Progress Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Progress Report Assessing the status of tigers in the Western Forest Complex of Thailand and developing a landscape scale management plan Final Report to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation October 2002 James L.D. Smith, [email protected] Peter Cutter, [email protected] Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology University of Minnesota 1980 Folwell Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 Tel. 612-624-5369 CONTENTS Contents...................................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................3 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................4 Capacity building.....................................................................................................................................6 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................6 Tiger Surveys.......................................................................................................................................6 Pellet/dung transects............................................................................................................................7 Interviews ............................................................................................................................................7 Captive Sign Study ..............................................................................................................................8 Results ...................................................................................................................................................10 Geographic Information System (GIS) Database..............................................................................10 Human Impact Patterns .....................................................................................................................11 Prey Base Assessment .......................................................................................................................11 Tiger - Habitat Relationships.............................................................................................................13 Tiger Distribution and Estimated Minimum Breeding Population ...................................................13 Monitoring.........................................................................................................................................13 Conclusions ...........................................................................................................................................14 Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................................14 References .............................................................................................................................................15 Appendix 1. Maps..............................................................................................................................17 Appendix 2. Photos............................................................................................................................18 ------Tiger Conservation in Western Thailand—Final Report to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation------ Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * Note: Numbered maps referred to in the text can be found at the back of this report. Over a four year period from 1997 to 2000, we surveyed a large portion of the Western Forest Complex--an expansive landscape (~10000 km2) of contiguous, mostly forested protected areas in western Thailand (Map 1) to assess the status of tigers, their prey base, and other factors potentially affecting the tiger population in this area. In particular, we sought to answer the following questions: 1.What proportion of the core area of the Western Forest Complex is occupied by tigers? 2.What are the landscape-scale patterns of tiger prey distribution and quality in this area? 3.What are the landscape-scale patterns of human impact in this area? 4.Are patterns of tiger distribution, tiger prey distribution, and human impacts related? In their macro-scale tiger conservation priority setting exercise, Wikramanayake et al. (1998) identified the Western Forest Complex and surrounding areas as the largest high priority Tiger Conservation Unit (TCU) in Asia and it is likely that this TCU is home to the largest population of tigers in Southeast Asia (Smith et al. 1999b). The area is mostly rugged, mountainous terrain with 2 major river systems and 2 mountain ranges bisecting it. The vegetation is a complex mosaic tropical seasonal forest including dry or semi-evergreen forest, tropical mixed deciduous forest, bamboo forest, and dry dipterocarp forest. Within the survey area, there are approximately 4000 people living in about 35 village sites. Our initial efforts focused on selecting methodologies appropriate to the geographic scale of the investigation and the questions being asked. In most cases, field methods that could be learned quickly, employed consistently, and that were not technology-dependent were selected so as to involve a greater number of people in the process and in so doing, foster greater long-term capacity building. Additionally, a Geographic Information System (GIS) was established at the outset of the project to store, analyze, and display data collected. On over 50 field trips during the course of the project, a core survey team would visit protected areas within the larger study area on a rotating basis to carry out training with protected area personnel and to supervise fieldwork. All of these efforts were focused on both completing the specific goals of the project and building the local capacity and baseline data necessary to continue the work after the completion of the project. Approximately 50 Royal Forest Department (RFD) rangers (4-6 from each of the 5 protected areas surveyed plus several replacements during the course of the project) took part in an intensive 2-3 day practical training course prior to assisting with fieldwork. The training covered wildlife and wildlife sign recognition, basic sampling concepts, forest navigation skills (including the use of handheld GPS units), and other methods specific to this investigation. An original training manual was created to supplement the training. To assess tiger distribution, irregular transect or “recce” style tiger sign surveys (Walsh and White 1999) were conducted on approximately 1880 km of roads, trails, streams, and ridges (Map 4). To assess relative prey abundance, pellet/dung count plots were carried out on 57 km of transects at 114 discrete locations (Map 4). Methods followed those used extensively throughout the Terai area of Nepal (Smith 1984, 1999) allowing for a comparison of relative densities between these two areas. ------Tiger Conservation in Western Thailand—Final Report to the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation------ Page 3 During the course of the study, 150 interviews were carried out at 29 villages and 47 Thai Royal Forest Department (RFD) stations in and around the study area (Map 5). These guided discussions provided additional information on the distribution of tigers (Map 7) and other wildlife (Map 9) as well as valuable insights into patterns of human use and impacts (Map 3). Visits to captive facilities during the course of the investigation resulted in a database of track measurements of tigers of known age and sex and the establishment of objective criteria for estimating the age and sex of tigers whose tracks were measured in the field. Applying these criteria to the pooled “unknown” sign collected during the investigation provides a snapshot of tiger demographics during the survey period (Map 7). An evaluation of these data using very conservative assumptions yields an estimated minimum adult tiger population of 6 males and 21 females within the area surveyed which is roughly 30% of the entire Western Forest Complex. A preliminary assessment of tiger distribution, tiger prey distribution, and human impacts indicates that there is a significant relationship between both tiger distribution and tiger prey distribution and between tiger distribution and human impact patterns. The data collected to date are currently being used to create predictive models of tiger and tiger prey distribution beyond the bounds of the study area with the ultimate goal being a predictive map of tiger distribution in western Thailand and eastern Burma. STUDY AREA The area selected for analysis encompasses five contiguous protected areas near the Thai / Myanmar border. At approximately 10,000 km2, the study area represents the core of a mostly forested landscape known as “the Western Forest Complex” comprised of 17 separately managed protected areas (Map 1). Together with a large area of contiguous forest on the Myanmar side of the border, the area represents the largest TCU (Tiger Conservation Unit) identified by Wikramanayake et al. (1998) in their range-wide tiger conservation priority-setting exercise. Armed conflict and travel restrictions have meant systematic fieldwork has not been carried out on the Myanmar side of the border in recent years. At the southeastern end of the extensive
Recommended publications
  • Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area Cggk"0F{ ;+/If0f If]Qsf :Tgwf/L Jgohgt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019
    Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area - 2019 ISBN 978-9937-8522-8-9978-9937-8522-8-9 9 789937 852289 National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal Hariyo Kharka, Pokhara, Kaski, Nepal National Trust for Nature Conservation P.O. Box: 3712, Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 183, Kaski, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5526571, 5526573, Fax: +977-1-5526570 Tel: +977-61-431102, 430802, Fax: +977-61-431203 Annapurna Conservation Area Project Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.ntnc.org.np Website: www.ntnc.org.np 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' National Trust for Nature Conservation Annapurna Conservation Area Project 2019 Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area cGgk"0f{ ;+/If0f If]qsf :tgwf/L jGohGt' Published by © NTNC-ACAP, 2019 All rights reserved Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit NTNC-ACAP. Reviewers Prof. Karan Bahadur Shah (Himalayan Nature), Dr. Naresh Subedi (NTNC, Khumaltar), Dr. Will Duckworth (IUCN) and Yadav Ghimirey (Friends of Nature, Nepal). Compilers Rishi Baral, Ashok Subedi and Shailendra Kumar Yadav Suggested Citation Baral R., Subedi A. & Yadav S.K. (Compilers), 2019. Wild Mammals of the Annapurna Conservation Area. National Trust for Nature Conservation, Annapurna Conservation Area Project, Pokhara, Nepal. First Edition : 700 Copies ISBN : 978-9937-8522-8-9 Front Cover : Yellow-bellied Weasel (Mustela kathiah), back cover: Orange- bellied Himalayan Squirrel (Dremomys lokriah).
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal
    SMALL CARNIVORES IN TINJURE-MILKE-JALJALE, EASTERN NEPAL The content of this booklet can be used freely with permission for any conservation and education purpose. However we would be extremely happy to get a hard copy or soft copy of the document you have used it for. For further information: Friends of Nature Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 23491 Email: [email protected], Website: www.fonnepal.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/fonnepal2005 First Published: April, 2018 Photographs: Friends of Nature (FON), Jeevan Rai, Zaharil Dzulkafly, www.pixabay/ werner22brigitte Design: Roshan Bhandari Financial support: Rufford Small Grants, UK Authors: Jeevan Rai, Kaushal Yadav, Yadav Ghimirey, Som GC, Raju Acharya, Kamal Thapa, Laxman Prasad Poudyal and Nitesh Singh ISBN: 978-9937-0-4059-4 Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Zaharil Dzulkafly for his photographs of Marbled Cat, and Andrew Hamilton and Wildscreen for helping us get them. We are grateful to www.pixabay/werner22brigitte for giving us Binturong’s photograph. We thank Bidhan Adhikary, Thomas Robertson, and Humayra Mahmud for reviewing and providing their valuable suggestions. Preferred Citation: Rai, J., Yadav, K., Ghimirey, Y., GC, S., Acharya, R., Thapa, K., Poudyal, L.P., and Singh, N. 2018. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal. Friends of Nature, Nepal and Rufford Small Grants, UK. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal Why Protect Small Carnivores! Small carnivores are an integral part of our ecosystem. Except for a few charismatic species such as Red Panda, a general lack of research and conservation has created an information gap about them. I am optimistic that this booklet will, in a small way, be the starting journey of filling these gaps in our knowledge bank of small carnivore in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivores
    SMALL CARNIVORES IN TINJURE-MILKE-JALJALE, EASTERN NEPAL The content of this booklet can be used freely with permission for any conservation and education purpose. However we would be extremely happy to get a hard copy or soft copy of the document you have used it for. For further information: Friends of Nature Kathmandu, Nepal P.O. Box: 23491 Email: [email protected], Website: www.fonnepal.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/fonnepal2005 First Published: April, 2018 Photographs: Friends of Nature (FON), Jeevan Rai, Zaharil Dzulkafly, www.pixabay/ werner22brigitte Design: Roshan Bhandari Financial support: Rufford Small Grants, UK Authors: Jeevan Rai, Kaushal Yadav, Yadav Ghimirey, Som GC, Raju Acharya, Kamal Thapa, Laxman Prasad Poudyal and Nitesh Singh ISBN: 978-9937-0-4059-4 Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Zaharil Dzulkafly for his photographs of Marbled Cat, and Andrew Hamilton and Wildscreen for helping us get them. We are grateful to www.pixabay/werner22brigitte for giving us Binturong’s photograph. We thank Bidhan Adhikary, Thomas Robertson, and Humayra Mahmud for reviewing and providing their valuable suggestions. Preferred Citation: Rai, J., Yadav, K., Ghimirey, Y., GC, S., Acharya, R., Thapa, K., Poudyal, L.P., and Singh, N. 2018. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke -Jaljale, Eastern Nepal. Friends of Nature, Nepal and Rufford Small Grants, UK. Small Carnivores in Tinjure-Milke-Jaljale, Eastern Nepal Why Protect Small Carnivore! Small carnivores are an integral part of our ecosystem. Except for a few charismatic species such as Red Panda, a general lack of research and conservation has created an information gap about them. I am optimistic that this booklet will, in a small way, be the starting journey of filling these gaps in our knowledge bank of small carnivore in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborators
    An investigation into the taxonomy of the Malabar Civet, Viverra civettina. R. Nandini, National Institute of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, India 560012. [email protected] •The Malabar Civet, Viverra civettina, is one of two species of small carnivores Collaborators worldwide that is listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List, and is Dr Uma Ramakrishnan described as endemic to the lowland evergreen forests of the Western Ghats. National Centre for Biological Sciences •However, this species has never been sighted with certainty in the wild and Dr Divya Mudappa knowledge of its ecology comes from two reports both over 60 years old. Nature Conservation Foundation •6 skins of the species are deposited in various museums, and have all traded Dr Carlos Fernandes hands before reaching their current destinations, with their primary origins being Lisbon University, Portugal unknown. At least 4 are thought to have been of individuals from captivity, and 2 Dr C Radhakrishnan & Dr JK De were obtained from hunters within Kerala. Zoological Survey of India (Nandini and Mudappa •A recent review The Malabar Civet (top) has been the 2010) summarised the diagnostic subject of numerous field surveys since the characteristics of the Malabar Civet and 1980s. This flyer (left) was produced by NG George, Calicut University, as part of one of provided a critical account of the persisting the earliest field surveys for the species. uncertainties in the taxonomy and ecology of the species, current conservation status, and potential threats. Progress •If the Malabar Civet is indeed a valid species it is important to determine its closest Molecular Analysis relatives and its evolutionary origins before •A combination of skins and skulls of five of the Malabar Civet samples have conservation plans can be drawn up.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Distribution of Large Indian Civet Viverra Zibetha in Nepal
    Notes on the distribution of Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha in Nepal Yadav GHIMIREY* and Raju ACHARYA Abstract The distribution range of Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha locality records presented here, and records from neighbouring India, suggest that it occurs widely across Nepal. Some pub- in Nepal is treated inconsistently in various sources. Verified point Keywordslished localities: citizen require science, verification. documentation, Kathmandu valley, locality, photograph नेपालमा ठु लो ननरबिरालोको भौगोललक वितारिारे टिꥍपणी सारा車श ठु लो निरबिरालो कहा更देखि कहा更स륍म पाइꅍछ भꅍिे कु रा भभꅍि श्रोतह셁का अिुसार भभꅍि हुिे गरेको पाइꅍछ | िेपाल तथा भारतमा भेटिएका प्रमाखित त镍यह셁का आधारमा यो प्रजानत िेपालभरी िै पाइिे देखिꅍछ | यस लेिमा हामीले १९९० पनछ िेपालमा पाइएका रेक셍डह셁 प्रतुत गरेका छ㄂ | यसको अवथा अझै पनि सामाꅍय रहेको तर मानिसस更ग हुिे 饍वꅍदका कारि मानिसले यसलाई मािे गरेको पाइꅍछ | Introduction central and south India, in most of which it does not occur). Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha is native to South and South- This paper presents some locality records of the species in Ne- east Asia (Corbet & Hill 1992). There is considerable incon- - The IUCN Red List of Threatened Methodspal, in the context of this uncertainty. Speciessistency maps in the it definition west only of tothe central western Nepal extent (84°30 of its ′globalE) (Duck dis- worthtribution et range.al.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Chapter 92A)
    1 S 23/2005 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 11th January 2005 at 5:00 pm. NO.S 23 ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (AMENDMENT OF FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD SCHEDULES) NOTIFICATION 2005 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 23 of the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act, the Minister for National Development hereby makes the following Notification: Citation and commencement 1. This Notification may be cited as the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act (Amendment of First, Second and Third Schedules) Notification 2005 and shall come into operation on 12th January 2005. Deletion and substitution of First, Second and Third Schedules 2. The First, Second and Third Schedules to the Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act are deleted and the following Schedules substituted therefor: ‘‘FIRST SCHEDULE S 23/2005 Section 2 (1) SCHEDULED ANIMALS PART I SPECIES LISTED IN APPENDIX I AND II OF CITES In this Schedule, species of an order, family, sub-family or genus means all the species of that order, family, sub-family or genus. First column Second column Third column Common name for information only CHORDATA MAMMALIA MONOTREMATA 2 Tachyglossidae Zaglossus spp. New Guinea Long-nosed Spiny Anteaters DASYUROMORPHIA Dasyuridae Sminthopsis longicaudata Long-tailed Dunnart or Long-tailed Sminthopsis Sminthopsis psammophila Sandhill Dunnart or Sandhill Sminthopsis Thylacinidae Thylacinus cynocephalus Thylacine or Tasmanian Wolf PERAMELEMORPHIA
    [Show full text]
  • Feliforms 21 V-6
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Feliform Sanctuaries Version: December 2019 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 4 FELIFORM STANDARDS 4 FELIFORM HOUSING 4 H-1. Types of Space and Size 4 H-2. Containment 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings 8 H-4. Transfer Doors 9 H-5. Shelter 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 10 H-7. Sanitation 12 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 13 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 15 N-1. Water 15 N-2. Diet 15 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 17 N-4. Food Storage 17 N-5. Food Handling 18 VETERINARY CARE 18 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 18 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 19 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 19 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 20 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Feliforms 21 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 22 V-7. Breeding/Contraception 23 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program 24 V-9. Euthanasia 30 WELL BEING AND HANDLING OF FELIFORMS 25 W-1. Physical Well-Being 26 W-2. Social Housing 27 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals 27 W-4. Behavioral/Psychological Well-Being 28 W-5. Feliform-Caregiver Relationships 29 W-6. Handling and Restraint 30 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries W-7. Animal Transport 37 FELIFORMS BEING RELEASED TO THE WILD 32 R-1. General Considerations 32 R-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Cat Prionailurus Viverrinus Bennett, 1833
    Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 October 2018 | 10(11): xxxxx–xxxxx Fishing Cat Prionailurus viverrinus Bennett, 1833 (Carnivora: Felidae) distribution and habitat characteristics Communication in Chitwan National Park, Nepal ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Rama Mishra 1 , Khadga Basnet 2 , Rajan Amin 3 & Babu Ram Lamichhane 4 OPEN ACCESS 1,2 Central Department of Zoology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal 3 Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK 4 National Trust for Nature Conservation - Biodiversity Conservation Center, Ratnanagar-6, Sauraha, Chitwan, Nepal 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected], 4 [email protected] Abstract: The Fishing Cat is a highly specialized and threatened felid, and its status is poorly known in the Terai region of Nepal. Systematic camera-trap surveys, comprising 868 camera-trap days in four survey blocks of 40km2 in Rapti, Reu and Narayani river floodplains of Chitwan National Park, were used to determine the distribution and habitat characteristics of this species. A total of 19 photographs of five individual cats were recorded at three locations in six independent events. Eleven camera-trap records obtained during surveys in 2010, 2012 and 2013 were used to map the species distribution inside Chitwan National Park and its buffer zone. Habitat characteristics were described at six locations where cats were photographed. The majority of records were obtained in tall grassland surrounding oxbow lakes and riverbanks. Wetland shrinkage, prey (fish) depletion in natural wetlands and persecution threaten species persistence. Wetland restoration, reducing human pressure and increasing fish densities in the wetlands, provision of compensation for loss from Fishing Cats and awareness programs should be conducted to ensure their survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Young Large-Spotted Civets Viverra Megaspila and Their Use of Water Sources As Foraging Sites in North Cambodia
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Notes on young Large-spotted Civets Viverra megaspila and their use of water sources as foraging sites in North Cambodia Ai SUZUKI1*, THONG Sokha2, TAN Setha2,3 & Akihisa IWATA1 http://www.smallcarnivoreconservation.org ISSN 1019-5041 1 Ecology and Environment, Division of Southeast Asia, Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies, Kyoto Abstract. University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Whilst there are relatively large amounts of data on the current distribution of Large- Japan. 2. spotted Civet Viverra megaspila, there is limited information on other aspects of the Wildlife Conservation Society species’ ecology. On 14 occasions between 2012 and 2015, one or two juveniles were Cambodia Program, Phnom photographed in the early to mid-dry season (when camera-trap effort was Penh, Cambodia. concentrated) in northern Cambodia. These juveniles are likely to have been born 3. Forestry Administration, Ministry around the change from the rainy to dry season. All camera-trap stations that of Agriculture, Forestry and photographed young Large-spotted Civet were within 50 m of a water source. At one camera-trap station, foraging and regular visits by young and adult were recorded Fisheries, Royal Government of Cambodia around a very shallow pool; the civets were probably preying on leaf-litter arthropods. Further research could clarify the dependency of Large-spotted Civet on waterholes (locally called trapeangs) during the dry season in northern Cambodia, but it is clear that mitigating threats at these trapeangs, particularly the use of snares and poison, is Correspondence: very likely to be a priority for Large-spotted Civet conservation within this landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Information About Camera Trap Records of Dholes in Thailand
    Jenks et al. Camera trap records of dholes in Thailand Copyright © 2012 by the IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. ISSN 1478-2677 Field Report Camera trap records of dholes in Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand Kate E. Jenks*1,2, Nucharin Songsasen2 and Peter Leimgruber2 1 Graduate Programs in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, and Wildlife and Fisheries Conservation, University of Massachusetts, 611 N. Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, USA . Email: [email protected] 2 Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA. * Correspondence author Keywords: Asian wild dog, Cuon alpinus, distribution, zero-inflation Poisson regression model Abstract In response to a lack of data on dholes Cuon alpinus, we initiated an intensive field study of dholes in Khao Ang Rue Nai Wildlife Sanctuary (KARN) in eastern Thailand to gather critical baseline information on the factors influencing dhole presence. Dholes have declined over time, are exposed to continued pressure from humans, yet are taking over the role of top-predator in many Thai protected areas with the extirpa- tion of tigers Panthera tigris. During January 2008-February 2010, we obtained 67 independent photo- graphs (n = 4,505 camera-trap nights) of dholes along with photos of 27 mammal species in KARN. To evaluate factors determining dhole presence we used a zero-inflation Posisson regression model. We did not detect any significant influence of human activity on dhole presence. However, our photos confirmed that dholes and domestic dogs use overlapping areas at KARN. The presence of domestic dogs could have implications for competition or disease spillover.
    [Show full text]
  • 990 PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES CONVENTION Subpart A—Introduction
    Pt. 23 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–01 Edition) Service agent, or other game law en- 23.36 Schedule of public meetings and no- forcement officer free and unrestricted tices. access over the premises on which such 23.37 Federal agency consultation. operations have been or are being con- 23.38 Modifications of procedures and nego- ducted; and shall furnish promptly to tiating positions. such officer whatever information he 23.39 Notice of availability of official re- may require concerning such oper- port. ations. Subpart E—Scientific Authority Advice (c) The authority to take golden ea- [Reserved] gles under a depredations control order issued pursuant to this subpart D only Subpart F—Export of Certain Species authorizes the taking of golden eagles when necessary to seasonally protect 23.51 American ginseng (Panax domesticated flocks and herds, and all quinquefolius). such birds taken must be reported and 23.52 Bobcat (Lynx rufus). turned over to a local Bureau Agent. 23.53 River otter (Lontra canadensis). 23.54 Lynx (Lynx canadensis). 23.55 Gray wolf (Canis lupus). PART 23—ENDANGERED SPECIES 23.56 Brown bear (Ursus arctos). CONVENTION 23.57 American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Subpart A—Introduction AUTHORITY: Convention on International Sec. Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna 23.1 Purpose of regulations. and Flora, 27 U.S.T. 1087; and Endangered 23.2 Scope of regulations. Species Act of 1973, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 23.3 Definitions. 1531 et seq. 23.4 Parties to the Convention. SOURCE: 42 FR 10465, Feb. 22, 1977, unless Subpart B—Prohibitions, Permits and otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]