Gambia: Intra-Africa Trade and Tariff Profile Trade Data Update, Issue No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gambia: Intra-Africa Trade and Tariff Profile Trade Data Update, Issue No Gambia: Intra -Africa trade and tariff profile No. 22 2018 TRADE DATA UPDATE This Trade Data Update provides an overview of Gambia’s intra-African trade relationships, both within the Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and with other individual African countries; the top import and export products traded; and applicable tariffs. Data is sourced from the UN International Trade Centre (ITC) TradeMap and World Trade Organisation (WTO) Tariff databases. The update is accompanied by a visual representation of key data and trends in an infographic. Regional Economic Communities Gambia is a member of two Regional Economic Communities (RECs) – the Community of Sahel-Saharan States (CEN-SAD) and Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). Currently, CEN-SAD has 24 Members states (Benin, Burkina Faso, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Cote d’Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Togo and Tunisia.).The CEN-SAD Treaty was revived in 2013 but the revised treaty has not yet entered into force because it has not been ratified requisite quorum. Out of the 24 countries, only 13 have ratified the revised treaty. There is still no free trade agreement in place, meaning that the products that are traded are still subject to high tariffs. ECOWAS is made up of 15 countries that are located in the Western African region (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo). There exists an ECOWAS Free Trade Area to facilitate the free movement of goods within the REC. All 15 countries are part of the ECOWAS Free Trade Area and all, but Cape Verde, are in the process of implementing the ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET). The ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme (ETLS) facilitates the free movement of goods through the region. Intra-ECOWAS goods that qualify for duty-free and quota-free access are unprocessed goods, traditional handicrafts and certain industrial products of ECOWAS origin. To benefit from Please consider the environment before printing this publication. Copyright © tralac, 2018 | www.tralac.org | [email protected] | Twitter @tradelawcentre Gambia: Intra-Africa trade and tariff profile Trade Data Update, Issue No. 22 | September 2018 the Scheme producers in member states must apply for approval and if granted will be issued the Certificate of Origin granting specified products duty-free and quota-free access to the ECOWAS market. In 2017 Mauritania and ECOWAS signed an Association Agreement for the re-admission of Mauritania to the REC by 2019; Morocco’s application to join ECOWAS has been granted ‘in principle’, but is awaiting final approval and Tunisia has recently obtained ECOWAS observer status. Qualifying imports from approved ECOWAS producers are imported duty- free Gambia. Gambia applies the ECOWAS CET on imports from outside the REC. Intra-Africa trade In 2017, Gambia exported and imported goods to and from the rest of Africa to the value of approximately US$9.2 million and US$267 million, respectively. Intra-Africa exports accounted for 41% of Gambia’s total exports and intra-African imports for 48% of total imports for 2017. Table 1: Gambia’s intra-Africa export and import products (2017) Intra-Africa export products Intra-Africa import products % total % total HS 2017 HS 2017 Product description intra-Africa Product description intra-Africa codes (US$m) codes (US$m) exports imports 0402 Milk and concentrated creams 2.352 26% 2710 Petroleum oils 163.609 61% Granite and Building 5408 Woven fabrics 1.494 16% 2516 78.75 29% Stones Sugar confectionery incl. 1704 1.248 14% 8429 Construction Vehicles 8.348 3% white chocolate Footwear (excluding water- 6402 0.94 10% 2402 Tobacco and Cigarettes 2.256 1% proof footwear) 2103 Sauce 0.716 8% 2523 Cement 1.699 1% 1905 Bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits 0.623 7% 2517 Road Metalling Material 1.135 0% Passenger Carrying 8506 Batteries and electrical parts 0.329 4% 8703 0.963 0% Vehicle Gypsum, Anhydrite, 0902 Tea 0.259 3% 2520 0.606 0% Calcium 6401 Waterproof footwear 0.224 2% 8701 Tractors 0.558 0% Fuel, wood, sawdust, 0306 Crustaceans 0.161 2% 4401 0.478 0% twigs, logs Source: ITC TradeMap (2018). tralac calculations Gambia’s top 10 export products constitute 91% of total exports to the rest of the continent. The exports to the rest of Africa are diverse but mainly consist of dairy and agricultural products with milk and cream making up 26% of the total exports. Woven fabric, sugar and footwear are also important products for export, with woven fabric, sugar confectionery and footwear (excluding waterproof footwear) making up: 16%, 14%, and 10% respectively. Rounding out the top 10 of Gambia’s intra-Africa exports are: crustaceans, waterproof footwear, tea, batteries, electricals, bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits, sauce, seasonings; mustard flour and meal. 2 Gambia: Intra-Africa trade and tariff profile Trade Data Update, Issue No. 22 | September 2018 Top export destinations for Gambia’s products are Mali and Guinea Bissau making up 68% and 23% respectively. Gambia’s main exports to Mali are: milk and cream (32%), woven fabric (22%) and sugar confectionery (20%). To Guinea Bissau, Gambia exports: sauce (33%) bread, pastry cakes (18%), milk and cream (16%). Gambia’s top intra-Africa imports are petroleum oils and oils obtained from bituminous minerals (excluding crude) from partners in the continent. Petroleum oil imports from African partners make up more than 50% of Gambia’s total intra-Africa imports. Granite, porphyry, basalt, sandstone and other monumental or building stone also form a considerable percentage of Gambia’s imports intra-Africa totalling 29%. Furthermore, construction vehicles (bulldozers, excavators, graders) feature in Gambia’s top products imported from across the continent, although the percentage is relatively low, accounting for only 3%. Cigarettes and tobacco products are also important import products accounting for 1 % as well as cement, which makes up 1% of intra-Africa imports. The top 10 imports account for 97% of intra-African imports. Gambia’s main import sources are Ivory Coast and Senegal which account for 61% and 36% respectively. The main import product from Ivory Coast is petroleum oils (100%) and main imports from Senegal are building materials (82%) and machinery and mechanical appliances (9%). Intra-Africa import tariffs Gambia subscribes to the ECOWAS ETLS enabling all qualifying goods sourced from approved producers in the other ECOWAS member states to be imported into Gambia duty-free. Goods imported from CEN-SAD countries, which are not ECOWAS member states (including Egypt, Morocco, Somalia and Tunisia) and the rest of Africa are levied the MFN applied duty. The MFN applied duty of Gambia is the ECOWAS CET. The highest average ad valorem applied tariff is 35%. The 35% tariff is applicable to numerous tariff lines, including meat and edible offal of bovine, swine and poultry; sausages; sugar confectionery not containing cocoa; cocoa powder and chocolate, yoghurt and waters. Various products are imported free of duty, including medicaments (HS30), orthopaedic appliances (HS9021), printed paper materials (unused postage, newspaper, books, music manuscripts, maps and children’s drawings), petroleum oils (HS2709) and diagnostic laboratory cultures and reagents (HS3821 and 3822). Apart from duty- free and 35%, the ECOWAS CET has three additional tariff bands – 5%, 10% and 20%. Gambia’s top import sources outside ECOWAS are: South Africa (44%), Morocco (28%) and Egypt (18%). These countries account for 90% of imports sourced out of ECOWAS. Main products imported by Gambia from South Africa are: tobacco and cigarettes (63%), milk and cream (13%), vegetable oils (3%) and apples and pears (3%). Gambia’s main imports from Morocco are gypsum and calcium sulphate (41%), petroleum oils (15%) and preserved fish (10%). None of the top 10 import products from outside ECOWAS are imported duty-free. The import duties applicable to the main products imported from outside ECOWAS range between 5% and 35%. Gambia mainly imports tobacco and cigarettes from outside ECOWAS at a 20% duty, followed by plasters consisting of calcium gypsum, calcium sulphate (10% tariff), protein concentrate (7.5% average tariff), milk and cream (6.7% average tariff) and medium oils (8.1% average tariff). Sugar confectionary attracts the highest duty (35% tariff). Linseed oil also attracts a 20% tariff, and sacks and paper bags are also imported at a 20% tariff. 3 Gambia: Intra-Africa trade and tariff profile Trade Data Update, Issue No. 22 | September 2018 Table 2: Gambia’s imports from Africa excluding ECOWAS countries HS 2017 Product description MFN applied tariff Code (US$m) 240220 Tobacco and cigarettes 4.807 20% 252020 Plasters consisting of calcium gypsum, calcium sulphate 1.446 10% 7.5% 210610 Protein concentrates and textured protein substances 0.592 (5%-10%) depending on TL 6.7% 040210 Milk and cream in solid forms 0.29 (5%-10%) depending on TL 8.1% 271019 Medium oils and preparation, of petroleum or bituminous minerals 0.274 (5%-10% depending on TL 170199 Cane, beet sugar and chemically pure sucrose in solid form 0.233 20.0% 160413 Prepared or preserved sardines, sardinella, brisling whole or in pieces 0.176 20.0% 170490 Sugar Confectionery including white chocolate (excluding chewing gum) 0.147 35.0% 151519 Linseed oil in all forms but not chemically modified 0.133 20.0% 481930 Sacks and bags of paper 0.105 20.0% Source: ITC TradeMap (2018) and WTO Tariff Database (2018) 4 .
Recommended publications
  • Côte D'ivoire
    CÔTE D’IVOIRE COI Compilation August 2017 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa - RSD Unit UNHCR Côte d’Ivoire Côte d’Ivoire COI Compilation August 2017 This report collates country of origin information (COI) on Côte d’Ivoire up to 15 August 2017 on issues of relevance in refugee status determination for Ivorian nationals. The report is based on publicly available information, studies and commentaries. It is illustrative, but is neither exhaustive of information available in the public domain nor intended to be a general report on human-rights conditions. The report is not conclusive as to the merits of any individual refugee claim. All sources are cited and fully referenced. Users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. UNHCR Regional Representation for West Africa Immeuble FAALO Almadies, Route du King Fahd Palace Dakar, Senegal - BP 3125 Phone: +221 33 867 62 07 Kora.unhcr.org - www.unhcr.org Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 4 1 General Information ....................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Historical background ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of the Togo Toad, Sclerophrys Togoensis, from South-Eastern Ivory Coast
    Herpetology Notes, volume 12: 501-508 (2019) (published online on 19 May 2019) New records of the Togo Toad, Sclerophrys togoensis, from south-eastern Ivory Coast Basseu Aude-Inès Gongomin1, N’Goran Germain Kouamé1,*, and Mark-Oliver Rödel2 Abstract. Reported are new records of the forest toad, Sclerophrys togoensis, from south-eastern Ivory Coast. A small population was found in the rainforest of Mabi and Yaya Classified Forests. These forests and Taï National Park in the western part of the country are the only known and remaining Ivorian habitats of this species. Sclerophrys togoensis is confined to primary and slightly degraded rainforest. Known sites should be urgently and effectively protected from further forest loss. Keywords. Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae, Conservation, Distribution, Mabi/Yaya Classified Forests, Upper Guinea forest Introduction In Ivory Coast the known records of S. togoensis are from the Cavally and Haute Dodo Classified Forests The toad Sclerophrys togoensis (Ahl, 1924) has been (Rödel and Branch, 2002), and the Taï National Park described from Bismarckburg in Togo (Ahl, 1924). Apart and its surroundings (e.g. Ernst and Rödel, 2006; Hillers from a parasitological study (Bourgat, 1978), no recent et al., 2008), all situated in the westernmost part of the records are known from that country (Ségniagbeto et al., country (Fig. 1). During a decade of conflict, both 2007; Hillers et al., 2009). Further records have been classified forests have been deforested (P.J. Adeba, pers. published from southern Ghana (Kouamé et al., 2007; comm.), thus restricting the species known Ivorian range Hillers et al., 2009), western Ivory Coast (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • African Dialects
    African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the African Economic Community Important? Mr
    House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations Hearing on “Will there be an African Economic Community?” January 9, 2014 Amadou Sy, Senior Fellow, Africa Growth Initiative, the Brookings Institution Chairman Smith, Ranking Member Bass, and Members of the Subcommittee, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for convening this important hearing to discuss Africa’s progress towards establishing an economic community. I appreciate the invitation to share my views on behalf of the Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution. The Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution delivers high-quality research on issues of economic growth and development from an African perspective to better inform policy research. I have recently joined AGI from the International Monetary Fund’s where I led or participated in a number of missions to Africa over the past 15 years. Why is the African Economic Community Important? Mr. Chairman, before we start answering the main question, “Will there be an Africa Economic Community?” it is important to look at the reasons why a regionally integrated Africa is beneficial to African nations as well as the United States. In spite of its remarkable economic performance over the past decade, Africa needs to grow faster in order to transform its economy and create the resources needed to reduce poverty. Over the past 10 years, sub-Saharan Africa’s real GDP grew by 5.6 percent per year, a much faster rate than the world economy, which grew by 3.2 percent. At this rate of 5.6 percent, the region should double the size of its economy in about 13 years.
    [Show full text]
  • History, External Influence and Political Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies Economics Department 2014 History, External Influence and oliticalP Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR) Henry Kam Kah University of Buea, Cameroon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jade Part of the Econometrics Commons, Growth and Development Commons, International Economics Commons, Political Economy Commons, Public Economics Commons, and the Regional Economics Commons Kam Kah, Henry, "History, External Influence and oliticalP Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR)" (2014). Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies. 5. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jade/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journal for the Advancement of Developing Economies 2014 Volume 3 Issue 1 ISSN:2161-8216 History, External Influence and Political Volatility in the Central African Republic (CAR) Henry Kam Kah University of Buea, Cameroon ABSTRACT This paper examines the complex involvement of neighbors and other states in the leadership or political crisis in the CAR through a content analysis. It further discusses the repercussions of this on the unity and leadership of the country. The CAR has, for a long time, been embroiled in a crisis that has impeded the unity of the country. It is a failed state in Africa to say the least, and the involvement of neighboring and other states in the crisis in one way or the other has compounded the multifarious problems of this country.
    [Show full text]
  • Côte D'ivoire Country Focus
    European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION European Asylum Support Office Côte d’Ivoire Country Focus Country of Origin Information Report June 2019 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). ISBN: 978-92-9476-993-0 doi: 10.2847/055205 © European Asylum Support Office (EASO) 2019 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, unless otherwise stated. For third-party materials reproduced in this publication, reference is made to the copyrights statements of the respective third parties. Cover photo: © Mariam Dembélé, Abidjan (December 2016) CÔTE D’IVOIRE: COUNTRY FOCUS - EASO COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT — 3 Acknowledgements EASO acknowledges as the co-drafters of this report: Italy, Ministry of the Interior, National Commission for the Right of Asylum, International and EU Affairs, COI unit Switzerland, State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), Division Analysis The following departments reviewed this report, together with EASO: France, Office Français de Protection des Réfugiés et Apatrides (OFPRA), Division de l'Information, de la Documentation et des Recherches (DIDR) Norway, Landinfo The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Office for Country of Origin Information and Language Analysis (OCILA) Dr Marie Miran-Guyon, Lecturer at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), researcher, and author of numerous publications on the country reviewed this report. It must be noted that the review carried out by the mentioned departments, experts or organisations contributes to the overall quality of the report, but does not necessarily imply their formal endorsement of the final report, which is the full responsibility of EASO.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre- Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast
    Col.lecció d’Economia E19/396 Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre- Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast Guido Alfani Federico Tadei UB Economics Working Papers 2019/396 Income Inequality in French West Africa: Building Social Tables for Pre-Independence Senegal and Ivory Coast Abstract: Sub-Saharan Africa is home today to some of the most unequal countries in the world, in Southern and Central Africa, as well as others that are close to the world average, in Western Africa. Yet, there is no consensus regarding the historical factors that led to such a situation. Given limited data on income distribution during colonial times, we do not know whether present-day inequality patterns can be traced back to the colonial period and which role was played by colonial institutions. Most of our knowledge comes from information on British colonies, while territories subjected to other colonial powers are much less well known. To address this gap, we analyze trends in income inequality for colonies in French West Africa, building social tables for Senegal and Ivory Coast during the last decades of colonial rule. We find that income inequality was high during the colonial period, because of the huge income differential between Africans and European settlers (especially in Senegal) and of high inequality within the African population (especially in the Ivory Coast). Nevertheless, it tended to reduce during colonial rule – but the trend inverted after independence. Our findings cast in a new light the connection between colonialism, extractive institutions, high inequality and inequality extraction ratios. JEL Codes: N17, O43.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • African Elections in 2015: a Snapshot for Côte D'ivoire, Tanzania, Burkina
    AFRICAN ELECTIONS IN 2015: A SNAPSHOT FOR CÔTE D’IVOIRE, TANZANIA, BURKINA FASO AND SUDAN John Mukum Mbaku, Nonresident Senior Fellow, Africa Growth Initiative INTRODUCTION democratic constitution making to provide each country with institutional arrangements In 2015, many countries in Africa—including that guarantee the rule of law—where the the Burkina Faso, Burundi, Chad, Egypt, latter exists, the law is supreme; a majority of Ethiopia, Guinea, Libya, Mauritius, Niger, the citizens voluntarily accept and respect the South Sudan, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo and law; there is judicial independence; the law is Zambia—will conduct presidential and/or not administered arbitrarily or capriciously but legislative elections. Most of these countries citizens are able to expect predictable results; have struggled with transition to democracy at there is protection of human rights, including least since the mid-1980s, and some of them those of minority ethnic and religious groups; much more recently. The 2015 elections, then, and governments operate in an open and for some, could be turning points for embrac- transparent manner. ing democracy more closely, and, for others, for significantly deepening and institutional- Openness and transparency are very important izing democracy and emerging as democratic for governance in Africa. Making certain that strongholds on the continent. public policies are designed and implemented in an open and transparent manner not only re- The failure to manage ethnic and religious di- duces corruption but also improves the chanc- versity and provide institutional structures that es that these policies will reflect the values, enhance peaceful coexistence, national inte- interests and aspirations of the country’s rele- gration and nation-building, remains one of vant stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea Côte D'ivoire Liberia
    Mount Nimba Ecosystem Roger W. Luke and Saye Thompson [email protected] +231777397418/+231886576131 and +2317770242935 Liberia, Ivory Coast and Guinea Size: Total 3 countries: 29,093 ha (290,93 km2) Guinea: 12,540 ha, Côte d'Ivoire: 5,000 ha, and Liberia: 11,553 hectares Côte d'Ivoire Guinea Liberia Page 1 of 5 Participants in coordinating the ongoing transboundary cooperation: National Government: • Liberian (Forestry Development Authority (FDA)) • Guinean (CEGENS) • Ivorian Government Local Government: • Nimba County Protected area administration: • East Nimba Nature Reserve Management (ENNR) • ENNR Co-management Committee International NGOs: • Conservation International • Fauna and Flora International National NGOs: • East Nimba Nature Reserve Co-management Committee (CMC) • Skills and Agriculture Development Services (SADS) • Rural Integrated Center for Community Empowerment (RICCE) Local NGOs: • Agriculture Relief Services (ARS) Intergovernmental organizations: • Mano River Union (MRU) Multi-National Corporations: • United National Development Program (UNDP) Community-based Organizations: • Gbalay-geh Youth Association Objectives: The Transboundary Collaboration is characterized by a composition of natural ecosystems evolving from several ecological and geo- physical processes that have obtained to the creation of many habitat types such as montane gallery forest, secondary thickets, or woody grass land, secondary hill forests, moist evergreen forest, swamp or wetter secondary forests. As a result of the diverse vegetative uniqueness of the site, accommodation is provided for many species of conservation relevance including the endemic Nimba Toad, endangered Nimba Otter Shrew, and African Swallow-tail butterfly; socially the area main habitants are the Mano and the Gio. Despite of the three countries they have the same culture and are intermarriage. Very common and spongy borders and conduct their local trade by frequent crossing and transacting their economic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independent Review Mechanism of the African Development Bank
    Key AfDB rules In 2013, the AfDB released a new Integrated About this brochure Safeguards System (ISS), which sets out This brochure provides a brief overview of the work of the AfDB’s Independent Review Mechanism About the rules for the protection of local populations, and how to file a complaint. Civil society organisations, workers, communities and groups of Independent Review vulnerable groups and the environment individuals who are harmed by an AfDB-supported project can use the IRM process to address their against harm from AfDB projects. The ISS grievance. This brochure briefly explains how. Mechanism of the African includes a set of Operational Safeguards (OS), and new Environmental and Social Assessment About SOMO Development Bank Procedures (ESAP) and Integrated Environmental SOMO is an independent, non-profit research and network organisation that promotes sustainable and and Social Impact Assessment (IESIA) Guidelines fair global economic development and the elimination of the structural causes of poverty, environmental The African Development Bank (AfDB) was are expected to be released soon. problems, exploitation and inequality. SOMO’s Rights, Remedy and Accountability Programme aims to established in 1964 as part of the AfDB Group. improve the accessibility and effectiveness of non-judicial grievance mechanisms for stakeholders who The bank’s mission is to contribute to the The OS set out the Bank’s expectations from experience adverse impacts on their human rights as a result of business activities. For more information, sustainable economic development and social its clients regarding social and environmental go to www.grievancemechanisms.org. progress of its 54 African member countries assessments and minimising adverse community and 27 non-African member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Intervention in the Gambia: Lessons from the Ivory Coast, Liberia and Sierra Leone
    BRICS LAW JOURNAL Volume V (2018) Issue 2 MILITARY INTERVENTION IN THE GAMBIA: LESSONS FROM THE IVORY COAST, LIBERIA AND SIERRA LEONE MARKO SVICEVIC, University of Pretoria (Pretoria, South Africa) DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-2-49-71 This article analyses the recent Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) military intervention in the Gambia, primarily focusing on possible legal bases for the enforcement action. It examines the political situation following the release of the election results and details the international response to the post-election situation in the Gambia. Among the legal bases assessed include United Nations Security Council authorisation of regional enforcement action under Chapter VIII of the U.N. Charter through Resolution 2337 (2017), intervention by invitation and consent through prior treaty. In so doing, the article also illuminates the plausibility that the ECOWAS military intervention may be considered as unilateral enforcement action, a point further stressed through an analysis of prior ECOWAS interventions, most notable, the interventions into Sierra Leone and Liberia. Moreover, the intervention in the Ivory Coast following the 2010–2011 post- election crisis is also examined in showcasing the situational similarities between those in the Ivory Coast and those in the Gambia. In so doing, the article inter alia, explores the international legal framework pertaining to the prohibition of the threat and use of force; analysing its nature as well as exceptions to it. Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter, read together with Article 53, therefore form the backbone of the contribution. Keywords: military intervention; United Nations Security Council; regional organisations; regional enforcement action; African Union; ECOWAS.
    [Show full text]