DOCSLIB.ORG

Joey Healthy Forest and Fuels Reduction Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joey Healthy Forest and Fuels Reduction Project Joey Healthy Forest and Fuels Reduction Project Biological Evaluation For Terrestrial and Aquatic Animals Threatened, Endangered and Proposed Species Species of concern, candidates for listing under the ESA and Forest Service Sensitive Species Pacific Southwest Region Kern River Ranger District, Sequoia National Forest Tulare County, California February 21, 2014 Prepared by: /s/ Steven W. Anderson . Steven W. Anderson, Resource Officer Kern River Ranger District Prepared by: a|Çt [xÅÑ{|ÄÄ . Nina Hemphill, Forest Fish Biologist Sequoia National Forest Page left blank intentionally Summary This biological evaluation (BE) documents analysis of effects of the Joey Healthy Forest and Fuels Reduction Project on aquatic and terrestrial animals (fish, birds, mammals, reptiles, insects and amphibians) species identified as sensitive by the Regional Forester, Pacific Southwest Region Forest Service and species listed for protection, including candidates and species proposed for listing, under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973. The project is located on the West Kern Plateau in Tulare County California. Analysis of effects is tiered to the Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA-FS 1988) as amended by the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (USDA-FS 2004). A determination of no effect was made for all federally protected species that were found to be in the area or have the potential to be affected by this project. There is no designated Critical Habitat within or affected by the project. A biological assessment will not be prepared and consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service is not required. Considering the context and intensity of the impacts of this project (40 CFR 1508.27) on wildlife and aquatic organisms, no significant impacts were identified either as a direct result of this project or cumulatively with other past, present or reasonably foreseeable projects. Species addressed and determinations of effect are summarized in the following table: Species Reviewed for Inclusion in the Joey Biological Evaluation Species Determination Kern Plateau Slender salamander SC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Batrachoseps robustus Mountain yellow -legged frog; All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Southern Sierra DPS FS, FC Rana muscosa California spotted owl FS All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Strix occidentalis occidentalis Northern goshawk FS All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Accipiter gentilis Pacific Fisher FS, FC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Martes pennanti pacifica Townsend's. big eared bat FS, FC, SC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing o r loss of viability. Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii Pallid bat FS,SC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Antrozous pallidus American badger SC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Taxidea taxus Western red bat FS,SC All Alternatives: would not be likely to result in a trend toward Federal listing or loss of viability. Lasiurus blossevillii Listing Status Key: federal/state SC CA Species of Special Concern SP State Fully Protected FS USFS Sensitive Species FT Federal Threatened SE State Endangered FC Federal Candidate FE Federal Endangered ST State Threatened SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 CONSULTATION TO DATE .................................................................................................................................................... 7 CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION .................................................................................................................................. 7 PROJECT SPECIFIC DESIRED CONDITION ............................................................................................................................................ 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT .......................................................................................................................... 7 EXISTING CONDITION / ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ........................................................................................................................... 10 GENERAL EFFECTS DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................................ 15 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 FEDERALLY PROTECTED (L ISTED ) SPECIES ........................................................................................................................................ 17 FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE SPECIES (INCLUDING SPECIAL INTEREST SPECIES ) ........................................................................................... 17 SUMMARY OF DETERMINATIONS ...................................................................................................................................... 49 LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................................................................. 49 APPENDIX A – ANIMAL SPECIES AT RISK ............................................................................................................................ 57 APPENDIX B – SPOTTED OWL HRCA AND PAC, SURVEY SUMMARY ................................................................................... 59 APPENDIX C – CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ......................................................................................................... 60 REGULATORY SETTING ................................................................................................................................................................. 60 LAND ALLOCATIONS AND DESIRED CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................... 60 MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES .................................................................................................................................. 62 Joey Healthy Forest and Fuel Reduction Project Wildlife and Aquatics Biological Evaluation Introduction Background This biological evaluation (BE) documents analysis of effects of the Joey Healthy Forest and Fuels Reduction Project on aquatic and terrestrial animal (fish, birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians) species identified as sensitive by the Pacific Southwest Region (R5) of the Forest Service and species listed for protection or proposed for protection under the Endangered Species Act (Threatened, Endangered and Proposed (TEP)) in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (19 U.S.C. 1536 c), standards established in Forest Service Manual direction (FSM 2672.42) and other relevant federal and state laws or regulations. Analysis of effects is tiered to the Sequoia National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (USDA-FS 1988) as amended by the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment (USDA-FS 2004). The project is located on the West Kern Plateau, Kern River Ranger District, and Sequoia National Forest in Tulare County, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act are included with Forest Service Sensitive species in this document. Table 1 indicates Threatened, Endangered, Proposed and Candidates for federal listing and Sensitive (TEPS) species that have the potential to be directly or indirectly affected by this project. These species are addressed in detail within this document. No TEP species or critical habitats were identified as having the potential to be affected by this project. A biological assessment will not be prepared since consultation with the USFWS is not required. A full list of TEPS species that may be affected by actions within the Sequoia National Forest is attached in Appendix A with a brief notation regarding rationale for inclusion or exclusion for detailed analysis in this document. The Sensitive Species list for the Pacific Southwest Region was updated effective August 16, 2013. The American badger is addressed as a species of concern based on public comment. No project specific issue or concern was raised regarding this species. Table 1: Species Reviewed for Inclusion in the Joey Healthy Forest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ridgecrest BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT
    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 1998 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE Ridgecrest BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA FOREST SERVICE l:100,0()0-Scale topographic map showing: Highways, roads and other manmade structures Water features • Contours and elevations in meters Recreation sites • Coverage of former desert access guide #4 Ridgecrest NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field . he. i-rd Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and l:62,5O0-scale topographic maps dated 1949-1973, and from advance materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken 1973-1989 and other source data. Revised information not CALIFORNIA STATE field checked. Map edited 1993. VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA Help protect your public lands by observing posted Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read hari'.verse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid licks based on them carefully. California coordinate system, zone 4 and 5. 1927 North American Datum. For more information contact the HIM, USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, California State Park, or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Slender Salamander, Genus Batrachoseps, from the Southern Sierra Nevada of California
    Copeia, 2002(4), pp. 1016±1028 New Species of Slender Salamander, Genus Batrachoseps, from the Southern Sierra Nevada of California DAVID B. WAKE,KAY P. Y ANEV, AND ROBERT W. HANSEN Populations of robust salamanders belonging to the plethodontid salamander ge- nus Batrachoseps (subgenus Plethopsis) from the southern Sierra Nevada and adjacent regions represent a previously unknown species here described as Batrachoseps ro- bustus. The new species is robust, with a short trunk (17±18 trunk vertebrae) and well-developed limbs. It differs from its close geographic neighbor, Batrachoseps campi, in lacking patches of dorsal silvery iridophores and in having (typically) a lightly pigmented dorsal stripe, and from Batrachoseps wrighti in being more robust, having more trunk vertebrae, and in lacking conspicuous white spots ventrally. This species is widely distributed on the semiarid Kern Plateau of the southeastern Sierra Nevada and extends along the east slopes of the mountains into the lower Owens Valley; it also is found to the south in the isolated Scodie Mountains. It occurs at high elevations, from 1615±2800 m, in areas of low rainfall and high summer tem- peratures. HE slender salamanders, Batrachoseps, range ci®c. They occur in relatively extreme environ- T from the Columbia River in northern ments for terrestrial salamanders, in areas that Oregon (458339N) to the vicinity of El Rosario, are exceptionally hot and dry in the summer, Baja California Norte (308009N). These sala- and that have a short, unpredictable wet season manders were considered to display mainly in- with little rainfall. Some of them occur at high traspeci®c morphological variation, and for elevations that are under snow cover for several many years only two (Hendrickson, 1954) or months each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation As Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest
    Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation as Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Natural Resources Specialist Regional Office, Inyo National Forest, and Washington Office Enterprise Program for: Inyo National Forest August 2018 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiavah Wilderness Sequoia National Forest
    USDA ~ United States Department of Agriculture Kiavah Wilderness Sequoia National Forest Kiavah Wilderness was created by the California Desert Wilderness Regulations: Protection Act of 1994. It is a shared wilderness between All mechanized vehicles and equipment, including moun- Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Forest Service tain bikes, are prohibited within the Wilderness area. A (FS). maximum group size of 15 people/25 head of stock per party has been adopted. A visitor permit is not required for Location: entering the Wilderness, but a campfire permit is re- Kiavah Wilderness is located in Kern County on the quired. Sequoia National Forest, with portions on the Bureau of Land Management. It is approximately 15 miles east of Non-Federal Lands: Lake Isabella and 15 miles west of Ridgecrest. This Private lands lie within the wilderness area. Please re- wilderness stretches from Walker Pass to Bird Spring Pass. spect the landowner's rights by not using these lands without first having permission. Description: Approximately 88,290-acres, comprise this wilderness which includes Federal, State and some private lands. This Wilderness Ethic: wilderness encompasses the eroded hills, canyons and Minimize impact by camping at least 100' from streams bajadas of the Scodie Mountains -- the southern extremity and trails. Pack out what you pack in. Bury body waste 6 of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. A unique mixing of inches deep and 200 feet from streams and camps. Keep several different species of plants and animals occurs within fires small and leave them DEAD OUT by mixing ashes the transition zone between the Mojave Desert and Sierra with water and stirring the ashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Astralagus Ertterae (Fabaceae), a New Species from the Southern Sierra Nevada Rupert C
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 11 | Issue 4 Article 13 1987 Astralagus ertterae (Fabaceae), a New Species from the Southern Sierra Nevada Rupert C. Barneby New York Botanic Garden James R. Shevock California Academy of Sciences Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Barneby, Rupert C. and Shevock, James R. (1987) "Astralagus ertterae (Fabaceae), a New Species from the Southern Sierra Nevada," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 11: Iss. 4, Article 13. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol11/iss4/13 ALISO 11(4), 1987, pp. 585-588 ASTRAGALUS ERTTERAE (FABACEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM THE SOUTHERN SIERRA NEVADA RUPERT C. BARNEBY New York Botanic Garden Bronx, New York 10458-9980 AND JAMES R. SHEVOCK Department of Botany California Academy of Sciences San Francisco, California 94118-9961 ABSTRACT Astragalus ertterae, a new species from pinyon pine woodlands, southern Sierra Nevada, Kern County, California, is described and illustrated. This remarkable new species is morphologically closest to A. bicristatus in sect. Bicristati but differs in its dwarf stature, pilose indumentum, short peduncles, somewhat smaller flowers, and especially in a pod only half as long and proportionately twice as plump. Key words: Astragalus, Fabaceae, Sierra Nevada, taxonomy, plant systematics. INTRODUCTION The exceedingly rare Astragalus being described here was first encountered on 14 May 1982 by the second author along a newly constructed section of the Pacific Crest Trail south of Walker Pass, Scodie Mountains, Sequoia National Forest. At that time the plants were just beginning to break dormancy and no collection was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 35(1)
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 35 | Issue 1 Article 1 2017 Contents 35(1) Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Recommended Citation (2017) "Contents 35(1)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 35: Iss. 1, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol35/iss1/1 ALISO PUBLICATIONS FROM RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN FOR SALE SYMPOSIUM ISSUES OF ALISO ($20.00 each; except Monocots volumes—see below) Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution—Poales: Fourth International Symposium on Grass Systematics and Evolution EDITORIAL BOARD & Third International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons, 31 Mar–4 Apr 2003. Aliso 23. Bruce G. Baldwin J. Travis Columbus Norman C. Ellstrand Patrick S. Herendeen J. Mark Porter Erin A. Tripp Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution (excluding Poales): Third International Conference on the Comparative Biology of the Monocotyledons, 31 Mar–4 Apr 2003. Aliso 22. Vanessa E. T. M. Ashworth, Editor-in-Chief Lucinda A. McDade, Managing Editor Evolution and Taxonomy of Southwestern Plants: 13th Annual Southwestern Botanical Systematics Symposium, May 1997. Aliso 17(2). Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany is the scientific journal of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden. Plant Evolution and Conservation on Islands: A Global Perspective: The Santa Barbara Botanic Garden 1996 Symposium. International in scope, the journal specializes in plant evolutionary biology and systematics. Aliso also features papers on Aliso 16(2). floristics and other facets of botanical research pertaining to the western United States and areas of comparable climate and The Linnean Hierarchy: Past, Present and Future: 12th Annual Southwestern Systematics Botanical Symposium, May 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List 53 Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States As Threatened Or Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST 53 AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE UNITED STATES AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY JULY 11, 2012 1 Notice of Petition _____________________________________________________________________________ Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Gary Frazer, Assistant Director for Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Nicole Alt, Chief Division of Conservation and Classification, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] AUTHORS Collette L. Adkins Giese Herpetofauna Staff Attorney Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 339 Circle Pines, MN 55014-0339 [email protected] 2 D. Noah Greenwald Endangered Species Program Director Center for Biological Diversity P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] Tierra Curry Conservation Biologist P.O. Box 11374 Portland, OR 97211-0374 [email protected] PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity. The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non- profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of native species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center is supported by over 375,000 members and on-line activists throughout the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised)
    Butterflies of North America 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America. 3.4 Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California (Revised) *Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Field Collecting and Sight Records for Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California *Butterflies of Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, Tulare and Fresno Counties, California by Ken Davenport¹ 8417 Rosewood Ave. Bakersfield, California 93306 1Museum Associate, C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 January 25, 2014 1 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: San Emigdio Blue (Plebejus emigdionis) near Onyx, Kern County, California, May 23, 2002. This is a very uncommon lycaenid butterfly endemic to a small area of southern California (see text). The type locality is in Kern County. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1177 2 Annotated Checklist of Butterflies of Kern and Tulare Counties, California INTRODUCTION The information presented here incorporates data from collecting, scientific papers, published articles on butterflies, field guides and books, letters from lepidopterists and butterfly watchers. My purpose is to give an updated and annotated checklist of the butterflies occurring in Kern and Tulare Counties, California. This revised publication now includes specific records for all the species and subspecies known to occur in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • When Desert Tortoises Are Rare: Testing a New Protocol for Assessing Status
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 94(2):75-97 2008 WHEN DESERT TORTOISES ARE RARE: TESTING A NEW PROTOCOL FOR ASSESSING STATUS KEVIN KEITH AND KRISTIN H. BERRY U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 E-mail: [email protected] JAMES F. WEIGAND U.S. Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room 1928 Sacramento, CA 95825 We developed and tested a new protocol for sampling populations of the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, a state- and federally listed species, in areas where population densities are very low, historical data are sparse, and anthropogenic uses may threaten the well-being of tortoise populations and habitat. We conducted a 3-year (2002–2004) survey in Jawbone-Butterbredt Area of Critical Environmental Concern and Red Rock Canyon State Park in the western Mojave Desert of California where the status was previously unknown. We stratified the study area and used 751, 1-ha plots to evaluate 187.7 km2 of habitat, a 4% sample. Tortoise sign was found on 31 of the 751 plots (4.1%) in two limited areas: ~14 km2 on the Kiavah Apron and ~40 km2 in the Red Rock Canyon watershed. Density estimates for adults were <9 tortoises/km2 for each of the two areas and were lower (0.4 tortoises/km2) elsewhere in the study area. An estimated 72 adult tortoises (95% CI = 15-210) live in the entire study area. Five live and nine dead tortoises were found, as well as 62 cover sites, 136 scats, and other sign.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Archaeology: Prehistoric Population Movements and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada
    Linguistic Archaeology: Prehistoric Population Movements and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada By ALAN PHILIP GOLD B.A. (California State University, Northridge) 1974 M.A. (University of California, Davis) 1977 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Prehistoric Forager Ecology in the OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS Approved: ____________________________________ Conrad J. Bahre, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Michael G. Barbour, Ph.D. ____________________________________ Michael J. Moratto, Ph.D. Committee in Charge 2005 i Copyright © by Alan Philip Gold 2005 ii For my wife, Leanne, and my children, Jason, Max, and Hannah and my friends Richard Blalock, Dr. Donna Kono, and Julia Schley. Thank you for keeping the dream alive and for your support throughout the completion of that vision. iii Linguistic Archaeology: Population Movement and Cultural Identity in the Southwest Great Basin and Far Southern Sierra Nevada Abstract Scholars posit contrasting models of the ethnic identity and language / population movements of prehistoric peoples in the southwestern Great Basin and far southern Sierra Nevada. These models favor either in situ cultural development or population replacement and expansion. Archaeological data from these areas are used in this dissertation to examine past movements of peoples speaking Numic and Tubatulabalic languages and, thereby, to evaluate the models. Seven
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft Land Management Plan for the Sequoia National Forest Fresno, Kern, and Tulare Counties, California
    United States Department of Agriculture Revised Draft Land Management Plan for the Sequoia National Forest Fresno, Kern, and Tulare Counties, California Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region R5-MB-320 2019 Cover: Image of Lower Kern River Canyon on the Sequoia National Forest. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (such as Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. We make every effort to create documents that are accessible to individuals of all abilities; however, limitations with our word processing programs may prevent some parts of this document from being readable by computer- assisted reading devices. If you need assistance with any part of this document, please contact the Sequoia National Forest at (559) 784-1500.
    [Show full text]
  • Kern IRWMP Update\ DOCS\Plan Update\KIRWMP Update FINAL 2020-0311.Docx Tulare Lake Basin Portion of Kern County IRWMP Update
    KERN tRWMP Integrated Regional Water Management Plan .0 a?” FINAL - March 2020 Tulare Lake Basin Portion of Kern County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Final Update March 11, 2020 Plan Update Prepared by: Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group 1800 30th Street, Suite 280 Bakersfield, CA 93301 G:\James Water Bank Authority-2884\288419001 Kern IRWMP Update\_DOCS\Plan Update\KIRWMP_Update_FINAL 2020-0311.docx Tulare Lake Basin Portion of Kern County IRWMP Update Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction to the Region ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Relationship with Neighboring IRWMPs ................................................... 1-2 1.2 Purpose of the Tulare Lake Basin Portion of Kern County IRWMP ......................... 1-5 1.3 Stakeholder Involvement ......................................................................................... 1-5 1.3.1 Regional Water Management Group ........................................................ 1-5 1.3.2 Executive Committee ............................................................................. 1-11 1.3.3 Stakeholders .......................................................................................... 1-11 1.4 Participation and Outreach .................................................................................... 1-16 1.4.1 Disadvantaged Community Outreach ....................................................
    [Show full text]