Romans Himself an “Incongruous Compound” of Good and Bad Mixed Together

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Romans Himself an “Incongruous Compound” of Good and Bad Mixed Together bad part of him is always holding the good part of him back. He calls “The Life-Long Struggle” // Romans himself an “incongruous compound” of good and bad mixed together. 7:1–25 // Romans #14 So, Dr. Jekyll, being a chemist, develops this potion that separates the two parts of him so that the good part only comes out by day and ● One of our members told me his one is a lady he’s been sharing the bad part only comes out at night. The good guy is Dr. Jekyll; the with for months. bad is “Mr. Hyde,” whose name derives from the word “hideous” or ● She told him, “I just don’t understand the Bible. It’s too “hidden.” (So, he’s got only good and only bad, operating all by confusing.” So he recommended she start listening to The Whole themselves.) Story sermon series. ● After listening to 4–5 sermons, she texted him: “J.D. said I’m The problem was that the evil part of Dr. Jekyll was far more evil supposed to tell someone if I accepted Jesus. Well, I did, so I’m than he had imagined. Mr. Hyde’s every thought was centered on telling you.” himself. He is spiteful, angry, vengeful and petty. He steals, lies, ● How to let us know your one has come to faith manipulates and even murders. Dr. Jekyll said, “I was tenfold more wicked than I ever thought.” Journal: pic of notes And Stevenson, speaking through Dr. Jekyll, explains, “I discovered Romans 7: In Romans 6 Paul began the discussion of why Christians through this process that man is not truly one, but two… It wasn’t still struggle so much with sin. Many Christians ask, “If Jesus and his that I was a hypocrite… both sides of me were completely sincere.” resurrection power have taken up residence inside of me, why do I still struggle with those same old temptations? Why don’t I love God That explanation probably resonates with a lot of us. Many of us feel more? Or, love to pray more? like we are an incongruous compound of completely opposite people. Paul talks about his own struggle with this in Romans 7. It’s one of Anybody relate? There’s a part of me that wants to do the right thing the most encouraging chapters in the Bible, I think. Paul’s account and another part that doesn’t want to do it at all. reminds me of a classic book I read many years ago by Robert Louis Stevenson called Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. They say the definition In Romans 7 chapter Paul talks about his struggle both pre-Christ of a “classic book” is a book everybody’s heard of but nobody’s read. and after being saved. This is one that is worth reading, because it is inspired by the struggle Paul describes in Romans 7. Tim Keller has an outline for this passage that I just don’t feel like I can improve on, so if it’s alright with y’all, I’m just going to use his.1 In the story, this Dr. Jekyll, a fine, upstanding citizen, is frustrated He says this chapter basically divides into 3 sections: because it seems inside of him is a bad part and a good part, and the ● Vv. 7–13 describe the battle we can’t win; 1 Tim Keller, Sermon on Romans 7:1–25, part 1, Redeemer Presbyterian, NYC 1 ● Vv. 14–25 describe a battle we can’t lose; enough student, a good mother, a successful businessman, or ● And vv. 1–6 give us an analogy that shows us how to make the hatever.) transition between the two. In Christ’s death, you died to the law, which meant you died to your I’m going to read verses 1–6 first, simply because they come first in keeping of the law as the basis of your acceptance, and now you’re the chapter, but I’m not really going to comment on them until the married to him, so… end because they really are Paul’s answer to his own dilemma. (Now, let me warn you: These first verses are going to sound weird You (now) belong to him who was raised from the dead in order that and even a little random, but it’s actually quite brilliant, and I’ll show we may bear fruit for God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful you that at the end. I just don’t want you to worry if in our first pass passions aroused through the law were working in us to bear fruit for through this you’re confused.) death. 6 But now we have been released from the law, since we have died to what held us, so that we may serve in the newness of the 7:1 Since I am speaking to those who know the law, brothers and Spirit and not in the old letter of the law. sisters, don’t you know that the law rules over someone as long as he lives? 2 For example, a married woman is legally bound to her That’s section 1, and we’ll come back to at the end. husband while he lives. But if her husband dies, she is released from the law regarding the husband. 3 So then, if she is married to another But let’s keep moving on to vs. 7, to discuss: man while her husband is living, she will be called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law. Then, if she is married to I. The Battle We Can’t Win (vv. 7–13) another man, she is not an adulteress. (Everybody turn to their neighbor and say, “I have NO IDEA what point Paul is trying to make 7 What should we say then? Is the law sin? (Paul here again picks up here.”) the objection that he knows his religious, Jewish readers would be raising: “Paul, you are hard on that law--saying that it ‘arouses sinful 4 Therefore, my brothers and sisters, you also were put to death in passions’ and that it “multiplies sin” and we need to ‘die to it’--You relation to the law through the body of Christ so that you may belong really think the law is bad, don’t you?) to another. (OK, here’s his point: pre-Christ, we were married to the law. The law, he has explained in Romans, is whatever standard you Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were think proves your worth and gains acceptance. not for the law. ● The law’s first purpose is to reveal how sinful we are. You were married to that--it was the center of your life. It was how ● It’s like a mirror that shows us how far we fall short of God’s you established your identity, what told you things were going to be standard of goodness. ok in the future, how you felt about yourself. It could have been a ● Imagine if you had a full length mirror at home that that had religious law--you were a good enough Christian; or it could have an outline of you at your ideal build and weight, so that every been that you built your identity on the fact that you were a good time you looked into it, you’d see the difference between 2 what you should be and what you are. (I need to move more o But then, something in the 10th commandment, “Thou shalt of this up here.) not covet,” gripped him. ● Or, even worse, imagine you had a filter on your camera o Because that command has nothing to do with external where every time someone took a picture of you, the filter obedience--it foces on the heart. superimposed a silhouetted outline of you at your ideal o Again, coveting means you are dissatisfied with what you weight. have. You look enviously at what other people have and wish ● That’s what the law does: Here’s what you should be—now you had it. compare that to what your heart actually is. o And Paul started to realize that even with all his external conformity to the other commandments, his heart really For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had broke this one. not said, Do not covet. o In fact, as Martin Luther pointed out, this is the ● (Coveting, of course, is wanting what somebody else has and commandment behind all the other commandments feeling like you can’t be satisfied until you have it.) ○ Why do we steal? Luther asked. We covet what someone ● The law said, “The righteous heart, the healthy heart, is a heart else has. that doesn’t covet. ○ Why do you lie? Quite often it is to obtain something you want but can’t get with the truth—So, for example, you 8 And sin, seizing an opportunity through the exaggerate your accomplishments or cover over faults to commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind. For apart gain approval. Or, you lie to obtain a position or an from the law sin is dead. 9 Once I was alive apart from the law, but advantage that you want but couldn’t get with the truth. when the commandment came, sin sprang to life again 10 and I died. Coveting this things that you don’t have compels you to (Thus) The commandment that was meant for life resulted in death lie.
Recommended publications
  • Romans 7 and Sanctification by Andy Woods
    Romans 7 and Sanctification by Andy Woods Introduction This article will argue that one’s understanding of practical sanctification is profoundly impacted by how one views the “I” in Romans 7:7-25. Specifically, the article will argue that the “I” in Romans 7 is Paul, and in verses 14-25 Paul is reflecting upon his post conversion experience. In addition, the article will maintain that a post conversion view of Romans 7:14-25 leads to a dual nature view of the believer. This view teaches that although the believer has a new nature that he received at conversion, his Adamic nature still exists within him and continues to tempt him to return to his former sinful lifestyle throughout the course of this life. Finally, the article will contend that viewing believers through the lenses of the dual nature view shapes one’s understanding of practical sanctification in several important ways. Who is the Speaker in Romans 7:7-25? Three options for the speaker in Romans 7:7-25 have been proposed.1 First, some have proposed the theory of the Rhetorical “I”. According to this view, the pronoun “I” in Romans 7:7-25 serves as a literary device that depicts all of humanity. Thus, the “I” is not autobiographical but rather represents the experience of everyone. Second, others have proposed the theory of the Representative “I”. According to this view, the pronoun “I” in Romans 7:7-25 depicts the life experience of a representative figure that is typical of every person including the speaker. For example, the “I” of Romans 7:7-25 could represent the experience of Adam at the time of the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Logging Songs of the Pacific Northwest: a Study of Three Contemporary Artists Leslie A
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Logging Songs of the Pacific Northwest: A Study of Three Contemporary Artists Leslie A. Johnson Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MUSIC LOGGING SONGS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST: A STUDY OF THREE CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS By LESLIE A. JOHNSON A Thesis submitted to the College of Music in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2007 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Leslie A. Johnson defended on March 28, 2007. _____________________________ Charles E. Brewer Professor Directing Thesis _____________________________ Denise Von Glahn Committee Member ` _____________________________ Karyl Louwenaar-Lueck Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank those who have helped me with this manuscript and my academic career: my parents, grandparents, other family members and friends for their support; a handful of really good teachers from every educational and professional venture thus far, including my committee members at The Florida State University; a variety of resources for the project, including Dr. Jens Lund from Olympia, Washington; and the subjects themselves and their associates. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flowers for Algernon.Pdf
    SHORT STORY FFlowerslowers fforor AAlgernonlgernon by Daniel Keyes When is knowledge power? When is ignorance bliss? QuickWrite Why might a person hesitate to tell a friend something upsetting? Write down your thoughts. 52 Unit 1 • Collection 1 SKILLS FOCUS Literary Skills Understand subplots and Reader/Writer parallel episodes. Reading Skills Track story events. Notebook Use your RWN to complete the activities for this selection. Vocabulary Subplots and Parallel Episodes A long short story, like the misled (mihs LEHD) v.: fooled; led to believe one that follows, sometimes has a complex plot, a plot that con- something wrong. Joe and Frank misled sists of intertwined stories. A complex plot may include Charlie into believing they were his friends. • subplots—less important plots that are part of the larger story regression (rih GREHSH uhn) n.: return to an earlier or less advanced condition. • parallel episodes—deliberately repeated plot events After its regression, the mouse could no As you read “Flowers for Algernon,” watch for new settings, charac- longer fi nd its way through a maze. ters, or confl icts that are introduced into the story. These may sig- obscure (uhb SKYOOR) v.: hide. He wanted nal that a subplot is beginning. To identify parallel episodes, take to obscure the fact that he was losing his note of similar situations or events that occur in the story. intelligence. Literary Perspectives Apply the literary perspective described deterioration (dih tihr ee uh RAY shuhn) on page 55 as you read this story. n. used as an adj: worsening; declining. Charlie could predict mental deterioration syndromes by using his formula.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 8:1 Commentary
    Romans 8:1 Commentary PREVIOUS NEXT Click chart to enlarge Chart from recommended resource Jensen's Survey of the NT - used by permission Romans Overview Chart - Charles Swindoll Source: Dr David Cooper Click to Enlarge ROMANS ROAD to RIGHTEOUSNESS Romans 1:18-3:20 Romans 3:21-5:21 Romans 6:1-8:39 Romans 9:1-11:36 Romans 12:1-16:27 SIN SALVATION SANCTIFICATION SOVEREIGNTY SERVICE NEED WAY LIFE SCOPE SERVICE FOR OF OF OF OF SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION SALVATION God's Holiness God's Grace God's Power God's Sovereignty Gods Glory In In In In The Condemning Justifying Sanctifying Saving Object of Sin Sinners Believers Jew and Gentile Service Deadliness Design Demonstration of Salvation of Sin of Grace Power Given Promises Fulfilled Paths Pursued Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Righteousness Needed Credited Demonstrated Restored to Israel Applied God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness God's Righteousness IN LAW IMPUTED OBEYED IN ELECTION DISPLAYED Slaves to Sin Slaves to God Slaves Serving God Doctrine Duty Life by Faith Service by Faith Modified from Irving L. Jensen's chart above R Ruin (Romans 1:17 – 3:20) – The utter sinfulness of humanity O Offer (Romans 3:21-31) – God’s offer of justification by grace M Model (Romans 4:1-25) – Abraham as a model for saving faith A Access (Romans 5:1-11) – The benefits of justification N New Adam (Romans 5:12-21) – We are children of two “Adams” S Struggle w/ Sin (Romans 6:1-8:39) Struggle, sanctification, and victory Romans 8:1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 Is Paul's Conclusion To
    1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 is Paul’s conclusion to this great letter and his personal greetings and commendations to individuals he knows in Rome. Many in this list of names are only mentioned here, but even this teaches us many things about the infant church and culture into which it was born. In chapter 15 Paul had spoken of a mutual indebtedness among believers. The Gentiles were indebted to the Jewish believers for the salvation they enjoyed, so they gave a financial gift to help the Jewish Christians in Rome who were destitute (15:27). By receiving the gift, the Jews would then be indebted to the Gentile believers for their help. This is part of the beauty of the church. The church is a gathering of people who depend on one another. In Romans 15:5–7 Paul said, “May the God who gives perseverance and encouragement grant you to be of the same mind with one another according to Christ Jesus, so that with one accord you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, accept one another, just as Christ also accepted us to the glory of God.” In Romans 16, this theme is applied to specific individuals. In this passage, Paul mentions 26 individuals, two families, and possibly three house churches (it is unclear what “those of Aristobulus” [16:10] and “those of Narcissus” [16:11] refer to. Although most translations insert the words, “of the household of” or “of the family of,” those additions are not present in the original Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7: an Old Covenant Struggle Seen Through New Covenant Eyes
    MSJ 30/2 (Fall 2019) 277–302 ROMANS 7: AN OLD COVENANT STRUGGLE SEEN THROUGH NEW COVENANT EYES Jay Street, ThM The Master’s Seminary Romans 7 is possibly one of the most cherished texts in church history. But it is also one of the most controversial passages in Scripture. Many resonate with Paul’s ambivalence and insist that Paul is speaking about the Christian’s daily struggle with sin. Others strongly disagree and purport that Paul’s struggle is too defeating for the Christian life, and he must be speaking for unbelievers. However, it will be argued in this article that both sides of the debate have been speaking past each other for centuries because both sides are asking the wrong question. This is not a passage about whether Paul is speaking as a Christian or not, but whether Paul is speaking as someone under the Old Covenant or the New Covenant. Thus, when the reader’s perspective is properly adjusted, he can rightly ascertain Paul’s spiritual status in the passage—Paul is speaking as a believer under the Old Covenant before the inauguration of the New Covenant. * * * * * Introduction Most people do not realize it, but their vision is clouded. This is not referring to physical blindness or short-sightedness, but to the popular evangelical perception of one biblical passage—Romans 7:14–25. Today, this text is as popular as it is contro- versial.1 Not only is the passage well-known, it has actually been one of the most cherished biblical texts in history. This is especially the case for those who have ad- vocated that Romans 7 conveys the Christian’s battle with sin, because many have discovered an inviting home in this emotional, heart-wrenching text.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance Treadmill (Romans 7:7-25) Study By: Keith Krell
    Spirit of Joy Men’s Fellowship Saturday Bible Study Romans 7:7-25 The Performance Treadmill (Romans 7:7-25) Study By: Keith Krell https://bible.org/seriespage/performance-treadmill-romans-77-25 This past week my children started a new job walking our neighbor’s dogs. Fortunately, these two dogs are small and easy to walk. However, I know this isn’t the case with all dogs. Perhaps you’ve seen someone walking a dog on a leash when the dog doesn’t want to go where its owner is going? The owner is constantly tugging on the leash pulling the dog back from here and there and telling it to stop and start. That’s the way a lot of Christians live. They’re on a “Law leash.” Their lives consist of, “stop that; come back here; don’t do that,” only it’s in terms of, “read your Bible; pray; witness; go to church; serve; be Christ-like.” Now, there’s nothing wrong with these things. They are all biblical. But God never meant us to do them at the end of a leash! What a difference it is when you see a dog and its owner have a strong relationship. The dog doesn’t need the leash to go for a walk. Its owner can just speak a word and the dog responds. I’m not comparing you to a dog. Rather, I’m comparing performance to relationship.1 For years I’ve been on a “Law leash.” I’ve tried to perform spiritually by reading my Bible, praying, witnessing, serving, and being Christ-like.
    [Show full text]
  • NT503: the Epistle to the Romans Course Lecturer: Harold W
    COURSE SYLLABUS NT503: The Epistle to the Romans Course Lecturer: Harold W. Hoehner, ThD, PhD About This Course This course was originally created through the Institute of Theological Studies in association with the Evangelical Seminary Deans’ Council. There are nearly 100 evangelical seminaries of various denominations represented within the council and many continue to use the ITS courses to supplement their curriculum. The lecturers were selected primarily by the Deans’ Council as highly recognized scholars in their particular fields of study. Course Description The book of Romans is crucial to the understanding of salvation and sanctification. In this course,you will explore the rich truths of justification and other significant topics by completing an exegetical and theological study of Paul’s Epistle to the Romans in the Greek text. The course treats select historical, grammatical, structural, and lexical data that illumine the meaning of this important New Testament document. You will be encouraged to put textual theory into living practice. NOTE: This course assumes a basic skill in Greek exegesis and the ability to make grammatical and textual critical evaluations and to do Greek word studies. Course Objectives Upon completion of the course, you should be able to do the following: • Increase your Greek vocabulary and gain additional competence in grammatical analysis and translation of the Greek text of Romans. • Gain additional experience in doing exegesis from the Greek text in preparation for expository preaching and teaching. • Wrestle with selected theological issues and formulate exegetically defensible solutions. • Be involved in a study of Romans in order to be able to think through the argument of the Epistle as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7 Pastor Jeremy Cagle, March 18, 2018
    Romans 7 Pastor Jeremy Cagle, March 18, 2018 Go ahead and turn in your Bibles to the book of Romans. And as you're doing that this morning, we're in a series called "The Book of Romans in Three Months", where we're looking at the Book of Romans over a three month, or 12-week period of time. We're surveying the book and flying over it so you can get the big picture. And the big picture of Romans is this, Jesus saves sinners. The big idea of the book is found in chapter 1, verse 18, if you want to look there with me. Paul writes and he says, "For I am not ashamed of the gospel. For it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes." Romans is about the power of God for salvation. It's about the gospel, or the good news, and its ability to change lives. In the 1800s, a painting was found in an art gallery in Chicago called "The Rock of Ages," which showed a person clinging to a cross that was firmly embedded in a rock. And as the wind and the waves beat against him, and the ocean crashed at his feet, the man was saved. That's what the book of Romans is about. It's about clinging to the Rock of ages and being delivered. It's about being saved from the storm. I don't have to ask you whether you're in a storm this morning. I'm guessing that you are.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Man in Romans 7? Part 1
    Who Is the Man in Romans 7? Part 1 Peter Ditzel Who is the man in Romans 7? This is a continuing controversy among Christians and a question I am often asked. Usually, I’m asked whether I think the man is Paul before or after his conversion. I find it impossible to directly or quickly answer because it is the wrong question. But who is this man whom Paul refers to as “I,” and who seems to believe the Gospel while, at the same time, he struggles with the law and sin? The only way to properly understand the answer to this question is to understand Paul’s purpose in writing Romans, the historical context of Paul’s letter to the Romans, and the textual context of Romans 7. I hope you’ll find this study as interesting as I do. I also hope you’ll see how relevant the lesson we will learn is to our spiritual lives today. For, while the man of Romans 7 is quite historical, his “ghost” still haunts us. Purpose of Paul’s Letter to the Romans It’s not really possible to separate Paul’s purpose for writing Romans from understanding the historical context, but I’ll make a few, brief comments before going into the history. I think it would be hard to argue against the position that one of Paul’s primary purposes in writing his letter to the Roman believers was to clarify their understanding of the Gospel. He wanted to establish that salvation is God’s gracious gift to those who believe on His Son as their Savior.
    [Show full text]
  • Ep #375: Do Hard Things Full Episode Transcript Brooke Castillo
    Ep #375: Do Hard Things Full Episode Transcript With Your Host Brooke Castillo The Life Coach School Podcast with Brooke Castillo Ep #375: Do Hard Things You are listening to The Life Coach School Podcast with Brooke Castillo, episode number 375. Welcome to The Life Coach School Podcast, where it’s all about real clients, real problems and real coaching. And now your host, Master Coach Instructor, Brooke Castillo. Hello, my friends. Okay, I might have a little rant. I might have a little talking-to today. You telling me that things are hard doesn’t mean anything. What does it mean that things are hard? It’s an irrelevant thing to say. People say things are hard to me as if that’s a reason not to do them. That is the reason to do them. Hard things are what make us stronger. We can’t get stronger if we don’t do hard things. So, if you come to me and you say, “But it’s so hard...” I don’t know what you mean. It’s like when people say to me, “But it’s so expensive.” Of course, it’s expensive. Of course, I charge a lot for what I do. It’s so valuable. Of course, it’s hard. It’s going to make you into who you want to be. You can’t become who you want to be on easy street. You can’t make things easy and then expect yourself to grow from doing easy things. You don’t want people to go, “Oh, she always takes the easy road.” When you hear someone talk about someone else like that, it’s not impressive, my friends.
    [Show full text]
  • “Romans 7:7-25 and the Doctrine of Sanctification”
    “Romans 7:7-25 and The Doctrine of Sanctification” Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Context ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Paul’s Biography ......................................................................................................................... 2 Overview of the Book of Romans .............................................................................................. 2 Major Interpretive Views ............................................................................................................. 4 Who is the “I” in Romans 7:7-25? .............................................................................................. 5 View 1: Autobiographical “I” (i.e., Paul) .............................................................................. 5 View 2: Representative “I” (i.e., Adam, Israel, or Paul in solidarity with Israel/the Jews) .. 7 View 3: Rhetorical “I” (i.e., literary device that depicts all of humanity) ............................. 9 What is the spiritual state described in Romans 7:7-25? .......................................................... 11 View 1: Unregenerate in 7:7-25 ........................................................................................... 11 View 2: Regenerate in 7:7-25 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]