Arxiv:1608.05366V2 [Gr-Qc] 7 Mar 2017 Tblt Rpris O Xml,Teinrhrzno the of Horizon Their Inner for the Notably Example, for Holes, Black Properties

Home , Black hole bomb

arXiv:1608.05366v2 [gr-qc] 7 Mar 2017 tblt rpris o xml,teinrhrzno the of horizon their inner for the notably example, For holes, black properties. stability of physics the for sequences – spherically-symmetric charged a hole). Reissner-Nordström– for black exist inner geometry, an does Kerr (although horizon the space-time of hole limit black Schwarzschild these nonrotating a hori- of the inner in None or exist zon) surface geodesics. there speed-of-light timelike direction hole. (ergosphere, inward and black regions the null the in closed “outside” horizon exist data inner for the horizon whichBeyond horizon, Cauchy inner a so-called Kerr the a is such also Inside of is there surface. boundary hole, speed-of-light the black the light; called of is speed region greater the a velocity to a equal have or re- must observer than a horizon an the exists where with horizon also event corotating There the the from hole. in separated black gion rotate the must as they direction where same static: horizon event a remain the exists cannot “near” observers – there ergosphere hole] the black – ro- flat region 1)-dimensional, + asymptotically (3 and ex- a For [i.e., tating geometrical space-time space-times. Kerr hole The in black richer ample, lot nonrotating a of 2]). is that space-times than [1, hole black rotating (e.g., of structure rotation some possess ∗ § ‡ † [email protected]. [email protected]. afabbri@ific.uv.es. [email protected]. [email protected], unu akecino he-iesoa lc oe and Holes Black Three-Dimensional on Backreaction Quantum Introduction. h rsneo h bv ein a motn con- important has regions above the of presence The eatmnod ´sc eoiaadII,Uiesddd V de Universidad F´ısica IFIC, Teórica de and Departamento iatmnod iiadl’nvri` iBlgaadINF and Bologna dell’Università di Fisica di Dipartimento uprigeiec o h ˆl fqatmmcaisa c formatio a as the mechanics cur to quantum rôle a lead of the effects of for superradi quantum evidence a formation of that supporting the appearance find the ve to we of angular singularity, evidence rise the no of give of show growth and reduction they a horizon a Furthermore, to to lead and effects values. ergosphere, quantum the the region of various that radius on find a effects We hole quantum black the space-time. explore a we of case, that former geometries: (BTZ) Teitelboim-Zanelli etoBaier ePsussFıia CP) i eJane de Rio F´ısicas (CBPF), Pesquisas de Brasileiro Centro eaayial netgt akecinb unu scal quantum a by backreaction investigate analytically We etod suisCetıcs(Es,A.Atr rt514, Prat Arturo Av. Cient´ıficos (CECs), Estudios de Centro ti xetdta otbakholes black most that expected is It colo ahmtclSine n ope dpieSyst Adaptive & Complex and Sciences Mathematical of School etoSuieRcrh .Fri izadlVmnl ,0018 1, Viminale del Piazza Fermi, E. Ricerche e Studi Centro nv ai-u,UiestePrsSca,945OsyCe Orsay 91405 Université Paris-Saclay, Paris-Sud, Univ. aoaor ePyiu herqe NSUR82,Ba.21 Bât. 8627, UMR Théorique, CNRS Physique de Laboratoire nvriyCleeDbi,Bled uln4 Ireland. 4, Dublin Belfield, Dublin, College University rsia Mart´ınezCristián Dtd ac ,2017) 8, March (Dated: lsadoFabbri Alessandro acCasals Marc ‡ ein iBlga i rei 6 02 oon,Italy, Bologna, 40126 46, Irnerio Via Bologna, di sezione N n og Zanelli Jorge and lni-SC .D.Mlnr5,410Brast Spain. Burjassot, 46100 50, Moliner Dr. C. alencia-CSIC, ucetylrecsooia osat[6.W finally a We for universe [16]. AdS constant an cosmological in large by hole naturally, sufficiently black by more rotating and surface possibly, the or, speed-of-light placing [14] the mirror region a beyond the placing space-time excludes define one the may if One of however, own 21]. state, its quantum [20, with such radiation a equilibrium field describing thermal boson state quantum in a hole define to cannot black 19] one rotating [18, why seems reason surface exists the speed-of-light be there a of that (AdS) Quantum-mechanically, existence so cosmological the Sitter [15–17]. small surface negative de speed-of-light sufficiently anti a a is an with and in universe constant) lies a hole (i.e., [14], black surface universe a speed-of-light the when outside and region any mirror the encloses which a of bomb”) by part hole surrounded perturba- “black is field so-called hole (the linear black [13] massive the when under instabili- [12]; classical tions holes: various black Superradiance behind of cause ties the modes. is superradiant general of in existence the hole. in order black in a the used from in be energy waves may rotational hole field extract black boson to the and into case falling matter the first second– whereby to the 11], and in [10, Penrose [9], –particles the variant superradiance of to “collisional” of presence leads its phenomenon turn, The with its [8], in [5–7]. process divergent Kerr, a in horizon ergosphere produce inner the to the falling expected at perturbations are curvature hole where black geometry, the Kerr oc- into feature the similar in A curs inflation”). “mass 4] of [3, (phenomenon unstable classically is Reissner-Nordström solution h pe-flgtsraeas ly nipratrôle important an plays also surface speed-of-light The ∗ † dta fankdsnuaiy nthe In singularity. naked a of that nd frlvnefrarttn lc hole black rotating a for relevance of s si esri nature. in censor osmic n ntblt.I h aeo naked a of case the In instability. ant oiy oprdt h unperturbed the to compared locity, fahrznta hed t thus it, shields that horizon a of n r,CP22010 rzl and Brazil, 22290-180, CEP iro, rfil ntorttn Bañados- rotating two on field ar auesnuaiya h Cauchy the at singularity vature ohteeethrznadthe and horizon event the both adva5146 Chile. 5110466, Valdivia § e,Fac,and France, dex, m Laboratory, ems oa Italy, Roma, 4 0, ae Singularities Naked 2 note that the ergosphere can be present in a rotating corrections continue to provide a mechanism for Cosmic space-time without an event horizon (such as that of a Censorship in the spinning case as well. Therefore, this is star), in which case it leads to classical instabilities of the not a peculiar feature of the static geometry, but a more space-time [22] and to quantum (Starobinski˘ı-Unruh) ra- generic phenomenon. diation [23]. Rotating BTZ geometry. The rotating BTZ ge- It is of great interest to understand the fate of the sta- ometry is obtained by identifying points in the universal bility properties and rotating space-time regions in the covering of anti-de Sitter space-time (CAdS3) by some presence of quantum corrections. One possibility is to spacelike Killing vector field corresponding to a genera- study the backreaction effects from quantum matter on tor of certain global isometries of AdS3. Any open set these geometrical regions of a rotating space-time. While of this geometry is, therefore, indistinguishable from a such a study would be technically very difficult in a Kerr portion of CAdS3. The BTZ metric is given by [24, 34] black hole space-time (whether or not placed inside a mirror or a AdS universe), in this Letter we undertake r2 dr2 ds2 = M dt2 Jdtdθ + + r2dθ2, that study for a rotating black hole in (2+1)-dimensions, − ℓ2 − r2 J2 ℓ2 M + 4r2 the so-called rotating BTZ (Bañados-Teitelboim-Zanelli) − (1) black hole [24]. This black hole possesses inner (Cauchy) where t ( , + ), r (0, ) and θ [0, 2π) and the and outer (event) horizons and an ergosphere but no cosmological∈ −∞ constant∞ is∈ given∞ by Λ = ∈ℓ−2. The BTZ speed-of-light surface; its Cauchy horizon exhibits “mass geometry corresponds to either a black hole− or to a naked inflation” [25, 26]; its ergosphere leads to a Penrose-like singularity possessing2 mass M and angular momentum process [27]. A major simplification in (2+1)-dimensions J. The metric (1) is stationary and axially symmetric, is the absence of propagating gravitational degrees of with corresponding Killing vectors ξ ∂/∂t and ψ freedom, which eliminates the need for quantizing the ∂/∂θ, respectively. ≡ ≡ gravitational field. Therefore, all quantum corrections In the case of the rotating BTZ black hole, Mℓ J come from the “matter sector”. (the extremal case corresponding to the equality),≥ the | | In this Letter, we analytically solve the semiclassical identification Killing field is a noncompact spacelike field Einstein equations sourced by a conformally coupled and – see Eq.(6) below. The resulting black hole space-time massless quantum scalar field on a rotating BTZ space- possesses an inner (Cauchy) horizon at r = r− = ℓ α− /2 time. We obtain the quantum-backreacted metric and in- | | and an outer (event) horizon at r = r+ = ℓα+/2, where vestigate the quantum effects on the inner horizon, outer horizon and ergosphere, and investigate the possible cre- J J ation of a speed-of-light surface. To the best of our knowl- α± M + M . (2) r ℓ r ℓ edge, this is the first time that a quantum-backreacted ≡ ± − metric has been obtained for a rotating black hole space- The inner horizon is classically unstable [25] in a simi- 1 time . Our results not only provide an insight into back- lar manner to that of Kerr or Reissner-Nordström space- reaction effects that might take place for astrophysical times [3, 5, 6]. Unlike Kerr, the 2+1 black hole possesses or particle-collider, rotating black holes, but they can no curvature singularities but it does possess a causal also be of interest for the AdS/Conformal Field Theory singularity at r = 0: there are inextendible incomplete (CFT) conjectured correspondence (e.g., [30]). For exam- geodesics that hit r = 0 [34]. The Killing vector ξ is time- ple, they can be used, following the analysis in [31], to like for r > r √Mℓ, is null at r = r and is space- test AdS/CFT in Randall Sundrum braneworlds [32] by SL ≡ SL like for r (r+, rSL). This means that no static observers constructing a rotating black hole localised on an AdS3 ∈ can exist for r < rSL. The hypersurface r = rSL is hence brane embedded in AdS4 [33]. called the static limit surface and the region r (r+, rSL) Most of the construction needed to analyze the back- is called the ergosphere. In its turn, the Killing∈ vector reaction of the black hole geometry produced by quan- 2 χ ξ +ΩH ψ, where ΩH = J/(2r+) is the angular ve- tum fields can also be used to study the fate of a naked locity≡ of the event horizon, is the generator of the event singularity. This could shed light on Penrose’s Cosmic horizon. The vector χ is null at the event horizon and, Censorship Hypothesis [8], which in its weaker version in the nonextremal case, is timelike everywhere outside. essentially states that, generically, no “naked” (i.e., not This means that, in the nonextremal case, observers that covered by an event horizon) space-time singularities can rigidly rotate at the angular velocity of the black hole form in Nature. In [29] we showed that quantum ef- can exist anywhere outside the event horizon, i.e., there fects on a static naked singularity in AdS3 lead to the is no speed-of-light surface. In the extremal case, on the formation of a horizon that covers it, thus enforcing Cos- other hand, the Killing vector χ is null everywhere on mic Censorship. In this Letter we confirm that quantum and outside the event horizon.

1 In the nonrotating case, the quantum-backreacted metric has been obtained for a background BTZ black hole in [28] and for 2 We are choosing units such that the gravitational constant is a background naked singularity space-time in [29]. G = 1/8 and the three-dimensional Planck’s length is lP = ~G. 3

For Mℓ J the metric (1) describes a conical sin- shift functions are equal to, respectively, 1 and 0, fol- ≤ −| | gularity, also obtained by an identification in CAdS3 by lowing the choice made in [34] for the classical unper- a spacelike Killing vector, which in this case is compact. turbed metric. The remaining two integration constants Note that Eq.(2) implies that, in this case, α± are both are the mass M and angular momentum J, which, in purely imaginary: no horizon is present and the geometry order to make a significant comparison, we assume to is a true naked singularity. In this geometry, ξ is always have the same values as in the unperturbed solution. timelike and so there is no ergosphere. The extremal case In this way, we find analytic expressions for a1, b1 and corresponds to maximal rotation, Mℓ = J . k1, which we give elsewhere [39]. In particular, we find Finally, we note that in the non extremal−| cases,| M ℓ> that, at large distances, the quantum corrections decay J , the classical solutions can be obtained by boosting| | as: a = O(r−3), b = O(r−1), k = O(r−3). In the | | 1 1 1 the corresponding static (J = 0) black hole [35] or conical static limit (J = 0, α− =0, α+ =2√M), we recover the solution [36]. known results [28]: a = 0, b1 = O(1/r), k = 0. Specif- Backreacted geometry. The backreaction of quan- ically, we find the metric coefficient b1(r) to be of the tum matter onto the geometry can be calculated via the form [39]: semiclassical Einstein equations: N −2 Fn(r) G ℓ g = π T . (3) b1 = , (5) µν − µν h µν i − d (r)3/2 nX=1 n Here, Gµν is the Einstein tensor for the quantum- where N = in the black hole case and is finite in the backreacted metric gµν and Tµν is the renormalized ∞ expectation value of the stress-energyh i tensor (RSET) of naked singularity case. Here, Fn(r) is a function that 2 the matter field in some quantum state. The quantum for large r grows as r and dn(r) is the squared geodesic state is determined by imposing boundary conditions for distance between a point and its nth image under the the field on the AdS boundary: the timelike hypersur- identification in CAdS3; it can be written as dn(r) = 2 face r = . We note that the RSET is calculated on Dnr + En for some coefficients Dn and En [39]. the classical∞ space-time, rather than on the quantum- Horizons and other regions of the black hole geometry. We next investigate various geometrical regions backreacted one (with metric gµν ). We shall consider a conformally coupled and massless of interest of the backreacted rotating black hole metric. For the black hole, the upper summation bound N = scalar field satisfying “transparent” boundary conditions ∞ on the AdS boundary. Transparent boundary conditions and for fixed r > r−, where dn(r) > 0, this is a con- correspond to decomposing the scalar field using modes verging geometric series [40]. The metric perturbations which are smooth on the entire Einstein static universe diverge for dn(rn) = 0, which occurs for certain discrete radii satisfying 0 < r < r−. As n + , r r−, [37, 38]. We calculate the vacuum expectation value for n → ∞ n → the RSET of the scalar field in a state corresponding to and therefore the inner horizon becomes a surface with transparent boundary conditions in the following way. an accumulation of points where dn = 0. This is a direct We consider the BTZ geometry as obtained from the ap- consequence of the identification that produces the spin- propriate identification of points in CAdS under an ele- ning black hole. The Killing vector that is employed in 3 3 ment of the Lorentz group. We then apply the method of this identification is images to find the two-point function of the field equation ζ(r+, r−)= r+J12 r−J03, (6) in the BTZ geometry from that in CAdS3 with the ap- − propriate identification. We then obtain the RSET [39] whose norm, ζ ζ = r2 r2 , is positive for a nonex- from the two-point function in the standard way. + − tremal black hole.· The spacelike− vector ζ(r , r ), how- We choose the following form for a general, stationary + − ever, can identify two distinct points connected by a null and axisymmetric metric geodesic in the CAdS3, turning this curve into a closed dr2 null solution of the geodesic equation in the black hole ds2 = ( e2ab + r2k2)dt2 +2r2kdtdθ + + r2dθ2 , (4) geometry. (We note that this curve is not everywhere − b future directed, as opposed to the closed timelike curves for some functions a(r), b(r), and k(r), which are given that would be produced if the identification in CAdS3 was made with a timelike Killing vector: those curves by their classical values plus corrections of order O(lP ), denoted by a1, b1 and k1 respectively. The (potential) would be everywhere future directed or everywhere past horizons are determined by the zeros of b(r) which, to directed). The resulting null closed curve extends from order l , is b(r) = r2/ℓ2 M + J 2/(4r2) + l b (r). infinity to some radius rmin inside the inner horizon and P − P 1 Next, we solve the semiclassical Einstein equations (3): back to infinity. This means that this geodesic is not a in the left hand side, we insert the metric ansatz Eq.(4) serious issue in classical physics because no real massless and expand to O(lP ); in the right hand side, we insert the RSET derived as indicated above. In order to inte- grate Einstein’s equations, we fix the coordinate choice 3 so that the values at infinity of the (rescaled) lapse and The SO(2, 2) generators are Jab = xa∂b − xb∂a, see e.g., [34]. 4 particle can follow this trajectory crossing both horizons The Killing vector χ(q)µ, in the nonextremal case, is twice [27, 41]. Virtual quantum mechanical particles, timelike in the near-horizon region and becomes null however, do not respect causality and we find that this on the horizon. Near infinity we find that χ(q)2 2 ∼ gives a divergent contribution to the RSET coming from r 2 (q)2 (q) 2 1 ℓ Ω . The condition for χ to be space- a pole in the propagator at a series of circles approach- − ℓ − H like, and (likely) for the space-time to develop a super- ing r− from the inside. This accumulation of poles pro- (q) J duces an essential singularity at r−. We find [39] that the radiant instability is ℓΩ = ℓ 2 lP k1(r+) > 1. H 2r(q) Kretschmann invariant picks up a divergent contribution + − (q) proportional to the square of the RSET. Therefore, the We find that ℓΩ < ℓΩ 1 (the equality being real- H H ≤ geometry indeed develops a curvature singularity at r− ized in the extremal case). We conclude that the quan- and, consequently, the semiclassical approximation can tum effects do not appear to change the superradiant- only be trusted for r > r−. Although both the quantum stability property of the classical solutions. backreaction found here and the classical mass inflation Another important (and delicate) case is the extremal found in [25, 26] yield a diverging (local) stress-energy at limit α+ α−. In this case, the identification that yields r , this singularity is not of the same nature in the two the extremal→ black hole, ζ = r (J J )+(J +J + − ext + 01− 23 12 03 cases (in mass inflation, it is due to infinitely-blueshifted J02 J13)/2, is not obtained as the limit r+ r− of (6) perturbations generated in the external region); plus, and− therefore it is not immediately obvious what→ happens here the Kretschmann scalar diverges whereas for mass in this case. However, we obtain that the extremal limit inflation in BTZ it does not. of the RSET in the nonextremal black hole is equal to The backreacted radius of the outer horizon is given by the RSET in the extremal black hole; the backreacted the largest positive root of b(r) = 0. Working at O(lP ), metrics share the same feature. Therefore, our results the corrected event horizon radius (in the nonextremal are physically meaningful for nonextremal black holes all (q) the way down to the extremal limit. case) is of the form r+ = r+ (1 + lP x+), where Naked singularity and Cosmic Censorship. For 2b (r ) the nonextremal conical singularity (Mℓ < J 0), x 1 + , (7) −| | ≤ + ≡−α2 α2 the upper summation bound N is finite and, therefore, + − − convergence is not an issue. In this case, the quantum correction b possesses at least one pole at a finite radius and b1(r+) is negative. Therefore, the event horizon 1 (q) (q) where b . This implies that the quantum correc- grows, r > r . We note that the expression for r via 1 + + + tions always→ −∞ generate an event horizon that covers the Eq.(7) is only valid for l (r r ). In the opposite P + − conical singularity at r = 0. We note, however, that for regime, 0 < (r r ) l ≪, the correction− to the horizon + − P finite values of (M,J), the formed horizon has size O(l ) radius has an expression− ≪ different from Eq.(7) [39]. In the p 2 2 and our results are at most indicative (higher-order quan- extremal case, r+ = r−, and for r+ ℓ lP b1(r+), this (q) ≫ tum corrections are equally important for establishing its expression takes the form r+ = r+(1 + √lP y+), where presence). Instead, for masses just below M = 0, and as 1/3 in the static case, r+ = O(lp ) O(lp) appears to be b1(r+) physically meaningful [29]. An alternative≫ way of seeing y+ − (8) ≡ r 2M this is by noting that the metric components as well as the corrections for a, b and k are continuous and analytic and in the M-J plane for J < M ℓ. Since in the static case ∞ | | | | 1 1 the quantum corrections give rise to a horizon at finite b1(r+)= . (9) radius [29], the addition of angular momentum produces −ℓπ2 n2 sinh nπα+ nX=1 2 a continuous change in this radius, and therefore, Cosmic Censorship continues to be upheld when angular momen- (q) This limit coincides with the corrected r+ for the ex- tum is switched on [39]. tremal solution in the semiclassical approximation. Discussion. We have established that the presence of To find the boundary of the quantum-corrected ergo- a conformally coupled quantum scalar field on a rotating 2a(r) 2 2 sphere we need to solve gtt = e b(r)+ r k (r) = 0, BTZ black hole leads to: (1) the event horizon grow- − which we solve to O(lP ). We analytically find that the (q) ing (r+ > r+), (2) the radius of the static limit surface sign of the quantum correction to the radius of the static (q) limit surface is always positive. growing (rSL > rSL), (3) the angular velocity diminishing (q) We can also compute the quantum-corrected angular (ΩH < ΩH ), and (4) no evidence that a speed-of-light velocity of the black hole: Ω(q) = gtθ = k(r ). We surface forms. In particular, in the extremal case, the H gθθ + − r+ − generator of the horizon goes from being null to time- (q) like everywhere outside the horizon, and so, in a sense, find numerical evidence that ΩH ΩH is always positive. We now turn to investigating the− speed-of-light surface. “the quantum corrections take the solutions away from (q)µ µ (q) µ (q) extremality”. The Killing vector χ = ξ +ΩH ψ = (1, 0, ΩH ) has 2 The perturbative correction shows the formation of a norm g χ(q)µχ(q)ν = e2ab + r2k2 +2r2kΩ(q) + r2Ω(q) . µν − H H 5

(1) (1) singularity at the inner horizon, which can be interpreted Tµν is the input to obtain a first corrected metric, gµν , as an instability due to the existence of a curvature singu- husingi (3). Next, this metric could be used to compute a (2) larity there. In the extreme case, the event horizon also new corrected stress-energy tensor, Tµν , etc. grows and the curvature singularity still forms inside, so In the iterative procedure outlinedh above,i there is no that the black hole can no longer be called “extremal”. need to worry about quantum gravity effects for there Strictly speaking, however, the instability at r− sig- are no gravitons in 2+1 dimensions, and therefore, there nals a breakdown of the linear approximation itself, and are no gravitational loop corrections. This is a significant therefore, any statement about the fate of the geometry difference with respect to the 3+1 case, where quantum there can be viewed, at most, as an indicative suggestion. gravity corrections cannot be consistently ignored. Nevertheless, it can also be argued that the singular- For ℓM < J (and possibly for ℓM = J as well), ity of the RSET is not a perturbative approximation but the classical naked−| | singularity dresses up with−| | a horizon an exact result due to the existence of closed null curves produced by quantum effects, as in the static case. We (which are not everywhere future directed or past di- conclude that quantum mechanics provides a mechanism rected) in the background geometry. Therefore, the for- for Cosmic Censorship for spinning as well as for static mation of a barrier of infinite energy is a real issue that conical singularities. cannot be dismissed on the grounds that the right hand Acknowledgments. M.C. acknowledges partial fi- side of (3) blows up, even if this equation could not pro- nancial support by CNPq (Brazil), process number vide an expression for the metric in the neighborhood 308556/2014-3. A.F. acknowledges partial financial sup- of r−. As a parallel, we note that, in the case of Kerr, port from the Spanish MINECO through the grant Ref. [7] directly links a classical instability of the region FIS2014-57387-C3-1-P and the Severo Ochoa Excellence r < r− under linear field perturbations to the existence Center Project SEV-2014-0398. This work has been par- of closed-timelike curves in that region. tially funded through Grants No. 1130658, No. 1140155, The only sure way of learning about the space-time and No. 1161311 from FONDECYT. The Centro de Es- geometry near the inner horizon would be to solve the tudios Cient´ıficos (CECs) is funded by the Chilean Gov- coupled system (3) exactly, in which the two-point func- ernment through the Centers of Excellence Base Financ- tion and the RSET are computed in the corrected geom- ing Program of CONICYT. etry. In the absence of such a scheme, the best one could achieve is a perturbative procedure where the corrected

[1] C. F. Gammie, S. L. Shapiro and J. C. McKinney, As- (2008) [gr-qc/0507116]. trophys. J. 602, 312 (2004) [astro-ph/0310886]. [15] S. W. Hawking and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024014 [2] D. Ida, K. Y. Oda and S. C. Park, Phys. Rev. D 67, (1999) [hep-th/9908109]. 064025 (2003); Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D 69, 049901 [16] E. Winstanley, Phys. Rev. D 64, 104010 (2001) (2004)] [hep-th/0212108]. [hep-th/9908109]. [3] E. Poisson and W. Israel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1663 [17] V. Cardoso and O. J. C. Dias, Phys. Rev. D 70, 084011 (1989). (2004) [hep-th/0405006]. [4] E. Poisson and W. Israel, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1796 (1990). [18] B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rept. 207, 49 (1991). [5] P. R. Brady and C. M. Chambers, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4177 [19] A. C. Ottewill and E. Winstanley, Phys. Rev. D 62, (1995) [gr-qc/9501025]. 084018 (2000) [gr-qc/0004022]. [6] A. Ori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2117 (1992). [20] J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 [7] G. Dotti, R. J. Gleiser and I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, Class. (1976). Quant. Grav. 29, 095017 (2012) [arXiv:1111.6854 [gr- [21] V. P. Frolov and K. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2125 qc]]. (1989). [8] R. Penrose, in Black Holes and Relativistic Stars, edited [22] J. L. Friedman, Commun. Math. Phys. 63, No. 3, 243 by Robert Wald (University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1978). 1998), Chap 5; J. Astrophys. Astr. 20, 233 (1999); Riv. [23] W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3194 (1974). Nuovo Cimento 1, 252 (1969). [24] M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. [9] M. Bañados, J. Silk and S. M. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992) [hep-th/9204099]. 103, 111102 (2009) [arXiv:0909.0169 [hep-ph]]. [25] J. S. F. Chan, K. C. K. Chan and R. B. Mann, Phys. [10] A. Starobinskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz, 64, 48 (1973) [Sov. Rev. D 54, 1535 (1996) [gr-qc/9406049]. Phys. JETP 37, 28 (1973)]. [26] V. Husain, Phys. Rev. D 50, R2361 (1994) [11] Y. B. Zel’Dovich, ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu 14, 270 [gr-qc/9404047]. (1971) [JETP Lett. 14, 270 (1971)]. [27] N. Cruz, C. Mart´ınez and L. Peña, Class. Quant. Grav. [12] T. J. M. Zouros and D. M. Eardley, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 11, 2731 (1994) [gr-qc/9401025]. 118, 139 (1979). [28] C. Mart´ınez and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3642 (1997) [13] W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Nature (London) 238, [gr-qc/9610050]. 211 (1972). [29] M. Casals, A. Fabbri, C. Mart´ınez and J. Zanelli, Phys. [14] G. Duffy and A. C. Ottewill, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024007 Lett. B 760, 244 (2016) [arXiv:1605.06078 [hep-th]]. 6

[30] D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. 61, 104013 (2000) [hep-th/9912259]. Rev. Lett. 88, 151301 (2002). [36] O. Miˇskovi´cand J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 79, 105011 [31] R. Emparan, A. Fabbri and N. Kaloper, J. High Energy (2009) [arXiv:0904.0475 [hep-th]]. Phys. 08 (2002) 043. [37] S. J. Avis, C. J. Isham and D. Storey, Phys. Rev. D 18, [32] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 3565 (1978). (1999). [38] G. Lifschytz and M. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1929 (1994) [33] R. Emparan, G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, JHEP [gr-qc/9310008]. 0001, 007 (2000); JHEP 0001, 021 (2000). [39] M. Casals, A. Fabbri, C. Mart´ınez, and J. Zanelli, in [34] M. Ba˜nados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, preparation (2017). Phys. Rev. D 48, 1506 (1993); Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D [40] A. R. Steif, Phys. Rev. D 49, R585 (1994) 88, 069902 (2013)] [gr-qc/9302012]. [gr-qc/9308032]. [35] C. Mart´ınez, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D [41] C. T. Asplund, N. Callebaut, C. Zukowski, J. High En- ergy Phys. 09 (2016) 154 [arXiv:1604.02687 [hep-th]].