DOCSLIB.ORG

Stress-Inducible-Stem Cells: a New View on Endocrine, Metabolic and Mental Disease?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stress-Inducible-Stem Cells: a New View on Endocrine, Metabolic and Mental Disease? Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 24:2–9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0244-9 GUEST EDITORIAL Stress-inducible-stem cells: a new view on endocrine, metabolic and mental disease? 1,2,3,4,5 1 6 7,8 9,10 11 12,13 S R Bornstein ● C Steenblock ● G P Chrousos ● A V Schally ● F Beuschlein ● G Kline ● N P Krone ● 14,15 14,15 1,16 1,17 5 18 1,2 J Licinio ● M L Wong ● E Ullmann ● G Ruiz-Babot ● B O Boehm ● A Behrens ● A Brennand ● 1,19 1 1 20 1 1,21 1 A Santambrogio ● I Berger ● M Werdermann ● R Sancho ● A Linkermann ● J W Lenders ● G Eisenhofer ● C L Andoniadou 1,19 Received: 19 July 2018 / Accepted: 25 July 2018 / Published online: 21 September 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Introduction will trigger and contribute to metabolic and cardiovascular diseases [4, 5]. In general terms we all use the word “stress” to describe our Endocrine and neural responses to stress have been well- discomfort in coping with challenges of daily life. This is defined and involve an activation of both the hypothalamic- mostly related to our subjective perceptions of workload pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) and the sympathoadrenal sys- 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: and/or other unexpected physical or mental efforts we are tem. A wide variety of external and internal stimuli, exposed to. The term is derived from the concept of stress as including inflammation, infection, as well as physical and a reaction to internal and external stimuli requiring acute or mental stressors induces the release of corticotropin- chronic adaptations, as introduced by Hans Selye in the releasing hormone (CRH) from the paraventricular second half of the last century [1–3]. nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus. CRH in turn is both a In 1998 on a WHO conference on stress a more compre- central activator of the HPA axis, as well as the sym- hensive definition of the term was provided: pathoadrenal system, since CRH mediates the release of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary “Stress may be defined as a mechanism of acute and and hence adrenocortical glucocorticoids as well as the chronic adaptation necessary for evolution and release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla [4]. In survival. The integrated stress response is part of the addition to CRH as a main regulator of the HPA axis there homoeostatic balance, and dysfunction of such are numerous CRH and ACTH-independent factors, response may contribute to disease. Alternations of including neuropeptides, cytokines, the microbiota-gut- the endocrine, neural and immune responses to stress brain axis [6], and even bacterial and viral pathogens that are involved both in etiology and the pathophysiology are capable of activating the release of adrenal stress ster- of the most common health problems in modern oids [7]. society.” (World Health Organization_WHO/RPS/ Finally, central activation of the autonomic nervous 98.3). system will lead to an acute activation of the adrenal medulla by the splanchnic nerves triggering the release of In a biological sense stress is a two-edged sword repre- epinephrine and other neuropeptides. Interestingly, senting a positive side (eustress) and a negative side (dis- splanchnic nerve stimulation will also provoke the release tress). On one hand, eustress helps to deal with challenges of adrenal glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, which is of daily life and disease, and it is also a driver of evolution mediated in a paracrine way by the released catecholamines and development. On the other hand, a chronic response to [8]. stress with chronic activation of the endocrine stress axis Thus, there is a complex network of neuronal and cel- lular interactions within the end organ of the endocrine and neuroendocrine stress system. It is no coincidence that the adrenal gland combines the steroid-producing adrenal cor- * S R Bornstein tex and the catecholamine-producing adrenal medulla under [email protected] a common organ capsule. In fact, there is an active cellular Extended author information available on the last page of the article. and functional interaction of cortical and chromaffin cells Stress-inducible-stem cells: a new view on endocrine, metabolic and mental disease? 3 within the gland. Whereas adrenocortical glucocorticoids to steroid-induced cell death (apoptosis) through glucocorti- are required for the biosynthesis of adrenomedullary epi- coid receptor (GR) signaling [16], providing a model for the nephrine, catecholamines regulate the release of steroids sensitivity of neuronal stem cells to metabolic cellular turn- and the cellular function of the adrenal cortex [9]. Fur- over and/or cellular loss induced by stress. thermore, patients with disorders of the adrenal cortex such Interestingly, we have identified CRH1 and CRH2 receptors as Addison’s disease or congenital adrenal hyperplasia not only in NSCs but also in hematopoietic stem cells display a dysfunction of the adrenal medulla resulting in an (HSCs) [17]. CRH receptors are involved in the systemic impaired stress response [10–12]. stress response and intriguingly CRH receptor expression is In addition to the cellular crosstalk between the two increased among immature hematopoietic progenitors but endocrine cell systems in the adrenal there is an important not in fully differentiated blood cells. Stimulation with CRH role for the vasculature and the immune system. Nearly decreases intracellular cAMP demonstrating active signal- each adrenal cell is in close proximity to endothelial cells ing of this central stress hormone in HSCs [17]. Recently, and the gland receives ten times more blood than expected the CNS has been shown to regulate embryonic HSCs via from its size [9]. Therefore, the intact physical and bio- the HPA axis, as GR activation leads to HSC expansion chemical communication between vascular and endocrine while GR loss reduces HSC formation [18]. Likewise cells is critical for the functional integrity and adaptation to chronic stress exposures also activate HSC formation [19]. stress of the entire gland, as vascular vulnerability may lead While, we are only beginning to understand the role of to ruptures, hemorrhage and adrenal failure with life- stress hormones on HSCs, their roles on NSCs and neuro- threatening consequences for the patient [13, 14]. Similarly, genesis have been explored more comprehensively. Most intact interactions with the systemic and resident immune importantly stress hormones exert a differential effect on cells are critical for proper functioning of the adrenal and its neurogenesis depending on age, time, location, and nature of ability to cope with the increased stress of inflammation and the exposure. Conditions that strongly elevate CRH, ACTH sepsis [13, 14]. and glucocorticoids, such as physical activity, enriched In addition to this complex interplay of cellular and environmental housing, or mental stress induce proliferation neuronal networks in mounting and maintaining an ade- and survival of newborn neurons and promote neurogenesis quate adrenal stress response, regulation of the secretion of [20]. Conversely, chronic endogenous or pharmacological peripheral and central stress hormones is under strict cir- exposure of NSCs to glucocorticoids has been clearly asso- cadian and ultradian control [15]. Thus, the entire endocrine ciated with reduced neurogenesis [20]. This has been linked to stress system is embedded in an even more complex and not the activation of GRs or to changes in the expression of genes fully explored cybernetic model of positive and negative associated with cellular senescence [21–23]. Why the acti- feedback regulations, which mature postnatally to become vation of the HPA axis leads to enhanced neurogenesis in fully functional only after puberty. some instances yet the loss of neural stem cells in others has This leads to the obvious question of how stress in early not been fully understood [20]. life may shape the development and maturation of the major Proliferating neuronal progenitors express higher levels cellular response elements including the HPA axis. Before of CRH receptors and are enhanced in the human fetal brain we try to explore this intriguing question we should reflect [24]. Moreover, CRH-deficient mice show reduced pro- on what is known-up to now on the role of the classical liferation and increased apoptosis among neural progenitors. stress hormones on the regulation of stem cells in general. Thus, it has been suggested that CRH, as the major mediator of the adaptive response to stressors, could reverse damaging Role of stress steroids on progenitor/stem cell effects of glucocorticoids on stem/progenitor cells [24]. populations If CRH could reverse the damaging effects of gluco- corticoids it may be assumed that the negative feedback on Progenitor and stem cell populations are both required for the CRH with elevated glucocorticoid levels contributes to the successful homeostasis and adaptation of most tissues. reduction of neurogenesis observed during chronic stress. In Human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells provide addition, we and others have shown that during the acute lifelong production of mature blood cells dependent on the and chronic stress of inflammation and sepsis but also in changing requirements of each individual. Therefore, hema- mental and metabolic disorders, several extra-hypothalamic topoiesis is a cellular process defined by a clear balance of and extra-pituitary factors including cytokines, pathogens, self-renewal and commitment to differentiation. Hemato- adipokines, growth factors, inflammatory lipids, morpho- poietic progenitors are also able to transdifferentiate into non- gens, catecholamines, and neuropeptides can stimulate hematopoietic cells and exhibit overlapping genetic programs adrenal glucocorticoid release [7, 9]. Consequently, the with mesenchymal and neural stem cells (NSCs). Importantly, neuroprotective effect of CRH may get lost during both neuronal stem cells in mice have been reported to be sensitive acute and chronic stress. Another explanation may relate to 4 S. R. Bornstein et al. the pattern of glucocorticoid secretion during stress as it has form the mature HPA axis [29, 30].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Novel Insights in Commercial in Vitro Embryo Production in Cattle
    Novel insights in commercial in vitro embryo production in cattle Maaike Catteeuw Promoter: Prof. dr. Ann Van Soom Copromoters: Prof. dr. Joris Vermeesch, Dr. Katrien Smits Dissertation submitted to Ghent University in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Veterinary Sciences 2018 Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Members of the examination committee Prof. dr. Herman Favoreel Chairman – Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Bjorn Heindryckx Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Luc Peelman Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Geert Opsomer Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Erik Mullaart CRV BV, the Netherlands Dr. Karen Goossens Research institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Belgium Funding Project G039214N: Chromosomal instability during early embryonic development: elucidating key mechanisms in a bovine model Printed by University Press, Zelzate TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN CATTLE 9 1.2 COMMERCIAL IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION 11 1.3 QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT 25 1.4 GENETIC DISORDERS AND CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN CATTLE 34 1.5 CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES IN HUMAN EMBRYOS AND THE BOVINE MODEL 35 1.5 REFERENCES 37 CHAPTER 2 AIMS OF THE STUDY 51 CHAPTER 3 HOLDING IMMATURE BOVINE OOCYTES IN A COMMERCIAL
    [Show full text]
  • 2123 Genes Regulating Implantation and Fetal Development
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 11, 2123-2137, September 1, 2006] Genes regulating implantation and fetal development: a focus on mouse knockout models 1 1 2 ,3 Surendra Sharma , Shaun P. Murphy , and Eytan R. Barnea 1 Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Women and Infants’ Hospital of Rhode Island-Brown University, Providence, RI, 2 SIEP, the Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy, Cherry Hill, NJ and 3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Endogeous gene expression 3.1. Gene expression in blastocyst implantation 3.2. Gene expression (silencing) in the embryo 4. Mouse knockout models of reproductive-related genes 4.1. Cytokines 4.2. Cyclooxygenase-2 4.3. Insulin-like growth factor system 4.4. Matrix metalloproteinase system 4.5. Transcription factors involved in placental development 4.6. Indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase 5. Conclusions 6. Acknowledgements 7. References 1. ABSTRACT 2. INTRODUCTION Timely and efficient regulation of blastocyst Mammalian reproduction represents a highly implantation and fetal growth are essential for the orchestrated and intricate process. The spatial and successful reproduction of viviparous mammals. temporal regulation of a fetal-maternal crosstalk is required Disruptions in this regulation can result in a wide variety of for a successful pregnancy (1-5). After fertilization, the human gestational complications including infertility, developing blastocyst must invade and establish itself in the spontaneous abortion, fetal growth restriction, and maternal endometrium, from which it will eventually gain premature delivery. The role of several groups of factors, the crucial protection and nourishment required for including cytokines, hormones, transcription factors, extra- development throughout gestation.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,646,003 Barnea Et Al
    US005646003A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,646,003 Barnea et al. 45 Date of Patent: Jul. 8, 1997 54 PREIMPLANTATION FACTOR Collier M, O'Neill C, Ammit AJ, Saunders DM, Biochemi cal and pharmacological characterization of human embryo 76) Inventors: Eytan R. Barnea, 1697 Lark La., -derived activating factor. Hum Reprod. 1988:3:993-998. Cherry Hill, N.J. 08003; Carolyn B. O'Neill C, Gidley-Baird AA, Amnit AJ. Saunders DM. Use Coulam, 11015 Bryar Lynn Ct., Fairfax of a bioassay for embryo-derived platelet activating factor Sta. Va., 22039 as a means of assessing quality and pregnancy potential of human embryos. Fertill Steril. 1987:47:967-975. 21 Appl. No.: 216,618 O'Neill C. Gidley-Baird AL, Pike AL, Porter RN, Sinosich MJ, Saunders DM. Maternal blood platelet physiology and (22 Filed: Mar 23, 1994 luteal phase endocrinology as a means of monitoring preand (51 int. Cl. ................... G01N 33/53 postimplantation embryo viability following in vitro fertili zation. J. Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer. 1985:2:59-65. 52 U.S. Cl. ........................ 435/7.24; 435/723; 435/806; O'Neill C, Collier M. Saunders DM. Embryo-derived plate 436/501; 436/510 let activating factor: its diagnosis and therapeutic future. 58 Field of Search ................................ 435/723, 7.24, Ann NY Acad Sci. 1988:541:398-403. 435/806; 436/501, 510 Smart YC, Roberts TK, Clancy RL, Cripps AW. Early 56 References Cited pregnancy factor: its role in mammalian reproduction-re search review. Ferti Steril. 1981:35:397-403. PUBLICATIONS Chen C. Jones WR, Bastin F.
    [Show full text]
  • (PIF) Protects Cultured Embryos Against Oxidative Stress: Relevance for Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL) Therapy
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, 2017, Vol. 8, (No. 20), pp: 32419-32432 Research Paper: Autophagy and Cell Death PreImplantation factor (PIF) protects cultured embryos against oxidative stress: relevance for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) therapy Lindsay F. Goodale1,6, Soren Hayrabedyan2, Krassimira Todorova2, Roumen Roussev3, Sivakumar Ramu3,8, Christopher Stamatkin3,9, Carolyn B. Coulam3, Eytan R. Barnea4,5,* and Robert O. Gilbert1,7,* 1 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA 2 Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria 3 CARI Reproductive Institute, Chicago, IL, USA 4 BioIncept, LLC, Cherry Hill, NJ, USA 5 Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy (SIEP), Cherry Hill, NJ, USA 6 Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA 7 Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, St. Kitts, West Indies 8 Promigen Life Sciences, Downers Grove, IL, USA 9 Therapeutic Validation Core, Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Eytan R. Barnea, email: [email protected] Keywords: recurrent pregnancy loss, preImplantation factor (PIF), oxidative stress, PDI, embryo, Autophagy Received: December 05, 2016 Accepted: February 22, 2017 Published: March 08, 2017 Copyright: Goodale et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. ABSTRACT Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 2-3% of couples.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Bioscientifica.Com at 09/25/2021 05:16:29PM Via Free Access
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW The embryonic stress response to in vitro culture: insight from genomic analysis Gael Cagnone and Marc-André Sirard Département des Sciences Animales Pavillon des services, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada Correspondence should be addressed to G Cagnone; Email: [email protected] Abstract Recent genomic studies have shed light on the impact of in vitro culture (IVC) on embryonic homeostasis and the differential gene expression profiles associated with lower developmental competence. Consistently, the embryonic stress responses to IVC conditions correlate with transcriptomic changes in pathways related to energetic metabolism, extracellular matrix remodelling and inflammatory signalling. These changes appear to result from a developmental adaptation that enhances a Warburg-like effect known to occur naturally during blastulation. First discovered in cancer cells, the Warburg effect (increased glycolysis under aerobic conditions) is thought to result from mitochondrial dysfunction. In the case of IVC embryos, culture conditions may interfere with mitochondrial maturation and oxidative phosphorylation, forcing cells to rely on glycolysis in order to maintain energetic homeostasis. While beneficial in the short term, such adaptations may lead to epigenetic changes with potential long-term effects on implantation, foetal growth and post-natal health. We conclude that lessening the detrimental effects of IVC on mitochondrial activity would lead to significantly improved embryo quality. Reproduction (2016) 152 R247–R261
    [Show full text]
  • YALE OBSTETRICAL and GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY YOGS Spring 2012 Volume 5
    YALE OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY YOGS Spring 2012 Volume 5 THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN 2011 YOGS Alumni & Friends Contributors Editor-In-Chief – Mary Jane Minkin, MD Managing Editor – Dianna Malvey The YOGS Journal is published yearly by the Yale University Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, PO Box 208063, FMB 337, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063. Tel: 203-737-4593; Fax: 203-737-1883 http://medicine.yale.edu/obgyn/yogs/index.aspx Copyright © 2012 Yale University School of Medicine. All Rights Reserved. Cover Photo: Yale University, Terry DaGradi, Yale Photo & Design. All Rights Reserved. I THE JOURNAL FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF YALE OB/GYN TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor’s Note 2 Historical Note 3 Residents’ Research Day Visiting Professor Grand Rounds 4 Other Selected Grand Rounds Presentations 6 Residents’ Research Day - Abstracts of Resident Presentations 23 Abstracts from Recent Scientific Meetings 29 The Year in Review 38 Photo Highlights 46 News Items 50 Forms 59 1 YALE OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SOCIETY EDITOR’S NOTE Another momentous year Of course, we will update you on the research here in New Haven! As and clinical progress of our sections and the prog- most of you know, de- ress of our trainees, who continue to go out into spite the many charms the world and promote our field. of New Haven, Dr. Lock- wood has left us to as- We hope that many of you will be joining us here sume the Dean’s post at in New Haven on May 12, when we celebrate The Ohio State University the career of Yale’s first female resident, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Into Preimplantation Factor (PIF*) Mechanism for Embryo
    Insight into PreImplantation Factor (PIF*) Mechanism for Embryo Protection and Development: Target Oxidative Stress and Protein Misfolding (PDI and HSP) through Essential RIPK Binding Site Eytan R. Barnea1,2,3*, David M. Lubman4, Yan-Hui Liu4, Victor Absalon-Medina5, Soren Hayrabedyan6, Krassimira Todorova6, Robert O. Gilbert5, Joy Guingab7, Timothy J. Barder8 1 Research & Development, SIEP The Society for the Investigation of Early Pregnancy, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States of America, 2 Research & Development, BioIncept, LLC, Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States of America, 3 Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America, 4 Department Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America, 5 Reproductive Medicine, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York, United States of America, 6 Institute of Biology and Immunology of Reproduction, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria, 7 Chemical Biology and Proteomics, Banyan Biomarkers, Alachua, Florida, United States of America, 8 Research & Development, Eprogen, Downers Grove, Illinois, United States of America Abstract Background: Endogenous PIF, upon which embryo development is dependent, is secreted only by viable mammalian embryos, and absent in non-viable ones. Synthetic PIF (sPIF) administration promotes singly cultured embryos development and protects against their demise caused by embryo-toxic serum. To identify and characterize critical sPIF-embryo protein interactions novel biochemical and bio-analytical methods were specifically devised. Methods: FITC-PIF uptake/binding by cultured murine and equine embryos was examined and compared with scrambled FITC-PIF (control). Murine embryo (d10) lysates were fractionated by reversed-phase HPLC, fractions printed onto microarray slides and probed with Biotin-PIF, IDE and Kv1.3 antibodies, using fluorescence detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program
    FINAL PROGRAM — From Innovation to Impact — Society for Reproductive Investigation 66th Annual Scientific Meeting March 12 - 16, 2019 PARIS, FRANCE The SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting has been accredited by the European Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (EACCME®) March 12 – 16, 2019 • Palais des Congrès de Paris, Paris, France 1 Table of Contents Message from the SRI President . 1 2019 Program Committee . 2 General Meeting Information . 3 Meeting Attendance Code of Conduct Policy . 4 Schedule-at-a-Glance . 5 Meeting Information and Social Events . 6 Exhibitors . 7 Palais des Congrès de Paris Floor Plan . 8 Hyatt Regency Paris Étoile Floor Plan . 9 Continuing Medical Education Information . 11 Scientific Program . 12 Thank You to Our 2019 Poster Judges . 55 SRI Grant Opportunities . .56 2019 Awards . 57 About SRI . .59 . SRI Council & Staff . 61 Poster Guide . 62 Oral and Poster Abstract Author Index . 108 Notes . 133 SRI Thanks Its 2019 Supporters . Inside Back Cover Save the Date: SRI 2020 Annual Meeting . Back Cover SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting Venue SRI 66th Annual Scientific Meeting Host Hotel Palais des Congrès de Paris Hyatt Regency Paris Étoile 2 Place de la Porte Maillot 3, Place du Général Kœnig 75853 Paris Cedex 17 Paris, 75017, FR Phone: +33 (0)1 40 68 22 22 Phone: +33 (0)1 40 68 12 34 Future SRI Annual Scientific Meetings SRI 67th Annual Scientific Meeting • Vancouver, BC, Canada • March 10 – 14, 2020 SRI 68th Annual Scientific Meeting • Boston, MA • March 23 – 27, 2021 SRI 69th Annual Scientific Meeting • Denver, CO • March 15 – 19, 2022 SRI 70th Annual Scientific Meeting • Brisbane, Australia • March 21 - 25, 2023 Society for Reproductive Investigation 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100 Milwaukee, WI 53202-3823 Phone: +1-414-918-9888 Fax: +1-414-276-3349 Email: info@sri-online .org Website: www .sri-online .org © Society for Reproductive Investigation .
    [Show full text]
  • Preimplantation Factor Modulates Trophoblastic Invasion Throughout
    Santos et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology (2021) 19:96 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00774-5 RESEARCH Open Access Preimplantation factor modulates trophoblastic invasion throughout the decidualization of human endometrial stromal cells Esther Dos Santos1,2,3, Hadia Moindjie4, Valérie Sérazin1,2,3, Lucie Arnould1,2, Yoann Rodriguez1,2, Khadija Fathallah5, Eytan R. Barnea6,7, François Vialard1,2,3 and Marie-Noëlle Dieudonné1,2,8* Abstract Background: Successful human embryo implantation requires the differentiation of endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) into decidual cells during a process called decidualization. ESCs express specific markers of decidualization, including prolactin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), and connexin-43. Decidual cells also control of trophoblast invasion by secreting various factors, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Preimplantation factor (PIF) is a recently identified, embryo-derived peptide with activities at the fetal-maternal interface. It creates a favorable pro-inflammatory environment in human endometrium and directly controls placental development by increasing the human trophoblastic cells’ ability to invade the endometrium. We hypothesized that PIF’s effects on the endometrium counteract its pro-invasive effects. Methods: We tested sPIF effect on the expression of three decidualization markers by RT-qPCR and/or immunochemiluminescence assay. We examined sPIF effect on human ESC migration by performing an in vitro wound healing assay. We analyzed sPIF effect on endometrial control of human trophoblast invasion by performing a zymography and an invasion assay. Results: Firstly, we found that a synthetic analog of PIF (sPIF) significantly upregulates the mRNA expression of IGFBP-1 and connexin-43, and prolactin secretion in ESCs - suggesting a pro-differentiation effect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Embryo-Endometrium Crosstalk During Human Implantation
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en The embryo-endometrium crosstalk during human implantation: a focus on molecular determinants and microbial environment Paula Vergaro Varela Thesis for Doctoral Degree in Cell Biology by Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology Barcelona, 2019 Supervisors: Dr. Rita Vassena and Prof. Josep Santaló Pedro All published papers were reproduced with permission from the publishers. Cover picture from iStock by Getty Images (iStockphoto LP.) A meus pais e a miña irmá, SUMMARY Implantation failure is a major cause of human infertility and currently the most limiting step in Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART). It can be caused by both maternal and embryonic factors, as well as by defective crosstalk between them. Due to technical and ethical limitations, it is not possible to study human implantation in vivo. The knowledge about implantation has been mainly obtained from animal models which fail to represent the physiology of the human process. Additionally, a number of in vitro studies have investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying implantation, mostly focussing on either the embryo or the endometrium in a unilateral manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Preimplantation Factor (PIF) Promoting Role in Embryo Implantation
    Barnea et al. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2012, 10:50 http://www.rbej.com/content/10/1/50 RESEARCH Open Access PreImplantation Factor (PIF) promoting role in embryo implantation: increases endometrial Integrin-α2β3, amphiregulin and epiregulin while reducing betacellulin expression via MAPK in decidua Eytan R Barnea1,2,3*, David Kirk4 and Michael J Paidas5 Abstract Background: Viable embryos secrete preimplantation factor (PIF), a peptide that has autocrine effects where levels correlate with cultured embryos development. sPIF (PIF synthetic analog) promotes implantation by regulating decidual-cells immunity, adhesion, apoptosis and enhances trophoblastic cell invasion. Herein sPIF priming effects on non-decidualized endometrium and decidualized-stroma are investigated, assessing elements critical for effective embryo-maternal cross-talk, prior to and at implantation. Methods: We tested sPIF effect on human non-pregnant endometrial epithelial and non-decidualized stroma α2β3 integrin expression (IHC and flow cytometry), comparing with scrambled PIF (PIFscr-control). We examined sPIF effect on decidualized non-pregnant human endometrial stromal cells (HESC) determining pro-inflammatory mediators expression and secretion (ELISA) and growth factors (GFs) expression (Affymetrix global gene array). We tested sPIF effect on HESC Phospho-kinases (BioPlex) and isolated kinases activity (FastKinase). Results: sPIF up-regulates α2β3 integrin expression in epithelial cells, (P < 0.05) while PIFscr had no effect. In contrast, in stromal cell cultures sPIF had no effect on the same. In HESC, sPIF up-regulates pro-inflammatory cytokines; IL8, IL1β and IL6 expression. The major increase in GRO-α, ICAM-1 and MCP-3 expression is coupled with same ligands secretion (P < 0.05). sPIF modulates in HESC GFs expression: up-regulates amphiregulin and epiregulin- critical for implantation and enhances several fibroblast growth factors (FGF) relevant for decidual function.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Epididymal and Ejaculated Sperm Collected from the Same Holstein Bulls Michael A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Comparison of epididymal and ejaculated sperm collected from the same Holstein bulls Michael A. Stout Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stout, Michael A., "Comparison of epididymal and ejaculated sperm collected from the same Holstein bulls" (2012). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1160. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1160 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. COMPARISON OF EPIDIDYMAL AND EJACULATED SPERM COLLECTED FROM THE SAME HOLSTEIN BULLS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Collage in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Animal Sciences by Michael A. Stout B.S., University of Louisiana Lafayette, 2004 M.S., Louisiana State University, 2006 August 2012 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor and advisor, Dr. Robert A. Godke, Boyd Professor for giving me the great opportunity to join the Reproductive Physiology Program. I am deeply honored to have had the privilege to work with a scientist of your stature and prestige. Thank you for guiding me through this journey and encouraging me to perform at the highest level.
    [Show full text]