Diet Analysis and Community Characteristics of Lepomis (Sunfish) Species Congregating Near Natural Spring Vents of the Rainbow R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diet Analysis and Community Characteristics of Lepomis (Sunfish) Species Congregating Near Natural Spring Vents of the Rainbow R Diet analysis and community characteristics of Lepomis (sunfish) species congregating near natural spring vents of the Rainbow River, Florida by Michael S. Sears A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Environmental Science, Policy, & Geography College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida St. Petersburg Major Professor: James Gore, Ph.D. Randy Edwards, Ph.D. Melanie Riedinger-Whitmore, Ph.D. Date of Approval: November 1, 2010 Keywords: natural spring vents, Lepomis , stomach content, spring-fed river, diversity, electroshocking, stomach pump Copyright © 2010, Michael S. Sears Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................ ii List of Figures ......................................................................................................... iii Abstract ................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Materials & Methods ............................................................................................ 12 Study Site .................................................................................................... 12 Sampling Methods ....................................................................................... 17 Electroshocking Sampling Methods ................................................. 18 Hook and Line Sampling Methods ................................................... 22 Plankton Net Sampling Methods ...................................................... 24 Statistical Analysis ....................................................................................... 27 Results ................................................................................................................... 29 Fish Populations .......................................................................................... 29 Stomach Content Analysis .......................................................................... 32 Plankton Net Sampling Results ................................................................... 36 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 37 List of References ................................................................................................. 44 Appendix ................................................................................................................ 51 i List of Tables Table 1. Upstream and downstream Rainbow River pH data from 2004 and 2005 .................................................................................... 17 Table 2. Mean monthly discharge (cfs) from the Rainbow River during sampling events ..................................................................... 17 Table 3. Upstream and downstream Fish species composition percentages ........ 29 Table 4. Upstream fish species diversity measurements ....................................... 30 Table 5. Downstream fish species diversity measurements .................................. 31 Table 6. Upstream and downstream Lepomis species length results .................... 31 Table 7. Upstream Lepomis species stomach contents ......................................... 33 Table 8. Downstream Lepomis species stomach contents .................................... 34 Table 9. Upstream Lepomis species stomach content diversity ............................ 36 Table 10. Downstream Lepomis species stomach content diversity ..................... 36 ii List of Figures Figure 1. Rainbow River Watershed Land Use Map of 1944 ................................... 3 Figure 2. Rainbow River Watershed Land Use Map of 1999 ................................... 4 Figure 3. Spring vent locations within the Rainbow River ..................................... 12 Figure 4. Rainbow River water quality sampling site .............................................. 15 Figure 5. Upstream and downstream Rainbow River temperature data between 2006 and 2009 ...................................................................... 16 Figure 6. Upstream and downstream Rainbow River dissolved oxygen data between 2006 and 2009 ...................................................................... 16 Figure 7. Upstream electroshocking sampling locations ........................................ 19 Figure 8. Downstream electroshocking sampling locations ................................... 20 Figure 9. Hook and line sampling locations ............................................................ 22 Figure 10. Upstream plankton net spring vent and tow sampling locations ........... 25 Figure 11. A Lepomis species at a sample site ...................................................... 26 Figure 12. View of the plankton net setup over a spring vent ................................ 26 Figure 13. Up-close view of a spring vent/boil ........................................................ 28 iii Abstract Little is known about the ecology of natural springs and the influence spring vents have on fish populations. This study explores fish population characteristics, such as abundance, diversity, and length distributions near headwater spring vents and downstream away from the spring vents within the Rainbow River, located in central Florida. The population characteristics examined are useful to resource managers when evaluating the possible impacts on fish populations from increased groundwater withdrawals and subsequent lower discharge rates into large spring-fed rivers. Initial field observations led to the hypothesis that Lepomis species feed on organisms expelled from the spring vents. Electrofishing and hook and line sampling were utilized to collect fish specimens for analysis, and Lepomis species were frozen for later stomach analysis, or stomach contents were pumped in the field. Spotted sunfish ( Lepomis punctatus ) were dominant upstream (28.8% composition), while bluegills ( Lepomis macrochirus) were most abundant downstream (38.0% composition). Upstream populations of Lepomis species had significantly larger individuals (P < 0.05) than Lepomis species sampled downstream. Lepomis species stomach analysis revealed Hyalella azteca as the most abundant food source upstream, and chironomids as the most abundant prey taxa downstream. Upstream Lepomis species stomach analysis yielded an average of 19.05 organisms identified per individual fish, while 4.01 iv organisms per fish were observed downstream. These differences in Lepomis species populations and their diets indicate that future groundwater withdrawals could impact these stable state spring environments, and have substantial impacts on the ecology of the Rainbow River. v Introduction Natural freshwater springs are unique ecosystems that provide essential habitat for many species of flora and fauna (Odum 1957; Hubbs 1995; Walsh 2001). These habitats are vulnerable to flow alterations and habitat loss from increased demand for groundwater withdrawals by residential and agricultural land use. This demand continues to increase on aquifers that sustain natural springs, like the Rainbow River, in central Florida. Over the last several decades, much of the Rainbow River watershed and recharge area were converted from forested lands to agricultural and residential land uses (Figures 1 and 2). As of 2004, the population of the area has increased by 37.5 percent since ten years prior (SWFWMD 2004). The increasing development of the area and demand on water poses a threat to the relatively constant water flows, water temperatures, and water quality that makes the Rainbow River and other spring habitats unique natural resources (Odum 1957; Hubbs 1995; Berndt et al . 1998; Barquin and Scarsbrook 2008). Spring-fed rivers are unique for providing a annually stable habitat for many species, including resident endemic species (Hubbs 2001), and seasonal species seeking thermal refuge in extreme cold or warm conditions (Patterson 1996). Future impacts from groundwater withdrawals on spring-fed rivers would have negative effects on these unique ecosystems by decreasing flows from springs and possibly altering fish and macroinvertebrate communities (Barquin and Scarsbrook 2008). 1 Initial visual site observations from a boat, with confirmation by preliminary electrofishing, indicated that fishes of the family Centrarchidae are abundant and likely dominant in the Rainbow River system, including bluegill ( Lepomis macrochirus ), spotted sunfish ( Lepomis punctatus ), and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides ). During these field visits, Lepomis species were observed congregating around the spring vents at high frequencies for reasons unknown. It is expected that decreased flow from the spring vents might alter this unique habitat and its fish populations. 2 Figure 1. Rainbow River watershed land use map of 1944 (SWFWMD 2004). 3 Figure 2. Rainbow River watershed land use map of 1999 (SWFWMD 2004). 4 Lepomis species, such as bluegill are characterized as generalist feeders (Werner et al. 1981), and select prey according to size (Werner and Hall 1974; O’Brien et al. 1976). As flow is concentrated directly adjacent to and downstream from individual spring vents, Lepomis may utilize the area of flow to maximize predation on drift prey expelled directly from the spring
Recommended publications
  • Luth Wfu 0248D 10922.Pdf
    SCALE-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN MOLECULAR AND ECOLOGICAL PATTERNS OF INFECTION FOR ENDOHELMINTHS FROM CENTRARCHID FISHES BY KYLE E. LUTH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADAUTE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology May 2016 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Gerald W. Esch, Ph.D., Advisor Michael V. K. Sukhdeo, Ph.D., Chair T. Michael Anderson, Ph.D. Herman E. Eure, Ph.D. Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Clifford W. Zeyl, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my PI, Dr. Gerald Esch, for all of the insight, all of the discussions, all of the critiques (not criticisms) of my works, and for the rides to campus when the North Carolina weather decided to drop rain on my stubborn head. The numerous lively debates, exchanges of ideas, voicing of opinions (whether solicited or not), and unerring support, even in the face of my somewhat atypical balance of service work and dissertation work, will not soon be forgotten. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the former Master, and now Doctor, Michael Zimmermann; friend, lab mate, and collecting trip shotgun rider extraordinaire. Although his need of SPF 100 sunscreen often put our collecting trips over budget, I could not have asked for a more enjoyable, easy-going, and hard-working person to spend nearly 2 months and 25,000 miles of fishing filled days and raccoon, gnat, and entrail-filled nights. You are a welcome camping guest any time, especially if you do as good of a job attracting scorpions and ants to yourself (and away from me) as you did on our trips.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of the Spotted Sunfish, Lepomis Punctatus Complex
    Variation of the Spotted Sunfish, Lepomis punctatus Complex (Centrarehidae): Meristies, Morphometries, Pigmentation and Species Limits BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Richard L. Mayden, Editor, John C. Hall, Managing Editor. BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was terminated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organization, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the midsouth. It appears irregularly in consecutively numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340; Telephone (205) 348-7550. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to Managing Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, at the above address. Numbers may be purchased individually; standing orders are accepted. Remittances should accompany orders for individual numbers and be payable to The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN will invoice standing orders. Library exchanges may be handled through: Exchange Librarian, The University of Alabama, Box 870266, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340. When citing this publication, authors are requested to use the following abbreviation: Bull. Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist. ISSN: 0196-1039 Copyright 1991 by The Alabama Museum of Natural History Price this number: $6.00 })Il{ -w-~ '{(iI1 .....~" _--.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Texas Fresh-Water Fishes By
    A Checklist of I Texas Fresh-Water Fishes By CLARK HUBBS Department of Zoology The University of Texas DIVISION OF INLAND FISHERIES TEXAS GAME AND FISH COMMISSION Austin, Texas Marion Toole, Director IF Series - No. 3 Revised Dec. 1958 FOREWORD A checklist of Texas fresh-water fishes by CLARK HUBBS This checklist is modified from that of Hubbs (1957a). A number of changes have been made in nomenclature. Notropis roseus and N. deliciosus have been changed to N. texanus and N. strarnineus, re­ spectively, following Suttkus (1958). Etheostorna whipplei and E. m·tesiae have been changed to E. radiosum following a re-examina­ tion of available material. Two species have been added, Garnbusia senilis, following Hubbs (1958), and Eucinoslornus argenteus, a marine species collected in a .coastal stream near Brownsville. Two species which had not been described in the previous checklist are given their names, Gambusia geiseri, following Hubbs and Springer (1957), and G. helerochir, following Hubbs (1957b). The primary difference between the checklists is the addition of information on the distribution of fishes within the state to this list. The general concepts follow those given in a previous report (Hubbs, 1957c), but emphasize the ranges of the individual species rather than the distributional patterns. The range designations follow the common names of all species. The numbers refer to the modified game areas shovvn on the map. If the fish inhabits only a part of the area, it is so designated by preceding the number with letters (N. for north, etc.) indicating· the pai·t of the area inhabited by the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecomorphology of Centrarchid Fishes D
    Cooke Jayshree c13 V1-12/10/2008 11:37pm P.70 Chapter 3 Ecomorphology of centrarchid fishes D. C. Collar and P. C. Wainwright 3.1 Introduction From the ecologist’s perspective, centrarchid fishes are widely recognized as a model system for investigating the role of phenotypic variation in shaping ecological patterns. To the ichthyologist, this group is considered among the most morphologically and ecologically diverse of North America’s freshwater ichthyofauna. This chapter is intended to bring these perspectives together, highlighting the contributions of studies linking resource use patterns to morphology in order to make sense of the ecological, functional, and morphological diversity exhibited within the Centrarchidae. We review literature on feeding and on locomotion. Historically, the diversity represented within this radiation helped inspire the development of ecomorphology, a research perspective that investigates hypothesized associations between organismal design and ecology. Working independently, Werner (1974, 1977) and Keast (1978, 1985; Keast and Webb 1967) were among the first to point out a general associa- tion between head and body form and resource use in centrarchid species. Using bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), and largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) to represent the range of ecologi- cal and morphological diversity in centrarchids, Werner and coworkers developed the first mechanistic insights into the implications of variation in body and head morphology. The diversity of form and feeding habits represented by bluegill, largemouth bass, black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus), and rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) motivated Keast’s proposal that different suites of morphological features confer varying prey capture and habitat use capabil- ities on these species and that these differences underlie the capacity for these species to coexist in sympatry.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepomis Spp. Technical Note Prepared by IUCN for the European Commission
    Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list This technical note has been drafted by a team of experts under the supervision of IUCN within the framework of the contract No 07.0202/2016/739524/SER/ENV.D.2 “Technical and Scientific support in relation to the Implementation of Regulation 1143/2014 on Invasive Alien Species”. The information and views set out in this note do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this note. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. This document shall be cited as: Zogaris, S.2017. Information on measures and related costs in relation to species considered for inclusion on the Union list: Lepomis spp. Technical note prepared by IUCN for the European Commission. This technical note provides information on the effectiveness of measures, alongside the required effort and resources, used to prevent the introduction, and to undertake early detection, rapid eradication, and management for the invasive alien species under review. Each table represents a separate measure. Date of completion: 04/12/2017 Comments which could support improvement of this document are welcome. Please send your comments by e-mail to [email protected] Species (scientific name) Genus: Lepomis (Rafinesque,
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Abundance and Spatial Distribution of Lepomid Sunfishes in the Peace River
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Relative Abundance and Spatial Distribution of Lepomid Sunfishes in the eaceP River Justin Henry Heller University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Scholar Commons Citation Heller, Justin Henry, "Relative Abundance and Spatial Distribution of Lepomid Sunfishes in the Peace River" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3147 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Relative Abundance and Spatial Distribution of Lepomid Sunfishes in the Peace River by Justin H. Heller A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science Department of Geography, Environment and Planning College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Joni Downs, Ph.D. Kamal Alsharif, Ph.D. Philip Reeder, Ph.D. Date of Approval March 24, 2011 Keywords: Bluegill, Redear, Spotted Sunfish, Lepomis, Peace River Copyright © 2011, Justin H. Heller i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Downs, Dr. Alsharif and Dr. Reeder for all your comments and suggestions for improving this manuscript. Special thanks to my advisor Dr. Downs for your help with the statistical analysis and for all your words of encouragement over the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning AFS Network Bill Fisher Reflects As His Year As President of AFS Comes to an End
    VOL 37 NO 8 FisheriesAmerican Fisheries Society • www.fisheries.org AUG 2012 Translocating Adult Pacific Lamprey Standardized Monitoring of Fish Populations Demographic Diversity in Natural Resource Science Professions Tilapia in South India Annual Report Inside 03632415(2012)37(8) Specializing in RFID products, expert customer service & biological consulting to the fisheries, wildlife & conservation communities for over 20 years. BIOMARK MULTIPLEXING TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM (IS1001-MTS) Biomark’s Multiplexing Transceiver System FS1001M “MUX” IS1001 “ACN” IS1001-MC (IS1001-MTS) is our newest stationary Input Voltage 24V DC 24V DC range 18–30V DC 24V DC range 18–30V DC reader; providing decoding of ISO Antenna Current 7.0 Ap-p 10.0 Ap-p 10.0 Ap-p 11784/11785 compliant FDX-B & HDX PIT tags. The MTS provides improved Auto-tuning 12 capacitors, 10 capacitors, 10 capacitors, electronically switched electronically switched electronically switched performance, with respect to detection range and number of antennas, over Tags Read 134.2 FDX-B 134.2 FDX-B & HDX 134.2 FDX-B & HDX the current FS1001M stationary reader. Virtual Test Tag Yes, digitally adjustable Yes, digitally adjustable Yes, digitally adjustable The MTS consists of a Master Controller Data Storage 1 x 128 KB: 5350 tags; 2 x 128 KB: 8900 tags; 2 x 128 KB: 15,600 tags; (IS1001-MC) and up to 12 IS1001 reader 146 status reports 151 status reports 151 status reports boards. The IS1001-MC acts as the Antenna Connections 6, multiplexed 1 12, multiplexed/synchronized command and control center for the Communication 1: RS232, DB-9 2 standard USB (Mini-B), 2 standard USB (Mini-B), system, directing each reader when to Ports CAN Bus.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Fishes of Caddo and Bossier Parishes, Louisiana
    BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES NUMBER 3 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY AND WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE SHREVEPORT LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY IN SHREVEPORT 1979 Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES are published at irregular intervals. Articles concerning any aspect of the natural history, systematics, or ecology of the flora and fauna of the southeastern United States are acceptable. Laurence M. Hardy, Editor Communications concerning manuscripts, the purchase or exchange of any number of the BULLETIN, or any editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Museum of Life Sciences, Louisiana State University in Shreveport, 8515 Youree Drive, Shreveport, Louisiana 71115. Date of publication: October 1, 1979 Price for this issue 50¢ This public document was published at a cost of 47 cents per copy by Louisiana State Uni- versity in Shreveport to inform citizens of Louisiana under authority of the Louisiana State Constitution. This material was printed in accordance with the standards for printing by state agencies pursuant to R.S. 43:31. Printing of this material was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. BULLETIN of the MUSEUM OF LIFE SCIENCES Number 3, Pages 1-12 October 1. 1979 CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF CADDO AND BOSSIER PARISHES, LOUISIANA LAURENCE M. HARDY Museum of Life Sciences Louisiana State University in Shreveport 8515 Youree Drive Shreveport, Louisiana 71115 WILLIAM H. LEGRANDE Department of Biology University of Wisconsin/Stevens Point Stevens Point, Wisconsin 54481 Copyright @ 1979 by Louisiana State University in Shreveport 1979 HARDY AND LEGRANDE: CHECKLIST OF FISHES 3 INTRODUCTION SOURCES OF INFORMATION Species are included in this list on the basis Bossier Parish or on published records in the of museum specimens (examined by one or both scientific literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment Vanessa Trujillo Florida International University, [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-27-2017 Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment Vanessa Trujillo Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC001758 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Integrative Biology Commons Recommended Citation Trujillo, Vanessa, "Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment" (2017). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3212. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3212 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida JEWELS FOR DOLLARS: NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FRESHWATER FISH INTERACTIONS IN A STRESSFUL DRY DOWN ENVIRONMENT A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Vanessa Trujillo 2017 To: Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts, Sciences and Education This dissertation, written by Vanessa Trujillo, and entitled Jewels for Dollars: Native and Nonnative Freshwater Fish Interactions in a Stressful Dry Down Environment, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. M. Danielle McDonald John C. Withey Robert Lickliter Jennifer S.
    [Show full text]
  • ENSR. 2007, Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study
    Attachment 38 to GNRO-2012/00039 Attachment 38 to GNRO-2012/00039 ENSR. 2007. Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study (IMECS), Entergy -Waterford 3. December 2007. Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study (IMECS) Entergy - Waterford 3 ENSR Corporation December 2007 Document No.: 00970-027-300 ENSR Prepared for: Entergy Operations, Inc. Impingement Mortality and Entrainment Characterization Study (IMECS) Entergy - Louisiana -A' • ;"- "x I'•', •' .. ' "" / Prepared By: Kurtis Schlicht Reviewed By: Robert D. Carpenter ENSR Corporation December 2007 Document No.: 00970-027-300 ENSR ,"v ENSR I A\1:.4F!! V Contents Executive Sum m ary .......................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Statement bf IMECS Goals ...................................................................................... ...... 1-1 1.1.1 Strategy Relative to the 2nd Circuit Court Decision and EPA Suspension of the Rule.. 1-1 1.1.2 Requirements from the Suspended Rule ......................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 Strategy to Address the Rule's Requirements .................................................................. 1-2 1.1.4 Support Issues Specific to Compliance Alternative .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Freshwater Fish Species Checklist
    TEXAS FRESHWATER FISH SPECIES CHECKLIST Order Common Name Genus species Location Collected LAMPREYS STATUS Chestnut Lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus Southern Brook Lamprey Ichthyomyzon gagei STURGEONS Shovelnose Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus platorynchus T PADDLEFISH Paddlefish Polyodon spathula T GARS Alligator Gar Atractosteus spatula Spotted Gar Lepisosteus oculatus Longnose Gar Lepisosteus osseus Shortnose Gar Lepisosteus platostomus BOWFINS Bowfin Amia calva FRESHWATER EELS American Eel Anguilla rostrata HERRINGS & SHADS Skipjack Herring Alosa chrysochloris Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum Threadfin Shad Dorosoma petenense MOONEYES Goldeye Hiodon alosoides Mooneye Hiodon tergisus TROUTS, SALMONS, ETC. * Rainbow Trout Onchorhynchus mykiss PIKES Grass Pickeral Esox americanus * Northern Pike Esox lucius Chain Pickeral Esox niger CHARACINS Mexican Tetra Astyanax mexicanus MINNOWS Central Stoneroller Campostoma anomalum * Goldfish Carassius auratus * Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella Edwards Plateau Shiner Cyprinella lepida Red Shiner Cyprinella lutrensis Proserpine Shiner Cyprinella proserpina T Blacktail Shiner Cyprinella venusta Steelcolor Shiner Cyprinella whipplei * Common Carp Cyprinus carpio Devils River Minnow Dionda diaboli T Roundnose Minnow Dionda episcopa Speckled Chub Extrarius aestivalis Rio Grande Chub Gila pandora T E – Endangered Page 1 of 5 * Non-Native Species T – Threatened X – Extinct TEXAS FRESHWATER FISH SPECIES CHECKLIST Cypress Minnow Hybognathus hayi Mississippi Silvery Minnow Hybognathus nuchalis Plains Minnow Hybognathus
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gregg R
    Gulf of Mexico Science Volume 22 Article 1 Number 2 Number 2 2004 Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gregg R. Poulakis Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Richard E. Matheson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Michael E. Mitchell Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission David A. Blewett Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Charles F. Idelberger Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission DOI: 10.18785/goms.2202.01 Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/goms Recommended Citation Poulakis, G. R., R. E. Matheson Jr., M. E. Mitchell, D. A. Blewett nda C. F. Idelberger. 2004. Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida. Gulf of Mexico Science 22 (2). Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/goms/vol22/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf of Mexico Science by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Poulakis et al.: Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida Gulf of Mexico Science, 2004(2), pp. 117-150 Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida GREGG R. POULAIUS, RICHARD E. MATHESON JR., MICHAEL E. MITCHELL, DAVID A. BLEWETT, AND CHARLES F. lDELBERGER To date, 255 fish species in 95 families have been reliably reported from the Charlotte Harbor estuarine system in southwest Florida. The species list was com­ piled from recent fishery-independent collections, a review of reports and peer­ reviewed literature, and examination of cataloged specimens at the Florida Mu­ seum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]