Restoration of the Yellow Montane Violet Population in Summit Park, Victoria, B.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Restoration of the Yellow Montane Violet Population in Summit Park, Victoria, B.C Restoration of the Yellow Montane Violet Population in Summit Park, Victoria, B.C. Shannon Breen UVic RNS Final Project - ER 390 Fall 2014 S. Breen 1 “Deep in their Roots, All Flowers Keep the Light” ~ Theodore Roethke Acknowledgments Firstly, I would like to pay my respect and give thanks to the Lekwungen peoples, known today as Esquimalt and Songhees First Nations, and their Coast Salish ancestors. This project was implemented on remarkably beautiful land that is in their traditional territory. Special thanks to Thomas Munson, City of Victoria. He was my supervisor overseeing me in this project. Thomas was incredibly helpful, enthusiastic and considerate throughout the project. I am very appreciative he connected me and granted me permission to do my project at Summit Park. I would like to give a big thank you to Colleen O’Brien, Playfair park community steward and super volunteer. Colleen’s environmental stewardship is incredibly inspiring and I feel very fortunate that she shared her vast knowledge about these special ecosystems with me. Many thanks to Dr. Valentin Schaefer, my amazing professor, project supervisor, and mentor at the University of Victoria’s Restoration of Natural Systems Program. Dr. Schaefer has given words of encouragement, council and assisted me many times over the past few years I have spent at UVic. I am so grateful for his guidance during this program. Thank you to Lisa Federspiel, Andréa Johnson, Andrew Reeves, and J.G. Balfour who are friends of mine that have lent a hand when I asked of them. Thanks to one of the neighbours of Summit Park/ the project plots who assisted and lent me equipment. Thank you to James Miskelly from the City of Victoria, who identified numerous species of grasses for me. Thanks to my fellow students in the UVic RNS program, and the wonderful society that makes up GOERT. Both are teams of hardworking, nature loving people. You are both very inspiring and keep me optimistic about the future of our environment. This project completes my Restoration of Natural Systems Diploma and a Bachelor’s degree. It has been a welcomed learning experience and an enjoyable way to end this chapter in my life. Though this project comes at the end of my university education, I do believe it is just the beginning of my connection with yellow montane violets and the start of my path in ecological restoration. (Cover Photo: Tim Ennis – Yellow Montane Violets, Cowichan Valley. 2009) S. Breen 2 Abstract Viola praemorsa spp. praemorsa (Yellow Montane Violet) is a Species at Risk, red-listed plant in B.C and it is listed as endangered by COSEWIC. There are a few small patches of this plant species found in the Garry oak ecosystem located at Summit Park in Victoria, B.C. The introduction of invasive grasses and other non- native plant species to the area has led to the degradation of the yellow montane violet habitat in the park. The goal of this project is to increase yellow montane violet’s populations’ health and numbers. The objective of this project is to improve the habitat of the yellow montane violet in Summit Park by reducing surrounding invasive species. The main approach to achieve this objective is to eliminate the invasive grasses from continuing to overtake the yellow montane violet habitat. This was carried out by removing the seed bank of unwanted species and the removal of invasive species. Mulch was added to the area to prevent the invasive grasses from growing late in the season. This report summarizes the restoration work that was implemented on the plots located in Summit Park. KEY WORDS: Ecological restoration, Biodiversity, Conservation, Garry oak ecosystem, Summit Park ,Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa, Yellow Montane Violet, Prairie Violet, Canary Violet, Upland Yellow Violet, Red-listed, Species at Risk, COSEWIC endangered S. Breen 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.0 Ecosystems & Species of Conservation Concern.......................................................................... 8 1.0.1 Species Ranking In British Columbia ...................................................................................... 8 1.0.2 Species at Risk ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.1.0 Coastal Douglas-fir Biogeoclimatic Zones & Garry oak (Quercus garryana) Ecosystems .. 9 1.2.0 Yellow montane violets (Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa).................................................... 12 2.0 Project Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 17 2.0.1 Colleen O’Brien & Playfair Park ........................................................................................... 17 2.1 Project Approach ............................................................................................................................ 19 2.2 Budget & Tools ............................................................................................................................ 21 2.3 Project Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 21 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 23 3.1 Site Conditions ................................................................................................................................ 23 3.2 Plots .................................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3 Invasive Species Removal ............................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1 Weeds ........................................................................................................................................ 26 3.3.2 Grasses ...................................................................................................................................... 27 3.4 Population Count ............................................................................................................................ 27 3.5 Mulch ............................................................................................................................................... 31 3.6 Measures of Success ........................................................................................................................ 32 4.0 Results & Observations & Interpretation ........................................................................................ 33 4.1 Site Conditions: ........................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Plots: ............................................................................................................................................. 33 4.3 Invasive Species Removal:.......................................................................................................... 34 4.4 Population Count: ....................................................................................................................... 34 4.5 Mulch: .......................................................................................................................................... 37 5.0 Discussion & Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 37 5.1 Suggested Improvements for Project ............................................................................................ 38 5.2 Future Possibilities .......................................................................................................................... 39 6.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................... 40 References .................................................................................................................................................. 42 S. Breen 4 Appendix .................................................................................................................................................... 44 I. Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 44 a. COSEWIC..................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Horse Mountain (Humboldt County, California) James P
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 4-2019 Vascular Plants of Horse Mountain (Humboldt County, California) James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] John O. Sawyer Jr. Humboldt State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr and Sawyer, John O. Jr., "Vascular Plants of Horse Mountain (Humboldt County, California)" (2019). Botanical Studies. 38. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/38 This Flora of Northwest California: Checklists of Local Sites of Botanical Interest is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF HORSE MOUNTAIN (HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA) Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. & John O. Sawyer, Jr. Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California Fourth Edition · 29 April 2019 Horse Mountain (elevation 4952 ft.) is located at 40.8743N, -123.7328 W. The Polystichum x scopulinum · Bristle or holly fern closest town is Willow Creek, about 15 miles to the northeast. Access is via County Road 1 (Titlow Hill Road) off State Route 299. You have now left the Coast Range PTERIDACEAE BRAKE FERN FAMILY and entered the Klamath-Siskiyou Region. The area offers commanding views of Adiantum pedatum var. aleuticum · Maidenhair fern the Pacific Ocean and the Trinity Alps.
    [Show full text]
  • Viola Praemorsa Ssp. Praemorsa
    Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa English name yellow montane violet, canary violet, upland yellow violet Scientific name Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa Family Violaceae (Violet) Other scientific names Viola nuttallii var. praemorsa Risk status BC: imperilled (S2); red-listed Canada: threatened (N2); COSEWIC: endangered (2007) Global: secure (G5T5) Elsewhere: California, Oregon, Washington – reported (SNR) Range/Known distribution Yellow montane violet occurs on the west coast of North America from southwestern British Columbia to northern California. In Canada, it is currently restricted to Salt Spring Island and southeastern Vancouver Island, from Duncan to Victoria. These Canadian populations represent the northern limit of the geographic range of yellow montane violet in North America. Currently, there are 14 known occurrences and 5, or possibly 6, sites are presumed extirpated. The number of plants in the larger populations may have large fluctuations from year to year due to seasonal weather variation. Distribution of Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa l recently confirmed sites l unconfirmed or extirpated sites Species at Risk in Garry Oak and Associated Ecosystems in British Columbia Viola praemorsa ssp. praemorsa Field description Yellow montane violet is a yellow-flowered perennial with short, erect stems 5-30 cm tall. The basal leaves are broadly egg- to lance-shaped, and conspicuously hairy. Basal leaves are 2-10 cm long and 1-3.5 cm wide with leaf stalks (petioles) 3-15 cm long. The flowering stem may be leafless or may have a few reduced leaves. Bright yellow flowers arise singly on stalks from the axils of the leaf stems. The lowest petal has a 1- to 2-mm long hollow tube (spur) at the base.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarkia Stewardship Acct8mar2002
    Stewardship Account for Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera Prepared for the Garry Oak Ecosystems Recovery Team March 2002 by Brenda Costanzo, BC Conservation Data Centre, PO Box 9344 Station Provincial Government, Victoria, BC V8W 9M7 Funding provided by the Habitat Stewardship Program of the Government of Canada and the Nature Conservancy of Canada Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera 2 STEWARDSHIP ACCOUNT Clarkia purpurea ssp. quadrivulnera Species information: Kingdom: Plantae Subkingdom: Tracheobionta Superdivision: Spermatophyta Division: Magnoliophyta Subclass: Rosidae Order: Myrtales Family: Onagraceae (Above classification is from U.S.D.A. Plants Database, 2001) Genus: Clarkia Species: purpurea Subspecies: quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) ex H.F. & M.E. Lewis Section Godetia (Lewis, 1955) Clarkia purpurea (Curtis) Nels. & Macbr. ssp. quadrivulnera (Dougl.) H. Lewis & M. Lewis; Small-flowered Godetia Synonyms: Clarkia quadrivulnera (Dougl.) ex Lindl. (Douglas et al., 2001) Clarkia quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) A. Nels. & J.F. Macbr. Godetia quadrivulnera var. vacensis Jepson Godetia purpurea (W. Curtis) G. Don var. parviflora (S. Wats.) C.L. Hitchc. Godetia quadrivulnera (Dougl. ex Lindl.) Spach (Above from ITIS data base, 2001; USDA Plants database, 2001) Oenothera quadrivulnera Douglas (GRIN database, 2001) Hitchcock and Jepson recognized two genera: Clarkia and Godetia based on petal shape The section Godetia consists of a diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid series, of which C. purpurea and C. prostrata is the latter (Lewis and Lewis, 1955). Lewis and Lewis (1955) felt that for Clarkia purpurea there were ephemeral local races due to hybridization. Some of these could be separated based on conspicuous morphological characters to the subspecies level. However, these subspecies were artificial and not distinct geographical nor ecological races.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R
    United States Department of Agriculture Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R. Mousseaux • R. Kasten Dumroese Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report November Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-387 2018 Luna, T.; Mousseaux, M.R.; Dumroese, R.K. 2018. Common native forbs of the northern Great Basin important for Greater Sage-grouse. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-387. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon–Washington Region. 76p. Abstract: is eld guide is a tool for the identication of 119 common forbs found in the sagebrush rangelands and grasslands of the northern Great Basin. ese forbs are important because they are either browsed directly by Greater Sage-grouse or support invertebrates that are also consumed by the birds. Species are arranged alphabetically by genus and species within families. Each species has a botanical description and one or more color photographs to assist the user. Most descriptions mention the importance of the plant and how it is used by Greater Sage-grouse. A glossary and indices with common and scientic names are provided to facilitate use of the guide. is guide is not intended to be either an inclusive list of species found in the northern Great Basin or a list of species used by Greater Sage-grouse; some other important genera are presented in an appendix. Keywords: diet, forbs, Great Basin, Greater Sage-grouse, identication guide Cover photos: Upper le: Balsamorhiza sagittata, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Lookout Mountain
    Lookout Mountain Ochoco National Forest Crook County, OR T14S R19E S 11, 12, 13, 24, 25 & T14S R20E S19, 20, 29, 20, 31, 32 Area studied includes all areas between FS Rd 42 and FS Rd 4215 on the south. List compiled from observations by Paul Slichter & from data obtained from the Oregon Plant Atlas & Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria websites. Updated March 7, 2019. Common Name Scientific Name Family Ferns, Horsetails, Liverworts & Mosses ____ Common Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha Marchantiaceae ____ Juniper Haircap Moss Polytrichum juniperinum Polytrichaceae ____ Lady Fern: Athyrium filix-femina v. cyclosorum Athyriaceae ____ Lace Lip Fern Cheilanthes gracillima Pteridaceae ____ American Parsley Fern Cryptogramma acrostichoides Pterideraceae ____ Oregon Cliff Fern? Woodsia (oregana ?) Woodsiaceae Trees & Shrubs ____ Black Elderberry Sambucus racemosa v. melanocarpa Adoxaceae ____ Low Sagebrush Artemisia arbuscula ssp. arbuscula Asteraceae ____ Mountain Big Sagebrush Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana Asteraceae ____ Creeping Oregon Grape Berberis repens Berberidaceae ____ Mountain Alder Alnus incana ssp. tenuifolia Betulaceae ____ Common Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus v. laevigatus Caprifoliaceae ____ Mountain Snowberry Symphoricarpos oreophilus v. utahensis Caprifoliaceae ____ Western Juniper Juniperus occidentalis Cupressaceae ____ Pinemat Manzanita Arctostaphylos nevadensis Ericaceae ____ Greenleaf Manzanita Arctostaphylos patula Ericaceae ____ Squaw Currant Ribes cereum v. cereum Grossulariaceae ____ Northern Black Currant Ribes hudsonianum v. petiolare Grossulariaceae ____ Swamp Currant Ribes lacustre Grossulariaceae ____ Sicky Currant Ribes viscosissimum Grossulariaceae ____ California White Fir Abies concolor X Abies grandis Pinaceae ____ Grand Fir Abies grandis ? Pinaceae ____ Subalpine Fir Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa Pinaceae ____ Western Larch Larix occidentalis Pinaceae ____ Lodgepole Pine Pinus contorta v. latifolia Pinaceae ____ Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa v.
    [Show full text]
  • Darlingtonia Fall 2015 Chapter Programs and Meetings
    FALL 2015 Darlingtonia OCT-DEC Newsletter of the North Coast Chapter of the California Native Plant Society Dedicated to the Preservation of California Native Flora Native Sidewalk Garden Inside this issue: at Spear & Alliance Feature Article: 1 by Anna Bernard Native Sidewalk Garden: Spear & Alliance June 2015 Field Trips and Plant Walks 2 When I work on the Native Sidewalk Garden in my neighborhood, folks Digital California Plant Portal Hits 2 stop and ask me questions about the project. Here are some of their Record Number of Specimens questions and my answers. Chapter Programs 3 Q. Why did you plant the Native Garden on the corner of Alliance Revised Wildflowers of California’s 3 Road and Spear Avenue (in Arcata)? North Coast Range A. There was a dead shrub on the corner that looked really bad. I Fall Plant Sale Thank Yous 4 asked the Arcata Public Work folks to remove it and things mushroomed from there. I live in the Vassaides Neighborhood and I wanted the Wildflowers at Clarke Museum entrance to our neighborhood to look better. The patch is a narrow strip Chapter Financial News 5 about three feet wide and 20 feet long (between the sidewalk and a block wall) so it seemed like a small and manageable project. Field Trip Reports: 6 Coastal Trail, Hidden Beach Q. Did you get permission Section from Requa to Lagoon to plant the garden? Creek Pink-margined Monkeyflower A. Yes, the City of Arcata Rare Plant Treasure Hunt has an “Adopt a Park” Snow Camp Mountain The Cusp of Horse Mountain program, which includes King Range places like the flower beds on the Arcata Plaza.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization
    Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization by Tyler Thomas Kelly B.Sc. (Wildlife Biology), University of Montana, 2014 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science © Tyler Thomas Kelly 2019 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY SPRING 2019 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Tyler Kelly Degree: Master of Science (Biological Sciences) Title: Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization Examining Committee: Chair: John Reynolds Professor Elizabeth Elle Senior Supervisor Professor Jonathan Moore Supervisor Associate Professor David Green Internal Examiner Professor [ Date Defended/Approved: April 08, 2019 ii Abstract Pollination events are highly dynamic and adaptive interactions that may vary across spatial scales. Furthermore, the composition of species within a location can highly influence the interactions between trophic levels, which may impact community resilience to disturbances. Here, I evaluated the species composition and interactions of plants and pollinators across a latitudinal gradient, from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to the Willamette and Umpqua Valleys in Oregon and Washington, United States of America. I surveyed 16 oak-savanna communities within three ecoregions (the Strait of Georgia/ Puget Lowlands, the Willamette Valley, and the Klamath Mountains), documenting interactions and abundances of the plants and pollinators. I then conducted various multivariate and network analyses on these communities to understand the effects of space and species composition on community resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Mc Years Over
    Historical Notes The Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Bird Sanctuary The Native Plant Reserve in Glenwood Park A year-by-year account of The Martha Crone Years 1933 - 1958 Gary D. Bebeau 2021 Revised ©Friends of the Wild Flower Garden Inc. www.friendsofthewildflowergarden.org P O Box 3793 Minneapolis MN 55403 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Maps 5 1933 8 1933 Butler Memorial Association 23 1934 27 1935 34 1936 42 1937 50 1938 56 1939 64 1940 73 1941 81 1942 88 1943 93 1944 107 1945 116 1946 119 1947 123 1948 129 1949 135 1950 140 1951 146 1952 152 Table of Contents 1953 158 1954 163 1955 167 1956 172 1957 178 1958 183 Subsequent events 188 Appendix 189 Gertrude Cram 189 Garden Fencing 191 Aquatic Pools 199 Bird Feeding Station 217 Natural Springs in area 222 1951 Garden History 228 1952 Self-conducted tour 233 1952 Friends founders 238 Clinton Odell History 242 1956 Fern Glen Development 248 Index of names and places 254 Map and historical photo index 257 Plant photo index 261 1 Introduction This document in not a narrative, but a year-by-year account of the Curator’s activities in relation to the development and maintenance of this special area in Glenwood Park, as the area was named in the early years and later named Theodore Wirth Park in 1938 following Wirth’s retirement in 1935. The more detailed information here supplements the overview provided in the companion book - “This Satisfying Pursuit - Martha Crone and the Wild Flower Garden.” Martha Crone succeeded Eloise Butler as Curator of the Eloise Butler Wild Flower Garden on April 18, 1933, following Miss Butler’s death on April 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Viola Praemorsa
    ATTACHMENT SS2 REGION 2 SENSITIVE SPECIES EVALUATION FORM Species: Viola praemorsa ssp. flavovirens (V. praemorsa) Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations Region 2 harbors the southeastern portion of the distribution of Viola praemorsa. It • Dorn 2001 1 BD occurs in the Big Horn, Medicine Bow, and Absaroka mountains and the Sierra Madre Distribution • NatureServe 2002 within R2 in Albany, Park, Big Horn, Carbon, Sweetwater, Sheridan, Washakie, Johnson, • University of Wyoming 1998 Campbell, Hot Springs, and Fremont counties, Wyoming, and is found in the Shoshone National Forest, Bighorn National Forest, and Medicine Bow national forests. It also occurs in Colorado, therefore, additional state information is necessary in order to determine its status in Region 2. In Wyoming, this species is found between 5,400 and 12,000 feet in elevation on open, moist seepage slopes, sagebrush slopes, open Pinus ponderosa forest, grasslands with patches of Picea engelmannii and Pinus albicaulis, Populus tremuloides groves, and Pseudotsuga menziesii/Abies lasiocarpus forests. Such habitats represent a variety of substrates and vegetation types that are discontinuous on the landscape, resulting in a patchy distribution. Note: Wyoming authors have not recognized this taxon below the species level, and two varieties are said to be present in the state, V. praemorsa ssp flavovirens and V. p. var. linguifolia. Wyoming specimens have not been annotated to subspecies and the information in this evaluation refers to species-level information. Confidence in Rank High Viola praemorsa is known from British Columbia to Alberta, south to California, and • Dorn 2001 2 C Utah. In Wyoming, it is known from all counties outside of Region 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species Checklist and Rare Plants of Fossil Butte National
    Vascular Plant Species Checklist And Rare Plants of Fossil Butte National Monument Physaria condensata by Jane Dorn from Dorn & Dorn (1980) Prepared for the National Park Service Northern Colorado Plateau Network By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming PO Box 3381, Laramie, WY 82071 9 October 2000 Table of Contents Page # Introduction . 3 Study Area . 3 Methods . 5 Results . 5 Summary of Plant Inventory Work at Fossil Butte National Monument . 5 Flora of Fossil Butte National Monument . 7 Rare Plants of Fossil Butte National Monument . 7 Other Noteworthy Plant Species from Fossil Butte National Monument . 8 Discussion and Recommendations . 8 Acknowledgments . 10 Literature Cited . 11 Figures, Tables, and Appendices Figure 1. Fossil Butte National Monument . 4 Figure 2. Increase in Number of Plant Species Recorded at Fossil Butte National Monument, 1973-2000 . 9 Table 1. Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Fossil Butte National Monument . 13 Table 2. Rejected Plant Taxa . 32 Table 3. Potential Vascular Plants of Fossil Butte National Monument . 35 Appendix A. Rare Plants of Fossil Butte National Monument . 41 2 INTRODUCTION The National Park Service established Fossil Butte National Monument in October 1972 to preserve significant deposits of fossilized freshwater fish, aquatic organisms, and plants from the Eocene-age Green River Formation. In addition to fossils, the Monument also preserves a mosaic of 12 high desert and montane foothills vegetation types (Dorn et al. 1984; Jones 1993) and over 600 species of vertebrates and vascular plants (Beetle and Marlow 1974; Rado 1976, Clark 1977, Dorn et al. 1984; Kyte 2000). From a conservation perspective, Fossil Butte National Monument is especially significant because it is one of only two managed areas in the basins of southwestern Wyoming to be permanently protected and managed with an emphasis on maintaining biological processes (Merrill et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of the Horse Mountain Serpentines Humboldt County, California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 2017 Vascular Plants of the Horse Mountain Serpentines Humboldt County, California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] John O. Sawyer Jr. Humboldt State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr and Sawyer, John O. Jr., "Vascular Plants of the Horse Mountain Serpentines Humboldt County, California" (2017). Botanical Studies. 51. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/51 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE HORSE MOUNTAIN SERPENTINES HUMBOLDT COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. & John O. Sawyer, Jr. Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Second Edition • 26 May 2009 Horse Mountain (elevation 4952 ft.) is located at N BERBERIDACEAE • BARBERRY 40.874, W -123.73. The closest town is Willow Creek, Achlys triphylla Vanilla leaf about 15 miles to the northeast. Access is via County Mahonia aquifolium Oregon-grape Road 1 (Titlow Hill Road) off State Route 299. About Mahonia nervosa Oregon-grape Vancouveria planipetala Inside-out flower 1100 acres have been set aside as the Horse Mountain Botanical Area, administered by the Six Rivers National BETULACEAE • BIRCH Forest.
    [Show full text]