DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Application 17/03474/FUL Details of Application: Full Planning Application Demolition of existing building and erection of replacement dwelling house with attached single storey service wing and garage with first floor staff accommodation Date Registered 27 October 2017 (Subject to three year condition) Location: Address: Ham Hill Sydmonton Road Ecchinswell RG20 9AB Ward: Burghclere, Highclere And St Mary Bourne Parish: ECCHINSWELL AND SYDMONTON CP OS: 449596 158590 Applicant: Mr & Mrs Marcus de Ferranti Case Officer: Lucy Page 01256 845515 RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that the application be APPROVED subject to the conditions listed at the end of this report. Planning Policy The site is located outside of a settlement policy boundary within the North Wessex Downs AONB. National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (March 2012) Core Principles – Achieving Sustainable Development Section 7 (Requiring Good Design) Section 10 (Meeting the challenge of Climate Change, Flooding and Coastal Change) Section 11 (Conserving and Enhancing the Natural Environment) Section 12 (Conserving and Enhancing the Historic Environment) Decision Taking Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011 – 2029 Policy SD1 (Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development) Policy SS6 (New Housing in the Countryside) Policy EM1 (Landscape) Policy EM4 (Biodiversity, Geodiversity and Nature Conservation) Policy EM10 (Delivering High Quality Development) Policy EM11 (The Historic Environment) Supplementary Planning Documents and Guidance (SPD's and SPG's) and interim planning guidance Appendix 4 Design and Sustainability SPD (Historic Environment: Conservation Areas) Appendix 14 – Countryside Design Summary Appendix 16 – Residential Amenity Design Guidance Landscape and Biodiversity Supplementary Planning Document Landscape Character Assessment SPD Other material documents North Wessex Downs AONB Management Plan S41 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act (NERC Act) 2006 Description of Site The existing dwelling has been demolished and the replacement dwelling is currently under construction. The existing dwelling was in an elevated position, accessed from a narrow track and public footpath off the Kingsclere to Sydmonton Road. Proposal The proposal is an amendment to previously approved schemes for a replacement dwelling and is to enable first floor staff accommodation to be provided above the garage. This application is for the demolition of existing building and erection of replacement dwelling house with attached single storey service wing and garage with first floor staff accommodation. Consultations Ecchinswell Parish Council: No objection Trees: No objection Landscape: No objection subject to condition Biodiversity: No objection Public Observations None. Relevant Planning History 16/00616/FUL Demolition of existing building and erection GTD 02.08.2016 of replacement dwelling house with attached single storey service wing and garage 17/00575/FUL Demolition of existing building and erection GTD 13.04.2017 of replacement dwelling house with attached single storey service wing and garage Assessment The site is in an elevated position, accessed from a narrow track and public footpath off the Kingsclere to Sydmonton Road. The existing dwelling has been demolished and work has commenced on constructing a replacement dwelling (approved under 16/00616/FUL and then amended under 17/00575/FUL). The house would sit within a slight dip on high ground with mature trees and planting on the south eastern and south western boundaries of the site. The strong hedged enclosure of the track would limit views towards the new building however views of part of the eastern elevation would be possible. As detailed above, there is recent and relevant planning history on the site. Planning permission 16/00616/FUL was granted in August 2016 for the erection of a replacement dwelling and in 2017 for an amended scheme (17/00575/FUL). The current application, relating to the erection of a replacement dwelling, is identical to that previously granted planning permission with the exception of the garage building having a larger footprint and slightly higher roof ridge height to accommodate staff accommodation above the garage. There have been no changes to the policies under which the previous applications were assessed and therefore it would be unreasonable to come to a different conclusion on the acceptability of a replacement dwelling. To ensure completeness, conditions and informatives relating to the original consent have been attached to this permission and updated accordingly based on the information already submitted to discharge conditions. The materials for this revised scheme have been permitted under discharge of condition application 16/04358/CONDN. These proposed materials were previously considered to be acceptable and as such the changes proposed would not be considered to have any greater impact on the surrounding character of the AONB landscape than the permitted scheme. Also the alterations would not alter the relationship of the proposed development with nearby listed buildings. The proposed development would be in compliance with Policies EM10, EM11 and EM1 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029. Impact on the character of the area/ design The proposal differs from the previously approved scheme with the addition of staff accommodation above the proposed garage/car port. This results in some increase in roof height and the addition of steps around the exterior to access the entrance to the flat on the southern side. The Landscape Officer has assessed the revised scheme and concluded that the proposed changes will have some landscape impacts; the inclusion of a front entrance porch together with a slight increase in height will affect the southern elevation and its prominence in the landscape; the inclusion of steps to the west and south of the proposed building could potentially have impacts depending on the amount of regrading required and whether this could be accommodated in a naturalistic landform without appearing too incongruous or engineered in the wider landscape. The Landscape Officer also considers that the earthworks could also potentially affect the existing belt of trees to the south which are a significant landscape feature which also has the benefit of partially screening and softening the impacts of the development and need to be retained. The agent has confirmed that the scheme is very similar to the previously approved scheme and that the existing belt of trees to the south are to be retained as they provide good screening and a mature backdrop for the new dwelling. The cutting into the bank has already been undertaken. The comments of the Landscape Officer are noted however it is considered that the differences between the approved scheme and the current application do not fundamentally alter the impact that this replacement dwelling would have in this location. The Tree Officer has confirmed that they have no objections to the proposed development and it is considered that subject to condition, the proposal would have an acceptable impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and would not adversely affect existing trees, in accordance with Local Plan policy. Impact on neighbouring amenities The closest residential property to the site is Nuthanger Farm which is located approximately 170 metres to the east of the site. The orientation of the building and landscape features between the site and this property, in combination with the distance, means that the development would have limited impact on the amenities of this neighbouring property. In addition, the development would continue to provide sufficient garden space and private amenity for the occupants of the replacement dwelling at Ham Hill. Highways and Parking The amended scheme would retain sufficient parking and manoeuvring within the site and is acceptable in this regard. Conditions 1 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority: 005 P3 032 P1 033 P1 A3-002-P1 A3-003-P1 A3-004-P1 REASON: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. 2 The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of 3 years from the date of this planning permission. REASON: To comply with Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and to prevent an accumulation of unimplemented planning permissions. 3 The development shall be undertaken in accordance with the details/specification of the types and colours of external materials to be used including colour of mortar, together with samples, approved under application reference 16/04358/CONDN on 04/01/16 for the discharge of Condition 3 relating to application 16/00616/FUL. The development shall be carried out and thereafter maintained in accordance with the details so approved unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. REASON: In the interests of the visual amenities of the area and in accordance with Policy EM1 and EM10 of the Basingstoke and Deane Local Plan 2011-2029. 4 All bat protection and mitigation measures shall be carried out in accordance with the Bat Survey dated July 2016 as submitted by Arbtech. The development shall be carried out in complete accordance with Section 4 of the approved report, including the installations of bat boxes. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. A plan
Recommended publications
  • 67263 Imposed

    67263 Imposed

    Of the many walks in the parish just a few have been chosen, WALK 4 (& 5) The Rights of Way Network intended to show the varied countryside including open downland, steep slopes, small fields and woodland. The rights This walk starts in the village alongside The Old House in Rights of way are paths and tracks which you, the public, can of way shown on this map are recorded on the definitive map Newbury Road at Frog’s Hole. (Parking is available in the use. These routes generally cross over private land, and we ask 2005. March Printed 2005. Council Parish Kingsclere © going walking and when you expect to be back. be to expect you when and walking going and as such the public have the right to use them. centre of the village). It is an easy walk across fields and you to bear this in mind and be responsible when exercising are you where and when someone Tell roads. crossing when care take and footwear and clothing suitable through some of our many copses, about 3-miles. your rights to use such routes. Wear print. of time at correct was leaflet the within contained Information herewith. contain information Publishers are unable to accept any responsibility for accident or loss resulting from following the following from resulting loss or accident for responsibility any accept to unable are Publishers WALK 1 From Frog’s Hole follow the path to the left of the cottages, the leaflet, this of preparation the in taken been has care every Whilst Council. Parish Kingclere by forward s Hampshire Paths Partnership.
  • Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan Examiner's Report

    Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan Examiner's Report

    Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan 2011 to 2029 Report by Independent Examiner to Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Janet L Cheesley BA (Hons) DipTP MRTPI CHEC Planning Ltd 14 November 2017 Contents Page Summary and Conclusion 4 Introduction 4 Legislative Background 5 EU Obligations 5 Policy Background 6 The Neighbourhood Development Plan Preparation 7 The Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan 8 Policy H1 New Housing 9 Policy H2 New Housing To Meet The Requirement Of Local Plan Policy SS5 9 Policy H3 Provision Of Housing To Meet Local Needs 14 Policy D1 Preserving And Enhancing The Historic Character And Rural Setting Of Sherfield On Loddon 15 Policy D2 Design Of New Development 17 Policy G1 Protection And Enhancement Of The Natural Environment 20 Policy G2 Protection And Enhancement Of Local Green Spaces 21 Policy G3 Reducing Flood Risk 23 Policy T1 Improving And Enhancing The Footpath Network 24 Policy T2 Creating A Cycle Network 24 Policy T3: Improving Road Safety In Sherfield On Loddon 25 Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan Examiner’s Report CHEC Planning Ltd 2 Policy CF1 Local Community-Valued Assets And Facilities 26 Policy CF2 Provision Of New Community Facilities 26 Policy E1 New Employment Development 27 Policy C1 Enabling Fibre Optic And Telecommunications Connections 28 Referendum & the Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan Area 29 Minor Modifications 30 Appendix 1 Background Documents 32 Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan Examiner’s Report CHEC Planning Ltd 3 Summary and Conclusion 1. The Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan has a clear vision and sets out strategic aims.
  • Basingstoke Rural West Covering the Wards Of: Baughurst and Tadley North; Kingsclere; Sherborne St John; Burghclere, Highclere and St Mary Bourne; East Woodhay

    Basingstoke Rural West Covering the Wards Of: Baughurst and Tadley North; Kingsclere; Sherborne St John; Burghclere, Highclere and St Mary Bourne; East Woodhay

    Basingstoke Rural West Covering the wards of: Baughurst and Tadley North; Kingsclere; Sherborne St John; Burghclere, Highclere and St Mary Bourne; East Woodhay www.hampshire.police.uk Welcome to the Basingstoke Rural West Newsletter, November 2019 Your neighbourhood policing team includes: PC Simon Denton PC Jon Hayes You can contact the team at [email protected] — though this address is not monitored every day. For reporting crime, call 101 or go to the Hampshire police website www.hampshire.police.uk. Community Priorities The current neighbourhood priority is Burglary. A residential property in Cannon Heath, Overton, was broken into during daylight hours and jewellery was stolen. An electric bike was stolen from a garage in Ecchinswell. Some facts about burglaries (sources in brackets). Most burglaries take place between 10am and 3pm. (Safestyle UK) The average burglary lasts for eight minutes. (Dr Claire Nee, Unviersity of Portsmouth) Many burglaries are ‘spur of the moment’ decisions by a burglar who notices an open door, open window, valuables on display or some other weakness. (Thames Valley Police) The vast majority of burglars will want to avoid meeting the home’s occupants at any cost. (The Independent) A burglar may typically examine many houses before finding one that looks like an easy one to steal from. Homes with no security measures in place are five times more likely to be burgled than those with simple security measures. Good window locks and strong deadlocks can make a big difference. In most burglaries, the criminals broke into the house or flat through the door, either by forcing the lock or kicking it in.
  • Browns Farm Pound Green, Ramsdell, Hampshire

    Browns Farm Pound Green, Ramsdell, Hampshire

    Browns Farm Pound Green, Ramsdell, Hampshire Browns Farm Pound Green, Ramsdell, Hampshire Most attractive Grade II listed Hampshire farmhouse with separate cottage and outbuildings. Kingsclere 3 miles, Basingstoke 8 miles, Newbury 10½ miles, Reading 14½ miles, M3 (Junction 6) 9 miles M4 (Junction 13) 14½ miles, London Waterloo via Basingstoke Station from 45 minutes (All distances and times are approximate) Accommodation and amenities Hall | Drawing room | Sitting room | Dining room | Kitchen/breakfast room | Study | Cloakroom | Master bedroom with walk-in wardrobe and en suite bathroom | 4 further bedrooms | Family bathroom Planning application submitted to extend to provide two further bedrooms and bathroom and to enlarge the kitchen/breakfast room Browns Cottage 4 bedrooms | Garaging | Office Period Barn Stable | Store room | Garden machinery store | Workshop | Attic with potential for games room or storage Mature gardens | Paddock land | Hard tennis court In all about 1.214 hectares (3 acres) Basingstoke Matrix House, Basing View Basingstoke RG21 4FF Tel: 1256 630 978 [email protected] knightfrank.co.uk Situation Browns Farm is situated in a superb rural position approximately 1½ miles north of Ramsdell, a popular village in this sought after location which lies between the towns of Basingstoke and Newbury. Day-to-day shopping requirements can be found in Kingsclere and Tadley. There are public houses at Charter Alley and Wolverton Townsend, as well as the popular Wellington Arms public house/restaurant in Baughurst. The major regional centres of Basingstoke, Reading and Newbury have a broad range of shopping, recreational and educational facilities and are all within easy reach. Despite its rural location, communications within the area are excellent with a mainline railway station at Basingstoke and easy access to both the M3 and M4 motorways providing good road access to London, the South Coast, the West Country and Heathrow and Gatwick airports.
  • The Distribution of the Romano-British Population in The

    The Distribution of the Romano-British Population in The

    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 119 THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE ROMANO - BRITISH POPULATION IN THE BASINGSTOKE AREA. By SHIMON APPLEBAUM, BXITT., D.PHIL. HE district round Basingstoke offers itself as the subject for a study of Romano-British . population development and. Tdistribution because Basingstoke Museum contains a singu­ larly complete collection of finds made in this area over a long period of years, and preserved by Mr. G. W. Willis. A number of the finds made are recorded by him and J. R. Ellaway in the Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club (Vol. XV, 245 ff.). The known sites in the district were considerably multiplied by the field-work of S. E. Winbolt, who recorded them in the Proceedings of the same Society.1 I must express my indebtedness to Mr. G. W. Willis, F.S.A., Hon. Curator of Basingstoke Museum, for his courtesy and assist­ ance in affording access to the collection for the purposes of this study, which is part of a broader work on the Romano-British rural system.2 The area from which the bulk of the collection comes is limited on the north by the edge of the London Clay between Kingsclere and Odiham ; its east boundary is approximately that, of the east limit of the Eastern Hampshire High Chalk Region' southward to Alton. The south boundary crosses that region through Wilvelrod, Brown Candover and Micheldever, with outlying sites to the south at Micheldever Wood and Lanham Down (between Bighton and Wield). The western limit, equally arbitrary, falls along the line from Micheldever through Overton to Kingsclere.
  • Basingstoke Inns, Breweries and Public Houses 1600 - 2015

    Basingstoke Inns, Breweries and Public Houses 1600 - 2015

    BASINGSTOKE INNS, BREWERIES AND PUBLIC HOUSES 1600 - 2015 Basingstoke Inns 1600 – 1850 Basingstoke was an important trading centre and staging post from medieval times until the 19th century. Its position on the junction of the Great Western Road between London and the West Country and the roads from Portsmouth and Southampton to the North, meant that it needed several great inns to cater for the travellers, traders and customers who came to the town. The inns of Basingstoke provided overnight accommodation for those who were journeying over long distances, hospitality for those who came from afar to trade in cloth, and refreshment for the farmers and others who visited the weekly markets. There were many more ale houses which were smaller and probably served a more local clientele In 1622 a record of the amount of malt that was brewed in Basingstoke listed five inns - the Angel, the Bell, the Chequers, the George and the Maidenhead - and 15 alehouses that were brewing beer.1 In 1636, the Bell, Maidenhead and George were recorded in a London publication.2 The landlord of the Bell was John Crosse who died in 1625 in which year the Bell had seven main bedrooms, along with four other rooms which had beds in them, including the servants’ chamber. His goods included 43 oz of silver plate as well as pewter weighing 234 lb.3 In 1631, Thomas Miles, tapster of the Bell, paid a shilling to sit in the Tapster’s Seat in the Gallery of St Michael’s Church.4 The Bell was where the marquis of Winchester was kept after his defeat at the siege of Basing House before being moved to the Tower of London.
  • Baptisms at St. Mary's Parish Church, Kingsclere, Hants 1780 to 1880

    Baptisms at St. Mary's Parish Church, Kingsclere, Hants 1780 to 1880

    Baptisms at St. Mary's Parish Church, Kingsclere, Hants 1780 to 1880 Extracted by Barrie Brinkman 2010 v1.0 Reg Bapt Date Child Fname Child Surname S Father Mother Abode Father Occup Birth Date Moth Sname Notes 5 1 1780 Hannah DYER d Samuel Ann Downton Farmer 7 1 1780 Thomas FARMER s Henry Honer Woodlands Labourer 15 1 1780 Nathaniel MARTLE s Nathaniel Elizabeth Common Labourer 16 1 1780 William NIGHTINGALE s James Elizabeth Common Labourer 22 1 1780 Thomas DOWLTON s Thomas Elizabeth Common Labourer 23 1 1780 William BRIANT s William Mary South Labourer 5 2 1780 James SEWARD s John Jane Marsh Labourer 12 2 1780 Charles MARSHALL s Charles Martha Town Labourer 20 2 1780 John WHEATLAND s William Mary Dell Labourer 26 2 1780 James APPLETON s David Mary Frith Labourer 4 3 1780 John MARRINER s John Ann 4 3 1780 Richard HARMSWORTH s Jonathan Ann Woodlands Labourer 4 3 1780 John WILLIS s Edward Hannah Woodlands Labourer 8 3 1780 Mary FULKER d Nighelle Dorothy Town 11 3 1780 Harriot TAYLOR d John Mary Labourer 19 3 1780 Mary WALKER d John Martha Sidmonton Labourer 27 3 1780 Elizabeth WALKER d John Mary Town Coachman 29 3 1780 Mary PULLENGER d Robert Sarah Dell Tanner 31 3 1780 Sarah TYLOR d John Ann B. head (?) Harrier 31 3 1780 Sophia BATES d James Mary Frobury Farmer 1 4 1780 Richard RABBETS s Richard Margaret Woodlands Labourer 1 4 1780 Letitia HUSE d Isaac Hester Newbury Marsh Labourer 7 4 1780 Rebecca LAMBOLE d Richard Elizabeth Town barber 9 4 1780 Mary PAICE d Abraham Rachell North Sidmonton Labourer 12 4 1780 John FULKER s John Grace Town
  • Fox Hall, Fox's Lane, Kingsclere, Newbury, Hampshire

    Fox Hall, Fox's Lane, Kingsclere, Newbury, Hampshire

    CGI Fox Hall, Fox’s Lane, Kingsclere, Newbury, Hampshire Fox Hall, Fox’s Lane, Kingsclere, Newbury, Hampshire RG20 5QD Situated on the edge of this attractive and sought after Downland village an impressive and substantial new country house of 7,734 sq ft, with extensive accommodation and nicely positioned in the centre of 9 acres. Reception hall • Drawing room • Dining room • Study • Superb kitchen and family room • Basement with cinema room and wine cellar • Utility and boot room • Impressive landing Master bedroom suite • 2 further bedrooms with en suites • 4 further bedrooms • 2 additional bathrooms • Courtyard with self contained one bedroom flat • Double garage • Gym Double car port • Various stores • Tennis court • Wonderful grounds of approximately 9 acres Fox Hall is situated on the south side of the village, close to the wonderful surrounding countryside including Watership Down, yet within walking distance of the village facilities. Kingsclere is conveniently positioned just off the A339 midway between Newbury and Basingstoke. It has a good range of facilities for everyday needs including shops, post office, primary school, health centre, public houses and churches. The surrounding countryside provides good walking and riding. Communications from the village are excellent both by road and rail providing fast access to London via the M3 and M4 motorways and regular fast trains from Basingstoke to Waterloo. Fox Hall, which is currently being built by Sherbourne Developments who have an excellent reputation of building bespoke county houses, will be a magnificent Georgian style new country house that has been thoughtfully designed. When complete it will be a stylish and impressive home combining traditional architecture with all the luxuries of contemporary living.
  • Appendix 11 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Parish

    Appendix 11 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Parish

    Appendix 11 Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council Parish Requirements 2014/15 Council Council Tax Element Tax for Parish Purposes Parish/Area Precept Base (*) at Band D (**) £ £ (1) (2) (3) (4) Ashford Hill with Headley 19,000.00 599.3 31.70 Ashmansworth 3,000.00 106.4 28.20 Baughurst 38,500.00 1,015.3 37.92 Bramley 65,000.00 1,590.8 40.86 Burghclere 9,600.00 554.0 17.33 Candovers 3,000.00 101.2 29.64 Chineham 36,800.00 3,072.7 11.98 Cliddesden 5,850.00 231.1 25.31 Dummer 6,500.00 219.5 29.61 East Woodhay 25,165.00 1,301.7 19.33 Ecchinswell, Sydmonton and Bishops Green 11,299.00 421.4 26.81 Ellisfield 5,521.00 145.2 38.02 Hannington 3,312.00 184.6 17.94 Highclere 13,466.00 741.7 18.16 Hurstbourne Priors 7,000.00 177.9 39.35 Kingsclere 40,735.00 1,284.2 31.72 Laverstoke and Freefolk 10,000.00 166.7 59.99 Mapledurwell and Up Nately 6,562.00 276.6 23.72 Monk Sherborne 9,450.00 179.8 52.56 Mortimer West End 7,400.00 180.2 41.07 Newnham 6,122.00 237.1 25.82 Newtown 3,500.00 131.3 26.66 North Waltham 10,100.00 384.2 26.29 Oakley and Deane 76,695.00 2,240.9 34.23 Old Basing and Lychpit 129,574.00 3,079.0 42.08 Overton 66,570.00 1,707.9 38.98 Pamber 25,500.00 1,160.3 21.98 Preston Candover and Nutley 7,000.00 239.2 29.26 Rooksdown 19,600.00 1,358.8 14.42 Sherborne St John 22,700.00 521.5 43.53 Sherfield-on-Loddon 75,000.00 1,514.3 49.53 Silchester 14,821.00 417.7 35.48 St Mary Bourne 19,572.00 578.9 33.81 Stratfield Saye 2,750.00 136.9 20.09 Tadley 186,466.00 4,004.5 46.56 Upton Grey 14,000.00 343.5 40.76 Whitchurch 75,000.00 1,846.4 40.62 Wootton
  • 2. Referendum Version of the Burghclere Neighbourhood Plan

    2. Referendum Version of the Burghclere Neighbourhood Plan

    BURGHCLERE PARISH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2011 – 2029 Referendum Version © Richard Carrow Published by Burghclere Parish Council for examination under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended). 6th May 2021 Courtesy of Lottie Baker, Burghclere Primary School Guide to Reading this Plan Of necessity, this Neighbourhood Plan is a detailed technical document. The purpose of this page is to explain the structure and help you find your way around the plan. 1. Introduction & Background This section explains the background to the Neighbourhood Plan. 2. The Neighbourhood Area This section details many of the features of the designated area. 3. Planning Policy Context This technical section relates this Plan to the National Planning Policy Framework and the planning policies of Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council. 4. Community Views on Planning Issues This section explains the community involvement that has taken place. 5. Vision, Objectives & Land Use Policies This is the key section. Firstly, it provides a statement on the Neighbourhood Plan Vision and Objectives. It then details Policies which are proposed to address the issues outlined in the Foreword and in Section 4. These Policies are listed on page 6. There are Policy Maps at the back of the plan to which the policies cross reference. 6. Implementation This section explains how the Plan will be implemented and future development guided and managed. It suggests projects which might be supported by the Community Infrastructure Levy, which the Parish Council will have some influence over. Finally, it deals with a number of issues which although relevant are outside the scope of a Neighbourhood Plan.
  • Sherfield Parish Council

    Sherfield Parish Council

    LODDON VALLEY LINK May 2006 The Parish Newsletter No. 384 SUNDAY SERVICES FOR MAY 2006 Sunday 7th MAY Easter 4 10.00am Holy Communion St Leonard’s, Sherfield 10.00am Family Service St Mary’s, Stratfield Saye 4.00pm SONGS OF PRAISE St Mary’s, Hartley Wespall Sunday 14th MAY Easter 5 10.00am Morning Worship St Leonard’s, Sherfield with Childrens’ Sunday Club in the Liddell Hall 11.15am Holy Communion (BCP) St Mary’s, Stratfield Saye* Sunday 21st MAY Easter 6 10.00am Holy Communion St Leonard’s, Sherfield 6.30pm Evensong St Mary’s , Hartley Wespall Wed 24th 4.00pm Toddlers Group St Leonard’s, Sherfield Sunday 28th MAY Easter 7 8.00am Holy Communion (BCP) St Mary’s, Hartley Wespall 10.00am Family Service St Leonard’s, Sherfield 11.15am Matins (BCP) St Mary’s, Stratfield Saye* Sunday 4th JUNE PENTECOST 10.00am Holy Communion St Leonard’s, Sherfield 10.00am Short Family Communion St Mary’s, Stratfield Saye 6.30pm Evensong with Communion St Mary’s , Hartley Wespall [*Drive up close to the white gates, which will open automatically] ( BCP= Book of Common Prayer ) 1 The Most Precious Gift in the World When I was about 9 years old I bought a little enamel brooch for my mother. She still wears it today and has always valued it beyond its worth. It was announced recently that the precious jewellery of the late Princess Margaret is to be sold in order to pay death duties. Unlike my mother’s brooch, if it were for sale, there will be many buyers willing to pay large amounts for these items.
  • Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)

    Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD)

    Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 2017 This Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan has been prepared by Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council and adopted as a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD). This SPD will supersede the 2003 Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG). 1 Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan SPD 2 Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan SPD CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Effect of conservation area designation 1.3 Statement of significance 2.0 ASSESSING SPECIAL INTEREST 2.1 Location, topography and setting 2.2 Origins and historic development 2.3 Archaeology 2.4 Architectural quality and built form 2.5 Views and vistas 2.6 Open space and trees 3.0 CHARACTER AREAS 3.1 Overview 3.2 Character area 1 – Central 3.3 Character area 2 – South 3.4 Character area 3 - North and West 3.5 Character area 4 – East 4.0 CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL CONCLUSIONS 5.0 CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX 1: Glossary APPENDIX 2: Appraisal Map APPENDIX 3: Historic Kingsclere map 1870-1880 3 Kingsclere Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan SPD APPENDIX 4: Historic Kingsclere map 1895-1896 APPENDIX 5: Historic Kingsclere map 1910-1911 APPENDIX 6: Planning Policy Context summary and compliance table. APPENDIX 7: Development controlled by conservation area designation. APPENDIX 8: Archaeological map. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION District Council in 1969, in recognition of the Certain permitted development rights are 1.1 Background special architectural and historic interest of the removed by conservation area designation.