE, 1300-1700 Suzanne M. Scanlan M. Suzanne Suzanne M. Scanlan Divine and Demonic Imagery at Tor de’Specchi, 1400–1500 Religious Women and Art in 15th-century Rome at Tor de’Specchi, 1400–1500 de’Specchi, Tor at Divine and Demonic Imagery Divine and Demonic Imagery at Tor de’Specchi, 1400–1500 Visual and Material Culture, 1300–1700 A forum for innovative research on the role of images and objects in the late medieval and early modern periods, Visual and Material Culture, 1300–1700 publishes mono- graphs and essay collections that combine rigorous investigation with critical inquiry to present new narratives on a wide range of topics, from traditional arts to seeming- ly ordinary things. Recognizing the fluidity of images, objects, and ideas, this series fosters cross-cultural as well as multi-disciplinary exploration. We consider proposals from across the spectrum of analytic approaches and methodologies. Series Editor Dr. Allison Levy, an art historian, has written and/or edited three scholarly books, and she has been the recipient of numerous grants and awards, from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Association of University Women, the Getty Research Institute, the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library of Harvard University, the Whiting Foundation and the Bogliasco Foundation, among others. www.allisonlevy.com. Divine and Demonic Imagery at Tor de’Specchi, 1400–1500 Religious Women and Art in Fifteenth-Century Rome Suzanne M. Scanlan Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Attributed to Antoniazzo Romano, The Death of Santa Francesca Romana, detail, fresco, 1468, former oratory, Tor de’Specchi, Rome. Photo by Author with permission from Suor Maria Camilla Rea, Madre Presidente.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatre Tips Sion of the Men in Her Life, Unfolded on Stage
    Issue 152 September 2018 A NEWSLETTER OF THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY GETTY IMAGES Theatre Tips sion of the men in her life, unfolded on stage. Broadway show inexpensively, but of course, Not every theatre experience is as emotion- you shouldn’t rely on winning to have plans M ELISSA JAR M EL ally charged as that one, but they all offer a to see theatre that night. Some shows like One of the best ways that I know how chance to see life from a different perspective Mean Girls, Book of Mormon, and Once On to take myself out of lab life is to see live the- and with a unique group of people. In future This Island offer in person lotteries every atre, and I’m lucky that New York City offers posts, I hope to highlight shows I’ve watched day that are usually drawn two hours before an overwhelming number of options to do on and off Broadway, but this time I want to the performance. In the last couple of years, this affordably (though Hamilton ticket pric- give you tips for seeing theatre on a budget. many shows have begun to offer digital lot- es may have you fooled about this). If you are a full time student, teacher, tery options. Broadway Direct (https://lot- One of the aspects I love most about or faculty member (or other qualifying cat- tery.broadwaydirect.com/) offers digital lot- going to the theatre is the acute feeling that egory), the Theatre Development Fund is teries for Lion King, Aladdin, Spongebob, and I am part of a connected community.
    [Show full text]
  • Regarding Michelangelo's "Bacchus" Author(S): Ralph Lieberman Source: Artibus Et Historiae, Vol
    Regarding Michelangelo's "Bacchus" Author(s): Ralph Lieberman Source: Artibus et Historiae, Vol. 22, No. 43 (2001), pp. 65-74 Published by: IRSA s.c. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1483653 Accessed: 20/05/2009 13:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=irsa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. IRSA s.c. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Artibus et Historiae. http://www.jstor.org RALPH LIEBERMAN RegardingMichelangelo's Bacchus Aftertelling his readers that
    [Show full text]
  • Cellini Vs Michelangelo: a Comparison of the Use of Furia, Forza, Difficultà, Terriblità, and Fantasia
    International Journal of Art and Art History December 2018, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 22-30 ISSN: 2374-2321 (Print), 2374-233X (Online) Copyright © The Author(s).All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijaah.v6n2p4 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijaah.v6n2p4 Cellini vs Michelangelo: A Comparison of the Use of Furia, Forza, Difficultà, Terriblità, and Fantasia Maureen Maggio1 Abstract: Although a contemporary of the great Michelangelo, Benvenuto Cellini is not as well known to the general public today. Cellini, a master sculptor and goldsmith in his own right, made no secret of his admiration for Michelangelo’s work, and wrote treatises on artistic principles. In fact, Cellini’s artistic treatises can be argued to have exemplified the principles that Vasari and his contemporaries have attributed to Michelangelo. This paper provides an overview of the key Renaissance artistic principles of furia, forza, difficultà, terriblità, and fantasia, and uses them to examine and compare Cellini’s famous Perseus and Medusa in the Loggia deiLanzi to the work of Michelangelo, particularly his famous statue of David, displayed in the Galleria dell’ Accademia. Using these principles, this analysis shows that Cellini not only knew of the artistic principles of Michelangelo, but that his work also displays a mastery of these principles equal to Michelangelo’s masterpieces. Keywords: Cellini, Michelangelo, Renaissance aesthetics, Renaissance Sculptors, Italian Renaissance 1.0Introduction Benvenuto Cellini was a Florentine master sculptor and goldsmith who was a contemporary of the great Michelangelo (Fenton, 2010). Cellini had been educated at the Accademiade lDisegno where Michelangelo’s artistic principles were being taught (Jack, 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • A Robot Application for Analysis, Survey and Conservation of Historical Architectures
    20 A Robot Application for Analysis, Survey and Conservation of Historical Architectures Michela Cigola and Marco Ceccarelli University of Cassino Italy 1. Introduction This work is the result of the collaboration between DART (Laboratory of Documentation, Analysis, Survey of Architecture and Territory) and LARM (Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics) which, despite their apparent differences in terms of fields of research, for years have found time and motivations for opinion exchanges and cultural contacts, as well as research topics on which to begin genuine and fertile collaborations (Ceccarelli, et al., 2002) (Cigola, et al., 2005) (Cigola & Ceccarelli, 2006). The project research group is made up as follows: for the DART Laboratory of Documentation, Analysis, Survey of Architecture and Territory: Michela Cigola, architect specialized in Restoration of Monuments, full professor director of DART; Assunta Pelliccio, architect, assistant professor; Sara Mattei, engineer, PHD student; for the LARM Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics: Marco Ceccarelli, engineer, full professor director of LARM, Giuseppe Carbone, engineer, assistant professor; Erica Ottaviano, engineer, assistant professor; Chiara Lanni, engineer, research assistant. Our goal is to analyse the characteristics and problems that are related to the analysis and conservation of historical architecture, within an innovative approach with robotised systems. The design requisites and the distinctive aspects of the operations of a large range of robotised systems have now been fully defined and investigated. However, there are very few precedents for such specialized application, moreover, in connection to the subject of historical architecture that is apparently far away from general areas of robotics and mechatronics. The case of study that is presented here, namely the pre-Cosmatesque floor of the abbatial basilica of Montecassino, is a good case to highlight the flexibility of robotics and possible interactions with architecture, particularly in the field of surveying.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) Discepolo E Biografo Di Michelangelo Buonarroti
    DIPARTIMENTO DI STORIA DELL’ARTE E SPETTACOLO DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN Strumenti e Metodi per la Storia dell’Arte Coordinatore: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Silvia DANESI SQUARZINA Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) discepolo e biografo di Michelangelo Buonarroti Tomo I TUTOR: DOTTORANDA: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Dott.ssa Beniamina MAZZUCA Silvia DANESI SQUARZINA XXIV Ciclo (aa.aa. 2008-2011) A mio padre Un ringraziamento sentito rivolgo alla prof.ssa Silvia Danesi Squarzina, insostituibile guida nel lavoro di questi anni, segnati dai suoi preziosi insegnamenti. Un vivo grazie anche alla prof.ssa Costanza Barbieri per il sostegno, la disponibilità e la grande cortesia riservatemi. Con affetto e simpatia ringrazio Luca Calenne e Tiziana Checchi, che mi hanno aiutata nella trascrizione dei documenti, e tutti gli amici e colleghi, in particolare Laura, Francesca e Carlo. Alla mia famiglia, a Valentino e ai miei amici di sempre: grazie di tutto. Indice TOMO I Introduzione VIII 1. Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) 1.1. Lo stato degli studi 1 1.2. Origini della famiglia Condivi 8 1.3. Nascita e formazione 9 1.4. Primo viaggio a Roma 10 1.5. Un caso di omonimia 12 1.6. Il soggiorno romano 14 1.7. Ritorno a Ripatransone: le nozze e il turbolento rapporto con Annibal Caro 17 1.8. L’elezione tra i membri dell’Accademia Fiorentina 22 1.9. Gli ultimi anni a Ripatransone e la morte 24 1.10. Le opere di Ascanio Condivi nei documenti dell’archivio storico di Ripatransone 27 1.11. La discendenza 31 1.12. I ritratti di Ascanio Condivi e dei suoi discendenti 33 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art and Artifacts Associated with the Cult of Dionysus
    Alana Koontz The Art and Artifacts Associated with the Cult of Dionysus Alana Koontz is a student at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee graduating with a degree in Art History and a certificate in Ancient Mediterranean Studies. The main focus of her studies has been ancient art, with specific attention to ancient architecture, statuary, and erotic symbolism in ancient art. Through various internships, volunteering and presentations, Alana has deepened her understanding of the art world, and hopes to do so more in the future. Alana hopes to continue to grad school and earn her Master’s Degree in Art History and Museum Studies, and eventually earn her PhD. Her goal is to work in a large museum as a curator of the ancient collections. Alana would like to thank the Religious Studies Student Organization for this fantastic experience, and appreciates them for letting her participate. Dionysus was the god of wine, art, vegetation and also widely worshipped as a fertility god. The cult of Dionysus worshipped him fondly with cultural festivities, wine-induced ritualistic dances, 1 intense and violent orgies, and secretive various depictions of drunken revelry. 2 He embodies the intoxicating portion of nature. Dionysus, in myth, was the last god to be accepted at Mt Olympus, and was known for having a mortal mother. He spent his adulthood teaching the cultivation of grapes, and wine-making. The worship began as a celebration of culture, with plays and processions, and progressed into a cult that was shrouded in mystery. Later in history, worshippers would perform their rituals in the cover of darkness, limiting the cult-practitioners to women, and were surrounded by myth that is sometimes interpreted as fact.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Through Sacred Space: Medieval Tree and Cross Symbolism in the Apse Mosaic and Floor of San Clemente in Rome Joe Hartm
    1 A Journey through Sacred Space: Medieval Tree and Cross Symbolism in the Apse Mosaic and Floor of San Clemente in Rome Joe Hartman PhD candidate, Art History, Southern Methodist University Introduction: Cross, Tree, and Vine Symbolism in the Church of San Clemente In medieval Rome, the cross – also called the lignum vitae (tree or wood of life) – represented a Christian belief that the sins of humankind, associated with the tree of knowledge, were overcome through Christ’s sacrifice.1 The cross and vine in the apse mosaic of the twelfth- century church of San Clemente in Rome are a case in point (Figs. 1-2). In the center of the mosaic, on top of a gold inlaid background, Christ appears crucified on a black cross. A lush, green acanthus plant grows beneath him. Sinuous vines surround the cross on either side. The mosaic’s theme follows a typical fourth- or fifth-century configuration, which likens the emblematic cross to the paradisiacal “Tree of Life.”2 The visually literate laity of the twelfth century would have understood the image as a symbol of redemption and renewal. As such, the apse mosaic also depicts the cross as the Vine of Christ that abundantly provides the wine of the Eucharist and represents Christ’s sacrificial blood.3 The ornament and furnishings of San Clemente emphasize this central tree and vine motif. For example, San Clemente’s iconographic 1 All translations are the authors’ own. For more on the semiotics of the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge, see Gerhart Ladner’s influential article “Medieval and Modern Understanding of Symbolism: A Comparison.” Speculum 54/ 2 (1979), 223-256.
    [Show full text]