De Fehr, John ,
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hon. Stanley H. Knowles Fonds MG 32, C 59
LIBRARY AND BIBLIOTHÈQUE ET ARCHIVES CANADA ARCHIVES CANADA Canadian Archives and Direction des archives Special Collections Branch canadiennes et collections spéciales Hon. Stanley H. Knowles fonds MG 32, C 59 Finding Aid No. 1611 / Instrument de recherche no 1611 Prepared by Colleen Dempsey and David Préparé par Colleen Dempsey et David Ross. Ross. Revised in 1991 by Geoff Ott for the Révisé en 1991 par Geoff Ott pour le service Political Archives Service. des archives politiques. -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages Index Headings .............................................................. ii Guide to the Finding Aid ...................................................... .xii Political Series vols. 1-349 ......................................................... 1-256 vols. 398-402 ..................................................... 293-295 vols. 412-485 ..................................................... 300-359 vols. 488-494 ..................................................... 361-366 vols. 502-513 ......................................................... 371 Canadian Labour Congress vols. 350-389 ..................................................... 256-288 vol. 513 ............................................................. 380 Personal Series vols. 390-397 ..................................................... 288-293 vols. 403-411 ..................................................... 295-300 vols. 486-487 ..................................................... 359-361 vols. 495-502 .................................................... -
The Aboriginal Vote in 2000
The Aboriginal Vote in 2000 Achieving an equitable position for Aboriginal Peoples in Canadian society Summary of Results ✔ 8 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations of 10,000 or more. ✔ 29 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations of 5,000 or more. ✔ 45 ridings will have Aboriginal voting age populations in excess of 5% of total vote. ✔ In 22 ridings, the size of the Aboriginal vote exceeded margin of victory in the last election. Note: The data contained in the following is based on Statistics Canada special runs. Population numbers represent eligible voters. The figures underestimate population by at least 18%. Regional Distribution Aboriginal People account for 8.9% of all voters in Manitoba, 8.0% of the vote in Saskatchewan, 4.9% of voters in Alberta and 4.4% in British Columbia. In the North, Aboriginal People represent 56.7% of the electorate in the Northwest Territories, 21% in the Yukon, and 19.9% in Labrador. In northwestern Ontario and northwestern Quebec, they form close to 20% of the voting populations. Aboriginal Voting Strength by Province REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF VOTING AGE POPULATION, 2000 TOTAL VOTING ABORIGINAL ABORIGINAL REGION POPULATION VOTE VOTE AS % # % # % OF TOTAL Newfoundland 465,075 2.1% 9,185 1.3% 2.0% Prince Edward Island 104,690 0.5% 1,270 0.2% 1.2% Nova Scotia 743,810 3.3% 15,335 2.2% 2.1% New Brunswick 597,340 2.7% 9,250 1.3% 1.6% Quebec 5,720,120 25.5% 103,770 14.8% 1.8% Ontario 8,315,000 37.1% 175,855 25.0% 2.1% Manitoba 886,035 4.0% 79,070 11.2% 8.9% Saskatchewan 784,660 3.5% 62,405 8.9% 8.0% Alberta 2,027,965 9.0% 98,845 14.1% 4.9% British Columbia 2,711,735 12.1% 120,135 17.1% 4.4% Northwest Territories* 41,650 0.2% 23,615 3.4% 56.7% Yukon 22,025 0.1% 4,630 0.7% 21.0% TOTAL 22,420,105 100.0% 703,365 100.00% 3.1% SOURCE: Special Run on 1991 Census Database Nunavut statistics are included in the Northwest Territories data. -
The Politics of Innovation
The Future City, Report No. 2: The Politics of Innovation __________________ By Tom Axworthy 1972 __________________ The Institute of Urban Studies FOR INFORMATION: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 599 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg phone: 204.982.1140 fax: 204.943.4695 general email: [email protected] Mailing Address: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 515 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9 THE FUTURE CITY, REPORT NO. 2: THE POLITICS OF INNOVATION Published 1972 by the Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg © THE INSTITUTE OF URBAN STUDIES Note: The cover page and this information page are new replacements, 2015. The Institute of Urban Studies is an independent research arm of the University of Winnipeg. Since 1969, the IUS has been both an academic and an applied research centre, committed to examining urban development issues in a broad, non-partisan manner. The Institute examines inner city, environmental, Aboriginal and community development issues. In addition to its ongoing involvement in research, IUS brings in visiting scholars, hosts workshops, seminars and conferences, and acts in partnership with other organizations in the community to effect positive change. ' , I /' HT 169 C32 W585 no.Ol6 c.l E FUTURE .·; . ,... ) JI Report No.2 The Politics of Innovation A Publication of THE INSTITUTE OF URBAN STUDIES University of Winnipeg THE FUTUKE CITY Report No. 2 'The Politics of Innovation' by Tom Axworthy with editorial assistance from Professor Andrew Quarry and research assistance from Mr. J. Cassidy, Mr. Paul Peterson, and Judy Friedrick. published by Institute of Urban Studies University of Winnipeg FOREWORD This is the second report published by the Institute of Urban Studies on the new city government scheme in Winnipeg. -
The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy. -
Canada Gazette, Part I
EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke -
Planning and Policy Implementation in the North St. Boniface Community 1971-1985
Planning and Policy Implementation in the North St. Boniface Community 1971-1985 __________________ by David Linton & Marianne Wade 1985 __________________ The Institute of Urban Studies FOR INFORMATION: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 599 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg phone: 204.982.1140 fax: 204.943.4695 general email: [email protected] Mailing Address: The Institute of Urban Studies The University of Winnipeg 515 Portage Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9 PLANNING AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN THE NORTH ST. BONIFACE COMMUNITY 1971- 1985 Published 1985 by the Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg © THE INSTITUTE OF URBAN STUDIES Note: The cover page and this information page are new replacements, 2015. The Institute of Urban Studies is an independent research arm of the University of Winnipeg. Since 1969, the IUS has been both an academic and an applied research centre, committed to examining urban development issues in a broad, non-partisan manner. The Institute examines inner city, environmental, Aboriginal and community development issues. In addition to its ongoing involvement in research, IUS brings in visiting scholars, hosts workshops, seminars and conferences, and acts in partnership with other organizations in the community to effect positive change. PLANNING AND POLICY IMPLEMENTATION IN THE NORTH ST. BONIFACE COMMUNITY 1971 - 1985 Sponsored by: N.E.U.F. Inc. Prepared by: David Linton Marianne Wade Institute of Urban Studies November 25,1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 NORTH ST. BONIFACE PROFILE 3 2.1 Data Sources 3 2.2 Census Data Analysis 4 2.2:1 Population 4 2.2.2 Income and "Mother Tongue" 6 2.2.3 Housing 6 2.3 NIP Data Analysis 12 2.3.1 Variables 12 2.3.2 Frequency Distributions 13 2.3.3 Contingency Tables 23 2.4 Summary 35 3.0 NORTH ST. -
2016 Tax Year
Table 1a - Federal Electoral District Statistics for All Returns - 2016 Tax Year Total Income Net Income Taxable Income FED ID Federal Electoral Districts Total ($000) ($000) ($000) PR 10 Newfoundland and Labrador 10001 Avalon 72,030 3,425,814 3,168,392 3,060,218 10002 Bonavista--Burin--Trinity 64,920 2,453,784 2,303,218 2,185,134 10003 Coast of Bays--Central--Notre Dame 65,130 2,458,068 2,286,474 2,173,178 10004 Labrador 20,830 1,169,248 1,089,412 992,898 10005 Long Range Mountains 77,250 2,914,423 2,714,495 2,579,982 10006 St. John's East 66,670 3,668,269 3,345,338 3,268,761 10007 St. John's South--Mount Pearl 66,270 3,086,318 2,836,073 2,739,070 TOTAL 433,100 19,175,924 17,743,402 16,999,241 Table 1a - Federal Electoral District Statistics for All Returns - 2016 Tax Year Total Income Net Income Taxable Income FED ID Federal Electoral Districts Total ($000) ($000) ($000) PR 11 Prince Edward Island 11001 Cardigan 29,970 1,237,610 1,140,059 1,103,647 11002 Charlottetown 29,650 1,192,487 1,098,089 1,060,050 11003 Egmont 29,310 1,079,972 1,003,318 959,122 11004 Malpeque 28,880 1,194,581 1,098,945 1,059,173 TOTAL 117,810 4,704,650 4,340,412 4,181,993 Table 1a - Federal Electoral District Statistics for All Returns - 2016 Tax Year Total Income Net Income Taxable Income FED ID Federal Electoral Districts Total ($000) ($000) ($000) PR 12 Nova Scotia 12001 Cape Breton--Canso 59,950 2,234,171 2,074,721 1,980,399 12002 Central Nova 60,040 2,370,409 2,190,341 2,106,315 12003 Cumberland--Colchester 66,070 2,418,184 2,242,671 2,156,801 12004 Dartmouth--Cole Harbour 74,670 3,360,261 3,056,811 2,990,209 12005 Halifax 72,440 3,582,762 3,290,294 3,209,508 12006 Halifax West 75,220 3,719,510 3,389,142 3,331,581 12007 Kings--Hants 67,220 2,632,211 2,429,195 2,353,692 12008 Sackville--Preston--Chezzetcook 69,410 3,231,041 2,949,533 2,896,662 12009 South Shore--St. -
Table 5 Number of WITB Recipients and Amount Credited by Federal Electoral District, 2017 Table 5 Number of WITB Recipients
Table 5 Number of WITB recipients and amount credited by Federal Electoral District, 2017 Assessed WITB Federal Electoral District Number of WITB Credit Recipients ($ dollars) Abbotsford 4,500 3,486,000 Abitibi--Baie-James--Nunavik--Eeyou 3,490 2,603,000 Abitibi--Témiscamingue 2,490 1,885,000 Acadie--Bathurst 3,050 2,136,000 Ahuntsic-Cartierville 5,720 4,838,000 Ajax 6,060 5,296,000 Alfred-Pellan 3,800 3,288,000 Algoma--Manitoulin--Kapuskasing 2,620 1,994,000 Argenteuil--La Petite-Nation 3,830 3,225,000 Aurora--Oak Ridges--Richmond Hill 5,450 4,925,000 Avalon 2,220 1,624,000 Avignon--La Mitis--Matane--Matapédia 1,890 1,359,000 Banff--Airdrie 4,950 3,765,000 Barrie--Innisfil 4,990 4,188,000 Barrie--Springwater--Oro-Medonte 4,590 3,666,000 Battle River--Crowfoot 4,450 3,520,000 Battlefords--Lloydminster 2,680 2,107,000 Bay of Quinte 4,240 3,244,000 Beaches--East York 5,240 4,286,000 Beauce 2,610 2,135,000 Beauport--Côte-de-Beaupré--Île d’Orléans--Charlevoix 2,140 1,774,000 Beauport--Limoilou 3,280 2,651,000 Beauséjour 2,680 2,000,000 Bellechasse--Les Etchemins--Lévis 2,710 2,185,000 Beloeil--Chambly 2,960 2,466,000 Berthier--Maskinongé 3,410 2,764,000 Bonavista--Burin--Trinity 2,070 1,457,000 Bourassa 6,410 5,345,000 Bow River 4,480 3,643,000 (Continued) Notes: 1. All counts are rounded to the nearest ten and all amounts are rounded to the nearest thousand. -
REDUCING POVERTY 1952-1967 Summary
REDUCING POVERTY 1952-1967 Summary Old Age Security (OAS), the first universal pension for Canadians, was introduced in 1952: · The maximum pension was $40 per month or $480 per year. · The pension was available to Canadians 70 years of age and over who had lived in Canada for at least 20 years. · Status Indians were included. · For the first time, Canadian seniors could receive a pension without undergoing a “means test1 ”. However, retirement still meant a drastically reduced standard of living for many people. There was growing public and political support for a universal, employment-based pension plan that would be portable from job to job. The provinces agreed to another Constitutional amendment to extend federal government powers beyond legislati that applied only to old age. As a result, the contributory Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Quebec Pension Plan (QPP)2 were established in 1966: 1 The "Means Test" The "means test" was used to determine a senior's income, or means. The test involved provincial pension authorities calculating all aspects of a senior's income (e.g., pensions, income from boarding house operations, etc.) as well as the value of "perks" they received, such as free room and board. The means test, however, did not take into account how much money a person needed to pay for food, shelter, clothing, fuel, utilities or household supplies. If a senior's annual income, including pensions, was greater than $365, he or she was not eligible for the Old Age Pension. The income each received determined the amount of assistance to which he or she was entitled. -
Candidate's Statement of Unpaid Claims and Loans 18 Or 36 Months
Candidate’s Statement of Unpaid Claims and Loans 18 or 36 Months after Election Day (EC 20003) – Instructions When to use this form The official agent for a candidate must submit this form to Elections Canada if unpaid amounts recorded in the candidate’s electoral campaign return are still unpaid 18 months or 36 months after election day. The first update must be submitted no later than 19 months after the election date, covering unpaid claims and loans as of 18 months after election day. The second update must be submitted no later than 37 months after election day, covering unpaid claims and loans as of 36 months after election day. Note that when a claim or loan is paid in full, the official agent must submit an amended Candidate’s Electoral Campaign Return (EC 20120) showing the payments and the sources of funds for the payments within 30 days after making the final payment. Tips for completing this form Part 1 ED code, Electoral district: Refer to Annex I for a list of electoral district codes and names. Declaration: The official agent must sign the declaration attesting to the completeness and accuracy of the statement by hand. Alternatively, if the Candidate’s Statement of Unpaid Claims and Loans 18 or 36 Months after Election Day is submitted online using the Political Entities Service Centre, handwritten signatures are replaced by digital consent during the submission process. The official agent must be the agent in Elections Canada’s registry at the time of signing. Part 2 Unpaid claims and loans: Detail all unpaid claims and loans from Part 5 of the Candidate’s Electoral Campaign Return (EC 20121) that remain unpaid. -
Statement of Votes Relevé Des Suffrages
Statement of Votes for the 38th Provincial General Election June 3, 2003 Relevé des suffrages pour la 38e élection générale provinciale le 3 juin 2003 Historical Summaries/ Comptes rendus d’élection précédentes Summary of Election Procedures in Manitoba 1870 to 1999 In examining historical election results it is important to be aware of the legislation that existed at the time the elections were held. What follows is a summary of the evolution of electoral law in Manitoba designed to accompany the Historical Summary that follows. Many of the dates given are for the year the new procedures were first used. In many cases, however, the legislation was passed in the years preceding the election. 1870 • The standard voting procedure was public declaration of one's preference at a constituency meeting. The electoral officer recorded the votes, and the simple plurality (or 'first-past-the-post') system was used to elect members for the 24 seats in the Legislative Assembly. • Only males owning property were eligible to vote. 1888 • The property qualification was eliminated. • The secret ballot was used for the first time. • Residence requirement raised to six months in province and one month in the electoral division. 1892 • Growth in population and territorial expansion were reflected by an increase in the Assembly's seats. By 1892, there were 40 seats in the Assembly. • Persons receiving a government salary of $350 or more annually could not vote. • Fee to file nomination papers is $200. 1894 • Residency requirements changed to three months in electoral division and one year in province. 1900 • Persons receiving government salary could vote. -
ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Manitoba
ELECTORAL DISTRICTS Proposal for the Province of Manitoba Published pursuant to the Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act Table of Contents Part I — Preamble ........................................................................................................................... 3 Part II — Notice of Sittings for the Hearing of Representations .................................................. 10 Part III — Rules ............................................................................................................................ 11 Schedule — Maps, Proposed Boundaries and Names of Electoral Districts ................................ 14 2 Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of Manitoba Proposal Part I — Preamble Introduction Each decade, after the decennial census is completed, a key democratic exercise called electoral redistribution takes place. Redistribution is meant to reflect population growth and the territorial shifts in population both among and within provinces. There are two steps in the redistribution process. The first step involves a recalculation of the number of seats in the House of Commons given to each province based on new population estimates and a complex formula contained in the Constitution. After the current redistribution, the number of seats in the House of Commons will have increased from 308 to 338. Four provinces—Alberta, British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario—will gain seats. Along with five other provinces, Manitoba is retaining the same number of seats (14) that it had before