Team Brazil – University of Campinas
Problem 9 - Optical Compass
Maria Carolina Volpato and Denise Christovam
1 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Problem Statement
Bees locate themselves in space using their eyes’ sensitivity to light polarization. Design an inexpensive optical compass using polarization effects to obtain the best accuracy. How would the presence of clouds in the sky change this accuracy?
2 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Visualization of the phenomenon
Problem 9- Optical Compass 3 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Light Scattering Incident
Scattered Backward Forward scattering scattering
Scattered Light
Incoming Light 4 Problem 9- Optical Compass Particle Team Brazil – University of Campinas Light Scattering
Rayleigh Scattering Mie Scattering
Conditions to Rayleigh scattering are satisfied!
Problem 9- Optical Compass 5 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Linear Polarization
➔ For the observer at PMP polarization plane collapses into a line ➔ 90o from the source of light
Problem 9- Optical Compass 6 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Mapping the sky
➔ Rayleigh sky model describes how the maximally polarized light stripe varies with rotation
Degree of polarization at sunset or sunrise. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_sky_model Problem 9- Optical Compass 7 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Materials and design ➔ Polarizing sheets ➔ Guillotine Paper Cutting Machine ➔ Adhesive tape ~ R$ 30.00 ($6.00) ➔ Cardboard A4 (120 g/m²)
o 12 petals – 30 72 petals – 5o 18 petals – 20o Problem 9- Optical Compass 8 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Angular Resolution - Malus Law
Angular Resolution ~ 20º
χ
Polarization Direction Problem 9- Optical Compass 9 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Setup- Vertical and Horizontal Mapping
Vertical
Horizontal
Problem 9- Optical Compass 10 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Vertical Angle χ Φ= 335º Ө
0º 40º 80º 120º
Problem 9- Optical Compass 11 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Horizontal Angle
Φ Ө ~ 10º 0º 60º 120º
180º 240º 300º Problem 9- Optical Compass 12 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Temporal evolution of the shadow
➔ Angle in relation to the ground Ө= 25±1º ➔ Approximate geographical position: ◆ Latitude: 23º 00’ 21” S ◆ Longitude: 46º 50’ 20” W ➔ Window facing SSW (276º form north) ➔ Total time of acquisition 266 min ( from 12 PM to sunset) ➔ Performed at 09/24/2019
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/@3460598?month=9&year Problem 9- Optical Compass =2019 13 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Temporal evolution of the shadow
Problem 9- Optical Compass 14 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Presence of clouds
Clear sky Partly Cloudy Cloudy
Typical radius of the droplets ~ 10² nm ~ λ
Mie Scattering dominates
Problem 9- Optical Compass 15 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Conclusions ➔ It is possible to build a cheap device R$ 30.00 - $ 6.00
➔ It indicates N-S direction Rayleigh Scattering
➔ Clouds reduces the accuracy Mie Scattering
Problem 9- Optical Compass 16 Team Brazil – University of Campinas
Thank You!
17 Team Brazil – University of Campinas How do bees locate themselves?
https://www.beeculture.com/bees-see-matters/ Problem 9- Optical Compass 18 Team Brazil – University of Campinas A model for radiation
The electric fields propagate radially
Time-averaged Poynting vector:
“p” wave
Total time-averaged power radiated:
David J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, Prentice Hall, 1999
Problem 9- Optical Compass 19 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Rayleigh x Mie If α≪λ : Rayleigh
Angular dependence Distance between Same dependence particle and with frequency observer
We recover dipole radiation!
If α is close to λ: Mie Distortion of the radiation in one direction
Problem 9- Optical Compass 20 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Rayleigh x Mie Recovering the toroidal profile of dipole radiation:
dipole z
y
Light scatters at xy plane – polarization depends on our position in relation to the Sun 21 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Atmospheric Conditions
% Kinetic Diameter (nm)
N2 78 0.364
O2 21 0.346
Conditions to Rayleigh scattering are satisfied! CO2 0.03 0.330
H2O 3 0.265
Ar 0.9 0.340
Problem 9- Optical Compass 22 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Linear polarization
At PMP, the polarization Plane: L
L L
Plane the observer sees Observer’s Plane of view polarization
At B, the observer sees E⊥ :
Sunbeam
L Observer Plane the observer sees
23 Problem 9- Optical Compass Team Brazil – University of Campinas Degree of polarization
At B, the observer sees E⊥ : Sunbeam
L Observer Plane the observer sees
As sunlight is unpolarized at first
We can define the degree of polarization P(γ):
24 Problem 9- Optical Compass Team Brazil – University of Campinas Navigation
Scattering Angle Sun Observation point
We always need some other info, like the time of the day (or measure for extended periods of time)
y (W)
z (N)
Problem 9- Optical Compass 25 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Analyse the data
➔ ImageJ
Problem 9- Optical Compass 26 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Defining angular resolution
Problem 9- Optical Compass 27 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Angular resolution - Malus Law
Deviation from Malus Law Intrinsic width of shadow: Limited due to small ~20o in 180o (“efficiency” of misalignments/anisotropies compass: ~89%) resolution Problem 9- Optical Compass 28 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Temporal evolution of the shadow
➔ Angle in relation to the ground Ө= 25±1º ➔ Approximate geographical position: ◆ Latitude: 23º 00’ 21” S ◆ Longitude: 46º 50’ 20” W ➔ Window facing SSW (276º form north) ➔ Total time of acquisition 266 min ( from 12 PM to sunset) ➔ Performed at 09/24/2019
Setup
Problem 9- Optical Compass 29 Gaussian – Calibration
Deviation from Malus Law due to small misalignments/ anisotropies Calibration curve for degree of polarization and sun 72 petals – 5o Intrinsic width of shadow: position ~20o in 180o (“efficiency” of compass: ~89%)
Limited
resolution 30 Timelapse – T0 = 1 PM
31 Timelapse – T0 = 5:26 PM
32 Temporal evolution of the shadow
• Shadow sharpens • Strip rotates indicating solar position
33 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Accuracy
Problem 9- Optical Compass 34 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Error Analysis - Intensity
Problem 9- Optical Compass 35 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Error Analysis - Position
土5º
Problem 9- Optical Compass 土8º 36 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Error Analysis - Position
Problem 9- Optical Compass 37 Team Brazil – University of Campinas Atmospheric conditions - Cloudy weather
Conditions to Rayleigh scattering are not satisfied
Mie Scattering dominates
Typical radius of the ~ λ droplets ~ 10² nm No pattern formed Problem 9- Optical Compass 38 Team Brazil – University of Campinas References
Wehner, R.D., 1976. Polarized-light navigation by insects. Scientific American, 235(1), pp.106-115.
Rossel, S., 1993. Navigation by bees using polarized skylight. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 104(4), pp.695-708.
39