DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2101.01865V3 [Hep-Ph] 4 May 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2101.01865V3 [Hep-Ph] 4 May 2021 Tests of the Atomki anomaly in lepton pair decays of heavy mesons G. L´opez Castro1, ∗ and N´estorQuintero2, 3, y 1Departamento de F´ısica, Centro de Investigaci´ony de Estudios Avanzados, Apartado Postal 14-740, 07000 M´exico D.F., M´exico 2Facultad de Ciencias B´asicas, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Campus Pampalinda, Calle 5 No. 62-00, C´odigoPostal 76001, Santiago de Cali, Colombia 3Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad del Tolima, C´odigoPostal 730006299, Ibagu´e,Colombia The anomalies recently reported in lepton pair transitions of 8Be∗ and 4He nuclei may be at- tributed to the existence of a feebly interacting light vector boson X17. We study the effects of this hypothetic particle in the semileptonic H∗ ! He+e− decays (H a Qq¯ meson) in the framework of the HQET+VMD model. Using current bounds and the universality assumption of the X17 boson ∗+ ∗+ to quarks, we find that decays of D and Ds mesons can be importantly enhanced relative to the dominant photon-mediated contributions. Dedicated experimental searches at current heavy meson factories may confirm the existence of this light boson or set stronger bounds of their couplings to ordinary matter. I. INTRODUCTION warned that the addition of radiative corrections to the leading one photon exchange amplitude may be respon- The existence of a light vector boson weakly coupled sible [14] for generating the bumps reported in the an- 8 ∗ to Standard Model (SM) fermions, has been suggested gle and mass spectrum of electron-positron pairs in Be as a solution to the observed discrepancy between the transitions. SM prediction and the experimental measurement of the muon g − 2 magnetic moment anomaly (see for exam- The almost isosinglet nature and the small mass dif- ple [1,2]). It may be also a good candidate as a media- ference of nuclei involved in 8Be∗ decay provides an ideal tor of dark and ordinary matter interactions [1,2]. Sev- place to observe this light boson, in case it exists. Mix- eral strategies aiming their detection in different collider ing of nuclear isospin states [7,8, 15] and other nuclear and fixed target experiments have not found any signal interference effects [16] can only partially explain the ob- so far [3,4], but have excluded different regions in the served anomaly. Further studies in analogous systems mass and coupling strenghts of parameter space. Theo- will be very important in order to establish or discard retically, different models can accomodate a light vector this light boson. In the present letter, we propose the boson and its required interactions through dimension- study of H∗ ! He+e− decays, where H(H∗) is a heavy four kinetic mixing with SM neutral gauge bosons and Qq¯ spin-0 (spin-1) meson. Previous related studies in- their interactions with fermionic currents of SM or dark clude: 1) J= ! ηcX decays and associated production matter particles [1{3]. of J= mesons at BESIII and Belle II experiments, re- The anomalies recently reported in the invariant-mass cently reported in [17] and, 2) a search proposal at LHCb spectrum and angular distribution of lepton pairs pro- of D∗0 ! D0A0 ! D0e+e− with displaced vertex or res- duced in 8Be∗ transitions to its ground state [5], re- onant production of the dark photon A0 was detailed in inforces the interest in searches of light vector bosons. Ref. [18]. H∗ ! He+e− decays seem to be interesting The observed anomalies seems to require the existence to further test the Atomki anomaly: on the one hand, of a spin-1 boson named X17 [5{7] with mass mX = the mass-splitting in heavy mesons is large enough (see (16:7 ± 0:35 ± 0:50) MeV and a relative ratio B(8Be∗ !8 TableI) to produce the X17 boson on-shell; on the other BeX)=B(8Be∗ !8 Beγ) = 5:8 × 10−6 [7]. Couplings to hand, strong decays of H∗ are either very suppressed of arXiv:2101.01865v3 [hep-ph] 4 May 2021 standard model first-generation fermions of O(10−3) (in forbidden by kinematics, leaving electromagnetic decays units of the the electron charge), required to explain this as dominant. Furthermore, the large amount of data pro- ratio is not discarded by other data. More recently, the duced at heavy meson factories would allow to test the same group seems to confirm the X17 particle in stud- proposed channels in the near future. ies of the 0− ! 0+ transitions of 4He [8]. Several new physics extensions of the SM have been proposed in the The Lagrangian describing the interaction of quark and literature with the required couplings to interpret the lepton flavors f with the photon and the X boson is P ¯ µ Atomki anomaly, including enlarged Higgs and/or gauge L(γ;X)ff = −e f (ef Aµ + "f Xµ)fγ f, with couplings sectors (see, for instance, Refs. [7,9{13]). Despite the strenghts ef and "f given in units of the electron charge excitement generated by these anomalies, one must be e. The photon and X boson couplings to hadrons are described each by a single vector form factor which takes into account their structure in the momentum transfer re- 2 2 2 gion 4me ≤ q ≤ (mH∗ −mH ) , with q = pe+ +pe− . The ∗ glopez@fis.cinvestav.mx form factors describing the couplings of the off-shell vec- y [email protected] ∗ tor particles (V = γ; X) in H (pH∗ ; H∗ ) ! H(pH )V (q) 2 −1 −1 −1 Transition mH∗ − mH (MeV) eQ=mH∗ [GeV ] eq=mq(0) [GeV ] FH∗Hγ (0) [GeV ] D∗+ ! D+γ 140.603(15) 0:33 −0:85 −0:54 ± 0:05 −0:47 ± 0:06 [21] D∗0 ! D0γ 142.014(30) 0:33 1:70 2:11 ± 0:10 < 10:8 [21] ∗+ + Ds ! Ds γ 143.8(4) 0:32 −0:48 (−0:17 ± 0:03) > −16:4 [21] B∗+ ! B+γ 45.37(21) −0:063 1:70 1:64 ± 0:09 B∗0 ! B0γ 45.37(21) −0:063 −0:85 −0:92 ± 0:12 ∗0 0 +1:8 Bs ! Bs γ 48.6(−1:5) −0:062 −0:48 (−0:42 ± 0:02) TABLE I. Mass splittings of heavy mesons and electromagnetic couplings of H∗ ! Hγ transitions in the HQET+VMD model. Within square brackets we show experimental values when available. are defined from the hadronic amplitude The vector H∗ and pseudoscalar H heavy mesons are 2 ν α β composed of a Qq¯ pair, with Q = b; c and q = u; d; s. The M = ieF ∗ (q ) p p : (1) µ H HV µναβ H∗ H H∗ hadronic matrix element of the electromagnetic current For on-shell vector particles V , this Lorentz-vector am- is given by [19]: plitude must be contracted with its vector polarization em ∗ H(P )jJ jH (P ∗ ; ∗ ) µ (q). The case of lepton pair production is discussed in H µ H H V ¯ ∗ Section III. = e H(PH )jeQQγµQ + eqqγ¯ µqjH (PH∗ ; H∗ ) ; Q q = e(eQJµ + eqJµ); (2) ∗ II. H H-VECTOR VERTICES where eQ(eq) is the electric charge of the heavy quark (light quark) in units of the positron charge, and simi- X ∗ Q q larly, H(P )jJ jH (P ∗ ; ∗ ) = e(" J + " J ) for The form factors FH∗HV (q) are evaluated in the frame- H µ H H Q µ q µ work of the heavy quark effective theory suplemented the X boson current. with vector meson dominance model (HQET+VDM) A straightforward evaluation of the form factors in the [19, 20], which has shown to give a good description of HQET+VMD model [19] leads to H∗ ! Hγ decays. Since we will normalize results for our r 2 mH∗ eQ eq ∗ observables to this radiative decay, we use the ratio of de- FH Hγ (q ) = + 2 ; (3) m m ∗ m (q ) cay rates because they are rather insensitive to the spe- H H q r 2 2 mH∗ "Q "q cific q -dependency of the form factor. This is due to the ∗ ∗ FH HX (q ) = + 2 ; (4) smallness of the H −H mass splitting (see TableI) com- mH mH∗ mq(q ) 2 pared to typical hadronic scales (∼ 1 GeV ). Also, since with the effective light \quark mass" parameter the contributions of heavy quarks are 1=mQ suppressed, 2 −1 we expect that such ratios are relatively independent of X p fV q m (q2)−1 = − 2 2g λ 1 − : (5) constants involved in light-quark contributions through q V m2 m2 vector meson dominance model. V V V For self-containess purposes, we reproduce here the The expressions for the form factors of heavy mesons are term of the Lagrangian density relevant for our calcula- explicitly separated in Eq. (3-4) into its heavy and light tions and definitions of couplings constants [19, 20]. The quark components. In the model under consideration, strong interaction of heavy mesons are described by the couplings of heavy quarks to the the photon and X ∗ µν boson are fixed by HQET, while the couplings to the L2(H HV ) = iλhHbσ Fµν (ρ)baHai ; light antiquarks are modeled by the dominance of light where h· · · i denotes the trace in flavor space, Fµν (ρ) = vector mesons [19]. For the latter, the sum extends over µ @µρν −@pν ρµ +[ρµ; ρν ] is the field strenght tensor and ρ = light vector-meson resonances (V = ρ0; !; φ) according µ µ igV ρb = 2 where ρb the 3×3 matrix of the nonet of light to the light-quark content of heavy mesons [19]. Under vector mesons. The heavy meson field H is defined in the assumption of the ideal mixing for vector mesons, the ∗ terms of the pseudoscalar (Pa) and vector (Paµ) mesons couplings of light u and d quarks are dominated by the 1 ∗ µ 0 y 0 exchange of ρ and ! mesons, while the coupling of the s fields as Ha = 2 (1+v=)[Paµγ −Paγ5], and Ha = γ Haγ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium 2019
    Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium 2019 Book of Abstracts and Program Contents HIAS 2019 Schedule. 1 Foreword................................................................................. 2 Code of Conduct . 3 Organisation . 4 Acknowledgements . 5 ANUMap................................................................................ 6 Program.................................................................................. 7 Abstracts . 16 List of Participants. .79 Australian National HIAS University will be held at University House, across the road Bull at University Centre. acrossfrom the road held Hedley will the House, be of Nuclear held will Department be the is a ~5-10at Physics, Hedley which the symposiumreception Bull min Centre. dinner from The walk theatre. the The of will lecture welcome breaks be held the inHedley just tea the foyer all Bull outside Centre, and lunch and Registration 18:00 18:00 17:30 17:10 16:50 16:30 16:00 15:30 15:10 14:50 14:30 14:00 12:40 12:20 12:00 11:30 11:00 10:30 10:00 9:40 9:40 9:30 8:30 AcceleratorHeavy Ion Symposium 2019 Schedule S1 chair: J.M. Allmond Allmond J.M. S1 chair: Welcome/Opening: K. Nugent Welcome/Opening: S4 chair: R. Golser Golser R. S4 chair: S3 S2 Country to Welcome Senden T. chair: Opening Registration chair: P. Collon Collon P. chair: Courtin S. chair: Walk to Nuclear Physics Nuclear to Walk C. Müller-Gatermann C. Welcome Reception Reception Welcome Nuclear Physics Physics Nuclear A.E. Stuchbery Stuchbery A.E. M. Martschini Martschini M. E. J. Stuchbery Stuchbery J. L.T. Bezzina Bezzina L.T. Tea break Tea break Tea break J.L. Wood Wood J.L. A. K.J. Cook K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Triple Vector Boson Production at the LHC
    Triple Vector Boson Production at the LHC Dan Green Fermilab - CMS Dept. ([email protected]) Introduction The measurement of the interaction among vector bosons is crucial to understanding electroweak symmetry breaking. Indeed, data from LEP-II have already determined triple vector boson couplings and a first measurement of quartic couplings has been made [1]. It is important to explore what additional information can be supplied by future LHC experiments. One technique is to use “tag” jets to identify vector boson fusion processes leading to two vector bosons and two tag jets in the final state. [2] However, the necessity of two quarks simultaneously radiating a W boson means that the cross section is rather small. Another approach is to study the production of three vector bosons in the final state which are produced by the Drell- Yan mechanism. There is a clear tradeoff, in that valence-valence processes are not allowed, which limits the mass range which can be explored using this mechanism, although the cross sections are substantially larger than those for vector boson fusion. Triple Vector Boson Production A Z boson decaying into lepton pairs is required in the final state in order to allow for easy triggering at the LHC and to insure a clean sample of Z plus four jets. Possible final states are ZWW, ZWZ and ZZZ. Assuming that the second and third bosons are reconstructed from their decay into quark pairs, the W and Z will not be easily resolved given the achievable dijet mass resolution. Therefore, the final states of interest contain a Z which decays into leptons and four jets arising for the quark decays of the other two vector bosons.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Boson Scattering Processes: Status and Prospects
    Vector Boson Scattering Processes: Status and Prospects Diogo Buarque Franzosi (ed.)g,d, Michele Gallinaro (ed.)h, Richard Ruiz (ed.)i, Thea K. Aarrestadc, Mauro Chiesao, Antonio Costantinik, Ansgar Dennert, Stefan Dittmaierf, Flavia Cetorellil, Robert Frankent, Pietro Govonil, Tao Hanp, Ashutosh V. Kotwala, Jinmian Lir, Kristin Lohwasserq, Kenneth Longc, Yang Map, Luca Mantanik, Matteo Marchegianie, Mathieu Pellenf, Giovanni Pellicciolit, Karolos Potamianosn,Jurgen¨ Reuterb, Timo Schmidtt, Christopher Schwanm, Michał Szlepers, Rob Verheyenj, Keping Xiep, Rao Zhangr aDepartment of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA bDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) Theory Group, Notkestr. 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany cEuropean Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland dDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Fysikgården 1, 41296 G¨oteborg, Sweden eSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Z¨urich, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland fUniversit¨atFreiburg, Physikalisches Institut, Hermann-Herder-Straße 3, 79104 Freiburg, Germany gPhysics Department, University of Gothenburg, 41296 G¨oteborg, Sweden hLaborat´oriode Instrumenta¸c˜aoe F´ısicaExperimental de Part´ıculas(LIP), Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 2 - 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal iInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Radzikowskiego, Cracow 31-342, Poland jUniversity College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom kCentre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3), Universit´eCatholique de Louvain, Chemin du Cyclotron, B-1348 Louvain la Neuve, Belgium lMilano - Bicocca University and INFN, Piazza della Scienza 3, Milano, Italy mTif Lab, Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Milano and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy nDepartment of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK oDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Pavia, Via A.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Ideas of the Standard Model
    BASIC IDEAS OF THE STANDARD MODEL V.I. ZAKHAROV Randall Laboratory of Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA Abstract This is a series of four lectures on the Standard Model. The role of conserved currents is emphasized. Both degeneracy of states and the Goldstone mode are discussed as realization of current conservation. Remarks on strongly interact- ing Higgs fields are included. No originality is intended and no references are given for this reason. These lectures can serve only as a material supplemental to standard textbooks. PRELIMINARIES Standard Model (SM) of electroweak interactions describes, as is well known, a huge amount of exper- imental data. Comparison with experiment is not, however, the aspect of the SM which is emphasized in present lectures. Rather we treat SM as a field theory and concentrate on basic ideas underlying this field theory. Th Standard Model describes interactions of fields of various spins and includes spin-1, spin-1/2 and spin-0 particles. Spin-1 particles are observed as gauge bosons of electroweak interactions. Spin- 1/2 particles are represented by quarks and leptons. And spin-0, or Higgs particles have not yet been observed although, as we shall discuss later, we can say that scalar particles are in fact longitudinal components of the vector bosons. Interaction of the vector bosons can be consistently described only if it is highly symmetrical, or universal. Moreover, from experiment we know that the corresponding couplings are weak and can be treated perturbatively. Interaction of spin-1/2 and spin-0 particles are fixed by theory to a much lesser degree and bring in many parameters of the SM.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM Phenomenology
    Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM phenomenology Ulrich Nierste Institut f¨ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik Universit¨at Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany I give an introduction to the theory of meson-antimeson mixing, aiming at students who plan to work at a flavour physics experiment or intend to do associated theoretical studies. I derive the formulae for the time evolution of a neutral meson system and show how the mass and width differences among the neutral meson eigenstates and the CP phase in mixing are calculated in the Standard Model. Special emphasis is laid on CP violation, which is covered in detail for K−K mixing, Bd−Bd mixing and Bs−Bs mixing. I explain the constraints on the apex (ρ, η) of the unitarity triangle implied by ǫK ,∆MBd ,∆MBd /∆MBs and various mixing-induced CP asymmetries such as aCP(Bd → J/ψKshort)(t). The impact of a future measurement of CP violation in flavour-specific Bd decays is also shown. 1 First lecture: A big-brush picture 1.1 Mesons, quarks and box diagrams The neutral K, D, Bd and Bs mesons are the only hadrons which mix with their antiparticles. These meson states are flavour eigenstates and the corresponding antimesons K, D, Bd and Bs have opposite flavour quantum numbers: K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, (1) ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ Here for example “Bs bs” means that the Bs meson has the same flavour quantum numbers as the quark pair (b,s), i.e.∼ the beauty and strangeness quantum numbers are B = 1 and S = 1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenology Lecture 6: Higgs
    Phenomenology Lecture 6: Higgs Daniel Maître IPPP, Durham Phenomenology - Daniel Maître The Higgs Mechanism ● Very schematic, you have seen/will see it in SM lectures ● The SM contains spin-1 gauge bosons and spin- 1/2 fermions. ● Massless fields ensure: – gauge invariance under SU(2)L × U(1)Y – renormalisability ● We could introduce mass terms “by hand” but this violates gauge invariance ● We add a complex doublet under SU(2) L Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs Mechanism ● Couple it to the SM ● Add terms allowed by symmetry → potential ● We get a potential with infinitely many minima. ● If we expend around one of them we get – Vev which will give the mass to the fermions and massive gauge bosons – One radial and 3 circular modes – Circular modes become the longitudinal modes of the gauge bosons Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs Mechanism ● From the new terms in the Lagrangian we get ● There are fixed relations between the mass and couplings to the Higgs scalar (the one component of it surviving) Phenomenology - Daniel Maître What if there is no Higgs boson? ● Consider W+W− → W+W− scattering. ● In the high energy limit ● So that we have Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs mechanism ● This violate unitarity, so we need to do something ● If we add a scalar particle with coupling λ to the W ● We get a contribution ● Cancels the bad high energy behaviour if , i.e. the Higgs coupling. ● Repeat the argument for the Z boson and the fermions. Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs mechanism ● Even if there was no Higgs boson we are forced to introduce a scalar interaction that couples to all particles proportional to their mass.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eternal Original Fundamental Particle of the Universe
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN: 2319-7064 ResearchGate Impact Factor (2018): 0.28 | SJIF (2019): 7.583 The Eternal Original Fundamental Particle of the Universe Dadarao Dhone B. E. Electrical (1971) Retiree Exe. Engr., Electric. & Mechanical, Gov. Maharashtra in India (2005) & Retd. Electrical Engg. Faculty. (2007 to 2013), Nanded, M.S., India Abstract: Till now, There are found four fundamental forces in the Nature/universe. They are, (1) Gravity, (2) The Weak Force, (3) Electromagnetism and (4) The Strong Force. But, since 2000, thinking on the most original, eternal, fundamental particles, it is found by the author through meditation of octo-microscopic nature, (1) self-conscious, (2) Intellect, (3) Mind, (4) Space, and Principle Properties of each of the following, (5) Air, (6) Light, (7) Water, (8) Earth; from the Modern Science and the Hindu Phylosophy particularly, ShriMadBhagWadGeeta. that, there must be some fundamental ever existing original particles as building blocks of the Nature, the Universe. Yethakashashthito nityam Vayuh… means as there is air always attached to space, all objects and events in the universe are attached to the space. Space is also self conscious as per the Geeta. The Dark Energy matter in astronomy corresponds to the Vayuh in Geeta. Something moving is energy, Dark photons, always in motion in space is energy and that's the Dark Energy in space. The particles of the Dark Energy are named 'Dark Photons' by the author. These particles represent all above fundamental four forces of the nature and also the properties of mass, electricity and magnetism, And a mesh of neutral field lines which, assume any field according to respective particles coming into existence in space-Domains.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Quark and Heavy Vector Boson Associated Production at the Atlas Experiment
    ! "#$ "%&'" (' ! ) #& *+ & , & -. / . , &0 , . &( 1, 23)!&4 . . . & & 56 & , "#7 #'6 . & #'6 & . , & . .3(& ( & 8 !10 92&4 . ) *)+ . : ./ *)#+ . *) +& . , & "#$ :;; &&;< = : ::: #>$ ? 4@!%$5%#$?>%'>'> 4@!%$5%#$?>%'>># ! #"?%# TOP QUARK AND HEAVY VECTOR BOSON ASSOCIATED PRODUCTION AT THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Olga Bessidskaia Bylund Top quark and heavy vector boson associated production at the ATLAS experiment Modelling, measurements and effective field theory Olga Bessidskaia Bylund ©Olga Bessidskaia Bylund, Stockholm University 2017 ISBN print 978-91-7649-343-4 ISBN PDF 978-91-7649-344-1 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2017 Distributor: Department of Physics, Stockholm University Cover image by Henrik Åkerstedt Contents 1 Preface 5 1.1 Introduction ............................ 5 1.2Structureofthethesis...................... 5 1.3 Contributions of the author . ................. 6 2 Theory 8 2.1TheStandardModelandQuantumFieldTheory....... 8 2.1.1 Particle content of the Standard Model ........ 8 2.1.2 S-matrix expansion .................... 11 2.1.3 Cross sections ....................... 13 2.1.4 Renormalisability and gauge invariance ........ 15 2.1.5 Structure of the Lagrangian ............... 16 2.1.6 QED ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Mass, Fine Structure Constant, and the Classification of Elementary Particles by Masses
    Journal of Modern Physics, 2021, 12, 988-1004 https://www.scirp.org/journal/jmp ISSN Online: 2153-120X ISSN Print: 2153-1196 Mass, Fine Structure Constant, and the Classification of Elementary Particles by Masses Khachatur Kirakosyan Institute of Chemical Physics, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Erevan, Armenia How to cite this paper: Kirakosyan, K. Abstract (2021) Mass, Fine Structure Constant, and the Classification of Elementary Particles The equations of motion of physical bodies are given, the characteristic pa- by Masses. Journal of Modern Physics, 12, rameters of which become the basis for determining a fundamental property 988-1004. of all matter—“mass”. The equations of motion are characterized by two con- https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2021.127061 stants, the derivative of one of which is the fine structure constant. Using Received: April 9, 2021 these constants, energy scales are compiled, which are the basis for classifying Accepted: May 22, 2021 particles by mass. Published: May 25, 2021 Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Keywords Scientific Research Publishing Inc. Mass, Energy, Structure, Quantum Numbers, Elementary Particles This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access 1. Introduction In modern theoretical views, the origin of the mass and the fine structure con- stant (the symbol α) one relates with the phenomena of interaction [1]-[6], thus the search for a connection between the mass of elementary particles (EP) and α seems to be quite natural. However, the establishment of this connection is complicated by the fact that the contents of α and mass are not sufficiently re- vealed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Jewels in the Crown of The
    The three jewels in the crown of the LHC Yosef Nir Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel [email protected] Abstract The ATLAS and CMS experiments have made three major discoveries: The discovery of an elementary spin-zero particle, the discovery of the mechanism that makes the weak interactions short-range, and the discovery of the mechanism that gives the third generation fermions their masses. I explain how this progress in our understanding of the basic laws of Nature was achieved. arXiv:2010.13126v1 [hep-ph] 25 Oct 2020 It is often stated that the Higgs discovery is “the jewel in the crown” of the ATLAS/CMS research. We would like to argue that ATLAS/CMS made (at least) three major discoveries, each of deep significance to our understanding of the basic laws of Nature: 1. The discovery of an elementary spin-0 particle, the first and only particle of this type to have been discovered. 2. The discovery of the mechanism that makes the weak interactions short-ranged, in contrast to the other (electromagnetic and strong) interactions mediated by spin-1 particles. 3. The discovery of the mechanism that gives masses to the three heaviest matter (spin- 1/2) particles, through a unique type of interactions. These three breakthrough discoveries can be related, in one-to-one correspondence, to three distinct classes of measurements: 1. The Higgs boson decay into two photons. 2. The Higgs boson decay into a W - or a Z-boson and a fermion pair, and the Higgs production via vector boson (W W or ZZ) fusion.
    [Show full text]
  • New Heavy Bosons
    Citation: M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update New Heavy Bosons (W ′, Z ′, leptoquarks, etc.), Searches for We list here various limits on charged and neutral heavy vector bosons (other than W ’s and Z’s), heavy scalar bosons (other than Higgs bosons), vector or scalar leptoquarks, and axigluons. The latest unpublished results are described in “W ′ Searches” and “Z ′ Searches” reviews. For recent searches on scalar bosons which could be identified as Higgs bosons, see the listings in the Higgs boson sec- tion. CONTENTS: Mass Limits for W ′ (Heavy Charged Vector Boson Other Than W ) in Hadron Collider Experiments WR (Right-Handed W Boson) Mass Limits Limit on WL-WR Mixing Angle ζ Mass Limits for Z (Heavy Neutral Vector Boson Other Than Z) ′′ Limits for Z − SM Limits for Z − LR Limits for Z − χ Limits for Z − ψ Limits for Z − η Limits for other Z − ′ Searches for Z with Lepton-Flavor-Violating decays − ′ Indirect Constraints on Kaluza-Klein Gauge Bosons Mass Limits for Leptoquarks from Pair Production Mass Limits for Leptoquarks from Single Production Indirect Limits for Leptoquarks Mass Limits for Diquarks Mass Limits for gA (axigluon) and Other Color-Octet Gauge Bosons Mass Limits for Color-Octet Scalar Bosons X 0 (Heavy Boson) Searches in Z Decays + Mass Limits for a Heavy Neutral Boson Coupling to e e− 0 + Search for X Resonance in e e− Collisions Search for X 0 Resonance in ep Collisions Search for X 0 Resonance in Two-Photon Process Search for X 0 Resonance in e+ e X 0 γ − → Search for X 0 Resonance in Z f f X 0 → Search for X 0 Resonance in W X 0 final state Search for X 0 Resonance in Quarkonium Decays See the related review(s): W ′-Boson Searches HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page1 Created: 8/2/2019 16:43 Citation: M.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTARY PARTICLES in PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S
    ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S. Gasiorowicz and P. Langacker Elementary-particle physics deals with the fundamental constituents of mat- ter and their interactions. In the past several decades an enormous amount of experimental information has been accumulated, and many patterns and sys- tematic features have been observed. Highly successful mathematical theories of the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions have been devised and tested. These theories, which are collectively known as the standard model, are almost certainly the correct description of Nature, to first approximation, down to a distance scale 1/1000th the size of the atomic nucleus. There are also spec- ulative but encouraging developments in the attempt to unify these interactions into a simple underlying framework, and even to incorporate quantum gravity in a parameter-free “theory of everything.” In this article we shall attempt to highlight the ways in which information has been organized, and to sketch the outlines of the standard model and its possible extensions. Classification of Particles The particles that have been identified in high-energy experiments fall into dis- tinct classes. There are the leptons (see Electron, Leptons, Neutrino, Muonium), 1 all of which have spin 2 . They may be charged or neutral. The charged lep- tons have electromagnetic as well as weak interactions; the neutral ones only interact weakly. There are three well-defined lepton pairs, the electron (e−) and − the electron neutrino (νe), the muon (µ ) and the muon neutrino (νµ), and the (much heavier) charged lepton, the tau (τ), and its tau neutrino (ντ ). These particles all have antiparticles, in accordance with the predictions of relativistic quantum mechanics (see CPT Theorem).
    [Show full text]