DOCSLIB.ORG

Reducing Precarious Work in Europe Through Social Dialogue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reducing Precarious Work in Europe Through Social Dialogue REDUCING PRECARIOUS WORK IN EUROPE THROUGH SOCIAL DIALOGUE: THE CASE OF FRANCE Kornig Cathel, Louit-Martinod Nathalie, Méhaut Philippe, with a contribution from Valeria Insarauto Produced for the EC project ‘Reducing precarious work in Europe through social dialogue’ DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Project VP/2014/004 (Industrial Relations & Social Dialogue) http://www.research.mbs.ac.uk/ewerc/Our-research/Current-projects/ Reducing-Precarious-Work-in-Europe-through-Social November 2016 Institute of Labour Economics and Industrial Sociology CNRS, Aix Marseille University Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Part 1 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. What precarious work is there in France? Literature review ........................................................... 8 1.1. Precarity as an imprecise category depending on different national normative systems..................... 8 1.2. In search of a common definition: contributions and limitations .......................................................... 8 1.3. Beyond a common definition: the investigation of a social process and a social phenomenon ......... 10 1.4. More than an analytical category: social profiles and social experiences of precarious workers ....... 11 1.5. Summary of the different approaches to precarity and the main possible contribution to the study of the reduction of precarious work through social dialogue ......................................................................... 12 1.6. Processes and elements that have favoured the spread of precarious work ...................................... 14 2. The standard employment relationship ................................................................................................. 18 2.1 The open-ended contract (OEC) and its main rules .............................................................................. 18 2.2 A sectoral and occupational perspective .............................................................................................. 20 2.3. In-work gaps ......................................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.1. Changes in the hiring process ....................................................................................................... 21 2.3.2 Wages and resources ..................................................................................................................... 25 2.3.3. Training ......................................................................................................................................... 26 2.3.4 Low-wage Work and Poverty ......................................................................................................... 26 2.4 Representation gaps .............................................................................................................................. 27 2.4.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 27 2.4.2 Gaps ............................................................................................................................................... 27 2.5 Enforcement .......................................................................................................................................... 28 2.5.1 Labour law in turmoil ..................................................................................................................... 28 2.5.2 Labour Inspectorate ....................................................................................................................... 29 2.5.3 Labour tribunal ............................................................................................................................... 32 2.5.4 Gaps ............................................................................................................................................... 33 2.6 Social protection .................................................................................................................................... 33 2.6.1. General overview .......................................................................................................................... 33 2.6.2. Gaps .............................................................................................................................................. 34 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 39 3. Fixed-term contracts and temporary agency work ............................................................................ 41 3.1. General overview ................................................................................................................................. 41 3.2 In-work regulation gaps ......................................................................................................................... 45 3.3. Representation gaps ............................................................................................................................. 47 3.4. Enforcement gaps ................................................................................................................................. 47 3.5. Social protection and integration gaps ................................................................................................ 48 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 48 4. Subcontracting, self-employment (and bogus self-employment) .................................................. 50 4.1 Subcontracting workers ........................................................................................................................ 50 4.1.1. Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 50 2 4.1.2. In-work gaps .................................................................................................................................. 50 4.1.3. Representation and enforcment gaps ........................................................................................... 51 4.2. The self-employed ................................................................................................................................ 52 4.2.1. Overview............................................................................................................................................ 52 4.2.2. In-work gaps ...................................................................................................................................... 53 4.2.3 Representation gaps ........................................................................................................................... 53 4.2.4. Enforcement gaps.............................................................................................................................. 54 4.2.5. Social protection gaps ....................................................................................................................... 54 Conclusion: precarious or not? ................................................................................................................... 55 5. Posted workers ................................................................................................................................................ 56 5.1 General overview .................................................................................................................................. 56 5.2 In-work regulatory gaps ........................................................................................................................ 57 5.3 Enforcement gaps/representation gaps................................................................................................ 58 5.4 Social protection .................................................................................................................................... 59 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 59 6. Part-time work ................................................................................................................................................. 60 6.1. General overview ................................................................................................................................. 60 6.2. In-work gaps ......................................................................................................................................... 63 6.3. Social protection gaps .......................................................................................................................... 65 Conclusion of part 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 67 Part 2 .......................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Struggles of Iregularly-Employed Workers in South Korea, 1999-20121
    1 The Struggles of Iregularly-Employed Workers in South Korea, 1999-20121 Jennifer Jihye Chun Department of Sociology University of Toronto [email protected] November 25, 2013 In December 1999, two years after the South Korean government accepted a $58.4 billion bailout package from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), President Kim Dae-Jung announced that the nation’s currency crisis was officially over. The South Korean government’s aggressive measures to stabilize financial markets, which included drastic efforts to reduce labor costs, dismantle employment security, and legalize indirect forms of dispatch or temporary employment, contributed to the fastest recovery of a single country after the 1997 Asian Debt Crisis, restoring annual GDP growth rates to pre-crisis levels.2 While the business community praised such efforts for helping debt-ridden banks and companies survive the crisis, labor unions and other proponents of social and economic justice virulently condemned the government’s neoliberal policy agenda for subjecting workers to deepening inequality and injustice. Despite differing opinions on the impact of government austerity measures, both sides agree that the “post-IMF” era is synonymous with a new world of work. Employment precarity – that is, the vulnerability of workers to an array of cost-cutting employer practices that depress wage standards, working conditions and job and income security – is a defining feature of the 21st century South Korean economy. The majority of jobs in the labor market consist of informal and precarious jobs that provide minimal, if any, legal protection against unjust and discriminatory employment practices. Informally- and precariously- employed workers also face numerous barriers to challenging deteriorating working conditions and heightened employer abuses through the conventional repertoire of unionism: strikes, collective bargaining and union agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Template
    Vol. 16 No 5 December 2017 ISSN 0791-458X Brexit Protecting 2017 the year of breakthrough Whistleblowers women’s football Page 10 Page 13 Page 30 More action needed to curb precarious work by Scott Millar Long awaited government proposals to change em- ployment law in order to provide greater security for workers, have been described by trade unions as a step in the right direction but in need of amendment if they are to provide adequate protections against precarious work practices. The Employment (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2017 was published on 7th December. The Bill proposes to make it mandatory that workers are provided with their core terms of employment within five days of beginning a job. The legislation will also ban zero hours contracts “in most circumstances”, with exceptions including to allow employers to provide cover in emergency situations or to cover short-term absences. SIPTU Services Division Organiser, Ethel Buckley, said: “While there are positive aspects to these proposals more must be done to protect SIPTU members Liz Cloherty, Maria Power and Stephanie Lee calling on the Government to give Section 39 workers’ pay workers against the rapid expansion in precarious work practices. justice outside Leinster House on Wednesday, 8th November 2017. See page 15. Photo: Rolling News SIPTU is focused on this issue because it affects a growing number of workers. “As part of our Fighting for the Future of Work campaign our mem- bers are calling for a remedial social statute which will put right the social wrong of precarious work and provide workers with an entitle- 2017 Highlights Crossword ment to security of hours.” Page 16-17 Page 31 She added: “Together with ICTU, we are campaigning for amend- ments to this Bill so that the scope of its ban on zero hours contracts Continued on page 2 WORKERS RIGHTS CENTRE 8.30 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement As Labor Regulation in the Era of Precarious Work in Preparation for Noah Zatz [email protected]
    A New Peonage?: Debt Enforcement as Labor Regulation in the Era of Precarious Work in preparation for Noah Zatz [email protected] The Thirteenth Amendment Through the Lens of Class and Labor @ Seattle University School of Law Dear Colleagues: I eagerly await our conversations in Seattle. Unfortunately, I am behind schedule on my paper. What I am sending you below is the closely related paper I am presenting two days before at Law & Society. For our conference, I plan to focus in more detail on the child-support enforcement cases and their 13th amendment analysis, so this provides the big picture within which that line of analysis is situated. Thanks Noah “Precarious Work in the Carceral State: Seeing the Invisible Fist” Noah Zatz for presentation at the Law & Society Ass’n Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA May 30, 2015 Preliminary draft as of May 15, 2015 * * * Not for circulation * * * [PP blank] The subtitle’s phrase “invisible fist” of course plays on the notion of the invisible hand by which market outcomes supposedly are produced from the aggregation of private decisions unmolested by the state. What we want to explore 1 here, building on a long tradition of doubting the public/private divide between state and economy, is the extent to which so-called market outcomes are produced through the threat or application of state violence, the strike of the fist. Invisibility here does not connote intangibility, but instead marks the relative absence of state violence from conventional accounts of labor market inequality, including accounts in broadly critical and progressive veins.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Work and Human Rights
    International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers’ Associations 8 Rampe du Pont Rouge, Petit Lancy, CH-1213 Geneva, Switzerland Tel : +41 22 793 22 33 ; Fax : +41 22 793 22 38 ; e-mail :[email protected]; www.iuf.org Precarious Work: Undermining Human Rights Any meaningful investigation of the relationship between business and human rights must address the rights impact of the accelerating dissolution of what the ILO and others refer to as the "standard employment relationship" (i.e. direct, permanent employment) and the rise of precarious work. This note does not attempt to account for the role of institutions like the World Bank and the OECD in pushing for even more precarious work relations, rewarding and rating countries for their efforts to abolish direct employment. Agriculture, which still has the world's largest work force, is almost entirely built on precarious labour, and there is a vital connection between this and the fact that agricultural workers who help to feed the world are often among the most food insecure. The relationship between poverty and deepening inequality, and the growth of precarious work in rich and poor countries alike, has been well documented. The purpose here is to highlight a phenomenon which has not received the attention it requires, i.e. the increasingly widespread use of indirect, precarious employment relations to weaken trade union organization and bargaining power. It is in this context that precarious work emerges as a fundamental human rights issue demanding a strong response rooted in a comprehensive human rights framework. The ILO defines the standard employment relationship in these terms: The traditional pattern of the employment relationship, or standard employment relationship, has for many years been that of full time work, under a contract of employment for unlimited duration, with a single employer, and protected against unjustified dismissal.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Trade Unionism and Post-Work Imaginaries
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of Applied Social Theory Journal of Applied Social Theory | Article ______________________________________________________________________ Feminist trade unionism and post-work imaginaries Dr Lena Wånggren* Department of English Literature, University of Edinburgh, UK Vol 1, No 2 (2018), 102 - 124 __________________________________________________________ The online version of this text can be found at socialtheoryapplied.com/journal/ Feminist academics in the marketised university are doing not only unpaid emotional and social work, but other unpaid work which makes up the core business of the institution. In a culture of overwork and increased demands for productivity, teaching, research, and administration cannot fit into contracted hours so are done at nights and weekends. This article highlights the gendered impacts of current working conditions, focusing specifically on the conditions of precariously employed researchers and educators in the UK higher education system. Emphasising the unpaid work done by feminists in academia and beyond, this article suggests looking toward a post-work imaginary as one strategy to make possible more inclusive and accessible educational futures. Sharing feminist trade unionist strategies through which to question some of the unrealistic demands put upon university staff, the article emphasises the need for a feminist ethics of care to build sustainable movements and futures. Keywords feminism, higher education, trade unions, post-work, neoliberalism, casualisation * Email: [email protected] 102 Journal of Applied Social Theory, Vol. 1, 2018 While feminist, antiracist and other critical pedagogies might offer possibilities for countering market-driven models of education, academic staff are faced with increasing workloads and insecure working conditions, making not only such labour- intensive pedagogies but also other forms of activism harder to fit in alongside paid work.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam's Export Manufacturing Sector
    Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam’s Export Manufacturing Sector Worker Rights Consortium May 2013 Made in Vietnam Labor Rights Violations in Vietnam’s Export Manufacturing Sector Worker Rights Consortium May 2013 Contents I. Introduction........................................1 II. Sources ...........................................4 III. Issues............................................5 A. Violations of Freedom of Association ................5 B. Forced Labor ..................................10 C. Child Labor ...................................11 D. Gender Discrimination ..........................12 E. Unsafe Working Conditions ......................13 F. Excessive Working Hours ........................14 G. Inadequate Wages ..............................15 H. Precarious Work ...............................17 I. “Wage Theft” and Failure to Enforce Labor Laws ....18 IV. Conclusion.......................................20 Made in Vietnam CREATIVE COMMONS: NTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATON I. Introduction THIS IS A BRIEFING paper for Worker Rights Consortium affiliate universities and colleges and their licensees concerning the labor rights environment in Vietnam and, in particular, its export garment manufacturing industry, a sector which includes the production of collegiate licensed apparel. As of March 2013, Vietnam was second only to China in the number of factories (185) that have been disclosed to the WRC by licensees as locations for the manufacture of collegiate products outside the United States.1 Likewise, over the previous
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Work in Asia Pacific Has Been Identified by Trade Unions Across the Region As a Central Concern for Working People
    A 10 country study by The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and ITUC Asia-Pacific 2014 Asia Pacific Region Precarious work in the work Precarious FOREWARD ..........................................................................................................................................5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................7 COUNTRY PROFILES ...........................................................................................................................13 Australia .............................................................................................................................................14 Cambodia ...........................................................................................................................................19 Indonesia............................................................................................................................................23 Japan .................................................................................................................................................29 Contents Korea, Republic of ...............................................................................................................................37 Nepal .................................................................................................................................................47 New Zealand ......................................................................................................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • Six Families of Flexicurity Indicators Developed at the Hans Boeckler Foundation
    Diskussionspapiere Six families of flexicurity indicators developed at the Hans Boeckler Foundation Andranik Tangian (Tanguiane) WSI – Diskussionspapier Nr. 168 November 2009 Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut in der Hans Böckler Stiftung , Hans-Böckler-Str. 39, 40476 Düsseldorf In der Reihe „WSI-Diskussionspapiere“ erscheinen in unregelmäßiger Folge Arbeiten aus dem WSI zu aktuellen Vorgängen auf wirtschafts-, sozial- und gesellschaftspolitischem Gebiet. Sie basieren u.a. auf Vorträgen, die Mitglieder des Instituts gehalten haben oder auf gutachterlichen Stellungnahmen, können aber auch Diskussionsbeiträge zu ausgesuchten Einzelthemen sein. Für den Inhalt sind die Autorinnen und Autoren selbst verantwortlich. Dieses und andere WSI-Diskussionspapiere finden sie als pdf-Datei unter: www.wsi.de Gedruckte Einzelexemplare sind zu beziehen über: Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut in der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung (WSI i.d. HBS), Hans-Böckler-Straße 39, 40476 Düsseldorf Prof. Dr. Dr. Andranik Tangian WSI in der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung Hans-Böckler-Straße 39 D-40476 Düsseldorf [email protected] Tel: +49 211 7778-0 Fax: +49 211 7778-190 WSI-Diskussionspapiere (Print) ISSN 1861-0625 WSI-Diskussionspapiere (Internet) ISSN 1861-0633 http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_diskp_168.pdf Abstract The paper is an overview of over 30 publications on six models with flexicurity indicators developed at the Hans-Böckler-Foundation for monitoring and analysis of flexicurity. The latter is a new European labour market policy
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Denmark
    REDUCING PRECARIOUS WORK IN EUROPE THROUGH SOCIAL DIALOGUE: THE CASE OF DENMARK Stine Rasmussen, Bjarke Refslund, Ole H. Sørensen and Trine P. Larsen Produced for the EC project ‘Reducing precarious work in Europe through social dialogue’ DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Project VP/2014/004 (Industrial Relations & Social Dialogue) http://www.research.mbs.ac.uk/ewerc/Our-research/Current-projects/ Reducing-Precarious-Work-in-Europe-through-Social November 2016 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 5 The nature of ‘Protective Gaps’ in the Denmark ........................................................................................... 6 How do Protective Gaps apply to different types of precarious work? ........................................................ 8 The role of social dialogue in closing protective gaps ................................................................................. 10 Case studies of distinct forms of social dialogue addressing precarious employment ............................... 10 Part 1: Overview report of Protective gaps and the Role of Social Dialogue ........................................... 12 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter 2: General description of the Danish labour market ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policies and Regulation to Combat Precarious Employmentpdf
    POLICIES AND REGULATIONS TO COMBAT PRECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT ACTRAV | POLICIES AND REGULATIONS TO COMBAT PRECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT Copyright © International Labour Organization 2011 First published 2011 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data From precarious work to decent work. Policies and regulations to combat precarious employment 978-92-2-125522-2 (print), 978-92-2-125523-9 (web pdf) Also available in French: Du travail précaire au travail décent. Politiques et règlementation visant à lutter contre l'emploi précaire (ISBN 978-92-2-225522-1 (print), 978-92-2-225523-8 (web pdf)), Geneva, 2011, in Spanish: Del trabajo precario al trabajo decente. Políticas y reglamentación para luchar contra el empleo precario (ISBN 978-92-2-325522-0 (print), 978-92-2-325523-7 (web pdf)), Geneva, 2011. The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Jobs
    ELR0010.1177/1035304617722943The Economic and Labour Relations ReviewLewchuk 722943research-article2017 ELRR Article The Economic and Labour Relations Review Precarious jobs: Where 1 –18 © The Author(s) 2017 are they, and how do Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav they affect well-being? https://doi.org/10.1177/1035304617722943DOI: 10.1177/1035304617722943 journals.sagepub.com/home/elrr Wayne Lewchuk McMaster University, Canada Abstract By the end of the 20th century, there was general agreement that most labour markets were in transition and that employment was becoming less secure. However, official labour market data have not shown a dramatic increase in temporary or casual employment. This article takes a new look at the changing characteristics of employment and offers a new method to measure employment security: the Employment Precarity Index. We use the Employment Precarity Index to assess how insecure employment associated with a ‘gig’ economy might affect well-being and social relations, including health outcomes, household well-being and community involvement. JEL Codes: J88 Keywords Community participation, employment precarity index, household well-being, measuring, precarious employment, standard employment relationship (SER) Introduction By the end of the 20th century, there was general agreement that, across the globe, labour markets were in transition and employment was becoming less secure. It was argued that the prevalence of secure full-time employment with benefits, known as the Standard Employment Relationship (SER), was in decline. Alternative forms of employment were growing, most of which were temporary and insecure. Today, there are concerns that this trend is continuing, perhaps even accelerating, as new digital Corresponding author: Wayne Lewchuk, School of Labour Studies and Department of Economics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Work: Lack of Human Rights Perspective on Labour Relations
    Prof. Dr. Barbara Kresal, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] Precarious Work: Lack of Human Rights Perspective on Labour Relations 1. Precarious work – a general trend in labour relations Precarious work is not linked with a specific legal form of employment and/or with a specific aspect of employment relationship, rather, it is an overall description of the worker's situation.1 Certain legal forms are more exposed (the so-called new forms of employment, atypical, non-standard, subcontracting etc.), but also the workers employed under the “regular” contract of employment can find themselves in a precarious situation and it is questionable nowadays, especially in some counties, what is standard and what non-standard. There are numerous studies dealing with special, “non-standard” forms of work or with certain aspects of precariousness of work.2 It is not the form itself, which makes the employment precarious; it is rather the content of this relationship that matters. The term ‘precarious work’ can be defined in a negative way as an employment which does not correspond to the concept of decent work, taking into account the international labour standards and human rights. Precarious work is therefore the opposite of a decent employment, decent work. The ILO report on precarious employment stresses that there are some common characteristics and that “in the most general sense, precarious work is a means for 1 »Precarious« can be described as being dependent on the will of another, being dependent on circumstances beyond one's control, uncertain, unstable, insecure, unpredictable, also risky, dangerous, subject to chance, substantially lacking in security and stability.
    [Show full text]