Novel Insights in Commercial in Vitro Embryo Production in Cattle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Novel Insights in Commercial in Vitro Embryo Production in Cattle Novel insights in commercial in vitro embryo production in cattle Maaike Catteeuw Promoter: Prof. dr. Ann Van Soom Copromoters: Prof. dr. Joris Vermeesch, Dr. Katrien Smits Dissertation submitted to Ghent University in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Veterinary Sciences 2018 Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Members of the examination committee Prof. dr. Herman Favoreel Chairman – Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Bjorn Heindryckx Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Luc Peelman Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Geert Opsomer Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Erik Mullaart CRV BV, the Netherlands Dr. Karen Goossens Research institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Belgium Funding Project G039214N: Chromosomal instability during early embryonic development: elucidating key mechanisms in a bovine model Printed by University Press, Zelzate TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN CATTLE 9 1.2 COMMERCIAL IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION 11 1.3 QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT 25 1.4 GENETIC DISORDERS AND CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN CATTLE 34 1.5 CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN HUMAN EMBRYOS AND THE BOVINE MODEL 35 1.5 REFERENCES 37 CHAPTER 2 AIMS OF THE STUDY 51 CHAPTER 3 HOLDING IMMATURE BOVINE OOCYTES IN A COMMERCIAL EMBRYO HOLDING MEDIUM 55 CHAPTER 4 IN VITRO PRODUCTION OF BOVINE EMBRYOS DERIVED FROM INDIVIDUAL DONORS 75 IN THE CORRAL® DISH CHAPTER 5 DEVELOPMENTAL COMPETENCE OF EARLY, INTERMEDIATE AND LATE CLEAVING 91 EMBRYOS USING TIME-LAPSE IMAGING CHAPTER 6 CHROMOSOME INSTABILITY IN IN VIVO AND IN VITRO BOVINE EMBRYOS 107 CHAPTER 7 GENERAL DISCUSSION 129 7.1 INFLUENCE OF THE DONOR ANIMAL 132 7.2 THE INTRINSIC OOCYTE QUALITY 134 7.3 EMBRYO DEVELOPMENTAL COMPETENCES 137 7.4 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 144 7.5 FUTURE PERSPECTIVES 145 7.6 REFERENCES 146 CHAPTER 8 SUMMARY – SAMENVATTING 153 DANKWOORD 163 BIBLIOGRAPHY 167 CURRICULUM VITAE 171 APPENDIX 173 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AC Apoptotic cell ACR Apoptotic cell ratio AI Artificial insemination AMH Anti-Muellerian Hormone ART Assisted reproductive technologies BAF B allele frequency BMP15 Bone morphogenetic protein 15 BoHV1 Bovine Herpes Virus 1 BSA Bovine serum albumin cAMP Cyclic AMP CIDR Controlled internal drug release CIN Chromosomal instability CN Copy number COCs Cumulus oocyte complexes CR1aa Charles Rosenkrans 1 amino acids dpi Days post insemination eCG Equine chorionic gonadotropin EGA Embryonic genome activation EGF Epidermal growth factor EHM Embryo holding medium FCS Fetal calf serum FISH Fluorescent in situ hybridization FSH Follicle stimulating hormone GC Guanine Cytosine GDF9 Growth differentiation factor 9 GEO Gene Expression Omnibus GnRH Gonadotrophin releasing hormone h Hours i.m. Intramuscularly ICM Inner cell mass IETS International Embryo Technology Society ITS Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium IVC In vitro culture IVF In vitro fertilization IVM In vitro maturation IVP In vitro production LH Luteinizing hormone LogR Log R ratio LOS Large offspring syndrome LSM Least square means MDA Multiple displacement amplification MEM Minimal essential medium MET Maternal-embryonic transition MOET Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer MPF Maturation promoting factor NA Not available NGS Next generation sequencing OCS Oestrus cow serum OMIA Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals OPU Ovum pick-up OR Odds ratio PBS Phosphate-buffered saline PCR Polymerase chain reaction PGD Preimplantation genetic diagnosis PGF Prostaglandin PGS Preimplantation genetic screening PVA Polyvinyl alcohol PVP Polyvinyl pyrrolidone qPCR Quantitative polymerase chain reaction rob Robertsonian translocation RT Room temperature SE Standard error SEM Standard error of the mean SNP Single polynucleotide polymorphism SOF Synthetic oviductal fluid TALP Tyrode's albumin-pyruvate-lactate TCM-199 Tissue Culture Medium 199 TCN Total cell number TE Trophectoderm TLC Time-lapse cinematography WGA Whole genome amplification WOW Well-of-the-well CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 1.1 Assisted reproductive technologies in cattle Today, assisted reproductive technology (ART) refers to all fertility treatments in which human or animals’ eggs, semen and embryos are being manipulated. Primarily, ART is used to overcome infertility and to help couples to fulfil their desire to have children. In cattle, ART is mainly performed to improve reproductive results but it is also intensively used to improve genetic selection in valuable individuals or herds. Furthermore, ART can also be a part of the preservation of endangered species. ART can be as simple as artificial insemination (AI) in which sperm cells from a male animal of interest is manually deposited in the reproductive tract of the female. This allows the use of genetic material of superior males, the import of semen to introduce new genetic material without the need to transport live animals, the use of frozen semen long after the animals’ dead and the risk reduction of spreading transmittable sexual diseases (Foote 2002). Generally, AI techniques have been standardized for many species and AI is performed globally in more than 100 million cattle every year (Boa-Amponsem and Minozzi 2006). Pregnancy rates after AI however can vary between 30 and 70% depending on several factors such as timing (Lamb et al. 2010), parity (Pursley et al. 1997) and number of AI performed (Chebel et al. 2004). Due to its massive worldwide application, the genetic impact from the male side increased enormously. Some bulls have over hundred thousands of descendants and have therefore a remarkable impact on the genetic pool of a breed (Thibier 2005; Goovaerts et al. 2007). Less evident is however producing more offspring from genetically valuable females to increase their genetic impact on the selection process. Starting from the mid-seventies, female donors are routinely treated with hormones to induce superovulation and are subsequently inseminated to recover embryos by uterine flushing. These in vivo derived embryos are then transferred to synchronized recipients (multiple ovulation and embryo transfer – MOET). Although annually more than 500,000 in vivo derived embryos are transferred worldwide to increase the genetic impact from the female side, it is not successful at all times due to the unpredictable response to the hormonal treatment between cows (Hasler et al. 1995; Van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw 2006). Nonetheless, the embryo transfer technique proved to be very useful in the transfer of in vitro produced embryos (IVP) (Goovaerts et al. 2007), in which immature oocytes are removed from the ovaries and are fertilized with semen in a dish. During culture, the fertilized oocytes or zygotes will start cleaving and when the blastocyst stage is reached, transfer of the embryo to the uterus of a recipient donor is possible. As some disadvantages of MOET, such as the unreliable hormonal response, can be overcome by IVP, it gained worldwide interest and nowadays more than 660,000 IVP embryos are produced each year. Since the first in vitro produced calf, including in vitro maturation of the oocyte, was born in 1990 (Fukuda et al. 1990), tremendous progress has been made 9 Chapter 1 not only in the oocyte retrieval process (ovum pick-up – OPU) but also in the in vitro procedures (maturation, fertilization and culture) and cryopreservation techniques. Other ART are part of fundamental or biomedical research, such as the production of cloned embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer or the production of transgenic embryos. However, cloned and genetically engineered animals have already raised interest in the meat and dairy industry, for application in breeding programs, such as the production of hornless offspring or improved food products from animals (Foote 2005). Until now, European legislation only recommends cloning or producing genetically modified animals by novel techniques such as Crispr-Cas for research purposes as the European Group on Ethics is still in doubt whether using cloned or genetically modified animals for food supply is ethically justified (European legislation COM/2010/0585). 10 Chapter 1 1.2 Commercial in vitro embryo production In order to produce bovine embryos in vitro from follicular oocytes, it is required to perform a series of essential techniques following a strict timing. After oocyte collection, which can be performed in live animals by ovum pick-up (OPU) or by follicular aspiration of slaughterhouse ovaries, three subsequent phases can be distinguished: in vitro maturation (IVM), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in vitro culture (IVC) (Figure 1). When all consecutive steps are carried out punctually, viable embryos will be the result. In commercial settings, this will be the higher goal of IVP as these viable embryos will be transferred to recipient animals which will hopefully become pregnant and deliver a healthy calf. 1.2.1 Oocyte collection Ovum pick-up in live donor animals Repeated oocyte collection by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular puncture (OPU) followed by routine IVP has become an important alternative to MOET in cattle. Adapted from human reproduction, OPU in cattle was performed for the first time in 1988 (Pieterse et al. 1988). It can be considered to be more advantageous than MOET as it can also be used in acyclic
Recommended publications
  • 2123 Genes Regulating Implantation and Fetal Development
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 11, 2123-2137, September 1, 2006] Genes regulating implantation and fetal development: a focus on mouse knockout models 1 1 2 ,3 Surendra Sharma , Shaun P. Murphy , and Eytan R. Barnea 1 Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Women and Infants’ Hospital of Rhode Island-Brown University, Providence, RI, 2 SIEP, the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy, Cherry Hill, NJ and 3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Endogeous gene expression 3.1. Gene expression in blastocyst implantation 3.2. Gene expression (silencing) in the embryo 4. Mouse knockout models of reproductive-related genes 4.1. Cytokines 4.2. Cyclooxygenase-2 4.3. Insulin-like growth factor system 4.4. Matrix metalloproteinase system 4.5. Transcription factors involved in placental development 4.6. Indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase 5. Conclusions 6. Acknowledgements 7. References 1. ABSTRACT 2. INTRODUCTION Timely and efficient regulation of blastocyst Mammalian reproduction represents a highly implantation and fetal growth are essential for the orchestrated and intricate process. The spatial and successful reproduction of viviparous mammals. temporal regulation of a fetal-maternal crosstalk is required Disruptions in this regulation can result in a wide variety of for a successful pregnancy (1-5). After fertilization, the human gestational complications including infertility, developing blastocyst must invade and establish itself in the spontaneous abortion, fetal growth restriction, and maternal endometrium, from which it will eventually gain premature delivery. The role of several groups of factors, the crucial protection and nourishment required for including cytokines, hormones, transcription factors, extra- development throughout gestation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,646,003 Barnea Et Al
    US005646003A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,646,003 Barnea et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 8, 1997 54 PREIMPLANTATION FACTOR Collier M, O'Neill C, Ammit AJ, Saunders DM, Biochemi cal and pharmacological characterization of human embryo 76) Inventors: Eytan R. Barnea, 1697 Lark La., -derived activating factor. Hum Reprod. 1988:3:993-998. Cherry Hill, N.J. 08003; Carolyn B. O'Neill C, Gidley-Baird AA, Amnit AJ. Saunders DM. Use Coulam, 11015 Bryar Lynn Ct., Fairfax of a bioassay for embryo-derived platelet activating factor Sta. Va., 22039 as a means of assessing quality and pregnancy potential of human embryos. Fertill Steril. 1987:47:967-975. 21 Appl. No.: 216,618 O'Neill C. Gidley-Baird AL, Pike AL, Porter RN, Sinosich MJ, Saunders DM. Maternal blood platelet physiology and (22 Filed: Mar 23, 1994 luteal phase endocrinology as a means of monitoring preand (51 int. Cl. ................... G01N 33/53 postimplantation embryo viability following in vitro fertili zation. J. Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1985:2:59-65. 52 U.S. Cl. ........................ 435/7.24; 435/723; 435/806; O'Neill C, Collier M. Saunders DM. Embryo-derived plate 436/501; 436/510 let activating factor: its diagnosis and therapeutic future. 58 Field of Search ................................ 435/723, 7.24, Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988:541:398-403. 435/806; 436/501, 510 Smart YC, Roberts TK, Clancy RL, Cripps AW. Early 56 References Cited pregnancy factor: its role in mammalian reproduction-re search review. Ferti Steril. 1981:35:397-403. PUBLICATIONS Chen C. Jones WR, Bastin F.
    [Show full text]
  • (PIF) Protects Cultured Embryos Against Oxidative Stress: Relevance for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL) Therapy
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 20), pp: 32419-32432 Research Paper: Autophagy and Cell Death PreImplantation factor (PIF) protects cultured embryos against oxidative stress: relevance for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) therapy Lindsay F. Goodale1,6, Soren Hayrabedyan2, Krassimira Todorova2, Roumen Roussev3, Sivakumar Ramu3,8, Christopher Stamatkin3,9, Carolyn B. Coulam3, Eytan R. Barnea4,5,* and Robert O. Gilbert1,7,* 1 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 2 Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 3 CARI Reproductive Institute, Chicago, IL, USA 4 BioIncept, LLC, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA 5 Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy (SIEP), Cherry Hill, NJ, USA 6 Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA 7 Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, St. Kitts, West Indies 8 Promigen Life Sciences, Downers Grove, IL, USA 9 Therapeutic Validation Core, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Eytan R. Barnea, email: [email protected] Keywords: recurrent pregnancy loss, preImplantation factor (PIF), oxidative stress, PDI, embryo, Autophagy Received: December 05, 2016 Accepted: February 22, 2017 Published: March 08, 2017 Copyright: Goodale et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 2-3% of couples.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Bioscientifica.Com at 09/25/2021 05:16:29PM Via Free Access
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW The embryonic stress response to in vitro culture: insight from genomic analysis Gael Cagnone and Marc-André Sirard Département des Sciences Animales Pavillon des services, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to G Cagnone; Email: [email protected] Abstract Recent genomic studies have shed light on the impact of in vitro culture (IVC) on embryonic homeostasis and the differential gene expression profiles associated with lower developmental competence. Consistently, the embryonic stress responses to IVC conditions correlate with transcriptomic changes in pathways related to energetic metabolism, extracellular matrix remodelling and inflammatory signalling. These changes appear to result from a developmental adaptation that enhances a Warburg-like effect known to occur naturally during blastulation. First discovered in cancer cells, the Warburg effect (increased glycolysis under aerobic conditions) is thought to result from mitochondrial dysfunction. In the case of IVC embryos, culture conditions may interfere with mitochondrial maturation and oxidative phosphorylation, forcing cells to rely on glycolysis in order to maintain energetic homeostasis. While beneficial in the short term, such adaptations may lead to epigenetic changes with potential long-term effects on implantation, foetal growth and post-natal health. We conclude that lessening the detrimental effects of IVC on mitochondrial activity would lead to significantly improved embryo quality. Reproduction (2016) 152 R247–R261
    [Show full text]
  • YALE OBSTETRICAL and GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY YOGS Spring 2012 Volume 5
    YALE OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY YOGS Spring 2012 Volume 5 THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN 2011 YOGS Alumni & Friends Contributors Editor-In-Chief – Mary Jane Minkin, MD Managing Editor – Dianna Malvey The YOGS Journal is published yearly by the Yale University Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, PO Box 208063, FMB 337, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063. Tel: 203-737-4593; Fax: 203-737-1883 http://medicine.yale.edu/obgyn/yogs/index.aspx Copyright © 2012 Yale University School of Medicine. All Rights Reserved. Cover Photo: Yale University, Terry DaGradi, Yale Photo & Design. All Rights Reserved. I THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 Historical Note 3 Residents’ Research Day Visiting Professor Grand Rounds 4 Other Selected Grand Rounds Presentations 6 Residents’ Research Day - Abstracts of Resident Presentations 23 Abstracts from Recent Scientific Meetings 29 The Year in Review 38 Photo Highlights 46 News Items 50 Forms 59 1 YALE OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY EDITOR’S NOTE Another momentous year Of course, we will update you on the research here in New Haven! As and clinical progress of our sections and the prog- most of you know, de- ress of our trainees, who continue to go out into spite the many charms the world and promote our field. of New Haven, Dr. Lock- wood has left us to as- We hope that many of you will be joining us here sume the Dean’s post at in New Haven on May 12, when we celebrate The Ohio State University the career of Yale’s first female resident, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Into Preimplantation Factor (PIF*) Mechanism for Embryo
    Insight into PreImplantation Factor (PIF*) Mechanism for Embryo Protection and Development: Target Oxidative Stress and Protein Misfolding (PDI and HSP) through Essential RIPK Binding Site Eytan R. Barnea1,2,3*, David M. Lubman4, Yan-Hui Liu4, Victor Absalon-Medina5, Soren Hayrabedyan6, Krassimira Todorova6, Robert O. Gilbert5, Joy Guingab7, Timothy J. Barder8 1 Research & Development, SIEP The Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States of America, 2 Research & Development, BioIncept, LLC, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States of America, 3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America, 4 Department Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America, 5 Reproductive Medicine, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America, 6 Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria, 7 Chemical Biology and Proteomics, Banyan Biomarkers, Alachua, Florida, United States of America, 8 Research & Development, Eprogen, Downers Grove, Illinois, United States of America Abstract Background: Endogenous PIF, upon which embryo development is dependent, is secreted only by viable mammalian embryos, and absent in non-viable ones. Synthetic PIF (sPIF) administration promotes singly cultured embryos development and protects against their demise caused by embryo-toxic serum. To identify and characterize critical sPIF-embryo protein interactions novel biochemical and bio-analytical methods were specifically devised. Methods: FITC-PIF uptake/binding by cultured murine and equine embryos was examined and compared with scrambled FITC-PIF (control). Murine embryo (d10) lysates were fractionated by reversed-phase HPLC, fractions printed onto microarray slides and probed with Biotin-PIF, IDE and Kv1.3 antibodies, using fluorescence detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    FINAL PROGRAM — From Innovation to Impact — Society for Reproductive Investigation 66th Annual Scientific Meeting March 12 - 16, 2019 PARIS, FRANCE The SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting has been accredited by the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME®) March 12 – 16, 2019 • Palais des Congrès de Paris, Paris, France 1 Table of Contents Message from the SRI President . 1 2019 Program Committee . 2 General Meeting Information . 3 Meeting Attendance Code of Conduct Policy . 4 Schedule-at-a-Glance . 5 Meeting Information and Social Events . 6 Exhibitors . 7 Palais des Congrès de Paris Floor Plan . 8 Hyatt Regency Paris Étoile Floor Plan . 9 Continuing Medical Education Information . 11 Scientific Program . 12 Thank You to Our 2019 Poster Judges . 55 SRI Grant Opportunities . .56 2019 Awards . 57 About SRI . .59 . SRI Council & Staff . 61 Poster Guide . 62 Oral and Poster Abstract Author Index . 108 Notes . 133 SRI Thanks Its 2019 Supporters . Inside Back Cover Save the Date: SRI 2020 Annual Meeting . Back Cover SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting Venue SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting Host Hotel Palais des Congrès de Paris Hyatt Regency Paris Étoile 2 Place de la Porte Maillot 3, Place du Général Kœnig 75853 Paris Cedex 17 Paris, 75017, FR Phone: +33 (0)1 40 68 22 22 Phone: +33 (0)1 40 68 12 34 Future SRI Annual Scientific Meetings SRI 67th Annual Scientific Meeting • Vancouver, BC, Canada • March 10 – 14, 2020 SRI 68th Annual Scientific Meeting • Boston, MA • March 23 – 27, 2021 SRI 69th Annual Scientific Meeting • Denver, CO • March 15 – 19, 2022 SRI 70th Annual Scientific Meeting • Brisbane, Australia • March 21 - 25, 2023 Society for Reproductive Investigation 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100 Milwaukee, WI 53202-3823 Phone: +1-414-918-9888 Fax: +1-414-276-3349 Email: info@sri-online .org Website: www .sri-online .org © Society for Reproductive Investigation .
    [Show full text]
  • Preimplantation Factor Modulates Trophoblastic Invasion Throughout
    Santos et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (2021) 19:96 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00774-5 RESEARCH Open Access Preimplantation factor modulates trophoblastic invasion throughout the decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells Esther Dos Santos1,2,3, Hadia Moindjie4, Valérie Sérazin1,2,3, Lucie Arnould1,2, Yoann Rodriguez1,2, Khadija Fathallah5, Eytan R. Barnea6,7, François Vialard1,2,3 and Marie-Noëlle Dieudonné1,2,8* Abstract Background: Successful human embryo implantation requires the differentiation of endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) into decidual cells during a process called decidualization. ESCs express specific markers of decidualization, including prolactin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), and connexin-43. Decidual cells also control of trophoblast invasion by secreting various factors, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Preimplantation factor (PIF) is a recently identified, embryo-derived peptide with activities at the fetal-maternal interface. It creates a favorable pro-inflammatory environment in human endometrium and directly controls placental development by increasing the human trophoblastic cells’ ability to invade the endometrium. We hypothesized that PIF’s effects on the endometrium counteract its pro-invasive effects. Methods: We tested sPIF effect on the expression of three decidualization markers by RT-qPCR and/or immunochemiluminescence assay. We examined sPIF effect on human ESC migration by performing an in vitro wound healing assay. We analyzed sPIF effect on endometrial control of human trophoblast invasion by performing a zymography and an invasion assay. Results: Firstly, we found that a synthetic analog of PIF (sPIF) significantly upregulates the mRNA expression of IGFBP-1 and connexin-43, and prolactin secretion in ESCs - suggesting a pro-differentiation effect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Embryo-Endometrium Crosstalk During Human Implantation
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en The embryo-endometrium crosstalk during human implantation: a focus on molecular determinants and microbial environment Paula Vergaro Varela Thesis for Doctoral Degree in Cell Biology by Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology Barcelona, 2019 Supervisors: Dr. Rita Vassena and Prof. Josep Santaló Pedro All published papers were reproduced with permission from the publishers. Cover picture from iStock by Getty Images (iStockphoto LP.) A meus pais e a miña irmá, SUMMARY Implantation failure is a major cause of human infertility and currently the most limiting step in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). It can be caused by both maternal and embryonic factors, as well as by defective crosstalk between them. Due to technical and ethical limitations, it is not possible to study human implantation in vivo. The knowledge about implantation has been mainly obtained from animal models which fail to represent the physiology of the human process. Additionally, a number of in vitro studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying implantation, mostly focussing on either the embryo or the endometrium in a unilateral manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Preimplantation Factor (PIF) Promoting Role in Embryo Implantation
    Barnea et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2012, 10:50 http://www.rbej.com/content/10/1/50 RESEARCH Open Access PreImplantation Factor (PIF) promoting role in embryo implantation: increases endometrial Integrin-α2β3, amphiregulin and epiregulin while reducing betacellulin expression via MAPK in decidua Eytan R Barnea1,2,3*, David Kirk4 and Michael J Paidas5 Abstract Background: Viable embryos secrete preimplantation factor (PIF), a peptide that has autocrine effects where levels correlate with cultured embryos development. sPIF (PIF synthetic analog) promotes implantation by regulating decidual-cells immunity, adhesion, apoptosis and enhances trophoblastic cell invasion. Herein sPIF priming effects on non-decidualized endometrium and decidualized-stroma are investigated, assessing elements critical for effective embryo-maternal cross-talk, prior to and at implantation. Methods: We tested sPIF effect on human non-pregnant endometrial epithelial and non-decidualized stroma α2β3 integrin expression (IHC and flow cytometry), comparing with scrambled PIF (PIFscr-control). We examined sPIF effect on decidualized non-pregnant human endometrial stromal cells (HESC) determining pro-inflammatory mediators expression and secretion (ELISA) and growth factors (GFs) expression (Affymetrix global gene array). We tested sPIF effect on HESC Phospho-kinases (BioPlex) and isolated kinases activity (FastKinase). Results: sPIF up-regulates α2β3 integrin expression in epithelial cells, (P < 0.05) while PIFscr had no effect. In contrast, in stromal cell cultures sPIF had no effect on the same. In HESC, sPIF up-regulates pro-inflammatory cytokines; IL8, IL1β and IL6 expression. The major increase in GRO-α, ICAM-1 and MCP-3 expression is coupled with same ligands secretion (P < 0.05). sPIF modulates in HESC GFs expression: up-regulates amphiregulin and epiregulin- critical for implantation and enhances several fibroblast growth factors (FGF) relevant for decidual function.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress-Inducible-Stem Cells: a New View on Endocrine, Metabolic and Mental Disease?
    Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 24:2–9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0244-9 GUEST EDITORIAL Stress-inducible-stem cells: a new view on endocrine, metabolic and mental disease? 1,2,3,4,5 1 6 7,8 9,10 11 12,13 S R Bornstein ● C Steenblock ● G P Chrousos ● A V Schally ● F Beuschlein ● G Kline ● N P Krone ● 14,15 14,15 1,16 1,17 5 18 1,2 J Licinio ● M L Wong ● E Ullmann ● G Ruiz-Babot ● B O Boehm ● A Behrens ● A Brennand ● 1,19 1 1 20 1 1,21 1 A Santambrogio ● I Berger ● M Werdermann ● R Sancho ● A Linkermann ● J W Lenders ● G Eisenhofer ● C L Andoniadou 1,19 Received: 19 July 2018 / Accepted: 25 July 2018 / Published online: 21 September 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Introduction will trigger and contribute to metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [4, 5]. In general terms we all use the word “stress” to describe our Endocrine and neural responses to stress have been well- discomfort in coping with challenges of daily life. This is defined and involve an activation of both the hypothalamic- mostly related to our subjective perceptions of workload pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) and the sympathoadrenal sys- 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: and/or other unexpected physical or mental efforts we are tem. A wide variety of external and internal stimuli, exposed to. The term is derived from the concept of stress as including inflammation, infection, as well as physical and a reaction to internal and external stimuli requiring acute or mental stressors induces the release of corticotropin- chronic adaptations, as introduced by Hans Selye in the releasing hormone (CRH) from the paraventricular second half of the last century [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Epididymal and Ejaculated Sperm Collected from the Same Holstein Bulls Michael A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Comparison of epididymal and ejaculated sperm collected from the same Holstein bulls Michael A. Stout Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stout, Michael A., "Comparison of epididymal and ejaculated sperm collected from the same Holstein bulls" (2012). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1160. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1160 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. COMPARISON OF EPIDIDYMAL AND EJACULATED SPERM COLLECTED FROM THE SAME HOLSTEIN BULLS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Collage in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Animal Sciences by Michael A. Stout B.S., University of Louisiana Lafayette, 2004 M.S., Louisiana State University, 2006 August 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor and advisor, Dr. Robert A. Godke, Boyd Professor for giving me the great opportunity to join the Reproductive Physiology Program. I am deeply honored to have had the privilege to work with a scientist of your stature and prestige. Thank you for guiding me through this journey and encouraging me to perform at the highest level.
    [Show full text]