DOCSLIB.ORG

Particle Physics of the Early Universe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Particle Physics of the Early Universe Particle Physics of the Early Universe Alexey Boyarsky Spring semester 2015 Fermi theory of β-decay 1 − Continuum Neutron decay n ! p + e +ν ¯e spectrum of electrons (1927) Two papers by E. Fermi: Prediction of An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. 1. (In neutrino German) Z.Phys. 88 (1934) 161-177 (1930, 1934) DOI: 10.1007/BF01351864 Fermi theory Trends to a Theory of beta Radiation. (In (1934) Italian) Nuovo Cim. 11 (1934) 1-19 DOI: 10.1007/BF02959820 Universality of Fermi interactions Fermi 4-fermion theory: (1949) GF µ LFermi = −p [¯p(x)γµn(x)][¯e(x)γ ν(x)] (1) 2 0History of β-decay (see [hep-ph/0001283], Sec. 1,1); Cheng & Li, Chap. 11, Sec. 11.1) Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 1 Neutrino-electron scattering Fermi Lagrangian includes leptonic and hardronic terms: GF h y y i h i LFermi = −p J (x) + J (x) · Jlepton(x) + Jhadron(x) (2) 2 lepton hadron where current J µ has leptonic (e±, µ±, ν, ν¯) and hadronic (p, n, π) parts Fermi theory predicts lepton-only weak interactions, such as e + νe ! e + νe scattering 4GF λ Lνe = p (¯eγλνe)(¯νeγ e) (3) 2 Matrix element for e + νe ! e + νe scattering X 2 2 4 jMj / GF Ec:m: (4) spins Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 2 Massive intermediate particle Unitarity means that for any process the matrix element should be bounded from above: jMj ≤ const The matrix element for e+νe ! e+νe scattering grows with energy, 2 2 4 jMj / GF Ec:m:. Therefore, the Fermi theory wouldp predict meaningless answers for scattering at energies Ec:m: & GF ≈ 300 GeV Promote point-like 4-fermion Fermi interaction to interaction, mediated by a new massive particle : W – massive particles with MW Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 3 Massive intermediate particle p For s MW – looks like a point, 4-fermion interaction p −1 For s MW – behaves as s What is the spin of this particle? It should couple to current so it is a vector field: g + − − + Lint = p J W + J W (5) 2 2 µ µ µ µ g – new coupling constant responsible for weak interactions ± The currents Jµ made of electron and νe (or muon and νµ) carries charge ±1. Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 4 Theory of massive vector boson Free massive vector boson obeys Proka equation: µ ν ν µ 2 µ @ν(@ W − @ W ) = MW W (6) 2 µ Taking @µ derivative of (4) )MW @µW = 0 Eq. (6) can be rewritten as a set of Klein-Gordon equations µ 2 µ W = MW W (7) 0 Three independent plane wave solution (because now W 6= 0): µ (i) (i) ix·k k · µ = 0; i = 1; 2; 3 Wµ = µ e where µ 2 k · kµ = MW (i) µ are 3 vectors of polarizations Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 5 Theory of massive vector boson Consider W boson at rest The three polarization vectors are just three unit vectors along the axes x, y, and z µ Now, make boost along z axis. W -bosons 4-momentum k = (E; 0; 0; kz) Three polarization vectors are 8 (1) > µ (k) = (0; 1; 0; 0) < (2) µ (k) = (0; 0; 1; 0) > (3) 1 : µ (k) = (kz; 0; 0;E) MW µ Consider W boson with energy E MW , then k = (E; 0; 0; kz) ≈ E(1; 0; 0; 1) when E ≈ kz MW Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 6 Theory of massive vector boson (3) E E The third polarization vector: µ = (kz; 0; 0;E) ≈ (1; 0; 0; 1) MW MW kµ L ≈ MW µ There is a subtle difference here! k is time-like vector and L is a space- like vector. In the relativistic limits they both approach light-cone, but from two different sides Longitudinally polarized Wµ in the limit E MW looks like a derivative of a scalar function W µ ≈ 1 @µφ L MW Interaction with currents: − + longitudinal @µφ − g µ − gJµ Wµ −−−−−−! g Jµ = φ(@ Jµ ) MW MW . this looks like a new dimensionful coupling constant Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 7 Massive vector field and St¨uckelberg field Introduce new scalar field, θ. It interacts with a gauge field W , satisfying Maxwell’s equation: µ ν ν µ @ν(@ W − @ W ) = 0 (8) Under gauge transformation Wµ ! Wµ + @µλ the field θ shifts as θ ! θ − λ Equation of motion for θ (Dµθ = @µθ + Wµ): µ µ µ @µ(D θ) = @µ(@ θ + W ) = 0 (9) The full equation for W becomes: µ ν ν µ 2 µ @ν(@ W − @ W ) = MW D θ (10) Gauge condition θ = 0 reduces these two equations for W and θ to the old Proka equation Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 8 Vector boson vs. photon (i) P3 (i) (i) kµkν Show that if are 3 polarization vectors than = −ηµν + µ i=1 µ ν M2 W Define a propagator of massive Klein-Gordon equation with µ additional condition @µW = 0: 4 Z d p 0 1 X hW (x)W (x0)i = e−ip(x−x ) i (p)i (p) µ ν (2π)4 p2 − M 2 µ ν W polarizations pµpν 4 η − Z 0 µν 2 d p ip(x−x ) MW = 4 e 2 2 (2π) p − MW (11) Try to put MW ! 0. Will you recover photon-like propagator? No! Trouble with the term in the numerator Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 9 Scattering eν ! eν The relevant part of the interaction Lagrangian is + 1 µ − 1 µ ∆L = gW p ν¯eγ PLe + gW p eγ¯ PLνe (12) µ 2 µ 2 1 PL = 2(1 − γ5) – projector of the 4-component spinor on the left chirality. The relevant matrix element is given by 0 rµrν 1 2 g − ig µν M2 p µ W ν iM = [¯u(k1)γ PLu(p2)] (−i) @ 2 2 A [¯u(k2)γ PLu(p1)] 2 r − MW (13) After average over polarization of the colliding electron and summation over polarizations of other particles we obtain: 4 2 ¯ 2 g s 2 jMj = 2 2 2; s = (p1 + p2) (14) 2(r − MW ) Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 10 Scattering eν ! eν 2 2 At low energies, when s; r MW , but nevertheless s; r me, we ¯ 2 2 2 get the result of the Fermi theory jMj = 16GF s , provided that we identify p 2g2 GF = 2 (15) 8MW In the general case 4 ¯ 2 2g 2 2 s jMj = ; r = (p2−k1) = − (1+cos θ) (16) 2 2 2MW 2 1 + cos θ + s (j) The unitarity requirement M ≤ 1 then leads to 16π s ≤ M 2 exp − 1 (17) W g2 2 p 28 For the known value αW = g =4π ≈ 1=30, we get s . 10 GeV. Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 11 Lagrangian of W boson Recall that the Lagrangian of the massive vector field Bµ would have the form (Proka Lagrangian): 1 1 L = − (@ B − @ B )2 + m2 BµB (18) Proka 4 µ ν ν µ 2 B µ However W -boson is charged! Under the gauge transformation: ± ±iα ± Wµ ! e Wµ (19) Therefore, we should change @µ ! Dµ in Eq. (18), where ± ± DµWν = (@µ ± i e Aµ)Wν We follow largely the book by J. Horejsi “Introduction to Electroweak Unification: Standard Model from Tree Unitarity”, Chapters 3 and 4. Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 12 Lagrangian of W boson The kinetic term for W -boson is therefore 1 M 2 L = − (D+W −−D+W −)(D−W +−D−W +)+ W W +W − (20) W 2 µ ν µ ν µ ν µ ν 2 µ µ Show that in addition to (18) Lagrangian (20) also contains terms of the form W +W −γ and W +W −γγ. Write down explicit form of the W W γ and W W γγ interactions Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 13 1 + − νeν¯e ! W W scattering The amplitude of the process: ig µ i =q ig ν ∗ ∗ iM =v ¯(p1) p γ PL p γ PL u(p2)µ(k1)ν(k2) 2 q2 2 2 Take s me (so that mass of electron was neglected in the fermion propagator). X 2 jMj¯ 2 = jMj = (21) s g2 h i k k k k = Tr =p γµ =qγν =p γρ =qγλ −g + 1µ 1λ −g + 2ν 2ρ 2 2 1 2 µλ 2 νρ 2 4q q MW MW 2 In the high-energy approximation s; q MW dominates longitudinal part, coming from k1;2=MW (i.e. one can neglect gµν term in Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 14 1 + − νeν¯e ! W W scattering the numerator) 2 2 ¯ 2 g s jMj = 4 (22) MW grows as a fourth power of energy. Therefore, the considered process still violates unitarity. + − + − Similarly the process e e ! W W violates unitarity Can this be amended? Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 15 More contributions to ee ! WW We saw that as W -bosons are charged, there is W W γ interaction term. Therefore the real process ee ! WW is described by the sum of two diagrams Can these two diagrams give rise to the unitary behavior of the resulting cross-section? No! (left diagram is parity violating, right diagram is parity conserved!) Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 16 New particle is needed + − + − What could restore the unitarity of e e ! W W and νν¯ ! WW ? )new particle New vector boson that couples to electrons and to neutrinos in the parity violating way and that also couples to W +W −. New boson (Z-bosons) interacts with ν: 1 L = g νγ¯ µ(1 − γ )νZ (23) ννZ¯ 2 ννZ¯ 5 µ + − New boson also interacts with W W and the vertex WWZ is similar to the vertex W W γ + − As result there are two processes contributing to νν¯ ! W W scattering Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 17 New particle is needed 2 2 E As discussed before Ma / g from longitudinally MW polarized final W states 2 E Mb / (gννZ¯ gZWW ) Can cancel contribution of Ma if MW 1 2 gννZ¯ gZWW = 2g Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 18 Z-boson contribution to e+e− ! W +W − + − + − Similarly, for e e ! W W we would have three contributions to 2 2 the matrix element: jMj = Ma + Mb + Mc Interaction with electrons: µ µ Vint = gLe¯Lγ eLZµ + gRe¯Rγ eRZµ (24) Alexey Boyarsky PPEU 2015 19 New symmetry? Neutrino and electron – different charge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Triple Vector Boson Production at the LHC
    Triple Vector Boson Production at the LHC Dan Green Fermilab - CMS Dept. ([email protected]) Introduction The measurement of the interaction among vector bosons is crucial to understanding electroweak symmetry breaking. Indeed, data from LEP-II have already determined triple vector boson couplings and a first measurement of quartic couplings has been made [1]. It is important to explore what additional information can be supplied by future LHC experiments. One technique is to use “tag” jets to identify vector boson fusion processes leading to two vector bosons and two tag jets in the final state. [2] However, the necessity of two quarks simultaneously radiating a W boson means that the cross section is rather small. Another approach is to study the production of three vector bosons in the final state which are produced by the Drell- Yan mechanism. There is a clear tradeoff, in that valence-valence processes are not allowed, which limits the mass range which can be explored using this mechanism, although the cross sections are substantially larger than those for vector boson fusion. Triple Vector Boson Production A Z boson decaying into lepton pairs is required in the final state in order to allow for easy triggering at the LHC and to insure a clean sample of Z plus four jets. Possible final states are ZWW, ZWZ and ZZZ. Assuming that the second and third bosons are reconstructed from their decay into quark pairs, the W and Z will not be easily resolved given the achievable dijet mass resolution. Therefore, the final states of interest contain a Z which decays into leptons and four jets arising for the quark decays of the other two vector bosons.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Boson Scattering Processes: Status and Prospects
    Vector Boson Scattering Processes: Status and Prospects Diogo Buarque Franzosi (ed.)g,d, Michele Gallinaro (ed.)h, Richard Ruiz (ed.)i, Thea K. Aarrestadc, Mauro Chiesao, Antonio Costantinik, Ansgar Dennert, Stefan Dittmaierf, Flavia Cetorellil, Robert Frankent, Pietro Govonil, Tao Hanp, Ashutosh V. Kotwala, Jinmian Lir, Kristin Lohwasserq, Kenneth Longc, Yang Map, Luca Mantanik, Matteo Marchegianie, Mathieu Pellenf, Giovanni Pellicciolit, Karolos Potamianosn,Jurgen¨ Reuterb, Timo Schmidtt, Christopher Schwanm, Michał Szlepers, Rob Verheyenj, Keping Xiep, Rao Zhangr aDepartment of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA bDeutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) Theory Group, Notkestr. 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany cEuropean Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland dDepartment of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Fysikgården 1, 41296 G¨oteborg, Sweden eSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Z¨urich, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland fUniversit¨atFreiburg, Physikalisches Institut, Hermann-Herder-Straße 3, 79104 Freiburg, Germany gPhysics Department, University of Gothenburg, 41296 G¨oteborg, Sweden hLaborat´oriode Instrumenta¸c˜aoe F´ısicaExperimental de Part´ıculas(LIP), Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 2 - 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal iInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Radzikowskiego, Cracow 31-342, Poland jUniversity College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom kCentre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3), Universit´eCatholique de Louvain, Chemin du Cyclotron, B-1348 Louvain la Neuve, Belgium lMilano - Bicocca University and INFN, Piazza della Scienza 3, Milano, Italy mTif Lab, Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Milano and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy nDepartment of Physics, University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK oDipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Pavia, Via A.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Ideas of the Standard Model
    BASIC IDEAS OF THE STANDARD MODEL V.I. ZAKHAROV Randall Laboratory of Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA Abstract This is a series of four lectures on the Standard Model. The role of conserved currents is emphasized. Both degeneracy of states and the Goldstone mode are discussed as realization of current conservation. Remarks on strongly interact- ing Higgs fields are included. No originality is intended and no references are given for this reason. These lectures can serve only as a material supplemental to standard textbooks. PRELIMINARIES Standard Model (SM) of electroweak interactions describes, as is well known, a huge amount of exper- imental data. Comparison with experiment is not, however, the aspect of the SM which is emphasized in present lectures. Rather we treat SM as a field theory and concentrate on basic ideas underlying this field theory. Th Standard Model describes interactions of fields of various spins and includes spin-1, spin-1/2 and spin-0 particles. Spin-1 particles are observed as gauge bosons of electroweak interactions. Spin- 1/2 particles are represented by quarks and leptons. And spin-0, or Higgs particles have not yet been observed although, as we shall discuss later, we can say that scalar particles are in fact longitudinal components of the vector bosons. Interaction of the vector bosons can be consistently described only if it is highly symmetrical, or universal. Moreover, from experiment we know that the corresponding couplings are weak and can be treated perturbatively. Interaction of spin-1/2 and spin-0 particles are fixed by theory to a much lesser degree and bring in many parameters of the SM.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM Phenomenology
    Three Lectures on Meson Mixing and CKM phenomenology Ulrich Nierste Institut f¨ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik Universit¨at Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany I give an introduction to the theory of meson-antimeson mixing, aiming at students who plan to work at a flavour physics experiment or intend to do associated theoretical studies. I derive the formulae for the time evolution of a neutral meson system and show how the mass and width differences among the neutral meson eigenstates and the CP phase in mixing are calculated in the Standard Model. Special emphasis is laid on CP violation, which is covered in detail for K−K mixing, Bd−Bd mixing and Bs−Bs mixing. I explain the constraints on the apex (ρ, η) of the unitarity triangle implied by ǫK ,∆MBd ,∆MBd /∆MBs and various mixing-induced CP asymmetries such as aCP(Bd → J/ψKshort)(t). The impact of a future measurement of CP violation in flavour-specific Bd decays is also shown. 1 First lecture: A big-brush picture 1.1 Mesons, quarks and box diagrams The neutral K, D, Bd and Bs mesons are the only hadrons which mix with their antiparticles. These meson states are flavour eigenstates and the corresponding antimesons K, D, Bd and Bs have opposite flavour quantum numbers: K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ K sd, D cu, B bd, B bs, (1) ∼ ∼ d ∼ s ∼ Here for example “Bs bs” means that the Bs meson has the same flavour quantum numbers as the quark pair (b,s), i.e.∼ the beauty and strangeness quantum numbers are B = 1 and S = 1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenomenology Lecture 6: Higgs
    Phenomenology Lecture 6: Higgs Daniel Maître IPPP, Durham Phenomenology - Daniel Maître The Higgs Mechanism ● Very schematic, you have seen/will see it in SM lectures ● The SM contains spin-1 gauge bosons and spin- 1/2 fermions. ● Massless fields ensure: – gauge invariance under SU(2)L × U(1)Y – renormalisability ● We could introduce mass terms “by hand” but this violates gauge invariance ● We add a complex doublet under SU(2) L Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs Mechanism ● Couple it to the SM ● Add terms allowed by symmetry → potential ● We get a potential with infinitely many minima. ● If we expend around one of them we get – Vev which will give the mass to the fermions and massive gauge bosons – One radial and 3 circular modes – Circular modes become the longitudinal modes of the gauge bosons Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs Mechanism ● From the new terms in the Lagrangian we get ● There are fixed relations between the mass and couplings to the Higgs scalar (the one component of it surviving) Phenomenology - Daniel Maître What if there is no Higgs boson? ● Consider W+W− → W+W− scattering. ● In the high energy limit ● So that we have Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs mechanism ● This violate unitarity, so we need to do something ● If we add a scalar particle with coupling λ to the W ● We get a contribution ● Cancels the bad high energy behaviour if , i.e. the Higgs coupling. ● Repeat the argument for the Z boson and the fermions. Phenomenology - Daniel Maître Higgs mechanism ● Even if there was no Higgs boson we are forced to introduce a scalar interaction that couples to all particles proportional to their mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Quark and Heavy Vector Boson Associated Production at the Atlas Experiment
    ! "#$ "%&'" (' ! ) #& *+ & , & -. / . , &0 , . &( 1, 23)!&4 . . . & & 56 & , "#7 #'6 . & #'6 & . , & . .3(& ( & 8 !10 92&4 . ) *)+ . : ./ *)#+ . *) +& . , & "#$ :;; &&;< = : ::: #>$ ? 4@!%$5%#$?>%'>'> 4@!%$5%#$?>%'>># ! #"?%# TOP QUARK AND HEAVY VECTOR BOSON ASSOCIATED PRODUCTION AT THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Olga Bessidskaia Bylund Top quark and heavy vector boson associated production at the ATLAS experiment Modelling, measurements and effective field theory Olga Bessidskaia Bylund ©Olga Bessidskaia Bylund, Stockholm University 2017 ISBN print 978-91-7649-343-4 ISBN PDF 978-91-7649-344-1 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2017 Distributor: Department of Physics, Stockholm University Cover image by Henrik Åkerstedt Contents 1 Preface 5 1.1 Introduction ............................ 5 1.2Structureofthethesis...................... 5 1.3 Contributions of the author . ................. 6 2 Theory 8 2.1TheStandardModelandQuantumFieldTheory....... 8 2.1.1 Particle content of the Standard Model ........ 8 2.1.2 S-matrix expansion .................... 11 2.1.3 Cross sections ....................... 13 2.1.4 Renormalisability and gauge invariance ........ 15 2.1.5 Structure of the Lagrangian ............... 16 2.1.6 QED ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Jewels in the Crown of The
    The three jewels in the crown of the LHC Yosef Nir Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel [email protected] Abstract The ATLAS and CMS experiments have made three major discoveries: The discovery of an elementary spin-zero particle, the discovery of the mechanism that makes the weak interactions short-range, and the discovery of the mechanism that gives the third generation fermions their masses. I explain how this progress in our understanding of the basic laws of Nature was achieved. arXiv:2010.13126v1 [hep-ph] 25 Oct 2020 It is often stated that the Higgs discovery is “the jewel in the crown” of the ATLAS/CMS research. We would like to argue that ATLAS/CMS made (at least) three major discoveries, each of deep significance to our understanding of the basic laws of Nature: 1. The discovery of an elementary spin-0 particle, the first and only particle of this type to have been discovered. 2. The discovery of the mechanism that makes the weak interactions short-ranged, in contrast to the other (electromagnetic and strong) interactions mediated by spin-1 particles. 3. The discovery of the mechanism that gives masses to the three heaviest matter (spin- 1/2) particles, through a unique type of interactions. These three breakthrough discoveries can be related, in one-to-one correspondence, to three distinct classes of measurements: 1. The Higgs boson decay into two photons. 2. The Higgs boson decay into a W - or a Z-boson and a fermion pair, and the Higgs production via vector boson (W W or ZZ) fusion.
    [Show full text]
  • New Heavy Bosons
    Citation: M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update New Heavy Bosons (W ′, Z ′, leptoquarks, etc.), Searches for We list here various limits on charged and neutral heavy vector bosons (other than W ’s and Z’s), heavy scalar bosons (other than Higgs bosons), vector or scalar leptoquarks, and axigluons. The latest unpublished results are described in “W ′ Searches” and “Z ′ Searches” reviews. For recent searches on scalar bosons which could be identified as Higgs bosons, see the listings in the Higgs boson sec- tion. CONTENTS: Mass Limits for W ′ (Heavy Charged Vector Boson Other Than W ) in Hadron Collider Experiments WR (Right-Handed W Boson) Mass Limits Limit on WL-WR Mixing Angle ζ Mass Limits for Z (Heavy Neutral Vector Boson Other Than Z) ′′ Limits for Z − SM Limits for Z − LR Limits for Z − χ Limits for Z − ψ Limits for Z − η Limits for other Z − ′ Searches for Z with Lepton-Flavor-Violating decays − ′ Indirect Constraints on Kaluza-Klein Gauge Bosons Mass Limits for Leptoquarks from Pair Production Mass Limits for Leptoquarks from Single Production Indirect Limits for Leptoquarks Mass Limits for Diquarks Mass Limits for gA (axigluon) and Other Color-Octet Gauge Bosons Mass Limits for Color-Octet Scalar Bosons X 0 (Heavy Boson) Searches in Z Decays + Mass Limits for a Heavy Neutral Boson Coupling to e e− 0 + Search for X Resonance in e e− Collisions Search for X 0 Resonance in ep Collisions Search for X 0 Resonance in Two-Photon Process Search for X 0 Resonance in e+ e X 0 γ − → Search for X 0 Resonance in Z f f X 0 → Search for X 0 Resonance in W X 0 final state Search for X 0 Resonance in Quarkonium Decays See the related review(s): W ′-Boson Searches HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page1 Created: 8/2/2019 16:43 Citation: M.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTARY PARTICLES in PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S
    ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S. Gasiorowicz and P. Langacker Elementary-particle physics deals with the fundamental constituents of mat- ter and their interactions. In the past several decades an enormous amount of experimental information has been accumulated, and many patterns and sys- tematic features have been observed. Highly successful mathematical theories of the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions have been devised and tested. These theories, which are collectively known as the standard model, are almost certainly the correct description of Nature, to first approximation, down to a distance scale 1/1000th the size of the atomic nucleus. There are also spec- ulative but encouraging developments in the attempt to unify these interactions into a simple underlying framework, and even to incorporate quantum gravity in a parameter-free “theory of everything.” In this article we shall attempt to highlight the ways in which information has been organized, and to sketch the outlines of the standard model and its possible extensions. Classification of Particles The particles that have been identified in high-energy experiments fall into dis- tinct classes. There are the leptons (see Electron, Leptons, Neutrino, Muonium), 1 all of which have spin 2 . They may be charged or neutral. The charged lep- tons have electromagnetic as well as weak interactions; the neutral ones only interact weakly. There are three well-defined lepton pairs, the electron (e−) and − the electron neutrino (νe), the muon (µ ) and the muon neutrino (νµ), and the (much heavier) charged lepton, the tau (τ), and its tau neutrino (ντ ). These particles all have antiparticles, in accordance with the predictions of relativistic quantum mechanics (see CPT Theorem).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Theory and the Standard Model
    Field theory and the Standard Model W. Buchmüller and C. Lüdeling Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany Abstract We give a short introduction to the Standard Model and the underlying con- cepts of quantum field theory. 1 Introduction In these lectures we shall give a short introduction to the Standard Model of particle physics with empha- sis on the electroweak theory and the Higgs sector, and we shall also attempt to explain the underlying concepts of quantum field theory. The Standard Model of particle physics has the following key features: – As a theory of elementary particles, it incorporates relativity and quantum mechanics, and therefore it is based on quantum field theory. – Its predictive power rests on the regularization of divergent quantum corrections and the renormal- ization procedure which introduces scale-dependent `running couplings'. – Electromagnetic, weak, strong and also gravitational interactions are all related to local symmetries and described by Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. – The masses of all particles are generated by two mechanisms: confinement and spontaneous sym- metry breaking. In the following chapters we shall explain these points one by one. Finally, instead of a summary, we briefly recall the history of `The making of the Standard Model' [1]. From the theoretical perspective, the Standard Model has a simple and elegant structure: it is a chiral gauge theory. Spelling out the details reveals a rich phenomenology which can account for strong and electroweak interactions, confinement and spontaneous symmetry breaking, hadronic and leptonic flavour physics etc. [2, 3]. The study of all these aspects has kept theorists and experimenters busy for three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Vector Boson Self-Interactions and Vector Boson Production Within the BESS-Model
    55 V. Vector Boson Self-Interactions and Vector Boson Production within the BESS-Model. C Cvctic, C. Grosse-Knelter, II. Kôgerler Among the models which are presently considered as realistic alternatives to the SM of electroweak interactions the so-called BESS-modelM"'2! constitutes in a certain sense the most radical version. In fact, while most alternatives remain within the framework of Higgs-realized SSB and differ from the SM only either by the underlying gauge group or by the scalar representations (thereby always containing one or more physical Higgs particles), the BESS model is characterized by a different mechanism of vector boson mass generation and, consequently, can manage without physical scalars at all. This is effected by realizing the spontaneous symmetry breaking in a nonlinear way. The whole situation can be visualized roughly by taking the Mu —> oo limit of the scalar sector of the SMl3I. The nonlinear nature unavoidably brings an additional local gauge symmetry GR into the gameW which manifests itself (in the most simple case Gn — SU(2)v) by an additional triplet of (heavy) vector bosons V^. These states which are to be interpreted as (resonance) manifestations of the strong self-interactions of the scalar (or, equivalently, longitudinal vector) components, have to be sufficiently heavy in order for the theory to be compatible with low energy experimental data1. They obtain their masses from the same (non-linear) SSB realization as the ordinary vector bosons W11 and Y11 (connected with (5{/(2)t X U(l)y), and thereby also get mixed with the latter ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Vector Boson Scattering in the Standard Model-An Overview Of
    PRA-HEP 97/15 October 2, 1997 Vector Boson Scattering in the Standard Model – an Overview of Formulae Tom´aˇsBahn´ık1 Department of Physics, Technical University Liberec, H´alkova 6, 461 17 Liberec, Czech republic and Nuclear Centre, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holeˇsoviˇck´ach 2, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech republic Abstract Tree-level scattering amplitudes of longitudinally polarized electroweak vector bosons in the Standard Model are calculated using Mathematica package Feyncalc. The modifications of low-energy theorems for longitudinally polarized W and Z in the Standard Model are discussed. 1 Introduction One of the open questions in high energy physics is the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking (EWSB). The physics that breaks electroweak symmetry is responsible for giving the W and Z their masses. Since a massive spin-one particle has three polarizations, rather than the two of a massless mode, the new physics must supply degrees of freedom to be swallowed by the W and Z. These new degrees of freedom are the longitudinal polarizations WL and ZL of the vector bosons. Therefore the interactions of the longitudinal components of the vector bosons arXiv:hep-ph/9710265v1 7 Oct 1997 could provide a good way to probe the interactions of the symmetry breaking sector [1]. The interactions of WL and ZL in high energy processes are usually studied by means of different production mechanisms of vector bosons followed by their purely leptonic decays e.g. W ± l±ν and Z l+l−(l = e,µ), referred to as gold-plated channels. One of the production mechanism→ is through→ light fermion anti-fermion i.e.
    [Show full text]