DOCSLIB.ORG

The Indestructible Will: a Critical Examination of Arthur Schopenhauer’S Theory of Athanasia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Indestructible Will: a Critical Examination of Arthur Schopenhauer’S Theory of Athanasia The Indestructible Will: A Critical Examination of Arthur Schopenhauer’s Theory of Athanasia Jonti Joey Bloomberg Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Johan Hattingh March/April 2021 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION ................................................................................................................................I ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... II ABSTRAK ....................................................................................................................................... III ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................ IV PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................... V 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 PART I: AN INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNT OF SCHOPENHAUER’S PHILOSOPHY .......... 11 2. KANT IDENTIFIES THE MIND AS AN ACTIVE ENTITY........................................................ 13 3. THE WORLD AS APPEARANCE: FIRST PART ........................................................................ 23 3.1. SENSATIONS VIS-À-VIS PERCEPTIONS ................................................................ 23 3.2. PRINCIPIUM COGNOSCENDI .................................................................................. 29 3.3. PRINCIPIUM FIENDI AND PRINCIPIUM ESSENDI ................................................ 33 3.4. OBJECTIVE CAUSALITY ......................................................................................... 35 3.5. HETEROGENEITY FROM HOMOGENEITY ............................................................ 38 3.6. SCHOPENHAUER’S ARGUMENTS FOR RADICAL IDEALISM ............................. 39 3.6.1. THE ARGUMENT FROM IMMEDIACY ................................................... 40 3.6.2. THE ARGUMENT FROM INCONCEIVABILITY ..................................... 41 3.6.3. THE ARGUMENT FROM CERTAINTY .................................................... 42 3.6.4. THE ARGUMENT FROM SIMPLICITY .................................................... 43 3.6.5. THE ARGUMENT FROM THE SUBJECT-OBJECT ANTITHESIS ........... 44 3.7. A DISCUSSION ON THREE DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF IDEALISM .................... 45 3.8. CONCLUDING REMARKS ........................................................................................ 61 4. THE WORLD AS WILL: FIRST PART ....................................................................................... 63 4.1. THE WILL AS ASPATIAL ......................................................................................... 65 4.2. THE WILL AS ACAUSAL .......................................................................................... 67 4.3. THE WILL AS ATEMPORAL .................................................................................... 69 4.4. SCHOPENHAUER’S THOUGHT IN RELATION TO HIS PHILOSOPHICAL PREDECESSORS .............................................................................................................. 71 4.5. SCHOPENHAUER’S SELECTION OF THE WORD “WILL” .................................... 72 4.6. THE SOLIPSISTIC PROBLEM ................................................................................... 82 4.7.1. THE ANALOGICAL ARGUMENT ............................................................ 83 4.7.2. THE PRACTICAL EGOIST ARGUMENT ................................................. 84 4.8. THE EXTENSION OF THE WILL TO INANIMATE OBJECTS ................................. 86 4.8.1. THE DING-AN-SICH AS THE SUBSTRATUM OF ALL PHENOMENAL APPEARANCES .................................................................................................. 88 4.8.2. THE ANALOGICAL ARGUMENT ............................................................ 89 4.8.3. METAPHYSICS AS THE FOUNDATION OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ............................................................................................................................. 91 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 4.8.4. THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF THE SCHOPENHAUERIAN PHILOSOPHY WITH THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD .................................................................... 97 4.9. THE PLATONIC IDEAS AS PROTOTYPES FOR THE PHENOMENAL WORLD .. 100 4.10. SCHOPENHAUER’S TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR EXTENDING THE WILL THROUGHOUT ANIMATE NATURE ................................................................. 107 4.11. SCHOPENHAUER’S VIEWS ON LOVE AND MALE HOMOSEXUALITY ......... 112 4.12. CONCLUDING REMARKS .................................................................................... 124 5. THE UNRELENTING STRUGGLE OF LIFE ............................................................................ 126 5.1. OPTIMISM AS A PERNICIOUS WAY OF THINKING............................................ 132 5.2. THE EVIL METAPHYSICAL WILL AS THE IMPETUS FOR THE ASCETIC LIFE 138 5.3. THE WILL AS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE OF DISCORD AND SUFFERING ........ 144 5.4. THE NEGATIVITY OF HAPPINESS THESIS .......................................................... 151 5.5. EXTERNAL CORROBORATIONS OF THE PESSIMISTIC VIEW OF LIFE ........... 155 5.5.1. BUDDHISM ............................................................................................. 156 5.5.2. EVOLUTION BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION ......................... 158 5.6. SCHOPENHAUER’S EVALUATION OF LIFE’S WORTH ...................................... 182 5.6.1. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER NOT TO HAVE BEEN BORN ......... 182 5.6.2. IT IS UNCONSCIONABLE TO BEGET CHILDREN ............................... 184 5.6.3. TO RAPIDLY RETURN TO THE UNCONSCIOUS STATE .................... 186 5.6.3.1. SCHOPENHAUER’S VIEWS ON SUICIDE ............................ 186 5.6.3.2. SCHOPENHAUER’S SOTERIOLOGICAL DOCTRINE .......... 191 5.7. IS A LIFE OF SUFFERING REALLY NOT WORTH LIVING?................................ 195 6. THE SCHOPENHAUERIAN DOCTRINE OF ATHANASIA .................................................... 197 6.1. THE ANXIETY OF DEATH AS A UNIQUELY RATIONAL PHENOMENON........ 198 6.2. THE WILLE-ZUM-LEBEN AS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE OF THE FEAR OF DEATH ............................................................................................................................ 204 6.3. SOME PRELIMINARY CONSOLATIONS FOR THE INEVITABILITY OF DEATH ......................................................................................................................................... 208 6.4. SCHOPENHAUER’S THEORY OF IMMORTALITY .............................................. 212 6.4.1. THE WILL AS ETERNAL ........................................................................ 217 6.4.2. THE WILL AS UNALTERABLE ............................................................. 218 6.4.3. THE WILL AS A UNITY.......................................................................... 219 6.5. THE DOCTRINE OF PALINGENESIS ..................................................................... 224 6.6. THE EXTENSION OF IMMORTALITY TO NON-HUMAN ANIMALS .................. 228 6.7. SOME DIFFICULTIES PERTAINING TO SCHOPENHAUER’S THEORY OF ATHANASIA ..................................................................................................... 234 6.7.1. A MULTIDIMENSIONAL DING-AN-SICH............................................. 234 6.7.2. THE WILL AS THE ORIGIN OF FUGA MORTIS ................................... 235 6.7.3. THE EVIL METAPHYSICAL WILL ........................................................ 236 PART II: CRITICISMS PERTAINING TO SCHOPENHAUER’S THEORY .......................... 238 7. THE WORLD AS APPEARANCE: PART TWO ....................................................................... 239 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za 7.1. THE ARGUMENT FROM IMMEDIACY ................................................................. 239 7.2. THE ARGUMENT FROM INCONCEIVABILITY .................................................... 240 7.3. THE ARGUMENT FROM CERTAINTY .................................................................. 241 7.4. THE ARGUMENT FROM SIMPLICITY .................................................................. 242 7.5. THE ARGUMENT FROM THE SUBJECT-OBJECT ANTITHESIS ......................... 243 7.6. THE STATUS OF THE MIND: A PHENOMENAL OR METAPHYSICAL ENTITY? ......................................................................................................................................... 244 7.7. THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF SCHOPENHAUERIAN RADICAL IDEALISM WITH EVOLUTIONISM ............................................................................................................ 246 7.8. TIME, SPACE AND CAUSALITY AS MIND-INDEPENDENT ............................... 267 8. THE WORLD AS WILL: PART TWO ....................................................................................... 276 8.1. THE WILL AS A CONCEPT..................................................................................... 276 8.2. KNOWLEDGE OF THE WILL AS A PRODUCT OF INTELLECTUAL INTUITION ......................................................................................................................................... 281 8.3. THE WILL AS SUBJECT TO THE PRINCIPIUM INDIVIDUATIONIS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is Factory Farming Making Us Sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK?
    Is Factory Farming making us sick? IS FACTORY FARMING MAKING US SICK? A Guide to Animal Diseases and their Impact on Human Health 1 Photo by Engin Akyurt Contents Introduction 4 Avian Influenza (Bird Flu) 6 Bovine TB 8 BSE 10 Campylobacter 12 E. Coli (O157: H7) 14 Foot and Mouth Disease 16 Johne’s Disease 18 Meningitis 20 MRSA 22 Nipah 24 Q Fever 25 Salmonella 26 Swine Flu 28 Other Zoonotic Diseases 30 We can change 32 References 34 2 Is Factory Farming making us sick? 3 Photo by Ethan Kent Introduction The majority of farmed animals in the UK In recent years, animal farming has are reared intensively, inside crowded, filthy brought us outbreaks of BSE, bovine sheds which are the perfect environment TB, foot and mouth, bird flu, swine flu, for bacteria and viruses to flourish. Stressed campylobacter, salmonella and many by their surroundings and their inability more devastating diseases. No wonder to display natural behaviours, forced to the United Nations Food and Agriculture live in their own excrement alongside sick Organization has warned that global and dying animals, it is not surprising that industrial meat production poses a serious farmed animals are vulnerable to infection. threat to human health3. Their immunity is further weakened by the industry breeding from just a few CREATING ANTIBIOTIC high-yielding strains, which has led to genetic erosion. This makes it easier for RESISTANCE disease to sweep swiftly through a group Instead of protecting of animals, who are likely to share near- ourselves by changing identical genetics with little immunological how we treat animals resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) - Utilitarianism
    Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) - Utilitarianism British economist Jeremy Bentham is most often associated with his theory of utilitarianism. Bentham's views ran counter to Adam Smith's vision of "natural rights." He believed in utilitarianism, or the idea that all social actions should be evaluated by the axiom "It is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong." Unlike Smith, Bentham believed that there were no natural rights to be interfered with. Trained in law, Bentham never practiced, choosing instead to focus on judicial and legal reform. His reform plans went beyond rewriting legislative acts to include detailed administrative plans to implement his proposals. In his plan for prisons, workhouses, and other institutions, Bentham devised compensation schemes, building designs, worker timetables, and even new accounting systems. A guiding principle of Bentham's schemes was that incentives should be designed "to make it each man's interest to observe on every occasion that conduct which it is his duty to observe." Interestingly, Bentham's thinking led him to the conclusion, one he shared with Smith, that professors should not be salaried. In his early years Bentham professed a free-market approach. He argued, for example, that interest rates should be free from government control. (See Defence of Usury.) But by the end of his life, he had shifted to a more interventionist stance. He predated Keynes in his advocacy of expansionist monetary policies to achieve full employment and advocated a range of interventions, including the minimum wage and guaranteed employment. His publications were few, but Bentham influenced many during his lifetime and lived to see some of his political reforms enacted shortly before his death in London at the age of eighty-four.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Arthur Schopenhauer
    03/05/2017 Arthur Schopenhauer (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Arthur Schopenhauer First published Mon May 12, 2003; substantive revision Sat Nov 19, 2011 Among 19th century philosophers, Arthur Schopenhauer was among the first to contend that at its core, the universe is not a rational place. Inspired by Plato and Kant, both of whom regarded the world as being more amenable to reason, Schopenhauer developed their philosophies into an instinct­recognizing and ultimately ascetic outlook, emphasizing that in the face of a world filled with endless strife, we ought to minimize our natural desires for the sake of achieving a more tranquil frame of mind and a disposition towards universal beneficence. Often considered to be a thoroughgoing pessimist, Schopenhauer in fact advocated ways — via artistic, moral and ascetic forms of awareness — to overcome a frustration­filled and fundamentally painful human condition. Since his death in 1860, his philosophy has had a special attraction for those who wonder about life's meaning, along with those engaged in music, literature, and the visual arts. 1. Life: 1788–1860 2. The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason 3. Schopenhauer's Critique of Kant 4. The World as Will 5. Transcending the Human Conditions of Conflict 5.1 Aesthetic Perception as a Mode of Transcendence 5.2 Moral Awareness as a Mode of Transcendence 5.3 Asceticism and the Denial of the Will­to­Live 6. Schopenhauer's Later Works 7. Critical Reflections 8. Schopenhauer's Influence Bibliography Academic Tools Other Internet Resources Related Entries 1. Life: 1788–1860 Exactly a month younger than the English Romantic poet, Lord Byron (1788–1824), who was born on January 22, 1788, Arthur Schopenhauer came into the world on February 22, 1788 in Danzig [Gdansk, Poland] — a city that had a long history in international trade as a member of the Hanseatic League.
    [Show full text]
  • I- Vegan Consciousness and the Commodity Chain: on the Neoliberal, Afrocentric, and Decolonial Politics of “Cruelty-Free” B
    Vegan Consciousness and the Commodity Chain: On the Neoliberal, Afrocentric, and Decolonial Politics of “Cruelty-Free” By Amie Louise Harper B.A. (Dartmouth College, Hanover) 1998 M.A. (Harvard University, Cambridge) 2007 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Geography In the Office of Graduate Studies Of the University of California Davis Approved: ____________________________________ (Dr. Kimberly Nettles-Barcelon), Chair ____________________________________ (Dr. Wendy Ho) ____________________________________ (Dr. Psyche A. Williams-Forson) Committee in Charge 2013 -i- Acknowledgments There are many people I would like to thank who made the completion of this manuscript possible. My dissertation committee of Dr. Kimberly Nettles-Barcelon, Dr. Psyche A. Williams- Forson and Dr. Wendy Ho: Thank you for your comments and patience, as well as directing me towards the path of rigorous scholarship. My husband Oliver Zahn: Thank you for your years of support. My parents Patricia Harper and Bob Harper: When I was 12 years old, I told you that I wanted to get a PhD. You told me that there is no reason why this should not be possible. Thanks for the never-ending encouragement. My twin brother Talmadge Harper: Like mom and dad, you kept on telling me that I could do it. Sister Jayne Simon: Thank you for the endless conversations and being an amazing mentor and spiritual godmother to me. Tseday Worku: I appreciate the hours of ‘free’ child-care that you provided for my babies so I could complete this manuscript. Marian Swanzy-Parker: Our hours of dialogues about race, class, gender, and power were amazingly helpful and inspiring.
    [Show full text]
  • JAHR 4-2011.Indd
    JAHR Vol. 2 No. 4 2011 UDK 575.4:17.03 Conference paper Eve-Marie Engels* Th e importance of Charles Darwin‘s theory for Fritz Jahr‘s conception of bioethics "Man in his arrogance thinks himself a great work. worthy the interposition of a deity, more humble & I believe true to consider him created from animals."** Charles Darwin, 1838 ABSTRACT Fritz Jahr is a pioneer of bioethics. In this article I will present and outline Jahr’s bioethical programme with a special emphasis on Charles Darwin’s role in Jahr’s ethics. According to Jahr, useful and effi cient animal protection can only be practised well if we have enough knowledge of nature. Jahr refers to Darwin who revolutionised our view of life and of the relationship between the human being and the rest of living nature. In the fi rst introductory section I will shortly present Jahr’s overall perspective and his bioethical imperative. I will also give a very short sketch of today’s bioethics. In the second and third section I will outline Dar- win’s revolutionary theory and its application to the human being. I will also present some of the reactions of his contemporaries which refl ect Darwin’s achievement for our understanding of living nature. In the fourth section I will go back to Fritz Jahr and will present and discuss diff erent aspects of his approach in more detail. A fi nal quotation from Hans Jonas about the dialectical character of Darwinism will trenchantly highlight Darwin’s importance for Fritz Jahr’s ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrition of Pigs Kept Under Low and High Sanitary Conditions Effects on Amino Acid and Energy Metabolism and Damaging Behaviour
    Nutrition of pigs kept under low and high sanitary conditions Effects on amino acid and energy metabolism and damaging behaviour Yvonne van der Meer Nutrition of pigs kept under low and high sanitary conditions Effects on amino acid and energy metabolism and damaging behaviour Yvonne van der Meer Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr W. J. J. Gerrits Personal chair at the Animal Nutrition Group Wageningen University & Research Co-promotors Dr A. J. M. Jansman Senior researcher, Animal Nutrition Wageningen University & Research Dr A. Lammers Researcher, Adaptation Physiology Group Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr J. Keijer, Wageningen University & Research Dr E. Labussière, INRA, Rennes, France Prof. Dr C.M. Nyachoti, University of Manitoba, Canada Prof. Dr S.A. Edwards, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School of Wageningen Institute of Animal Science (WIAS) Nutrition of pigs kept under low and high sanitary conditions Effects on amino acid and energy metabolism and damaging behaviour Yvonne van der Meer Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr. A. P. J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 7 July 2017 at 4 p.m. in the Aula. Yvonne van der Meer Nutrition of pigs kept under low and high sanitary conditions Effects on amino acid and energy metabolism and damaging behaviour,
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals
    81 ATTENTION TO SUFFERING: A FEMINIST CARING ETHIC FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS Josephine Donovan Many feminists, including myself, have criticized contemporary animal welfare theory for its reliance upon natural rights doctrine, on the one hand, and utilitarianism on the other. The main exponent of the former approach has been Tom Regan, and of the latter, Peter Singer. However incompatible the two theories may be, they nevertheless unite in their rationalist rejection of emotion or sympathy as a legitimate base for ethical theory about animal treatment. Many feminists have urged just the opposite, claiming that sympathy, compassion, and caring are the ground upon which theory about human treatment of animals should be constructed. Here I would like to further deepen this assertion. To do so I will argue that the terms of what constitutes the ethical must be shifted. Like many other feminists, I contend that the dominant strain in contemporary ethics reflects a male bias toward rationality, defined as the construction of abstract universals that elide not just the personal, the contextual, and the emotional, but also the political compo- nents of an ethical issue. Like other feminists, particularly those in the "caring" tradition, I believe that an alternative epistemology and ontol- ogy may be derived from women's historical social, economic, and political practice. I will develop this point further below. In addition to recent feminist theorizing, however, there is a long and important strain in Western (male)philosophy that does not express the rationalist bias of contemporary ethical theory, that in fact seeks to root ethics in emotion-in the feelings of sympathy and compassion.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society
    Proceedings of the Conference Critical Perspectives on Animals in Society held at the University of Exeter, UK 10 March 2012 © CPAS convenors, editors and individual named contributors, 2013 Some rights reserved Copyright in contributions to these proceedings rests with their respective authors. Copyright to the overall collection and arrangement and to any other material in this document rests with the convenors of CPAS and the editors of its proceedings. In the spirit of open-access publishing and with a commitment to the intellectual commons, reuse and distribution of these proceedings for non-commercial purposes is permitted and encouraged, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution± NonCommercial±NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales licence, which can be read at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ Amongst other things, this licence requires that you attribute material you reproduce to its author, and make clear to those you share it with that they too may reproduce it under the terms of the licence. Anything outside the licence, especially commercial use, requires the express permission of the editors and conference convenors, or of individual authors. Requests to the former should be directed to: [email protected] Edited by Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling Contents Introduction by the editors 5 Chris Calvert and Jessica Gröling — Contributions in brief — About CPAS — Acknowledgements — Conference programme Campaigning techniques 11 Keynote address by Dr Richard D. Ryder Animal rights: moral crusade or social
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecocritical Examination of Whale Texts
    Econstruction: The Nature/Culture Opposition in Texts about Whales and Whaling. Gregory R. Pritchard B.A. (Deakin) B.A. Honours (Deakin) THESIS SUBMITTED IN TOTAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. FACULTY OF ARTS DEAKIN UNIVERSITY March 2004 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their assistance in the research and production of this thesis: Associate Professor Brian Edwards, Dr Wenche Ommundsen, Dr Elizabeth Parsons, Glenda Bancell, Richard Smith, Martin Bride, Jane Wilkinson, Professor Mark Colyvan, Dr Rob Leach, Ian Anger and the staff of the Deakin University Library. I would also like to acknowledge with gratitude the assistance of the Australian Postgraduate Award. 2 For Bessie Showell and Ron Pritchard, for a love of words and nature. 3 The world today is sick to its thin blood for lack of elemental things, for fire before the hands, for water welling from the earth, for air, for the dear earth itself underfoot. In my world of beach and dune these elemental presences lived and had their being, and under their arch there moved an incomparable pageant of nature and the year. The flux and reflux of ocean, the incomings of waves, the gatherings of birds, the pilgrimages of the peoples of the sea, winter and storm, the splendour of autumn and the holiness of spring – all these were part of the great beach. The longer I stayed, the more eager was I to know this coast and to share its mysteries and elemental life … Edward Beston, The Outermost House Premises of the machine age.
    [Show full text]
  • Animism, Empathy and Human Development
    Animism,1 Empathy and Human Development Michael W. Fox The Humane Society of the United States That people do feel pain when the earth is damaged is afflI1Iled by a Wintu Indian woman ofCalifornia who said, "We don't chop down trees. We only use dead wood. But the white people plow up the ground, pull down the trees, kill everything. The tree says, 'Don't. I am sore. Don't hurt me.' ... They blast rocks and scatter them on the ground. The rock says, 'Don't. You are hurting me."'} Such empathy lcads to a feeling of kinship with all life. Lakota ChiefLuther Standing Bear wrote: "Kinship with all creatures of the earth, sky and water, was a real Surely it is time for us all to make every effort to evolve and active principle. For the animal and bird world there as a species and become more fully human. To be fully existed a brotherly feeling that kept the Lakota safe human is to be humane. To be sub-human is to be among them and so elose did some of the Lakotas eome inhumane. In order to evolve in this way and become to their feathered and furred friends that in true more fully human we must defme and refine our ethical brotherhood they spoke a common tongue.,,3 Chief and spiritual responsibilities and sensibilities. And we Luther also asserted that lack of respect for growing, must redefine what it means to be human. 'Ine origin of living things soon led to lack ofrespect for humans also.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics
    Great Clarendon Street, Oxford Ox2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York Translation, Note on the Text and Translation, Select Bibliography, Chronology, Explanatory Notes © David E. Cartwright and Edward E. Erdmann 2010 Introduction © Christopher Janaway 2010 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published as an Oxford World’s Classics paperback 2010 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Thinking Different - Encouraging the Transfer of Knowledge in the Poultry Sector
    A Report for Ireland’s Nuffield Scholarship Trust 2014 Title: Thinking Different - Encouraging the Transfer of Knowledge in the Poultry Sector Scholar: Alo Mohan Sponsor: FBD Trust Date: September 2014 Countries Visited: Canada, Australia, Belgium, Netherlands, UK Objective: To investigate the opportunities and threats to the effective transfer of knowledge in the poultry sector. Findings: The technologies and methodologies of the transfer of knowledge are well documented - the industry needs strong & effective leadership from farmers & other stakeholders to join up the dots. We must always think Different. Thinking Different - Encouraging The Transfer of Knowledge In The Poultry Sector 1 Contact Details Alo Mohan Drumkeenan Redhills Co Cavan tel +353 (0)87 629 2456 [email protected] Thinking Different - Encouraging The Transfer of Knowledge In The Poultry Sector 2 Thinking Different Encouraging The Transfer Of Knowledge In The Poultry Sector Disclaimer This publication has been prepared in good faith. The opinions expressed in this report are my own and are not necessarily those of the Nuffield Farming Scholarships trust, or of my sponsor, or of any other sponsoring body. All pictures used have been sourced by myself Alo Mohan and permission granted for their use. Thinking Different - Encouraging The Transfer of Knowledge In The Poultry Sector 3 Contents Table of Contents 4 1 Executive Summary 5 2. List of Tables & Figures 6 3 Personal Introduction 7 4 Acknowledgements 9 5. Thinking different 11 6 Knowledge at Farm Level 15 7 World
    [Show full text]