DOCSLIB.ORG

Superradiance Arxiv:1501.06570V3 [Gr-Qc] 4 Sep 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Superradiance Arxiv:1501.06570V3 [Gr-Qc] 4 Sep 2015 September 7, 2015 Superradiance Richard Brito,1 Vitor Cardoso,1;2;3 Paolo Pani,4;1 1 CENTRA, Departamento de F´ısica, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049 Lisboa, Portugal. 2 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 2W9, Canada. 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA. 4 Dipartimento di Fisica, \Sapienza" Universit`adi Roma & Sezione INFN Roma1, P.A. Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Superradiance is a radiation enhancement process that involves dissipative systems. With a 60 year-old history, superradiance has played a prominent role in optics, quantum mechanics and especially in relativity and astrophysics. In General Relativity, black-hole superradiance is permitted by dissipation at the event horizon, that allows for energy, charge and angular momentum extraction from the vacuum, even at the classical level. Black-hole superradiance is intimately connected to the black-hole area theorem, Penrose process, tidal forces and even Hawking radiation, which can be interpreted as a quantum version of black-hole super- radiance. Various mechanisms (as diverse as massive fields, magnetic fields, anti-de Sitter boundaries, nonlinear interactions, etc...) can confine the amplified radiation and give rise to strong instabilities. These \black-hole bombs" have applications in searches of dark matter arXiv:1501.06570v3 [gr-qc] 4 Sep 2015 and of physics beyond the Standard Model, are associated to the threshold of formation of new black hole solutions that evade the no-hair theorems, can be studied in the laboratory by devising analog models of gravity, and might even provide a holographic description of spontaneous symmetry breaking and superfluidity through the gauge-gravity duality. This work is meant to provide a unified picture of this multifaceted subject, which was missing in the literature. We focus on the recent developments in the field, and work out a number of novel examples and applications, ranging from fundamental physics to astrophysics. Contents 1 Prologue 7 2 Milestones 9 3 Superradiance in flat spacetime 13 3.1 Klein paradox: the first example of superradiance . 13 3.1.1 Bosonic scattering . 13 3.1.2 Fermionic scattering . 14 3.2 Superradiance and pair creation . 15 3.3 Superradiance and spontaneous emission by a moving object . 17 3.3.1 Cherenkov emission and superradiance . 18 3.3.2 Cherenkov radiation by neutral particles . 18 3.3.3 Superradiance in superfluids and superconductors . 20 3.4 Sound amplification by shock waves . 21 3.4.1 Sonic \booms" . 21 3.4.2 Superradiant amplification at discontinuities . 22 3.5 Rotational superradiance . 23 3.5.1 Example 1. Scalar waves . 24 3.5.2 Example 2. Sound and surface waves: a practical experimental setup? 25 3.6 Tidal acceleration . 29 4 Superradiance in black hole physics 31 4.1 Action, equations of motion and black hole spacetimes . 31 4.1.1 Static, charged backgrounds . 32 4.1.2 Spinning, neutral backgrounds . 33 4.1.3 Geodesics and frame dragging in the Kerr geometry . 33 4.1.4 The ergoregion . 34 4.1.5 Intermezzo: stationary and axisymmetric black holes have an ergoregion 36 4.2 Area theorem implies superradiance . 37 4.3 Energy extraction from black holes: the Penrose process . 38 4.3.1 The original Penrose process . 39 4.3.2 The Newtonian carousel analogy . 41 4.3.3 Penrose's process: energy limits . 42 4.3.4 The Penrose process in generic spacetimes . 44 4.3.5 The collisional Penrose process: ultra-high-energy debris . 46 4.4 The ABC of black hole superradiance . 48 4.5 Superradiance from charged static black holes . 49 4.5.1 Linearized analysis: amplification factors . 49 1 4.5.2 Backreaction on the geometry: mass and charge loss . 51 4.6 Superradiance from rotating black holes . 52 4.6.1 Bosonic and fermionic fields in the Kerr geometry . 53 4.6.2 Energy fluxes of bosonic fields at infinity and on the horizon . 54 4.6.3 Amplification factors . 56 4.6.4 Dirac fields on the Kerr geometry . 56 4.6.5 Linearized analysis: analytic vs numerics . 58 4.6.6 Scattering of plane waves . 61 4.6.7 Nonlinear superradiant scattering . 64 4.7 Boosted black strings: ergoregions without superradiance . 65 4.8 Superradiance in higher dimensional spacetimes . 67 4.9 Superradiance in analogue black hole geometries . 68 4.10 Superradiance in nonasymptotically flat spacetimes . 70 4.11 Superradiance from stars . 71 4.12 Superradiance beyond General Relativity . 72 4.13 Microscopic description of superradiance and the Kerr/CFT duality . 75 4.14 Open issues . 76 5 Black holes & superradiant instabilities 79 5.1 No black hole fission processes . 79 5.2 Spinning black holes in confining geometries are unstable . 80 5.3 Superradiant instabilities: time-domain evolutions versus an eigenvalue search 82 5.4 Black holes enclosed in a mirror . 83 5.4.1 Rotating black-hole bombs . 83 5.4.2 Charged black-hole bombs . 86 5.5 Black holes in AdS backgrounds . 86 5.5.1 Instability of small Kerr-AdS black holes and new BH solutions . 87 5.5.2 Charged AdS black holes: spontaneous symmetry breaking and holo- graphic superconductors . 91 5.6 Massive bosonic fields . 93 5.6.1 The zoo of light bosonic fields in extensions of the Standard Model . 94 5.6.2 Massive scalar fields . 95 5.6.3 Massive vector fields . 99 5.6.4 Massive tensor fields . 101 5.6.5 A unified picture of superradiant instabilities of massive bosonic fields 103 5.7 Black holes immersed in a magnetic field . 104 5.8 Superradiant instability of black holes surrounded by conducting rings . 105 5.9 Nonminimal interactions . 106 5.9.1 Plasma-triggered superradiant instabilities . 108 5.9.2 Spontaneous superradiant instabilities in scalar-tensor theories . 108 2 5.10 Kaluza-Klein mass: superradiant instabilities in higher dimensions . 110 5.11 Ergoregion instability . 110 5.11.1 Ergoregion instability of rotating objects: a consistent approach . 111 5.11.2 Ergoregion instability and long-lived modes . 115 5.11.3 Ergoregion instability in fluids . 118 5.11.4 Ergoregion instability and Hawking radiation . 121 5.12 Black-hole lasers and superluminal corrections to Hawking radiation . 122 5.13 Black holes in Lorentz-violating theories: nonlinear instabilities . 122 5.14 Open issues . 123 6 Black hole superradiance in astrophysics 126 6.1 Superradiance & relativistic jets . 126 6.1.1 Blandford-Znajek process . 127 6.1.2 Blandford-Znajek process and the membrane paradigm . 129 6.2 Superradiance, CFS instability, and r-modes of spinning stars . 133 6.3 Evolution of superradiant instabilities: gravitational-wave emission and accretion135 6.3.1 Scalar clouds around spinning black holes . 136 6.3.2 Gravitational-wave emission from the bosonic condensate . 137 6.3.3 Gas accretion . 138 6.3.4 Growth and decay of bosonic condensates around spinning black holes 139 6.3.5 Superradiant instabilities imply no highly-spinning black holes . 141 6.3.6 Summary of the evolution of superradiant instabilities . 143 6.4 Astrophysical black holes as particle detectors . 144 6.4.1 Bounds on the mass of bosonic fields from gaps in the Regge plane . 144 6.4.2 Gravitational-wave signatures and bosenova . 148 6.4.3 Floating orbits . 151 6.5 Are black holes in the universe of the Kerr family? . 154 6.5.1 Circumventing the no-hair theorem with complex scalars . 154 6.5.2 Other hairy solutions and the role of tidal dissipation . 157 6.5.3 Formation of hairy solutions and bounds on bosonic fields . 158 6.6 Plasma interactions . 159 6.7 Intrinsic limits on magnetic fields . 161 6.8 Phenomenology of the ergoregion instability . 163 6.8.1 Ergoregion instability of ultracompact stars . 163 6.8.2 Supporting the black-hole paradigm: instabilities of black-hole mimickers164 6.9 Open issues . 168 7 Conclusions & Outlook 170 A List of publicly available codes 172 3 B Analytic computation of the amplification coefficients 172 C Angular momentum and energy 174 C.1 Energy and angular momentum fluxes at the horizon . 175 D Electromagnetic fluctuations around a rotating black hole enclosed in a mirror 175 E Hartle-Thorne formalism for slowly-rotating spacetimes and perturbations179 E.1 Background . 179 E.2 Perturbations of a slowly-rotating object . 180 E.2.1 Scalar perturbations of a slowly-rotating star . 181 F WKB analysis of long-lived and unstable modes of ultracompact objects 182 4 Notation and conventions Unless otherwise and explicitly stated, we use geometrized units where G = c = 1, so that energy and time have units of length. We also adopt the (− + + + ::: ) convention for the metric. For reference, the following is a list of symbols that are used often throughout the text. ' Azimuthal coordinate. # Angular coordinate. m Azimuthal number with respect to the axis of rotation, jmj ≤ l. l Integer angular number, related to the eigenvalue Alm = l(l + 1) in four spacetime dimensions. s Spin of the field. ! Fourier transform variable. The time dependence of any field is ∼ e−i!t. For stable spacetimes, Im(!) < 0. !R;!I Real and imaginary part of the QNM frequencies. R; I Amplitude of reflected and incident waves, which characterize a wavefunction Φ. Zslm Amplification factor of fluxes for a wave with spin s and harmonic indices (l; m). For scalar fields, 2 2 i!t −i!t Z0lm = jRj =jIj − 1 with the asymptotic expansion at spatial infinity, Φ ∼ Re + Ie . Occasionally, when clear from the context, we will omit the indices s and l and simply write Zm.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena in Interacting Bosonic Systems: Josephson flow in Liquid 4He and Multimode Schr¨Odingercat States
    Macroscopic quantum phenomena in interacting bosonic systems: Josephson flow in liquid 4He and multimode Schr¨odingercat states by Tyler James Volkoff A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor K. Birgitta Whaley, Chair Professor Philip L. Geissler Professor Richard E. Packard Fall 2014 Macroscopic quantum phenomena in interacting bosonic systems: Josephson flow in liquid 4He and multimode Schr¨odingercat states Copyright 2014 by Tyler James Volkoff 1 Abstract Macroscopic quantum phenomena in interacting bosonic systems: Josephson flow in liquid 4He and multimode Schr¨odingercat states by Tyler James Volkoff Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor K. Birgitta Whaley, Chair In this dissertation, I analyze certain problems in the following areas: 1) quantum dynam- ical phenomena in macroscopic systems of interacting, degenerate bosons (Parts II, III, and V), and 2) measures of macroscopicity for a large class of two-branch superposition states in separable Hilbert space (Part IV). Part I serves as an introduction to important concepts recurring in the later Parts. In Part II, a microscopic derivation of the effective action for the relative phase of driven, aperture-coupled reservoirs of weakly-interacting condensed bosons from a (3 + 1)D microscopic model with local U(1) gauge symmetry is presented. The effec- tive theory is applied to the transition from linear to sinusoidal current vs. phase behavior observed in recent experiments on liquid 4He driven through nanoaperture arrays. Part III discusses path-integral Monte Carlo (PIMC) numerical simulations of quantum hydrody- namic properties of reservoirs of He II communicating through simple nanoaperture arrays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flexibility of Optical Metrics
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience The flexibility of optical metrics This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2016 Class. Quantum Grav. 33 165008 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0264-9381/33/16/165008) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 128.220.159.5 This content was downloaded on 08/05/2017 at 21:52 Please note that terms and conditions apply. You may also be interested in: Induced optical metric in the non-impedance-matched media S A Mousavi, R Roknizadeh and S Sahebdivan Lux in obscuro: photon orbits of extremal black holes revisited Fech Scen Khoo and Yen Chin Ong Hidden geometries in nonlinear theories: a novel aspect of analogue gravity E Goulart, M Novello, F T Falciano et al. Black holes and stars in Horndeski theory Eugeny Babichev, Christos Charmousis and Antoine Lehébel Singularities in GR coupled to nonlinearelectrodynamics M Novello, S E Perez Bergliaffa and J M Salim Parity horizons in shape dynamics Gabriel Herczeg Numerical methods for finding stationary gravitational solutions Óscar J C Dias, Jorge E Santos and Benson Way Static spherically symmetric solutions in mimetic gravity: rotation curves and wormholes Ratbay Myrzakulov, Lorenzo Sebastiani, Sunny Vagnozzi et al. Supersymmetric solutions of N = (2, 0) topologically massive supergravity Nihat Sadik Deger and George Moutsopoulos Classical and Quantum Gravity Class. Quantum Grav. 33 (2016) 165008 (14pp) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/16/165008
    [Show full text]
  • R-Process Elements from Magnetorotational Hypernovae
    r-Process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae D. Yong1,2*, C. Kobayashi3,2, G. S. Da Costa1,2, M. S. Bessell1, A. Chiti4, A. Frebel4, K. Lind5, A. D. Mackey1,2, T. Nordlander1,2, M. Asplund6, A. R. Casey7,2, A. F. Marino8, S. J. Murphy9,1 & B. P. Schmidt1 1Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 2ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Australia 3Centre for Astrophysics Research, Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK 4Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 6Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany 7School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia 8Istituto NaZionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi, 5, 50125, Firenze, Italy 9School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia Neutron-star mergers were recently confirmed as sites of rapid-neutron-capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis1–3. However, in Galactic chemical evolution models, neutron-star mergers alone cannot reproduce the observed element abundance patterns of extremely metal-poor stars, which indicates the existence of other sites of r-process nucleosynthesis4–6. These sites may be investigated by studying the element abundance patterns of chemically primitive stars in the halo of the Milky Way, because these objects retain the nucleosynthetic signatures of the earliest generation of stars7–13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanics of the Fermionic and Bosonic Fields: an Introduction to the Standard Model and Particle Physics
    The Mechanics of the Fermionic and Bosonic Fields: An Introduction to the Standard Model and Particle Physics Evan McCarthy Phys. 460: Seminar in Physics, Spring 2014 Aug. 27,! 2014 1.Introduction 2.The Standard Model of Particle Physics 2.1.The Standard Model Lagrangian 2.2.Gauge Invariance 3.Mechanics of the Fermionic Field 3.1.Fermi-Dirac Statistics 3.2.Fermion Spinor Field 4.Mechanics of the Bosonic Field 4.1.Spin-Statistics Theorem 4.2.Bose Einstein Statistics !5.Conclusion ! 1. Introduction While Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is a remarkably successful tool of quantum particle physics, it is not used as a strictly predictive model. Rather, it is used as a framework within which predictive models - such as the Standard Model of particle physics (SM) - may operate. The overarching success of QFT lends it the ability to mathematically unify three of the four forces of nature, namely, the strong and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism. Recently substantiated further by the prediction and discovery of the Higgs boson, the SM has proven to be an extraordinarily proficient predictive model for all the subatomic particles and forces. The question remains, what is to be done with gravity - the fourth force of nature? Within the framework of QFT theoreticians have predicted the existence of yet another boson called the graviton. For this reason QFT has a very attractive allure, despite its limitations. According to !1 QFT the gravitational force is attributed to the interaction between two gravitons, however when applying the equations of General Relativity (GR) the force between two gravitons becomes infinite! Results like this are nonsensical and must be resolved for the theory to stand.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicke's Superradiance in Astrophysics
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 9-1-2016 12:00 AM Dicke’s Superradiance in Astrophysics Fereshteh Rajabi The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Prof. Martin Houde The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Physics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Fereshteh Rajabi 2016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Physical Processes Commons, Quantum Physics Commons, and the Stars, Interstellar Medium and the Galaxy Commons Recommended Citation Rajabi, Fereshteh, "Dicke’s Superradiance in Astrophysics" (2016). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4068. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4068 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract It is generally assumed that in the interstellar medium much of the emission emanating from atomic and molecular transitions within a radiating gas happen independently for each atom or molecule, but as was pointed out by R. H. Dicke in a seminal paper several decades ago this assumption does not apply in all conditions. As will be discussed in this thesis, and following Dicke's original analysis, closely packed atoms/molecules can interact with their common electromagnetic field and radiate coherently through an effect he named superra- diance. Superradiance is a cooperative quantum mechanical phenomenon characterized by high intensity, spatially compact, burst-like features taking place over a wide range of time- scales, depending on the size and physical conditions present in the regions harbouring such sources of radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Dynamics and Stellar Phenomena Near a Massive Black Hole
    Stellar Dynamics and Stellar Phenomena Near A Massive Black Hole Tal Alexander Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St, Rehovot, Israel 76100; email: [email protected] | Author's original version. To appear in Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. See final published version in ARA&A website: www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2017. Keywords 55:1{41 massive black holes, stellar kinematics, stellar dynamics, Galactic This article's doi: Center 10.1146/((please add article doi)) Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Abstract All rights reserved Most galactic nuclei harbor a massive black hole (MBH), whose birth and evolution are closely linked to those of its host galaxy. The unique conditions near the MBH: high velocity and density in the steep po- tential of a massive singular relativistic object, lead to unusual modes of stellar birth, evolution, dynamics and death. A complex network of dynamical mechanisms, operating on multiple timescales, deflect stars arXiv:1701.04762v1 [astro-ph.GA] 17 Jan 2017 to orbits that intercept the MBH. Such close encounters lead to ener- getic interactions with observable signatures and consequences for the evolution of the MBH and its stellar environment. Galactic nuclei are astrophysical laboratories that test and challenge our understanding of MBH formation, strong gravity, stellar dynamics, and stellar physics. I review from a theoretical perspective the wide range of stellar phe- nomena that occur near MBHs, focusing on the role of stellar dynamics near an isolated MBH in a relaxed stellar cusp.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Field Dynamics of Bosonic Fields
    Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields: Looking for new particles and modified gravity William East, Perimeter Institute ICERM Workshop October 26, 2020 ... Introduction How can we use gravitational waves to look for new matter? Can we come up with alternative predictions for black holes and/or GR to test against observations? Need understanding of relativistic/nonlinear dynamics for maximum return William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ... Three examples with bosonic fields Black hole superradiance, boson stars, and modified gravity with non-minially coupled scalar fields William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ... Gravitational wave probe of new particles Search new part of parameter space: ultralight particles weakly coupled to standard model William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ... Superradiant instability: realizing the black hole bomb Massive bosons (scalar and vector) can form bound states, when frequency ! < mΩH grow exponentially in time. Search for new ultralight bosonic particles (axions, dark massive “photons," etc.) with Compton wavelength comparable to black hole radius (Arvanitaki et al.) William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ... Boson clouds emit gravitational waves WE (2018) William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ... Boson clouds emit gravitational waves 50 100 500 1000 5000 104 107 Can do targeted 105 1000 searches–e.g. follow-up 10 0.100 black hole merger events, 0.001 1 or “blind" searches 0.8 0.6 Look for either resolved or 0.4 1 stochastic sources with 0.98 0.96 LIGO (Baryakthar+ 2017; 0.94 Zhu+ 2020; Brito+ 2017; 10-12 10-11 10-10 Tsukada+ 2019) Siemonsen & WE (2020) William East Strong field dynamics of bosonic fields ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Superradiant Stability of Kerr-Newman Black Holes
    The superradiant stability of Kerr-Newman black holes Wen-Xiang Chen and Jing-Yi Zhang1∗ Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Materials Science, GuangZhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China Yi-Xiao Zhang School of Information and Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, South China Normal University In this article, the superradiation stability of Kerr-Newman black holes is discussed by introducing the condition used in Kerr black holes y into them. Moreover, the motion equation of the minimal coupled scalar perturbation in a Kerr-Newman black hole is divided into angular and radial parts. We adopt the findings made by Erhart et al. on uncertainty principle in 2012, and discuss the bounds on y. 1. INTRODUCTION The No Hair Theorem of black holes first proposed in 1971 by Wheeler and proved by Stephen Hawking[1], Brandon Carter, etc, in 1973. In 1970s, the development of black hole thermodynamics applies the basic laws of thermodynamics to the theory of black hole in the field of general relativity, and strongly implies the profound and basic relationship among general relativity, thermodynamics and quantum theory. The stability of black holes is an major topic in black hole physics. Regge and Wheeler[2] have proved that the spherically symmetric Schwarzschild black hole is stable under perturbation. The great impact of superradiance makes the stability of rotating black holes more complicated. Superradiative effects occur in both classical and quantum scattering processes. When a boson wave hits a rotating black hole, chances are that rotating black holes are stable like Schwarzschild black holes, if certain conditions are satisfied[1–9] a ! < mΩH + qΦH ;ΩH = 2 2 (1) r+ + a where q and m are the charge and azimuthal quantum number of the incoming wave, ! denotes the wave frequency, ΩH is the angular velocity of black hole horizon and ΦH is the electromagnetic potential of the black hole horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extremal Black Hole Bomb
    The extremal black hole bomb João G. Rosa Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics University of Oxford arXiv: 0912.1780 [hep‐th] "II Workshop on Black Holes", 22 December 2009, IST Lisbon. Introduction • Superradiant instability: Press & Teukolsky (1972-73) • scattering of waves in Kerr background (ergoregion) • f or modes with , scattered wave is amplified • Black hole bomb: Press & Teukolsky (1972), Cardoso et al. (2004), etc • multiple scatterings induced by mirror around BH • c an extract large amounts of energy and spin from the BH • Natural mirrors: • inner boundary of accretion disks Putten (1999), Aguirre (2000) • massive field bound states 22/12/09 The extremal black hole bomb, J. G. Rosa 2 Introduction • Estimates of superradiant instability growth rate (scalar field): • small mass limit: Detweiller (1980), Furuhashi & Nambu (2004) • lar ge mass limit: Zouros & Eardley (1979) • numeric al: Dolan (2007) 4 orders of magnitude • r ecent analytical: Hod & Hod (2009) discrepancy! 10 • µM 1 µ 10− eV Phenomenology: ∼ ⇒ ! • pions: mechanism effective if instability develops before decay, but only for small primordial black holes • “string axiverse”: Arvanitaki et al. (2009) many pseudomoduli acquire small masses from non‐perturbative string instantons and are much lighter than QCD axion! • Main goals: • c ompute superradiant spectrum of massive scalar states • f ocus on extremal BH and P‐wave modes (l=m=1) maximum growth rate • check discr epancy! 22/12/09 The extremal black hole bomb, J. G. Rosa 3 The massive Klein‐Gordon equation • Massive Klein‐Gordon equation in curved spacetime: • field decomposition: • angular part giv en in terms of spheroidal harmonics • Schrodinger‐like radial eq.
    [Show full text]
  • PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Physics 2001 PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion I. H. Stairs R. N. Manchester A. G. Lyne V. M. Kaspi Fronefield Crawford Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/physics_facpubs Repository Citation "PSR J1740-3052: a Pulsar with a Massive Companion" I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, V. M. Kaspi, F. Camilo, J. F. Bell, N. D'Amico, M. Kramer, F. Crawford, D. J. Morris, A. Possenti, N. P. F. McKay, S. L. Lumsden, L. E. Tacconi-Garman, R. D. Cannon, N. C. Hambly, & P. R. Wood, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 325, 979 (2001). This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 979–988 (2001) PSR J174023052: a pulsar with a massive companion I. H. Stairs,1,2P R. N. Manchester,3 A. G. Lyne,1 V. M. Kaspi,4† F. Camilo,5 J. F. Bell,3 N. D’Amico,6,7 M. Kramer,1 F. Crawford,8‡ D. J. Morris,1 A. Possenti,6 N. P. F. McKay,1 S. L. Lumsden,9 L. E. Tacconi-Garman,10 R. D. Cannon,11 N. C. Hambly12 and P. R. Wood13 1University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL 2National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box 2, Green Bank, WV 24944, USA 3Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 4Physics Department, McGill University, 3600 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2T8, Canada 5Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, Columbia University, 550 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotation and Mixing in Binary Stars
    ROTATION AND MIXING IN BINARY STARS Gloria Koenigsberger2 and Edmundo Moreno1 Abstract. Rotation in massive stars plays a key role in the transport of nuclear-processed elements to the stellar surface. Although a large fraction of massive stars are binaries, most current models rely on the assumption that their mixing efficiency is the same as in single stars. This assumption neglects the perturbing effect of the binary companion. In this poster we examine the manner in which the rotation structure of an asynchronous binary star is affected by the presence of a companion. We use the TIDES code (Moreno & Koenigsberger 1999; 2017; Moreno et al. 2011) to solve for the spatielly-resolved velocity of several concentric shells in a star that is tidally perturbed by its companion and focus on the azimuthal component of the velocity field, v'(r; θ; '). The code includes gravitational, centrifugal, Coriolis, gas pressure and viscous forces. The input parameters for the example in this poster are: stellar d masses m1 = 30M , m2 = 20M , equilibrium radius R1 = 6:44R , eccentricity e = 0:1, orbital period P = 6 , 2 rotation velocity vrot = 0, kinematical viscosity ν = 5:56 cm =s, shell thickness ∆R = 0:06R1. The binary interaction produces time-dependent shearing flows in both the polar and in the radial directions which, we speculate, may lead to a more efficient transport of angular momentum and nuclear processed material in binaries than in their single-star analogues. Key unresolved issues concern the value that is adopted for the viscosity, the inner radius to which tidal forces are effective, and the interplay between tidal flows and convection.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of Three-Dimensional Bosonic Topological Insulators: Surface-Deconfined Criticality and Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X 3, 011016 (2013) Physics of Three-Dimensional Bosonic Topological Insulators: Surface-Deconfined Criticality and Quantized Magnetoelectric Effect Ashvin Vishwanath Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, Berkeley, California 94720, USA T. Senthil Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA (Received 4 October 2012; revised manuscript received 31 December 2012; published 28 February 2013) We discuss physical properties of ‘‘integer’’ topological phases of bosons in D ¼ 3 þ 1 dimensions, protected by internal symmetries like time reversal and/or charge conservation. These phases invoke interactions in a fundamental way but do not possess topological order; they are bosonic analogs of free- fermion topological insulators and superconductors. While a formal cohomology-based classification of such states was recently discovered, their physical properties remain mysterious. Here, we develop a field-theoretic description of several of these states and show that they possess unusual surface states, which, if gapped, must either break the underlying symmetry or develop topological order. In the latter case, symmetries are implemented in a way that is forbidden in a strictly two-dimensional theory. While these phases are the usual fate of the surface states, exotic gapless states can also be realized. For example, tuning parameters can naturally lead to a deconfined quantum critical point or, in other situations, to a fully symmetric vortex metal phase. We discuss cases where the topological phases are characterized by a quantized magnetoelectric response , which, somewhat surprisingly, is an odd multiple of 2.Two different surface theories are shown to capture these phenomena: The first is a nonlinear sigma model with a topological term.
    [Show full text]