DOCSLIB.ORG

The Virgilian Tradition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

List of Illustrations xx Preface xxi Rules of the Edition xxvii Acknowledgments xxix Introduction xxxiii List of Abbreviations xxxvii I VIRGIL THE POET i A. VIRGIL ON HIMSELF 2 1 Georgics 2 2 Letter to Augustus 4 B. CONTEMPORARY RESPONSE 1 Lucius Varius Rufus 5 2 Horace 7 3 Agrippa 12 4 Propertius 12 5 Domitius Marsus 13 C. LATER INFLUENCE AND IMPORTANCE 14 1 Ovid 14 2 "Ille ego qui quondam gracili niodulatus avena" "22 3 Appendix Vergiliana 25 4 Seneca the Elder 27 5 Velleius Paterculus 29 6 Quintus Remmius Palaemon 29 7 Seneca the Younger 30 8 Pliny the Elder 33 9 Lucan 34 10 Calpurnius Siculus 35 11 First Einsiedeln Eclogue 35 12 LausPisonis 36 13 Petronius 37 14 Columella 40 15 Pompeian Graffiti 42 16 Masada Papyrus 44 17 Vindolanda Writing-Tablets 44 18 Silius Italicus 45 19 Quintilian 46 20 Martial 48 21 Statius 56 22 Tacitus 59 23 Florus 60 24 Pliny the Younger 62 25 Juvenal 63 26 Apuleius 65 27 Aulus Gellius 65 28 Avienus 71 29 Ammianus Marcellinus 71 30 Jerome 72 31 Augustine 73 32 Claudian 86 33 Sidonius Apollinaris 87 34 Ennodius 88 35 Cassiodorus 89 36 Gregory of Tours 90 37 Isidore of Seville 91 38 Aldhelm 92 39 Alcuin 96 viii CONTENTS 40 Ermoldus NigeJlus 100 41 Welsh Battle of the Trees i o i 42 Ermenrich of Ellwangen 102 43 Modus Ottinc 105 44 Fulbert of Chartrcs 106 45 Donizo 107 46 Peter Abelard 111 47 Otto of Frelsing 111 48 "Archpoet" 113 49 Walter of Chatillon 114 50 Alan of Lille us 51 Chretien de Troyes 128 52 Jacob van Maerlant 129 53 Dante 130 54 Petrarch 132 55 Chaucer 145 56 Christine de Pizan 146 57 Maffeo Vegio 147 D. VIRGIL AS PERFORMED OR DECLAIMED I 62 1 Tacitus 162 2 Suetonius 162 3 Probus 163 4 Lucian 164 5 Macrobius 164 6 Performances of the Eclogues 164 7 Servius 165 8 Augustine 165 9 Fulgentius 166 10 Venantius Fortunatus 166 11 Virgil and Musical Notation 167 II BIOGRAPHY: IMAGES OF VIRGIL 179 A. VlTAE 179 1 Vita Suetonii vulgo Donatiana (VSD ) 181 2 Jerome 199 3 Vita Servii 202 4 VitaFocae 205 5 Vita Philarjjyrii I 212 CONTEN T S ix 6 Vita Philargyrii II 220 7 Vita Probi 225 8 Expositio Donati 227 9 Expositio Monacensis I 229 10 Expositio Monacensis II 230 11 Periochae Bernenses I 236 .12 Periochae BernensesII 237 13 Periochae Gudianae 242 14 Periochae Teaernseenses 243 15 Periochae Vaticanae 246 16 VitaAurelianensis 248 17 Vita Bernensis I 249 18 Vita Bernensis II 250 19 Vita Bernensis III 251 20 VitaGudianal 252 21 VitaGudianall 256 22 Vita Gudiana III 259 23 Vita Leidensis 260 24 Vita Monacensis I 263 25 Vita Monacensis II 269 26 Vita Monacensis III 274 27 Vita Monacensis IV 275 28 Vita Noricensis I 278 29 Vita Noricensis II 280 30 Vita Parisina II 281 31 VitaVaticanal 281 32 Vita Vaticana II 282 3 3 Fzto Vossiana 289 34 Zono de' Magnalis 292 35 Domenico di Bandino 303 36 Sicco Polenton I 321 37 Donatus auctus 345 38 Sicco Polenton II 369 39 Vita Laurentiana 396 B. VIRGIL'S BIRTHDAY: IDES OF OCTOBER AS SACRED 403 1 Pliny the Younger 403 2 Martial 403 3 Ausonius 404 x CONTENTS C. VIRGIL'S REMAINS AND GRAVE 404 r Epitaph 404 2 Statins 405 3 Martial 405 4 Pliny the Younger 405 5 Aelius Donatus 406 6 VitaProbi 406 7 Jerome 406 8 Sidonius Apollinaris 407 9 Eusthenius 407 10 Pompilianus 407 11 Rodulfus Tortarius 407 12 John of Salisbury 408 13 Conrad of Querfurt 409 14 Gervase of Tilbury 409 15 Dante 411 16 Sequence about St. Paul 412 17 Petrarch 413 18 Itinerary of a Certain Englishman 417 19 Boccaccio 418 D. THE BURNING OF THE AENEID 420 1 Ovid 420 2 Pliny the Elder 422 3 Gaius Sulpicius Apollinaris 422 4 Aulus Gellius 424 5 Aelius Donatus 424 6 Macrobius 425 E. AUTOGRAPH MANUSCRIPTS OF VIRGIL 425 1 Pliny the Elder 425 2 Quintilian 426 3 Aulus Gellius 426 F. ViRGiLiAN IMAGES 427 1 Ancient Textual References to Portraits of Virgil 427 2 Late Antique Textual Reference to Portraits of Virgil 429 3 Late Antique Virgilian Imagery 429 4 Flabellum of Tournus 436 5 Virgil on a Wooden Bowl 438 CONTENTS xi 6 Illuminated Aeneid 438 7 Virgil in Mantua 446 8 Virgil and Dante 448 9 Virgil and Petrarch 451 10 Portraits of Prophetic Virgil and the Sibyl 45 3 11 Virgil as Magician 457 12 Virgil in the Basket 457 13 Virgilian Imagery in Non-Virgilian Texts 459 14 Conclusion 462 G. VIRGIL AS PHILOSOPHER AND COMPENDIUM OF KNOWLEDGE 463 1 Seneca the Younger 463 2 Macrobius 463 3 Servius 464 4 (Pseudo-)Bernardus Silvestris 465 5 Roman de Thebes 465 6 John of Salisbury 466 7 Alexander Neckam 466 8 Boccaccio 466 H. VIRGIL AS WORTHY OF VENERATION AND DIVINE 467 1 Tacitus 467 2 Macrobius 467 3 Servius 468 III VIRGIL'S TEXTS AND THEIR USES 469 A. VIRGILIAN CENTO 471 1 Petronius 471 2 Hosidius Geta and African Centos 471 3 Tertullian 471 4 Ausonius 472 5 Proba 475 6 Pomponius 480 7 Mavortius 480 8 Deverbiincarnatione 481 9 Thierry of St. Trond 481 B. VIRGILIAN PARODY 485 1 Early Detractors 485 2 Comiflcius Gallus 486 xii CONTE N T S 3 vScrvius 487 C. ECLOGUES 4- 487 1 Lactantius 488 2 Constantine I 491 3 Augustine 496 4 Jerome 499 5 Christian of Stavdot 500 6 Peter Abelard 501 7 Jean de Meun 502 8 Dante 503 D. ORPHEUS 503 1 Ovid 504 2 Martial 506 3 Boethius 507 4 Fulgentius 510 5 (Pseudo-)Bernardus Silvestris 510 E. DIDO 511 T Ovid 511 2 Tertullian 522 3 Bobbio Epigrams 522 4 Macrobius 524 5 Jerome 524 6 Augustine 525 7 "O decus, O Libye regnum" 528 8 "Anna soror ut quid mori" 531 9 Dante 534 10 Petrarch 535 11 Boccaccio 536 12 Chaucer 542 F. DESCENT INTO THE UNDERWORLD 543 1 Servius 543 2 (Pseudo-)Bernardus Silvestris 544 G. GOLDEN BOUGH 544 1 Macrobius 544 2 Servius 545 3 (Pseudo-)Bernardus Silvestris 547 4 John of Salisbury 548 CONTENTS xiii H. FLORILEGIA 550 I. ROMAN D'ENEAS 550 1 Dido 551 2 Golden Bough 572 J. HEINRICH VON VELD EKE 576 1 Dido S77 2 Descent into the Underworld 598 K. MIDDLE IRISH WANDERINGS OF AENEAS 60S 1 Historical Prologue 609 2 Dido 610 3 Golden Bough 615 L. VIRGIL IN MEDIEVAL ICELANDIC 616 1 Trojan Horse 618 2 Serpentine Simile 621 3 Trojan Horse (Rationalized) 621 4 Thor Substituted for Jupiter 621 IV COMMENTARY TRADITION 623 A. TRADITION OF COMMENTARY BEFORE THE FOURTH CENTURY 626 1 Quintus Caecilius Epirota 626 2 Gaius Iulius Hyginus 627 3 Quintus Asconius Pedianus 627 4 Lucius Annaeus Cornutus 627 5 Marcus Valerius Probus 628 6 Velius Longus 628 7 Aulus Gellius 628 8 Aemilius Asper 628 B. SERVIUS 628 1 Comment on Aeneid 4 630 2 Allegory 631 C. MACROBIUS 636 1 Rhetorical Devices 637 2 Oratorical Skill 637 3 Greek Models 639 4 Roman Models 639 5 Knowledge of Astronomy and Philosophy 639 xiv CONTENTS 6 Pontifical Law 640 7 Augural Law 641 D. OTHER COMMENTATORS OF THE FOURTH OR FIFTH CENTURY 641 1 Iunius Philargyrius 641 2 Aclius Donatus 642 3 Tiberius Claudius Donatus 644 E. PRISCIAN 649 F. FULGENTIUS 660 G. VlRGILIUS M.ARO GRAMMATICUS 672 H. SCHOLIA BERNENSIA ON ECLOG UES 4 674 I. OLD IRISH GLOSSES ON PHILARGYRIUS 698 1 Comment on Eclogues 4.19 699 2 Comment on Eclogues 4.28 699 3 Comment on Eclogues 4.34 699 4 Comment on Eclogues 4.40 699 5 Comment on Eclogues 4.42 699 6 Comment on Eclogues 4.44 700 7 Comment on Eclogues 4.45 700 3 Comment on Eclogues 4.50 700 J. CAROLINGIAN COMMENTARY ON ECLOGUES 6 700 K. CAROLINGIAN GLOSSES ON THE AENEID 704 L. OLD HIGH GERMAN GLOSSES 705 M. INTRODUCTION TO THE LATIN HOMER 705 N. INTRODUCTIONS TO THE ECLOG UES 707 1 Argumenta 707 2 Accessus 711 O. "MASTER ANSELM" 717 P. PLATONIZING DIRECTIONS IN VIRGILIAN ALLEGORY 721 1 Opening Notes 722 2 Glosses on the Aeneid 724 Q. (PSEUDO-)BERNARDUS SILVESTRIS 726 1 Preface to Commentary on Aeneid 727 2 Comment on Aeneid 1.52 728 CONTENTS 3 Comment on Aeneid 1,412,446 728 4 Comment on Aeneid 2.1 729 5 Comment on Aeneid 3 730 6 Comment on Aeneid 4 730 7 Co mment on Aeneid 5.1, 114 73 3 8 Comment on Aeneid 6,6 734 9 Comment onAr/^ 6.13, 34 735 10 Comment on Aeneid 6.42 736 11 Comment on Aeneid 6.455 737 12 Introduction to Martianus Capella 2.70-86, 93-104, 114-24 73: R. CONRAD OF HIRSAU 739 S. JOHN OF GARLAND 744 1 Parisians poetria 1.124-34 745 2 Parisians poetria 1.394-405 745 3 Parisians poetria 2.87-123 746 T. NICHOLAS TREVET 750 U. AENEID COMMENTARY OF MIXED TYPE 773 1 Opening of Book 6 774 2 Orpheus and Eurydice 782 3 Golden Bough 786 V. CRISTOFORO LANDING 793 1 Introduction on the Nature of Poetry 794 2 On Allegorical Interpretation 799 3 Dido and Aeneas 802 4 Golden Bough 807 W. VIRGILIAN OBSCENITY 811 1 Quintilian 81.1 2 Aulus Gellius 812 3 Ausonius 813 4 Diomedes 813 5 Marius Plotius Sacerdos 813 6 Macrobius 814 7 Servius 814 X. ALLEGORICAL TOPOI 815 1 Evolution of Civilization 816 2 Vita contemplativa, voluptuosa, and activa 817 xvi C O N T E N T S 3 Development of a Human Life 817 4 Physics and Philosophy 822 5 Eclogues 1-3 and the Three Natural Lives 823 V VIRGILIAN LEGENDS 82s A.
Recommended publications
  • The Asàrotos Òikos Mosaic As an Elite Status Symbol 5

    The Asàrotos Òikos Mosaic As an Elite Status Symbol 5

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert Ehud Fathy The asàrotos òikos mosaic as an elite status symbol 5 The asàrotos òikos mosaic as an elite status symbol Ehud Fathy Tel Aviv University Recibido: 31/03/2017 / Evaluado: 25/04/2017 / Aprobado: 08/05/2017 Abstract: This article focuses on theasarotos oikos theme in roman mosaics, and aims at exploring the social significance these depictions have held during the late Imperial age, and their relation to the proceedings of the banquet. This study suggests that disguised symbolism and erudite references rest behind the representation of these seemingly daily objects, which could only be fully understood by members of the Roman cultural elite, who possessed the proper education for the task. The mosaic served as a starting point for the elitist practice of an erudite discourse and as a reminder of the brevity of life. Keywords: asàrotos òikos, unswept floor, roman elitist art, Heraclitus mosaic, carpe diem, roman banquet, Sosos of Pergamon. ne of the less common themes of roman mosaics is the asàrotos òikos or «unswept floor», depicting titbits of a luxurious meal, scattered evenly onO the room’s floor. According to Pliny this theme was originally created by the mosaicist Sosos in Pergamon,1 presumably in the second century BCE.2 1. This contribution is part of the author's doctoral thesis carried out at Tel Aviv University under the supervision of Dr. Talila Michaeli. I would like to express my gratitude to Dr.
  • The Copa: an Introduction and Commentary

    The Copa: an Introduction and Commentary

    THE COPA: AN INTRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY by FRANCES J. GRUENEWALD B.A., University of British Columbia, 1972 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Classics We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1975 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date AlfJL 3L<\t /<?7S. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is two-fold: firstly, to make a general study of the Copa with a view to determining, as far as is possible, its authorship and date, and,secondly, to attempt a detailed exegesis of its contents. The first Chapter contains an introduction to the MSS tradi• tion of the Appendix Vergiliana, and a brief discussion of the statements of Donatus and Servius concerning Vergilian authorship of the poems. In Chapter 2 the question of the authorship of the Copa is considered. The views of various scholars, who use as tests of authenticity studies of content and style, vocabulary, metre and parallel passages, are discussed.
  • Collection 13

    Collection 13

    EARLY EUROPEAN BOOKS Explore the Record of European Life and Culture About Collection 13 Early European Books Collection 13 presents a selection themed around literature, poetry and drama. Items from London’s Wellcome Library, Florence’s Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, Copenhagen’s Kongelige Bibliotek and The Hague’s Koninklijke Bibliotheek provide a rich assembly of content from across Europe. Supported by key classical and medieval texts, at the heart of Collection 13 is a body of works which document the remarkable flowering of vernacular literatures witnessed during the early modern period. Among the thousands of titles featured are acknowledged literary landmarks, but also less familiar items. Brought together, Collection 13 builds up a picture of the early modern literary scene that embraces ephemeral as well as timeless works, and that strongly accentuates its creative diversity. Collection 13 comes complete with USTC subject classifications to enable and enhance user experience. From Homer to Persius The early modern period was defined by its rediscovery of classical texts, and Collection 13 presents a choice of these ranging from literary giants like Homer and Ovid to more minor figures like Persius (34-62 CE) and Claudian (c.370-c.404 CE). Prose pieces include a 1624 Amsterdam edition of Apuleius (c.124-c.170 CE) which includes his Erasmus (1466-1536) and Philip Melanchthon (1497-1560). Metamorphoses or The Golden Ass, while a 1700 edition of Other Erasmus items include a 1524 edition of Euripides Petronius’ notorious Satyricon is another bawdy inclusion. in Greek and Latin, and a 1507 Aldine printing of the same Classical literature’s rediscovery inevitably involved its Latin translation bound with his own classical imitation, reconstruction, and items featured reflect both advances Ode de laudibus Britanniæ.
  • The Recollections of Encolpius

    The Recollections of Encolpius

    The Recollections of Encolpius ANCIENT NARRATIVE Supplementum 2 Editorial Board Maaike Zimmerman, University of Groningen Gareth Schmeling, University of Florida, Gainesville Heinz Hofmann, Universität Tübingen Stephen Harrison, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Costas Panayotakis (review editor), University of Glasgow Advisory Board Jean Alvares, Montclair State University Alain Billault, Université Jean Moulin, Lyon III Ewen Bowie, Corpus Christi College, Oxford Jan Bremmer, University of Groningen Ken Dowden, University of Birmingham Ben Hijmans, Emeritus of Classics, University of Groningen Ronald Hock, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Niklas Holzberg, Universität München Irene de Jong, University of Amsterdam Bernhard Kytzler, University of Natal, Durban John Morgan, University of Wales, Swansea Ruurd Nauta, University of Groningen Rudi van der Paardt, University of Leiden Costas Panayotakis, University of Glasgow Stelios Panayotakis, University of Groningen Judith Perkins, Saint Joseph College, West Hartford Bryan Reardon, Professor Emeritus of Classics, University of California, Irvine James Tatum, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire Alfons Wouters, University of Leuven Subscriptions Barkhuis Publishing Zuurstukken 37 9761 KP Eelde the Netherlands Tel. +31 50 3080936 Fax +31 50 3080934 [email protected] www.ancientnarrative.com The Recollections of Encolpius The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction Gottskálk Jensson BARKHUIS PUBLISHING & GRONINGEN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GRONINGEN 2004 Bókin er tileinkuð
  • Orthographies in Grammar Books

    Orthographies in Grammar Books

    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 30 July 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201807.0565.v1 Tomislav Stojanov, [email protected], [email protected] Institute of Croatian Language and Linguistic Republike Austrije 16, 10.000 Zagreb, Croatia Orthographies in Grammar Books – Antiquity and Humanism Summary This paper researches the as yet unstudied topic of orthographic content in antique, medieval, and Renaissance grammar books in European languages, as part of a wider research of the origin of orthographic standards in European languages. As a central place for teachings about language, grammar books contained orthographic instructions from the very beginning, and such practice continued also in later periods. Understanding the function, content, and orthographic forms in the past provides for a better description of the nature of the orthographic standard in the present. The evolution of grammatographic practice clearly shows the continuity of development of orthographic content from a constituent of grammar studies through the littera unit gradually to an independent unit, then into annexed orthographic sections, and later into separate orthographic manuals. 5 antique, 22 Latin, and 17 vernacular grammars were analyzed, describing 19 European languages. The research methodology is based on distinguishing orthographic content in the narrower sense (grapheme to meaning) from the broader sense (grapheme to phoneme). In this way, the function of orthographic description was established separately from the study of spelling. As for the traditional description of orthographic content in the broader sense in old grammar books, it is shown that orthographic content can also be studied within the grammatographic framework of a specific period, similar to the description of morphology or syntax.
  • 412 and Beneficial to Further Studies. in Contrast to This Precise Demar

    412 and Beneficial to Further Studies. in Contrast to This Precise Demar

    412 DE NOVIS LIBRIS IUDICIA and beneficial to further studies. In contrast to this precise demar- cation of Julian's literary output his military and political acts are treated with less exactness and somehow do not seem to have been fully integrated with the history of his time. This has something to do with A.'s handling of the historical sources. In this she seems not critical enough, not merely regarding details. There is e.g. preciously little analysis of the principles and viewpoints from which Ammianus Marcellinus portrayed Julian. Although the achievement of the historian is quite admirable and honourable, it definitely testifies to personal involvement. Moreover, it is cer- tainly not a Hellenist who emerges from the many pages he devoted to Julian. Such critical remarks are not new. A. has reacted to them in her introduction, explaining her own particular objectives on some enlightening pages, which command respect. On these she also admits to have overstated Julian's Mithraic devotion and its conse- quences. This had not been generally noticed by reviewers; K. Rosen (Gnomon 55, 245-9), however, was quite justified in expressing his doubts in some detail. Describing the life of a versatile and even enigmatic person like Julian is treading on a path full of pitfalls. One reviewer called this biography ` `the polar opposite of the invectives of Gregory". Even if such a remark were not an overstatement, Mrs. Athanassiadi's portrait of Julian has much to offer to those who take a deep interest in the history of the 4th century. 2353 BM LEIDERDORP, van Effendreef 15 J.
  • THE CULEX VIRGILIAN RATHER THAN NON-VIRQ ILIAN by John

    THE CULEX VIRGILIAN RATHER THAN NON-VIRQ ILIAN by John

    The Culex; Virgilian rather than non-Virgilian Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Weidenschilling, J. M. (John Martin), 1893- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 15:39:08 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553096 THE CULEX VIRGILIAN RATHER THAN NON-VIRQ ILIAN By John Martin Weidonschilling Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the College of Letters,Arts,and Sciences,of the University of Arizona 19)0 V U l d l 381V- n c v %AHT A3HT .nH I ir oar. b ' .^1+' n ' < , "dj '' o v*r!e: •> ar rti bejj-jpi a *- * dV ut lot eeonei a? bra* i ♦ ^;. e b*j* + UilJ ni "nocit/ 3v jjo oy.; r?:? 1. Introduction* The question of authorship of the Latin poem,the Culex, has elicited considerable attention and comment during the past twenty-five years,and the subject is of special interest in this bimillenial anniversary year(1950) of the birth of Virgil. Up to the middle of the last century the Culex had been generally accepted as Virgilian. But more recently the Virgilian authorship of the poem has been questioned and even rejected by scholars of renown. Others have tried to uphold the claim of tradition. Although the controversy has pro­ duced numerous monographs and articles in classical peri­ odicals,the question of authorship still remains unsettled.
  • Further Commentary Notes

    Further Commentary Notes

    Virgil Aeneid X Further Commentary Notes Servius, the author of a fourth-century CE commentary on Virgil is mentioned several times. Servius based his notes extensively on the lost commentary composed earlier in the century by Aelius Donatus. A version of Servius, amplified by material apparently taken straight from Donatus, was compiled later, probably in the seventh or eighth century. It was published in 1600 by Pierre Daniel and is variously referred to as Servius Auctus, Servius Danielis, or DServius. Cross-reference may be made to language notes – these are in the printed book. An asterisk against a word means that it is a term explained in ‘Introduction, Style’ in the printed book. A tilde means that the term is explained in ‘Introduction, Metre’ in the printed book. 215 – 6 In epic, descriptions of the time of day, particularly dawn, call forth sometimes surprising poetic flights. In Homer these are recycled as formulae; not so in Virgil (for the most part), although here he is adapting a passage from an earlier first- century epic poet Egnatius, from whose depiction of dawn seems to come the phrase curru noctivago (cited in Macrobius, Sat. 6.5.12). This is the middle of the night following Aeneas’s trip to Caere. The chronology of Books VIII – X is as follows: TWO DAYS AGO Aeneas sails up the Tiber to Evander (VIII). NIGHT BEFORE Aeneas with Evander. Venus and Vulcan (VIII). Nisus and Euryalus (IX). DAY BEFORE Evander sends Aeneas on to Caere; Aneneas receives his armour (VIII). Turnus attacks the Trojan camp (IX, X).
  • Catullum Numquam Antea Lectum […] Lego »: a Short Analysis of Catullus’ Fortune in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries

    Catullum Numquam Antea Lectum […] Lego »: a Short Analysis of Catullus’ Fortune in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries

    chapter 15 « Catullum Numquam Antea Lectum […] Lego »: A Short Analysis of Catullus’ Fortune in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries Alina Laura de Luca The Liber Catulli Veronensis has a mysterious history full of twists and turns, chance discoveries and sudden disappearances, avid attempts at correction and of convictions for obscenity. We know that it had an enormous and imme- diate popularity among poets of the ‘Golden Age’ and was read and discussed from the second to the fourth century.1 However, the study and discussion of Catullus in the Middle Ages have left only a few traces. He is mentioned two or three times and he is not listed in the manuscript catalogues of monastic libraries during the Carolingian age; whereas in the same period we witness a multiplication of copies of Horace, Virgil, Ovid, and Juvenal. Nevertheless, there is evidence that Catullus was being read in France and northern Italy: in the late ninth century poem 62 was included in a florilegium;2 in 966 Raterio, Bishop of Verona, was reading Catullus, as he says in one of his sermons: “I read Catullus that has never been accessed before”.3 However, the Liber soon disap- peared, or more probably it lay undisturbed in the Chapter Library of Verona throughout most of the Middle Ages.4 1 The modern study of Kenneth Quinn, The Catullan revolution (Melbourne, Melbourne University Press, 1959), describes the impact that Catullus had on Roman poetry. Individual Catullan poems were admired and imitated by the Augustan poets, above all by elegists, and his popularity continued later with Martial, Pliny the Younger, Aulus Gellius and Pomponius.
  • Optima Carme: a Reexamination of the Nurse in the Ciris By

    Optima Carme: a Reexamination of the Nurse in the Ciris By

    OPTIMA CARME: A REEXAMINATION OF THE NURSE IN THE CIRIS BY CASEY LYNN HUGHES Submitted to the graduate degree program in Classics and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Chairperson: Dr. Tara Welch Dr. Anthony Corbeill Dr. Pamela Gordon Date defended: 10 May 2017 The Thesis Committee for CASEY LYNN HUGHES certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: OPTIMA CARME: A REEXAMINATION OF THE NURSE IN THE CIRIS Chairperson: Dr. Tara Welch Date approved: 10 May 2017 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the Ciris, a Pseudo-Vergilian epyllion of uncertain date, and analyzes the figure of the nurse Carme, a character who has largely been ignored in previous studies of the poem. The Ciris narrates the story of Scylla of Megara and how she betrayed her father, King Nisus, because of her love for Minos, King of Crete. While nurses are typical stock characters in Greek and Roman literature, I will show how the character of Carme becomes more than Scylla’s nurse. Although she embodies the qualities of many nurses from various genres before her, the Ciris poet also expands her role, briefly transforming an otherwise minor character into a second heroine. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Introduction 1 Chapter Two: Influential Nurses 11 Chapter Three: The Heroine Nurse 32 Conclusion 53 Bibliography 57 Appendix A 60 Appendix B 61 iv Chapter One Introduction The Ciris is a first century B.C. or first century A.D. epyllion about Scylla, who betrays her father Nisus, king of Megara, because of her love for Minos, king of Crete.
  • Latin Literature

    Latin Literature

    Latin Literature By J. W. Mackail Latin Literature I. THE REPUBLIC. I. ORIGINS OF LATIN LITERATURE: EARLY EPIC AND TRAGEDY. To the Romans themselves, as they looked back two hundred years later, the beginnings of a real literature seemed definitely fixed in the generation which passed between the first and second Punic Wars. The peace of B.C. 241 closed an epoch throughout which the Roman Republic had been fighting for an assured place in the group of powers which controlled the Mediterranean world. This was now gained; and the pressure of Carthage once removed, Rome was left free to follow the natural expansion of her colonies and her commerce. Wealth and peace are comparative terms; it was in such wealth and peace as the cessation of the long and exhausting war with Carthage brought, that a leisured class began to form itself at Rome, which not only could take a certain interest in Greek literature, but felt in an indistinct way that it was their duty, as representing one of the great civilised powers, to have a substantial national culture of their own. That this new Latin literature must be based on that of Greece, went without saying; it was almost equally inevitable that its earliest forms should be in the shape of translations from that body of Greek poetry, epic and dramatic, which had for long established itself through all the Greek- speaking world as a common basis of culture. Latin literature, though artificial in a fuller sense than that of some other nations, did not escape the general law of all literatures, that they must begin by verse before they can go on to prose.
  • Rhetorical and Dramatic Performance in Donatus' Commentary On

    Rhetorical and Dramatic Performance in Donatus' Commentary On

    chapter 10 From the Stage to the Court: Rhetorical and Dramatic Performance in Donatus’ Commentary on Terence Beatrice da Vela Aelius Donatus’ Commentary on Terence (4th cent. ad) is the most complete late antique exegesis of Terence’s plays, commenting on five of them (Andria, Eunuchus, Adelphoe, Hecyra, Phormio) in full.1 Scholars have often used this work to shed light on Terence’s words and lines which are not sufficiently clear, or to reconstruct extra-textual features (particularly concerning delivery and performance). Besides commenting on Terence’s language and explain- ing the meaning of obscure references in the text (in a way which is very similar to another great late-antique commentary, that of Servius on Vergil), Aelius Donatus is particularly interested in performative elements, especially the different uses of the voice and the gestures of different parts of the body (primarily hands and face).2 The grammarian is able to describe extra-textual features of Terence’s text in detail, showing awareness of and sensibility to the peculiarity of drama as a genre.3 What remains to be determined is the 1 From now on, texts from the Donatus’ Commentary on Terence will be indicated by the abbre- viation Don., followed by the abbreviation for the name of Terence’s play (e.g. Don. Ad. shall be interpreted as Donatus’ commentary on Terence’s Adelphoe). To avoid ambiguity, each time Terence’s text is quoted, the abbreviation of the play is preceded by the abbreviation of the author (e.g. Ter. Ad.). 2 An example of a note on delivery: Don.