DOCSLIB.ORG

Rome's Role in Imperial Propaganda and Policy, 293-324 Ce

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rome's Role in Imperial Propaganda and Policy, 293-324 Ce ROME’S ROLE IN IMPERIAL PROPAGANDA AND POLICY, 293-324 CE ROMA, AUCTRIX IMPERII? ROME’S ROLE IN IMPERIAL PROPAGANDA AND POLICY FROM 293 CE UNTIL 324 CE By JOHN M. FABIANO, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by John Fabiano, September 2013 McMaster University MASTER OF ARTS (2013) Hamilton, Ontario (Classics) TITLE: Roma, Auctrix Imperii? Rome’s Role in Imperial Propaganda and Policy from 293 CE until 324 CE AUTHOR: John Fabiano, B.A. (University of Toronto) SUPERVISOR: Professor M. Beckmann NUMBER OF PAGES: xiii, 198 i Abstract By the early fourth century Rome was more than a thousand years old and the historical caput mundi was, accordingly, steeped in long established traditions. It was these historical traditions and memories that served as paradigms for understanding present circumstances. One such paradigm was the relationship between Rome and her emperors. Traditionally, monarchical power was the antithesis of the Roman Republican model, yet Augustus uniquely altered this model and established a new acceptable paradigm wherein the emperor was the princeps civitatis and the patron to all Romans. This imperial patronage was characterized primarily by the commissioning of public buildings in the Urbs and the maintenance of Rome’s cults and traditions. Therefore, Rome was inextricably intertwined with the legitimacy, success (or failure), and longevity of an emperor’s reign. Throughout the third century, however, Rome was plagued by manifold crises and the paradigmatic relationship between Rome and her rulers began to break down, such that some scholars have suggested that from 293 CE and the establishment of the tetrarchy Rome became increasingly manifest wherever the emperors were, with the city itself becoming nothing more than a peripheral concern. The former line of argumentation, however, is often advanced with the belief that Rome’s diminishing importance was uninterrupted and invariable, often disregarding the evidence within the city itself and focusing on monumental evidence outside of Rome and across the empire. This thesis, then, by examining the evidence within the city of Rome and that pertaining to it, demonstrates that between 293 and 324 CE Rome’s marginalization was anything but consistent and that the city, with all its symbolic and actual power, was integral to Maxentius’ and Constantine’s legitimation policies. Moreover, this thesis also elucidates how Rome functioned in imperial thought for each regime, with old paradigms becoming malleable to accommodate new imperial policy. ii Acknowledgements I would like to extend my thanks and gratitude to all who supported me along the way and, in particular, make mention of a few. First of all, I owe a great debt to my supervisor, Dr. M. Beckmann, for his guidance, encourangment, and tireless effort to make my work better even though he was stationed across the Atlantic. Also, to the members of my committee, Drs. George and Haley, for their thought provoking questions, constructive input, and supervision. But above all else, I must thank my family and wife, Caralia, without their support I would never have been able to complete this journey. iii Table of Contents List of Illustrations ....................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: Rome of the Periphery: Tetrarchic Representation and Ideology Introduction ....................................................................................................................................8 Unity of the Tetrarchy and of the Empire: Artistic Representations of Rome and the Imperial College 293-305 C.E. The Imperial College 293-305 CE ................................................................................................12 Artistic Representations of Rome 293-305 CE .............................................................................20 Tetrarchic Building in Rome’s Center ......................................................................................25 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................28 Chapter 2: From the Rule of Four to Maxentius, Conservator Urbis Suae Introduction ....................................................................................................................................30 Conservator Urbis Suae: Propaganda and Politics ........................................................................36 Coinage at Rome 306-308 CE ......................................................................................................37 Maxentian Aes Coinage at Rome 306-308 CE .............................................................................46 Coinage from 308- 312 CE ...........................................................................................................48 “Marti Invicto Patri:” Maxentius in the Epigraphic Record at Rome ........................................54 The Maxentian Building Program .................................................................................................65 The “Sacra Via Trio” ...................................................................................................................66 The Sacra Via Rotunda .................................................................................................................67 The Basilica Nova .........................................................................................................................77 The Templum Romae .....................................................................................................................88 The Arch of Maxentius? ................................................................................................................97 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................105 Chapter 3: Liberator, Innovator, or Imitator? Constantine and Rome Introduction ..................................................................................................................................111 Liberator Urbis Suae: Panegyrics and Propaganda Maxentius, a Tyrannus? ...............................................................................................................113 iv Erasing Maxentius: Constantine’s Secular Building in Rome Appropriation and Continuity of Power, Part I ...........................................................................117 Appropriation and Continuity of Power, Part II: “The Arch of Constantine” ...........................132 Constantine’s Christian Building in Rome: “Novatoris Turbatorisque” or Novatoris Conservatorisque .........................................................................................................................138 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................151 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................155 Image Appendix .........................................................................................................................159 Bibliography ...............................................................................................................................190 v List of Illustrations Maps 1. Map of Rome, 330 C.E., with extramural and intramural buildings of Maxentius and Constantine (adapted from Lenski 2006, Map 3.1 & 3.2). Figures 1. A. Porphyry Group, Venice (Rees 1993, Pl. 2). B. Porphyry Groups, Vatican (Rees 1993, Pls. 9 & 10). 2. Sketch of Cult Room at Luxor (Rees 1993, Pl. 3). 3. Luxor, Temple of Ammon in the late third century (Kalavrezou-Maxeiner 1975, Fig. A). 4. Tetrarchic Five-Column Monument depicted on the Arch of Constantine (Kalavrezou- Maxeiner 1975, Fig. 27). 5. Decennalia base from Five-Column Monument in Forum Romanum (L’Orange 1973, Abb.6). 6. Gold Medallion of Tetrarchy from Trier (American Numismatic Society 1967.153.38). 7. Silver Coin of Constantius I from Trier (American Numismatic Society 1944.100.5869). 8. Aes Coin of Diocletian, Unmarked (American Numismatic Society 1984.136.358). 9. A. Reception of Persian Delegation (Pond Rothman 1977, Fig. 19). B. Roma flanked by the Personifications of other Imperial Cities (Pond Rothman 1977, Fig. 28). 10. Bronze Relief with Roma Flanked by Personifications of Imperial Cities (Toynbee 1947, Pl. VII). 11. A. Aureus multiple from Rome, Obverse Legend: IMP C M VAL MAXENTIVS P F AVG, Reverse Legend: ROMAE AETERNAE AVCTRICI AVG N (Cullhed, 1994, Fig. 4). B. Aureus from Rome, Obverse Legend: MAXENTIVS P F INVIC AVG (British Museum R. 137). C. Aes coin minted in Ostia for Maxentius with dioscuri on reverse (American Numismatic Society 1974.95.17). D. Aes coin from Rome, Reverse Legend: CONSERV VRB SVAE ( American Numismatic Society 1944.100.3030). 12. A. Statue Base in the Forum Romanum dedicated to Mars and the Founders of Rome by Maxentius (Last Statues of Antiquity Database, LSA-1388). vi B. Right side of statue base set up by Maxentius (Last Statues of Antiquity Database, LSA-1388). 13. Statue base
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great Fire of Rome: Life and Death in the Ancient City
    Joseph J. Walsh. The Great Fire of Rome: Life and Death in the Ancient City. Witness to Ancient History Series. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2019. Illustrations. 192 pp. $19.95, paper, ISBN 978-1-4214-3371-4. Reviewed by Linda R. Gosner (Texas Tech University) Published on H-Environment (January, 2021) Commissioned by Daniella McCahey (Texas Tech University) Fires in ancient Rome were common, but the Chapter 1 is a colorful introduction to the di‐ Great Fire was the longest and largest incendiary verse hazards of everyday life in ancient Rome. disaster in the city’s history. It sprang up on July 18, Walsh vividly describes the sights, smells, sounds, 64 CE, and raged for nine days, devastating the city and tastes of the ancient city, an excellent counter and displacing thousands of residents. The event to the usual whitewashed depictions of Rome that also brought us the infamous story of the emperor focus on public monuments and urban layout Nero fiddling from his palace as the fire burned. without much of a nod to the sensory experiences Joseph J. Walsh’s new book is a lively account of of the city. He outlines the evidence for flooding, the catastrophe and its aftermath. This book is building collapse, crime, pollution, disease, and part of John Hopkins University Press’s Witness to fire. He draws primarily from poetry and prose of Ancient History series, which publishes short-form, the late republic and early empire, in which au‐ engaging monographs on events, places, and thors—including Cicero, Martial, Seneca, Plutarch, people in classical antiquity.
    [Show full text]
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ius Militare – Military Courts in the Roman Law (I)
    International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) ISSN 2307-4531 (Print & Online) http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ius Militare – Military Courts in the Roman Law (I) PhD Dimitar Apasieva*, PhD Olga Koshevaliskab a,bGoce Delcev University – Shtip, Shtip 2000, Republic of Macedonia aEmail: [email protected] bEmail: [email protected] Abstract Military courts in ancient Rome belonged to the so-called inconstant coercions (coercitio), they were respectively treated as “special circumstances courts” excluded from the regular Roman judicial system and performed criminal justice implementation, strictly in conditions of war. To repress the war torts, as well as to overcome the soldiers’ resistance, which at moments was violent, the king (rex) himself at first and the highest new established magistrates i.e. consuls (consules) afterwards, have been using various constrained acts. The authority of such enforcement against Roman soldiers sprang from their “military imperium” (imperium militiae). As most important criminal and judicial organs in conditions of war, responsible for maintenance of the military courtesy, were introduced the military commander (dux) and the array and their subsidiary organs were the cavalry commander, military legates, military tribunals, centurions and regents. In this paper, due to limited available space, we will only stick to the main military courts in ancient Rome. Keywords: military camp; tribunal; dux; recruiting; praetor. 1. Introduction “[The Romans...] strictly cared about punishments and awards of those who deserved praise or lecture… The military courtesy was grounded at the fear of laws, and god – for people, weapon, brad and money are the power of war! …It was nothing more than an army, that is well trained during muster; it was no possible for one to be defeated, who knows how to apply it!” [23].
    [Show full text]
  • Rome Vs Rome Ing Late Romans Come from the Cover of the Roman Empire in the Middle of the Fourth
    THE BATTLE OF MURSA MAJOR THEME Left-handed warriors? Yes, the image has been mirrored. These charg- Rome vs Rome ing Late Romans come from the cover of The Roman Empire in the middle of the fourth Ancient Warfare VI-5. V century found itself in crisis. It had been split by Constantine the Great between his three surviving sons, Constantine II, Constantius II and Constans. However, soon the brothers were at each other’s throats vying for power. By David Davies onstantine II was defeated by the forces of Constans in AD 340, leav- ingC him in control of the western half of the Roman Empire. Howev- er in AD 350, he in turn was usurped by one of his own generals, Mag- nentius, who took the title Emperor of the West- ern Empire. Constans fled but was ambushed and killed by a troop of light cavalry while his party at- tempted to cross the Pyrenees. Magnentius quickly wooed support from the provinces in Britannia, Gaul, and Hispania with his lax approach to pagan- ism. Other provinces remained hesitant and many remained loyal to the Constan- tinian dynasty. The new Western Roman Emperor tried to exert his control directly by appointing his own men to command provinces and legions, ex- ecuting commanders loyal to the old regime, and by moving his forces into poten- tial rebel territories. When Nepotianus (a nephew of Constantine the Great) stormed Rome with a band of gladiators and pro- claimed himself em- peror, the revolt was swiftly dealt with. It became clear to 1 Wargames, soldiers & strategy 95 Cataphracts from the Eastern and Western Roman Empires square off.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMAN POLITICS DURING the JUGURTHINE WAR by PATRICIA EPPERSON WINGATE Bachelor of Arts in Education Northeastern Oklahoma State
    ROMAN POLITICS DURING THE JUGURTHINE WAR By PATRICIA EPPERSON ,WINGATE Bachelor of Arts in Education Northeastern Oklahoma State University Tahlequah, Oklahoma 1971 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1975 SEP Ji ·J75 ROMAN POLITICS DURING THE JUGURTHINE WAR Thesis Approved: . Dean of the Graduate College 91648 ~31 ii PREFACE The Jugurthine War occurred within the transitional period of Roman politics between the Gracchi and the rise of military dictators~ The era of the Numidian conflict is significant, for during that inter­ val the equites gained political strength, and the Roman army was transformed into a personal, professional army which no longer served the state, but dedicated itself to its commander. The primary o~jec­ tive of this study is to illustrate the role that political events in Rome during the Jugurthine War played in transforming the Republic into the Principate. I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Neil Hackett, for his patient guidance and scholarly assistance, and to also acknowledge the aid of the other members of my counnittee, Dr. George Jewsbury and Dr. Michael Smith, in preparing my final draft. Important financial aid to my degree came from the Dr. Courtney W. Shropshire Memorial Scholarship. The Muskogee Civitan Club offered my name to the Civitan International Scholarship Selection Committee, and I am grateful for their ass.istance. A note of thanks is given to the staff of the Oklahoma State Uni­ versity Library, especially Ms. Vicki Withers, for their overall assis­ tance, particularly in securing material from other libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Roman Law to Test the Validity of Livy's Caudine Forks Narrative
    A Legal Interpretation of Livy's Caudine Sponsio: Using Roman Law to test the validity of Livy's Caudine Forks Narrative Michael Aston Although much has been written about Livy's account of the defeat of a Roman army at the hands of the Samnites at the Caudine Forks in 321 B.C., commentators do not agree as to whether the account describes an historical event. This paper offers a new approach to the problem, by analyzing the legal form and content of the sponsio (agreement) that acts as the backbone of Livy's narrative. The body of the paper analyzes Uvy's sponsio in detail, from a legal perspective. The analysis leads to the conclusion that U\y based his narrative upon the sponsio of Roman civil law. Since it is unlikely that the Romans and Samnites conducted their agreement on the basis of Roman private law, it is concluded that the events at the Caudine Forks are either fictional, or did not happen as LJvy describes them. Livy's account of the stunning Roman defeat at the Caudine Forks in 321 B.C. and the ensuing settlement is exciting and dramatic. But is it more than a well told story? Is it possible to prove or disprove Livy's account? The details of the Roman defeat recounted by Livy are well-known: a Samnite army under Gaius Pontius trapped a Roman army, under the command of consuls Spurius Postumius Albinus and Titus Veturius Calvinus, at the Caudine Forks.1 The Romans and Samnites subsequently reached an agreement (sponsio), whereby the Samnites proposed release of the captured army in exchange for a treaty of peace and Roman withdrawal from Samnite territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetrarch Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    TETRARCH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Ian Irvine | 704 pages | 05 Feb 2004 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781841491998 | English | London, United Kingdom Tetrarch PDF Book Chapter Master Aetheon of the 19th Chapter of the Ultramarines Legion was rumoured to be Guilliman's choice to take up the role of the newest Prince of Ultramar. Eleventh Captain of the Ultramarines Chapter. After linking up with the 8th Parachute Battalion in Bois de Bavent, they proceeded to assist with the British advance on Normandy, providing reconnaissance for the troops. Maxentius rival Caesar , 28 October ; Augustus , c. Year of the 6 Emperors Gordian dynasty — Illyrian emperors — Gallic emperors — Britannic emperors — Cookie Policy. Keep scrolling for more. Luke Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Cesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother In the summer of , Tetrarch got their first taste at extensive touring by doing a day east coast tour in support of the EP. D, Projector and Managing Editor. See idem. Galerius and Maxentius as Augusti of East and West. The four tetrarchs based themselves not at Rome but in other cities closer to the frontiers, mainly intended as headquarters for the defence of the empire against bordering rivals notably Sassanian Persia and barbarians mainly Germanic, and an unending sequence of nomadic or displaced tribes from the eastern steppes at the Rhine and Danube. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Primarch of the Ultramarines Legion. The armor thickness was increased to a maximum of 16mm using riveted plating, and the Henry Meadows Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideazione Di Clementina Panella a Cura Di Alessandro D'alessio
    Ideazione di Clementina Panella A cura di Alessandro D’Alessio Clementina Panella Rossella Rea ROMA UNIVERSALIS SEZIONE I SEZIONE II 206 Tombe e necropoli a Roma SEZIONE III L’IMPERO E LA DINASTIA L’IMPERO DEI SEVERI LA ROMA DEI SEVERI e dintorni ROMA E IL MEDITERRANEO VENUTA DALL’AFRICA Barbara E. Borg LA DINASTIA LA FORMA DELLA CITTÀ 210 Linguaggio architettonico e sistemi CITTÀ, TERRITORI, ECONOMIE 23 I Severi e i caratteri di un’epoca. 36 I Severi 132 Urbs Roma – Urbs Sacra: forma decorativi dei grandi complessi 264 La Sicilia Continuità e frattura nella storia Orietta D. Cordovana e immagini della Città di Roma Daniele Malfitana della popolazione di Roma Domenico Palombi L’IMPERO IN PACE Patrizio Pensabene, Francesca Caprioli 270 L’Africa e del suo impero mediterraneo 48 Moneta, economia e cittadinanza I LUOGHI SEVERIANI Alejandro Quevedo Elio Lo Cascio 220 L’industria laterizia e Marco Maiuro 142 Le “Terme di Elagabalo” l’organizzazione dei grandi 278 L’Egitto 28 Cronologia dell’età severiana. Clementina Panella 58 Società, cultura, religione cantieri urbani Jessica Montani 192-235 Cesare Letta 150 I reperti scultorei dalle Évelyne Bukowiecki, 282 Dal Mediterraneo a Roma “Terme di Elagabalo”: dall’età Ulrike Wulf-Rheidt † L’IMPERO IN GUERRA Clementina Panella augustea all’età severiana 64 Gli eserciti: riforme, campagne Massimiliano Papini L’IMPERATORE E LA PLEBE URBANA militari e nuove province 228 Intrattenere e sorprendere: ludi, 298 Abbreviazioni Cecilia Ricci 154 Il Tempio di Elagabalo munera e agones Françoise Villedieu 300 Bibliografia ARTE E ARCHITETTURA Silvia Evangelisti 72 Luoghi, monumenti, immagini: 158 La Domus Severiana sul Palatino.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sack of Rome and the Theme of Cultural Discontinuity
    CHAPTER ONE THE SACK OF ROME AND THE THEME OF CULTURAL DISCONTINUITY i. Introduction The Sack of Rome had unmatched significance for contemporaries, and it triggered momentous cultural and intellectual transformations. It stands apart from the many other brutal conquests of the time, such as the sack of Prato fifteen years earlier, because Rome held a place of special prominence in the Renaissance imagination.1 This prominence was owed in part to the city's geographical position on the ruins of the ancient city of Rome, which provided an ever-pres­ ent visual reminder of its classical role sis caput mundi.2 Just as impor­ tant for contemporary observers, it stood at the center of Western Christendom: a position to which it had been restored in 1443, when Pope Eugenius IV returned the papacy to the Eternal City.3 In the ensuing decades, the Renaissance popes strove to rebuild the physical city and to enhance both the theoretical claim of the papacy to uni­ versal impenum and its actual political and ecclesiastical sway, which the recent schism had eroded. Modern historians, who have tended to confirm contemporaries' assessment of Rome's centrality in Renaissance European culture, have similarly viewed the events of 1527 as marking a critical turning point. The nineteenth-century German scholar Ferdinand Gregoro- vius chose the Imperial conquest of 1527 as the terminus ad quern for his monumental eight-volume history of Rome in the Middle Ages, 1 Eric Cochrane, Italy, 1530-1630 (London and New York, 1988), 9-10, also draws attention to this contrast. 2 On Renaissance Roman antiquarianism and archaeology, see the sources cited in Philip Jacks, The Antiquarian and the Myth of Antiquity: The Origins of Rome in Renaissance Thought (Cambridge, 1993); and idem, "The Simulachrum of Fabio Calvo: A View of Roman Architecture aWantka in 1527," Art Bulletin 72 (1990): 453-81.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/160995 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-04 and may be subject to change. Monuments & Memory Architectural Crossroads Studies in the History of Architecture Vol. 3 Series Editor Lex Bosman, Universiteit van Amsterdam Editorial Board Dale Kinney, Bryn Mawr College Wolfgang Schenkluhn, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle Christof Thoenes, Bibliotheca Hertziana, Rome Marvin Trachtenberg, New York University Monuments & Memory Christian Cult Buildings and Constructions of the Past Essays in honour of Sible de Blaauw Edited by Mariëtte Verhoeven, Lex Bosman, and Hanneke van Asperen H F Cover photo: Nine Miedema, S. Prassede in Rome. Image editing: Centre for Art Historical Documentation (CKD), Radboud University Nijmegen. © 2016, Brepols Publishers n.v., Turnhout, Belgium. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. D/2016/0095/215 ISBN 978-2-503-56973-4 Printed in the EU on acid-free paper Contents Introduction: Cherished Memories 9 Monuments ‘In Hoc Signo Vinces’: The Various Victories Commemorated Through the Labarum Nathalie DE HAAN & Olivier HEKSTER 17 Eine vergessene Erinnerung an das byzantinische Rom: Neudeutung und Rezeptionsgeschichte einer Grabinschrift aus dem 7. Jahrhundert in der S. Cecilia in Trastevere Raphael G. R. HUNSUCKER & Evelien J. J. ROELS 31 S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus As a Case of Etruscan Influence on Roman Religious Architec
    HPS: The Journal of History & Political Science 5 Caput Mundi: An Analysis of the HPS: The Journal of History & Political Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maximus Science 2017, Vol. 5 1-12 as a Case of Etruscan Influence on © The Author(s) 2017 Roman Religious Architecture Mario Concordia York University, Canada While Roman architecture is often generalized as being primarily of Greek influence, there are important periods where other influences can be clearly identified. This paper considers the Etruscan, Greek, and Villanovan influence on Roman religious architecture through an examination of the Temple of Jupiter Optimus Maxmius, also known as the Capitolium, and argues that the temple is ultimately of primarily Etruscan influence. Introduction Religious temple architecture was a dynamic, evolving tradition throughout the entire span of Roman history. From its founding, customarily dated at 753 BCE with the mythical tale of Romulus and Remus, until the eventual fall of the Western Empire in the 5th century CE, temples were a central piece of the majesty of Roman architecture. But, like all construction fashion, what was dominant and popular in one period would inevitably change over time. As Becker indicates in his work, “Italic Architecture of the Earlier First Millennium BCE,” many scholars believe that Roman temple architecture is completely indebted to Greek advancements and influence, and that historians should be looking at Classic Greek models when considering Roman architecture,1 but this is hardly a complete answer. While it is true that Rome began to steer toward a more Hellenistic aesthetic some time around the Late Republic to Early Empire Period, there is an entire period before that which cannot be understood in this simple way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edictum Theoderici: a Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy
    The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy By Sean D.W. Lafferty A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Sean D.W. Lafferty 2010 The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy Sean D.W. Lafferty Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This is a study of a Roman legal document of unknown date and debated origin conventionally known as the Edictum Theoderici (ET). Comprised of 154 edicta, or provisions, in addition to a prologue and epilogue, the ET is a significant but largely overlooked document for understanding the institutions of Roman law, legal administration and society in the West from the fourth to early sixth century. The purpose is to situate the text within its proper historical and legal context, to understand better the processes involved in the creation of new law in the post-Roman world, as well as to appreciate how the various social, political and cultural changes associated with the end of the classical world and the beginning of the Middle Ages manifested themselves in the domain of Roman law. It is argued here that the ET was produced by a group of unknown Roman jurisprudents working under the instructions of the Ostrogothic king Theoderic the Great (493-526), and was intended as a guide for settling disputes between the Roman and Ostrogothic inhabitants of Italy. A study of its contents in relation to earlier Roman law and legal custom preserved in imperial decrees and juristic commentaries offers a revealing glimpse into how, and to what extent, Roman law survived and evolved in Italy following the decline and eventual collapse of imperial authority in the region.
    [Show full text]