Historically Jeffco Magazine 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historically Jeffco Magazine 2012 Issue 33, 2012 Historically Je ff co Historically Je ff co Mall visionary Gerri von Frellick, circa 1967, at Villa Italia Courtesy Lakewood’s Heritage Center, City of Lakewood Contents 2 Fortress Commerce: Jefferson County’s Malls Rosemary Lewis 8 A Modern Revolution in Historic Preservation Sally White 11 Applewood – an Orchard of Apple Trees Marian Metsopoulos 13 All It Took Was One Ad Writers’ Award Winner, First Place, Adult Long Essay Matthew Prythero 16 Golden Cemetery National Register of Historic Places Richard Gardner 17 Ralston Cemetery State Register of Historic Places Matthew Prythero 18 Norman and Ethel Meyer Award for Historic Preservation in Jefferson County Deborah Andrews 20 Jefferson County Hall of Fame: John C. Bandimere, Jr. Viona ‘Vi’ Mae Hader 21 The Humphrey Memorial Park and Museum Writers’ Award Winner, First Place, Adult Short Essay Lois Lange 23 Step Back in Time at the Humphrey Museum Margaret T. Chapman 25 Wildfire History in Jefferson County List of Fires Published by the Jefferson County Jeffco’s First Major Wildfire Historical Commission (JCHC) Historic Consequences of Early Fires Chair: Rose Lewis Richard Gardner JCHC Publications Committee Farewell to the Lamb School Co-editors of Historically Jeffco: Milly Roeder Margaret T. Chapman, Sally L. White Design & Layout: Doyle Harrison 31 Territorial Capitol Anniversary Issue 33, 2012 Richard Gardner ISSN 1532-6047 32 Historic Places in Transition 34 Denver Mountain Parks Centennial Celebrates a Legacy of History Sally White, Denver Mountain Parks, and Jay Clark, Marketing & Communications, Denver Parks and Recreation 37 Jefferson County Historical Commission 2012 Rosemary Lewis Please note: A revised version of the 2011 article The Rhubarb Festival at Pine Grove, by David Nelson, has been posted on the web site at HistoricJeffco.org. Cover Photo: 2000 Hi Meadows Fire copyright Jefferson County Archives Historically Jeffco 2012 1 Fortress Commerce: Jefferson County’s Malls By Rosemary Lewis s there anything more maligned in modern by a protective moat of asphalt, turned inward America than the mall? From the countless and providing protection from the intrusions of Istrip malls that line commercial thorough- the outside world. They promised escape and a fares to mega-malls with entire amusement parks permissible sense of voyeurism embodied in the within their confines, the mall is synonymous tantalizing allure of products and services that with blight and the destruction of our historic were the envy of the world. They served as sub- urban cores. Yet this architectural form is a prod- stitutes for civic, social, and cultural centers in uct of supply-and-demand economics. The rise the exploding residential suburbs. But within a of automobiles, the post-war baby boom, and few decades they passed from novelties to rel- the burgeoning economy made home owner- ics, their blank facades revealing nothing of ship away from the city not only desirable but the once-beautiful hive of activity that buzzed often a necessity to keep pace with growing de- within. Today a grass-roots nostalgic movement mand for living space. Retailers simply followed documenting the dead malls has formed on the The Sears store at the money, and the money was in those enticing internet, and Jefferson County has its own share Westland, circa 1963. fortresses of commerce—the Shopping Centers. of stories to tell, notably the distinction of hav- Photos and illustrations for this article are Indeed these shopping centers (they were not ing what is potentially the first fully enclosed courtesy of Lakewood’s shopping center in the United States, Gerri von Heritage Center, City of known as “malls” until later) resembled the me- Lakewood. dieval fortress, isolated from their surroundings Frellick’s Lakeside Shopping City. 2 Historically Jeffco 2012 Although our shopping malls may be considered include restaurants, post offices, pharmacies, and View of Westland to have roots in the ancient market centers of banks. In March 1954, the first phase of Gruen’s mall, circa 1963 Europe, the twentieth-century American mall is masterwork, the 460-acre open air Northland largely the brainchild of one man, Austrian emi- Center near Detroit, opened its doors. It was a grant Victor Gruen. He conceptualized an ap- milestone in retail development, incorporating proach to retailing that expanded far beyond the separate flows for automobiles, delivery trucks, conventional display of wares in store windows and pedestrians, as well as tasteful landscaping to incorporate the entire retail space as a display and public art installations. case for goods. The theory held that the pass- ing customers would be so captivated that they would be drawn subconsciously into the store, shop, and thereby increase revenue. This model, termed the “Gruen Effect” or “Gruen Transfer” stands at the core of modern retail design and by extension the form and function of the shopping center. Gruen’s vision was not limited just to a single store, but to a whole commercial village arranged artfully in a comprehensive fashion to Historically Jeffco 2012 3 The train at Villa Italia, circa 1967. Denver Suburban Shopping Joslin’s opened its fourth branch location at the The Denver metropolitan area benefitted greatly new Merchant’s Park on South Broadway, argu- from the post-war economic boom. The five- ably Denver’s first “ultramodern” shopping cen- county Denver metropolitan area, consisting ter. It incorporated a Miller’s supermarket and a of Denver, Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, and variety of specialty shops, as well as the depart- Jefferson counties, posted a population gain of ment store, under one roof. The design included 51.8 percent between 1950 and 1960. Jefferson plenty of off-street parking, an indispensable ne- County maintained a high, but steady, rate of cessity in this age of the automobile. growth in post-war years, on average doubling The following year Denver retailers continued every ten years between 1940 and 1970, and was their slow but inexorable move to the suburbs. second only to Denver County in population in On October 8, 1953, the Denver Dry Goods the metro area by 1950. Farms disappeared be- Company opened its Cherry Creek branch store, neath housing developments, and more residents in the first phase of architect Temple Buell’s meant increased demand for convenient retail grand scheme to re-develop the former city centers and local grocery stores. Owners of Den- dump. Sears Roebuck joined the Denver Dry ver’s leading department stores—Denver Dry at Cherry Creek in 1954. On December 3, the Goods, Joslin’s, May D&F, and Neusteters—re- May Company (it would not acquire the Daniels alized that expansion to the suburbs would be in and Fisher Company until 1956 to become May their best financial interests and began to test the D&F) announced it would open a branch store waters, with Joslin’s leading the way. at the University Hills Shopping Center as part As of early 1952, Joslin’s operated three branch of that center’s $5 million expansion. locations, located in Aurora, Englewood, and Jefferson County Mall Development Lakewood. These were not associated with a shopping center but were stand-alone establish- Developers in Jefferson County easily kept pace ments with the conventional pedestrian-orient- with neighboring Denver. On September 21, ed street-front design. In March of that year, 1953, the directors of the Jewish Consump- 4 Historically Jeffco 2012 tives’ Relief Society (JCRS) announced a pro- opment stalled only to be resurrected a few years posed shopping center on 20 acres of its land later as the Westland Shopping Center. facing Colfax Avenue that would likely include While these early runners in the shopping center a Joslin’s, which would relocate from its existing race were still on the drawing boards, Oklaho- Lakewood location. The newspapers speculated ma-born developer Gerri von Frellick stole the that the JCRS development would up the ante show. On September 12, 1954, he announced by including not just one but two department his plans for the biggest shopping center yet in stores. The second retailer would be Neusteters, the Denver area—Lakeside Shopping City. Von as Myron Neusteter was a vice-president on the Frellick arrived in Colorado in 1952, scraping JCRS board. Neusteters never branched into Jef- by after the crash of his construction company ferson County, instead contenting itself with a in Texas and reinventing himself as a shopping- branch at Cherry Creek. center visionary. He proved to be a genius in Further west along Colfax a group of investors promotion, keeping consumer anticipation high (including local automobile dealership owners with frequent articles in the newspapers, all Roy J. Weaver, E. Jack Beatty, Harry Downing, leading up to the grand opening on August 30, and Ralph Schomp) announced their plans on 1956, beating out JCRS and the re-envisioned December 3 to construct a shopping center on Westland developments by several years. It also 65 acres of the former Montgomery farm west of beat out by five weeks the opening of Gruen’s Miller Street, tentatively called the Colfax-Lake- highly-anticipated Southdale Center at Edina, May D&F at wood Trading Center. Planning for that devel- Minnesota, as the first enclosed, air-condi- Westland, circa 1963. Historically Jeffco 2012 5 tioned, shopping center in the United States, a Meanwhile, the JCRS Shopping Center opened fact scarcely noted in the contemporary public- its doors in February 1957. Like Lakeside it ity and entirely overlooked in subsequent years. featured a range of stores, led by Joslin’s and Lakeside was located to the west of Lakeside J.C. Penney, F.W. Woolworth, and Miller’s Su- Amusement Park on West Forty-fourth Avenue, per Market. Although both developments were a major street connecting Golden and Denver.
Recommended publications
  • Inventory of Existing Conditions
    Inventory of Existing Conditions Introduction Boulder Municipal Airport is located in the City of Boulder, Colorado. Nestled at the foot of the Rocky Mountains, the Airport has served an important niche in the general aviation market for the City and its surrounding region. Boulder Municipal Airport is open to the general public and to visiting aircraft. The Airport does not have commercial passenger activity and has been in continuous operation at this site since 1928. Boulder Municipal Airport is located three miles northeast of the City of Boulder, in north-central Colorado. The Airport is located within the Denver metropolitan area, on the eastern fringe of the Rocky Mountain range. The Airport provides a safe operating environment for a variety of general aviation aircraft types, ranging from gliders and small powered aircraft to corporate jet aircraft. The airport’s relative location within the region is illustrated in Figure A1, AIRPORT LOCATION MAP. The City of Boulder is located at the base of the eastern Front Range of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado. Boulder is surrounded by several communities, including Superior, Broomfield, Louisville, Lafayette, Erie, Longmont, and Lyons. Although Boulder has not grown significantly in the last ten years, the exponential growth of the surrounding communities has influenced the City of Boulder and the regional transportation system. While airport planning documents related to the layout of airport facilities have been kept up-to-date, an overall master planning study of airport facilities has not been completed since 1994. During this time, aviation issues on a local, regional, and national level have changed, and the FAA also recommends that an Airport Master Plan be updated every 5-10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions Found for the Arvada Colorado Police Department Case Study
    DRAGON NATURALLYSPEAKING CASE STUDY CHALLENGE SOLUTIONS FOUND FOR THE ARVADA The time and cost of creating police reports was taking COLORADO POLICE DEPARTMENT resources away from other important needs. The city of Arvada Colorado is part of the Denver metropolitan area and has a population of over 100,000 people. The Arvada Police Department has more than 166 SOLUTION sworn officers and was facing a series of problems relating to the use of its third-party Dragon NaturallySpeaking was implemented department- transcription system and report writing. wide, for use throughout the Administration, Patrol and Investigation Divisions. This series of problems was tackled head-on by the department Administration using Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software throughout the Administration, Patrol and Investigation Divisions. The problems and solutions: RESULTS This 166 officer department saw a 789% Return on COST FACTOR: 789% Return on Investment Investment (ROI), a 50% reduction in time spent on The department was paying a substantial, $200,000 annual fee for third-party reports and greatly reduced lag time on report filing. transcription services. With a one-time purchase of Dragon NaturallySpeaking at approximately 20% of the annual transcription cost, the department was able to eliminate the need for the annual third-party transcription service. The department HOW IT WAS DONE opted for Dragon’s yearly maintenance contract (including free upgrades and no-cost To bring this solution to its department, Arvada Police direct access to the Dragon NaturallySpeaking engineering staff to resolve any issues work closely with Dragon’s Gold Level Partner for Law Enforcement sales and training, Lieutenant John Kane or problems) to help them maintain the solution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Comprehensive Plan
    Town of Superior COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DECEMBER 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii Acknowledgements Town Board of Trustees Consultants Mayor Andrew Muckle Clarion Associates Mayor Pro‐Tem Elia Gourgouris Foxfire Community Planning and Development Trustee Joe Cirelli Economics & Planning Systems, Inc. Trustee Chris Hanson Russell + Mills Studios Trustee Sandy Pennington Greenplay, LLC Trustee Lisa Skumatz LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Trustee Debra Williams The Planning Group (McCaslin Corridor Concepts) OZ Architecture and Team (Town Center) Planning Commission Chairperson Clint Folsom Citizens of the Town of Superior Vice‐Chairperson Bob McCool Commissioner Rozita Abdul‐ Williams Commissioner Joanne Eaton Commissioner Phyllis Hardin Commissioner Robert Mommaerts Commissioner Thomas Ricker Commissioner Rochelle Rittmaster Chairperson John Cracraft (Former) Commissioner Ian Elverson (Former) Vice‐Chairperson Kraig Prestesater (Former) Town Staff Town Manager Matt Magley Assistant Town Manager Beth Moyski Town Clerk Phyllis Hardin Finance Director Paul Nilles Parks, Recreation and Open Space Director Martin Toth Public Works and Utilities Director Alex Ariniello Management Analyst Lisa Ritchie Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan Town of Superior Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS v Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1‐1 Purpose of Plan .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1920S Small Homes Survey Report
    Discover Denver Know It. Love It. One Building at a Time. Survey Report Pilot Area #2 1920s Small Homes Park Hill, Harkness Heights, Grand View Prepared By: Jessica Aurora Ugarte and Beth Glandon Historic Denver, Inc. 1420 Ogden Street, #202 Denver, CO 80218 Rev. May 4, 2015 With Support From: 1 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Funding Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................................... 4 Project Areas .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Research Design & Methods ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Context, Theme and Property Type ......................................................................................................................... 18 Results ...................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Data .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fully Sited and Designed to Minimize Visual Impacts, Particularly of Distant Front Range Mountain Views and Open Meadows
    20352202035200303500333555 Department of Community Development Douglas County 2035 Comprehensive Master Plan Douglas County Department of Community Development Planning Services Division Douglas County, Colorado Adopted by the Douglas County Planning Commission June 16, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On behalf of the Douglas County Planning Commission, staff would like to thank all those who participated in this incredible effort to aid in Douglas County’s development well into the future. Special thanks to all of the citizens who have Douglas County Community Development Staff participated in the 2035 Comprehensive Master Terence T. Quinn, AICP, Director of Community Plan Update. Without your input, the Plan Development would not be possible. Randy Burkhardt, Assistant Director of Parks, Planning Commission 2014 Trails & Building Grounds Pam Schenck Kelly, Chair Edward Brewer Jennifer Eby, Manager of Community and Jim Dullea Resource Services Clarence Hughes Scott Kirkwood Steve Koster, AICP, Assistant Director of David Simonson Planning Services Stevan Strain Bill Vincent Update Team Krystal Woodbury Joe Fowler Dustin Smith, Alternate Kati Rider, AICP Michael O’Muireadhaigh, Alternate Curt Weitkunat, AICP Lloyd Whittal, Jr., Alternate Editing and Graphics Former Planning Commissioners Kim Smith Gary Dani Gary Weaver Contributing Staff Dan Avery, AICP Board of County Commissioners Jeanette Bare, AICP Roger A. Partridge, Chair Chris Boyd Jack A. Hilbert Donna Coffin Jill E. Repella Dan Dertz Tina Dill Doug DeBord, County Manager Nancy Gedeon Judy
    [Show full text]
  • City of Aurora, Colorado Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice
    City of Aurora, Colorado Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice FINAL July 13, 2016 Prepared by: EV Studio, LLC 1117 Cherokee St Denver, CO 80204 City of Aurora Community Development Division Neighborhood Services Department 9898 E. Colfax Avenue Aurora, CO 80010 2015-2016 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – City of Aurora, Colorado Table of Contents SECTION 1 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 SECTION 2 12 Community Profile……………………………………………………………………………………………………12 Population…………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 Population by Age…………………………………………………………………………………14 Population by Race……………………………………………………………………………….16 Population by Ethnicity…………………………………………………………………………17 Foreign Born Population……………………………………………………………………….18 Language……………………………………………………………………………………………….21 Disabilities……………………………………………………………….……………………………26 Households……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...27 Household Income…………………………………………………………………………………………28 Median Household income……………………………………………………………………28 Types of Households……………………………………………………………………………..33 Low to Moderate Census Tracts…………………………………………………………….35 Poverty………………………………………………………………………………………………………….39 Employment………………………………………………………………………………………………….42 Employment Status……………………………………………………………………………….42 Occupations………………………………………………………………………………………….44 Travel to Work for City of Aurora Residents……………………………..…………..46 Housing…………………………………………………………………………………………………………48 Occupancy and Tenure………………………………………………………………………….49
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Denver Mountain Parks System 56
    Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 56 The Denver Mountain Parks System The Denver Mountain Parks The System 57 Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 4.A. Systemwide Recommendations Recreation Recommendations Background Today, those who visit the Denver Mountain Parks (DMP) represent a broad cross section of people in demographics, where they reside, and how far they travel to enjoy these mountain lands. Visitors to the Mountain Parks are cosmopolitan – a true mix of cultures and languages. With the exception of African-Americans being under- represented, the Mountain Parks reflect the same diversity of age and ethnicity as occurs at Denver’s urban parks. Although visitors to the Mountain Parks represent the spectrum, many come from low to middle income households. Typically one third of those who visit either a Denver Mountain Park or another county open space park are Denver residents. Another third reside in the county in which the park is located. The last third are visitors from other counties along the Front Range, visitors from other parts of the state and nation, and international visitors. Together, mountain open space lands owned by Denver, Jefferson County, Douglas County, and Clear Creek County are used recipro- cally. Together, they are a regional Front Range open space sys- tem where each county provides its own lands and facilities for the enjoyment of its own residents, recognizing that these lands are also enjoyed by all visitors. The goal for Denver Mountain Parks is to provide the amenities and programs that take advantage of but do not diminish the valu- Red Rocks Park able natural and cultural resources and that meet today’s recre- ation needs and desire to connect kids with nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver's Mountain Parks Foundation Kicks Off Capital Campaign
    Est. 1970 + Vol ume 45 + Number 4 + fall 2016 The picnic shelter in Filius Park is an excellent example of the Denver Mountain Parks rustic architectural style. Many of these shelters have been neglected and are now in severe disrepair. Photo courtesy: Denver Public Library, Western History Collection Denver’s Mountain Parks Foundation Kicks Off Capital Campaign By Becca Dierschow, Preservation and Research Coordinator was a bold move, but one that the voters of Denver heartily supported. In 1912, In 1916, Denver released a series of tourism booklets promoting the newly the citizens of Denver passed a mill levy that funded the purchase and maintenance formed Denver Mountain Parks system. These 18 page, full color pamphlets of the parks system until 1955. illustrate many features of the Mountain Parks system that are well-known today To create a master plan for the proposed system, Denver tapped the most – Bergen Park, the winding Lariat Loop leading up to Lookout Mountain, and the prominent landscape architecture firm in the country – the Olmsted Brothers. The buffalo herd grazing in Genesee Park. All of these amenities, the pamphlets boast- sons of renowned landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, John and Frederick ed, were an easy car ride from Denver. Picnic shelters, fire pits, and well houses Jr carried on their father’s legacy and vastly expanded the firm’s reputation in their welcomed visitors and provided a place of respite from city living. own right. Frederick Olmsted Jr came to Denver in 1912 to oversee the planning The Denver Mountain Parks system was first proposed as early as 1901, as of the Denver Zoo, Civic Center, and City Park, along with the city-wide parkways part of a state-wide trend of preserving natural landscapes for the benefit of urban system.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Parks Parkways
    MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society DIRECTORY OF MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OOFF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Includes Colorado properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and the State Register of Historic Properties Updated Through December 2006 Prepared By Lisa Werdel © 2006 Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203-2137 www.coloradohistory-oahp.org The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a program of the Colorado Historical Society. Founded in 1879, the Colorado Historical Society brings the unique character of Colorado's past to more than a million people each year through historical museums and highway markers, exhibitions, manuscript and photograph collections, popular and scholarly publications, historical and archaeological preservation services, and educational programs for children and adults. The Society collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Colorado for present and future generations. A nonprofit agency with its own membership, the Society is also a state institution located within Colorado's Department of Higher Education The Colorado Historical Society operates twelve historic sites and museums at ten locations around the state, including
    [Show full text]
  • Denver and Area Attractions
    A Welcome Guide to DENVER and Area Attractions Adams Arapahoe ˆcompliments Boulder of N ATIONALBroomfield JEWISH HEALTH Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Jefferson Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Welcome to Denver, Colorado National Jewish Health is providing you with this welcome guide to assist with your adjustment to life in Colorado. You may find it helpful to read this guidebook in its entirety or find that only certain sections pertain to your situation. Human Resources is here to assist with your transition to your new life! Our office is located at 1400 Jackson Street, Southside Building, Room G-113, Denver, Colorado 80206. Our offices are open Monday to Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Please call our main number at 303.398.1035 to contact us. We look forward to you joining our National Jewish Health team. Human Resources National Jewish Health The information contained herein is provided as a public service with the understanding that National Jewish Health makes no warranties, either expressed or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information, nor does National Jewish Health warrant that
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mountains Area Plan 1 Introduction This Area Plan Is an Update to the 1994 Central Mountains Community Plan
    Jefferson County Comprehensive Master Plan Table of Contents 2 Introduction 2 History 10 Demographics 10 Land Use Recommendations 16 General Policies 30 Maps Jefferson County Comprehensive Master Plan - Central Mountains Area Plan 1 Introduction This Area Plan is an update to the 1994 Central Mountains Community Plan. The creation of the Central Mountains Community Plan started in June of 1989, and involved rigorous participation from a Community Advisory Group comprised of 13 people, chosen by the Board of County Commissioners as representatives of the community. The update of this Plan was started by Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Staff in the spring of 2012 with the intent of incorporating the Community Plan into the Comprehensive Master Plan. Seven public meetings were held throughout the update process to gather comments on the Plan. The goal of the update was to re-evaluate the existing conditions related to land use and then create a land use recommendation map and policies that are specific to the Central Mountains area. The recommendations in this Central Mountains Area Plan supersede the recommendations in the Central Mountains Community Plan. This Plan is shorter than the 1994 plan because any goals or policies that were duplicated in the Comprehensive Master Plan have been removed. This Plan now only contains information, land use recommendations, and policies specific to the Central Mountains Area. History The history of the Central Mountain community with its three canyons Mt. Vernon, Bear Creek and Clear Creek is rich with memories of Colorado’s early mining days. That these canyons are the “Gateways to the Rockies” is a statement just as true today as it was in 1859 when miners began haul- ing their equipment up the old Ute Indian trails to the gold mining near Idaho Springs, Central City, Leadville and Breckenridge.
    [Show full text]
  • C Lear Creek GIS C Ounty
    Creek G ilpin C o unty D D D 12147 D Jefferson County G ty Gilpin County rand Coun ICE LAKE D OHMAN LAKE STEUART LAKE D D REYNOLDS LAKE D D 13391 LAKE CAROLINELOCH LOMAND ST MARYS GLACIER Fox Mountain ST MARYS DLAKE FALL RIVER SILVER LAKE D D LAKE QUIVIRA 11239 13130 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR SLATER LAKE D SILVER CREEK SHERWIN LAKECHINNS LAKE Witter Peak D D 12884 D D James Peak Wilderness MEXICAN GULCH D ETHEL LAKEBYRON LAKE D D BILL MOORE LAKE HAMLIN GULCH D D 13132 CUMBERLAND GULCH D MILL CREEK D D Russell Peak Breckinridge Peak Berthoud Pass D D 12889 G D D ilp D in D C D ou n ty D Grand C D D ounty D MAD CREEK LION CREEK D Stanley Mountain YORK GULCH D D FALL RIVER 12521 BLUE CREEK Cone Mountain D D HOOP CREEK 12244 SPRING GULCH Red Elephant Hill D 10316 D ¤£US 40 D CLEAR CREEK This map is visual representation only, do not use Bellevue Mountain URAD RESERVOIR (LOWER) for legal purposes. Map is not survey accurate and ¨¦§I 70 D WEST FORK CLEAR CREEK 9863 Seaton Mountain may not comply with National Mapping Accuracy Red Mountain D D GUANELLA RESERVOIR 9105 12315 EMPIRE n County Standards. Map is based on best available data as Gilpi RUBY CREEK Ball Mountain Douglas Mountain of October, 2018 . BUTLER GULCH CENTRAL CITY D D VIRGINIA CANYON Lincoln Mountain GEORGIA GULCH 12529 9550 OHIO GULCH WOODS CREEK D GILSON GULCH Engelmann Peak 10363 TURKEY GULCH D IDAHO HASSELL LAKEURAD RESERVOIR (UPPER) 13362 BARD CREEK LAKE SILVER CREEK TRAIL CREEK J e US 6 f f ¤£ e r s o BARD CREEK SPRINGS n Flirtation Peak C Robeson Peak Columbia Mountain o ty
    [Show full text]