DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2007.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring 2007.Indd The Journal of the South Carolina Native Plant Society Spring 2007 Orchids of the Francis Marion National Forest, Berkeley County, SC In this issue By Jim Fowler Orchids ....................... 1 Reprinted with permission from: North President’s Perspective .... 2 American Native Orchid Journal & the Plant Terms .................. 2 Author. All orchid photos by Jim Fowler Georgia Aster ................ 3 The Francis Marion National Cogongrass .................6-7 Forest (known by locals as the USDA Plants Website ..... 8 Francis Marion) is a popular desti- nation for botanists, especially for those interested in orchids and car- nivorous plants. It comprises about 250,000 acres of mixed hardwoods, Name That bottomland swamps, and longleaf pine savannahs. It contains some Native Plant! unique geological features known This perennial as Carolina Bays. These bays are forb is found shallow oval depressions (their on roadsides origin is still hotly debated) that and forest edges make excellent habitat for many throughout SC. rare and unusual plant species, Calopogon barbatus, bearded grass-pink It can be very including about two dozen of South showy in mid- Carolina’s fi fty-fi ve native orchid spring to mid- species and hybrids. summer. It has The largest portion of the trifoliate leaves. Francis Marion is located in It might help Berkeley County, the rest being in if we showed adjacent Charleston County, in the more of the southern portion of coastal South plant, but Carolina. It is criss-crossed by where’s the fun hundreds of sandy, one-lane USFS in making it roads that wind through areas with easy? To see names like Hellhole Swamp, Dog more of the Swamp, Florida Bay, Tiger Cor- ner, and Yellow-jacket Island, and plant go to Ponthieva racemosa, shadow-witch orchid www.scnps.org. offering views of dense pocosins and vast longleaf pine savannahs. These local names bring to mind the many seemingly impenetrable areas of boot-sucking mud, chiggers, ticks, mosquitoes, leeches, snakes, and alligators. But, we never let those minor inconveniences The answer is embedded in the text somewhere hold us back, do we? in this newsletter. Photo by Bill Stringer. (See Orchids, page 4) South Carolina Native Plant Society • Spring 2007 1 State of the SC Native Plant Plant origin terms Native plant – A plant species that is Society - Spring, 2007 found in a region because it developed and evolved in that region over thou- The Society continues to actively pursue sands of years. Plants that existed in a our mission of “preserving and restoring native region prior to settlement. plant communities in South Carolina”. This has happened via an impressive expense of time and Exotic (introduced) plant – A plant energy by a growing number of members. A par- species that exists in a region because tial list of activities this spring includes 7 chapter it was brought to that region by man, meetings with speakers, 10 field trips to see native during and since settlement of the plant communities, 6 fundraiser plant sales, and region. We are still introducing exotic participation in 6 public information events, like plants, by intention or by accident. Earth Day or Home Shows. We have had at least 6 organized plant rescues, to save native plants Naturalized plant – An exotic plant from the bulldozer. Many of these plants have that was introduced into an area, es- been re-planted in public park or garden sites. caped from cultivation and reproduces We have had 2 informational workshops, with an Bill Stringer on its own (includes exotic invasive expert showing and telling about a topic, to make plants). Many plants commonly our members more knowledgeable and effective in the future. thought to be natives were actually I think I can safely report that we are gaining visibility and support for our introduced by early settlers. goals and activities. We are collaborating with other naturalist/environmental Exotic invasive plant – An exotic groups, such as SCAN and TNC. As often as not, these groups are seeking plant species that is able to invade us out. We have been very successful in getting our message into the media, and overrun native ecosystems. Some which is not an easy job. We have re-established regular publication of our native plants can become invasive un- quarterly newsletter, and it has been getting good reviews among the member- der certain conditions, but most inva- ship. Two Chapters have local newsletters, as well. And our website... Wow! sive species are introduced (exotic). We have a terrific website, full of information on activities, articles on native plant issues, and a large number of beautiful photos to interact with your senses Ornamental plant – A plant species as you cruise the site. or cultivar that is grown for its beauty Another indication of the Society “gaining traction” is in the impressive (in its end use), rather than commer- list of awards coming to our group and its members. In the past year, members cial or production reasons. have received the SC Wildlife Federation’s Conservationist of the Year (Land), and Conservationist of the Year (Water). The Society was awarded Greenville Variety – Within a species, a natu- Soil and Water Conservation District’s Conservation Award. Most recently, rally occurring sub-group of plants Rick Huffman was awarded the Governor’s Environmental Awareness Award, that have one or more minor charac- in a ceremony at the Statehouse. teristics that set it apart from the rest We are not able to rest on our laurels, however. We have gained 86 new of the species. Ex.: Solidago odora var. members since the start of 2006. Unfortunately, that number has been bal- chapmanii. anced out by the failure of 86 members to renew their membership. We need to work on member retention. We have been working on that in the Chapters. Cultivar – Short for “cultivated We have also devoted some effort at the state level to helping our two smaller variety”. A plant “variety” developed chapters in raising their numbers and visibility, and we will continue to do so. by man via plant selection and/or I have saved for last an important issue: LEADERSHIP. Not that we genetic manipulation to exhibit a set don’t have good leaders, he said modestly. The thing is, we need more, newer, of plant characteristics. Cultivars are younger members to step up to the plate, to help share the load, and to prepare maintained via controlled pollination for future leadership roles. The Chapters need this, and the Statewide orga- or vegetative means, so that cultivar nization does, too. For instance, as of now, we do not have a statewide vice- characteristics are passed to ensuing president, which is of concern to yours truly. So, if you are interested in taking generations. on a role at any level, and we haven’t asked you, please take the initiative and Ecovar – Short for “ecological vari- button-hole one of your officers. We will be most attentive to you. ety”. A plant “variety” developed by man from a collection of plants of a Thanks! Bill Stringer, President (See Plant terms, page 3) 2 South Carolina Native Plant Society • Spring 2007 Two New Georgia Aster Finds Sudie Daves, - USDA-NRCS & Ron and I had John Nel- Midlands Chapter son, USC botanist, confirm the A Richland County plant rescue identification. The population organized by Ron Chicone for the contained about 500 stems, and Midlands Chapter yielded a very nice is a previously undocumented surprise. Having forgotten to re-set population for Richland County, my clock for daylight savings time, according to SCDNR records. I arrived at the rescue site an hour Now that’s an exciting way to early, so I passed the time investigat- “pass some time”! ing a right-of-way I had passed on the way. I found woodland sunflower, Janie Marlow, Karen eastern silvery aster, whorled coreop- Burnett, Ted Thern, - sis, Maryland golden aster, rosinweed, Upstate Chapter narrow-leaf mountain-mint, Indi- Roadsides and utility right- scrubby loblolly and Virginia pines and angrass, plumegrass, little bluestem, of-ways are among the few places immature deciduous trees, surrounded split-beard bluestem, bushy bluestem, where South Carolina’s native by Japanese honeysuckle, multiflora Virginia wild rye and a mystery aster, prairie plants can still be found, rose, cedar, broomsedge and goldenrod. later identified by Ron as New York but who takes time to investigate Kudzu is encroaching from the railroad aster. these “scruffy-looking” sites? Vol- embankment. Then there was another aster unteers on a SCNPS Native Plant The population grows on a slight that looked familiar, one that I had Seed Collection field trip — that’s ridge beside the railroad cut, by tracks not seen in a while. It had composite who! On Oct. 28, 2006, we were that were laid in the early 1900s and flowers about 2 inches collecting seeds of are still in use. The site appears to have wide with deep purple big bluestem, little retained more of the sandy clay topsoil ray flowers, pale bluestem and pur- than areas around it – maybe cotton white disk flowers, pletop, on property fields were not planted that close to the and rough clasping wedged between railroad? alternate leaves. The road and railroad habitat was a dis- in southern Pick- turbed right-of-way/ ens County. (Any roadside with clay site in the Upstate soils and the associate with big bluestem species listed above. I warrants piling out tentatively identified of the van). An it as Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum intensely vivid color caught the georgianum), a species I knew from eye of Ted Thern — an aster, but previous Piedmont Prairie restora- such a deep, rich purple... tion work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Organic Compounds: Contents and Their Role in Improving Seed Germination and Protocorm Development in Orchids
    Hindawi International Journal of Agronomy Volume 2020, Article ID 2795108, 12 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2795108 Review Article Organic Compounds: Contents and Their Role in Improving Seed Germination and Protocorm Development in Orchids Edy Setiti Wida Utami and Sucipto Hariyanto Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia Correspondence should be addressed to Sucipto Hariyanto; [email protected] Received 26 January 2020; Revised 9 May 2020; Accepted 23 May 2020; Published 11 June 2020 Academic Editor: Isabel Marques Copyright © 2020 Edy Setiti Wida Utami and Sucipto Hariyanto. ,is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In nature, orchid seed germination is obligatory following infection by mycorrhizal fungi, which supplies the developing embryo with water, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals, causing the seeds to germinate relatively slowly and at a low germination rate. ,e nonsymbiotic germination of orchid seeds found in 1922 is applicable to in vitro propagation. ,e success of seed germination in vitro is influenced by supplementation with organic compounds. Here, we review the scientific literature in terms of the contents and role of organic supplements in promoting seed germination, protocorm development, and seedling growth in orchids. We systematically collected information from scientific literature databases including Scopus, Google Scholar, and ProQuest, as well as published books and conference proceedings. Various organic compounds, i.e., coconut water (CW), peptone (P), banana homogenate (BH), potato homogenate (PH), chitosan (CHT), tomato juice (TJ), and yeast extract (YE), can promote seed germination and growth and development of various orchids.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchids of Oklahoma Dr. Lawrence K. Magrath Curator-USAO
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 39 Volume 1, Number 1, December 2001 Native Orchids of Oklahoma Dr. Lawrence K. Magrath Curator-USAO (OCLA) Herbarium Chickasha, OK 73018-5358 As of the publication of this paper Oklahoma is known to have orchids of 33 species in 18 genera, which compares to 20 species and 11 genera reported by Waterfall (1969). Four of the 33 species are possibly extinct in the state based on current survey work. The greatest concentration of orchid species is in the southeastern corner of the state (Atoka, Bryan, Choctaw, LeFlore, McCurtain and Pushmataha Counties). INTRODUCTION Since the time of Confucius (551-479 BCE) who mentioned lan in his writings, "acquaintance with The family Orchidaceae is the largest of the good men was like entering a room full of lan or families of flowering plants with somewhere between fragrant orchids" (Withner, 1959), orchids have been 25,000 and 35,000 species, with new species important in many facets of Chinese life including continually being described. There are also literature, painting, horticulture, and not least, numerous natural and artificial hybrids. The only medicine". They are mentioned in the materia place where orchids are not known to occur is medica, “Sheng nung pen ts'ao ching”, tracing back Antarctica. to the legendary emperor Sheng Nung (ca. 28th Orchids fascinate us because of the century BCE). The term "lan hua" in early Chinese seemingly infinite combinations of colors and forms records refers to species of the genus Cymbidium that are found in orchid flowers from the Arctic to (Withner, 1959), most likely Cymbidium the tropical rain forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Iowa Plant Species List
    !PLANTCO FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE: IOWA DATABASE This list has been modified from it's origional version which can be found on the following website: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~herbarium/Cofcons.xls IA CofC SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PHYSIOGNOMY W Wet 9 Abies balsamea Balsam fir TREE FACW * ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI Buttonweed A-FORB 4 FACU- 4 Acalypha gracilens Slender three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 3 Acalypha ostryifolia Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 6 Acalypha rhomboidea Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU 0 Acalypha virginica Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU * ACER GINNALA Amur maple TREE 5 UPL 0 Acer negundo Box elder TREE -2 FACW- 5 Acer nigrum Black maple TREE 5 UPL * Acer rubrum Red maple TREE 0 FAC 1 Acer saccharinum Silver maple TREE -3 FACW 5 Acer saccharum Sugar maple TREE 3 FACU 10 Acer spicatum Mountain maple TREE FACU* 0 Achillea millefolium lanulosa Western yarrow P-FORB 3 FACU 10 Aconitum noveboracense Northern wild monkshood P-FORB 8 Acorus calamus Sweetflag P-FORB -5 OBL 7 Actaea pachypoda White baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Actaea rubra Red baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Adiantum pedatum Northern maidenhair fern FERN 1 FAC- * ADLUMIA FUNGOSA Allegheny vine B-FORB 5 UPL 10 Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel P-FORB 0 FAC * AEGILOPS CYLINDRICA Goat grass A-GRASS 5 UPL 4 Aesculus glabra Ohio buckeye TREE -1 FAC+ * AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM Horse chestnut TREE 5 UPL 10 Agalinis aspera Rough false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 10 Agalinis gattingeri Round-stemmed false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 8 Agalinis paupercula False foxglove
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part II Monocotyledons Stanwyn G. Shetler Sylvia Stone Orli Botany Section, Department of Systematic Biology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 MAP OF THE CHECKLIST AREA Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Washington - Baltimore Area Part II Monocotyledons by Stanwyn G. Shetler and Sylvia Stone Orli Department of Systematic Biology Botany Section National Museum of Natural History 2002 Botany Section, Department of Systematic Biology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0166 Cover illustration of Canada or nodding wild rye (Elymus canadensis L.) from Manual of the Grasses of the United States by A. S. Hitchcock, revised by Agnes Chase (1951). iii PREFACE The first part of our Annotated Checklist, covering the 2001 species of Ferns, Fern Allies, Gymnosperms, and Dicotyledons native or naturalized in the Washington-Baltimore Area, was published in March 2000. Part II covers the Monocotyledons and completes the preliminary edition of the Checklist, which we hope will prove useful not only in itself but also as a first step toward a new manual for the identification of the Area’s flora. Such a manual is needed to replace the long- outdated and out-of-print Flora of the District of Columbia and Vicinity of Hitchcock and Standley, published in 1919. In the preparation of this part, as with Part I, Shetler has been responsible for the taxonomy and nomenclature and Orli for the database. As with the first part, we are distributing this second part in preliminary form, so that it can be used, criticized, and updated while the two parts are being readied for publication as a single volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating the Origin of the Orchidaceae from a Fossil Orchid with Its Pollinator
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6111228 Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Article in Nature · September 2007 DOI: 10.1038/nature06039 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 211 770 5 authors, including: Santiago R Ramírez Barbara Gravendeel University of California, Davis Leiden University, Naturalis Biodiversity Center & University of Applied Sciences L… 50 PUBLICATIONS 999 CITATIONS 208 PUBLICATIONS 2,081 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Rodrigo B. Singer Naomi E Pierce Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Harvard University 109 PUBLICATIONS 1,381 CITATIONS 555 PUBLICATIONS 6,496 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Insect endosymbiont diversity View project Support threatened research Institutions from Southern Brazil (Rio Grande do Sul) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Barbara Gravendeel on 31 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Vol 448 | 30 August 2007 | doi:10.1038/nature06039 LETTERS Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator Santiago R. Ramı´rez1, Barbara Gravendeel2, Rodrigo B. Singer3, Charles R. Marshall1,4 & Naomi E. Pierce1 Since the time of Darwin1, evolutionary biologists have been fas- subfamily showed that the size, shape and ornamentation of the cinated by the spectacular adaptations to insect pollination exhib- fossil closely resemble those of modern members of the subtribe ited by orchids. However, despite being the most diverse plant Goodyerinae, particularly the genera Kreodanthus and Microchilus family on Earth2, the Orchidaceae lack a definitive fossil record (Supplementary Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemillen, Pasco-Perú
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E. A. P. DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS Diversidad de la familia Orchidaceae, en el sector quebrada Yanachaga del Parque Nacional Yanachaga- Chemillen, Pasco-Perú TESIS para optar el Título Profesional de Biólogo con mención en Botánica AUTOR Edwin Becerra Gonzales Lima-Perú 2007 A mis padres Rosa y Rafael con entera gratitud y amor A mis hermanos Geiser, Wili y Cynthia por su cariño y ayuda y a mi familia por brindarme siempre su apoyo. ii AGRADECIMIENTOS Al fondo Christensen por el auspicio a través del Jardín Botánico de Missouri, para la realización de la presente tesis. Asimismo al Ing. Rodolfo Vásquez Martínez, curador del Missouri Botanical Garden y Director del Programa de Investigación en el Perú y a la Blga. Rocío Rojas Gonzales, por sus invalorables consejos y permanente asistencia, en la ejecución del presente trabajo. A la Mg. Joaquina Alban Castillo, Jefe del Herbario de San Marcos del Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, por su asesoramiento y apoyo en la elaboración de la tesis. Al Mg. César Córdova Castañeda y la Mg. Esther Cox Ramos, revisores de mi tesis, por sus sugerencias y consejos en la elaboración del Proyecto de Tesis. Al PhD. Robert Dressler del Missouri Botanical Garden, al Dr. Henry Oakeley del Royal Horticultural Society y a Stig Dalstrom del Marie Selby Botanical Gardens, por la confirmación e identificación de las especies. Al Blgo. Abel Monteagudo por su constante e invalorable apoyo. A Damian Catchpole del School of Geography & Enviromental Studies-University of Tasmania., por la bibliografía, traducciones y sugerencias.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM ECUADOR Marta Kolanowska1 & Dariusz L. Szlachetko
    Polish Botanical Journal 59(1): 23–25, 2014 DOI: 10.2478/pbj-2014-0014 A NEW SPECIES OF PONTHIEVA (ORCHIDACEAE, SPIRANTHOIDEAE) FROM ECUADOR Marta Kolanowska1 & Dariusz L. Szlachetko Abstract. A new species of Ponthieva R. Br., Ponthieva jamesonii is described and illustrated based on Ecuadorian material. The taxonomic affinity of the new entity is briefly discussed. Key words: Ponthieva, Neotropics, new species, Orchidaceae, taxonomy Dariusz L. Szlachetko & Marta Kolanowska, Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Introduction The Neotropical genus Ponthieva was proposed that remains an object of intense taxonomic discus- by Brown (1813) to separate Neottia glandulosa sion is the species described initially as Goodyera Sims distinguished by its rosulate, shortly petiolate fertilis F. Lehm. & Kraenzl. (Kränzlin 1899), which leaves, glandular-hairy ovary and floral bracts, as in a short time was transferred to Cranichis by well as by the clawed petals and lip, both connivent Schlechter (1921). The distinctive characters of the to the gynostemium. The generic name was given species led to its separation on the generic level, as in honor of Henry de Ponthieu, a London merchant Exalaria by Garay and Romero-Gonzalez (1999), who was sending plant collections from the West but recently the species was also suggested to be Indies to Joseph Banks in the late 18th century. a representative of Ponthieva by Salazar (2009). The specific content of initially monotypic We believe that the petals not adnate to the gy- Ponthieva quickly increased – over 90 species have nostemium, triangular stigma, bifid rostellum and been described since then.
    [Show full text]